Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kita, N.
Right arrow Articles by Keen, N. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kita, N.
Right arrow Articles by Keen, N. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 43, Issue of October 25, 1996 pp. 26529-26535
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Differential Effect of Site-directed Mutations in pelC on Pectate Lyase Activity, Plant Tissue Maceration, and Elicitor Activity*

(Received for publication, May 17, 1996, and in revised form, July 31, 1996)

Nobuhiro Kita Dagger §, Carol M. Boyd Dagger , Michael R. Garrett par , Frances Jurnak and Noel T. Keen Dagger ''

From the Departments of Dagger  Plant Pathology and  Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgements
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Oligonucleotide site-directed mutations were introduced into the pelC gene of Erwinia chrysanthemi EC16 that directed single or double amino acid changes affecting disulfide linkages, calcium binding, catalysis, and protein folding. Subsequent characterization of the purified PelC mutant proteins demonstrated that pectinolytic function involves amino acids located near the calcium binding site rather than those surrounding an invariant vWiDH sequence. Wild-type PelC and the tested mutant proteins generally macerated plant tissue in proportion to their specific pectinolytic activity in vitro. However, some mutants gave higher maceration activity in plant tissue and elicited greater production of the phytoalexin, glyceollin, in soybean cotyledons than predicted by their in vitro pectinolytic activity. Most notable in this regard were three different mutations at lysine 172 with greatly reduced pectinolytic activity but as much elicitor activity as the wild-type protein. PelE macerated plant tissue 10 times more efficiently than PelC, as observed previously, but surprisingly showed equal activity in the elicitor assay. The results indicate that factors other than pectinolytic activity per se are involved in plant tissue maceration and elicitor activity.


INTRODUCTION

Pectate lyases (Pels)1 are major virulence factors of plant pathogenic Erwinia sp., the causal agents of soft-rotting diseases on a broad range of plants (1). These bacteria produce an array of Pel isozymes that depolymerize cell wall polygalacturonides in the presence of Ca2+ ions and accordingly destroy the integrity of plant tissues, a process classically called ``maceration'' (2, 3). In addition, pectate lyases have been shown to activate defense systems in plants, presumably by releasing oligogalacturonides from the plant cell wall that function as defense elicitors (4). Pectate lyase proteins are secreted extracellularly by Erwinia sp. via the general secretory pathway (5), involving elements of the Sec system as well as specialized extracellular secretion proteins encoded by out genes (6). Although secretion to the periplasm is determined by stereotypic leader peptides, unknown structural features of the Pels predicate their entrance into the Erwinia Out secretion system. Because Escherichia coli cells lack the Out system, Pel proteins are not appreciably secreted extracellularly and instead accumulate in the periplasmic space.

Many of the genes encoding Pels have been cloned and characterized (2, 7). The overexpression of various pel genes in E. coli has also afforded large amounts of Pel proteins that can be easily purified from the periplasmic space. Recently, the three-dimensional structures of PelC (8, 9) and PelE (10) from Erwinia chrysanthemi EC16 were determined. These proteins have an unusual structure, the ``parallel beta  helix,'' which is generated by coiling a beta  strand into a large, right-handed helix with an unusual stacking of asparagines on consecutive turns of the parallel beta  helix core (11). Although PelC and PelE share only 22% amino acid identity, their core structures are very similar, with differences only in the size and conformation of the four loop regions that protrude from and cover the parallel beta  helix core (10, 12). The parallel beta  helix structure has also been found in a pectate lyase from Bacillus subtilis (13), the Salmonella typhimurium phage P22 tailspike protein (14), E. coli UDP-N-acetylglucosamine acyltransferase (15), and Bordetella pertussis P.69 pertactin (16). A topologically related structure, termed a beta -roll, has been observed in an alkaline protease from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17). Like Pels, several of these proteins are involved in pathogenesis and appear to function at cell surfaces.

Extracellularly secreted pectate lyases share regions of sequence similarity with fungal pectin lyases (18, 19, 20) and certain plant pollen- and style-specific proteins (21, 22, 23, 24). Structure-based multiple alignment of these Pel-related proteins revealed the presence of potentially catalytic, invariant amino acid residues, not only around the Ca2+ binding site but also in the midregion of the core structure of the parallel beta  helix, designated as the vWiDH region (25, 26) (see Fig. 1). These observations suggested that all of the Pel-related proteins might have pectinolytic activity. This prediction was recently supported when a pollen-specific Pel-homologue from Japanese cedar was shown to exhibit in vitro pectinolytic activity (27).


Fig. 1. Location of PelC amino acids mutated by oligonucleotide site-directed mutagenesis of the cloned pelC gene. The mutated amino acids are numbered and superimposed upon the alpha C tracing of the polypeptide backbone of the E. chrysanthemi PelC structure. The dot labeled Ca denotes the location of the Ca2+ binding site.
[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]


We have initiated a project to understand amino acids important in pectinolytic activity, maceration of plant tissue, elicitor activity, and extracellular secretion, as well as for folding and stability of the parallel beta  helix. In this paper we report the construction of several oligonucleotide site-directed PelC mutant proteins and their characterization.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacteria and Plasmids

Strains of E. coli employed and the plasmids utilized and constructed are summarized in Table I. E. coli HMS174(DE3) (28) was used with the expression vector pRSET5A, containing a T7 promoter upstream of a multiple cloning site (29). pRSET405Delta Pst, which contains the entire pelC gene downstream of a T7 promoter, was constructed by inserting a ~1.4-kilobase pair XbaI-HindIII fragment from pPEL405 (30) into the same sites of pRSET5A and deleting the polylinker PstI site (Table I). For expression, the mutant and wild-type T7 plasmids were generally transformed into E. coli HMS174(DE3) (Table I). E. coli HB101 was also used for the expression of several pelC mutants cloned in the expression vector pINK1 (31). The same strain was also used for expression of the pelE gene (pPEL748, Table I).

