JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Medina, R.
Right arrow Articles by Berlot, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Medina, R.
Right arrow Articles by Berlot, C. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 40, Issue of October 4, 1996 pp. 24720-24727
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Localization of the Effector-specifying Regions of Gi2alpha and Gqalpha *

(Received for publication, May 24, 1996, and in revised form, July 23, 1996)

Rolando Medina Dagger , Galina Grishina §, Edward G. Meloni Dagger , Theodore R. Muth and Catherine H. Berlot Dagger §par

From the § Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, the Dagger  Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, and the  Department of Cell Biology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8026

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Heterotrimeric G proteins transmit hormonal and sensory signals received by cell surface receptors to effector proteins that regulate cellular processes. Members of the highly conserved family of alpha  subunits specifically modulate the activities of a diverse array of effector proteins. To investigate the determinants of alpha  subunit-effector specificity, we localized the effector-specifying regions of alpha i2, which inhibits adenylyl cyclase, and alpha q, which stimulates phosphoinositide phospholipase C using chimeric alpha  subunits. The chimeras were generated using an in vivo recombination method in Escherichia coli. The effector-specifying regions of both alpha i2 and alpha q were localized within the GTPase domain. An alpha q/alpha i2/alpha q chimera containing only 78 alpha i2 residues within the GTPase domain robustly inhibited adenylyl cyclase. This alpha i2 segment includes regions corresponding to two of the three regions of alpha s that activate adenylyl cyclase, but does not include any of the alpha  subunit regions that switch conformation upon binding GTP. Replacement of the alpha q residues that comprise the helical domain with the homologous alpha i2 residues resulted in a chimeric alpha  subunit that activated phospholipase C. Combined with previous studies of the effector-specifying residues of alpha s and alpha t, our results suggest that the effector specificity of alpha  subunits is generally determined by the GTPase and not the helical domain.


INTRODUCTION

The heterotrimeric G proteins transmit hormonal and sensory signals received by cell surface receptors to effector proteins that regulate processes such as proliferation, secretion, chemotaxis, vision, olfaction, neurotransmitter release, conduction of nerve impulses, and cardiac and smooth muscle contraction (1, 2, 3, 4). The alpha  subunit serves as a molecular switch that determines the activation state of a G protein. Liganded receptors activate G proteins by catalyzing the replacement of GDP bound to the alpha  subunit with GTP, resulting in dissociation of alpha ·GTP from the beta gamma subunits. Both alpha ·GTP and beta gamma can transmit signals to effector proteins. alpha ·GTP but not alpha ·GDP modulates the activities of effector proteins. The GTPase activity of the alpha  subunit regulates the timing of deactivation and reassociation of the G protein subunits.

Differences in the amino acid sequences of the G protein alpha  subunits determine the specificity and nature of their interactions with effector proteins. However, the molecular determinants of effector specificity and the mechanisms by which alpha  subunit-effector interactions affect the structure and function of both proteins are poorly understood. Key questions to be answered include the following. How do specific alpha  subunits and effectors recognize their appropriate partners? How do these interactions depend on the guanine nucleotide-binding state of the alpha  subunit? Is there a common mechanism by which the structurally conserved alpha  subunits recognize and modulate the activities of a diverse array of structurally unrelated effector proteins? A structure/function study of the alpha  subunit provides the opportunity to relate the determinants of effector interaction and specificity to the GTP-dependent molecular switch.

Studies of G protein alpha  subunit function can be interpreted in the context of the x-ray crystal structures of alpha t, which activates cGMP phosphodiesterase in the visual transduction system, and of alpha i1, which inhibits adenylyl cyclase. The alpha  subunits belong to a structurally conserved family, sharing at least 40% identity at the amino acid level, with 60-90% identity within subfamilies (5). This degree of homology assures (6) that the structures of alpha t and alpha i1 (which are closely superimposable) provide an accurate model for the structures of other alpha  subunits. The structures of the GTPgamma S1-bound (active) and GDP-bound (inactive) forms of alpha t (7, 8) and alpha i1 (9, 10) have been solved. These alpha  subunit structures consist of two domains, a GTPase domain that resembles the oncogene protein, p21ras, and a helical domain consisting of alpha  helices and connecting loops (see Fig. 7). Comparison of the GTPgamma S- and GDP-bound structures reveals three regions (Switches I-III) that change conformation depending on the activation state of the alpha  subunit. Understanding alpha  subunit-effector interactions involves relating effector contact sites to these switch regions.


Fig. 7. Mapping of the effector-specifying regions of alpha i2 and alpha q onto the x-ray crystal structure of the GTPgamma S-bound form of alpha t. alpha i2 residues are magenta, and alpha q residues are green. Conformational switch regions are red. The EE epitope is tan. A, effector-specifying region of alpha i2 as defined by QI8+IQ15 is magenta. B, effector-specifying region of alpha q as defined by QI13+IQ1 is green. Coordinates are from Ref. 7. Figures were drawn using MidasPlus, developed by the Computer Graphics Laboratory at UCSF.
[View Larger Version of this Image (136K GIF file)]

As a first step in understanding how G protein alpha  subunits recognize specific effector proteins and modulate their activities, we previously identified residues of alpha s that specify activation of adenylyl cyclase (11). When these effector-activating residues of alpha s are mapped onto the x-ray crystal structures of the GTPgamma S-bound forms of alpha t (7) and alpha i1 (9), they are localized to three adjacent regions in the GTPase domain. One of these regions is part of Switch II (8, 10), suggesting that this region is directly responsible for the GTP dependence of adenylyl cyclase activation by alpha s. The alpha  subunit regions that specify activation of adenylyl cyclase by alpha s are also important for the interaction between alpha t and its effector, cGMP phosphodiesterase (12, 13, 14, 15).

To investigate whether there is a common mechanism for effector modulation by G protein alpha  subunits, we have localized the residues of alpha i2 and alpha q that specify interaction with their respective effectors, adenylyl cyclase and PLC. Adenylyl cyclase and PLC are distinct in structure and cellular localization, so that common features of alpha  subunit interaction with these effectors are likely to be generalizable to the effector interactions of most alpha  subunits. Adenylyl cyclases are a family of proteins that exhibit distinct patterns of regulation by multiple input signals (16). For example, the three isoforms of alpha i can inhibit the alpha s-stimulated activity of adenylyl cyclase types V (17) and VI (18). Thus, alpha s and alpha i, which are ~40% identical at the amino acid level, both bind to adenylyl cyclase, but have opposite effects on activity. The PLC isoforms are cytosolic proteins that are structurally unrelated to the adenylyl cyclases. Furthermore, the alpha q-PLC interaction differs from that between alpha s and adenylyl cyclase in that PLC-beta 1 can stimulate the GTPase activity of the alpha  subunit that activates it (19).

This study utilized chimeric alpha  subunits to localize the effector-specifying regions of alpha i2 and alpha q. We found that the effector-specifying regions of both alpha i2 and alpha q are localized within the alpha  subunit GTPase domain. The region of alpha i2 that specifies interaction with adenylyl cyclase was localized to a 78-residue segment within this domain. Replacement of the alpha q residues that comprise the helical domain with alpha i2 residues resulted in a chimeric alpha  subunit that activated PLC. Combined with previous studies of the effector-specifying residues of alpha s and alpha t, our results suggest that the effector specificity of alpha  subunits, in general, is determined by the GTPase and not the helical domain. Furthermore, although GTP-dependent conformational changes are required for productive effector interactions, the conformational switch regions are not always determinants of effector specificity.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Chimera Generation

All chimeric alpha  subunits were constructed from mouse alpha i2 cDNA (20) and mouse alpha q cDNA (21). Two modifications were made to each of the alpha  subunits to facilitate detection of their activities and expression levels. The arginine at position 179 in alpha i2 and 183 in alpha q was mutated to cysteine to inhibit GTPase activity and produce constitutive activation (22, 23). An epitope, referred to as the EE epitope (24) was generated by mutating alpha i2 residues <UNL>SD</UNL>Y<UNL>I</UNL>PT<UNL>Q</UNL> (166-172) to EEYMPTE and alpha q residues <UNL>S</UNL>Y<UNL>L</UNL>PT<UNL>Q</UNL> (171-176) to EYMPTE (single-letter amino acid code; mutated residues are underlined). The resultant constructs were designated alpha i2RCEE and alpha qRCEE. The alpha i2RCEE cDNA was a gift of Ann Pace and Henry Bourne. The alpha qEE cDNA (gift of Paul Wilson and Henry Bourne) was subcloned into the SphI site of the pcDNA I/Amp expression vector (Invitrogen), and arginine 183 was mutated to cysteine to produce alpha qRCEE by oligonucleotide-directed in vitro mutagenesis (25) using the Bio-Rad Muta-Gene kit. alpha oRCEE was generated from the rat alpha o cDNA (26) by mutating arginine 179 to cysteine and residues <UNL>D</UNL>Y<UNL>Q</UNL>PTE (167-172) to EYMPTE. Subcloning and mutagenesis procedures were verified by restriction enzyme analysis and DNA sequencing.

The sequence of the multiple cloning site in pcDNA I/Amp was mutated to produce two modified constructs. In pcDNA I/AmpA, the EcoRV site was mutated to a BstEII site. In pcDNA I/AmpB, the HindIII site was removed and a BstEII site was introduced in between the BamHI and BstXI sites.

To generate alpha q/alpha i2 chimeras, the unique BamHI site in alpha i2RCEE was removed and the cDNA was subcloned into the EcoRI site of pcDNA I/AmpB. The alpha qRCEE cDNA was then subcloned upstream of alpha i2RCEE into the BamHI site of this construct. The plasmid (5 µg) was then linearized at the unique HindIII and BstEII restriction sites in between the two cDNAs and transformed into Library Efficiency HB101 chemically competent cells (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's procedure. Colonies were initially screened by restriction mapping to distinguish between tandem insert constructs and recombinant alpha  subunits and to roughly localize chimera junctions. The precise cross-over points were then identified by DNA sequencing. The alpha q/alpha i2 chimeras were designated as QI followed by the number of the bacterial colony from which the cDNA was isolated.

For the alpha i2/alpha q chimeras, the unique SphI site in alpha i2RCEE was removed and the cDNA was subcloned into the EcoRI site of pcDNA I/AmpA. The alpha qRCEE cDNA was then subcloned downstream of alpha i2RCEE into the SphI site of this construct. The plasmid (5 µg) was then linearized at the unique BstEII and SmaI restriction sites in between the two cDNAs and introduced into chemically competent MV1190 cells (Bio-Rad) that were prepared and transformed according to the method of Chung and Miller (27). Colonies were screened and sequenced as described above. The alpha i2/alpha q chimeras were designated as IQ followed by the number of the bacterial colony from which the cDNA was isolated.

To generate the QI8+IQ15 chimera, chimera IQ15 was digested with BglII and XhoI to yield a 457-bp fragment of sequence encoding codons 319-330 of alpha i2 and codons 335-359 and the 3'-untranslated region of alpha q. BglII-XhoI restriction of Chimera QI8 removed 313 bp of sequence encoding codons 319-355 and the 3'-untranslated region of alpha i2 that was replaced by the 457-bp fragment from chimera IQ15. To generate the QI13+IQ1 chimera, chimera IQ1 was digested with MscI and SphI to yield a 1166-bp fragment encoding codons 82-177 of alpha i2 and codons 182-359 and the 3'-untranslated region of alpha q. Chimera QI13 was digested with MscI and SphI, removing 1024 bp of sequence encoding codons 82-355 and the 3'-untranslated region of alpha i2 which was replaced by the 1166-bp fragment from chimera IQ1.

cAMP Accumulation Assay

Recombinant alpha  subunits were transiently expressed in the human embryonic kidney fibroblast line, HEK-293 (American Type Culture Collection, CRL-1573), using DEAE-dextran (28) under the control of the CMV promoter in pcDNA I/Amp. 106 cells/60-mm dish were transfected with 0.1 µg of vector alone or were co-transfected with 0.1 µg of vector containing the constitutively activated alpha sRC mutant (arginine 201 is mutated to cysteine; Ref. 29), and 0.03, 0.1, or 0.3 µg of vector containing alpha i2RCEE, alpha qRCEE, alpha oRCEE, or a chimeric alpha  subunit. Inhibition of alpha sRC-stimulated cAMP accumulation by the recombinant alpha  subunits was measured by determining intracellular cAMP levels in cells labeled with [3H]adenine, as described (11). 24 h after transfection, the cells were replated in 24-well plates and labeled with [3H]adenine (5 µCi/ml for 24 h). The cells were then washed with 1 ml of assay medium (20 mM HEPES-buffered minimal essential medium with Earle's salts without bicarbonate) and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in 0.5 ml of assay medium containing 1 mM 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine. The medium was then aspirated, and the cells were lysed by the addition of 5% trichloroacetic acid plus 1 mM each of ATP and cAMP. Nucleotides were separated on ion exchange columns (30). Conversion of ATP to cAMP was expressed as [3H]cAMP/([3H]ATP + [3H]cAMP) × 103 (31). cAMP values in cells co-transfected with alpha sRC and other constructs were expressed as the fraction of cAMP accumulation in cells transfected only with alpha sRC.

Inositol Phosphate Formation Assay

Recombinant alpha  subunits were transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells using DEAE-dextran (28). The assay for intracellular inositol phosphates in cells labeled with [3H]inositol was a modification of the one described in Ref. 23. 106 cells/60-mm dish were transfected with 3 µg of vector alone or varying amounts of vector containing an alpha  subunit construct (Figs. 5 and 6). 24 h after transfection, the cells were replated in 24-well plates and labeled with [3H]inositol (5 µCi/ml for 24 h). The cells were then washed with 1 ml of assay medium (20 mM HEPES-buffered minimal essential medium with Earle's salts without bicarbonate containing 10 mM LiCl) and then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in 0.5 ml of assay medium. The medium was then aspirated, and the cells were lysed by the addition of 0.75 ml of ice-cold 20 mM formic acid. After a 30-min incubation at 4 °C, the lysates were brought to pH 8 with 0.1 ml of 3% ammonium hydroxide. The lysates were loaded onto 1-ml AG1-X8 Dowex columns, followed by the immediate addition of 1 ml of 0.18% ammonium hydroxide to elute the [3H]inositol fraction into scintillation vials containing 4 ml of Ultima Gold scintillation fluid (Packard). The columns were then washed with 4 ml of 40 mM ammonium formate, 0.1 M formic acid. Total [3H]inositol phosphates were eluted with 1 ml of 4 M ammonium formate, 0.2 M formic acid into scintillation vials containing 4 ml of Ultima-Flo AF scintillation fluid (Packard). Inositol phosphate production was expressed as [3H]inositol phosphate/([3H]inositol + [3H]inositol phosphate) × 103.


Fig. 5. Inositol phosphate (IP) production in transfected HEK-293 cells. Diagrammatic representation of chimeras as in Fig. 3 is shown. Inositol phosphate levels in 106 HEK-293 cells transfected with 3 µg of vector alone or vector containing the indicated alpha  subunit constructs and labeled with [3H]inositol were determined as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Each value represents the mean ± S.E. of at least three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (44K GIF file)]


Fig. 6. The GTPase domain of alpha q is sufficient to endow an alpha  subunit chimera with the ability to activate PLC. A, inositol phosphate (IP) levels in 106 HEK-293 cells transfected with the indicated amounts of vector containing alpha qRCEE, QI13+IQ1, or alpha i2RCEE and labeled with [3H]inositol were determined as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Each value represents the mean ± S.E. of at least three independent experiments. B, immunoblot showing expression of QI13+IQ1 and alpha qRCEE. 12.5 × 106 HEK-293 cells were transfected with 3 µg/106 cells of vector alone or the indicated amounts (µg/106 cells) of vector containing alpha qRCEE or QI13+IQ1, and membranes were prepared and immunoblotted as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' C, relationship between amount of immunoreactive alpha  subunit and amount of transfected plasmid. 12.5 × 106 HEK-293 cells were transfected with the indicated amounts (per 106 cells) of vector containing alpha qRCEE or QI13+IQ1. alpha  subunit levels in membrane preparations from the transfected cells were quantitated by scanning densitometry of immunoblots. Data points represent the average values from two independent transfections. The lines represent a linear fit to the data using the KaleidaGraph program (Synergy Software).
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]

Membrane Preparations and Immunoblots

HEK-293 cells in 150-mm dishes were transfected using DEAE-dextran (28). Membranes were prepared 48 h after transient transfection from cells that had been lysed by 10 passages through a 27-gauge needle in an ice-cold buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM benzamidine, and 1 mM dithiothreitol. Nuclei were removed by low speed centrifugation at 4 °C, and the membrane fractions were then isolated by centrifugation for 30 min at 4 °C in a microcentrifuge. 25 µg of membrane proteins were then resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis (10%), transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with the anti-EE monoclonal antibody (24), which was purified from hybridoma supernatants using E-Z-SEP reagents (Middlesex Sciences, Inc). The antigen-antibody complexes were detected using an anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-linked antibody according to the ECL Western blotting protocol (Amersham). Quantitation of alpha  subunit expression levels was performed by densitometry using an IS-1000 Digital Imaging System (Alpha Innotech Corp., San Leandro, CA).


RESULTS

Generation of alpha q/alpha i2 and alpha i2/alpha q Chimeras

To localize the alpha i2 and alpha q regions that specify interaction with and modulation of their respective effectors, we produced alpha  subunit chimeras in which portions of alpha i2 were replaced by the corresponding portions of alpha q. Since alpha i2 but not alpha q inhibits adenylyl cyclase (17, 32) and alpha q but not alpha i2 activates PLC (33, 34), the same chimeras could be used to map the effector-specifying regions of both alpha i2 and alpha q. In order to characterize these chimeras after transient expression in HEK-293 cells, two features were included to enable measurement of their functions without interference from the activities of the alpha i and alpha q proteins endogenous to these cells. First, a conserved arginine was replaced by cysteine (R179C in alpha i2, R183C in alpha q). This mutation constitutively activates these alpha  subunits by inhibiting their GTPase activities (22, 23). This mutation made it possible to measure inhibition of adenylyl cyclase or activation of PLC without requiring receptor-mediated activation of the chimeric alpha  subunits. Second, the chimeras include an epitope from an internal region of polyoma virus medium T antigen, referred to as the EE epitope (24). In the x-ray crystal structure of alpha t (7), the site of this epitope maps onto an exposed loop connecting alpha  helices alpha E and alpha F in the helical domain (Fig. 7). The EE epitope does not interfere with the alpha i2-adenylyl cyclase interaction (35) or the alpha q-PLC interaction (36).

We generated alpha  subunit chimeras containing alpha q/alpha i2 or alpha i2/alpha q junctions using a novel method (37, 38, 39) that utilized Escherichia coli DNA repair enzymes to rapidly generate a set of chimeras containing junctions within regions of amino acid identity between alpha i2 and alpha q. Plasmids containing single ``head to tail'' copies of both alpha  subunit genes were linearized in between the two cDNAs and transformed into bacteria. Transformants were derived from either uncut plasmids or plasmids that recircularized in vivo. Using restriction enzyme mapping, we screened 119 colonies generated after transformation of the linearized alpha q/alpha i2 plasmid and obtained 73 that were not the original plasmid. The restriction maps of 58 of these 73 constructs were consistent with their being alpha q/alpha i2 chimeras. The remaining colonies may have represented recombination events within the 5'- or 3'-untranslated regions of the cDNAs. Of 131 colonies produced from transformation of the linearized alpha i2/alpha q plasmid, 97 were not the original plasmid. The restriction maps of 56 of these 97 colonies were consistent with their being alpha i2/alpha q chimeras. The junctions of the chimeras were further localized with additional restriction enzymes and then determined precisely by DNA sequencing. The junctions of these chimeras were always in frame. As shown in Fig. 1, six unique alpha q/alpha i2 junctions and three unique alpha i2/alpha q junctions were obtained. The amount of sequence identity seen at the chimera junctions ranged from 8 to 20 bases.


Fig. 1. Alignment of alpha i2 and alpha q sequences and diagrammatic representation of chimera junctions. The amino acids encoded by identical nucleotide bases at each junction are boxed. Elements of secondary structure, determined from the structure of the GTPgamma S-bound form of alpha t (7), are indicated by a (alpha  helices), b (beta  strands), and dashes (turns and loops). The three regions that switch conformation between the GDP-bound and GTPgamma S-bound forms of alpha t (Switches I-III) (8) are indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (51K GIF file)]

All of the chimeric alpha  subunit cDNAs encoded proteins that were expressed in membranes of transiently transfected HEK-293 cells (Fig. 2). Chimeras QI5, QI1, and IQ15 were expressed at higher levels than those of alpha i2RCEE and alpha qRCEE, while chimeras QI13, QI23, IQ1, and QI8+IQ15, an alpha q/alpha i2/alpha q chimera derived from QI8 and IQ15 (see Fig. 3), were expressed at somewhat lower levels, and QI4, QI8, and IQ23 were expressed at significantly reduced levels. A commonly used criterion for proper alpha  subunit folding and function is a GTPgamma S-dependent decrease in sensitivity to trypsin at a conserved alpha  subunit cleavage site (11, 40, 41, 42). We were unable to apply this criterion to the chimeric alpha  subunits because alpha qRCEE expressed in HEK-293 cells exhibited extremely poor GTPgamma S-dependent trypsin resistance relative to alpha i2RCEE (data not shown), presumably due to inadequate binding of GTPgamma S in the absence of receptor stimulation (32).


Fig. 2. Expression of recombinant alpha  subunits in HEK-293 cell membranes. 6.25 × 106 HEK-293 cells were transfected with 1 µg/106 cells of vector alone or vector containing the indicated alpha  subunit constructs, and membranes were prepared and immunoblotted as described under ``Experimental Procedures.''
[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]


Fig. 3. cAMP accumulation in transfected HEK-293 cells. Chimeras are depicted as segments with numbers that represent alpha i2 or alpha q residues at the beginning and end of segments derived from these proteins (open for alpha i2 and shaded for alpha q). All chimeras include the GTPase-inhibiting arginine to cysteine mutation (R179C in alpha i2, R183C in alpha q) and the EE epitope as shown for alpha i2RCEE. Each junction is defined as the point at which the sequence first diverges from that of the amino-terminal alpha  subunit segment. Shown next to each alpha  subunit construct is the cAMP accumulation in 106 HEK-293 cells transfected with 0.1 µg of vector containing alpha sRC and 0.3 µg of vector containing the indicted alpha  subunit construct. The amount of cAMP accumulation in cells transfected with alpha sRC alone is set at 1.0, and the values from cells co-transfected with the indicated constructs are expressed relative to this value. cAMP values of constructs with greatly decreased abilities to inhibit cAMP accumulation are shown as shaded bars, and values of constructs that are similar to that of alpha i2RCEE are shown as open bars. cAMP levels in [3H]adenine-labeled cells were determined as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Each value represents the mean ± S.E. of at least three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]

Localization of the Region of alpha i2 That Specifies Inhibition of Adenylyl Cyclase

We measured the ability of recombinant alpha  subunits to inhibit adenylyl cyclase in HEK-293 cells by co-expressing them with the constitutively activated alpha s mutant, alpha sRC, in which arginine 201 is mutated to cysteine (29). Transfection with 0.1 µg of vector containing alpha sRC resulted in an approximately 18-fold increase in cAMP production compared to cells transfected with the vector alone. Co-transfection with 0.3 µg of vector containing alpha i2RCEE resulted in ~60% inhibition of the cAMP response to alpha sRC, while co-transfection with the same amount of vector containing alpha oRCEE inhibited the response to alpha sRC by only ~14% (Fig. 3). alpha oRCEE was used as a negative control because it does not inhibit adenylyl cyclase types V (17) or VI (18). It is not known which adenylyl cyclases are present in HEK-293 cells, but it seems likely that types V and/or VI are present, since these are the only adenylyl cyclases known to exhibit inhibition by alpha i of alpha s-stimulated activity (17, 18). Co-transfection with 0.3 µg of vector containing alpha qRCEE caused an approximately 2-fold elevation of cAMP levels,2 presumably due either to release of Ca+2 from intracellular stores or to activation of protein kinase C, since alpha q has no direct effect on adenylyl cyclase activity (32). Since adenylyl cyclase types V and VI are inhibited by Ca+2 (43, 44, 45), some other adenylyl cyclase isoform must be responsible for the activation seen with alpha qRCEE.

We tested all of the chimeras shown in Fig. 1 for their ability to inhibit adenylyl cyclase, except QI23, which was the only chimera that activated PLC (Fig. 5). Since activation of PLC indirectly causes activation of adenylyl cyclase in HEK-293 cells, interpretation of the effect of QI23 on adenylyl cyclase activity would have been difficult. Of the IQ chimeras, only IQ15 inhibited adenylyl cyclase, while all of the QI chimeras were able to inhibit adenylyl cyclase (Fig. 3). The inability of IQ1 and IQ23 to inhibit adenylyl cyclase cannot be attributed to their reduced expression levels, which are greater than or equal to those of QI4 and QI8 (Fig. 2), although it is possible that they do not fold properly.

The alpha q/alpha i2 and alpha i2/alpha q chimera results suggested that the ability to inhibit adenylyl cyclase is specified by a 78-residue segment, alpha i2 residues 245-322 (alpha i2 residues 323-330 are identical to alpha q residues 327-334). Specifically, IQ15 and QI8 showed that alpha i2 residues 331-355 and 1-244, respectively, could be replaced by the homologous alpha q residues without affecting alpha i2 effector specificity. To test whether alpha i2 residues 245-322 were sufficient to specify inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by an alpha  subunit chimera, we produced an alpha q/alpha i2/alpha q chimera, QI8+IQ15, in which this segment of alpha i2 replaced the homologous segment of alpha q (Fig. 3). QI8+IQ15 inhibited adenylyl cyclase activity as effectively as alpha i2RCEE did (Figs. 3 and 4). Thus, this chimera localizes the alpha i2 residues that specify inhibition of adenylyl cyclase to residues 245-322.


Fig. 4. Substitution of a 79-residue segment of alpha i2 for its alpha q homologs endows alpha q with the ability to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. Figure shows cAMP accumulation in 106 HEK-293 cells co-transfected with 0.1 µg of vector containing alpha sRC and the indicated amounts of vector containing alpha i2RCEE, QI8+IQ15, or alpha oRCEE. cAMP levels in [3H]adenine-labeled cells were determined as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Each value represents the mean ± S.E. of at least three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]

To visualize the 78-residue alpha i2 effector-specifying segment in three dimensions, we mapped it onto the x-ray crystal structure of the GTPgamma S-bound form of alpha t (7). 67% and 49% of the alpha t amino acids can be aligned with identical residues in the sequences of alpha i2 and alpha q, respectively. For comparison, 67% of the alpha i1 residues can be aligned with identical residues in alpha t and the structures of the GTPgamma S-bound forms of alpha i1 and alpha t are closely superimposable. The alpha i2 effector-specifying segment defines a region that extends from alpha 3 to beta 6, shown in magenta on the alpha t·GTPgamma S structure (Fig. 7A). The segment includes three alpha  helices (alpha 3, alpha G, and alpha 4), two beta  strands (beta 5 and beta 6), and the loops that connect these elements of secondary structure. This alpha i2 segment includes regions corresponding to two of the three regions of alpha s that specify activation of adenylyl cyclase, which are located in the alpha 3/beta 5 and alpha 4/beta 6 loops (11). However, the alpha i2 region corresponding to the third effector-activating region of alpha s, which is part of Switch II (8), and the other two switch regions are not included.

Localization of the Region of alpha q That Specifies Activation of PLC

The abilities of the alpha q/alpha i2 and alpha i2/alpha q chimeras to activate PLC were tested by transiently expressing them in HEK-293 cells. In cells transfected with 3 µg of vector containing alpha qRCEE, inositol phosphate levels were elevated ~30-fold over levels in cells transfected with vector alone. Of the alpha q/alpha i2 chimeras, only QI23, in which the extreme carboxyl-terminal region of alpha q (residues 335-359) was replaced by alpha i2 sequence, exhibited any PLC-activating ability, elevating inositol phosphate levels ~8-fold above levels in vector-transfected cells (Fig. 5). This chimera was expressed at approximately half the level that alpha qRCEE was (Fig. 2). Thus, the decreased activity of QI23, relative to alpha qRCEE, was not entirely due to its decreased expression level. alpha q/alpha i2 chimeras in which larger carboxyl-terminal segments of alpha q sequence were replaced by alpha i2 sequence (QI8, QI4, QI1, QI5, and QI13) exhibited no ability to activate PLC. Furthermore, the alpha q/alpha i2/alpha q chimera, QI8+IQ15, in which only 86 alpha q residues in the carboxyl-terminal portion of the molecule (amino acids 249-334) were replaced by alpha i2 homologs, had no effect on PLC. All of the chimeras that did not activate PLC were expressed in HEK-293 cell membranes (Fig. 2) and all except IQ23 and IQ1 could inhibit adenylyl cyclase (Fig. 3), indicating that they were functional alpha  subunits.

The above results suggested that a region in the carboxyl-terminal portion of alpha q that includes residues 249-334 is necessary for PLC activation. However, results with the alpha i2/alpha q chimeras demonstrated that the carboxyl-terminal region of alpha q is not sufficient to specify PLC activation. Chimeras IQ23 and IQ1, which contain alpha q residues 222-359 and 182-359, respectively, did not activate PLC (Fig. 5). Reasoning that in addition to alpha q residues 182-359, amino-terminal alpha q residues are required for PLC activation, we generated an alpha q/alpha i2/alpha q chimera using fragments from IQ1 and QI13. In the resultant chimera, QI13+IQ1 (Fig. 5), alpha i2 sequence was substituted for alpha q residues 57-181 in the helical domain (alpha q residues 57-59 are identical to alpha i2 residues 51-53).

QI13+IQ1 activated PLC, although both its activity (Figs. 5 and 6A) and expression level (Fig. 6B) were reduced relative to those of alpha qRCEE. Inositol phosphate production in cells transfected with 3 µg of vector containing QI13+IQ1 was ~5-fold elevated over that of vector-transfected cells (Fig. 5). For both alpha qRCEE and QI13+IQ1, the relationship between amount of transfected plasmid and inositol phosphate production was approximately linear when cells were transfected with <= 0.5 µg of plasmid. Within this range, alpha qRCEE elevated inositol phosphate production above that in vector-transfected cells ~9 times as much as QI13+IQ1 did (Fig. 6A). Similarly, the amount of immunoreactive alpha  subunit expressed in membranes varied linearly with amount of transfected plasmid, and alpha qRCEE was expressed at ~8-fold the level of QI13+IQ1 (Fig. 6, B and C). Therefore, the PLC-activating ability of QI13+IQ1 is comparable to that of alpha qRCEE when expression level is controlled for. The fact that QI13+IQ1 but not IQ1 activates PLC indicates that alpha q residues 1-56 are either directly involved in effector interaction or are required for proper alpha  subunit folding. We cannot distinguish between these possibilities since we were unable to determine whether IQ1 adopts a native alpha  subunit conformation.

When mapped onto the alpha t·GTPgamma S structure, the alpha q segment, residues 57-181, which was replaced by homologous alpha i2 residues in an alpha  subunit chimera that activates PLC, localizes to the entire alpha  subunit helical domain (shown in magenta in Fig. 7B), beginning within the second half of alpha 1 and extending to the end of alpha F immediately before Switch I. Thus, the GTPase domain of alpha q (shown in green in Fig. 7B) is sufficient to specify activation of PLC. Furthermore, our results suggest that residues within both segments of primary structure that comprise the GTPase domain, residues 1-56 and residues 182-359, are important for specifying this effector interaction.


DISCUSSION

In the study described here, the regions of alpha i2 and alpha q that specify interaction with and modulation of adenylyl cyclase and PLC, respectively, were localized using chimeric alpha  subunits composed of portions of the two alpha  subunits. Of the two alpha  subunit domains, the GTPase domain and not the helical domain specifies the effector interactions of both alpha i2 and alpha q. The region of alpha i2 that specifies inhibition of adenylyl cyclase was localized to a 78-residue segment (amino acids 245-322) that extends from alpha 3 to beta 6 within the GTPase domain. The effector-specifying region of alpha q was also localized to the GTPase domain, by means of a chimeric alpha  subunit that substituted alpha i2 homologs for an alpha q segment (residues 57-181) extending from the second half of alpha 1 to the end of alpha F in the helical domain.

Previous experiments localized the effector-specifying residues of alpha s to three adjacent regions within the GTPase domain: the carboxyl-terminal end of alpha 2 and the alpha 2/beta 4 loop, the alpha 3/beta 5 loop, and the alpha 4/beta 6 loop (11). In alpha t, the following regions within the GTPase domain are involved in activation of cGMP phosphodiesterase: alpha 2 (14), alpha 3 and the alpha 3/beta 5 loop (15), and alpha 4 and the alpha 4/beta 6 loop (12, 13). Thus, the effector-specifying segment of alpha i2 includes residues that correspond to residues in two of the three effector-specifying regions of alpha s and alpha t, while that of alpha q includes all of these regions.

Although the function of the helical domain is still under investigation, current evidence suggests that it serves as a regulator of guanine nucleotide handling. When the helical and GTPase domains of alpha s are individually expressed and reconstituted in vitro, the helical domain dramatically stimulates the GTPase activity of the GTPase domain and also promotes binding of GTPgamma S (46). Furthermore, interactions between the helical and GTPase domains are most likely involved in assuring that guanine nucleotide exchange is tightly regulated by activated receptors, since the two domains effectively bury the bound GDP (8, 10, 47, 48). The two domains, which are connected by two short stretches of sequence, presumably shift relative to one another to allow receptor-dependent nucleotide exchange.

Others have suggested that residues within the helical domains of alpha s and alpha i might be important for effector interactions. A chimera in which human alpha s residues extending from alpha A to alpha C in the helical domain were replaced by the corresponding residues from Xenopus alpha s, which does not activate adenylyl cyclase, had a greatly reduced ability to activate adenylyl cyclase. Conversely, a chimera in which the corresponding human alpha s residues were substituted for Xenopus alpha s residues effectively activated adenylyl cyclase (49). However, 17 of the 19 residues that differ between human and Xenopus alpha s in this region also differ between mammalian alpha s and alpha i2, and substitution of alpha i2 residues for these alpha s residues does not prevent activation of adenylyl cyclase (11, 50, 51). The two residues within this region that are the same in mammalian alpha s and alpha i2, but different in Xenopus alpha s, are also different from mammalian alpha s in either Drosophila alpha s (52) or alpha olf (53), both of which stimulate adenylyl cyclase. These results suggest that the inability of Xenopus alpha s to activate adenylyl cyclase is not due to a lack of effector-specifying residues, but instead is the result of a more general difference in alpha  subunit function such as nucleotide handling and/or ability to become activated in response to GTP binding. Interestingly, a segment of alpha i1 within this region (residues 110-120) exhibits the largest deviation between the structures of the active forms of alpha i1 and alpha t, which led to the suggestion that this region might be an effector contact site for alpha i (9). However, this region does not specify interaction with adenylyl cyclase, because alpha  subunit chimeras in which entirely divergent alpha q sequence replaced the alpha i2 sequence in this region effectively inhibited adenylyl cyclase.

It has been proposed that the amino terminus of alpha i binds to adenylyl cyclase (48), since alpha i must be myristoylated in order to inhibit this effector enzyme (17). We have shown that the amino-terminal sequence of alpha i2 does not specify inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, since chimeric alpha  subunits in which the amino terminus of alpha i2 is replaced by the highly divergent sequence of alpha q can effectively inhibit adenylyl cyclase. However, since alpha q is palmitoylated at the amino terminus (54), it is possible that a lipid modification in this region is required for the interaction between alpha i and the membrane-bound adenylyl cyclase.

The effector-specifying region of alpha i2, as defined by QI8+IQ15, does not include any of the GTP-dependent conformational switch regions identified by comparison of the x-ray crystal structures of the GTPgamma S-bound forms of alpha t (7) and alpha i1 (9) with the GDP-bound forms of these alpha  subunits (8, 10). Since the GTP-bound form of alpha i is much more effective than the GDP-bound form is at inhibiting adenylyl cyclase (18), we expected that one or more of these conformational switch regions would be involved in this effector interaction. However, since the switch regions are highly conserved among alpha  subunits, their importance as effector-interacting sites could have been missed using a chimeric alpha  subunit approach. Although conserved residues within the switch regions might not confer specificity for a particular effector, they could be contact sites that allow effectors to discriminate between the GTP- and GDP-bound forms of alpha  subunits. In fact, alanine substitution studies have shown that residues within a conserved part of Switch II are important for the effector interactions of both alpha s and alpha i2.3

Our study with alpha  subunit chimeras demonstrates that the GTPase domain of alpha q is both necessary and sufficient to specify interaction with PLC. The GTPase domain consists of two noncontiguous segments of sequence, a short amino-terminal region that extends from the amino terminus to the end of alpha 1 and a larger carboxyl-terminal region that extends from beta 2 to the carboxyl terminus. Our results and those of others implicate both segments as being important for specifying interaction with PLC. Within the amino-terminal segment, mutational replacement of alpha q residues 9 and 10, the sites of palmitoylation, greatly reduces the ability of alpha q to activate PLC, although enzymatic removal of palmitate does not affect PLC activation (55). Peptides corresponding to two regions of alpha q sequence in the carboxyl-terminal segment, residues 251-265 and 306-319, block alpha q-stimulated PLC activity (56). These peptides map onto alpha 3 and the alpha 3/beta 5 loop, and alpha 4 and the alpha 4/beta 6 loop. Using alpha q/alpha s chimeras, Venkatakrishnan and Exton (57) found that alpha q residues 277-359 could be replaced by alpha s residues without reducing the ability of alpha q to activate PLC. However, replacement of alpha q residues 217-276 with alpha s homologs did cause a loss of function. Alanine scanning in this region identified two regions, alpha q residues 243-245 and 256-257, which, when mutated, caused a loss of PLC-activating ability without affecting the ability of alpha q to attain the GTP-dependent activated conformation. These residues are located in the beta 4/alpha 3 loop, which includes Switch III (8, 10), and in alpha 3. The other two conformational switch regions are also localized within the GTPase domain and may be important for PLC activation.

The method used here to generate chimeric alpha  subunits in vivo in E. coli should be applicable to any pair of genes that encode proteins with a similar amount of amino acid identity as alpha i2 and alpha q (~50%) and has already been used to make chimeric alpha -amylases (39), neurotransmitter transporters (38), and adenylyl cyclases (37). The exact mechanism of recombination is not understood, but does not require the RecA protein since it occurs in RecA- E. coli strains. The most likely recombination mechanism is that the linearized DNA is exonucleolytically digested upon entering bacteria, and homologous regions on opposite strands then base pair. The resultant molecule is repaired and ligated closed. The amount of sequence identity seen at the chimera junctions ranged from 8 to 20 bases. However, there are other regions in the sequences of alpha i2 and alpha q that share at least 8 bases of identical sequence where chimera junctions were not obtained. Although additional junctions might have been found if more colonies had been screened, junction formation may have been nonrandom since the same chimeras were isolated multiple times.

Localization of the effector-specifying residues of alpha i2 and alpha q at higher resolution as well as investigation of the roles of the conformational switch regions in effector interaction will provide further insight into the mechanism by which alpha  subunits modulate effectors in a GTP-dependent manner. A complete understanding of alpha  subunit-effector interactions will require determination of the structures of the effectors and characterization of the regions with which they interact with alpha  subunits.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
par    To whom all correspondence should be addressed.
1   The abbreviations used are: GTPgamma S, guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate); PLC, phosphoinositide phospholipase C; bp, base pair(s).
2   C. H. Berlot, unpublished observation.
3   G. Grishina and C. H. Berlot, manuscript in preparation.

Acknowledgments

We thank Gernot Walter (UCSD) for the EE hybridoma; Ann Pace, Paul Wilson, and Henry Bourne (UCSF) for the alpha i2RCEE and alpha qEE constructs; Randall Reed (Johns Hopkins) for suggesting the in vivo recombination method for generating chimeras; Gita Venkatakrishnan and John Exton (Vanderbilt) for sharing data prior to publication; Thomas Hynes (Pfizer, Inc.) for critical reading of the text; Susan Brill and Maja Zecevic for help with screening for alpha  subunit chimeras; Joseph Noel, David Lambright, and Paul Sigler for sharing coordinates of alpha t·GTPgamma S and alpha t·GDP; and Gary Rudnick for use of the IS-1000 Digital Imaging System.


REFERENCES

  1. Gilman, A. G. (1987) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 56, 615-649 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Stryer, L., Bourne, H. R. (1986) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 2, 391-419 [CrossRef]
  3. Clapham, D. E., Neer, E. J. (1993) Nature 365, 403-406 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Neer, E. (1995) Cell 80, 249-257 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Simon, M. I., Strathmann, M. P., Gautam, N. (1991) Science 252, 802-808 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Chothia, C., Lesk, A. M. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 823-826 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Noel, J. P., Hamm, H. E., Sigler, P. B. (1993) Nature 366, 654-663 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Lambright, D. G., Noel, J. P., Hamm, H. E., Sigler, P. B. (1994) Nature 369, 621-628 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Coleman, D. E., Berghuis, A. M., Lee, E., Linder, M. E., Gilman, A. G., Sprang, S. R. (1994) Science 265, 1405-1412 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Mixon, M. B., Lee, E., Coleman, D. E., Berghuis, A. M., Gilman, A. G., Sprang, S. R. (1995) Science 270, 954-960 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Berlot, C. H., Bourne, H. R. (1992) Cell 68, 911-922 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Rarick, H. M., Artemyev, N. O., Hamm, H. E. (1992) Science 256, 1031-1033 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Spickofsky, N., Robichon, A., Danho, W., Fry, D., Greeley, D., Graves, B., Madison, V., Margolskee, R. F. (1994) Nat. Struct. Biol. 11, 771-781
  14. Faurobert, E., Otto-Bruc, A., Chardin, P., Chabre, M. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4191-4198 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Skiba, N. P., Bae, H., Hamm, H. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 413-424 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Taussig, R., Gilman, A. G. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1-4 [Free Full Text]
  17. Taussig, R., Iniguez-Lluhi, J. A., Gilman, A. G. (1993) Science 261, 218-221 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Taussig, R., Tang, W.-J., Hepler, J. R., Gilman, A. G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6093-6100 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Berstein, G., Blank, J. L., Jhon, D.-Y., Exton, J. H., Rhee, S. G., Ross, E. M. (1992) Cell 70, 411-418 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Sullivan, K. A., Liao, Y. C., Alborzi, A., Beiderman, B., Chang, F.-H., Masters, S. B., Levinson, A. D., Bourne, H. R. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 6687-6691 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Strathmann, M., Simon, M. I. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 9113-9117 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Wong, Y. H., Federman, A., Pace, A. M., Zachary, I., Evans, T., Pouysségur, J., Bourne, H. R. (1991) Nature 351, 63-65 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Conklin, B. R., Chabre, O., Wong, Y. H., Federman, A. D., Bourne, H. R. (1992) J. Biol. Chem 267, 31-34 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Grussenmeyer, T., Scheidtmann, K. H., Hutchinson, M. A., Eckhart, W., Walter, G. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 7952-7954 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kunkel, T. A., Roberts, J. D., Zakour, R. A. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 154, 367-382 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Jones, D. T., Reed, R. R. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 14241-14249 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Chung, C. T., Miller, R. H. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 3580 [Free Full Text]
  28. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R. E., Kingston, R. E