JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mimnaugh, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Neckers, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mimnaugh, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Neckers, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 37, Issue of September 13, 1996 pp. 22796-22801
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Polyubiquitination and Proteasomal Degradation of the p185c-erbB-2 Receptor Protein-tyrosine Kinase Induced by Geldanamycin*

(Received for publication, January 19, 1996, and in revised form, May 9, 1996)

Edward G. Mimnaugh Dagger , Christine Chavany and Len Neckers

From the Clinical Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgment
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Treatment of SKBr3 human breast carcinoma cells with the benzoquinoid ansamycin, geldanamycin, rapidly depletes p185c-erbB-2 protein-tyrosine kinase. Loss of p185c-erbB-2 is initiated by disruption of a heteromeric complex between p185c-erbB-2 and the 94-kDa glucose-regulated protein, GRP94, to which geldanamycin binds avidly. Here we report that within minutes of exposure to geldanamycin, mature p185c-erbB-2 becomes polyubiquitinated. Treatment of cells with the specific proteasome proteolytic inhibitor, lactacystin, blocked geldanamycin-induced degradation of p185c-erbB-2 and enhanced the accumulation of polyubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2. Following geldanamycin and lactacystin treatment, a higher molecular weight form of p185c-erbB-2, which likely represents ubiquitin-p185c-erbB-2 conjugates, was detected by anti-p185c-erbB-2 immunoblotting. Nascent p185c-erbB-2 synthesized in the presence of geldanamycin is incompletely glycosylated and remains sequestered in the endoplasmic reticulum. While this immature form of the protein is not ubiquitinated in the presence of geldanamycin, its marked, drug-induced instability is nonetheless antagonized by lactacystin. Thus, the rapid depletion of mature p185c-erbB-2 caused by geldanamycin and the marked, drug-stimulated decrease in half-life of the newly synthesized protein are both mediated by the proteasome, although only the former phenomenon involves polyubiquitination.


INTRODUCTION

The c-erbB-2 proto-oncogene (also designated HER-2/neu) encodes an 185-kDa, glycosylated transmembrane protein-tyrosine kinase, p185c-erbB-2, that is highly homologous to and structurally related to the cellular epidermal growth factor receptor (1). Overexpression of c-erbB-2 has been found in a variety of aggressive human malignancies, and an elevated level of p185c-erbB-2 in primary tumors is associated with frequent relapse and an especially poor prognosis for breast and ovarian cancers (2). Normal breast epithelial cells can be transformed by transfection with the c-erbB-2 gene, suggesting that p185c-erbB-2 plays a role in the neoplastic process (3), but also hinting that inhibition of p185c-erbB-2 function in certain human tumors may be therapeutic.

Recently, Miller et al. (4) reported that p185c-erbB-2 protein and its tyrosine kinase activity are dramatically decreased by treating cells with herbimycin (HA)1 or other benzoquinone ansamycin antibiotics, including geldanamycin (GA). The Streptomyces fermentation products GA and HA are inhibitors of several protein-tyrosine kinases (5), but these ansamycins are now thought to indirectly inhibit protein kinases in cells. In particular, HA and GA bind strongly to heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) and disrupt its chaperone association with pp60v-src protein-tyrosine kinase (6) and with c-Raf-1 serine/threonine kinase (7), resulting in reduced stability and greatly diminished levels of these HSP90-complexed enzymes.

Depletion of p185c-erbB-2 by GA has been reported to be mediated by a p100 protein (8), which we have recently identified as the glucose-regulated protein, GRP94, a member of the HSP90 family of stress proteins (9, 10). GRP94 apparently functions to maintain the steady-state level of membrane-associated p185c-erbB-2 by preventing its degradation (4, 9). As a consequence of GA binding specifically to GRP94, p185c-erbB-2 dissociates from the heterocomplex and is subsequently rapidly degraded (9).

Having established this sequence of events, we have now investigated the biochemistry of the proteolytic processes that are responsible for the rapid degradation of p185c-erbB-2 following its dissociation from GRP94. In the present study, we show that GA rapidly stimulates the polyubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2 and directs its proteolysis by the cytosolic ATP-dependent, 26 S proteasome complex. We further demonstrate that nascent, immature p185c-erbB-2, synthesized in the presence of GA, is also rapidly degraded by the proteasome, but without prior ubiquitination.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tumor Cells

Mycoplasma-free SKBr3 human breast carcinoma cells obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, under standard tissue culture conditions. Cells growing in log phase in 100-mm plates were treated with GA (1 nM to 10 µM) dissolved in Me2SO for various times (1 min to 17 h); control cells were exposed to equivalent volumes of Me2SO alone (0.1% or less). Lactacystin (LC) was first dissolved in water at 2 mM, then diluted in complete medium to 10 µM, unless stated otherwise.

Reagents and Drugs

GA was obtained from the Developmental Therapeutics Program, National Cancer Institute (Rockville, MD). Mouse anti-c-ErbB-2 protein monoclonal antibodies, clone TA-1 (anti-c-neu, Ab-5, used for immunoprecipitations) and clone 3B5 (Ab-3, used for Western immunoblots) were from Oncogene Science (Uniondale, NY). Rabbit anti-ubiquitin polyclonal antibody was from Sigma, and mouse 4F3 anti-ubiquitin monoclonal antibody was a gift from Dr. Linda Guarino, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. Other antibodies used were: rabbit anti-mouse IgG1 (Cappel, Durham, NC) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-mouse antibody and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody (Amersham Life Science). LC was purchased from Dr. E. J. Corey, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. All other chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma.

