Volume 271, Number 50,
Issue of December 13, 1996
pp. 32474-32481
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Functional Interaction of Src Family Kinases with the
Acetylcholine Receptor in C2 Myotubes*
(Received for publication, August 6, 1996, and in revised form, September 23, 1996)
Christian
Fuhrer
¶ and
Zach W.
Hall
From the Department of Physiology, University of California, San
Francisco, California 94143 and the Section on Synaptic Mechanisms,
Laboratory of Cell Biology, National Institute of Mental Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Note Added in Proof
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Tyrosine phosphorylation of the
subunit of
the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) has been postulated to play a role in
AChR clustering during development of the neuromuscular junction. We have investigated the mechanism of this phosphorylation in mammalian C2
myotubes and report that the tyrosine kinase Src binds and phosphorylates glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins
containing the N-terminal half of the cytoplasmic loop of the
subunit. No binding occurs to the related kinases Fyn or Yes or to the corresponding regions from the
and
subunits. Furthermore, AChRs
affinity-isolated from C2 myotubes using
-bungarotoxin-Sepharose were specifically associated with Src and Fyn and had
tyrosine-phosphorylated
subunits. We suggest that AChRs are
initially phosphorylated by Src and subsequently bind Fyn in a
phosphotyrosine-dependent manner. These interactions are
likely to play an important role in construction of the specialized
postsynaptic membrane during synaptogenesis.
INTRODUCTION
Protein-tyrosine phosphorylation is a widely used mechanism for
regulating cellular functions, particularly those involving growth or
differentiation factors. Several protein-tyrosine kinases are highly
expressed in brain (1, 2, 3) and are associated with synaptic structures
(4), suggesting that they play a general role in synaptic function. At
the neuromuscular junction and at its homologous synapse in the
electric organ of Torpedo, tyrosine phosphorylation appears
to be important for regulating both the function and the distribution
of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR)1 during development (5, 6).
The AChR is a ligand-gated ion channel with a pseudosymmetric
pentameric structure consisting of four homologous subunits in the
ratio
2

. Each subunit traverses the membrane
four times, with a long, cytoplasmic loop between transmembrane domains
3 and 4 (7, 8). In the Torpedo AChR, a single conserved
tyrosine residue in the cytoplasmic loop of each of the
,
,
and
subunits is phosphorylated by a kinase activity in the
postsynaptic membrane (9). In this tissue, two members of the Src
family of tyrosine kinases, Fyn and Fyk, account for a substantial
fraction of the total tyrosine kinase activity and have been shown in
immunoprecipitation experiments to be associated with
tyrosine-phosphorylated AChRs (10, 11). Phosphorylation of the AChR
subunits is accompanied by an increase in the rate of rapid
desensitization of the receptor by cholinergic ligands, a change that
is also produced by phosphorylation of the receptor on serine residues
(12, 13).
Tyrosine phosphorylation of the AChR appears to play an important role
in synaptogenesis. At the mammalian neuromuscular junction, tyrosine
phosphorylation in the postsynaptic membrane, possibly of the AChR,
increases during the late, post-natal stage of synaptic maturation
(14). Tyrosine phosphorylation of the AChR may also be related to one
of the earliest steps in synapse formation, the clustering of AChRs in
the postsynaptic membrane underlying the nerve terminal (5). Studies on
the development of the chick neuromuscular synapse have shown that the
earliest detectable AChR clusters in vivo contain
phosphotyrosine and that in vitro AChR clustering and
phosphotyrosine co-staining in chick myotubes depend on innervation by
co-cultured neurons (15). Both in nerve-muscle cultures and in
vivo, the aggregation of AChRs at the nascent neuromuscular
junction is caused by agrin released from motor nerves (16, 17). The
addition of agrin to cultured myotubes induces both widespread AChR
cluster formation and tyrosine phosphorylation of the AChR (15, 18,
19). In mammalian muscle, this phosphorylation, which is specific for
the
subunit of the receptor, reaches a peak in 1 h and
precedes AChR clustering (20). The kinase inhibitors herbimycin A and
staurosporine block both AChR phosphorylation and AChR clustering (20,
21). A receptor tyrosine kinase, MuSK, which is localized to synapses
in adult muscle, appears to be part of the signaling receptor for agrin
(22). Activation of MuSK also results in tyrosine phosphorylation of
the AChR (23, 24).
The protein-tyrosine kinase or kinases that are responsible for
phosphorylating the AChR in mammalian muscle cells are unknown. We
report here experiments to identify the kinase(s) responsible for
tyrosine phosphorylation of the AChR and to examine the interaction of
Src family kinases with the AChR in mammalian muscle. Our results show
that Src from C2 myotubes selectively binds to fusion proteins derived
from the long, intracellular loop of the AChR
subunit; by
immunodepletion and in vitro phosphorylation we find that
bound Src phosphorylates the fusion proteins. We also show that AChRs isolated from C2 myotubes are tyrosine-phosphorylated on their
subunits and are associated with two members of the Src family, Fyn and
Src. We describe a model for the interaction between the AChR and the
Src family members and suggest that these kinases are likely to play a
role in the construction of a postsynaptic complex and immobilization
of the AChR at developing synapses.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Generation of GST Fusion Proteins
Glutathione
S-transferase fusion proteins containing segments of the
long cytoplasmic loop of the AChR subunits were generated using
cDNAs encoding the
,
, and
subunits of the mouse muscle nicotinic AChR in the vector pSM (25) as templates. AChR segments were
amplified using the polymerase chain reaction in combination with
oligonucleotides that bordered the domains of interest and were
designed to create a 5
BamHI and a 3
EcoRI
restriction site. Amplified DNA segments were isolated, digested with
BamHI and EcoRI, and ligated into pGEX-2T vectors
(Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) cleaved with the same enzymes. Polymerase
chain reaction-amplified DNA inserts were control sequenced using a
commercially available dideoxy sequencing kit from U.S. Biochemical
Corp. In the resulting fusion proteins, the AChR segments are fused to
the C terminus of GST. DNA constructs were used to transform E. coli HB101. Large scale cultures were grown, induced with
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside, sonicated on ice,
and the GST fusion proteins purified on glutathione-Sepharose beads
(26) and stored coupled to the beads at 4 °C. The concentration of
the fusion proteins was estimated by SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), protein staining with Coomassie Blue
(Sigma), and comparison to a bovine serum albumin
standard (Pierce). The following fusion proteins were prepared (see
also Fig. 2; numbers indicate positions of amino acids within the
full-length subunits including the N-terminal signal sequence):
A,9,10,B (
subunit, amino acids 333-469);
A,9,10 (
subunit, amino acids 333-455);
A,9 (
subunit, amino acids
333-405);
9 (
subunit, amino acids 349-405);
9,10 (
subunit, amino acids 349-455);
10 (
subunit, amino acids 406-455);
9 (
subunit, amino acids 346-417);
9 (
subunit, amino acids 353-420). The amino acid sequence (N to C terminus) of the
exon 9 region in the
9 fusion protein is
IFIHKLPPYLGLKRPKPERDQLPEPHHSLSPRSGWGRGTDEYFIRKPPSDFLFPKLN. The
corresponding sequence of
9 is
LFLRLRPQLLRMHVRPLAPAAVQDARFRLQNGSSSGWPIMAREEGDLCLPRSELLFRQRQRNGLVQAVLEKL, and the homologous sequence of
9 is
FFLETLPKLLHMSRPAEEDPGPRALIRRSSSLGYICKAEEYFSLKSRSDLMFEKQSERHGLARRLTTA.
Fig. 2.
Sequences of AChR cytoplasmic portion
constructs. A, general transmembrane organization of the
AChR
,
, and
subunits. The long loop between transmembrane
domains 3 and 4 accounts for most of the cytoplasmic portion of the
subunits. B, GST constructs derived from the mouse
,
,
and
cytoplasmic loops. Intron/exon boundaries were previously
determined for the mouse
, human, and chicken
, and chicken
subunits (31, 54, 55). The scheme at the top represents the
loop of the
subunit and shows that most of this domain is encoded
by two exons, exon 9 and exon 10. Two short flanking regions, termed A
and B, account for the rest. Numbers refer to the position
of amino acids within the uncleaved mouse
subunit including the
N-terminal signal sequence. As the amino acid sequences surrounding the
exon/exon boundaries are highly conserved between species, we designed
9 and
9 constructs according to the human and chicken genomic
structures. Tyrosine residues are highlighted and names of
constructs are as indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
Cell Culture
C2C12 mouse muscle cells were cultured on 10- or 15-cm plastic dishes (Nunc) as described previously (27). All cell
culture reagents were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Cells were propagated at low density in growth medium consisting of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 4.5 g/liter D-glucose
supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum, 0.5% chick embryo extract,
2 mM glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin. Cultures at
about 90% confluence were induced to form myotubes by changing the
medium to differentiation medium consisting of Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium containing 5% horse serum and 2 mM
glutamine. Fusion of myoblasts to generate myotubes was evident after 1 day, and contracting myotubes were usually observed after 2 days by
which time the cultures were used for experiments.
Kinase Binding Assays and Kinase Expression
Myotubes grown
on 10-cm dishes were rinsed at 4 °C with phosphate-buffered saline
supplemented with 1 mM sodium orthovanadate and 50 mM NaF and extracted in 1 ml of lysis buffer containing 1%
Nonidet P-40, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM
triethanolamine, pH 7.6, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM EDTA,
50 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and protease inhibitors (1 mM benzamidine, 1 mM
N-ethylmaleimide, 1 mM sodium tetrathionate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 25 µg/ml aprotinin, and
25 µg/ml leupeptin). Insoluble material, such as nuclei and
extracellular matrix, was removed by centrifugation at 18,000 × g for 5 min. To analyze binding of fusion proteins to
Src-related kinases, lysates were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with 2 or 5 µg of fusion proteins adhering to glutathione-Sepharose beads. Beads were then washed twice in wash buffer 1 (0.4% Nonidet P-40, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM triethanolamine, pH
7.6, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM
sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride),
twice in wash buffer 2 (same as 1, but containing 150 mM
NaCl), and boiled in SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Samples were analyzed by
reducing SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using nitrocellulose (Micron Separations Inc.) and specific antibodies against Src (mouse
monoclonal, Oncogene Science Inc.), Fyn (rabbit polyclonal, Santa Cruz
Biotech), Yes (mouse monoclonal, Wako Chemicals), or with src-CT
antiserum (rabbit polyclonal, Santa Cruz Biotech). Immunoreactive bands were visualized with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Amersham Corp.). To
analyze expression of Src, Fyn, and Yes in total extracts of C2
myotubes, aliquots of cleared lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotting with the antibodies mentioned above. Alternatively, Src-related kinases were first immunoprecipitated with 1 µg of src-CT, Src, Fyn, and Yes antibodies followed by protein A- or protein
G-Sepharose. Precipitates were then analyzed by nonreducing SDS-PAGE
and immunoblotting with src-CT. To reprobe immunoblots, they were
stripped as described (20) using 200 mM glycine, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 2.5, for 20 min and then reprobed with antibodies against
GST (mouse monoclonal, Santa Cruz Biotech) to confirm that equal
amounts of fusion proteins were present in all samples. For some
experiments, a concentrated membrane fraction of C2 myotubes (18, 28)
was used for fusion protein adsorption. Briefly, myotubes grown on
15-cm dishes were homogenized in a lysis buffer without detergent,
centrifuged at 6000 × g to remove nuclei and unbroken
cells, and then centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min. The pelleted membranes were extracted in 200 µl of lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40 and centrifuged again at 100,000 × g for 30 min. The supernatant, consisting of concentrated C2
myotube membranes, was then analyzed as described above. Quantitation of ECL immunoblotting data was performed by scanning the films with a
computerized densitometer (Sierra Scientific) and using the NIH Image
1.54 software (National Institutes of Health).
In Vitro Phosphorylation and Kinase Depletion
To analyze
the capability of Src to phosphorylate bound
9 fusion proteins, C2
myotube extracts were first adsorbed with fusion protein beads as
mentioned above. Beads were then washed twice in kinase assay buffer
(20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C
with kinase assay buffer containing 3 mM ATP. Beads were
pelleted and boiled in SDS-PAGE sample buffer. To visualize tyrosine
phosphorylation, samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting
using an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, 4G10 (mouse monoclonal, UBI),
and ECL. For immuno-depletion of Src-related kinases, C2 extracts were
incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with src-CT or antibodies specific
for Src, Fyn, and Yes. Antibodies were removed by two rounds of
precipitation with protein A- or protein G-Sepharose. Depleted lysates
were then adsorbed with fusion proteins as described before. To analyze
the ability of purified Src kinase to phosphorylate the
9 fusion
protein, fusion proteins were first eluted from glutathione-Sepharose
using 5 mM reduced glutathione in 50 mM Tris,
pH 7.5, and 2 mM EDTA and dialyzed into the same buffer
lacking glutathione. 5 µg of fusion proteins were then incubated with
5 ng of baculovirus-expressed and purified Src kinase (a gift from Dr.
