JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rabinow, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rabinow, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 44, Issue of November 1, 1996 pp. 27299-27303
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Activity and Autophosphorylation of LAMMER Protein Kinases*

(Received for publication, May 10, 1996, and in revised form, September 4, 1996)

Kun Lee Dagger §, Cheng Du , Mark Horn and Leonard Rabinow Dagger par

From the Dagger  Waksman Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855-0759 and the  Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-4525

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Clk/STY, the murine homologue of the recently described LAMMER family of protein kinases, autophosphorylates on serine/threonine and tyrosine residues in vitro and in vivo. LAMMER kinases are found throughout eukaryotes and possess virtually complete amino acid identity in many domains critical for kinase function, leading to the question of whether other family members also possess dual specificity. We report here that the Drosophila family member DOA, human SK-G1, and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae KNS1, all possess protein kinase activity and autophosphorylate with dual specificity in vitro, suggesting that the entire family possesses this activity. Although the LAMMER kinases are closely related to the mitogen-activated protein kinase family, they possess different substrate specificity in vitro, based on phosphorylation of peptide and protein substrates and sequencing of a phosphorylation site in a common substrate.


INTRODUCTION

Protein kinases are generally differentiated according to the specificity with which they phosphorylate substrates, with activity toward serine/threonine or tyrosine residues (1, 2). Recently, some kinases capable of phosphorylating all three amino acid residues have been identified (reviewed in Refs. 3 and 4). Such ``dual specificity'' kinases would be classified as serine/threonine-specific based on their amino acid sequences. Among these is murine STY or Clk (5, 6), whose cDNAs were isolated because their products autophosphorylated on tyrosine residues. Data base searches with the sequence of cDNAs from the Doa locus of Drosophila revealed murine Clk and other closely related homologues in eukaryotes ranging from yeast to humans (7). Additional homologues have subsequently been described in green plants (8)1 (also accession number D49304[GenBank] from the rice genome sequencing project), from rat (accession number X94351[GenBank]), and from Schizosaccharomyces pombe (accession number Z69239[GenBank]), a third family member in humans (9), a mink family member whose message is induced by cycloheximide in cultured cells (10), and a member from S. pombe, found in the genome sequencing project of this organism (accession number Z69239[GenBank]). We have dubbed these the LAMMER protein kinases, based upon the existence of this motif, or conserved variations upon it, in all members (7).

The LAMMER kinases are nearly identical in size, spacing, and placement of their kinase catalytic domains and also show extremely high amino acid identity in domains essential for phosphotransfer to the peptide substrate and in substrate recognition (11). By analogy with the structure of two crystallized protein kinases (12, 13), the LAMMER motif lies in an alpha -helix below the substrate-binding cleft, potentially allowing it to make contact with substrates, and suggesting that these molecules are also highly conserved.

Much of what is known of LAMMER kinase function derives from analysis of the Drosophila locus Doa, whose mutants were isolated during screens for loci with transcriptional regulatory effects (14, 15). Doa is an essential gene; its mutations alter the mutagenic activity and transcription rate of the copia retrotransposon and reveal defects in embryonic segmentation and nervous system development, degeneration of retinal photoreceptors, and small imaginal discs (7). Recently, murine Clk was described as phosphorylating and altering intranuclear localization of SR splicing factors, suggesting that these proteins are among the in vivo substrates of LAMMER kinases (16).

Murine Clk autophosphorylates on serine, threonine and tyrosine residues in vivo, suggesting that there may be a biological function for dual specificity (17). To begin to address this issue further, we have examined whether other LAMMER putative protein kinases autophosphorylate in vitro, as well as whether they too possess dual specificity. We report here that DOA and the LAMMER kinases SK-G1 of humans (recently reidentified as Clk2 (9)) and KNS1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae possess protein kinase activity and autophosphorylate with dual specificity in vitro, as murine Clk/STY, suggesting that the entire family does so. Examination of DOA's substrate specificity in vitro suggests that it differs from that of the closely related MAP2 kinases. Although myelin basic protein (MBP) is a common substrate of both kinase families, amino acid sequencing of the peptide phosphorylated by the LAMMER kinases DOA, SK-G1, and KNS1 reveals that the site is distinct from that phosphorylated by MAP kinases.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Expression and Purification of LAMMER Kinases

Expression and purification of fusion proteins utilized the pMAL-C2 vector of New England Biolabs and were performed as recommended. DOA, a StyI fragment of cDNA clone, pCD1 + 2, containing the DOA catalytic domain (7), was modified with EcoRI linkers and inserted into pMAL-C2. SK-G1, a BsrBI-BamHI fragment containing the catalytic domain of pSK-G1, generously provided by Steven Hanks, was modified with BamHI linkers and inserted into pMAL-C2. KNS1, a SspI-BamHI fragment from p217, containing the KNS1 catalytic domain, kindly provided by Michael Snyder and Ramesh Padmanabha (18), was modified with BamHI linkers and inserted into pMAL-C2. Expression and purification of fusion proteins was confirmed by probing immunoblots of crude and affinity-purified proteins with antibodies directed against the maltose binding domain. In all cases, a protein of the expected molecular weight was observed. Affinity-purified fusion proteins obtained were: DOA, 85 kDa, with some apparent degradation products; SK-G1, 83 kDa; KNS1, 106 kDa, 90 kDa, and 78 kDa, the latter two and a smear at about 40 kDa thought to be due to degradation.

Site-directed Mutagenesis

Site-directed mutagenesis altering Lys-199 (AAG) to Arg (AGG) in subdomain II of DOA utilized the Promega Altered Sites In Vitro Mutagenesis System, as per instructions. A 0.3-kilobase BamHI fragment excised from the pMAL-DOA expression vector was inserted into the pALTER-1 vector. The mutagenic oligonucleotide (TAC TGC ATG GCT TTA AGG ATT ATT AAG AAC GTG) replaced the native sequence, as confirmed by DNA sequencing.

SDS-Gel Electrophoresis, Protein Transfers, and Immunoblots

SDS-gel electrophoresis, protein transfers, and immunoblots were performed as described (19), using a 10% separating gel. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose by electrophoretic blotting for immunological detection and renaturation kinase assays. Immunological detection utilized the Amersham ECL chemiluminescence system.

Autophosphorylation, Kinase Assays, and Phosphatase Treatment

Filter denaturation/renaturation kinase assays were performed as described (20, 21), using 1 ml of bacterial lysates or 5~10 µg of electrophoresed purified fusion proteins, which were transferred to nitrocellulose for renaturation. Purified KNS1 fusion protein was autophosphorylated by incubation in the same buffer.

Kinase activity toward exogenous substrates was tested in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MnCl2, 20 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.5 mg/ml synthetic peptides or protein substrates, 1 µl of 500 µM [gamma -32P]ATP, and 1-50 µg/ml purified DOA fusion protein. Reactions were incubated for 20 min at room temperature, stopped by spotting 25-µl aliquots onto Whatman P-81 phosphocellulose paper, and washed in 75 mM phosphoric acid 5 times, 5 min each, dried, and counted.

Specific activity determinations of the kinases toward MBP were performed in 25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 100 µM ATP, incubated 10 min at 30 °C. 1 unit of LAMMER kinase activity was arbitrarily defined as the amount of kinase required to catalyze the transfer of 1 pmol of phosphate to MBP in 1 min at 30 °C, in a 100-µl reaction volume. Activated recombinant murine ERK2 MAP kinase was purchased from New England Biolabs.

Dephosphorylation was accomplished by incubating cell lysates for 30 min at 37 °C with calf intestinal phosphatase in 50 µl (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ZnCl2) with or without 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4), as a competitive inhibitor.

Phosphoamino Acid Analysis

Acid and base hydrolysis of phosphorylated proteins and phosphoamino acid analysis were as described (22). Proteins from SDS-gels were transferred to PVDF membranes, kinase reactions were carried out as above, hydrolysis was performed, and the products were electrophoretically separated on cellulose thin layer plates (23). Labeled phosphoamino acids were detected by exposing the plate in a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).

Sequencing of Tryptic Peptide Fragments

For N-terminal sequencing, phosphorylated MBP was excised from an SDS gel, and peptide fragments were generated by in-gel digestion with trypsin (24). Fragments were separated on a Vydac C18 column (2.1-mm inner diameter × 25 cm) using a Hewlett-Packard 1090 HPLC with diode array detector. Peak fractions containing significant radioactivity were subjected to N-terminal Edman degradation on an Applied Biosystems model 477. The peptides were attached to Sequelon membranes as described by the manufacturer. The sequencing method described (25) was modified by Richard G. Cook, Baylor University to use 90% methanol, 0.015% trifluoroacetic acid in the S3 position on the sequencer.3 This modification of the standard method allowed radioactivity from phosphoserine and phosphothreonine to be observed in collected fractions.


RESULTS

LAMMER Kinase Homologues Possess Protein Kinase Activity

To determine whether LAMMER family members possess kinase activity and whether they autophosphorylate with dual specificity, analogously to murine Clk, we characterized the activity of the gene products encoded by Doa of Drosophila, human SK-G1 (Clk2), and KNS1 of S. cerevisiae. These family members were selected based on their wide evolutionary divergence. Our hypothesis was that if these three LAMMER kinases possess dual specificity, that all family members are likely to.

The catalytic domains of the selected family members were expressed and purified as maltose-binding fusion proteins. Affinity purified proteins of the predicted size were obtained in each case (Fig. 1), although both DOA and KNS1 also yielded several lower molecular weight proteins, presumably due to degradation or lability.


Fig. 1. Expression of MBP-DOA, MBP-SK-G1, and MBP-KNS1 fusion proteins and their autophosphorylation activities in vitro. LAMMER kinases were cloned, expressed, and purified as maltose-binding fusion proteins and run on SDS gels. A, SK-G1: left, Coomassie Blue-stained protein; right, protein transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, renatured, and autophosphorylated. B, KNS1: left, purified protein, showing degradation of the expected 107-kDa product; right, transferred, renatured, and autophosphorylated product. Several of the degradation products, as well as the minimal amount of intact 107-kDa purified fusion protein, autophosphorylate. C, purified DOA maltose-binding fusion protein, transferred to nitrocellulose, renatured and autophosphorylated. Left, intact purified DOA fusion protein. Right, purified fusion protein digested with factor Xa prior to SDS-gel electrophoresis, demonstrating partial cleavage of the kinase domain from the MBP domain. D, crude E. coli extracts containing DOA fusion proteins, transferred to nitrocellulose, renatured, and autophosphorylated. Equal amounts of protein were loaded. Left, native. Right, K199R in vitro generated point mutant, demonstrating drastically reduced kinase autophosphorylation activity (<2%, from PhosphorImager quantitation).
[View Larger Version of this Image (71K GIF file)]


Both crude extracts and affinity-purified proteins were tested for kinase activity, by subjecting transfers of electrophoresed proteins to a filter-based autophosphorylation assay (21), identical to that used for murine Clk (6). In the case of the KNS1 fusion, this assay demonstrated only a very weak signal, and so purified protein was assayed directly in solution, followed by separation on an SDS gel, and autoradiography. Positive and negative controls were provided by crude extracts in which a TrpE-murine clk fusion and the pMAL vector had been expressed, respectively.

Crude extracts and purified fusion proteins of all three putative kinases possess autophosphorylation activity at the molecular weight of the purified fusion protein and, in the case of KNS1, a subset of the degradation products (Fig. 1). No activity was observed in extracts expressing the vector alone. Further verification that the kinase activity originated only from the fusion proteins was provided by cleaving the purified DOA fusion protein into its maltose-binding and DOA moieties with factor Xa. Digested reaction products subjected to kinase filter-renaturation assays revealed two labeled bands corresponding to the molecular weights of the uncleaved protein and the excised DOA catalytic domain (Fig. 1).

Lysine 199 of DOA corresponds to an invariant residue in kinase catalytic domain II of all protein kinases, and alteration of this residue to any other drastically reduces kinase catalytic activity (1, 2). As final confirmation that the activities observed in the LAMMER kinase preparations were due solely to the cloned kinases, Lys-199 of DOA was altered by site-directed mutagenesis to an Arg. The (K199R) mutant protein possessed less than 2% of the activity in crude extracts, compared with equivalent amounts of crude extracts in which the wild type protein was expressed (Fig. 1), providing conclusive proof that bacterially expressed DOA and the other two LAMMER putative kinases possess intrinsic kinase activity.

It was noted that the mutant DOA fusion protein (K199R) migrated very slightly faster than the wild type fusion protein on SDS gels. To determine whether this differential migration was due to autophosphorylation of the wild-type protein in E. coli, purified wild type DOA fusion protein was treated with calf intestinal phosphatase prior to electrophoresis. Phosphatase treatment increased the migration of wild type DOA fusion protein to that of the catalytically inactive fusion (not shown). Faster migration of the treated wild-type protein did not occur when the phosphatase was boiled prior to treatment or phosphatase treatment took place in the presence of sodium phosphate, a nonspecific phosphatase inhibitor. We conclude that the DOA fusion protein autophosphorylates in E. coli, consistent with the isolation of murine Clk as a tyrosine-phosphorylated protein from expression cDNA libraries (5, 6).

LAMMER Protein Kinases from Drosophila, Humans, and S. cerevisiae Autophosphorylate with Dual Specificity

To determine the autophosphorylation specificity of the three kinases, phosphoamino acid analysis was performed on the purified fusion proteins. These results conclusively demonstrate that all three autophosphorylate with dual specificity, albeit with differing efficiency toward tyrosine residues (Fig. 2).


Fig. 2. Phosphoamino acid analysis of autophosphorylated LAMMER protein kinases in vitro. SDS-gel fractionated fusion proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane, renatured, and autophosphorylated, except as noted. The labeled band was excised and acid-hydrolyzed, and the labeled amino acids were separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis. In each case, the upper left spot is phosphoserine, the upper right phosphothreonine, and the lower right phosphotyrosine. A, DOA, intentionally overloaded to demonstrate the faint tyrosine signal. B, DOA, alkali-treated prior to acid hydrolysis, to reduce the phosphoserine and phosphothreonine signals, to increase the relative phosphotyrosine signal. C, SK-G1, standard acid hydrolysis only. D, KNS1, which was the only protein autophosphorylated in solution, prior to being separated on an SDS gel, due to weak autophosphorylation activity following renaturation. The prominent 65-kDa phosphoprotein (Fig. 1) was excised and subjected to standard acid hydrolysis.
[View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]


In the case of DOA, the phosphoserine signal comprised 96.8% of the total activity, phosphothreonine 2.5%, and phosphotyrosine was barely detectable at 0.7% (Fig. 2 and Table I). To verify the phosphotyrosine signal, proteins on the PVDF membranes were base-hydrolyzed prior to acid hydrolysis, to hydrolyze most of the phosphoserine and phosphothreonine (22). Since phosphotyrosine is not labile in alkali, its signal is enhanced under these conditions. Phosphotyrosine was also detected by grossly overloading the thin layer chromatography plates with sample prepared by standard acid hydrolysis (Fig. 2). All three methods demonstrate that DOA autophosphorylates in vitro with dual specificity, albeit weakly on tyrosine.

Table I.

Relative phosphoamino acid levels in MBP-LAMMER kinase fusion proteins


Serine Threonine Tyrosine

%
DOA 96.8 2.5 0.7
SK-G1 71.5 16.0 12.5
KNS1a 51.5 30.2 18.3
C1k 44.8 11.7 43.5

a  The 65-kDa autophosphorylated protein was used for phosphoamino acid analysis.

The autophosphorylation specificity of SK-G1 also shows that phosphoserine is the major phosphorylated amino acid, although phosphothreonine and phosphotyrosine are easily detected (Fig. 2 and Table I). Purified pMAL-KNS fusion proteins were also tested. As for SK-G1 and DOA, a prominently labeled 65-kDa KNS1 was heavily phosphorylated on phosphoserine, with phosphothreonine and phosphotyrosine also detected (Fig. 2 and Table I). Thus, all LAMMER protein kinase family members tested autophosphorylate with dual specificity. KNS1 is among the most diverged in amino acid sequence of LAMMER family members, and so these results suggest that they all may possess this property.

LAMMER Kinases Phosphorylate Myelin Basic Protein in Vitro

To identify in vitro substrates for DOA kinase, 13 synthetic peptides, myelin basic protein, and histone H1 were tested (Table II). The two intact proteins were chosen because they serve as in vitro substrates for many protein kinases, including MAP kinase and p34cdc2, close phylogenetic relatives of the LAMMER kinases. The synthetic peptides were chosen essentially at random. However, MAPK and p34cdc2 substrates were of particular interest due to the close relationship between these families and the LAMMER kinases. Of the extended protein kinase family, the LAMMER kinases are most closely related to the MAP kinases. For example, the catalytic domain of murine Clk shares 55% amino acid identity with the MAP kinase FUS3 of S. cerevisiae (6), sharing high conservation in residues and domains important in phosphotransfer and substrate recognition.

Table II.

Potential substrates assayed


Substrate (amino acid residues) Phosphorylated by Sequencea

Histone H1 p34cdc2
Myelin basic protein MAP kinase, PKA
Myelin basic protein peptide (95-98) MAP kinase APRTPGGRR
Tyrosine hydroxylase peptide (24-33) MAP kinae KQAEAVTSPR
EGF receptor peptide (663-673) MAP kinase RRRELVEPLTPSGE
Myelin basic protein peptide PKC QKRPSQRSKL
40 S ribosomal protein S6 (231-239) Rsk kinase S6 RRRLSSLRA
PTKb substrate (pp60src) SRC RRLIEQAEYAARG
MAP kinase (173-190) MEK kinase ADPDHDHTGFLTEYVATRWR
Kemptide PKA LRRASLG
Syntide 2 Raf kinase PLARTLSVAGLPGKK
CK II substrate peptide Casein kinase II RRREEETEEE
Histone H1 phosphorylation site p34cdc2 RRLASGPE
Protein kinase p34 substrate p34cdc2 ADAQHATPPKKKRKVEDPKD
Poly(Glu,Tyr) 1:1
Poly(Glu,Tyr) 4:1

a  Bold letters refer to phosphorylation sites.
b  PTK, protein-tyrosine kinase.

Of the proteins and peptides tested, DOA efficiently phosphorylates only MBP, in vitro, stimulating phosphate incorporation over 80-fold above background. MBP is also an efficient in vitro substrate for MAPK. However, although both MAPK and DOA phosphorylate intact MBP, three peptides phosphorylated by MAPK (the sequences from MBP, tyrosine hydroxylase, and the epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylated by MAPK) were not phosphorylated by DOA, suggesting that the phosphorylation site of DOA is different from that of MAPK.

To compare the relative activities of the LAMMER kinases with MAP kinase toward their common substrate, MBP, we performed in vitro phosphorylation reactions with DOA, KNS1, SK-G1 (Clk2), and the MAP kinase ERK2, using [32P]ATP (Fig. 3). Following correction for the presence of the maltose-binding protein fusion domain in the LAMMER kinases, the specific activities of the kinases toward MBP are as follows: DOA, 3.0 units/µg; SK-G1, 11.5 units/µg; KNS1, 0.16 units/µg. These figures compare to the approximate 500 units/µg of the recombinant, commercially supplied MAP kinase. It might be noted that these figures are quantitative estimates of LAMMER kinase activity in vitro and may not reflect the actual activity of the kinases in vivo, since they are susceptible to influences by the structure of the fusion protein, among other things.


Fig. 3. Phosphorylation of MBP by LAMMER protein kinases. In vitro phosphorylation reactions were carried out on MBP with the following protein kinases: 1, DOA; 2, SK-G1; 3, KNS1; 4, ERK2, as a control. Following the in vitro phosphorylation reaction, proteins were resolved on a SDS gel. The arrow indicates the location of the major band of protein staining. Equal amounts of trichloroacetic acid-precipitable counts were loaded in each lane.
[View Larger Version of this Image (99K GIF file)]


To identify the LAMMER kinase phosphorylation sites on MBP, labeled protein was isolated on a SDS gel, tryptic digests were performed on the excised gel slice, and peptides were separated by HPLC. Two peptides eluting at virtually identical points from the column were radiolabeled by DOA, SK-G1, and KNS1. N-terminal sequencing of these peptides revealed that they correspond to residues 162-168 (SG<UNL><B>S</B></UNL>PMAR) or 162-169 (SG<UNL><B>S</B></UNL>PMARR) of bovine myelin basic protein, the second serine in each case being the labeled residue. As hypothesized, this site is different from the major phosphorylation site in bovine MBP for MAP kinases, which has been previously defined as 91NIVTPRTP98 (26, 27).

Murine Clk phosphorylates the synthetic peptide poly(Glu,Tyr), which was interpreted as suggesting that it may possess tyrosine specificity on exogenous substrates (6). We therefore determined whether DOA also would phosphorylate poly(Glu,Tyr); no significant differences from controls (no substrate) were observed. Thus, DOA does not efficiently phosphorylate poly(Glu,Tyr), in contrast to its murine relative, Clk. This difference may be attributable to any of a number of factors, including the possibility that the general tyrosine kinase activity of the DOA fusion construct is significantly less than Clk's, as suggested in the phosphoamino acid analyses reported above.


DISCUSSION

Although no specific motifs have yet been identified that confer dual specificity on a protein kinase, the high sequence identity among the LAMMER family and the dual specificity of murine Clk suggested that additional family members might autophosphorylate with dual specificity. It is therefore not surprising that the three LAMMER homologues DOA, SK-G1, and KNS1 not only encode active protein kinases, but autophosphorylate with dual specificity. These results suggest that all other LAMMER family members possess this property, since KNS1, the S. cerevisiae family member, is among the most diverged in the family.

Attempts to identify DOA substrates in vitro among several proteins and synthetic peptides showed that MBP was efficiently phosphorylated in vitro, although no others were found. N-terminal peptide sequencing revealed that Ser-164 of bovine MBP is phosphorylated by DOA, SK-G1, and KNS1, supporting the hypothesis that the LAMMER kinases will have very similar substrate specificities. Given the structural relationships between the LAMMER family and the MAP kinases and Cdks, it is, however, not surprising that the major phosphorylation site of DOA, SK-G1, and KNS1 in MBP possesses a Pro residue at the +1 position, since the consensus phosphorylation sites for the latter two families also show similar specificity. Thus, although closely related, the LAMMER and MAP kinases apparently possess different substrate specificities, based on the fact that the major site of MBP phosphorylation by MAP kinases is different from the one phosphorylated by DOA, SK-G1, and KNS1, as well as on the failure of DOA to phosphorylate any of the MAP kinase peptide substrates tested. Definition of a consensus LAMMER kinase phosphorylation site awaits further experimentation.

In contrast to murine Clk, DOA did not phosphorylate poly(Glu,Tyr). This result may be explained by the very low efficiency with which DOA autophosphorylates on tyrosine residues, in contrast to murine Clk. Alternatively, neither result may be indicative of the true activity of these kinases in vivo, since these assays were performed in vitro with bacterially expressed fusion proteins.

The significance of the dual specificity autophosphorylation of LAMMER kinases remains to be determined. It is known that the murine homologue Clk autophosphorylates on tyrosine when expressed in 3T3 cells (17). Autophosphorylation with dual specificity may not be biologically relevant in vivo and may not accurately reflect substrate specificity (3). However, as in the case of many tyrosine kinases, autophosphorylation on one or more tyrosine residues might allow docking of either regulatory or substrate molecules containing SH2-binding sites (for reviews see Refs. 28 and 29). If the dual specificity of the LAMMER kinases is biologically significant, even extremely low stoichiometries of tyrosine autophosphorylation may be important in the creation of such SH2 domain docking sites. Only the identification of additional molecules interacting with the LAMMER kinases will reveal the significance or irrelevance of autophosphorylation with dual specificity.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant MCB 92-19371 (to L. R.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   Present address: The Fox Chase Cancer Center, 7701 Burholme Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111.
par    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 600 South 42nd St., Omaha, NE 68198-4525. Tel.: 402-55926655; Fax: 402-559-6650; E-mail: lrabinow{at}molbio.unmc.edu.
1   V. Raz and R. Fluhr, submitted for publication.
2   The abbreviations used are: MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MBP, myelin basic protein; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.
3   R. G. Cook, personal communication.

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael Snyder and Ramesh Padmanabha for clones of KNS1, Tony Pawson and Karen Colwill for providing the TrpE-clk fusion expression construct, and Michael Greenberg and Kurt Amsler for advice on kinase assays. We also thank Laurey Steinke and Han Huang of the Protein Structure Core Facility at the University of Nebraska Medical Center for sequencing analysis and the Nebraska Research Initiative for support of the facility. We especially thank Steve Hanks for unpublished sequence data and clones of pSK-G1, John Bell for helpful discussions and communication of unpublished results, and Rick MacDonald and Rob Lewis for critical reading of the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Hanks, S. K., Quinn, A. M. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 200, 38-62 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Hanks, S. K., Quinn, A. M., Hunter, T. (1988) Science 241, 42-52 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Lindberg, R. A., Quinn, A. M., Hunter, T. (1992) Trends Biochem. Sci. 17, 114-119 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Douville, E., Duncan, P., Abraham, N., Bell, J. C. (1994) Cancer Metastasis Rev. 13, 1-7 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Howell, B. W., Afar, D. E. H., Lew, J., Douville, E. M. J., Iceley, P. L. E., Gray, D. A., Bell, J. C. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 568-572 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ben-David, Y., Letwin, K., Tannock, L., Bernstein, A., Pawson, T. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 317-325 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Yun, B., Farkas, R., Lee, K., Rabinow, L. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 1160-1173 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Bender, J., Fink, G. R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 12105-12109 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hanes, J., von der Kammer, H., Klaudiny, J., Scheit, K. H. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 244, 665-672 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. McClelland, M., Ralph, D., Cheng, R., Welsh, J. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4419-4431 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Taylor, S. S., Knighton, D. R., Zheng, J., Ten Eyck, L. F., Sowadski, J. M. (1992) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8, 429-462 [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, F., Strand, A., Robbins, D., Cobb, M. H., Goldsmith, E. J. (1994) Nature 367, 704-711 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. DeBondt, H. L., Rosenblatt, J., Jancarik, J., Jones, H. D., Morgan, D. O., Kim, S. H. (1993) Nature 363, 595-602 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Rabinow, L., Birchler, J. A. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 879-889 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Rabinow, L., Chiang, S. L., Birchler, J. A. (1993) Genetics 134, 1175-1185 [Abstract]
  16. Colwill, K., Pawson, T., Andrews, B., Prasad, J., Manley, J. L., Bell, J. C., Duncan, P. I. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 265-275 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Duncan, P. I., Howell, B. W., Marius, R. M., Drmanic, S., Douville, E. M. J., Bell, J. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21524-21531 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Padmanabha, R., Gehrung, S., Snyder, M. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 229, 1-9 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., Struhl, K. (1989) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , Greene/Wiley Publishing, New York
  20. Ferrell, J. E., Martin, G. S. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 20723-20729 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ferrell, J. E., Martin, G. S. (1990) Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 3020-3026 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kamps, M., Sefton, B. (1989) Anal. Biochem. 176, 22-27 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Boyle, W. J., Van Der Geer, P., Hunter, T. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 201, 110-149 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Rosenfeld, J., Capedevielle, J., Guillemot, J. C., Ferrara, P. (1992) Anal. Biochem. 203, 173-179 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Wettenhall, R. E. H., Aebersold, R. H., Hood, L. E. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 201, 186-199 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Sanghera, J. S., Aebersold, R., Morrison, H. D., Bures, E. J., Pelech, S. L. (1990) FEBS Lett. 273, 223-226 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Erickson, A. K., Payne, D. M., Martino, P. A., Rossomando, A., Shabonowitz, J., Weber, M., Hunt, D. F., Sturgill, T. W. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 19728-19735 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Cohen, G. B., Ren, R., Baltimore, D. (1995) Cell 80, 237-248 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Pawson, T. (1995) Nature 373, 573-579 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Kpebe and L. Rabinow
Dissection of Darkener of Apricot Kinase Isoform Functions in Drosophila
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 1973 - 1987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
E. M. Rubenstein and M. C. Schmidt
Mechanisms Regulating the Protein Kinases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2007; 6(4): 571 - 583.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Muraki, B. Ohkawara, T. Hosoya, H. Onogi, J. Koizumi, T. Koizumi, K. Sumi, J.-i. Yomoda, M. V. Murray, H. Kimura, et al.
Manipulation of Alternative Splicing by a Newly Developed Inhibitor of Clks
J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 2004; 279(23): 24246 - 24254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. Prasad and J. L. Manley
Regulation and Substrate Specificity of the SR Protein Kinase Clk/Sty
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2003; 23(12): 4139 - 4149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
S. Savaldi-Goldstein, D. Aviv, O. Davydov, and R. Fluhr
Alternative Splicing Modulation by a LAMMER Kinase Impinges on Developmental and Transcriptome Expression
PLANT CELL, April 1, 2003; 15(4): 926 - 938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
P. Sacco-Bubulya and D. L. Spector
Disassembly of interchromatin granule clusters alters the coordination of transcription and pre-mRNA splicing
J. Cell Biol., February 4, 2002; 156(3): 425 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. Yun, K. Lee, R. Farka, C. Hitte, and L. Rabinow
The LAMMER Protein Kinase Encoded by the Doa Locus of Drosophila Is Required in Both Somatic and Germline Cells and Is Expressed as Both Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Isoforms Throughout Development
Genetics, October 1, 2000; 156(2): 749 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Himpel, W. Tegge, R. Frank, S. Leder, H.-G. Joost, and W. Becker
Specificity Determinants of Substrate Recognition by the Protein Kinase DYRK1A
J. Biol. Chem., January 28, 2000; 275(4): 2431 - 2438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
H. Menegay, M. Myers, F. Moeslein, and G. Landreth
Biochemical characterization and localization of the dual specificity kinase CLK1
J. Cell Sci., January 9, 2000; 113(18): 3241 - 3253.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. Nayler, F. Schnorrer, S. Stamm, and A. Ullrich
The Cellular Localization of the Murine Serine/Arginine-rich Protein Kinase CLK2 Is Regulated by Serine 141 Autophosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem., December 18, 1998; 273(51): 34341 - 34348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Kojima, T. Zama, K. Wada, H. Onogi, and M. Hagiwara
Cloning of Human PRP4 Reveals Interaction with Clk1
J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2001; 276(34): 32247 - 32256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
P. Sacco-Bubulya and D. L. Spector
Disassembly of interchromatin granule clusters alters the coordination of transcription and pre-mRNA splicing
J. Cell Biol., February 4, 2002; 156(3): 425 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rabinow, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rabinow, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.