|
Volume 271, Number 47,
Issue of November 22, 1996
pp. 30205-30211
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Constitutive Expression of Murine Complement Factor B Gene Is
Regulated by the Interaction of Its Upstream Promoter with Hepatocyte
Nuclear Factor 4*
(Received for publication, July 31, 1996)
Gérard
Garnier
,
Antonella
Circolo
and
Harvey R.
Colten
From the Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of
Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Factor B (Bf) is a constituent of the alternative
pathway of complement activation encoded within the major
histocompatibility complex. Transcription of the murine gene from two
initiation sites generates two Bf mRNA species differing in size
and tissue distribution. Striking genetic, tissue-specific differences
in Bf mRNA levels at extrahepatic sites (kidney and intestine)
among mouse strains correlate with a DNA sequence polymorphism in the 5 -flanking region of the gene and differential nuclear protein binding
at the Bf upstream transcriptional initiation site (UIS). To ascertain
the functional consequences of this polymorphism in the Bf promoter, we
analyzed the effects of strain-specific sequences in the Bf 5 region
on the expression of a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter
gene transfected in human and mouse hepatoma cells. The CAT activity
and mRNA level produced when transcription was driven by the
sequence of strains with high extrahepatic expression were reduced to
background levels when the sequence specific to the low expressor
strains was used. Eighty percent of this difference was accounted for
by a point substitution that affects DNA-protein interaction at the
UIS, the sequence of higher affinity conferring higher expression. Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF-4), derived from HepG2, mouse liver
and kidney or cell-free translation of HNF-4 RNA, is the nuclear
protein that preferentially binds to the high expressor UIS. Bf-CAT is
not expressed in cells that lack HNF-4 (CV-1). However, co-transfection
of HNF-4 into CV-1 cells drives Bf-CAT expression and reproduces the
differences derived from the substitution that affect HNF-4 binding
in vitro. These data show that interaction of HNF-4 with
polymorphic variants of the upstream Bf promoter is the major
determinant of strain-specific extrahepatic factor B expression.
INTRODUCTION
Factor B (Bf)1 is a serine proteinase
of the antibody-independent, alternative pathway of complement
activation, an important humoral system of host defense against
invading pathogens (1). In addition, Bf activation fragments exert
cytokine-like activities such as B lymphocyte proliferation and
differentiation (2, 3, 4), macrophage spreading (5), and monocyte-mediated cytotoxicity (6, 7, 8). The Bf gene is located within the class III gene
cluster of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on chromosome 6 in humans (9) and 17 in mice (10, 11) immediately downstream of the
complement C2 gene (12, 13), its structural and functional homologue in
the classical, antibody dependent complement activation pathway.
The major site of Bf biosynthesis is the liver, as evidenced by
allotypic changes of serum Bf following liver transplant (14). Hepatic
constitutive Bf expression has been demonstrated in vitro, in primary hepatocyte cultures (15), in the HepG2 hepatoma cell line
(16), and in vivo, by Bf mRNA analysis in liver tissue (17, 18). Bf is a positive acute phase reactant in that its hepatic
synthesis and serum level are increased during the acute phase of the
inflammatory response (19).
Extrahepatic biosynthesis of Bf and other complement components has
also been documented in cell lines of nonhepatic origin and in
vivo (19, 20). Extrahepatic Bf expression is usually low
constitutively, but it is markedly up-regulated under inflammatory conditions by bacterial endotoxin and by cytokines such as
interleukin-1, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor- , and
interferon- in many cell lines and tissues (17, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25). The
extrahepatic production of complement may be of biological importance
especially at early stages of inflammation. In the mouse, the kidney is
by far the major extrahepatic site of Bf mRNA constitutive
expression (18, 25), although Bf mRNA is constitutively present to
some extent in many other nonhepatic tissues.
Two mRNAs differing in size (2.4 and 2.7 kb) are transcribed from
the murine Bf gene as a result of alternative transcriptional initiation at two sites separated by 302 bp (18). The downstream transcriptional initiation site (DIS) is located 105 bp 5 to the Bf
open reading frame at a position homologous to that of the human gene
(12). The upstream initiation site (UIS) is only 88 bp 3 to the
polyadenylation site of the C2 gene (18). The two Bf mRNA species
are present in equal amounts in kidney or intestine, but in the liver,
the short mRNA represents at least 95% of Bf transcription
products (18, 26). Bf up-regulation during inflammation is accounted
for by a preferential increase of expression of the short transcript
(18, 27, 28), which in turn is translated at approximately twice the
rate of the long transcript (29). Thus, extrahepatic Bf expression is
up-regulated by the cooperative effects of transcriptional and
translational controls. Although the C2-Bf intergenic region is highly
conserved between mouse and human (12), a longer Bf mRNA has not
yet been found in humans.
In certain inbred strains (e.g. H-2f and
H-2z MHC haplotypes), both Bf mRNA species are
expressed at very low levels in the kidney and intestine, compared with
other strains (28). This phenotypic difference correlates with DNA
sequence polymorphism in the 5 region of the Bf gene that includes the
disruption of a binding site for liver and kidney nuclear protein(s) at
the UIS in the low expressor strains (28). Hepatic expression of Bf in
these strains is similar to that in other strains including those with
high extrahepatic Bf expression.
Cis elements required for Bf up-regulation by cytokines have been
mapped in the 5 -flanking regions of the mouse (12, 30) and human (12,
13) genes. However, the molecular mechanisms and transcription factors
involved in the control of constitutive and tissue-specific expression
of the Bf gene have not yet been identified. In this study, we
demonstrate the functional relevance of the sequence polymorphism in
the 5 region of the murine Bf gene in Bf transcription. Differential
interaction of the upstream promoter with HNF-4, resulting from the
point substitution near the UIS, appears to be the major determinant in
extrahepatic strain-specific Bf expression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bf-CAT Reporter Constructs
Bf-CAT constructs were prepared
and analyzed according to standard cloning and sequencing procedures
(31) using Promega enzymes (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) and a Sequenase
version 2.0 kit (U.S. Biochemical Corp.). Oligonucleotides were
synthesized by a PCR-Mate DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems,
Foster City, CA). Polymerase chain reactions were performed in a
Tempcycler (Coy Laboratory Products, Ann Arbor, MI) using Perkin-Elmer
AmpliTaq DNA polymerase and reagents (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.,
Branchburg, NJ). Bf genomic clones (28) from B10.PL (high expressor)
and B10.M (low expressor) mouse strains were used as DNA templates to
generate strain-specific Bf 5 -flanking sequences by PCR. The plasmid
pCAT-0, a subclone of pSV0-CAT in pBluescript-II SK(+) (32) (from which
the EcoRI site in the 3 polylinker was deleted) was used as
PCR template for the CAT sequence and as vector for subcloning.
Strain-specific 5 sequences of the murine Bf gene, extending from
728 to +105, the positions preceding the first in-frame ATG
(numbering refers to the nucleotide positions relative to the DIS),
were linked 5 to the first 214 bp of the CAT open reading frame by
overlap extension PCR (33). The chimeric PCR products, containing an
engineered XbaI 5 cloning site and the internal EcoRI site of the CAT gene at the 3 end were then ligated
with the corresponding sites of pCAT.0, yielding the Bf-CAT constructs pBfPL-CAT (high expressor) and PBfM-CAT (low expressor). A mutant pBf-CAT.M1 was generated (34) by substituting T to C at 299 in
pBfPL-CAT. Upstream constructs pUBfPL-CAT, pUBfM-CAT, and pUBf-CAT.M1 were derived from pBfPL-CAT, PBfM-CAT, and pBf-CAT.M1, respectively, by
deleting the DNA segment between the NcoI site at the first ATG 3 to the UIS and the NcoI site created by the Bf-CAT
fusion at the CAT initiation codon. pUPBf-CAT was generated by deleting pUBfPL-CAT from the XbaI 5 cloning site to a
SmaI site at 554. pSV2-CAT was a subclone of the original
SV40 promoter-driven CAT expression clone in pBluescript-II SK(+)
(32).
Expression of Bf-CAT Reporter Constructs in Transfected
Cells
Human (HepG2) and murine (Hepa1-6) hepatoma cells
(American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD), grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum, were plated at 2 × 106 cells in 100-mm
tissue culture dishes. The cells were transfected the next day with the
calcium phosphate method (35) by a 7-h incubation with 10 µg of test
plasmid and 3.5 µg of -galactosidase expression vector pCH110
(Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). The CAT activity was determined 36 h
later by a modification (32) of a previously described method (36) in
the cell lysates normalized for -galactosidase activity. For
transcriptional activation experiments using an HNF-4 expression
plasmid (see below), monkey kidney-derived, fibroblast-like CV-1 cells
(ATCC) were plated at 106 cells/dish and co-transfected
with 6 µg of CAT plasmid, various amounts (see "Results") of
HNF-4 plasmid, and 3.5 µg of -gal plasmid, processed, and analyzed
as above.
For Northern blot analysis of CAT and -galactosidase mRNAs,
total cellular RNA was prepared by guanidinium thiocyanate lysis and
CsCl density gradient ultracentrifugation (37), and 20 µg were
separated in a 1.2% agarose denaturing gel and analyzed as described
(28). The CAT cDNA probe was a 516-bp NcoI fragment corresponding to the most 5 CAT coding sequence from the pUBfM-CAT plasmid described above. The -galactosidase cDNA probe was a 2.4-kb PvuII fragment from pCH110. RNA loading and quality
were controlled by ethidium bromide stain of ribosomal RNA in the gel and on the blot.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Analysis
Nuclei from mouse
tissues and HepG2 cells were prepared as described (38) and lysed with
NaCl and spermidine (39), and the nuclear lysates were dialyzed (40).
The soluble material was quantified for protein content using a protein
assay kit (Sigma) and stored at 70 °C. The binding reactions were
performed essentially as described (28) in the presence of 4 µg of
extract, 2 µg of poly(dI-dC)-poly(dI-dC), and 175 pg of
32P-end-labeled, 35-mer double-strand oligonucleotide as
probe in 25 µl containing 5% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, for 30 min at room temperature. The complexes were resolved in a 7%
polyacrylamide gel in TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0).
The sequences of the probes are indicated under "Results" except
for the CIIIB site of the rat apoCIII gene ( 103/ 69, coding strand: 5 -TCTGGACTGTTCAGCAGGTGACCTTTGACCAGCTC-3 ) (41) and the 5 -UT
binding site of the mouse Bf gene (+36/+70, coding strand: 5 -CAGGAGGTCAAATAGGCACCCAGAGTGACCTGGAG-3 ) (12). The latter reciprocally competes with a PvuII-BglII
( 18/+116) genomic probe in which the binding element of the 5 -UT
region was initially detected (28) and therefore contains the complete
5 -UT element (not shown).
In the antibody supershift assays, 1 µl of HNF-4 specific rabbit
antiserum (42) (or nonimmune rabbit serum as control) at the indicated
dilutions (in 3% bovine serum albumin) was added to the reactions. For
analysis of cell-free translated HNF-4, a plasmid kindly provided by
Dr. F. M. Sladek, consisting of the rat HNF-4 cDNA sequence (42)
subcloned in the pSG5 vector (43), which supports prokaryotic and
eukaryotic transcription, was linearized and transcribed by the
bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim). HNF-4 transcript
was then purified in a CsCl density gradient (37) and translated in a
rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Promega) using an unlabeled amino
acid mix. Translation times and RNA input are indicated under
"Results." For binding experiments, 5 µl of translation reaction
mixture were added instead of nuclear extract.
RESULTS
A Polymorphic Binding Site in the Bf Upstream Promoter Responsible
for Strain-specific Constitutive Activity of the Downstream
Promoter
To ascertain the functional consequences of the sequence
differences in the 5 region of the mouse Bf gene between strains with
high and low extrahepatic Bf expression, we generated a set of CAT
reporter constructs driven by the strain-specific Bf 5 sequences
( 728 to +108 from the DIS) (Fig. 1B),
transfected them into HepG2 cells, and assessed the CAT activity (Fig.
1A). Higher activity was obtained with the construct bearing
the high expressor strain sequence (pBfPL-CAT). In contrast, CAT
activity detected when the sequence of the low expressor strains was
used (pBfM-CAT) did not significantly differ from background (pCAT.0).
The differences between high and low expressor sequences consists of
six point substitutions and a 6-bp deletion. A mutant (pBf-CAT.M1) was
also generated, in which only the nucleotide at 299 (3 bp downstream of the UIS) of the high expressor sequence was substituted (T to C).
This substitution disrupts the site for nuclear protein binding at the
UIS (28). The CAT activity for this mutant was approximately 20% of
the activity obtained with the high expressor, indicating that 80% of
the difference in CAT activity between the high and low expressor
sequences results from this T/C substitution. Because the differences
in Bf-CAT expression in HepG2 were more comparable with extrahepatic
than hepatic differences in Bf expression in vivo, the
following experiments were done. Analysis of expression of several
constructs extending up to 6.7 kb upstream of the DIS (26) in HepG2
showed a correlation of CAT activity with sequences identical to that
observed with the shortest constructs (see above). The longest ( 6.7
kb) and shortest ( 728 bp) constructs transfected into a murine
hepatoma cell line (Hepa1-6), also yielded results similar to that
observed in HepG2 transfected with the shortest Bf strain-specific
sequences; i.e. expression was markedly reduced for the UIS
substitution (72 and 78% reduction for the short and 5 -extended
constructs, respectively).
Fig. 1.
Effect of the sequence polymorphism in the 5
region of the murine Bf gene on the expression of the CAT reporter gene
in HepG2 cells. A, cells were co-transfected with the
indicated CAT constructs and the -galactosidase control expression
plasmid, and the CAT activity was determined in cell lysates
standardized for -galactosidase activity. The relative CAT activity
is expressed as percentage of the activity obtained with pBfPL-CAT.
Average values of triplicate experiments (histograms) and a
representative experiment (inset, same sample order) are
shown. B, Bf-CAT constructs used in A and
C. The six point substitutions (boxed) between
high (pBfPL-CAT) and low (pBfM-CAT) expressor sequences are positioned at 553, 327, 307, 299, +22, and +52, and the 6-bp deletion is
at 203/ 198 relative to the Bf DIS. The UIS at 302 is also indicated. The CAT open reading frame is inserted at the Bf most 5
in-frame ATG (A at +106) except for the upstream construct (pUBfPL-CAT)
where the CAT sequence is at the first ATG downstream of the UIS.
C, Northern blot analysis of the CAT mRNA in total RNA
from cells transfected with the indicated constructs. pSV2-CAT control
plasmid is driven by the SV40 promoter. This blot is representative of
three separate experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
Differences in CAT gene expression were confirmed at the mRNA level
by Northern blot analysis of the CAT mRNA in transfected HepG2
cells (Fig. 1C). A CAT transcript was also detected with an
upstream construct (pUBfPL-CAT) in which the CAT open reading frame was
inserted at the first ATG following the UIS (22 bp downstream of the
UIS) (Fig. 1C, lane 6), indicating that the
sequence spanning 728 to 276 contains functional element(s) of the
Bf upstream promoter. However, no significant CAT activity was detected
using this construct (not shown), probably due to low translation
initiation at this ATG (29).
To analyze the effect of strain-specific sequences on the
activity of the upstream promoter, constructs bearing the
upstream sequence of the low expressor strains (pUBfM-CAT) and
identical sequence substituted only at 299 (pUBf-CAT.M1) were also
generated (Fig. 2A) and transfected into
HepG2 cells, and the expression of the CAT transcript was assessed by
Northern blot analysis (Fig. 2B). Transcription driven
upstream by the low expressor sequence was also markedly less than that
driven by the high expressor sequence. However, in contrast to
downstream initiation, the substitution at 299 (T to C) had no effect
on transcription initiated at the UIS. A 5 -truncated construct
(pUPBf-CAT) retained the promoter activity, which thus localizes the
minimal upstream promoter within a 272-bp fragment ( 553 to 276 from
the DIS).
Fig. 2.
Effect of the strain-specific 5 -flanking
sequences on the Bf upstream promoter activity. A, Bf
upstream CAT constructs (see descriptions in the Fig. 1B
legend). B, cells were transfected as in Fig. 1, and total
cellular RNA, standardized for -galactosidase mRNA (control in
upper part), was analyzed by Northern blotting for CAT
mRNA contents (lower part). The result shown is
representative of duplicate experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]
The differential binding at the UIS resulting from the T/C
polymorphism at 299 (28) was further analyzed by gel shift
analysis using 35-mer double-strand oligonucleotides ( 323/ 289) as
probes (Fig. 3). Using a mouse liver nuclear extract,
the high expressor sequence as probe (T at 299) and increasing
amounts of competitor with or without the substitution (T to C) at
299, the gel shift analysis (Fig. 3A) shows that both
sequences bind to the nuclear factor(s), but approximately 8 times more
competitor was required to reach equivalent competition when T was
substituted to C. Single-strand substitutions in the probe at this
position (Fig. 3B) revealed that, despite the mismatch, the
T to C substitution in the coding strand did not affect the interaction
with the mouse liver and kidney and HepG2 nuclear protein(s). In
contrast, the corresponding A to G substitution in the noncoding strand
abrogated the interaction with all three extracts. The HepG2 extract
showed an additional complex of faster mobility. However, this
interaction was consistently decreased only by the single-strand
substitution in the coding strand and equally competed by the wild-type
and double-strand mutant oligonucleotides (not shown).
Fig. 3.
The T/C substitution near the UIS affects the
affinity of a DNA element for a nuclear factor. A,
differential binding of the two alleles. Gel shift analysis was
performed using the wild-type (T at 299) double-strand
oligonucleotide as probe and a mouse liver nuclear extract in the
presence of increasing amounts (25-, 50-, 100-, and 200-fold excess) of
wild type or mutant (C at 299) competitor. B, the
substitution on the noncoding strand affects the interaction at the
UIS. Wild-type, mutant, and hybrid (with single-strand substitutions)
double-strand oligonucleotides with the residue at 299 as indicated
were used as probes in gel shift analysis with the indicated nuclear
extracts. All interactions were competed by the wild-type competitor
(not shown). C, oligonucleotides (coding strand is shown
only) used in A and B, showing the T/C polymorphic residue at 299 (highlighted).
[View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]
The Two Major Binding Sites at the UIS and in the 5 -UT of the Bf
Gene Share Transcription Factors with the Apolipoprotein CIII Gene
Promoter
The binding specificity at the UIS and in the
5 -untranslated region of the Bf gene was assessed by competition with
a sequence of the apolipoprotein CIII gene that shows homologies with
the Bf sites and is known to interact with members of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily (42, 44, 45). Double-strand oligonucleotides were generated for the UIS ( 323/ 289) and 5 -UT (+36/+70) sites of Bf and for the CIIIB site ( 103/ 69) of the rat
apoCIII gene. These were used as probes and competitors in gel shift
analysis with mouse liver and HepG2 nuclear extracts (Fig.
4). All three probes showed specific interactions with
both extracts (Fig. 4A). With the mouse liver extract, the
two Bf sites did not compete with each other, but each was competed by
the CIIIB site. The CIIIB site was only partially competed by each of
the two Bf sites separately but completely competed when both Bf
sequences were added (Fig. 4B). The kidney nuclear extract showed identical results (not shown). With the HepG2 extract an additive effect of the Bf competitors on the CIIIB interactions was
also observed (Fig. 4B). As with the liver and kidney
extracts, the interaction with the UIS probe that was affected by the
T/C polymorphism at 299 was competed by the CIIIB site but not by the
5 -UT site (Fig. 4A).
Fig. 4.
Competition for binding between the DNA
elements at the UIS and in the 5 -UT region of the Bf gene and the
CIIIB site of the apoCIII promoter. A, gel shift analysis of
the interactions of the Bf UIS and 5 -UT elements and the CIIIB site of
the apoCIII gene with mouse liver and HepG2 nuclear proteins.
Competitions were performed with a 50- and 100-fold excess of the
indicated competitors. B, competition of the interactions at
the CIIIB site by the Bf UIS and 5 -UT binding elements added
separately (50-, 100-, and 200-fold excess) and together (50- and
100-fold excess of each) to the reactions with mouse liver (upper
part) and HepG2 (lower part) nuclear extracts. The six
control lanes on the left show the interactions on each
probe and competition with a 100-fold excess of the corresponding cold
probe (CP).
[View Larger Version of this Image (54K GIF file)]
The T/C Polymorphism at 299 Affects the Affinity of the UIS
Element for HNF-4
Sequence homologies and binding specificities
of the UIS and elements interacting with members of the steroid hormone
receptor superfamily and the tissue distribution of these factors led
us to analyze the interaction of HNF-4 with the binding site at the UIS. An HNF-4 transcript synthesized in vitro from a rat
cDNA clone (42) was translated in a reticulocyte lysate. The
interaction of the translation product with the UIS element was
assessed by gel shift analysis using as probe the high expressor
sequence ( 323/ 289) described above. The kinetics of translation
(Fig. 5A) and the dose response to
HNF-4-specific RNA input (Fig. 5B) show formation of a
complex between the UIS probe and cell-free translated HNF-4. The
complex with HNF-4 had the same mobility as the complex obtained with
the mouse nuclear extract, was not competed by the 5 -UT site, and was
competed by the CIIIB site of the apoCIII gene (Fig. 5C).
The substitution (T to C at 299) specific of the low expressor
sequence markedly reduced the HNF-4 interaction at the UIS as shown by
using the mutated probe and competitor (Fig. 5C, lanes
8 and 5, respectively). A complex of slightly higher
mobility with a protein already present in the lysate was also
detected.
Fig. 5.
Interaction of the UIS element with cell-free
translated HNF-4. A, the translation reaction in a rabbit
reticulocyte lysate programmed with 20 ng/µl of HNF-4 in
vitro transcript was stopped at different incubation times (from 0 to 120 min by 20-min increments) and assayed for binding to the Bf UIS
oligonucleotide probe by gel shift analysis. The arrowhead
shows the complex with cell-free translated HNF-4. B, the
translation reactions (60 min) were programmed with increasing
concentrations (0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 20 ng/µl) of HNF-4 transcript
and analyzed as in A. C, competition for HNF-4
binding at the UIS by a 50-fold excess of wild-type (W) and
mutant (M) cold probe (see Fig. 3A) and 5 -UT and
CIIIB competitors. L, liver extract as control.
D, analysis of HNF-4 in vitro transcript
(lane 2) in agarose denaturing gel. Lane 1, mouse
liver RNA.
[View Larger Version of this Image (39K GIF file)]
The complex formed on the UIS probe with the mouse liver nuclear
extract was recognized by an HNF-4-specific antiserum (42), as assessed
by supershift analysis (Fig. 6A). The
specificity of the supershift complex is indicated by the lack of such
supershift using a nonimmune serum, by the absence of direct
interaction between the antiserum and the probe, and by the identical
supershift pattern obtained with cell-free translated HNF-4. Similarly,
the complexes formed with the kidney and HepG2 nuclear extracts were recognized by the antiserum (Fig. 6B). The faster mobility
complex with the HepG2 extract was not shifted by the antibody.
Fig. 6.
Interaction of the UIS element with HNF-4
from nuclear extracts. A, gel shift analysis was performed
with the mouse liver nuclear extract in the presence of increasing
amounts (1:48, 1:12, and 1:3 dilutions) of HNF-4-specific antiserum (+)
or nonimmune serum (N). Controls without extract and with
cell-free translated HNF-4 are shown. B, HNF-4 supershift
analysis with liver, kidney, and HepG2 nuclear extracts.
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]
Strain-specific Transcriptional Activation of Bf-CAT Constructs by
Exogenous HNF-4 in Transfected CV-1 Cells
To confirm a functional
role for HNF-4 in strain-specific Bf transcription, we cotransfected
CV-1 cells, a monkey kidney-derived cell line that lacks endogenous
HNF-4 (46), with the aforementioned Bf-CAT constructs (Bf 5 sequences:
728 to +108 from the DIS) and an HNF-4 expression plasmid.
Cotransfection with HNF-4 increased Bf-CAT expression in a
dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7). At 0.1 µg
of HNF-4 plasmid input (and up to 0.6 µg, not shown), transcription from the high expressor Bf sequence was markedly greater than with the
low expressor. Most of this effect was accounted for by the mutation at
the UIS (T to C at 299) in a manner similar to that observed in
hepatoma cells HepG2 (Fig. 1), which express endogenous HNF-4. However,
at higher HNF-4 plasmid input, (4 µg), the T to C substitution had
little effect on Bf-CAT expression. On the other hand, expression
driven by the low expressor sequence was significantly less, even at
high HNF-4 input.
Fig. 7.
Effects of strain-specific Bf 5 -flanking
sequences on transcriptional activation of Bf-CAT expression by
exogenous HNF-4. CV-1 cells were cotransfected with the indicated
Bf-CAT construct (Fig. 1), 0.1 ( ) or 4 µg ( ) of the HNF-4
expression plasmid, or an equivalent amount of vector ( ) as control
and the - galactosidase expression plasmid (see "Materials and
Methods"). The relative CAT activity is normalized to the activity of
the pBfPL-CAT construct without HNF-4 and represents the average values
of two to five separate experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]
A Low Affinity Binding Site for HNF-4 in the Human Bf
Gene
The HNF-4 antibody supershift analyses described above show
that in the mouse genomic sequence, the cis element encompassing the
UIS interacts with both murine and human HNF-4. The high degree of
sequence homology between the 5 -flanking regions of the human and
murine Bf genes (12), particularly in the sequence surrounding the UIS,
raises the question whether HNF-4 also interacts with the corresponding
human sequence. In the human sequence, the residue corresponding to the
position of the T/C polymorphism that affects HNF-4 binding in mice
( 299 in the mouse, 297 in the human) is a cytosine (Fig.
8C) as in the low expressor strains. To
compare the DNA-protein interactions between the murine and human
sequences, we used the mouse UIS probe described above ( 323/ 289,
high expressor sequence) and its human counterpart ( 321/ 287) in gel
shift analysis. With the mouse liver and kidney and HepG2 nuclear
extracts, the two probes formed complexes of same mobility and competed
with each other, although the interaction with the human sequence was markedly weaker in all cases (Fig. 8A). As for the mouse,
the interaction of the human probe with the mouse liver and HepG2 extracts was dramatically increased by a C to T substitution at 297
(Fig. 8B, lanes 1 and 2, and
lanes 4 and 5). The resulting complex was
competed by the mouse sequence (high expressor) (lane 3) and
recognized by the HNF-4 antiserum (lane 6). Furthermore, the
mutated human probe formed a complex with cell-free translated HNF-4
(lane 8).
Fig. 8.
Comparison between the UIS and the
corresponding sequence of the human gene for HNF-4 binding.
A, interactions with mouse liver and kidney and HepG2
nuclear proteins and competition between the human (h) and
mouse (m) sequences. B, C to T substitution at
297 in the human sequence increases HNF-4 binding. Gel shift analysis
with the wild-type (lanes 1 and 4) and mutated
(lanes 2, 3, and 5-8) human probes
was performed with mouse liver (lanes 1-3) and HepG2
(lanes 4-7) nuclear extracts and cell-free translated HNF-4
(lane 8) alone or in the presence of mouse competitor
(lane 3), HNF-4 antiserum (lane 6), or nonimmune
serum (lane 7). C, oligonucleotides used in
A and B and comparison between the murine (high
expressor) and human sequences; the polymorphic residue at 299 in
mice and the corresponding residue in humans are
highlighted.
[View Larger Version of this Image (66K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
We previously reported that differences in extrahepatic
levels of factor B mRNA among mouse strains correlate with a
DNA sequence polymorphism in the 5 region of the Bf gene and with
binding of nuclear protein(s) expressed in liver and kidney (28). In the present study, we show that this polymorphism similarly affects the
expression of a reporter gene in vitro (i.e. is
of functional importance) and that the functional difference is
primarily accounted for by a point substitution near the Bf upstream
transcriptional initiation site that also markedly affects the affinity
of a binding site for HNF-4 and transcriptional activation by HNF-4.
The remaining differences between transcriptional activities of high
and low expressor sequences (including a difference in the upstream
promoter activity) originate from other polymorphic differences within this region.
In vivo Bf expression varies among various mouse strains
particularly in extrahepatic sites, but only minimal differences in
hepatic expression have been observed (17, 18, 28). The functional
analysis of the murine Bf promoter was initially undertaken by
transfecting Bf reporter (CAT) constructs into the well differentiated human hepatoma HepG2. Surprisingly, expression of Bf-CAT in HepG2 reflected more closely the in vivo pattern of Bf expression
in extrahepatic, not in hepatic tissues. Several possible explanations for this finding were considered. (a) A species difference
was ruled out by results similar to that in HepG2 when the chimeric constructs were transfected into a murine hepatoma (Hepa1-6) cell line. (b) The possibility that contiguous sequences outside
of the minimal promoter region imposed tissue specificity was ruled out
by transfecting several constructs extending as far as 6.7 kb upstream,
which yielded differences in expression that also correlated with
strain differences in extrahepatic Bf expression. (c) Finally, the possibility was considered that the HNF-4
protein content of the indicator cells may reflect more the in
vivo extrahepatic than hepatic tissues. To test this, a cell line
that does not express HNF-4 (CV-1) (46) was cotransfected with the
Bf-CAT constructs and varying amounts of plasmid expressing HNF-4. This suggested that the differential effect of sequence polymorphism within
the Bf promoter was functionally of most importance at moderate HNF-4
levels and that at high HNF-4 input (e.g. in liver) even low
affinity binding sites are capable of interacting with HNF-4 and
driving transcription of Bf (see Fig. 7). These data reemphasize that
although well differentiated hepatoma cell lines are quite useful, they
differ from hepatocytes in important ways.
In this study, we localized the Bf upstream promoter within a
272-bp DNA segment encompassing the interleukin-1-responsive element
for Bf and the polyadenylation site of the C2 gene (12, 26, 30). This
upstream, TATA-less promoter does not correspond to the sequence
requirements for transcriptional initiator activity (47, 48) (except
for A at +1 and T at +3). Substitutions in the region of the upstream
transcription start site of the low expressor strains markedly reduce
the upstream promoter activity in vitro, consistent with the
low extrahepatic expression of the long Bf mRNA observed in these
strains in vivo (28). One of these substitutions is located
between two imperfect half-palindromes (CAGGAAGG and CCTTGCTG) at 25
from the UIS. The sequence surrounding 30 has been shown to be
important for transcriptional initiation, even in TATA-less promoters
(49). The substitution of T to C in the HNF-4 site alone does not
significantly affect the upstream promoter activity in transfected
HepG2 cells. However, the interaction of HNF-4 at a transcriptional
start site is unusual and suggests a possible role in the enhancement
of the upstream promoter activity in conditions, like those prevailing
in the kidney, that differ from HepG2. Although it has not been
documented for HNF-4, several members of the steroid hormone receptor
superfamily, including orphan members like COUP-TF (chicken ovalbumin
upstream promoter transcription factor) (50) and ARP-1 (51), are able
to directly interact with the general transcription factor,
transcription factor IIB. This has been interpreted as facilitating the
assembly of the preinitiation complex. If transcription factor IIB can also interact with HNF-4, the HNF-4 binding site at the UIS could conceivably substitute for the apparent lack of TATA and initiator elements in the upstream Bf promoter.
The sequence surrounding the UIS consists of two 6-bp palindromic
repeats (GATGGA and TCCATC, which are parts of a larger imperfect
palindrome) separated by a 6-bp spacer containing a typical CTTTG motif
found in HNF-4 binding sites of other genes (45, 52, 53). Palindromic
sequences are also found in some of these sites (52, 53). The consensus
sequence for HNF-4 binding is not clearly established yet, due to the
high sequence variability among the known HNF-4 binding sites,
variability in their affinity for HNF-4, and in most cases their
ability to interact with other proteins. Mutations within the CTTTG
motif invariably disrupt the site and decrease transcription (52, 54, 55, and this work). In the human blood coagulation factor IX gene, a
substitution of the second T of the spacer (as in the mouse Bf gene)
leads to developmentally determined factor IX deficiency and hemophilia B Leyden (55). In the Bf upstream promoter, at this position the
double-strand substitution or single-strand substitution in the
noncoding strand, but not in the coding strand alone, affects HNF-4
binding. The fact that a mismatch even at a critical position for
binding does not impair the interaction suggests that in the complex
with HNF-4 the two DNA strands may be locally dissociated. A strand
separation at the upstream transcription start site, stabilized by
intrachain associations between the half-palindromes and perhaps by the
HNF-4 interaction, could facilitate promoter melting and hence
transcription.
The high sequence homology between the human and mouse Bf 5 -flanking
regions (12) led us to identify an HNF-4 binding site in the human gene
at a position equivalent to that of the mouse sequence. A genomic DNA
segment containing this site has been shown to function as a typical
constitutive, cell-specific enhancer for human Bf transcription (13).
This region, which is also important for transcriptional termination of
the C2 gene, includes a binding site for the myc-associated
zinc finger protein (56) and a 100-bp sequence further downstream
(encompassing the HNF-4 site); both are required for accurate C2
transcriptional termination (56, 57). Identification of DNA/protein
interactions in this region is therefore important for further
functional analyses of the C2-Bf intergenic region. The interaction
between HNF-4 and the human sequence is, however, relatively weak, due
to a cytosine at 297, which in the mouse sequence characterizes the binding site of the low expressor strains. However, as discussed above,
a weak interaction may not preclude but rather restrict HNF-4-regulated
expression of the human Bf gene to tissues such as the liver, where
HNF-4 is abundant. This should prompt a search for polymorphism in the
human sequence as well.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants AI24836, HD17461, and AI24739. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Dept. of Pediatrics,
Washington University School of Medicine, One Children's Place, St.
Louis, MO 63110. Tel.: 314-454-2129; Fax: 314-454-2476.
1
The abbreviations used are: Bf, factor B; CAT,
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; MHC, major histocompatibility
complex; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase pair(s); DIS, downstream
transcriptional initiation site; UIS, upstream transcriptional
initiation site; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; UT, untranslated;
HNF-4, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Drs. Frances M. Sladek and
James E. Darnell, Jr., for providing the HNF-4 antiserum and cDNA
clone and for helpful suggestions. We also thank Barbara Dickeson for
secretarial assistance.
REFERENCES
-
Rother, K., and Till, G. O.
(eds)
(1988)
The Complement System, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany
-
Praz, F., and Ruuth, E.
(1986)
J. Exp. Med.
163,
1349-1354
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Peters, M. G., Ambrus, J. L., Jr., Fauci, A. S., and Brown, E. J.
(1988)
J. Exp. Med.
168,
1225-1235
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ambrus, J. L., Jr., Chesky, L., Chused, T., Young, K. R., Jr., McFarland, P., August, A., and Brown, E. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
3702-3708
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gotze, O., Bianco, C., and Cohn, Z. A.
(1979)
J. Exp. Med.
149,
372-386
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hirani, S., Fair, D. S., Papin, R. A., and Sundsmo, J. S.
(1985)
Cell. Immunol.
92,
235-246
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hall, R. E., Blaese, R. M., Davis, A. E., III, Decker, J. M., Tack, B. F., Colten, H. R., and Muchmore, A. V.
(1982)
J. Exp. Med.
156,
834-843
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Leijh, P. C., van den Barselaar, M. T., Daha, M. R., and van Furth, R.
(1982)
J. Immunol.
129,
332-337
[Medline]
[Abstract]
-
Carroll, M. C., Campbell, R. D., Bentley, D. R., and Porter, R. R.
(1984)
Nature
307,
237-241
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chaplin, D. D., Woods, D. E., Whitehead, A. S., Goldberger, G., Colten, H. R., and Seidman, J. G.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
6947-6951
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Muller, U., Stephan, D., Philippsen, P., and Steinmetz, M.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
369-373
[Medline]
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nonaka, M., Gitlin, J. D., and Colten, H. R.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
89,
1-14
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wu, L. C., Morley, B. J., and Campbell, R. D.
(1987)
Cell
48,
331-342
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Alper, C. A., Raum, D., Awdeh, Z. L., Petersen, B. H., Taylor, P. D., and Starzl, T. E.
(1980)
Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol.
16,
84-89
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ramadori, G., Sipe, J. D., Dinarello, C. A., Mizel, S. B., and Colten, H. R.
(1985)
J. Exp. Med.
162,
930-942
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Morris, K. M., Aden, D. P., Knowles, B. B., and Colten, H. R.
(1982)
J. Clin. Invest.
70,
906-913
[Medline]
-
Falus, A., Beuscher, H. U., Auerbach, H. S., and Colten, H. R.
(1987)
J. Immunol.
138,
856-860
[Medline]
[Abstract]
-
Nonaka, M., Ishikawa, N., Passwell, J., Natsuume-Sakai, S., and Colten, H. R.
(1989)
J. Immunol.
142,
1377-1382
[Medline]
[Abstract]
-
Colten, H. R., and Strunk, R. C.
(1993)
in
Complement in Health and Disease (Whaley, K., Loos, M., and Weiler, J. M., eds), 2nd Ed., pp. 127-158, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Lancaster, UK
-
Naughton, M. A., Botto, M., Carter, M. J., Alexander, G. J. M., Goldman, J. M., and Walport, M. J.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
156,
3051-3056
[Medline]
[Abstract]
-
Strunk, R. C., Whitehead, A. S., and Cole, F. S.
(1985)
J. Clin. Invest.
76,
985-990
[Medline]
-
Katz, Y., and Strunk, R. C.
(1989)
J. Immunol.
142,
3862-3867
[Medline]
[Abstract]
-
Katz, Y., Revel, M., and Strunk, R. C.
(1989)
Eur. J. Immunol.
19,
983-988
[Medline]
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Strunk, R. C., Cole, F. S., Perlmutter, D. H., and Colten, H. R.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
15280-15285
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ramadori, G., Sipe, J. D., and Colten, H. R.
(1985)
J. Immunol.
135,
3645-3647
[Medline]
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ishikawa, N., Nonaka, M., Wetsel, R. A., and Colten, H. R.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
19040-19046
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Passwell, J., Schreiner, G. F., Nonaka, M., Beuscher, H. U., and Colten, H. R.
(1988)
J. Clin. Invest.
82,
1676-1684
[Medline]
-
Garnier, G., Ault, B., Kramer, M., and Colten, H. R.
(1992)
J. Exp. Med.
175,
471-479
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Garnier, G., Circolo, A., and Colten, H. R.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
3275-3282
[Medline]
[Abstract]
-
Nonaka, M., and Huang, Z. M.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
6283-6289
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Kawamura, N., Singer, L., Wetsel, R. A., and Colten, H. R.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
283,
705-712
[Medline]
-
Horton, R. M., Hunt, H. D., Ho, S. N., Pullen, J. K., and Pease, L. R.
(1989)
Gene (Amst.)
77,
61-68
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K., and Pease, L. R.
(1989)
Gene (Amst.)
77,
51-59
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Segal, S.
(1986)
in
Basic Methods in Molecular Biology (Davis, L. G., Dibner, J., and Battery, F., eds), p. 286, Elsevier Science Publishing Co, New York
-
Gorman, C. M., Moffat, L. F., and Howard, B. H.
(1982)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
1044-1051
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chirgwin, J. M., Przybyla, A. E., MacDonald, R. J., and Rutter, W. J.
(1979)
Biochemistry
18,
5294-5299
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gorski, K., Carneiro, M., and Schibler, U.
(1986)
Cell
47,
767-776
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Miskimins, W. K., Roberts, M. P., McClelland, A., and Ruddle, F. H.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
6741-6744
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dignam, J. D., Lebovitz, R. M., and Roeder, R. G.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
1475-1489
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reue, K., Leff, T., and Breslow, J. L.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6857-6864
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sladek, F. M., Zhong, W. M., Lai, E., and Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1990)
Genes & Dev.
4,
2353-2365
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Green, S., Issemann, I., and Sheer, E.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
369
[Medline]
[Free Full Text]
-
Mietus-Snyder, M., Sladek, F. M., Ginsburg, G. S., Kuo, C. F., Ladias, J. A., Darnell, J. E., Jr., and Karathanasis, S. K.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
1708-1718
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ladias, J. A. A., Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M., Kardassis, D., Cardot, P., Cheng, J., Zannis, V., and Cladaras, C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
15849-15860
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rottman, J. N., and Gordon, J. I.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
11994-12002
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Purnell, B. A., Emanuel, P. A., and Gilmour, D. S.
(1994)
Genes & Dev.
8,
830-842
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Javahery, R., Khachi, A., Lo, K., Zenzie-Gregory, B., and Smale, S. T.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
116-127
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wiley, S. R., Kraus, R. J., and Mertz, J. E.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
5814-5818
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ing, N. H., Beekman, J. M., Tsai, S. Y., Tsai, M.-J., and O'Malley, B. W.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17617-17623
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Malik, S., and Karathanasis, S.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
1536-1543
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reijnen, M. J., Sladek, F. M., Bertina, R. M., and Reitsma, P. H.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6300-6303
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kuo, C. J., Conley, P. B., Chen, L., Sladek, F. M., Darnell, J. E., Jr., and Crabtree, G. R.
(1992)
Nature
355,
457-461
[Medline]
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ogami, K., Hadzopoulou-Cladaras, M., Cladaras, C., and Zannis, V. I.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
9808-9815
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reijnen, M. J., Peerlinck, K., Maasdam, D., Bertina, R. M., and Reitsma, P. H.
(1993)
Blood
82,
151-158
[Medline]
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ashfield, R., Patel, A. J., Bossone, S. A., Brown, H., Campbell, R. D., Marcu, K. B., and Proudfoot, N. J.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
5656-5667
[Medline]
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ashfield, R., Enriquez-Harris, P., and Proudfoot, N. J.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
4197-4207
[Medline]
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Gubbels, T. N. Jorgensen, T. E. Metzger, K. Menze, H. Steele, S. A. Flannery, S. J. Rozzo, and B. L. Kotzin
Effects of MHC and Gender on Lupus-Like Autoimmunity in Nba2 Congenic Mice
J. Immunol.,
November 1, 2005;
175(9):
6190 - 6196.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Watanabe, G. Garnier, A. Circolo, R. A. Wetsel, P. Ruiz, V. M. Holers, S. A. Boackle, H. R. Colten, and G. S. Gilkeson
Modulation of Renal Disease in MRL/lpr Mice Genetically Deficient in the Alternative Complement Pathway Factor B
J. Immunol.,
January 15, 2000;
164(2):
786 - 794.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Krivan and W. W. Wasserman
A Predictive Model for Regulatory Sequences Directing Liver-Specific Transcription
Genome Res.,
September 1, 2001;
11(9):
1559 - 1566.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|