|
Volume 271, Number 39,
Issue of September 27, 1996
pp. 24115-24122
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Binding of Human Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins with Histone
H3*
(Received for publication, March 28, 1996, and in revised form, May 28, 1996)
Yukio
Ishimi
,
Sachiyo
Ichinose
,
Akira
Omori
,
Kazuki
Sato
and
Hiroshi
Kimura
§¶
From the Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences, 11 Minamiooya, Machida, Tokyo 194, Japan and § Research Center
for Molecular Genetics, Hokkaido University, Kita 10 Nishi 8, Kita-ku,
Sapporo 060, Japan
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Minichromosome maintenance (MCM) proteins play
essential roles in eukaryotic DNA replication, but their biochemical
properties remain to be determined. We detected in HeLa cell extracts
six proteins, CDC47, CDC46/MCM5, Cdc21, P1/MCM3, Mis5, and BM28/MCM2,
by their binding to a specific antibody and by partial sequencing. The
human homologs of the MCM2 (BM28), Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins were
tightly bound to a histone-Sepharose column and purified to near
homogeneity, whereas the P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins passed
through. Among the four core histones, the human BM28/MCM2, Mis5,
Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins had high affinity for histone H3.
Immunoprecipitation with anti-Cdc21 antibody revealed that these four
MCM proteins form complexes. These results are consistent with the
findings that MCM proteins bind with chromatin in vivo.
INTRODUCTION
In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication initiates from multiple sites
in chromosomes during S phase, which are called replication origins. In
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, several proteins that are required
for the initiation of DNA replication have been identified. Origin
recognition complex (ORC)1 proteins (1)
that bind to the essential origin sequence are involved in DNA
replication (2, 3, 4, 5). MCM proteins, which include MCM2, MCM3, CDC46/MCM5,
CDC47, and CDC54 (6, 7, 8, 9), are essential for cell growth and are required
for DNA replication. Genetic analyses indicate that they have distinct
roles in DNA replication and that they interact (7, 8). Interactions
between the components of ORC with MCM proteins have also been
described (5, 10). In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Cdc21 (11)
and Mis5 (12) MCM proteins in addition to Nda1/MCM2 and Nda4/CDC46 (13)
have been identified. Homologues of these MCM proteins are found in
various organisms and Xenopus MCM3 (14, 15, 16, 17),
Drosophila MCM2 (18) and Cdc21 (19), mouse P1/MCM3 (20), and
human BM28/MCM2 (21) proteins also play essential roles in cellular DNA
replication. However, it remains to be analyzed how the MCM proteins
are involved in this process.
Since MCM proteins have the domains required for
DNA-dependent ATPase activity in central regions (22), they
may function as the DNA helicase that is required for DNA unwinding
during DNA replication, although human BM28/MCM2 (23), Cdc21, CDC47,
and MCM3 (24), and mouse MCM3 (20) proteins are not co-localized in
replication foci. P1/MCM3 protein may be a component of the DNA
polymerase holoenzyme (25). Immunocytochemical analyses suggest
that human BM28/MCM2 (23) and mouse P1/MCM3 (20, 26) proteins bind with
the nuclear structure in G1 phase and detach from it during
DNA replication. The sensitivity to nuclease suggests that both human
BM28/MCM2 (23) and S. cerevisiae MCM3 (27) proteins bind
with chromatin. We detected MCM proteins in HeLa cell extracts by
immunoblotting, using antibodies against a conserved portion of MCM
proteins, and found that MCM protein complexes containing BM28/MCM2,
Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins have high affinity for histone H3.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Proteins and Serum
Histone pairs of H2A/H2B and H3/H4 were
purified from HeLa cells as described by Simon and Felsenfeld (28). H3
and H4 histones were purified from mouse FM3A cells. They were
separated by HPLC using a reverse phase C18 column. The histones were
eluted by a linear gradient from 20 to 60% acetonitrile containing
0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. H4 and H3 histones were eluted from the
column by approximately 45 and 50% acetonitrile, respectively.
Separation of these two histones was confirmed by electrophoresis in a
15% polyacrylamide gel containing sodium dodecyl sulfate (29).
Histones other than H4 were dialyzed against 0.1 M
NaHCO3, pH 8.5, and cross-linked to cyanogen
bromide-activated Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) (30). Since H4
histone was insoluble in the buffer, it was dialyzed against 0.1 M potassium phosphate, pH 7.5, and then NaHCO3,
pH 8.5, was added at the final concentration of 0.1 M
before cross-linking. Histones (0.3-0.5 mg) were cross-linked to 1 ml
of Sepharose 4B. Rabbit antiserum against the peptides
(VVCIDEFDKMSDMDRTA) from mouse MCM proteins that had been linked to
keyhole limpet hemocyanin was raised (31). The specific antibodies
(rabbit) against mouse P1/MCM3, CDC46/MCM5, and Cdc21 proteins were
raised as reported elsewhere (20, 32). A carboxyl-terminal region
(amino acid 683-862) of mouse Cdc21 protein was produced in
Escherichia coli as a glutathione S-transferase
fusion protein (Pharmacia). The rabbit antibodies against the protein
were raised and they were affinity-purified. Anti-Cdc21 antibody beads
(2 mg/ml) were prepared by cross-linking the antibodies to
cyanogen-activated Sepharose 4B. The beads were also conjugated with
rabbit immunoglobulin (5 mg/ml) that had been purified from preimmune
serum by a protein A column. For immunoblotting, the proteins in a 10%
polyacrylamide gel were transferred to a nylon membrane (Immobilon-P,
Millipore) and then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in TBS (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 150 mM NaCl)
containing 5% horse serum (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7) or skim milk (Fig.
8). The membrane was incubated for 1 h with anti-MCM protein
antibody (rabbit antibody) diluted with the solution described above.
After washing with TBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100, the membrane was
incubated for 1 h with diluted peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit
antibody (goat antibody, Bio-Rad). Proteins were visualized using a
peroxidase detection kit (HRP1000, Konica) (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7) or a
chemiluminescent substrate system (Pierce) (Fig. 8). Logarithmically
growing HeLa cells and those in mitotic phase were kindly provided by
Keiji Kimura (33).
Fig. 1.
DE52 column chromatography of HeLa MCM
proteins. The proteins in HeLa cell extracts (lane 1),
ammonium sulfate fraction (lane 2), and the DE52 fractions
(lanes 3-25) were electrophoresed in a 10% polyacrylamide
gel and analyzed by immunoblotting by using the antibodies against the
conserved portion of MCM protein. The proteins passed through the DE52
column were electrophoresed in lanes 3 and 4, and
those eluted from the column by increasing the concentration of NaCl
were run in lanes 5-25. The concentration of NaCl, which
was determined by examining the conductivity of the eluate, is
indicated at the top of the gel. The molecular mass was determined by
comparison with marker proteins (Bio-Rad, high range).
[View Larger Version of this Image (59K GIF file)]
Fig. 2.
Immunoblotting MCM proteins in 0.2 M NaCl-soluble and 2 M NaCl-soluble HeLa cell
extracts. A, the proteins in the pooled DE52 fraction from
0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole cell extracts were resolved by
electrophoresis in a 10% polyacrylamide gel and examined by
immunoblotting. The first antibodies used are those against a peptide
from the conserved portion of MCM proteins (lane 1,
peptide), the specific antibodies against mouse Cdc21
(lane 2, Cdc21), mouse P1/MCM3 (lane
3, MCM3), or mouse CDC46/MCM5 protein (lane
4, CDC46), as indicated. B, the proteins in
the hydroxylapatite fraction purified from 2 M NaCl-soluble
nuclear extracts were analyzed by immunoblotting. The antibodies used
are those against the mouse CDC46/MCM5 (lane 1), mouse Cdc21
(lane 2), mouse P1/MCM3 protein (lane 3), and a
peptide from the conserved portion of MCM proteins (lane
4).
[View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]
Fig. 3.
Histone-Sepharose column chromatography of
MCM proteins. A, the proteins in the pooled DE52 fraction
were loaded onto a histone-Sepharose column, and the bound proteins
were eluted with a linear gradient from 0.2 to 1 M NaCl.
The proteins in the gel were stained with silver. The concentration of
NaCl was indicated at the top of the gel. B, proteins
eluting from the column near 1 M NaCl were immunoblotted.
The first antibodies were those against a peptide from the conserved
portion of MCM proteins (lane 1), mouse P1/MCM3 (lane
2), mouse CDC46 (lane 3), and mouse Cdc21 protein
(lane 4) as indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (61K GIF file)]
Fig. 5.
Histone H2A/H2B and H3/H4 column
chromatography of MCM proteins. The proteins in the DE52 fraction
(30 ml) were loaded onto a 5-ml column of H2A/H2B (A) or
H3/H4 (B), and the bound proteins were eluted by a linear
gradient from 0.3 to 2 M NaCl. Proteins were resolved by
electrophoresis in a 10% acrylamide gel and stained with silver. In
lane 16 of A and B, the MCM proteins
purified by histone-Sepharose column chromatography were resolved by
electrophoresis. NAP-I protein was indicated in H2A/H2B column
chromatography. C, left, the flow-through
fractions of the H3/H4 (lanes 2-5) and H2A/H2B columns
(lanes 6-9) were resolved by electrophoresis and
immunoblotted against the antibodies to the conserved portion. The
proteins from the loaded DE52 fraction were electrophoresed in
lane 1. Right, proteins in the flow-through fractions of the
H3/H4 column were analyzed by immunoblotting. The first antibodies used
were those against a peptide from the conserved region of MCM protein
(lane 10), P1/MCM3 (lane 11), Cdc21 (lane
12), and CDC46/MCM5 (lane 13) as indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]
Fig. 7.
Complex formation of MCM proteins.
A, the MCM proteins (150 ng) purified by histone-Sepharose column
chromatography were mixed with the beads conjugated with anti-Cdc21
antibody or control rabbit antibody. After washing, proteins bound to
the beads were eluted twice (indicated by e-1 and
e-2, respectively) and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. Proteins were visualized by staining with silver. MCM
proteins purified by histone-Sepharose column chromatography were
electrophoresed in the left-end lane. B, the DE52 fraction
was mixed with the antibody beads as described above. Unbound
(un) and bound (e-1 and e-2) MCM
proteins were detected by immunoblotting using the antibodies against
the conserved portion. The DE52 fraction was electrophoresed in the
left-end lane. C, MCM proteins bound to the anti-Cdc21
antibody beads (e-1 in B) were examined by
immunoblotting using the antibodies against the conserved portion
(lane 2, peptide), P1/MCM3 (lane 3),
CDC46/MCM5 (lane 4), and Cdc21 (lane 5), as
indicated. Immunoblotting of purified MCM proteins by the antibodies
against the conserved portion is shown in lane 1.
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]
Fig. 8.
Phosphorylation state of MCM2 protein in the
purified fraction. Extracts from logarithmically growing HeLa
cells (log) and mitotic phase of HeLa cells (M)
were prepared (33). They (7 µl in a 10-µl reaction mixture) were
incubated with phosphatase (400 units, New England Biolabs) in the
presence of 2 mM MnCl2 at 30 °C for 30 min.
These extracts were electrophoresed in parallel with the MCM proteins
purified by histone-Sepharose column chromatography
(purified). MCM proteins were detected by immunoblotting
using the antibodies against the conserved portion. Treatment with
phosphatase is indicated by + at the top of the gel.
[View Larger Version of this Image (41K GIF file)]
Purification of MCM Proteins
HeLa cells were cultured in
spinner bottles until late-log phase. After the cells (1 × 1010 cells) were homogenized in hypotonic buffer, 5 M NaCl was added to a final concentration of 0.2 M, and the mixture was centrifuged to obtain 0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole cell extracts (34). The extracted
proteins were fractionated by ammonium sulfate precipitation. The
35-65% saturated fraction was loaded onto a DE52 (Pharmacia) column
equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10% glycerol (buffer
A) containing 0.1 M NaCl. The bound proteins were eluted by
a linear gradient from 0.1 to 0.4 M NaCl in buffer A. The
proteins containing MCM proteins eluting at near 0.2 M were
pooled (1 mg/ml protein, total 40 ml) and loaded onto a
histone-Sepharose column (5 ml) equilibrated with 0.2 M
NaCl in buffer A. After washing the column with the same buffer, the
bound proteins were eluted by a linear gradient from 0.2 to 1 M NaCl. When MCM proteins were fractionated by histone
H2A/H2B, H3/H4, H3, or H4 column chromatography (Figs. 5 and 6), HeLa
cell extracts were directly fractionated by DE52 column chromatography,
and pooled fractions were loaded onto each column equilibrated with 0.3 M NaCl in buffer A. The bound proteins were eluted by a
linear gradient from 0.3 to 2 M NaCl.
Fig. 6.
Histone H3 and H4 column chromatography of
MCM proteins. The proteins in the DE52 fraction (1 ml) were loaded
onto a 1-ml column of histone H3 (A) or H4 (B),
and the bound proteins were eluted by a gradient from 0.3 to 2 M NaCl. The proteins in the fractions obtained by the
gradient were resolved by electrophoresis, and they were stained with
silver. In lanes 12 and 8 of A and
B, respectively, the MCM proteins purified by the
histone-Sepharose column chromatography were electrophoresed.
[View Larger Version of this Image (75K GIF file)]
The proteins were extracted from the residual nuclear precipitates of
the 0.2 M NaCl-treated HeLa cells with 2 M NaCl
to obtain 2 M NaCl-soluble nuclear extracts. After nucleic
acids were removed by precipitation with polyethylene glycol, the
proteins were fractionated by hydroxylapatite column chromatography as
described by Miller et al. (35). After the fractions eluted
with 0.2 M phosphate that contained MCM proteins were
dialyzed against 0.1 M NaCl in buffer A, they were loaded
onto a phosphocellulose column equilibrated with the same buffer. The
bound proteins were eluted by a linear gradient from 0.1 to 0.6 M NaCl. The fractions that eluted near 0.35 M
NaCl were pooled and loaded onto the histone-Sepharose column. The
bound proteins were eluted by a linear gradient from 0.3 to 2 M NaCl in buffer A.
Partial Sequencing of MCM Proteins
The proteins in a 10%
polyacrylamide gel were transferred to a membrane (Immobilon-P) and
stained with 0.1% Ponceau, 1% acetic acid for 5 min. The protein
bands were excised, destained with 0.5 mM NaOH, and washed
with deionized water. The excised membrane in a microtube (1.5 ml) was
immersed in 6 M guanidine HCl, 0.5 M Tris-HCl,
pH 8.5, 0.3% EDTA, 2% acetonitrile (200 µl). The same solution (100 µl) containing 1 mg of dithiothreitol was added, and it was incubated
for 1 h at 37 °C. ICH2COONa (2.4 mg) dissolved in
10 µl of water was added and incubated for 20 min at 37 °C in the
dark. The membrane was washed successively with 2% acetonitrile four
times, once with 0.1% SDS, and once with water. The membrane was
incubated with 0.5% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 0.1 M acetic
acid (500 µl) for 30 min at room temperature, and then washed with
water four times. After cutting the membrane into small pieces, the
pieces were shaken at 37 °C overnight with 0.4 µg of lysyl
endopeptidase (Acromobacter, Wako) in 8% acetonitrile, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5. After centrifugation, the supernatant
was loaded onto an HPLC column (RP-300, inner diameter, 2.1 × 30 mm, Applied Biosystems), and the peptides were eluted by a linear
gradient from 0 to 70% acetonitrile in the presence of 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid. Amino acids from the NH2 terminus of
the peptides were determined by a pulse-liquid phase protein sequencer
(model 477A/120A, Applied Biosystems).
Immunoprecipitation
The fraction containing MCM proteins
(20 µl) in 0.15 M NaCl, buffer A, was mixed for 1.5 h at 4 °C with beads (15 µl) conjugated with anti-Cdc21 antibody
or control rabbit antibody that had been washed with the buffer A
containing 0.1 M NaCl, 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, and
0.05% Nonidet P-40. After centrifugation, the supernatant was saved.
The beads were washed four times with phosphate-buffered saline
containing 0.05% Nonidet P-40, and proteins bound to the beads were
recovered by eluting twice with 20 µl of 0.1 M glycine,
pH 2.5, and 0.15 M NaCl. The solution was neutralized and
then subjected to electrophoresis.
Other Methods
Proteins in the gel were stained with
Coomassie Blue or silver (silver stain kit, Wako). The protein
concentration was determined with the Bio-Rad protein assay reagent
using bovine serum albumin as a standard.
RESULTS
Detection of MCM Proteins in 0.2 M NaCl-soluble and 2 M NaCl-soluble Extracts of HeLa Cells
Six MCM
proteins of MCM2, MCM3, CDC46/MCM5, CDC47, Cdc21, and Mis5 have been
identified in eukaryotic cells (Table I) (32, 36, 37).
They have a conserved region in the central part of the proteins (12,
21, 31, 37) where the domains required for DNA-dependent
ATPase activity are present (22). Antibodies against a peptide from a
highly conserved region of MCM proteins were obtained by immunizing
rabbits with a synthetic peptide from the region (31). The antibodies
recognized several proteins ranging from 80 to 125 kDa in addition to
smaller proteins in 0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole cell extracts
of HeLa cells on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel, which was analyzed by
immunoblotting (Fig. 1, lane 1). The extracts
were fractionated by ammonium sulfate precipitation followed by DE52
column chromatography. Immunoblotting showed that the MCM-related
proteins of higher molecular mass were bound to the DE52 column, and
they were eluted from the column near 0.2 M NaCl (Fig. 1).
In the pooled DE52 fractions (fractions 9-15), at least
three (86-, 100-, and 125-kDa) proteins, all of which were recognized
by the antibodies to MCM proteins, were detected (Fig.
2A). The specific antibodies to mouse P1/MCM3
protein recognized a 100-kDa protein, and those to mouse Cdc21 protein
recognized 86- and 100-kDa proteins on immunoblots. Antibodies to mouse
CDC46/MCM5 did not detect any proteins, but a 90-kDa protein in the
DE52 fraction was detected by the antibodies (as shown in Fig. 7). A
90-kDa protein recognized by the antibodies against the conserved
portion of MCM protein was detected in the fractions eluting at about
0.15 M NaCl in the DE52 column chromatography, but the
protein was not detected in the fractions eluting at a higher NaCl
concentration (Fig. 1). It appears that the CDC46/MCM5 protein was
present in the pooled DE52 fraction, but the binding of the anti-MCM
protein antibodies to the CDC46/MCM5 protein was interfered with by a
protein(s) in the pooled fraction that migrates at a similar position
to the 90-kDa CDC46/MCM5 protein in the SDS-polyacrylamide gel under
the conditions described in Fig. 2A.
The nuclear precipitate remaining after the extraction with 0.2 M NaCl was treated with 2 M NaCl, and the
extracted proteins were fractionated by hydroxylapatite column
chromatography. Proteins of 90, 100, and 125 kDa were detected in the
pooled fraction by immunoblotting, using antibodies against the
conserved portion of MCM proteins (Fig. 2B). A 100-kDa
protein was recognized by antibodies specific to mouse P1/MCM3 protein,
and 76- and 90-kDa proteins were detected with anti-mouse CDC46/MCM5
antibodies. The 76-kDa protein was not detected with the antibodies
against the conserved portion. These results indicated that several
MCM-related proteins are present in HeLa cells and that the proteins
recognized by the anti-Cdc21 antibodies were enriched in the 0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole cell extracts.
Purification and Identification of MCM Proteins from 0.2 M NaCl-soluble Whole Cell Extracts
The DE52 fraction
containing MCM proteins was fractionated by histone-Sepharose column
chromatography (Fig. 3A). The column
contained almost equal amounts of four core histones that were
cross-linked to Sepharose. At 0.6 M NaCl, NAP-I that
stimulates nucleosome assembly in vitro is eluted from the
column (30). Proteins of 86, 100, 103, and 125 kDa bound to the column
and were eluted near 1 M NaCl. All four proteins were
recognized by the antibodies against the conserved region of MCM
proteins (Fig. 3B). The 100-kDa protein in the purified
fraction was recognized by specific antibodies against the mouse Cdc21
protein, but no protein was recognized with the antibodies against
mouse P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins. A 86-kDa protein in whole cell
extracts that was recognized with the anti-mouse Cdc21 antibody did not
bind with the histone column. Immunoblotting showed that P1/MCM3
protein in the DE52 fraction (Fig. 2A) passed through the
histone-Sepharose column (data not shown, see Fig. 5C).
The partial amino acid sequences of the proteins bound to the
histone-Sepharose column were determined after digesting the proteins
with lysyl endopeptidase (Fig. 4). Two peptides obtained
from the 125-kDa protein were localized in boxes A (peptide
1) and D (peptide 2) (31) of human BM28/MCM2 protein
(21) (Fig. 4A). One peptide from the 86-kDa protein was
identified in box A of human CDC47 (P1.1/MCM3) protein (38) that has
been partially cloned (31), and another peptide was almost matched to a
peptide of mouse CDC47 protein (39). Four of five peptides from the
103-kDa protein were localized in a rat intestinal crypt protein that
has been partially cloned (40) (Fig. 4B). Homology of the
rat protein to the central region of S. pombe Mis5 protein
was greater than that to the human MCM proteins, including MCM2(BM28),
P1/MCM3, CDC46/MCM5, Cdc21, and CDC47 (Fig. 4B and data not
shown). These results suggested that the 125-, 103-, 100-, and 86-kDa
proteins correspond to human BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47
proteins, respectively. These results indicated that the human homologs
of the MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins have a high affinity for
histones, but P1/MCM3 does not. Immunoblotting showed that about 400 µg of MCM protein were precipitated in the ammonium sulfate fraction
(0.3% of total protein), and the final histone-Sepharose fraction
contained about 50 µg of the protein.
Fig. 4.
Partial amino acid sequencing of
histone-bound MCM proteins. A, the amino acid sequences of
two MCM proteins of 125 and 86 kDa bound to the histone-Sepharose
column were determined as described under ``Experimental
Procedures.'' Two peptides from the 125-kDa protein and two from the
86-kDa protein were sequenced. These sequences, each of which is placed
at the top of column, were compared with the published sequences of
human MCM proteins and a mouse CDC47 protein (m). The amino
acid numbers of human BM28/MCM2 and mouse CDC47 proteins are indicated.
B, five peptides from the 103-kDa protein were sequenced.
The partial amino acid sequence of a rat protein (GenBankTM
nucleotide accession no. U17565[GenBank]) (40) where four out of the five
peptides from the 103-kDa protein were localized (underlined
and numbered) was compared with that of S. pombe
Mis5 (12) (EMBL accession no. D31960[GenBank]) and human BM2/MCM2 proteins (21)
(EMBL accession no. X67334[GenBank]). The conserved domains (boxes
A-D) of MCM proteins (31) are indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]
The fractions containing the MCM proteins that were obtained from 2 M NaCl-soluble nuclear extracts by hydroxylapatite column
chromatography (Fig. 2B) were further separated by
phosphocellulose column chromatography (data not shown). The fractions
that eluted near 0.35 M NaCl contained the 102- and 90-kDa
MCM proteins, which corresponded to P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins,
respectively. When they were loaded onto the histone-Sepharose column,
these two MCM proteins passed through the column (data not shown).
Binding of MCM Proteins with Histone H3
To understand the
interaction of the MCM proteins with histones, the MCM proteins of the
DE52 fraction were loaded onto a histone H2A/H2B or a H3/H4 column,
instead of the histone-Sepharose column containing four core histones
(Fig. 5). Proteins of 86, 100, 103, and 125 kDa were
bound to the H3/H4 column and eluted near 1 M NaCl (Fig.
5B). The composition was similar to that in the fractions
purified by the histone-Sepharose column chromatography (Fig. 3). All
four proteins were recognized by the antibodies against the conserved
portion of MCM proteins, and the 100-kDa protein was recognized by
anti-Cdc21 antibodies (data not shown). However, the 102-kDa protein
passed through the H3/H4 column, and it was recognized by the specific
antibodies against P1/MCM3 protein (Fig. 5C). These results
are essentially the same as those obtained after histone-Sepharose
column chromatography. No MCM proteins were detected in the bound
fractions of H2A/H2B column chromatography (Fig. 5A), but
they passed through the column (Fig. 5C). NAP-I was bound to
the H2A/H2B but not to the H3/H4 column, since it has a higher binding
affinity for H2A/H2B than for H3/H4 (41). Next, the DE52 fraction was
loaded onto a histone H3 or a H4 column (Fig. 6). The
86-, 100-, 103-, and 125-kDa proteins bound to the H3, but not to the
H4 column. They were mainly eluted from the H3 column by 0.5-1
M NaCl; the concentration was slightly lower than that
required for the elution from the H3/H4 column. These results indicated
that the human homologs of the MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins
specifically interact with histone H3. However, the possibility that
these MCM proteins also interact with H4 histone cannot be
excluded.
Complex Formation of MCM Proteins
To know the interaction of
MCM proteins, the fraction containing MCM proteins were
immunoprecipitated with anti-Cdc21 antibody beads (Fig.
7). Four MCM proteins of BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and
CDC47 in the purified fraction were precipitated with the beads
conjugated with anti-Cdc21 antibody, but not with those conjugated with
control rabbit antibody (Fig. 7A). The anti-Cdc21 antibody
beads also precipitated four proteins of 125, 100, 90, and 86 kDa from
the DE52 fraction, which was analyzed by immunoblotting (Fig.
7B). The 125-kDa protein most probably corresponds to
BM28/MCM2 and the 86-kDa protein to CDC47. Binding of specific
antibodies showed that Cdc21 and P1/MCM3 proteins of about 100 kDa were
precipitated with the anti-Cdc21 antibody beads, and the 90-kDa
CDC46/MCM5 protein was also precipitated (Fig. 7C). Three
MCM proteins of Mis5, Cdc21, and P1/MCM3 may migrate at the same
position under these conditions. Therefore, it was suggested that six
MCM proteins in DE52 fraction are all precipitated by the Cdc21
antibodies. In addition to some portion of 125-kDa MCM2 protein,
however, a 100-kDa protein was not precipitated with the anti-Cdc21
antibodies. The 100-kDa protein was recognized with anti-P1/MCM3
antibodies, but not with anti-Cdc21 antibodies by immunoblotting (data
not shown). These results suggest that BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and
CDC47 proteins, which were tightly bound with histone H3, form
complexes, and P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins in DE52 fraction are
also associated with these complexes. When the purified MCM proteins
were fractionated by sucrose gradient centrifugation in the buffer
containing 0.15 M NaCl, a major peak of MCM proteins, where
the BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins were present, was
detected at 11 S (data not shown). These data support the conclusion
that they form complexes.
Human BM28/MCM2 (23) and mouse P1/MCM3 (20) proteins are phosphorylated
as DNA replication proceeds. Phosphorylated human BM28/MCM2 protein
migrates faster than underphosphorylated forms of the protein in
SDS-polyacrylamide gel (23). To know the phosphorylation state of MCM2
protein in the purified fractions, the mobility of MCM2 protein in the
purified fraction was compared with that of MCM2 protein in extracts
prepared from logarithmically growing HeLa cells and also mitotic cells
(Fig. 8). Two bands of 125 and 120 kDa, which are most
probably MCM2 proteins, were detected in the extracts from growing
cells in addition to the MCM proteins of smaller molecular mass, and
several bands ranging from 135 to 120 kDa were detected in the extracts
from mitotic cells. After incubating these extracts with phosphatase, only the 125-kDa protein was detected. The mobility of the
protein in the gel was almost the same as that of MCM2 protein in the
purified fraction. These results suggest that the MCM2 protein in the
purified fraction is an underphosphorylated form.
DISCUSSION
We showed that human homologs of MCM2 (BM28), Mis5, Cdc21, and
CDC47 proteins bound histone. The four MCM proteins, which form
complexes, specifically bound histone H3 among four core histones.
P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins did not bind histone, but these two MCM
proteins from 0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole cell extracts are
associated with the above MCM protein complexes. Both human BM28/MCM2
(23) and mouse P1/MCM3 (20, 26) proteins are bound with nuclear
structures in the G1 phase. The sensitivity to nuclease
suggests that human BM28/MCM2 (23) protein binds with chromatin. The
specific binding of MCM proteins to histone H3 may explain their
binding to chromatin in vivo. It remains to be determined
whether or not all of the four MCM proteins have a binding affinity for
histone H3. Although some portion of BM28/MCM2 protein was not
precipitated with anti-Cdc21 antibodies (Fig. 7B), almost
all of the protein bound with histone (Fig. 5C), suggesting
that BM28/MCM2 protein itself can bind with histone H3. Musahl et
al. (42) have reported that human Cdc21 protein forms a stable
trimeric complex with CDC47 and 105-kDa MCM proteins, and BM28/MCM2
protein is loosely associated with the trimeric Cdc21 complex.
Immunoprecipitation with anti-Cdc21 antibodies (Fig. 7) supports these
findings, and the 105-kDa MCM protein probably corresponds to the
103-kDa protein of human Mis5 protein in our study. Among six MCM
proteins, the behavior of the P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 differed from that
of other MCM proteins, which may be consistent with the findings that
these proteins form complexes in mouse cells (32) and in human nuclear
extracts (43). In addition, two MCM complexes of 600 kDa, one that
contains CDC46 and one that appears to contain both MCM2 and Cdc21
proteins, have been identified in Drosophila extracts (44).
The sensitivity to nuclease suggests that S. cerevisiae MCM3
protein also binds with chromatin (27). MCM3 protein may bind chromatin
by interacting with other MCM proteins, since MCM3 protein complexes
with MCM2 and Cdc21 proteins in Xenopus egg extracts (45),
and P1/MCM3 and CDC46/MCM5 proteins in DE52 fraction interacted with
the complexes containing other MCM proteins (Fig. 7). P1/MCM3 and
CDC46/MCM5 proteins may be released from the MCM protein complexes
under the conditions (0.3 M NaCl) where the MCM proteins in
the DE52 fraction were loaded onto a histone-Sepharose column (Fig. 5).
All of the MCM2 (BM28), Mis5, Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins have a putative
Zn-binding motif (37), which may play an important role in forming the
complexes.
The human BM28/MCM2 (23), Cdc21, CDC46 and MCM3 (24), and mouse MCM3
(20) proteins are not concentrated at the replication forks, since the
localization of the MCM proteins in the cells is not coincident with
those of the replication proteins of RPA (HSSB) and PCNA that is an
accessory protein of DNA polymerase . These in vivo
findings suggest that they are not a DNA helicase that is present at
the replication forks. Complexes containing BM28/MCM2, Mis5, Cdc21, and
CDC47 proteins have a high affinity for H3 histone, which forms a
tetramer complexed with histone H4 and occupies the central region in
the nucleosome structure (46). These two histones play a crucial role
in forming a nucleosome structure (47, 48). Histone H2A/H2B dissociates
from chromatin near 1 M NaCl and H3/H4 near 1.5 M NaCl (49). The four MCM proteins eluted mainly from the
histone H3/H4 column at 1-1.6 M NaCl (Fig. 5). These
results suggest that the affinity of the MCM proteins to histone H3
seems to be comparable to that of histone H3 to DNA. Therefore, the MCM
proteins may play a role in DNA replication by changing nucleosome
structures. The activities of nucleosome disruption and concomitant
transcription factor binding, which are dependent on ATP hydrolysis,
have been reported in a transcription complex of SWI/SNF (50, 51) that
may interact with histone H3 and H4 (52). Three possibilities can be
considered for the physiological meanings of the high affinity of MCM
proteins to histone H3. First, the MCM proteins may disassemble
nucleosome structures near the replication origin through interaction
with the origin binding proteins. Thereby, the other replication
proteins can be assembled to the origin. Consistent with this notion,
interaction between the components of ORC and MCM protein has been
suggested in S. cerevisiae (5, 10). However, MCM are
abundant proteins and are estimated to present at
105-106 molecules/cell (23, 53). They may be
present in other chromosomal regions than in the replication origins.
Second, the MCM proteins, which have affinity for histone, are required
for progression of the replication forks by displacing the nucleosome
structures of the unreplicated DNA (23). Krude and Knippers (54) have
reported that re-replication of the SV40 minichromosome in
vitro is inhibited at the stage of chain elongation, after the
chromosome is constructed in a DNA replication-dependent
manner. They have interpreted this finding to mean that the specific
structure of post-replicative chromatin interferes with the progression
of the replication forks. MCM proteins may relieve the structural
constraints upon replication during elongation. However, the second
notion may not be consistent with the findings that microinjecting
anti-BM28 antibody inhibits the initiation of DNA replication but not
the progression of DNA replication (21). Third, MCM proteins may
disassemble nucleosome structures of chromatin, not specifically in the
origin region, but to generate negative DNA superhelicity, since the
negative superhelicity is embedded in the nucleosome structure. In
topologically fixed chromosomal domains, the torsional stress of the
negative superhelicity can be propagated to the origin regions where a
DNA unwinding element (55, 56) is present, which may result in the
unwinding of the origin regions. These three possibilities that are not
mutually exclusive can be tested by constructing in vitro
systems, although a factor(s) that is required for the assembly of MCM
proteins to chromatin remains to be identified (15).
An increasing number of regions in the chromosome where DNA replication
initiates have been mapped in higher eukaryotic cells, and they are
called ``initiation zones'' (57, 58, 59). Furthermore, sequences
essential for DNA replication in higher eukaryotic cells have been
identified in the region of human -globin gene (60), and the
initiation of DNA replication was detected within a region in
extrachromosomal amplicons containing Syrian hamster CAD
gene (61) and mouse ADA gene (62). However, multiple
initiations occur from initiation zones of 55 kilobase pairs in the
regions downstream of the DHFR gene of CHO cells in
vivo (63), although one highly preferred initiation site of 0.5 kilobase pair has been identified within this region (64). Similar long
initiation zones have been found in the regions downstream of the DNA
polymerase gene in Drosophila (65) and in the intergenic
regions of human rDNA (66). These findings suggest that changes in the
higher order structure of DNA as well as the proteins bound to specific
sequences may play an important role in the initiation of DNA
replication in higher eukaryotic cells. We reported that negative
supercoiling of the template DNA was sufficient for inducing DNA
replication from S. cerevisiae ARS1 (67, 68), the human
c-myc initiation zone, and the Drosophila DHFR
origin (69) in a replication system consisting of the minimal
components of SV40 DNA replication. Since these origins contained DNA
elements where the stability of the DNA duplex is relatively low (70),
the origins were unwound with the torsional stress of the negative
superhelicity, and the unwound regions were recognized with replication
proteins of DNA helicase, HSSB (RPA), and DNA polymerase /primase to
initiate DNA replication. This mechanism of initiation of DNA
replication may explain why the requirement of the DNA sequence for the
initiation of DNA replication is not so stringent in higher eukaryotic
cells.
Human BM28/MCM2 (23) and mouse P1/MCM3 proteins (20) are accumulated in
nuclei at G1 phase, but they are released from chromatin at
DNA synthesis. Therefore, these MCM proteins may be inactivated at the
onset of DNA replication, which is consistent with the notion that they
are replication licensing factors (71), which was first postulated by
Blow and Laskey (72). Based on this consideration, the correlation
between the phosphorylation and the dissociation of the BM28/MCM2 and
P1/MCM3 proteins from chromatin (20, 23, 53) suggests that the MCM
proteins are inactivated by the phosphorylation. Since MCM2 protein in
the purified fraction was underphosphorylated (Fig. 8), these MCM
proteins may be active forms. Although we purified BM28/MCM2, Mis5,
Cdc21, and CDC47 proteins from 0.2 M NaCl-soluble whole
cell extracts, they may be derived from chromatin-bound forms. It may
be important to examine the affinity to histone H3 of highly
phosphorylated forms of MCM2 protein in logarithmically growing cells.
It is also important to analyze the interaction between the MCM protein
complexes and histone H3 at the molecular level and to address the
physiological significance of this interaction.
FOOTNOTES
*
This study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for
scientific research on priority areas from the Ministry of Education,
Science and Culture of Japan. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 0427-24-6266;
Fax: 0427-24-6317; E-mail: yukio{at}libra.ls.m-kagaku.co.jp.
¶
Present address: Sir William Dunn School of Pathology,
University of Oxford, South Parks Rd., Oxford OX1 3RE, United Kingdom.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) X67334[GenBank], BM28/MCM2; X74794[GenBank], hCdc21; X74796[GenBank], hCDC47; U17565[GenBank],
ratMis5.
1
The abbreviations use are: ORC, origin
recognition complex; MCM, minichromosome maintenance; HPLC, high
performance liquid chromatography; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary.
Acknowledgments
We thank Yoshiko Ishimi and Reiko Ohba for
discussions, Keiji Kimura for providing HeLa cells, Kazufumi Kuroda for
his help in operating the HPLC, and Atsuko Ohtake for the conjugation
of peptide with carrier protein.
REFERENCES
-
Bell, S. P.,
Stillman, B.
(1992)
Nature
357,
128-134
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bell, S. P.,
Kobayashi, R.,
Stillman, B.
(1993)
Science
262,
1844-1849
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Foss, M.,
McNally, F. J.,
Laurenson, P.,
Rine, J.
(1993)
Science
262,
1838-1844
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Micklem, G.,
Rowley, A.,
Harwood, J.,
Nasmyth, K.,
Diffley, J. F. X.
(1993)
Nature
366,
87-89
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Loo, S.,
Fox, C. A.,
Rine, J.,
Kobayashi, R.,
Stillman, B.,
Bell, S.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
741-756
[Abstract]
-
Gibson, S. I.,
Surosky, R. T.,
Tye, B.-K.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
5707-5720
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yan, H.,
Gibson, S.,
Tye, B. K.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
944-957
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hennessy, K. M.,
Lee, A.,
Chen, E.,
Botstein, D.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
958-969
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dalton, S.,
Whitbread, L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
2514-2518
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Li, J. J.,
Herskowitz, I.
(1993)
Science
262,
1870-1874
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Coxon, A.,
Maundrell, K.,
Kearsey, S. E.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
5571-5577
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Takahashi, K.,
Yamada, H.,
Yanagida, M.
(1994)
Mol. Biol. Cell
5,
1145-1158
[Abstract]
-
Miyake, S.,
Okishio, N.,
Samejima, I.,
Hiraoka, Y.,
Toda, T.,
Saitoh, I.,
Yanagida, M.
(1993)
Mol. Biol. Cell
4,
1003-1015
[Abstract]
-
Kubota, Y.,
Mimura, S.,
Nishimoto, S.,
Takizawa, H.,
Nojima, H.
(1995)
Cell
81,
601-609
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chong, J. P. J.,
Mahbubani, H. M.,
Khoo, C.-Y.,
Blow, J. J.
(1995)
Nature
375,
418-421
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Madine, M. A.,
Khoo, C.-Y.,
Mills, A. D.,
Laskey, R. A.
(1995)
Nature
375,
421-424
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Someya, A.,
Shioda, M.,
Okuyama, A.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm.
209,
823-831
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Treisman, J. E.,
Follette, P. J.,
O'Farrell, P. H.,
Rubin, G. M.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1709-1715
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Feger, G.,
Vaessin, H.,
Su, T. T.,
Wolff, E.,
Jan, L. J.,
Jan, Y. N.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
5387-5398
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kimura, H.,
Nozaki, N.,
Sugimoto, K.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4311-4320
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Todorov, I. T.,
Pepperkok, R.,
Philipova, R. N.,
Kearsey, S. E.,
Ansorge, W.,
Werner, D.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
253-265
[Abstract]
-
Koonin, E. V.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
2541-2547
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Todorov, I. T.,
Attaran, A.,
Kearsey, S. E.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
1433-1445
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Krude, T.,
Musahl, C.,
Laskey, R. A.,
Knippers, R.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
309-318
[Abstract]
-
Thömmes, P.,
Fett, R.,
Schray, B.,
Burkhart, R.,
Barnes, M.,
Kennedy, C.,
Brown, N. C.,
Knippers, R.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
1069-1074
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Starborg, M.,
Brundell, E.,
Gell, K.,
Larsson, C.,
White, I.,
Daneholt, B.,
Höög, C.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
927-934
[Abstract]
-
Yan, H.,
Merchant, A. M.,
Tye, B. K.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2149-2160
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Simon, R. H.,
Felsenfeld, G.
(1979)
Nucleic Acids Res.
6,
689-696
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ishimi, Y.,
Hirosumi, J.,
Sato, W.,
Sugasawa, K.,
Yokota, S.,
Hanaoka, F.,
Yamada, M.
(1984)
Eur. J. Biochem.
142,
431-439
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hu, B.,
Burkhart, R.,
Schulte, D.,
Musahl, C.,
Knippers, R.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
5289-5293
[Free Full Text]
-
Kimura, H.,
Takizawa, N.,
Nozaki, N.,
Sugimoto, K.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
2097-2104
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kimura, K.,
Nozaki, N.,
Saijo, M.,
Kikuchi, A.,
Ui, M.,
Enomoto, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
24523-24526
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wobbe, C. R.,
Dean, F.,
Weissbach, L.,
Hurwitz, J.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
5710-5714
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Miller, K. G.,
Liu, L. F.,
Englund, P. T.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
9334-9339
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chong, J. P. J.,
Thömmes, P.,
Blow, J. J.
(1996)
Trends Biol. Sci.
21,
102-106
-
Kearsey, S. E.,
Mariorano, D.,
Holmes, E. C.,
Todorov, I. T.
(1996)
BioEssays
18,
183-190
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schulte, D.,
Richter, A.,
Burkhart, R.,
Musahl, C.,
Knippers, R.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
235,
144-151
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Takizawa, N.,
Kimura, H.,
Sugimoto, K.
(1995)
Gene (Amst.)
167,
343-344
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sykes, D. E.,
Weiser, M. M.
(1995)
Gene (Amst.)
163,
243-247
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ishimi, Y.,
Kojima, M.,
Yamada, M.,
Hanaoka, F.
(1987)
Eur. J. Biochem.
162,
19-24
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Musahl, C.,
Schulte, D.,
Burkhart, R.,
Knippers, R.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
230,
1096-1101
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Burkhart, R.,
Schulte, D.,
Hu, B.,
Musahl, C.,
Göhring, F.,
Knippers, R.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
228,
431-438
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Su, T. T.,
Feger, G.,
O'Farrell, P. H.
(1996)
Mol. Biol. Cell
7,
319-326
[Abstract]
-
Madine, M. A.,
Khoo, C.-Y.,
Mills, A. D.,
Musahl, C.,
Laskey, R. A.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
1270-1279
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
van Holde, K. E.
(1988)
Chromatin
, 1st Ed.
, p. 219, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
-
Camerini-Otero, R. D.,
Sollner-Webb, B.,
Felsenfeld, G.
(1976)
Cell
8,
333-347
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hayes, J. J.,
Clark, D. J.,
Wolffe, A. P.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
6829-6833
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Burton, D., R.,
Butler, M. J.,
Hyde, J. E.,
Philips, D.,
Skidmore, C. J.,
Walker, I. O.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
5,
3643-3666
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cote, J.,
Quinn, J.,
Workman, J. L.,
Peterson, C. L.
(1994)
Science
265,
53-60
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kwon, H.,
Imbalzano, A. N.,
Khavari, P. A.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Green, M. R.
(1994)
Nature
370,
477-485
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kruger, W.,
Peterson, C. L.,
Sil, A.,
Coburn, C.,
Arents, G.,
Moudrianakis, E., N.,
Herskowitz, I.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2770-2779
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schulte, D.,
Burkhart, R.,
Musahl, C.,
Hu, B.,
Schlatterer, C.,
Hameister, H.,
Knippers, R.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
1381-1389
[Abstract]
-
Krude, T.,
Knippers, R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21021-21029
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Umek, R. M.,
Kowalski, D.
(1988)
Cell
52,
559-567
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Umek, R. M.,
Kowalski, D.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
2486-2490
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Benbow, R. M.,
Zhao, J.,
Larson, D. D.
(1992)
BioEssays
14,
661-670
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Held, P. G.,
Heintz, N. H.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1130,
235-246
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hamlin, J. L.
(1992)
BioEssays
14,
651-659
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kitsberg, D.,
Selig, S.,
Keshet, I.,
Cedar, H.
(1993)
Nature
366,
588-590
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kelly, R. E.,
DeRose, M. L.,
Draper, B. W.,
Wahl, G. M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4136-4148
[Abstract]
-
Carroll, S. M.,
DeRose, M. L.,
Kolman, J. L.,
Nonet, G. H.,
Kelly, R. E.,
Wahl, G. M.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
2971-2981
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dijkwel, P. A.,
Hamlin, J. L.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
3715-3722
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Burhans, W. C.,
Vassilev, L. T.,
Caddle, M. S.,
Heinz, N. H.,
DePamphilis, M. L.
(1990)
Cell
62,
955-965
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shinomiya, T.,
Ina, S.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
7394-7403
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Little, R. D.,
Platt, T. H. K.,
Schildkraut, C. L.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6600-6613
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ishimi, Y.,
Matsumoto, K.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5399-5403
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ishimi, Y.,
Matsumoto, K.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
2733-2740
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ishimi, Y.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Ohba, R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6489-6496
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Matsumoto, K.,
Ishimi, Y.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
4624-4632
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tye, B.-K.
(1994)
Trends Cell Biol.
4,
160-166
-
Blow, J. J.,
Laskey, R. A.
(1988)
Nature
357,
128-134
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. W. Shultz, T.-J. Lee, G. C. Allen, W. F. Thompson, and L. Hanley-Bowdoin
Dynamic Localization of the DNA Replication Proteins MCM5 and MCM7 in Plants
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2009;
150(2):
658 - 669.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Groth, A. Corpet, A. J. L. Cook, D. Roche, J. Bartek, J. Lukas, and G. Almouzni
Regulation of Replication Fork Progression Through Histone Supply and Demand
Science,
December 21, 2007;
318(5858):
1928 - 1931.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Pruitt, K. J. Bailey, and A. Freeland
Reduced Mcm2 Expression Results in Severe Stem/Progenitor Cell Deficiency and Cancer
Stem Cells,
December 1, 2007;
25(12):
3121 - 3132.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Bochman and A. Schwacha
Differences in the Single-stranded DNA Binding Activities of MCM2-7 and MCM467: MCM2 AND MCM5 DEFINE A SLOW ATP-DEPENDENT STEP
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 16, 2007;
282(46):
33795 - 33804.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Sakwe, T. Nguyen, V. Athanasopoulos, K. Shire, and L. Frappier
Identification and Characterization of a Novel Component of the Human Minichromosome Maintenance Complex
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
April 15, 2007;
27(8):
3044 - 3055.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Mitkova, E. E. Biswas-Fiss, and S. B. Biswas
Modulation of DNA Synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nuclear Extract by DNA Polymerases and the Origin Recognition Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 25, 2005;
280(8):
6285 - 6292.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhou and T. S.-F. Wang
A Coordinated Temporal Interplay of Nucleosome Reorganization Factor, Sister Chromatin Cohesion Factor, and DNA Polymerase {alpha} Facilitates DNA Replication
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
November 1, 2004;
24(21):
9568 - 9579.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Francon, J.-M. Lemaitre, C. Dreyer, D. Maiorano, O. Cuvier, and M. Mechali
A hypophosphorylated form of RPA34 is a specific component of pre-replication centers
J. Cell Sci.,
October 1, 2004;
117(21):
4909 - 4920.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Forsburg
Eukaryotic MCM Proteins: Beyond Replication Initiation
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
March 1, 2004;
68(1):
109 - 131.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Dziak, D. Leishman, M. Radovic, B. K. Tye, and K. Yankulov
Evidence for a Role of MCM (Mini-chromosome Maintenance)5 in Transcriptional Repression of Sub-telomeric and Ty-proximal Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 18, 2003;
278(30):
27372 - 27381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Gauthier, R. Dziak, D. J. H. Kramer, D. Leishman, X. Song, J. Ho, M. Radovic, D. Bentley, and K. Yankulov
The Role of the Carboxyterminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II in Regulating Origins of DNA Replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics,
November 1, 2002;
162(3):
1117 - 1129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. You, Y. Ishimi, H. Masai, and F. Hanaoka
Roles of Mcm7 and Mcm4 Subunits in the DNA Helicase Activity of the Mouse Mcm4/6/7 Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 1, 2002;
277(45):
42471 - 42479.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Carpentieri, M. De Felice, M. De Falco, M. Rossi, and F. M. Pisani
Physical and Functional Interaction between the Mini-chromosome Maintenance-like DNA Helicase and the Single-stranded DNA Binding Protein from the Crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 29, 2002;
277(14):
12118 - 12127.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Ishimi, Y. Komamura-Kohno, K.-i. Arai, and H. Masai
Biochemical Activities Associated with Mouse Mcm2 Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 9, 2001;
276(46):
42744 - 42752.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. DaFonseca, F. Shu, and J. J. Zhang
Identification of two residues in MCM5 critical for the assembly of minichromosome maintenance complexes and signal transducer and activator of transcription-mediated transcription activation in response to IFN-gamma
PNAS,
March 1, 2001;
(2001)
61487598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-K. Lee and J. Hurwitz
Processive DNA helicase activity of the minichromosome maintenance proteins 4, 6, and 7 complex requires forked DNA structures
PNAS,
January 2, 2001;
98(1):
54 - 59.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Maiorano, J.-M. Lemaitre, and M. Mechali
Stepwise Regulated Chromatin Assembly of MCM2-7 Proteins
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 17, 2000;
275(12):
8426 - 8431.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Prokhorova and J. J. Blow
Sequential MCM/P1 Subcomplex Assembly Is Required to Form a Heterohexamer with Replication Licensing Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 28, 2000;
275(4):
2491 - 2498.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Gillespie and J. J. Blow
Nucleoplasmin-mediated chromatin remodelling is required for Xenopus sperm nuclei to become licensed for DNA replication
Nucleic Acids Res.,
January 15, 2000;
28(2):
472 - 480.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Kelman, J.-K. Lee, and J. Hurwitz
The single minichromosome maintenance protein of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum Delta H contains DNA helicase activity
PNAS,
December 21, 1999;
96(26):
14783 - 14788.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. You, Y. Komamura, and Y. Ishimi
Biochemical Analysis of the Intrinsic Mcm4-Mcm6-Mcm7 DNA Helicase Activity
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 1, 1999;
19(12):
8003 - 8015.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G. Pasion and S. L. Forsburg
Nuclear Localization of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mcm2/Cdc19p Requires MCM Complex Assembly
Mol. Biol. Cell,
December 1, 1999;
10(12):
4043 - 4057.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Yankulov, I. Todorov, P. Romanowski, D. Licatalosi, K. Cilli, S. McCracken, R. Laskey, and D. L. Bentley
MCM Proteins Are Associated with RNA Polymerase II Holoenzyme
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
September 1, 1999;
19(9):
6154 - 6163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ritzi, M. Baack, C. Musahl, P. Romanowski, R. A. Laskey, and R. Knippers
Human Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins and Human Origin Recognition Complex 2 Protein on Chromatin
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 18, 1998;
273(38):
24543 - 24549.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Sherman, S. G. Pasion, and S. L. Forsburg
Multiple Domains of Fission Yeast Cdc19p (MCM2) Are Required for Its Association with the Core MCM Complex
Mol. Biol. Cell,
July 1, 1998;
9(7):
1833 - 1845.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Ishimi, Y. Komamura, Z. You, and H. Kimura
Biochemical Function of Mouse Minichromosome Maintenance 2 Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 3, 1998;
273(14):
8369 - 8375.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. P. Holthoff, M. Baack, A. Richter, M. Ritzi, and R. Knippers
Human Protein MCM6 on HeLa Cell Chromatin
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 27, 1998;
273(13):
7320 - 7325.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Ishimi
A DNA Helicase Activity Is Associated with an MCM4, -6, and -7 Protein Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 26, 1997;
272(39):
24508 - 24513.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Fujita, T. Kiyono, Y. Hayashi, and M. Ishibashi
In Vivo Interaction of Human MCM Heterohexameric Complexes with Chromatin. POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF ATP
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 18, 1997;
272(16):
10928 - 10935.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-K. Lee and J. Hurwitz
Isolation and Characterization of Various Complexes of the Minichromosome Maintenance Proteins of Schizosaccharomyces pombe
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 16, 2000;
275(25):
18871 - 18878.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Poplawski, B. Grabowski, S. E. Long, and Z. Kelman
The Zinc Finger Domain of the Archaeal Minichromosome Maintenance Protein Is Required for Helicase Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 21, 2001;
276(52):
49371 - 49377.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. J. Chong, M. K. Hayashi, M. N. Simon, R.-M. Xu, and B. Stillman
A double-hexamer archaeal minichromosome maintenance protein is an ATP-dependent DNA helicase
PNAS,
February 15, 2000;
97(4):
1530 - 1535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. DaFonseca, F. Shu, and J. J. Zhang
Identification of two residues in MCM5 critical for the assembly of MCM complexes and Stat1-mediated transcription activation in response to IFN-gamma
PNAS,
March 13, 2001;
98(6):
3034 - 3039.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|