JBC Focus on PI3-Kinase with Echelon

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Simonds, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Simonds, W. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 52, Issue of December 27, 1996 pp. 33575-33579
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Selective Activation of Effector Pathways by Brain-specific G Protein beta 5*

(Received for publication, October 1, 1996, and in revised form, October 29, 1996)

Shiying Zhang , Omar A. Coso Dagger , Chunghee Lee §, J. Silvio Gutkind Dagger and William F. Simonds

From the Metabolic Diseases Branch, NIDDK, and the Dagger  Molecular Signaling Unit, Laboratory of Cellular Development and Oncology, NIDR, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

While multiple G protein beta  and gamma  subunit isoforms have been identified, the implications of this potential diversity of beta gamma heterodimers for signaling through beta gamma -regulated effector pathways remains unclear. Furthermore the molecular mechanism(s) by which the beta gamma complex modulates diverse mammalian effector molecules is unknown. Effector signaling by the structurally distinct brain-specific beta 5 subunit was assessed by transient cotransfection with gamma 2 in COS cells and compared with beta 1. Transfection of either beta 1 or beta 5 with gamma 2 stimulated the activity of cotransfected phospholipase C-beta 2 (PLC-beta 2), as previously reported. In contrast, cotransfection of beta 1 but not beta 5 with gamma 2 stimulated the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathways even though the expression of beta 5 in COS cells was evident by immunoblotting. The G protein beta 5 expressed in transfected COS cells was properly folded as its pattern of stable C-terminal proteolytic fragments was identical to that of native brain beta 5. The inability of beta 5 to activate the MAPK and JNK pathways was not overcome by cotransfection with three additional Ggamma isoforms. These results suggest it is the Gbeta subunit which determines the pattern of downstream signaling by the beta gamma complex and imply that the structural features of the beta gamma complex mediating effector regulation may differ among effectors.


INTRODUCTION

Both the heterotrimeric G protein alpha  subunit and the beta gamma complex transmit signals to effector molecules (1, 2). Multiple isoforms of beta  and gamma  subunits have been identified by cDNA cloning (3, 4), and the formation of beta gamma heterodimers from particular combinations of beta  and gamma  subtypes may contribute to signaling specificity by the beta gamma complex (5). G protein beta gamma -regulated effector molecules in vertebrates include inwardly-rectifying potassium channels (6), certain isoforms of adenylyl cyclase (7, 8) and phospholipase C-beta (PLC-beta )1 (9, 10, 11), and as yet unidentified upstream targets in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) (12, 13, 14) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) (15) pathways.

The effector specificity of the recently described brain-specific beta 5 subunit(3) was examined by transient cotransfection with gamma 2 in COS cells and compared with beta 1. We report here that while both beta 1 and beta 5 were found to activate PLC-beta 2 in a gamma 2-dependent fashion consistent with previous reports (3, 10), beta 5, unlike beta 1, did not stimulate the MAPK or JNK pathways. Cotransfection of different gamma  isoforms failed to confer MAPK or JNK stimulatory ability to beta 5. These results imply that the Gbeta subunit can define the pattern of downstream signaling mediated by the beta gamma complex and suggest that distinct mechanisms mediate the activation of different beta gamma -responsive effectors.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

cDNA Constructs

The cDNA for human phospholipase C-beta 2 (16) (GenBankTM accession number M95678[GenBank]) (in pMT2) was a gift from Dr S. G. Rhee. Constructs encoding beta 1, gamma 1, and gamma 2 in the vector pCDM8.1 (17) were described previously (18, 19). The expression constructs for hemagglutinin epitope-tagged (HA)-ERK2 and HA-JNK in pcDNA3 were described previously (12, 20).

The cDNA for beta 5 was obtained by PCR of mouse brain cDNA (Clontech) using specific primers (3) and the thermostable DNA polymerase Pyrococcus furiosus (Pfu) (Stratagene). The final construct contained two silent base changes (Ser130 TCt and Phe136 TTc) relative to the published sequence (3) (GenBankTM accession number L34290[GenBank]). The cDNA for gamma 4 was obtained by reverse transcription-PCR employing the Pyrococcus woesei (Pwo) (Boehringer Mannheim) thermostable DNA polymerase from human brain total RNA (Clontech) with primers based on the published sequence (4) (GenBankTM accession number U31382[GenBank]). A silent nucleotide substitution in codon Ala38 (GCt) was found. The construct for gamma 5 (GenBankTM accession number M95779[GenBank]) was obtained by PCR employing Pwo DNA polymerase and bovine liver gamma 5 cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. Nathan N. Aronson) as a template in combination with specific primers (21). The cDNA for gamma 7 (GB M99393[GenBank]) was obtained by PCR employing Pfu DNA polymerase from bovine brain cDNA (Clontech) and specific primers (22). The finished beta 5, gamma 4, gamma 5, and gamma 7 constructs all contained the sequence GAATTCAAG<UNL>ATG</UNL> at their 5' ends (starting methionine codon underlined) and after the stop codon were followed by an XbaI site at their 3' end and were ligated between EcoRI and XbaI sites of pCDM8.1 (beta 5) or pcDNA3 (gamma 4, gamma 5, and gamma 7). Constructs in pcDNA3 were amplified in Escherichia coli XL1Blue (Stratagene). The resulting plasmid preparations were purified by column chromatography (Qiagen Maxiprep kits). The DNA sequence of all inserts was verified by the chain termination method (23) using Sequenase 2.0 (U. S. Biochemical Corp.).

Protein Expression, Immunoblotting, and Proteolytic Analysis

Growth, maintenance, transfection (24), and fractionation of COS-7 cells was as described previously (18). Protein was determined by the method of Bradford (25) using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Membrane proteins or crude lysates were separated on 11% slab gels by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (26) and electrotransferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes in Dunn's buffer (27). For analysis of low molecular weight proteolytic fragments, the Tricine gel system of Schägger and von Jagow (28) was employed as indicated. Detection of Gbeta 5 subunits employed the primary antibody SGS generated in rabbits against the synthetic dodecapeptide SGSWDHTLRVWA (conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (29)) corresponding to residues 342-353 at the C terminus of beta 5 (3). The antibody RA generated against a peptide corresponding to beta 1 residues 256-265 has been described (30). Secondary detection employed 125I-Protein A followed by autoradiography on film (19) or a storage phosphor screen (Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager), or else enhanced chemiluminescence using goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies coupled to horseradish peroxidase (Boehringer Mannheim).

Cleared cholate extracts of crude membrane preparations of transfected COS cells or BALB/c mouse brains were prepared by extraction with 1% (w/v) cholate, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) (buffer A) on ice for 30 min followed by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 10 min. The preparation of bovine brain membrane cholate extract was as described (31, 32).

For limited proteolytic digestion of membrane detergent extracts, samples were diluted into buffer A and then incubated for 30 min at 37 °C at a 1:30 or 1:40 (w/w) ratio of enzyme:extract protein. Reactions were terminated by the addition of denaturing sample buffer and boiling. The enzymes employed were L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-trypsin (Sigma T-8642), endoproteinase Lys-C (Calbiochem 324715), and endoproteinase Glu-C (V8 protease) (Calbiochem 324713).

Phosphoinositol Phospholipase C Activity Assay

The PI-PLC activity of transfected cells was estimated by a modification of the procedure of Berridge et al. (33) as described previously (10, 34).

MAPK and JNK Activity Assays

The assays for MAPK and JNK activity were essentially as described by Crespo et al. (12) and Coso et al. (20), respectively. Approximately 2.5 × 106 COS-7 cells were plated into 75-cm2 flasks and incubated at 37 °C overnight. On the following day, the cells were transfected by the DEAE-dextran method (24) using a total of 15 µg of DNA per cotransfection, typically including 5 µg of HA-ERK2 or HA-JNK (12, 20), 5 µg of Ggamma , and 5 µg of Gbeta . Vector DNA was added where necessary to keep the total amount of plasmid DNA per flask constant. The remainder of the assay was as described (12, 20) except that mouse monoclonal HA.11 (Berkeley Antibody Co.) was used for the immunoprecipitations (3 µl of HA.11 ascites fluid per 900 µl of detergent lysate).


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Functional Properties of beta 5 Cotransfected with gamma 2

The low degree of sequence homology between the brain-specific beta 5 subunit recently described by Simon and co-workers (3) and other Gbeta subunits (e.g. only 53% amino acid identity with beta 1) suggests a possible specialization of beta 5 for interactions with Galpha , Ggamma , receptor, and/or effector molecules. The effector specificity of the beta 5 subunit was examined by cotransfection with gamma 2 in COS cells and compared with beta 1. As previously reported (3), transfection of the combination of beta 5 and gamma 2 produced a robust stimulation of cotransfected PLC-beta 2 (Fig. 1A). This stimulation was comparable with that of the beta 1/gamma 2 combination and was not seen with transfection of beta 5 or gamma 2 alone (Fig. 1A).


Fig. 1. Functional properties and expression of G protein beta 5 in COS cells. A, PI-PLC stimulatory activity of G protein beta 1 and beta 5 compared in a cotransfection assay. COS cells in 75-cm2 flasks were transfected with vector alone or with PLC-beta 2 (1.5 µg) either alone or in combination with beta 1 (10 µg), beta 5 (10 µg), gamma 2 (5 µg), and PI-PLC activity assayed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The results shown represent the mean (± S.E.) value of triplicate determinations in a single experiment. Three additional experiments produced comparable results. B, MAPK stimulatory activity of G protein beta 1 and beta 5 compared in a cotransfection assay. COS cells in 75-cm2 flasks were transfected with HA-ERK2 in combination with vector alone, or with beta 1 (5 µg), beta 5 (5 µg), gamma 2 (5 µg) either alone or in combinations as indicated. An additional HA-ERK2-transfected flask was treated with 100 ng/ml epidermal growth factor (EGF) for 5 min at 37 °C prior to cell lysis as a positive control. MAPK activity was measured as described previously (12) by quantification of 32P-phosphorylated myelin basic protein substrate in dried SDS-PAGE gels by PhosphorImager analysis. Data are expressed as fold stimulation relative to the activity of gamma 2 alone. The results shown are from a single experiment and are representative of three experiments giving an identical pattern of results. C, expression of HA-ERK2 (HA-MAPK) and Gbeta 5 in cotransfected COS cells. Aliquots (20 µg of protein) of the Triton detergent lysates of COS cells transfected under the conditions indicated in Fig. 1B were subjected to SDS-PAGE on 11% polyacrylamide gels and then immunoblotted with antibodies to the HA epitope (HA.11 mouse monoclonal) or the Gbeta 5 C-terminal dodecapeptide (SGS rabbit polyclonal). Subsequent detection employed horseradish peroxidase-coupled secondary antibody and enhanced chemiluminescence as described under "Experimental Procedures."
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]


G protein beta 5 and beta 1 were then compared in their ability to activate the MAPK pathway in a gamma -dependent fashion using a cotransfection paradigm employing HA-epitope-tagged ERK2 (12). The beta gamma complex of heterotrimeric G proteins activates the MAPK cascade in metazoans (12, 13, 14) as it does in yeast (35). Previous analysis by Hawes et al. (36) of Gbeta subtypes 1-4 and multiple gamma  isoforms in transfected COS-7 cells showed a strong correlation between the ability of a specific beta gamma combination to activate PLC-beta 2 and its ability to activate the MAPK pathway. In contrast, we found that beta 5 was unable to stimulate MAPK activity in combination with gamma 2 despite the ability of beta 1 to do so under the same conditions (Fig. 1B and see below) and despite the efficacy of beta 5/gamma 2 in the PLC assay (Fig. 1A). The inability of beta 5 to activate the MAPK pathway was not due to failure of expression of the beta 5 or HA-ERK2 proteins under the conditions of the MAPK assay as documented by immunoblots of the Triton lysates of transfected COS cells with specific antibodies (Fig. 1C and see below).

Analysis of Recombinant beta 5 by Immunoblotting and Limited Proteolysis

The ability of beta 5 to activate PLC-beta 2 in a gamma -dependent fashion strongly implies its proper expression and assembly with Ggamma . To further exclude the possibility, however, that the failure of transfected beta 5 to activate the MAPK pathway was due to abnormal expression or folding of the recombinant polypeptide, additional analysis was performed using the antibody SGS generated against the C-terminal dodecapeptide of mouse beta 5. Like the N-terminal beta 5 antibody described by Watson et al. (3), SGS identified a major ~39-kDa band in immunoblots of detergent extracts of membranes prepared from beta 5/gamma 2 cotransfected but not control COS cells (Figs. 1C and 2A, left panel). This immunoreactive band comigrated with the major band in both mouse and bovine brain membrane extracts (Fig. 2A, left panel) consistent with previous reports (3). A faint upper SGS-reactive band of Mr ~90,000 was also noted in blots of mouse brain extract. The pattern of C-terminal fragments generated by limited proteolysis of bovine brain beta 5 was then compared with that of brain beta 1 by immunoblotting with specific antibodies (Fig. 2A, right panel). Such biochemical analysis has proven very useful in assessing the folding of native and recombinant G protein beta gamma complexes (19, 37, 38, 39). Whereas a stable ~26-kDa C-terminal fragment of beta 1 is identified by RA antibody (30) in a tryptic digest of bovine brain proteins, analysis of the same sample with the beta 5 C-terminal antibody SGS revealed no stable immunoreactive fragments (Fig. 2A, right panel). Limited digestion of the bovine brain samples with endoproteinase Lys-C produced an SGS-reactive C-terminal fragment visible at the dye front, while digestion with V8 protease yielded a diffuse band centered at ~35 kDa. The RA immunoreactivity at ~36 kDa in the endoproteinase Lys-C and V8 digests remained unchanged from control (Fig. 2A, right panel). Further analysis of the low molecular weight products on Tricine gels (28) revealed a major C-terminal SGS-reactive band of 12 kDa and a faint band of ~22 kDa in the endoproteinase Lys-C digests of both mouse and bovine brains (Fig. 2B). In addition to the major 35-kDa band product, a minor product of ~11 kDa was noted in the Tricine gel blots of V8 protease digests of both brain samples (Fig. 2B). An identical pattern of SGS-reactive C-terminal fragments was seen upon limited proteolysis of detergent extracts of membranes prepared from COS cells cotransfected with beta 5 + gamma 2 (Fig. 2B). Taken together, these data demonstrate that the state of folding of the beta 5 polypeptide expressed in transfected COS cells inferred from selective proteolysis is indistinguishable from that of native beta 5 found in brain.


Fig. 2. C-terminal Gbeta 5 antibody immunoblots of control and protease-treated membrane detergent extracts and comparison with Gbeta 1. A, left panel, immunoblot of cholate membrane extracts of control (Con) or transfected (beta 5 + gamma 2) COS cells (20 µg/lane), mouse (M), or bovine (B) brain (40 µg/lane) separated on an 11% SDS-PAGE gel and employing the Gbeta 5 C-terminal antibody SGS. Right panel, immunoblot of control and protease-treated bovine brain membrane cholate extract (50 µg/lane) separated on 11% SDS-PAGE gel and probed with either antipeptide antibody RA (against residues 256-265 of Gbeta 1 and which recognizes the C-terminal tryptic fragment of transducin beta  (30)) or antibody SGS as indicated. Samples were either kept on ice (Con) or treated with a 1:30 (w/w) ratio of TPCK-trypsin (Tryp), endoproteinase Lys-C (Lys), or endoproteinase Glu-C (V8) as described under "Experimental Procedures." Molecular mass of marker proteins (indicated in kilodaltons) are shown at the left of each panel. Detection of primary antibody was with 125I-Protein A followed by autoradiography. B, Tricine gel immunoblot of control and protease-treated cholate extracts from beta 5/gamma 2-transfected COS cells, mouse, and bovine brain with SGS antibody. Abbreviations are as in A. COS cell samples, 20 µg of protein/lane (3.5-h exposure), and brain samples, loaded at 60 µg of protein/lane (14-h exposure), were analyzed on the same Tricine gel (28). Digests were performed at a ratio of enzyme to extract protein of 1:40 (w/w) for 30 min at 37 °C. Molecular masses of marker proteins (indicated in kilodaltons) are shown on the left as are positions of the top of the gel and the dye front (DF). Detection of primary antibody was with 125I-Protein A.
[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]


Ability of beta 5 to Assemble with Different Ggamma Isoforms and Activate PLC-beta

Previous studies of beta gamma -responsive effectors comparing purified recombinant Gbeta gamma complexes have found significant differences due to the gamma  component of the beta gamma heterodimer (40, 41). We therefore wondered if the inactivity of beta 5 in the MAPK assay was specific to the beta 5/gamma 2 combination and might be overcome by employing other gamma  isoforms. Because certain combinations of beta  and gamma  subunits fail to assemble as heterodimers (39, 42), we first compared three additional gamma  subunits with gamma 2 in their ability to assemble with beta 5 in cotransfected COS cells. Immunoblots of cholate extracts of COS cell membranes revealed no endogenous beta 5 immunoreactivity and no beta 5 signal resulting from transfection of any gamma  subunit alone (Fig. 3, upper panel), consistent with the results of Fig. 1C. Transfection of beta 5 alone or in combination with gamma 1 (transducin gamma ) produced only a faint SGS-reactive band at ~39-kDa which may reflect assembly of beta 5 with the endogenous pool of gamma  subunits (Figs. 1C and 3, upper panel). In contrast, cotransfection of beta 5 with gamma 2, gamma 4, or gamma 7 gave a reproducible increment of beta 5 immunoreactivity over that seen with beta 5 alone, with a rank order gamma 2 >>  gamma 4 = gamma 7 (Fig. 3). This increase in the steady state levels of membrane beta 5 seen with gamma  cotransfection presumably reflects increased stability and/or membrane targetting of the beta  subunit engendered by assembly with the exogenous gamma . The reciprocal ability of cotransfected beta  to stabilize gamma  has been previously documented (43).


Fig. 3. Analysis of the expression and function of beta 5 cotransfected in COS cells with different gamma  isoforms. Upper panel, immunoblot with SGS antibody of cholate membrane extracts from COS cells transfected with vector alone (Con) or the indicated cDNA constructs. Only the region of the 11% SDS-PAGE gel where SGS reactivity was present is shown. Detection of primary antibody was with 125I-Protein A. Lower left panel, PhosphorImager quantification of the 125I-Protein A signal from the immunoblot shown in the upper panel. The ordinate shows the beta 5 immunoreactivity in arbitrary units for the transfection conditions shown. Lower right panel, PI-PLC activity in COS cells transfected with PLC-beta 2 alone or in combination with the cDNA constructs indicated, determined as described under "Experimental Procedures" and in the legend to Fig. 1A. Correlation analysis of PhosphorImager-quantified beta 5 band intensity with PI-PLC activity for four experimental conditions (beta 5 alone, beta 5 + gamma 2, beta 5 + gamma 4, beta 5 + gamma 7) yielded a correlation coefficient of 1.0 and an r2 value = 1.0.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]


The functional association of beta 5 with gamma 4 and gamma 7 was also demonstrated by the ability of beta 5/gamma 4 and beta 5/gamma 7 to stimulate PLC-beta 2 activity above control levels in parallel functional assays (Fig. 3, lower right). In contrast to results with gamma 2, gamma 4, and gamma 7, cotransfection of gamma 1 with beta 5 produced no increment in PLC activity (data not shown). The ability of the different gamma  isoforms to promote the beta 5-dependent activation of PLC-beta 2 correlated strongly with their ability to increase the steady-state expression of beta 5 documented by quantitation of the SGS immunoblots (Fig. 3, lower panels). Simon and co-workers (3) also reported that the beta 5/gamma 2 combination stimulated PLC-beta 2 activity much more strongly in COS cells than combinations employing other gamma  isoforms, although beta 5 expression levels were not compared.

Failure of Additional Ggamma Isoforms to Support MAPK and JNK Activation by beta 5

Despite biochemical and functional evidence of their assembly with beta 5 (Fig. 3), neither cotransfected gamma 4 nor gamma 7 conferred to beta 5 the ability to activate the MAPK pathway (Fig. 4A), resembling gamma 2 in this regard (Figs. 1B and 4A). On the other hand, gamma 4 and gamma 7 both supported MAPK stimulation by cotransfected beta 1 (Fig. 4A). The analysis of the effector signaling functions of beta 5 was extended to look at potential JNK stimulatory activity. The ability of cotransfected mammalian beta 1/gamma 2 to activate JNK through a p21ras- and p21rac1-dependent pathway bearing many similarities to the beta gamma -driven pheromone response pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was described recently (15). We compared the ability of beta 1 and beta 5 to activate HA-JNK when transfected alone or in combination with gamma 2, gamma 4, or gamma 7. The kinase activity of the cotransfected HA-JNK reporter in beta 5 + gamma  transfected cells was consistently the same as or lower than the activity in gamma -only transfected cells, regardless of which gamma  was employed (Fig. 4B). The inactivity of beta 5 in this assay was in stark contrast to the activity of beta 1 which produced a robust increment in JNK activity when cotransfected with each of the three gamma  isoforms (Fig. 4B). Immunoblotting of cell lysates from such experiments demonstrated that the expression of the HA-JNK reporter enzyme was comparable whether beta 1 or beta 5 was employed in the cotransfection (data not shown). Additional experiments with the gamma 5 isoform, shown previously by Watson et al. (3) to promote beta 5 stimulation of PLC-beta 2, revealed that it too supported MAPK and JNK activation by beta 1, but not by beta 5 (data not shown).


Fig. 4. Comparison of the MAPK and JNK stimulatory activities of G protein beta 1 and beta 5 when cotransfected with different Ggamma isoforms. A, MAPK activity in COS cells cotransfected with the indicated constructs and expressed as fold stimulation relative to gamma 2 alone. Results are presented as in Fig. 1B. Shown are results from a single experiment and representative of three additional experiments. B, JNK activity in COS cells cotransfected with the indicated constructs. Assay was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures," and data are from PhosphorImager quantitation of 32P incorporation into glutathione S-transferase-c-Jun-(1-79) substrate (20) from a single experiment, expressed as fold stimulation relative to gamma 2 alone. Two additional experiments gave similar results.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]


Implications of the Effector Selectivity of Gbeta 5

While signaling through particular Galpha subunits is characteristically confined to a restricted set of effector targets, beta gamma heterodimers have been found to modulate a wide range of structurally diverse effector molecules, an observation true even when a defined pair of beta  and gamma  isoforms has been studied. Reconstitution experiments have shown, for example, that purified recombinant beta 1gamma 2 can regulate adenylyl cyclase (40), phospholipase C-beta (40, 44), inwardly rectifying potassium channels (41), and beta -adrenergic receptor kinase activities (45). Differences in effector regulation ascribed to the Gbeta component of defined heterodimers noted previously in cotransfection and reconstitution experiments have been only modest (45, 46). The present results offer the strongest evidence to date that G protein beta  subunits are sufficient to determine the effector selectivity of beta gamma and suggest that the structural features of the beta gamma complex mediating effector regulation may differ depending on the effector.

The G protein beta 5 fails to activate critical intermediates in the MAPK and JNK pathways in COS cells when complexed with gamma 2, gamma 4, gamma 5, or gamma 7 in beta gamma heterodimers. In vertebrates, the G protein beta gamma complex triggers the MAPK cascade by a p21ras-dependent mechanism (12, 14) involving an unknown number of upstream intermediaries which may include nonreceptor tyrosine kinases (47), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (48), and Shc (49) acting through Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factors including Sos (50) and Ras-guanine nucleotide releasing factor (51). The upstream mediators of the Ras- and Rac1-dependent activation of JNK by beta gamma subunits (15) remain unknown, but activation of a homologous pathway in S. cerevisiae appears to involve the direct interaction of beta gamma with the scaffolding protein Ste5p (52) and the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24p (53). It is tempting to speculate that the structure of beta 5 precludes its interaction with the mammalian counterparts of these or perhaps other critical intermediates in the kinase pathways. Such a loss of function might represent an evolutionary goal of beta 5. It is possible to speculate, for example, that expression of beta 5 might promote the survival of certain neurons by failing to activate JNK, a pathway linked to apoptosis in neuronal cell culture (54). An alternative speculation is that the inability of Gbeta 5 to activate the kinase cascades is an incidental consequence of evolution to gain a function such as an ability to regulate novel effector molecules in brain.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   Present address: Laboratory of Cell Signaling, NHLBI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
   To whom correspondence should be addressed: NIDDK, Metabolic Diseases Branch, Bldg. 10 Room 8C-101, 10 Center Dr. MSC 1752, Bethesda, MD 20892-1752. Tel.: 301-496-9299; Fax: 301-402-0374; E-mail: wfs{at}helix.nih.gov.
1    The abbreviations used are: PLC, phospholipase C; PI, phosphatidylinositol; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; HA, influenza hemagglutinin; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; Tricine, N-tris(hydroxymethyl)methylglycine; TPCK, L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Sue Ghoo Rhee for providing the human phospholipase C-beta 2 cDNA, Dr. Nathan N. Aronson for providing the bovine gamma 5 cDNA, and Dr. Regina Collins for assistance with cell culture.


REFERENCES

  1. Neer, E. J. (1995) Cell 80, 249-257 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Hamm, H. E., and Gilchrist, A. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 189-196 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Watson, A. J., Katz, A., and Simon, M. I. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 22150-22156 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ray, K., Kunsch, C., Bonner, L. M., and Robishaw, J. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21765-21771 [JBC][Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Clapham, D. E., and Neer, E. J. (1993) Nature 365, 403-406 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Logothetis, D. E., Kurachi, Y., Galper, J., Neer, E. J., and Clapham, D. E. (1987) Nature 325, 321-326 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Tang, W.-J., and Gilman, A. G. (1991) Science 254, 1500-1503 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Federman, A. D., Conklin, B. R., Schrader, K. A., Reed, R. R., and Bourne, H. R. (1992) Nature 356, 159-161 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Camps, M., Carozzi, A., Schnabel, P., Scheer, A., Parker, P. J., and Gierschik, P. (1992) Nature 360, 684-686 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Katz, A., Wu, D., and Simon, M. I. (1992) Nature 360, 686-689 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Park, D., Jhon, D. Y., Lee, C. W., Lee, K. H., and Rhee, S. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 4573-4576 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Crespo, P., Xu, N., Simonds, W. F., and Gutkind, J. S. (1994) Nature 369, 418-420 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Faure, M., Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T. A., and Bourne, H. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7851-7854 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Koch, W. J., Hawes, B. E., Allen, L. F., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 12706-12710 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Coso, O. A., Teramoto, H., Simonds, W. F., and Gutkind, J. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3963-3966 [JBC][Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Park, D., Jhon, D. Y., Kriz, R., Knopf, J., and Rhee, S. G. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16048-16055 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Bonifacino, J. S., Suzuki, C. K., and Klausner, R. D. (1990) Science 247, 79-82 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Simonds, W. F., Butrynski, J. E., Gautam, N., Unson, C. G., and Spiegel, A. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 5363-5366 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Garritsen, A., and Simonds, W. F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 24418-24423 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Coso, O. A., Chiariello, M., Yu, J.-C., Teramoto, H., Crespo, P., Xu, N., Miki, T., and Gutkind, J. S. (1995) Cell 81, 1137-1146 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Fisher, K. J., and Aronson, N. N., Jr. (1992) Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 1585-1591 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Cali, J. J., Balcueva, E. A., Rybalkin, I., and Robishaw, J. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 24023-24027 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Cullen, B. R. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152, 684-704 [Medline] [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Dunn, S. D. (1986) Anal. Biochem 157, 144-53 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Schägger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 166, 368-379 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Reichlin, M. (1980) Methods Enzymol. 70, 159-165 [Medline] [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Murakami, T., Simonds, W. F., and Spiegel, A. M. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 2905-2911 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Sternweis, P. C., and Robishaw, J. D. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 13806-13813 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Gierschik, P., Milligan, G., Pines, M., Goldsmith, P., Codina, J., Klee, W., and Spiegel, A. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 2258-2262 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Berridge, M. J., Dawson, R. M., Downes, C. P., Heslop, J. P., and Irvine, R. F. (1983) Biochem. J. 212, 473-482 [Medline] [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Zhang, S. Y., Coso, O. A., Collins, R., Gutkind, J. S., and Simonds, W. F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20208-20212 [JBC] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Herskowitz, I. (1995) Cell 80, 187-197 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Hawes, B. E., Van Biesen, T., Koch, W. J., Luttrell, L. M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17148-17153 [JBC][Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Fung, B. K., and Nash, C. R. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 10503-10510 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Thomas, T. C., Sladek, T., Yi, F., Smith, T., and Neer, E. J. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 8628-8635 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Schmidt, C. J., Thomas, T. C., Levine, M. A., and Neer, E. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13807-13810 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Ueda, N., Iñiguez-Lluhi, J. A., Lee, E., Smrcka, A. V., Robishaw, J. D., and Gilman, A. G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 4388-4395 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Wickman, K. D., Iñiguez-Lluhi, J. A., Davenport, P. A., Taussig, R., Krapivinsky, G. B., Linder, M. E., Gilman, A. G., and Clapham, D. E. (1994) Nature 368, 255-257 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Pronin, A. N., and Gautam, N. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 6220-6224 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Pronin, A. N., and Gautam, N. (1993) FEBS Lett. 328, 89-93 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Boyer, J. L., Graber, S. G., Waldo, G. L., Harden, T. K., and Garrison, J. C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2814-2819 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Müller, S., Hekman, M., and Lohse, M. J. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10439-10443 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Wu, D., Katz, A., and Simon, M. I. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 5297-5301 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Luttrell, L. M., Hawes, B. E., Van Biesen, T., Luttrell, D. K., Lansing, T. J., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19443-19450 [JBC][Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Hawes, B. E., Luttrell, L. M., Van Biesen, T., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12133-12136 [JBC][Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Touhara, K., Hawes, B. E., Van Biesen, T., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 9284-9287 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Van Biesen, T., Hawes, B. E., Luttrell, D. K., Krueger, K. M., Touhara, K., Porfiri, E., Sakaue, M., Luttrell, L. M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1995) Nature 376, 781-784 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Mattingly, R. R., and Macara, I. G. (1996) Nature 382, 268-272 [Medline] [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Whiteway, M. S., Wu, C. L., Leeuw, T., Clark, K., Fourest-Lieuvin, A., Thomas, D. Y., and Leberer, E. (1995) Science 269, 1572-1575 [Medline] [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Zhao, Z. S., Leung, T., Manser, E., and Lim, L. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5246-5257 [Medline] [Abstract]
  54. Xia, Z. G., Dickens, M., Raingeaud, J., Davis, R. J., and Greenberg, M. E. (1995) Science 270, 1326-1331 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. J. Gold, C. V. Hoang, B. W. Potts, G. Porras, E. Pioli, K. W. Kim, A. Nadjar, C. Qin, G. J. LaHoste, Q. Li, et al.
RGS9 2 Negatively Modulates L-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine-Induced Dyskinesia in Experimental Parkinson's Disease
J. Neurosci., December 26, 2007; 27(52): 14338 - 14348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
E. A. Yost, S. M. Mervine, J. L. Sabo, T. R. Hynes, and C. H. Berlot
Live Cell Analysis of G Protein beta5 Complex Formation, Function, and Targeting
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2007; 72(4): 812 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. L. Halls, R. A. D. Bathgate, and R. J. Summers
Relaxin Family Peptide Receptors RXFP1 and RXFP2 Modulate cAMP Signaling by Distinct Mechanisms
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2006; 70(1): 214 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
S. Krystofova and K. A. Borkovich
The Heterotrimeric G-Protein Subunits GNG-1 and GNB-1 Form a G{beta}{gamma} Dimer Required for Normal Female Fertility, Asexual Development, and G{alpha} Protein Levels in Neurospora crassa
Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2005; 4(2): 365 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
M. B. Jones, D. P. Siderovski, and S. B. Hooks
The G{beta}{gamma} DIMER as a NOVEL SOURCE of SELECTIVITY in G-Protein Signaling: GGL-ing AT CONVENTION
Mol. Interv., August 1, 2004; 4(4): 200 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. R. Hynes, L. Tang, S. M. Mervine, J. L. Sabo, E. A. Yost, P. N. Devreotes, and C. H. Berlot
Visualization of G Protein {beta}{gamma} Dimers Using Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation Demonstrates Roles for Both {beta} and {gamma} in Subcellular Targeting
J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30279 - 30286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page