Table I.

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotide primers used


Designation Relevant characteristicsa Source of reference

Escherichia coli
 DH5alpha F-lacZ M15 endA hsdR17 supE44 thi-1 gyrA relA1 Bethesda Research Laboratories
 HB101 F-hsdS20(hsdR hsdM) recA13 ara-14 proA2 lac1 galK2 rpsL20(Strr) xyl-5 mtl-1 supE44lambda - (32)
 HMS174(DE3) F-recA r-K12m+K12m+K12Rifr (T7 lysogen)b (28)
Plasmids
 pUC119 Cloning vector, Apr (42)
 pRSET5A Expression vector carrying the T7 promoter, Apr (29)
 pINK1 Expression vector, Apr (31)
 pPEL405 Clone carrying the pelC gene in pUC119 (30)
 pRSET405Delta Pst 1.4-kb XbaI-HindIII fragment from pPEL405 inserted into pRSET5A. A PstI site in the fragment was removed by partial PstI digestion, S1 digestion and religation This study
 pPEL410 pelC expression construct (30)
 pPEL748 pelE expression construct (30)
Oligonucleotide primers mismatched primersc
 L-10E 5'-GAGCGCCAG<UNL>T<B>TC</B></UNL>CAGTCCAG-3' (antisense) This study
 Y7D 5'-GTAGCGGC<UNL>GT<B>C</B></UNL>GCCACCGGTA-3' (antisense) This study
 D28R 5'-GATATTGACGAT<UNL>A<B>CG</B></UNL>CTGCATCG-3' (antisense) This study
 C72S 5'-CACTGGCC<UNL>G<B>G</B>A</UNL>GATATTGGCG-3' (antisense) This study
 M118N 5'-CGATACG<UNL><B>AT</B>T</UNL>GTTCTGTACCACC-3' (antisense) This study
 I120F 5'-CAGGTAGCC<UNL>GA<B>A</B></UNL>ACGCATGTTC-3' (antisense) This study
 D129N 5'-GTCGCC<UNL>AT<B>T</B></UNL>TTTAGCGCCG-3' (antisense) This study
 D131E 5'-GCGGATCAT<UNL><B>T</B>TC</UNL>GCCATCTT-3' (antisense) This study
 D131N 5'-CTAAAGATGGC<UNL><B>A</B>AC</UNL>ATGATCC-3' (sense) This study
 W142H 5'-CGTTATGGTCAAC<UNL><B>ATG</B></UNL>GACATTCGGCG-3' (antisense) This study
 D144N 5'-CAATTCGTTATG<UNL>GT<B>T</B></UNL>AACCCAGAC-3' (antisense) This study
 H145Q 5'-CAATTCGTT<UNL><B>T</B>TG</UNL>GTCAACCCAG-3' (antisense) This study
 C155S 5'-GTGCCGTC<UNL>G<B>G</B>A</UNL>CTCATGGTTG-3' (antisense) This study
 E166D 5'-ACGGCGGA<UNL><B>A</B>TC</UNL>AAAGGTGGTG-3' (antisense) This study
 E166Q 5'-ACGGCGGA<UNL>TT<B>G</B></UNL>AAAGGTGGTG-3' (antisense) This study
 D170N 5'-CCTTGAT<UNL>AT<B>T</B></UNL>AACGGCGG-3' (antisense) This study
 K172H 5'-GTTGATATA<UNL><B>C</B>A<B>T</B></UNL>GGCGCGTCGAAC-3' (sense) This study
 K172L 5'-GTTGATATA<UNL><B>CTG</B></UNL>GGCGCGTCGAAC-3' (sense) This study
 K172R 5'-GACGCGCC<UNL><B>ACG</B></UNL>GATATCAACG-3' (antisense) This study
 K190A 5'-CAGACCCAC<UNL>T<B>GC</B></UNL>TTTCACACCGTG-3' (antisense) This study
 T206A 5'-GTTATGGTGATA<UNL>GG<B>C</B></UNL>AATATTGC-3' (antisense) This study
 N210S 5'-CGTTGTAGTA<UNL>G<B>C</B>T</UNL>ATGGTG-3' (antisense) This study
 R218A 5'-CAACGGCAG<UNL>A<B>GC</B></UNL>GGCGTTAACG-3' (antisense) This study
 R218E 5'-CAACGGCAG<UNL><B>TT</B>C</UNL>GGCGTTAACG-3' (antisense) This study
 R218K 5'-CAACGGCAG<UNL><B>TTT</B></UNL>GGCGTTAACGTC-3' (antisense) This study
 R218L 5'-CGGCAG<UNL>A<B>A</B>G</UNL>GGCGTTAACG-3' (antisense) This study
 R223A 5'-CTGCCGTTGCAA<UNL><B>GC</B>T</UNL>GGTGGT-3' (sense) This study
 H228Q 5'-GTTGTAAGC<UNL><B>T</B>TG</UNL>AACCAGACC-3' (antisense) This study
 G280N 5'-GATGTTGTT<UNL>G<B>TT</B></UNL>TTTCAGCAC-3' (antisense) This study
 C329S 5'-TGTCCTTCAC<UNL>GC<B>T</B></UNL>TTGTGC-3' (antisense) This study
 K342E 5'-GTGGCCAGATT<UNL>TT<B>C</B></UNL>ACCCAC-3' (antisense) This study
 C352S 5'-GAGATTATTT<UNL>AC<B>T</B></UNL>GGCTGTGC-3' (antisense) This study
Matched primers
 F(M13/pUC) 5'-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3' (sense) This study
 F200 5'-CTGGCTATGAAATCACTC-3' (sense) This study
 F400 5'-CACGTCTGGATGCCAACG-3' (sense) This study
 F600 5'-CAACTTCGGCATCTGGAT-3' (sense) This study
 F800 5'-GTCGAACACCGTCACCGT-3' (sense) This study
 F1000 5'-CACCAACATCACCGGTTC-3' (sense) This study
 F1200 5'-GACACCAAGCCTTATGTG-3' (sense) This study
 R(M13/pUC) 5'-AACAGCTATGACCATG-3' (antisense) This study

a  Str, streptomycin; Rif, rifampicin; Ap, ampicillin; r, resistance.
b  Lysogen carrying the lacI gene, the lacUV5 promoter, the beginning of the lacZ gene, and the gene for T7 RNA polymerase.
c  Bases underlined correspond to substituted amino acid codons, and bold letters represent mismatched bases with the wild-type pelC gene.

Recombinant DNA Techniques and Site-directed Oligonucleotide Mutagenesis

DNA manipulations were generally done according to the methods of Maniatis et al. (32). Site-directed oligonucleotide mutagenesis of the pelC gene was performed by PCR using essentially an overlapping extension method (33, 34). The synthesized primers for generating pelC mutants were reverse or forward and contained 18-24 nucleotides with 1-3 mismatched base pairs, depending on the desired amino acid change (Table I). Six primers were also designed to give overlapping fragments for the second round of PCR, and also for sequencing ~200-base pair intervals of the final clones. All mutagenesis primers were obtained from Cruachem Inc., Sterling, VA and were used in combination with M13 forward or reverse sequencing primers. pPEL405 was used as the template DNA in the first round of PCR, and VentTM DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) was employed because of its high fidelity. In first round PCR, 30 cycles of amplification were carried out: 30 s at 94 °C for denaturation, 30 s at 55 °C for annealing, and 60 s at 72 °C for extension in each cycle. The resulting fragments were diluted and mixed to make full-length fragments and reamplified, but at 50 °C for annealing. These second round fragments were then treated with proteinase K followed by phenol-chloroform extraction (35), digested with XbaI and HindIII, and then cloned into pRSET5A. E. coli DH5alpha transformants were screened for the proper mutation by extraction of plasmid DNA and sequencing. Following selection of desired pelC mutants, the genes were sequenced in entirety to confirm fidelity.

Cell Culture and Isolation of PelC Mutant Proteins

E. coli strain HMS174(DE3) cells harboring pRSET5A constructs were grown to stationary phase at 28 °C with shaking in 15 ml of Luria broth (LB) supplemented with 50 µg ml-1 ampicillin. These cells were then added to 250 ml of the same medium and, when the culture had attained an A600 of 0.6-0.8 (after approximately 4 h at 28 °C), isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to 0.6 mM. The cells were incubated for an additional 4 h at 28 °C with shaking and then recovered by centrifugation at 8,000 × g.

In the case of strain HB101 carrying pelC wild-type (pPEL410, Table I) or mutant constructs in pINK1, cells were grown for ~48 h at 22 °C in LB medium supplemented with 1 mM IPTG at culture initiation. For production of PelE, HB101 cells carrying pPEL748 were grown for ~20 h at 28 °C on LB medium supplemented with ampicillin but no IPTG. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8,000 × g. For both the HB101 and HMS174(DE3) expression systems, periplasmic fractions containing PelE, PelC, or mutant PelC proteins were prepared according to the method of Witholt et al. (36). The cells from a 250-ml culture were suspended in 25 ml of 0.2 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and the cells suspended in 4 ml of 0.2 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Five ml of 1 M sucrose in the Tris-HCl buffer and 100 µl of 50 mM EDTA were added, mixed well, and allowed to stand for 5 min. Then 100 µl of freshly prepared lysozyme solution (6 mg/ml) was added, followed by 10 ml of distilled water and thorough mixing. The mixture was allowed to stand for 20 min at 22 °C. The resulting spheroplasts were pelleted by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 15 min, and the supernatant periplasmic fraction was retained.

PelE, PelC, and PelC mutant proteins were purified using cation exchange chromatography, essentially as described previously (31). Periplasmic fractions were dialyzed against 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, for 36-48 h at 4 °C (tubing was from Spectrum Medical Industries, Los Angeles, CA, Mr 6000-8000 cut-off). The dialyzed preparations were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min.

The clear supernatants were adjusted to pH 8.0 if necessary and applied to a 1.4 × 15-cm column of CM Bio-Gel (Bio-Rad) in 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, at room temperature. After application of samples and washing with the starting Tris-HCl buffer, Pel proteins were eluted batchwise with the same buffer containing 0.25 M sodium chloride. Fractions of 2.8 ml were collected and analyzed for absorbance at 280 nm and pectinolytic activity. Peak pectate lyase fractions were pooled, dialyzed against 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, for 24 h, concentrated using a Centricon 10 device (Amicon Inc., Beverly, MA), and stored at -20 °C. In some experiments, the proteins were dialyzed against distilled water. Little loss of activity was observed through all treatments.

SDS-Gel Electrophoresis and Western Blotting

Production of wild-type and mutant proteins by bacterial cells and the purity of proteins were determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (37) (12% gels, 0.75 mm thick) followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250 staining and Western blot analysis (34). Following electrophoretic transfer to nitrocellulose membranes, pre-PelC, mature PelC, and mutant proteins were detected using a rabbit polyclonal PelC antiserum at 1:5000 dilution.

Pectinolytic Activity Assay

The activity of PelE and various PelC proteins was determined by monitoring the absorbance increase at 232 nm of a 1-ml reaction mixture containing sodium polypectate at 22 °C. To start the reaction, 5 µl of appropriately diluted protein were mixed with 870 µl of 50 mM Bis-Tris-propane (BTP), pH 9.5, containing the optimal CaCl2 concentration (0.5 mM for wild-type PelC) and 125 µl of 1% sodium polypectate. For preparation of stock solutions of 1% sodium polypectate, polygalacturonic acid (85-90% purity, Sigma) was dissolved in deionized water, boiled for 5 min, and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min to remove sedimenting materials. 50 mM BTP, pH 9.5, containing the optimal CaCl2 concentration was prepared just prior to assays. The assay for wild-type PelE was identical to that for PelC, with the exception that the pH was 9.0. One unit of pectate lyase activity was defined as described previously (7) (1 µmol of unsaturated product formed/min, which equaled 1.73 absorbance units min-1), and the specific activity was expressed as units mg-1 protein. For each protein, the specific activity reported was optimized at optimal pH and CaCl2 concentration values. Protein concentration was determined by the method of Bradford (38).

Plant Tissue Maceration Assay

Plant tissue maceration assays were done using mesocarp tissue of cucumber fruit, essentially according to the method of Mussell and Morre (39). Cylinders were cut from the mesocarp tissue with a cork borer (0.5 mm diameter), sliced into 5-mm lengths, and immediately immersed in distilled water. After standing for ~1 h, five cucumber cylinders were gently blotted onto filter paper to remove excess water, weighed to the nearest milligram, and placed into 5 ml of 50 mM BTP, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM CaCl2 containing 0-10 µg ml-1 of PelC or mutant proteins. Concentrations of the mutant proteins were adjusted depending on their specific activity. After incubation for 1 h at 37 °C with shaking at 80 rpm, the cylinders were vortexed at maximum speed for 20 s and then poured onto a concave wire mesh filter (~0.8 mm mesh size) to remove loosened cells. The resultant cylinders were then blotted gently with filter paper and weighed to the nearest mg. Maceration was expressed as the weight loss of each sample during incubation and was calculated per 500 mg of starting tissue. Three replications were used for the wild-type and mutant proteins, and the data reported were normalized to the activity of wild-type PelC protein.

Elicitor Assay

Activity of PelC and mutant proteins to elicit glyceollin production in soybean cotyledons was determined by slight modification of previous methods (40, 41). Eight cotyledons were freshly harvested from 8-10-day-old cv. Harosoy 63 plants when the primary leaves had just begun to expand. Each cotyledon was wounded on the undersurface, and 200 µl of protein solution in water containing 300 µg ml-1 streptomycin and 10 µg ml-1 rifampicin were placed onto the cut surface. After 24 h of incubation at room temperature under fluorescent lights, 50 µl of fluid were recovered from the cut surfaces of each of five representative cotyledons and the pooled samples were added to 20 ml of distilled water. The absorbance of this solution at 285 nm was determined and is proportional to the concentration of glyceollin (40). At least three replications were carried out for each enzyme per experiment.


RESULTS

PelC Mutants Constructed by Site-directed Mutagenesis

Screening of the PelC PCR mutant constructs by DNA sequencing at the mutation sites showed that the desired mutations were obtained from approximately 50% of the constructs analyzed, as theoretically expected. Undesired mutations occurred randomly with a probability of ~1/4000 bases, and such genes were generally discarded. Following confirmation of complete sequences, genes encoding mutant PelC proteins were cloned into pRSET5A or pINK1 (Table I) and transformed into E. coli HMS174(DE3) or HB101, respectively, for expression. Fig. 1 shows the location of mutated amino acids on the PelC structure that were used in this study.

Overexpression of pelC Mutants

pelC and the various mutated genes in pRSET5A generally directed the production of large amounts of protein in E. coli cells, much of which was secreted into the periplasmic space (Fig. 2). Most of the PelC mutant proteins were purified satisfactorily using CM Bio-Gel chromatography with elution by 0.25 M NaCl in 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. However, two mutants, R218A and R218L, did not bind well to the column at pH 8.0, presumably as a consequence of their lower pI values. Dialyzed periplasmic fractions containing these mutant proteins were therefore subjected to repeated CM Bio-Gel purification with 10 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.0 and elution with 0.25 M NaCl in the same buffer. Approximately 3 mg of purified protein were obtained from a 250-ml bacterial culture (~0.5 g wet weight cells). As expected, differences in molecular weight among the various mutant proteins were not detected by SDS-gel electrophoresis. In the T7, but not the pINK1 expression system, approximately half of the translated products were not cleaved and remained in the membrane fraction of spheroplasts in the form of unprocessed preproteins, detected as higher weight bands on SDS gels (data not shown). They were assumed to be an artifact of the high level T7 expression system, because they were not normally observed using the pINK1 system.


Fig. 2. SDS-gel electrophoresis of whole cells and periplasmic fractions of E. coli HMS174(DE3) cells containing various plasmids. Cultures (15 ml) were grown for 4 h at 28 °C, and then IPTG was added to a final concentration of 0.6 mM when the cultures were at A600 = 0.6. After an additional 4 h of incubation at 28 °C, the cells were harvested and suspended in 1 ml of distilled water, and 100 µl of the cell suspension was mixed with 100 µl of 2 × Laemmli sample buffer as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' After boiling for 5 min, 5 µl were applied to each lane. Lane 1, pRSET405Delta Pst (whole cells); lane 2, pRSET5A vector only (whole cells); lane 3, purified PelC; lane 4, periplasmic fraction from cells with pRSET405Delta Pst; lane 5, periplasmic fraction from cells with pRSET5A only. Sizes of standard proteins are shown at the left in kilodaltons, and PelC is denoted by arrow at the right.
[View Larger Version of this Image (98K GIF file)]


Unlike wild-type PelC and most mutants, several PelC mutant proteins (L-10E, Y7D, D28R, C72S, M118N, D144N, H145Q, N210S, H228Q, and C329S) were produced at high level in the T7 system, but appeared to remain associated with the membrane fraction as preproteins or mature proteins, based on their sizes on SDS-gel electrophoresis with detection by Coomassie Blue staining or Western blotting (data not shown). No pectinolytic activity in the standard spectrophotometric assay could be detected for these mutants and the preproteins and mature proteins were both readily digested by trypsin (data not shown). With D28R, C72S, and D144N, small amounts of protein were present in the periplasmic fraction as detected by Western blotting, but were insufficient for isolation and purification. The remaining mutants gave only traces of proteins in the periplasmic fraction as deduced by Western blotting. The double cysteine mutant, C329S/C352S, gave greatly reduced protein production, even using the T7 expression system.

When D28R, C72S, and D144N were recloned into pINK1 and expressed in E. coli HB101, the proteins were present in the periplasmic fraction, albeit at reduced levels relative to wild-type PelC, since only ~3 mg/liter culture were recovered by cation exchange chromatography. All three of these mutant proteins were contaminated with 10-30% of a ~57-kDa protein that did not react with PelC antiserum on Western blots (data not shown). In these cases, it was necessary to run successive CM Bio-gel columns until the 57-kDa protein was removed. Recloning of the mutant genes encoding L-10E, H145Q, H228Q, and C329S into pINK1 resulted in greatly reduced production by strain HB101 relative to wild-type PelC.

Characterization of Mutant Proteins

The specific pectate lyase activities of wild-type PelC and all isolable mutant proteins are shown in Table II, along with PelE as a control. All mutations located in the vWiDH and surrounding regions of PelC that yielded isolable proteins (D28R, W142H, D144N, T206A, and K342E) retained high pectinolytic specific activity. Two additional oligonucleotide mutants (I120F and G280N) and one spontaneous mutant (T275I) also showed specific activities 80% or more of the wild-type level (Table II). The double mutant, C72S/C155S, gave relatively low activity (14% of the wild type, Table II), but C72S gave even lower activity (~6% of the wild type). Several mutants (R218A, R218E, R218K, R218L, R223A, K190A, K172H, K172L, K172R, D129N, D131E, D131N, D170N, E166D, and E166Q) were constructed as a consequence of their proximity to the active site region deduced by x-ray diffraction studies (Fig. 1). With the exception of D129N, E166D, and K172R, these proteins showed greatly reduced specific activities. They will be discussed elsewhere.2

Table II.

Maximum specific activity, plant tissue maceration, and elicitor activity of wild-type PelC, PelC mutant proteins, and wild-type PelE


PelC mutant proteins Maximum specific activitya Plant tissue macerationb Elicitor activityc

Wild-type PelC 2900 420 0.978
 D28R 2200 330 0.511
 C72S 180 25 0.351
C72S/C155S 400 160 0.416
 I120F 2300 350 1.186
 D129N 1400 210 0.497
 D131E <2 <3 0.201
 D131N <3 <4 0.108
 W142H 2800 370 0.854
 D144N 1800 280 0.826
 E166D 2700 410 0.779
 E166Q <1 <3 0.136
 D170N <8 <7 0.194
 K172H 80 80 0.972
 K172L 120 60 0.988
 K172R 1300 290 0.896
 K190A <1 <3 0.089
 T206A 2400 340 0.744
 R218A <1 <2 0.291
 R218E <2 <7 0.322
 R218K <15 <8 0.112
 R218L <5 <5 0.129
 R223A <18 <20 0.391
 T275I 2300 350 0.797
 G280N 2600 390 0.733
 K342E 2100 300 0.518
Wild-type PelE 1700 4300 0.876

a  Maximum specific activities of PelC, PelC mutant enzymes, and PelE are expressed as units mg-1 of purified protein and determined spectrophotometrically at 22 °C at the optimal pH and CaCl2 concentration for each enzyme. The maximum specific activity of each protein was calculated from three replications with triplicates.
b  Plant tissue maceration activity is expressed as mg weight loss per 500 mg of cucumber mesocarp tissue by 1 µg ml-1 of PelC, PelC mutant proteins, or PelE per 1 h at 37 °C. Plant tissue maceration activity of each protein was calculated from three replications with triplicates. Weight loss of buffer control was subtracted.
c  Elicitor activity is expressed as the A285 nm of wound droplets taken from excised soybean cotyledons treated with 1 µg ml-1 of PelC, PelC mutant proteins or PelE in distilled water. Cotyledons were incubated at 22 °C under fluorescent lights for 24 h. Absorbance at 285 nm of the control (without enzymes) was 0.111 and was not subtracted from experimental values. Elicitor activity of each protein was calculated from three replications with triplicates.

Plant Tissue Maceration Activity

PelC and isolated mutant proteins were assayed for maceration activity (Table II), and this was compared with their in vitro pectinolytic specific activity (Fig. 3). These results showed that tissue maceration activity was closely correlated with pectinolytic specific activity, but three different K172 mutants and C72S/C155S showed higher maceration activity than expected, based on their pectinolytic specific activity (Fig. 3). Confirming previous results (30), PelE yielded ~10-fold greater maceration activity than PelC, based on in vitro activity (Table II).


Fig. 3. Correlation between the maximum specific activity and plant tissue maceration activity of PelC and several mutant proteins. Linear regression analysis applied to proteins except K172H, K172R, K172L and C72S/C155S gave a regression coefficient of 0.995 (n = 22, significant < 0.01). Means and standard deviations (shown as brackets) for maceration values were calculated from three replicates.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]


Elicitor Activity

Pectic enzymes behave as elicitors of plant defense reactions (3), presumably by generating oligouronides from the plant cell wall that are the actual elicitors. As shown in Fig. 4, wild-type PelC elicited accumulation of the soybean phytoalexin, glyceollin, at a minimal concentration of about 0.1 µg/ml. Two mutant proteins (D129N and D170N) showed lesser ability to elicit glyceollin (Fig. 4), consistent with their decreased specific pectinolytic activities (Table II). E166D, which showed similar pectinolytic activity to wild-type PelC (Table II), also elicited with similar efficiency (Fig. 4). However, when a larger collection of mutant proteins were compared, a relatively poor correlation of specific pectinolytic activity and elicitor activity was observed (Fig. 5; Table II). For instance, K172L, K172H, and K172R gave high elicitor activity relative to their in vitro pectinolytic activity. These same mutants also were more active than expected in the tissue maceration assay (Fig. 3). Several other mutants (R223A, D144N, and I120F) yielded higher elicitor activity than predicted from their specific pectinolytic activity. Only D28R gave elicitor activity significantly below that expected from its in vitro activity (Fig. 5). Surprisingly, PelE showed the same level of elicitor activity in the soybean assay as did PelC (Table II), despite the fact that PelE macerated cucumber mesocarp tissue ~10 times more efficiently. These results suggest that elicitor activity is not solely dependent on pectinolytic activity, as measured in vitro.


Fig. 4. Effect of the concentration of PelC and three mutant proteins on elicitor activity in soybean cotyledons. Elicitor activity was determined by following production of the phytoalexin, glyceollin, expressed as the absorbance at 285 nm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]



Fig. 5. Correlation between the maximum specific activity and elicitor activity of PelC and mutant proteins. Linear regression analysis applied to all mutants except K172H and K172L gave a correlation coefficient of 0.758 (n = 24, significant < 0.01). The mean values and standard deviations (shown as brackets) for elicitor activity were calculated from at least three replicates.
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

There is a considerable body of information on the organization, sequence and regulation of pel genes that, combined with the three-dimensional structures of three Pel proteins, has provided significant understanding of these important virulence factors in Erwinia sp. An analysis of the structure-based multiple sequence alignment for the entire Pel superfamily suggested that the active site resides in the Ca2+-binding region (Fig. 1) (25, 26). Supporting this idea, pectinolytic activity was virtually abolished in mutants D131E, D131N, E166Q, D170N, K190A, R218A, R218E, R218K, R218L, and R223A. All of these amino acids cluster around the Ca2+-binding site, with the first three coordinating directly to the cation. The next question was whether the loss of pectinolytic activity was due to loss of Ca2+ binding, impairment of a catalytic residue, a decrease in substrate affinity or an abnormality in protein folding. Because all of the mutants above readily form crystals isomorphous to wild-type PelC, an abnormality in protein folding is unlikely. The question of Ca2+ binding and catalytic impairment will be addressed in detail elsewhere,2 and the effects of various mutations on substrate binding are currently being studied. Interestingly, the data in Table II eliminate the possibility that the vWiDH region is involved in pectinolytic cleavage observed under in vitro conditions, because W142H and D144N as well as mutations T206A and K3442E in spatially adjacent amino acids exhibited enzymatic specific activities near the wild-type level. The question of function for the vWiDH region is illuminated by the fact that several mutations in this region led to proteins that remained associated with the bacterial membrane fraction and were poorly exported to the periplasm. While additional experiments are needed, these results raise the possibility that the vWiDH region is involved in secretion or protein folding in the periplasm.

In addition to pectinolytic function, the PelC mutants were also screened for their ability to macerate plant tissue under in vivo conditions and to elicit the formation of phytoalexins in soybean cotyledons. Generally, there was a good correlation between in vitro pectinolytic activity, which utilized PGA as the substrate, and maceration efficiency of the various PelC mutants (Fig. 3). However, four proteins (K172H, K172L, K172R, and C72S/C155S) showed significantly higher maceration activity relative to their pectinolytic activity. The relatively high maceration activity of these mutants is interesting, because it suggests that important features of PelC other than its ability to cleave PGA per se are involved in plant tissue maceration. In this regard, it should be noted that PelC itself is about 10-fold less efficient in maceration than PelE from Erwinia chrysanthemi (Table II; Ref. 30). It is therefore possible that the PelC K172 mutants have been modified to approach the maceration efficiency of PelE and that additional mutations could be made which would further increase the maceration activity of PelC.

The tendency for some PelC mutants to give greater maceration activity than predicted from their in vitro activity was more pronounced when the same proteins were assayed for their ability to elicit formation of the phytoalexin, glyceollin, in soybean cotyledons. Thus, K172L, K172H, and K172R gave elicitor activity that was not significantly different from wild-type PelC, despite their much lower in vitro pectinolytic activities (Table II, Fig. 5). One mutant, I120F, gave elicitor activity that was greater than wild-type PelC (Fig. 5), but its maceration activity was proportional to its in vitro pectinolytic activity (Fig. 3). Although some of the mutants exhibited elicitor activity that was less than wild-type PelC relative to their in vitro pectinolytic activity, only D28R was significantly lower. It is interesting that, despite its 10-fold greater maceration efficiency, PelE exhibited the same elicitor activity as PelC. These results all indicate that factors other than ability to cleave PGA are involved in the interactions of PelC and PelE with plant cells.

Another outcome of the research was the development of a more effective overexpression system for producing large quantities of Pel proteins. For all previous studies of E. chrysanthemi PelC and PelE, including determination of the three-dimensional structures, the pINK1 expression system was used (31). A more efficient T7 expression vector, pRSET5A, was employed for the production of PelC and most mutant proteins in this study. Expression directed by pRSET5A in E. coli HMS174(DE3) generally provided large amounts of Pel proteins in the periplasmic fraction for isolation and characterization. Approximately 6 mg of PelC or the mutant proteins could be purified from 1 g of fresh bacteria following 4 h of induction at 28 °C. However, a portion of the translated products appeared to remain associated with the membrane fraction as the preprotein when the T7 system was used. This may be a consequence of PelC synthesis levels exceeding the capacity of the general secretory pathway.

Certain amino acid changes in PelC resulted in reduced protein production and/or production of protein that was associated with the bacterial membrane fraction and not significantly exported into the periplasm. One such mutant was L-10E, in which a glutamate residue was inserted into the hydrophobic region of the PelC leader peptide sequence. Western blots confirmed that, as expected, the resulting preprotein accumulated in the E. coli membrane fraction with little or no cleavage to give the processed, mature protein. Several other PelC mutants (Y7D, D28R, C72S, M118N, D144N, H145Q, N210S, H228Q, and C329S) also were not produced as soluble periplasmic proteins in the T7 system, but remained associated with the bacterial inner membrane. In contrast to L-10E, Western blots established that a significant portion of these mutant PelC proteins ran on SDS gels at the size of the mature, processed PelC protein (data not shown). Thus, the signal peptide appeared to have been cleaved, but the mutant proteins failed to fold or release properly, and instead remained associated with the inner membrane. Some of these mutants were sensitive to trypsin digestion (e.g. M118N and H145Q; data not shown), suggesting that they were in an unfolded or semi-folded state. When these same mutant proteins were produced in the pINK1 expression system, only trace amounts of protein were detected by Western blots in either the membrane or periplasmic fractions. This may be interpreted as indicative of proteolysis of improperly folded protein products in the slower expressing pINK1 system. In contrast, expression of D28R, C72S, and D144N in the pINK1 system at 22 °C led to low but recoverable amounts of processed, periplasmic proteins from E. coli strain HB101. These periplasmic preparations exhibited the peculiarity of having significant contamination with a 57-kDa protein that was difficult to remove except by repeated cation exchange chromatography. Further experiments are under way to determine if the 57-kDa protein is specifically associated with the mutant PelC proteins.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant MCB9408999, and the International Exchange Program of the Kanagawa Prefectural Government of Japan. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   Current address: Kanagawa Institute of Agricultural Science, 1617 Kamikisawa, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa 259-12, Japan.
par    Current address: 244 Manville Ave., Bowling Green, OH 43402.
''   To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 909-787-4134; Fax: 909-787-4294; E-mail: keen{at}ucrac1.ucr.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: Pel, pectate lyase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; IPTG, isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside; BTP, (1,3-bis[tris(hydroxymethyl)methylamine]propane)-HCl; PGA, polygalacturonic acid.
2   M. Garrett, N. Kita, C. Wattad, C. Boyd, N. Keen, and F. Jurnak, manuscript in preparation.

Acknowledgements

Castro Wattad, Robert Scavetta, and Fredi Bruhlmann in our laboratories made valuable inputs, and Alan Collmer, Peter Albersheim, and their colleagues offered useful suggestions on the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Kotoujansky, A. (1987) Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 25, 405-430 [CrossRef]
  2. Barras, F., van Gijsegem, F., Chatterjee, A. K. (1994) Annu. Rev. Phytopath. 32, 201-234
  3. Collmer, A., Keen, N. T. (1986) Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 24, 383-409 [CrossRef]
  4. De Lorenzo, G., Cervone, F., Hahn, M. G., Darvill, A., Albersheim, P. (1991) Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 39, 335-344 [CrossRef]
  5. Pugsley, A. P. (1993) Microbiol. Rev. 57, 50-108 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lindeberg, M., Collmer, A. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 7385-7397 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Keen, N. T., Dahlbeck, D., Staskawicz, B., Belser, W. (1984) J. Bacteriol. 159, 825-831 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Yoder, M. D., Keen, N. T., Jurnak, F. (1993) Science 260, 1503-1507 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yoder, M. D., Lietzke, S. E., Jurnak, F. (1993) Structure 1, 241-251 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Lietzke, S. E., Yoder, M. D., Keen, N. T., Jurnak, F. (1994) Plant Physiol. 106, 849-862 [Abstract]
  11. Yoder, M. D., Jurnak, F. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 35-342
  12. Yoder, M. D., Jurnak, F. (1995) Plant Physiol. 107, 349-364 [Abstract]
  13. Pickersgill, R., Jenkins, J., Harris, G., Nasser, W., Robert-Baudouy, J. (1994) Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 717-723 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Steinbacher, S., Seckler, R., Miller, S., Steipe, B., Huber, R., Reinemer, P. (1994) Science 265, 383-386 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Raetz, C. R. H., Roderick, S. L. (1995) Science 270, 997-1000 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Emsley, P., Charles, I. G., Fairweather, N. F., Isaacs, N. W. (1996) Nature 381, 90-92 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Baumann, U., Wu, S., Flaherty, K. M., McKay, D. B. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 3357-3364 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Gysler, C., Harmsen, J. A. M., Kester, H. C. M., Visser, J., Heim, J. (1990) Gene (Amst.) 89, 101-108 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Kusters-van Someren, M. A., Harmsen, J. A. M., Kester, C. H. M., Visser, J. (1991) Curr. Genet. 20, 293-299 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Kusters-van Someren, M., Flipphi, M., de Graff, L., Broeck, H., Kester, H., Hinnen, A., Visser, J. (1992) Mol. Gen. Genet. 234, 113-120 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Budelier, K. A., Smith, A. G., Gasser, C. S. (1990) Mol. Gen. Genet. 224, 183-192 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Rafnar, T., Griffith, I. J., Kuo, M. C., Bond, J. F., Rogers, B. L., Klapper, D. G. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 1229-1236 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Rogers, H. J., Harvey, A., Lonsdale, D. M. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 493-502 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Wing, R. A., Yamaguchi, I., Larabell, S. K., Ursin, V. M., McCormick, S. (1989) Plant Mol. Biol. 14, 17-28
  25. Heffron, S., Henrissat, B., Yoder, M. D., Lietzke, S., Jurnak, F. (1995) Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 8, 331-334 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Henrissat, B., Heffron, S. E., Yoder, M. D., Lietzke, S. E., Jurnak, F. (1995) Plant Physiol. 107, 963-976 [Abstract]
  27. Taniguchi, Y., Ono, A., Sawatani, M., Nanba, M., Kohno, K., Usui, M., Kurimoto, M., Matsuhashi, T. (1995) Allergy 50, 90-93 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Studier, F. W., Rosenberg, A. H., Dunn, J. J., Dubendorff, J. W. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 185, 60-89 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Schoepfer, R. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 124, 83-85 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Tamaki, S. J., Gold, S., Robeson, M., Manulis, S., Keen, N. T. (1988) J. Bacteriol. 170, 3468-3478 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Keen, N. T., Tamaki, S. (1986) J. Bacteriol. 168, 595-606 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F., Sambrook, J. (1982) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  33. Mikaelian, I., Sergeant, A. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 376 [Free Full Text]
  34. Yucel, I, Keen, N. T. (1994) Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 7, 140-147 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Crowe, J. S., Cooper, H. J., Smith, M. A., Sims, M. J., Parker, D., Gewert, D. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 184 [Free Full Text]
  36. Witholt, B., Boekhout, M., Brock, M., Kingma, J., van Heerikhuizen, H., deLeij, L. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 74, 160-170 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Mussell, H. W., Morre, D. J. (1969) Anal. Biochem. 28, 353-360 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Ayers, A. R., Ebel, J., Finelli, F., Berger, N., Albersheim, P. (1976) Plant Physiol. 57, 751-759 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Keen, N. T., Yoshikawa, M., Wang, M.-C. (1983) Plant Physiol. 71, 466-471 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Yanisch-Perron, C., Vieira, J., Messing, J. (1985) Gene (Amst.) 33, 103-119 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. W. Czerwinski, T. Midoro-Horiuti, M. A. White, E. G. Brooks, and R. M. Goldblum
Crystal Structure of Jun a 1, the Major Cedar Pollen Allergen from Juniperus ashei, Reveals a Parallel {beta}-Helical Core
J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2005; 280(5): 3740 - 3746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. R. Herron, R. D. Scavetta, M. Garrett, M. Legner, and F. Jurnak
Characterization and Implications of Ca2+ Binding to Pectate Lyase C
J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2003; 278(14): 12271 - 12277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
M. C. Marin-Rodriguez, J. Orchard, and G. B. Seymour
Pectate lyases, cell wall degradation and fruit softening
J. Exp. Bot., October 1, 2002; 53(377): 2115 - 2119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. R. Herron, J. A. E. Benen, R. D. Scavetta, J. Visser, and F. Jurnak
Structure and function of pectic enzymes: Virulence factors of plant pathogens
PNAS, August 1, 2000; 97(16): 8762 - 8769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
V. E. Shevchik, G. Condemine, J. Robert-Baudouy, and N. Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat
The Exopolygalacturonate Lyase PelW and the Oligogalacturonate Lyase Ogl, Two Cytoplasmic Enzymes of Pectin Catabolism in Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937
J. Bacteriol., July 1, 1999; 181(13): 3912 - 3919.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
R. D. Scavetta, S. R. Herron, A. T. Hotchkiss, N. Kita, N. T. Keen, J. A. E. Benen, H. C. M. Kester, J. Visser, and F. Jurnak
Structure of a Plant Cell Wall Fragment Complexed to Pectate Lyase C
PLANT CELL, June 1, 1999; 11(6): 1081 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
M. Lindeberg, C. M. Boyd, N. T. Keen, and A. Collmer
External Loops at the C Terminus of Erwinia chrysanthemi Pectate Lyase C Are Required for Species-Specific Secretion through the Out Type II Pathway
J. Bacteriol., March 15, 1998; 180(6): 1431 - 1437.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kita, N.
Right arrow Articles by Keen, N. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kita, N.
Right arrow Articles by Keen, N. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement