Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koller, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ranscht, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koller, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ranscht, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 47, Issue of November 22, 1996 pp. 30061-30067
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Differential Targeting of T- and N-cadherin in Polarized Epithelial Cells*

(Received for publication, June 19, 1996, and in revised form, August 19, 1996)

Erich Koller and Barbara Ranscht Dagger

From The Burnham Institute, La Jolla Cancer Research Center, La Jolla, California 92307

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

To test whether glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-linked T-cadherin is a component of cell junctions like classical cadherins, we have examined its distribution and targeting in polarized epithelial cells. In vivo, T-cadherin was detected on the apical cell surface of the chick intestinal epithelium. In cultures of transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, T-cadherin was also expressed apically, whereas classical N-cadherin resided basolaterally. Both cadherins were directly targeted to their respective membrane domains. Mutant proteins were expressed in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells to identify the regions responsible for differential cadherin localization. NDelta cyt, an N-cadherin cytoplasmic domain deletion mutant, was stably distributed basolaterally. This mutant was transported to both the apical and basolateral membrane compartments, followed by preferential removal from the apical surface. T-NDelta cyt, a T-cadherin mutant with the N-cadherin cytoplasmic domain deletion, was localized basolaterally, whereas N-TGPI, a GPI-anchored N-cadherin mutant, resided at the apical domain. The T-cadherin carboxyl-terminal 76 amino acids contain the apical targeting signal and include the signal for GPI anchor attachment. Basolateral localization of N-cadherin is achieved through targeting signals in the cytoplasmic domain. Thus, GPI-linked T-cadherin is not a component of cell junctions, consistent with a function as a recognition rather than a cell adhesion molecule.


INTRODUCTION

Polarized epithelia separate biological compartments and regulate the vectorial transport of ions and solutes. Epithelial cells are polarized into an apical and basolateral pole (1), each characterized by a distinct protein and lipid composition. The induction of epithelial cell differentiation and polarization and the molecular signals responsible for selective protein sorting to distinct membrane domains can be studied in vitro using MDCK1 cells (2).

The organization of MDCK cells into an apical and a basolateral pole depends on extracellular matrix and cell-cell interactions (3, 4, 5). Formation of cell-cell contacts, induced through adhesive interactions mediated by E-cadherin (6), results in the differentiation of MDCK cells into a polarized epithelium and the gradual restriction of specific proteins to the apical or basolateral membrane domain (5, 6, 7, 8). E-cadherin is a classical transmembrane, calcium-dependent cadherin cell adhesion molecule, which is characterized by five extracellular structural repeats and a highly conserved cytoplasmic region. The cadherin cytoplasmic region interacts with the catenins, a group of cytoplasmic proteins that connects cadherins with the actin-based cytoskeleton (9, 10). In epithelial cells in vivo, E-cadherin is a major constituent of adherens junctions, where it mediates calcium-dependent adhesion and links cortical actin filaments between adjacent cells (7, 11).

T-cadherin is a member of the cadherin family that shares the ectodomain organization with classical cadherins and is anchored to the membrane through a GPI moiety (12, 13). In contrast to classical cadherins that generally do not mediate adhesive interactions without their conserved cytoplasmic domain (14, 15), T-cadherin induces calcium-dependent, homophilic aggregation between transfected cells (13). In the animal, T-cadherin is a component of specific cell populations both within and outside the nervous system. In the nervous system, T-cadherin demarcates specific neuron populations and axon pathways (12, 16, 17), suggesting a role in axon patterning. Outside the nervous system, T-cadherin is expressed on skeletal muscle surfaces and is specifically excluded from myoneural junctions (17), which are demarcated by N-cadherin (19). The mechanisms of how T-cadherin functions in mediating cell-cell interactions and axon guidance are not understood.

To gain insights into the principal function of T-cadherin, we have examined whether T-cadherin is localized to cell-cell junctions like classical cadherins. Two approaches were used: immunohistochemical staining of the chick intestinal epithelium in vivo and heterologous expression of T-cadherin in polarized MDCK cells in vitro. Our results revealed T-cadherin on apical cell surfaces of epithelial cells, in contrast to the basolateral localization of classical cadherins. Examination of the mechanisms responsible for differential cadherin localization identified direct targeting as well as selective removal from specific membrane domains as key principles.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cells and Tissue Culture

Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, clone II/8, were obtained from Dr. James Nelson (Stanford University, Stanford, CA) (20) and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin, and streptomycin.

Cryosectioning of Chick Embryonic Tissue

Fertilized White Leghorn chicken eggs (McIntyre Poultry Farm, Lakeside, CA) were incubated in a force-draft incubator until the desired developmental stages. Embryos were dissected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), fixed for 6 h in 4% formaldehyde in PBS, and rinsed in several changes of PBS. The tissue was cryoprotected overnight in 30% sucrose in PBS and embedded and frozen in OCT embedding medium (Miles Scientific, Elkhart, IN). Sections of 15 µm were cut, collected on chromalum-coated slides, and labeled with anti-T-cadherin antiserum as described below.

Construction of Expression Plasmids and Cell Transfection

Chick T-cadherin (13) or N-cadherin pcDNA1 expression plasmids were cotransfected with the selectable marker plasmid pSV2neo into MDCK cells as described below. Chicken N-cadherin cDNA (a gift from Dr. C. Kintner, Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA) was excised from the SP72 plasmid vector (Promega, Madison, WI) with EcoRV and XbaI, and the coding region was inserted into the EcoRV- and XbaI-digested pcDNA1 expression vector (Ncad-pcDNA1; Invitrogen, La Jolla, CA). Three mutants, N-TGPI, NDelta cyt, and T-NDelta cyt (see Fig. 5), were constructed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction amplification and ligation of the respective T- and N-cadherin DNA fragments into pcDNA1. N-TGPI, comprising N-cadherin ectodomain amino acids 1-660 (amino acid numbering according to Hatta et al. (21)) and the GPI anchor of T-cadherin (amino acids 615-690, numbering according to Ranscht and Dours-Zimmermann (12)), was generated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using N-cadherin primers 5'-(NotI)<UNL>GCGGCCGC</UNL>ATGTGCCGGATAGCGGGAA and 3'-(SalI)<UNL>GTCGAC</UNL>AATGGTCCAATTCCTCTTAAT (restriction sites underlined) and T-cadherin primers 5'-(SalI)<UNL>GTCGAC</UNL>CTTAACAATACTCATGCCCAG and 3'-(XbaI)<UNL>TCTAGA</UNL>CTACAGACAAAATAAACTGAA. The N-cadherin cytoplasmic domain deletion mutant NDelta cyt (amino acids 1-755) was generated using N-cadherin 5'-(NotI)<UNL>GCGGCCGC</UNL>ATGTGCCGGATAGCGGGAA and 3'-(XbaI)<UNL>TCTAGA</UNL>TCAACGGCGCTTCATCCATACTAC primers. Last, the T-NDelta cyt chimera comprising the T-cadherin ectodomain (amino acids -22 to 616) and the N-cadherin cytoplasmic tail deletion (amino acids 667-755) was generated using T-cadherin primers 5'-(NotI)<UNL>GCGGCCGC</UNL>ATGCAGCACAAAACTCAACTT and 3'-(SalI)<UNL>GTCGAC</UNL>GTTAAGCTTGTTGATTCTCCA and N-cadherin primers 5'-(SalI)<UNL>GTCGAC</UNL>CATGCCCAGCTCTCTTTAAGG and 3'-(XbaI)<UNL>TCTAGAT</UNL>CAACGGCGCTTCATCCATACTAC. All polymerase chain reaction fragments were cloned into the pCRII vector (Invitrogen) and digested with restriction enzymes specific for the sites at their respective 5'- and 3'-ends. Ligation into the pcDNA1 expression plasmid (Invitrogen) was carried out in a single step reaction with one or two DNA inserts.


Fig. 5. T- and N-cadherin mutants. T-cadherin sequences are depicted as open boxes; N-cadherin sequences are shaded. Diagonal stripes, hydrophobic sequences. S, signal peptide; PRE, prepeptide; EC, extracellular domain; CYTO, cytoplasmic domain.
[View Larger Version of this Image (33K GIF file)]


MDCK cells were transfected by calcium phosphate precipitation (22) with either of the above plasmids in the presence of the selectable marker plasmid pSV2neo using CellPhect (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) according to the manufacturer's directions. Colonies were selected in the presence of G418 and enriched by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. For T- and N-cadherin co-expression, T-cadherin-expressing MDCK cells were transfected with Ncad-pcDNA1 and pPGK-hygromycin (kindly provided by R. Oshima, The Burnham Institute) and selected in G418 (0.5 mg/ml) and hygromycin (0.25 mg/ml).

Immunocytochemistry

MDCK cells were grown on Costar TranswellTM filters (Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA), coated with type I collagen (25 µg/ml; Collaborative Research Inc., Bedford, MA), at densities close to saturation (2 × 105 cells/cm2). After 2-3 days, cells were washed with PBS containing 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 mM CaCl2 (PBS/CM) and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS/CM for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were incubated with 50 mM NH4Cl in PBS/CM for 10 min at room temperature and permeabilized for 10 min with 0.075% (w/v) saponin in PBS/CM containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin. T-cadherin was detected by indirect immunofluorescence with rabbit anti-T-cadherin antiserum (1:100; Ranscht and Dours-Zimmermann (12)), followed by fluorescein-conjugated fluorescein isothiocyanate goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500; Cappel, West Chester, PA) in PBS/CM containing 0.075% (w/v) saponin and 0.2% bovine serum albumin. E-cadherin was visualized with the mouse monoclonal antibody rr1 (1:500; Gumbiner and Simons (22); a generous gift from Dr. Barry Gumbiner, Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY). For N-cadherin staining, cells were fixed with ethanol (-20 °C) for 2 min and then labeled with mouse monoclonal anti-N-cadherin antibody GC4 (1:50; Volk and Geiger (11); Sigma). Both rr1 and GC4 were visualized with fluorescein-conjugated fluorescein isothiocyanate goat anti-mouse IgG (1:200 in PBS/CM containing 1% heat-inactivated goat serum; Antibodies, Inc., Davis, CA).

For counterstaining, nuclei were labeled with propidium iodide (1 µg/ml; Sigma) in PBS/CM for 15 min after pretreatment of the cells with RNase A (50 µg/ml; Boehringer Mannheim) for 30 min at room temperature. Vertical optical sections were obtained by laser scanning confocal microscopy (XZ sections in 0.25-µm intervals; Zeiss LSM 410 inverted laser scan microscope).

Immuno-electron Microscopy

Monolayer cultures of MDCK cells, grown to confluency on polycarbonate TranswellTM filter chambers, were fixed for 1 h with 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde in 0.13 M phosphate buffer and blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5% goat serum in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; 0.1 M Tris and 77 mM NaCl, pH 7.6) containing 0.1% Photo-flo (Eastman Kodak Co.). Cells were stained overnight at 4 °C with anti-T-cadherin antiserum (1:500) in TBS containing 1% goat serum and 0.1% Photo-flo. The cultures were then labeled with goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:50; Cappel) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by rabbit peroxidase-antiperoxidase for 1 h at room temperature (1:100; Sternberger Monoclonals, Baltimore, MD). All of the immunoreagents were diluted in TBS containing 1% goat serum, and the cells were rinsed after each incubation step in three changes of TBS. Cells were reacted in a chromogen mixture of 0.05% diaminobenzidine and 0.005% hydrogen peroxide. The immunolabeled cells were then postfixed in 2% OsO4 and 15% potassium ferricyanide in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 1 h on ice, dehydrated with a series of ethanol, flat embedded in a TAAB/Epon (1:1) resin embedding mixture, and polymerized for 2 days at 65 °C. Ultrathin sections were cut and examined with a Hitachi 600E transmission electron microscope.

Immunoblotting

Cells from a confluent 35-mm plate were lysed for 20 min at 4 °C in 100 µl of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 µM leupeptin, 5 µM pepstatin, and 4 µg/ml aprotinin; all protease inhibitors from Boehringer Mannheim). Insoluble material was pelleted, and 14 µl of the supernatant was analyzed by Western blotting of proteins separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto Immobilon polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore Intertech, Bedford, MA; Ref. 23). The blots were blocked for 1 h at room temperature with 5% fish gelatin (Sigma) in TBST (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20) and incubated with either rabbit anti-T-cadherin (1:600), mouse anti-E-cadherin (rr1, 1:500), or rat anti-N-cadherin (NCD2, 1:200; a gift from M. Takeichi, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Ref. 21) in TBST for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibodies were detected by chemiluminescence (ECL system, Amersham Life Science, Inc.) after incubation of the blots with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-rabbit, sheep anti-mouse, or sheep anti-rat IgG, respectively.

Phosphatidylinositol-specific Phospholipase C Release

T-cadherin was removed with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (a gift from M. G. Low, Columbia University, New York, NY) from MDCK and Cos7 cells as described previously (13). Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-T-cadherin or anti-N-cadherin antibodies as described above.

Metabolic Labeling

For metabolic labeling, MDCK cell cultures grown on TranswellTM filters were rinsed twice with PBS. The cells were incubated with DMEM/FBS without methionine for 15 min at 37 °C. [35S]Methionine/cysteine (250 µCi; DuPont NEN) was added to the basolateral side of cells on the TranswellTM filter in a total volume of 100 µl DMEM/FBS without methionine; DMEM/FBS without methionine (1 ml) was added to the apical compartment to keep the cells submerged. Metabolically labeled proteins were biotinylated for targeting assays as described below. For assays measuring cadherin removal from specific membrane domains, cells were incubated in DMEM/FBS without methionine for 15 min, labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine as above, and chased for the indicated times in cold DMEM/FBS.

Biotinylation and Immunoprecipitation

Biotinylation was performed essentially as described by Rodriguez-Boulan et al. (24). Briefly, MDCK cells were plated at high density on 24-mm Costar TranswellTM plates (as described above). After 6-8 days in culture, the permeability of the monolayer was measured by adding 0.2 µCi of [3H]inulin to the apical compartment of the filter chamber. After 2 h at 37 °C, [3H]inulin was measured in the basolateral compartment. If more than 1% of the added inulin permeated, the monolayers were discarded. Monolayers with less than 1% inulin permeability were washed with PBS/CM and biotinylated by adding 0.5 mg sulfo-NHS-biotin (stock solution, 200 mg/ml in dimethylsulfoxide; Pierce) in 1 ml of PBS/CM either to the apical or basolateral compartment of the filter chamber. Compartments not receiving sulfo-NHS-biotin were filled with an equal volume of PBS/CM. After 30 min of agitation at 4 °C, filters were washed three times with Tris-saline/phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (15 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 120 mM NaCl, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and extracted with 100 µl of lysis buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 60 mM octylglucoside, 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, 50 µM leupeptin, and 4 µg/ml aprotinin). The cells were scraped from the filter with a rubber policeman and sedimented in a microfuge for 5 min.

Immunoprecipitation was essentially performed as described by Wollner et al. (8). Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and gels were processed for fluorography using Amplify (Amersham). Protein bands were quantitated by scanning densitometry (Pharmacia).


RESULTS

T-cadherin Is Expressed on the Apical Cell Surface of Chick Intestinal Epithelium

Both E-cadherin and LI-cadherin are concentrated on the basolateral cell surface of intestinal epithelial cells, E-cadherin in adherens junctions (25, 26) and LI-cadherin in lateral contact zones excluding junctional regions (27). To test the localization of T-cadherin, sections of intestine from chick embryos just before hatching were immunohistochemically labeled for T-cadherin expression. T-cadherin was localized on the apical surface of chick intestinal epithelium and displayed the most intense staining signal in the villus, in areas where enterocytes approach the apical extrusion zone of the villus (Fig. 1). Little staining was detected on epithelial cells of the crypt and on cells close to the crypt-villus junction. Thus, in contrast to the basolateral localization of E-cadherin and LI-cadherin, T-cadherin is localized on the apical surface of epithelial cells in vivo.


Fig. 1. Apical distribution of T-cadherin in chick intestine. A, frozen sections of embryonic day 21 chick embryo intestine were immunohistochemically stained for T-cadherin. T-cadherin is expressed on the apical surface of columnar epithelial cells. B, nuclei of the same villi were stained with propidium iodide to reveal single cells. Arrows, apical surface of epithelial cells.
[View Larger Version of this Image (45K GIF file)]


Differential Localization of Exogenously Expressed T- and N-cadherin in Polarized Epithelial Cells in Vitro

To address whether heterologously expressed, GPI-anchored T-cadherin and classical cadherins are differentially targeted in polarized epithelial cells in vitro, MDCK cells were stably transfected with either chicken T-cadherin (13) or N-cadherin cDNA expression plasmids and pSV2 neo. N-cadherin was chosen because MDCK cells express endogenous E-cadherin (28, 29). Cell lines expressing either cadherin were selected from neomycin-resistant colonies, enriched by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and grown to confluency on collagen-coated TranswellTM polycarbonate filters. Cadherin distribution was examined by confocal microscopy following indirect immunostaining with rabbit anti-chick T-cadherin antiserum (12) and monoclonal anti-N-cadherin antibody GC4. In optical sections in the vertical plane (XZ section), T-cadherin was only apparent on apical MDCK cell surfaces (Fig. 2A). In contrast, endogenously expressed E-cadherin, detected with monoclonal anti-canine E-cadherin antibody rr1 (22), was expressed at the lateral surface both in wild type MDCK cells as described previously (28, 29; not shown) and in T-cadherin-transfected cells (Fig. 2B). Exclusive T-cadherin localization on the apical cell surface was confirmed by immuno-electron microscopy after immuno-peroxidase staining (Fig. 2C).


