JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishimi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishimi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 39, Issue of September 27, 1996 pp. 24115-24122
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Binding of Human Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins with Histone H3*

(Received for publication, March 28, 1996, and in revised form, May 28, 1996)

Yukio Ishimi Dagger , Sachiyo Ichinose , Akira Omori , Kazuki Sato and Hiroshi Kimura §

From the Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences, 11 Minamiooya, Machida, Tokyo 194, Japan and § Research Center for Molecular Genetics, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060, Japan

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins play essential roles in eukaryotic DNA replication, but their biochemical properties remain to be determined. We detected in HeLa cell extracts six proteins, CDC47, CDC46/MCM5, Cdc21, P1/MCM3, Mis5, and BM28/MCM2, by their binding to a specific antibody and by partial sequencing. The human homologs of the MCM2 (BM28), Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins were tightly bound to a histone-Sepharose column and purified to near homogeneity, whereas the P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins passed through. Among the four core histones, the human BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins had high affinity for histone H3. Immunoprecipitation with anti-Cdc21 antibody revealed that these four MCM proteins form complexes. These results are consistent with the findings that MCM proteins bind with chromatin in vivo.


INTRODUCTION

In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication initiates from multiple sites in chromosomes during S phase, which are called replication origins. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, several proteins that are required for the initiation of DNA replication have been identified. Origin recognition complex (ORC)1 proteins (1) that bind to the essential origin sequence are involved in DNA replication (2, 3, 4, 5). MCM proteins, which include MCM2, MCM3, CDC46/MCM5, CDC47, and CDC54 (6, 7, 8, 9), are essential for cell growth and are required for DNA replication. Genetic analyses indicate that they have distinct roles in DNA replication and that they interact (7, 8). Interactions between the components of ORC with MCM proteins have also been described (5, 10). In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Cdc21 (11) and Mis5 (12) MCM proteins in addition to Nda1/MCM2 and Nda4/CDC46 (13) have been identified. Homologues of these MCM proteins are found in various organisms and Xenopus MCM3 (14, 15, 16, 17), Drosophila MCM2 (18) and Cdc21 (19), mouse P1/MCM3 (20), and human BM28/MCM2 (21) proteins also play essential roles in cellular DNA replication. However, it remains to be analyzed how the MCM proteins are involved in this process.

Since MCM proteins have the domains required for DNA-dependent ATPase activity in central regions (22), they may function as the DNA helicase that is required for DNA unwinding during DNA replication, although human BM28/MCM2 (23), Cdc21, CDC47, and MCM3 (24), and mouse MCM3 (20) proteins are not co-localized in replication foci. P1/MCM3 protein may be a component of the DNA polymerase alpha  holoenzyme (25). Immunocytochemical analyses suggest that human BM28/MCM2 (23) and mouse P1/MCM3 (20, 26) proteins bind with the nuclear structure in G1 phase and detach from it during DNA replication. The sensitivity to nuclease suggests that both human BM28/MCM2 (23) and S. cerevisiae MCM3 (27) proteins bind with chromatin. We detected MCM proteins in HeLa cell extracts by immunoblotting, using antibodies against a conserved portion of MCM proteins, and found that MCM protein complexes containing BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins have high affinity for histone H3.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Proteins and Serum

Histone pairs of H2A/H2B and H3/H4 were purified from HeLa cells as described by Simon and Felsenfeld (28). H3 and H4 histones were purified from mouse FM3A cells. They were separated by HPLC using a reverse phase C18 column. The histones were eluted by a linear gradient from 20 to 60% acetonitrile containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. H4 and H3 histones were eluted from the column by approximately 45 and 50% acetonitrile, respectively. Separation of these two histones was confirmed by electrophoresis in a 15% polyacrylamide gel containing sodium dodecyl sulfate (29). Histones other than H4 were dialyzed against 0.1 M NaHCO3, pH 8.5, and cross-linked to cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) (30). Since H4 histone was insoluble in the buffer, it was dialyzed against 0.1 M potassium phosphate, pH 7.5, and then NaHCO3, pH 8.5, was added at the final concentration of 0.1 M before cross-linking. Histones (0.3-0.5 mg) were cross-linked to 1 ml of Sepharose 4B. Rabbit antiserum against the peptides (VVCIDEFDKMSDMDRTA) from mouse MCM proteins that had been linked to keyhole limpet hemocyanin was raised (31). The specific antibodies (rabbit) against mouse P1/MCM3, CDC46/MCM5, and Cdc21 proteins were raised as reported elsewhere (20, 32). A carboxyl-terminal region (amino acid 683-862) of mouse Cdc21 protein was produced in Escherichia coli as a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein (Pharmacia). The rabbit antibodies against the protein were raised and they were affinity-purified. Anti-Cdc21 antibody beads (2 mg/ml) were prepared by cross-linking the antibodies to cyanogen-activated Sepharose 4B. The beads were also conjugated with rabbit immunoglobulin (5 mg/ml) that had been purified from preimmune serum by a protein A column. For immunoblotting, the proteins in a 10% polyacrylamide gel were transferred to a nylon membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore) and then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in TBS (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 150 mM NaCl) containing 5% horse serum (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7) or skim milk (Fig. 8). The membrane was incubated for 1 h with anti-MCM protein antibody (rabbit antibody) diluted with the solution described above. After washing with TBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, the membrane was incubated for 1 h with diluted peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (goat antibody, Bio-Rad). Proteins were visualized using a peroxidase detection kit (HRP1000, Konica) (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7) or a chemiluminescent substrate system (Pierce) (Fig. 8). Logarithmically growing HeLa cells and those in mitotic phase were kindly provided by Keiji Kimura (33).


Fig. 1. DE52 column chromatography of HeLa MCM proteins. The proteins in HeLa cell extracts (lane 1), ammonium sulfate fraction (lane 2), and the DE52 fractions (lanes 3-25) were electrophoresed in a 10% polyacrylamide gel and analyzed by immunoblotting by using the antibodies against the conserved portion of MCM protein. The proteins passed through the DE52 column were electrophoresed in lanes 3 and 4, and those eluted from the column by increasing the concentration of NaCl were run in lanes 5-25. The concentration of NaCl, which was determined by examining the conductivity of the eluate, is indicated at the top of the gel. The molecular mass was determined by comparison with marker proteins (Bio-Rad, high range).
[View Larger Version of this Image (59K GIF file)]


Fig. 2. Immunoblotting MCM proteins in 0.2 M NaCl-soluble and 2 M NaCl-soluble HeLa cell extracts. A, the proteins in the pooled DE52 fraction from 0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole cell extracts were resolved by electrophoresis in a 10% polyacrylamide gel and examined by immunoblotting. The first antibodies used are those against a peptide from the conserved portion of MCM proteins (lane 1, peptide), the specific antibodies against mouse Cdc21 (lane 2, Cdc21), mouse P1/MCM3 (lane 3, MCM3), or mouse CDC46/MCM5 protein (lane 4, CDC46), as indicated. B, the proteins in the hydroxylapatite fraction purified from 2 M NaCl-soluble nuclear extracts were analyzed by immunoblotting. The antibodies used are those against the mouse CDC46/MCM5 (lane 1), mouse Cdc21 (lane 2), mouse P1/MCM3 protein (lane 3), and a peptide from the conserved portion of MCM proteins (lane 4).
[View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]


Fig. 3. Histone-Sepharose column chromatography of MCM proteins. A, the proteins in the pooled DE52 fraction were loaded onto a histone-Sepharose column, and the bound proteins were eluted with a linear gradient from 0.2 to 1 M NaCl. The proteins in the gel were stained with silver. The concentration of NaCl was indicated at the top of the gel. B, proteins eluting from the column near 1 M NaCl were immunoblotted. The first antibodies were those against a peptide from the conserved portion of MCM proteins (lane 1), mouse P1/MCM3 (lane 2), mouse CDC46 (lane 3), and mouse Cdc21 protein (lane 4) as indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (61K GIF file)]


Fig. 5. Histone H2A/H2B and H3/H4 column chromatography of MCM proteins. The proteins in the DE52 fraction (30 ml) were loaded onto a 5-ml column of H2A/H2B (A) or H3/H4 (B), and the bound proteins were eluted by a linear gradient from 0.3 to 2 M NaCl. Proteins were resolved by electrophoresis in a 10% acrylamide gel and stained with silver. In lane 16 of A and B, the MCM proteins purified by histone-Sepharose column chromatography were resolved by electrophoresis. NAP-I protein was indicated in H2A/H2B column chromatography. C, left, the flow-through fractions of the H3/H4 (lanes 2-5) and H2A/H2B columns (lanes 6-9) were resolved by electrophoresis and immunoblotted against the antibodies to the conserved portion. The proteins from the loaded DE52 fraction were electrophoresed in lane 1. Right, proteins in the flow-through fractions of the H3/H4 column were analyzed by immunoblotting. The first antibodies used were those against a peptide from the conserved region of MCM protein (lane 10), P1/MCM3 (lane 11), Cdc21 (lane 12), and CDC46/MCM5 (lane 13) as indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]


Fig. 7. Complex formation of MCM proteins. A, the MCM proteins (150 ng) purified by histone-Sepharose column chromatography were mixed with the beads conjugated with anti-Cdc21 antibody or control rabbit antibody. After washing, proteins bound to the beads were eluted twice (indicated by e-1 and e-2, respectively) and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were visualized by staining with silver. MCM proteins purified by histone-Sepharose column chromatography were electrophoresed in the left-end lane. B, the DE52 fraction was mixed with the antibody beads as described above. Unbound (un) and bound (e-1 and e-2) MCM proteins were detected by immunoblotting using the antibodies against the conserved portion. The DE52 fraction was electrophoresed in the left-end lane. C, MCM proteins bound to the anti-Cdc21 antibody beads (e-1 in B) were examined by immunoblotting using the antibodies against the conserved portion (lane 2, peptide), P1/MCM3 (lane 3), CDC46/MCM5 (lane 4), and Cdc21 (lane 5), as indicated. Immunoblotting of purified MCM proteins by the antibodies against the conserved portion is shown in lane 1.
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]


Fig. 8. Phosphorylation state of MCM2 protein in the purified fraction. Extracts from logarithmically growing HeLa cells (log) and mitotic phase of HeLa cells (M) were prepared (33). They (7 µl in a 10-µl reaction mixture) were incubated with lambda  phosphatase (400 units, New England Biolabs) in the presence of 2 mM MnCl2 at 30 °C for 30 min. These extracts were electrophoresed in parallel with the MCM proteins purified by histone-Sepharose column chromatography (purified). MCM proteins were detected by immunoblotting using the antibodies against the conserved portion. Treatment with phosphatase is indicated by + at the top of the gel.
[View Larger Version of this Image (41K GIF file)]

Purification of MCM Proteins

HeLa cells were cultured in spinner bottles until late-log phase. After the cells (1 × 1010 cells) were homogenized in hypotonic buffer, 5 M NaCl was added to a final concentration of 0.2 M, and the mixture was centrifuged to obtain 0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole cell extracts (34). The extracted proteins were fractionated by ammonium sulfate precipitation. The 35-65% saturated fraction was loaded onto a DE52 (Pharmacia) column equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10% glycerol (buffer A) containing 0.1 M NaCl. The bound proteins were eluted by a linear gradient from 0.1 to 0.4 M NaCl in buffer A. The proteins containing MCM proteins eluting at near 0.2 M were pooled (1 mg/ml protein, total 40 ml) and loaded onto a histone-Sepharose column (5 ml) equilibrated with 0.2 M NaCl in buffer A. After washing the column with the same buffer, the bound proteins were eluted by a linear gradient from 0.2 to 1 M NaCl. When MCM proteins were fractionated by histone H2A/H2B, H3/H4, H3, or H4 column chromatography (Figs. 5 and 6), HeLa cell extracts were directly fractionated by DE52 column chromatography, and pooled fractions were loaded onto each column equilibrated with 0.3 M NaCl in buffer A. The bound proteins were eluted by a linear gradient from 0.3 to 2 M NaCl.


Fig. 6. Histone H3 and H4 column chromatography of MCM proteins. The proteins in the DE52 fraction (1 ml) were loaded onto a 1-ml column of histone H3 (A) or H4 (B), and the bound proteins were eluted by a gradient from 0.3 to 2 M NaCl. The proteins in the fractions obtained by the gradient were resolved by electrophoresis, and they were stained with silver. In lanes 12 and 8 of A and B, respectively, the MCM proteins purified by the histone-Sepharose column chromatography were electrophoresed.
[View Larger Version of this Image (75K GIF file)]

The proteins were extracted from the residual nuclear precipitates of the 0.2 M NaCl-treated HeLa cells with 2 M NaCl to obtain 2 M NaCl-soluble nuclear extracts. After nucleic acids were removed by precipitation with polyethylene glycol, the proteins were fractionated by hydroxylapatite column chromatography as described by Miller et al. (35). After the fractions eluted with 0.2 M phosphate that contained MCM proteins were dialyzed against 0.1 M NaCl in buffer A, they were loaded onto a phosphocellulose column equilibrated with the same buffer. The bound proteins were eluted by a linear gradient from 0.1 to 0.6 M NaCl. The fractions that eluted near 0.35 M NaCl were pooled and loaded onto the histone-Sepharose column. The bound proteins were eluted by a linear gradient from 0.3 to 2 M NaCl in buffer A.

Partial Sequencing of MCM Proteins

The proteins in a 10% polyacrylamide gel were transferred to a membrane (Immobilon-P) and stained with 0.1% Ponceau, 1% acetic acid for 5 min. The protein bands were excised, destained with 0.5 mM NaOH, and washed with deionized water. The excised membrane in a microtube (1.5 ml) was immersed in 6 M guanidine HCl, 0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 0.3% EDTA, 2% acetonitrile (200 µl). The same solution (100 µl) containing 1 mg of dithiothreitol was added, and it was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. ICH2COONa (2.4 mg) dissolved in 10 µl of water was added and incubated for 20 min at 37 °C in the dark. The membrane was washed successively with 2% acetonitrile four times, once with 0.1% SDS, and once with water. The membrane was incubated with 0.5% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.1 M acetic acid (500 µl) for 30 min at room temperature, and then washed with water four times. After cutting the membrane into small pieces, the pieces were shaken at 37 °C overnight with 0.4 µg of lysyl endopeptidase (Acromobacter, Wako) in 8% acetonitrile, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5. After centrifugation, the supernatant was loaded onto an HPLC column (RP-300, inner diameter, 2.1 × 30 mm, Applied Biosystems), and the peptides were eluted by a linear gradient from 0 to 70% acetonitrile in the presence of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Amino acids from the NH2 terminus of the peptides were determined by a pulse-liquid phase protein sequencer (model 477A/120A, Applied Biosystems).

Immunoprecipitation

The fraction containing MCM proteins (20 µl) in 0.15 M NaCl, buffer A, was mixed for 1.5 h at 4 °C with beads (15 µl) conjugated with anti-Cdc21 antibody or control rabbit antibody that had been washed with the buffer A containing 0.1 M NaCl, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 0.05% Nonidet P-40. After centrifugation, the supernatant was saved. The beads were washed four times with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Nonidet P-40, and proteins bound to the beads were recovered by eluting twice with 20 µl of 0.1 M glycine, pH 2.5, and 0.15 M NaCl. The solution was neutralized and then subjected to electrophoresis.

Other Methods

Proteins in the gel were stained with Coomassie Blue or silver (silver stain kit, Wako). The protein concentration was determined with the Bio-Rad protein assay reagent using bovine serum albumin as a standard.


RESULTS

Detection of MCM Proteins in 0.2 M NaCl-soluble and 2 M NaCl-soluble Extracts of HeLa Cells

Six MCM proteins of MCM2, MCM3, CDC46/MCM5, CDC47, Cdc21, and Mis5 have been identified in eukaryotic cells (Table I) (32, 36, 37). They have a conserved region in the central part of the proteins (12, 21, 31, 37) where the domains required for DNA-dependent ATPase activity are present (22). Antibodies against a peptide from a highly conserved region of MCM proteins were obtained by immunizing rabbits with a synthetic peptide from the region (31). The antibodies recognized several proteins ranging from 80 to 125 kDa in addition to smaller proteins in 0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole cell extracts of HeLa cells on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel, which was analyzed by immunoblotting (Fig. 1, lane 1). The extracts were fractionated by ammonium sulfate precipitation followed by DE52 column chromatography. Immunoblotting showed that the MCM-related proteins of higher molecular mass were bound to the DE52 column, and they were eluted from the column near 0.2 M NaCl (Fig. 1). In the pooled DE52 fractions (fractions 9-15), at least three (86-, 100-, and 125-kDa) proteins, all of which were recognized by the antibodies to MCM proteins, were detected (Fig. 2A). The specific antibodies to mouse P1/MCM3 protein recognized a 100-kDa protein, and those to mouse Cdc21 protein recognized 86- and 100-kDa proteins on immunoblots. Antibodies to mouse CDC46/MCM5 did not detect any proteins, but a 90-kDa protein in the DE52 fraction was detected by the antibodies (as shown in Fig. 7). A 90-kDa protein recognized by the antibodies against the conserved portion of MCM protein was detected in the fractions eluting at about 0.15 M NaCl in the DE52 column chromatography, but the protein was not detected in the fractions eluting at a higher NaCl concentration (Fig. 1). It appears that the CDC46/MCM5 protein was present in the pooled DE52 fraction, but the binding of the anti-MCM protein antibodies to the CDC46/MCM5 protein was interfered with by a protein(s) in the pooled fraction that migrates at a similar position to the 90-kDa CDC46/MCM5 protein in the SDS-polyacrylamide gel under the conditions described in Fig. 2A.

Table I.

Summary of MCM protein family

The MCM protein family proteins identified in S. cerevisiae, S. pombe, and human cells are shown where the names used in this report are underlined. Molecular mass, the binding to histone and the recognition by the peptide antibodies of human MCM proteins determined in this paper are presented. Group nomenclature shown at the top is as suggested by Chong et al. (36).
Source and character Protein
MCM2 MCM3 MCM4 MCM5 MCM6 MCM7

S. cerevisiae MCM2 MCM3 CDC54 CDC46/MCM5  <UNL>CDC47</UNL>
S. pombe Nda1/Cdc19 Mcm3 Cdc21 Nda4  <UNL>Mis5</UNL>
Human  <UNL>BM28/MCM2</UNL>  <UNL>P1/MCM3</UNL> P1<UNL>Cdc21</UNL> P1<UNL>CDC46</UNL> p85Mcm

Molecular mass (kDa) 125 100 100 90  103 86
(+76)
Binding to histone +  - +  - + +
Binding of peptide antibodies + + + + + +

The nuclear precipitate remaining after the extraction with 0.2 M NaCl was treated with 2 M NaCl, and the extracted proteins were fractionated by hydroxylapatite column chromatography. Proteins of 90, 100, and 125 kDa were detected in the pooled fraction by immunoblotting, using antibodies against the conserved portion of MCM proteins (Fig. 2B). A 100-kDa protein was recognized by antibodies specific to mouse P1/MCM3 protein, and 76- and 90-kDa proteins were detected with anti-mouse CDC46/MCM5 antibodies. The 76-kDa protein was not detected with the antibodies against the conserved portion. These results indicated that several MCM-related proteins are present in HeLa cells and that the proteins recognized by the anti-Cdc21 antibodies were enriched in the 0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole cell extracts.

Purification and Identification of MCM Proteins from 0.2 M NaCl-soluble Whole Cell Extracts

The DE52 fraction containing MCM proteins was fractionated by histone-Sepharose column chromatography (Fig. 3A). The column contained almost equal amounts of four core histones that were cross-linked to Sepharose. At 0.6 M NaCl, NAP-I that stimulates nucleosome assembly in vitro is eluted from the column (30). Proteins of 86, 100, 103, and 125 kDa bound to the column and were eluted near 1 M NaCl. All four proteins were recognized by the antibodies against the conserved region of MCM proteins (Fig. 3B). The 100-kDa protein in the purified fraction was recognized by specific antibodies against the mouse Cdc21 protein, but no protein was recognized with the antibodies against mouse P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins. A 86-kDa protein in whole cell extracts that was recognized with the anti-mouse Cdc21 antibody did not bind with the histone column. Immunoblotting showed that P1/MCM3 protein in the DE52 fraction (Fig. 2A) passed through the histone-Sepharose column (data not shown, see Fig. 5C).

The partial amino acid sequences of the proteins bound to the histone-Sepharose column were determined after digesting the proteins with lysyl endopeptidase (Fig. 4). Two peptides obtained from the 125-kDa protein were localized in boxes A (peptide 1) and D (peptide 2) (31) of human BM28/MCM2 protein (21) (Fig. 4A). One peptide from the 86-kDa protein was identified in box A of human CDC47 (P1.1/MCM3) protein (38) that has been partially cloned (31), and another peptide was almost matched to a peptide of mouse CDC47 protein (39). Four of five peptides from the 103-kDa protein were localized in a rat intestinal crypt protein that has been partially cloned (40) (Fig. 4B). Homology of the rat protein to the central region of S. pombe Mis5 protein was greater than that to the human MCM proteins, including MCM2(BM28), P1/MCM3, CDC46/MCM5, Cdc21, and CDC47 (Fig. 4B and data not shown). These results suggested that the 125-, 103-, 100-, and 86-kDa proteins correspond to human BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins, respectively. These results indicated that the human homologs of the MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins have a high affinity for histones, but P1/MCM3 does not. Immunoblotting showed that about 400 µg of MCM protein were precipitated in the ammonium sulfate fraction (0.3% of total protein), and the final histone-Sepharose fraction contained about 50 µg of the protein.


Fig. 4. Partial amino acid sequencing of histone-bound MCM proteins. A, the amino acid sequences of two MCM proteins of 125 and 86 kDa bound to the histone-Sepharose column were determined as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Two peptides from the 125-kDa protein and two from the 86-kDa protein were sequenced. These sequences, each of which is placed at the top of column, were compared with the published sequences of human MCM proteins and a mouse CDC47 protein (m). The amino acid numbers of human BM28/MCM2 and mouse CDC47 proteins are indicated. B, five peptides from the 103-kDa protein were sequenced. The partial amino acid sequence of a rat protein (GenBankTM nucleotide accession no. U17565[GenBank]) (40) where four out of the five peptides from the 103-kDa protein were localized (underlined and numbered) was compared with that of S. pombe Mis5 (12) (EMBL accession no. D31960[GenBank]) and human BM2/MCM2 proteins (21) (EMBL accession no. X67334[GenBank]). The conserved domains (boxes A-D) of MCM proteins (31) are indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]

The fractions containing the MCM proteins that were obtained from 2 M NaCl-soluble nuclear extracts by hydroxylapatite column chromatography (Fig. 2B) were further separated by phosphocellulose column chromatography (data not shown). The fractions that eluted near 0.35 M NaCl contained the 102- and 90-kDa MCM proteins, which corresponded to P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins, respectively. When they were loaded onto the histone-Sepharose column, these two MCM proteins passed through the column (data not shown).

Binding of MCM Proteins with Histone H3

To understand the interaction of the MCM proteins with histones, the MCM proteins of the DE52 fraction were loaded onto a histone H2A/H2B or a H3/H4 column, instead of the histone-Sepharose column containing four core histones (Fig. 5). Proteins of 86, 100, 103, and 125 kDa were bound to the H3/H4 column and eluted near 1 M NaCl (Fig. 5B). The composition was similar to that in the fractions purified by the histone-Sepharose column chromatography (Fig. 3). All four proteins were recognized by the antibodies against the conserved portion of MCM proteins, and the 100-kDa protein was recognized by anti-Cdc21 antibodies (data not shown). However, the 102-kDa protein passed through the H3/H4 column, and it was recognized by the specific antibodies against P1/MCM3 protein (Fig. 5C). These results are essentially the same as those obtained after histone-Sepharose column chromatography. No MCM proteins were detected in the bound fractions of H2A/H2B column chromatography (Fig. 5A), but they passed through the column (Fig. 5C). NAP-I was bound to the H2A/H2B but not to the H3/H4 column, since it has a higher binding affinity for H2A/H2B than for H3/H4 (41). Next, the DE52 fraction was loaded onto a histone H3 or a H4 column (Fig. 6). The 86-, 100-, 103-, and 125-kDa proteins bound to the H3, but not to the H4 column. They were mainly eluted from the H3 column by 0.5-1 M NaCl; the concentration was slightly lower than that required for the elution from the H3/H4 column. These results indicated that the human homologs of the MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins specifically interact with histone H3. However, the possibility that these MCM proteins also interact with H4 histone cannot be excluded.

Complex Formation of MCM Proteins

To know the interaction of MCM proteins, the fraction containing MCM proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-Cdc21 antibody beads (Fig. 7). Four MCM proteins of BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 in the purified fraction were precipitated with the beads conjugated with anti-Cdc21 antibody, but not with those conjugated with control rabbit antibody (Fig. 7A). The anti-Cdc21 antibody beads also precipitated four proteins of 125, 100, 90, and 86 kDa from the DE52 fraction, which was analyzed by immunoblotting (Fig. 7B). The 125-kDa protein most probably corresponds to BM28/MCM2 and the 86-kDa protein to CDC47. Binding of specific antibodies showed that Cdc21 and P1/MCM3 proteins of about 100 kDa were precipitated with the anti-Cdc21 antibody beads, and the 90-kDa CDC46/MCM5 protein was also precipitated (Fig. 7C). Three MCM proteins of Mis5, Cdc21, and P1/MCM3 may migrate at the same position under these conditions. Therefore, it was suggested that six MCM proteins in DE52 fraction are all precipitated by the Cdc21 antibodies. In addition to some portion of 125-kDa MCM2 protein, however, a 100-kDa protein was not precipitated with the anti-Cdc21 antibodies. The 100-kDa protein was recognized with anti-P1/MCM3 antibodies, but not with anti-Cdc21 antibodies by immunoblotting (data not shown). These results suggest that BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins, which were tightly bound with histone H3, form complexes, and P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins in DE52 fraction are also associated with these complexes. When the purified MCM proteins were fractionated by sucrose gradient centrifugation in the buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl, a major peak of MCM proteins, where the BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins were present, was detected at 11 S (data not shown). These data support the conclusion that they form complexes.

Human BM28/MCM2 (23) and mouse P1/MCM3 (20) proteins are phosphorylated as DNA replication proceeds. Phosphorylated human BM28/MCM2 protein migrates faster than underphosphorylated forms of the protein in SDS-polyacrylamide gel (23). To know the phosphorylation state of MCM2 protein in the purified fractions, the mobility of MCM2 protein in the purified fraction was compared with that of MCM2 protein in extracts prepared from logarithmically growing HeLa cells and also mitotic cells (Fig. 8). Two bands of 125 and 120 kDa, which are most probably MCM2 proteins, were detected in the extracts from growing cells in addition to the MCM proteins of smaller molecular mass, and several bands ranging from 135 to 120 kDa were detected in the extracts from mitotic cells. After incubating these extracts with lambda  phosphatase, only the 125-kDa protein was detected. The mobility of the protein in the gel was almost the same as that of MCM2 protein in the purified fraction. These results suggest that the MCM2 protein in the purified fraction is an underphosphorylated form.


DISCUSSION

We showed that human homologs of MCM2 (BM28), Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins bound histone. The four MCM proteins, which form complexes, specifically bound histone H3 among four core histones. P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins did not bind histone, but these two MCM proteins from 0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole cell extracts are associated with the above MCM protein complexes. Both human BM28/MCM2 (23) and mouse P1/MCM3 (20, 26) proteins are bound with nuclear structures in the G1 phase. The sensitivity to nuclease suggests that human BM28/MCM2 (23) protein binds with chromatin. The specific binding of MCM proteins to histone H3 may explain their binding to chromatin in vivo. It remains to be determined whether or not all of the four MCM proteins have a binding affinity for histone H3. Although some portion of BM28/MCM2 protein was not precipitated with anti-Cdc21 antibodies (Fig. 7B), almost all of the protein bound with histone (Fig. 5C), suggesting that BM28/MCM2 protein itself can bind with histone H3. Musahl et al. (42) have reported that human Cdc21 protein forms a stable trimeric complex with CDC47 and 105-kDa MCM proteins, and BM28/MCM2 protein is loosely associated with the trimeric Cdc21 complex. Immunoprecipitation with anti-Cdc21 antibodies (Fig. 7) supports these findings, and the 105-kDa MCM protein probably corresponds to the 103-kDa protein of human Mis5 protein in our study. Among six MCM proteins, the behavior of the P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 differed from that of other MCM proteins, which may be consistent with the findings that these proteins form complexes in mouse cells (32) and in human nuclear extracts (43). In addition, two MCM complexes of 600 kDa, one that contains CDC46 and one that appears to contain both MCM2 and Cdc21 proteins, have been identified in Drosophila extracts (44). The sensitivity to nuclease suggests that S. cerevisiae MCM3 protein also binds with chromatin (27). MCM3 protein may bind chromatin by interacting with other MCM proteins, since MCM3 protein complexes with MCM2 and Cdc21 proteins in Xenopus egg extracts (45), and P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins in DE52 fraction interacted with the complexes containing other MCM proteins (Fig. 7). P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins may be released from the MCM protein complexes under the conditions (0.3 M NaCl) where the MCM proteins in the DE52 fraction were loaded onto a histone-Sepharose column (Fig. 5). All of the MCM2 (BM28), Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins have a putative Zn-binding motif (37), which may play an important role in forming the complexes.

The human BM28/MCM2 (23), Cdc21, CDC46 and MCM3 (24), and mouse MCM3 (20) proteins are not concentrated at the replication forks, since the localization of the MCM proteins in the cells is not coincident with those of the replication proteins of RPA (HSSB) and PCNA that is an accessory protein of DNA polymerase delta . These in vivo findings suggest that they are not a DNA helicase that is present at the replication forks. Complexes containing BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins have a high affinity for H3 histone, which forms a tetramer complexed with histone H4 and occupies the central region in the nucleosome structure (46). These two histones play a crucial role in forming a nucleosome structure (47, 48). Histone H2A/H2B dissociates from chromatin near 1 M NaCl and H3/H4 near 1.5 M NaCl (49). The four MCM proteins eluted mainly from the histone H3/H4 column at 1-1.6 M NaCl (Fig. 5). These results suggest that the affinity of the MCM proteins to histone H3 seems to be comparable to that of histone H3 to DNA. Therefore, the MCM proteins may play a role in DNA replication by changing nucleosome structures. The activities of nucleosome disruption and concomitant transcription factor binding, which are dependent on ATP hydrolysis, have been reported in a transcription complex of SWI/SNF (50, 51) that may interact with histone H3 and H4 (52). Three possibilities can be considered for the physiological meanings of the high affinity of MCM proteins to histone H3. First, the MCM proteins may disassemble nucleosome structures near the replication origin through interaction with the origin binding proteins. Thereby, the other replication proteins can be assembled to the origin. Consistent with this notion, interaction between the components of ORC and MCM protein has been suggested in S. cerevisiae (5, 10). However, MCM are abundant proteins and are estimated to present at 105-106 molecules/cell (23, 53). They may be present in other chromosomal regions than in the replication origins. Second, the MCM proteins, which have affinity for histone, are required for progression of the replication forks by displacing the nucleosome structures of the unreplicated DNA (23). Krude and Knippers (54) have reported that re-replication of the SV40 minichromosome in vitro is inhibited at the stage of chain elongation, after the chromosome is constructed in a DNA replication-dependent manner. They have interpreted this finding to mean that the specific structure of post-replicative chromatin interferes with the progression of the replication forks. MCM proteins may relieve the structural constraints upon replication during elongation. However, the second notion may not be consistent with the findings that microinjecting anti-BM28 antibody inhibits the initiation of DNA replication but not the progression of DNA replication (21). Third, MCM proteins may disassemble nucleosome structures of chromatin, not specifically in the origin region, but to generate negative DNA superhelicity, since the negative superhelicity is embedded in the nucleosome structure. In topologically fixed chromosomal domains, the torsional stress of the negative superhelicity can be propagated to the origin regions where a DNA unwinding element (55, 56) is present, which may result in the unwinding of the origin regions. These three possibilities that are not mutually exclusive can be tested by constructing in vitro systems, although a factor(s) that is required for the assembly of MCM proteins to chromatin remains to be identified (15).

An increasing number of regions in the chromosome where DNA replication initiates have been mapped in higher eukaryotic cells, and they are called ``initiation zones'' (57, 58, 59). Furthermore, sequences essential for DNA replication in higher eukaryotic cells have been identified in the region of human beta -globin gene (60), and the initiation of DNA replication was detected within a region in extrachromosomal amplicons containing Syrian hamster CAD gene (61) and mouse ADA gene (62). However, multiple initiations occur from initiation zones of 55 kilobase pairs in the regions downstream of the DHFR gene of CHO cells in vivo (63), although one highly preferred initiation site of 0.5 kilobase pair has been identified within this region (64). Similar long initiation zones have been found in the regions downstream of the DNA polymerase alpha  gene in Drosophila (65) and in the intergenic regions of human rDNA (66). These findings suggest that changes in the higher order structure of DNA as well as the proteins bound to specific sequences may play an important role in the initiation of DNA replication in higher eukaryotic cells. We reported that negative supercoiling of the template DNA was sufficient for inducing DNA replication from S. cerevisiae ARS1 (67, 68), the human c-myc initiation zone, and the Drosophila DHFR origin (69) in a replication system consisting of the minimal components of SV40 DNA replication. Since these origins contained DNA elements where the stability of the DNA duplex is relatively low (70), the origins were unwound with the torsional stress of the negative superhelicity, and the unwound regions were recognized with replication proteins of DNA helicase, HSSB (RPA), and DNA polymerase alpha /primase to initiate DNA replication. This mechanism of initiation of DNA replication may explain why the requirement of the DNA sequence for the initiation of DNA replication is not so stringent in higher eukaryotic cells.

Human BM28/MCM2 (23) and mouse P1/MCM3 proteins (20) are accumulated in nuclei at G1 phase, but they are released from chromatin at DNA synthesis. Therefore, these MCM proteins may be inactivated at the onset of DNA replication, which is consistent with the notion that they are replication licensing factors (71), which was first postulated by Blow and Laskey (72). Based on this consideration, the correlation between the phosphorylation and the dissociation of the BM28/MCM2 and P1/MCM3 proteins from chromatin (20, 23, 53) suggests that the MCM proteins are inactivated by the phosphorylation. Since MCM2 protein in the purified fraction was underphosphorylated (Fig. 8), these MCM proteins may be active forms. Although we purified BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins from 0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole cell extracts, they may be derived from chromatin-bound forms. It may be important to examine the affinity to histone H3 of highly phosphorylated forms of MCM2 protein in logarithmically growing cells. It is also important to analyze the interaction between the MCM protein complexes and histone H3 at the molecular level and to address the physiological significance of this interaction.


FOOTNOTES

*   This study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for scientific research on priority areas from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 0427-24-6266; Fax: 0427-24-6317; E-mail: yukio{at}libra.ls.m-kagaku.co.jp.
   Present address: Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Rd., Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) X67334[GenBank], BM28/MCM2; X74794[GenBank], hCdc21; X74796[GenBank], hCDC47; U17565[GenBank], ratMis5.


1   The abbreviations use are: ORC, origin recognition complex; MCM, minichromosome maintenance; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yoshiko Ishimi and Reiko Ohba for discussions, Keiji Kimura for providing HeLa cells, Kazufumi Kuroda for his help in operating the HPLC, and Atsuko Ohtake for the conjugation of peptide with carrier protein.


REFERENCES

  1. Bell, S. P., Stillman, B. (1992) Nature 357, 128-134 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Bell, S. P., Kobayashi, R., Stillman, B. (1993) Science 262, 1844-1849 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Foss, M., McNally, F. J., Laurenson, P., Rine, J. (1993) Science 262, 1838-1844 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Micklem, G., Rowley, A., Harwood, J., Nasmyth, K., Diffley, J. F. X. (1993) Nature 366, 87-89 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Loo, S., Fox, C. A., Rine, J., Kobayashi, R., Stillman, B., Bell, S. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 741-756 [Abstract]
  6. Gibson, S. I., Surosky, R. T., Tye, B.-K. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 5707-5720 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Yan, H., Gibson, S., Tye, B. K. (1991) Genes Dev. 5, 944-957 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hennessy, K. M., Lee, A., Chen, E., Botstein, D. (1991) Genes Dev. 5, 958-969 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Dalton, S., Whitbread, L. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 2514-2518 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Li, J. J., Herskowitz, I. (1993) Science 262, 1870-1874 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Coxon, A., Maundrell, K., Kearsey, S. E. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 5571-5577 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Takahashi, K., Yamada, H., Yanagida, M. (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell 5, 1145-1158 [Abstract]
  13. Miyake, S., Okishio, N., Samejima, I., Hiraoka, Y., Toda, T., Saitoh, I., Yanagida, M. (1993) Mol. Biol. Cell 4, 1003-1015 [Abstract]
  14. Kubota, Y., Mimura, S., Nishimoto, S., Takizawa, H., Nojima, H. (1995) Cell 81, 601-609 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Chong, J. P. J., Mahbubani, H. M., Khoo, C.-Y., Blow, J. J. (1995) Nature 375, 418-421 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Madine, M. A., Khoo, C.-Y., Mills, A. D., Laskey, R. A. (1995) Nature 375, 421-424 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Someya, A., Shioda, M., Okuyama, A. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 209, 823-831 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Treisman, J. E., Follette, P. J., O'Farrell, P. H., Rubin, G. M. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 1709-1715 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Feger, G., Vaessin, H., Su, T. T., Wolff, E., Jan, L. J., Jan, Y. N. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 5387-5398 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Kimura, H., Nozaki, N., Sugimoto, K. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4311-4320 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Todorov, I. T., Pepperkok, R., Philipova, R. N., Kearsey, S. E., Ansorge, W., Werner, D. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 253-265 [Abstract]
  22. Koonin, E. V. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 2541-2547 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Todorov, I. T., Attaran, A., Kearsey, S. E. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 1433-1445 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Krude, T., Musahl, C., Laskey, R. A., Knippers, R. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 309-318 [Abstract]
  25. Thömmes, P., Fett, R., Schray, B., Burkhart, R., Barnes, M., Kennedy, C., Brown, N. C., Knippers, R. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1069-1074 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Starborg, M., Brundell, E., Gell, K., Larsson, C., White, I., Daneholt, B., Höög, C. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 108, 927-934 [Abstract]
  27. Yan, H., Merchant, A. M., Tye, B. K. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 2149-2160 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Simon, R. H., Felsenfeld, G. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res. 6, 689-696 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Ishimi, Y., Hirosumi, J., Sato, W., Sugasawa, K., Yokota, S., Hanaoka, F., Yamada, M. (1984) Eur. J. Biochem. 142, 431-439 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Hu, B., Burkhart, R., Schulte, D., Musahl, C., Knippers, R. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 5289-5293 [Free Full Text]
  32. Kimura, H., Takizawa, N., Nozaki, N., Sugimoto, K. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 2097-2104 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kimura, K., Nozaki, N., Saijo, M., Kikuchi, A., Ui, M., Enomoto, T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 24523-24526 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Wobbe, C. R., Dean, F., Weissbach, L., Hurwitz, J. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 5710-5714 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Miller, K. G., Liu, L. F., Englund, P. T. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 9334-9339 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Chong, J. P. J., Thömmes, P., Blow, J. J. (1996) Trends Biol. Sci. 21, 102-106
  37. Kearsey, S. E., Mariorano, D., Holmes, E. C., Todorov, I. T. (1996) BioEssays 18, 183-190 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Schulte, D., Richter, A., Burkhart, R., Musahl, C., Knippers, R. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 235, 144-151 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Takizawa, N., Kimura, H., Sugimoto, K. (1995) Gene (Amst.) 167, 343-344 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Sykes, D. E., Weiser, M. M. (1995) Gene (Amst.) 163, 243-247 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Ishimi, Y., Kojima, M., Yamada, M., Hanaoka, F. (1987) Eur. J. Biochem. 162, 19-24 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Musahl, C., Schulte, D., Burkhart, R., Knippers, R. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 230, 1096-1101 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Burkhart, R., Schulte, D., Hu, B., Musahl, C., Göhring, F., Knippers, R. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 228, 431-438 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Su, T. T., Feger, G., O'Farrell, P. H. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 319-326 [Abstract]
  45. Madine, M. A., Khoo, C.-Y., Mills, A. D., Musahl, C., Laskey, R. A. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 1270-1279 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. van Holde, K. E. (1988) Chromatin , 1st Ed. , p. 219, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
  47. Camerini-Otero, R. D., Sollner-Webb, B., Felsenfeld, G. (1976) Cell 8, 333-347 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Hayes, J. J., Clark, D. J., Wolffe, A. P. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 6829-6833 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Burton, D., R., Butler, M. J., Hyde, J. E., Philips, D., Skidmore, C. J., Walker, I. O. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 5, 3643-3666 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Cote, J., Quinn, J., Workman, J. L., Peterson, C. L. (1994) Science 265, 53-60 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Kwon, H., Imbalzano, A. N., Khavari, P. A., Kingston, R. E., Green, M. R. (1994) Nature 370, 477-485 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Kruger, W., Peterson, C. L., Sil, A., Coburn, C., Arents, G., Moudrianakis, E., N., Herskowitz, I. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 2770-2779 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Schulte, D., Burkhart, R., Musahl, C., Hu, B., Schlatterer, C., Hameister, H., Knippers, R. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 108, 1381-1389 [Abstract]
  54. Krude, T., Knippers, R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21021-21029 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Umek, R. M., Kowalski, D. (1988) Cell 52, 559-567 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Umek, R. M., Kowalski, D. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 2486-2490 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Benbow, R. M., Zhao, J., Larson, D. D. (1992) BioEssays 14, 661-670 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Held, P. G., Heintz, N. H. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1130, 235-246 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Hamlin, J. L. (1992) BioEssays 14, 651-659 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Kitsberg, D., Selig, S., Keshet, I., Cedar, H. (1993) Nature 366, 588-590 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Kelly, R. E., DeRose, M. L., Draper, B. W., Wahl, G. M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4136-4148 [Abstract]
  62. Carroll, S. M., DeRose, M. L., Kolman, J. L., Nonet, G. H., Kelly, R. E., Wahl, G. M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 2971-2981 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Dijkwel, P. A., Hamlin, J. L. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 3715-3722 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Burhans, W. C., Vassilev, L. T., Caddle, M. S., Heinz, N. H., DePamphilis, M. L. (1990) Cell 62, 955-965 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Shinomiya, T., Ina, S. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7394-7403 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Little, R. D., Platt, T. H. K., Schildkraut, C. L. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6600-6613 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Ishimi, Y., Matsumoto, K. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 5399-5403 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Ishimi, Y., Matsumoto, K. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 2733-2740 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  69. Ishimi, Y., Matsumoto, K., Ohba, R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6489-6496 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Matsumoto, K., Ishimi, Y. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4624-4632 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Tye, B.-K. (1994) Trends Cell Biol. 4, 160-166
  72. Blow, J. J., Laskey, R. A. (1988) Nature 357, 128-134

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. Groth, A. Corpet, A. J. L. Cook, D. Roche, J. Bartek, J. Lukas, and G. Almouzni
Regulation of Replication Fork Progression Through Histone Supply and Demand
Science, December 21, 2007; 318(5858): 1928 - 1931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
S. C. Pruitt, K. J. Bailey, and A. Freeland
Reduced Mcm2 Expression Results in Severe Stem/Progenitor Cell Deficiency and Cancer
Stem Cells, December 1, 2007; 25(12): 3121 - 3132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. L. Bochman and A. Schwacha
Differences in the Single-stranded DNA Binding Activities of MCM2-7 and MCM467: MCM2 AND MCM5 DEFINE A SLOW ATP-DEPENDENT STEP
J. Biol. Chem., November 16, 2007; 282(46): 33795 - 33804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. M. Sakwe, T. Nguyen, V. Athanasopoulos, K. Shire, and L. Frappier
Identification and Characterization of a Novel Component of the Human Minichromosome Maintenance Complex
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2007; 27(8): 3044 - 3055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. V. Mitkova, E. E. Biswas-Fiss, and S. B. Biswas
Modulation of DNA Synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nuclear Extract by DNA Polymerases and the Origin Recognition Complex
J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2005; 280(8): 6285 - 6292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
Y. Zhou and T. S.-F. Wang
A Coordinated Temporal Interplay of Nucleosome Reorganization Factor, Sister Chromatin Cohesion Factor, and DNA Polymerase {alpha} Facilitates DNA Replication
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2004; 24(21): 9568 - 9579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
P. Francon, J.-M. Lemaitre, C. Dreyer, D. Maiorano, O. Cuvier, and M. Mechali
A hypophosphorylated form of RPA34 is a specific component of pre-replication centers
J. Cell Sci., October 1, 2004; 117(21): 4909 - 4920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.