Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laser, B.
Right arrow Articles by Philippe, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laser, B.
Right arrow Articles by Philippe, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 46, Issue of November 15, 1996 pp. 28984-28994
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

The caudal-related Homeodomain Protein Cdx-2/3 Regulates Glucagon Gene Expression in Islet Cells*

(Received for publication, January 26, 1996, and in revised form, July 1, 1996)

Beate Laser Dagger , Paolo Meda , Isabel Constant Dagger and Jacques Philippe Dagger

From Dagger  Clinical Diabetology, Department of Medicine and the  Department of Morphology, Centre Médical Universitaire, 1 rue Michel Servet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgment
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Glucagon gene transcription in the endocrine pancreas is regulated by at least four cis-acting DNA control elements. We showed previously that G1 is critical for alpha cell-specific expression. G1 contains three AT-rich sequences important for promoter function, which represent candidate binding sites for homeodomain transcription factors. Performing reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction amplifications with degenerate oligonucleotide primers homologous to the Antennapedia homeobox, cDNA clones corresponding to the caudal-related gene cdx-2/3 were predominantly obtained from glucagon-producing cells and primary non-beta cells. From RNase protection and polymerase chain reaction analyses, cdx-2/3 turned out to be the only caudal-related gene that is expressed at significant levels in cells of the endocrine pancreas. Cdx-2/3 binds with high affinity to an AT-rich motif of G1, which matches the consensus binding site of caudal-related proteins. In the glucagon-producing hamster cell line InR1G9, Cdx-2/3 is a subunit of complex B3 formed on G1. Alternative splicing generates two cdx-2/3 transcripts in islet cells, coding for a full-length protein and an amino-terminally truncated isoform. Although both isoforms bind G1 with similar affinity, only the full-length Cdx-2/3 A protein activates glucagon gene transcription in non-glucagon-producing cells, transcriptional activation being dose-dependent. We therefore conclude that the caudal-related gene cdx-2/3 is implicated in the transcriptional control of glucagon gene expression in the alpha cells of the islets of Langerhans.


INTRODUCTION

Glucagon and the glucagon-like peptides are synthesized as a common precursor, preproglucagon, encoded by the glucagon gene and are involved in the control of glucose homeostasis. Expression of the glucagon gene is highly restricted to the alpha cells of the endocrine pancreas, the L cells of the intestine, and certain areas of the brain (1, 2, 3). The factors controlling glucagon gene expression are poorly understood. In addition, they may differ depending on the tissue examined; studies in transgenic mice expressing the simian virus (SV)1 large T antigen under the control of 1300 bp of the rat glucagon gene 5'-flanking sequences demonstrate expression in the pancreas and the brain, whereas additional upstream sequences are necessary for expression in the gut (4, 5).

Tissue-specific expression of the glucagon gene in the pancreas is conferred in two steps by the islet-specific enhancer elements G2, G3, and G4 (6, 7, 8) and the alpha cell-specific proximal promoter element G1 (7, 9, 10). G1 contains three AT-rich sequences that are candidate binding sites for homeodomain transcription factors. Two of these sequences represent nearly identical 7-bp direct repeats and are important for transcriptional activity. At least four protein complexes were found to interact with G1, and the integrity of the AT-rich 7-bp direct repeats was shown to be critical for their binding (9).

In a first attempt to identify the proteins implicated in the control of glucagon gene expression, we designed degenerate oligonucleotide primers based on highly conserved sequences in the first and third helix of the Antennapedia class of homeodomain transcription factors. Recent studies indicate that homeobox genes are involved in the control of pancreatic hormone genes, such as insulin and somatostatin. Several homeodomain proteins have been isolated from islet cells by cDNA cloning or PCR amplification of reverse transcribed RNA (11, 12) and proposed to be implicated in insulin and somatostatin gene regulation (13, 14, 15, 16).

In this study, we show that the caudal-related gene cdx-3, which has been proposed to regulate insulin gene transcription through its binding to the FLAT element (15) is expressed in glucagon-producing cells. Since cdx-3 represents the hamster homologue of the mouse cdx-2 gene (15, 17, 18), this gene will be referred to here as cdx-2/3. In cell lines of the endocrine pancreas, alternative splicing generates two cdx-2/3 mRNAs, encoding a full-length protein (termed Cdx-2/3 A) and an amino-terminally truncated isoform (Cdx-2/3 B). Cdx-2/3 binds the proximal AT-rich direct repeat motif of the glucagon promoter element G1, which matches the consensus binding site of caudal-related genes (18, 19) and is contained in complex B3 binding to G1. Interestingly, the full-length Cdx-2/3 A, but not the truncated Cdx-2/3 B isoform activates glucagon gene expression in non-glucagon-producing cells. Different transactivating properties of the two isoforms exhibiting the same affinity for G1 suggests that differential expression of cdx-2/3 A and cdx-2/3 B may regulate transcriptional activation. We conclude that the intestine-specific gene cdx-2/3 is the only caudal-related gene expressed in the endocrine pancreas and that it may be involved in the control of pancreatic glucagon gene expression.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Isolation of Islets of Langerhans and Separation of Beta and Non-Beta Cells

Rat pancreatic islets as well as primary beta and non-beta cells were isolated as described previously (20, 21).

Reverse Transcription and PCR

cDNA was generated from 2 µg of total RNA and 200 ng of random hexamer primers. Amplification reactions were carried out for 40 cycles according to standard protocols (22). Degenerate primers used for PCR amplification of homeodomain proteins were as follows: 5'-GA(G/A)(C/T)T(C/G)GA(G/A)AA(A/G)GA(G/A)TT-3' and 5'-CATIC(G/T)IC(G/T)(A/G)TT(C/T)TG(A/G)AACCA-3' (nt 43-59 and 142-162 of the Antennapedia class homeobox, respectively). cdx-2/3 and cdx-4 open reading frames were amplified with the following primers: 5'-GTCGAGGTGCAGCTAGCC-3' and 5'-CACTGGGTAACAGTGGG-3' (nt 89-106 and 1139-1155 of the cdx-3 cDNA, respectively; Ref. 15), 5'-CAACTTCTTCTATCCAAG-3' and 5'-TGCTCCTGTTTCATTCAG-3' (nt 143-160 and 1107-1124 of the cdx-4 cDNA, respectively; Ref. 23). PCR fragments were sequenced by the double-stranded dideoxy chain termination method (22), and sequence comparisons were performed at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) using the BLAST Network Service.

Cell Culture and DNA Transfection

The glucagon-producing InR1G9 (hamster; Ref. 24) and alpha TC1 (mouse; Ref. 25), insulin-producing HIT T15 (hamster; Ref. 26), beta TC1 (mouse; Ref. 27), RIN-5F (rat, Ref. 28), and MIN6 (mouse; Ref. 29), and somatostatin-producing RIN 1027-B2 (rat, Ref. 30) cell lines as well as the non-islet Syrian hamster baby kidney (BHK 21) cells were grown in RPMI 1640 (Seromed; Basel, Switzerland) supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum and 5% newborn calf serum, 100 units of penicillin, and 100 µg of streptomycin/ml. The insulin-producing rat cell line Ins1 (31) was cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 2 mM glutamine, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 100 units of penicillin, and 100 µg of streptomycin/ml. alpha TC1 and beta TC1 cells were generously provided by Dr. D. Hanahan (University of California, San Francisco), MIN6 cells by Dr. J.-I. Miyazaki (Kumamoto University Medical School, Kumamoto, Japan), and Ins1 cells by Dr. C. B. Wollheim (University of Geneva Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland). BHK cells were transfected by the calcium phosphate technique (32) using 10 µg of plasmid DNA/6-cm Petri dish. The cdx-3 expression plasmid pBAT7.cdx3 was kindly provided by Dr. M. German (University of California, San Francisco, CA), and plasmids cdx2/3 A.cmv, cdx2/3 B.cmv, and cdx4.cmv were constructed by subcloning the respective PCR fragments in a cmv-driven expression vector (33). For stable transfection of InR1G9 cells, the PCR fragment of cdx-2/3 B was cloned in sense orientation into the eukaryotic expression vector pBJ1-neo (Ref. 34; kindly provided by Dr. M. Davies, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA). After transfection by the calcium phosphate technique, stably transfected clones were selected and grown in 200-400 µg/ml Geneticin (G-418 Sulfate, Life Technologies, Inc., Basel, Switzerland).

