Volume 271, Number 46,
Issue of November 15, 1996
pp. 29049-29059
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
rek, a Gene Expressed in Retina and Brain, Encodes a
Receptor Tyrosine Kinase of the Axl/Tyro3 Family*
(Received for publication, April 8, 1996, and in revised form, July 15, 1996)
Jacqueline S.
Biscardi
,
Fabienne
Denhez
,
Georg F.
Buehler
,
David A.
Chesnutt
,
Steven C.
Baragona
,
John P.
O'Bryan
§,
Channing J.
Der
,
James J.
Fiordalisi
¶,
Daniel W.
Fults
and
Patricia F.
Maness
**
From the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics and the
Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina
School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 and the
Department of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine,
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Rek (retina-expressed kinase) has been identified
as a putative novel receptor-type tyrosine kinase of the Axl/Tyro3
family with a potential role in neural cell development.
rek clones were isolated from a chick embryonic brain
cDNA library with a DNA probe obtained by reverse
transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction of mRNA from Müller
glia-like cells cultured from chick embryonic retina. Sequence analysis
indicated that Rek is a protein of 873 amino acids with an
extracellular region composed of two immunoglobulin-like domains
followed by two fibronectin type III domains with eight predicted
N-glycosylation sites. Two consensus src
homology 2 domain binding sites are present in the cytoplasmic domain,
suggesting that Rek activates several signal transduction pathways.
Northern analysis of rek mRNA revealed a 5.5-kilobase
transcript in chick brain, retina, and kidney and in primary cultures
of retinal Müller glia-like cells. Rek protein was identified by
immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting as a 140-kDa protein expressed
in the chick retina at embryonic days 6-13, which corresponded to the
major period of neuronal and glial differentiation. Transfection of rek cDNA into COS cells resulted in transient
expression of a putative precursor of 106 kDa that autophosphorylated
in immune complex protein kinase assays. Overexpression of
rek cDNA in mouse NIH3T3 fibroblasts resulted in
activation of the 140-kDa rek kinase and induction of
morphologically transformed foci. These properties indicated that Rek
has oncogenic potential when overexpressed, but its normal function is
likely to be related to cell-cell recognition events governing the
differentiation or proliferation of neural cells.
INTRODUCTION
Receptor tyrosine kinases are widely expressed in the developing
nervous system, where they play important roles in development of
neurons and glia (1). Upon binding of membrane-bound or diffusable
ligands to their extracellular domains, these enzymes autophosphorylate
on cytoplasmic tyrosine residues, which serve as docking sites for
src homology 2 (SH2)1
domain-containing signal transduction proteins. In the developing fly
eye, the receptor tyrosine kinase encoded by the sevenless gene is activated by a neighboring cell surface protein encoded by the
boss gene (2), causing precursor cells to differentiate into
photoreceptors (3, 4). In vertebrates, activation of receptor tyrosine
kinases of the trk family by nerve growth factor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, or neurotrophin-3 and
neurotrophin-4/5 induces differentiation and survival of different
neuronal populations (5). In the peripheral nervous system, glial
growth factor/heregulin causes multipotent neural crest progenitors to
differentiate into glia rather than neurons (6) by activating the
erbB2/c-neu/HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase in the
presence of the erbB4/HER4 tyrosine kinase (7).
Receptor tyrosine kinases were initially identified as homologs of
retroviral oncogene products (8); thus, it is not surprising that
mutations in proto-oncogenes that result in constitutive activation of
normal receptor tyrosine kinases render these proteins oncogenic. Such
activating mutations can occur within the coding region of the
extracellular domain, for example in the retroviral oncogene
v-erbB (8) and trk/nerve growth factor receptor
gene (9). Alternatively, the mutation can be an amino acid substitution in the transmembrane region, as shown for the
erbB/c-neu/HER2 gene in chemically induced rat
glioblastomas (10). Another means by which a receptor tyrosine kinase
can become constitutively activated is by overexpression, which may
result in forced receptor dimerization within the plasma membrane (11).
This is one mechanism that may contribute to the deregulation of growth
in glial cell tumors. For example, the
erbB2/c-neu/HER2 gene is overexpressed in certain
human glioblastomas (12), while the epidermal growth factor receptor
gene, c-erbB, is amplified to various degrees in human
glioblastomas with the highest levels of expression correlating with
poor prognosis (13).
Protein tyrosine phosphorylation in the developing neural retina is
unusually active in Müller glia (14, 15, 16, 17). The Müller glial
cell is the principal glial cell type in the vertebrate eye, where its
chief function is to buffer the microenvironment following neuronal
firing (18). The normally quiescent Müller cell proliferates in
an unregulated manner in several pathological situations, including
retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, proliferative
vitreoretinopathy, and macular pucker (19). At least one receptor
tyrosine kinase, the basic fibroblast growth factor receptor, is
up-regulated in Müller glia that have been induced to proliferate
in animal models of injury (20). Müller glia and all types of
retinal neurons differentiate from a common progenitor by a poorly
understood process that depends on growth factors and other local
environmental cues such as cell-cell contact (21, 22, 23).
Because receptor tyrosine kinases are important in growth factor and
cell contact recognition, it is likely that they regulate retinal cell
differentiation. Protein tyrosine phosphorylation in the developing
chick retina increases strikingly during the period of differentiation
of retinal neurons and Müller glia and is most abundant in
regions where Müller glial processes contact their neighbors (16,
17, 24). Immunoelectron microscopy of the outer chick retina with
phosphotyrosine antibodies revealed that phosphotyrosine-modified
proteins accumulate predominantly in Müller glia and that they
are located in the Müller glial plasma membrane at sites of
contact with adjacent Müller glial processes and photoreceptors
(24).
To identify protein-tyrosine kinases that might be responsible for the
elevated protein tyrosine phosphorylation in developing Müller
cells, we used reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
with primers specific to highly conserved regions shared within the
catalytic domain of receptor and nonreceptor-class protein-tyrosine
kinases to amplify partial cDNAs encoding tyrosine kinases
expressed in Müller glia-enriched cultures from embryonic chick
retina. Such an approach has been used with success to identify novel
tyrosine kinase genes expressed in nonneural as well as neural
cells (25, 26).
Here we describe the discovery of a novel receptor-type tyrosine
kinase, termed Rek (retina-expressed kinase), a new member of the
Axl/Tyro3 family of receptor tyrosine kinases. The Axl/Tyro 3 family
includes receptor tyrosine kinases encoded by axl
(ufo, ark) (27, 28, 29, 73, 85), tyro3
(sky, brt, rse, tif) (26,
30, 31, 32, 33), c-eyk (34), and c-mer (35). There is
evidence that these kinases have transforming potential. Axl was
originally identified as a protein encoded by a transforming gene from
primary human myeloid leukemia cells (27). Axl is overexpressed in a
number of different tumor cell types and transforms mouse NIH3T3
fibroblasts (27). Experimental overexpression of Tyro3 causes
anchorage-independent growth of Rat-2 fibroblasts (36). Also, the
murine homolog of sky has been shown to be expressed at
elevated levels in mouse mammary tumors (37). c-eyk is a chicken proto-oncogene that was first identified as the retroviral transforming gene v-ryk (34). A close relative,
c-mer, is a human proto-oncogene expressed in malignant B-
and T-lymphocytic cell lines (35).
The hallmark of the Axl/Tyro3 family is an extracellular region
consisting of two immunoglobulin-like (Ig) and two fibronectin III (FN)
domains. These domains are found in cell recognition molecules such as
the neural cell adhesion molecules L1 and NCAM (38) and certain
receptor tyrosine phosphatases (39, 40). Homotypic and heterotypic
binding involving extracellular determinants have been demonstrated for
some Axl/Tyro3 family members. Homotypic binding has been shown to
activate the Axl tyrosine kinase (41), an event that may be important
in signaling cell adhesion. Axl (42) and, to a lesser extent, Tyro3
(43) are also activated by a heterophilic ligand, Gas6, a vitamin
K-dependent protein that is up-regulated during growth
arrest in confluent fibroblast cultures. Protein S, which bears
significant homology to Gas6, was found to be a heterophilic ligand for
Tyro3 (44). Protein S is an anticoagulant in serum and a mitogen for
smooth muscle cells (45), but its up-regulation in Schwann cells
following nerve injury suggests that it may also serve as a neural
growth or differentiation factor (44).
The molecular cloning, structural analysis, and expression of the Rek
receptor tyrosine kinase in developing chick neural tissues is
described here. It is also demonstrated that overexpression and
activation of Rek in mouse NIH3T3 fibroblasts leads to cell transformation, indicating that the rek gene has oncogenic
potential that might contribute to malignant growth of nervous system
tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell Cultures and Tissues
Primary cultures enriched for
Müller glia were prepared from embryonic day 10 chicken retinas
as described previously (17, 46). Retinas were dissected free of
sclera-choroid-pigmented epithelium and cells seeded on tissue culture
dishes in DMEM, 10% fetal calf serum. By 7-10 days, a mixed culture
developed consisting of a monolayer of flat cells underlying a network
of neuronal fascicles and cell clumps, which were removed by gentle mechanical agitation. As described previously, the identification of
the flat cells as Müller glia is supported by abundant
intermediate filaments (47), staining with vimentin antibodies (48),
lack of binding to tetanus toxin, [3H]thymidine
incorporation, GABA and glutamate uptake (49, 50), expression of a
filamin-related protein (51), and the presence of carbonic anhydrase
and glutamine synthetase (52). The glial-like cells do not show
induction of glutamine synthetase by hydrocortisone, a response
characteristic of Müller cells in vivo (52), and are
negative for expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein, perhaps due
to the absence of necessary intercellular interactions in the
monolayers. They will be referred to as Müller glia-like cultures, but they may not represent fully differentiated Müller cells or their precursors.
Hatchling chicks (White Leghorn, NC State) were anesthetized with
Ketamine and sacrificed by decapitation. Staging of chick embryos was
done according to the guidelines of Hamilton and Hamburger (53). For
RNA, tissues were rapidly excised, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and
stored at
80 °C until use. Poly(A)+-selected RNA was
isolated using the FastTrack RNA isolation kit (Invitrogen).
Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction and Cloning of
cDNA Fragments
Poly(A)-selected RNA (1 µg) from
Müller glial cell cultures was reverse transcribed using random
hexamers as described by O'Bryan et al. (27) in 10 mM Tris, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.001% gelatin, 625 µM each
deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 20 units of RNAsin (Promega), 10 mM of dithiothreitol, and 200 units of Moloney murine
leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (final volume, 20 µl). The
reaction was incubated for 10 min at room temperature and then for 45 min at 45 °C. This first strand cDNA (1 µl) was amplified in a
100-µl reaction containing 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM each dNTP, 0.001% gelatin, 1 µg each primer, and
1.25 units of Taq polymerase (Promega). The degenerate
oligonucleotide primer sequences of Wilks (25) were used corresponding
to the following amino acid sequences: PTK1, CGG ATC CAC (A/C)GN
GA(C/T) (C/T)T; PTK2, CT(G/A)CA(G/C) ACC AGG A(A/T)A CCT TAA GG.
Reaction conditions were as follows: 1.5 min at 95 °C (denaturing),
2 min at 37 °C (annealing), and 3 min at 63 °C (elongation). The
PCR products were ligated into the plasmid pBluescript (Stratagene) and
transfected into DH5 Escherichia coli cells (Life
Technologies, Inc.), and colonies were selected after induction with
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl
-D-galactoside and
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside.
To produce a DNA fragment of suitable length for a hybridization probe,
a modification of the 3
-RACE method (54) was used to generate a 1.4-kb
fragment representing the 3
-end of rek cDNA extending
from the sequence encoding the IHRDL motif in the catalytic domain to
the poly(A) tail. For this purpose, an oligo(dT)-primed
ZAPII
cDNA library was generated from Müller glia-enriched cultures using a cDNA cloning kit (Stratagene). A nondegenerate primer specific to rek (seal-1, ATG CTG GAT GAG AAC ATG AAT;
corresponding to amino acids MLDENMN; residues 649-655) was used as
the sense primer, and an oligonucleotide (pBlu5) specific to the
pBluescript phagemid between the XhoI site and the T7
promoter (ATA GGG CGA ATT GGG TAC) was the antisense primer. PCR was
carried out as above with 0.75 mM MgCl2, using
the following reaction conditions: 5 min at 94 °C (denaturing), 5 min at 60 °C (annealing), and 4 min at 72 °C (extending) for 1 cycle, followed by 45 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 60 °C, and 4 min at 72 °C for 35 cycles. The PCR product was directly ligated
into the pCR plasmid (TA cloning vector, Stratagene), DH10 E. coli cells were transformed, and colonies were selected. The
insert sequence from one of the 3
-RACE clones was sequenced, verifying
that it specified the Rek catalytic domain.
cDNA Library Screening
An oligo(dT)-primed cDNA
library in
gt10 from chick embryonic brain (day 13) (Barbara
Ranscht, Burnham Cancer Research Foundation) was screened at high
stringency using the 32P-radiolabeled 3
-RACE clone (1.4 kb) as probe. Out of the 28 positive primary clones obtained, 15 clones
survived plaque purification through secondary and tertiary screening.
Subclones of the longest clone (approximately 4 kb) were generated by
exonuclease III digestion, and DNA sequencing was completed for both
strands. This clone contained a long open reading frame, a
3
-untranslated region containing an internal A-rich sequence, and a
poly(A) addition site, but it lacked a start codon and signal peptide.
The additional 5
-sequence was obtained by rescreening the brain
library using as probe a PCR fragment amplified from the 5
-region of
the 4-kb clone. Twelve clones were plaque-purified through tertiary
screening, and their 5
-regions were sized by PCR. The clone with the
longest 5
-region was sequenced and found to contain the full
rek coding sequence, including a putative start codon and
signal peptide sequence. The remainder of the sequence was identical to
the 4-kb cDNA clone. Interestingly, the clone specifying the entire
protein sequence (3.3 kb) represented a cDNA that had been
internally primed at an A-rich sequence in the 3
-untranslated region
of the mRNA.
Sequence Analysis
Two methods of DNA sequence analysis were
used. Manual DNA sequencing by the dideoxy chain termination method was
carried out using Sequenase T7 polymerase (U.S. Biochemical Corp.) with T3 and T7 primers. Automated sequencing was performed in the UNC-Chapel Hill Automated DNA Sequencing Facility (Dr. Laura Livingstone, Director), which employs a model 373A DNA sequencer (Applied
Biosystems). Both sense and antisense strands were sequenced. Sequences
were compared by the FASTA program to the GenBankTM/EMBL
and SwissProt data bases using the GCG software package. Contiguous
clones were aligned using the GAP program and then merged using the
ASSEMBLE program. The PILEUP program was used to compare the Rek amino
acid sequence with other members of the Axl/Tyro3 family. The
phylogenetic tree was generated by the computer program Phylogenetic
Analogy Using Parsimony (PAUP)(55).
Northern Blot Analysis
RNA was separated on denaturing 1%
agarose, 2% formaldehyde gels and subjected to blot hybridization on
Hybond N membranes at high stringency (83). Hybridization using a
32P-radiolabeled DNA probe generated by PCR amplification
of the 1.4-kb 3
-RACE clone was carried out at 42 °C overnight in
5 × SSC, 40% formamide, 5 × Denhardt's solution, 0.1%
SDS, 1 mM NaH2PO4, and 200 µg/ml
boiled salmon sperm DNA. Washes were as follows: 6 × SSC, 0.1%
SDS for 30 min at 42 °C, 2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS for 30 min at
42 °C, and 1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS for 20 min at 55 °C. The
filters were exposed to film at
80 °C for 6 days with intensifying
screens. Normalization of the amount of RNA loaded was confirmed by
hybridizing to an actin probe, which was generated by PCR amplification
of Müller glial cDNA with actin specific primers as described
in O'Bryan et al. (27).
Southern Blotting
Chicken genomic DNA was partially
digested with EcoRI or HindIII, and fragments
were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and blotted to
nitrocellulose. Filters were hybridized to two EcoRI/BamHI fragments (0.4 and 0.9 kb) encoding
the entire extracellular and transmembrane domains (nucleotides
1-1602), which were 32P-labeled by random priming. Filters
were hybridized overnight in 50% (v/v) formamide, 4 × SSC, 5%
(w/v) Denhardt's solution, 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, at 42 °C and washed two times for 20 min each in 2 × SSC,
0.5% SDS at room temperature, once in 2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS for 20 min at room temperature, and once in 2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS for 30 min at 50 °C. Filters were exposed to x-ray film for 24 h.
Antibody Preparation
Two different
BamHI-HindIII fragments of the 3.3-kb
rek cDNA clone were used to express Rek fusion proteins
as antigens. One (for antibody A) encoded 305 amino acids of the kinase
domain (residues 459-764), and the other (for antibody B) encoded the carboxyl-terminal 100 residues. The fragments were subcloned into the
pLC24 vector (56), and fusion proteins with 98 amino acids of the MS2
polymerase protein were expressed in E. coli upon
temperature shift from 28 to 42 °C. The proteins were purified by
preparative SDS-PAGE and used to inoculate rabbits. Rek fusion proteins
(150 µg) in complete Freund's adjuvant were used for the primary
injection and for each of three boosts in Freund's incomplete
adjuvant. Antisera were screened by Western blotting against the fusion proteins. Where indicated, antibodies were purified from IgG
preparations by immunoaffinity on an Affi-Gel column (Bio-Rad) to which
the fusion proteins were covalently coupled. Antibodies were eluted with 50 mM diethylamine and dialyzed against
phosphate-buffered saline.
Expression of Rek in COS Cells
The entire 3.3-kb cDNA
encoding the complete Rek protein was cloned into the EcoRI
site of the vector pSG5 (57) and transfected into bacteria. Clones were
selected with rek cDNA in either the sense or antisense
orientation with respect to the SV40 promoter of pSG5. COS-7 cells (in
100-mm dishes) were transfected for 6 h in OptiMEM medium (Life
Technologies, Inc.) with the sense or antisense construct (5 µg)
using lipofectamine (36 µl; Life Technologies, Inc.). Cells were
washed and incubated in fresh medium and then passaged 24 h later
onto new 100-mm dishes. Metabolic labeling was carried out for 14 h with an 35S-protein labeling solution
(EXPRE35S35S, DuPont NEN) containing
radiolabeled L-methionine and L-cysteine in
DMEM (without methionine and cysteine), 10% dialyzed fetal bovine
serum. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer and immunoprecipitated with
preimmune serum or rek antiserum (350 µl of lysate, 12 µl of serum) or Rek antiserum preadsorbed of Rek-specific antibodies by passing IgG through an Affi-Gel column to which the antigen-fusion protein was coupled. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography on x-ray film (1-week exposure).
Immune Complex Protein Kinase Assay and Western
Blotting
Rek was immunoprecipitated from either RIPA (24) or Brij
97 detergent extracts of transfected COS cells or Rek lysis buffer (RLB) extracts of transfected NIH3T3 cells using antibodies prepared as
described above and protein A-Sepharose. The composition of Brij 87 buffer was 1% Brij-97, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM NaEDTA, 1 mM NaEGTA,
10 mM NaF, 200 µM
Na3VO4, 500 µg/ml Pefabloc, 0.01% leupeptin,
0.11 trypsin inhibitory units/ml aprotinin. The composition of RLB was
50 mM HEPES, pH 6.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM Na-EGTA, 200 µM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM NaF, 0.11 trypsin inhibitory units/ml aprotinin, 0.01%
leupeptin. Immune complexes were washed in RIPA, Brij 96, or RLB,
respectively, and incubated with a reaction buffer containing 50 nM to 1 µM
[
-32P]ATP-Mn2+ in a 30-µl volume as
described for 30 min at 37 °C (15). Products were separated by
SDS-PAGE, and gels were fixed in 10% acetic acid, 30% methanol.
Phosphoserine and phosphothreonine residues were selectively
dephosphorylated by treating gels with 1 M KOH at 55 °C
for 45 min and then fixing again for 10 min. Gels were dried and set up
for autoradiography at
70 °C using x-ray film. In some
experiments, Rek was subjected to immunoblotting with phosphotyrosine
antibodies (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.; Transduction Laboratories,
Inc.) and detection by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Corp.).
For Western blotting, Rek was immunoprecipitated from RLB extracts (500 µg; 1 ml) of chick embryonic retina or 50 µg of NIH3T3 cells using
20 µl of Rek antiserum B and protein A-Sepharose. After SDS-PAGE,
proteins were transferred to Immobilon filters, and the filters were
blocked with 3% fish gelatin or 3% milk protein in 120 mM
NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.1% Tween 20. Western blotting was carried out using Rek antiserum B (1:500) with detection by enhanced chemiluminescence.
Focus Formation Assays in NIH3T3 Cells
NIH3T3 cultures were
maintained in DMEM with 10% fetal calf serum. The rek
cDNA was subcloned into the pLXSN retroviral expression vector. The
axl expression vector was constructed in pLXSN as described
previously (27). Five µg of each plasmid or pLXSN alone were
transfected into an NIH3T3 cell line as described (27). Briefly, 2 × 105 cells were plated in each 60-mm tissue culture plate
on the day prior to transfection. The next day, DNAs were precipitated
in the presence of calf thymus DNA (20 µg) using the calcium
phosphate method and then added to cells. The cells were incubated at
37 °C for 5-8 h and then glycerol-shocked to increase the
efficiency of DNA uptake. After 2 days, the cells were passaged and
grown in the antibiotic G418 (600 µg/ml final concentration), and
drug-resistant colonies were selected after 2 weeks. G418-resistant
colonies were combined, passaged into 60-mm plates, and allowed to
reach confluence. The appearance of morphologically transformed foci were visualized by phase contrast microscopy after 3-4 weeks.
RESULTS
Molecular Cloning and Sequence Analysis of rek cDNA
We
used reverse transcriptase-PCR with primers flanking a highly conserved
region within the tyrosine kinase catalytic domain (25) to identify
genes that coded for tyrosine kinases whose RNA transcripts were
present in primary cultures enriched in Müller glia-like cells
from embryonic chick retina. The insert sequences of 80 PCR clones
obtained (each 210 base pairs in length) were subjected to DNA sequence
analysis. This resulted in the identification of 11 different sequences
encoding tyrosine kinases expressed in the retinal cell cultures, eight
of which were identical to previously described tyrosine kinases. Five
of these represented sequences encoding receptor class tyrosine
kinases: elk, fibroblast growth factor 2-receptor
(cek3, bek), hepatocyte growth factor receptor
(met),
-platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and insulin-like growth factor-I receptor. Three represented nonreceptor tyrosine kinases: fyn, CSK (carboxyl-terminal src
kinase), and c-abl. The expression of the fyn
gene in Müller glia-enriched cultures was previously demonstrated
by immunoblotting (24). The predicted amino acid sequence of each clone
was at least 94% identical to that of the designated protein-tyrosine
kinase in the data base, identifying it as a putative chicken homolog.
One of the PCR clones, appearing twice in the screen, encoded the catalytic region of a potentially novel receptor-like tyrosine kinase
(Rek).
To obtain full-length rek cDNAs, a chick embryonic brain
(day 13)
gt10 cDNA library was screened as described under
"Materials and Methods." A composite sequence of cDNA
comprising the full coding sequence of the rek protein and
the 5
- and 3
-untranslated regions is shown in Fig. 1.
The cDNA sequence (4961 nucleotides) comprised a GC-rich
5
-untranslated region (228 nucleotides), a coding sequence (2619 nucleotides), and a 3
-untranslated region (2116 nucleotides). It was
not determined whether the complete 5
-untranslated sequence was
represented in the clones obtained. The 3
-untranslated region included
an internal poly(A)-rich sequence (nucleotides 3498-3513), an AATAAAA
polyadenylation recognition site, and two ATTTA sites, which have been
associated with mRNA instability in cytokine and growth factor
transcripts (57).
Fig. 1.
Sequences of rek cDNA and its
protein product. The deduced amino acid sequence of Rek is shown
above the cDNA sequence. Indicated in the coding
sequence are the signal sequence (underlined), potential
N-linked glycosylation sites (N-GLY), the kinase
insert sequence (IGENPFN), and putative SH2 binding sites.
Indicated in the 3
-untranslated region are potential RNA instability
sites (ATTTA) (58), the poly(A)-rich internal priming site,
and the polyadenylation recognition site.
[View Larger Version of this Image (87K GIF file)]
The rek cDNA sequence predicts a precursor protein of
873 amino acids (molecular weight 96,370) with a putative signal
peptide of 28 residues, an extracellular region of 385 residues, a
hydrophobic transmembrane domain of 25 residues, and an intracellular
region of 435 residues. The cytoplasmic region comprises a catalytic domain conserved among protein-tyrosine kinases followed by a divergent
carboxyl-terminal sequence. The predicted amino acid sequence contains
2 in-frame methionines that are candidate initiating amino acids based
on Kozak consensus rules (59). The first methionine marks the beginning
of the characteristic signal peptide sequence. The signal peptide has a
positively charged amino-terminal region, followed by a hydrophobic
region rich in leucines and alanines, and a polar carboxyl region
satisfying the (
3,
1) rule for defining the signal peptidase
cleavage site (60). Supporting the assignment of the initiating amino
acid as the first methionine, there is an in-frame termination codon
(TAG) lying in a highly GC-rich region located 168 base pairs 5
of the
initiating codon.
The amino acid sequence of the extracellular region revealed two tandem
Ig domains (37) followed by two tandem FN III motifs (61). The first Ig
domain is a typical C2 type structure (37) with a conserved cysteine
(amino acid 52) followed by a tryptophan (amino acid 64) and a cysteine
(amino acid 105) within the consensus motif
DXGXYXC. The second Ig domain also has
a conserved sequence of a cysteine (amino acid 148), two tryptophans
(residues 161 and 162), and a cysteine (residue 191), but the latter
cysteine is not located within the characteristic consensus motif. The two FN III repeats share residues conserved in the fibronectin molecule
and in other proteins with FN III repeats (62). There are eight
potential N-linked glycosylation sites (NX(S/T))
dispersed among the Ig and FN III domains, suggesting that the mature
protein is highly glycosylated (63).
Following the extracellular domain is a hydrophobic transmembrane
segment (amino acids 414-438) (64). The tyrosine kinase domain (amino
acids 505-672) exhibits signature motifs conserved among other protein
kinase catalytic domains, including GXGXXG, which
binds ATP-Mn2+, and the triplet motifs RDL, DFG, and ALE,
which function in the catalytic loop (65). Diagnostic of a
receptor-like kinase is the presence of PVKWLALE and AARN sequences
carboxyl-terminal to the RDL sequence. There are two potential tyrosine
autophosphorylation sites adjacent to each other in the catalytic
domain and a third tyrosine located 4 positions amino-terminal to these
residues. These three tyrosine autophosphorylation sites are found in
all members of the insulin receptor family (66). The catalytic domain contains a kinase insert (IGENPFN) typical of the insulin receptor superfamily (amino acids 607-613).
The catalytic and carboxyl-terminal regions possessed tyrosine residues
within two consensus motifs that could serve as binding sites for SH2
domain-containing signaling proteins. The first site (YDLM; residues
749-752) was a potential binding motif that has been shown in
synthetic phosphopeptide libraries to prefer sequences in the SH2
domain of the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (67). The second site (YVNI; residues 791-794) was a potential binding
motif for the SH2 domains of Grb2/sem5 (67). Three
additional tyrosine residues (residues 832, 834, and 863) were located
carboxyl-terminal to the second putative SH2 domain binding site, and
may also function in signaling.
Comparison of the rek sequence with the
GenBankTM data base revealed that Rek was most closely
related to Tyro3, with 61% identity in nucleotide sequence to mouse
Tyro3 (36). Rek displayed 66% identity in amino acid sequence to mouse
Tyro3 over the entire protein sequence, 56% identity in the
extracellular region, and 87% identity in the catalytic domain but
only 36% identity in the carboxyl-terminal region. Rek exhibited lower
overall homologies in amino acid sequence with human Axl (43%
identity; Ref. 27), chicken Eyk (41%; Ref. 34), and human Mer (41%;
Ref. 35). Alignment of the Axl/Tyro3 family members illustrated the
highest degree of conservation in the catalytic domain and second
immunoglobulin-like domain but little conservation in the
carboxyl-terminal tail (Fig. 2). An exception was the
second putative SH2 binding site and an arginine-tyrosine sequence that
was conserved in the cytoplasmic domain in all family members.
Fig. 2.
A comparison of the predicted amino acid
sequence of Rek with members of the Axl/Tyro3 family, aligned by the
program PILEUP. Residues highlighted in
black are conserved among all family members; residues in
gray are shared by Rek and one or more family members. The
carboxyl terminus is indicated by an asterisk. Sequences
shown are for chicken Rek, mouse Tyro3 (36), human Axl (27), and chicken Eyk (34).
[View Larger Version of this Image (86K GIF file)]
The entire amino acid sequences of members of the Axl/Tyro3 family were
compared phylogenetically using the computer program PAUP (55) (Fig.
3). This statistical analysis, which reflected sequence
relatedness, placed Rek in the Axl/Tyro3 family but distinguished Rek
and Tyro3 as distinct gene products. By this analysis, Rek is more
closely related to Tyro3 than to Axl and is more distantly related to
Eyk and Mer.
Fig. 3.
A phylogenetic tree for receptor tyrosine
kinases related to Rek. This tree was generated by the PAUP
computer program (54). The entire amino acid sequence of each kinase
was used in the analysis. Branch lengths along the horizontal
axis reflect amino acid sequence differences, while branch points
indicate putative gene duplications. Vertical distances are for
convenience only. The tree is rooted to the human met
proto-oncogene (82). Sequences used include chicken rek,
mouse tyro3 (36), human axl (27), chicken
c-eyk (34), and human c-mer (35).
[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]
Expression of the Rek Protein in COS Cells
To demonstrate
that the 3.3-kb rek cDNA encoded a functional protein,
the complete rek cDNA clone (an EcoRI
fragment) was subcloned into the eukaryotic expression vector pSG5, and
the construct was transfected into COS-7 cells for transient
expression. Transfected COS cells were metabolically labeled with
[35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine, lysed in
RIPA buffer, and immunoprecipitated with Rek antibodies. Rek antibodies
immunoprecipitated a single 35S-radiolabeled protein of 106 kDa from COS cells that were transfected with sense but not antisense
rek plasmids (Fig. 4A). Neither
preimmune serum (lanes 1 and 4) nor Rek antiserum
preadsorbed with purified Rek fusion protein (lanes 3 and
6) immunoprecipitated the 106-kDa protein. Moreover, the
106-kDa protein was not immunoprecipitated from 35S-labeled
nontransfected COS cells (lane 7). The size of this protein
(106 kDa) was in good agreement with the predicted size of an
unprocessed Rek precursor protein (96 kDa). The 106-kDa protein was
immunoprecipitated with Rek antibodies from RIPA extracts of
Rek-expressing COS cells and subjected to immune complex protein kinase
assays with [
-32P]ATP (Fig. 4B). In this
assay, the 106-kDa protein was the principal protein
autophosphorylated. This phosphorylation may have represented a basal
level of ligand-independent autophosphorylation or constitutive activation due to forced dimerization of the overexpressed receptor (11).
Fig. 4.
Expression of Rek kinase in COS-7 cells.
A, COS-7 cells were transfected with pSG5 expression
plasmids containing rek cDNA in the sense (lanes
1-3) or antisense (lanes 4-6) orientation or were not
transfected (lane 7). Proteins were metabolically labeled
with L-[35S]methionine and
L-[35S]cysteine. As described under
"Materials and Methods," RIPA lysates were subjected to
immunoprecipitation with preimmune serum (lanes 1 and
4), Rek antiserum A (lanes 2 and 7),
or Rek antiserum A preadsorbed with Rek fusion protein (lanes
3 and 6). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and
visualized by fluorography on x-ray film (1-week exposure). The
apparent molecular weight of Rek expressed in COS-7 cells was
determined by regression analysis from RF values of
marker proteins. B, COS-7 cells were transfected with pSG5
expression plasmids containing rek cDNA in the sense
(lanes 1 and 2) or antisense (lanes 3 and 4) orientation and lysed in RIPA buffer. Lysates (0.5 mg) were immunoprecipitated with preimmune serum (lanes 1 and 3) or Rek antiserum A (lanes 2 and
4) and subjected to immune complex protein kinase assays
using 50 nM [
-32P]ATP as described under
"Materials and Methods." Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and
autoradiography was carried out for 15 min with intensifying screens.
The arrow indicates the position of autophosphorylated Rek
(106 kDa).
[View Larger Version of this Image (60K GIF file)]
Expression of Rek Transcripts and Protein in Chick Tissues
To
examine the tissue-specific pattern of expression of rek,
Northern blot analysis was carried out with poly(A)+ RNA
isolated from different tissues of embryonic and hatchling chicks. The
size of the composite cDNA sequence of rek excluding the
poly(A) tail (4.9 kb) approximated the size of the rek
transcript (5.5 kb) on Northern blots. A single 5.5-kb message was
present in hatchling chick brain, retina, and kidney but was not
detected in spleen, heart, liver, or skeletal muscle (Fig.
5A). Comparison to actin mRNA indicated
that the hatchling brain and retina had approximately the same level of
rek transcripts, while kidney had half this amount. The
similar levels of expression in brain and retina suggested that
rek was not restricted to a small subpopulation of neurons
or glia. rek transcripts in kidney could reflect expression in adrenal medullary endocrine cells, which have the ability to transdifferentiate to sympathetic neurons (68, 69). A rek transcript of the same size was observed at embryonic day 13 in brain
and retina but not heart, liver, or skeletal muscle (not shown).
rek transcripts in the developing chick neural retina were
seen at embryonic day 8 (stage 34), day 10 (stage 36), and hatching
(Fig. 5A). During this time, neural progenitors
differentiate into Müller glia and all types of retinal neurons
(71, 72). Normalization to actin mRNA indicated that the relative
levels of rek transcripts were approximately the same from
E8 to hatching. Poly(A)+ RNA isolated from Müller
glia-enriched cultures contained low but detectable levels of
rek transcripts (Fig. 5A).
Fig. 5.
Northern and Western blot analysis for
rek transcripts in hatchling and embryonic chick tissues.
A, poly(A)+ RNA (5 µg) was separated on a
denaturing formaldehyde gel and subjected to Northern blotting with
hybridization at high stringency to a 32P-labeled
rek probe representing the 1.4-kb 3
-RACE clone. Lane 1, hatchling chick spleen; lane 2, hatchling heart;
lane 3, hatchling liver; lane 4, hatchling
kidney; lane 5, hatchling skeletal muscle; lane
6, hatchling brain; lane 7, embryonic day 8 retina;
lane 8, embryonic day 10 retina; lane 9,
hatchling retina; lane 10, Müller glial cell cultures.
Autoradiography was for 6 days with intensifying screens. The positions
of ribosomal RNA are shown. The size of the transcript was determined
by linear regression analysis using RF values from
an RNA ladder (Life Technologies, Inc.). Similar results were obtained
in three different experiments. Below, the blot was stripped
of the rek probe and reprobed with a 32P-labeled
actin probe as an internal control for the amount of RNA loaded onto
each lane. B, Rek was immunoprecipitated from chick retina
extracts (500 µg) at embryonic days 6 (lane 2), 7 (lane 3), 8 (lane 4), 9 (lane 5), 10 (lane 6), 11 (lane 7), and 13 (lane 8)
with Rek antibody B and protein A-Sepharose under conditions of
antibody excess. Lane 1, control immunoprecipitation with
normal rabbit IgG from chick retina at embryonic day 7. Rek protein was
detected by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with Rek antibody B using
enhanced chemiluminescence for detection. The size of the major Rek
band was determined by comparison of RF values using
molecular weight standards. Similar results were obtained by Western
blotting of straight extracts but with high background due to low
levels of Rek relative to abundant cellular proteins.
[View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]
Rek protein was expressed in the developing chick retina at embryonic
days 6-13 as a principle band of 140 kDa with a minor band of 120 kDa
(Fig. 5B). Differences in the extent of
N-glycosylation could account for the differences in
molecular weight of the Rek protein in retina and COS cells. Similar
results are seen with Axl when expressed in insect cells
versus fibroblast cells (27). The relative levels of
rek protein decreased at embryonic days 11 and 13, suggesting that developmental regulation may occur posttranscriptionally. Longer exposure of the film showed that Rek
protein was still present at these stages and at embryonic day 15, although levels were lower than at embryonic days 9 and 10. This
pattern of expression was consistent with a role for Rek in
differentiation or proliferation of retinal neural cells.
Southern blotting with a rek cDNA probe corresponding to
the extracellular region and transmembrane domain showed a single hybridizing band in chicken genomic DNA digested with EcoRI
and two bands in chicken DNA digested with HindIII under
relatively high stringency (Fig. 6). This indicates that
the rek gene is a single copy gene and that there are not
likely to be closely related genes in the chicken with substantial
identities in the putative ligand binding region. Under the same
conditions, no hybridization to mouse, rat, or human genomic DNA was
observed.
Fig. 6.
Southern blot analysis. Chicken genomic
DNA was partially digested with EcoRI or HindIII
and subjected to Southern blotting as described under "Materials and
Methods" with 32P-labeled rek cDNA
encoding the entire extracellular and transmembrane domains as
hybridization probe. Autoradiographic exposure was for 24 h.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]
Morphological Transformation of NIH3T3 Cells by Overexpression of
Rek
In view of the demonstrated transforming activity of Axl (27,
72) and Tyro3 (36), the ability of Rek to transform fibroblasts in
culture was assayed. NIH3T3 cells were transfected with an expression
vector (pLXSN) encoding the Rek or Axl receptor to assess the
transforming potential of Rek relative to Axl. As shown in Fig.
7, overexpression of Rek or Axl caused morphologic
transformation of NIH3T3 cells. Cells transfected with the
axl expression plasmid showed altered morphology. However,
the phenotype of the cells was qualitatively different from that of the
rek-transformed cells (Fig. 7). rek-transformed
cells were only slightly refractile but with an obvious spindle-like
appearance, whereas axl-transformed cells were more
refractile and rounded. Additionally, rek-transformed cells
appeared in the cultures with a latency of 3-4 weeks, 1-2 weeks later
than in axl-transformed cultures. However, transformed foci
were abundant in each dish of rek-transfected cells. Similar results were observed in 13 independent transfections. These findings suggested that rek, like axl, is capable of
inducing morphological transformation of NIH3T3 cells. However,
rek transforming activity appears to be less potent compared
with that of axl.
Fig. 7.
Transformation of mouse NIH3T3 fibroblasts by
rek. NIH3T3 cell cultures were transfected with the
neo-containing expression vector pLXSN encoding
rek or axl or with vector alone and selected in
the antibiotic G418 as described under "Materials and Methods." Foci of morphologically transformed cells in the rek and
axl-expressing cultures were visualized by phase contrast
microscopy after 4 weeks and photographed at low magnification
(upper panels; × 40) and high magnification (lower
panels; × 100).
[View Larger Version of this Image (197K GIF file)]
Immune complex kinase assays with Rek antibodies showed that high
levels of Rek were expressed in the rek-transformed NIH3T3 cell cultures (Fig. 8A). Cultures resulting
from two independent rek transfections showed different
levels of overexpressed Rek kinase. In vitro phosphorylated
Rek appeared as it did in the chick retina, as a principal band of 140 kDa and a secondary band of 120 kDa. Similarly, Axl is expressed in
transfected cells as a mature 140-kDa protein that can be converted to
a partially glycosylated 120-kDa protein and an unglycosylated protein
of 104-kDa by N-glycanase treatment (84). A small amount of
kinase activity immunoprecipitating with Rek antibodies was seen in
cells transfected with vector alone and axl-transformed
cells. This result may indicate that NIH3T3 cells express low levels of
endogenous Rek or a cross-reacting kinase.
Fig. 8.
Rek expression and activation in transformed
NIH3T3 cell cultures. NIH3T3 cell cultures were transfected with
the neo-containing expression vector pLXSN encoding Rek or
Axl or with vector alone and selected in the antibiotic G418. After
3-4 weeks, transformed foci arose in the cultures transfected with
axl or rek expression plasmids. A, Rek
was immunoprecipitated with Rek antibody B from RLB extracts (250 µg)
of two independently transfected cultures for each plasmid. Immune
complex protein kinase assays were carried out using
[
-32P]ATP as described under "Materials and
Methods." SDS-polyacrylamide gels were alkali-treated to selectively
hydrolyze phosphoserine and phosphothreonine. High levels of
autophosphorylated Rek were seen in two independent
rek-transformed cell cultures (lanes 1 and
2) as a major band of 140 kDa and a minor band at 120 kDa. Much lower levels were seen in two independent 3T3 cell cultures transformed by axl (1, 2) or in cells with vector pLXSN alone (1, 2). Autoradiography was for 16 h. The positions of
molecular weight standards are indicated on the left.
B, Rek was immunoprecipitated with Rek antibody B from RLB
extracts (50 µg) of two independently transfected cultures for each
plasmid. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotted with phosphotyrosine antibodies with detection by
enhanced chemiluminescence. Tyrosine-phosphorylated Rek was seen in two
independent rek-transformed cultures (lanes 1 and
2) as a single band of 140 kDa (arrow) but not in
two independent axl-transformed cell cultures or in cultures transfected with vector alone.
[View Larger Version of this Image (74K GIF file)]
The in vivo state of Rek phosphorylation at tyrosine in the
transformed NIH3T3 cells was evaluated by immunoprecipitating Rek from
two different rek-transformed cultures and immunoblotting with phosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig. 8B). Both
rek-transformed cultures contained elevated levels of
phosphotyrosine-modified Rek protein, which migrated as a predominant
140-kDa protein. The 120-kDa Rek protein detected in immune complex
assays was present on longer exposure of the phosphotyrosine blots.
Cells transfected with vector alone and axl-transformed
cells did not contain detectable levels of phosphotyrosine-modified Rek
protein. These findings show that overexpression of rek
results in constitutive kinase activation in NIH3T3 cells and that
kinase activation correlates with cell transformation.
DISCUSSION
Rek, a putative novel member of the Axl/Tyro3 family of receptor
tyrosine kinases, was identified by molecular cloning and analysis of
cDNAs isolated from an embryonic chick brain library. Sequence
homology and distinguishing structural features of the predicted Rek
protein placed it in the insulin receptor superfamily, which includes
receptor tyrosine kinases with neural developmental functions such as
the Drosophila sevenless protein (3, 4) and the
trkA/nerve growth factor receptor (5). rek
expression was elevated in developing neural tissues and corresponded
to the period of differentiation of Müller glia and retinal
neurons, suggesting a function in neural differentiation.
Although both Rek and Tyro3 tyrosine kinases are expressed in neural
tissues, several lines of evidence indicate that they are probably the
products of different genes. The chicken Rek tyrosine kinase displayed
a 66% identity in predicted amino acid sequence to mouse Tyro3 over
the entire protein sequence, which included the contribution of the
highly conserved catalytic region. Significantly lower identities were
observed in the extracellular (56%) and carboxyl-terminal (36%)
regions. Comparison of chicken Rek with the human Tyro3 ortholog, Rse
(33), revealed a degree of overall identity (68%) that was
substantially less than that between the chicken and human EGF
receptors (88%) (35). Within the extracellular region, the amino acid
identity of Rek and Rse was also lower (61%) than that of the chicken
and human EGF receptors (84%). Moreover, this level of identity is
also found in the extracellular region of the chicken EGF receptor and
human ErbB2/c-Neu/HER2 receptor tyrosine kinase (63%), a closely
related but distinct EGF receptor family member (10). Finally, there is
striking divergence in the carboxyl-terminal regions of Rek and Rse
despite a conserved cysteine at the carboxyl terminus (33%). Notably, Rek is expressed at high levels in the retina, a site of low Tyro3 expression (43). However, since Rek is substantially more homologous to
Tyro3/Rse than to other subfamily members, it is either the Tyro3/Rse
ortholog or a second member of a Tyro3/Rse subfamily. Until the mouse
ortholog of rek is cloned or another chicken gene is
identified that is more closely related to tyro3/rse than is rek, the possibility remains that rek could be
the chicken ortholog of tyro3/rse.
The Ig and FN III domains of Rek, like those of neural cell adhesion
molecules, are likely to bind different molecular components. The
different Ig and FN III domains of L1 (74) and F3/F11/contactin (75)
have distinct functions in neural cell adhesion, neurite outgrowth, and
neurite repulsion and bind different different homophilic and
heterophilic partners. Sequence differences in the extracellular region
of Rek, particularly in the first Ig and both FN III domains, may
indicate that these domains have specificities different from those of
Tyro3 or Axl. At this time, little is known about the homo- or
heterotypic ligand binding properties of Rek, although preliminary
experiments have not revealed an ability of Gas6 to activate Rek
kinase. The second Ig domain of Rek was more highly conserved than
other extracellular domains, which could indicate that there are some
molecular interactions that this family has in common.
The existence of two consensus SH2 binding motifs in the Rek
carboxyl-terminal region predicts an ability to activate several intracellular signaling pathways. The first motif (YDLM) is predicted to bind phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase, whereas the second motif (YVNI)
is predicted to bind Grb2/Sem5, which activates Ras signaling pathways,
although other SH2 domain-containing proteins are not ruled out (67).
The final tyrosine in Rek is highly conserved in this family and could
be an additional phosphorylation site. Although the tyrosine residues
at all three sites are conserved in Rek, Tyro3, Axl, and Eyk, residues
following the tyrosine at positions 1-3 are not highly conserved, and
these residues are known to be determinants of binding specificity for
signal transduction proteins (67). It has been shown that the second
SH2 binding site in Axl (YVNM) binds both phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase
and Grb2/Sem5 in cells (77), whereas the lack of a methionine at position 3 in the second putative binding site in rek (YVNI)
should result in a much lower selectivity for
phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (67). The 4-6-positions also influence
specificity, and nonconservative amino acid substitutions in Rek and
Tyro3 are found in these positions at both putative SH2 domain binding
sites. Thus, Rek may activate a distinct but overlapping set of
signaling pathways compared with tyro3 and other family
members. An interesting possibility is that Rek and Tyro3 may form
heterodimers within the plasma membrane of neural cells. Ligand-induced
heterodimerization has been demonstrated in the EGF and PDGF receptor
families, where it can recruit different combinations of SH2-containing
proteins for intracellular signaling. Such a mechanism provides a means for increasing the range of cellular responses from a limited number of
ligands and receptor kinases (Refs. 11, 75, 76 and references
therein).
The restricted tissue expression of rek suggests a possible
role in neural cell growth or differentiation. During development of
the neural retina, rek-specific transcript and protein
levels were elevated throughout the period during which Müller
glia and retinal neurons differentiate from a common proliferative progenitor (70). rek expression has not yet been studied at the cellular level, but its presence in Müller glia-enriched cultures suggests that it might be a product of differentiating Müller glia or neural progenitors in vivo. It is
interesting to speculate that activation of Rek kinase by homo- or
heterotypic binding between apposing Müller cell surfaces might
be responsible for the increased protein tyrosine phosphorylation
observed at sites of cell-cell apposition in Müller glial
processes in the chicken retina (24). rek expression in the
kidney could be related to its presumed function in brain and retina if
Rek protein were found to be localized to sympathoadrenal precursors
rather than to renal cells (68, 69).
Overexpression of rek in mouse NIH3T3 fibroblasts resulted
in cell transformation and kinase activation. This appears to be an
important feature of the axl/tyro3 family of
receptor tyrosine kinases, since both Axl (27) and Tyro3 (36) are
transforming when overexpressed. Transforming ability has also been
demonstrated for an overexpressed eph receptor tyrosine
kinase (79), which functions in retinal axon guidance (80, 81). The
degree of transformation induced by overexpression of rek or
axl was similar to that of overexpressed EGF receptor in
NIH3T3 cells.2 It is important to note
that, since a ligand for Rek has not yet been identified, it is
possible that Rek is activated by a molecule present in growth medium
containing fetal calf serum, especially in light of the reported
activation of Tyro3 by the serum protein, protein S (43). However, Sky,
the human homolog of Tyro3, has recently been shown to be activated in
a ligand-independent manner (85), suggesting that Rek activation may
also be ligand-independent. Other receptor tyrosine kinases such as
ErbB2/Neu/HER2 cause potent ligand-independent cell transformation
(78). Because exogenous EGF significantly increases the transforming
ability of the EGF receptor (82), it is possible that putative
ligand-independent rek transforming ability would be
potentiated in the presence of an activating ligand. The ability of
rek to transform NIH3T3 fibroblasts when overexpressed
demonstrates that this receptor tyrosine kinase has oncogenic
potential. In this regard, it is interesting to consider that mutations
giving rise to rek overexpression or activation in
vivo might contribute to the growth of malignant nervous system
tumors.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
(NIH) Grants NS26620 and EY08975 (to P. F. M.); CA42978, CA63071, and
CA55008 (to C. J. D.); and CA52855 (to D. W. F.). The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) U70045[GenBank].
§
Supported by an NIH National Research Service Award.
¶
Supported by an NCI, NIH, training grant to the Lineberger
Comprehensive Cancer Center.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 919-966-2323;
Fax: 919-966-2852; E-mail: srclab{at}med.unc.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: SH2, src
homology 2; Ig, immunoglobulin-like; FN, fibronectin; PCR, polymerase
chain reaction; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; kb,
kilobase pair(s); PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; RIPA,
radioimmune precipitation assay; RLB, Rek lysis buffer; EGF, epidermal
growth factor.
2
J. P. O'Bryan, unpublished results.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Edison Liu and Shelley Earp and
members of their laboratories for helpful advice during this project.
We gratefully acknowledge Karen Dold for generating the Müller
cell cDNA library and Carl Brown for expert technical
assistance.
REFERENCES
-
Maness, P. F., and Cox, M. E.
(1992)
Semin. Cell Biol.
3,
117-126
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kramer, H., Cagan, R. L., and Zipursky, S. L.
(1991)
Nature
352,
207-212
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hafen, E., Basler, K., Edstrom, J.-E., and Rubin, G. M.
(1987)
Science
236,
55-63
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
123, 264-275Tomlinson, A., and Ready, D. F. (1987) 123, 264-275
-
Glass, D. J., and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1993)
Trends Cell Biol.
3,
262-268
-
Marchionni, M. A., Goodearl, A. D. J., Chen, M. S., Bermingham-McDonogh, O., Kirk, C., Hendricks, M., Danehy, F., Misumi, D., Sudhalter, J., Kobayashi, K., Wroblewski, D., Lynch, C., Baldassare, M., Hiles, I., Davis, J. B., Hsuan, J. J., Totty, N. F., Otsu, M., McBurney, R. N., Waterfield, M. D., Stroobant, P., and Gwynne, D.
(1993)
Nature
362,
312-318
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Plowman, G. D., Green, J. M., Culouscou, J.-M., Carlton, G. W., Rothwell, V. M., and Buckley, S.
(1993)
Nature
366,
473-475
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Downward, J., Yarden, Y., Mayes, E., Scrace, G., Totty, N., Stockwell, P., Ullrich, A., Schlessinger, J., and Waterfield, M. D.
(1984)
Nature
307,
521-527
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Martin-Zanca, D., Hughes, S. H., and Barbacid, M.
(1986)
Nature
319,
743-748
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bargmann, C. I., Hung, M.-C., and Weinberg, R. A.
(1986)
Cell
45,
649-657
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Heldin, C.-H.
(1995)
Cell
80,
213-223
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schwechheimer, K., Laufle, R. M., Schmahl, W., Knodlseder, M., Fisher, H., and Hofler, H.
(1994)
Hum. Pathol.
25,
772-780
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Libermann, T. A., Nusbaum, H. R., Razon, N., Kris, R., Lax, I., Soreq, H., Whittle, N., Waterfield, M. D., Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J.
(1985)
Nature
313,
144-147
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sorge, L. K., Levy, B. T., and Maness, P. F.
(1984)
Cell
36,
249-257
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ingraham, C. A., Cooke, M. P., Chuang, Y.-N., Perlmutter, R. M., and Maness, P. F.
(1992)
Oncogene
7,
95-100
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shores, C. G., and Maness, P. F.
(1989)
J. Neurosci. Res.
24,
59-66
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Biscardi, J. S., Shores, C. G., and Maness, P. F.
(1991)
Curr. Eye Res.
10,
1121-1128
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Newman, E. A. (1986) The Müller Cell in Astrocytes
(Federoff, S., and Vernadakis, A.) Vol. 1, pp. 149-171,
Academic Press, London
-
Wiedemann, P.
(1992)
Survey Opthalmol.
36,
373-384
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lewis, G. P., Erickson, P. A., Guerin, C. J., Anderson, D. H., and Fisher, S. K.
(1992)
J. Neurosci.
12,
3968-3978
[Abstract]
-
Turner, D. L., and Cepko, C. L.
(1987)
Nature
328,
131-136
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wetts, R., and Fraser, S. E.
(1988)
Science
239,
1142-1145
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Anchan, R. M., Reh, T. A., Angello, J., Balliet, A., and Walker, M.
(1991)
Neuron
6,
923-936
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Biscardi, J. S., Cooper, N. G. F., and Maness, P. F.
(1993)
Exp. Eye Res.
56,
281-289
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wilks, A. F.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
1603-1607
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lai, C., and Lemke, G.
(1991)
Neuron
6,
691-704
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
O'Bryan, J. P., Frye, R. A., Cogswell, P. C., Neubauer, A., Kitch, B., Prodop, C., Espinosa, R., III, Le Beau, M. M., Earp, H. S., and Liu, E. T.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
5016-5031
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rescigno, J., Mansukhani, A., and Basilico, C.
(1991)
Oncogene
6,
1909-1913
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Faust, M., Ebensperger, C., Schulz, A. S., Schleithoff, L., Hameister, H., Bartram, C. R., and Janssen, J. W. G.
(1992)
Oncogene
7,
1287-1293
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ohashi, K., Mizuno, K., Kuma, K., Miyata, T., and Nakamura, T.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
699-703
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fujimoto, J., and Yamamoto, T.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
693-698
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dai, W., Pan, H., Hassanain, H., Gupta, S. L., and Murphy, M. J., Jr.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
975-979
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mark, M. R., Scadden, D. T., Wang, Z., Gu, Q., Goddard, A., and Godowski, P. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
10720-10728
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jia, R., and Hanafusa, H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1839-1844
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Graham, D. K., Dawson, T. L., Mullaney, D. L., Snodgrass, H. R., and Earp, H. S.
(1994)
Cell Growth & Differ.
5,
647-657
[Abstract]
-
Lai, C., Gore, M., and Lemke, G.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
2567-2578
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Taylor, I. C. A., Roy, S., Yaswen, P., Stampfer, M. R., and Varmus, H. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
6872-6880
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Williams, A. F., and Barclay, A. N.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
6,
381-405
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gebbink, M. F. B. G., van Etten, I., Hateboer, G., Suijkerbuijk, R., Beijersbergen, R. L., van Kessel, A. G., and Moolenaar, W. H.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
290,
123-130
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sap, J., Jiang, Y.-P., Grumet, M., and Schlessinger, J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1-9
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bellosta, P., Costa, M., Lin, D. A., and Basilico, C.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
614-625
[Abstract]
-
Varnum, B. C., Young, C., Elliot, G., Garcia, A., Bartley, T. D., Fridell, Y.-H., Hunt, R. W., Trail, G., Clogston, C., Toso, R. J., Yanagihara, D., Bennett, L., Sylber, M., Merewether, L. A., Tseng, A., Escobar, E., Liu, E. T., and Yamane, H. K.
(1995)
Nature
373,
623-626
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Godowski, P. J., Mark, M. R., Chen, J., Sadick, M. D., Raab, H., and Hammonds, R. G.
(1995)
Cell
82,
355-358
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stitt, T. N., Conn, G., Gore, M., Lai, C., Bruno, J., Radziejewski, C., Mattsson, K., Fisher, J., Gies, D. R., Jones, P. F., Masiakowski, P., Ryan, T. E., Tobkes, N. J., Chen, D. H., DiStefano, P. S., Long, G. L., Basilico, C., Goldfarb, M. P., Lemke, G., Glass, D. J., and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1995)
Cell
80,
661-670
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gasic, G. P., Arenas, C. P., Gasic, T. B., and Gasic, G. J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
2317-2320
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Adler, R.
(1990)
Methods Neurosci.
2,
134-150
-
Li, H. P., and Sheffield, J. B.
(1984)
Tissue Cell Res.
16,
843-857
-
Lemmon, V., and Rieser, B.
(1983)
Brain Res.
313,
191-197
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
dePomerai, D. I., and Carr, A.
(1982)
Exp. Eye. Res.
34,
553-563
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
dePomerai, D. I., Carr, A., Hyndman, A. G., and Adler, R.
(1982)
Dev. Brain Res.
2,
303-314
- <