![]()
|
|
||||||||
(Received for publication, June 17, 1996)
From the Cdc42 and Rac1 have been implicated in the
regulation of various cell functions such as cell morphology, polarity,
and cell proliferation. We have partially purified a Cdc42- and
Rac1-associated protein with molecular mass of about 170 kDa
(p170) from bovine brain cytosol. This protein interacted with
guanosine 5 Cdc42 and Rac1, the members of the small GTPase Rho family, are
shown to regulate the cytoskeleton through the actin filament (reviewed
in Refs. 1 and 2). Cdc42 and Rac1 are implicated in filopodia (3, 4)
and lamellipodia (4, 5) formation, respectively, in Swiss 3T3 cells.
Rac1 is shown to be involved in platelet-derived growth factor-induced
membrane ruffling (5) and insulin-induced one in KB cells (6, 7). Rac1
is also shown to stimulate phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase
activity and actin-uncapping in human platelets (8) and arachidonic
acid release in Swiss 3T3 cells or in Rat-1 cells (9). Cdc42 and Rac1
are shown to regulate the activities of c-Jun N-terminal kinase and p38
(10, 11, 12), members of mitogen-activated protein kinases. In T cells,
Cdc42 is shown to regulate the polarization of both actin and
microtubules toward antigen-presenting cells (13). In
Drosophila, ectopic expression of dominant-active Cdc42
inhibits the dendrite and axon growth of neural cells and normal muscle
formation (14), and that of dominant-negative Cdc42 inhibits the
apico-basal elongation of wing disc epithelial cells (15). Ectopic
expression of dominant-active Rac inhibits only axon growth (14) and
assembly of actin at adherence junction of wing disc epithelial cells
(15), and that of dominant-negative Rac causes disruption of cell shape
changes in the lateral epidermis (16). Ectopic expression of
dominant-active Rac1 in mice results in the reduction of Purkinje cell
axon terminals (17).
Cdc42 and Rac1 have two interconvertible forms: GDP-bound inactive
forms and GTP-bound active forms (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 18) and their
GTP-bound forms interact with their target molecules and exert their
biological functions. The target molecules of Cdc42 and Rac1 have been
identified to be serine/threonine kinase PAK (19, 20, 21),
phosphatidylinositol 3 We have previously purified target molecules for Rho by the Rho
affinity column chromatography and identified them as protein kinase N
(29), Rho-kinase (30), and myosin-binding subunit of myosin phosphatase
(31). In the present study, we purified a putative target for Cdc42 and
Rac1 with a molecular mass of 170 kDa and identified it as an IQGAP,
which is originally isolated as a Ras GAP family (32, 33).
Anti- pGEX2T-Cdc42, pGEX2T-Rac1, and
pGEX2TRhoA were constructed as described previously (29, 34).
Cdc42Val12 and Rac1Val12, or
Cdc42Asn17 and Rac1Asn17 cDNAs were
generated by the site-directed mutagenesis of Gly12 and Thr17 to Val12
and Asn17, respectively. Recombinant wild-type and mutant small GTPases
were expressed as GST-fusion proteins and purified as described (29).
For microinjection, they were cleaved with thrombin, purified to remove
the GST, and concentrated (5, 35). For expression in COS7 cells,
pEF-BOS-HA-small GTPases were constructed as described (29, 36). To
obtain the IQGAP (521-914 amino acids) as an antigen, a cDNA
fragment corresponding to the IQGAP fragment was subcloned into
pGEX4T-2. For in vitro translation of IQGAP, the cDNA
fragments corresponding to the indicated IQGAP fragments were subcloned
into pBluescript KS( The
affinity purification was performed essentially as described (29).
Briefly, bovine brain cytosol was passed through glutathione beads to
remove endogenous GST. Then, the pass fraction was loaded on
glutathione beads containing respective GST-small GTPases preloaded
with guanine nucleotides as described (29, 37). After washing the
columns, bound proteins were coeluted with respective GST-small GTPases
by the addition of reduced glutathione.
The interactions of indicated fragments of in vitro
translated IQGAP with GST-small GTPases were examined as described
(38). Briefly, indicated fragments of in vitro translated
IQGAP were mixed with affinity beads coated with the respective
guanine nucleotide-bound GST-small GTPases. After washing the
beads, the bound proteins were coeluted with respective small GTPases
by the addition of glutathione. The eluates were resolved by SDS-PAGE,
and radioactivities were detected using the bioimaging analyzer BAS2000
(Fujix, Tokyo, Japan).
The overlay assay was performed as described
(19, 30). Briefly, an aliquot of the eluate fraction of
GTP COS7
cells were transfected with pEF-BOS-HA-small GTPases by use of the
DEAE-dextran method (39). Immunoprecipitation of HA-tagged small
GTPases by anti-HA antibody was performed as described (29). The
immunocomplex was subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting
using anti-IQGAP antibody.
KB cells
were cultured, seeded, and starved for 36 h as described (6).
Microinjection of small GTPases (1 mg/ml) or C3 (200 µg/ml) followed
by the stimulation of insulin was performed as described (6). MDCK
cells were cultured and seeded as described (40). Immunofluorescence
analysis with anti-IQGAP antibody was carried out essentially as
described (41).
The peptide sequence of p170 was
determined as described (37, 42). Anti-IQGAP polyclonal antibody was
raised by standard procedures using GST-IQGAP (521-914 amino acids) as
an antigen.
To identify Cdc42- and Rac1-interacting molecules, the bovine
brain cytosol was loaded onto a GST-Cdc42 affinity column. The proteins
bound to the affinity column were coeluted with GST-Cdc42 by the
addition of glutathione. A protein with molecular mass of about 170 kDa
(p170) was detected in the glutathione-eluate from GTP
To identify the p170, it was subjected to amino acid sequencing as
described (42). Three peptide sequences derived from p170 were
determined. The amino acid sequences of the peptides are YGEQVDYYK,
IFYPETTDIYDRK, and RLIVDVIRFQPGETLTEILE. All of the three peptide
sequences obtained were identical to the deduced amino acid sequence of
human IQGAP, which is identified as a Ras GAP family (32, 33).
Furthermore, p170 was recognized by anti-IQGAP antibody (data not
shown). The molecular weight of IQGAP is calculated to be 189,249, which is almost the same as the apparent molecular mass of p170
estimated by SDS-PAGE. We, therefore, concluded that p170 was a
bovine counterpart of human IQGAP and hereafter refer to it as
IQGAP.
To examine whether recombinant IQGAP interacts with GTP
To determine the binding domain of IQGAP to Cdc42 and Rac1, the
N-terminal (1-863 amino acids) and the C-terminal (764-1657 amino
acids) fragments of IQGAP were in vitro translated, and
their interactions with Cdc42 and Rac1 were examined. The C-terminal
fragment of IQGAP interacted with GTP Furthermore, direct interaction of the purified IQGAP with
GTP We next examined whether IQGAP interacts with Cdc42 or Rac1 in
vivo. Cdc42Val12 and Rac1Val12,
structurally equivalent to RasVal12 (18), are thought to be
a constitutively GTP-bound form in vivo as a result of
defective GTPase activity (3, 4, 5), whereas Cdc42Asn17 and
Rac1Asn17, structurally equivalent to RasAsn17
(44), are thought to be a constitutively GDP-bound form in
vivo (3, 4, 5) as a result of preferential binding to GDP relative to
GTP and to specifically interfere in the activation of endogenous
respective small GTPases. When HA-tagged Cdc42Val12, Cdc42,
Cdc42Asn17, Rac1Val12, or RhoAVal14
was transiently transfected into COS7 cells and HA-small GTPases were
immunoprecipitated by anti-HA antibody, IQGAP was coimmunoprecipitated
with Cdc42Val12 or Rac1Val12 (Fig.
3). It coimmunoprecipitated with neither Cdc42,
Cdc42Asn17, nor RhoAVal14. Almost the same
amounts of the HA-small GTPases were precipitated (data not shown).
Therefore, it is most likely that IQGAP specifically interacts with
GTP·Cdc42 and GTP·Rac1 in vivo.
IQGAP was originally identified as a Ras GAP, but the recombinant IQGAP
did not show any GAP activity toward Ras and Rho (33). We also
attempted to detect GAP activity using affinity-purified IQGAP toward
Ha-Ras, Ki-Ras, R-Ras, RalA, Cdc42, Rac1, and RhoA but failed (data not
shown). We cannot exclude the possibility that the purified IQGAP lost
its activity. Further study is necessary to clarify the function of the
GAP domain of IQGAP.
Insulin is shown to induce membrane ruffling in KB cells (45, 46), and
the insulin-induced membrane ruffling is blocked by the prior
microinjection of Rac1Asn17 into the cells but not by that
of C3 (6). Microinjection of GTP
To further examine the IQGAP accumulation at the cell-cell junction, we
examined the localization of IQGAP in MDCK cells. IQGAP was
specifically accumulated at the cell-cell junction (Fig.
5, B and E). IQGAP showed similar
distribution as
We here identified the Cdc42- or Rac1-interacting p170 protein as
IQGAP. We showed that recombinant IQGAP directly interacts with active
forms of Rac1 and Cdc42 in vitro and in vivo.
Moreover, we found that IQGAP is accumulated at the insulin- or
Rac1-induced membrane ruffling area, and that the insulin-induced
membrane ruffling and the IQGAP accumulation at the membrane ruffling
area is blocked by the prior microinjection of Rac1Asn17 or
Cdc42Asn17. Our results indicate that IQGAP is the target
for Rac1 and Cdc42 and suggest that IQGAP is involved in the insulin-
and Rac1-induced membrane ruffling.
The targets for Cdc42 and Rac1 are identified as PAK (19, 20, 21),
phosphatidylinositol 3 We thank Dr. A. Nagafuchi and Dr. S. Tsukita
(Kyoto University) for providing anti-
Volume 271, Number 38,
Issue of September 20, 1996
pp. 23363-23367
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
,
,
,
and
''
Division of Signal Transduction, Nara
Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma 630-01, § Department of Biochemistry, Hiroshima University School of
Medicine, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734, ¶ Kazusa DNA
Research Institute, 1532-3 Yanauchino, Kisarazu 292, and
Central
Laboratories for Key Technology, Kirin Brewery Co. Ltd., 1-13-5 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236, Japan
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
-(3-O-thio)triphosphate
(GTP
S)·glutathione S-transferase (GST)-Cdc42 and
GTP
S·GST-Rac1 but not with the GDP·GST-Cdc42, GDP·GST-Rac1, or
GTP
S·GST-RhoA). We identified p170 as an IQGAP, which is
originally identified as a putative Ras GTPase-activating
protein. Recombinant IQGAP specifically interacted with
GTP
S·Cdc42 and GTP
S·Rac1. The C-terminal fragment
of IQGAP was responsible for their interactions. IQGAP was specifically
immunoprecipitated with dominant-active Cdc42Val12 or
Rac1Val12 from the COS7 cells expressing
Cdc42Val12 or Rac1Val12, respectively.
Immunofluorescence analysis revealed that IQGAP was accumulated at
insulin- or Rac1-induced membrane ruffling areas. This accumulation of
IQGAP was blocked by the microinjection of the dominant-negative
Rac1Asn17 or Cdc42Asn17. Moreover, IQGAP was
accumulated at the cell-cell junction in MDCK cells, where
-catenin
and ZO-1 were localized. These results suggest that IQGAP is a novel
target molecule for Cdc42 and Rac1.
-kinase (22, 23), and
WASP1 (24, 25); the target molecule of
Cdc42 is ACK (26), and the target molecule of Rac1 in neutrophils is
p67 phox (27, 28). To understand the pleiotropic functions
of Cdc42 and Rac1, it is important to identify their novel targets.
Materials and Chemicals
-catenin antibody and
anti-ZO-1 antibody were kindly provided by Drs. A. Nagafuchi and S. Tsukita (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan), and Drs. M. Itoh and S. Tsukita (Kyoto University), respectively. KB cells and MDCK cells were
provided from Health Science Research Resources Bank (Osaka, Japan). C3
exoenzyme was kindly provided by Dr. Ohashi (Nihon Shering, Osaka,
Japan). Other materials and chemicals were obtained from commercial
sources.
) having a sequence encoding a myc epitope tag
(MEQKLISEEDL).
S·GST-Cdc42 affinity column was subjected to SDS-PAGE and
blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane. After the denaturation with
guanidinium hydrochloride and the subsequent renaturation, the membrane
was probed with [35S]GTP
S·GST-small GTPases. The
bound small GTPases to IQGAP were visualized using bioimaging
analyzer.
S·GST-Cdc42
affinity column but not from GST or GDP·GST-Cdc42 affinity column
(Fig. 1). Less amount of p170 was detected in the eluate
from the GTP
S·GST-Rac1 affinity column but not from the
GDP·GST-Rac1 affinity column. To further confirm the specificity of
the interaction, affinity column chromatography using GST-RhoA was
performed (29). p170 was not eluted from the GTP
S·GST-RhoA
affinity column. p170 was eluted from neither GST-Ha-Ras nor GST-RalA
affinity columns (data not shown). Proteins with molecular masses of 62 kDa (p62), 90 kDa (p90), and 110 kDa (p110) were also detected in both
of the eluates from GTP
S·GST-Rac1 and GTP
S·GST-Cdc42 affinity
columns. p62 was recognized by anti-PAK antibody (data not shown).
Proteins with molecular masses of 122 kDa (p122) and 140 kDa (p140)
were specifically detected in the eluate of GTP
S·GST-Rac1.
Identifications of p90, p110, p122, and p140 are currently under
investigation.2
Fig. 1.
Purification of Cdc42- or Rac1-interacting
proteins. The bovine brain cytosol was loaded onto a
glutathione-agarose column containing the indicated GST-small GTPases.
The bound proteins were coeluted with the respective GST-small GTPases
by the addition of glutathione. Aliquots of the eluates were resolved
by SDS-PAGE, followed by silver staining. Lane 1,
GDP·GST-Cdc42; lane 2, GTP
S·GST-Cdc42; lane
3, GDP·GST-Rac1; lane 4, GTP
S·GST-Rac1;
lane 5, GDP·GST-RhoA; lane 6, GTP
S·GST-RhoA; lane 7, GST. An arrowhead
denotes the position of p170. Arrows from the top
denote the positions of p140, p122, p110, and p90, respectively. The
results shown are representative of three independent
experiments.
S·Cdc42 or
GTP
S·Rac1, the affinity beads coated with GST-small GTPases
were mixed with in vitro translated IQGAP. After washing
the affinity beads, GST-small GTPases were eluted by the addition
of glutathione. In vitro translated IQGAP coeluted
strongly with GTP
S·GST-Cdc42 or GTP
S·GST-Rac1 (Fig.
2A). It was slightly retained on and eluted
from the GDP·GST-Cdc42 affinity beads, but it was not detected in the
eluate of GDP·GST-Rac1, GST-RhoA, or GST affinity beads.
Fig. 2.
Interactions of in vitro
translated IQGAP and affinity-purified IQGAP with activated Cdc42 and
Rac1. A and B, in vitro translated IQGAP was
produced and its interaction with GST-small GTPases was determined as
described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' A, with
in vitro translated IQGAP (1-1657 amino acids).
B, with in vitro translated C-terminal IQGAP
(764-1657 amino acids). Lanes are the same as those in the legend of
Fig. 1. Arrowheads in A and B denote
the positions of the in vitro translated IQGAP (1-1657
amino acids) and the in vitro translated C-terminal IQGAP
(764-1657 amino acids), respectively. C, the interaction of
affinity-purified IQGAP with [35S]GTP
S·GST-small
GTPases was examined using an overlay assay method as described under
``Experimental Procedures.'' The membrane was probed with
[35S]GTP
S·GST-Cdc42 (lane 1),
[35S]GTP
S·GST-Rac1 (lane 2), or
[35S]GTP
S·GST-RhoA (lane 3). An
arrowhead denotes the position of the affinity-purified
IQGAP. The results shown are representative of three independent
experiments.
S·Cdc42 or GTP
S-Rac1 (Fig.
2B), whereas the N-terminal fragment did not (data not
shown). Both fragments interacted with neither GST, GDP·Cdc42, nor
GDP·Rac1.
S·GST-Cdc42 or GTP
S·GST-Rac1 was examined using the
overlay assay method (19, 30). [35S]GTP
S·GST-Cdc42
and [35S]GTP
S·GST-Rac1 bound to the purified IQGAP,
whereas [35S]GTP
S·GST-RhoA did not (Fig.
2C). The consensus sequence of the Cdc42- or Rac1-binding
domain of target proteins, such as PAK or WASP, has been determined and
was termed as CRIB (25, 43). There is no CRIB domain in the fragment
(764-1657 amino acids). Therefore, Cdc42 or Rac1 interacts with at
least two distinct target interfaces.
Fig. 3.
In vivo association of IQGAP with
activated Cdc42 and Rac1 in COS7 cells. pEF-BOS-HA-small GTPases
were transfected into COS7 cells and incubated for 48 h. After the
incubation, HA-tagged small GTPases were immunoprecipitated by anti-HA
antibody (12CA5). The immunoprecipitates were washed and subjected to
SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with anti-IQGAP antibody.
Lane 1, Cdc42Val12; lane 2, Cdc42;
lane 3, Cdc42Asn17; lane 4, Rac1Val12; lane 5, RhoAVal14;
lane 6, mock. An arrowhead denotes the position
of IQGAP. The results shown are representative of three independent
experiments.
S·Rac1 is shown to induce the
membrane ruffling in KB cells (6). Then, we examined the localization
of IQGAP in KB cells. When KB cells were stimulated with insulin,
membrane ruffling was induced, and IQGAP accumulated at the membrane
ruffling area (Fig. 4, A and B).
The insulin-induced membrane ruffling and IQGAP accumulation at the
membrane ruffling area were blocked by prior microinjection of
Rac1Asn17 (Fig. 4, C and D). The
prior microinjection of Cdc42Asn17 also blocked the
insulin-induced membrane ruffling and the IQGAP accumulation in some
injected cells (Fig. 4, E and F), whereas both
processes weakly occurred in other injected cells.
Cdc42Asn17 may not completely block
insulin-dependent activation of endogenous Rac1. The prior
microinjection of C3 did not block the insulin-induced membrane
ruffling and IQGAP accumulation (Fig. 4, G and
H). Microinjection of Rac1Val12 induced membrane
ruffling and IQGAP accumulation at the membrane ruffling area (Fig. 4,
I and J). That of Cdc42Val12 induced
filopodia formation, but IQGAP was not accumulated at the filopodia
(data not shown). It should be noted that IQGAP was accumulated at the
cell-cell junction of KB cells.
Fig. 4.
Specific localization of IQGAP at the
insulin- or Rac1-induced membrane ruffling area in KB cells. KB
cells were starved for 36 h, and microinjection of the indicated
proteins was performed. Thirty minutes after the microinjection, cells
were stimulated with 1 µ insulin for 5 min, fixed, and
stained with anti-IQGAP antibody. A, C, E, G, and
I, phase-contrast microscopy. B, D, F, H, and
J, fluorescence microscopy. A and B,
with microinjection of buffer alone; C and D,
with microinjection of Rac1Asn17; E and
F, with microinjection of Cdc42Asn17;
G and H, with microinjection of C3; I
and J, with microinjection of Rac1val12. Arrows
in I and J indicate the
Rac1val12-injected cells. The results shown are
representative of three independent experiments. Bar, 20 µm. All photographs were taken with the same magnification.
-catenin and ZO-1, which are marker molecules of
adherence junction and tight junction, respectively, at the cell-cell
junction (Fig. 5, C and F). It seems that IQGAP
is well colocalized with
-catenin, whereas IQGAP is not completely
colocalized with ZO-1. It remains to be clarified whether IQGAP is
localized at the adherence junction or tight junction in MDCK
cells.3 This observation suggests that
IQGAP regulates the cell-cell junction, or that the cell-cell
junctional signal leads to the IQGAP-accumulation.3 This
accumulation was not affected by the addition of insulin or by
microinjection of various small GTPases. It is possible that Rac1 or
Cdc42 is not necessary for the localization of IQGAP at the cell-cell
junction once IQGAP is complexed with the cell-cell junctional
cytoskeleton, or that activation of Rac1 or Cdc42 at the cell-cell
junction is blocked by neither Rac1Asn17 nor
Cdc42Asn17. When actin filament was visualized with
rhodamine-labeled phalloidin, IQGAP was observed in association with
cortical actin at the membrane ruffling area in KB cells (Fig.
6).
Fig. 5.
Specific localization of IQGAP at the
cell-cell junction in MDCK cells. MDCK cells were cultured and
seeded as described (40). Forty-eight hours after seeding, cells were
fixed and doubly stained with anti-IQGAP antibody and anti-
-catenin
antibody or anti-ZO-1 antibody. A and D,
phase-contrast microscopy. B, C, E, and F,
fluorescence microscopy. B and E, with anti-IQGAP
antibody; C, with anti-
-catenin antibody; F,
with anti-ZO-1 antibody. Fluorescein-labeled anti-rat IgG antibody for
-catenin, fluorescein-labeled anti-mouse IgG antibody for ZO-1, and
Texas Red-labeled anti-rabbit IgG antibody for IQGAP were used as
secondary antibody. The results shown are representative of three
independent experiments. Bar, 20 µm. All photographs were
taken with the same magnification.
Fig. 6.
Colocalization of IQGAP with actin filament
at the insulin-induced membrane ruffling area in KB cells. KB
cells were starved for 36 h and stimulated with 1 µ
insulin. Five minutes after the stimulation, cells were fixed and
doubly stained with anti-IQGAP antibody and rhodamine-labeled
phalloidin. A, phase-contrast microscopy. B and
C, fluorescence microscopy. B, with anti-IQGAP
antibody. C, with rhodamine-labeled phalloidin. The results
shown are representative of three independent experiments.
Bar, 20 µm. All photographs were taken with the same
magnification.
-kinase (22, 23), and WASP (24, 25). Among these
targets, the localization of WASP is determined (25). WASP was
clustered and associated with actin filament when WASP was transiently
expressed in cells (25), but it was not observed that WASP was
accumulated at the membrane ruffling area. WASP is expressed
exclusively in cells of hematopoietic lineage (47, 48). PAK (19, 21)
and phosphatidylinositol 3
-kinase (49) are ubiquitously expressed, but
there is no evidence obtained thus far that these molecules are
accumulated at the membrane ruffling area. We showed that IQGAP is
accumulated at the insulin- or Rac1-induced membrane ruffling area. On
the basis of these observations, it is likely that the target molecules
for Rac1 and Cdc42, including IQGAP, have distinct roles, and that
IQGAP functions in concert with other targets, resulting in the
exertion of pleiotropic functions of Rac1 and Cdc42.
*
This study was supported by grants-in-aid for Scientific
Research and for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Education,
Science, Sports and Culture, Japan, and by a grant from the Yamanouchi
Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disease. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
''
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-7437-2-5440;
Fax: 81-7437-2-5449; E-mail: kaibuchi{at}bs.aist-nara.ac.jp.
1
The abbreviations used are: WASP,
Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein; GAP, GTPase-activating protein; GST,
glutathione S-transferase; HA, hemagglutinin; PAGE,
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; GTP
S, guanosine
5
-(3-O-thio)triphosphate; CRIB, Cdc42/Rac1 interactive
binding region.
2
Identifications of p90, p110, p122, and p140
will be described elsewhere.
3
A detailed analysis will be described
elsewhere.
-catenin antibody, Dr. M. Itoh
and Dr. S. Tsukita (Kyoto University) for providing anti-ZO-1 antibody,
and Dr. S. Tsukita for helpful discussion.
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. A. Schmidt, C. S. Chiariello, E. Capilla, F. Miller, and W. F. Bahou Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Iqgap2-Deficient Mice Is IQGAP1 Dependent Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2008; 28(5): 1489 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Shen, D. S. Hirsch, C. A. Sasiela, and W. J. Wu Cdc42 Regulates E-cadherin Ubiquitination and Degradation through an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor to Src-mediated Pathway J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2008; 283(8): 5127 - 5137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. N. Rittmeyer, S. Daniel, S.-C. Hsu, and M. A. Osman A dual role for IQGAP1 in regulating exocytosis J. Cell Sci., February 1, 2008; 121(3): 391 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Owen, L. J. Campbell, K. Littlefield, K. A. Evetts, Z. Li, D. B. Sacks, P. N. Lowe, and H. R. Mott The IQGAP1-Rac1 and IQGAP1-Cdc42 Interactions: INTERFACES DIFFER BETWEEN THE COMPLEXES J. Biol. Chem., January 18, 2008; 283(3): 1692 - 1704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Brown, L. Bry, Z. Li, and D. B. Sacks IQGAP1 Regulates Salmonella Invasion through Interactions with Actin, Rac1, and Cdc42 J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2007; 282(41): 30265 - 30272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-W. Jeong, Z. Li, M. D. Brown, and D. B. Sacks IQGAP1 Binds Rap1 and Modulates Its Activity J. Biol. Chem., July 13, 2007; 282(28): 20752 - 20762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wang, T. Watanabe, J. Noritake, M. Fukata, T. Yoshimura, N. Itoh, T. Harada, M. Nakagawa, Y. Matsuura, N. Arimura, et al. IQGAP3, a novel effector of Rac1 and Cdc42, regulates neurite outgrowth J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2007; 120(4): 567 - 577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Bensenor, H.-M. Kan, N. Wang, H. Wallrabe, L. A. Davidson, Y. Cai, D. A. Schafer, and G. S. Bloom IQGAP1 regulates cell motility by linking growth factor signaling to actin assembly J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2007; 120(4): 658 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yamaoka-Tojo, T. Tojo, H. W. Kim, L. Hilenski, N. A. Patrushev, L. Zhang, T. Fukai, and M. Ushio-Fukai IQGAP1 Mediates VE-Cadherin-Based Cell-Cell Contacts and VEGF Signaling at Adherence Junctions Linked to Angiogenesis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(9): 1991 - 1997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Moldovan, K. Mythreye, P. J. Goldschmidt-Clermont, and L. L. Satterwhite Reactive oxygen species in vascular endothelial cell motility. Roles of NAD(P)H oxidase and Rac1 Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2006; 71(2): 236 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sato, N. Fujita, A. Yamada, T. Ooshio, R. Okamoto, K. Irie, and Y. Takai Regulation of the Assembly and Adhesion Activity of E-cadherin by Nectin and Afadin for the Formation of Adherens Junctions in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells J. Biol. Chem., February 24, 2006; 281(8): 5288 - 5299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Phillips-Mason, T. J. Gates, D. L. Major, D. B. Sacks, and S. M. Brady-Kalnay The Receptor Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase PTP{micro} Interacts with IQGAP1 J. Biol. Chem., February 24, 2006; 281(8): 4903 - 4910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Broman, P. Kouklis, X. Gao, R. Ramchandran, R. F. Neamu, R. D. Minshall, and A. B. Malik Cdc42 Regulates Adherens Junction Stability and Endothelial Permeability by Inducing {alpha}-Catenin Interaction With the Vascular Endothelial Cadherin Complex Circ. Res., January 6, 2006; 98(1): 73 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mehta and A. B. Malik Signaling Mechanisms Regulating Endothelial Permeability Physiol Rev, January 1, 2006; 86(1): 279 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hoshino, T. Sakisaka, T. Baba, T. Yamada, T. Kimura, and Y. Takai Regulation of E-cadherin Endocytosis by Nectin through Afadin, Rap1, and p120ctn J. Biol. Chem., June 24, 2005; 280(25): 24095 - 24103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Noritake, T. Watanabe, K. Sato, S. Wang, and K. Kaibuchi IQGAP1: a key regulator of adhesion and migration J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2005; 118(10): 2085 - 2092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Y. W. Bourguignon, E. Gilad, K. Rothman, and K. Peyrollier Hyaluronan-CD44 Interaction with IQGAP1 Promotes Cdc42 and ERK Signaling, Leading to Actin Binding, Elk-1/Estrogen Receptor Transcriptional Activation, and Ovarian Cancer Progression J. Biol. Chem., March 25, 2005; 280(12): 11961 - 11972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Lavelin and B. Geiger Characterization of a Novel GTPase-activating Protein Associated with Focal Adhesions and the Actin Cytoskeleton J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2005; 280(8): 7178 - 7185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nakayama, M. Amano, A. Katsumi, T. Kaneko, S. Kawabata, M. Takefuji, and K. Kaibuchi Rho-kinase and myosin II activities are required for cell type and environment specific migration Genes Cells, February 1, 2005; 10(2): 107 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Chew, C. T. Okamoto, X. Chen, and H. Y. Qin IQGAPs are differentially expressed and regulated in polarized gastric epithelial cells Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): G376 - G387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Hirota, R. Fukuda, S. Takabuchi, S. Kizaka-Kondoh, T. Adachi, K. Fukuda, and G. L. Semenza Induction of Hypoxia-inducible Factor 1 Activity by Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Signaling J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 41521 - 41528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Izumi, T. Sakisaka, T. Baba, S. Tanaka, K. Morimoto, and Y. Takai Endocytosis of E-cadherin regulated by Rac and Cdc42 small G proteins through IQGAP1 and actin filaments J. Cell Biol., July 19, 2004; 166(2): 237 - 248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Gu, Q. Lin, C. Childress, and W. Yang Identification of the Region in Cdc42 That Confers the Binding Specificity to Activated Cdc42-associated Kinase J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30507 - 30513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||