![]()
|
|
||||||||
(Received for publication, June 24, 1996)
From the Imperial Cancer Research Fund, Clare Hall Laboratories,
South Mimms, Hertfordshire EN6 3LD, United Kingdom
A human cDNA encoding a previously
unrecognized DNA ligase IV has been identified (Wei, Y.-F.,
Robins, P., Carter, K., Caldecott, K., Pappin, D. J. C., Yu, G.-L.,
Wang, R.-P., Shell, B. K., Nash, R. A., Schär, P., Barnes,
D. E., Haseltine, W. A., and Lindahl, T. (1995) Mol. Cell.
Biol. 15, 3206-3216). Antibodies have been raised against
predicted peptide sequences of DNA ligase IV and used to identify the
enzyme during purification from HeLa cell nuclei. The 96-kDa DNA ligase
IV and the 103-kDa DNA ligase III co-migrate during SDS-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis and have similar column fractionation properties,
which complicates the distinction between the two enzymes, but they
have been separated by Mono S liquid chromatography. During initial
size fractionation by gel chromatography in 1 M NaCl, DNA
ligase IV elutes in the same position as the DNA ligase III-XRCC1
protein complex, indicating that DNA ligase IV is also bound to another
protein or occurs as a dimer. DNA ligase IV has been purified free from
other DNA ligases, and its enzymatic properties have been
examined. The purified protein effectively joins single-strand breaks
in a double-stranded polydeoxynucleotide in an ATP-dependent
reaction. The substrate specificity of DNA ligase IV differs from those
of the other two cloned human DNA ligases, I and III, with regard to
their ability to join the hybrid substrates oligo(dT)·poly(rA) and
oligo(rA)·poly(dT). DNA ligase IV occurs in part as an
enzyme-adenylate complex in HeLa cell nuclear extracts.
Previous biochemical studies on fractionated mammalian cell
extracts have established the presence of three distinct nuclear DNA
ligases (1). The 102-kDa DNA ligase I is not evenly distributed in cell
nuclei but is mainly localized in ``replication factories'' together
with DNA polymerase Molecular cloning of cDNAs encoding DNA ligase I (17), and the 103- and 96-kDa forms of DNA ligase III (12, 15) has been achieved. During
our attempts to clone DNA ligase III by searching human cDNA
libraries for sequence motifs characteristic of DNA ligases, we also
unexpectedly found an open reading frame apparently encoding a
previously unrecognized enzyme, which we tentatively named DNA ligase
IV (12). The gene encoding DNA ligase IV is located on chromosome 13, whereas those encoding DNA ligases I and III are on chromosomes 19 and
17, respectively. DNA ligase IV has a catalytic domain similar in
structure to other ATP-dependent DNA ligases but also has a
C-terminal region of 320 amino acids with no apparent homology to DNA
ligases I and III or to any other mammalian proteins in current data
bases. In the present work, we show that an enzyme with the predicted
properties of DNA ligase IV can be purified from HeLa cell nuclei, and
that its substrate specificity is distinct from those of DNA ligases I
and III.
DNA ligase-containing
fractions (2 µl) were adenylated in reaction mixtures (10 µl)
containing 60 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM
MgCl2, 5 mM DTT,2
50 µg ml Reaction mixtures (5 µl) contained 60 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM MgCl2,
5 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, 50 µg ml Histidine-tagged human DNA ligase III recombinant
protein was overproduced in Escherichia coli, affinity
purified on nickel-agarose, and used to raise rabbit polyclonal
antibodies.1 Antibodies were also raised against synthetic
peptides derived from the predicted amino acid sequence of DNA ligase
IV and affinity purified by standard procedures (18); peptides were
coupled to hemocyanin, were selected to have an N-terminal cysteine
residue, and corresponded to amino acids 526-538 and 834-844 of the
844-residue protein. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (8%),
transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell), and
detected by immunostaining with diluted antibody (1:400).
Antigen-antibody complexes were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence
using a derivatized secondary antibody (Amersham).
Frozen HeLa cells
(2 × 1010 cells) were thawed in a hypotonic buffer
containing protease inhibitors and disrupted in a Dounce glass
homogenizer, and nuclei were collected by low speed centrifugation and
a nuclear extract made in the presence of 0.3 M KCl as
described by Masutani et al. (19). The nuclear extract was
loaded onto a 2.2 × 20-cm phosphocellulose P11 column (Whatman)
pre-equilibrated with 20 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, and 150 mM KCl. The column was washed with 2 column volumes of this
buffer, and then the protein was eluted with the same buffer containing
400 mM KCl. Crystalline ammonium sulfate was added to the
protein solution to 65% saturation, followed by gentle stirring for 30 min. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 30 min,
the pellets were resuspended in buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 10% glycerol)
containing 1 M NaCl to a protein concentration of
approximately 30 mg/ml. The protein was dialyzed for 5 h against
the same buffer, and any remaining insoluble material was removed by
centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 30 min. The protein
supernatant was loaded onto a column (2.5 × 100 cm) of Ultrogel
AcA34 (Sepracor/IBF) pre-equilibrated with buffer A containing 1 M NaCl. Protein fractions eluting from the column were
assayed for formation of enzyme-adenylate complexes and subjected to
immunoblotting with DNA ligase III-specific antiserum and DNA ligase
IV-specific antipeptide antibodies. Fractions that were recognized by
the DNA ligase IV-specific antibodies were pooled and dialyzed
extensively against buffer A containing 25 mM NaCl. The
protein was recovered and loaded onto a FPLC Mono S HR5/5 column
(Pharmacia Biotech Inv.) pre-equilibrated with buffer A containing 25 mM NaCl. Protein was eluted with a 25-ml linear gradient of
NaCl (25-400 mM) in buffer A. Fractions were again assayed
for enzyme-adenylate formation and immunostaining with antibodies
specific for DNA ligase III or IV. Fractions that were recognized by
the DNA ligase IV-specific antibodies, eluting at 220 mM
NaCl, were pooled and dialyzed against buffer A containing 100 mM NaCl. The protein was loaded onto a column (4-ml bed
volume) of native DNA cellulose (Pharmacia) pre-equilibrated with
buffer A containing 100 mM NaCl. DNA ligase IV was not
retained by the column, but the matrix was effective in removing traces
of other DNA ligases. The flow-through fraction from the native DNA
cellulose column was recovered and dialyzed against buffer A containing
50 mM NaCl before loading onto a FPLC Mono Q HR5/5 column
(Pharmacia) pre-equilibrated in buffer A containing 50 mM
NaCl. Protein was eluted from the column with a 25-ml linear gradient
of NaCl (50-600 mM) in buffer A. Fractions that contained
protein recognized by the DNA ligase IV-specific antibodies, eluting at
350 mM NaCl, were pooled and dialyzed for 5 h against
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 50% glycerol, and 30 mM NaCl. The
protein recovered was aliquoted and frozen at An extract
of HeLa cell nuclei was partly purified by stepwise phosphocellulose
chromatography, concentrated by ammonium sulfate precipitation, and
fractionated by gel chromatography in the presence of 1 M
NaCl (Fig. 1). Eluted fractions were assayed for
enzyme-adenylate formation (Fig. 1A). DNA ligase I occurs as
an asymmetric monomer in high salt extracts (20), migrates anomalously
slowly during SDS-PAGE, and was apparently present in column fractions
40-42 as a 125-kDa protein (Fig. 1A). Much of the DNA
ligase I was removed during preparation of cell nuclei, since the
enzyme readily leaches out of nuclei (2). DNA ligase III was present
mainly in fractions 37-40 (Fig. 1, A and B). We
have observed previously (11) that DNA ligase III elutes before DNA
ligase I on gel chromatography, although the two proteins are of
similar molecular mass, and this may now be ascribed to the occurrence
of DNA ligase III as a salt-resistant heterodimer with the 70-kDa XRCC1
protein (14). Immunoblotting with an antiserum against DNA ligase III
(Fig. 1B) verified the presence of DNA ligase III in
fractions 37-40 and also identified large, active proteolytic
fragments of DNA ligase III, apparently either remaining bound to XRCC1
protein and occurring in fractions 37-40 or eluting as monomers in
fractions 45-47. An antibody directed against a C-terminal peptide in
DNA ligase IV, not present in either DNA ligase I or III, showed that
DNA ligase IV co-chromatographed with DNA ligase III in fractions
37-40. This DNA ligase IV antibody appeared monospecific, since it did
not bind other proteins in the crude fractions (Fig. 1, C
and D). The identical gel filtration profiles of DNA ligases
III and IV indicate that DNA ligase IV also occurs tightly bound to
another protein or possibly is present as a salt-resistant homodimer.
DNA ligase IV does not interact with XRCC1 protein (12), so the
apparent protein partner of DNA ligase IV is at present unknown.
Further chromatography of pooled AcA34 fractions 36-40 containing DNA
ligases III and IV on a Mono S column largely separated the two enzymes
(Fig. 2). Activity for enzyme-adenylate formation was
mainly present in column fractions 16-18 but was also detected in
several fractions eluting earlier (Fig. 2A). Immunoblotting
with the DNA ligase III polyclonal antiserum showed that this enzyme
was present in fractions 15-20 but not in earlier fractions, although
a fragment of DNA ligase III was seen in fractions 14 and 15 (Fig.
2B). Immunoblotting with an antipeptide antibody directed
against the C-terminal sequence of DNA ligase IV showed that this
enzyme was present in fractions 10-16 (Fig. 2C) and thus
accounted for the enzyme-adenylate complexes generated by fractions
10-14 (Fig. 2A). Identical results to those in Fig.
2C, with a slightly weaker signal, were obtained with
another antipeptide antibody directed against residues 526-538 of DNA
ligase IV, confirming the presence of this protein (data not
shown).
Fractions 10-13 of DNA ligase IV from the Mono S column were pooled,
passed through a DNA-cellulose column to remove remaining traces and
active fragments of DNA ligase III, and then chromatographed on a Mono
Q column (Fig. 3). Protein staining of the most active
fraction, fraction 10, indicated that DNA ligase IV was the most
abundant protein in this fraction, but a few contaminating protein
bands were still present (Fig. 3, A and B).
Immunoblotting with antiserum against DNA ligase III did not reveal
detectable amounts of this enzyme in any of the Mono Q fractions (data
not shown).
Attempts to overexpress DNA ligase IV cDNA in several E. coli and yeast expression systems under a variety of conditions
yielded insoluble protein.
The fractions containing DNA ligase IV protein after Mono Q
chromatography (Fig. 3, A and B) showed joining
activity in a standard DNA ligase assay (Fig. 3C). When the
standard reaction mixture was supplemented with 50 mM KCl,
DNA ligase IV was ~30% inhibited, whereas DNA ligase III exhibited
2-fold higher activity under these conditions (data not shown).
Different DNA ligases may show different abilities to join single
strand breaks in hybrid polynucleotide substrates with one DNA strand
and one RNA strand. Thus, DNA ligase I is totally unable to join the
oligonucleotides in an oligo(dT)·poly(rA) substrate, whereas DNA
ligases II and III do so efficiently (21, 11). DNA ligase IV joins this
substrate (Fig. 4, A and B), so it
is similar to ligase III and different from ligase I in this respect.
DNA ligases I and III also can join an oligo(rA)·poly(dT) substrate
(11), but DNA ligase IV was shown here to be unable to ligate nicks in
this polynucleotide (Fig. 4C). Thus, DNA ligase IV shows
different substrate specificity from either DNA ligase I or DNA ligase
III with regard to its ability to join DNA-RNA hybrids.
DNA ligase IV showed no detectable blunt end joining of plasmid DNA cut
with PvuII; DNA ligase III has weak activity in this regard.
In contrast, DNA ligase I, as well as T4 DNA ligase, joined this
substrate effectively (data not shown). Thus, DNA ligase I remains the
best candidate enzyme for DNA blunt end-joining activity in mammalian
cells (21).
Northern blotting
experiments (12) and the immunoblotting data shown in this article
suggest that DNA ligases III and IV are present in similar amounts in
cell nuclei as two low abundance proteins. However, in partly purified
protein fractions containing both enzymes, the formation of
enzyme-adenylate was more efficient with DNA ligase III than with DNA
ligase IV (Fig. 2), making the latter enzyme difficult to detect by
this standard assay. One explanation for this apparent
discrepancy would be that DNA ligase IV is already present as an
endogenous enzyme-adenylate complex, refractory to charging with
[
DNA ligase IV was identified previously as a unique human cDNA
sequence (12). The present data show that an enzyme with the expected
antigenic properties of the protein product of this open reading frame
can be purified from HeLa cell nuclei, and that the enzyme is able to
join phosphodiester bonds in polydeoxyribonucleotide substrates in
standard DNA ligation assays. The main structural features of DNA
ligase IV are similar to those of other human DNA ligases, with
significant sequence homology within the catalytic domain (12). A
region with strong sequence homology to the active site of
enzyme-adenylate formation in DNA ligase I (22) is readily identified
in DNA ligase IV. Both these enzymes, as well as DNA ligase III, have a
Glu-Tyr/Thr/Ile-Lys sequence at the active site, where the Lys residue
forms a covalent phosphoamide bond with AMP and the side chain of the
Glu residue interacts specifically with the extracyclic adenine amino
group of the ATP cofactor (23). The reason that DNA ligase IV was not
detected in earlier biochemical studies on DNA ligases in mammalian
cells is the inability to distinguish between DNA ligases III and IV by
SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1) and also the low efficiency of DNA ligase IV in
enzyme-adenylate formation assays (Fig. 2).
Several distinct DNA ligases have now been found in human cell nuclei,
indicating specific roles in DNA metabolism, but the physiological
function of DNA ligase IV is at present unknown. For example, V(D)J
recombination occurs normally in cells with a malfunctioning DNA ligase
I (16), but it is not known whether DNA ligase II, III, or IV is
involved in such recombination events. Northern blots have indicated
that DNA ligase IV is present at higher levels in the thymus and testis
than in other tissues (12), suggesting a role in recombination,
although similar data have been obtained for many proteins involved in
the replication, repair, or recombination of DNA. The gene for DNA
ligase IV is located on human chromosome 13q33-34 (12). Immunoblotting
with DNA ligase IV antipeptide antibodies on tumor cell extracts from
several unusual lymphomas and leukemias with chromosomal abnormalities
in this band have not revealed any cells with significantly altered
levels of DNA ligase IV.3
Although the N-terminal 524 amino acids of DNA ligase IV largely
contain the catalytic domain resembling that of the other DNA ligases,
the C-terminal 320 amino acids of the enzyme show no sequence homology
to the C termini of DNA ligases I and III (12). It seems likely that
this unique C-terminal domain of the enzyme is involved in a specific
protein-protein interaction, since all of the DNA ligase IV present
appears to be bound to another factor during gel chromatography of
crude enzyme preparations (Fig. 1). Identification of this hypothetical
partner might give clues to the physiological roles of DNA ligase IV,
and analysis of homozygous knockout mice may also be informative with
regard to this recently discovered enzyme.
We thank Primo Schär and Deborah Barnes
for helpful discussions.
Volume 271, Number 39,
Issue of September 27, 1996
pp. 24257-24261
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
and other replication factors (2, 3); it is
induced in S phase (4) and functions in lagging strand DNA synthesis in
a reconstituted SV40 DNA replication system (5). Moreover, a human cell
line with a malfunctioning DNA ligase I shows defective joining of
Okazaki fragments during lagging strand replication (6), and
experiments on homozygous ``knockouts'' by targeted disruption of the
DNA ligase I gene of murine embryonic stem cells show that the enzyme
is essential in vivo (7, 8). The 70-kDa DNA ligase II is a
relatively abundant form of DNA ligase in nonproliferating tissues such
as liver but is only seen at low levels compared with other DNA ligases
in growing cells. Its primary structure is closely related to that of
the larger DNA ligase III (9, 10), and it is unclear at present whether
these two enzymes are encoded by separate genes or whether DNA ligases
II and III reflect differential RNA or protein processing of the same
gene product. A protein complex of the 103-kDa DNA ligase III (11, 12)
and the 70-kDa XRCC1 protein (13, 14) is widely distributed in tissues.
XRCC1-defective mutant Chinese hamster ovary cells are hypersensitive
to alkylating agents and ionizing radiation, defective in the repair of
DNA single strand breaks, and exhibit a very high level of spontaneous
sister chromatid exchanges (13). Possible roles for the DNA ligase
III-XRCC1 complex in base excision repair and homologous recombination
have been suggested. A 96-kDa form of DNA ligase III has also been
detected in testis (15). This smaller form of DNA ligase III is unable
to interact with the XRCC1 protein and may represent a testis-specific,
differentially spliced form of the
enzyme.1
Formation of DNA Ligase-Adenylate
1 bovine serum albumin, and 1 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Corp.) at 20 °C
for 10 min. Reactions were stopped by addition of 10 µl SDS sample
buffer, heated at 95 °C for 5 min, and proteins were separated by
SDS-PAGE. The gels were fixed in 10% acetic acid for 30 min and dried,
and adenylated polypeptides were detected by autoradiography.
1
bovine serum albumin, radioactively labeled polynucleotide substrate (5 ng, 104 cpm), and enzyme fraction (2 µl). The
polynucleotide substrates [5
-32P]oligo(dT)·poly(dA),
[5
-32P]oligo(dT)·poly(rA), and
[5
-32P]oligo(rA)·poly(dT) were prepared as
described (11). Reaction mixtures were incubated for 10 min at
37 °C. The reaction was stopped by addition of 20 µl of 95%
formamide/dye and heating at 80 °C for 10 min, and then the mixture
was rapidly chilled to 0 °C. Ligation products were separated on
denaturing 20% polyacrylamide gels. The gels were fixed in 10%
methanol, 10% acetic acid for 30 min and dried, and ligation products
were detected by autoradiography.
80 °C or stored at
20 °C. During either method of storage, DNA ligase IV retained
full activity for at least 3 months.
Separation of DNA Ligase IV from Other DNA Ligases
Fig. 1.
Fractionation of DNA ligases III and IV by
gel filtration. HeLa nuclear extract was batch purified by
phosphocellulose chromatography and applied to a gel filtration column
(AcA34) in the presence of 1 M NaCl. Fractions containing
protein were assayed for formation of enzyme-adenylate complexes and
subjected to immunoblotting with antibodies specific for DNA ligase III
or IV. The void volume of the column was in fraction 32. A,
formation of enzyme-adenylate complexes by aliquots (2 µl) of the
indicated fractions. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and
adenylated polypeptides were detected by autoradiography. B,
immunoblotting with antibodies against DNA ligase III. Aliquots (5 µl) of the indicated fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE,
transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with antiserum
against recombinant DNA ligase III (diluted 1:400). Antigen-antibody
complexes were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham).
C, immunoblotting with antibodies against DNA ligase IV. An
identical membrane was probed with the antipeptide antibody against the
C terminus of DNA ligase IV (diluted 1:400). The positions and masses
in kDa of 14C-labeled protein markers are indicated. Column
fraction numbers are indicated above and below the autoradiograms;
L, column load. D, silver staining of proteins in
2-µl aliquots of indicated fractions after SDS-PAGE.
Fig. 2.
Separation of DNA ligase IV from DNA ligase
III by FPLC Mono S chromatography. Partially purified DNA ligase
IV protein (pool of gel filtration fractions 36-40; see Fig. 1) was
applied to a FPLC Mono S column. Bound protein was eluted from the
column with a linear salt gradient, and fractions containing protein
were assayed for formation of enzyme-adenylate complexes and subjected
to immunoblotting with specific antibodies against either DNA ligase
III or IV, as in Fig. 1. A-C, as described for Fig. 1.
FT, column flow through.
Fig. 3.
Purification of DNA ligase IV by Mono Q
chromatography and DNA-joining activity of the enzyme. Partially
purified DNA ligase IV protein was applied to a FPLC Mono Q column.
Bound protein was eluted from the column with a linear salt gradient,
and all fractions were probed with DNA ligase IV-specific antibody and
assayed for ligation activity. Fractions 8-12 contained activity and
are shown. A, aliquots (15 µl) of the indicated fractions
were separated by SDS-PAGE, and proteins were detected by Coomassie
Brilliant Blue staining. B, aliquots (5 µl) of the
indicated fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto a
nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with DNA ligase IV-specific
antibody (diluted 1:400). Antigen-antibody complexes were detected by
enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham). The positions and masses in kDa
of protein markers are indicated on the right. C,
Aliquots (2 µl) of the indicated fractions were assayed for ligation
activity with a [5
-32P](dT)16·poly(dA)
substrate. *, joining by T4 DNA ligase (10 units; New England
Biolabs). DNA ligase assays and analysis of ligation products were
performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The sizes
of the ligation products are indicated.
Fig. 4.
Substrate specificities of DNA ligase III and
DNA ligase IV. DNA ligase assays and analysis of ligation products
were performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Equal
amounts of purified human DNA ligases III and IV, as measured by
ligation activity on a substrate of
[5
-32P]oligo(dT)·poly(dA), were assayed for ligation
of oligo(dT)·poly(rA) and oligo(rA)·poly(dT) substrates.
A, substrate oligo(dT)·poly(dA). B,
substrate oligo(dT)·poly(rA). C, substrate
oligo (rA)·poly(dT). Lanes 1, 4, and 7, substrate only; lanes 2, 5, and 8, substrates
incubated with DNA ligase III; lanes 3, 6, and 9, substrate incubated with DNA ligase IV. Ligation products were
separated on denaturing 20% acrylamide gels and detected by
autoradiography. The sizes of the ligation products are
indicated.
-32P]ATP. If this were the case, significant DNA
joining should occur with DNA ligase IV even in the absence of the ATP
cofactor. Fig. 5 shows that DNA ligase IV could indeed
partially join the (dT)16·poly(dA) substrate, with
formation of (dT)32 without addition of ATP, whereas DNA
ligase III showed no such joining. The ligation was much less efficient
than that observed in the presence of ATP (Fig. 5, lanes 4 and 5). From an estimate of the amount of ligated substrate
nicks and DNA ligase IV molecules in the reaction mixture, it appears
that 10-40% of the enzyme molecules were already present in the
adenylated form. These data might explain the apparently poor ability
of DNA ligase IV from HeLa cell nuclei to form the enzyme-adenylate
complex (Fig. 2).
Fig. 5.
Ligation products formed by DNA ligases III
and IV in the absence and presence of ATP. Equal amounts of
purified DNA ligases III and IV, as measured by ligation activity on a
substrate of oligo (dT)·poly(dA) in the presence of 1 mM
ATP, were assayed for ligation with or without ATP, as indicated.
Lane 1, oligo(dT)·poly(dA) substrate only; lanes
2 and 3, substrate incubated with DNA ligase III;
lanes 4 and 5, substrate incubated with DNA
ligase IV. The sizes of the DNA ligation products are indicated.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax:
44-171-269-3819.
1
R. A. Nash, K. W. Caldecott, and T. Lindahl,
submitted for publication.
2
The abbreviations used are: DTT, dithiothreitol;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; FPLC, fast protein liquid
chromatography.
3
P. Robins, T. Lindahl, and B. Young, unpublished
data.
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Lu, U. Pannicke, K. Schwarz, and M. R. Lieber Length-dependent Binding of Human XLF to DNA and Stimulation of XRCC4{middle dot}DNA Ligase IV Activity J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2007; 282(15): 11155 - 11162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Yurchenko, Z. Xue, and M. J. Sadofsky SUMO Modification of Human XRCC4 Regulates Its Localization and Function in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair. Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2006; 26(5): 1786 - 1794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Bladen, D. Udayakumar, Y. Takeda, and W. S. Dynan Identification of the Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein-associated Splicing Factor{middle dot}p54(nrb) Complex as a Candidate DNA Double-strand Break Rejoining Factor J. Biol. Chem., February 18, 2005; 280(7): 5205 - 5210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Chen, K. M. Trujillo, S. Van Komen, D. H. Roh, L. Krejci, L. K. Lewis, M. A. Resnick, P. Sung, and A. E. Tomkinson Effect of Amino Acid Substitutions in the Rad50 ATP Binding Domain on DNA Double Strand Break Repair in Yeast J. Biol. Chem., January 28, 2005; 280(4): 2620 - 2627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-M. Girard, B. Kysela, C. J. Harer, A. J. Doherty, and P. A. Jeggo Analysis of DNA ligase IV mutations found in LIG4 syndrome patients: the impact of two linked polymorphisms Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2004; 13(20): 2369 - 2376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Y. Ho and M. S. Satoh Repair of single-strand DNA interruptions by redundant pathways and its implication in cellular sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2003; 31(23): 7032 - 7040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Namekawa, Y. Ichijima, F. Hamada, N. Kasai, K. Iwabata, T. Nara, H. Teraoka, F. Sugawara, and K. Sakaguchi DNA ligase IV from a basidiomycete, Coprinus cinereus, and its expression during meiosis Microbiology, August 1, 2003; 149(8): 2119 - 2128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. van Attikum, P. Bundock, R. M. Overmeer, L.-Y. Lee, S. B. Gelvin, and P. J. J. Hooykaas The Arabidopsis AtLIG4 gene is required for the repair of DNA damage, but not for the integration of Agrobacterium T-DNA Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2003; 31(14): 4247 - 4255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Kysela, A. J. Doherty, M. Chovanec, T. Stiff, S. M. Ameer-Beg, B. Vojnovic, P.-M. Girard, and P. A. Jeggo Ku Stimulation of DNA Ligase IV-dependent Ligation Requires Inward Movement along the DNA Molecule J. Biol. Chem., June 13, 2003; 278(25): 22466 - 22474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Nick McElhinny and D. A. Ramsden Polymerase Mu Is a DNA-Directed DNA/RNA Polymerase Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2003; 23(7): 2309 - 2315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lee and P. J. McKinnon DNA Ligase IV Suppresses Medulloblastoma Formation Cancer Res., November 15, 2002; 62(22): 6395 - 6399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sun, R. Urrabaz, S. Kelly, M. Nguyen, and S. Weitman Enhancement of DNA Ligase I Level by Gemcitabine in Human Cancer Cells Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 8(4): 1189 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wang, Z.-C. Zeng, A. R. Perrault, X. Cheng, W. Qin, and G. Iliakis Genetic evidence for the involvement of DNA ligase IV in the DNA-PK-dependent pathway of non-homologous end joining in mammalian cells Nucleic Acids Res., April 15, 2001; 29(8): 1653 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nakatani, S. Ezaki, H. Atomi, and T. Imanaka A DNA Ligase from a Hyperthermophilic Archaeon with Unique Cofactor Specificity J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2000; 182(22): 6424 - 6433. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lee, D. E. Barnes, T. Lindahl, and P. J. McKinnon Defective neurogenesis resulting from DNA ligase IV deficiency requires Atm Genes & Dev., October 15, 2000; 14(20): 2576 - 2580. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Nick McElhinny, C. M. Snowden, J. McCarville, and D. A. Ramsden Ku Recruits the XRCC4-Ligase IV Complex to DNA Ends Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2000; 20(9): 2996 - 3003. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Karimi-Busheri, G. Daly, P. Robins, B. Canas, D. J. C. Pappin, J. Sgouros, G. G. Miller, H. Fakhrai, E. M. Davis, M. M. Le Beau, et al. Molecular Characterization of a Human DNA Kinase J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 1999; 274(34): 24187 - 24194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Lakshmipathy and C. Campbell The Human DNA Ligase III Gene Encodes Nuclear and Mitochondrial Proteins Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 1999; 19(5): 3869 - 3876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Baumann and S. C. West DNA end-joining catalyzed by human cell-free extracts PNAS, November 24, 1998; 95(24): 14066 - 14070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Pinz and D. F. Bogenhagen Efficient Repair of Abasic Sites in DNA by Mitochondrial Enzymes Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 1998; 18(3): 1257 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Levin, W. Bai, N. Yao, M. O'Donnell, and A. E. Tomkinson An interaction between DNA ligase I and proliferating cell nuclear antigen: Implications for Okazaki fragment synthesis and joining PNAS, November 25, 1997; 94(24): 12863 - 12868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Schar, G. Herrmann, G. Daly, and T. Lindahl A newly identified DNA ligase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae involved in RAD52-independent repair of DNA double-strand breaks Genes & Dev., August 1, 1997; 11(15): 1912 - 1924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Chen, K. Trujillo, P. Sung, and A. E. Tomkinson Interactions of the DNA Ligase IV-XRCC4 Complex with DNA Ends and the DNA-dependent Protein Kinase J. Biol. Chem., August 18, 2000; 275(34): 26196 - 26205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-J. Lee, J. Huang, Y. Takeda, and W. S. Dynan DNA Ligase IV and XRCC4 Form a Stable Mixed Tetramer That Functions Synergistically with Other Repair Factors in a Cell-free End-joining System J. Biol. Chem., October 27, 2000; 275(44): 34787 - 34796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Riballo, A. J. Doherty, Y. Dai, T. Stiff, M. A. Oettinger, P. A. Jeggo, and B. Kysela Cellular and Biochemical Impact of a Mutation in DNA Ligase IV Conferring Clinical Radiosensitivity J. Biol. Chem., August 10, 2001; 276(33): 31124 - 31132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Perez-Jannotti, S. M. Klein, and D. F. Bogenhagen Two Forms of Mitochondrial DNA Ligase III Are Produced in Xenopus laevis Oocytes J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2001; 276(52): 48978 - 48987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||