RNase Protection Analysis

Uniformly labeled RNA probes were obtained from in vitro transcription with T3 or T7 RNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim) as described (35). The cdx-1 cDNA used for riboprobe generation was generously provided by Dr. R. James (University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia) and contains 412 nt homologous to nt 114-525 of the mouse cdx-1 mRNA (36). cDNAs for the mouse cdx-4 and the hamster cdx-2/3 A, cdx2/3 B, and cdx-2/3 homeobox were obtained by PCR amplification. As a control for RNA quantity, a riboprobe was synthesized containing 250 nt of the mouse beta -actin cDNA (codon 220-303; Ambion, Lugano, Switzerland). RNase protection analysis was performed according to standard protocols (22) except that RNA digestion was performed with 4 µg/ml RNase A. The relative abundance of protected fragments was analyzed using a PhosphorImager.

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSAs)

EMSAs were performed as described previously (37) using nuclear extracts prepared according to Schreiber et al. (38). Anti-Cdx-3 antibodies were generously provided by Dr. M. German (University of California).

Immunoblotting

Nuclear extracts were separated on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA) as described previously (39, 40). Western blotting was performed using rabbit polyclonal anti-Cdx-3 (15) as first antibody and peroxidase-coupled anti-rabbit immungloblin as secondary reagent. Antigen-antibody complexes were visualized by chemoluminescence using the ECL Western blotting system (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom).

Chloramphenicol Acetyltransferase (CAT) and Protein Assays

Transfection was performed with 10 µg of reporter plasmid -292 CAT and 1 µg of effector plasmid (cdx2/3 A.cmv, cdx2/3 B.cmv, cdx4.cmv, cmv). RSV-CAT (41) and the cytomegalovirus expression vector served as positive and negative controls, respectively. Cell extracts were prepared 48 h after transfection and analyzed for CAT activity as described previously (37) except that quantification of acetylated and nonacetylated forms was performed using a PhosphorImager. All assays were carried out a minimum of five times. Protein concentrations were determined with a Bio-Rad protein assay kit.


RESULTS

Expression of Homeobox-containing Genes Differs Between Alpha and Beta Cells

To investigate the relative distribution of homeodomain proteins in alpha and beta cells of the endocrine pancreas, we designed degenerate oligonucleotide primers based on highly conserved sequences of the Antennapedia homeodomain class of transcription factors (42). As shown in Table I, cDNA clones corresponding to Idx-1/STF1/IPF1 (11, 16, 43) were most frequently found in insulin-producing cells (HIT-T15 and beta TC1) and even the sole sequence obtained from primary islets and primary beta cells. This finding suggests that Idx-1/STF1/IPF1 mRNA levels are the most abundant compared with those encoding other homeodomain proteins of the same class. In glucagon-producing (InR1G9 and alpha TC1) and primary non-beta cells, by contrast, sequences corresponding to cdx-2/3 were most commonly found. Out of 23 clones analyzed in glucagon-producing cells, 16 matched the sequence of cdx-2 (in mouse-derived cells) or cdx-3 (in hamster-derived cells), whereas 24 out of 28 were found in primary non-beta cells (Table I). Of note, cdx-2/3 sequences were not exclusively found in glucagon- but also in insulin-producing cells. Additional cDNA fragments corresponding to known and unknown homeodomain proteins were amplified in glucagon-producing cells and in primary non-beta cells (Table I). Their respective mRNA levels relative to that of cdx-2/3 were found by RNase protection analyses to be much lower and for most of them hardly detectable (data not shown). We also screened a mouse alpha TC1 library with the 32P-labeled PCR fragments. All clones obtained corresponded to the published cdx-2 sequence (17). We thus conclude that the cdx-2/3 gene is expressed in glucagon-producing cells and that its mRNA may be the most abundant homeobox transcript of the Antennapedia class in these cells.

Table I.

Frequency of homeobox sequences in cloned PCR products

Degenerate oligonucleotide primers used for PCR amplification hybridize to motifs ELEKE(F/L) and WFQNRRM in the 5' and 3' part of the homeodomain, respectively. An asterisk marks the closest sequence match for the unknown homeobox sequence in the NCBI database.
Glucagon-producing cell lines Insulin-producing cell lines Primary islets Primary non-beta cells Primary beta cells Reference

Hox A1 1 /23 44
Hox A9 2 /23 45
Hox C10 1 /23 46
Hox D9 1 /28 47, 48 
Cdx-2/3 16 /23 4 /11 24 /28 15, 17 
Idx1/STF1/IPF1 3 /23 7 /11 12/12 2 /28 10/10 11, 16, 43 
Unknown 1 /28 49*

Cdx-2/3 Is the Only caudal-related Gene Expressed in the Islets

In mammalian intestine, expression of three caudal-type homeobox genes, cdx-1, cdx-2/3, and cdx-4 has been reported (for review, see Ref. 50). Since homeobox sequences corresponding to cdx-1 and cdx-4 have also been amplified from rat pancreatic islet cDNA (11), we examined the relative abundance of the three different cdx mRNAs in both glucagon- and insulin-producing cell lines by RNase protection analyses. Using a riboprobe specific for the 5' end of the cdx-1 cDNA (Fig. 1A), a corresponding protected fragment of 412 nt could only be detected in rat intestine, serving as a positive control, but neither in InR1G9 nor in HIT T15 cells (Fig. 1B). These data were confirmed by assays with mRNA derived from mouse alpha TC1 and rat Ins1 cells. Even after prolonged exposure, no cdx-1-specific signal was visible in these islet cell lines (data not shown).


Fig. 1.

Tissue distribution of the caudal-type homeobox mRNAs. A, schematic diagram representing the location of RNA probes used in RNase protection experiments. cDNAs encoding Cdx-1, Cdx-2/3, and Cdx-4 are illustrated. Shaded boxes represent open reading frames containing the homeobox (black bar). B-D, autoradiograms of RNase protection analyses using riboprobes generated from the mouse cdx-1, mouse cdx-4, and hamster cdx-2/3 cDNAs. As a positive control, an antisense in vitro transcript of the mouse beta -actin was added in all assays. The specific activity of this riboprobe was 25-125 times less than the activity of the caudal-type antisense transcripts. Hybridization was carried out using 50 µg of yeast tRNA or 30 µg of total RNA from rat jejunum or the insulin- and glucagon-producing hamster cell lines HIT T15 and InR1G9, respectively. ivt, in vitro transcript without RNase treatment. Fragment sizes are given in nucleotides.


[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]


Similar results were obtained using an antisense in vitro transcript covering the cdx-4 open reading frame. In agreement with the previously reported cdx-4 expression pattern limited to the embryo (23), no cdx-4-specific signal was detected in the adult intestine, InR1G9, or HIT T15 cells (Fig. 1C). Additional assays performed on mouse alpha TC1, mouse Min6, and rat Ins1 cells also confirmed the absence of cdx-4 transcripts in pancreatic cell lines (data not shown). However, when reverse transcription-PCR amplifications were carried out using cdx-4-specific primers, PCR fragments corresponding to this mRNA could be obtained from InR1G9, primary beta, and primary non-beta cells. Their relative abundance was much lower compared with a control amplification performed on mouse embryonic RNA d9.5 (a kind gift from Dr. J. Huarte, University of Geneva Medical School) (data not shown).

In contrast to cdx-1 and cdx-4 transcripts, which can only be detected by PCR amplification, the cdx-2/3 homeobox gene is expressed at high levels in both insulin- and glucagon-producing cell lines. As shown in Fig. 1D, a fragment of 115 nt corresponding to part of the cdx-2/3 homeobox sequence is protected in InR1G9 and HIT T15 cells as well as in the intestine. The relative abundance of cdx-2/3 transcripts in the pancreatic cell lines tested is similar to that found in the intestine and about 4% that of the beta -actin mRNA. We therefore conclude that of the caudal-related genes, only cdx-2/3 is expressed at a significant level in islet cell lines.

Alternative Splicing Generates Two cdx-2/3 mRNAs Present in Islet Cells

Amplification of the cdx-2/3 cDNA using primers 10 and 11 complementary to the 5'- and 3'-ends of the transcript, respectively, generates two specific fragments (Fig. 2A). One PCR product corresponds to the expected size of 1.2 kilobase pairs, whereas an additional smaller band is about 500 bp. Both fragments were identified in glucagon- and insulin-producing cells, in primary islets, and in both primary beta and non-beta cells (data not shown). Sequence analysis of the 500-bp fragment revealed that it shares the 5' and 3' termini with the full-length transcript, whereas it lacks sequences encoding the amino-terminal part of Cdx-2/3. Of note, the homeodomain is entirely present in the smaller form, designated Cdx-2/3 B. The translation initiation codon of cdx-2/3 B is found within the 5'-untranslated region of the longer isoform designated cdx-2/3 A, 32 bp upstream of the cdx-2/3 A ATG (Fig. 2A). The sequence upstream of the cdx-2/3 B initiation codon conforms closely to the consensus sequence for translational initiation as proposed by Kozak (51). Interestingly, the 3' splice junction of cdx-2/3 B corresponds to the insertion site of intron 1 of the cdx-2/3 pre-mRNA, whereas the 5' splice junction is located within the ATG start codon of cdx-2/3 A. The 5' and 3' termini of the alternative intron correspond to the consensus splice site sequence of nuclear introns (52) (see Fig. 2A).


Fig. 2.

Alternative splicing of cdx-2/3 transcripts. A, schematic diagram illustrating the cdx-2/3 cDNA with the mouse intron insertion sites (17) In1 and In2, for introns 1 and 2, separating the three exons (E1, E2, and E3). A shaded box represents the open reading frame containing the homeobox (black bar). cDNAs cdx-2/3 A and cdx-2/3 B were cloned by PCR amplification with primers 10 and 11, and the splice junction of the smaller form is indicated at the bottom. The ATG start codon of the longer form is underlined and the homeobox sequence is in boldface letters. Lowercase letters indicate sequences of exon 1 that have been deleted in cdx-2/3 B. B, schematic representation of antisense RNA probes (hatched boxes) used for RNase protection analyses and the expected protected fragments (open bars). A dashed line represents the portion of cdx-2/3 mRNA that is not present in cdx-2/3 B, while sequences of the in vitro transcript complementary to vector sequences are indicated by a solid line. C, autoradiogram of RNase protection analyses using riboprobes generated from the hamster cdx-2/3 A and cdx-2/3 B cDNAs. As a positive control, an antisense in vitro transcript (ivt) of the mouse beta -actin was added in all but two assays. The specific activity of this riboprobe was 125 times less than the activity of the cdx-2/3 antisense transcripts. Hybridization was carried out using 50 µg of yeast tRNA as a negative control or 30 µg of total RNA from the hamster cell line InR1G9. The 130-nt Delta  E1 fragment is not visible in lanes 5 and 7 of this autoradiogram because it has a much lower intensity using the cdx-2/3 A riboprobe. This might be due to the fact that the 130-nt fragment represents only 11% of the total length of riboprobe A and 30% of all cdx-2/3 transcripts. ivt, in vitro transcript without RNase treatment. Fragment sizes are given in nucleotides. E, exon; In, intron; UTR, untranslated RNA.


[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]


To evaluate the relative abundance of the two RNA isoforms in glucagon-producing cells, we performed RNase protection assays on InR1G9 RNA using either the cdx-2/3 A or cdx-2/3 B riboprobe (Fig. 2, B and C). With the cdx-2/3 A antisense in vitro transcript, two major protected bands can be observed, which correspond to the size of the full-length cdx-2/3 A (1068 nt) and the second and third exons (404 nt) comprised in the cdx-2/3 B mRNA, respectively (Fig. 2C). The relative abundance of the truncated mRNA isoform as determined with a PhosphorImager is 30% of all cdx-2/3 transcripts. Identical results were obtained whether total or cytoplasmic RNA was used for the assay (data not shown). Using the cdx-2/3 B riboprobe, completely protected cdx-2/3 B fragments were identified at 534 nt. A second signal at 404 nt, comprising the second and third exon, corresponds in this assay to cdx-2/3 A isoform mRNAs (about 70% of all cdx-2/3 transcripts) and is therefore much more abundant than when using the cdx-2/3 A riboprobe. In addition to the third specific fragment of 130 nt corresponding to part of the first exon, signals that could represent degradation products of the three major protected fragments, splicing intermediates, or alternative mRNA isoforms were detected but at a much lower abundance. We thus conclude that expression of the cdx-2/3 gene in islet cells generates at least two mRNAs by alternative splicing, probably giving rise to two Cdx-2/3 isoforms that differ by their amino-terminal ends. The two cdx-2/3 transcripts are not specific for glucagon-producing cells inasmuch as they are also found in insulin-producing cells and the intestine (data not shown).

To verify that the proteins corresponding to Cdx-2/3 A and B were present in islet cells, we performed Western blot analyses of InR1G9 and HIT T15 nuclear extracts. As shown in Fig. 3A, a band of 34 kDa corresponding to Cdx-2/3 A was observed in both cell types in roughly the same intensity. In contrast to the longer isoform, the anti-Cdx-2/3 antibody was unable to recognize Cdx-2/3 B in Western blot assays as demonstrated by the failure to detect this isoform in clone cdx-2/3 B.S2 overexpressing Cdx-2/3 B. The presence of both Cdx-2/3 proteins in islet cells was confirmed, however, by EMSA with oligonucleotide G1-52 (Table II) matching the consensus binding sequence of caudal-related genes. A complex corresponding to cdx-2/3 A is observed with nuclear extracts from different insulin-, glucagon-, and somatostatin-producing cell lines (Fig. 3B). A second complex representing Cdx-2/3 B is shown in an InR1G9 clone overexpressing the smaller isoform (cdx-2/3 B.S2) and with extracts from RIN-5F and RIN 1027-B2 cells (Fig. 3B). The abundance of Cdx-2/3 B relative to Cdx-2/3 A in both glucagon- and insulin-producing islet cell lines is less than 1:20 on average. This contrasts to the relative levels of both isoform mRNAs (Fig. 2C) and suggests that Cdx-2/3 B has a lower binding affinity for G1-52 or that translational efficiency or degradation rates differ for the Cdx-2/3 isoforms.


Fig. 3. Relative abundance of Cdx-2/3 proteins in glucagon-, insulin-, and somatostatin-producing cells. A, nuclear extracts of fibroblast cells overexpressing Cdx-2/3 A (5 µg), HIT T15 (30 µg), and InR1G9 cells (30 µg) were separated on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane for hybridization with anti-Cdx-2/3-specific antibody. The 34-kDa Cdx-2/3 protein was visualized by chemoluminescence. B, EMSA using 8 µg of nuclear extracts from an InR1G9 clone overexpressing Cdx-2/3 B (cdx-2/3 B.S2) and pancreatic cell lines as indicated with oligonucleotide G1-52 (Table II). The addition of Cdx-2/3 immune serum (I) is indicated. P* designates free oligonucleotides, and nonspecific complexes are indicated by an asterisk.
[View Larger Version of this Image (45K GIF file)]


Table II.

Synthetic oligonucleotides used in EMSA

Mutations in oligonucleotides deviating from the wild-type rat glucagon gene sequence are indicated. Nucleotides in the G1 element homologous to binding sites of caudal-related homeodomain proteins (18) are underlined.
    -110     -100      -90       -80       -70       -60
      *         *         *         *         *         *
G1-56 AGTGAAATCATTTGAACAAAACCCCATT<UNL>ATTTACA</UNL>GATGAGAA<UNL>ATTTATA</UNL>TTGTCAG
C1-56 M11 -------------------------------------------CC------------
G1-52                                       GAGAA<UNL>ATTTATA</UNL>TTGTCAGCG
G1-52 M11                                       -----CC--------------
G1-52 M13                                       -------CC------------
G1-33                      CCCCATT<UNL>ATTTACA</UNL>GATGAGAA<UNL>ATTTATA</UNL>TTGT
G1-33r5                      ------CCCGCCCCAG-----------------
G1-33r3                      -----------------GACAGCCCGC------

Cdx-2/3 Interacts with the Upstream Promoter Sequence G1 of the Glucagon Gene

The upstream promoter sequence G1 involved in the cell-specific expression of the glucagon gene (9) contains three AT-rich sequences, which are potential motifs for the binding of homeobox-containing transactivating factors. Two of these sequences represent nearly identical 7-bp direct repeats (Table II), and the proximal motif from nt -67 to -73 matches closely the consensus binding site for caudal-related genes (18, 19). We therefore investigated by EMSA if in vitro produced Cdx-2/3 A and B proteins were able to bind G1. As shown in Fig. 4A, two specific complexes are observed that migrate with the same electrophoretic mobility as the two faster migrating complexes formed with G1-52 and nuclear extracts from islet cell lines or clone cdx-2/3 B.S2. Both complexes are displaced by the addition of anti-Cdx-2/3 antibody and thus correspond to the Cdx-2/3 isoform proteins. The fact that the anti-Cdx-2/3 antibody that was raised against the carboxyl terminus of Cdx-3 (15) recognizes Cdx-2/3 B in EMSA but not in Western blot analysis may possibly be explained by the different protein conformations in both assays. To test for the relative binding affinity of Cdx-2/3 A and B for G1, we competed for both complexes formed with nuclear extracts from clone cdx-2/3 B.S2 with increasing amounts of unlabeled G1-52. As shown in Fig. 4B, competition results in similar displacement effects on Cdx-2/3 A and B complexes, indicating that both isoforms have the same binding affinity for G1; consequently, protein synthesis or degradation rates for Cdx-2/3 A and B must be different. The slowest migrating band was competed with both specific and nonspecific oligonucleotides (data not shown) and does not react with anti-Cdx-2/3 antibody (Fig. 4A).


Fig. 4. Binding of Cdx-2/3 to the proximal promoter of the glucagon gene G1. A, binding of Cdx-2/3 A and B to G1-52 using in vitro produced proteins or nuclear extracts from InR1G9 or InR1G9 cells stably transfected with cdx-2/3 B (cdx-2/3 B.S2). B, competition of Cdx-2/3 A and B binding with increasing amounts of unlabeled oligonucleotide G1-52. C, complexes formed on the two AT-rich direct repeat motifs within G1 using nuclear extracts from InR1G9, BHK 21 (C), or BHK21 cells overexpressing Cdx-2/3 A. D designates a complex that might correspond to a Cdx-2/3 A homodimer. B1, B2, and B3 indicate the positions of specific but yet unidentified complexes. D, direct repeat motifs within G1. B1 and B2 point to complexes observed with nuclear extracts from InR1G9 cells and oligonucleotide G1-33r3. E, effect of mutation of the proximal AT-rich direct repeat motif on Cdx-2/3 A binding. EMSAs were performed with 6-8 µg of nuclear extracts and incubated with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides as shown in Table II. The addition of Cdx-2/3 preimmune (P) or immune serum (I) is indicated. P* designates free oligonucleotides, and nonspecific complexes are indicated by an asterisk.
[View Larger Version of this Image (65K GIF file)]


To analyze in more detail the binding of Cdx-2/3 A to G1, we then investigated protein-DNA complex formation with the oligonucleotide G1-33 containing both AT-rich direct repeat elements of G1 (Table II). As shown in Fig. 4C, incubation of nuclear extracts from BHK 21 cells transfected with the hamster cdx-2/3 A cDNA with oligonucleotide G1-33 results in the formation of two complexes (Cdx-2/3 and D) not present with control extracts from untransfected BHK 21 cells. Both complexes are supershifted by the addition of anti-Cdx-2/3 antibodies but not by preimmune serum. We therefore suggest that the lower and upper complexes represent Cdx-2/3 A monomer and homodimers, respectively. Of note, the monomeric form is much favored over dimer formation in these assay conditions. Using nuclear extracts from glucagon-producing InR1G9 cells, we detect three specific protein complexes, B1, B2, and B3 (Fig. 4C), as previously reported (9). The addition of the anti-Cdx-2/3 antibody displaced B3 but not B1 or B2. Since the migration velocity of B3 is different to both the Cdx-2/3 monomer and dimer (Fig. 4C, BHK 21 extracts), we propose that B3 represents a heterodimer containing Cdx-2/3 A.

Whereas oligonucleotide G1-33 contains both AT-rich direct repeat elements, G1-33r5 and G1-33r3 have the distal and proximal motif mutated, respectively (Table II). Incubation of nuclear extracts from BHK 21 cells overexpressing the hamster Cdx-2/3 A with G1-33r5 and G1-33r3 results in the formation of a specific complex that is supershifted by the addition of anti-Cdx-2/3 antibody (Fig. 4D). However, the intensity of the complex formed with oligonucleotide G1-33r3 is lower, indicating that the downstream AT-rich motif is a more favorable binding site for Cdx-2/3 A than the upstream motif, while homodimer formation only occurs when both sites are intact. With InR1G9 nuclear extracts, mutation of the 5' AT-rich motif (G1-33r5, Fig. 4D) results in the loss of B1, B2, and B3, whereas a new complex migrating with the same velocity as the Cdx-2/3 A monomer appears; this complex is supershifted by the anti-Cdx-2/3 antibody. Mutation of the proximal motif by contrast (G1-33r3, Fig. 4D), does not affect B1 or B2, but only formation of B3. Therefore, we conclude that B1 and B2 bind to the distal portion of the G1 control element and do not contain Cdx-2/3 A. In contrast, Cdx-2/3 A binds most preferentially to the proximal AT-rich motif and contributes as a heterodimer to the formation of B3.

We then investigated the effects of more specific mutations within the proximal AT-rich direct repeat motif of G1 on binding of Cdx-2/3 A, using the mutated oligonucleotides G1-52 M11 and M13 (Table II). Both mutations result in a marked decrease of Cdx-2/3 A binding as assayed with InR1G9 and Cdx-2/3 A-containing BHK 21 nuclear extracts (Fig. 4E). To study the effect of the M11 mutation on B3 formation, we used the mutated oligonucleotide G1-56 M11 (Table II); M11 eliminated B3, indicating that the mutated nucleotides are critical for B3 formation (data not shown).

In addition to the two AT-rich sequences arranged as a tandem repeat, G1 contains a third AT-rich motif from nt -54 to -57, that was recently reported to bind the homeodomain factor Isl-1 with high affinity (53). This sequence does not correspond to the consensus binding motif for caudal-related genes and in agreement with this observation, no Cdx-2/3 A complex could be detected with nuclear extracts from InR1G9 cells and an oligonucleotide covering the sequence from -44 to -63 (data not shown). The Cdx-2/3 A binding pattern on G1 observed by EMSAs was also confirmed by DNase I footprint assays. Utilization of Cdx-2/3 A protein overexpressed in BHK 21 resulted in a weak and a strong protection of the distal and proximal AT-rich motif of G1 (data not shown).

Cdx-2/3 A Transactivates the Glucagon Gene Promoter in BHK 21 Cells

We previously reported that point mutations (M11) of the proximal AT-rich direct repeat element within G1 markedly decreased transcriptional activity conferred by the glucagon gene promoter (9). To ascertain whether Cdx-2/3 A binding to this motif leads to changes in transcriptional activity, 292 bp of the 5'-flanking sequence of the rat glucagon gene promoter linked to the CAT reporter gene (-292 CAT) were cotransfected into BHK 21 cells together with increasing amounts of cdx-2/3 A cDNA inserted into a cytomegalovirus promoter-driven expression vector or the vector alone. The reporter construct -292 CAT was inactive in BHK 21 cells when cotransfected with the vector, whereas a dose-dependent activation in transcription resulted from overexpression of Cdx-2/3 A (Fig. 5).


Fig. 5. Dose-response curve of transactivation of the glucagon promoter by Cdx-2/3. Different amounts of cdx-2/3 A cDNA in a cytomegalovirus-driven expression vector (0.1, 0.5, and 1 µg of plasmid DNA) (top line) were cotransfected into BHK 21 cells together with a reporter plasmid containing the CAT gene under the control of sequence nt -292 to +58 of the rat glucagon gene promoter (-292 CAT; Ref. 7). Cotransfection of the expression vector alone (bottom line) served as a negative control. CAT activities assayed after 48 h are given relative to the positive control RSV-CAT as the mean of eight experiments ± S.E.
[View Larger Version of this Image (10K GIF file)]


Interference of Cdx-2/3 B with Cdx-2/3 A Binding on G1 and Transcriptional Activation

To analyze the impact of Cdx-2/3 B on DNA-protein complexes formed on the G1 element, we stably transfected InR1G9 cells with the smaller isoform cloned in the eukaryotic expression vector pBJ1-neo (34). When nuclear extracts of the generated InR1G9 clones are incubated with oligonucleotide G1-52, different levels of Cdx-2/3 B overexpression can be observed (Fig. 6A). Whereas clone B.S7 does not express the truncated isoform, clones S.B2 and S.B5 contain an equal level and twice the level, respectively, of Cdx-2/3 B relative to Cdx-2/3 A. Incubation of the same nuclear extracts with G1-56 containing both AT-rich sequences results in the formation of the usual complexes B1, B2, and B3 and of a complex representing the Cdx-2/3 B monomer (Figs. 4C and 6B). Of note, the intensity of B3 is decreased with nuclear extracts from all clones overexpressing Cdx-2/3 B, although there appears to be no strict correlation with the expression level of the truncated isoform. Additionally, a new complex is detected from clone B.S5, probably representing a homo- or heterodimer of Cdx-2/3 B. Of note, the new complex is only formed with InR1G9 extracts expressing high levels of Cdx-2/3 B, indicating that binding of the monomer is favored over dimer formation, an observation reinforced by the failure to detect Cdx-2/3 B homodimers after overexpression in BHK 21 cells or protein synthesis in vitro (data not shown, Fig. 6C). To investigate complexes formed on G1 in the presence of both isoforms overexpressed in BHK 21, we mixed the two nuclear extracts prior to the addition of the labeled oligonucleotide. As seen in Fig. 6C, no additional complexes that might contain Cdx-2/3 A and Cdx-2/3 B could be observed. Our data indicate that Cdx-2/3 A or B homodimer and Cdx-2/3 A/B heterodimer formation are not readily observed on G1 and that heterodimers between Cdx-2/3 A or B and another protein are probably favored.


Fig. 6. Interference of Cdx-2/3 B with complex formation on G1. A and B, EMSAs using nuclear extracts from InR1G9 clones stably transfected with cdx-2/3 B and oligonucleotides G1-52 and G1-56. B1, B2, and B3 indicate the positions of specific complexes formed on G1, and X points to a novel complex observed with clone cdx-2/3 B.S5. C, complex formation on G1-56 using 8 µg of nuclear extracts from clone cdx-2/3 B.S5 or 8 and 16 µg of nuclear extracts from BHK 21 cells transfected with cdx-2/3 A and cdx-2/3 B, respectively. In lane 4, 4 and 16 µg of BHK 21 extracts expressing Cdx-2/3 A and Cdx-2/3 B, respectively, were mixed prior to the addition of G1-56. P* designates free oligonucleotides, and nonspecific complexes are indicated by an asterisk.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]


To compare the effects of both Cdx-2/3 isoforms on transcriptional activation, we cotransfected either cdx-2/3 A or cdx-2/3 B with -292 CAT. While cotransfection with cdx-2/3 A resulted in a 11-fold increase, cotransfection of cdx-2/3 B was, by contrast, without any effect (Fig. 7A). The fact that Cdx-2/3 B is able to bind the glucagon promoter without activating transcription suggests that the activation domain of Cdx-2/3 might be located in the N-terminal part of the protein, which is deleted in isoform Cdx-2/3 B. To investigate whether the truncated isoform can decrease or prevent the activation of transcription conferred by Cdx-2/3 A, both Cdx-2/3 isoform cDNAs were cotransfected with the reporter construct; a slight but significant decrease of 19% in transcriptional activation compared with cdx-2/3 A alone could be observed (Fig. 7A). This small effect might be explained by a higher relative abundance of Cdx-2/3 A compared with Cdx-2/3 B as assayed by EMSAs (data not shown). To further analyze the effect of Cdx-2/3 B expression in glucagon-producing cells, we transfected InR1G9 cells producing only little amounts of the smaller isoform and also the two stably transfected clones cdx-2/3 B.S2 and cdx-2/3 B.S5 with the reporter construct -292 CAT. As shown in Fig. 7B, expression of relatively higher levels of Cdx-2/3 B results in a 72% reduction of relative transcriptional activity compared with InR1G9 cells. In contrast, no significant decrease in activity is observed when similar levels of the Cdx-2/3 isoforms are present in InR1G9 cells. The presence of Cdx-2/3 B in a higher concentration relative to Cdx-2/3 A may interfere with complex formation on G1 by competing for the protein partners of Cdx-2/3 A and therefore influence the relative transcriptional activation by a mechanism that remains to be determined.


Fig. 7. Interference of Cdx-2/3 B with transactivation of the glucagon gene promoter. A, transient expression of Cdx-2/3 A and Cdx-2/3 B in BHK 21. Alternative spliced cdx-2/3 cDNAs A and B in a cytomegalovirus-driven expression vector were cotransfected into BHK 21 cells together with the reporter construct -292 CAT. CAT activities are given relative to RSV-CAT as the mean of six experiments ± S.E. The relative transcriptional activations of Cdx-2/3 A, Cdx-2/3 B, Cdx-2/3 A+B, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) are 50.6, 7.2, 41.1, and 4.8%, respectively, of RSV-CAT. The p value comparing cotransfection of both isoforms in BHK 21 cells and transfection of cdx-2/3 A alone was calculated using the paired two-tailed Student's t test and is 0.0416. B, transactivation of the glucagon promoter construct -292 CAT in InR1G9 cells and InR1G9 clones stably transfected with cdx-2/3 B. CAT activities (shaded bars) are given relative to RSV-CAT (hatched bars) as the mean of six experiments ± S.E. The relative transcriptional activations of -292 CAT in InR1G9 cells, clone cdx-2/3 B.S2, and clone cdx-2/3 B.S5 are 46.7, 40.0, and 13.1%, respectively, of RSV-CAT in these cells. The p value comparing transfection clones cdx-2/3 B.S2 and cdx-2/3 B.S5 was calculated using the paired two-tailed Student's t test and is 0.0063.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

Differentiation of multicellular organisms is based on a precise temporal and spatial pattern of cell specific gene expression. In vertebrates, as in all other metazoa analyzed today, homeotic genes are major control genes determining cell fate and function (42). Islet cells express a variety of homeobox genes, and recent data indicate that Idx-1/STF1/IPF1, a homeodomain protein of the Antennapedia class, plays a major role in the cell-specific expression of the insulin gene, its regulation by glucose, and the differentiation of the pancreas (16, 43, 54, 55, 56, 57).

To better understand the molecular mechanisms involved in the islet cell-specific expression of the glucagon gene, we searched for homeotic cDNA sequences in glucagon-producing cells by reverse transcription-PCR. cdx-2/3 appears from our PCR analysis to be the predominant homeobox gene from the Antennapedia class in glucagon-producing cells, although it is also present in the intestine and in pancreatic beta cells (15, 17, 18). Quantification of cdx-2/3 by RNase protection experiments, Western blots, and EMSAs on RNA and nuclear extracts from glucagon-, insulin-, and somatostatin-producing cell lines show roughly equivalent cdx-2/3 transcript and protein levels in all cell types. In addition, the amount of PCR-amplified full-length cdx-2/3 cDNA products from primary beta and non-beta cells does not indicate major differences. The reason for the preferential amplification of Idx-1/STF1/IPF1 sequences in primary beta cells is then likely due to the relatively higher Idx-1/STF1/IPF1 mRNA levels compared with cdx-2/3. The relative distribution of Antennapedia class homeobox sequences identified in our study is slightly different from previous PCR analyses in islet cell lines and primary islets (11, 12); some homeobox genes reported to be expressed in primary islets could not be detected among the cDNA clones sequenced (Table I). Likely explanations for these differences are statistical variance, primer choice, and the source of RNA analyzed.

Cdx-2/3 is a member of the family of homeodomain proteins related to the Drosophila melanogaster gene caudal (cad) (58). caudal-related genes have been found in Bombyx mori (59), Caenorhabditis elegans (60), zebrafish, Xenopus laevis, and chicken, as well as in the mammals mouse, rat, hamster, and human (50, 61). In vertebrates, expression onset of most caudal-related genes is observed at the state of gastrulation exhibiting a gradient along the anteroposterior axis. With the exception of Chox-cad2 (62) and Xcad-3 (63), transcripts of caudal-related genes are detected predominantly in endodermally derived tissues, playing a major role in the development of the intestine (17, 23, 64, 65). For cdxA, early expression pattern is reported to cover several organs of endodermal origin like liver, pancreas, lung, and the epithelial lining of the intestine, whereas later expression is restricted to the intestine. The presence of cdx-2/3 in adult cells of the endocrine pancreas (15, 66) may indicate a wider role of cdx genes not only in the development of endodermally derived tissues but also in transcriptional control of differentiated islet cells. In contrast to the intestine, cdx-2/3 is the only caudal-related gene expressed at significant levels in the islets of Langerhans. Interestingly, alternative splicing of the cdx-2/3 mRNA leads to an amino-terminally truncated isoform protein with translational initiation at an upstream AUG normally supposed to be skipped (15). Of note, all mammalian caudal-related genes exhibit a second AUG codon 22-33 nt upstream of the initiator AUG (17, 23, 36). With the exception of cdx-2/3 B, however, these upstream AUGs only imperfectly match the Kozak consensus for vertebrates, which may explain the deviation of the first AUG rule. The initiator context for cdx-2/3 B (GCGAGC<UNL>AUG</UNL>G) is close to the consensus sequence GCCACC<UNL>AUG</UNL>G, allowing translational initiation in the absence of the second AUG. Protein synthesis of Cdx-2/3 B may not be optimal, however, inasmuch it is much lower than synthesis of Cdx-2/3 A in in vitro transcription/translation assays.

Our results indicate that one of the functions of cdx-2/3 may be the regulation of glucagon gene expression. Cdx-2/3 indeed binds the upstream control element G1 at the proximal AT-rich repeat motif, which corresponds to the consensus binding site for caudal-related genes (19). It is also capable, although with much lower affinity, of binding the distal, imperfect repeat motif within G1. However, in contrast to the proximal motif, the distal element contains a C at position 6, where in the CdxA consensus as well as in the Cad binding sites there is a strong preference for T. When oligonucleotides used for EMSAs contain both repeat elements, Cdx-2/3 A homodimer formation (complex D) is observed with BHK 21 nuclear extracts containing high concentrations of Cdx-2/3 A and disappears when one of the repeat elements is mutated. Our data indicate that if homodimer formation occurs, this is only in the presence of large amounts of Cdx-2/3 A. With cdx-2/3 A-transfected BHK 21 extracts the intensity of complex D is less than (null)/1;10 that of the monomeric complex. Cdx-2/3 A homodimer formation is thus not favored with G1, an observation in agreement with the low affinity of the distal AT-rich motif for Cdx-2/3 A. By contrast, with InR1G9 nuclear extracts, only the slow migrating complex B3 is recognized by anti-Cdx-2/3 antibodies, and a Cdx-2/3 A monomer can only be detected using small or mutated oligonucleotides that may prevent the assembly of higher molecular weight complexes. Thus, with extracts from glucagon-producing cells, formation of heterodimers is much favored over monomers. Caudal binding sites in Drosophila (67), the rat insulin I gene (15), and the mouse sucrase-isomaltase gene (18) represent direct or indirect repeats, and for the latter homodimer formation was observed. Although most dimer-forming homeodomain proteins bind to sequences with dyad symmetry, it is well established that dimerization also occurs on tandem repeats such as G1 (68, 69, 70, 71). However, in contrast to the redox potential-dependent dimer formation on the sucrase-isomaltase gene promoter, neither the Cdx-2/3 A homodimer nor B3 binding to G1 is influenced by the redox state (data not shown). In a recent report, Jin and Drucker (66) have observed binding of Cdx-2/3 A as a monomer to the G1 element. However, the oligonucleotides used for EMSA in their study comprised only one Cdx-2/3 binding site and thus do not enable dimer formation.

Binding of Cdx-2/3 A to the glucagon promoter leads to a dose-dependent activation of transcription in non-glucagon-producing cells, and mutation of the Cdx-2/3 A binding site leads to a marked decrease in transcriptional activity, suggesting a functional relevance for Cdx-2/3 A in glucagon gene expression (9). The presence of an amino-terminally truncated Cdx-2/3 isoform in glucagon-producing cells that binds to G1 but does not activate transcription opens additional possibilities for gene regulation. The interference of Cdx-2/3 B with the transcriptional property of Cdx-2/3 A in BHK 21 and InR1G9 cells suggests a role of Cdx-2/3 B as a modulator of glucagon gene expression. This effect could be due to competition of both isoforms for binding to the glucagon promoter or to protein-protein interactions inhibiting the activation properties of Cdx-2/3 A. It will be interesting to analyze if the alternative splicing leading to both Cdx-2/3 isoforms is differentially regulated during development or in response to physiological stimuli and correlated to changes in glucagon gene expression.

G1 is a large DNA control element that likely interacts with multiple transcription factors; Cdx-2/3 A may be one of them present in complex B3. We previously identified at least three additional protein complexes, B1, B2, and B6 (9), that might also be functionally important for glucagon gene expression. Recently, the LIM-domain homeobox gene isl-1 was shown to interact with oligonucleotides containing the most proximal AT-rich motif (positions -54 to -57) of the glucagon promoter element G1 (53). However, in cotransfection experiments with 292 bp of the 5'-flanking sequence of the rat glucagon gene promoter linked to the CAT reporter gene, Isl-1 was unable to activate transcription, and no synergistic effect with Cdx-2/3 A on transcription of the glucagon gene could be observed.2 Therefore, Cdx-2/3 A is unlikely to interact with Isl-1, which by itself does not appear to play a major role in glucagon gene transcription.

Cdx-2/3 A has been implicated in the control of cell proliferation and differentiation in the intestine (65) as well as in the regulation of intestine-specific gene transcription, at least for the sucrase-isomaltase, carbonic anhydrase I, and lactase genes (18, 72). Cdx-2/3 A is also able to bind and activate the rat insulin I gene promoter at the minienhancer (15), although other homeodomain factors such as Idx-1/STF1/IPF1 are more likely physiological activators of insulin gene transcription (11, 16, 54, 55, 56). Our data and a recent report (66) indicate that Cdx-2/3 A is involved in glucagon gene expression both in the endocrine pancreas and in enteroendocrine cell lines expressing glucagon. In both cell types, Cdx-2/3 A was shown to transactivate the glucagon gene promoter (66). These results are consistent with the endodermal origin of both tissues and indicate that some of the mechanisms of glucagon gene regulation in the intestine and endocrine pancreas might be similar. The presence of two Cdx-2/3 isoforms with different transactivation properties not only in glucagon- but also in insulin-producing cells as well as in the intestine opens further possibilities to control gene expression in these tissues.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grant FN 3200-031327.91 (to J. P.) and Grant 32-043086.95 (to P. M.), the Helmut Horten Foundation, the Institute for Human Genetics and Biochemistry, the Wolfermann-Nägeli Foundation, and the Elsie and Carlos de Reuter Foundation. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1   The abbreviations used are: SV, simian virus; bp, base pair(s); PCR, polymerase chain reaction; nt, nucleotide(s); BHK, baby hamster kidney; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; RSV, Rous sarcoma virus.
2   B. Laser, P. Meda, I. Constant, and J. Philippe, unpublished observations.
Dagger    To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Clinical Diabetology, Centre Médical Universitaire, 1 rue Michel Servet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. Tel.: +41 22 702 55 67; Fax: +41 22 702 55 43; E-mail: Laser{at}cmu.unige.ch.

Acknowledgment

We thank B. Mach and his group for helpful advice.


REFERENCES

  1. Drucker, D. J., and Asa, S. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 13475-13478 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mojsov, S., Heinrich, G., Wilson, I. B., Ravazzola, M., Orci, L., and Habener, J. F. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 11880-11889 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Novak, U., Wilks, A., Buelln, G., and McEwen, S. (1987) Eur. J. Biochem. 164, 553-558 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Efrat, S., Teitelman, G., Anwar, M., Ruggiero, D., and Hanahan, D. (1988) Neuron 1, 605-613 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Lee, Y. C., Asa, S. L., and Drucker, D. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 10705-10708 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Cordier-Bussat, M., Morel, C., and Philippe, J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3904-3916 [Abstract]
  7. Philippe, J., Drucker, D., Knepel, W., Jepal, L., Misulovin, Z., and Habener, J. F. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 4877-4888 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Philippe, J., Morel, C., and Cordier-Bussat, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 3039-3045 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Morel, C., Cordier-Bussat, M., and Philippe, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 3046-3055 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Philippe, J. (1994) Endocr. Rev. 2, 21-27
  11. Miller, C., McGehee, R., and Habener, J. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1145-1156 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Rudnick, A., Ling, T. Y., Odagiri, H., Rutter, W. J., and German, M. S. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 12203-12207 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Emens, L. A., Landers, D. W., and Moss, L. G. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7300-7304 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Karlsson, O., Thor, S., Norberg, T., Ohlsson, H., and Edlund, T. (1990) Nature 344, 879-882 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. German, M. S., Wang, J., Chadwick, R. B., and Rutter, W. J. (1992) Genes & Dev. 6, 2165-2176 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ohlsson, H., Karlsson, K., and Edlund, T. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4251-4259 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. James, R., Erler, T., and Kazenwadel, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 15229-15237 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Suh, E., Chen, L., Taylor, J., and Traber, P. G. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7340-7351 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Margalit, Y., Yarus, S., Shapira, E., Gruenbaum, Y., and Fainsod, A. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 4915-4922 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Giordano, E., Cirulli, V., Bosco, D., Rouiller, D., Halban, P., and Meda, P. (1993) Am. J. Physiol. 265, C358-C364 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Philippe, J., Pacheco, I., and Meda, P. (1994) Diabetes 43, 523-528 [Abstract]
  22. Sambrook, E., Fritsch, F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  23. Gamer, L. W., and Wright, C. V. E. (1993) Mech. Dev. 43, 71-81 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Takaki, R., Ono, J., Nakamura, M., Yokogawa, Y., Kumae, S., Hiraoka, T., Yamagushi, K., Hamaguchi, K., and Uchida, S. (1986) In Vitro Cell. & Dev. Biol. 22, 120-126 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Powers, A. C., Efrat, S., Mojsov, S., Spector, D., Habener, J. F., and Hanahan, D. (1990) Diabetes 39, 406-414 [Abstract]
  26. Santerre, R. F., Cook, R. A., Criesel, R. M. D., Sharp, J. D., Williams, R. J., and Wilson, C. P. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 4339-4343 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Efrat, S., Linde, S., Kofod, H., Spector, D., Delannoy, M., Grant, S., Hanahan, D., and Baekkeskov, S. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 9037-9041 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Oie, H. K., Gazdar, A. F., Minna, J. D., Weir, G. C., and Baylin, S. B. (1983) Endocrinology 112, 1070-1075 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Miyazaki, J.-I., Araki, K., Yamato, E., Ikegami, H., Asano, T., Shibasaki, Y., Oka, Y., and Yamamura, K.-I. (1990) Endocrinology 127, 126-132 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Philippe, J., Chick, W. L., and Habener, J. F. (1987) J. Clin. Invest. 79, 351-358
  31. Asfari, M., Janjic, D., Meda, P., Li, G., Halban, P. A., and Wollheim, C. B. (1992) Endocrinology 130, 167-178 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Graham, F. L., and Van der Eb, A. J. (1973) Virology 52, 456-467 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Costa, R., Grayson, D. R., and Darnell, D. J. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 1415-1425 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Lin, A. Y., Devaux, B., Green, A., Sagerström, C., Elliott, J. F., and Davis, M. (1990) Science 249, 677-679 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Winkler, M., and Kück, U. (1991) Curr. Genet. 20, 495-502 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Hu, Y., Kazenwadel, J., and James, R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 27214-27225 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Philippe, J. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 7224-7227 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Schreiber, E., Mathias, P., Muller, M. M., and Schaffner, W. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 4221-4229 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Towbin, H., Staehlin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Prost, E., and Moore, D. D. (1986) Gene (Amst.) 45, 107-111 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Gehring, W., Affolter, J. M., and Bürglin, T. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 487-526 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Leonard, J., Peers, B., Johnson, T., Ferreri, K., Lee, S., and Montminy, M. R. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 1275-1283 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Baron, A., Featherstone, M. S., Hill, R. E., Hall, A., Galliot, B., and Duboule, D. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 2977-2986 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Rubin, M. R., King, W., Toth, L. E., Sawczuk, I. S., Levine, E. S., D'Eustachio, P., and Nguyen-Huu, M. C. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 3836-3841 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Peterson, R. L., Jacobs, D. F., and Awgulewitsch, A. (1992) Mech. Dev. 37, 151-166 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Izpisua-Belmonte, J.-C., Tickle, C., Dolle, P., Wolpert, L., and Duboule, D. (1991) Nature 350, 585-589 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Renucci, A. G. P., Zappavigna, V., Zakany, J., Izpisua-Belmonte, J.-C., Buerki, K., and Duboule, D. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 1459-1468 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Hart, C. P., Fainsod, A., and Ruddle, F. H. (1987) Genomics 1, 182-195 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Stein, S., Fritsch, R., Lemaire, L., and Kessel, M. (1996) Mech. Dev. 55, 91-108 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Kozak, M. (1986) Cell 44, 283-292 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Hodges, D., and Bernstein, S. I. (1994) Adv. Genet. 31, 207-281 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Wang, M., and Drucker, D. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12646-12652 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. MacFarlane, W. M., Read, M. L., Gilligan, M., Bujalska, I., and Docherty, K. (1994) Biochem. J. 303, 625-631
  55. Petersen, H. V., Serup, P., Leonard, J., Michelsen, B. K., and Madsen, O. D. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10465-10469 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Serup, P., Petersen, H. V., Pedersen, E. E., Edlund, H., Leonard, J., Petersen, J. S., Larsson, L.-I., and Madsen, O. D. (1995) Biochem. J. 310, 997-1003
  57. Jonsson, J., Carlsson, L., Edlund, T., and Edlund, H. (1994) Nature 371, 606-609 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Mlodzik, M., Fjose, A., and Gehring, W. J. (1985) EMBO J. 4, 2961-2969 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Xu, X., Xu, P.-X., and Suzuki, Y. (1994) Development 120, 277-285 [Abstract]
  60. Burglin, T. R., Finney, M., Coulson, A., and Ruvkun, G. (1989) Nature 341, 239-243 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Bonner, C. A., Loftus, S. K., and Wasmuth, J. J. (1995) Genomics 28, 206-211 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Serrano, J., Scavo, L., Roth, J., de la Rosa, E. J., and de Pablo, F. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 190, 270-276 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Northrop, J. L., and Kimelman, D. (1994) Dev. Biol. 161, 490-503 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Frumkin, A., Pillemer, G., Haffner, R., Tarcic, N., Gruenbaum, Y., and Fainsod, A. (1994) Development 120, 253-263 [Abstract]
  65. Suh, E., and Traber, P. G. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 619-625 [Abstract]
  66. Jin, T., and Drucker, D. J. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 19-28 [Abstract]
  67. Dearolf, C. R., Topol, J., and Parker, C. S. (1989) Nature 341, 340-343 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  68. Beachy, P. A., Varkey, J., Young, K. E., von Kessler, D. P., Sun, B. I., and Ekker, S. C. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6941-6956 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Desplan, C., Theis, J., and O'Farrell, P. H. (1988) Cell 54, 1081-1090 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Ruvkun, G., and Finney, M. (1991) Cell 64, 475-478 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  71. Galang, C. K., and Hauser, C. A. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4609-4617 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Drummond, F., Sowden, J., Morrison, K., and Edwards, Y. H. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 236, 670-681 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
T. Jin
Mechanisms underlying proglucagon gene expression
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2008; 198(1): 17 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Gosmain, I. Avril, A. Mamin, and J. Philippe
Pax-6 and c-Maf Functionally Interact with the {alpha}-Cell-specific DNA Element G1 in Vivo to Promote Glucagon Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2007; 282(48): 35024 - 35034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. Wang, T. Liu, Z. Li, X. Ma, and T. Jin
Redundant and Synergistic Effect of Cdx-2 and Brn-4 on Regulating Proglucagon Gene Expression
Endocrinology, April 1, 2006; 147(4): 1950 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
Y. Nakano, H. Furuta, A. Doi, S. Matsuno, T. Nakagawa, H. Shimomura, S. Sakagashira, Y. Horikawa, M. Nishi, H. Sasaki, et al.
A Functional Variant in the Human Betacellulin Gene Promoter Is Associated With Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes, December 1, 2005; 54(12): 3560 - 3566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
Y. Zhao, T. Liu, N. Zhang, F. Yi, Q. Wang, I. G. Fantus, and T. Jin
Role of Cdx-2 in insulin and proglucagon gene expression: a study using the RIN-1056A cell line with an inducible gene expression system
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2005; 186(1): 179 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
M. Maziarz, C. Chung, D. J. Drucker, and A. Emili
Integrating Global Proteomic and Genomic Expression Profiles Generated from Islet {alpha} Cells: Opportunities and Challenges to Deriving Reliable Biological Inferences
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2005; 4(4): 458 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. E. Hansel, A. Maitra, J. W. Lin, M. Goggins, P. Argani, C. J. Yeo, S. Piantadosi, S. D. Leach, and A. V. Biankin
Expression of the Caudal-Type Homeodomain Transcription Factors CDX 1/2 and Outcome in Carcinomas of the Ampulla of Vater
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2005; 23(9): 1811 - 1818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Mithieux, F. Rajas, and A. Gautier-Stein
A Novel Role for Glucose 6-Phosphatase in the Small Intestine in the Control of Glucose Homeostasis
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44231 - 44234.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Gautier-Stein, C. Domon-Dell, A. Calon, I. Bady, J.-N. Freund, G. Mithieux, and F. Rajas
Differential regulation of the glucose-6-phosphatase TATA box by intestine-specific homeodomain proteins CDX1 and CDX2
Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2003; 31(18): 5238 - 5246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
X. Cao, G. Flock, C. Choi, D. M. Irwin, and D. J. Drucker
Aberrant Regulation of Human Intestinal Proglucagon Gene Expression in the NCI-H716 Cell Line
Endocrinology, May 1, 2003; 144(5): 2025 - 2033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
D. K.Y. Trinh, K. Zhang, M. Hossain, P. L. Brubaker, and D. J. Drucker
Pax-6 Activates Endogenous Proglucagon Gene Expression in the Rodent Gastrointestinal Epithelium
Diabetes, February 1, 2003; 52(2): 425 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
G. Flock and D. J. Drucker
Pax-2 Activates the Proglucagon Gene Promoter But Is Not Essential for Proglucagon Gene Expression or Development of Proglucagon-Producing Cell Lineages in the Murine Pancreas or Intestine
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2002; 16(10): 2349 - 2359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
B. R. Gauthier, V. M. Schwitzgebel, M. Zaiko, A. Mamin, B. Ritz-Laser, and J. Philippe
Hepatic Nuclear Factor-3 (HNF-3 or Foxa2) Regulates Glucagon Gene Transcription by Binding to the G1 and G2 Promoter Elements
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2002; 16(1): 170 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
P. A. Kitchen, A. J. Fitzgerald, R. A. Goodlad, N. F. Barley, M. A. Ghatei, S. Legon, S. R. Bloom, A. Price, J. R. F. Walters, and A. Forbes
Glucagon-like peptide-2 increases sucrase-isomaltase but not caudal-related homeobox protein-2 gene expression
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, March 1, 2000; 278(3): G425 - G428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
T. J. Kieffer and J. Francis Habener
The Glucagon-Like Peptides
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 1999; 20(6): 876 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. A. Hussain and J. F. Habener
Glucagon Gene Transcription Activation Mediated by Synergistic Interactions of pax-6 and cdx-2 with the p300 Co-activator
J. Biol. Chem., October 8, 1999; 274(41): 28950 - 28957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Y. Trinh, T. Jin, and D. J. Drucker
Identification of Domains Mediating Transcriptional Activation and Cytoplasmic Export in the Caudal Homeobox Protein Cdx-3
J. Biol. Chem., February 26, 1999; 274(9): 6011 - 6019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Ritz-Laser, A. Estreicher, N. Klages, S. Saule, and J. Philippe
Pax-6 and Cdx-2/3 Interact to Activate Glucagon Gene Expression on the G1 Control Element
J. Biol. Chem., February 12, 1999; 274(7): 4124 - 4132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
O. Lorentz, I. Duluc, A. D. Arcangelis, P. Simon-Assmann, M. Kedinger, and J.-N. Freund
Key Role of the Cdx2 Homeobox Gene in Extracellular Matrix-mediated Intestinal Cell Differentiation
J. Cell Biol., December 15, 1997; 139(6): 1553 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
T. Jin, D. K. Y. Trinh, F. Wang, and D. J. Drucker
The Caudal Homeobox Protein cdx-2/3 Activates Endogenous Proglucagon Gene Expression in InR1-G9 Islet Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 1997; 11(2): 203 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Herzig, L. Fuzesi, and W. Knepel
Heterodimeric Pbx-Prep1 Homeodomain Protein Binding to the Glucagon Gene Restricting Transcription in a Cell Type-dependent Manner
J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2000; 275(36): 27989 - 27999.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Jin and H. Li
POU Homeodomain Protein OCT1 Is Implicated in the Expression of the Caudal-related Homeobox Gene Cdx-2
J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2001; 276(18): 14752 - 14758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Planque, L. Leconte, F. M. Coquelle, S. Benkhelifa, P. Martin, M.-P. Felder-Schmittbuhl, and S. Saule
Interaction of Maf Transcription Factors with Pax-6 Results in Synergistic Activation of the Glucagon Promoter
J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2001; 276(38): 35751 - 35760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Yeagley, J. Moll, C. A. Vinson, and P. G. Quinn
Characterization of Elements Mediating Regulation of Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase Gene Transcription by Protein Kinase A and Insulin. IDENTIFICATION OF A DISTINCT COMPLEX FORMED IN CELLS THAT MEDIATE INSULIN INHIBITION
J. Biol. Chem., June 2, 2000; 275(23): 17814 - 17820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laser, B.
Right arrow Articles by Philippe, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Laser, B.
Right arrow Articles by Philippe, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement