|
Volume 271, Number 42,
Issue of October 18, 1996
pp. 25727-25730
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
COMMUNICATION:
Hormone-dependent Transactivation by Estrogen
Receptor Chimeras That Do Not Interact with hsp90
EVIDENCE FOR TRANSCRIPTIONAL REPRESSORS*
(Received for publication, December 26, 1995, and in revised form, July 2, 1996)
Han S.
Lee
,
Jonathan
Aumais
and
John H.
White
From the Department of Physiology, McGill University, Montreal,
Quebec H3G 1Y6, Canada
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The ligand-free estrogen receptor (ER), like
other steroid receptors, interacts with the 90-kDa heat shock protein
hsp90 in vitro. Analysis of the effect of potential
ER-hsp90 interactions in vivo on receptor function is
complicated by the fact that hsp90 binds to ER domains required for
hormone binding and stable DNA binding. ER chimeras were therefore
created by replacing the ER DNA binding domain with that of GAL4. In
addition, the N-terminal AF-1 domain of the ER was replaced with the
strong constitutive activation domain of VP16 to create VP16-GAL-ERs.
These chimeras bind DNA in a ligand-independent manner, but,
importantly, are ligand-dependent transactivators, unlike
VP16-GAL, which displays strong constitutive activity under the same
conditions. Hormone induces transactivation by VP16-GAL-ERs to levels
similar to the constitutive activity of VP16-GAL. Glycerol gradient and
coimmunoprecipitation experiments showed that, unlike the wild-type ER,
VP16-GAL-ER chimeras do not interact with hsp90. Deletion analyses
indicate that a region of the ER, primarily between amino acids 370 and
470, is responsible for repressed transcription. Our results suggest
that interaction with hsp90 is not necessary for controlling
hormone-dependent transcription by the ER and provide
evidence for repressor factors that interact with the N-terminal
portion of the receptor's ligand binding domain in the absence of
hormone.
INTRODUCTION
The estrogen receptor (ER)1 is a
ligand-activated transcriptional regulator (1, 2, 3, 4). Ligand-free (apo)
steroid receptors can be isolated from cell extracts associated with
complexes composed of a number of heat shock and immunophilin proteins
(5, 6, 7). The major nonreceptor constituent of these complexes is a dimer
of the 90-kDa heat shock protein, hsp90. Addition of hormone leads to
complex dissociation and receptor homodimerization. These in
vitro experiments would be consistent with a model where steroid
receptors are in a multisubunit cytoplasmic complex in the absence of
ligand and that hormone binding leads to complex dissociation, receptor
homodimerization, and transfer of cytoplasmic receptor to the
nucleus.
A potential role for hsp90 in vivo in controlling
ligand-inducible transactivation by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR)
has been well supported by genetic studies in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (8). Reduced expression of the hsp90 gene strongly
inhibited GR-dependent transactivation, suggesting that
hsp90 stabilized the ligand-free GR. However, the ER was less affected
in similar experiments (8), suggesting that hsp90 may not be necessary
for regulating ligand-inducible transcription by ER. Moreover, several
immunocytochemical studies have suggested that the hormone-free ER is
at least partially nuclear (9, 10, 11, 12). Gene transfer experiments have
shown that the receptor can be nuclear in the absence of hormone, and
can bind DNA, providing evidence for the presence of ligand-free ER
homodimers (13, 14).
Stable ER-hsp90 interactions in vitro require portions of
domains essential for ligand binding and stable DNA binding (5, 15),
thus complicating analysis of potential interactions in
vivo. Here, we have created ER chimeras that are functional
in vivo, and that do not interact with hsp90 in
vitro, by replacing the ER DNA binding domain with that of the
yeast transactivator GAL4. Our results suggest that interaction with
hsp90 is not necessary for controlling hormone-dependent
transcription by the ER and, moreover, provide evidence for
transcriptional repressors that interact with the ligand binding domain
of the receptor in the absence of hormone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Recombinants
All chimeras were constructed in the pSG5
expression vector (16) by polymerase chain reaction amplification of
appropriate regions of VP16, GAL4, and the wild-type ER HEG0.
Duplicates of each recombinant were tested for transactivation and
verified by DNA sequencing.
Cell Culture
COS-7 cells were grown in 3.5-cm dishes in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing charcoal stripped 5%
fetal bovine serum. Lipofections were performed according to
manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies, Inc.). For luciferase
assays, 100 ng of chimera expression vector was used along with 500 ng
of 17M5TATA-luc and 1 µg of p610AZ -galactosidase expression
vector for standardization. Cells were lysed in 250 µl of lysis
buffer (Promega). 50- and 45-µl aliquots were used for
-galactosidase and luciferase assays, respectively. For Western and
gel retardation analyses, 1.0 µg of ER expression vector was
lipofected along with 1.0 µg of p610AZ. For glycerol gradients and
coimmunoprecipitations, 10 µg of ER expression plasmid was lipofected
into COS-7 cells in 10-cm dishes.
Gel Retardation Assays
Cells were harvested and gel
retardation assays were performed as described (17) except that cells
were resuspended in 30 µl of high salt buffer. Estradiol (20 nM) was added during extraction and incubation as
indicated.
Immunoprecipitation
Immunoprecipitations were performed
essentially as described by Scherrer et al. (18). Cytosol
was prepared from transfected or untransfected COS-7 cells in HEPES
buffer (10 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM sodium molybdate, 50 mM NaCl, and protease
inhibitors). Clarified lysates were diluted in TEGM buffer (20 mM Tris, 4 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 20 mM sodium molybdate, 50 mM NaCl, and protease
inhibitors) and incubated overnight on ice with anti-GAL4 antibodies
2GV3 and 3GV2 (19) or with anti-ER antibody F3 (20). Glycerol gradient
fractions from 4 or 8 S peaks were pooled and diluted in TEGM prior to
Immunoprecipitation. Immune complexes were absorbed to protein
G-Sepharose, washed four times, and analyzed by Western blotting.
Western Analysis
48 h after transfection, cells were
harvested in phosphate-buffered saline and divided in half. One aliquot
was lysed in lysis buffer (Promega), and -galactosidase assays were
performed (21) to assess transfection efficiency. The other aliquot was
lysed directly in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer
and used for Western analysis. Blots were incubated with a combination
of anti-GAL4 DBD monoclonal antibodies 2GV3 and 3GV2 (19) diluted
1/1000 in Tris-buffered saline-Tween and 1% milk powder. Western
analysis of hsp90 was performed using anti-hsp90 monoclonal antibody
SPA-835 (Stressgen). Blots were developed using the ECL detection
system (DuPont NEN).
Glycerol Gradient Analysis
Gradients were performed as
described by Chambraud et al. (5). Extracts were made in the
presence of phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride and protease inhibitors
and stabilized with 30 mM sodium molybdate. Fractions (150 µl) were collected from the top of the gradient and assayed by
scintillation counting.
RESULTS
Experimental Design
We were interested in constructing
functional ER derivatives that would not interact with hsp90 in
vitro to analyze the potential role of heat shock proteins in
controlling ER activity. Region D of the receptor has been shown to
participate in ER-hsp90 interactions in vitro (5). Since
mutation of region D would disrupt stable DNA binding (15), the ER DBD
was replaced with that of GAL4 by fusing the GAL4 DBD to the C-terminal
portion of the ER from aa 251 to 300 (Fig.
1A).
Fig. 1.
Characterization of VP16-GAL-ER chimeras.
A, the luciferase reporter plasmid containing five GAL4 DBD
binding sites, 17M5-TATA-luc is shown at the top. A
schematic representation (not to scale) of the wild-type human ER HEG0
is shown below, indicating the DNA and hormone binding domains, along
with the N- and C-terminal transactivation domains, AF-1 and AF-2. The
structures of the chimeric activators are indicated below.
B, transactivation by chimeras. Luciferase activity of three
to five independent experiments from extracts of COS-7 cells
transfected with 17M5-TATA-luc, p610AZ, and parental expression vector
( ) or expression vector GAL-ER (G-ER), VP16-GAL
(V-G), or VP16-GAL-ER (V-G-ER) as indicated, in
the absence (shaded bars), or presence (black
bars) of 100 nM estradiol. Fold induction by hormone
varied by a maximum of ±20%. Inset, Western analysis of
extract of COS-7 cells expressing VP16-GAL-ER258
(258) or VP16-GAL-ER300 (300). Cells
were untreated ( ) or treated with 10 nM estradiol (+) for
24 h prior to extraction. C, Western analysis of
extracts of COS-7 cells transfected with VP16-GAL or VP16-GAL-ER
expression vectors. D, gel retardation of COS-7 extracts
from cells transfected with parental expression vector ( ), VP16-GAL,
VP16-GAL-ER258, or VP16-GAL-ER300, using a
17-mer binding site.
[View Larger Version of this Image (71K GIF file)]
Any hormone-free GAL-ER chimeras, which do not interact with hsp90,
would be expected to be nuclear and possibly DNA-bound. Thus, it would
be useful to use transactivation as an assay for nuclear localization
and DNA binding. However, wild-type ER bound to DNA in the absence of
ligand would be hormone-dependent for transactivation,
since the transactivating domain AF-1 (Fig. 1A) has been
shown to synergize strongly with ligand-bound AF-2 (21). Therefore, the
N-terminal A/B region containing AF-1 was replaced with the strong
hormone-independent activating domain of the herpes simplex virus
activator VP16 (Fig. 1A), which does not synergize with AF-2
(21). In addition, we used a synthetic promoter containing five GAL4
17-mer binding sites (17M5-TATA-luc, Fig. 1A),
since VP16 functions highly synergistically when bound to multiple
sites.
VP16-GAL-ER Chimeras Are Hormone-inducible Transactivators That Do
Not Interact with hsp90 in Vitro
VP16-GAL, which lacks the ER
ligand binding domain (LBD), is a strong constitutive activator of
17M5-TATA-luc (Fig. 1B, V-G). This activity is 200-fold
higher than that from a promoter containing a single 17-mer binding
site (data not shown) and 50-fold higher than the
hormone-dependent activity of GAL-ER (Fig. 1B,
G-ER), demonstrating the powerful transcriptional activity of
VP16. Transactivation by VP16-GAL-ER chimeras on 17M5-TATA-luc in the
absence of hormone was 15-35% of that observed with VP16-GAL.
Estradiol consistently stimulated transactivation by chimeras 4-fold
(with the exception of VP16-GAL-ER281; 3-fold), to levels
similar to those observed with VP16-GAL. While this induction is less
than the 6-9-fold stimulation observed with the wild-type ER (data not
shown), it is striking given that VP16 is a strong constitutive
activator. Several Western analyses showed that all recombinants were
expressed at similar levels (Fig. 1C and data not shown) and
that expression levels were not dependent on the presence of estradiol
(Fig. 1B, inset), thus indicating that the reduced level of
transactivation by VP16-GAL-ER chimeras in the absence of hormone
relative to VP16-GAL was not due to low levels of expression.
Glycerol gradients were used to analyze molybdate-stabilized extracts
of cells transfected with the wild-type-ER or VP16-GAL-ER chimeras for
interaction with hsp90. The wild-type ER displayed a characteristic
salt-dependent shift in sedimentation coefficient (5) from
the 8 S hsp90-containing complex, to the hsp90-free 4 S form (Fig.
2A). In contrast, 4 S, but no 8 S complex
formation, was observed in extracts of cells transfected with
VP16-GAL-ER258 (Fig. 2B) or
VP16-GAL-ER300 (not shown), indicating that they did not
interact with hsp90. Western analysis of gradient fractions showed that
peak hormone binding corresponds to peaks of intact protein, suggesting
that no significant proteolysis of chimeras occurred (Fig.
2B). No interaction of VP16-GAL-ER258 with hsp90
was detected by immunoprecipitation with anti-GAL antibodies of
molybdate-stabilized whole cell extracts of transiently transfected
COS-7 cells or of the 4 S peak from a glycerol gradient (Fig. 2C,
lanes 1-6). Identical results were obtained using anti-ER
antibody F3 (not shown). In contrast, immunoprecipitation of HEG0
expressed in COS-7 cells with F3 led to increased coimmunoprecipitation
of hsp90 (Fig. 2C, lanes 7-9). These results suggest that
interaction with hsp90 does not control hormone-dependent
transactivation by the chimeras. Gel retardation assays were also
performed to test for hormone-dependent DNA binding. No
significant effect of hormone on DNA binding by
VP16-GAL-ER258 or VP16-GAL-ER300 was detected
in assays performed with extracts made in the presence or absence of
estradiol (Fig. 1D and data not shown). In this respect, the
chimeras functioned similarly to the wild-type ER
(22).2
Fig. 2.
Glycerol gradients performed on extracts of
cells expressing HEG0 (A), VP16-GAL-ER258
(B), performed in the absence (triangles) or
presence of 400 mM KCl (circles). The
top of each gradient is at the left. Horseradish
peroxidase and glucose oxidase markers are indicated. Western analysis
of gradient fractions of B using anti-GAL4 DBD antibody is
shown below. The 50 kDa molecular mass marker is indicated.
C, Western analyses with an anti-hsp90 antibody of
immunoprecipitations performed with anti-GAL or anti-ER antibodies.
Lanes 2 and 3, analysis of immunoprecipitations
performed with anti-GAL antibodies of whole cell extracts of COS-7
cells untransfected ( ) or transfected with a
VP16-GAL-ER258 expression vector (+). Lanes 5 and 6, same as lanes 2 and 3 except
that fractions corresponding to 4 S from glycerol gradients of extracts
of untransfected ( ) or transfected cells (+) were immunoprecipitated.
Lanes 7 and 8, analysis of immunoprecipitations
performed with anti-HEG0 antibody F3 of whole cell extracts of COS-7
cells untransfected ( ) or transfected with an HEG0 expression vector
(+). The band corresponding to hsp90 is indicated by the
arrowhead. Lanes 1, 4, and 9, whole
cell extracts of COS-7 used to provide an hsp90 marker (M),
which is indicated by the asterisk. The major band detected
in each immunoprecipitate corresponds to the immunoprecipitating
antibody recognized by the secondary antibody used in Western
analysis.
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]
Deletion Analysis of the ER Ligand Binding Domain
Hormone
dependence of VP16-GAL-ER chimeras may be due to interaction with
factors, other than hsp90, which repress transcription in the absence
of hormone. A series of deletion mutants were created to test which
portions of the ER LBD are responsible for the reduced transactivation
in the absence of estradiol (Fig. 3A).
C-terminal truncations beyond ER aa 553, which disrupt the integrity of
the LBD, generated chimeras displaying low levels of constitutive
transactivation (Fig. 3B). Significant constitutive activity
is recovered, however, with C-terminal deletions beyond aa 430 to aa
370 and further to aa 302. Disruption of the LBD N terminus by deletion
past aa 302 to aa 340, 370, or 430 generated chimeras exhibiting low
levels of constitutive activity (Fig. 3B). Significant
constitutive activation was only recovered by deletion of the N
terminus to aa 470. Taken together, these data indicate that a portion
of the LBD, primarily sequences between aa 370 and 470, is required for
repressed transcription observed in the absence of hormone.
Fig. 3.
Transactivation by chimeras containing C- or
N-terminal deletions in the ER LBD. A, recombinants used in
this study. B, luciferase activities of COS-7 extracts
expressing truncated chimeras, in the absence (black bars)
or presence (white bars) of 100 nM estradiol.
Experiments with C- and N-terminal deletions are in the
left- and right-hand panels, respectively.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
Our results suggest that the mechanism of action of the ER is
intermediate between that of the GR subfamily of steroid receptors and
those of the thyroid hormone/retinoid/vitamin D3 nuclear
receptors. The apo-GR is cytoplasmic, and ligand binding leads to its
translocation to the nucleus where it binds palindromic DNA sequences
as a homodimer (23). The cytoplasmic location of the aporeceptor would
be consistent with its interaction in vitro with hsp90,
which is predominantly cytoplasmic. In contrast, the thyroid hormone
and related receptors do not interact with hsp90 in vitro
(24), are nuclear in the absence of hormone and bind to response
elements composed of directly repeated motifs as heterodimers with
retinoid X receptors (25, 26).
The ER, like the GR, recognizes palindromic response elements as a
homodimer (1, 2, 3, 4). Numerous studies have indicated that the full-length
ER interacts with hsp90 in vitro, suggesting that similar
interactions may occur in vivo. Immunoprecipitation
experiments by others have also indicated that the isolated ER LBD
interacts weakly with hsp90 (18). However, the LBD used contains a
Gly400 Val mutation, which destabilizes its structure
(22, 27). Our glycerol gradient analyses with VP16-GAL-ER chimeras
containing a Val400 mutation have shown that, unlike their
Gly400 counterparts, these chimeras form salt-sensitive 8 S
complexes in vitro (not shown). In vivo studies,
including immunocytochemistry and gene transfer experiments, have
provided evidence for the presence of homodimers of apo-ER in the
nucleus (13, 14), which would be inconsistent with stable interaction
with hsp90. Taken together, the above results suggest that if the ER
interacts with hsp90 in vivo, this interaction is transient,
and that a significant concentration of homodimeric aporeceptor is
present in the nucleus.
Our results show that ER derivatives, which do not interact with hsp90
in vitro, can function as ligand-dependent
transactivators in vivo. This occurs in spite of the fact
that the VP16-GAL-ER chimeras contain an acidic activating domain which
is strongly constitutively active when not tethered to the ER LBD.
These results suggest that interaction with hsp90 in vivo is
not essential for controlling ligand-dependent
transactivation by the ER. It appears that the chimeras tested here are
maintained in a transcriptionally repressed state in the absence of
ligand, given that ligand induces transactivation to levels similar to
those seen with the constitutive activator VP16-GAL. There are several
potential candidates for a repressor. In yeast, HSP70 acts downstream
of hsp90 to control ER and GR function (28). It is possible that
molecules analogous to those that repress the thyroid hormone and
retinoic acid receptors (29, 30) also act on the ER. A repressor may be
specific or have a broad spectrum of effects on transcription similar
to the yeast factor SSN6 (31). Deletion analyses of the ER suggest that
a putative repressor would interact with a region of the LBD between aa
370 and 470 (Fig. 3).
The obvious function of a putative repressor would be to maintain
DNA-bound apo-ER in a transcriptionally silent state. Hormone would
stimulate dissociation of bound repressor, freeing the LBD for binding
of transcriptional intermediary factors or coactivators (32, 33, 34). In
this model, antagonists would either bind the ER and not stimulate
repressor dissociation, or bind, stimulate repressor dissociation, but
maintain the LBD in a conformation not recognized by transcriptional
intermediary factors. Repression of the ER would not only act to block
the activity of the LBD but also the AF-1 domain in the N terminus,
which can be activated by phosphorylation in the presence of hormone
(35) and which has the capacity to synergize with other classes of
transactivators under certain conditions (21). The potential activity
of AF-1 would be dampened in cells where truncated receptors lacking
the LBD display significant levels of constitutive activity (36). It is
also noteworthy that aa 370-470 are adjacent to the region of the LBD
(aa 300-330) identified as being important for binding of TATA
box-binding protein-associated factor TAFII30, which is required for
transactivation by the ER (37).
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by Operating Grant MT-11704 from the
Medical Research Council of Canada (to J. H. W.). The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Chercheur-Boursier of les Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du
Québec. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Physiology, McGill University, 3655 Drummond St., Montreal, Quebec H3G
1Y6, Canada. Tel.: 514-398-8498; Fax: 514-398-7452.
1
The abbreviations used are: ER, estrogen
receptor; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; AF, activating function; DBD,
DNA binding domain; LBD, ligand binding domain; aa, amino
acid(s).
2
H. S. Lee, J. Aumais, and J. H. White,
unpublished results.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Drs. P. Chambon, M. Featherstone, and R. Kothary for the gifts of HEG0, 17M5TATA-luc, and
p610AZ recombinants, respectively, and Drs. P. Chambon, D. Metzger, and
Y. Lutz for anti-GAL and anti-ER antibodies.
REFERENCES
-
Green, S.,
Chambon, P.
(1988)
Trends Genet.
4,
309-314
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Evans, R. M.
(1988)
Science
240,
889-895
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wahli, W.,
Martinez, M.
(1991)
FASEB J.
5,
2243-2249
[Abstract]
-
Gronemeyer, H.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Genet.
25,
89-123
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chambraud, B.,
Berry, M.,
Redeuilh, G.,
Chambon, P.,
Baulieu, E. E.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
20686-20691
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Church Landel, C.,
Kushner, P. J.,
Greene, G. L.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
1407-1419
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Smith, D. F.,
Toft, D. O.
(1993)
Mol. Endocrinol.
7,
4-11
[Free Full Text]
-
Picard, D.,
Khursheed, B.,
Garabedian, M.,
Fortin, M.,
Lindquist, S.,
Yamamoto, K.
(1990)
Nature
348,
166-168
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ishibashi, T.,
Nakabeppu, Y.,
Sekigushi, M.
(1989)
Biol. Reprod.
40,
1275-1285
[Abstract]
-
Fuxe, K.,
Cintra, A.,
Agnati, L. F.,
Harfstrand, A.,
Wikstrom, A. C.,
Okret, S.,
Zoli, M.,
Miller, L. S.,
Greene, J. L.,
Gustaffson, J.-A.
(1987)
J. Steroid Biochem.
27,
159-170
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Greene, G. L.,
Press, M. F.
(1986)
J. Steroid Biochem.
26,
1-7
-
Press, M. F.,
Nousek-Goebl, N. A.,
Greene, G. L.
(1985)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
33,
915-924
[Abstract]
-
Zhuang, Y.,
Katzenellenbogen, B. S.,
Shapiro, D. S.
(1995)
Mol. Endocrinol.
9,
457-466
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tzukerman, M.,
Zhang, X.-K.,
Herman, T.,
Wills, K. N.,
Graupner, G.,
Pfahl, M.
(1990)
New Biol.
2,
613-620
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mader, S.,
Chambon, P.,
White, J. H.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
1125-1132
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Green, S.,
Isseman, I.,
Scheer, E.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
389
-
Ferrara, J.,
McCuaig, K.,
Hendy, G.,
Uskokovic, M.,
White, J. H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2971-2981
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Scherrer, L. C.,
Picard, D.,
Massa, E.,
Harmon, J. M.,
Simons, S. S.,
Yamamoto, K. R.,
Pratt, W. B.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
5381-5386
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
White, J. H.,
Brou, C.,
Wu, J.,
Lutz, Y.,
Moncollin, V.,
Chambon, P.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
2229-2240
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ali, S.,
Lutz, Y.,
Bellocq, J.-P.,
Chenard-Neu, M.-P.,
Rouyer, N.,
Metzger, D.
(1993)
Hybridoma
12,
391-405
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tora, L.,
White, J. H.,
Brou, C.,
Tasset, D.,
Webster, N.,
Scheer, E.,
Chambon, P.
(1989)
Cell
59,
477-487
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Metzger, D.,
Berry, M.,
Ali, S.,
Chambon, P.
(1995)
Mol. Endocrinol.
9,
579-591
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pratt, W. B.
(1992)
Bioessays
14,
841-848
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dalman, F. C.,
Sturzenbecker, L.,
Levin, A. A.,
Lucas, D. A.,
Perdew, G. H.,
Petkovich, P. M.,
Chambon, P.,
Grippo, J. F.,
Pratt, W. B.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
5605-5608
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yu, V. C.,
Delsert, C.,
Andersen, B.,
Holloway, J.,
Devary, O. V.,
Naar, A.,
Kim, S. Y.,
Boutin, J.-M.,
Glass, C. K.,
Rosenfeld, M. G.
(1991)
Cell
67,
1251-1266
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Leid, M.,
Kastner, P.,
Lyons, R.,
Nakshatri, H.,
Saunders, M.,
Zacharewski, T.,
Chen, J.-Y.,
Staub, A.,
Garnier, J.-M.,
Mader, S.,
Chambon, P.
(1992)
Cell.
68,
377-395
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tora, L.,
Mullick, A.,
Metzger, D.,
Ponglikitmongkol, M.,
Park, I.,
Chambon, P.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
1981-1986
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bohen, S. P.,
Kralli, A.,
Yamamoto, K. R.
(1995)
Science
268,
1303-1304
[Free Full Text]
-
Hörlein, A. J.,
Näär, A. M.,
Heinzel, T.,
Torchia, J.,
Gloss, B.,
Kurokawa, R.,
Ryan, A.,
Kamei, Y.,
Söderstrom, M.,
Glass, C. K.,
Rosenfeld, M. G.
(1995)
Nature
377,
397-404
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chen, J. D.,
Evans, R. M.
(1995)
Nature
377,
454-457
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
McDonnell, D. P.,
Vegeto, E.,
O'Malley, B. W.
(1992)
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10563-10567
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Le Douarin, B.,
Zechel, C.,
Garnier, J.-M.,
Lutz, Y.,
Tora, L.,
Pierrat, B.,
Heery, D.,
Gronemeyer, H.,
Chambon, P.,
Losson, R.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2020-2033
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cavaillès, V.,
Dauvois, S.,
L'Horset, F.,
Lopez, G.,
Hoare, S.,
Kushner, P. J.,
Parker, M. G.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
3741-3751
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Onate, S. A.,
Tsai, S. Y.,
Tsai, M.-J.,
O'Malley, B. W.
(1995)
Science
270,
1354-1357
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ali, S.,
Metzger, D.,
Bornert, J.-M.,
Chambon, P.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
1153-1164
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Berry, M.,
Metzger, D.,
Chambon, P.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
2811-2818
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jacq, X.,
Brou, C.,
Lutz, Y.,
Davidson, I.,
Chambon, P.,
Tora, L.
(1994)
Cell
79,
107-117
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-J. Huang, J. D. Norris, and D. P. McDonnell
Identification of a Negative Regulatory Surface within Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Provides Evidence in Support of a Role for Corepressors in Regulating Cellular Responses to Agonists and Antagonists
Mol. Endocrinol.,
August 1, 2002;
16(8):
1778 - 1792.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Zheng, L. A. Annab, C. A. Afshari, W.-H. Lee, and T. G. Boyer
BRCA1 mediates ligand-independent transcriptional repression of the estrogen receptor
PNAS,
August 1, 2001;
(2001)
171174298.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Knoblauch and M. J. Garabedian
Role for Hsp90-Associated Cochaperone p23 in Estrogen Receptor Signal Transduction
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
May 1, 1999;
19(5):
3748 - 3759.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Stafford and R. H. Morse
Mutations in the AF-2/Hormone-binding Domain of the Chimeric Activator GAL4·Estrogen Receptor·VP16 Inhibit Hormone-dependent Transcriptional Activation and Chromatin Remodeling in Yeast
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 18, 1998;
273(51):
34240 - 34246.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Gong, S. Chávez, and M. Beato
Point Mutation in the Ligand-Binding Domain of the Progesterone Receptor Generates a Transdominant Negative Phenotype
Mol. Endocrinol.,
September 1, 1997;
11(10):
1476 - 1485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. L. Smith, Z. Nawaz, and B. W. OMalley
Coactivator and Corepressor Regulation of the Agonist/Antagonist Activity of the Mixed Antiestrogen, 4-Hydroxytamoxifen
Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 1997;
11(6):
657 - 666.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Aumais, H. S. Lee, R. Lin, and J. H. White
Selective Interaction of hsp90 with an Estrogen Receptor Ligand-binding Domain Containing a Point Mutation
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 2, 1997;
272(18):
12229 - 12235.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Zheng, L. A. Annab, C. A. Afshari, W.-H. Lee, and T. G. Boyer
BRCA1 mediates ligand-independent transcriptional repression of the estrogen receptor
PNAS,
August 14, 2001;
98(17):
9587 - 9592.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|