|
Volume 271, Number 51,
Issue of December 20, 1996
pp. 32825-32833
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Cryptic Antigenic Determinants on the Extracellular Pyruvate
Dehydrogenase Complex/Mimeotope Found in Primary Biliary
Cirrhosis
A PROBE BY AFFINITY MASS SPECTROMETRY*
(Received for publication, June 18, 1996, and in revised form, September 12, 1996)
Tai-Tung
Yip
§,
Judy
Van de Water
¶,
M. Eric
Gershwin
¶ ,
Ross L.
Coppel
and
T. William
Hutchens
From the Department of Food Science and Technology
and the ¶ Department of Rheumatology, Allergy and
Clinical Immunology, University of California Davis, School of
Medicine, Davis, California 95616, § Molecular Analytical
Systems, Davis, California 95616, and the Department of Microbiology,
Monash University, Victoria, Australia 3168
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Affinity mass spectrometry (AMS) was used to
evaluate the structural diversity of the E2 component of pyruvate
dehydrogenase complex (PDC) in normal and diseased liver cells,
including those from patients with the autoimmune disease primary
biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Two different antibodies to PDC-E2, the
immunodominant mitochondrial autoantigen in patients with PBC, were
used. AMS was performed directly on frozen liver sections
and purified bile duct epithelial cells. Mass spectrometric signals
associated with the molecular recognition of PBC-specific antigenic
determinants were enhanced by an in situ enzyme-linked
signal amplification process. Samples from patients with PBC gave
strong positive signals for the antigen(s) recognized by the monoclonal
antibody C355.1. Conversely, tissues from normal and disease controls
showed only a minimal signal. AMS was used to identify specific
antigenic determinants within the E2 component of PDC for comparison
with unknown antigenic determinants observed by affinity capture with C355.1 monoclonal antibody from PBC samples. PDC components bound to
C355.1 were mapped and identified by mass before dissociation from the
E2 component. A similar approach was used to identify unknown antigenic
determinants associated with PBC. We believe AMS may be an important
new approach with wide application to the identification of molecules
associated with a number of disease states.
INTRODUCTION
A multienzyme structure known as the pyruvate dehydrogenase
complex (PDC),1 common to both prokaryotic
and eukaryotic cells, has been characterized primarily to understand
its essential role in the maintenance of carbohydrate utilization.
Three different multimeric enzyme components are assembled, together
with regulatory components, to generate the highly regulated
function(s) of PDC.
Pyruvate dehydrogenase (E1) is a large (150 kDa) tetrameric
( 2 2) protein at the periphery of the
assembled PDC (1, 2). E1 is a highly regulated enzyme responsible for
the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvic acid and the reductive
acetylation of lipoic acid within the dihydrolipoamide acetyl
transferase complex (E2). Phosphorylation of E1 by E1-kinase (bound to
E2) and dephosphorylation by phospho-E1-phosphatase appears to be important in the regulatory process (3, 4). E2 is a macromolecular assembly of 60 identical (52 kDa) but highly segmented (four
"domain") proteins. A homodimer (51 kDa) known as
dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (E3) completes the PDC complex
(5).
The ability to evaluate more closely the molecular basis of PDC
function and its regulation improves continuously as subunit molecular
recognition events are clarified and specific binding domains
identified. E2 is thought by many to hold the key to understanding the
PDC self-assembly process, its final quaternary structure, and its
function (6). Several aspects of PDC-E2 structure remain elusive.
Monoclonal antibodies are becoming increasingly important in the
process of defining subunit composition, alterations in subunit composition, and conformational epitopes associated with functional capacity (7, 8). Recently, due to a growing awareness of the role of
PDC in a number of clinical disorders, there has been a concerted
effort to identify and define new antibodies to PDC. It is especially
important to identify antibodies capable of inhibiting PDC function
and, hopefully, antibodies capable of identifying the dysfunctional PDC
assembly. Thus, new approaches to the generation and characterization
of useful antibodies have been explored. Most recently, these included
the use of surface plasmon resonance to conduct competitive
(i.e. indirect) epitope mapping studies with libraries of
monoclonal antibodies (7, 8).
Structural information is needed beyond general knowledge of
operational molecular specificity. In the case of complex multimeric protein antigens, it has not always been possible, even with monoclonal antibodies, to verify by indirect means the identity of individual target antigens or specific epitopes. This is particularly true in
situations where antibodies must be used to investigate antigenic determinants that are limited in quantity. This issue is exacerbated in
cases where the antigenicity of target proteins must be evaluated in situ to determine possible contributions of local
environment on conformational epitopes and the differential
presentation of otherwise occluded (i.e. cryptic)
epitopes.
In this study, we have addressed an opportunity to compare more closely
the biochemistry and structural biology of normal PDC with that of an
abnormal, extracellular form of PDC (or molecular mimic). Specifically,
the structural diversity of PDC-E2 was investigated in human liver
collected from normal individuals and individuals with diseased livers,
including those with an autoimmune disease known as primary biliary
cirrhosis (PBC). PBC results from autoimmune-mediated destruction of
intrahepatic bile ducts with progressive inflammatory scarring (9). The
association of PBC with high titer autoantibodies to mitochondrial
antigens (AMA) has long been recognized and the possible significance
discussed (9, 10, 11). It is of considerable interest that the major AMA
activity is directed against PDC-E2.
We have previously reported the development and characterization of
several different murine monoclonal antibodies specific for PDC-E2
(10). These antibodies were found to recognize four different regions
of PDC-E2 when evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with
overlapping recombinant fragments (10). Each of the monoclonal
antibodies showed typical mitochondrial immunofluorescence on biliary
epithelium and on hepatocytes from patients with PBC, primary
sclerosing cholangitis, or hepatocarcinoma (12). However, one of the
eight antibodies (C355.1) showed greater intensity and specificity for
the apical region of biliary epithelial cells only from patients with
PBC. Similar results have also been obtained with affinity-purified
anti-PDC-E2 and combinatorial (13, 14, 15). Attempts to characterize this
antigen have failed for a variety of reasons, including the small
number and low viability of biliary epithelial cells in diseased
livers. There is a clear need for both enabling new technologies and
the implementation of alternative strategies to identify structural
variations in PDC-E2.
We have previously outlined new strategies for the enhanced detection
and structural characterization of biopolymers by laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (e.g.
Ref. 16). We demonstrated that laser desorption probe elements and the
necessary energy absorbing molecules can be much more defined and
independent of the empirical process imposed on them previously. Indeed, inert probe element "platforms" have been chemically and physically transformed (i.e. redesigned) at the molecular
level to become active participants in both the process of
analyte docking and the subsequent laser-induced desorption/ionization
process (16). Because of the unique involvement of the probe element surfaces in both the analyte adsorption and desorption process, surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) has been referred
to simply as affinity mass spectrometry (AMS). Affinity mass
spectrometry may be considered simply a solid phase mass spectrometric approach to molecular detection, the evaluation of
molecular recognition, and a wide variety of in situ
chemical and enzymatic reactions necessary for structural analyses.
We present here our use of SELDI in the AMS mode to detect and help
identify epitopes that distinguish normal PDC-E2 from what is
apparently an abnormal form of PDC-E2 or a mimeotope (17). We
demonstrate the ability to detect and map two important epitopes with
very low levels of purified PDC-E2. One of these epitopes, or a highly
reactive mimeotope, has also been detected at very low levels directly
within target tissues and cells. The apparent structural diversity of
"PDC-E2" observed in livers from patients with PBC is discussed in
the context of three competing hypotheses, including the existence of
conformation-dependent PDC-E2 epitopes, altered
presentation (i.e. cryptic) of PDC-E2 epitopes after
translocation to an extracellular location, and molecular mimicry. The
SELDI technology provides a very high level of sensitivity and an
opportunity to directly evaluate tissue sections, cells, or crude cell
lysates. We believe the strategy and capabilities demonstrated here
will find wide application in the study of other biomolecules present in trace quantities, especially those associated with disease states.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Clinical Specimens
Liver specimens were obtained from 9 patients with PBC, 3 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, 1 patient with -trypsin deficiency, and 2 patients with alcoholic
cirrhosis. The diagnosis of all patients was based on established
disease criteria and confirmed by histologic review by an independent
observer (18).
Preparation of Bile Duct Epithelial Cells
Biliary
epithelial cells were prepared as described (19). We used the region of
liver most likely to contain small intrahepatic ducts and ductules,
which are the primary target of disease, rather than the larger
interhepatic ducts. Approximately 30 g of liver was minced and
incubated with 1 mg/ml type 1A collagenase with agitation for 4 h
at 37 °C. The resulting mixture was washed four times with PBS, the
cells resuspended in 30 ml of PBS, layered onto 15 ml of Lymphoprep for
density gradient separation, and centrifuged at 2400 rpm for 25 min.
The cells at the differential density interphase were harvested and
washed three times with PBS. The washed cells were then incubated with
5 mg/ml HEA125 (epithelial cell-specific monoclonal antibody) for 30 min at 37 °C. After washing three times with PBS, 1 ml of washed
sheep anti-mouse IgG-Dynabeads (Dynal) in 7 ml of PBS were added to the
cells and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, followed by magnetic
separation (20).
Monoclonal Antibodies
We utilized a mouse monoclonal
antibody, termed C355.1, that is specific to PDC-E2 but produces a
distinctive staining pattern of biliary epithelial cells of patients
with PBC as well as a non-disease-specific PDC-E2 mAb, C150, as a
control. As an additional control, we used an irrelevant mAb (SAG-1)
throughout (10, 12). The characteristics of these mAbs have been
described in detail previously (10).
Surface-enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization (SELDI)
Time-of-flight (TOF) Mass Spectrometry
The generic use of this
methodology has been previously published in detail (16, 21, 22, 23).
Energy absorbing molecules such as sinapinic acid or
-cyano-4-OH-cinnamic acid were prepared in 60% acetonitrile/0.5%
trifluoroacetic acid. An aliquot of 1-2 µl was deposited on the
sample affinity captured on the probe (SEAC) device and allowed to air
dry. The resulting sample preparations were analyzed with either a
modified Hewlett Packard 1700XP laser desorption/ionization
time-of-flight or a Molecular Analytical System SELDI mass
spectrometer. The instruments were supplied with three-stage ion optic
assembly with a variable high voltage source (up to 30 kV potential)
and a 1.5-2.0-m flight pathlength. Laser pulses were generated from
either a nitrogen laser or a neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG)
laser. The nitrogen laser (model VSL 377 ND from Laser Science, Inc.,
Boston, MA) generates up to 300 mJ/pulse maximum output with a 3-ns
pulse width at a variable repetition rate of 0.2-5 Hz. The spot size is an ellipse with a long axis width of 180 mm and a short axis width
of 80 mm. The Nd:YAG laser (Lumonics, Livonia, MI or Continuum, Santa
Clara, CA) generates several (up to 90) mJ/pulse as output with a 3-ns
pulse (at a 0.03-3-mm2 spot size) width at a repetition
rate of 10-20 Hz. The spot size is an ellipse with a long axis width
of about 100 mm and a short axis width of about 50 mm. The laser
irradiance was adjusted real-time, while monitoring the process on an
oscilloscope or computer, in order to achieve optimum ion signal
(significant signal versus maximum resolution). Ion signals
were detected on the Hewlett Packard 1700XP using a secondary ion
generator with an array of microchannel plates; one N-type microchannel
plate followed by a high output technology (HOT) microchannel plate
manufactured by Galileo Electro-Optics Corp. (Sturbridge, MA). The
microchannel plates are held at a constant 1000 V and the secondary
ion generator was set for post acceleration with a potential of 5 kV.
The SELDI instrument from MAS uses a discrete dynode electron
multiplier (Hamamatsu Corp, Bridgewater, NJ) with microchannel plates,
and the signals were amplified using a fast pre-amplifier prior to being recorded by transient recorder capable of fast signal averaging. Data was captured with a 400-500 megasample/s digital oscilloscope with a 350 MHz bandwidth and analyzed on PC-based software. Spectra presented typically represent the average of 50-250 shots unless otherwise stated.
Affinity Mass Spectrometry to Demonstrate Specificity of
Monoclonal Antibodies
The antigen specificity of the monoclonal
antibodies C355.1 and C150 and the sensitivity of the AMS technique
with PDC was performed as follows. C150 or C355.1 monoclonal antibodies
were immobilized on Protein G-agarose beads according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). The pure PDC
antigen was prepared as described previously (18). An aliquot of PDC
was incubated with a slurry of beads bound to either C355.1 or C150 at
4 °C for 30-60 min. The beads were washed with 0.1% Tween 20 in
phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7, then with 50 mM ammonium
citrate, and, finally, with water. An aliquot of 0.5 µl of the beads
was added to the mass spectrometer probe element, followed by an
aliquot of 1 µl of sinapinic acid, and the mixture was allowed to
air-dry. The samples were analyzed with a mass spectrometer, and
averages from 250 laser shots were obtained from multiple spots on each sample. The sample of PDC affinity captured on monoclonal antibodies immobilized on Protein G-agarose beads were further washed with 3 M urea in phosphate-buffered saline, then with 50 mM ammonium citrate, and, finally, with water. An aliquot
of 0.5 µl of the beads was added to the mass spectrometer probe
element, an aliquot of 1 µl of sinapinic acid was added, and the
mixture was allowed to air-dry. The samples were analyzed with a mass
spectrometer, and averages from 250 laser shots were obtained from
multiple spots on each sample.
Detection Sensitivity of PDC-E2 by Affinity Mass Spectrometry
with Enzyme-linked Signal Amplification
Various amounts (from
0.5-50 fmol) of PDC-E2, prepared as described (24, 25), were
immobilized on a 96-well plate by incubating with shaking overnight at
37 °C in the presence of phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7. Each well
was probed with C150 or C355.1 monoclonal antibodies diluted in
phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7, by incubating with shaking at 25 °C
for 1-2 h. In another series of wells, 10 fmol of PDC-E2 was
immobilized and then probed with serial dilutions (100-18,000-fold) of
C150 or C355.1 mAb under the same conditions. The unbound antibodies
were washed away with 0.1% Tween 20 in phosphate-buffered saline, pH
7. Each well was then incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG antibody
conjugated to bovine intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Calbiochem, 1 mg/ml, diluted 5000-fold in phosphate buffered saline, pH 7). The wells
were washed with 0.1% Tween 20 in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7, then with 50 mM ammonium citrate, and finally with water. A
synthetic phosphopeptide, Gly-Leu-phosphoSer-Pro-Ala-Arg (680 Da,
prepared in TWH laboratory), in 50 mM ammonium carbonate, 0.05 mM MgCl2, pH 9.5, was added to monitor the
activity of bound alkaline phosphatase. The amount of dephosphorylated
peptide (600 Da) produced indicates the amount of antigen-specific
monoclonal antibodies bound to the immobilized enzyme sample. Nitrogen
laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry was used to detect both the substrate and product peptide with
-cyano-4-OH-cinnamic acid as the energy absorbing molecule.
Detection of Marker Protein(s) by Affinity Mass Spectrometry with
Enzyme-linked Signal Amplification
This was performed on both
frozen liver sections and isolated bile duct epithelial cells. Frozen
liver sections (8 µm thick) on glass coverslips were cut up into
approximately four 4-mm pieces. They were used either directly without
treatment or fixed with 95% methanol, 5% acetic acid to facilitate
handling. The purified bile duct epithelial (BDE) cells and the liver
tissue were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7. An aliquot of
5 µl of C150 or C355.1 monoclonal antibodies was added and allowed to
incubate at 25 °C in a moist chamber for 30-60 min. For the
controls, the cells or tissue were incubated with phosphate-buffered
saline only. The cells or tissue were washed with 3 M urea
in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7, then with 0.1% Tween 20 in
phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7. After washing with phosphate-buffered
saline, an aliquot of 5 µl of goat anti-mouse IgG antibodies
conjugated to bovine intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Calbiochem, 1 mg/ml, diluted 5000-fold in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7) was added
and allowed to incubate at 25 °C in a moist chamber for 30-60 min.
The cells or tissue were washed with 3 M urea in
phosphate-buffered saline, then with 0.1% Tween 20 in
phosphate-buffered saline, with 50 mM ammonium citrate, and
finally with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 7.8. An aliquot
of 5 µl of synthetic phosphopeptide (Gly-Leu-phosphoSer-Pro-Ala-Arg) in 50 mM ammonium carbonate, 0.05 mM
MgCl2, pH 9.5, was added and allowed to incubate at
25 °C in a moist chamber for various periods of time. For the liver
sections on glass coverslips, an aliquot of 2 µl of
-cyano-4-OH-cinnamic acid was added and allowed to air-dry. For the
BDE cells, after brief centrifugation to remove the cells, an aliquot
of 0.5 µl of the supernatant was mixed with an aliquot of 1 µl of
-cyano-4-OH-cinnamic acid on the mass spectrometer probe and allowed
to air-dry. The samples were analyzed with a mass spectrometer, and
averages from 250 laser shots were obtained from multiple spots on each
sample.
Affinity Mass Spectrometry to Demonstrate the Detection and
Identification of Previously Unknown Molecular Determinants of
PBC
C150 and C355.1 mAbs were immobilized separately on Affi-Prep
10 polymer beads according to the manufacturer's instructions (Bio-Rad). The PBC liver homogenate was prepared by homogenization in
PBS containing 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, pH 7.4. An aliquot of PBC liver homogenate was incubated with a slurry of either C355.1- or C150-bound beads at 4 °C for 18 h. The beads were washed with 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS, pH 7, then with 50 mM ammonium citrate, and, finally, with water. An aliquot of 0.5 µl of the beads was added to the mass spectrometer probe element, followed by an aliquot of 1 µl of sinapinic acid, and the
mixture was allowed to air-dry. The samples were analyzed with a mass
spectrometer, and averages from 250 laser shots were obtained from
multiple spots on each sample.
Biomolecule Detection and Quantitation in SELDI TOF Mass
Spectrometry
The mass spectra were analyzed by IBM-compatible
computers using the softwares HP MALDITOF (Hewlett Packard) and
GRAMS/386 (Galactic Industries Corp). The software evaluates the noise
of the base line relative to the peaks and automatically set peak detection factors such as data smoothing (noise filter or data bunching), minimum area and height reject thresholds, minimum detectable slope, fused/shoulder peaks detection, and grouped peaks
detection. Peak area was estimated by Gaussian fit. Normal statistical
protocols such as standard deviation and linear regression were used to
analyze the data.
RESULTS
Strategy for Detection of PBC Antigenic Determinants by Affinity
Mass Spectrometry with Enzyme-linked Signal Amplification
Fig.
1 shows the design and architecture of the laser
desorption SEAC probe of the biomolecular reagents necessary for the detection of PBC antigenic determinants. The presence of specific marker analyte, in this case either PDC-E2 or the PDC-E2-like PBC
antigen, is amplified by the coupled enzymatic conversion of substrate
to product directly in situ (i.e. on the probe
surface). SEAC probes of this type were used to demonstrate the
specificity and sensitivity of the C355.1 and control C150 mAbs. Fig.
2A shows the use of SEAC probes with
surface-immobilized PDC-E2 (three different PDC-E2 ligand densities)
used with SELDI in the AMS mode to model the recognition of membrane
bound PDC-E2 antigens with the C355.1 (PBC-specific) monoclonal
antibodies. Fig. 2B shows the use of these same SEAC probes
to compare the recognition affinity and specificity of C355.1 mAbs
(PBC-specific) and C150 mAbs (control) for the surface-immobilized
PDC-E2. The utility of AMS for quantitation of surface-immobilized
PDC-E2 with C355.1 and C150 mAbs was determined to be significant over
the background signal at 0.5 fmol of surface-immobilized antigen. The
product peak increased in intensity, with a corresponding decrease of substrate peak intensity when increasing amounts of surface-immobilized antigens were probed with the mAbs. Since the efficiency of
immobilization of femtomole quantities of PDC-E2 on a 96-well plate is
difficult to estimate, this represents only a semiquantitative
estimation of the detection sensitivity and response. Serial dilutions
of C150 or C355.1 monoclonal antibodies were also used to detect 10 fmol of immobilized PDC-E2. A significant difference in efficacy was
detected for the two mAbs. An 18,000-fold dilution of C150 could still
generate a strong product peptide signal, whereas a 600-fold dilution
of C355.1 reduced the signal to just over background (Fig.
2B).
Fig. 1.
The design of laser desorption probe surfaces
used to detect either PDC-E2 or the PDC-E2-like
PBC antigen with specific monoclonal antibodies. The primary
signal is amplified by interaction of the secondary antibody with a
coupled enzyme (alkaline phosphatase). The enzyme converts added
substrate (phosphopeptide, 680 Da) to product (dephosphorylated
peptide, 600 Da) directly in situ (i.e. on the
probe surface). The mass spectrum (inset) shows the
detection of both the substrate and product, which are separated by 80 Da (one phosphate group). The ratio of product to substrate gives an
indication of the amount of specific marker analyte being
detected.
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]
Fig. 2.
Detection sensitivity of surface immobilized
antigen by AMS with enzyme-linked signal amplification. A,
0.5-50 fmol of PDC-E2 were immobilized on a 96-well plate. Each well
was probed with C150 or C355.1 monoclonal antibodies. The amount of
dephosphorylated peptide (600 Da, Product) produced indicates
the amount of marker-specific monoclonal antibodies bound to the
immobilized PDC-E2 sample. The x-axis delineates the peptide
mass/charge values, and the y-axis represents the intensity
of the peptide ion signal detected. Blank wells as well as an
irrelevant monoclonal antibody (SAG-1) were used as controls and showed
a small amount of background product peak formation. A significant
increment over the background signal was detected for 0.5 fmol of
surface immobilized antigen when probed with C355.1 mAb. This product
peak increased in intensity with a corresponding decrease of substrate
peak intensity when increasing amounts of surface immobilized PDC-E2
were probed with the mAbs. B, serial dilutions of the mAbs
C150 or C355.1 were used to detect 10 fmol of PDC-E2 immobilized on a
96-well plate.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]
Detection of PDC-E2-like Antigens Directly within Frozen Liver
Sections by AMS with Enzyme-linked Signal Amplification
To
determine whether a macromolecule specific to PBC could be detected in
frozen liver sections using C355.1 and the control mAb C150, specimens
from 9 patients with PBC and 6 control livers (1 normal and 5 disease
controls) were analyzed by SELDI in the AMS mode with SEAC probes using
the enzyme-linked amplification system. Our results indicate that an
intense C355.1 specific product signal is present at 600 Da
(mass/charge) in 9/9 of the PBC samples, but was found in much lower
intensities in the 5 disease controls or the normal control liver (Fig.
3A). There were variations in avidity among
the PBC patients as expected. However, the specificity and intensity of
the signal is consistent with immunohistochemical data obtained using
confocal microscopy (12). In contrast, the control mAb C150 produced a
strong product peak in the normal control specimen, moderate peaks in
the disease controls, and very little signal for the PBC sections (Fig.
3B).
Fig. 3.
A, the detection of PBC-specific
macromolecules in frozen liver sections by AMS with enzyme-linked
signal amplification. The amount of antigen-specific C355.1 bound to
the liver sample is indicated by the amount of dephosphorylated peptide
(600 Da, Product) produced. The x-axis delineates the peptide mass/charge values, and
the y-axis represents the intensity of the peptide ion
signal detected. The +Na peak represents the peptide ion
with a sodium ion adduct (+23 Da); the +K peak represents
the peptide ion with a potassium ion adduct (+39 Da). The upper
collection of profiles shows the positive coupled-enzyme activity
detected in 6 representative PBC liver samples when probed with C355.1.
The middle profiles and the lower profile (dashed line)
represent the decreased coupled-enzyme activity detected in,
respectively, 3 representative non-PBC liver disease control liver
samples and 1 representative normal liver control sample when probed
with the same C355.1 mAb. A significant amount of product was generated
in the PBC liver samples, whereas slight coupled-enzyme activities were
detected for the non-PBC and control liver samples when assayed under
the same conditions (25 °C, 30 min). This indicates that the C355.1
profile is highly specific for PBC. B, the detection of
control macromolecules in frozen liver sections by AMS with
enzyme-linked signal amplification. Frozen liver sections from 9 patients with PBC, 1 normal liver, and 5 non-PBC liver disease controls
were incubated first with the PDC-E2-specific mAb C150, followed by a
goat anti-mouse secondary antibody coupled to alkaline phosphatase as
in A. The upper profile (dashed line) shows the
positive enzyme activity detected in a normal liver sample when probed
with C150. The middle profiles indicate the decreased coupled-enzyme
activities detected in 2 representative non-PBC disease control liver
samples. The lower profiles show the coupled-enzyme activity detected
in 5 representative PBC liver samples when probed with the same C150
mAb. A significant amount of product was generated in the normal liver
sample, whereas much less to virtually no coupled-enzyme activity
(i.e. no product) were detected for the non-PBC and the PBC
liver samples when assayed under the same conditions (25 °C, 30 min).
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
Direct Detection of PDC-E2-like Antigens in Isolated BDE Cells by
AMS with Enzyme-linked Signal Amplification
The detection of
PDC-E2 or PDC-E2-like molecular determinants associated with PBC was
also performed using purified BDE cells isolated from either PBC livers
or normal (non-PBC livers). Purified BDE cells were analyzed with both
the PBC-specific mAb C355.1 and the control mAb C150. A distinct
difference in product signal generation was revealed in the PBC
epithelial cells when probed with the C355.1 mAb (PBC-positive)
versus the C150 mAb (negative control) (Fig.
4A). The solid line profiles
illustrate the positive enzyme activity (strong product peaks) detected
in the PBC BDE cells when probed with C355.1. The dashed
line profiles represent the reduced enzyme activity detected in
PBC BDE cells when probed with the control mAb C150. Similarly, a
distinct difference in product signal generation was revealed in the
non-PBC epithelial cells when probed with the C355.1 mAb (little or no
signal) versus the stronger signal detected with C150 mAb
(positive control) (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4.
The detection of PBC-specific macromolecules
in isolated BDE cells by AMS with enzyme-linked signal
amplification. Isolated BDE cells captured on magnetic beads were
incubated first with either mAb C355 or mAb C150, followed by a goat
anti-mouse secondary antibody coupled to alkaline phosphatase. The amount of
dephosphorylated peptide (600 Da, Product) produced
indicates the amount of marker-specific monoclonal antibodies bound to
the BDE cells. The x-axis delineates the protein mass/charge
values, and the y-axis represents the intensity of the
protein ion signal detected. The +Na peak represents the
peptide ion with a sodium ion adduct (+23 Da); the +2Na peak
represents the peptide ion with two sodium ion adducts (+46 Da). In
A, the upper profile (solid line) illustrates the
positive enzyme activity detected in three PBC BDE cell specimens when
probed with C355.1, where the dashed line profiles represent the
reduced enzyme activity detected in PBC BDE cells when probed with the
control mAb, C150. Note the strong product peak seen in the PBC BDE
cell specimens when probed with C355.1 compared to C150. The enzyme
activity is so strong that almost all the substrate was used up in the C355.1 probed samples and only the sodium adducts, peak +Na
and peak +2Na, remained. In B, the solid
line profile illustrates the absence of enzyme activity detected
in two non-PBC cell specimens when probed with C355.1 and the
dashed line profile represents the strongly positive enzyme
activity detected in these same cells when probed with the mAb C150.
The amount of product generated in the non-PBC liver cells when probed
with C150 was significantly higher than that detected for the non-PBC
liver cells probed with C355.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]
Evaluation of PDC and the PDC-E2 Component by AMS
AMS was
used to characterize and distinguish the PDC-E2 antigenic determinants
recognized by the mAbs C355.1 and C150 within PDC. Isolated PDC was
bound to C150 or C355.1 mAbs that were tethered to the SEAC probe
surface through immobilized Protein G. The PDC components bound to the
immobilized mAb were mapped and identified by mass before their
dissociation from the known antigenic determinant, the E2 component.
The specificity of the C355.1 and C150 mAbs for PDC is illustrated in
Fig. 5. When the PDC was captured on either of the two
different monoclonal antibodies, C355.1 (Fig. 5A) or C150
(Fig. 5B), after exposure to 3 M urea in
phosphate-buffered saline, only the E2 and X components of the original
PDC remain tightly bound to the antibodies. These results further
confirm the E2 component of PDC as the antigen specifically recognized by both C150 and C355.1 monoclonal antibodies. When the PDC was captured on the C150 or C355.1 SEAC probe surfaces, after exposure to 3 M urea to remove all but the bound E2 component, a trypsin digest of the C150- or C355.1-bound PDC-E2 component revealed C355.1
epitope containing fragments of 4.7, 5.4, 7.5, and 10 kDa (Fig.
6). When the SEAC probe was constructed with C150 and
the trypsin digest performed, the bound fragments were identified as
1.6, 4.7, and 5.4 kDa.
Fig. 5.
Demonstration of PDC-E2
specificity of mAbs C355.1 and C150. The mAbs C150 or C355.1 were
immobilized on Protein G-agarose beads and incubated with PDC. The
complexes were analyzed with a mass spectrometer. A, the composite mass
spectrum of PDC proteins specifically captured by C355.1 mAb.
B, the composite mass spectrum of PDC proteins specifically
captured by C150 mAb. In both A and B, the top
profile is a control mass spectrum of the monoclonal antibodies on
Protein G-agarose beads alone. The major peak (48,670 Da) represents
the triply charged ions of the antibodies ([IgG + 3H]3+),
which were desorbed by the laser from the Protein G-agarose beads. The
middle profile shows the mass spectrum of proteins in the PDC captured
by the monoclonal antibodies. The major peaks are the E2 (59,970 Da),
E1 (39,970 Da), E1 (35,930 Da), and X (48,200 Da). Thus the whole
PDC was captured by the mAb-SEAC probes as a single unit even after
detergent and water washes. The individual components of the complex
were revealed by the disruption with laser during the mass
spectrometric analyses. When the samples of PDC affinity captured on
mAb-SEAC probes were further washed with 3 M urea in
phosphate-buffered saline, the lower profile shows that only E2 and X
components remained tightly bound to both antibodies, confirming that
the E2 component is the antigen specifically recognized by both C150
and C355.1 monoclonal antibodies.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]
Fig. 6.
Identification of PDC-E2 fragments bound to
C355.1 and/or C150 mAb by epitope mapping with AMS. PDC was
captured on either the C355.1 or the C150 SEAC probe surface. The bound
PDC was exposed to 3 M urea to remove all but the bound E2
and X components, then digested with trypsin directly in
situ. The C355.1-bound PDC-E2 component revealed fragments (7.5 kDa and 10 kDa) not found when similar experiments were conducted with
C150. The C150-bound PDC-E2 component revealed fragments of 1.6 and 4.7 kDa after trypsin digestion.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
SEAC Probes with Immobilized C355.1 for the Detection and
Identification of Previously Unknown Molecular Determinants of
PBC
Because the identity of the molecule recognized by C355.1 in
livers from PBC patients is unknown, SEAC probe surfaces, with the
C355.1 mAb as the tethered affinity capture device, were used in an
attempt to detect and identify previously unknown molecular determinants of PBC. Several separate proteins or protein fragments (8.7, 13, 21, and 24 kDa) were identified in liver homogenates from PBC
patients that were not recognized by the C150 mAb (Fig. 7). Additionally, when the homogenate was preadsorbed
with the immobilized C150 beads prior to incubation with the C355.1
SEAC probe, the 8.7- and 13-kDa peaks became even more evident (data not shown).
Fig. 7.
SEAC probes with immobilized C355.1 were used
for the detection and identification of previously unknown molecular
determinants of PBC liver homogenate. Several separate proteins or
protein fragments were captured from PBC liver homogenates (top
profile). Some of these (8.7, 13, 21, and 24 kDa) were distinct from
those recognized by C150 (bottom profile).
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
PBC is an autoimmune cholangitis characterized by the destruction
of intra-hepatic bile ducts/bile duct epithelial cells and the presence
of AMA. Although AMA were first identified nearly 30 years ago, it was
not until the cloning of the mitochondrial autoantigens that the
targets were identified as components of the 2-oxodehydrogenase pathway
with the E2 component of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC-E2) as
the immunodominant autoantigen. We have previously demonstrated that
patients with PBC, but not controls, have either PDC-E2 or a
cross-reactive molecule at the apical surface of biliary epithelium but
the identity of this important molecular "marker" remains unclear.
This molecule is detected in Stage I and II PBC, before the appearance
of BB1/B7 or major histocompatibility class II, and therefore appears
to be the earliest known marker of PBC (12, 26). This previous work has
provided us with a monoclonal antibody that is highly specific for the
bile duct epithelial cells of patients with PBC, yet the exact nature
of this molecule and its epitope is still unknown.
A variety of methods have been used to study monoclonal
antibody-antigen interactions and the characterization of epitopes. Two
of the most common approaches are competitive binding analysis using
synthetic peptides and fine specificity studies with panels of
evolutionary variant or recombinant proteins (27). Although these
methods are well established, they do have significant limitations. Among these are the fact that discontinuous or conformationally defined
epitopes may not be detectable using peptide probes (28). Therefore, a
direct approach for epitope mapping has been more recently introduced
based on several factors. Among these are the following: 1) mAbs
exhibit resistance toward proteolytic enzymes; 2) in immune complexes,
antigenic determinants can be protected from proteolytic degradation;
and 3) proteolysis does not lead to dissociation of immune complexes
(29, 30, 31). Previously, limited proteolytic cleavage of immune complexes
has been used for epitope characterization by means of polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis (32) and high performance liquid chromatography
(33). However, these methods may not enable unambiguous epitope
identification due to unresolved peptides.
The high molecular specificity provided by mass spectrometric peptide
mapping has been used successfully in various protein structural
studies, such as the characterization of cDNA-derived sequences,
identification of posttranslational modifications, and the
differentiation of isoenzyme structures (34, 35, 36). In addition, this
methodology has recently been used with great success in the analysis
of antigen/antibody complexes such as the characterization of the
epitope recognized by a mAb to the complement component C3a and mapping
of the gastrin-releasing peptide/anti-bombesin monoclonal antibody
complex (34, 37). Epitope extraction and direct identification of a
single immune complex by mass spectrometry has been shown to be a
sensitive and rapid method of high molecular specificity in the
analysis of protein antigens.
In this study, we demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of AMS
in conjunction with highly specific mAb reagents using enzyme-linked
signal amplification. Previous studies using these mAbs and confocal
microscopy have shown that an increase in apical staining of the bile
duct epithelial cells is seen only with C355.1 in patients with PBC
(12). These observations are further substantiated by the current
study. When frozen liver sections from patients with PBC and controls
were probed with C355.1 and examined by AMS, strong enzyme activity was
only found in the PBC specimens (9/9). In contrast, when the control
mAb (C150) was used to analyze the same samples, there was little if
any product peak in the PBC samples and reduced product in the disease
controls when compared to the normal, healthy liver. A similar analysis
of purified BDE cells was performed to focus on the disease target
tissue and to compare these results with the intact liver tissue
sections. When pure BDE cells from patients with PBC and controls were
analyzed by AMS with enzyme-linked signal amplification using C355.1
and C150, a strong C355.1 product peak was seen with PBC but not
control BDE. These findings were almost identical to the crude frozen liver sections discussed above and indicate that the macromolecule recognized by C355.1 is also specific to the BDE cells of patients but
not controls. Moreover, similar to the liver sections, when the PBC and
disease-control BDE were tested with C150, the control liver BDE had a
significantly higher product peak than the PBC BDE cells.
The epitope mapping studies performed herein suggest that while both
mAbs indeed recognize PDC-E2, there is a distinct difference in their
antigenic determinants. This further substantiates earlier immunohistochemistry studies with C355.1 and C150 (10). Moreover, the
moderate reduction of C150-probed elements in the disease controls and
the dramatic reduction in the PBC liver suggest that normal
mitochondrial production of PDC-E2 in liver is compromised by disease.
These observations have been further substantiated by in
situ hybridization studies where little signal for PDC-E2 is seen
in the bile duct of liver from patients with
PBC.2 The strong product peak in both
the crude frozen liver sections and the BDE cells from patients with
PBC using C355.1, as well as its absence in controls, suggests that
C355.1 recognizes a molecule in the liver of these patients other than
PDC-E2 or PDC-E2 in its native/immunodominant form.
When the liver homogenates from patients with PBC were analyzed with
probe-bound C355.1 as an affinity capture device, several prominent
protein fragments were observed (8.7, 13, 21, and 24 kDa) that were not
recognized by C150. Moreover, when the homogenate were preincubated
with immobilized C150 prior to probing with C355.1, the peaks at 8.7 and 13 kDa became more pronounced. Preliminary data obtained with BDE
cells isolated from a patient with PBC showed similar results. The
limited digestion of liver homogenate with collagenase during the
preparation of BDE cells generated some protein fragments specifically
captured by the immobilized antibodies that were substantially
different and bigger in size than those generated from exhaustive
digestion of PDC E2 with trypsin. However, some peptides in the PBC
liver digest, particularly the 1670- and 4853-Da ones, did correspond
in mass to some of the major PDC-E2 digest fragments captured by
C150.
Thus, it appears that there are unique antigens recognized by C355.1 in
the liver homogenate of patients with PBC. This could also be the
result of different epitopes generated from the breakdown of PDC-E2.
However, whatever the origin of these unique fragments, their identity
would be instrumental in the determination of the differences between
PBC and other liver disease bile ducts.
The eventual sequence identification could lead to more information
regarding the possible role of these macromolecules in molecular
mimicry or as cryptic determinants. Cryptic peptides of autoantigens
may become expressed at sites of inflammation (38). This can lead to
the engagement of T cells potentially directed against cryptic
self-determinants that escaped tolerance induction in the thymus
leading to induction and/or perpetuation of autoimmune reactivity. This
self-directed T cell repertoire can also be activated silently to
induce memory and participate unexpectedly in responses to foreign
antigens and may be responsible for molecular mimicry (39). It is
possible that the determinants recognized by C355.1 are in fact cryptic
determinants of PDC-E2 that are also recognized by patients with PBC.
In fact, immunohistochemical staining of PBC liver with human
combinatorial antibodies generated from the lymph node of a patient
with PBC has led to the discovery of one antibody, SP4, that stains in
a PBC-specific apical pattern similar to C355.1. It has been suggested
by studies using CD4+ T cell responses to two different strains of
mycobacteria that T cell cross-reactive epitopes can exist in proteins
with apparently not more than random levels of sequence homology (40).
Thus, the potential of cross-reactive epitopes for unsuspected
cross-sensitization may play a role in the maintenance of T cell
memory, in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease, and possibly in a
wider range of host immune responses to infectious pathogens (40).
Also of much interest are the considerable advantages of this
technology. First, the use of AMS in the SELDI mode allows a level of
sensitivity in the femtomole range. Second, without the need to isolate
large numbers of cells, such analysis can even be performed on crude
tissue sections. Third, using probes docked with mAb, capture assays
will permit direct in situ epitope sequencing. The use of
laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry will thus
allow autoimmunity to be addressed and macromolecules identified using
existing tools with extraordinary and versatile applications.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by grants from Hewlett-Packard (to
T. W. H. and T.-T. Y.) and Molecular Analytical Systems (to T. W. H. and T.-T. Y.), by National Institutes of Health Grant R41GM 51658 (to
T. W. H.), and by NIADDK Grants 50977 and 39588 (to M. E. G.). The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Div. of
Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, TB 192, School of
Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. Tel.:
916-752-2884; Fax: 916-752-4669; E-mail: megershwin{at}ucdavis.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: PDC, pyruvate
dehydrogenase complex; AMS, affinity mass spectrometry; BDE, bile duct
epithelial cells; PBC, primary biliary cirrhosis; PDC-E2, E2 component
of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; SEAC, surface enhanced affinity capture; SELDI, surface enhanced laser desorption ionization; TOF,
time-of-flight; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; E1, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1; E2, pyruvate dehydrogenase E2
dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase; AMA, autoantibodies to mitochondrial antigens.
2
K. Harada, J. Van de Water, P. S. C. Leung, R. L. Coppel, Y. Nakanuma, and M. E. Gershwin, submitted for
publication.
REFERENCES
-
Reed, L. J.
(1994)
Acc. Chem. Res.
7,
40-46
[CrossRef]
-
Patel, M. S., and Roche, T. E.
(1990)
FASEB J.
4,
3224-3233
[Abstract]
-
Linn, T. C., Pettit, F. H., and Reed, L. J.
(1969)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
62,
227-234
-
Linn, T. C., Pettit, F. H., Hucho, F., and Reed, L. J.
(1969)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
62,
227-234
-
Pons, G., Raefsky-Estrin, C., Carothers, D. J., Pepin, R. A., Joved, A. A., Jesse, B. W., Ganapathi, M. K., Samols, D., and Patel, M. S.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
1422-1426
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lessard, I. A. D., and Perham, R. N.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
306,
727-733
-
McNally, A. J., Motter, K., and Jordan, F.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
19736-19743
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McNally, A. J., Mattsson, L., and Jordan, F.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
19744-19751
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
MacSween, R. N., and Sumithran, E.
(1981)
Semin. Liver Dis.
1,
282-292
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Surh, C. D., Ahmed-Ansari, A., and Gershwin, M. E.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
144,
2647-2652
[Abstract]
-
Coppel, R. L., and Gershwin, M. E.
(1995)
Immunol. Rev.
144,
17-49
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Van de Water, J., Turchany, J., Leung, P. S., Lake, J., Munoz, S., Surh, C. D., Coppel, R., Ansari, A., Nakanuma, Y., and Gershwin, M. E.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
91,
2653-2664
-
Cha, S., Leung, P. S., Gershwin, M. E., Fletcher, M. P., Ansari, A. A., and Coppel, R. L.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
2527-2531
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cha, S., Leung, P. S., Coppel, R. L., Van de Water, J., Ansari, A. A., and Ger, M. E.
(1994)
Hepatology
20,
574-583
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Joplin, R., Wallace, L. L., Johnson, G. D., Lindsay, J. G., Yeaman, S. J., Palmer, J. M., Strain, A. J., and Neuberger, J. M.
(1995)
J. Pathol.
176,
381-390
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hutchens, T. W., and Yip, T. T.
(1993)
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
7,
576-580
[CrossRef]
-
Doig, P., McCubbin, W. D., Kay, C. M., and Trust, T. J.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
233,
753-765
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Van de Water, J., Fregeau, D., Davis, P., Ansari, A., Danner, D., Leung, P., Coppel, R., and Gershwin, M. E.
(1988)
J. Immunol.
141,
2321-2324
[Abstract]
-
Joplin, R. E., Johnson, G. D., Matthews, J. B., Hambruger, J., Lindsay, J. G., Hubscher, S. G., Strain, A. J., and Neuburger, J. M.
(1994)
Hepatology
19,
1375-1380
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Joplin, R., Strain, A. J., and Neuberger, J. M.
(1989)
In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.
25,
1189-1192
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yip, T. T., and Hutchens, T. W.
(1992)
Proceedings of the 40th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry, and Allied Topics, pp. 1915-1916
-
1), 81Hutchens, T. W., and Yip, T. T. (1994) Protein Sci. 3, (Suppl. 1), 81
-
Hutchens, T. W., and Yip, T. T.
(1993)
Protein Sci.
2,
92
-
Rahmatullah, M., Gopalakrishnan, S., Andrews, P. C., Chang, C. L., Radke, G. A., and Roche, T. E.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
2221-2227
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Roche, T. E., Rahmatullah, M., Liu, S., Radke, G. A., Chang, C. L., and Powers-Greenwood, S. L.
(1989)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
573,
168-173
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tsuneyama, K., Van de Water, J., Leung, P. S. C., Cha, S., Nakanuma, Y., Kaplan, M., De Lellis, R., Coppel, R., Ansari, A., and Gershwin, M. E.
(1995)
Hepatology
21,
1031-1037
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Benjamin, D. C., Berzofsky, J. A., East, I. J., Gurd, F. R. N., Hannum, C., Leach, S. J., Magroliash, E., Michael, J. G., Miller, A., Prager, E. M., Reichlin, M., Sercarz, E. E., Smith-Gill, S. J., Todd, P. E., and Wilson, A. C.
(1984)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
2,
67-101
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Berzofsky, J. A.
(1985)
Science
229,
932-940
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Eisenberg, R. J., Long, D., Pereira, L., Hampar, B., Zweig, M., and Cohen, G. H.
(1982)
J. Virol.
41,
478-488
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Moelling, K., Scott, A., Dittmann, K. E. J., and Owada, M.
(1980)
J. Virol.
33,
680-688
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schwyzer, M., Weil, R., Frank, G., and Zuber, H.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
5627-5634
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sheshberadaran, H., and Payne, L. G.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
1-5
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jemmerson, R., and Paterson, Y.
(1986)
Science
232,
1001-1004
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Suckau, D., Kohl, J., Karwath, G., Schneider, K., Casaretto, M., BitterSuermann, D., and Przybylski, M.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9848-9852
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Svoboda, M. M., Przybylski, M., Schreurs, J., Miyajima, A., Hogeland, K., and Deinzer, M.
(1991)
J. Chromatogr.
562,
403-419
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gauss, C., Klein, J., Post, K., Suckau, D., Schneider, K., Thomas, H., Oesch, F., and Przybylski, M.
(1990)
Environ. Health Perspect.
88,
57-62
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Papac, D. I., Hoyes, J., and Tomer, K. B.
(1994)
Protein Sci.
3,
1485-1492
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sercarz, E. E., Lehmann, P. V., Ametani, A., Benichou, G., Miller, A., and Houdgil, K.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
11,
729-766
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Moudgil, K. D., and Sercarz, E. E.
(1994)
Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol.
73,
283-289
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Harris, D. P., Vordermeier, H. M., Singh, M., Moreno, C., Jurcevic, S., and Ivanyi, J.
(1995)
Eur. J. Immunol.
254,
3173-3179
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Zhang, R. Sprung, J. Pei, X. Tan, S. Kim, H. Zhu, C.-F. Liu, N. V. Grishin, and Y. Zhao
Lysine Acetylation Is a Highly Abundant and Evolutionarily Conserved Modification in Escherichia Coli
Mol. Cell. Proteomics,
February 1, 2009;
8(2):
215 - 225.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. R. Srinivas, M. Verma, Y. Zhao, and S. Srivastava
Proteomics for Cancer Biomarker Discovery
Clin. Chem.,
August 1, 2002;
48(8):
1160 - 1169.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Migliaccio, A. Nishio, J. Van de Water, A. A. Ansari, P. S. C. Leung, Y. Nakanuma, R. L. Coppel, and M. E. Gershwin
Monoclonal Antibodies to Mitochondrial E2 Components Define Autoepitopes in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
J. Immunol.,
November 15, 1998;
161(10):
5157 - 5163.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|