D. Morgan, University of California, San Francisco, CA) in a volume of
40 µl of phosphorylation buffer (0.5 µCi/µl
[
-32P]ATP, 10 µM ATP, 20 mM
Hepes, pH 7.4, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM
MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl) for 1-24 h at 4, 25, or
37 °C. Reactions were stopped by boiling in SDS-PAGE sample buffer
and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
autoradiography. For quantitation, the
9 protein bands (~34 kDa)
were excised from dried gels and analyzed by liquid scintillation
counting. As background we measured pieces of the gels not containing
any proteins. Comparison of the amount of incorporated 32P
with the amount of
9 fusion protein allowed us to calculate the
percentage of fusion proteins phosphorylated in the reactions.
Isolation of AChRs
To assay association of endogenous
Src-related kinases with the AChR in C2 myotubes, cells were grown and
lysed as mentioned above with the exception of Nonidet P-40 which was
replaced by digitonin in most experiments. The solubilized AChR was
isolated as described (20) by incubating the extracts with
-bungarotoxin (Sigma) conjugated to Sepharose beads
(Sigma). As a control for specificity, we added excess
(10 µM) free uncoupled
-bungarotoxin. Other control
samples were precipitated with uncoupled Sepharose beads. Precipitates
were washed as before and the proteins isolated on the beads eluted in
SDS-PAGE sample buffer, either by boiling or at room temperature.
Analysis by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with antibodies against
Src-related kinases was performed as mentioned. Stripped immunoblots
were reprobed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (4G10, in a few
experiments with PY20 (mouse monoclonal; Transduction Labs)). To reveal
the AChR, the blots were stripped and reprobed a second time using mAB
124 which recognizes the AChR
subunit (rat monoclonal; a kind gift
from Dr. J. Lindstrom, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia,
PA).
RESULTS
Expression of Src Family Kinases in C2 Myotubes
In our
initial experiments we examined C2 myotubes for the expression of three
prominent Src family kinase members, Src, Fyn, and Yes. In contrast to
other Src-related kinases that are restricted to particular cell types,
these kinases show a widespread tissue distribution and are thought to
be involved in a variety of cellular signal transduction pathways (29,
30). Extracts of C2 myotube cultures were immunoblotted with an
antiserum, src-CT, that recognizes a highly conserved sequence at the
extreme C terminus of all three kinases, and with antibodies specific
for each of the kinases (Fig. 1A). All three
kinases were found in the extracts. Each of the kinases was also
immunoprecipitated from C2 extracts as shown by immunoprecipitation
with the specific antisera followed by immunoblotting with src-CT (Fig.
1B). Thus each of the Src family members examined is present
in C2 myotubes and is recognized by src-CT in immunoblot assays.
Fig. 1.
Expression of Src-related kinases in C2
myotubes and characterization of kinase-specific antibodies.
A, C2 myotubes grown on 10-cm dishes were lysed in a buffer
containing 1% Nonidet P-40, and the indicated fractions of the
extracts were analyzed by reducing SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Nitrocellulose blots
were incubated with antibodies specific for Src, Fyn, or Yes or with an
antiserum, src-CT, that recognizes all three. Arrowheads
indicate the position of Src-related kinases. Under reducing
conditions, all three kinases show essentially the same mobility.
Src-CT and Fyn antibodies also react with unknown proteins of ~90 and
~100 kDa, respectively. B, C2 myotube extracts were
subjected to immunoprecipitation with 1 µg of the indicated antibodies followed by protein A- or protein G-Sepharose.
Immunoprecipitates (IP) were analyzed by nonreducing
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with src-CT. A fraction of the initial
lysate (L) was included for comparison. As src-CT and Fyn
antisera are both from rabbit, whereas anti-Src and Yes are mouse
monoclonal antibodies, immunoglobulin molecules (~150 kDa) and Ig
heavy chains (~50 kDa) appear in the first two lanes
(marked by asterisks). After immunoprecipitation and
analysis with nonreducing SDS-PAGE, Yes displays a slightly slower
mobility than Src or Fyn. All three kinases are recognized by src-CT
antiserum on immunoblots.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]
Fusion Proteins Containing the
Subunit Cytoplasmic
Loop
We then constructed GST fusion proteins containing all or
part of the cytoplasmic loop connecting transmembrane domains 3 and 4 of the
subunit of the mouse muscle AChR (Fig. 2).
The gene encoding the
subunit contains two exons, 9 and 10, that together encode most of the loop (31). The fusion protein
9 covers
exon 9, whereas the fusion proteins
10 and
9,10 contain the
products of exon 10 and both exon 9 and exon 10, respectively (Fig. 2).
The region encoded by exon 9, which is N-terminal, contains two
tyrosine residues. One of these (Tyr-390), which is conserved between
species, is phosphorylated in the AChR isolated from the Torpedo electric organ (9). Exon 10 encodes most of the
C-terminal half of the loop which contains a third tyrosine as well as
the amphipathic helix (32). As controls we made fusion proteins with
sequences from the cytoplasmic loops of the AChR
and
subunits
that correspond to the exon 9 region of the
subunit (
9 and
9
proteins). Whereas the
region lacks tyrosine residues, the
region contains two, one of which is homologous to Tyr-390 of the
subunit and is phosphorylated in the Torpedo AChR
(9).
The N-terminal Half of the AChR
Subunit Loop Specifically
Interacts with Src
To determine whether the
loop of the AChR
interacts with members of the Src family, Nonidet P-40 extracts of C2
myotubes were incubated with purified GST
fusion proteins adhering
to glutathione-Sepharose beads. Bound kinases were identified by elution of the beads with SDS buffer, followed by SDS-gel
electrophoresis and immunoblotting. Experiments with src-CT showed that
one or more Src family member(s) bound to fusion proteins containing the
subunit exon 9 region, but not to a fusion protein containing only
exon 10 (
10) nor to GST alone (Fig.
3A). Apparent differences in the extent of
binding to Src kinase(s) between
exon 9-containing fusion proteins
(Fig. 3A) were not reproducible over the course of several
experiments and may be related to variations in the folding efficiency
of the different fusion proteins. Binding to the
exon 9 region was
specific, however, as interactions with
10 or GST were not observed,
even when large amounts (20 µg) of fusion proteins and long
immunoblot exposure times were used. In control experiments, the
ability of the AChR
and
subunits to bind to Src-related kinases
was tested using the
9 and
9 fusion proteins (Fig.
3B). No binding was detected to the
9 region, consistent
with the absence of tyrosine residues. Surprisingly, the
9 region,
which contains two tyrosine residues, also failed to bind Src family
kinases. Together, these findings indicate that the exon 9 region of
the AChR
subunit specifically binds at least one kinase of the Src
family.
Fig. 3.
Fusion proteins containing the exon 9 region
of the
-cytoplasmic loop bind to a Src-related kinase(s).
Nonidet P-40 lysates from C2 myotubes were incubated for 2 h at
4 °C with either 2 or 5 µg of the indicated GST fusion proteins
attached to glutathione-Sepharose. Adsorptions were analyzed by
reducing SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting using src-CT antiserum
(upper panels). Nitrocellulose blots were stripped and
reprobed with an antibody against glutathione S-transferase to confirm that equal amounts of GST fusion proteins were present in
the relevant adsorptions (lower panels). A,
binding of constructs containing portions of the
-cytoplasmic loop
to Src-related kinase(s). Apparent differences in kinase binding
efficiencies varied between experiments. No binding was seen to
10
and GST. B, binding capabilities of
and
regions
homologous to the exon 9 region in
. Binding of Src-related
kinase(s) is only observed for
9 fusion proteins but not for the
homologous regions of
or
, even when 5 µg of fusion protein is
used. A fraction of the initial cell lysate was analyzed as a standard
(L). Lower molecular weight products in the lower
panels represent degradation products of the GST fusion proteins.
The arrowhead indicates Src-related kinases.
[View Larger Version of this Image (67K GIF file)]
To identify the specific kinase(s) involved, we analyzed the
adsorptions with antibodies specific for Src, Fyn, or Yes. Each antibody was also tested against the original C2 myotube lysate to
allow comparison of the results with different antisera. As shown in
Fig. 4,
9 and
9,10 fusion proteins bound Src, but
no binding was detected for Fyn or Yes.
10,
9, and
9 fusion
proteins failed to bind Src, Fyn, or Yes, confirming the specificity of the
9-Src interaction. For each kinase the efficiency of binding to
the
9 fusion protein was estimated by comparing the amount of kinase
bound with the total kinase content of the initial cell lysates as
measured by immunoblotting with the same antibody. With the
Src-specific antibody we estimate that under the conditions of our
experiments 5 µg of
9 fusion protein bound ~1.4% of the Src
initially present in the cell extracts. When more (15 µg) fusion
protein was incubated with a concentrated C2 membrane preparation instead of a total cell extract, this percentage was increased to about
15%. Using src-CT on immunoblots the comparable recovery values were
0.5 and 5% for 5 and 15 µg of
9 fusion protein in total extracts
and membrane preparations, respectively (data not shown). Together,
these studies indicate that the
exon 9 fusion protein specifically
binds to Src, but not to Fyn or Yes, and that the homologous regions
from the
and
subunits fail to bind to any of these three
kinases.
Fig. 4.
The exon 9 region of the
-cytoplasmic loop
specifically binds to the tyrosine kinase Src. C2 myotubes grown
on 10-cm dishes were lysed and adsorbed to 5 µg of fusion proteins as
described in the legend to Fig. 3. Kinases (arrowheads)
binding to the various fusion proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting
with src-CT and antibodies specific for Src, Fyn, and Yes. To normalize
for different antibody affinities, a constant fraction (0.25%) of the
initial lysate was included (L).
9 and
9,10 fusion
proteins bound to Src, but no comparable binding was observed to Fyn
and Yes. Densitometric quantitation of data revealed that 5 µg of
9 bound to and immobilized ~1.4% of Src initially present in the
cell extracts. Using src-CT to immunoblot, this value was
~0.5%.
[View Larger Version of this Image (61K GIF file)]
The Exon 9 Region of the AChR
Subunit Is Phosphorylated by
Src
To determine whether associated Src is able to phosphorylate
the
exon 9 region, we adsorbed C2 extracts with
9 fusion protein beads and subsequently incubated the washed and immobilized Src-
9 complex with ATP under phosphorylating conditions. Tyrosine
phosphorylation was monitored by immunoblotting with antibodies against
phosphotyrosine (Fig. 5). The
9 fusion protein showed
a low degree of reactivity with this antiserum, even in the absence of
incubation with ATP (Fig. 5A, lane 1). The same signal was
seen with the
9 fusion protein, which lacks tyrosine residues in its
AChR portion, and presumably represents nonspecific cross-reactivity of
phosphotyrosine antibodies with both bacterially expressed proteins.
Upon incubation of the
9 fusion protein with C2 extracts and
subsequently with ATP, two phosphorylated bands were observed, a
prominent band of ~34 kDa and a minor band of ~60 kDa (Fig.
5A, lane 2). Longer exposures of immunoblots revealed no
other bands. Based on their molecular weights and the results of
stripping and reprobing the blots with the appropriate antibodies (data
not shown), we identified the 34- and 60-kDa bands as the
9 fusion
protein and Src, respectively. When C2 extracts were adsorbed with
9
or with GST protein beads, followed by incubation with ATP, no specific
phosphotyrosine staining was observed (Fig. 5A, lanes 16 and
18). Furthermore, no phosphorylation was detected using
9
or
10 fusion proteins, but strong phosphorylation did occur when the
9,10 fusion protein was used (data not shown). Thus tyrosine
phosphorylation is specific for the
exon 9 region of fusion
proteins.
Fig. 5.
The exon 9 region of the
-cytoplasmic loop
is tyrosine-phosphorylated by Src. To determine whether bound Src
phosphorylates the
exon 9 region, in vitro tyrosine
phosphorylation of
9 adsorbates and the effect of kinase depletion
were analyzed. For kinase depletion, C2 myotube lysates were incubated
with 1 or 5 µg of src-CT, Src, Fyn, or Yes antisera (lanes
5-12). Antibodies with bound kinases were removed by two rounds
of precipitation with protein A- or protein G-Sepharose. In control
experiments, incubation with antibodies was omitted (lanes 1-4,
13-18). Depleted and control lysates were then incubated with 5 µg of
9,
9, or GST proteins as indicated. Adsorbates (except
lanes 1, 3, 15, and 17) were subjected to
in vitro phosphorylation with ATP. A, tyrosine
phosphorylation of fusion proteins and associated proteins was
visualized by reducing SDS-PAGE and anti-phosphotyrosine
immunoblotting. B, aliquots of control and depleted cell
lysates were analyzed by immunoblotting with specific antibodies
against Src, Fyn, and Yes (open arrowheads) to reveal the
degree of kinase depletion prior to adsorption with fusion proteins.
Phosphorylation and depletion assays show that
9 (but not
9 or
GST) and an interacting protein of ~60 kDa (Src; solid
arrowheads) become tyrosine-phosphorylated and that Src, but not
Fyn or Yes, accounts for most of this activity. Residual activity in
Src-depleted lysates is somewhat higher than after kinase removal with
src-CT. This difference may originate from src-CT antiserum
preferentially binding to the more exposed C terminus of kinase active
Src. Lanes 1 and 3 and 2 and
4 are duplicates. PAS and PGS, protein
A- and protein G-Sepharose, respectively. C, phosphorylation
of
9 by purified Src. Isolated Src kinase was incubated for 3 h
at 25 °C with 5 µg of
9, GST, or no substrate under
phosphorylating conditions including [
-32P]ATP.
Autoradiography reveals that
9 (~34 kDa) and Src (~60 kDa), but
not GST, become phosphorylated efficiently. D, time and
temperature dependence of Src-mediated
9 phosphorylation. Phosphorylated
9 protein bands were excised from SDS-polyacrylamide gels and quantitated by liquid scintillation counting. Phosphorylation reaches a plateau after about 5 h at 25 or 37 °C.
[View Larger Version of this Image (40K GIF file)]
To analyze whether this phosphorylation is carried out specifically by
bound Src, we immuno-depleted the C2 lysates with Src-specific antibodies prior to adsorption. Phosphorylation of the
9 fusion protein and Src was drastically reduced by depletion with either Src-specific antibodies or with src-CT but was unchanged when antibodies against Fyn or Yes were used (Fig. 5A, lanes
5-12). Analysis of the depleted C2 lysates confirmed that each
antibody removed a substantial fraction of its corresponding kinase
without affecting the others (Fig. 5B). Src-CT removes all
kinases, including Src, to an intermediate degree, yet depletes the
phosphorylating activity slightly better than the Src-specific
antibody. This discrepancy may be due to preferential depletion by
src-CT of the enzymatically active form of Src in which its C terminus
is not engaged in an intramolecular SH2 domain interaction but is exposed and therefore more accessible for antibody recognition (33).
Together, these results show that the
exon 9 fusion protein is
phosphorylated by bound Src, and, as Src family kinases are known to
phosphorylate themselves, they suggest that phosphorylation of bound
Src is due to autophosphorylation. To confirm the ability of Src to
phosphorylate the
9 fusion protein, we incubated the fusion protein
with purified Src kinase and [
-32P]ATP.
Phosphorylation of the
9 fusion protein, but not the parental GST
protein, was observed (Fig. 5C). Phosphorylation was more efficient at 25 or 37 °C than at 4 °C (Fig. 5D); under
optimal conditions, 24 h at 25 °C, about 1% of the
9 fusion
protein was phosphorylated.
Src and Fyn Are Bound to the AChR in C2 Myotubes
To determine
whether Src interacts with the AChR in vivo as it does with
the
subunit fusion proteins in vitro, we examined the
AChR purified from muscle cells for associated Src family kinases. C2
myotube cultures were extracted with a mild detergent (1% digitonin or
Nonidet P-40) and the AChRs precipitated using
-bungarotoxin
conjugated to Sepharose beads. The beads were then stripped under
denaturing conditions and the proteins analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
immunoblotting. When immunoblots were probed with src-CT (Fig.
6A), a Src family kinase was observed. The
kinase was not observed when uncoupled Sepharose beads were used as a control nor when binding of the AChR to the beads was blocked by
preincubation of the receptor in the cell lysates with free toxin. Thus
the presence of the Src family kinase on the beads was dependent on its
association with the AChR. Accordingly, the Src kinase was seen on
immunoblots only when the AChR was also present, as observed by
stripping the blots and reprobing them with an antibody to the
subunit (Fig. 6C). In contrast, a contaminating src-CT
reactive band of ~90 kDa and unknown identity was isolated under all
conditions tested. Stripped immunoblots were also analyzed with
antibodies to phosphotyrosine. Two bands were consistently seen (Fig.
6B), a 50-kDa band whose mobility was identical to the
subunit of the AChR (Fig. 6C) and a 60-kDa band with the same mobility as the Src-related kinase seen with src-CT (Fig. 6A). A third band of ~110 kDa (Fig. 6B) was not
consistently observed. Tyrosine phosphorylation of certain proteins,
such as the
subunit of the AChR in chick, is reported to be
sensitive to degradation during boiling in SDS loading buffer (15).
However, we did not see additional phosphotyrosine bands specifically
precipitated by
-bungarotoxin-Sepharose beads, even when unboiled
samples were used and when immunoblots were analyzed with an
alternative phosphotyrosine antiserum (data not shown).
Fig. 6.
Specific co-isolation of a Src-related
kinase(s) with the AChR from C2 myotubes. C2 myotubes were lysed
in a buffer containing 1% digitonin. AChRs were isolated by an
incubation for 2 h at 4 °C with
-bungarotoxin conjugated to
Sepharose beads. As controls, we either added 10 µM
excess free toxin to the lysate to compete for AChR binding to
toxin-Sepharose, or we used nonconjugated Sepharose beads.
A, analysis of co-isolated Src-related kinase(s) was
performed by immunoblotting with src-CT. One or several kinases were
isolated in a specific manner with toxin-Sepharose beads (solid
arrowhead). The ~90-kDa src-CT-reactive, contaminating band
represented nonspecific binding as it was found in both control and
experimental samples. A fraction of the initial cell lysate was
analyzed as a control (L). B, the nitrocellulose
membrane was stripped and reprobed with an antibody recognizing
phosphotyrosine. C, a second reprobing of the same blot was
performed with antibody m124 reactive with the AChR
subunit. The
absence and presence of the
subunit (open arrowhead)
confirms that the AChR is specifically isolated with toxin-Sepharose.
In this experiment, the amount of the control lysate loaded
(L) was too small for the
subunit to be visualized with
m124 antiserum. Analysis shows that one or several Src-related kinases
are co-isolated with the AChR and that the kinase(s) and the
subunit of the AChR are tyrosine-phosphorylated. Similar results were
obtained when using Nonidet P-40 instead of digitonin as the
detergent.
[View Larger Version of this Image (45K GIF file)]
The identity of the Src-related kinase(s) associated with the AChR was
determined on immunoblots using the kinase-specific antibodies. As
shown in Fig. 7, two kinases were specifically co-isolated with the AChR, Fyn and Src; no detectable Yes was seen.
Under these conditions, the fraction of each kinase associated with the
AChR was small: approximately 0.04% of the total Fyn and 0.01% of the
total Src in the extract were recovered with the AChR from
-bungarotoxin-Sepharose. By comparing the amount of isolated AChR to
the receptor content of the initial lysate, on the other hand, we
estimate that we recover only about 4% of the total AChR in the
extract (data not shown). Therefore we calculate that in C2 myotubes
about 1% of the total Fyn and about 0.25% of the total Src are
associated with AChRs. Taken together these experiments show that the
AChRs in C2 myotubes contain tyrosine-phosphorylated
subunits and
are specifically associated with two tyrosine kinases of the Src
family, Src and Fyn.
Fig. 7.
AChRs from C2 myotubes are co-isolated with
the Src family kinases Src and Fyn. AChRs were isolated from C2
myotube lysates as described in the legend to Fig. 6, with the
exception of control isolations with nonconjugated Sepharose. Kinases
(arrowhead) were analyzed by specific immunoblotting. A
fraction (0.03%) of the initial lysate was included as a standard
(L). Quantitation of immunoblots shows that under these
conditions ~0.04% of Fyn and ~0.01% of Src present in the initial
lysate are recovered with toxin-Sepharose. In src-CT immunoblots this
value is ~0.02%. Replacing digitonin with Nonidet P-40 produced
similar results.
[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
We have investigated the mechanism by which the AChR becomes
tyrosine-phosphorylated in mammalian C2 myotubes and find that the
tyrosine kinase Src associates with, and phosphorylates, the region
encoded by exon 9 in the N-terminal half of the cytoplasmic loop of the
subunit of the AChR. In addition, AChRs isolated from C2 myotubes
were specifically associated with two Src-related kinases, Src and Fyn,
and the AChRs were found to have tyrosine-phosphorylated
subunits.
As judged by several criteria, binding of Src to GST fusion proteins
containing the
exon 9 region was specific. First, binding of Src to
this region occurred in a sequence-specific way. Binding was not
observed to fusion proteins containing only the C-terminal half of the
loop, encoded by exon 10, nor to GST protein lacking AChR segments.
Second, binding of
exon 9 fusion proteins specifically occurred to
Src, but not to Fyn or Yes, two other members of the Src family. Third,
the corresponding regions from the
and
subunits of the AChR,
although highly homologous to the exon 9 region of
, did not show
detectable binding to either Src, Fyn, or Yes. Fourth, and most
importantly, the
exon 9 region was a substrate for both purified
Src and for bound Src derived from muscle cell extracts. Moreover, as
the phosphorylation activity was abolished by immunodepletion of C2
lysates with Src-specific antibodies, Src appears to be the major, and
perhaps the only, tyrosine kinase in C2 myotubes that constitutively
recognizes, binds, and phosphorylates initially unphosphorylated
subunits of the AChR. Src-mediated phosphorylation of the
subunit
may involve Tyr-357 but is more likely to occur on Tyr-390; the
corresponding tyrosine of the Torpedo AChR is phosphorylated
and the flanking amino acids show features of consensus tyrosine
phosphorylation sites (34). Detailed analysis reveals that the residues
surrounding Tyr-390 resemble sites phosphorylated by receptor tyrosine
kinases more closely than motifs preferred by cytosolic kinases (34). Our observation that Src phosphorylates the
9 region, however, still
renders Tyr-390 a potential substrate for this kinase. Adsorption with
fusion proteins followed by phosphorylation revealed that the
exon
9-homologous regions of
and
fail to associate with tyrosine-phosphorylating activity (data not shown), which correlates with the inability of Src family kinases to bind to these regions. This
specificity is notable, because the AChR isolated from postsynaptic membranes of the Torpedo electric organ can be
tyrosine-phosphorylated in vitro at a high stoichiometry on
its
,
, and
subunits (9) and because the critical
and
tyrosine residues are conserved in the mouse AChR subunits. The
selective binding of the unphosphorylated
subunit, but not the
or
subunits, to Src, suggests that this interaction may be relevant
to AChR phosphorylation during synaptogenesis at the mammalian
neuromuscular junction.
As binding of the
exon 9 region to Src is not
phosphotyrosine-dependent, it does not appear to involve
the SH2 domain of Src. Apart from the catalytic region, Src contains
two other functional domains that could be responsible for binding to
the
exon 9 segment, its unique N-terminal domain and its SH3 domain
(29, 30, 33). The exon 9 region of
contains 10 prolines, whereas the corresponding
and
segments only show 5 and 4, respectively. However, since the proline residues in
are distributed throughout the exon 9 region and do not show the high proline density found in
typical polyproline-SH3 domain interactions (35, 36), we assume that
binding to
does not occur via the SH3 domain of Src. Binding may
rather involve the unique domain of Src, as the unique domains of
Src-related kinases have been shown to mediate constitutive binding to
a number of transmembrane receptors (29). For example, the unique
region of Lck is responsible for its association with CD4 (37), and
binding to components of the T- and B-cell receptors has been shown to
involve the unique domains of Fyn and Lyn (38, 39). Interestingly, to
our knowledge, no constitutive interactions have been described between
Src and transmembrane proteins lacking kinase activity, although Src is
well known to bind via its SH2 domain to activated, phosphorylated
receptor tyrosine kinases such as the platelet-derived growth factor
receptor (40). Our observed binding of Src to the
subunit of the
AChR may thus represent a class of Src interactions that is specific for differentiated post-mitotic cells such as myotubes. One possibility that we cannot exclude is that a third, ancillary protein mediates the
binding of Src to the
exon 9 region. If such a protein is involved,
however, it is not subject to tyrosine phosphorylation, as our assays
did not identify any phosphorylated proteins other than Src and the
fusion proteins.
None of the GST fusion proteins tested bound to Fyn or Yes, yet AChRs
isolated from C2 myotubes by
-bungarotoxin-Sepharose are associated
with Fyn as well as with Src. While we cannot exclude the possibility
that association of the AChR with Fyn involves one or several domains
of the receptor not covered by our fusion proteins, it seems most
likely that this association involves an interaction between the
tyrosine-phosphorylated AChR
subunit and the Fyn SH2 domain. This
inference is based on the observations that in C2 myotubes the
subunit of the AChR is tyrosine-phosphorylated (Fig. 6) and that in the
electric organ of Torpedo phosphorylated AChRs are
associated with the SH2 domains of two kinases of the Src family, Fyn
and Fyk (10, 11). In co-immunoprecipitation experiments, Fyn interacted
both with phosphorylated
and
subunits, whereas Fyk
preferentially interacted with phosphorylated
subunits. Expression
of Fyk, a Src-related kinase with homologies to Fyn and Yes, has not
been reported in organisms other than Torpedo. Furthermore,
in our precipitates with
-bungarotoxin-Sepharose, we failed to
detect tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins other than the AChR
subunit, Src, or Fyn. Together, these findings suggest that abundant
tyrosine phosphorylation of the AChR
subunit, as well as binding of
Fyk to phosphorylated
, may occur specifically in the electric organ
of Torpedo but not in mammalian muscle. In mammalian C2
myotubes, on the other hand, our findings suggest a model in which
newly synthesized, unphosphorylated AChRs are initially
tyrosine-phosphorylated by Src on their
subunits. The
phosphorylated
subunits may then interact with the SH2 domain of
Fyn. Src may remain bound to the
subunits to yield a
Fyn·Src·AChR complex or dissociate from the AChR prior to its
association with Fyn.
What is the functional significance of the association of the AChR with
Src and Fyn in C2 myotubes? The most likely hypothesis is that AChR
phosphorylation is related to clustering and immobilization of the AChR
in the myotube membrane. Phosphotyrosine labeling, as observed by
immunofluorescence, is concentrated both at the mature synapse and at
AChR clusters in developing myotubes (14, 15, 19). In addition, a
variety of physiological and nonphysiological stimuli that result in
AChR aggregation, including agrin, neuregulin, basic fibroblast growth
factor, polymer beads, and electric fields, appear to act through
mechanisms that involve protein-tyrosine kinase activation (18,
41, 42, 43, 44). A number of postsynaptic proteins such as
-dystroglycan,
syntrophin, paxillin, the 87-kDa protein, or dystrophin contain
tyrosine phosphorylation consensus sites or have been shown to be
tyrosine-phosphorylated in Torpedo electric organ (45, 46, 47, 48, 49).
In our experiments with unstimulated C2 myotubes, small but significant fractions of the total kinases present in C2 cells are associated with
the AChRs, ~1% of the total Fyn and ~0.25% of the total Src. Considering the high level of AChR expression in C2 myotubes, we thus
expect only a small proportion of surface AChRs to be associated with
Src and Fyn. C2 myotubes spontaneously form a small number of AChR
clusters (27), and the phosphorylated AChRs and those associated with
kinases could represent AChRs that are in the process of spontaneous
cluster formation. Such a mechanism could involve phosphorylation of
critical muscle proteins by AChR-associated Src and/or Fyn kinases and
subsequent immobilization of phosphorylated AChRs by protein-protein
recognition mediated by SH2 domain-phosphotyrosine interactions. In
agreement with this idea, immunofluorescence studies have shown that C2
myotubes contain some domains composed of coextensive aggregates of
phosphotyrosine and AChRs (19).
An important question raised by these experiments is whether Src and
Fyn are part of the agrin signaling pathway. A number of experimental
observations link tyrosine phosphorylation of the AChR with
agrin-induced clustering. After treatment with agrin, tyrosine
phosphorylation of the AChR occurs before AChR clustering, and
inhibitors that block tyrosine phosphorylation of the AChR also block
clustering (20, 21, 50). The agrin dose-response curve is the same for
both events, and the two are correlated under several different
conditions (20). Agrin has recently been shown to act via a receptor
tyrosine kinase, MuSK, which apparently acts as part of a receptor
complex involving other, unidentified proteins (23). Activation of MuSK
has been shown to result in both autophosphorylation and tyrosine
phosphorylation of the AChR (23, 24). Thus, although the intracellular
signaling pathway by which agrin induces AChR clustering is unknown, it appears to involve activation of protein-tyrosine kinases and tyrosine
phosphorylation, perhaps of the AChR itself.
A possible interpretation of the association of Fyn and Src with the
AChR in unstimulated cells and its relevance for agrin's signaling
pathway is suggested by consideration of other receptors. Several
signaling receptors that lack intrinsic tyrosine kinase activities,
such as cytokine (e.g. interleukin-2) and lymphocyte (e.g. T-cell and B-cell) receptors, are hetero-oligomeric
transmembrane proteins that constitutively associate with nonreceptor
tyrosine kinases of the Jak and Src family, respectively, before onset of signaling (51, 52, 53). Upon extracellular stimulation with ligand, the
cytoplasmic kinases associated with the receptors phosphorylate them,
thereby beginning the signaling cascade. In a similar way, activation
of the agrin receptor could, through as yet undefined steps, result in
phosphorylation of the AChR by bound Src or Fyn and in increased
association of the AChR with Fyn. This may then lead to phosphorylation
of other postsynaptic proteins and/or their association with the AChR.
Alternatively, tyrosine phosphorylation of the AChR may be unrelated to
the initial clustering events but rather to downstream events in the
pathway regulating AChR aggregation. Accordingly, the initial
clustering of AChRs, leading to formation of microclusters, could
itself result in activation of receptor-associated Src or Fyn. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the AChR might thus be related to enlargement and
stabilization of the clusters or to the recruitment of other proteins
to the aggregates. In any case, the elucidation of the signaling
pathways and the protein-protein interactions related to AChR
clustering is an important area of future research. Our experiments
indicate that Src and Fyn, associated with the AChR, are likely to play
important roles in these pathways.
FOOTNOTES
*
The work was supported in part by grants from the National
Institutes of Health and the Muscular Dystrophy Association and then
intramurally by the National Institute of Mental Health. The
experiments reported in this article were initiated at the Dept. of
Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, and completed at
the National Institutes of Health. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Supported by postdoctoral fellowships from the Swiss National
Science Foundation, the Ciba-Geigy Jubilaeumsstiftung, and the Human
Frontier Science Program.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Office of the Director,
NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 31, Rm. 8A52, 31 Center
Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892-2540. Tel.: 301-496-9746; Fax: 301-496-0296.
1
The abbreviations used are: AChR, acetylcholine
receptor; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PAGE,
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence;
PGS, protein G-Sepharose.
Note Added in Proof
Holmes et al. (Holmes, T. C.,
Fadool, D. A., Ren, R., and Levitan, I. B. (1996) Science,
in press) have found that the potassium channel, hKv1.5, is also
associated Src tyrosine kinase and that the channel is
tyrosine-phosphorylated. Regulation of ionic channel function via
interaction with Src may thus be a general phenomenon.
REFERENCES
-
Cotton, P. C., and Brugge, J. S.
(1983)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
3,
1157-1162
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sudol, M., and Hanafusa, H.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6,
2839-2846
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cooke, M. P., and Perlmutter, R. M.
(1989)
New Biol.
1,
66-74
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wagner, K. R., Mei, L., and Huganir, R. L.
(1991)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
1,
65-73
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
99121Hall, Z. W., and Sanes, J. R. (1993) Neuron 10, (suppl.) 99-121
-
Swope, S. L., Qu, Z., and Huganir, R. L.
(1995)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
757,
197-214
[Abstract]
-
Galzi, J. L., Revah, F., Bessis, A., and Changeux, J. P.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol.
31,
37-72
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chavez, R. A., and Hall, Z. W.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
385-393
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wagner, K., Edson, K., Heginbotham, L., Post, M., Huganir, R. L., and Czernik, A. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
23784-23789
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Swope, S. L., and Huganir, R. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
25152-25161
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Swope, S. L., and Huganir, R. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29817-29824
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Huganir, R. L., Delcour, A. H., Greengard, P., and Hess, G. P.
(1986)
Nature
321,
774-776
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hopfield, J. F., Tank, D. W., Greengard, P., and Huganir, R. L.
(1988)
Nature
336,
677-680
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Qu, Z., Moritz, E., and Huganir, R. L.
(1990)
Neuron
2,
367-378
-
Qu, Z., and Huganir, R. L.
(1994)
J. Neurosci.
14,
6834-6841
[Abstract]
-
Reist, N. E., Werle, M. J., and McMahan, U. J.
(1992)
Neuron
8,
865-868
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gautam, M., Noakes, P. G., Moscoso, L., Rupp, F., Scheller, R. H., Merlie, J. P., and Sanes, J. R.
(1996)
Cell
85,
525-535
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wallace, B. G., Qu, Z., and Huganir, R. L.
(1991)
Neuron
6,
869-878
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Meier, T., Perez, G. M., and Wallace, B. G.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
441-451
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ferns, M., Deiner, M., and Hall, Z.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
937-944
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wallace, B. G.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
661-668
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
DeChiara, T. M., Bowen, D. C., Valenzuela, D. M., Simmons, M. V., Poueymirou, W. T., Thomas, S., Kinetz, E., Compton, D. L., Rojas, E., Park, J. S., Smith, C., DiStefano, P. S., Glass, D. J., Burden, S. J., and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1996)
Cell
85,
501-512
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Glass, D. J., Bowen, D. C., Stitt, T. N., Radziejewski, C., Bruno, J., Ryan, T. E., Gies, D. R., Shah, S., Mattsson, K., Burden, S. J., DiStefano, P. S., Valenzuela, D. M., DeChiara, T. M., and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1996)
Cell
85,
513-523
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gillespie, S. K. H., Balasubramanian, S., Fung, E. T., and Huganir, R. L.
(1996)
Neuron
16,
953-962
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yu, X.-M., and Hall, Z. W.
(1994)
Mol. Pharmacol.
46,
964-969
[Abstract]
-
Smith, D. B., and Johnson, K. S.
(1988)
Gene (Amst.)
67,
31-40
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gordon, H., Lupa, M., Bowen, D., and Hall, Z.
(1993)
J. Neurosci.
13,
586-595
[Abstract]
-
Sugiyama, J., Bowen, D. C., and Hall, Z. W.
(1994)
Neuron
13,
103-115
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kefalas, P., Brown, T. R. P., and Brickell, P. M.
(1995)
Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.
27,
551-563
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Erpel, T., and Courtneidge, S. A.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
7,
176-182
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Buonanno, A., Mudd, J., and Merlie, J. P.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
7611-7616
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stroud, R. M., and Finer-Moore, J.
(1985)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
1,
317-351
[CrossRef]
-
Superti-Furga, G.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
369,
62-66
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Songyang, Z., Carraway, K. L., III, Eck, M. J., Harrison, S. C., Feldman, R. A., Mohammadi, M., Schlessinger, J., Hubbard, S. R., Smith, D. P., Eng, C., Lorenzo, M. J., Ponder, B. A. J., Mayer, B. J., and Cantley, L. C.
(1995)
Nature
373,
536-539
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yu, H., Chen, J. K., Feng, S., Dalgarno, D. C., Brauer, A. W., and Schreiber, S. L.
(1994)
Cell
76,
933-945
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pawson, T.
(1995)
Nature
373,
573-580
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shaw, A. S., Amrein, K. E., Hammond, C., Stern, D. F., Sefton, B. M., and Rose, J. K.
(1989)
Cell
59,
627-636
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Timson-Gauen, L. K., Tony Kong, A. N., Samelson, L. E., and Shaw, A. S.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
5438-5446
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pleiman, C. M., Abrams, C., Gauen, L. T., Bedzyk, W., Jonstra, J., Shaw, A. S., and Cambier, J. C.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
4268-4272
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Twamley-Stein, G. M., Pepperkok, R., Ansorge, W., and Courtneidge, S. A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
7696-7700
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Falls, D. L., Rosen, K. M., Corfas, G., Lane, W. S., and Fischbach, G. D.
(1993)
Cell
72,
801-815
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Peng, H. B., Baker, L. P., and Chen, Q.
(1991)
Neuron
6,
237-246
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Baker, L. P., Chen, Q., and Peng, H. B.
(1992)
J. Cell Sci.
102,
543-555
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Peng, H. B., Baker, L. P., and Dai, Z.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
197-204
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya, O., Ervasti, J. M., Leveille, C. J., Slaughter, C. A., Sernett, S. W., and Campbell, K. P.
(1992)
Nature
355,
696-702
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Adams, M. E., Butler, M. H., Dwyer, T. M., Peters, M. F., Murnane, A. A., and Froehner, S. C.
(1993)
Neuron
11,
531-540
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gumbiner, B. M.
(1993)
Neuron
11,
551-564
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wagner, K. R., Cohen, J. B., and Huganir, R. L.
(1993)
Neuron
10,
511-522
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wagner, K. R., and Huganir, R. L.
(1994)
J. Neurochem.
62,
1947-1952
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wallace, B. G.
(1992)
J. Neurobiol.
23,
592-604
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cambier, J. C., and Jensen, W. A.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Genet. & Dev.
4,
55-63
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Weiss, A., and Littman, D. R.
(1994)
Cell
76,
263-274