|
Volume 271, Number 42,
Issue of October 18, 1996
pp. 26214-26219
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Binding of the Cytoplasmic Domain of Intercellular Adhesion
Molecule-2 (ICAM-2) to -Actinin*
(Received for publication, April 16, 1996, and in revised form, June 18, 1996)
Leena
Heiska
§,
Carmela
Kantor
¶,
Timothy
Parr
,
David R.
Critchley
,
Pekka
Vilja
'',
Carl G.
Gahmberg
¶ and
Olli
Carpén
From the Departments of Pathology and
¶ Biosciences, Division of Biochemistry, University of Helsinki,
FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland, the Department of Biochemistry,
University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, United Kingdom, and
the '' Medical School, University of
Tampere, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Intercellular adhesion molecule-2 (ICAM-2)
functions as a ligand for lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1
(LFA-1) and is involved in leukocyte adhesion. We studied intracellular
associations of ICAM-2 using a peptide encompassing the cytoplasmic
amino acids 231-254 as an affinity matrix. Among the proteins from
placental lysates that bound to the peptide was -actinin as
demonstrated by immunoblotting. Purified, 125I-labeled
-actinin also bound to the peptide. Confocal microscopic analysis of
Eahy926 cells demonstrated a colocalization of ICAM-2 and -actinin.
Of overlapping octapeptides covering the entire ICAM-2 cytoplasmic
amino acids, ICAM-2241-248 bound -actinin most avidly
and effectively competed with the longer cytoplasmic peptide for
binding. The site of interaction in -actinin was studied using
bacterially expressed -actinin fusion proteins. Several constructs
covering nonoverlapping regions of -actinin bound to the ICAM-2
cytoplasmic peptide suggesting that multiple regions in -actinin can
mediate the interaction. These results, together with previously
demonstrated interactions between -actinin and the adhesion proteins
ICAM-1, L-selectin, 1- and 2-integrins
emphasize the role of -actinin as a linker between cell surface
adhesion molecules and the actin-containing cytoskeleton.
INTRODUCTION
Linkages between cell surface adhesion molecules and the
cytoskeleton are important for many cellular functions. Such
interactions regulate cell growth, morphology, and migration as well as
contacts with the extracellular matrix and other cells (reviewed in
Refs. 1 and 2). Adhesion molecules located at focal contacts and
different cell-to-cell junctions are known to have complex interactions
with cytoskeleton. Cellular adhesion is closely connected with changes
in cytoskeletal organization and cell shape with concomitant
phosphorylation of many cytoskeleton-associated proteins. So far, the
exact molecular mechanisms of adhesion and its regulation are poorly
understood.
Several immune functions are dependent on adhesion, e.g.
cellular cytotoxicity, antigen presentation, and leukocyte migration to
inflammatory and neoplastic sites. The intercellular adhesion molecules
(ICAMs)1 belong to the immunoglobulin
superfamily of proteins and mediate leukocyte binding to
2-integrins (CD11/18). ICAM-2 (CD102) is expressed
constitutively on lymphocytes, monocytes, platelets, and most
endothelial cells (3, 4, 5, 6), but is strongly increased on endothelial
cells in lymphomas (7). It is highly glycosylated and has an apparent
molecular weight of 55,000 (5). It has two extracellular Ig-like
domains, one membrane-spanning region and a short cytoplasmic domain
(8). ICAM-2 plays a role in lymphocyte extravasation and may be
important for the leukocyte recirculation in normal uninflamed tissues
(9).
-Actinin is a versatile actin-binding and cross-linking protein
which mediates linkages between plasma membrane and the cytoskeleton by
several mechanisms. It has been shown to associate with ICAM-1,
L-selectin and 1- and 2-integrins
(10, 11, 12, 13, 14) and the intracellular focal contact-associated proteins talin,
vinculin, and zyxin (15, 16, 17, 18, 19). -Actinin is linked to the phospholipid
signal pathways by its interactions with phosphatidylinositol
4,5-biphosphate and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (20, 21, 22). In this study
we describe an interaction between the cytoplasmic domain of ICAM-2 and
-actinin and map the binding sites on both proteins.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell Lines, Antibodies, and GST Fusion Protein
Constructs
The cell line Eahy926 is a hybrid between vascular
endothelial and carcinoma cells and expresses endothelial markers (23).
It was grown in Dulbeccos modified Eagle's medium containing 100 µmol of hypoxanthine, 500 nM aminopterine, 16 µM thymidine, and 10% fetal calf serum. The mAb used to
detect human ICAM-2 was from MedSystems, Vienna, Austria. X63 IgG
(ATCC, Rockville, MD) was used as control mAb. -Actinin was detected
with three polyclonal antibodies. 592 and 1642 were a kind gift of F. M. Pavalko, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
(14) and 802-T was raised by immunizing rabbits with purified chicken
gizzard -actinin. Nonimmune control sera were obtained before
immunization. Talin was detected with rabbit antiserum kindly provided
by K. Burridge, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (12). The
mAbs used to detect spectrin and vinculin are described in (24).
-Actinin/GST fusion proteins have been described previously (25).
Peptide Synthesis and Immobilization
The ICAM-2 peptides
encompassing amino acids 20-42, 74-96, and 231-254 and amino acids
21-42, 231-254, and 241-248 in random order (Fig. 1) were
synthesized by t-butoxycarbonyl chemistry on an Applied
Biosystems 430A peptide synthesizer and purified to >98% purity by
high performance liquid chromatography. The purified peptides were
controlled by amino acid sequence analysis and mass spectrometry. An
additional lysine residue was synthesized to the NH2
terminus of ICAM-2231-254 peptide. The overlapping
octapeptides encompassing amino acids 229-236, 232-239, 235-242,
238-245, 241-248, 244-251, and 247-253 (Fig. 1) were synthesized by
Fmoc (N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl) chemistry on a SMPS
350 multiple peptide synthesizer (Zinsser Analytic, Frankfurt,
Germany). An additional cysteine residue was added to the COOH terminus
of the octapeptides.
Fig. 1.
Schematic picture of the ICAM-2 molecule with
the amino acid sequences of the cytoplasmic domain and the peptides
used in studies on ICAM-2- -actinin interaction. The short
octapeptides contain an additional COOH-terminal cysteine for coupling
purposes.
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]
The ICAM-2 peptides lacking an NH2-terminal cysteine
extension were coupled to CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia
Biotech Inc., Uppsala, Sweden) at a concentration of 2 mg/ml according
to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. The overlapping ICAM-2
octapeptides were coupled to thiopropyl-Sepharose 6B (Pharmacia). The
coupling efficiency for the octapeptides was 66-91% and for the other
peptides 90-97%.
Affinity Chromatography
100 g of placental tissue was
homogenized with a tissue grinder and lysed in 100 ml of lysis buffer
(50 mM octyl- -glucopyranoside, 50 mM
Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin).
The lysate was first centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant further centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h at 4 °C. This supernatant was filtered
through a sterile gauze. The lysate was applied to a Sepharose CL-4B
precolumn followed by the ICAM-2231-254 peptide Sepharose
column equilibrated in the lysis buffer. The peptide column (2 ml) was
washed with 15 column volumes of lysis buffer, eluted with soluble
ICAM-2231-254 peptide (1 mg/ml), washed, and further
eluted with lysis buffer containing 1 M NaCl, washed, and
finally eluted with fresh 8 M urea, 50 mM
Tris-Cl, pH 7.4. One-ml fractions were collected. The proteins were
separated in 8% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and visualized by
silver staining.
Immunoblot Analysis
10 µl of eluted fractions from the
ICAM-2231-254 peptide affinity chromatographies were
separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted onto nitrocellulose sheets, and blocked
overnight using 5% milk powder in TBS (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH
7.6, 137 mM NaCl). Primary and secondary antibodies were
applied in appropriate concentrations in 1% milk powder-TBS for 1 h each, followed by extensive washes with 1% Tween 20-TBS. The bound
antibodies were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham,
Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom (UK)).
Purification and Iodination of -Actinin and GST/ -Actinin
Fusion Proteins
-Actinin was purified from chicken gizzard
(26) and the GST fusion proteins were purified from Escherichia
coli lysates (27). The proteins were dialyzed against TSA (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 0, 1%
NaN3) for 48 h and 125I-labeled using
IODO-GEN (Pierce) (10).
Indirect Immunofluorescence Microscopy
The Eahy926 cells
grown on glass coverslips were double-stained for ICAM-2 and
-actinin. The coverslips were reacted with anti-ICAM-2 mAb, rinsed,
fixed in 3.5% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, and reacted with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat
F(ab )2 anti-mouse IgG (Immunotech, Marseille, France). The
cells were then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in
phosphate-buffered saline, stained with rabbit antiserum 592 against
-actinin or normal rabbit serum followed by staining with
tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated goat F(ab )2
anti-rabbit IgG (Cappel, Durham, NC). The coverslips were viewed with a
confocal microscope (Laser Scan Microscope, Carl Zeiss, Germany).
Affinity Precipitation Assays
Iodinated proteins ( 60,000
cpm) were mixed with 10 µl of 1:1 slurry of peptide Sepharose in 200 µl of binding buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.1% Tween 20). The tubes were
shaken for 3 h at 25 °C. The Sepharose beads were washed twice
with the binding buffer and the remaining radioactivity counted in a
counter. In some experiments the NaCl concentration was increased,
the cations substituted with 10 mM EDTA or -actinin
denatured with boiling in 2% SDS for 5 min. For competition assays the
cytoplasmic peptide Sepharose conjugate was diluted 1:4 with
ethanolamine-blocked Sepharose beads. The beads were preincubated with
excess unlabeled protein or soluble peptide for 1 h before the
addition of the radioactive protein.
RESULTS
Isolation of Proteins Interacting with the ICAM-2
231-254 Peptide
To characterize the proteins
interacting intracellularly with ICAM-2, we synthesized a 25-amino acid
peptide encompassing the cytoplasmic amino acids 231-254 of ICAM-2
(ICAM-2231-254, see Fig. 1). This peptide
was coupled to Sepharose CL-4B and used as an affinity matrix.
Placental endothelial cells express ICAM-2 and were used as a probable
source for proteins interacting with ICAM-2. Placental lysate was
passed through the peptide column and bound material was eluted under
three different conditions: first with soluble
ICAM-2231-254 peptide, followed by a high ionic strength
(1 M NaCl) buffer and finally with 8 M urea.
The eluted fractions contained a variety of proteins visualized by
silver staining of SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Fig.
2A). To find the protein(s) possibly linking
ICAM-2 to the cytoskeleton, eluted fractions were immunoblotted with
antisera against various cytoskeletal proteins. Antisera against
-actinin reacted with a 100-kDa protein, which eluted with all three
different elution solutions (Fig. 2B). No reactivity was
seen with preimmune sera or with antibodies against vinculin, talin, or
spectrin. The strongest -actinin reactivity was seen in fractions
eluted with 1 M NaCl, whereas the soluble peptide eluted
significantly less -actinin. It is possible that the concentration
of soluble peptide used for elution (1 mg/ml) was not high enough to
efficiently compete with the immobilized peptide on Sepharose beads.
Also in silver staining, a band of 100 kDa corresponding to the size of
-actinin was most prominent in the 1 M NaCl eluate.
Fig. 2.
Detection of the proteins eluted from
the ICAM-2231-254 peptide column. A placental
lysate was passed through a column containing
ICAM-2231-254 Sepharose as an affinity matrix. Bound
proteins were sequentially eluted with soluble
ICAM-2231-254 peptide, 1 M NaCl, and 8 M urea. A, silver staining of the
SDS-polyacrylamide gel. B, immunoblot detection of
cytoskeletal proteins in fractions eluted from the
ICAM-2231-254 peptide column. -Actinin is detected in
the eluate fractions, whereas talin, vinculin, and spectrin are present
only in the lysate. Fraction numbers correspond to panel
A.
[View Larger Version of this Image (54K GIF file)]
Interaction of -Actinin with the ICAM-2 231-254
Peptide
As -actinin was among the placental proteins binding
to ICAM-2 peptide, we investigated if purified -actinin binds
directly to this peptide. Chicken gizzard -actinin was purified and
labeled with 125I. 125I- -Actinin was
incubated with Sepharose-coupled ICAM-2231-254 peptide and
control peptides, which included ICAM-2231-254 residues in
random order and peptides derived from the extracellular domain of
ICAM-2. The results show that -actinin bound specifically to the
cytoplasmic peptide (Fig. 3A).
ICAM-2231-254 peptide- -actinin binding could be
competed with excess unlabeled -actinin in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3B).
Fig. 3.
Binding of -actinin to ICAM-2
peptides. The ICAM-2 cytoplasmic peptide
(ICAM-2231-254), residues 231-254 in random order
(ICAM-2231-254 scrambled), and the extracellular peptides
(ICAM-220-42, ICAM-221-42 scrambled, and
ICAM-274-96) were coupled to Sepharose beads and reacted
with purified, 125I-labeled -actinin. After washes the
radioactivity remaining on beads was measured. A, binding of
labeled -actinin to ICAM-2 peptides. Mean ± S.D. of five
experiments. B, binding of 125I- -actinin to
ICAM-2231-254 in the presence of excess unlabeled
-actinin.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
To further characterize the interaction we examined the effect of ionic
strength, divalent cations and protein folding on the binding (Fig.
4). The binding of labeled -actinin to
ICAM-2231-254 peptide was measured using different NaCl
concentrations. The interaction was relatively insensitive to an
increase in the ionic strength, and even at a concentration of 1 M NaCl, 43% of the binding was still retained when
compared with the binding in 0.15 M NaCl. Chelation of
divalent cations with 10 mM EDTA did not affect binding,
indicating that Ca2+ or Mg2+ ions do not play a
role in the interaction between -actinin and
ICAM-2231-254. When -actinin was denatured by heat
treatment in the presence of 2% SDS, the binding was totally
abolished.
Fig. 4.
The effect of ionic strength, divalent
cations, and protein denaturation on the interaction between
-actinin and ICAM-2231-254 peptide. Binding of
labeled -actinin to ICAM-2231-254 Sepharose was
measured in the presence of an increasing NaCl concentration and 10 mM EDTA. -Actinin was also denatured with heat and 2%
SDS and its binding compared with the binding of native -actinin.
Mean ± S.D. of three experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]
Identification of the Cytoplasmic Region of ICAM-2 Interacting with
-Actinin
To define the region in the cytoplasmic domain of
ICAM-2 that mediates binding to -actinin, short, overlapping
octapeptides were synthesized. The peptides were coupled to
thiopropyl-Sepharose through their cysteine extensions at their
NH2 terminus (see Fig. 1). Labeled -actinin was
reacted with these peptides. The results (Fig.
5A) show that the seven peptides bound to
-actinin at variable levels. The peptide VRAAWRRL-C representing
amino acids 241-248 bound -actinin at a degree comparable with the
longer cytoplasmic ICAM-2231-254 peptide. A scrambled
version of the ICAM-2241-248 peptide showed little
specific binding. The overlapping octapeptides
(ICAM-2238-245 and ICAM-2244-251) reached
both approximately 40% binding compared to
ICAM-2231-254. The ICAM-2241-248
peptide efficiently competed for -actinin binding with the longer
ICAM-2 cytoplasmic peptide, whereas only slight competition was seen
with the octapeptide ICAM-2232-239 (Fig.
5B).
Fig. 5.
Binding of overlapping octapeptides to
-actinin and the ability of the octapeptides to compete with
ICAM-2231-254 for -actinin binding. A, the
ICAM-2 cytoplasmic octapeptides were coupled to Sepharose, and the
binding of labeled -actinin to individual peptides was compared with
ICAM-2231-254/ -actinin binding. Mean ± S.D. of
three experiments. B, soluble competing octapeptides
(ICAM-2232-239 and ICAM-2241-248) were added
in the reaction mixture in amounts indicated. A representative of three
individual experiments is shown.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]
Identification of the Interacting Region in
-Actinin
-Actinin consists of an NH2-terminal
globular actin-binding domain, four individual spectrin-like repeats
and a COOH-terminal EF-hand-like Ca2+-binding motif. To
define the region of -actinin which binds to the ICAM-2 cytoplasmic
domain, we purified bacterially expressed GST fusion proteins
representing different regions of -actinin (Fig.
6A). The fusion proteins were labeled with
125I (Fig. 6B) and used in binding assays with
ICAM-2231-254. The fusion protein, which contained the
entire COOH-terminal half of -actinin (repeat domains 3 and 4 and
calcium-binding EF-hand like domain), mediated highest binding (Fig.
7). The fusion proteins containing the
NH2-terminal half of -actinin (actin-binding domain and
repeat domains 1 and 2) or all four repeats (R1-R4) also bound to
ICAM-2. None of the individual spectrin-like repeats bound to the
peptide.
Fig. 6.
Schematic illustration and SDS-PAGE of
GST/ -actinin fusion protein constructs. A, schematic
picture of -actinin dimeric molecule and the domains expressed as
GST fusion proteins. ABD = actin-binding domain,
R1-R4 = spectrin-like repeat domains,
EF = calcium-binding EF-hand domain. B,
autoradiography of purified 125I-labeled fusion proteins
separated in SDS-PAGE.
[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]
Fig. 7.
Binding of ICAM-2231-254 peptide
to the GST/ -actinin fusion protein constructs. The fusion
proteins were purified from bacterial lysates, labeled, and their
binding to immobilized peptide was measured. Mean ± S.D. of four
experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]
Cellular Colocalization of ICAM-2 and -Actinin
The
cellular distribution of ICAM-2 and -actinin was analyzed by
indirect immunofluorescence staining of endothelial Eahy926 cells (Fig.
8). ICAM-2 was primarily located on microvillae and on
prominent, concentrated patches, from which microvillae were extending.
-Actinin reactivity in Eahy926 cells was typically concentrated in
the same regions, where ICAM-2 staining was most pronounced (Fig.
8C). Three other cytoskeletal proteins, spectrin, vinculin,
and talin, showed a distribution distinctive from -actinin and were
not localized in the areas where ICAM-2 was concentrated (not
shown).
Fig. 8.
Immunofluorescence localization of ICAM-2 and
-actinin on endothelial cell line Eahy926. The cells were
double-stained for ICAM-2 (A) and -actinin (B)
as described under ``Materials and Methods'' and analyzed with a
confocal microscope. C shows a composite image of ICAM-2
(green) and -actinin (red) staining. Regions,
where the two proteins codistribute appear in yellow.
[View Larger Version of this Image (51K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
In this study we report an interaction between the cell adhesion
molecule ICAM-2 and -actinin. We enriched -actinin from placental
lysates using an immobilized peptide representing the ICAM-2
cytoplasmic amino acids 231-254 as an affinity matrix. Purified,
labeled -actinin bound to this peptide in a specific manner. As a
control we used peptides, whose sequences were derived from the
extracellular part of ICAM-2 and two scrambled versions of the
cytoplasmic residues. As expected, these peptides did not bind
-actinin, although they resembled the cytoplasmic
ICAM-2231-254 peptide in length and charge. We could
further map the highest binding activity in the cytoplasmic domain to a
stretch of 8 amino acids. Several regions in -actinin appeared to be
responsible for the interaction. Finally, we could show a cellular
colocalization of ICAM-2 and -actinin in a cultured endothelial cell
line.
In addition to -actinin, several other proteins from placental
lysates were recovered from the ICAM-2231-254 peptide
column. These proteins still need to be characterized. Three other
cytoskeleton-associated proteins, spectrin, talin, and vinculin, were
not detected in immunoblot analysis. When visualized with silver
staining after SDS-PAGE, the eluted fractions appeared different from
analogous fractions eluted from an ICAM-1 cytoplasmic peptide column
(10). This is not surprising, since the cytoplasmic domains of these
proteins share only limited homology (see Fig. 9). The
cytoplasmic domains are short in both molecules and probably do not
have any stable conformation. The differences in sequence make
interactions with different cytoplasmic proteins possible. On the other
hand, -actinin has been shown to bind also to ICAM-1 (10). This
suggests an important function for -actinin in the linkage between
cytoskeleton and adhesion molecules of the immune system, in
particular, as the integrin subunits 1,
2, and 3, and L-selectin also display a
similar linkage (11, 12, 13, 14).
Fig. 9.
Sequence comparison of the cytoplasmic
domains of human and mouse ICAM-2 and human ICAM-1. Identical
amino acids are indicated by vertical lines. The regions in
ICAM-2 and ICAM-1 involved in -actinin binding are
underlined.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]
The -actinin binding site in ICAM-2 was primarily located to amino
acids 241-248. The sequence VRAAWRRL includes both hydrophobic and
positively charged amino acids, but contains no known protein motif.
This peptide could compete with the longer ICAM-2231-254
peptide for -actinin binding, confirming that it contains residues
sufficient for the interaction. Mouse and human cytoplasmic ICAM-2
sequences are overall highly conserved, but especially this region is
almost identical, with only one amino acid difference (see Fig. 9).
Thus, this region could have been conserved because of its functional
importance.
It is interesting to compare our findings to other known binding sites
of transmembrane proteins interacting with -actinin. The binding
site of ICAM-1 to -actinin was mapped to a short RKIKK sequence (10)
with a similar kind of approach as used in this study. Although there
is no direct sequence homology, the cytoplasmic binding sites of ICAM-1
and ICAM-2 resemble each other by having a highly positive charge and
one hydrophobic residue. In a mimotope assay with 10-residue peptides
(13), two different binding regions of 1-integrin were
detected. The NH2-terminal binding site was highly charged
with alternating lysines and glutamic acid residues, while the
COOH-terminal binding region was relatively hydrophobic, containing one
lysine. There is no direct sequence similarity in either of these
binding regions with the binding region of ICAM-2 defined here. Another
adhesion molecule, recently shown to bind to -actinin, is
L-selectin. It mediates leukocyte rolling and adhesion to endothelium,
and its ligand binding ability depends on its linkage to cytoskeleton.
When 11 COOH-terminal cytoplasmic amino acids are deleted from
L-selectin, it fails to coprecipitate with -actinin (11). The
deleted sequence is KKSKRSMNDPY, which contains charged and hydrophobic
amino acids. The presence of cationic residues seems to be the only
common factor in the -actinin binding sites of cell surface
proteins.
The ionic strength or the absence of Mg2+ or
Ca2+ ions do not have a major effect on ICAM-2/ -actinin
binding. On the other hand, denaturation of -actinin blocks binding
totally. This indicates the importance of a native conformation of
-actinin for binding. It might be possible that denaturation affects
the dimerization of -actinin. The results with GST fusion protein
constructs suggest also that multiple regions of the -actinin
molecule are involved in binding to ICAM-2, and dimerization of
-actinin could be one reason for this phenomenon. In comparison, the
binding of -actinin to 1-integrin is mediated by the
spectrin-like repeats (12), but identification of any particular
binding site in the -actinin molecule has been unsuccessful. Rather,
all of the GST fusion proteins expressing separate repeats mediated
binding. In microinjection of REF-52 cells with GST/ -actinin fusion
proteins, only the one with all the repeats in tandem was adequately
localized to focal contacts (36). These results also suggest that the
dimerization of the -actinin molecule could be meaningful for its
interactions with adhesion receptors.
There are four other ICAM-like molecules presently known, ICAM-1,
ICAM-3, LW blood group glycoprotein, and telencephalin (28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33). All
ICAMs are relatively different in their cytoplasmic domains and show
variable expression patterns. Recent reports suggest that ICAM-3
regulates the ICAM-1/LFA-1 pathway of intercellular adhesion (34, 35).
In these studies a certain activating antibody promoted ICAM-3
redistribution to an uropod-like structure. This change of morphology
was accompanied with linear arrays of myosin within the uropod, while
actin-based cytoskeleton and -actinin showed much wider
distribution. This result would indicate that at least under these
circumstances ICAM-3 is not interacting with -actinin, although it
does not rule out the possibility this linkage could exist in some
adhesive event.
Many adhesion molecules seem to interact with cytoskeletal components,
and this connection is evidently essential during cellular migration,
adhesion, and during different stages of extravasation. For instance,
the membrane-spanning and immobilized form of LFA-3 can support
CD2-mediated motility better than the GPI-anchored form of LFA-3, which
is laterally diffusible in the lipid bilayer (37). Similarly, for
migratory leukocytes, endothelial ICAM-1 and ICAM-2, immobilized
through a linkage of adhesion receptors to cytoskeleton would give a
better foothold for movement, as the actin network can maintain and
resist tension during migration. For P-selectin, high tensile strength
has been shown to be important for rolling (38). It is apparent that
also other adhesion molecules operating in the circulation are
subjected to high tensile forces. Anchoring of the receptor and ligand
to the cytoskeleton could allow them to resist tensile stress.
The regulation of the cytoskeleton/adhesion receptor interactions is
still poorly understood at the molecular level. All the characterized
transmembrane binding partners for -actinin are adhesion molecules,
which suggests a key role for -actinin in the adhesive events. Its
multiple associations to other cytoskeletal proteins and connections to
the phospholipid signal pathways are probably important in this
context. The interaction of -actinin with ICAM-2 described in this
study should give some insight on how cells regulate their complicated
adhesive functions.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by the Academy of Finland, the
Finnish Cancer Society, and the Ida Montin Foundation. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology,
University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 21 (Haartmanink.3), FIN-00014
Helsinki, Finland. Tel.: 358-9-4346228; Fax: 358-9-4346675; E-mail:
lheiska{at}cc.helsinki.fi.
1
The abbreviations used are: ICAM, intercellular
adhesion molecule; Ig, immunoglobulin; LFA, lymphocyte
function-associated antigen; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PAGE,
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; GST, glutathione
S-transferase.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. F. M. Pavalko for antisera
against -actinin, Dr. K. Burridge for antiserum against talin, Dr.
I. Virtanen for mAbs against spectrin and vinculin, Dr. A. P. Gilmore
for providing some of the GST- -actinin constructs, and Tuula
Halmesvaara and Marja-Liisa Mäntylä for skillful technical
assistance.
REFERENCES
-
Luna, E. J.,
Hitt, A. L.
(1992)
Science
258,
955-964
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hitt, A. L.,
Luna, E. J.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6,
120-130
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
de Fougerolles, A. R.,
Stacker, S. A.,
Schwarting, R.,
Springer, T. A.
(1991)
J. Exp. Med.
174,
253-267
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nortamo, P.,
Li, R.,
Renkonen, R.,
Timonen, T.,
Prieto, J.,
Patarroyo, M.,
Gahmberg, C. G.
(1991)
Eur. J. Immunol.
21,
2629-2632
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nortamo, P.,
Salcedo, R.,
Timonen, T.,
Patarroyo, M.,
Gahmberg, C. G.
(1991)
J. Immunol.
146,
2530-2535
[Abstract]
-
Diacovo, T. G.,
deFougerolles, A. R.,
Bainton, D. F.,
Springer, T. A.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
94(3),
1243-1251
-
Renkonen, R.,
Paavonen, T.,
Nortamo, P.,
Gahmberg, C. G.
(1992)
Am. J. Pathol.
140,
763-767
[Abstract]
-
Staunton, D. E.,
Dustin, M. L.,
Springer, T. A.
(1989)
Nature
339,
61-64
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Springer, T. A.
(1994)
Cell
76,
301-314
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Carpén, O.,
Pallai, P.,
Staunton, D. E.,
Springer, T. A.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
118,
1223-1234
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pavalko, F. M.,
Walker, D. M.,
Graham, L.,
Goheen, M.,
Doerschuk, C. M.,
Kansas, G. S.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
1155-1164
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Otey, C. A.,
Pavalko, F. M.,
Burridge, K.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
721-729
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Otey, C. A.,
Vasquez, G. B.,
Burridge, K.,
Erickson, B. W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
21193-21197
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pavalko, F. M.,
LaRoche, S. M.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
3795-3807
[Abstract]
-
Gilmore, A. P.,
Wood, C.,
Ohanian, V.,
Jackson, P.,
Patel, B.,
Rees, D. J. G.,
Hynes, R. O.,
Critchley, D. R.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
337-347
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Otto, J. J.
(1983)
J. Cell Biol.
97,
1283-1287
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wachsstock, D. H.,
Wilkins, J. A.,
Lin, S.
(1987)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
146,
554-560
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Belkin, A. M.,
Koteliansky, V. E.
(1987)
FEBS Lett.
220,
291-294
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Crawford, A. W.,
Michelsen, J. W.,
Beckerle, M. C.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
1381-1393
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fukami, K.,
Furuhashi, K.,
Inagaki, M.,
Endo, T.,
Hatano, S.,
Takenawa, T.
(1992)
Nature
359,
150-152
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fukami, K.,
Endo, T.,
Imamura, M.,
Takenawa, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1518-1522
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shibasaki, F.,
Fukami, K.,
Fukui, Y.,
Takenawa, T.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
302,
551-557
-
Edgell, C.-J. S.,
McDonald, C. C.,
Graham, J. B.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
3734-3737
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Carpén, O.,
Virtanen, I.,
Lehto, V.-P.,
Saksela, E.
(1983)
J. Immunol.
131,
2695-2698
[Abstract]
-
Gilmore, A. P.,
Parr, T.,
Patel, B.,
Gratzer, W. B.,
Critchley, D. R.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
225,
235-242
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Feramisco, J. R.,
Burridge, K.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
1194-1199
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (eds) (1991) Current Protocols
in Molecular Biology, pp. 16.7.1.-16.7.8, John Wiley & Sons, New
York
-
Marlin, S. D.,
Springer, T. A.
(1987)
Cell
51,
813-819
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
de-Fougerolles, A. R.,
Klickstein, L. B.,
Springer, T. A.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
177,
1187-1192
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fawcett, J.,
Holness, C. L.,
Needham, L. A.,
Turley, H.,
Gatter, K. C.,
Mason, D. Y.,
Simmons, D. L.
(1992)
Nature
360,
481-484
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Vazeux, R.,
Hoffman, P. A.,
Tomita, J. K.,
Dickinson, E. S.,
Jasman, R. L.,
St. John, T.,
Gallatin, W. M.
(1992)
Nature
360,
485-488
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bailly, P.,
Hermand, P.,
Callebaut, I.,
Sonneborn, H. H.,
Khamlichi, S.,
Mornon, J.-P.,
Cartron, J.-P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
5306-5310
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yoshihara, Y.,
Oka, S.,
Nemoto, Y.,
Watanabe, Y.,
Nagata, S.,
Kagamiyama, H.,
Mori, K.
(1994)
Neuron
12,
541-553
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Campanero, M. R.,
del Pozo, M. A.,
Arroyo, A. G.,
Sánchez-Mateos, P.,
Hernández-Caselles, T.,
Craig, A.,
Pulido, R.,
Sánchez-Madrid, M.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1007-1016
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Campanero, M. R.,
Sánchez-Mateos, P.,
del Pozo, M. A.,
Sánchez-Madrid, F.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
867-878
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
45aGilmore, A. P., Otey, C. A., Critchley, D. R., and Burridge, K. (1994)
Mol. Biol. Cell 5, (suppl.) 45a
-
Carpén, O.,
Dustin, M. L.,
Springer, T. A.,
Swafford, J. A.,
Smith, L. A.,
Caulfield, J. P.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
861-871
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Alon, R.,
Hammer, D. A.,
Springer, T. A.
(1995)
Nature
374,
539-542
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. An, E. Gauthier, X. Zhang, X. Guo, D. J. Anstee, N. Mohandas, and J. A. Chasis
Adhesive activity of Lu glycoproteins is regulated by interaction with spectrin
Blood,
December 15, 2008;
112(13):
5212 - 5218.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. van Buul, E. Kanters, and P. L. Hordijk
Endothelial Signaling by Ig-Like Cell Adhesion Molecules
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
September 1, 2007;
27(9):
1870 - 1876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Nyman-Huttunen, L. Tian, L. Ning, and C. G. Gahmberg
{alpha}-Actinin-dependent cytoskeletal anchorage is important for ICAM-5-mediated neuritic outgrowth
J. Cell Sci.,
August 1, 2006;
119(15):
3057 - 3066.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Mueller, R. Jung, S. Weiler, and S. M. Lang
Vpx proteins of SIVmac239 and HIV-2ROD interact with the cytoskeletal protein {alpha}-actinin 1
J. Gen. Virol.,
November 1, 2004;
85(11):
3291 - 3303.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Beausejour and M. J. Tremblay
Interaction between the Cytoplasmic Domain of ICAM-1 and Pr55Gag Leads to Acquisition of Host ICAM-1 by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1
J. Virol.,
November 1, 2004;
78(21):
11916 - 11925.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. P. Goode, M. Shires, T. N. Khan, and A. F. Mooney
Expression of {alpha}-actinin-4 in acquired human nephrotic syndrome: a quantitative immunoelectron microscopy study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
April 1, 2004;
19(4):
844 - 851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Tian, H. Nyman, P. Kilgannon, Y. Yoshihara, K. Mori, L. C. Andersson, S. Kaukinen, H. Rauvala, W. M. Gallatin, and C. G. Gahmberg
Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-5 Induces Dendritic Outgrowth by Homophilic Adhesion
J. Cell Biol.,
July 11, 2000;
150(1):
243 - 252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Taylor, D. W. Taylor, and F. Schachat
Isoforms of {alpha}-Actinin from Cardiac, Smooth, and Skeletal Muscle Form Polar Arrays of Actin Filaments
J. Cell Biol.,
May 1, 2000;
149(3):
635 - 646.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-F. Galliano, C. Huet, J. Frygelius, A. Polgren, U. M. Wewer, and E. Engvall
Binding of ADAM12, a Marker of Skeletal Muscle Regeneration, to the Muscle-specific Actin-binding Protein, alpha -Actinin-2, Is Required for Myoblast Fusion
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 28, 2000;
275(18):
13933 - 13939.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Wojciak-Stothard, L. Williams, and A. J. Ridley
Monocyte Adhesion and Spreading on Human Endothelial Cells Is Dependent on Rho-regulated Receptor Clustering
J. Cell Biol.,
June 14, 1999;
145(6):
1293 - 1307.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Reinhard, J. Zumbrunn, D. Jaquemar, M. Kuhn, U. Walter, and B. Trueb
An alpha -Actinin Binding Site of Zyxin Is Essential for Subcellular Zyxin Localization and alpha -Actinin Recruitment
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 7, 1999;
274(19):
13410 - 13418.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Evans, D. M. Schleider, L. A. Bowman, M. L. Francis, G. S. Kansas, and J. D. Black
Dynamic Association of L-Selectin with the Lymphocyte Cytoskeletal Matrix
J. Immunol.,
March 15, 1999;
162(6):
3615 - 3624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Heiska, K. Alfthan, M. Gronholm, P. Vilja, A. Vaheri, and O. Carpen
Association of Ezrin with Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 and -2 (ICAM-1 and ICAM-2). REGULATION BY PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 4,5-BISPHOSPHATE
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 21, 1998;
273(34):
21893 - 21900.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Izaguirre, L. Aguirre, Y.-P. Hu, H. Y. Lee, D. D. Schlaepfer, B. J. Aneskievich, and B. Haimovich
The Cytoskeletal/Non-muscle Isoform of alpha -Actinin Is Phosphorylated on Its Actin-binding Domain by the Focal Adhesion Kinase
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 27, 2001;
276(31):
28676 - 28685.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|