![]()
|
|
||||||||
(Received for publication, March 29, 1996, and in revised form, July 8, 1996)

From the Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Section of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, and Departments of Pediatrics and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202-5225
Repressor elements in the gp91phox
promoter are necessary to restrict tissue-specific transcription to
mature phagocytes. Deletion of these elements leads to significant
promoter activity in cell lines such as HEL and K562 that do not
normally express gp91phox. The
100 to +12 base pair
gp91phox promoter region is sufficient to direct maximal
de-repressed transcription in these cells. However, promoter activity
is dramatically decreased following a 16-base pair truncation that
deletes an interferon-stimulated response element. This element
interacts with IRF-1 and IRF-2, members of the interferon regulatory
factor family of transcription factors. In addition, this promoter
region is bound by a factor with properties similar to BID, a
DNA-binding protein that also interacts with three upstream sites
within the gp91phox promoter. Transient transfection studies
using mutated promoters indicate that both the IRF and BID binding
sites are required for maximal gp91phox promoter activity.
Overexpression of IRF-1 or IRF-2 in K562 cells leads to transactivation
of gp91phox promoter constructs, which is dependent on the
presence of an intact IRF binding site. IRF-2 predominates in
macrophages that express the gp91phox gene as well as in HEL
and K562 cells. We conclude that IRF-2 and BID activate
gp91phox promoter activity in the absence of transcriptional
repression.
The gp91phox gene encodes the cytochrome
b558 heavy chain of the
NADPH-dependent oxidase and is required for the generation
of toxic free radicals and microbicidal activity by phagocytes (1).
Absence of gp91phox leads to the immunodeficiency syndrome
chronic granulomatous disease (CGD)1 (1).
The gp91phox gene is expressed nearly exclusively in terminally
differentiating myeloid cells (2), is transcriptionally induced by
interferon-
(IFN-
) (3), and provides an attractive system to
study the regulation of myeloid cell gene expression and
development.
Previous studies demonstrated that the
450 to +12 bp region of the
gp91phox promoter directs transcription in a subset of
monocyte/macrophages in transgenic mice (4) and also in response to
IFN-
in stably transfected PLB985 myeloid cells (5). Complex
interactions between cis elements and DNA-binding proteins occur within
this promoter region (Fig. 1). Highly related if not
identical DNA-binding proteins denoted BID (binding
increased during differentiation) bind to three
sites centered at
355 bp (DIST-BID),
225 bp (MID-BID), and
145 bp
(PROX-BID) of the gp91phox promoter. These interactions are
required for IFN-
-induced
transcription.2 The MID-BID element
conforms to an interferon-stimulated response element (ISRE), and is
also a binding site for IFN regulatory factors (IRF).2 In
addition, the binding of a novel factor, HAF-1
(hematopoietic associated factor-1),
to a site at
57 bp is also required for IFN-
induction of the
gp91phox promoter (5). Mutations of the HAF-1 binding site have
been reported in two kindreds of CGD patients who fail to normally
transcribe the gp91phox gene (6, 7). Also, a CCAAT box located
at
123 to
119 bp of the gp91phox promoter is recognized by
CP1, a ubiquitous CCAAT box binding activity (8). None of these
transcriptional activating factors are myeloid-specific.
The restriction of gp91phox promoter activity to mature
phagocytes requires regulated transcriptional repression mediated by
the binding of CCAAT displacement protein (CDP). Four CDP binding sites
have been detected centered at
350,
220,
150, and
110 bp of the
gp91phox promoter. Each CDP binding site overlaps BID or CP1
binding sites, and binding of CDP excludes these transcriptional
activating factors (8, 9).2 The binding of CDP to each site
is down-regulated during myeloid differentiation, coincident with
induction of gp91phox expression (8, 9), and constitutive
expression of CDP prevents gp91phox induction during terminal
myeloid differentiation (10). Ablation of CDP binding sites results in
increased gp91phox promoter activity in HEL, K562, and HeLa
cells that do not normally express gp91phox, a phenomenon
termed de-repression (8, 9).
The
100 to +12 bp region of the gp91phox gene, which lacks
upstream repressor elements, directs transcription in nonphagocytic
cells (9). Transcriptional activating elements within this region of
the endogenous gp91phox promoter are presumably interfered with
by CDP binding in nonphagocytic cells and are possibly also required
for appropriate transcription in mature myeloid cells. The purpose of
this study was to identify cis elements and cognate DNA-binding
proteins within this promoter region that are required for
gp91phox promoter activity. We describe a cis element between
100 and
85 bp of the gp91phox promoter that is required for
promoter activity in the absence of repression and which binds members
of the IRF family and a factor similar to BID.
Individual gp91phox
promoter fragments, each of which ends at +12 bp and contains the
5
-untranslated region, were obtained by utilizing the polymerase chain
reaction to amplify desired regions from a
450 to +12 bp
gp91phox promoter/human growth hormone plasmid (5). Polymerase
chain reaction products were digested with SalI and
BamHI and subcloned into
SalI/BglII-digested luciferase reporter gene
vector (pXP2) (11) (the generous gift of Yu-Chung Yang, Indianapolis).
Mutations of the BID or IRF binding sites were introduced into the
100 to +12 bp gp91phox promoter by polymerase chain
reaction-mediated mutagenesis. The nucleotide sequence of each
gp91phox promoter construct was confirmed by the dideoxy chain
termination method using a Sequenase 2.0 kit (U. S. Biochemical
Corp.). The pCO
-IRF-1 (12) and pCMV-BL-IRF-2 (13) plasmids that
express IRF-1 or IRF-2 under the control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV)
promoter were generously provided by Stephen Goodbourn (London) and
John Hiscott (Montreal), respectively. Plasmids used in transfections
were prepared by two rounds of equilibrium centrifugation in CsCl
ethidium bromide gradients (14).
The human cervical carcinoma cell line HeLa (15), the human erythroleukemia cell line HEL (16), and the human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line K562 (17) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). The human myelomonoblastic PLB985 cell line (18) was the generous gift of Thomas Rado (Birmingham, AL). Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium as described previously (9).
K562 and HEL cells were transfected by electroporation. For each
transfection, 107 cells were resuspended in 0.3 ml of
serum-free medium and mixed with 5 µg of gp91phox
promoter/luciferase plasmid and 0.5 µg of CMV
promoter-enhancer/
-galactosidase (CMV-
-gal) plasmid at room
temperature. The mixture was electroporated at 220 V, 960 microfarads,
and the transfected cells were grown in 10 ml of complete medium at
37 °C and 5% CO2. After 10 h of incubation, cells
were harvested and washed twice with 1 × phosphate-buffered
saline, and cell pellets were collected and resuspended in 100 µl of
1 × lysis buffer (Promega). After incubation at room temperature
for 10-15 min, cell extracts were collected, and 20 µl were used to
assay luciferase activity using a Promega luciferase kit and a Lumat
9210 luminometer.
-Galactosidase activity in each extract was
measured (14) and used to standardize luciferase values to compensate
for variability in transfection efficiency between samples. For
co-transfection experiments, 10 µg of expression vector was used in
addition to luciferase reporter constructs. Multiple independent
plasmid preparations of each promoter construct were analyzed in
transfection experiments.
Nuclear extracts were
isolated as described by Dignam et al. (19) from untreated
HEL or K562 cells, or PLB985 cells treated with phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate for 48 h. Nuclear extract was isolated by a
minipreparation method (20) from HeLa cells treated with 1000 units/ml
human IFN-
(Boehringer Mannheim) for 12 h. Oligonucleotides
were annealed, subcloned into pUC19, released by restriction digestion,
and radiolabeled by T4 polynucleotide kinase using
[
-32P]ATP or with Klenow enzyme using
[
-32P]dCTP. Radiolabeled probes were resolved by
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and eluted by the crush and soak
method (14). Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) were
performed as described previously (8) with slight modification.
Briefly, 3-6 µg of nuclear extract was mixed with 0.5 µg of
poly(dI·dC) and competitor double-stranded oligonucleotides where
indicated in a 20-µl reaction volume. All samples containing the
100 to
63 bp gp91phox promoter probe also contain 20 ng of
a high affinity CDP binding site oligonucleotide (E36) to disrupt
CDP-containing complexes. The mixture was incubated on ice for 15 min
prior to the addition of 15,000 cpm of probe. After another 15-min
incubation on ice, samples were loaded onto a 0.5 × TBE (45 m Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 45 m borate, 1.25 m EDTA), 6% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel, and
electrophoresis was carried out at 25 mA for 2.5 h at 4 °C.
Antibodies against IRF-1, IRF-2, and ISGF-3
(p48) were purchased
from Santa Cruz Biotech. (Santa Cruz, CA) and were incubated with
nuclear extracts for 20 min prior to the addition of radiolabeled
probes in antibody-blocking EMSA experiments.
Complementary
oligonucleotides were synthesized on an Applied Biosystems model 394 synthesizer. Listed are the upper strands of double-stranded
oligonucleotides corresponding to the following regions of the
gp91phox promoter (8). Mutated sequences are underlined and
nomenclature used in the text is indicated in bold:
PROX-BID (
182 to
113 bp),
5
-tttgtagttgttgaggtttaaagatttaagtttgttatggatgcaagcttttcagttgaccaatgattat-3
;
PROX-BID-mut,
5
-tttgtagttgttga
g
t
aa
ga
t
a
tgttatggat
caagc
agt
gaccaatgattat-3
;
MID-BID (
261 to
212 bp),
5
-gttatttatctcttagttgtagaaattggtttcattttccactatgttta-3
;
MID-BID-mut (
241 to
212 bp),
5
-gttatttatctcttagttgtagaaattggt
ttccactatgttta-3
;
105 to
63 bp,
5
-aatttctgataaaagaaaaggaaaccgattgccccagggctgc-3
;
100 to
63 bp, 5
-ctgataaaagaaaaggaaaccgattgccccagggctgc-3
;
BID-mut (
105 to
63 bp),
5
-aatttctgataaaagaaa
gaaaccgattgccccagggctgc-3
;
IRF-mut (
105 to
63 bp),
5
-aatttctgataaaagaaaag
ccgattgccccagggctgc-3
;
BID + IRF-mut (
105 to
63 bp),
5
-aatttctgataaaagaaactgaaa
ttgccccagggctgc-3
.
Oligonucleotides corresponding to high affinity binding sites for the
following transcription factors were also used as competitors or probes
in EMSA (nomenclature used in text is indicated in bold): CDP
(E36) (21), 5
-cggatccgaattcatcgataatcgattat-3
; IFN
regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) (22),
5
-acggatccggcatattcaaaaccgaaaccaagtccctcgagac-3
; IFN regulatory
factor-2 (IRF-2) (22),
5
-acggatccctcgagggaggaaagtgaaacctaaacagtg-3
; IFN-stimulated gene
factor-3
(p48) (ISGF-3
) (23),
5
-aatttcactttctagtttcactttcccttttgt-3
; IFN consensus sequence binding
protein (ICSBP) (24), 5
-tctcctcagtttcacttctgca-3
; PU.1
interaction partner (PIP) (25),
5
-gaaaaagagaaataaaaggaagtgaaaccaag-3
; differentiation induced factor
(DIF) (26),
5
-tatctgtttcaaggatttgagatgtattttcccagaaaaggaac-3
.
Previously we demonstrated that the
100 to
+12 bp region of the gp91phox gene, which lacks multiple
upstream repressor elements, exhibits significant promoter activity in
cell lines such as K562 and HEL that do not normally express the
gp91phox gene (9). The level of de-repressed promoter activity
is 3-fold greater than that exhibited by the SV40 early promoter in HEL
cells.3 To study the proximal
gp91phox promoter in more detail, a series of progressive
deletions from the 5
-end of the
100 to +12 bp promoter fragment were
constructed and linked to a luciferase reporter gene. These constructs
were then transiently transfected into HEL and K562 cells to identify
cis elements required for gp91phox promoter activity in the
absence of CDP-mediated repression. The activity of the
gp91phox promoter is drastically reduced in both HEL and K562
cells by a 16-bp truncation of the gp91phox promoter to
84 bp
(Fig. 2). This suggests that transcriptional activating
element(s) are located within the
100 to
85 bp region of the
gp91phox promoter.
-deletions of the
gp91phox gene promoter. A series of 5
-deletions of the
gp91phox promoter were linked to a luciferase reporter gene
(luc) and transiently transfected into HEL and K562 cells as
described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The gp91phox
promoter fragment present in each construct is shown to the
left. The length of promoter upstream of the transcription
initiation site is indicated in base pairs. Each construct additionally
contains the gp91phox 5
-untranslated region to +12 bp. The
luciferase activities have been normalized to
-galactosidase
activities produced by co-transfected CMV-
-gal plasmid, and the
activity of the 100-bp construct is arbitrarily set as 100. pXP2 refers to the parental reporter gene vector (11). Data
represent at least four experiments with two different preparations of
plasmid, and are presented as mean ± S.E.
IRF-2 and BID Bind to the
100 to
63 bp Region of the
gp91phox Promoter
The
92 to
80 bp region of the
gp91phox promoter (5
-AGAAAAGGAAACC-3
) conforms to an ISRE
consensus sequence (RGAAANNGAAASY) (27). EMSA was performed using
nuclear extracts isolated from HEL cells and a probe corresponding to
the
100 to
63 bp region of the gp91phox promoter (Fig.
3). Because this probe is recognized by CDP (data not
shown), a high affinity CDP binding site (E36) was used as a competitor
in these experiments. Under these conditions, three DNA-binding
complexes are revealed. The two lower complexes are disrupted by
oligonucleotide competitors corresponding to binding sites of the IRF
family members IRF-1, IRF-2, ICSBP, PIP, and ISGF-3
(p48) (22, 23, 24, 25)
(Fig. 3A, left panel). However, these complexes
are not disrupted by a binding site for DIF, an IFN response factor
unrelated to the IRF family (Fig. 3A, left panel)
(26). None of these competitors affects the upper complex of the
triplet. All three complexes are disrupted by the addition of a
competitor homologous to the probe (data not shown). These data
indicate that the lower two complexes exhibit a binding specificity
similar to the IRF family of transcription factors. Similar DNA-binding
complexes are observed using a shorter probe (
100 to
79 bp) of the
gp91phox promoter that also contains the ISRE element (data not
shown).
Identification of proteins that bind to the
100 to
63 bp region of the gp91phox promoter. A,
the bottom two complexes of the triplet correspond to IRF-2. EMSA was
performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' using a
nuclear extract isolated from HEL cells and a probe corresponding to
the
100 to
63 bp region of the gp91phox promoter.
Oligonucleotides corresponding to high affinity binding sites for the
IFN response factors IRF-1, IRF-2, ISGF-3
(p48), PIP, and DIF were
used as competitors (40 ng), and 2 µl of antiserum raised against
IRF-1, IRF-2, or ISGF-3
were added to reactions where indicated. The
doublet that contains IRF-2 is indicated by the bracket. The
asterisk indicates the position of the upper complex of the
triplet that does not contain IRF-2. Relative mobilities of complexes
cannot be directly compared between panels. B, the upper
complex of the triplet exhibits the mobility and binding site specificity of BID. EMSA
was performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures'' using
the
100 to
63 bp or
261 to
212 bp regions of the
gp91phox promoter as probes and a nuclear extract isolated from
HEL cells. The PROX-BID oligonucleotide corresponds to the
182 to
113 bp region of the gp91phox promoter that contains a BID
binding site, while the PROX-BID-mut oligonucleotide is a mutated
version of this sequence that no longer binds BID (see Footnote 2). The
MID-BID oligonucleotide corresponds to the
261 to
212 bp region of
the gp91phox promoter and contains binding sites for both BID
and IRF-2. The MID-BID-mut oligonucleotide corresponds to a mutated
version of the BID-BID element that no longer binds either BID nor
IRF-2 (see Footnote 2). The upward shift of the triplet of complexes
formed by the
261 to
212 bp probe is due to the longer length of
this probe compared to the
100 to
63 bp probe.
Additional experiments were performed to determine which member of the
IRF family binds to the
92 to
80 bp ISRE. The two lower EMSA
complexes are disrupted by antibody against IRF-2, but not by
antibodies against IRF-1 or ISGF-3
(Fig. 3A, right
panel), suggesting that the two lower complexes contain IRF-2. It
is not unusual to detect multiple IRF-2 complexes, which may arise from
proteolysis or post-translational modification (28, 29).
Previous work demonstrated that another ISRE at
233 to
222 bp of
the gp91phox promoter also produces a triplet of complexes when
used as a probe in EMSA. This probe is also bound by IRF-2 and
additionally by BID, a factor that interacts with several upstream
gp91phox promoter elements.2 EMSA was therefore
performed to evaluate whether the upper complex of the triplet
generated by the
100 to
63 bp gp91phox promoter probe
contains BID. This complex is disrupted by the addition of PROX-BID
oligonucleotide competitor that represents a BID binding site located
at
145 bp of the gp91phox promoter, but not by a mutated site
(PROX-BID-mut) that no longer contains a BID binding
site2 (Fig. 3B, left panel).
Furthermore, all three complexes of the triplet are disrupted by
competition with the upstream ISRE-containing region from the
gp91phox promoter (MID-BID) that contains both BID
and IRF-2 binding sites (Fig. 3B, left panel).
However, none of the complexes are disrupted by a mutated version of
this competitor (MID-BID-mut) that has lost both binding
sites.
A direct comparison of the complexes generated by the two ISRE probes
derived from the gp91phox promoter reveals indistinguishable
binding site specificities and relative mobilities (Fig. 3B,
right panel). For both probes the upper complex is disrupted
by the PROX-BID competitor, and the bottom two complexes are disrupted
by the IRF-2 binding site competitor. The slightly slower mobility of
the triplet generated by the upstream ISRE probe is due to the longer
length of this probe compared to the downstream ISRE probe. These
results suggest that the upper most complex generated by the
100 to
63 bp gp91phox promoter probe contains BID. A conclusive
examination of this hypothesis awaits the identification and/or
molecular cloning of the BID activity.
The region from
100 to
76 bp of the gp91phox promoter has
been noted by Perez et al. (30) as exhibiting similarity to
the myeloid activating transcription element (MATE) of the high
affinity Fc
receptor promoter. The MATE element has been
demonstrated to be a binding site for PU.1 (31), an Ets factor largely
restricted to macrophages and B cells (32). However, we found that a
competitor corresponding to the
100 to
63 bp region of the
gp91phox promoter does not disrupt EMSA complexes formed with
PU.1 and known PU.1 binding sites in the Fc
receptor promoter (30)
and SV40 enhancer (32) (data not shown). Furthermore, antiserum
directed against PU.1 has no effect on complexes formed with the
100
to
63 bp gp91phox promoter probe (data not shown). These
results indicate that the
100 to
63 bp region of the
gp91phox promoter does not contain an authentic binding site
for PU.1.
IRF-1 is a transcriptional activator that antagonizes the action of
IRF-2 (33), is induced following IFN treatment (34), and has an
identical DNA binding specificity as that exhibited by IRF-2 (22).
Additional experiments were conducted to determine whether IRF-1 also
binds to the
100 to
63 bp region of the gp91phox promoter.
A nuclear extract isolated from macrophages that express the
gp91phox gene generates a triplet of complexes similar to that
produced by a nuclear extract isolated from HEL cells (Fig.
4A). The bottom two bands of the triplet are
disrupted by antiserum directed against IRF-2, suggesting the IRF-2
activity is predominant in macrophage cell lines as well as in HEL
cells. However, nuclear extracts isolated from IFN-
-induced HeLa
cells generate an EMSA doublet that is disrupted by antibody to IRF-1,
but not by antibody to IRF-2 (Fig. 4B). This indicates that
the ISRE at
92 to
80 bp of the gp91phox promoter is also an
IRF-1 binding site. However, antibody against IRF-1 has no effect on
complexes generated by the
100 to
63 bp probe using nuclear extract
isolated from HEL cells, even following the removal of IRF-2 binding by
the addition of IRF-2 antibody (data not shown). This indicates that
HEL cells contain an undetectable level of IRF-1, consistent with
previous observations that IRF-2 activity is predominant over IRF-1 in
cells not exposed to IFN or virus (34, 35). Interestingly, IRF-2
binding activity is significantly more abundant in HEL cells than in
K562 cells (Fig. 4C). This correlates with the observation
that
100 to +12 bp gp91phox promoter activity is higher in
HEL cells than in K562 cells (9).
100 to
63 bp probe. EMSA was performed as described under
``Experimental Procedures'' using a probe corresponding to the
100
to
63 bp region of the gp91phox promoter, nuclear extracts
isolated from various cell sources, and 2 µl of antiserum raised
against IRF-1, IRF-2, or ISGF-3
where indicated. Relative mobilities
of complexes cannot be directly compared between panels. A,
IRF-2 binds to the probe following incubation with nuclear extract
isolated from PLB985 cells induced to form macrophages by treatment
with PMA. B, IRF-1 binds to the probe following incubation
with nuclear extract isolated from HeLa cells treated with 1000 units/ml IFN-
for 12 h. C, IRF-2 is more abundant in
HEL cells than in K562 cells. 3 µg of nuclear extracts isolated from
HEL or K562 cells were incubated with the probe.
The IRF Binding Site Is Required for gp91phox Promoter Activity
Three sets of mutations were identified that
specifically ablate binding of IRF-2, BID, or both to the
100 to
63
bp gp91phox promoter probe (Fig. 5). The IRF-mut
probe specifically fails to bind IRF-2, while the BID-mut probe fails
to interact with BID (Fig. 5). The slower migrating complex that
appears in the BID-mut lane is a nonspecific complex, as it is
disrupted by a variety of oligonucleotide competitors of unrelated
sequence (data not shown). A BID + IRF-mut probe was also created that
fails to interact with either BID or IRF-2. Each of these mutations was
introduced individually into the
100 to +12 bp gp91phox
promoter/luciferase construct and transiently transfected into HEL and
K562 cells to study the functional significance of IRF-2 and BID
binding on gp91phox promoter function.
100 to
63 bp
gp91phox promoter region. The nucleotide sequence of the
100 to
63 bp region of the gp91phox promoter is illustrated
and the ISRE is underlined. The positions of mutations that
ablate either the IRF binding site (IRF-mut), the BID
binding site (BID-mut), or both (BID + IRF-mut)
are indicated. Solid lines denote regions not mutated. EMSA
using a nuclear extract isolated from HEL cells and these four
oligonucleotide sequences as probes was performed as described under
``Experimental Procedures.'' The positions of the BID and IRF
complexes are indicated. The slowly migrating complex that appears in
the BID-mut probe lane is a nonspecific binding complex, as it is
disrupted by all oligonucleotide competitors tested (data not
shown).
Disruption of the BID binding site causes a 50% decrease of
gp91phox promoter activity in HEL cells, but has little effect
in K562 cells (Fig. 6). Disruption of the IRF binding
site causes a 93% decrease in gp91phox promoter activity in
HEL cells, and a 75% drop in K562 cells. Abolishment of both the IRF
and BID binding sites decreases gp91phox promoter activity to
nearly the same level as the activity of the
84 to +12 bp promoter
(Fig. 6). These data indicate that both IRF and BID binding sites are
transcriptional activating elements that are necessary for
gp91phox promoter activity in the absence of transcriptional
repression.
100 to +12
bp gp91phox promoter/luciferase construct, or mutant promoter
constructs lacking binding sites for IRF-2, BID, or both were
transiently transfected into HEL and K562 cells as described in Fig. 2.
The corresponding gp91phox promoter fragment present in each
construct is shown to the left. Each construct additionally
contains the 5
-untranslated region of the gp91phox gene to +12
bp. The IRF binding site is represented by an oval, and the
BID binding site is shown as a striped square. Luciferase
activities have been normalized to the
-galactosidase activities
produced by co-transfected CMV-
-gal plasmid, and the luciferase
activity of the wild type 100-bp construct is arbitrarily set as 100. Data represent at least four experiments, with two different
preparations of plasmid, and are presented as mean ± S.E.
Overexpression of IRF-1 or IRF-2 Transactivates the
100 to +12 bp
gp91phox Promoter
The data presented above indicate that
both IRF-1 and IRF-2 are able to bind to the ISRE at
92 to
80 bp of
the gp91phox promoter, and that IRF-2 is more abundant than
IRF-1 in the cells used in this study, including macrophages that
express the endogenous gp91phox gene. This leads to the
hypothesis that IRF-2 directs expression of the gp91phox
promoter in the absence of CDP-mediated transcriptional repression, a
role opposite to the transcriptional repression activity commonly
associated with this factor (33, 36). To directly test this hypothesis,
plasmids that overexpress IRF-1 or IRF-2 were co-transfected with the
wild type or IRF-mut versions of the
100 to +12 bp gp91phox
promoter/luciferase construct. Because HEL cells contain a high level
of endogenous IRF-2 binding activity (Fig. 4C), K562 cells
were used for the co-transfection experiments.
Overexpression of IRF-2 in K562 cells results in a 2.5-fold increase of
gp91phox promoter activity when compared to the vector control,
while overexpression of IRF-1 causes a 5-fold increase in
gp91phox promoter activity (Fig. 7, solid
bars). Neither IRF-1 nor IRF-2 transactivates a
mutated gp91phox promoter that lacks the IRF binding site (Fig.
7, striped bars). These data indicate that IRF-1 and IRF-2
are transcriptional activators of the gp91phox gene promoter
via binding to the ISRE site at
92 to
80 bp. The dominance of IRF-2
in HEL cells indicates that it is responsible for transcriptional
activation mediated via the
92 to
80 bp IRF binding site in these
cells.
100 to +12 bp gp91phox promoter/luciferase reporter plasmids
were co-transfected into K562 cells along with a control vector or an
expression vector encoding IRF-1 or IRF-2. Transactivation was
calculated by comparing luciferase activities to the vector control,
which was set as 100%. Co-transfection using the wild type reporter
plasmid is represented by black bars, while co-transfection
with the IRF-mut construct is shown as striped bars.
This study examines the cis elements and cognate DNA-binding proteins that are required for gp91phox promoter activity in the absence of CDP-mediated repression. Characterization of these elements should identify promoter components that are interfered with by transcriptional repression in nonphagocytic cells and which are also possibly required for appropriate gp91phox expression in mature myeloid cells in which CDP DNA-binding activity is down-regulated.
The results demonstrate that the region between
100 and
85 bp is
required for gp91phox promoter activity. An ISRE at
92 to
80 bp serves as a binding site for IRF-1 and IRF-2, which were
originally identified as important regulators of interferon and
virus-induced genes (33, 35). Recent studies indicate that IRF-1 and
IRF-2 are also involved in the regulation of cell proliferation,
transformation, and apoptosis (37, 38, 39). Furthermore, IRF-1 and IRF-2
play critical roles during hematopoiesis. IRF-1 is involved in growth
inhibition during myeloid differentiation induced by interleukin-6 and
leukemia inhibitory factor (40), and deletion of IRF-1 is frequently
observed in human leukemia and preleukemia myelodysplasia (41). IRF-1
is also required for the induction of the nitric oxide synthase gene in
macrophages (42). IRF-1 null mice exhibit impaired development of
CD8+ T cells (43), while B lymphopoiesis is suppressed in
IRF-2 deficient mice (44).
The significance of the
92 to
80 bp IRF binding site in mediating
gp91phox promoter activity is confirmed by transient
transfections in which specific ablation of this element results in
decreased promoter activity in both HEL and K562 cells. The
transcriptional activating activity of both IRF-1 and IRF-2 is further
demonstrated by the ability of each to transactivate the
gp91phox promoter, an effect dependent on an intact ISRE.
Abundant IRF-2 levels in HEL cells indicate that IRF-2, and not IRF-1,
mediates transcription via the ISRE in this system. Furthermore, IRF-2
DNA-binding activity is dominant over that of IRF-1 in a macrophage
cell line that expresses the gp91phox gene, indicating that
IRF-2 may also be involved in directing expression of the
gp91phox gene in mature myeloid cells. However, these findings
do not exclude a role for IRF-1 in the myeloid-specific induction of
gp91phox expression following IFN-
stimulation. When present
in nuclear extract, IRF-1 does bind to the downstream ISRE, and
transactivation studies indicate that IRF-1 induces approximately twice
the expression from the
100 to +12 bp gp91phox promoter as
that produced by IRF-2.
IRF-2 has generally been described as a transcriptional repressor and functions by competing with the transcriptional activator IRF-1 for DNA-binding sites (33, 36). However, IRF-2 contains a latent transcriptional activation domain (36), and a recent study demonstrates that overexpression of IRF-2 causes a 2-fold activation of the histone H4 promoter (28). Hence, IRF-2 is similar to factors such as YY1, RAP-1, Dorsal, and Kruppel that exhibit both transcriptional activation and repression activities (45, 46, 47, 48, 49). Our findings reveal a second example of the ability of IRF-2 to function as a transcriptional activator. The relative strength of the transcriptional activating activity of IRF-2 on the gp91phox promoter is comparable to that reported for IRF-2 action on the histone H4 promoter (28).
Subsets of myeloid cells require distinct cis elements to direct
gp91phox expression in vivo. For example, CGD
patients who carry mutations in the gp91phox promoter exhibit
normal expression in 5-10% of the lineage (6, 7). Similarly, a CGD
patient has been identified in whom gp91phox transcription is
restricted to myeloid cells of the eosinophil compartment (50). We have
previously demonstrated that the
450 to +12 bp region of the
gp91phox gene directs myeloid-specific expression in transgenic
mice, but in only a subset of monocyte/macrophages (4). We also found
that CP1 binding to a CCAAT-box at
123 to
119 bp is necessary for
de-repressed gp91phox promoter activity in HeLa and K562 cells,
but not in HEL cells (9). Variability in promoter element requirements
may reflect heterogeneity in the complement of transcription factors
present in various cell types. We hypothesize that abundant IRF-2
activity in HEL cells makes CP1 binding dispensable for
gp91phox promoter activity, hence providing a molecular
mechanism to explain one example of variable cis element requirements
for gp91phox promoter activity.
Binding of a factor denoted BID to three upstream elements of the
gp91phox promoter is required for IFN-
-induced expression of
the gp91phox gene.2 We now describe a fourth BID
binding site at approximately
90 bp that directs gp91phox
promoter activity in the absence of upstream repressor elements. It is
remarkable that both ISRE elements in the gp91phox promoter
serve as binding sites for BID and IRF-1/IRF-2. However, the properties
of BID do not correspond to those of previously described IFN response
factors, and two of the BID binding sites in the gp91phox
promoter do not conform to the ISRE consensus sequence.2
Examination of the role of the newly described BID/IRF binding sites in
the regulation of the gp91phox promoter in response to IFN and
more generally during terminal myeloid cell differentiation is
currently under investigation.
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed:
Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Riley Hospital for Children, Rm.
2600, 702 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, IN 46202-5225. Tel.:
317-274-8977; Fax: 317-274-8679; E-mail:
dskalnik{at}sunflower.bio.indiana.edu.
We thank Maureen Harrington for critically reading this manuscript. We also thank Stephen Goodbourn, John Hiscott, Richard Pine, and Paula Pithy for providing IRF expression vectors, and Riley Cancer Research for Children for supporting oligonucleotide production.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Huang, E. Horvath, and E. A. Eklund PU.1, Interferon Regulatory Factor (IRF) 2, and the Interferon Consensus Sequence-binding Protein (ICSBP/IRF8) Cooperate to Activate NF1 Transcription in Differentiating Myeloid Cells J. Biol. Chem., March 2, 2007; 282(9): 6629 - 6643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. M. Nhu, N. Cuesta, and S. N. Vogel Transcriptional regulation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced Toll-like receptor (TLR) expression in murine macrophages: role of interferon regulatory factors 1 (IRF-1) and 2 (IRF-2) Innate Immunity, October 1, 2006; 12(5): 285 - 295. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kuwano, T. Kawahara, H. Yamamoto, S. Teshima-Kondo, K. Tominaga, K. Masuda, K. Kishi, K. Morita, and K. Rokutan Interferon-{gamma} activates transcription of NADPH oxidase 1 gene and upregulates production of superoxide anion by human large intestinal epithelial cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): C433 - C443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Thomas, S. Samanta, C. Wu, N. Berliner, and E. Fikrig Anaplasma phagocytophilum Modulates gp91phox Gene Expression through Altered Interferon Regulatory Factor 1 and PU.1 Levels and Binding of CCAAT Displacement Protein Infect. Immun., January 1, 2005; 73(1): 208 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-C. Chung and S. Kawamoto IRF-2 Is Involved in Up-regulation of Nonmuscle Myosin Heavy Chain II-A Gene Expression during Phorbol Ester-induced Promyelocytic HL-60 Differentiation J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 56042 - 56052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Oshima, T. Nakamura, S. Namiki, E. Okada, K. Tsuchiya, R. Okamoto, M. Yamazaki, T. Yokota, M. Aida, Y. Yamaguchi, et al. Interferon Regulatory Factor 1 (IRF-1) and IRF-2 Distinctively Up-Regulate Gene Expression and Production of Interleukin-7 in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2004; 24(14): 6298 - 6310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mazzi, M. Donini, D. Margotto, F. Wientjes, and S. Dusi IFN-{gamma} Induces gp91phox Expression in Human Monocytes via Protein Kinase C-Dependent Phosphorylation of PU.1 J. Immunol., April 15, 2004; 172(8): 4941 - 4947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ichikawa, S. Hida, Y. Omatsu, S. Shimoyama, K. Takahara, S. Miyagawa, K. Inaba, and S. Taki Defective development of splenic and epidermal CD4+ dendritic cells in mice deficient for IFN regulatory factor-2 PNAS, March 16, 2004; 101(11): 3909 - 3914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.-L. Xie, S. Gupta, A. Miele, D. Shiffman, J. L. Stein, G. S. Stein, and A. J. van Wijnen The Tumor Suppressor Interferon Regulatory Factor 1 Interferes with SP1 Activation to Repress the Human CDK2 Promoter J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2003; 278(29): 26589 - 26596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Masumi, Y. Yamakawa, H. Fukazawa, K. Ozato, and K. Komuro Interferon Regulatory Factor-2 Regulates Cell Growth through Its Acetylation J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 25401 - 25407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|