Fig. 2. Steady state distribution of transfected T-cadherin at the apical surface of MDCK cells grown on polycarbonate filters. Indirect immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy of T-cadherin (A) and endogenous E-cadherin (B) in T-cadherin-transfected MDCK cells. A and B, top panels, Z sections of the monolayer (line). T-cadherin is localized on the apical membrane surface, whereas E-cadherin is localized to sites of cell-cell contact. C, electron micrograph of immunostained T-cadherin in MDCK cells grown on a polycarbonate filter. T-cadherin is localized on apical membrane domains Arrows, apical side; arrowheads, lateral side; N nucleus; F, membrane filter. D, release of T-cadherin from the surface of transfected MDCK cells with PI-PLC. T-cadherin-transfected cells were treated with PI-PLC, and cell lysates (cells) and culture medium (SN) were analyzed by Western blotting. With PI-PLC treatment, T-cadherin is released into the culture medium. In controls (no enzyme) T-cadherin remains associated with cell membranes. Mock-transfected cells do not express T-cadherin (lane 1).
[View Larger Version of this Image (118K GIF file)]


To verify that the anticipated GPI-anchored T-cadherin protein is expressed in MDCK cells, transfected cells were treated with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC), an enzyme that specifically cleaves GPI-linked anchors (30). PI-PLC released a large fraction of T-cadherin from the cell surface into the culture medium (Fig. 2D). Some proportion of T-cadherin was resistant to PI-PLC treatment, possibly due to incomplete digestion. In controls without enzyme, T-cadherin remained associated with cell membranes.

T- and N-cadherin are expressed in an overlapping pattern on cultured sympathetic neurons and immature muscle cells (17, 31), raising the possibility that one cadherin affects the localization of the other at specific membrane domains. To test this possibility, MDCK cells were double transfected to stably express T- and N-cadherin protein. Both 95-kDa mature T-cadherin and 120-kDa N-cadherin were detected by Western blotting (not shown). As in the singly transfected cells, T-cadherin was localized to the apical surface (Fig. 3A), whereas N-cadherin was detected basolaterally (Fig. 3B). Apical T-cadherin and basolateral N-cadherin expression was already prominent on subconfluent groups of nonpolarized MDCK cells, which are much flatter in morphology (not shown). As the distribution of T- and N-cadherin in the double transfected cells was indistinguishable from that in the single transfected cells, these experiments provide evidence that the localization of these cadherins is independent of each other.


Fig. 3. Confocal microscopy of MDCK cells double transfected with N- and T-cadherin. Localization by indirect immunofluorescence of T-cadherin (A) and N-cadherin (B) in double transfected MDCK cells. T-cadherin (A) is expressed on the apical and N-cadherin (B) on the basolateral cell surface.
[View Larger Version of this Image (66K GIF file)]


The localization of T-cadherin was biochemically quantitated by immunoprecipation of surface biotinylated proteins from either the apical or basolateral membrane domain. MDCK cell monolayers with <1% permeability for the [3H]inulin tracer were used for these experiments. Confluent monolayers of T-cadherin-transfected cells were labeled with sulfo-NHS-biotin (a tight junction-impermeable probe) from either the apical or the basolateral side of the filter compartment and extracted with lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40. As GPI-linked proteins are insoluble in nonionic detergents such as Nonidet P-40 (32, 33, 34, 35), T-cadherin was immunoprecipitated from both Nonidet P-40-soluble and Nonidet P-40-insoluble fractions. Precipitated proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and biotinylated T-cadherin was detected with peroxidase-coupled streptavidin on immunoblots (Fig. 4). T-cadherin was predominantly (93%) localized on the apical cell surface (Fig. 4), and approximately 50% of the protein was soluble in Nonidet P-40 extracts (Fig. 4, lane 1), whereas the remainder was resistant to nonionic detergent extraction (Fig. 4, lane 3). A small percentage of T-cadherin (7%) was localized basolaterally, probably due to misrouting. Thus, both immunohistochemical and biochemical analyses localize the majority of T-cadherin at the apical MDCK cell surface.


Fig. 4. Steady state distribution of T-cadherin at the apical membrane domain of MDCK cells. Cells cultured on pairs of TranswellTM filters were biotinylated on either the apical (Ap) or basolateral (Bl) surface with sulfo-NHS-biotin. Cells were extracted with Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer, and T-cadherin was immunoprecipitated from the Nonidet P-40-soluble (s) and insoluble (p) pool of proteins. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. Biotinylated T-cadherin (97-kDa band) was detected predominantly on the apical surface with horseradish peroxidase-coupled streptavidin.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]


Wild Type N-Cadherin and Cytoplasmic Tail Deletion Mutant NDelta cyt Are Localized at the Basolateral Domain in MDCK Cells

classical cadherins contain in their cytoplasmic domain signals for basolateral sorting (50). To investigate whether deletion of these signals is sufficient to shuttle cadherins apically like cytoplasmic tail deletion mutants of the low density lipoprotein receptor (37), we have generated and tested for localization and targeting an N-cadherin cytoplasmic tail deletion mutant, NDelta cyt (Fig. 5). The NDelta cyt protein lacks all but three amino acids (KRR) of the N-cadherin cytoplasmic domain. The localization of the NDelta cyt mutant was analyzed by confocal microscopy of confluent, stably transfected MDCK cell monolayers stained by indirect immunofluorescence. Optical sections in the XZ axis revealed the majority of the NDelta cyt protein on basolateral MDCK cell surfaces (Fig. 6A). To biochemically quantitate NDelta cyt protein distribution, monolayers of MDCK cells were biotinylated from either the apical or basolateral surface, extracted with lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40, and immunoprecipitated with monoclonal anti-N-cadherin antibodies. The majority (87%) of the biotinylated NDelta cyt protein was detected in extracts biotinylated from the basolateral surface (Fig. 6B, NDelta cyt). This distribution was closely similar to that of wild type N-cadherin (Fig. 6B, N). Thus, in contrast to the prominent apical localization of deletion mutants of other basolaterally targeted proteins, NDelta cyt was stably expressed on the basolateral domain.


Fig. 6. Steady state distribution of NDelta cyt at the basolateral surface of MDCK cells. A, confocal microscopy of MDCK cells transfected with the NDelta cyt mutant were examined by indirect immunofluorescence. The mutant was stably expressed on the basolateral surface. B, biotinylation assay of MDCK cells expressing either NDelta cyt or intact N-cadherin (N). Cells cultured on pairs of TranswellTM filters were biotinylated on either the apical (Ap) or basolateral (Bl) surface with sulfo-NHS-biotin. Cells were extracted with Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer, and NDelta cyt and N-cadherin were immunoprecipitated from the respective cell lysates with specific antibodies (NCD2). Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. The majority of biotinylated NDelta cyt (97-kDa band) and N-cadherin (120-kDa band) were detected at the basolateral surface with horseradish peroxidase-coupled streptavidin.
[View Larger Version of this Image (65K GIF file)]


T- and N-cadherin Are Directly Targeted to Distinct Membrane Domains in MDCK Cells

To determine whether newly synthesized T- and N-cadherin are directly sorted to the apical or basolateral membrane, the kinetics of cadherin arrival at each membrane domain were measured between 4 and 96 h after induction of cell-cell contact. For synchronization, MDCK cells were kept on TranswellTM polycarbonate filters in DMEM/FBS under low Ca2+ conditions (37). Formation of intercellular contacts was induced by raising the Ca2+ concentration to 1.8 mM. At various times after Ca2+ induction, cells were labeled for 1 h with [35S]methionine/cysteine and biotinylated from either the apical or basolateral filter compartment (see above), and cadherins were immunoprecipitated with specific antibodies. The immune complexes were dissociated, and biotinylated cadherins were identified in either the apical or the basolateral fraction by reprecipitation with streptavidin-agarose. After 4 h, 84% of total T-cadherin was detected on the apical membrane domain (Fig. 7A). With further polarization, the percentage of T-cadherin delivered to the apical membrane increased, reaching a maximum of 96% after 96 h (Fig. 7A). Thus, T-cadherin was directly targeted to the apical membrane domain already 4 h after induction of cell-cell contact.


Fig. 7. Delivery of newly synthesized cadherins and cadherin mutant NDelta cyt to specific membrane domains. Cell monolayers were established on filters in DMEM/FBS without Ca2+. Cell-cell contact was induced by raising the Ca2+ concentration of the medium to 1.8 mM. At different times after induction of cell-cell contact, cells were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 1 h and biotinylated at the apical (Ap) or basolateral (Bl) membrane. Cadherins and the NDelta cyt mutant were immunoprecipitated, solubilized, reprecipitated with streptavidin-agarose, and detected with autoradiography. A, T-cadherin is targeted to the apical domain 4 and 96 h after Ca2+ induction. B, N-cadherin (N) and E-cadherin (E) are predominantly targeted basolaterally, whereas NDelta cyt is transported to both the apical and basolateral domain. C, degradation of newly synthesized NDelta cyt on the apical cell surface of MDCK cells. Cells on filters were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine/cysteine for 1 h, incubated for different chase periods in the absence of labeled amino acids, and then biotinylated for 1 h at the apical (Ap) or basolateral (Bl) membrane. NDelta cyt was immunoprecipitated, solubilized, reprecipitated with streptavidin-agarose, and detected with autoradiography. The NDelta cyt mutant is specifically removed from the apical domain.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]


Targeting assays of wild type N-cadherin in transfected MDCK cells demonstrated that 86% (96 h after induction of cell-cell contact) of newly synthesized N-cadherin was delivered directly to the basolateral surface of fully polarized cells (Fig. 7B, N). This is comparable with the targeting of endogenous E-cadherin in MDCK cells, 82% of which is directly transported to the basolateral membrane domain 96 h after induction of cell-cell contact (Fig. 7B, E). A small percentage of N- and E-cadherin is missorted to the apical surface. As apically transported wild type N- and E-cadherin do not accumulate at the apical surface, they must be rapidly removed, either by proteolytic degradation or transcytosis.

N-Cadherin Cytoplasmic Tail Deletion Mutant NDelta cyt Is Transported to the Apical and Basolateral Domain in MDCK Cells and Is Removed at the Apical Surface

To address whether the NDelta cyt mutant protein is directly targeted to the basolateral domain, the arrival of metabolically labeled NDelta cyt protein at each membrane surface was measured in targeting assays as described above. Analysis of proteins at both membrane domains revealed that mutant protein was transported in similar amounts to both the apical and basolateral membrane domains (Fig. 7B, NDelta cyt).

The random transport of the NDelta cyt mutant raised the possibility that this protein is preferentially removed from the apical membrane surface. To test this hypothesis, the residence time of newly synthesized protein at each membrane domain was determined. Monolayer cultures were metabolically labeled for 15 min or 1 h with [35S]methionine/cysteine, and the label was chased with medium containing an excess of unlabeled methionine. At various time points during the chase period, duplicate cultures were biotinylated for 15 min at 4 °C from either the apical or basolateral filter chamber as described above. Cells were extracted with Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer and immunoprecipitated with monoclonal anti-N-cadherin antibody followed by avidin-agarose. After a chase period of 4 h, 96% of NDelta cyt protein was found on the basolateral membrane (not shown). After chase of 120 h, 87% of the NDelta cyt protein was detected on the basolateral surface domain (Fig. 7C). Thus, the NDelta cyt mutant protein is preferentially removed at the apical membrane surface and accumulates basolaterally.

T-Cadherin Carboxyl-terminal Amino Acids Are Responsible for Apical Targeting

The regions within N- and T-cadherin responsible for their respective basolateral and apical distribution in MDCK cells were examined by studying the distribution of additional mutants (see Fig. 5).

Expression of T-NDelta cyt, composed of the T-cadherin ectodomain and the N-cadherin transmembrane domain and truncated cytoplasmic domain, was achieved only in a small number of cells and was unstable. Examination by indirect immunofluorescence revealed that the T-NDelta cyt mutant was localized on the basolateral MDCK cell surface (Fig. 8), identical to that of the NDelta cyt protein. Expression of the reverse chimera, N-TGPI, containing the N-cadherin extracellular portion followed by the 76 T-cadherin carboxyl-terminal amino acids, was restricted to the apical membrane domain, as shown by confocal microscopic analysis of transfected cells after indirect immunofluorescence (Fig. 9A). As expression of the N-TGPI mutant was unstable in MDCK cells, membrane attachment of the mutant protein was examined after transient transfection of the corresponding DNA construct into Cos7 cells. Proteins of 95 and 110 kDa were detected with monoclonal anti-N-cadherin antibody by Western blotting of transfected cell lysates (Fig. 9B). The sizes of these proteins correspond to those of T-cadherin, which comprises the mature 95-kDa protein and the unprocessed 110-kDa precursor (12, 13). Treatment of N-TGPI-expressing Cos7 cells with PI-PLC released both the 95- and 110-kDa proteins from the cell surface into the culture medium, whereas in controls without PI-PLC, chimeric proteins were associated with cell membranes (Fig. 9B). Thus, the 76 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of T-cadherin include the signal for GPI anchor attachment.


Fig. 8. Steady state distribution of T-NDelta cyt at the basolateral surface of MDCK cells. Confocal microscopy of MDCK cells transfected with the T-NDelta cyt chimera. The chimera was detected by indirect immunofluorescence with anti-T-cadherin-antibody on the basolateral surface.
[View Larger Version of this Image (70K GIF file)]



Fig. 9. Steady state distribution of N-TGPI at the apical surface of MDCK cells. A, confocal microscopy of MDCK cells transfected with the N-TGPI chimera. The N-TGPI chimera was detected by indirect immunofluorescence on the apical surface of MDCK cells. B, GPI attachment of the N-TGPI mutant. N-TGPI was transiently transfected into COS 7 cells. N-TGPI-transfected cells were treated with PI-PLC. Cell lysates (cells) and culture medium (SN) were analyzed by Western blotting. All N-TGPI is released into the culture medium. In controls (no enzyme) N-TGPI is detected in cell lysates only.
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]


Taken together, these results demonstrate that the carboxyl-terminal 76 T-cadherin amino acids contain the signal for GPI anchor attachment and are responsible for apical targeting of T-cadherin in MDCK cells.


DISCUSSION

In this article, we have examined whether GPI-linked T-cadherin is a component of cell-cell junctions like classical cadherins. In contrast to the basolateral distribution of classical cadherins, T-cadherin was transported and stably expressed at the apical domain of polarized epithelial cells. Apical targeting signals reside within the carboxyl-terminal 76 amino acids of T-cadherin and contain signals for GPI anchor attachment. The signal for GPI-linkage generally consists of an uncharged amino acid followed by a stretch of hydrophobic amino acid residues (38, 39). The T-cadherin carboxyl-terminal 76 amino acid region when fused to the ectodomain of N-cadherin produces a GPI-linked protein that is distributed apically. Therefore, the T-cadherin carboxyl-terminal amino acids are sufficient for GPI anchor attachment and apical targeting.

Classical cadherins contain in their cytoplasmic domain a putative basolateral targeting signal (50) that resembles that of the low density lipoprotein receptor and other basolaterally targeted proteins (36). The targeting motif comprises a tyrosine and a downstream cluster of three negatively charged amino acid residues, structurally organized into a type I beta -turn, and is related to clathrin-coated pit localization signals (40). Removal or inactivation of this signal results in the transport of basolaterally targeted proteins to the apical cell surface (41, 42, 43). Classical cadherins such as E-, P-, and N-cadherin contain in their cytoplasmic domain two such motifs, Y-(X)6-EED and Y-(X)3-EDD. However, N-cadherin lacks one of the three negatively charged amino acids in the distal signal, and the putative N-cadherin-targeting signals have not been probed for activity. The results reported here demonstrate that heterologously expressed N-cadherin is targeted basolaterally. Thus, the signals contained within the N-cadherin cytoplasmic domain are sufficient for basolateral targeting.

We demonstrate here that the N-cadherin tail minus mutant NDelta cyt is localized at the basolateral membrane in MDCK cells. This mutant is randomly transported to both the apical and basolateral membrane surfaces but rapidly and specifically removed from the apical pole, either by proteolytic degradation or transcytosis. The random transport of the NDelta cyt mutant is unexpected, as deletion of the basolateral targeting signals of proteins such as the low density lipoprotein receptor, the Fc receptor, lysosomal glycoprotein 120, and polyimmunoglobulin receptor results in the predominant targeting and stable expression of the mutant proteins at the apical membrane domain (41, 42, 43, 44). The fast removal of the NDelta cyt mutant may be explained by the lack of homophilic binding at the apical surface, which renders the protein accessible to proteolytic degradation. This is in contrast to the stable expression of both GPI-linked wild type T-cadherin and the N-TGPI mutant at the apical surface. As the N-TGPI chimera differs from the NDelta cyt mutant only in its carboxyl-terminal 76 amino acids, our results strongly argue that this region provides signals not only for apical targeting but also for stable expression at the apical domain. One possible explanation is that T-cadherin and the N-TGPI chimera are clustered as GPI-linked proteins in caveolae and are therefore less accessible to proteolytic degradation. T-cadherin was recently isolated from the heart as a major protein of caveolae preparations (45), where it is hypothesized to serve as a calcium store and contribute to specific cardiac functions.

The apical localization of T-cadherin in MDCK cells correlates with its apical expression on intestinal epithelial cells in vivo. The highest T-cadherin concentration was detected on the apical extrusion zone where enterocytes exfoliate. Expression on the apical domain is complementary to that of E-cadherin (25, 26) and LI-cadherin (27), which occupy the basolateral domain and are distributed in adherens junctions and lateral contact zones, excluding junctional regions, respectively.

What is the possible function of T-cadherin at the apical surface of epithelial cells? One hypothesis is that T-cadherin is clustered in caveolae as in the heart and serves as a calcium store. Alternatively, and perhaps in addition, T-cadherin may play a role in receiving and transducing signals from the luminal space. A number of GPI-linked proteins of lymphocytes participate in T-cell activation putatively through a signaling cascade involving Src-related kinases (46, 47, 48, 49). In epithelial cells in vivo, apically expressed T-cadherin may play a role in signaling events required for specific epithelial functions. Together with the observation that T-cadherin mediates weak adhesive interactions2 and repulses growth cones from specific neuron populations (18), its localization at the apical cell surface of polarized epithelial cells is consistent with a function as a recognition rather than a cell adhesion molecule. The nature of T-cadherin function and its mechanism of operation at the apical epithelial cell surface are important issues to be addressed concerning this unique member of the cadherin family.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by fellowships from the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds, the Schweizerische Stiftung für Medizinisch-Biologische Stipendien, and the American Heart Association (to E. K.) and by National Institutes of Health Research Grant GM 48077 (to B. R.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Burnham Institute, La Jolla Cancer Research Center, 10901 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA 92307. Tel.: 619-455-6480 (ext. 3122); Fax: 619-646-3197; E-mail: ranscht{at}ljcrf.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FBS, fetal bovine serum; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PI-PLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C; GPI, glycosyl phosphatidylinositol; NHS, N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide.
2   B. Ranscht, unpublished observation.

Acknowledgments

Appreciation is extended to Drs. B. J. Fredette and M. Schibler for competent advice and help with immuno-electron microscopic and confocal techniques, to Dr. W. J. Nelson for helpful discussions, and to Dr. M. Fukuda and J. K. Bodnar for critical comments on the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Kirkpatrick, C., and Peiffer, M. (1995) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5, 56-65 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Rodriguez-Boulan, E. (1983) in Modern Cell Biology (Sativ, B. H., ed), Vol. 1, pp. 119-170, Alan R. Liss, New York
  3. Frisch, S. M., and Francis, H. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 124, 619-626 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ojakian, G. K., and Schwimmer, R. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 561-576 [Medline] [Abstract]
  5. Vega-Salas, D. E., Salas, P. J., and Rodriguez-Boulan, E. (1987) J. Cell Biol. 104, 1249-1259 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. McNeill, H., Ozawa, M., Kemler, R., and Nelson, W. J. (1990) Cell. 62, 309-316 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Gumbiner, B., Stevenson, B., and Grimaldi, A. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 107, 1575-1587 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wollner, D. A., Krzeminski, K. A., and Nelson, W. J. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 116, 889-899 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Nagafuchi, A., Tsukita, S., and Takeichi, M. (1993) Semin. Cell Biol. 4, 175-181 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Gumbiner, B. M. (1993) Neuron 11, 551-564 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Volk, T., and Geiger, B. (1984) EMBO J. 10, 2249-2260
  12. Ranscht, B., and Dours-Zimmermann, M. T. (1991) Neuron 7, 1-20 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Vestal, D. J., and Ranscht, B. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 451-461 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ozawa, M., Engel, J., and Kemler, R. (1990) Cell 63, 1033-1038 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Nagafuchi, A., and Takeichi, M. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 3679-3684 [Medline] [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Ranscht, B., and Bronner-Fraser, M. (1991) Development (Camb.) 111, 15-22 [Medline] [Abstract]
  17. Fredette, J. B., and Ranscht, B. (1994) J. Neurosci. 14, 7331-7346 [Abstract]
  18. Fredette, B. J., Miller, J., and Ranscht, B. (1996) Development (Camb.), in press
  19. Cifuentes-Diaz, C., Nicolet, M., Goudou, D., Reiger, F., and Mege, R. M. (1994) Development (Camb.) 120, 1-11 [Medline] [Abstract]
  20. Nelson, W. J., and Veshnock, P. J. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 1751-1765 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hatta, K., Nose, A., Nagafuchi, A., and Takeichi, M. (1988) J. Cell Biol. 106, 873-881 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gumbiner, B., and Simons, K. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 102, 457-468 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Towbin, M., Staehlin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rodriguez-Boulan, E., Salas, P. J., Sargiacomo, M., Lisanti, M., LeBivic, A., Sambuy, Y., Vega-Salas, D., and Graeve, L. (1989) Methods Cell Biol. 32, 37-56 [Medline] [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Amerongen, H. M., Mack, J. A., Wilson, J. M., and Neutra, M. R. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 2129-2138 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Cepek, K. L., Shaw, S. K., Parker, C. M., Russell, G. J., Morrow, J. S., Rimm, D. L., and Brenner, M. B. (1994) Nature 372, 190-193 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Berndorff, D., Gessner, R., Kreft, B., Schnoy, N., Lajous-Petter, A., Loch, N., Reutter, W., Hortsch, M., and Tauber, R. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 125, 1353-1369 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Imhof, B. A., Vollmers, H. P., Goodman, S. L., and Birchmeier, W. (1983) Cell 35, 667-675 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Behrens, J., Birchmeier, W., Goodman, S. L., and Imhof, B. A. (1985) J. Cell Biol. 100, 1307-1315
  30. Low, M. G., and Saltiel, A. R. (1988) Science. 239, 268-275 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Sacristan, M. P., Vestal, D. J., Dours-Zimmermann, M. T., and Ranscht, B. (1992) J. Neurosci. Res. 34, 664-680
  32. Brown, D. A., and Rose, J. K. (1992) Cell 68, 533-544 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Sargiacomo, M., Sudol, M., Tang, Z., and Lisanti, M. P. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 789-807 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Gorodinsky, A., and Harris, D. A. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 619-627 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Hoessli, D., and Rungger-Brandle, E. (1985) Exp. Cell Res. 156, 239-250 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Matter, K., Hunziker, W., and Mellman, I. (1992) Cell 71, 741-753 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Gonzales-Mariscal, L., Chavez de Remirez, B., and Cereijido, M. (1985) J. Membr. Biol. 96, 113-122
  38. Cross, G. A. M. (1990) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 6, 1-39 [CrossRef]
  39. Kodukula, K., Gerber, L. D., Amthauer, R., Brink, L., and Udenfried, S. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 120, 657-664 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Trowbridge, I. S., Collawn, J. F., and Hopkins, C. R. (1993) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 9, 129-161 [Medline] [CrossRef]
  41. Casanova, J. E., Apodaca, G., and Mostov, K. E. (1991) Cell. 66, 65-75 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Prill, V., Lehmann, L., von Figura, K., and Peters, C. (1993) EMBO J. 123, 2181-2193
  43. Matter, K., and Mellman, I. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 545-554 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Hopkins, C. R. (1991) Cell 66, 827-829 [Medline] [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Doyle, D. D., Ranscht, B., Page, E., and Palfrey, H. C. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 403a (abstr.)
  46. Stefanova, I., Horejsi, V., Ansotegui, I. J., Knapp, W., and Stockinger, H. (1991) Science 254, 1016-1019 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Zisch, A. H., D'Alessandri, L., Amrein, K., Ranscht, B., Winterhalter, K. H., and Vaughan, L. (1995) Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 6, 263-279 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Thomas, P. M., and Samelson, L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12317-12322 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Shenoy-Scaria, A. M., Kwong, J., Fujita, T., Olszowy, M. W., Shaw, A. S., and Lublin, T. M. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 3535-3541 [Medline] [Abstract]
  50. Chen, Y.-T., Ryan, T. A., Smith, S. J., and Nelson, W. J. (1995) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. LX, 34

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. A. Dames, E. Bang, D. Haussinger, T. Ahrens, J. Engel, and S. Grzesiek
Insights into the Low Adhesive Capacity of Human T-cadherin from the NMR Structure of Its N-terminal Extracellular Domain
J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2008; 283(34): 23485 - 23495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Philippova, D. Ivanov, M. B. Joshi, E. Kyriakakis, K. Rupp, T. Afonyushkin, V. Bochkov, P. Erne, and T. J. Resink
Identification of Proteins Associating with Glycosylphosphatidylinositol- Anchored T-Cadherin on the Surface of Vascular Endothelial Cells: Role for Grp78/BiP in T-Cadherin-Dependent Cell Survival
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2008; 28(12): 4004 - 4017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. M. Lewis, L. R. Cler, D.-W. Bu, S. Zochbauer-Muller, S. Milchgrub, E. Z. Naftalis, A. M. Leitch, J. D. Minna, and D. M. Euhus
Promoter Hypermethylation in Benign Breast Epithelium in Relation to Predicted Breast Cancer Risk
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 11(1): 166 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
Z.-y. Huang, Y. Wu, N. Hedrick, and D. H. Gutmann
T-Cadherin-Mediated Cell Growth Regulation Involves G2 Phase Arrest and Requires p21CIP1/WAF1 Expression
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2003; 23(2): 566 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. Goldberg, M. Wei, B. Tycko, I. Falikovich, and D. Warburton
Identification and expression analysis of the human {micro}-protocadherin gene in fetal and adult kidneys
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): F454 - F463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
P. Navarro, L. Ruco, and E. Dejana
Differential Localization of VE- and N-Cadherins in Human Endothelial Cells: VE-Cadherin Competes with N-Cadherin for Junctional Localization
J. Cell Biol., March 23, 1998; 140(6): 1475 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Yamada, B. Fredette, K. Shitara, K. Hagihara, R. Miura, B. Ranscht, W. B. Stallcup, and Y. Yamaguchi
The Brain Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan Brevican Associates with Astrocytes Ensheathing Cerebellar Glomeruli and Inhibits Neurite Outgrowth from Granule Neurons
J. Neurosci., October 15, 1997; 17(20): 7784 - 7795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koller, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ranscht, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koller, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ranscht, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement