Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coe, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coe, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 46, Issue of November 15, 1996 pp. 29468-29472
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

The Role of Protein Kinase C in Cellular Tolerance to Ethanol*

(Received for publication, March 5, 1996, and in revised form, July 12, 1996)

Imogen R. Coe Dagger §, Lina Yao Dagger , Ivan Diamond Dagger par ** and Adrienne S. Gordon Dagger par **Dagger Dagger

From the Dagger  Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center and the  Department of Neurology, par  Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology and ** Neuroscience Program, University of California, San Francisco, California 94110

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

We have shown that ethanol inhibits uptake of adenosine by a specific nucleoside transporter in NG108-15 neuroblastoma × glioma cells and that cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) activity is required for this inhibition. After chronic exposure to ethanol, adenosine uptake is no longer inhibited on rechallenge with ethanol, i.e. transport has become tolerant to ethanol. Here we show that protein kinase C (PKC) contributes to ethanol-induced tolerance of adenosine transport. Activation of PKC by phorbol esters in control cells results in an ethanol-tolerant phenotype, similar to that produced by chronic ethanol exposure. In addition, chronic exposure to ethanol increases the amounts of alpha , delta , and epsilon  PKC. However, reducing PKC activity by inhibition with chelerythrine during chronic exposure to ethanol or down-regulation by phorbol esters prevents the development of ethanol-induced tolerance of adenosine transport. By contrast, the inhibition of PKA activity produces tolerance to ethanol inhibition of adenosine uptake. When protein phosphatase inhibitors are present, inhibiting PKA activity has no effect on ethanol sensitivity of adenosine uptake, suggesting a role for protein phosphatases in the regulation of ethanol sensitivity of uptake. Taken together, our results suggest that PKA and PKC have opposing effects on the ethanol sensitivity of adenosine transport; PKA activity is required for ethanol sensitivity, and PKC activation produces tolerance. Based on these data, we propose that chronic ethanol exposure increases PKC activity, leading to the activation of a protein phosphatase (1 or 2A). This phosphatase then dephosphorylates a PKA-phosphorylated site, which is required for ethanol to inhibit adenosine uptake. Therefore, the sensitivity of adenosine transport to ethanol appears to be maintained by a balance of PKA and protein phosphatase activities, and PKC may regulate phosphatase activity.


INTRODUCTION

We have presented evidence that the cAMP signaling system is important for regulating the response to ethanol in a cell culture model of tolerance. We found that ethanol acts on a specific nucleoside transporter in NG108-15 neuroblastoma × glioma cells (1), inhibiting adenosine uptake (2). In cells treated chronically with ethanol, however, adenosine uptake becomes insensitive when rechallenged with acute ethanol, and adenosine uptake is no longer inhibited by ethanol (2). The loss of ethanol sensitivity is an example of ethanol tolerance at a cellular level. Using this model system, we have investigated the molecular mechanisms that regulate tolerance to ethanol.

We have shown that ethanol inhibition of adenosine uptake requires cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA)1 activity; ethanol does not inhibit adenosine uptake in mutant cells lacking PKA activity (3). We also found that the ethanol sensitivity of transport in cells chronically exposed to ethanol can be restored by activating PKA (4). In addition, the inhibition of PKA in naive cells reproduces the ethanol-tolerant phenotype. This latter effect can be prevented by inhibiting protein phosphatase activity with okadaic acid (4), suggesting that protein phosphatase (1 or 2A) is also involved in regulating the ethanol sensitivity of adenosine uptake. Based on this earlier work, we concluded that ethanol sensitivity of adenosine uptake appears to be due to a balance of PKA and phosphatase activities.

Recent evidence also implicates protein kinase C (PKC) in cellular responses to ethanol. On acute exposure to ethanol, PKC activity increases in human lymphocytes (5) and epidermal keratinocytes (6). Moreover, chronic exposure to ethanol causes increased PKC activity in NG108-15 and PC12 cells (7). PKC also regulates the ethanol sensitivity of GABAA receptors (8, 9, 10), NMDA receptors (11), AMPA/kainate receptors (12), and 5HT1c and M1 muscarinic receptors (13). We therefore investigated the role of PKC in the regulation of ethanol sensitivity of adenosine transport. We found that activation of PKC produces the tolerant phenotype in naive cells and that inhibition or down-regulation of PKC during chronic exposure to ethanol prevents the development of tolerance. Our results suggest that PKC activity is required for the development of tolerance of adenosine transport after chronic exposure to ethanol.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

The a and b isomers of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (LC Services, Woburn, MA) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide or 95% ethanol to a concentration of 10 mM, stored at -20 °C, and diluted in assay medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium: F-12 (Ham's), 3:1; 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) to 100 nM for use in acute ethanol experiments. PMA was diluted in defined medium for chronic ethanol experiments. Bradykinin (Calbiochem) was dissolved in water to a concentration of 5 mM and diluted in assay medium to a concentration of 50 mM. Chelerythrine (Calbiochem) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide to a concentration of 13 mM, stored at -20 °C, and diluted in defined medium to 1 mM. Nitrobenzylthioinosine, [3H]adenosine (30 Ci/mmol), and non-radioactive adenosine were from Sigma, DuPont NEN, and Boehringer Mannheim, respectively. 125I-protein A was purchased from Amersham Corp., and anti-PKC isozyme-specific antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.

Cell Culture

NG108-15 neuroblastoma × glioma hybrid cells (passage number 19-23) obtained from the cell culture facility at the University of California, San Francisco, were grown in 10% Nu-Serum and maintained for 2-3 days in complete defined medium as described previously (14). The cells were then seeded in six-well plates at a density of 4-6 × 104 cells/well in complete defined medium and used for acute experiments on day 3. For most chronic ethanol experiments, cells were seeded as above and treated on day 3 for a further 48 h with or without 200 mM ethanol or other additions. The medium was replaced daily. The data in Fig. 3C for varying concentrations of ethanol were obtained after a 4-day exposure to ethanol. For the experiments investigating inhibition of PKC by chelerythrine, cells were incubated in the presence or absence of 1 µM chelerythrine for 30 min prior to exposure to 200 mM ethanol or defined medium alone with or without 1 µM chelerythrine for 48 h. For the PKC down-regulation experiments, cells were pretreated on day 3 with beta -PMA (100 nM) or vehicle for 24 h and then incubated in the presence or absence of ethanol with or without beta -PMA for an additional 48 h. For the uptake experiments using phorbol esters, bradykinin, or chelerythrine, cells incubated in assay medium containing carrier only were included as controls.


Fig. 3. PKC immunoreactivity in NG108-15 cells. A, Western blots of control or beta -PMA down-regulated NG108-15 cells cultured in the absence (C) or presence (E) of 200 mM ethanol for 48 h. 25 µg and 40 µg indicate the amount of protein loaded on the gel. Molecular masses of the PKC isozymes are 80, 82, 84, 78, and 92 kDa for alpha 1, beta 1, beta 2, delta , and epsilon , respectively. B, percent increase in the amount of specific PKC isozyme immunoreactivity from cells treated for 48 h with 200 mM ethanol as compared with control cells. Data shown are the means ± S.E. *, p < 0.001 (student's t test), alpha  (n = 5), beta 1 (n = 3), beta 2 (n = 3), delta  (n = 7), and epsilon  (n = 7). C, Western blot of control cells (C) and cells exposed to varying concentrations of ethanol for 4 days, probed with anti-epsilon PKC antibodies. D, Western blots of control cells or cells exposed to 200 mM ethanol for 48 h in the absence or presence of 1 µM chelerythrine as described under "Experimental Procedures." Blots were probed for delta  and epsilon  PKC. E, percent increase in the amounts of delta  and epsilon  PKC in cells exposed to ethanol in the absence or presence of chelerythrine as compared with control cells. Data shown are means ± S.E. *, p < 0.001 (Student's t test) and n = 4.
[View Larger Version of this Image (33K GIF file)]


Adenosine Uptake Measurements

Cells were preincubated at room temperature for 4 min with 1 ml/well assay medium (2) in the presence or absence of 200 mM ethanol. The medium was replaced with assay medium containing 0.3 µM [3H]adenosine (0.03 Ci/µmol) in the presence or absence of ethanol. The incubation was stopped at 1 min (uptake is linear for at least 1.5 min (2)) by rapidly aspirating the medium and washing the cells with 3 ml of ice-cold non-radioactive medium. The cells were dissolved overnight in 1 ml of 2 N NaOH and aliquots taken for measurement of protein (15) and radioactivity. Specific uptake was determined by subtracting nonspecific uptake in the presence of 10 nM nitrobenzylthioinosine from total uptake. Data are presented as percent inhibition of specific uptake by ethanol.

Western Blot Analysis

Cells were collected in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EDTA, 10 mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml each of leupeptin and aprotinin, and 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate. 400-µl samples (1.6 mg of protein) were each mixed with 100 µl of 5 × sample buffer (16) and heated for 5 min at 90 °C. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min (4 °C), samples were diluted to 20-50 µg of protein and subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 10% acrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred electrophoretically to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes that were then incubated overnight at 4 °C in a blocking solution containing TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl), 0.1% Tween 20, and 5% nonfat dry milk. Blots were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with affinity-purified rabbit antibodies to PKC isozymes (0.5 mg/ml, diluted 1:200), washed 3 times in TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T), and then incubated for 2 h with 125I-protein A (10 µCi/100 ml), followed by an extensive washing with TBS-T. The immunoreactive bands were visualized and quantitated using a Molecular Imager System (Bio-Rad).


RESULTS

Activation of PKC Causes Tolerance of Adenosine Transport in Control Cells

Acute ethanol inhibits adenosine uptake by approximately 40% (Ref. 2 and Fig. 1). After chronic exposure to ethanol, adenosine uptake becomes tolerant to acute rechallenge with ethanol (Ref. 2 and Fig. 1). If increased amount and/or activity of PKC contributes to chronic ethanol-induced tolerance in NG108-15 cells, then activating PKC in naive control cells (cells not exposed to ethanol) should also produce ethanol tolerance. We therefore incubated naive cells for 10 min in the absence and presence of the phorbol ester, beta -PMA (100 nM), which activates PKC, and then measured ethanol inhibition of adenosine uptake. Control cells showed a typical level of inhibition of adenosine uptake by acute ethanol (34 ± 6%, Fig. 1). By contrast, ethanol did not significantly inhibit adenosine uptake in cells pretreated with beta -PMA. This loss of ethanol sensitivity of adenosine transport was similar to the tolerance caused by chronic ethanol exposure (Fig. 1). beta -PMA had no further effect on the tolerance of adenosine uptake in cells treated chronically with ethanol (Fig. 1). In both naive cells and cells chronically exposed to ethanol, the absolute values of uptake in the absence of acute ethanol were not affected by beta -PMA treatment (not shown). The inactive phorbol ester alpha -PMA had no effect on the ethanol sensitivity of adenosine uptake in control cells (Fig. 1), suggesting that the ethanol tolerance produced by beta -PMA was due to the activation of PKC.


Fig. 1. Activation of PKC by PMA abolishes ethanol inhibition of adenosine uptake in naive NG108-15 cells. Naive NG108-15 cells were incubated in the absence or presence of 200 mM ethanol for 48 h. alpha - or beta -PMA or vehicle was added, and the cells were further incubated for 10 min. The cells were then exposed to 200 mM ethanol for 4 min and the ethanol sensitivity of adenosine uptake assayed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data shown are means ± S.E. for at least three experiments. *, p < 0.05 compared with ethanol inhibition of adenosine uptake in control cells. (Two-way ANOVA and Newman-Keul's test were used.)
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]


We also determined whether the activation of PKC by an endogenous receptor pathway produces the tolerant phenotype in naive cells. In NG108-15 cells, bradykinin receptors activate phospholipase C (17), which consequently activates PKC. Therefore, cells were incubated with bradykinin (50 µM) for 10 min before measuring ethanol sensitivity of adenosine uptake. Cells treated with bradykinin showed the tolerant phenotype; acute ethanol did not inhibit adenosine uptake (Fig. 2). Similar to the effect of beta -PMA, incubation with bradykinin had no effect on the tolerant phenotype produced by chronic ethanol exposure (Fig. 2). These data suggest that activation of PKC induces tolerance to ethanol inhibition of adenosine transport in naive cells not previously exposed to ethanol.


Fig. 2. Incubation with bradykinin abolishes ethanol inhibition of adenosine uptake in naive cells. NG108-15 cells were incubated in the absence or presence of 200 mM ethanol for 48 h. Bradykinin (50 µM) or assay medium was then added, and the cells were incubated for 10 min prior to measurement of uptake. Data shown are means ± S.E. of three experiments. *, p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA and Newman-Keul's test) compared with ethanol inhibition of adenosine uptake in control cells.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]


Chronic Ethanol Exposure Increases the Amount of Specific PKC Isozymes

Since activation of PKC and chronic exposure to ethanol produced the same tolerant phenotype, it was possible that ethanol increased the amount of PKC in NG108-15 cells, leading to tolerance of adenosine transport. We therefore determined whether chronic exposure to ethanol alters the amount of PKC in NG108-15 cells grown in defined medium. PKC is a family of closely related isozymes divided into three subfamilies (18): the Ca2+-dependent or conventional isozymes (PKC alpha , beta 1, beta 2, gamma ), the Ca2+-independent or novel isozymes (delta , epsilon , eta , theta , and µ), and phorbol ester-insensitive or atypical subfamilies (PKC zeta  and iota /lambda ). Using isozyme-specific antibodies against the phorbol ester-sensitive PKC isozymes, we found that alpha , beta 1, beta 2, delta , and epsilon  PKC are expressed in these cells (Fig. 3A, control). gamma  PKC was not detectable. Antibodies against eta , theta , and µ were not available to us. Chronic exposure to 200 mM ethanol for 48 h caused a significant increase in the levels of PKC alpha , delta , and epsilon  when compared with naive control cells (Fig. 3, A and B). There was no significant change in the amount of the beta 1 and beta 2 isozymes (Fig. 3, A and B). These experiments were carried out at a relatively high concentration of ethanol to allow us to use short exposure times (2 days). To determine whether lower concentrations of ethanol also increase delta  and epsilon PKC levels, NG108-15 cells were incubated in varying concentrations of ethanol for 4 days. The data in Fig. 3C indicate that the amounts of delta  and epsilon  PKC were significantly increased at 25 mM ethanol and that the increase was dependent on the concentration of ethanol.

PKC Inhibition during Chronic Ethanol Exposure Prevents the Development of Tolerance

If the increased amount of alpha , delta , or epsilon  PKC produced by chronic ethanol exposure contributes to the development of tolerance, then inhibiting PKC activity during ethanol treatment should prevent the development of the chronic ethanol phenotype. We used the specific PKC inhibitor, chelerythrine (19), to test this hypothesis. Cells were pretreated for 30 min either with or without 1 µM chelerythrine in the medium. The cells were then incubated in the presence or absence of ethanol, with or without 1 µM chelerythrine, for 48 h, and ethanol inhibition of adenosine uptake was measured. Cells exposed to ethanol alone for 48 h show tolerance when rechallenged with ethanol (Fig. 4). In contrast, chelerythrine prevented the development of tolerance; ethanol inhibited adenosine uptake in cells incubated with chelerythrine and ethanol for 48 h just as in untreated cells (Fig. 4). Chelerythrine had no effect on adenosine uptake in the absence or presence of ethanol in naive control cells. However, chelerythrine completely blocked the chronic ethanol-induced increase in the amounts of delta  and epsilon  PKC (Fig. 3, D and E).


Fig. 4. Inhibition of PKC by chelerythrine before and during chronic exposure to ethanol prevents the development of tolerance. NG108-15 cells were preincubated with or without 1 µM chelerythrine for 30 min prior to incubation in the absence or presence of 200 mM ethanol for 48 h in the absence and presence of 1 µM chelerythrine. Data shown are the means ± S.E. of three experiments. *, p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA and Newman-Keul's test) compared with other conditions.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]


Down-regulation of PKC Prevents the Development of Tolerance

The functional consequences of reduced PKC activity can also be determined by down-regulating PKC. Therefore, the PMA-sensitive PKC isozymes were down-regulated with beta -PMA (20) prior to and during exposure to ethanol. Cells were pretreated for 30 min with medium alone or medium containing 100 nM beta -PMA and then incubated in the presence or absence of ethanol, with or without 100 nM beta -PMA for 48 h. The alpha , beta 1, beta 2, delta , and epsilon  isozymes were virtually absent after beta -PMA treatment (Fig. 3A). Chronic ethanol exposure did not produce the tolerant phenotype in these down-regulated cells; ethanol inhibition of adenosine uptake was similar in down-regulated ethanol-exposed cells and naive control cells (Fig. 5). Down-regulation of PKC had no effect on ethanol sensitivity of adenosine uptake in naive cells. Therefore, reduced PKC activity produced either by PKC inhibition (with chelerythrine) or down-regulation (by beta -PMA) during chronic ethanol exposure prevented the development of the ethanol tolerant phenotype. These data support the hypothesis that an ethanol-induced increase in PKC amount or activity is required for tolerance of adenosine transport to develop during chronic exposure to ethanol.


Fig. 5. Down-regulation of PKC by incubation with PMA before and during chronic exposure to ethanol prevents the development of tolerance. PKC was down-regulated by preincubating NG108-15 cells with 100 nM PMA for 24 h. Control cells (carried through the down-regulation procedure in the absence of PMA) and down-regulated cells were then incubated in the presence or absence of 200 mM ethanol for 48 h. PMA was also present during the chronic ethanol exposure of down-regulated cells. *, p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA and Newman-Keul's test) compared with other conditions.
[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

We have shown that a specific facilitative nucleoside transporter is a primary target for ethanol in NG108-15 cells (1). Acute ethanol inhibition of adenosine uptake via this transporter leads to activation of adenosine A2 receptors and a cascade of intracellular signaling events leading to tolerance of adenosine transport on rechallenge with ethanol (2). We found that adenosine uptake is not inhibited by ethanol in mutant cells lacking PKA activity (3) and that the tolerance of adenosine transport induced by chronic ethanol exposure could be reversed by activating PKA (4). These results suggest that PKA activity is required for ethanol to inhibit adenosine uptake. Treatment with phorbol esters (Fig. 1), which activate PKC, or activation of bradykinin receptors (Fig. 2), which also leads to activation of PKC (21, 22), produces a tolerant phenotype similar to that produced by chronic exposure to ethanol. Conversely, ethanol tolerance is prevented in chronically exposed cells when PKC activity is inhibited (Fig. 4) or reduced by down-regulation (Fig. 5).

These data suggest that the ethanol sensitivity of adenosine transport is regulated by both PKA and PKC. PKA maintains the ethanol-sensitive phenotype; PKC activity is required for chronic ethanol-induced tolerance of adenosine transport. There is evidence in other systems that a balance of PKA and PKC activities regulates cellular functions. PKA can overcome PKC-dependent desensitization of the G-protein-activated K+ channel (23), and opposing effects of PKA and PKC on the glycine receptor have also been reported (24). Hoek and co-workers (25) have also shown that PKA and PKC have opposite effects on the regulation of basal and receptor-stimulated phospholipase C activity by ethanol in liver.

In naive NG108-15 cells, activation of PKC produces the tolerant phenotype of adenosine transport (Fig. 1), but ethanol-induced tolerance can be reversed by activating PKA. These observations are best explained by an indirect mechanism of action for PKC with protein phosphatase(s) 1 and/or 2A as intermediates (Fig. 6). We propose that PKC activates a phosphatase that dephosphorylates the PKA-phosphorylated site on the transporter or an associated regulatory protein producing the ethanol-insensitive phenotype. In support of this model, we found that inhibition of PKA activity produces an ethanol-tolerant phenotype only if protein phosphatase(s) 1 and/or 2A are active (4); in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors, inhibiting PKA activity had no effect on ethanol sensitivity of transport. Therefore, ethanol sensitivity of transport appears to be due to a balance between phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. In naive cells, phosphorylation predominates. Phosphatase activity predominates after inhibition of PKA activity or after chronic ethanol exposure. Phosphatase activity could be stimulated directly by PKC as described for the receptor-like protein-tyrosine phosphatase RPTPalpha (26) or indirectly by phosphorylation and inactivation of a phosphatase inhibitor protein as described for beta -PMA activation of protein phosphatase 1 in L6 cells (27). Inhibition of PKC by chelerythrine or down-regulation of PKC by PMA in cells exposed chronically to ethanol would be expected to prevent activation of the phosphatase by PKC, leaving the PKA-phosphorylated site intact and resulting in an ethanol-sensitive phenotype.


Fig. 6. Ethanol sensitivity of adenosine transport is due to a balance of PKA, PKC, and phosphatase activities. In naive cells, the transporter (T) or an associated regulatory component is maintained in an ethanol-sensitive state by phosphorylation by PKA. Protein phosphatase(s) 1 and/or 2A can dephosphorylate the transporter but PKA activity predominates. Ethanol inhibits uptake by the phosphorylated transporter, leading to an accumulation of extracellular adenosine. When the cells are exposed chronically to ethanol, PKC activity increases, activating the phosphatase(s). There is a consequent dephosphorylation of the transporters leading to the tolerant phenotype (ethanol no longer inhibits adenosine uptake and there is less extracellular accumulation of adenosine).
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]


PKC is a family of isozymes of which at least five are expressed in NG108-15 cells (Fig. 3A). Beckmann et al. (28) did not detect beta 1 in NG108-15 cells. This may reflect the difference in culture medium in which the cells are grown. We found that the amounts of alpha , delta , and epsilon  were increased after chronic exposure to ethanol (Fig. 3B). Although we have not measured PKC activity directly, an increase in PKC activity correlated with increased amounts of alpha , delta , and epsilon  PKC after chronic exposure of PC12 cells to ethanol (7). Since chelerythrine inhibited both PKC activity and the ethanol-induced increase in amounts of delta  and epsilon  PKC, it remains to be determined whether increases in PKC amount or PKC activity, per se, are required for the development of tolerance of adenosine transport.

In addition to changes in the amount or activity of PKA, PKC, or possibly protein phosphatases 1 and 2A, ethanol might alter the intracellular localization of these enzymes, thus altering their function. Recent evidence suggests that the localization of intracellular signaling enzymes determines their specificity of action (29, 30, 31). PKA (32), protein phosphatases 1 and 2A (30), and specific isozymes of PKC (33) have unique locations within a number of cell lines including NG108-15 cells (28). Ethanol has been shown to cause translocation of PKC activity from cytosolic to membrane fractions in astroglial cells (34), human lymphocytes (5), and epidermal keratinocytes (6). It is therefore possible that ethanol may modulate the balance of PKA, PKC, and protein phosphatase activities by altering their localization in NG108-15 cells. Such changes may contribute to the development of ethanol tolerance.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by grants from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry, 4-74 Medical Sciences Bldg., University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7, Canada.
Dagger Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Ernest Gallo Clinic and Research Center, SFGH Bldg. 1, Rm. 101, San Francisco, CA 94110. Tel.: 415-648-7111; Fax: 415-648-7116.
1   The abbreviations used are: PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase; PKC, protein kinase C; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; ANOVA, analysis of variance.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Daria Mochly-Rosen and Robert Messing for many invaluable discussions and Drs. Ulrike Heberlein, Michael Miles, and Robert Messing, as well as members of the laboratory, for critical reading of the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Krauss, S. W., Ghirnikar, R. B., Diamond, I., and Gordon, A. S. (1993) Mol. Pharmacol. 44, 1021-1026 [Abstract]
  2. Nagy, L. E., Diamond, I., Casso, D. J., Franklin, C., and Gordon, A. S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1946-1951 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Nagy, L. E., Diamond, I., and Gordon, A. S. (1991) Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 812-817 [Abstract]
  4. Coe, I. R., Dohrman, D. P., Constantinescu, A., Diamond, I., and Gordon, A. S. (1996) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 276, 365-369 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. DePetrillo, P. B., and Liou, C. S. (1993) Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 17, 351-354 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Kharbanda, S., Nakamura, T., and Kufe, D. (1993) Biochem. Pharmacol. 45, 675-681 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Messing, R. O., Petersen, P. J., and Henrich, C. J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 23428-23432 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wafford, K. A., and Whiting, P. J. (1992) FEBS Lett. 313, 113-117 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Weiner, J. L., Zhang, L., and Carlen, P. L. (1994) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 268, 1388-1395 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Harris, R. A., McQuilkin, S. J., Paylor, R., Abeliovich, A., Tonegawa, S., and Wehner, J. M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 3658-3662 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Snell, L. D., Iorio, K. R., Tabakoff, B., and Hoffman, P. L. (1994) J. Neurochem. 62, 1783-1789 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Dildy-Mayfield, J. E., and Harris, R. A. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 3162-3171 [Abstract]
  13. Sanna, E., Dildy-Mayfield, J. E., and Harris, R. A. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol. 45, 1004-1012 [Abstract]
  14. Gordon, A. S., Collier, K., and Diamond, I. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 2105-2108 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Bradford, M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Wolsing, D. H., and Rosenbaum, J. S. (1991) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 257, 621-633 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Nishizuka, Y. (1992) Science 258, 607-614 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Herbert, J. M., Augereau, J. M., Gleye, J., and Maffrand, J. P. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 172, 993-999 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Blackshear, P. J. (1988) Am. J. Med. Sci. 296, 231-240 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Tippmer, S., Quitterer, U., Kolm, V., Faussner, A., Roscher, A., Mosthaf, L., Müller-Esterl, W., and Häring, H. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 225, 297-304 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Gerwins, P., and Fredholm, B. B. (1995) Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 351, 186-193 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Chen, Y., and Yu, L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7839-7842 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Vaello, M.-L., Ruiz-Gomez, A., Lerma, J., and Mayor, F., Jr. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2002-2008 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hoek, J. B., Nomura, T., and Higashi, K. (1993) in Alcohol, Cell Membranes, and Signal Transduction in Brain (Alling, C., Diamond, I., Leslie, S. W., Sun, G. Y., and Wood, W. G., eds), pp. 219-234, Plenum Press, New York
  26. Tracy, S., van der Geer, P., and Hunter, T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10587-10594 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Srinivasan, M., and Begum, N. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 16662-16667 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Beckmann, R., Lindschau, C., Haller, H., Hucho, F., and Buchner, K. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 222, 335-343 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Mochly-Rosen, D. (1995) Science 268, 247-251 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hubbard, M. J., and Cohen, P. (1993) Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 172-177 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Inagaki, N., Ito, M., Nakano, T., and Inagaki, M. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 448-452 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Scott, J. D., and McCartney, S. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 5-11 [Free Full Text]
  33. Disatnik, M.-H., Buraggi, G., and Mochly-Rosen, D. (1994) Exp. Cell Res. 210, 287-297 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Skwish, S., and Shain, W. (1990) Life Sci. 47, 1037-1042 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Sahin, H. Shu, J. Fernandez, A. El-Armouche, J. D. Molkentin, A. C. Nairn, and J. A. Bibb
Phosphorylation of Protein Phosphatase Inhibitor-1 by Protein Kinase C
J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2006; 281(34): 24322 - 24335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
M. E. Jung, M. B. Gatch, and J. W. Simpkins
Estrogen Neuroprotection Against the Neurotoxic Effects of Ethanol Withdrawal: Potential Mechanisms
Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2005; 230(1): 8 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D.-S. Choi, D. Wang, J. Dadgar, W. S. Chang, and R. O. Messing
Conditional Rescue of Protein Kinase C epsilon Regulates Ethanol Preference and Hypnotic Sensitivity in Adult Mice
J. Neurosci., November 15, 2002; 22(22): 9905 - 9911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. Aguayo, C. Flores, J. Parodi, R. Rojas, G. E Mann, J. D Pearson, and L. Sobrevia
Modulation of adenosine transport by insulin in human umbilical artery smooth muscle cells from normal or gestational diabetic pregnancies
J. Physiol., July 1, 2001; 534(1): 243 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
O. A. Dina, J. Barletta, X. Chen, A. Mutero, A. Martin, R. O. Messing, and J. D. Levine
Key Role for the Epsilon Isoform of Protein Kinase C in Painful Alcoholic Neuropathy in the Rat
J. Neurosci., November 15, 2000; 20(22): 8614 - 8619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
B. L. Hungund and B. S. Basavarajappa
ARE ANANDAMIDE AND CANNABINOID RECEPTORS INVOLVED IN ETHANOL TOLERANCE? A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE
Alcohol Alcohol., March 1, 2000; 35(2): 126 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. S. Gordon, L. Yao, Z.-L. Wu, I. R. Coe, and I. Diamond
Ethanol Alters the Subcellular Localization of delta - and epsilon  Protein Kinase C in NG108-15 Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 1997; 52(4): 554 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coe, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coe, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement