JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elshourbagy, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nambi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elshourbagy, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nambi, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 41, Issue of October 11, 1996 pp. 25300-25307
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Molecular Characterization of a Novel Human Endothelin Receptor Splice Variant*

(Received for publication, April 26, 1996, and in revised form, June 27, 1996)

Nabil A. Elshourbagy Dagger §, John E. Adamou Dagger , Alison W. Gagnon Dagger , Hsiao-Ling Wu , Mark Pullen and Ponnal Nambi

From the Departments of Dagger  Molecular Genetics and  Renal Pharmacology, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Endothelin receptors are widely distributed throughout a number of tissues. A novel ETB receptor splice variant (ETB-SVR) was identified from a human placental cDNA library. Sequence analysis indicated that the ETB-SVR is 436 amino acids long and shares 91% identity to the human ETB-R. Northern blot analysis indicated an mRNA species of 2.7 kilobases, which is expressed in the lung, placenta, kidney, and skeletal muscle. Ligand binding studies of the cloned ETB-SVR and ETB-R receptors expressed in COS cells showed that ET peptides exhibited similar potency in displacing 125I-ET-1 binding. Functional studies showed that ET-1, ET-3, and sarafotoxin 6c displayed similar potencies for inositol phosphates accumulation in ETB-R-transfected COS cells, whereas no increase in inositol phosphate accumulation was observed in ETB-SVR-transfected cells. In addition, exposure of ETB-R-transfected cells to ET-1 caused an increase in the intracellular acidification rate whereas ETB-SVR-transfected cells did not respond to ET-1. These data suggest that the ETB-SVR and ETB-R are functionally distinct and the difference in the amino acid sequences between the two receptors may determine functional coupling. Availability of cDNA clones for endothelin receptors can facilitate our understanding of the role of ET in the pathophysiology of various diseases.


INTRODUCTION

Endothelins are a family of peptide hormones having profound cardiovascular, mitogenic, and potential neuroregulatory functions. In mammals, the ET1 peptide family is composed of three members, ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3, that are encoded by three separate genes, which are differentially expressed in the tissues of the periphery and central nervous system (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2). Mammalian ETs share high sequence homology and structural similarity with a family of 21 amino acid peptide toxins from the snake Atractaspis engaddensis, the sarafotoxins (3).

Two major subtypes of ET receptors (ETA and ETB) (4) have been identified based on the rank order potency of ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, and S6c (5, 6). ETA receptor is defined by high and equal affinity for ET-1 and ET-2, approximately 70-100-fold lower affinity for ET-3, and a 1000-fold lower affinity for S6c. In contrast, the ETB receptor subtype displays equal high affinities for all ET-related peptides. Two additional receptors have been cloned and characterized from Xenopus melanophores (ETC) and heart (ETAX) (7, 8). While ETC receptors display high affinity for ET-3 compared to ET-1, ETAX receptors displayed extremely weak affinity for BQ123 as well as S6c (ETA- and ETB-selective ligands, respectively). Receptors for ET are differentially expressed in a wide variety of tissues and cell types (9, 10). ETs and sarafotoxins bind to a common receptor and initiate a common signal transduction pathway, principally a G-protein-mediated activation of phospholipase C and subsequent inositol triphosphate-mediated increase in Ca2+ levels (1, 11).

ET mediates a number of physiological effects including vasoconstriction mitogenesis, and induction of c-fos transcription (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). These diverse and complex physiological effects mediated by ET in conjunction with the molecular heterogeneity and differential tissue distribution of the ET-related peptides and their receptors underscores the importance of utilizing molecular biological approaches to dissect the components of ET physiology. Several laboratories have postulated the presence of additional ET receptors to account for the diverse biochemical and physiological activities of various ETs (24). This hypothesis has been supported by binding as well as functional studies. We have previously reported the cloning, functional characterization, and regulation of the human ETA and ETB receptor subtypes (25). In this report, we describe the cloning and functional characterization of a novel ETB receptor splice variant from human placenta.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Construction and Screening of the cDNA Libraries

The porcine cerebellum cDNA library (26) in pcDNA vector was screened by hybridization to nitrocellulose replicates using 32P-labeled porcine ETB-R cDNA coding sequence as a probe in 20% formamide, 5 × SSC (SSC is 150 mM NaCl, 15 mM sodium citrate), 5 × Denhardt's, 0.1% SDS, and 0.2 mg/ml Escherichia coli tRNA at 42 °C (27). Filters were washed with 2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 42 °C. Several positive recombinant clones were isolated from the porcine cerebellum library and characterized. Preliminary sequence analysis of these clones showed that 6 of these clones encode the ETB-R clones except two clones which contain the same 5'-coding region of ETB-R and a diverge 3'-coding sequences. In order to obtain the human homologue and eliminate the possibility that this variant is due to a recombination artifact, primers were synthesized corresponding to the amino termini of ETB-R (5'-TCTGGAGCAGGATCCAGCATGCAGCCGCCT-3') and the 3'-untranslated region of the porcine ETB-SVR (5'-CCCGTGATATCTAAA TAGAATCCATATGGTGTG-3') and used to obtain the human full-length splice variant cDNA clone from human placental RNA using polymerase chain reaction (28).

Nucleotide Sequence Analysis

The inserts of the porcine ETB-SVR560 and the human ETB-SVR cDNAs were sequenced on both strands using a modification of the dideoxy chain termination method (29) using the Sequenase II Kit (U. S. Biochemical Corp.). The Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group Software package (30) was used to assemble composite sequences from the various fragments and for future sequence analysis.

RNA Blot Analysis

For Northern analysis, poly(A) RNA was isolated from various human tissues using the guanidinum thiocyanate acid-phenol method (31). One µg of each RNA was fractionated on 1% agarose-formaldehyde gels (32) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Northern hybridizations were performed at 42 °C in 50% formamide, 5% SSPE, 5 × Denhardt's reagent, 0.1% SDS, and 100 µg/ml yeast tRNA (33). The blots were washed with 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50 °C and exposed to x-ray film for 4 days at -70 °C. Autoradiograms were analyzed by quantitative scanning densitometry.

Expression of Human ETB Receptors in COS Cells

Fragments containing the entire human ETB-SVR cDNA and ETB-R cDNA coding sequences was subcloned into the mammalian expression vector pRLDN (25). COS cells grown in 245 × 245-mm tissue culture plates were transfected with 75 µg of human ETB-SVR or human ETB-R cDNA and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum for 2 days as described previously (26).

Membrane Preparation

The COS cells were washed with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline containing a protease inhibitor mixture (5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, and 0.1 µg/ml aprotinin) and scraped in the same buffer. The membranes were prepared as described previously (25). Protein content was determined by the bicinchoninic acid method using bovine serum albumin as the standard.

Radioligand Binding Studies

125I-ET-1 binding to membranes prepared from COS cells transfected with ETB-R or ETB-SVR was performed as explained (25) with the following modifications. The assay volumes were 50 µl, and the protein was 50-100 ng/tube. The procedure for 125I-ET-3 and 125I-IRL-1620 binding was exactly the same as that for 125I-ET-1. Each experiment was done three times with separate transfections. The data presented are from one experiment which is representative of the others. Intra-experimental variation was <10%. 125I-ET-1, 125I-ET-3, and 125I-IRL-1620 (specific activities 2200 Ci/mmol) were obtained from DuPont NEN.

Phosphoinositide Turnover

COS cells transfected with human ETB-R or ETB-SVR receptor clones were treated with 1 µCi/ml myo-[3H]inositol for 24 h in serum-free medium. At the end of treatment, medium was removed, cells were washed with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline, and then exposed to indicated concentrations of various agonists for 10 min at 37 °C. The inositol phosphates were separated using ion exchange chromatography following the procedure of Aiyar et al. (34).

Microphysiometry

The cytosensor microphysiometer was used to measure the intracellular pH change with a pH-sensitive silicon sensor which is part of a microvolume flow chamber (35). COS cells transfected with vector or human ETBR or ETB-SVR were allowed to attach in capsule cups (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) for 24 h before transferring to the sensor chamber in the microphysiometer (Molecular Devices). After establishing a steady base line, acidification rate in response to ET was measured as a change in pH over time (35).


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Cloning of a cDNA Encoding the Human ETB Splice Variant

The porcine ETB-R cDNA, previously cloned in our laboratory (26) was used to probe porcine cerebellum cDNA library. Several positive clones were identified. Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that several of these positive clones encoded for ETB-R except for two novel ETB-R clones which differed in the length and the amino acid sequence at the 3'-coding region. In order to determine the presence of this novel ETB-R form in human tissues, oligonucleotide primers corresponding to the 5'-coding region of ETB-R and the 3'-noncoding region of the novel ETB receptor form were used to polymerase chain reaction the human homologue using human placental cDNA as a template. Agarose gel electrophoresis identified a polymerase chain reaction product of 1400 base pairs. Sequence analysis of this product revealed a sequence that was identical to ETB receptor from the 5'-untranslated region through the putative seventh transmembrane domain, and then completely differed in the cytoplasmic domain and 3'-untranslated region. The deduced polypeptide consisted of 436 amino acid residues with a calculated molecular mass of approximately 48 kDa (Fig. 1, A and B). This is different from the size of ETB receptor which is 442 amino acids with a calculated molecular mass of 49 kDa. Several independent clones in our library were found to contain this sequence which appears to represent alternative splicing of the carboxyl-terminal tail of the ETB receptor. The carboxyl-terminal region of the ETB-SVR clone bore no significant homology with other known proteins. Several lines of evidence support the fact that the ETB-SV and the ETB receptors represent alternatively spliced variants of a single gene. First, the 3' terminal tail of the ETB-SVR clone was used to search the data base for identical sequences. Interestingly this sequence was found to correspond to the extreme 3'-untranslated region of ETB-R. Further analysis of the ETB-R genomic structure (36) revealed that exons 1 through 6 are identical in ETB-SVR and the ETB-R in terms of their nucleotide sequence composition and their splice site. However, the 3' terminal tail of the ETB-SVR represents a putative splice site and an A(G/G)T sequence is found at the 5' donor junction which showed that this region is a splice site for the ETB receptor (Fig. 2). Therefore, two putative splice sites were identified at exon 7 in the human ETB receptor gene: the first splice site at nucleotide 1194 to produce a 2855-base pair exon which encodes the normal ETB-R; and the second splice site at nucleotide 2970 to produce a 997-base pair exon which encodes the ETB-SVR. Second, an mRNA transcript of 2.7 kb corresponds to the size of the ETB-SV receptor was identified in various human tissues (Fig. 3).


Fig. 1. Amino acid sequences of the human ETB receptor cDNA clones. The recombinant plasmid clones of human ETB-R and ETB-SVR were sequenced by the dideoxy method (29). Deduced amino acid residues are indicated beginning with the initiation methionine. The region identifying the positive transmembrane as domains I-VII are underlined and numbered sequentially. The optimal alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of ETB-R and ETB-SVR were made with the Wisconsin program obtained from Devereux et al. (30) (A). The membrane topology and amino acid differences between the ETB-R and the ETB-SVR are presented with black circles (B).
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]


Fig. 2. Structural organization of the human ETB receptor genes. The indicated ETB receptor gene loci are presented by solid bars and exons are shown as open boxes. The structure of the endothelin receptor cDNAs derived from ETB receptor gene is shown between the gene loci. Transmembrane-spanning domains (TM I-VII) are indicated as black and open boxes, respectively. Exons in the genomic DNA and their corresponding regions of the cDNA are connected by solid lines.
[View Larger Version of this Image (48K GIF file)]


Fig. 3. Size and tissue distribution of ETB-R and ETB-SVR mRNA in various human tissues. Poly(A)+ RNA was prepared from the indicated tissues and then fractionated on an 1% agarose formaldehyde gel, blotted, and hybridized with cloned 32P-labeled ETB-R cDNA. beta -Actin was used as an internal standard for the amount of RNA loaded (data not shown). The position of a 4.4-, 2.7-, and 1.7-kb bands ETB-R, ETB-SVR, and ETB-R mRNA are indicated (A). Several different exposures of the autoradiograms of the hybridized filters were made and analyzed by quantitative scanning densitometry. The data are presented as a total ETB-Rs expressed in each tissue (B) and also expressed as a percent of each individual band as compared to the total in each lane C.
[View Larger Version of this Image (32K GIF file)]

Receptor subtypes can arise through divergent genes, e.g. ETA and ETB and in the case of intron-containing genes, additional variants within a subtype can arise by alternative RNA splicing. Recent studies have identified an ETB receptor variant which contains an additional 10 amino acids in the second cytoplasmic domain of the ETB receptor (37). This sequence was part of the ETB receptor intron that separates the second and the third exons and therefore arises by alternative RNA splicing of a single gene. The identification of splice variants among the seven transmembrane receptors has been increasing at a phenomenal rate following the initial observation of two variant forms for dopamine D2 receptor (38). Recent splice variants have been identified for thyrotropin stimulating hormone, TRH (39), neurokinin receptors (40), prostaglandin EP3 receptor (41, 42), pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating polypeptide, PACAP receptor (43), and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) receptor (44). It is interesting to note that in all these examples the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor is altered indicating that alternative RNA splicing plays an important role in the generation of physiologically divergent receptor activity for the same ligand.

mRNA Size and Tissue Distribution

Northern hybridization analysis of RNA from various human tissues with the human ETB-SV receptor cDNA clone indicated the presence of two major mRNA species at 4.4 and 1.7 kb and one minor band at 2.7 kb. The two major bands correspond to the full-length ETB receptor clones resulted from two polyadenylation signals which are 32 and 29 base pairs upstream of the polyadenylation sites of the two mRNA species. The minor band of 2.7 kb corresponds exactly to the size of the splice variant ETB receptor.

Northern blot was also used to examine the pattern of expression of the ETB and the ETB-SV receptor mRNA derived from different human tissues. As shown in Fig. 3, mRNA expressed by each ETB-R species were specifically detected in all the RNA samples. The total amount of ETB-R mRNA levels appeared to be higher in the lung, liver, kidney, and placenta. However, the relative ratio of expression of each individual ETB-SVR mRNA does not represent more than 10% of the total ETB-R expression, except the skeletal muscle where ETB-SVR contributes to more than 39% of the total ETB receptor expression (Fig. 3). In addition, the mRNA levels of normal as well as splice variant ETB-R were examined by Northern blot as well as reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction methods in smooth muscle and endothelial cells. While both displayed normal ETB-R mRNA, the ETB-SVR mRNA was not detectable in both cells (data not shown).

Ligand Binding Properties

Addition of increasing concentrations of 125I-ET-3 or 125I-IRL-1620 to membranes prepared from COS cells transfected with ETB-R or ETB-SVR clone resulted in specific, saturable and high affinity binding as shown in Figs. 4 and 5. The nonspecific bindings were 5-25 and 5-35% for 125I-ET-3 and 125I-IRL-1620, respectively (Figs. 4, A and B, and 5, A and B, respectively). The Scatchard transformations of the specific binding from the saturation binding experiments are shown as Figs. 4C and 5C for ETB-R and ETB-SVR, respectively. The apparent dissociation constants (Kd values) for 125I-ET-3 and 125I-IRL-1620 were 53 and 145 pM for ETB-R and 42 and 68 pM for ETB-SVR. The maximum density of the receptors were comparable for both receptors with both radioligands (Figs. 4C and 5C), indicating that the expression of these two receptors in COS cells is comparable.


Fig. 4. Saturation binding of 125I-ET-3 (A) or 125I-IRL-1620 (B) to membranes prepared from COS cells transfected with human ETB-R. C presents the Scatchard transformations of the specific binding obtained from saturation binding experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]


Fig. 5. Saturation binding of 125I-ET-3 (A) or 125I-IRL-1620 (B) to membranes prepared from COS cells transfected with human ETB-SVR. C presents the Scatchard transformations of the specific binding obtained from saturation binding experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]

Competition binding data using 125I-ET-1 and increasing concentrations of unlabeled ET-1, ET-3, S6c, and BQ123 (ETA-selective antagonist) obtained with ETB-R and ETB-SVR are shown in Fig. 6, A and B. While ET-1, ET-3, and S6c gave superimposable monophasic competition curves with both receptors, BQ123 was totally inactive up to 10 µM in both receptors (Fig. 6), indicating that the binding properties of ETB-SVR are very similar to those observed with ETB-R. Similar binding profiles were obtained when the competition binding experiments were done with the ETB-selective radioligand, 125I-IRL-1620, and the ETB-selective peptide antagonist, BQ788, and the nonselective nonpeptide antagonists, SB 209670 and SB 222802 (Fig. 6, C and D). Thus, the data presented so far clearly indicate that the modifications present at the COOH-terminal end of the receptor did not have any effect on the binding of the radioligands (125I-ET-1, 125I-ET-3, and 125I-IRL-1620) or ETB-selective peptide antagonist, ETA-selective peptide antagonist, as well as nonselective-nonpeptide antagonists.


Fig. 6. Competition of 125I-ET-1 (A and B) or 125I-IRL-1620 (C and D) binding by various unlabeled ligands to membranes prepared from COS cells transfected with ETB-R (A and C) and ETB-SVR (B and D) clones. Membranes in duplicate were incubated with 0.3 nM 125I-ET-1 or 125I-IRL-1620 in the absence and presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled ET-1, ET-3, S6c, and BQ123 (A and B) or BQ788 (ETB-R selective antagonist), SB 209670 and SB 222802 (nonselective, nonpeptide antagonists) (C and D) for 60 min at 30 °C. ET-1, ET-3, S6c, and BQ788 were obtained from American Peptides. SB 209670 and 222802 were synthesized at SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]

Since the intracellular regions of seven transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors have been implicated in the coupling of these receptors to the signal transduction pathway, it was of interest to test whether there were any differences in the coupling of these two variants to signal transduction pathways. ET receptors have been shown to activate phospholipase C, resulting in the generation of diacylglycerol and inositol triphosphate which, in turn, releases intracellular calcium. Exposure of myo-[3H]inositol-prelabeled COS cells expressing ETB-R to increasing concentrations of ET-1, ET-3, or S6c resulted in a concentration-dependent increase in inositol phosphate accumulation as shown in Fig. 7A. The maximum stimulation (50-60% over basal) obtained with the three agonists as well as the EC50 values (0.2-1.0 nM) of these three agonists for stimulation of inositol phosphate accumulation were very similar. In contrast, the COS cells transfected with ETB-SVR and prelabeled with myo-[3H]inositol did not respond to any of the three agonists tested (Fig. 7B). Since ET peptides were ineffective in stimulating inositol phosphates accumulation in ETBSVR-transfected COS cells, a more sensitive method, such as cytosensor microphysiometer, was used to test whether these receptors were capable of inducing a change in intracelluar pH in response to ET. As shown in Fig. 7C, COS cells transfected with human ETB-R gave a nice increase in the acidification rate, whereas COS cells transfected with vector alone or ETB-SVR gave very little response. These data agree well with the data obtained from the inositol phosphates accumulation and indicate that even though the splice variant displayed the same binding properties as the wild type, this receptor was incapable of stimulating a functional response. Similar results have been reported by Kuang et al. (45) for chemokine receptors MCP-1Ra and MCP-1Rb. These two receptors are alternately spliced receptors, and the differences between the two is the COOH-terminal intracellular domain. While MCP-1Rb coupled to both Galpha 16 and Galpha 14, MCP-1Ra did not couple to either of these G proteins. Thus, the data presented here and in the literature strongly suggest that the intracellular COOH-terminal domain of the 7TM receptors is critical for G protein coupling and functional responses. It is clear from the amino acid sequence comparison of the two receptors that the only difference between the ETB-R and ETB-SVR is the proximal 52 amino acids of the COOH-terminal end. The amino acid composition of the wild type has 5 cysteines, 9 serines, 2 tyrosines, and no threonine, whereas the splice variant has 1 cysteine, 2 serines, 2 threonines, and no tyrosines. The importance of these key amino acids (involved in palmitoylation as well as phosphorylation) in the coupling to signal transduction pathway is not clear. In an elegant study to identify the functional domains of human ETA receptor, Adachi et al. (46) have reported that the regions involved in signal transduction for human ETA receptor are amino acids 296-305 and 373-385. Comparison of human ETA and ETB in these regions indicate that these regions are >95% identical in both subtypes; suggesting the significance of this region in the signaling mechanism. Further analysis of the 52 amino acids located at the COOH-terminal tail of ETB-R identify the sequence SCLC which is part of the 373-385 conserved sequence of ETB-R and ETA-R. Interestingly, this sequence in the ETB-SVR was replaced by AGPH. These data suggest that these four amino acids are critical for the signal transduction of these receptors.


Fig. 7. Inositol phosphate accumulation in ETB-R (A) and ETB-SVR (B) transfected COS cells in response to ET-1, ET-3, and S6c. myo-[3H]Inositol-prelabeled cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of ET-1, ET-3, or S6c for 10 min at 37 °C, and the reactions were stopped with trichloroacetic acid. The inositol phosphates were quantitated as explained under ``Experimental Procedures.'' C, intracellular acidification rate in response to ET-1. COS cells transfected with vector alone (M.T.) or human ETB-R or ETB-SVR were challenged with ET-1 and the change in intracellular acidification rate was measured using microphysiometer.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]

The main unanswered question is what is the physiological role of the ETB-SVR receptor in the cell? It is tempting to hypothesize that this receptor might function as a clearance receptor for the ET peptides, since there was no observed difference in the binding characteristics between the two receptors. Another possibility is that ET exhibits many diverse physiological effects, and it is possible that the ETB-SVR could mediate another, yet unidentified, response. It has been demonstrated recently that prostaglandin E2 receptor has four alternatively spliced carboxyl-terminal tails (37, 38). Interestingly, the four isoforms couple to different G proteins to activate different second messengers.

Several laboratories have demonstrated that cells expressing seven transmembrane receptors could undergo homologous desensitization in response to repeated challenges with agonists (47, 48). The mechanism of homologous desensitization to ET-1 is not well understood because the binding of ET-1 to its receptor is irreversible which makes it rather difficult to study down-regulation after prolonged exposure to agonists. One commonly used mechanism for inactivation of seven transmembrane receptors is phosphorylation of the serines and/or threonines in the carboxyl-terminal tails by the beta -adrenergic receptor kinase, which belongs to a multigene family containing six known subtypes and are called G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (49, 50, 51). It is of interest in this regard that the ETB-R has a total of 9 serines, whereas the ETB-SVR has a total of 2 serines and 2 threonines. Differences in receptor phosphorylation by beta -adrenergic receptor kinase-like enzyme might lead to differences in the pattern of deactivation between the two forms of the ETB-receptors, providing another mechanism for increasing the diversity of cellular responses to ETs. The availability of these clones will facilitate investigation of the potential roles of ETB-SVR and its possible participation in physiological and pathophysiological processes.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed.
1   The abbreviations used are: ET, endothelin; ETR, endothelin receptors; COS, African green monkey kidney cells; G protein, GTP-binding protein; S6c, sarafotoxin 6c; BQ123, Banyu-123; kb, kilobase(s); MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful Dr. Ganesh Sathe and Joyce Mao for oligonucleotide synthesis, Stephanie Van horn for sequence analysis, Dr. Eliot Ohlstein for his suggestions, Dr. Thomas Logan for reviewing the manuscript, Drs. Derk Bergsma and Christine Debouck for their advice and support, and Sue Tirri for expert secretarial assistance.


REFERENCES

  1. Simonson, M. S., Dunn, M. J. (1990) FASEB J. 4, 2989-3000 [Abstract]
  2. Shigeno, T., Mima, T. (1990) Cerebrovasc. Brain Metab. Rev. 2, 227-239 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Kloog, Y., Ambar, I., Sokolovsky, M., Wollberg, Z. (1989) Science 242, 268-270
  4. Sakurai, T., Yanagisawa, M., Takuwa, Y., Miyazaki, H., Kimura, S., Goto, K., Masaki, T. (1990) Nature 348, 732-735 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Takayanagi, R., Ohnaka, K., Takasaki, C., Ohashi, M., Nawata, H. (1991) Reg. Peptides 32, 23-37 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Williams, D. L., Jr., Jones, K. L., Pettibone, D. J., Lis, E. V., Clineschmidt, B. V. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 175, 556-561 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Karne, S., Jayawickreme, C. K., Lerner, M. R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19126-19133 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Kumar, C., Mwangi, V., Nuthulaganti, P., Wu, H-L., Pullen, M., Brun, K., Aiyar, H., Morris, R. A., Naughton, R., Nambi, P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13414-13420 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Jones, C. R., Hiley, C. R., Pelton, J. T., Mohr, M. (1989) Neurosci. Lett. 97, 276-279 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Davenport, A. P., Nunez, D. J., Hall, J. A., Kaumann, A. J., Brown, M. J. (1989) J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 13, S166-S170
  11. Kloog, Y., Sokolovsky, M. (1989) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 10, 212-214 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Yanagisawa, M., Kurihara, H., Kimara, S., Tomobe, Y., Kobayashi, M., Mitsui, Y., Yazaki, Y., Goto, K., Masaki, T. (1988) Nature 332, 1111-1115
  13. Komuro, I., Kurihara, H., Sugiyama, T., Takaku, F., Yazaki, Y. (1988) FEBS Lett. 238, 249-252 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Takuwa, N., Takuwa, Y., Yanagisawa, M., Yamashita, K., Masaki, T. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7856-7861 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. MacCumber, M. W., Ross, C. A., Snyder, S. H. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 2359-2363 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lysko, P. G., Feuerstein, G., Pullen, M., Wu, H-L., Nambi, P. (1991) Neuropeptides 18, 83-86 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Yoshizawa, T., Kimura, S., Kanazawa, I., Uchiyama, Y., Yanagisawa, M., Masaki, T. (1989) Neurosci. Lett. 102, 179-184 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Calvo, J. J., Gonzalez, R., De Carvalho, L. F., Takahashi, K., Kanse, S. M., Hart, G. R., Ghatei, M. A., Bloom, S. R. (1989) Endocrinology 126, 2288-2295 [Abstract]
  19. Shichiri, M., Hirata, Y., Kanno, K., Ohta, K., Emori, T., Marumo, F. (1989) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 163, 1332-1337 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Sampson, W. K., Skala, K. D., Alexander, B., Huang, F-L. S. (1991) Endocrinology 128, 1465-1473 [Abstract]
  21. Rosolowsky, L. J., Campbell, W. B. (1990) Endocrinology 126, 1860-1866 [Abstract]
  22. Stojikovic, S. S., Merelli, F., Iida, T., Krsmanovic, L. Z., Catt, K. J. (1990) Science 248, 1663-1666 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Stojikovic, S. S., Iida, T., Merelli, F., Catt, K. J. (1990) Mol. Pharmacol. 39, 762-770 [Abstract]
  24. Sakurai, T., Yanagisawa, M., Masaki, T. (1992) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 13, 103-108 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Elshourbagy, N. A., Korman, D. R., Wu, H-L., Sylvester, D. R., Lee, J. A., Nuthalaganti, P., Bergsma, D. J., Kumar, C. S., Nambi, P. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 3873-3879 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Elshourbagy, N. A., Lee, J. A., Korman, D. R., Nuthulaganti, P., Sylvester, D. R., DiLella, A. G., Sutiphong, J. A., Kumar, C. S. (1992) Mol. Pharmacol. 41, 465-473 [Abstract]
  27. Elshourbagy, N. A., Near, J. C., Kmetz, P. J., Sathe, G. M., Southan, C., Strickler, J. E., Gross, M., Young, J. F., Wells, T. N. C., Groot, P. H. E. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1430-1435 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Saiki, R. K., Sharf, S., Faloona, F., Mullis, K. B., Horn, G. T., Erlich, H. A., Arnheim, N. (1985) Science 230, 1350-1353 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Devereux, J., Haeberli, P., Smithies, O. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 387-395
  31. Chomczynski, P., Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Lehrach, H., Diamond, D., Wozney, J. M., Boedtker, H. (1977) Biochemistry 16, 4743-4751 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Elshourbagy, N. A., Boguski, M. S., Liao, W. J., Jefferson, L. S., Gordon, J. I., Taylor, J. M. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 8242-8246 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Aiyar, N., Nambi, P., Stassen, F. L., Crooke, S. T. (1986) Life Sci. 39, 37-45 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Mcconnell, H. M., Owicki, J. C., Parce, J. W., Miller, D. L., Baxter, G. T., Wada, H. G., Pitchford, S. (1992) Science 257, 1906-1912 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Arai, H., Nakao, K., Takaya, K., Hosoda, K., Ogawa, Y., Nakanishi, S., Imura, H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 3463-3470 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Shyamala, V., Moulthrop, T. H. M., Stratton-Thomas, J., Tekamp-Olson, P. (1994) Cell. Mol. Biol. Res. 40, 285-296 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Sibley, D. R., Monsma, F. J. (1992) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 13, 62-69
  39. de la Pena, P., Delgado, L. M., del Camino, D., Barros, F. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25703-25708 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Frong, T. M., Anderson, S. A., Yu, H., Huang, R. R. C., Strader, C. D. (1992) Mol. Pharmacol 41, 24-30 [Abstract]
  41. Sugimoto, Y., Negishi, M., Hayaski, Y., Namba, T., Honda, A., Watabe, A., Hirata, M., Narumiya, S., Ichikawa, A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 2712-2718 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Namba, T., Sugimoto, Y., Negishi, M., Irie, A., Ushikubi, F., Kakizuka, A., Ito, S., Ichikawa, A., Narumiya, S. (1993) Nature 365, 166-170 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Spengler, D., Waeber, C., Pantaloni, C., Holsboer, F., Bockaert, J., Seeburg, P. H., Jouront, L. (1993) Nature 365, 170-175 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Charo, I. F., Myers, S. J., Herman, A., Franci, C., Connolly, A. J., Coughlin, S. R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2752-2756 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Kuang, Y., Wu, Y., Jiang, H., Wu, D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3975-3978 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Adachi, M., Hashido, K., Trzeciak, A., Watanabe, T., Furuichi, Y., Miyamoto, C. (1993) J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 22, Suppl. 8, S121-S124
  47. Benovic, J. L., Bouvier, M., Caron, M. G., Lefkowitz, R. J. (1988) Annu. Rev. Cell. Biol. 4, 405-427 [CrossRef]
  48. Kobilka, B. (1992) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 87-114 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Benovic, J. L., DeBlasi, A., Stone, W. C., Caron, M. G., Lefkowitz, R. J. (1989) Science 246, 235-246 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Inglese, J., Freedman, N. J., Koch, W. J., Lefkowitz, R. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23735-23738 [Free Full Text]
  51. Chuang, T. T., Sallese, M., Ambrosini, G., Parruti, G., De Blasi, A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6886-6892 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
N. Hatae, N. Aksentijevich, H. W. Zemkova, K. Kretschmannova, M. Tomic, and S. S. Stojilkovic
Cloning and Functional Identification of Novel Endothelin Receptor Type A Isoforms in Pituitary
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 21(5): 1192 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
Y. Berger, C. C. Bernasconi, and L. Juillerat-Jeanneret
Targeting the endothelin axis in human melanoma: combination of endothelin receptor antagonism and alkylating agents.
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 1111 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. J. Rashid, B. F. O'Dowd, and S. R. George
Minireview: Diversity and Complexity of Signaling through Peptidergic G Protein-Coupled Receptors
Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 2645 - 2652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J.-R. Landry and D. L. Mager
Functional Analysis of the Endogenous Retroviral Promoter of the Human Endothelin B Receptor Gene
J. Virol., July 1, 2003; 77(13): 7459 - 7466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Tanoue, T.-a. Koshimizu, M. Tsuchiya, K. Ishii, M. Osawa, M. Saeki, and G. Tsujimoto
Two Novel Transcripts for Human Endothelin B Receptor Produced by RNA Editing/Alternative Splicing from a Single Gene
J. Biol. Chem., August 30, 2002; 277(36): 33205 - 33212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
A. P. Davenport
International Union of Pharmacology. XXIX. Update on Endothelin Receptor Nomenclature
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 219 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Kojima, H. Mano, and Y. Fukada
Vertebrate Ancient-Long Opsin: A Green-Sensitive Photoreceptive Molecule Present in Zebrafish Deep Brain and Retinal Horizontal Cells
J. Neurosci., April 15, 2000; 20(8): 2845 - 2851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P. Nambi, H.-L. Wu, D. Ye, A. Gagnon, and N. Elshourbagy
Characterization of a Novel Porcine EndothelinB Receptor Splice Variant
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2000; 292(1): 247 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
G. G. Nussdorfer, G. P. Rossi, L. K. Malendowicz, and G. Mazzocchi
Autocrine-Paracrine Endothelin System in the Physiology and Pathology of Steroid-Secreting Tissues
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 1999; 51(3): 403 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Okamoto, H. Ninomiya, M. Tanioka, A. Sakamoto, S. Miwa, and T. Masaki
Palmitoylation of Human EndothelinB. ITS CRITICAL ROLE IN G PROTEIN COUPLING AND A DIFFERENTIAL REQUIREMENT FOR THE CYTOPLASMIC TAIL BY G PROTEIN SUBTYPES
J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 1997; 272(34): 21589 - 21596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elshourbagy, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nambi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elshourbagy, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nambi, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.