![]()
|
|
||||||||
(Received for publication, April 26, 1996, and in revised form, June 27, 1996)
From the Departments of Endothelin receptors are widely distributed
throughout a number of tissues. A novel ETB receptor splice
variant (ETB-SVR) was identified from a human placental
cDNA library. Sequence analysis indicated that the
ETB-SVR is 436 amino acids long and shares 91% identity to
the human ETB-R. Northern blot analysis indicated an
mRNA species of 2.7 kilobases, which is expressed in the lung,
placenta, kidney, and skeletal muscle. Ligand binding studies of the
cloned ETB-SVR and ETB-R receptors expressed in
COS cells showed that ET peptides exhibited similar potency in
displacing 125I-ET-1 binding. Functional studies showed
that ET-1, ET-3, and sarafotoxin 6c displayed similar potencies for
inositol phosphates accumulation in ETB-R-transfected COS
cells, whereas no increase in inositol phosphate accumulation was
observed in ETB-SVR-transfected cells. In addition,
exposure of ETB-R-transfected cells to ET-1 caused an
increase in the intracellular acidification rate whereas
ETB-SVR-transfected cells did not respond to ET-1. These
data suggest that the ETB-SVR and ETB-R are
functionally distinct and the difference in the amino acid sequences
between the two receptors may determine functional coupling.
Availability of cDNA clones for endothelin receptors can facilitate
our understanding of the role of ET in the pathophysiology of various
diseases.
Endothelins are a family of peptide hormones having profound
cardiovascular, mitogenic, and potential neuroregulatory functions. In
mammals, the ET1 peptide family is composed
of three members, ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3, that are encoded by three
separate genes, which are differentially expressed in the tissues of
the periphery and central nervous system (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and
2). Mammalian ETs share high sequence homology and structural
similarity with a family of 21 amino acid peptide toxins from the snake
Atractaspis engaddensis, the sarafotoxins (3).
Two major subtypes of ET receptors (ETA and
ETB) (4) have been identified based on the rank order
potency of ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, and S6c (5, 6). ETA receptor
is defined by high and equal affinity for ET-1 and ET-2, approximately
70-100-fold lower affinity for ET-3, and a 1000-fold lower affinity
for S6c. In contrast, the ETB receptor subtype displays
equal high affinities for all ET-related peptides. Two additional
receptors have been cloned and characterized from Xenopus
melanophores (ETC) and heart (ETAX) (7, 8).
While ETC receptors display high affinity for ET-3 compared
to ET-1, ETAX receptors displayed extremely weak affinity
for BQ123 as well as S6c (ETA- and
ETB-selective ligands, respectively). Receptors for ET are
differentially expressed in a wide variety of tissues and cell types
(9, 10). ETs and sarafotoxins bind to a common receptor and initiate a
common signal transduction pathway, principally a G-protein-mediated
activation of phospholipase C and subsequent inositol
triphosphate-mediated increase in Ca2+ levels (1, 11).
ET mediates a number of physiological effects including
vasoconstriction mitogenesis, and induction of c-fos
transcription (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). These diverse and complex physiological effects
mediated by ET in conjunction with the molecular heterogeneity and
differential tissue distribution of the ET-related peptides and their
receptors underscores the importance of utilizing molecular biological
approaches to dissect the components of ET physiology. Several
laboratories have postulated the presence of additional ET receptors to
account for the diverse biochemical and physiological activities of
various ETs (24). This hypothesis has been supported by binding as well
as functional studies. We have previously reported the cloning,
functional characterization, and regulation of the human
ETA and ETB receptor subtypes (25). In this
report, we describe the cloning and functional characterization of a
novel ETB receptor splice variant from human placenta.
The
porcine cerebellum cDNA library (26) in pcDNA vector was
screened by hybridization to nitrocellulose replicates using
32P-labeled porcine ETB-R cDNA coding
sequence as a probe in 20% formamide, 5 × SSC (SSC is 150 mM NaCl, 15 mM sodium citrate), 5 × Denhardt's, 0.1% SDS, and 0.2 mg/ml Escherichia coli tRNA
at 42 °C (27). Filters were washed with 2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at
42 °C. Several positive recombinant clones were isolated from the
porcine cerebellum library and characterized. Preliminary sequence
analysis of these clones showed that 6 of these clones encode the
ETB-R clones except two clones which contain the same
5 The inserts of the porcine
ETB-SVR560 and the human ETB-SVR cDNAs were
sequenced on both strands using a modification of the dideoxy chain
termination method (29) using the Sequenase II Kit (U. S. Biochemical
Corp.). The Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group Software package (30) was
used to assemble composite sequences from the various fragments and for
future sequence analysis.
For Northern analysis, poly(A) RNA was
isolated from various human tissues using the guanidinum thiocyanate
acid-phenol method (31). One µg of each RNA was fractionated on 1%
agarose-formaldehyde gels (32) and transferred to nitrocellulose
membranes. Northern hybridizations were performed at 42 °C in 50%
formamide, 5% SSPE, 5 × Denhardt's reagent, 0.1% SDS, and 100 µg/ml yeast tRNA (33). The blots were washed with 0.1 × SSC,
0.1% SDS at 50 °C and exposed to x-ray film for 4 days at
Fragments containing the entire human ETB-SVR
cDNA and ETB-R cDNA coding sequences was subcloned
into the mammalian expression vector pRLDN (25). COS cells grown in
245 × 245-mm tissue culture plates were transfected with 75 µg
of human ETB-SVR or human ETB-R cDNA and
grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum for 2 days as described previously (26).
The COS cells were washed with
Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline containing a protease inhibitor
mixture (5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, and 0.1 µg/ml aprotinin) and scraped
in the same buffer. The membranes were prepared as described previously
(25). Protein content was determined by the bicinchoninic acid method
using bovine serum albumin as the standard.
125I-ET-1 binding
to membranes prepared from COS cells transfected with ETB-R
or ETB-SVR was performed as explained (25) with the
following modifications. The assay volumes were 50 µl, and the
protein was 50-100 ng/tube. The procedure for 125I-ET-3
and 125I-IRL-1620 binding was exactly the same as that for
125I-ET-1. Each experiment was done three times with
separate transfections. The data presented are from one experiment
which is representative of the others. Intra-experimental variation was
<10%. 125I-ET-1, 125I-ET-3, and
125I-IRL-1620 (specific activities 2200 Ci/mmol) were
obtained from DuPont NEN.
COS cells transfected with human
ETB-R or ETB-SVR receptor clones were treated
with 1 µCi/ml myo-[3H]inositol for 24 h
in serum-free medium. At the end of treatment, medium was removed,
cells were washed with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline, and then
exposed to indicated concentrations of various agonists for 10 min at
37 °C. The inositol phosphates were separated using ion exchange
chromatography following the procedure of Aiyar et al.
(34).
The cytosensor microphysiometer was used
to measure the intracellular pH change with a pH-sensitive silicon
sensor which is part of a microvolume flow chamber (35). COS cells
transfected with vector or human ETBR or
ETB-SVR were allowed to attach in capsule cups (Molecular
Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) for 24 h before transferring to the sensor
chamber in the microphysiometer (Molecular Devices). After establishing
a steady base line, acidification rate in response to ET was measured
as a change in pH over time (35).
The porcine ETB-R cDNA, previously cloned
in our laboratory (26) was used to probe porcine cerebellum cDNA
library. Several positive clones were identified. Nucleotide sequence
analysis revealed that several of these positive clones encoded for
ETB-R except for two novel ETB-R clones which
differed in the length and the amino acid sequence at the 3
Receptor subtypes can arise through divergent genes, e.g.
ETA and ETB and in the case of
intron-containing genes, additional variants within a subtype can arise
by alternative RNA splicing. Recent studies have identified an
ETB receptor variant which contains an additional 10 amino
acids in the second cytoplasmic domain of the ETB receptor
(37). This sequence was part of the ETB receptor intron
that separates the second and the third exons and therefore arises by
alternative RNA splicing of a single gene. The identification of splice
variants among the seven transmembrane receptors has been increasing at
a phenomenal rate following the initial observation of two variant
forms for dopamine D2 receptor (38). Recent splice variants have been
identified for thyrotropin stimulating hormone, TRH (39), neurokinin
receptors (40), prostaglandin EP3 receptor (41, 42), pituitary adenylyl
cyclase-activating polypeptide, PACAP receptor (43), and monocyte
chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) receptor (44). It is interesting to
note that in all these examples the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor
is altered indicating that alternative RNA splicing plays an important
role in the generation of physiologically divergent receptor activity
for the same ligand.
Northern hybridization
analysis of RNA from various human tissues with the human
ETB-SV receptor cDNA clone indicated the presence of
two major mRNA species at 4.4 and 1.7 kb and one minor band at 2.7 kb. The two major bands correspond to the full-length ETB
receptor clones resulted from two polyadenylation signals which are 32 and 29 base pairs upstream of the polyadenylation sites of the two
mRNA species. The minor band of 2.7 kb corresponds exactly to the
size of the splice variant ETB receptor.
Northern blot was also used to examine the pattern of expression of the
ETB and the ETB-SV receptor mRNA derived
from different human tissues. As shown in Fig. 3, mRNA expressed by
each ETB-R species were specifically detected in all the
RNA samples. The total amount of ETB-R mRNA levels
appeared to be higher in the lung, liver, kidney, and placenta.
However, the relative ratio of expression of each individual
ETB-SVR mRNA does not represent more than 10% of the
total ETB-R expression, except the skeletal muscle where
ETB-SVR contributes to more than 39% of the total
ETB receptor expression (Fig. 3). In addition, the mRNA
levels of normal as well as splice variant ETB-R were
examined by Northern blot as well as reverse transcriptase-polymerase
chain reaction methods in smooth muscle and endothelial cells. While
both displayed normal ETB-R mRNA, the
ETB-SVR mRNA was not detectable in both cells (data not
shown).
Addition of increasing
concentrations of 125I-ET-3 or 125I-IRL-1620 to
membranes prepared from COS cells transfected with ETB-R or
ETB-SVR clone resulted in specific, saturable and high
affinity binding as shown in Figs. 4 and
5. The nonspecific bindings were 5-25 and 5-35% for
125I-ET-3 and 125I-IRL-1620, respectively
(Figs. 4, A and B, and 5, A and
B, respectively). The Scatchard transformations of the
specific binding from the saturation binding experiments are shown as
Figs. 4C and 5C for ETB-R and
ETB-SVR, respectively. The apparent dissociation constants
(Kd values) for 125I-ET-3 and
125I-IRL-1620 were 53 and 145 pM for
ETB-R and 42 and 68 pM for ETB-SVR.
The maximum density of the receptors were comparable for both receptors
with both radioligands (Figs. 4C and 5C),
indicating that the expression of these two receptors in COS cells is
comparable.
Competition binding data using 125I-ET-1 and increasing
concentrations of unlabeled ET-1, ET-3, S6c, and BQ123
(ETA-selective antagonist) obtained with ETB-R
and ETB-SVR are shown in Fig. 6,
A and B. While ET-1, ET-3, and S6c gave
superimposable monophasic competition curves with both receptors, BQ123
was totally inactive up to 10 µM in both receptors (Fig.
6), indicating that the binding properties of ETB-SVR are
very similar to those observed with ETB-R. Similar binding
profiles were obtained when the competition binding experiments were
done with the ETB-selective radioligand,
125I-IRL-1620, and the ETB-selective peptide
antagonist, BQ788, and the nonselective nonpeptide antagonists, SB
209670 and SB 222802 (Fig. 6, C and D).
Thus, the data presented so far clearly indicate that the modifications
present at the COOH-terminal end of the receptor did not have any
effect on the binding of the radioligands (125I-ET-1,
125I-ET-3, and 125I-IRL-1620) or
ETB-selective peptide antagonist, ETA-selective
peptide antagonist, as well as nonselective-nonpeptide antagonists.
Since the intracellular regions of seven transmembrane G
protein-coupled receptors have been implicated in the coupling of these
receptors to the signal transduction pathway, it was of interest to
test whether there were any differences in the coupling of these two
variants to signal transduction pathways. ET receptors have been shown
to activate phospholipase C, resulting in the generation of
diacylglycerol and inositol triphosphate which, in turn, releases
intracellular calcium. Exposure of
myo-[3H]inositol-prelabeled COS cells
expressing ETB-R to increasing concentrations of ET-1,
ET-3, or S6c resulted in a concentration-dependent increase
in inositol phosphate accumulation as shown in Fig.
7A. The maximum stimulation (50-60% over
basal) obtained with the three agonists as well as the EC50
values (0.2-1.0 nM) of these three agonists for
stimulation of inositol phosphate accumulation were very similar. In
contrast, the COS cells transfected with ETB-SVR and
prelabeled with myo-[3H]inositol did not
respond to any of the three agonists tested (Fig. 7B). Since
ET peptides were ineffective in stimulating inositol phosphates
accumulation in ETBSVR-transfected COS cells, a more
sensitive method, such as cytosensor microphysiometer, was used to test
whether these receptors were capable of inducing a change in
intracelluar pH in response to ET. As shown in Fig. 7C, COS
cells transfected with human ETB-R gave a nice increase in
the acidification rate, whereas COS cells transfected with vector alone
or ETB-SVR gave very little response. These data agree well
with the data obtained from the inositol phosphates accumulation and
indicate that even though the splice variant displayed the same binding
properties as the wild type, this receptor was incapable of stimulating
a functional response. Similar results have been reported by Kuang
et al. (45) for chemokine receptors MCP-1Ra and MCP-1Rb.
These two receptors are alternately spliced receptors, and the
differences between the two is the COOH-terminal intracellular domain.
While MCP-1Rb coupled to both G
The main unanswered question is what is the physiological role of the
ETB-SVR receptor in the cell? It is tempting to hypothesize
that this receptor might function as a clearance receptor for the ET
peptides, since there was no observed difference in the binding
characteristics between the two receptors. Another possibility is that
ET exhibits many diverse physiological effects, and it is possible that
the ETB-SVR could mediate another, yet unidentified,
response. It has been demonstrated recently that prostaglandin
E2 receptor has four alternatively spliced
carboxyl-terminal tails (37, 38). Interestingly, the four isoforms
couple to different G proteins to activate different second
messengers.
Several laboratories have demonstrated that cells expressing seven
transmembrane receptors could undergo homologous desensitization in
response to repeated challenges with agonists (47, 48). The mechanism
of homologous desensitization to ET-1 is not well understood because
the binding of ET-1 to its receptor is irreversible which makes it
rather difficult to study down-regulation after prolonged exposure to
agonists. One commonly used mechanism for inactivation of seven
transmembrane receptors is phosphorylation of the serines and/or
threonines in the carboxyl-terminal tails by the We are grateful Dr. Ganesh Sathe and Joyce
Mao for oligonucleotide synthesis, Stephanie Van horn for sequence
analysis, Dr. Eliot Ohlstein for his suggestions, Dr. Thomas Logan for
reviewing the manuscript, Drs. Derk Bergsma and Christine Debouck for
their advice and support, and Sue Tirri for expert secretarial
assistance.
Volume 271, Number 41,
Issue of October 11, 1996
pp. 25300-25307
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
§,
,
,
Molecular Genetics and
¶ Renal Pharmacology, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals,
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
Construction and Screening of the cDNA Libraries
-coding region of ETB-R and a diverge 3
-coding
sequences. In order to obtain the human homologue and eliminate the
possibility that this variant is due to a recombination artifact,
primers were synthesized corresponding to the amino termini of
ETB-R (5
-TCTGGAGCAGGATCCAGCATGCAGCCGCCT-3
) and the
3
-untranslated region of the porcine ETB-SVR
(5
-CCCGTGATATCTAAA TAGAATCCATATGGTGTG-3
) and used to obtain the human
full-length splice variant cDNA clone from human placental RNA
using polymerase chain reaction (28).
70 °C. Autoradiograms were analyzed by quantitative scanning
densitometry.
Cloning of a cDNA Encoding the Human ETB Splice
Variant
-coding
region. In order to determine the presence of this novel
ETB-R form in human tissues, oligonucleotide primers
corresponding to the 5
-coding region of ETB-R and the
3
-noncoding region of the novel ETB receptor form were
used to polymerase chain reaction the human homologue using human
placental cDNA as a template. Agarose gel electrophoresis
identified a polymerase chain reaction product of 1400 base pairs.
Sequence analysis of this product revealed a sequence that was
identical to ETB receptor from the 5
-untranslated region
through the putative seventh transmembrane domain, and then completely
differed in the cytoplasmic domain and 3
-untranslated region. The
deduced polypeptide consisted of 436 amino acid residues with a
calculated molecular mass of approximately 48 kDa (Fig.
1, A and B). This is different
from the size of ETB receptor which is 442 amino acids with
a calculated molecular mass of 49 kDa. Several independent clones in
our library were found to contain this sequence which appears to
represent alternative splicing of the carboxyl-terminal tail of the
ETB receptor. The carboxyl-terminal region of the
ETB-SVR clone bore no significant homology with other known
proteins. Several lines of evidence support the fact that the
ETB-SV and the ETB receptors represent
alternatively spliced variants of a single gene. First, the 3
terminal
tail of the ETB-SVR clone was used to search the data base
for identical sequences. Interestingly this sequence was found to
correspond to the extreme 3
-untranslated region of ETB-R.
Further analysis of the ETB-R genomic structure (36)
revealed that exons 1 through 6 are identical in ETB-SVR
and the ETB-R in terms of their nucleotide sequence
composition and their splice site. However, the 3
terminal tail of the
ETB-SVR represents a putative splice site and an A(G/G)T
sequence is found at the 5
donor junction which showed that this
region is a splice site for the ETB receptor (Fig.
2). Therefore, two putative splice sites were identified
at exon 7 in the human ETB receptor gene: the first splice
site at nucleotide 1194 to produce a 2855-base pair exon which encodes
the normal ETB-R; and the second splice site at nucleotide
2970 to produce a 997-base pair exon which encodes the
ETB-SVR. Second, an mRNA transcript of 2.7 kb
corresponds to the size of the ETB-SV receptor was
identified in various human tissues (Fig. 3).
Fig. 1.
Amino acid sequences of the human
ETB receptor cDNA clones. The recombinant plasmid
clones of human ETB-R and ETB-SVR were
sequenced by the dideoxy method (29). Deduced amino acid residues are
indicated beginning with the initiation methionine. The region
identifying the positive transmembrane as domains I-VII are
underlined and numbered sequentially. The optimal
alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of ETB-R and
ETB-SVR were made with the Wisconsin program obtained from
Devereux et al. (30) (A). The membrane topology
and amino acid differences between the ETB-R and the
ETB-SVR are presented with black circles
(B).
Fig. 2.
Structural organization of the human
ETB receptor genes. The indicated ETB
receptor gene loci are presented by solid bars and exons are
shown as open boxes. The structure of the endothelin
receptor cDNAs derived from ETB receptor gene is shown
between the gene loci. Transmembrane-spanning domains (TM I-VII) are
indicated as black and open boxes, respectively.
Exons in the genomic DNA and their corresponding regions of the
cDNA are connected by solid lines.
Fig. 3.
Size and tissue distribution of
ETB-R and ETB-SVR mRNA in various human
tissues. Poly(A)+ RNA was prepared from the indicated
tissues and then fractionated on an 1% agarose formaldehyde gel,
blotted, and hybridized with cloned 32P-labeled
ETB-R cDNA.
-Actin was used as an internal standard
for the amount of RNA loaded (data not shown). The position of a 4.4-, 2.7-, and 1.7-kb bands ETB-R, ETB-SVR, and
ETB-R mRNA are indicated (A). Several
different exposures of the autoradiograms of the hybridized filters
were made and analyzed by quantitative scanning densitometry. The data
are presented as a total ETB-Rs expressed in each tissue
(B) and also expressed as a percent of each individual band
as compared to the total in each lane C.
Fig. 4.
Saturation binding of 125I-ET-3
(A) or 125I-IRL-1620 (B) to
membranes prepared from COS cells transfected with human
ETB-R. C presents the Scatchard transformations
of the specific binding obtained from saturation binding
experiments.
Fig. 5.
Saturation binding of 125I-ET-3
(A) or 125I-IRL-1620 (B) to
membranes prepared from COS cells transfected with human
ETB-SVR. C presents the Scatchard
transformations of the specific binding obtained from saturation
binding experiments.
Fig. 6.
Competition of 125I-ET-1
(A and B) or 125I-IRL-1620
(C and D) binding by various unlabeled ligands
to membranes prepared from COS cells transfected with ETB-R
(A and C) and ETB-SVR
(B and D) clones. Membranes in duplicate
were incubated with 0.3 nM 125I-ET-1 or
125I-IRL-1620 in the absence and presence of increasing
concentrations of unlabeled ET-1, ET-3, S6c, and BQ123 (A
and B) or BQ788 (ETB-R selective antagonist), SB 209670 and
SB 222802 (nonselective, nonpeptide antagonists) (C and
D) for 60 min at 30 °C. ET-1, ET-3, S6c, and BQ788 were
obtained from American Peptides. SB 209670 and 222802 were synthesized
at SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals.
16 and G
14, MCP-1Ra did not couple
to either of these G proteins. Thus, the data presented here and in the
literature strongly suggest that the intracellular COOH-terminal domain
of the 7TM receptors is critical for G protein coupling and functional
responses. It is clear from the amino acid sequence comparison of the
two receptors that the only difference between the ETB-R
and ETB-SVR is the proximal 52 amino acids of the
COOH-terminal end. The amino acid composition of the wild type has 5 cysteines, 9 serines, 2 tyrosines, and no threonine, whereas the splice
variant has 1 cysteine, 2 serines, 2 threonines, and no tyrosines. The
importance of these key amino acids (involved in palmitoylation as well
as phosphorylation) in the coupling to signal transduction pathway is
not clear. In an elegant study to identify the functional domains of
human ETA receptor, Adachi et al. (46) have
reported that the regions involved in signal transduction for human
ETA receptor are amino acids 296-305 and 373-385.
Comparison of human ETA and ETB in these
regions indicate that these regions are >95% identical in both
subtypes; suggesting the significance of this region in the signaling
mechanism. Further analysis of the 52 amino acids located at the
COOH-terminal tail of ETB-R identify the sequence SCLC
which is part of the 373-385 conserved sequence of ETB-R
and ETA-R. Interestingly, this sequence in the
ETB-SVR was replaced by AGPH. These data suggest that these
four amino acids are critical for the signal transduction of these
receptors.
Fig. 7.
Inositol phosphate accumulation in
ETB-R (A) and ETB-SVR
(B) transfected COS cells in response to ET-1, ET-3, and
S6c. myo-[3H]Inositol-prelabeled cells were
exposed to increasing concentrations of ET-1, ET-3, or S6c for 10 min
at 37 °C, and the reactions were stopped with trichloroacetic acid.
The inositol phosphates were quantitated as explained under
``Experimental Procedures.'' C, intracellular
acidification rate in response to ET-1. COS cells transfected with
vector alone (M.T.) or human ETB-R or
ETB-SVR were challenged with ET-1 and the change in
intracellular acidification rate was measured using
microphysiometer.
-adrenergic
receptor kinase, which belongs to a multigene family containing six
known subtypes and are called G-protein-coupled receptor kinases
(49, 50, 51). It is of interest in this regard that the ETB-R
has a total of 9 serines, whereas the ETB-SVR has a total
of 2 serines and 2 threonines. Differences in receptor phosphorylation
by
-adrenergic receptor kinase-like enzyme might lead to differences
in the pattern of deactivation between the two forms of the
ETB-receptors, providing another mechanism for increasing
the diversity of cellular responses to ETs. The availability of these
clones will facilitate investigation of the potential roles of
ETB-SVR and its possible participation in physiological and
pathophysiological processes.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed.
1
The abbreviations used are: ET, endothelin; ETR,
endothelin receptors; COS, African green monkey kidney cells; G
protein, GTP-binding protein; S6c, sarafotoxin 6c; BQ123, Banyu-123;
kb, kilobase(s); MCP, monocyte chemoattractant protein.
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Hatae, N. Aksentijevich, H. W. Zemkova, K. Kretschmannova, M. Tomic, and S. S. Stojilkovic Cloning and Functional Identification of Novel Endothelin Receptor Type A Isoforms in Pituitary Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 21(5): 1192 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Berger, C. C. Bernasconi, and L. Juillerat-Jeanneret Targeting the endothelin axis in human melanoma: combination of endothelin receptor antagonism and alkylating agents. Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2006; 231(6): 1111 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Rashid, B. F. O'Dowd, and S. R. George Minireview: Diversity and Complexity of Signaling through Peptidergic G Protein-Coupled Receptors Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 2645 - 2652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-R. Landry and D. L. Mager Functional Analysis of the Endogenous Retroviral Promoter of the Human Endothelin B Receptor Gene J. Virol., July 1, 2003; 77(13): 7459 - 7466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tanoue, T.-a. Koshimizu, M. Tsuchiya, K. Ishii, M. Osawa, M. Saeki, and G. Tsujimoto Two Novel Transcripts for Human Endothelin B Receptor Produced by RNA Editing/Alternative Splicing from a Single Gene J. Biol. Chem., August 30, 2002; 277(36): 33205 - 33212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Davenport International Union of Pharmacology. XXIX. Update on Endothelin Receptor Nomenclature Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2002; 54(2): 219 - 226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kojima, H. Mano, and Y. Fukada Vertebrate Ancient-Long Opsin: A Green-Sensitive Photoreceptive Molecule Present in Zebrafish Deep Brain and Retinal Horizontal Cells J. Neurosci., April 15, 2000; 20(8): 2845 - 2851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Nambi, H.-L. Wu, D. Ye, A. Gagnon, and N. Elshourbagy Characterization of a Novel Porcine EndothelinB Receptor Splice Variant J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2000; 292(1): 247 - 253. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Nussdorfer, G. P. Rossi, L. K. Malendowicz, and G. Mazzocchi Autocrine-Paracrine Endothelin System in the Physiology and Pathology of Steroid-Secreting Tissues Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 1999; 51(3): 403 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Okamoto, H. Ninomiya, M. Tanioka, A. Sakamoto, S. Miwa, and T. Masaki Palmitoylation of Human EndothelinB. ITS CRITICAL ROLE IN G PROTEIN COUPLING AND A DIFFERENTIAL REQUIREMENT FOR THE CYTOPLASMIC TAIL BY G PROTEIN SUBTYPES J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 1997; 272(34): 21589 - 21596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |