|
Volume 271, Number 47,
Issue of November 22, 1996
pp. 30061-30067
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Differential Targeting of T- and N-cadherin in Polarized
Epithelial Cells*
(Received for publication, June 19, 1996, and in revised form, August 19, 1996)
Erich
Koller
and
Barbara
Ranscht
From The Burnham Institute, La Jolla Cancer Research Center,
La Jolla, California 92307
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
To test whether glycosyl
phosphatidylinositol-linked T-cadherin is a component of cell junctions
like classical cadherins, we have examined its distribution and
targeting in polarized epithelial cells. In vivo,
T-cadherin was detected on the apical cell surface of the chick
intestinal epithelium. In cultures of transfected Madin-Darby canine
kidney cells, T-cadherin was also expressed apically, whereas classical
N-cadherin resided basolaterally. Both cadherins were directly targeted
to their respective membrane domains. Mutant proteins were expressed in
Madin-Darby canine kidney cells to identify the regions responsible for
differential cadherin localization. N cyt, an N-cadherin cytoplasmic
domain deletion mutant, was stably distributed basolaterally. This
mutant was transported to both the apical and basolateral membrane
compartments, followed by preferential removal from the apical surface.
T-N cyt, a T-cadherin mutant with the N-cadherin cytoplasmic domain
deletion, was localized basolaterally, whereas N-TGPI, a
GPI-anchored N-cadherin mutant, resided at the apical domain. The
T-cadherin carboxyl-terminal 76 amino acids contain the apical
targeting signal and include the signal for GPI anchor attachment.
Basolateral localization of N-cadherin is achieved through targeting
signals in the cytoplasmic domain. Thus, GPI-linked T-cadherin is not a
component of cell junctions, consistent with a function as a
recognition rather than a cell adhesion molecule.
INTRODUCTION
Polarized epithelia separate biological compartments and regulate
the vectorial transport of ions and solutes. Epithelial cells are
polarized into an apical and basolateral pole (1), each characterized
by a distinct protein and lipid composition. The induction of
epithelial cell differentiation and polarization and the molecular
signals responsible for selective protein sorting to distinct membrane
domains can be studied in vitro using
MDCK1 cells (2).
The organization of MDCK cells into an apical and a basolateral pole
depends on extracellular matrix and cell-cell interactions (3, 4, 5).
Formation of cell-cell contacts, induced through adhesive interactions
mediated by E-cadherin (6), results in the differentiation of MDCK
cells into a polarized epithelium and the gradual restriction of
specific proteins to the apical or basolateral membrane domain (5, 6, 7, 8).
E-cadherin is a classical transmembrane, calcium-dependent
cadherin cell adhesion molecule, which is characterized by five
extracellular structural repeats and a highly conserved cytoplasmic
region. The cadherin cytoplasmic region interacts with the catenins, a group of cytoplasmic proteins that connects cadherins with the actin-based cytoskeleton (9, 10). In epithelial cells in vivo, E-cadherin is a major constituent of adherens junctions, where it mediates calcium-dependent adhesion and links
cortical actin filaments between adjacent cells (7, 11).
T-cadherin is a member of the cadherin family that shares the
ectodomain organization with classical cadherins and is anchored to the
membrane through a GPI moiety (12, 13). In contrast to classical
cadherins that generally do not mediate adhesive interactions without
their conserved cytoplasmic domain (14, 15), T-cadherin induces
calcium-dependent, homophilic aggregation between
transfected cells (13). In the animal, T-cadherin is a component of
specific cell populations both within and outside the nervous system.
In the nervous system, T-cadherin demarcates specific neuron
populations and axon pathways (12, 16, 17), suggesting
a role in axon patterning. Outside the nervous system, T-cadherin is
expressed on skeletal muscle surfaces and is specifically excluded from
myoneural junctions (17), which are demarcated by N-cadherin (19). The
mechanisms of how T-cadherin functions in mediating cell-cell
interactions and axon guidance are not understood.
To gain insights into the principal function of T-cadherin, we have
examined whether T-cadherin is localized to cell-cell junctions like
classical cadherins. Two approaches were used: immunohistochemical
staining of the chick intestinal epithelium in vivo and
heterologous expression of T-cadherin in polarized MDCK cells in
vitro. Our results revealed T-cadherin on apical cell surfaces of
epithelial cells, in contrast to the basolateral localization of
classical cadherins. Examination of the mechanisms responsible for
differential cadherin localization identified direct targeting as well
as selective removal from specific membrane domains as key
principles.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cells and Tissue Culture
Madin-Darby canine kidney cells,
clone II/8, were obtained from Dr. James Nelson (Stanford University,
Stanford, CA) (20) and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS),
penicillin, and streptomycin.
Cryosectioning of Chick Embryonic Tissue
Fertilized White
Leghorn chicken eggs (McIntyre Poultry Farm, Lakeside, CA) were
incubated in a force-draft incubator until the desired developmental
stages. Embryos were dissected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH
7.2), fixed for 6 h in 4% formaldehyde in PBS, and rinsed in
several changes of PBS. The tissue was cryoprotected overnight in 30%
sucrose in PBS and embedded and frozen in OCT embedding medium (Miles
Scientific, Elkhart, IN). Sections of 15 µm were cut, collected on
chromalum-coated slides, and labeled with anti-T-cadherin antiserum as
described below.
Construction of Expression Plasmids and Cell
Transfection
Chick T-cadherin (13) or N-cadherin pcDNA1
expression plasmids were cotransfected with the selectable marker
plasmid pSV2neo into MDCK cells as described below. Chicken N-cadherin
cDNA (a gift from Dr. C. Kintner, Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA) was
excised from the SP72 plasmid vector (Promega, Madison, WI) with
EcoRV and XbaI, and the coding region was
inserted into the EcoRV- and XbaI-digested
pcDNA1 expression vector (Ncad-pcDNA1; Invitrogen, La Jolla,
CA). Three mutants, N-TGPI, N cyt, and T-N cyt (see Fig. 5), were constructed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain
reaction amplification and ligation of the respective T- and N-cadherin
DNA fragments into pcDNA1. N-TGPI, comprising
N-cadherin ectodomain amino acids 1-660 (amino acid numbering
according to Hatta et al. (21)) and the GPI anchor of
T-cadherin (amino acids 615-690, numbering according to Ranscht and
Dours-Zimmermann (12)), was generated by reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction using N-cadherin primers
5 -(NotI) ATGTGCCGGATAGCGGGAA and
3 -(SalI) AATGGTCCAATTCCTCTTAAT
(restriction sites underlined) and T-cadherin primers
5 -(SalI) CTTAACAATACTCATGCCCAG and 3 -(XbaI) CTACAGACAAAATAAACTGAA. The
N-cadherin cytoplasmic domain deletion mutant N cyt (amino acids
1-755) was generated using N-cadherin
5 -(NotI) ATGTGCCGGATAGCGGGAA and
3 -(XbaI) TCAACGGCGCTTCATCCATACTAC primers.
Last, the T-N cyt chimera comprising the T-cadherin ectodomain (amino
acids 22 to 616) and the N-cadherin cytoplasmic tail deletion (amino
acids 667-755) was generated using T-cadherin primers
5 -(NotI) ATGCAGCACAAAACTCAACTT and
3 -(SalI) GTTAAGCTTGTTGATTCTCCA and
N-cadherin primers 5 -(SalI) CATGCCCAGCTCTCTTTAAGG and
3 -(XbaI) CAACGGCGCTTCATCCATACTAC. All
polymerase chain reaction fragments were cloned into the pCRII vector
(Invitrogen) and digested with restriction enzymes specific for the
sites at their respective 5 - and 3 -ends. Ligation into the pcDNA1
expression plasmid (Invitrogen) was carried out in a single step
reaction with one or two DNA inserts.
Fig. 5.
T- and N-cadherin mutants. T-cadherin
sequences are depicted as open boxes; N-cadherin sequences
are shaded. Diagonal stripes, hydrophobic
sequences. S, signal peptide; PRE, prepeptide; EC, extracellular domain; CYTO, cytoplasmic
domain.
[View Larger Version of this Image (33K GIF file)]
MDCK cells were transfected by calcium phosphate precipitation (22)
with either of the above plasmids in the presence of the selectable
marker plasmid pSV2neo using CellPhect (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.)
according to the manufacturer's directions. Colonies were selected in
the presence of G418 and enriched by fluorescence-activated cell
sorting. For T- and N-cadherin co-expression, T-cadherin-expressing MDCK cells were transfected with Ncad-pcDNA1 and pPGK-hygromycin (kindly provided by R. Oshima, The Burnham Institute) and selected in
G418 (0.5 mg/ml) and hygromycin (0.25 mg/ml).
Immunocytochemistry
MDCK cells were grown on Costar
TranswellTM filters (Costar Corp., Cambridge,
MA), coated with type I collagen (25 µg/ml; Collaborative Research
Inc., Bedford, MA), at densities close to saturation (2 × 105 cells/cm2). After 2-3 days, cells were
washed with PBS containing 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 mM CaCl2 (PBS/CM) and fixed with 2%
paraformaldehyde in PBS/CM for 30 min at room temperature. The cells
were incubated with 50 mM NH4Cl in PBS/CM for
10 min at room temperature and permeabilized for 10 min with 0.075%
(w/v) saponin in PBS/CM containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin.
T-cadherin was detected by indirect immunofluorescence with rabbit
anti-T-cadherin antiserum (1:100; Ranscht and Dours-Zimmermann (12)),
followed by fluorescein-conjugated fluorescein isothiocyanate goat
anti-rabbit IgG (1:500; Cappel, West Chester, PA) in PBS/CM containing
0.075% (w/v) saponin and 0.2% bovine serum albumin. E-cadherin was
visualized with the mouse monoclonal antibody rr1 (1:500; Gumbiner and
Simons (22); a generous gift from Dr. Barry Gumbiner, Sloan Kettering
Cancer Center, New York, NY). For N-cadherin staining, cells were fixed with ethanol ( 20 °C) for 2 min and then labeled with mouse
monoclonal anti-N-cadherin antibody GC4 (1:50; Volk and Geiger (11);
Sigma). Both rr1 and GC4 were visualized with
fluorescein-conjugated fluorescein isothiocyanate goat anti-mouse IgG
(1:200 in PBS/CM containing 1% heat-inactivated goat serum;
Antibodies, Inc., Davis, CA).
For counterstaining, nuclei were labeled with propidium iodide (1 µg/ml; Sigma) in PBS/CM for 15 min after
pretreatment of the cells with RNase A (50 µg/ml; Boehringer
Mannheim) for 30 min at room temperature. Vertical optical sections
were obtained by laser scanning confocal microscopy (XZ sections in
0.25-µm intervals; Zeiss LSM 410 inverted laser scan microscope).
Immuno-electron Microscopy
Monolayer cultures of MDCK
cells, grown to confluency on polycarbonate TranswellTM
filter chambers, were fixed for 1 h with 4% paraformaldehyde and
0.2% glutaraldehyde in 0.13 M phosphate buffer and blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5% goat serum in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 0.1 M Tris and 77 mM NaCl, pH 7.6)
containing 0.1% Photo-flo (Eastman Kodak Co.). Cells were stained
overnight at 4 °C with anti-T-cadherin antiserum (1:500) in TBS
containing 1% goat serum and 0.1% Photo-flo. The cultures were then
labeled with goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:50; Cappel) for 1 h at room
temperature, followed by rabbit peroxidase-antiperoxidase for 1 h
at room temperature (1:100; Sternberger Monoclonals, Baltimore, MD).
All of the immunoreagents were diluted in TBS containing 1% goat
serum, and the cells were rinsed after each incubation step in three
changes of TBS. Cells were reacted in a chromogen mixture of 0.05%
diaminobenzidine and 0.005% hydrogen peroxide. The immunolabeled cells
were then postfixed in 2% OsO4 and 15% potassium
ferricyanide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 1 h on ice,
dehydrated with a series of ethanol, flat embedded in a TAAB/Epon (1:1)
resin embedding mixture, and polymerized for 2 days at 65 °C.
Ultrathin sections were cut and examined with a Hitachi 600E
transmission electron microscope.
Immunoblotting
Cells from a confluent 35-mm plate were
lysed for 20 min at 4 °C in 100 µl of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet
P-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 µM leupeptin, 5 µM pepstatin, and 4 µg/ml
aprotinin; all protease inhibitors from Boehringer Mannheim). Insoluble
material was pelleted, and 14 µl of the supernatant was analyzed by
Western blotting of proteins separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto
Immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore Intertech,
Bedford, MA; Ref. 23). The blots were blocked for 1 h at room
temperature with 5% fish gelatin (Sigma) in TBST (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05%
Tween 20) and incubated with either rabbit anti-T-cadherin (1:600),
mouse anti-E-cadherin (rr1, 1:500), or rat anti-N-cadherin (NCD2,
1:200; a gift from M. Takeichi, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Ref.
21) in TBST for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were
detected by chemiluminescence (ECL system, Amersham Life Science, Inc.)
after incubation of the blots with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
sheep anti-rabbit, sheep anti-mouse, or sheep anti-rat IgG,
respectively.
Phosphatidylinositol-specific Phospholipase C
Release
T-cadherin was removed with phosphatidylinositol-specific
phospholipase C (a gift from M. G. Low, Columbia University, New York,
NY) from MDCK and Cos7 cells as described previously (13). Proteins
were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with
anti-T-cadherin or anti-N-cadherin antibodies as described above.
Metabolic Labeling
For metabolic labeling, MDCK cell
cultures grown on TranswellTM filters were rinsed twice
with PBS. The cells were incubated with DMEM/FBS without methionine for
15 min at 37 °C. [35S]Methionine/cysteine (250 µCi;
DuPont NEN) was added to the basolateral side of cells on the
TranswellTM filter in a total volume of 100 µl DMEM/FBS
without methionine; DMEM/FBS without methionine (1 ml) was added to the
apical compartment to keep the cells submerged. Metabolically labeled
proteins were biotinylated for targeting assays as described below. For
assays measuring cadherin removal from specific membrane domains, cells were incubated in DMEM/FBS without methionine for 15 min, labeled with
[35S]methionine/cysteine as above, and chased for the
indicated times in cold DMEM/FBS.
Biotinylation and Immunoprecipitation
Biotinylation was
performed essentially as described by Rodriguez-Boulan et
al. (24). Briefly, MDCK cells were plated at high density on 24-mm
Costar TranswellTM plates (as described above). After 6-8
days in culture, the permeability of the monolayer was measured by
adding 0.2 µCi of [3H]inulin to the apical compartment
of the filter chamber. After 2 h at 37 °C,
[3H]inulin was measured in the basolateral compartment.
If more than 1% of the added inulin permeated, the monolayers were
discarded. Monolayers with less than 1% inulin permeability were
washed with PBS/CM and biotinylated by adding 0.5 mg sulfo-NHS-biotin
(stock solution, 200 mg/ml in dimethylsulfoxide; Pierce) in 1 ml of
PBS/CM either to the apical or basolateral compartment of the filter chamber. Compartments not receiving sulfo-NHS-biotin were filled with
an equal volume of PBS/CM. After 30 min of agitation at 4 °C, filters were washed three times with Tris-saline/phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (15 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 120 mM NaCl, and
1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and extracted with 100 µl of lysis buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 60 mM
octylglucoside, 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM
NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, 50 µM
leupeptin, and 4 µg/ml aprotinin). The cells were scraped from the
filter with a rubber policeman and sedimented in a microfuge for 5 min.
Immunoprecipitation was essentially performed as described by Wollner
et al. (8). Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and gels were
processed for fluorography using Amplify (Amersham). Protein bands were
quantitated by scanning densitometry (Pharmacia).
RESULTS
T-cadherin Is Expressed on the Apical Cell Surface of Chick
Intestinal Epithelium
Both E-cadherin and LI-cadherin are
concentrated on the basolateral cell surface of intestinal epithelial
cells, E-cadherin in adherens junctions (25, 26) and LI-cadherin in
lateral contact zones excluding junctional regions (27). To test the localization of T-cadherin, sections of intestine from chick embryos just before hatching were immunohistochemically labeled for T-cadherin expression. T-cadherin was localized on the apical surface of chick
intestinal epithelium and displayed the most intense staining signal in
the villus, in areas where enterocytes approach the apical extrusion
zone of the villus (Fig. 1). Little staining was
detected on epithelial cells of the crypt and on cells close to the
crypt-villus junction. Thus, in contrast to the basolateral localization of E-cadherin and LI-cadherin, T-cadherin is localized on
the apical surface of epithelial cells in vivo.
Fig. 1.
Apical distribution of T-cadherin in chick
intestine. A, frozen sections of embryonic day 21 chick
embryo intestine were immunohistochemically stained for T-cadherin.
T-cadherin is expressed on the apical surface of columnar epithelial
cells. B, nuclei of the same villi were stained with
propidium iodide to reveal single cells. Arrows, apical
surface of epithelial cells.
[View Larger Version of this Image (45K GIF file)]
Differential Localization of Exogenously Expressed T- and
N-cadherin in Polarized Epithelial Cells in Vitro
To address
whether heterologously expressed, GPI-anchored T-cadherin and classical
cadherins are differentially targeted in polarized epithelial cells
in vitro, MDCK cells were stably transfected with either
chicken T-cadherin (13) or N-cadherin cDNA expression plasmids and
pSV2 neo. N-cadherin was chosen because MDCK cells express endogenous
E-cadherin (28, 29). Cell lines expressing either cadherin were
selected from neomycin-resistant colonies, enriched by
fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and grown to confluency on
collagen-coated TranswellTM polycarbonate filters. Cadherin
distribution was examined by confocal microscopy following indirect
immunostaining with rabbit anti-chick T-cadherin antiserum (12) and
monoclonal anti-N-cadherin antibody GC4. In optical sections in the
vertical plane (XZ section), T-cadherin was only apparent on apical
MDCK cell surfaces (Fig. 2A). In contrast,
endogenously expressed E-cadherin, detected with monoclonal anti-canine
E-cadherin antibody rr1 (22), was expressed at the lateral surface both
in wild type MDCK cells as described previously (28, 29; not shown) and
in T-cadherin-transfected cells (Fig. 2B). Exclusive
T-cadherin localization on the apical cell surface was confirmed by
immuno-electron microscopy after immuno-peroxidase staining (Fig.
2C).
Fig. 2.
Steady state distribution of transfected
T-cadherin at the apical surface of MDCK cells grown on polycarbonate
filters. Indirect immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy of
T-cadherin (A) and endogenous E-cadherin (B) in
T-cadherin-transfected MDCK cells. A and B, top
panels, Z sections of the monolayer (line). T-cadherin
is localized on the apical membrane surface, whereas E-cadherin is
localized to sites of cell-cell contact. C, electron micrograph of immunostained T-cadherin in MDCK cells grown on a
polycarbonate filter. T-cadherin is localized on apical membrane domains Arrows, apical side; arrowheads, lateral
side; N nucleus; F, membrane filter.
D, release of T-cadherin from the surface of transfected
MDCK cells with PI-PLC. T-cadherin-transfected cells were treated with
PI-PLC, and cell lysates (cells) and culture medium (SN)
were analyzed by Western blotting. With PI-PLC treatment, T-cadherin is
released into the culture medium. In controls (no enzyme) T-cadherin
remains associated with cell membranes. Mock-transfected cells do not
express T-cadherin (lane 1).
[View Larger Version of this Image (118K GIF file)]
To verify that the anticipated GPI-anchored T-cadherin protein is
expressed in MDCK cells, transfected cells were treated with
phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC), an enzyme that
specifically cleaves GPI-linked anchors (30). PI-PLC released a large
fraction of T-cadherin from the cell surface into the culture medium
(Fig. 2D). Some proportion of T-cadherin was resistant to
PI-PLC treatment, possibly due to incomplete digestion. In controls
without enzyme, T-cadherin remained associated with cell membranes.
T- and N-cadherin are expressed in an overlapping pattern on cultured
sympathetic neurons and immature muscle cells (17, 31), raising the
possibility that one cadherin affects the localization of the other at
specific membrane domains. To test this possibility, MDCK cells were
double transfected to stably express T- and N-cadherin protein. Both
95-kDa mature T-cadherin and 120-kDa N-cadherin were detected by
Western blotting (not shown). As in the singly transfected cells,
T-cadherin was localized to the apical surface (Fig.
3A), whereas N-cadherin was detected
basolaterally (Fig. 3B). Apical T-cadherin and basolateral
N-cadherin expression was already prominent on subconfluent groups of
nonpolarized MDCK cells, which are much flatter in morphology (not
shown). As the distribution of T- and N-cadherin in the double
transfected cells was indistinguishable from that in the single
transfected cells, these experiments provide evidence that the
localization of these cadherins is independent of each other.
Fig. 3.
Confocal microscopy of MDCK cells double
transfected with N- and T-cadherin. Localization by indirect
immunofluorescence of T-cadherin (A) and N-cadherin
(B) in double transfected MDCK cells. T-cadherin
(A) is expressed on the apical and N-cadherin (B)
on the basolateral cell surface.
[View Larger Version of this Image (66K GIF file)]
The localization of T-cadherin was biochemically quantitated by
immunoprecipation of surface biotinylated proteins from either the
apical or basolateral membrane domain. MDCK cell monolayers with <1%
permeability for the [3H]inulin tracer were used for
these experiments. Confluent monolayers of T-cadherin-transfected cells
were labeled with sulfo-NHS-biotin (a tight junction-impermeable probe)
from either the apical or the basolateral side of the filter
compartment and extracted with lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet
P-40. As GPI-linked proteins are insoluble in nonionic detergents such
as Nonidet P-40 (32, 33, 34, 35), T-cadherin was immunoprecipitated from both Nonidet P-40-soluble and Nonidet P-40-insoluble fractions. Precipitated proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and
biotinylated T-cadherin was detected with peroxidase-coupled streptavidin on immunoblots (Fig. 4). T-cadherin was
predominantly (93%) localized on the apical cell surface (Fig. 4), and
approximately 50% of the protein was soluble in Nonidet P-40 extracts
(Fig. 4, lane 1), whereas the remainder was resistant to
nonionic detergent extraction (Fig. 4, lane 3). A small
percentage of T-cadherin (7%) was localized basolaterally, probably
due to misrouting. Thus, both immunohistochemical and biochemical
analyses localize the majority of T-cadherin at the apical MDCK cell
surface.
Fig. 4.
Steady state distribution of T-cadherin at
the apical membrane domain of MDCK cells. Cells cultured on
pairs of TranswellTM filters were biotinylated on
either the apical (Ap) or basolateral (Bl)
surface with sulfo-NHS-biotin. Cells were extracted with Nonidet P-40
lysis buffer, and T-cadherin was immunoprecipitated from the Nonidet
P-40-soluble (s) and insoluble (p) pool of
proteins. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. Biotinylated T-cadherin (97-kDa band) was detected predominantly on the apical surface with horseradish peroxidase-coupled streptavidin.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]
Wild Type N-Cadherin and Cytoplasmic Tail Deletion Mutant N cyt
Are Localized at the Basolateral Domain in MDCK Cells
classical
cadherins contain in their cytoplasmic domain signals for basolateral
sorting (50). To investigate whether deletion of these signals is
sufficient to shuttle cadherins apically like cytoplasmic tail deletion
mutants of the low density lipoprotein receptor (37), we have generated
and tested for localization and targeting an N-cadherin cytoplasmic
tail deletion mutant, N cyt (Fig. 5). The N cyt
protein lacks all but three amino acids (KRR) of the N-cadherin
cytoplasmic domain. The localization of the N cyt mutant was analyzed
by confocal microscopy of confluent, stably transfected MDCK cell
monolayers stained by indirect immunofluorescence. Optical sections in
the XZ axis revealed the majority of the N cyt protein on basolateral
MDCK cell surfaces (Fig. 6A). To
biochemically quantitate N cyt protein distribution, monolayers of
MDCK cells were biotinylated from either the apical or basolateral
surface, extracted with lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40, and
immunoprecipitated with monoclonal anti-N-cadherin antibodies. The
majority (87%) of the biotinylated N cyt protein was detected in
extracts biotinylated from the basolateral surface (Fig. 6B,
N cyt). This distribution was closely similar to that
of wild type N-cadherin (Fig. 6B, N). Thus, in contrast to
the prominent apical localization of deletion mutants of other
basolaterally targeted proteins, N cyt was stably expressed on the
basolateral domain.
Fig. 6.
Steady state distribution of N cyt at the
basolateral surface of MDCK cells. A, confocal microscopy of
MDCK cells transfected with the N cyt mutant were examined by
indirect immunofluorescence. The mutant was stably expressed on the
basolateral surface. B, biotinylation assay of MDCK cells
expressing either N cyt or intact N-cadherin (N). Cells
cultured on pairs of TranswellTM filters were biotinylated
on either the apical (Ap) or basolateral (Bl)
surface with sulfo-NHS-biotin. Cells were extracted with Nonidet P-40
lysis buffer, and N cyt and N-cadherin were immunoprecipitated from
the respective cell lysates with specific antibodies (NCD2). Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to
nitrocellulose. The majority of biotinylated N cyt (97-kDa band) and
N-cadherin (120-kDa band) were detected at the basolateral surface with
horseradish peroxidase-coupled streptavidin.
[View Larger Version of this Image (65K GIF file)]
T- and N-cadherin Are Directly Targeted to Distinct Membrane
Domains in MDCK Cells
To determine whether newly synthesized T-
and N-cadherin are directly sorted to the apical or basolateral
membrane, the kinetics of cadherin arrival at each membrane domain were
measured between 4 and 96 h after induction of cell-cell contact.
For synchronization, MDCK cells were kept on TranswellTM
polycarbonate filters in DMEM/FBS under low Ca2+ conditions
(37). Formation of intercellular contacts was induced by raising the
Ca2+ concentration to 1.8 mM. At various times
after Ca2+ induction, cells were labeled for 1 h with
[35S]methionine/cysteine and biotinylated from either the
apical or basolateral filter compartment (see above), and cadherins
were immunoprecipitated with specific antibodies. The immune complexes were dissociated, and biotinylated cadherins were identified in either
the apical or the basolateral fraction by reprecipitation with
streptavidin-agarose. After 4 h, 84% of total T-cadherin was
detected on the apical membrane domain (Fig.
7A). With further polarization, the
percentage of T-cadherin delivered to the apical membrane increased,
reaching a maximum of 96% after 96 h (Fig. 7A). Thus,
T-cadherin was directly targeted to the apical membrane domain already
4 h after induction of cell-cell contact.
Fig. 7.
Delivery of newly synthesized cadherins and
cadherin mutant N cyt to specific membrane domains. Cell
monolayers were established on filters in DMEM/FBS without
Ca2+. Cell-cell contact was induced by raising the
Ca2+ concentration of the medium to 1.8 mM. At
different times after induction of cell-cell contact, cells were
pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 1 h
and biotinylated at the apical (Ap) or basolateral
(Bl) membrane. Cadherins and the N cyt mutant were immunoprecipitated, solubilized, reprecipitated with
streptavidin-agarose, and detected with autoradiography. A,
T-cadherin is targeted to the apical domain 4 and 96 h after
Ca2+ induction. B, N-cadherin (N) and
E-cadherin (E) are predominantly targeted basolaterally,
whereas N cyt is transported to both the apical and basolateral
domain. C, degradation of newly synthesized N cyt on the
apical cell surface of MDCK cells. Cells on filters were pulse-labeled
with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 1 h, incubated for
different chase periods in the absence of labeled amino acids, and then
biotinylated for 1 h at the apical (Ap) or basolateral
(Bl) membrane. N cyt was immunoprecipitated, solubilized,
reprecipitated with streptavidin-agarose, and detected with
autoradiography. The N cyt mutant is specifically removed from the
apical domain.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]
Targeting assays of wild type N-cadherin in transfected MDCK cells
demonstrated that 86% (96 h after induction of cell-cell contact) of
newly synthesized N-cadherin was delivered directly to the basolateral
surface of fully polarized cells (Fig. 7B, N). This is
comparable with the targeting of endogenous E-cadherin in MDCK cells,
82% of which is directly transported to the basolateral membrane
domain 96 h after induction of cell-cell contact (Fig. 7B,
E). A small percentage of N- and E-cadherin is missorted to the
apical surface. As apically transported wild type N- and E-cadherin do
not accumulate at the apical surface, they must be rapidly removed,
either by proteolytic degradation or transcytosis.
N-Cadherin Cytoplasmic Tail Deletion Mutant N cyt Is Transported
to the Apical and Basolateral Domain in MDCK Cells and Is Removed at
the Apical Surface
To address whether the N cyt mutant protein
is directly targeted to the basolateral domain, the arrival of
metabolically labeled N cyt protein at each membrane surface was
measured in targeting assays as described above. Analysis of proteins
at both membrane domains revealed that mutant protein was transported
in similar amounts to both the apical and basolateral membrane domains
(Fig. 7B, N cyt).
The random transport of the N cyt mutant raised the possibility that
this protein is preferentially removed from the apical membrane
surface. To test this hypothesis, the residence time of newly
synthesized protein at each membrane domain was determined. Monolayer
cultures were metabolically labeled for 15 min or 1 h with
[35S]methionine/cysteine, and the label was chased with
medium containing an excess of unlabeled methionine. At various time
points during the chase period, duplicate cultures were biotinylated
for 15 min at 4 °C from either the apical or basolateral filter
chamber as described above. Cells were extracted with Nonidet P-40
lysis buffer and immunoprecipitated with monoclonal anti-N-cadherin antibody followed by avidin-agarose. After a chase period of 4 h,
96% of N cyt protein was found on the basolateral membrane (not
shown). After chase of 120 h, 87% of the N cyt protein was detected on the basolateral surface domain (Fig. 7C). Thus,
the N cyt mutant protein is preferentially removed at the apical
membrane surface and accumulates basolaterally.
T-Cadherin Carboxyl-terminal Amino Acids Are Responsible for Apical
Targeting
The regions within N- and T-cadherin responsible for
their respective basolateral and apical distribution in MDCK cells were examined by studying the distribution of additional mutants (see Fig.
5).
Expression of T-N cyt, composed of the T-cadherin ectodomain and the
N-cadherin transmembrane domain and truncated cytoplasmic domain, was
achieved only in a small number of cells and was unstable. Examination
by indirect immunofluorescence revealed that the T-N cyt mutant was
localized on the basolateral MDCK cell surface (Fig. 8),
identical to that of the N cyt protein. Expression of the reverse
chimera, N-TGPI, containing the N-cadherin extracellular portion followed by the 76 T-cadherin carboxyl-terminal amino acids,
was restricted to the apical membrane domain, as shown by confocal
microscopic analysis of transfected cells after indirect immunofluorescence (Fig. 9A). As expression
of the N-TGPI mutant was unstable in MDCK cells, membrane
attachment of the mutant protein was examined after transient
transfection of the corresponding DNA construct into Cos7 cells.
Proteins of 95 and 110 kDa were detected with monoclonal
anti-N-cadherin antibody by Western blotting of transfected cell
lysates (Fig. 9B). The sizes of these proteins correspond to
those of T-cadherin, which comprises the mature 95-kDa protein and the
unprocessed 110-kDa precursor (12, 13). Treatment of
N-TGPI-expressing Cos7 cells with PI-PLC released both the
95- and 110-kDa proteins from the cell surface into the culture medium,
whereas in controls without PI-PLC, chimeric proteins were associated
with cell membranes (Fig. 9B). Thus, the 76 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of T-cadherin include the signal for GPI
anchor attachment.
Fig. 8.
Steady state distribution of T-N cyt at the
basolateral surface of MDCK cells. Confocal microscopy of MDCK
cells transfected with the T-N cyt chimera. The chimera was detected
by indirect immunofluorescence with anti-T-cadherin-antibody on the
basolateral surface.
[View Larger Version of this Image (70K GIF file)]
Fig. 9.
Steady state distribution of
N-TGPI at the apical surface of MDCK cells. A,
confocal microscopy of MDCK cells transfected with the
N-TGPI chimera. The N-TGPI chimera was detected
by indirect immunofluorescence on the apical surface of MDCK cells.
B, GPI attachment of the N-TGPI mutant.
N-TGPI was transiently transfected into COS 7 cells.
N-TGPI-transfected cells were treated with PI-PLC. Cell
lysates (cells) and culture medium (SN) were
analyzed by Western blotting. All N-TGPI is released into
the culture medium. In controls (no enzyme) N-TGPI is
detected in cell lysates only.
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]
Taken together, these results demonstrate that the carboxyl-terminal 76 T-cadherin amino acids contain the signal for GPI anchor attachment and
are responsible for apical targeting of T-cadherin in MDCK cells.
DISCUSSION
In this article, we have examined whether GPI-linked T-cadherin is
a component of cell-cell junctions like classical cadherins. In
contrast to the basolateral distribution of classical cadherins, T-cadherin was transported and stably expressed at the apical domain of
polarized epithelial cells. Apical targeting signals reside within the
carboxyl-terminal 76 amino acids of T-cadherin and contain signals for
GPI anchor attachment. The signal for GPI-linkage generally consists of
an uncharged amino acid followed by a stretch of hydrophobic amino acid
residues (38, 39). The T-cadherin carboxyl-terminal 76 amino acid
region when fused to the ectodomain of N-cadherin produces a GPI-linked
protein that is distributed apically. Therefore, the T-cadherin
carboxyl-terminal amino acids are sufficient for GPI anchor attachment
and apical targeting.
Classical cadherins contain in their cytoplasmic domain a putative
basolateral targeting signal (50) that resembles that of the low
density lipoprotein receptor and other basolaterally targeted proteins
(36). The targeting motif comprises a tyrosine and a downstream cluster
of three negatively charged amino acid residues, structurally organized
into a type I -turn, and is related to clathrin-coated pit
localization signals (40). Removal or inactivation of this signal
results in the transport of basolaterally targeted proteins to the
apical cell surface (41, 42, 43). Classical cadherins such as E-, P-, and
N-cadherin contain in their cytoplasmic domain two such motifs,
Y-(X)6-EED and
Y-(X)3-EDD. However, N-cadherin lacks one of the
three negatively charged amino acids in the distal signal, and the
putative N-cadherin-targeting signals have not been probed for
activity. The results reported here demonstrate that heterologously
expressed N-cadherin is targeted basolaterally. Thus, the signals
contained within the N-cadherin cytoplasmic domain are sufficient for
basolateral targeting.
We demonstrate here that the N-cadherin tail minus mutant N cyt is
localized at the basolateral membrane in MDCK cells. This mutant is
randomly transported to both the apical and basolateral membrane
surfaces but rapidly and specifically removed from the apical pole,
either by proteolytic degradation or transcytosis. The random transport
of the N cyt mutant is unexpected, as deletion of the basolateral
targeting signals of proteins such as the low density lipoprotein
receptor, the Fc receptor, lysosomal glycoprotein 120, and
polyimmunoglobulin receptor results in the predominant targeting and
stable expression of the mutant proteins at the apical membrane domain
(41, 42, 43, 44). The fast removal of the N cyt mutant may be explained by
the lack of homophilic binding at the apical surface, which renders the
protein accessible to proteolytic degradation. This is in contrast to
the stable expression of both GPI-linked wild type T-cadherin and the
N-TGPI mutant at the apical surface. As the
N-TGPI chimera differs from the N cyt mutant only in its
carboxyl-terminal 76 amino acids, our results strongly argue that this
region provides signals not only for apical targeting but also for
stable expression at the apical domain. One possible explanation is
that T-cadherin and the N-TGPI chimera are clustered as
GPI-linked proteins in caveolae and are therefore less accessible to
proteolytic degradation. T-cadherin was recently isolated from the
heart as a major protein of caveolae preparations (45), where it is
hypothesized to serve as a calcium store and contribute to specific
cardiac functions.
The apical localization of T-cadherin in MDCK cells correlates with its
apical expression on intestinal epithelial cells in vivo.
The highest T-cadherin concentration was detected on the apical
extrusion zone where enterocytes exfoliate. Expression on the apical
domain is complementary to that of E-cadherin (25, 26) and LI-cadherin
(27), which occupy the basolateral domain and are distributed in
adherens junctions and lateral contact zones, excluding junctional
regions, respectively.
What is the possible function of T-cadherin at the apical surface of
epithelial cells? One hypothesis is that T-cadherin is clustered in
caveolae as in the heart and serves as a calcium store. Alternatively,
and perhaps in addition, T-cadherin may play a role in receiving and
transducing signals from the luminal space. A number of GPI-linked
proteins of lymphocytes participate in T-cell activation putatively
through a signaling cascade involving Src-related kinases (46, 47, 48, 49). In
epithelial cells in vivo, apically expressed T-cadherin may
play a role in signaling events required for specific epithelial
functions. Together with the observation that T-cadherin mediates weak
adhesive interactions2 and repulses growth
cones from specific neuron populations (18), its localization at the
apical cell surface of polarized epithelial cells is consistent with a
function as a recognition rather than a cell adhesion molecule. The
nature of T-cadherin function and its mechanism of operation at the
apical epithelial cell surface are important issues to be addressed
concerning this unique member of the cadherin family.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by fellowships from the
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds, the Schweizerische Stiftung für
Medizinisch-Biologische Stipendien, and the American Heart Association
(to E. K.) and by National Institutes of Health Research Grant GM
48077 (to B. R.). The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Burnham Institute,
La Jolla Cancer Research Center, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla,
CA 92307. Tel.: 619-455-6480 (ext. 3122); Fax: 619-646-3197; E-mail:
ranscht{at}ljcrf.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: MDCK, Madin-Darby
canine kidney; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FBS, fetal
bovine serum; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TBS, Tris-buffered
saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PI-PLC,
phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C; GPI, glycosyl
phosphatidylinositol; NHS, N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide.
2
B. Ranscht, unpublished observation.
Acknowledgments
Appreciation is extended to Drs. B. J. Fredette and M. Schibler for competent advice and help with
immuno-electron microscopic and confocal techniques, to Dr. W. J. Nelson for helpful discussions, and to Dr. M. Fukuda and J. K. Bodnar
for critical comments on the manuscript.
REFERENCES
-
Kirkpatrick, C., and Peiffer, M.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
5,
56-65
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rodriguez-Boulan, E.
(1983)
in
Modern Cell Biology (Sativ, B. H., ed), Vol. 1, pp. 119-170, Alan R. Liss, New York
-
Frisch, S. M., and Francis, H.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
619-626
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ojakian, G. K., and Schwimmer, R.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
561-576
[Medline]
[Abstract]
-
Vega-Salas, D. E., Salas, P. J., and Rodriguez-Boulan, E.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
104,
1249-1259
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McNeill, H., Ozawa, M., Kemler, R., and Nelson, W. J.
(1990)
Cell.
62,
309-316
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gumbiner, B., Stevenson, B., and Grimaldi, A.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
1575-1587
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wollner, D. A., Krzeminski, K. A., and Nelson, W. J.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
889-899
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nagafuchi, A., Tsukita, S., and Takeichi, M.
(1993)
Semin. Cell Biol.
4,
175-181
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gumbiner, B. M.
(1993)
Neuron
11,
551-564
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Volk, T., and Geiger, B.
(1984)
EMBO J.
10,
2249-2260
-
Ranscht, B., and Dours-Zimmermann, M. T.
(1991)
Neuron
7,
1-20
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Vestal, D. J., and Ranscht, B.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
451-461
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ozawa, M., Engel, J., and Kemler, R.
(1990)
Cell
63,
1033-1038
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nagafuchi, A., and Takeichi, M.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
3679-3684
[Medline]
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ranscht, B., and Bronner-Fraser, M.
(1991)
Development (Camb.)
111,
15-22
[Medline]
[Abstract]
-
Fredette, J. B., and Ranscht, B.
(1994)
J. Neurosci.
14,
7331-7346
[Abstract]
-
Fredette, B. J., Miller, J., and Ranscht, B. (1996)
Development (Camb.), in press
-
Cifuentes-Diaz, C., Nicolet, M., Goudou, D., Reiger, F., and Mege, R. M.
(1994)
Development (Camb.)
120,
1-11
[Medline]
[Abstract]
-
Nelson, W. J., and Veshnock, P. J.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
103,
1751-1765
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hatta, K., Nose, A., Nagafuchi, A., and Takeichi, M.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
106,
873-881
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gumbiner, B., and Simons, K.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
102,
457-468
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Towbin, M., Staehlin, T., and Gordon, J.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4350-4354
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rodriguez-Boulan, E., Salas, P. J., Sargiacomo, M., Lisanti, M., LeBivic, A., Sambuy, Y., Vega-Salas, D., and Graeve, L.
(1989)
Methods Cell Biol.
32,
37-56
[Medline]
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Amerongen, H. M., Mack, J. A., Wilson, J. M., and Neutra, M. R.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
2129-2138
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cepek, K. L., Shaw, S. K., Parker, C. M., Russell, G. J., Morrow, J. S., Rimm, D. L., and Brenner, M. B.
(1994)
Nature
372,
190-193
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Berndorff, D., Gessner, R., Kreft, B., Schnoy, N., Lajous-Petter, A., Loch, N., Reutter, W., Hortsch, M., and Tauber, R.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
1353-1369
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Imhof, B. A., Vollmers, H. P., Goodman, S. L., and Birchmeier, W.
(1983)
Cell
35,
667-675
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Behrens, J., Birchmeier, W., Goodman, S. L., and Imhof, B. A.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
100,
1307-1315
-
Low, M. G., and Saltiel, A. R.
(1988)
Science.
239,
268-275
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sacristan, M. P., Vestal, D. J., Dours-Zimmermann, M. T., and Ranscht, B.
(1992)
J. Neurosci. Res.
34,
664-680
-
Brown, D. A., and Rose, J. K.
(1992)
Cell
68,
533-544
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sargiacomo, M., Sudol, M., Tang, Z., and Lisanti, M. P.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
789-807
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gorodinsky, A., and Harris, D. A.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
619-627
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hoessli, D., and Rungger-Brandle, E.
(1985)
Exp. Cell Res.
156,
239-250
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Matter, K., Hunziker, W., and Mellman, I.
(1992)
Cell
71,
741-753
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gonzales-Mariscal, L., Chavez de Remirez, B., and Cereijido, M.
(1985)
J. Membr. Biol.
96,
113-122
-
Cross, G. A. M.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
6,
1-39
[CrossRef]
-
Kodukula, K., Gerber, L. D., Amthauer, R., Brink, L., and Udenfried, S.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
657-664
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Trowbridge, I. S., Collawn, J. F., and Hopkins, C. R.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
9,
129-161
[Medline]
[CrossRef]
-
Casanova, J. E., Apodaca, G., and Mostov, K. E.
(1991)
Cell.
66,
65-75
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Prill, V., Lehmann, L., von Figura, K., and Peters, C.
(1993)
EMBO J.
123,
2181-2193
-
Matter, K., and Mellman, I.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6,
545-554
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hopkins, C. R.
(1991)
Cell
66,
827-829
[Medline]
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Doyle, D. D., Ranscht, B., Page, E., and Palfrey, H. C.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
403a
(abstr.)
-
Stefanova, I., Horejsi, V., Ansotegui, I. J., Knapp, W., and Stockinger, H.
(1991)
Science
254,
1016-1019
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zisch, A. H., D'Alessandri, L., Amrein, K., Ranscht, B., Winterhalter, K. H., and Vaughan, L.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
6,
263-279
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Thomas, P. M., and Samelson, L.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
12317-12322
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shenoy-Scaria, A. M., Kwong, J., Fujita, T., Olszowy, M. W., Shaw, A. S., and Lublin, T. M.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
149,
3535-3541
[Medline]
[Abstract]
-
Chen, Y.-T., Ryan, T. A., Smith, S. J., and Nelson, W. J.
(1995)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
LX,
34
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Dames, E. Bang, D. Haussinger, T. Ahrens, J. Engel, and S. Grzesiek
Insights into the Low Adhesive Capacity of Human T-cadherin from the NMR Structure of Its N-terminal Extracellular Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 22, 2008;
283(34):
23485 - 23495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Philippova, D. Ivanov, M. B. Joshi, E. Kyriakakis, K. Rupp, T. Afonyushkin, V. Bochkov, P. Erne, and T. J. Resink
Identification of Proteins Associating with Glycosylphosphatidylinositol- Anchored T-Cadherin on the Surface of Vascular Endothelial Cells: Role for Grp78/BiP in T-Cadherin-Dependent Cell Survival
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
June 15, 2008;
28(12):
4004 - 4017.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Lewis, L. R. Cler, D.-W. Bu, S. Zochbauer-Muller, S. Milchgrub, E. Z. Naftalis, A. M. Leitch, J. D. Minna, and D. M. Euhus
Promoter Hypermethylation in Benign Breast Epithelium in Relation to Predicted Breast Cancer Risk
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 1, 2005;
11(1):
166 - 172.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z.-y. Huang, Y. Wu, N. Hedrick, and D. H. Gutmann
T-Cadherin-Mediated Cell Growth Regulation Involves G2 Phase Arrest and Requires p21CIP1/WAF1 Expression
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
January 15, 2003;
23(2):
566 - 578.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Goldberg, M. Wei, B. Tycko, I. Falikovich, and D. Warburton
Identification and expression analysis of the human {micro}-protocadherin gene in fetal and adult kidneys
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
September 1, 2002;
283(3):
F454 - F463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Navarro, L. Ruco, and E. Dejana
Differential Localization of VE- and N-Cadherins in Human Endothelial Cells: VE-Cadherin Competes with N-Cadherin for Junctional Localization
J. Cell Biol.,
March 23, 1998;
140(6):
1475 - 1484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yamada, B. Fredette, K. Shitara, K. Hagihara, R. Miura, B. Ranscht, W. B. Stallcup, and Y. Yamaguchi
The Brain Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan Brevican Associates with Astrocytes Ensheathing Cerebellar Glomeruli and Inhibits Neurite Outgrowth from Granule Neurons
J. Neurosci.,
October 15, 1997;
17(20):
7784 - 7795.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|