Volume 271, Number 40,
Issue of October 4, 1996
pp. 24720-24727
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Localization of the Effector-specifying Regions of
Gi2
and Gq
*
(Received for publication, May 24, 1996, and in revised form, July 23, 1996)
Rolando
Medina
,
Galina
Grishina
§,
Edward G.
Meloni
,
Theodore
R.
Muth
¶ and
Catherine H.
Berlot
§
From the § Department of Cellular and Molecular
Physiology, the
Interdepartmental Neuroscience
Program, and the ¶ Department of Cell Biology, Yale University
School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8026
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Heterotrimeric G proteins transmit hormonal and
sensory signals received by cell surface receptors to effector proteins
that regulate cellular processes. Members of the highly conserved
family of
subunits specifically modulate the activities of a
diverse array of effector proteins. To investigate the determinants of
subunit-effector specificity, we localized the effector-specifying
regions of
i2, which inhibits adenylyl cyclase, and
q, which stimulates phosphoinositide phospholipase C
using chimeric
subunits. The chimeras were generated using an
in vivo recombination method in Escherichia
coli. The effector-specifying regions of both
i2
and
q were localized within the GTPase domain. An
q/
i2/
q chimera containing
only 78
i2 residues within the GTPase domain robustly
inhibited adenylyl cyclase. This
i2 segment includes
regions corresponding to two of the three regions of
s
that activate adenylyl cyclase, but does not include any of the
subunit regions that switch conformation upon binding GTP. Replacement
of the
q residues that comprise the helical domain with
the homologous
i2 residues resulted in a chimeric
subunit that activated phospholipase C. Combined with previous studies
of the effector-specifying residues of
s and
t, our results suggest that the effector specificity of
subunits is generally determined by the GTPase and not the helical
domain.
INTRODUCTION
The heterotrimeric G proteins transmit hormonal and sensory
signals received by cell surface receptors to effector proteins that
regulate processes such as proliferation, secretion, chemotaxis,
vision, olfaction, neurotransmitter release, conduction of nerve
impulses, and cardiac and smooth muscle contraction (1, 2, 3, 4). The
subunit serves as a molecular switch that determines the activation
state of a G protein. Liganded receptors activate G proteins by
catalyzing the replacement of GDP bound to the
subunit with GTP,
resulting in dissociation of
·GTP from the 
subunits. Both
·GTP and 
can transmit signals to effector proteins.
·GTP but not
·GDP modulates the activities of effector
proteins. The GTPase activity of the
subunit regulates the timing
of deactivation and reassociation of the G protein subunits.
Differences in the amino acid sequences of the G protein
subunits
determine the specificity and nature of their interactions with
effector proteins. However, the molecular determinants of effector
specificity and the mechanisms by which
subunit-effector
interactions affect the structure and function of both proteins are
poorly understood. Key questions to be answered include the following.
How do specific
subunits and effectors recognize their appropriate
partners? How do these interactions depend on the guanine
nucleotide-binding state of the
subunit? Is there a common
mechanism by which the structurally conserved
subunits recognize
and modulate the activities of a diverse array of structurally
unrelated effector proteins? A structure/function study of the
subunit provides the opportunity to relate the determinants of effector
interaction and specificity to the GTP-dependent molecular
switch.
Studies of G protein
subunit function can be interpreted in the
context of the x-ray crystal structures of
t, which
activates cGMP phosphodiesterase in the visual transduction system, and
of
i1, which inhibits adenylyl cyclase. The
subunits
belong to a structurally conserved family, sharing at least 40%
identity at the amino acid level, with 60-90% identity within
subfamilies (5). This degree of homology assures (6) that the
structures of
t and
i1 (which are closely
superimposable) provide an accurate model for the structures of other
subunits. The structures of the
GTP
S1-bound (active) and GDP-bound
(inactive) forms of
t (7, 8) and
i1 (9,
10) have been solved. These
subunit structures consist of two
domains, a GTPase domain that resembles the oncogene protein,
p21ras, and a helical domain consisting of
helices and
connecting loops (see Fig. 7). Comparison of the GTP
S- and GDP-bound
structures reveals three regions (Switches I-III) that change
conformation depending on the activation state of the
subunit.
Understanding
subunit-effector interactions involves relating
effector contact sites to these switch regions.
Fig. 7.
Mapping of the effector-specifying regions of
i2 and
q onto the x-ray crystal structure
of the GTP
S-bound form of
t.
i2
residues are magenta, and
q residues are
green. Conformational switch regions are red. The
EE epitope is tan. A, effector-specifying region
of
i2 as defined by QI8+IQ15 is magenta.
B, effector-specifying region of
q as defined
by QI13+IQ1 is green. Coordinates are from Ref. 7. Figures
were drawn using MidasPlus, developed by the Computer Graphics
Laboratory at UCSF.
[View Larger Version of this Image (136K GIF file)]
As a first step in understanding how G protein
subunits recognize
specific effector proteins and modulate their activities, we previously
identified residues of
s that specify activation of
adenylyl cyclase (11). When these effector-activating residues of
s are mapped onto the x-ray crystal structures of the
GTP
S-bound forms of
t (7) and
i1 (9),
they are localized to three adjacent regions in the GTPase domain. One
of these regions is part of Switch II (8, 10), suggesting that this
region is directly responsible for the GTP dependence of adenylyl
cyclase activation by
s. The
subunit regions that
specify activation of adenylyl cyclase by
s are also
important for the interaction between
t and its
effector, cGMP phosphodiesterase (12, 13, 14, 15).
To investigate whether there is a common mechanism for effector
modulation by G protein
subunits, we have localized the residues of
i2 and
q that specify interaction with
their respective effectors, adenylyl cyclase and PLC. Adenylyl cyclase
and PLC are distinct in structure and cellular localization, so that
common features of
subunit interaction with these effectors are
likely to be generalizable to the effector interactions of most
subunits. Adenylyl cyclases are a family of proteins that exhibit
distinct patterns of regulation by multiple input signals (16). For
example, the three isoforms of
i can inhibit the
s-stimulated activity of adenylyl cyclase types V (17)
and VI (18). Thus,
s and
i, which are
~40% identical at the amino acid level, both bind to adenylyl
cyclase, but have opposite effects on activity. The PLC isoforms are
cytosolic proteins that are structurally unrelated to the adenylyl
cyclases. Furthermore, the
q-PLC interaction differs
from that between
s and adenylyl cyclase in that
PLC-
1 can stimulate the GTPase activity of the
subunit that
activates it (19).
This study utilized chimeric
subunits to localize the
effector-specifying regions of
i2 and
q.
We found that the effector-specifying regions of both
i2
and
q are localized within the
subunit GTPase
domain. The region of
i2 that specifies interaction with
adenylyl cyclase was localized to a 78-residue segment within this
domain. Replacement of the
q residues that comprise the
helical domain with
i2 residues resulted in a chimeric
subunit that activated PLC. Combined with previous studies of the
effector-specifying residues of
s and
t,
our results suggest that the effector specificity of
subunits, in
general, is determined by the GTPase and not the helical domain.
Furthermore, although GTP-dependent conformational changes
are required for productive effector interactions, the conformational
switch regions are not always determinants of effector specificity.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Chimera Generation
All chimeric
subunits were
constructed from mouse
i2 cDNA (20) and mouse
q cDNA (21). Two modifications were made to each of
the
subunits to facilitate detection of their activities and
expression levels. The arginine at position 179 in
i2
and 183 in
q was mutated to cysteine to inhibit GTPase
activity and produce constitutive activation (22, 23). An epitope,
referred to as the EE epitope (24) was generated by mutating
i2 residues
Y
PT
(166-172) to EEYMPTE and
q residues
Y
PT
(171-176) to EYMPTE
(single-letter amino acid code; mutated residues are underlined). The
resultant constructs were designated
i2RCEE and
qRCEE. The
i2RCEE cDNA was a gift of
Ann Pace and Henry Bourne. The
qEE cDNA (gift of
Paul Wilson and Henry Bourne) was subcloned into the SphI
site of the pcDNA I/Amp expression vector (Invitrogen), and
arginine 183 was mutated to cysteine to produce
qRCEE by
oligonucleotide-directed in vitro mutagenesis (25) using the
Bio-Rad Muta-Gene kit.
oRCEE was generated from the rat
o cDNA (26) by mutating arginine 179 to cysteine and
residues
Y
PTE (167-172) to EYMPTE.
Subcloning and mutagenesis procedures were verified by restriction
enzyme analysis and DNA sequencing.
The sequence of the multiple cloning site in pcDNA I/Amp was
mutated to produce two modified constructs. In pcDNA I/AmpA, the
EcoRV site was mutated to a BstEII site. In
pcDNA I/AmpB, the HindIII site was removed and a
BstEII site was introduced in between the BamHI
and BstXI sites.
To generate
q/
i2 chimeras, the unique
BamHI site in
i2RCEE was removed and the
cDNA was subcloned into the EcoRI site of pcDNA
I/AmpB. The
qRCEE cDNA was then subcloned
upstream of
i2RCEE into the BamHI site of
this construct. The plasmid (5 µg) was then linearized at the unique
HindIII and BstEII restriction sites in between
the two cDNAs and transformed into Library Efficiency HB101
chemically competent cells (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the
manufacturer's procedure. Colonies were initially screened by
restriction mapping to distinguish between tandem insert constructs and
recombinant
subunits and to roughly localize chimera junctions. The
precise cross-over points were then identified by DNA sequencing. The
q/
i2 chimeras were designated as QI
followed by the number of the bacterial colony from which the cDNA
was isolated.
For the
i2/
q chimeras, the unique
SphI site in
i2RCEE was removed and the
cDNA was subcloned into the EcoRI site of pcDNA
I/AmpA. The
qRCEE cDNA was then subcloned downstream
of
i2RCEE into the SphI site of this
construct. The plasmid (5 µg) was then linearized at the unique
BstEII and SmaI restriction sites in between the
two cDNAs and introduced into chemically competent MV1190 cells
(Bio-Rad) that were prepared and transformed according to the method of
Chung and Miller (27). Colonies were screened and sequenced as
described above. The
i2/
q chimeras were
designated as IQ followed by the number of the bacterial colony from
which the cDNA was isolated.
To generate the QI8+IQ15 chimera, chimera IQ15 was digested with
BglII and XhoI to yield a 457-bp fragment of
sequence encoding codons 319-330 of
i2 and codons
335-359 and the 3
-untranslated region of
q.
BglII-XhoI restriction of Chimera QI8 removed 313 bp of sequence encoding codons 319-355 and the 3
-untranslated region
of
i2 that was replaced by the 457-bp fragment from
chimera IQ15. To generate the QI13+IQ1 chimera, chimera IQ1 was
digested with MscI and SphI to yield a 1166-bp
fragment encoding codons 82-177 of
i2 and codons
182-359 and the 3
-untranslated region of
q. Chimera
QI13 was digested with MscI and SphI, removing
1024 bp of sequence encoding codons 82-355 and the 3
-untranslated
region of
i2 which was replaced by the 1166-bp fragment
from chimera IQ1.
cAMP Accumulation Assay
Recombinant
subunits were
transiently expressed in the human embryonic kidney fibroblast line,
HEK-293 (American Type Culture Collection, CRL-1573), using
DEAE-dextran (28) under the control of the CMV promoter in pcDNA
I/Amp. 106 cells/60-mm dish were transfected with 0.1 µg
of vector alone or were co-transfected with 0.1 µg of vector
containing the constitutively activated
sRC mutant
(arginine 201 is mutated to cysteine; Ref. 29), and 0.03, 0.1, or 0.3 µg of vector containing
i2RCEE,
qRCEE,
oRCEE, or a chimeric
subunit. Inhibition of
sRC-stimulated cAMP accumulation by the recombinant
subunits was measured by determining intracellular cAMP levels in cells
labeled with [3H]adenine, as described (11). 24 h
after transfection, the cells were replated in 24-well plates and
labeled with [3H]adenine (5 µCi/ml for 24 h). The
cells were then washed with 1 ml of assay medium (20 mM
HEPES-buffered minimal essential medium with Earle's salts without
bicarbonate) and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in 0.5 ml of assay
medium containing 1 mM 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine. The
medium was then aspirated, and the cells were lysed by the addition of
5% trichloroacetic acid plus 1 mM each of ATP and cAMP.
Nucleotides were separated on ion exchange columns (30). Conversion of
ATP to cAMP was expressed as
[3H]cAMP/([3H]ATP + [3H]cAMP) × 103 (31). cAMP values in cells co-transfected with
sRC and other constructs were expressed as the fraction
of cAMP accumulation in cells transfected only with
sRC.
Inositol Phosphate Formation Assay
Recombinant
subunits
were transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells using DEAE-dextran (28).
The assay for intracellular inositol phosphates in cells labeled with
[3H]inositol was a modification of the one
described in Ref. 23. 106 cells/60-mm dish were transfected
with 3 µg of vector alone or varying amounts of vector containing an
subunit construct (Figs. 5 and 6). 24 h after transfection,
the cells were replated in 24-well plates and labeled with
[3H]inositol (5 µCi/ml for 24 h). The cells were
then washed with 1 ml of assay medium (20 mM HEPES-buffered
minimal essential medium with Earle's salts without bicarbonate
containing 10 mM LiCl) and then incubated for 1 h at
37 °C in 0.5 ml of assay medium. The medium was then aspirated, and
the cells were lysed by the addition of 0.75 ml of ice-cold 20 mM formic acid. After a 30-min incubation at 4 °C, the
lysates were brought to pH 8 with 0.1 ml of 3% ammonium hydroxide. The
lysates were loaded onto 1-ml AG1-X8 Dowex columns, followed by the
immediate addition of 1 ml of 0.18% ammonium hydroxide to elute the
[3H]inositol fraction into scintillation vials containing
4 ml of Ultima Gold scintillation fluid (Packard). The columns were
then washed with 4 ml of 40 mM ammonium formate, 0.1 M formic acid. Total [3H]inositol phosphates
were eluted with 1 ml of 4 M ammonium formate, 0.2 M formic acid into scintillation vials containing 4 ml of
Ultima-Flo AF scintillation fluid (Packard). Inositol phosphate
production was expressed as [3H]inositol
phosphate/([3H]inositol + [3H]inositol
phosphate) × 103.
Fig. 5.
Inositol phosphate (IP)
production in transfected HEK-293 cells. Diagrammatic
representation of chimeras as in Fig. 3 is shown. Inositol phosphate
levels in 106 HEK-293 cells transfected with 3 µg of
vector alone or vector containing the indicated
subunit constructs
and labeled with [3H]inositol were determined as
described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Each value represents
the mean ± S.E. of at least three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (44K GIF file)]
Fig. 6.
The GTPase domain of
q is
sufficient to endow an
subunit chimera with the ability to activate
PLC. A, inositol phosphate (IP) levels in
106 HEK-293 cells transfected with the indicated amounts of
vector containing
qRCEE, QI13+IQ1, or
i2RCEE and labeled with [3H]inositol were
determined as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Each value
represents the mean ± S.E. of at least three independent
experiments. B, immunoblot showing expression of QI13+IQ1
and
qRCEE. 12.5 × 106 HEK-293 cells
were transfected with 3 µg/106 cells of vector alone or
the indicated amounts (µg/106 cells) of vector containing
qRCEE or QI13+IQ1, and membranes were prepared and
immunoblotted as described under ``Experimental Procedures.''
C, relationship between amount of immunoreactive
subunit
and amount of transfected plasmid. 12.5 × 106 HEK-293
cells were transfected with the indicated amounts (per 106
cells) of vector containing
qRCEE or QI13+IQ1.
subunit levels in membrane preparations from the transfected cells were
quantitated by scanning densitometry of immunoblots. Data points
represent the average values from two independent transfections. The
lines represent a linear fit to the data using the KaleidaGraph program
(Synergy Software).
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]
Membrane Preparations and Immunoblots
HEK-293 cells in
150-mm dishes were transfected using DEAE-dextran (28). Membranes were
prepared 48 h after transient transfection from cells that had
been lysed by 10 passages through a 27-gauge needle in an ice-cold
buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 2.5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM benzamidine, and 1 mM dithiothreitol. Nuclei were removed by low speed
centrifugation at 4 °C, and the membrane fractions were then
isolated by centrifugation for 30 min at 4 °C in a microcentrifuge.
25 µg of membrane proteins were then resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide
electrophoresis (10%), transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with
the anti-EE monoclonal antibody (24), which was purified from hybridoma
supernatants using E-Z-SEP reagents (Middlesex Sciences, Inc). The
antigen-antibody complexes were detected using an anti-mouse
horseradish peroxidase-linked antibody according to the ECL Western
blotting protocol (Amersham). Quantitation of
subunit expression
levels was performed by densitometry using an IS-1000 Digital Imaging
System (Alpha Innotech Corp., San Leandro, CA).
RESULTS
Generation of
q/
i2 and
i2/
q Chimeras
To localize the
i2 and
q regions that specify interaction
with and modulation of their respective effectors, we produced
subunit chimeras in which portions of
i2 were replaced
by the corresponding portions of
q. Since
i2 but not
q inhibits adenylyl cyclase
(17, 32) and
q but not
i2 activates PLC
(33, 34), the same chimeras could be used to map the
effector-specifying regions of both
i2 and
q. In order to characterize these chimeras after
transient expression in HEK-293 cells, two features were included to
enable measurement of their functions without interference from the
activities of the
i and
q proteins
endogenous to these cells. First, a conserved arginine was replaced by
cysteine (R179C in
i2, R183C in
q). This
mutation constitutively activates these
subunits by inhibiting
their GTPase activities (22, 23). This mutation made it possible to
measure inhibition of adenylyl cyclase or activation of PLC without
requiring receptor-mediated activation of the chimeric
subunits.
Second, the chimeras include an epitope from an internal region of
polyoma virus medium T antigen, referred to as the EE epitope (24). In
the x-ray crystal structure of
t (7), the site of this
epitope maps onto an exposed loop connecting
helices
E and
F
in the helical domain (Fig. 7). The EE epitope does not interfere with
the
i2-adenylyl cyclase interaction (35) or the
q-PLC interaction (36).
We generated
subunit chimeras containing
q/
i2 or
i2/
q junctions using a novel method
(37, 38, 39) that utilized Escherichia coli DNA repair enzymes
to rapidly generate a set of chimeras containing junctions within
regions of amino acid identity between
i2 and
q. Plasmids containing single ``head to tail'' copies
of both
subunit genes were linearized in between the two cDNAs
and transformed into bacteria. Transformants were derived from either
uncut plasmids or plasmids that recircularized in vivo.
Using restriction enzyme mapping, we screened 119 colonies generated
after transformation of the linearized
q/
i2 plasmid and obtained 73 that were
not the original plasmid. The restriction maps of 58 of these 73 constructs were consistent with their being
q/
i2 chimeras. The remaining colonies may
have represented recombination events within the 5
- or 3
-untranslated
regions of the cDNAs. Of 131 colonies produced from transformation
of the linearized
i2/
q plasmid, 97 were
not the original plasmid. The restriction maps of 56 of these 97 colonies were consistent with their being
i2/
q chimeras. The junctions of the
chimeras were further localized with additional restriction enzymes and
then determined precisely by DNA sequencing. The junctions of these
chimeras were always in frame. As shown in Fig. 1, six
unique
q/
i2 junctions and three unique
i2/
q junctions were obtained. The amount
of sequence identity seen at the chimera junctions ranged from 8 to 20 bases.
Fig. 1.
Alignment of
i2 and
q sequences and diagrammatic representation of chimera
junctions. The amino acids encoded by identical nucleotide bases
at each junction are boxed. Elements of secondary structure,
determined from the structure of the GTP
S-bound form of
t (7), are indicated by a (
helices),
b (
strands), and dashes (turns and loops).
The three regions that switch conformation between the GDP-bound and
GTP
S-bound forms of
t (Switches I-III) (8) are
indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (51K GIF file)]
All of the chimeric
subunit cDNAs encoded proteins that were
expressed in membranes of transiently transfected HEK-293 cells (Fig.
2). Chimeras QI5, QI1, and IQ15 were expressed at higher
levels than those of
i2RCEE and
qRCEE,
while chimeras QI13, QI23, IQ1, and QI8+IQ15, an
q/
i2/
q chimera derived
from QI8 and IQ15 (see Fig. 3), were expressed at
somewhat lower levels, and QI4, QI8, and IQ23 were expressed at
significantly reduced levels. A commonly used criterion for proper
subunit folding and function is a GTP
S-dependent
decrease in sensitivity to trypsin at a conserved
subunit cleavage
site (11, 40, 41, 42). We were unable to apply this criterion to the
chimeric
subunits because
qRCEE expressed in HEK-293
cells exhibited extremely poor GTP
S-dependent trypsin
resistance relative to
i2RCEE (data not shown),
presumably due to inadequate binding of GTP
S in the absence of
receptor stimulation (32).
Fig. 2.
Expression of recombinant
subunits in
HEK-293 cell membranes. 6.25 × 106 HEK-293 cells
were transfected with 1 µg/106 cells of vector alone or
vector containing the indicated
subunit constructs, and membranes
were prepared and immunoblotted as described under ``Experimental
Procedures.''
[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]
Fig. 3.
cAMP accumulation in transfected HEK-293
cells. Chimeras are depicted as segments with numbers
that represent
i2 or
q residues at the
beginning and end of segments derived from these proteins
(open for
i2 and shaded for
q). All chimeras include the GTPase-inhibiting arginine
to cysteine mutation (R179C in
i2, R183C in
q) and the EE epitope as shown for
i2RCEE. Each junction is defined as the point at which
the sequence first diverges from that of the amino-terminal
subunit
segment. Shown next to each
subunit construct is the cAMP
accumulation in 106 HEK-293 cells transfected with 0.1 µg
of vector containing
sRC and 0.3 µg of vector
containing the indicted
subunit construct. The amount of cAMP
accumulation in cells transfected with
sRC alone is set
at 1.0, and the values from cells co-transfected with the indicated
constructs are expressed relative to this value. cAMP values of
constructs with greatly decreased abilities to inhibit cAMP
accumulation are shown as shaded bars, and values of
constructs that are similar to that of
i2RCEE are shown
as open bars. cAMP levels in
[3H]adenine-labeled cells were determined as described
under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Each value represents the
mean ± S.E. of at least three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]
Localization of the Region of
i2 That Specifies
Inhibition of Adenylyl Cyclase
We measured the ability of
recombinant
subunits to inhibit adenylyl cyclase in HEK-293 cells
by co-expressing them with the constitutively activated
s mutant,
sRC, in which arginine 201 is
mutated to cysteine (29). Transfection with 0.1 µg of vector
containing
sRC resulted in an approximately 18-fold
increase in cAMP production compared to cells transfected with the
vector alone. Co-transfection with 0.3 µg of vector containing
i2RCEE resulted in ~60% inhibition of the cAMP
response to
sRC, while co-transfection with the same
amount of vector containing
oRCEE inhibited the response
to
sRC by only ~14% (Fig. 3).
oRCEE
was used as a negative control because it does not inhibit adenylyl
cyclase types V (17) or VI (18). It is not known which adenylyl
cyclases are present in HEK-293 cells, but it seems likely that types V
and/or VI are present, since these are the only adenylyl cyclases known
to exhibit inhibition by
i of
s-stimulated activity (17, 18). Co-transfection with 0.3 µg of vector containing
qRCEE caused an
approximately 2-fold elevation of cAMP
levels,2 presumably due either to release
of Ca+2 from intracellular stores or to activation of
protein kinase C, since
q has no direct effect on
adenylyl cyclase activity (32). Since adenylyl cyclase types V and VI
are inhibited by Ca+2 (43, 44, 45), some other adenylyl cyclase
isoform must be responsible for the activation seen with
qRCEE.
We tested all of the chimeras shown in Fig. 1 for their ability to
inhibit adenylyl cyclase, except QI23, which was the only chimera that
activated PLC (Fig. 5). Since activation of PLC indirectly causes
activation of adenylyl cyclase in HEK-293 cells, interpretation of the
effect of QI23 on adenylyl cyclase activity would have been difficult.
Of the IQ chimeras, only IQ15 inhibited adenylyl cyclase, while all of
the QI chimeras were able to inhibit adenylyl cyclase (Fig. 3). The
inability of IQ1 and IQ23 to inhibit adenylyl cyclase cannot be
attributed to their reduced expression levels, which are greater than
or equal to those of QI4 and QI8 (Fig. 2), although it is possible that
they do not fold properly.
The
q/
i2 and
i2/
q chimera results suggested that the
ability to inhibit adenylyl cyclase is specified by a 78-residue
segment,
i2 residues 245-322 (
i2
residues 323-330 are identical to
q residues 327-334).
Specifically, IQ15 and QI8 showed that
i2 residues
331-355 and 1-244, respectively, could be replaced by the homologous
q residues without affecting
i2 effector
specificity. To test whether
i2 residues 245-322 were
sufficient to specify inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by an
subunit
chimera, we produced an
q/
i2/
q chimera, QI8+IQ15,
in which this segment of
i2 replaced the homologous
segment of
q (Fig. 3). QI8+IQ15 inhibited adenylyl
cyclase activity as effectively as
i2RCEE did (Figs. 3
and 4). Thus, this chimera localizes the
i2 residues that specify inhibition of adenylyl cyclase
to residues 245-322.
Fig. 4.
Substitution of a 79-residue segment of
i2 for its
q homologs endows
q with the ability to inhibit adenylyl cyclase.
Figure shows cAMP accumulation in 106 HEK-293 cells
co-transfected with 0.1 µg of vector containing
sRC
and the indicated amounts of vector containing
i2RCEE,
QI8+IQ15, or
oRCEE. cAMP levels in
[3H]adenine-labeled cells were determined as described
under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Each value represents the
mean ± S.E. of at least three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]
To visualize the 78-residue
i2 effector-specifying
segment in three dimensions, we mapped it onto the x-ray crystal
structure of the GTP
S-bound form of
t (7). 67% and
49% of the
t amino acids can be aligned with identical
residues in the sequences of
i2 and
q,
respectively. For comparison, 67% of the
i1 residues
can be aligned with identical residues in
t and the
structures of the GTP
S-bound forms of
i1 and
t are closely superimposable. The
i2
effector-specifying segment defines a region that extends from
3 to
6, shown in magenta on the
t·GTP
S
structure (Fig. 7A). The segment includes three
helices
(
3,
G, and
4), two
strands (
5 and
6), and the loops
that connect these elements of secondary structure. This
i2 segment includes regions corresponding to two of the
three regions of
s that specify activation of adenylyl
cyclase, which are located in the
3/
5 and
4/
6 loops (11).
However, the
i2 region corresponding to the third
effector-activating region of
s, which is part of Switch
II (8), and the other two switch regions are not included.
Localization of the Region of
q That Specifies
Activation of PLC
The abilities of the
q/
i2 and
i2/
q chimeras to activate PLC were tested
by transiently expressing them in HEK-293 cells. In cells transfected
with 3 µg of vector containing
qRCEE,
inositol phosphate levels were elevated ~30-fold over levels in cells
transfected with vector alone. Of the
q/
i2 chimeras, only QI23, in which the
extreme carboxyl-terminal region of
q (residues
335-359) was replaced by
i2 sequence, exhibited any
PLC-activating ability, elevating inositol phosphate levels ~8-fold
above levels in vector-transfected cells (Fig. 5). This
chimera was expressed at approximately half the level that
qRCEE was (Fig. 2). Thus, the decreased activity of
QI23, relative to
qRCEE, was not entirely due to its
decreased expression level.
q/
i2 chimeras
in which larger carboxyl-terminal segments of
q sequence
were replaced by
i2 sequence (QI8, QI4, QI1, QI5, and
QI13) exhibited no ability to activate PLC. Furthermore, the
q/
i2/
q chimera, QI8+IQ15,
in which only 86
q residues in the carboxyl-terminal
portion of the molecule (amino acids 249-334) were replaced by
i2 homologs, had no effect on PLC. All of the chimeras
that did not activate PLC were expressed in HEK-293 cell membranes
(Fig. 2) and all except IQ23 and IQ1 could inhibit adenylyl cyclase
(Fig. 3), indicating that they were functional
subunits.
The above results suggested that a region in the carboxyl-terminal
portion of
q that includes residues 249-334 is
necessary for PLC activation. However, results with the
i2/
q chimeras demonstrated that the
carboxyl-terminal region of
q is not sufficient to
specify PLC activation. Chimeras IQ23 and IQ1, which contain
q residues 222-359 and 182-359, respectively, did not
activate PLC (Fig. 5). Reasoning that in addition to
q
residues 182-359, amino-terminal
q residues are
required for PLC activation, we generated an
q/
i2/
q chimera using
fragments from IQ1 and QI13. In the resultant chimera, QI13+IQ1 (Fig.
5),
i2 sequence was substituted for
q
residues 57-181 in the helical domain (
q residues
57-59 are identical to
i2 residues 51-53).
QI13+IQ1 activated PLC, although both its activity (Figs. 5 and
6A) and expression level (Fig. 6B)
were reduced relative to those of
qRCEE. Inositol
phosphate production in cells transfected with 3 µg of vector
containing QI13+IQ1 was ~5-fold elevated over that of
vector-transfected cells (Fig. 5). For both
qRCEE and
QI13+IQ1, the relationship between amount of transfected plasmid and
inositol phosphate production was approximately linear when cells were
transfected with
0.5 µg of plasmid. Within this range,
qRCEE elevated inositol phosphate production above that
in vector-transfected cells ~9 times as much as QI13+IQ1 did (Fig.
6A). Similarly, the amount of immunoreactive
subunit
expressed in membranes varied linearly with amount of transfected
plasmid, and
qRCEE was expressed at ~8-fold
the level of QI13+IQ1 (Fig. 6, B and C).
Therefore, the PLC-activating ability of QI13+IQ1 is comparable to that
of
qRCEE when expression level is controlled for. The
fact that QI13+IQ1 but not IQ1 activates PLC indicates that
q residues 1-56 are either directly involved in
effector interaction or are required for proper
subunit folding. We
cannot distinguish between these possibilities since we were unable to
determine whether IQ1 adopts a native
subunit conformation.
When mapped onto the
t·GTP
S structure, the
q segment, residues 57-181, which was replaced by
homologous
i2 residues in an
subunit chimera that
activates PLC, localizes to the entire
subunit helical domain
(shown in magenta in Fig. 7B),
beginning within the second half of
1 and extending to the end of
F immediately before Switch I. Thus, the GTPase domain of
q (shown in green in Fig. 7B) is
sufficient to specify activation of PLC. Furthermore, our results
suggest that residues within both segments of primary structure that
comprise the GTPase domain, residues 1-56 and residues 182-359, are
important for specifying this effector interaction.
DISCUSSION
In the study described here, the regions of
i2 and
q that specify interaction with and modulation of
adenylyl cyclase and PLC, respectively, were localized using chimeric
subunits composed of portions of the two
subunits. Of the two
subunit domains, the GTPase domain and not the helical domain
specifies the effector interactions of both
i2 and
q. The region of
i2 that specifies
inhibition of adenylyl cyclase was localized to a 78-residue segment
(amino acids 245-322) that extends from
3 to
6 within the GTPase
domain. The effector-specifying region of
q was also
localized to the GTPase domain, by means of a chimeric
subunit that
substituted
i2 homologs for an
q segment
(residues 57-181) extending from the second half of
1 to the end of
F in the helical domain.
Previous experiments localized the effector-specifying residues of
s to three adjacent regions within the GTPase domain:
the carboxyl-terminal end of
2 and the
2/
4 loop, the
3/
5
loop, and the
4/
6 loop (11). In
t, the following
regions within the GTPase domain are involved in activation of cGMP
phosphodiesterase:
2 (14),
3 and the
3/
5 loop (15), and
4 and the
4/
6 loop (12, 13). Thus, the effector-specifying
segment of
i2 includes residues that correspond to
residues in two of the three effector-specifying regions of
s and
t, while that of
q
includes all of these regions.
Although the function of the helical domain is still under
investigation, current evidence suggests that it serves as a regulator
of guanine nucleotide handling. When the helical and GTPase domains of
s are individually expressed and reconstituted in
vitro, the helical domain dramatically stimulates the GTPase
activity of the GTPase domain and also promotes binding of GTP
S
(46). Furthermore, interactions between the helical and GTPase domains
are most likely involved in assuring that guanine nucleotide exchange
is tightly regulated by activated receptors, since the two domains
effectively bury the bound GDP (8, 10, 47, 48). The two domains, which
are connected by two short stretches of sequence, presumably shift
relative to one another to allow receptor-dependent
nucleotide exchange.
Others have suggested that residues within the helical domains of
s and
i might be important for effector
interactions. A chimera in which human
s residues
extending from
A to
C in the helical domain were replaced by the
corresponding residues from Xenopus
s, which
does not activate adenylyl cyclase, had a greatly reduced ability to
activate adenylyl cyclase. Conversely, a chimera in which the
corresponding human
s residues were substituted for
Xenopus
s residues effectively activated
adenylyl cyclase (49). However, 17 of the 19 residues that differ
between human and Xenopus
s in this region
also differ between mammalian
s and
i2,
and substitution of
i2 residues for these
s residues does not prevent activation of adenylyl
cyclase (11, 50, 51). The two residues within this region that are the
same in mammalian
s and
i2, but different
in Xenopus
s, are also different from
mammalian
s in either Drosophila
s (52) or
olf (53), both of which
stimulate adenylyl cyclase. These results suggest that the inability of
Xenopus
s to activate adenylyl cyclase is not
due to a lack of effector-specifying residues, but instead is the
result of a more general difference in
subunit function such as
nucleotide handling and/or ability to become activated in response to
GTP binding. Interestingly, a segment of
i1 within this
region (residues 110-120) exhibits the largest deviation between the
structures of the active forms of
i1 and
t, which led to the suggestion that this region might be
an effector contact site for
i (9). However, this region
does not specify interaction with adenylyl cyclase, because
subunit
chimeras in which entirely divergent
q sequence replaced
the
i2 sequence in this region effectively inhibited
adenylyl cyclase.
It has been proposed that the amino terminus of
i binds
to adenylyl cyclase (48), since
i must be myristoylated
in order to inhibit this effector enzyme (17). We have shown that the
amino-terminal sequence of
i2 does not specify
inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, since chimeric
subunits in which
the amino terminus of
i2 is replaced by the highly
divergent sequence of
q can effectively inhibit adenylyl
cyclase. However, since
q is palmitoylated at the amino
terminus (54), it is possible that a lipid modification in this region
is required for the interaction between
i and the
membrane-bound adenylyl cyclase.
The effector-specifying region of
i2, as defined by
QI8+IQ15, does not include any of the GTP-dependent
conformational switch regions identified by comparison of the x-ray
crystal structures of the GTP
S-bound forms of
t (7)
and
i1 (9) with the GDP-bound forms of these
subunits (8, 10). Since the GTP-bound form of
i is much
more effective than the GDP-bound form is at inhibiting adenylyl
cyclase (18), we expected that one or more of these conformational
switch regions would be involved in this effector interaction. However,
since the switch regions are highly conserved among
subunits, their
importance as effector-interacting sites could have been missed using a
chimeric
subunit approach. Although conserved residues within the
switch regions might not confer specificity for a particular effector,
they could be contact sites that allow effectors to discriminate
between the GTP- and GDP-bound forms of
subunits. In fact, alanine
substitution studies have shown that residues within a conserved part
of Switch II are important for the effector interactions of both
s and
i2.3
Our study with
subunit chimeras demonstrates that the GTPase domain
of
q is both necessary and sufficient to specify
interaction with PLC. The GTPase domain consists of two noncontiguous
segments of sequence, a short amino-terminal region that extends from
the amino terminus to the end of
1 and a larger carboxyl-terminal
region that extends from
2 to the carboxyl terminus. Our results and
those of others implicate both segments as being important for
specifying interaction with PLC. Within the amino-terminal segment,
mutational replacement of
q residues 9 and 10, the sites
of palmitoylation, greatly reduces the ability of
q to
activate PLC, although enzymatic removal of palmitate does not affect
PLC activation (55). Peptides corresponding to two regions of
q sequence in the carboxyl-terminal segment, residues
251-265 and 306-319, block
q-stimulated PLC activity
(56). These peptides map onto
3 and the
3/
5 loop, and
4 and
the
4/
6 loop. Using
q/
s chimeras,
Venkatakrishnan and Exton (57) found that
q residues
277-359 could be replaced by
s residues without
reducing the ability of
q to activate PLC. However,
replacement of
q residues 217-276 with
s
homologs did cause a loss of function. Alanine scanning in this region
identified two regions,
q residues 243-245 and
256-257, which, when mutated, caused a loss of PLC-activating ability
without affecting the ability of
q to attain the
GTP-dependent activated conformation. These residues are
located in the
4/
3 loop, which includes Switch III (8, 10), and
in
3. The other two conformational switch regions are also localized
within the GTPase domain and may be important for PLC activation.
The method used here to generate chimeric
subunits in
vivo in E. coli should be applicable to any pair of
genes that encode proteins with a similar amount of amino acid identity
as
i2 and
q (~50%) and has already
been used to make chimeric
-amylases (39), neurotransmitter
transporters (38), and adenylyl cyclases (37). The exact mechanism of
recombination is not understood, but does not require the RecA protein
since it occurs in RecA
E. coli
strains. The most likely recombination mechanism is that the linearized
DNA is exonucleolytically digested upon entering bacteria, and
homologous regions on opposite strands then base pair. The resultant
molecule is repaired and ligated closed. The amount of sequence
identity seen at the chimera junctions ranged from 8 to 20 bases.
However, there are other regions in the sequences of
i2
and
q that share at least 8 bases of identical sequence
where chimera junctions were not obtained. Although additional
junctions might have been found if more colonies had been screened,
junction formation may have been nonrandom since the same chimeras were
isolated multiple times.
Localization of the effector-specifying residues of
i2
and
q at higher resolution as well as investigation of
the roles of the conformational switch regions in effector interaction
will provide further insight into the mechanism by which
subunits
modulate effectors in a GTP-dependent manner. A complete
understanding of
subunit-effector interactions will require
determination of the structures of the effectors and characterization
of the regions with which they interact with
subunits.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by grants from the National
Institutes of Health and the Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue
Medical Research Foundation. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom all correspondence should be addressed.
1
The abbreviations used are: GTP
S, guanosine
5
-O-(3-thiotriphosphate); PLC, phosphoinositide
phospholipase C; bp, base pair(s).
2
C. H. Berlot, unpublished observation.
3
G. Grishina and C. H. Berlot, manuscript in
preparation.
Acknowledgments
We thank Gernot Walter (UCSD) for the EE
hybridoma; Ann Pace, Paul Wilson, and Henry Bourne (UCSF) for the
i2RCEE and
qEE constructs; Randall Reed
(Johns Hopkins) for suggesting the in vivo recombination
method for generating chimeras; Gita Venkatakrishnan and John Exton
(Vanderbilt) for sharing data prior to publication; Thomas Hynes
(Pfizer, Inc.) for critical reading of the text; Susan Brill and Maja
Zecevic for help with screening for
subunit chimeras; Joseph Noel,
David Lambright, and Paul Sigler for sharing coordinates of
t·GTP
S and
t·GDP; and Gary Rudnick
for use of the IS-1000 Digital Imaging System.
REFERENCES
-
Gilman, A. G.
(1987)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
56,
615-649
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stryer, L.,
Bourne, H. R.
(1986)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
2,
391-419
[CrossRef]
-
Clapham, D. E.,
Neer, E. J.
(1993)
Nature
365,
403-406
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Neer, E.
(1995)
Cell
80,
249-257
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Simon, M. I.,
Strathmann, M. P.,
Gautam, N.
(1991)
Science
252,
802-808
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chothia, C.,
Lesk, A. M.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
823-826
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Noel, J. P.,
Hamm, H. E.,
Sigler, P. B.
(1993)
Nature
366,
654-663
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lambright, D. G.,
Noel, J. P.,
Hamm, H. E.,
Sigler, P. B.
(1994)
Nature
369,
621-628
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Coleman, D. E.,
Berghuis, A. M.,
Lee, E.,
Linder, M. E.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Sprang, S. R.
(1994)
Science
265,
1405-1412
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mixon, M. B.,
Lee, E.,
Coleman, D. E.,
Berghuis, A. M.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Sprang, S. R.
(1995)
Science
270,
954-960
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Berlot, C. H.,
Bourne, H. R.
(1992)
Cell
68,
911-922
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rarick, H. M.,
Artemyev, N. O.,
Hamm, H. E.
(1992)
Science
256,
1031-1033
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Spickofsky, N.,
Robichon, A.,
Danho, W.,
Fry, D.,
Greeley, D.,
Graves, B.,
Madison, V.,
Margolskee, R. F.
(1994)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
11,
771-781
-
Faurobert, E.,
Otto-Bruc, A.,
Chardin, P.,
Chabre, M.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
4191-4198
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Skiba, N. P.,
Bae, H.,
Hamm, H. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
413-424
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Taussig, R.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1-4
[Free Full Text]
-
Taussig, R.,
Iniguez-Lluhi, J. A.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1993)
Science
261,
218-221
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Taussig, R.,
Tang, W.-J.,
Hepler, J. R.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
6093-6100
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Berstein, G.,
Blank, J. L.,
Jhon, D.-Y.,
Exton, J. H.,
Rhee, S. G.,
Ross, E. M.
(1992)
Cell
70,
411-418
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sullivan, K. A.,
Liao, Y. C.,
Alborzi, A.,
Beiderman, B.,
Chang, F.-H.,
Masters, S. B.,
Levinson, A. D.,
Bourne, H. R.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
6687-6691
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Strathmann, M.,
Simon, M. I.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9113-9117
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wong, Y. H.,
Federman, A.,
Pace, A. M.,
Zachary, I.,
Evans, T.,
Pouysségur, J.,
Bourne, H. R.
(1991)
Nature
351,
63-65
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Conklin, B. R.,
Chabre, O.,
Wong, Y. H.,
Federman, A. D.,
Bourne, H. R.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem
267,
31-34
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Grussenmeyer, T.,
Scheidtmann, K. H.,
Hutchinson, M. A.,
Eckhart, W.,
Walter, G.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
7952-7954
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kunkel, T. A.,
Roberts, J. D.,
Zakour, R. A.
(1987)
Methods Enzymol.
154,
367-382
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jones, D. T.,
Reed, R. R.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
14241-14249
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chung, C. T.,
Miller, R. H.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
3580
[Free Full Text]
-
Ausubel, F. M.,
Brent, R. E.,
Kingston, R. E