Immunoprecipitations and Immunoblotting

SKBr3 tumor cells were washed twice in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, then lysed on ice with TNESV lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1% Nonidet P-40 detergent, 2 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM orthovanadate) with protease inhibitors: 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml leupeptin, and 20 µg/ml aprotinin. After clearing the cell lysates of debris by centrifuging at 14,000 × g for 20 min, protein concentrations were determined by the bicinchoninic acid method using bovine serum albumin as the standard (11). p185c-erbB-2 was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates with 2 µg of anti-c-ErbB-2 protein mAb (Ab-5) followed by rabbit anti-mouse IgG1 (Cappel, Durham, NC) previously bound to protein A-Sepharose beads (RAM-PAS beads). Where indicated, SDS was added to cell lysates to a final concentration of 1% (w/v), and following a 30-min incubation on ice and 10-fold dilution with lysis buffer, p185c-erbB-2 was immunoprecipitated as usual. The proteins were eluted from their immune complex by heating to 95 °C in reducing loading buffer (12), and after fractionating by 8% SDS-PAGE, they were electrotransferred to Protran nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell). Aliquots of cell lysates (10-50 µg) diluted in reducing loading buffer were also separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to membranes for immunoblotting. The membranes used for anti-ubiquitin Western blots were first autoclaved in water for 20 min to insure complete denaturation of ubiquitinated proteins.2 All membranes were blocked with 5% fat-free dry milk in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM EDTA buffer. p185c-erbB-2 was detected by immunoblotting with Ab-3 anti-c-ErbB-2, and ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 with either anti-ubiquitin polyclonal or monoclonal antibody, followed by the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibodies. Visualization was by chemiluminescence (13), using a commercial kit (RenaissanceTM, DuPont NEN). X-OmatTM AR films (Kodak) were scanned with a Foto/Eclipse Gel Analysis system (Fotodyne), and the images were captured using Collage 2.0 software, processed with a MacintoshTM computer (PowerPoint 3.0), and quantified using image analysis software (NIH Image 1.59).


RESULTS

GA Treatment of SKBr3 Cells Causes Rapid Ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2

Within 1 h after treating SKBr3 cells with GA, an immunoprecipitable complex between p185c-erbB-2 and GRP94 is disrupted and p185c-erbB-2 levels rapidly decline thereafter (8, 9). In order to determine whether p185c-erbB-2 was ubiquitinated prior to its degradation, cells were treated with 3 µM GA and lysed, and p185c-erbB-2 was immunoprecipitated using a monoclonal antibody (Ab-5) directed to an extracellular epitope of this protein. Western immunoblots for p185c-erbB-2 with a second anti-ErbB-2 mAb (Ab-3) verified that GA significantly decreased p185c-erbB-2 within 1 h (Fig. 1, lanes 1-4). Separate immunoblots of control and GA-treated samples probed with an anti-ubiquitin polyclonal antibody revealed greater amounts of ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 with increasing time of GA exposure (Fig. 1, lanes 5-8), with little detectable ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 in the absence of GA. Ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 did not appear as discrete bands of increasing molecular mass, but instead was visualized on immunoblots as a diffuse signal that extended upward toward the top of the gel. This is a feature seen previously with other ubiquitinated proteins (14) and probably occurs because a variable number of ubiquitin molecules are added to the substrate protein during the process of polyubiquitination (15). To verify that we specifically detected ubiquitinated protein with the polyclonal antibody, we probed blots from p185c-erbB-2 immunoprecipitations with a monoclonal anti-ubiquitin antibody (4F3) (16) and found essentially the same result (Fig. 1, compare lanes 5-8 with lanes 9-12).


Fig. 1. GA causes rapid ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2. p185c-erbB-2 protein was immunoprecipitated from clarified TNESV lysates of control and GA-treated (15-, 30-, and 60-min exposure to 3 µM GA) SKBr3 cells, proteins were resolved by reducing 8% SDS-PAGE, electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and immunoblotted for p185c-erbB-2 and for ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2. For the anti-ErbB-2 immunoblot, 50 µg of lysate protein was used (lanes 1-4); for anti-ubiquitin immunoblots (lanes 5-12), 1.0 mg of lysate was immunoprecipitated. Lanes 1-4, p185c-erbB-2; lanes 5-8, ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 probed with an anti-ubiquitin polyclonal antibody; lanes 9-12, ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 probed with 4F3 anti-ubiquitin monoclonal antibody for verification.
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]

Polyubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 Is Detectable Before p185c-erbB-2 Levels Decline

In the first experiment (Fig. 1), ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 protein was detected as early as 15 min after adding GA to the cells, but the amount of p185c-erbB-2 found on anti-ErbB-2 Western blots did not significantly decline until 60 min, suggesting that ubiquitination of the protein occurred prior to its degradation. To more carefully explore the relationship between polyubiquitination and the degradation of p185c-erbB-2, we treated cells with 3 µM GA for varying periods of time prior to immunoprecipitating p185c-erbB-2 from lysates. Cells were also exposed to varying concentrations of GA for a fixed time of 2.5 h. By Western immunoblot of total lysate, it is clear that p185c-erbB-2 levels were stable for approximately 15-30 min after cells were exposed to GA, then declined rapidly thereafter (Fig. 2A, lanes 1-6). In the companion Western blot from anti-c-ErbB-2 immunoprecipitations of the same samples, the ubiquitin signal was slightly increased by GA treatment as brief as 5 min and this increase was pronounced by 15 min (Fig. 2A, lanes 7-12). The lowest concentration of GA that effectively decreased the level of p185c-erbB-2 within 2.5 h was 0.5 µM (Fig. 2B, lanes 1-7), but considerable ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 was detected in cells treated with 50 nM GA for 2.5 h (Fig. 2B, lanes 8-14). 95 µg of cell lysates were immunoprecipitated for the p185c-erbB-2 immunoblots, and 1.0 mg of cell lysates was precipitated for the ubiquitin immunoblots. These results show that ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2 occurs rapidly after cells are exposed to even relatively low concentrations of GA and that ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2 precedes its degradation.


Fig. 2. Ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2 precedes its degradation following GA. Cells were treated with 3 µM GA for various times (1-60 min) or with a range of GA concentrations for a fixed time of 2.5 h. Immunoblots for p185c-erbB-2 and ubiquitin were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Shown in A are anti-c-ErbB-2 (lanes 1-6) and anti-ubiquitin (lanes 7-12) immunoblots of p185c-erbB-2 immunoprecipitations from lysates of cells treated with GA for the indicated times. The position of the 200-kDa molecular mass marker is shown on the left. In B are shown anti-c-ErbB-2 (lanes 1-7) and anti-ubiquitin (lanes 8-14) immunoblots of p185c-erbB-2 immunoprecipitations from control cell lysates (lanes 1 and 8), and lysates of cells treated with GA at 0.05 µM (lanes 2 and 9), 0.1 µM (lanes 3 and 10), 0.5 µM (lanes 4 and 11), 1.0 µM (lanes 5 and 12), 3.0 µM (lanes 6 and 13) and 10 µM (lanes 6 and 14).
[View Larger Version of this Image (58K GIF file)]

Lactacystin Inhibition of Proteasomal Protease Activity Blocks GA-caused Depletion of p185c-erbB-2 and Promotes the Accumulation of Polyubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2

LC is a potent, irreversible and specific inhibitor of at least three of the peptidase activities of the 26 S proteasome (17). We therefore treated cells with 10 µM LC for 1 h prior to and during exposure to 3 µM GA for an additional 2.5 h, in order to examine the role of the proteasome in p185c-erbB-2 degradation. As shown in Fig. 3, the loss of p185c-erbB-2 was almost completely prevented by LC pretreatment (lanes 1-4). Although treatment of cells with LC alone had no effect on the amount of p185c-erbB-2 (Fig. 3, lane 3), and little effect on the level of ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 (Fig. 3, lane 7), co-treatment with GA and LC increased the accumulation of ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2 (Fig. 3, lane 8). We also examined the effect of LC on the ubiquitination of proteins in total cell lysates after GA and LC treatments and found that LC alone, as expected, enhanced the detection of ubiquitinated proteins (Fig. 3, lanes 9-12). These results show that ubiquitin-conjugated p185c-erbB-2 is a substrate for the proteasome and that GA treatment accelerates the degradation of p185c-erbB-2 by the proteasomal pathway.


Fig. 3. The proteasomal inhibitor LC prevents GA-induced depletion of p185c-erbB-2. Prior to immunoprecipitating p185c-erbB-2 from lysates as described in the legend to Fig. 1, cells were treated with 3 µM GA alone, 10 µM LC alone, or the combination of 10 µM LC plus 3 µM GA. LC was added 1 h before incubating cells with GA (for an additional 2.5 h). Following SDS-PAGE and electrotransfer, membranes were probed for p185c-erbB-2 (lanes 1-4) and for ubiquitin (lanes 5-12). For comparison, both p185c-erbB-2 immunoprecipitations (lanes 5-8) and 25-µg aliquots of total cell lysates (lanes 9-12) were probed for ubiquitin. Controls are shown in lanes 1, 5, and 9; GA-treated samples in lanes 2, 6, and 10; LC-treated samples in lanes 3, 7, and 11; LC- and GA-treated samples in lanes 4, 8, and 12. The position of the 200-kDa molecular mass marker is shown on the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]

To rule out the possibility that p185c-erbB-2 was degraded by lysosomal proteases in addition to the ubiquitin-dependent proteasome pathway, cells were treated with 3 µM GA alone or with 3 µM GA plus the lysosomal protease inhibitors: chloroquine (18) or monensin (19) at 10 mM for 2 h. Neither of these agents prevented the loss of p185c-erbB-2 caused by GA treatment (data not shown), indicating that GA-induced degradation of p185c-erbB-2 was not catalyzed by lysosomal proteases.

Nascent p185c-erbB-2 Is Poorly Ubiquitinated after GA Exposure

Miller et al. (4) have shown ansamycin treatment does not alter mRNA levels for p185c-erbB-2 or change the rate of de novo synthesis of p185c-erbB-2. We have verified these observations and noted further that after immunoprecipitating p185c-erbB-2 from cells treated for 17 h with GA, the p185c-erbB-2 bands on immunoblots have a slightly lower molecular mass of ~160 kDa (9). Together with the sensitivity of these bands to endoglycosidase H (9), these data suggest incomplete glycosylation of the immature protein, with its resultant sequestration in the endoplasmic reticulum. We therefore investigated whether nascent p185c-erbB-2 synthesized in the presence of GA was a substrate for ubiquitination and proteasome degradation.

Following a 17-h exposure to GA, only newly synthesized p185c-erbB-2 (i.e. synthesized in the presence of GA) remains, because essentially all of the pre-existing, mature p185c-erbB-2 has been degraded (9). Preliminary experiments showed it was necessary to immunoprecipitate p185c-erbB-2 from as much as 1.0 mg of lysate from cells treated with GA for 17 h in order to visualize on immunoblots the low level of the unstable, nascent protein. For comparison, the anti-c-ErbB-2 immunoprecipitation of as little as 50 µg of control lysate yields a strong p185c-erbB-2 signal. Thus, it should be noted in Fig. 4, that anti-c-ErbB-2 immunoprecipitations from GA-treated cells were from 1.0 mg of lysate, while 95 µg of lysate from control and LC-treated cells was precipitated. Overnight exposure to 3 µM GA nearly eliminated p185c-erbB-2 from cells, although a small amount of the 160-kDa immature form of the protein could be detected (Fig. 4, compare lanes 1 and 2). This nascent protein is unstable and has a markedly shorter half-life than the mature protein in untreated cells (4). The addition of LC to GA-treated cells during the last 3 h of incubation resulted in noticeable accumulation of the immature, 160-kDa species of p185c-erbB-2 (Fig. 4, compare lanes 2 and 4). As in previous experiments, treating cells with LC alone had no effect on the level of p185c-erbB-2 and did not alter its apparent molecular mass (Fig. 4, compare lanes 1 and 3). However, nascent p185c-erbB-2 was not ubiquitinated to the extent of mature p185c-erbB-2 following GA exposure (Fig. 4, lane 6). In fact, ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 from anti-c-ErbB-2 immunoprecipitations could be visualized only after a film exposure at least 20 times longer than that normally used for visualizing ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 after short term (2.5 h) GA treatment. In addition, LC had only a minimal effect on the low level of detectable ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 after 17-h GA treatment (Fig. 4, compare lanes 6 and 8). Even when an amount of p185c-erbB-2 equivalent to the control level was immunoprecipitated from lysate from cells treated overnight with GA, only a trace of ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 could be visualized by immunoblotting (data not shown). In contrast, in immunoblots of aliquots of total lysates separated by SDS-PAGE, the 17-h exposure to GA alone or the 3-h exposure to LC alone clearly increased general protein ubiquitination, while the combination of GA (17 h) and LC (3 h) enhanced the polyubiquitination of proteins severalfold more than either agent alone, showing that LC indeed stabilized ubiquitinated proteins by preventing their degradation (Fig. 4, lanes 9-12).


Fig. 4. Nascent p185c-erbB-2 is poorly ubiquitinated yet degraded by the proteasome. Cells were treated with 3 µM GA for 17 h in order to completely degrade mature p185c-erbB-2 (9). LC (10 µM) was included during the last 3 h of incubation. Following lysis, immunoprecipitation, SDS-PAGE, and electrotransfer, nitrocellulose membranes were probed for p185c-erbB-2 (lanes 1-4) and for ubiquitin (lanes 5-12). Because only a small amount of p185c-erbB-2 was found in cells treated with GA for 17 h, differential amounts of lysates were used to immunoprecipitate p185c-erbB-2: 100 µg of lysate from control and LC-treated cells and 1.0 mg of lysate from cells treated with GA and the combination of GA plus LC. The various treatments are indicated at the bottom of the figure, where ``+'' denotes inclusion of the agent. The position of the 200-kDa molecular mass marker is shown at the left.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]

GA Treatment Causes the Formation of a Higher Molecular Form of p185c-erbB-2 in SKBr-3 Cells

In the previous experiments, we did not observe heavier species of p185c-erbB-2 on anti-ErbB-2 immunoblots that would correspond to polyubiquitinated forms of p185c-erbB-2. We therefore immunoprecipitated p185c-erbB-2 from 500 µg of lysate (rather than the usual 50 µg) from cells treated with 6 µM GA for 2 h and from cells treated with 6 µM GA for 2 h plus 10 µM LC for 3 h. Anti-c-ErbB-2 immunoblots of these samples revealed a higher molecular mass form of p185c-erbB-2 in GA-treated cells where the degradation of p185c-erbB-2 was blocked by LC (Fig. 5A, lane 3); this upper anti-c-ErbB-2-reacting band was completely absent in control cells (lane 1), and only very faint in cells treated with GA alone (lane 2). Given the approximate 200-kDa molecular mass of the upper band, it probably represents the addition of one to two 8.6-kDa ubiquitin molecules to p185c-erbB-2. It is possible we did not detect other slower migrating bands representing polyubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2, because the anti-c-ErbB-2 mAb we used may not recognize polyubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 due to stearic hindrance caused by the attachment of longer multiubiquitin chains. Polyubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 could easily be detected by anti-ubiquitin immunoblotting of identical anti-c-ErbB-2 immunoprecipitations from GA-treated, as well as GA plus LC-treated, cells (Fig. 5, compare lanes 4-6).


Fig. 5. LC causes the accumulation of a higher molecular weight form of p185c-erbB-2 after GA treatment. A, cells were treated with 6 µM GA for 2 h or GA for 2 h plus 10 µM LC for 3 h prior to p185c-erbB-2 immunoprecipitation from 500 µg of lysates. Immunoblots for p185c-erbB-2 (lanes 1-3) and ubiquitin (lanes 4-6) were performed on identical samples. Controls are shown in lanes 1 and 4, GA-treated samples in lanes 2 and 5 and GA plus LC-treated samples in lanes 3 and 6. B, p185c-erbB-2 was immunoprecipitated from untreated (lanes 1-3) and 1% SDS-treated lysates (lanes 4-6) from control, 3 µM GA-treated (2 h), and GA plus 10 µM LC-treated cells (2 h). For comparison, and to rule out artifactual precipitation of ubiquitinated proteins, an anti-ubiquitin immunoblot of samples sham-precipitated without the anti-c-ErbB-2 antibody but with RAM-PAS beads is shown in lanes 7-9. Anti-ubiquitin immunoblots of immunoprecipitated p185c-erbB-2 from control cell lysates are shown in lanes 1, 4, and 7; GA-treated cells in lanes 2, 5, and 8; and GA plus LC-treated cells in lanes 3, 6, and 9.
[View Larger Version of this Image (67K GIF file)]

To rule out artifactual detection of ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 resulting from the binding of adventitious ubiquitinated proteins to p185c-erbB-2 itself or to the RAM-PAS beads used to immunoprecipitate p185c-erbB-2, we added 1% SDS to lysates from control, GA-treated, and GA plus LC-treated cells prior to immunoprecipitating p185c-erbB-2. The SDS treatment only slightly diminished the detection of ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 immunoprecipitated from GA-treated cells (Fig. 5B, lanes 4-6) compared to SDS-untreated lysates (Fig. 5B, lanes 1-3), indicating that the anti-ubiquitin immunoblots truly detected polyubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 rather than nonspecific ubiquitinated proteins. When cell lysates were sham-precipitated by omitting the primary anti-ErbB-2 mAb, only trace amounts of ubiquitinated proteins were bound to the RAM-PAS beads, even when lysates from cells treated with GA or the combination of GA and LC were used (Fig. 5B, lanes 7-9).


DISCUSSION

The benzoquinone ansamycins, including HA and GA, are antibiotics isolated from Streptomyces, which rapidly destabilize and accelerate the degradation of diverse signal transduction proteins, including certain receptor and non-receptor tyrosine kinases (6, 8, 20, 21, 22), serine-threonine kinases (7), and mutated p53 (23). The major cellular molecular target for these agents is the chaperone protein, HSP90, to which GA and HA bind avidly (6). The signal-transducing proteins are destabilized subsequent to the ansamycin-HSP90 interaction that dissociates the chaperone multimolecular complexes, and degradation of the normally chaperone-stabilized proteins rapidly ensues (6, 7).

One of the receptor tyrosine kinases most sensitive to the effects of ansamycins is p185c-erbB-2, which is frequently overexpressed in a high percentage of breast, ovarian, and prostate carcinomas. Within hours after exposure to HA or GA, p185c-erbB-2 is lost from human tumor cells in which it is highly expressed, a phenomenon solely mediated by drug-stimulated protein degradation (8). Although p185c-erbB-2 does not associate with HSP90, we have recently identified a molecular complex containing p185c-erbB-2 and GRP94 (9), a protein homologous to HSP90, which functions as a chaperone, within the endoplasmic reticulum (10). A radiolabeled, photoaffinity ansamycin derivative binds specifically to GRP94 in intact cells (but not to p185c-erbB-2), and destabilization of p185c-erbB-2 appears to be preceded by ansamycin-induced dissociation of a p185c-erbB-2GRP94 heterocomplex (9).

The results reported in the present study show that GA-induced degradation of mature p185c-erbB-2 involves polyubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2 and subsequent hydrolysis by the 26 S proteasome. GA-stimulated ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2 occurred rapidly and was easily detectable on anti-ubiquitin immunoblots within minutes of adding GA to cells at 3 µM. Lower concentrations of GA also promoted ubiquitination and loss of p185c-erbB-2, albeit at longer exposure times, i.e. 2.5 h with 50 nM GA (Fig. 2B) and after 18 h with 10 nM GA (data not shown). The ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2 occurred prior to any measurable decrease in p185c-erbB-2 protein levels, suggesting that conjugation of p185c-erbB-2 to ubiquitin was a prerequisite to its degradation.

By immunoprecipitating p185c-erbB-2 from a large quantity of lysate (500 µg, 10-fold more than usual) from cells treated with GA or GA plus LC, we observed a higher molecular weight form of p185c-erbB-2 (Fig. 5A). This slower migrating band of approximately 200 kDa that was prominent in the sample from GA plus LC-treated cells on the p185c-erbB-2 immunoblot most likely represents p185c-erbB-2 conjugated to one or two 8.6-kDa ubiquitin moieties. We believe that higher molecular weight forms of p185c-erbB-2, corresponding to polyubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2, may not be recognized by the anti-p185c-erbB-2 immunoblotting antibody because of stearic interference by ubiquitin homopolymeric chains. Two other anti-c-ErbB-2 antibodies gave a similar result (data not shown). Therefore, if most of the ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 in GA-treated cells is polyubiquitinated (as one would expect for a proteasome substrate and as the anti-ubiquitin immunoblots show), then most of the material would be difficult if not impossible to detect by anti-ErbB-2 immunoblotting. Similar results have been obtained in the identification of other polyubiquitinated proteins including the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p27 (24), and the epidermal growth factor receptor (25).

We propose that the dissociation of GRP94-p185c-erbB-2 heterocomplexes precedes the ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2, but due to technical limitations, we cannot rule out the converse sequence of events. Not only do the ubiquitin immunoblots detect the appearance of a signal on what is essentially a null background (i.e. ubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 is only weakly detected in untreated control cells), but the addition of many ubiquitin moieties to p185c-erbB-2 would further amplify the detectable ubiquitin signal. In contrast, measurement of disappearance of GRP94-p185c-erbB-2 heterocomplexes requires detection of a signal decrease from a control level that is maximal (i.e. untreated cells have the greatest amount of detectable heterocomplex). For these reasons, we believe that ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2 provides a more sensitive indicator of the onset of GA action than the loss of the GRP94-p185c-erbB-2 heterocomplex, but given these caveats, ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2 may not necessarily be the first in the sequence of events set in motion by GA.

To investigate whether the 26 S proteasome was in fact responsible for degradation of p185c-erbB2, we treated control and GA-treated cells with the specific and irreversible proteasome inhibitor, LC (26). This proteasome inhibitor has been used previously in a similar fashion to implicate involvement of the proteasome in the processing and degradation of a mutated cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein (27), and LC also inhibits proteasome-mediated proteolytic processing of the NF-kappa B precursor, as well as proteasomal destruction of the inhibitory I-kappa B regulatory protein (28). We found that LC potently blocked GA-dependent depletion of p185c-erbB-2, maintaining p185c-erbB-2 at or near the control level in the presence of GA. Furthermore, although LC itself did not greatly affect ubiquitination of p185c-erbB-2, the inclusion of LC during GA treatment enhanced the accumulation of polyubiquitinated p185c-erbB-2 that otherwise would have been rapidly degraded. Thus, these results show the degradation of mature, plasma membrane-localized p185c-erbB-2 after GA treatment proceeds predominantly, if not solely, through ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal hydrolysis. This conclusion is further supported by our observation that the lysosomal protease inhibitors, chloroquine and monensin, failed to attenuate the GA-induced loss of p185c-erbB-2. Our findings on the fate of mature p185c-erbB-2 following GA treatment are quite similar to those recently reported by Sepp-Lorenzino et al. (22) for the decline in several other tyrosine kinase signaling receptors following HA exposure.

In an earlier report, we noted that prolonged GA treatment prevented nascent p185c-erbB-2 from trafficking to the plasma membrane, most likely because it failed to associate with GRP94 and was not processed as usual, as indicated by an increase in endoglycosidase H sensitivity (9). Instead, newly synthesized, incompletely glycosylated p185c-erbB-2 remained localized predominantly within the endoplasmic reticulum/cis-Golgi compartment (9). We therefore asked whether there might be differential susceptibility between mature and nascent p185c-erbB-2 to ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated proteolysis following GA treatment. After cells were exposed to GA for 17 h, we found nascent, newly synthesized p185c-erbB-2 to be only minimally ubiquitinated, even when LC was included for the last 3 h of GA exposure to inhibit possible proteasomal degradation. Nonetheless, in cells treated with the combination of LC and GA, the level of incompletely glycosylated, lower molecular weight p185c-erbB-2 was markedly enhanced compared to GA alone. These observations imply that the immature 160-kDa p185c-erbB-2 protein remained sequestered within the endoplasmic reticulum in the presence of GA, and while not a substrate for ubiquitination, was still susceptible to proteasome degradation. These observations parallel those reported in a study of the mutated cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein precursor, which fails to be converted to the mature, fully glycosylated form, yet undergoes proteasome-mediated but ubiquitin-independent degradation while retained within the endoplasmic reticulum (27, 29).

Results presented in this paper and in our previous report (9) suggest the binding of GA to GRP94, with the subsequent perturbation of mature p185c-erbB-2-GRP94 complexes, triggers events that target p185c-erbB-2 for ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated degradation. Could GA merely be accelerating a normal process of ligand induced p185c-erbB-2 ubiquitination and degradation? Mori et al. (30, 31) have shown that platelet-derived growth factor beta  receptor, the epidermal growth factor receptor, colony stimulating factor-1 receptor, and fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases all become polyubiquitinated as a direct consequence of ligand binding. In addition, recently, Galcheva-Gargova et al. (25) have verified that the epidermal growth factor receptor is conjugated to ubiquitin following activation by its ligand. If this hypothesis is correct, then by analogy with p185c-erbB-2, the other receptor signal-transducing kinases may be protected from degradation by the formation of a ligand-sensitive stabilization complex with GRP94, HSP90, or similar chaperone proteins. At the least, the interaction between GRP94 and p185c-erbB-2 might serve as a model for an important regulatory mechanism for modulation of the protein level of receptor tyrosine kinases. We recently reported that such protein-chaperone interactions (in this example pp60v-src and HSP90) can be dissociated by the phosphorylation state of both the chaperone and the target protein, identifying a physiologic mechanism for modulating protein-chaperone heterocomplexes which could indirectly result from ligand-dependent activation of the receptor (32). Such a model of receptor regulation through phosphorylation, although involving a chaperone complex, differs from the mechanism of receptor-chaperone instability caused by GA, which results from a direct interaction of GA with the chaperone rather than the receptor.

In conclusion, the ability of GA to initiate biochemical events that target p185c-erbB-2 for degradation by the ubiquitin-dependent proteasome suggests this agent may be useful in the biochemical dissection of the initiating mechanisms by which certain proteins are rendered susceptible to the ubiquitin/proteasome multicatalytic degradative pathway. Furthermore, accumulating evidence suggests the ansamycin-targeted HSP90 and GRP94 chaperones play a hitherto unrecognized but critical role in this process.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Clinical Pharmacology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 10, Room 12N226, Bethesda, MD 20892. Tel.: 301-496-8050; Fax: 301-402-1608.
1   The abbreviations used are: HA, herbimycin; GA, geldanamycin; GRP94, 94-kDa glucose-regulated protein; HSP90, 90-kDa heat shock protein; LC, lactacystin; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
2   L. Guarino, personal communication.

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Linda Guarino for the 4F3 anti-ubiquitin antibody and Drs. Guarino and John Haley for helpful discussions.


REFERENCES

  1. Yamamoto, T., Ikawa, S., Akiyama, T., Semba, K., Nomure, N., Miyajima, N., Saito, T., Toyoshima, K. (1986) Nature 319, 230-234 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Slamon, D. J., Clark, G. M., Wong, S. G., Levin, W. J., Ullrich, A., McGuire, W. L. (1987) Science 235, 177-182 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Di Fiore, P. P., Pierce, J. H., Kraus, M. H., Segatto, O., King, C. R., Aaronson, S. A. (1987) Science 237, 178-182 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Miller, P., DiOrio, C., Moyer, M., Schnur, R. C., Druskin, A., Cullen, W., Moyer, J. D. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 2724-2730 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Uehara, Y., Murakami, Y., Mizuno, S., Kawai, S. (1988) Virology 164, 294-298 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Whitesell, L., Mimnaugh, E. G., DeCosta, B., Myers, C. E., Neckers, L. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 8324-8328 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Schulte, T. W., Blagosklonny, M. V., Ingui, C., Neckers, L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24585-24588 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Miller, P., Schnur, R. C., Barbacci, E., Moyer, M. P., Moyer, J. D. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 201, 1313-1319 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Chavany, C., Mimnaugh, E. G., Miller, P., Bitton, R., Nguyen, P., Trepel, J., Whitesell, L., Schnur, R., Moyer, J. D., Neckers, L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 4974-4977 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Welch, W. J. (1992) Physiol. Rev. 72, 1063-1081 [Free Full Text]
  11. Smith, P. K., Krohn, R. I., Hermanson, G. T., Mallia, A. K., Gartner, F. H., Provenzano, M. D., Fujimoto, E. K., Goeke, N. M., Olson, B. J., Klenk, D. C. (1985) Anal. Biochem. 150, 76-85 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Bobrow, M. N., Harris, T. D., Shaughnessy, K. J., Litt, G. J. (1989) J. Immunol. Methods 125, 279-285 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Ciechanover, A., Finley, D., Varshavsky, A. (1984) J. Cell. Biochem. 24, 137-163
  15. Ciechanover, A. (1994) Cell 79, 13-21 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Guarino, L. A., Smith, G., Dong, W. (1995) Cell 80, 301-309 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Fenteany, G., Standaert, R. F., Lane, W. S., Choi, S., Corey, E. J., Schreiber, S. L. (1995) Science 268, 726-731 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Poole, B., Ohkuma, S. (1981) J. Cell Biol. 90, 665-669 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Tartakoff, A. M. (1983) Cell 32, 1026-1028 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Uehara, Y., Murakami, Y., Sugimoto, Y., Mizuno, S. (1989) Cancer Res. 49, 780-785 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Murakami, Y., Mizuno, S., Uehara, Y. (1994) Biochem. J. 301, 63-68
  22. Sepp-Lorenzino, L., Ma, Z., Lebwohl, D. E., Vinitsky, A., Rosen, N. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16580-16587 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Blagosklonny, M. V., Toretsky, J., Neckers, L. (1995) Oncogene 11, 933-939 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Pagano, M., Tam, S. W., Theodoras, A. M., Beer-Romero, Del Sal, G., Chau, V., Yew, P. R., Draetta, G. F., Rolfe, M. (1995) Science 269, 682-685 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Galcheva-Gargova, Z., Theroux, S. J., Davis, R. J. (1995) Oncogene 11, 2649-2655 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Fenteany, G., Standaert, R. F., Reichard, G. A., Corey, E. J., Schreiber, S. L. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 3358-3362 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Ward, C. L., Omura, S., Kopito, R. R. (1995) Cell 83, 121-127 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Palombella, V. J., Rando, O. J., Goldberg, A. L., Maniatis, T. (1994) Cell 78, 773-785 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Jensen, T. J., Loo, M. A., Pind, S., Williams, D. B., Goldberg, A. L., Riordan, J. R. (1995) Cell 83, 129-135 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Mori, S., Claesson-Welsh, L., Okuyama, Y., Saito, Y. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 213, 32-39 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Mori, S., Heldin, C.-H., Claesson-Welsh, L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 577-583 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Mimnaugh, E. G., Worland, P. J., Whitesell, L., Neckers, L. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 28654-28659 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
D. J. Barr, A. G. Ostermeyer-Fay, R. A. Matundan, and D. A. Brown
Clathrin-independent endocytosis of ErbB2 in geldanamycin-treated human breast cancer cells
J. Cell Sci., October 1, 2008; 121(19): 3155 - 3166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Fukuyo, M. Inoue, T. Nakajima, R. Higashikubo, N. T. Horikoshi, C. Hunt, A. Usheva, M. L. Freeman, and N. Horikoshi
Oxidative Stress Plays a Critical Role in Inactivating Mutant BRAF by Geldanamycin Derivatives
Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 68(15): 6324 - 6330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W.-Y. Chen, F.-R. Chang, Z.-Y. Huang, J.-H. Chen, Y.-C. Wu, and C.-C. Wu
Tubocapsenolide A, a Novel Withanolide, Inhibits Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 Cells by Thiol Oxidation of Heat Shock Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2008; 283(25): 17184 - 17193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
X. Cao, M. Bloomston, T. Zhang, W. L. Frankel, G. Jia, B. Wang, N. C. Hall, R. M. Koch, H. Cheng, M. V. Knopp, et al.
Synergistic Antipancreatic Tumor Effect by Simultaneously Targeting Hypoxic Cancer Cells With HSP90 Inhibitor and Glycolysis Inhibitor
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 14(6): 1831 - 1839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
N. M. Pedersen, I. H. Madshus, C. Haslekas, and E. Stang
Geldanamycin-Induced Down-Regulation of ErbB2 from the Plasma Membrane Is Clathrin Dependent but Proteasomal Activity Independent
Mol. Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 6(3): 491 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. L. Holmes, S. Y. Sharp, S. Hobbs, and P. Workman
Silencing of HSP90 Cochaperone AHA1 Expression Decreases Client Protein Activation and Increases Cellular Sensitivity to the HSP90 Inhibitor 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin
Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 68(4): 1188 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Sidera, M. Gaitanou, D. Stellas, R. Matsas, and E. Patsavoudi
A Critical Role for HSP90 in Cancer Cell Invasion Involves Interaction with the Extracellular Domain of HER-2
J. Biol. Chem., January 25, 2008; 283(4): 2031 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Sawai, S. Chandarlapaty, H. Greulich, M. Gonen, Q. Ye, C. L. Arteaga, W. Sellers, N. Rosen, and D. B. Solit
Inhibition of Hsp90 Down-regulates Mutant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expression and Sensitizes EGFR Mutant Tumors to Paclitaxel
Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 68(2): 589 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. C. Arthur, J. D. Lich, R. K. Aziz, M. Kotb, and J. P.-Y. Ting
Heat Shock Protein 90 Associates with Monarch-1 and Regulates Its Ability to Promote Degradation of NF-{kappa}B-Inducing Kinase
J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 6291 - 6296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
Yuhong Du, K. Moulick, A. Rodina, J. Aguirre, S. Felts, R. Dingledine, Haian Fu, and G. Chiosis
High-Throughput Screening Fluorescence Polarization Assay for Tumor-Specific Hsp90
J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2007; 12(7): 915 - 924.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. Lerdrup, S. Bruun, M. V. Grandal, K. Roepstorff, M. M. Kristensen, A. M. Hommelgaard, and B. van Deurs
Endocytic Down-Regulation of ErbB2 Is Stimulated by Cleavage of Its C-Terminus
Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2007; 18(9): 3656 - 3666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Bae, C. Mitsiades, Y.-T. Tai, R. Bertheau, M. Shammas, R. B. Batchu, C. Li, L. Catley, R. Prabhala, K. C. Anderson, et al.
Phenotypic and Functional Effects of Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibition on Dendritic Cell
J. Immunol., June 15, 2007; 178(12): 7730 - 7737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. Luo, F. Dou, A. Rodina, S. Chip, J. Kim, Q. Zhao, K. Moulick, J. Aguirre, N. Wu, P. Greengard, et al.
Roles of heat-shock protein 90 in maintaining and facilitating the neurodegenerative phenotype in tauopathies
PNAS, May 29, 2007; 104(22): 9511 - 9516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. B. Solit, S. P. Ivy, C. Kopil, R. Sikorski, M. J. Morris, S. F. Slovin, W. K. Kelly, A. DeLaCruz, T. Curley, G. Heller, et al.
Phase I Trial of 17-Allylamino-17-Demethoxygeldanamycin in Patients with Advanced Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2007; 13(6): 1775 - 1782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
W. Xu, X. Yuan, K. Beebe, Z. Xiang, and L. Neckers
Loss of Hsp90 Association Up-Regulates Src-Dependent ErbB2 Activity
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2007; 27(1): 220 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
F. Cardoso, V. Durbecq, J.-F. Laes, B. Badran, L. Lagneaux, F. Bex, C. Desmedt, K. Willard-Gallo, J. S. Ross, A. Burny, et al.
Bortezomib (PS-341, Velcade) increases the efficacy of trastuzumab (Herceptin) in HER-2-positive breast cancer cells in a synergistic manner
Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2006; 5(12): 3042 - 3051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
E. G. Mimnaugh, W. Xu, M. Vos, X. Yuan, and L. Neckers
Endoplasmic Reticulum Vacuolization and Valosin-Containing Protein Relocalization Result from Simultaneous Hsp90 Inhibition by Geldanamycin and Proteasome Inhibition by Velcade
Mol. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 4(9): 667 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Germano, D. Barberis, M. M. Santoro, L. Penengo, A. Citri, Y. Yarden, and G. Gaudino
Geldanamycins Trigger a Novel Ron Degradative Pathway, Hampering Oncogenic Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., August 4, 2006; 281(31): 21710 - 21719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page