Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Monfardini, C.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, W. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Monfardini, C.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, W. V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 6, Issue of February 9, 1996 pp. 2966-2971
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Rational Design of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-stimulating Factor Antagonist Peptides (*)

(Received for publication, September 20, 1995; and in revised form, November 7, 1995)

Cristina Monfardini (1),  (2),  Thomas Kieber-Emmons (3), (§),  Donald Voet (4),  A. Paul Godillot (1),  (2),  David B. Weiner (1),  (2),  (3), (¶),  William V. Williams (1) (2) (5)(**)

From the  (1)Department of Medicine, Rheumatology Division, (2)Institute for Biotechnology and Advanced Molecular Medicine, (3)Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, and (4)Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, (5)Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a member of the four-helix bundle family of cytokines/growth factors which exhibit several activities. It is a hematopoietic growth factor, a cytokine involved in inflammatory and immune processes, an adjunct for cancer therapy, and an anti-tumor immunomodulator. Studies of interactions between GM-CSF and its receptor and identification of small peptides presenting binding capacity to the receptor are important goals for the development of GM-CSF analogs. Here we describe the study of two cyclic peptides, 1785 and 1786, developed based on structural analysis of the GM-CSF region mimicked by anti-anti-GM-CSF recombinant antibody 23.2. These peptides were designed to structurally mimic the positions of specific residues on the B and C helices of human GM-CSF implicated in receptor binding and bioactivity. Both 1785 and 1786 were specifically recognized by polyclonal anti-GM-CSF antibody (stronger for 1786 than 1785). 1786 also competitively inhibited binding of GM-CSF to the GM-CSF receptor on HL-60 cells and demonstrated antagonist bioactivity, as shown by its reversal of GM-CSF's ability to inhibit apoptosis of the GM-CSF-dependent cell line MO7E. These studies support the role of residues on the GM-CSF B and C helices in receptor binding and bioactivity and suggest strategies for mimicking binding sites on four-helix bundle proteins with cyclic peptides.

INTRODUCTION

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (^1)is a hematopoietic growth factor and a cytokine involved in many inflammatory and immune processes. GM-CSF activates antigen-presenting cells (monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells), increases major histocompatibility complex class II expression-enhancing antigen presentation, and increases macrophage anti-tumor activity(1) . Recently it has been used as an important adjunct in cancer therapy for bone marrow recovery following chemotherapy and transplantation(2) . Moreover, GM-CSF induces protective immune responses against lymphoma cells if fused with a tumor-derived idiotype, eliciting tumor-specific immunity(3) . GM-CSF also enhances the immunogenicity of tumor cells when expressed by them, resulting in induction of protective anti-tumor immunity, while other cytokines such as IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, -interferon, or tumor necrosis factor-alpha are less effective(4) .

The crystal structure of human GM-CSF (5, 6, 7, 8) reveals a four-helix bundle organization similar in some respects to that described for growth hormone(9) , IL-2(10) , and IL-4(11, 12, 13, 14) . The related cytokines macrophage colony stimulating factor (15) and IL-5 are organized as dimers of four-helix bundles(16) . GM-CSF activity is mediated by binding to specific cellular receptors (GM-CSFR) which belong to a recently described supergene family(17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23) . The high affinity GM-CSFR is comprised of an alpha chain (GM-CSFRalpha) specific for GM-CSF(20) , and a beta chain (beta(c)), which can also associate with the IL-3 and IL-5 receptor alpha chains(21) . The GM-CSFRalpha imparts specificity to the interaction with GM-CSF, and when expressed without beta(c) is able to bind GM-CSF, albeit with lower affinity than the heterodimeric receptor(24) . The high affinity receptor (GM-CSFRalpha and beta(c)) appears to be the signal-transducing unit(25, 26) , with a sequential binding of GM-CSF to GM-CSFRalpha followed by binding to beta(c) postulated.

GM-CSF and the related four-helix bundle cytokines are important targets for drug design and production of low molecular weight analogs which mimic the native ligand. Studies of ligand-receptor intermolecular interactions which help delineate their active sites should allow the development of small molecules able to mimic the larger polypeptide ligands. Such small drugs, created based on analysis of the most important binding interactions, could circumvent problems of immunogenicity, antigenicity, rapid proteolysis by serum proteolytic enzymes, short serum half-life, and low oral bioavailability, commonly presented by large polypeptides.

In prior studies, linear peptide analogs of GM-CSF were produced by dividing the human GM-CSF sequence into six peptides(27) . This strategy led to the identification of two peptides with receptor binding and antagonist activity. One peptide corresponding to residues 17-31 (the A helix) inhibited high affinity receptor binding, while a second peptide corresponding to residues 54-78 (the B and C helices) inhibited low affinity receptor binding(27) . This implicates these sites in intermolecular interactions with the GM-CSFR. We also have used a recombinant antibody (rAb) as a GM-CSF mimic(28) . Molecular modeling of the rAb 23.2 allowed the identification of complementarity determining regions (CDRs) as sites of structural mimicry of GM-CSF, focusing attention on the CDRI region mimicking residues on the B and C helices of GM-CSF. After synthesis and characterization of CDRI, CDRII, and CDRII peptides, the CDRI peptide exhibited specific GM-CSF receptor binding and antagonist bioactivity(28) . Thus, these studies suggest that residues on the B and C helices of GM-CSF mediate binding to the low affinity receptor (GM-CSFRalpha alone).

Here we describe the development of two cyclic peptide GM-CSF mimics (1785 and 1786) obtained from structural analysis of the GM-CSF region mimicked by rAb 23.2(28) . Cysteines were introduced in the peptide structures at the amino and carboxyl termini to allow cyclization. The cyclized peptides were specifically bound by polyclonal anti-GM-CSF antibody (stronger for 1786 than for 1785). Moreover, 1786 competes with GM-CSF for binding to the GM-CSF receptor present on HL-60 cells and reverses GM-CSF's prevention of apoptosis of MO7E cells. Thus, 1786 represents a structurally designed biological and receptor antagonist of GM-CSF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Design of Peptides 1785 and 1786

1785 and 1786 were the result of the comparison of the GM-CSF mimic rAb 23.2 molecular models and its individual CDR sequences with the human GM-CSF structure(28) . Despite the weak primary sequence similarity shown by 23.2 with GM-CSF, structural similarity was suggested centered on the B (residues 54-61) and C (residues 77-83) helices of GM-CSF and the 23.2 CDRI region (28) . Important residues in the GM-CSF structure mimicked by similar residues on 23.2 were postulated to be: Thr-57, Glu-60, Lys-63, Lys-74, Thr-78, Ser-82, and Lys-85. Based on the ability of a predicted reverse turn structure (the 23.2 CDRI) to functionally mimic this site on GM-CSF, two distinct reverse turns were designed using the MacImdad program (Molecular Applications Group, Stanford, CA). Peptide 1786 was designed beginning at Thr-57 and proceeding up the exposed residues on the B helix (Glu-60 and Lys-63), then continuing in the reverse orientation on the C helix (Lys-74, Thr-78, Ser-82, and Lys-85). Glycine or alanine residues were introduced to orient the predicted contact residues on the same face of the reverse turn. Additional Gly residues were added at the amino and carboxyl termini to appropriately position Cys residues for cyclization by disulfide bridge formation. The 1785 peptide was designed according to the same principles, but beginning with Lys-85 on the C helix and proceeding in the opposite orientation. The sequences of these peptides and their predicted structures in comparison with the GM-CSF structure is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1: Development of 1785 and 1786 peptides. The structure of GM-CSF (left ) was determined from coordinates derived from the crystal structure (J. M. LaLonde, K. Swaminathan and D. Voet, manuscript in preparation), displayed on the MacImdad program (Molecular Applications Group, Palo Alto, CA) on a Macintosh Quadra 950 computer. The critical residues of 54-61 region of B helix and of 77-83 region on C helix are reported. These residues are introduced in 1785 (upper right) and 1786 (lower right) sequences together with glycines, alanines, and cysteines (for peptide cyclization). Peptide tridimensional structures are also reported.


Preparation of Cyclic Peptides

The two peptides were synthesized by solid phase methods, deprotected, and released from the resin by anhydrous HF as described previously (29, 30, 31, 32) by Macromolecular Resources at Colorado State University (C. Miles). Peptides (containing cysteine residues as terminal amino acids) were oxidized dissolving them at 0.5 mg/ml in 50 mM NH(4)HCO(3), pH 8.0, and stirring them overnight exposed to the air at room temperature. The extent of oxidation was estimated by Ellman determination after this procedure.

Determination of Free Sulfhydryls in Peptides (Ellman Determination)

20, 40, 80, and 160 µl of peptides at 0.5 mg/ml in 50 mM NH(4)HCO(3), pH 8.0, were added to 10 mM Na(2)HPO(3), pH 7.0, for a final volume of 1 ml. 6 µl of 4 mg/ml 5,5`-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (Sigma) in 50 mM Na(2)HPO(3), pH 7.0, were then added, and the reaction mixtures were kept at room temperature for 10 min. The percentage of sulfhydryls was determined from the absorbance at 420 nm, using the formula: (100 times A times M(r))/(13600 times mg/ml).

Peptide Characterization

The formation of peptide intrachain disulfide bridge versus interchain bridges was estimated by mass spectrometry analysis performed at the Protein Chemistry Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (J. Lambris). This indicated >90% monomers of the oxidized peptides.

Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

ELISA was performed with polystyrene plates (Dynatech Laboratories Inc., Chantilly, VA). The peptides 1785, 1786, and a control peptide (Cys-Thr-Tyr-Arg-Tyr-Pro-Leu-Glu-Leu-Asp-Thr-Ala-Asn-Asn-Arg) were dissolved in 50 mM NH(4)HCO(3) at 120, 90, 60, and 30 µg/ml and 50 µl of each dilution were used to coat the wells in duplicate by evaporation overnight at 37 °C. As positive controls wells were coated with 50 µl of 1 µg/ml GM-CSF in 0.1 M NaHCO(3) overnight at 4 °C. The wells were then washed with PBS, 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST), and blocked for 1 h at 37 °C with PBS, 0.05% Tween, 2% bovine serium albumin (PBSTB). After washing with PBST, 50 µl/well of primary antibody (polyclonal antibody against GM-CSF previously described(28, 33) ) and preimmune serum (normal mouse serum) as a negative control were added at 1:1,000, 1:10,000, 1:100,000, and 1:1,000,000 dilutions in PBSTB, and the plate was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The plate was washed, and 200 µl of secondary antibody, goat anti-mouse conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma) diluted 1:3500 in PBSTB was added to the wells, and the plate was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing, the color reagent 3,3`,5,5`-tetramethyl-benzidine dihydrochloride (Sigma) 0.1 mg/ml was added at 100 µl/well and, after 10 min of incubation at 37 °C, the color reaction was stopped with 20 µl/well of 2 N H(2)SO(4), and the absorbance at 450 nm was detected using the plate reader MR 5000 (Dynatech Laboratories Inc., Chantilly, VA). Values were reported subtracting the absorbance measured for uncoated wells from the absorbance of peptide-coated wells (34) .

Radioreceptor Binding Assay

Binding of 1785 and 1786 to the GM-CSF receptor present on HL60 cells was analyzed by a competitive radioreceptor assay modified from previously reported protocols(20, 35) . Briefly, HL60 (from ATCC) were grown in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal calf serum, L-glutamine, oxalate, pyruvate, insulin, essential amino acids, and nonessential amino acids. 10^6 cells were washed twice in RPMI 1640, 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 10% fetal calf serum (binding buffer), centrifuged, and incubated with different dilutions of peptides 1785, 1786, and control peptide (for final concentrations of 500, 250, 125, 62.5, and 31.25 µg/ml) for 1 h at room temperature. I-GM-CSF (118 µCi/µg, Dupont NEN) was then added to the reaction mixtures at a final concentration of 0.5 nM (for total GM-CSF bound) or a mixture of radioiodinated (0.5 nM), and cold GM-CSF (at the saturating concentration of 50 nM) was added (for nonspecific binding) and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The mixture was then layered over 500 µl of chilled fetal calf serum and centrifuged, and the counts/min bound determined in an LKB gamma counter. Specific binding was determined by subtracting the nonspecific counts/min bound from the total counts/min bound. Scatchard analysis revealed that, at this concentration, predominately low affinity sites (2.9 nM) were measured (27) (data not shown). Based on the EC achieved by peptide, the K(i) was calculated by the method of Cheng and Prusoff(36) .

Inhibition of Apoptosis

The assay was performed in a 24-well polystyrene plate (Corning, Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA), using MO7E cells (from R. Zollner, Genetics Institute, Cambridge MA), grown in RPMI 1640, 10% fetal calf serum, L-glutamine, oxalate, pyruvate, insulin, nonessential amino acids, essential amino acids, penicillin/streptomycin, and 20% U87 supernatant (containing GM-CSF as a growth factor). The peptides were added at different dilutions to the wells (final concentrations of 160, 80, 40, and 0 µg/ml). After sterilization of the plates under UV light for 40 min, fixed amounts of sterile GM-CSF (200 pM), TPA (12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (Sigma), 4 nM), and U87 supernatant (5%) were added separately to all the different concentrations of peptide. 250 µl of cell suspension at 10^6 cells/ml, previously washed with the medium without U87 supernatant and resuspended in the same medium, were added to each well, reaching a final concentration 5 times 10^5 cells/ml in a total volume of 500 µl. After 24 h of growth, cells were lysed and DNA degradation detected both by an agarose gel run and by the use of ``Cell Death Detection ELISA'' kit (Boehringer Mannheim).

For the agarose evaluation, 350 µl of 5 times 10^5 cells/ml were washed, added to 20 µl of lysis buffer (10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris HCl pH 8.0, 0.5% N-lauroylsarcosine sodium salt (Sarkosyl), 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K) and incubated for 1 h at 50 °C. After addition of 10 µl of 0.45 mg/ml RNase and incubation at 50 °C for 1 h, the samples were mixed with 10 µl of 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 0.03% bromphenol blue, 1% Nue Sieve GTG agarose (FMC BioProducts, Rockland, ME), heated at 70 °C for 10 min, loaded into a 1.2% agarose gel and run for 1 h at 100 V using TBE buffer (89 mM Tris base, 89 mM boric acid, 2 mM EDTA pH 8.0). The gel was stained with ethidium bromide (Sigma) and photographed under ultraviolet light.

Mono- and oligonucleosome fragments present in the cytoplasmic fraction of cell lysates were detected following the protocol for ``Cell Death Detection ELISA'' kit. Briefly, the microtiter plate was coated with anti-histone solution and, after incubation with a 1:10 dilution of the lysate derived from 2.5 times 10^4 cells, DNA was detected by the anti-DNA-peroxidase system according to the kit instructions, with color development read at 405 nm.

RESULTS

Peptide Design

The two peptides were synthesized according to the sequences reported in Fig. 1. The postulated contact residues on the GM-CSF B and C helices (regions involved in the interaction with GM-CSFRalpha) were introduced into the peptides in two different orientations (``up'' the B and ``down'' the C helices for 1786, with the opposite orientation for 1785). The design incorporated reverse turn structures together with appropriate spacer residues and cysteines at the amino and carboxyl termini, which allowed the development of cyclic forms.

Peptide Cyclization

The procedure followed for peptide cyclization was oxidation of the terminal sulfhydryls with intrachain disulfide bond formation. Ellman determination indicated that only 4.7 and 1.8% of free sulfhydryls were still present in the oxidized forms of 1785 and 1786, respectively, confirming near complete oxidation of the peptides.

Mass spectrometry analysis was performed on the oxidized peptides to confirm that oxidation had resulted in intrachain disulfide bond formation, as opposed to formation of oligomers. The mass spectrometry study showed that >90% of the oxidized 1785 peptide was represented by a peak at molecular mass 1514, with the theoretical molecular mass for 1785 being 1511 daltons. Similarly, >90% of the 1786 peptide was seen as a peak at molecular mass 1637, the theoretical molecular mass being 1639. Thus, both of the oxidized peptides were >90% in the monomeric form, with only trace contamination by oligomers (dimers and trimers).

Recognition of Peptides by Polyclonal Antibody against GM-CSF

The ability of these peptides to mimic GM-CSF was initially evaluated by its recognition by polyclonal antibody against GM-CSF in an ELISA (Fig. 2). Neither peptide showed any specific binding by the preimmune serum (normal mouse serum), indicating lack of nonspecific binding. Both peptides 1785 and 1786 were specifically bound by polyclonal antibody against GM-CSF, with the titer higher for 1786 than that for 1785. The control peptide was not bound by the anti-GM-CSF, further supporting specific recognition of the peptide mimics. This supports structural mimicry of GM-CSF by the peptides 1785 and 1786.

Figure 2: Binding of polyclonal Ab against GM-CSF to 1786 and 1785 peptides. Binding was performed by ELISA assay as described under ``Material and Methods.'' The graphs shown are referred to the case of peptides at 1.5 µg/well. Similar results were obtained with 3, 4.5, and 6 µg/well. Binding of 1786, 1785, and control peptides both to anti-GM-CSF polyclonal antibody and to preimmunization serum (normal mouse serum, NMS) are reported. The values are obtained subtracting the A of wells without peptides from the A of wells with peptides at different concentrations. The mean ± S.D. of duplicate wells is shown for decreasing amounts of polyclonal anti-GM-CSF antibody.


Peptide Binding to the GM-CSF Receptor

The ability of the peptides to bind the GM-CSF receptor was evaluated by their ability to compete with GM-CSF for binding to the GM-CSF receptor present on HL-60 cells as evaluated by a radioreceptor assay. Peptides were preincubated with HL-60 cells prior to the addition of I-GM-CSF, and specific binding was determined by carrying out identical reactions in the presence of excess of unlabeled GM-CSF. Fig. 3reports the typical results obtained with 1786, 1785, and control peptides. While 1785 and control peptides failed to show any specific inhibitory activity, 1786 inhibited GM-CSF binding to its receptor in a dose-dependent manner, with 50% inhibition achieved at 500 µg/ml. 1786 therefore antagonizes GM-CSF binding to its receptor, indicating binding of this peptide to the GM-CSFR on HL-60 cells. Scatchard analysis of GM-CSF binding to HL-60 cells reveals high affinity (46 pM) and low affinity (2.9 nM) sites for GM-CSF binding(20, 35) . Under the conditions of the assays here, predominately low affinity sites were measured (27) (data not shown). Based on the low affinity K(d), calculation of the K(i) for peptide using the method of Cheng and Prusoff (36) gives a value of 270 µM.

Figure 3: Inhibition of I-GM-CSF binding to HL-60 cells by peptides. The radioreceptor assay was performed as reported under ``Materials and Methods,'' using 10^6 cells/test. The specific proportion of count/min bound was determined subtracting the proportion of counts/min bound under identical conditions in the presence of saturating amounts of unlabeled GM-CSF (50 nM). The percent inhibition of binding of 1786, 1785, and control peptide is reported versus increasing amounts of peptides together with the S.D. of duplicate tests.


Bioactivity of Peptides

GM-CSF bioactivity can be evaluated by its ability to inhibit spontaneous apoptosis of the GM-CSF-dependent cell line MO7E(37, 38) . This assay is of particular utility as it can also be applied to stimuli which inhibit apoptosis independent of signaling through the GM-CSF receptor(37) . To analyze the bioactivity shown by the 1786 and 1785 peptides, their capacity to interfere with GM-CSF's ability to prevent apoptosis in MO7E cells was assayed. Apoptosis was evaluated both by agarose gel electrophoresis of total cellular DNA and by a specific ELISA assay. In addition to GM-CSF, two other stimuli were evaluated: phorbol ester (TPA), which inhibits apoptosis in a receptor-independent fashion, and GM-CSF containing U87 cell supernatant.

Both the agarose gel and the ELISA results (Fig. 4) indicated clear antagonist activity for the 1786 peptide, with reversal of GM-CSF's prevention of apoptosis. Increasing the amount of 1786 in presence of GM-CSF increased the amount of apoptosis seen (IC of 85 µM). When incubated with the cells in medium alone, the 1786 peptide did not prevent DNA degradation, excluding any agonist activity by the peptide. The same peptide, in the presence of U87 cell supernatant, presented the same type of dose-dependent behavior in increasing apoptosis as shown in presence of GM-CSF (IC of 65 µM). The 1786 effect was not seen in the presence of TPA which prevents apoptosis in a receptor independent fashion, indicating that the antagonist activity was GM-CSF receptor-dependent. In contrast, the 1785 peptide did not demonstrate agonist or antagonist activity in these apoptosis assays. This indicates that 1786, which inhibits GM-CSF receptor binding, has a similarly specific GM-CSF receptor-dependent antagonist bioactivity.

Figure 4: Inhibition of GM-CSF's prevention of apoptosis by peptides. Apoptosis was evaluated both by running cell lysate in an agarose gel (left, reported only for the case of peptides at 160 µg/ml) and by determining mono- and oligonucleosomes with an ELISA kit (right, reported only for the significant 1786 peptide). The assays were performed as indicated under ``Materials and Methods.'' Lysates from cells incubated with or without peptides in presence or absence of factors preventing apoptosis (GM-CSF, TPA, U87 supernatant) were loaded into gel (left) or analyzed by ELISA reporting the percentage of maximal apoptosis, as referred to the absence of any reagent preventing apoptosis (right).


DISCUSSION

The interaction of GM-CSF with its receptor has been the subject of intense investigation. Prior studies with GM-CSF mutants indicated that residues on the first (A) helix of GM-CSF are involved in the binding to high affinity receptor (the GM-CSFRalphabulletbeta(c) complex) but not to low affinity receptor (GM-CSFRalpha alone)(24, 39, 40) . This is illustrated most strikingly by studies using mutants of residue Glu-21 of GM-CSF, which inhibit binding of GM-CSF to the low affinity receptor, but display little activity in inhibiting binding to the high affinity receptor(39, 41, 42) . Based on these experiments, it has been proposed that the first alpha helix of GM-CSF is responsible for binding to beta(c)(40) .

Murine and human GM-CSF display species specificity and are not cross-reactive. As substitutions are scattered throughout these molecules, it was possible to swap regions of murine and human GM-CSF to locate sites critical for receptor interaction(35) . These studies indicated a critical role for amino acids 21-31 (A helix) and 77-94 (including the C helix) in mediating the activity of human GM-CSF, suggesting that the second site may be involved in binding to the GM-CSFRalpha. Additional mutagenesis studies(42, 43, 44, 45) , mapping of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies(46, 47, 48, 49, 50) , and synthetic peptide studies (47, 51, 52) suggest other potential interaction sites. Thus, in spite of considerable study, the GM-CSFRalpha interaction site(s) on GM-CSF remain incompletely characterized.

In our group use of synthetic peptides, anti-peptide antisera, and neutralizing monoclonal antibody to map epitopes on GM-CSF important for bioactivity have led to several conclusions: a peptide corresponding to residues 17-31 of the A helix, as well as antibodies against this peptide, are able to inhibit GM-CSF dependent cellular proliferation; the 17-31 peptide also inhibits GM-CSF binding to the high affinity receptor but not to the low affinity receptor; a peptide corresponding to residues 54-78 overlapping the B and C helices is recognized by two neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to GM-CSF and exhibits antagonist bioactivity(27) . This suggests a model of receptor interaction where residues on the B and C helices of GM-CSF, the opposite face of the A helix, are involved in interactions with GM-CSFRalpha, while residues on the A helix mediate binding to beta(c)(27) . This model is supported by analysis of a rAb mimic of GM-CSF (23.2) as well as a peptide derived from the CDRI sequence of the rAb 23.2. The CDRI peptide and the rAb were shown to exhibit structural similarity to residues on the GM-CSF B and C helices; both the peptide and the rAb mimic were bound by neutralizing anti-GM-CSF monoclonal antibody 126.213 and exhibited biological and/or receptor antagonist activity(28, 33) .

The purpose of this study was to further test this model by developing additional peptides which mimic the position of specific residues on the GM-CSF B and C helices, and evaluating them for receptor binding and biological activity. The structure of the two peptides discussed in this report derived from our prior studies, with 1785 and 1786 designed to structurally mimic potential contact residues on the GM-CSF B (residues 54-61) and C (residues 77-83) helices. The two peptides were synthesized with cysteines at both the amino and carboxyl termini in order to develop cyclic forms, thereby constraining the conformations of the peptides and providing more accurate mimicry of the B and C helical face of GM-CSF. These peptides also allowed us to evaluate whether reverse turn peptide mimics, such as those developed from the rAb 23.2 CDRI sequence, could be developed from simple structural considerations, obviating the need to develop them by library screening or antibody mimicry.

The cyclic peptides were easily prepared by oxidation overnight, reaching almost 100% oxidation and 90% yield (only traces of dimer and trimer were detected by mass spectrometry analysis). The cyclized monomer peptides were therefore used in binding tests to polyclonal antibody against GM-CSF and to GM-CSF receptor present on HL60 cells. In both cases peptide 1786 showed good binding capacity, displaying competitive behavior toward GM-CSF in the radioreceptor assay. On the other hand, peptide 1785 demonstrated a lower binding affinity to polyclonal anti-GM-CSF antiserum and complete lack of interaction with the GM-CSF receptor. In order to establish their bioactivity, the peptides were assayed in an apoptosis assay. GM-CSF is known to prevent apoptosis of MO7E cells(37, 38) . These cells were incubated, in presence or absence of different concentrations of peptides, with fixed amounts of GM-CSF or U87 supernatant (a source of GM-CSF). TPA, an agent which also prevents apoptosis but via a different mechanism not involving the GM-CSF receptor, allowed the specificity of the reaction to be evaluated(37) . Peptide 1786, but not 1785 or control peptides, displayed biological antagonist activity: increasing the amount of peptide 1786 resulted in an increase in apoptosis in response to GM-CSF or U87 supernatant, while no effect was seen in the presence of TPA.

The IC for peptide 1786 in the apoptosis assay was similar for both GM-CSF and U87 supernatant (65-85 µM). This is somewhat smaller than the calculated K(i) for peptide inhibition of binding to low affinity receptor sites on HL-60 cells (270 µM). However, the low affinity sites do not appear to mediate bioactivity, while the high affinity sites do(21, 39) . Interestingly, if a similar EC is assumed for the high affinity sites, the calculated K(i) for peptide 1786 in the binding assay is 59 µM(36) , much closer to the IC observed in the apoptosis assay. This supports the role of high affinity sites in mediating bioactivity.

Based on these studies, peptide 1786 represents a receptor antagonist of GM-CSF, supporting our conclusions from molecular-structural analysis utilizing recombinant antibodies (28) for the identification of residues critical for bioactivity. Moreover, these studies suggest that similar peptide mimics can be designed based on structural information derived from knowledge of potential contact residues. The ability to design such mimics may be readily extended to other systems where sufficient structural and biological information is available to delineate potential contact residues. This should allow for the analysis of potential contact residues on novel backbones as well as the rational design of receptor antagonists with potential clinical utility.

FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported in part by grants from the American Cancer Society and the Arthritis Foundation (to W. V. W.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Supported by a grant from the USAMRAA (DAMD17-94-J-4310) Breast Cancer Initiative.

Supported by grants from the American Foundation for AIDS Research and the National Institutes of Health.

**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of Pennsylvania, 913 BRB1, 422 Curie Dr., Philadelphia, PA 19104-6100. Tel.: 215-662-3681.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: CSF, colony-stimulating factor; GM, granulocyte-macrophage; CSFR, colony-stimulating factor receptor; IL, interleukin; rAB, recombinant antibody; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; CDR, complementarity determining region; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Protein Chemistry Laboratory of the Medical School of the University of Pennsylvania for the mass spectrometry analysis, Paul McGonigle and Carl Romano for their help with pharmacology questions, and A. Domenico for his helpful comments.

REFERENCES

  1. Weisbart, R., and Golde, D. (1989) Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am. 3, 401-409 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Antman, K. H. (1993) Eur. J. Cancer 3, S2-S6
  3. Tao, M.-H., and Levy, R. (1993) Nature 362, 755-758 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Dranoff, G., Jaffee, E., Lazenby, A., Golumbek, P., Levitsky, H., Brose, K., Jackson, V., Hamada, H., Pardoll, D., and Mulligan, R. C. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U. S. A. 90, 3539-3543 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Diederichs, K., Boone, T., and Karplus, P. A. (1991) Science 254, 1779-1782 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Diederichs, K., Jacques, S., Boone, T., and Karplus, P. A. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 221, 55-60 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. LaLonde, J. M., Hanna, L. S., Rattoballi, R., Berman, H. M., and Voet, D. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 205, 783-785 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Walter, M. R., Cook, W. J., Ealick, S. E., Nagabhushan, T. L., Trotta, P. P., and Bugg, C. E. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 224, 1075-1085 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. deVos, A. M., Ultsch, M., and Kossiakoff, A. A. (1992) Science 255, 306-312 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Brandhuber, B. J., Boone, T., Kenney, W. C., and McKay, D. B. (1987) Science 238, 1707-1709 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Garrett, D. S., Powers, R., March, C. J., Frieden, E. A., Clore, G. M., and Gronenborn, A. M. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 4347-4353 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Powers, R., Garrett, D. S., March, C. J., Frieden, E. A., Gronenborn, A. M., and Clore, G. M. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 6744-6762 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Redfield, C., Boyd, J., Smith, L. J., Smith, R. A., and Dobson, C. M. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 10431-10437 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Smith, L. J., Redfield, C., Boyd, J., Lawrence, G. M., Edwards, R. G., Smith, R. A., and Dobson, C. M. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 224, 899-904 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Pandit, J., Bohm, A., Jancarik, J., Halenbeck, R., Koths, K., and Kim, S. H. (1992) Science 258, 1358-13562 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Milburn, M. V., Hassell, A. M., Lambert, M. H., Jordan, S. R., Proudfoot, A. E., Graber, P., and Wells, T. N. (1993) Nature 363, 172-1726 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Chiba, S., Tojo, A., Kitamura, T., Urabe, A., Miyazono, K., and Takaku, F. (1990) Leukemia 4, 29-36 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Cannistra, S. A., Groshek, P., Garlick, R., Miller, J., and Griffin, J. D. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 93-97 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. DiPersio, J., Billing, P., Kaufman, S., Eghtesady, P., Williams, R. E., and Gasson, J. C. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 1834-1841 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Gearing, D. P., King, J. A., Gough, N. M., and Nicola, N. A. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 3667-3676 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Hayashida, K., Kitamura, T., Gorman, D. M., Arai, K.-I., Yokota, T., and Miyajima, A. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 9655-9659 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Park, L., Friend, D., Gillis, S., and Urdal, D. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 4177-4183 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Onetto-Pothier, N., Aumont, N., Haman, A., Bigras, C., Wong, G. G., Clark, S. C., De Lean, A., and Hoang, T. (1990) Blood 75, 59-66 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Shanafelt, A. B., and Kastelein, R. A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25466-25472 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Yokota, T., Watanabe, S., Mui, A. L., Muto, A., Miyajima, A., and Arai, K. (1993) Leukemia 7, S102-S107
  26. Sakamaki, K., Miyajima, I., Kitamura, T., and Miyajima, A. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3541-3549 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. VonFeldt, J. M., Monfardini, C., Fish, S., Rosenbaum, H., Kieber-Emmons, T., Williams, R. M., Kahn, S. A., Weiner, D. B., and Williams, W. V. (1995) Peptide Res 8, 20-32
  28. Monfardini, C., Kieber-Emmons, T., VonFeldt, J. M., O'Malley, B., Rosenbaum, H., Godillot, A. P., Kaushansky, K., Brown, C. B., Voet, D., McCallus, D. E., Weiner, D. B., and Williams, W. V. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 6628-6638 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Williams, W., Guy, H., Rubin, D., Robey, F., Myers, J., Kieber-Emmons, T., Weiner, D., and Greene, M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 6488-6492 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Williams, W., Moss, D., Kieber-Emmons, T., Cohen, J., Myers, J., Weiner, D., and Greene, M. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 5537-5541 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Williams, W., Kieber-Emmons, T., Weiner, D., Rubin, D., and Greene, M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 9241-9250 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Williams, W., Kieber-Emmons, T., VonFeldt, J., Greene, M. I., and Weiner, D. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 5182-5190 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. VonFeldt, J. M., Monfardini, C., Kieber-Emmons, T., Voet, D., Weiner, D. B., and Williams, W. V. (1994) Immunol. Res. 13, 96-109 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Ugen, K. E., Goedert, J. J., Boyer, J., Refaeli, Y., Frank, I., Williams, W. V., Willoughby, A., Landesman, S., Mendez, H., Rubinstein, A., KeiberEmmons, T., and Weiner, D. B. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 89, 1923-1930
  35. Kaushansky, K., Shoemaker, S., Alfaro, S., and Brown, C. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 1213-1217 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Cheng, Y. C., and Prusoff, W. H. (1973) Biochem. Pharmacol. 22, 3099-3108 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Rajotte, D., Haddad, P., Haman, A., Cragoe, E. J., Jr., and Hoang, T. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 9980-9987 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Horie, M., and Broxmeyer, H. E. (1995) Exp. Hematol. 23, 168-173 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Lopez, A. F., Shannon, M. F., Hercus, T., Nicola, N. A., Cambareri, B., Dottore, M., Layton, M. J., Eglinton, L., and Vadas, M. A. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 909-916 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Shanafelt, A. B., Miyajima, A., Kitamura, T., and Kastelein, R. A. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 4105-4112 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Hercus, T. R., Bagley, C. J., Cambareri, B., Dottore, M., Woodcock, J. M., Vadas, M. A., Shannon, M. F., and Lopez, A. F. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 5838-5842 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Hercus, T. R., Cambareri, B., Dottore, M., Woodcock, J., Bagley, C. J., Vadas, M. A., Shannon, M. F., and Lopez, A. F. (1994) Blood 83, 3500-3508 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Gough, N., Grail, D., Gearing, D., and Metcalf, D. (1987) Eur. J. Biochem. 169, 353-358 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Shanafelt, A. B., and Kastelein, R. A. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 4872-4876 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Altmann, S. W., Johnson, G. D., and Prystowky, M. B. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 5333-5341 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Brown, C. B., Hart, C. E., Curtis, D. M., Bailey, M. C., and Kaushansky, K. (1990) J. Immunol. 144, 2184-2189 [Abstract]
  47. Kanakura, Y., Cannistra, S. A., Brown, C. B., Nakamura, M., Seelig, G. F., Prosise, W. W., Hawkins, J. C., Kaushansky, K., and Griffin, J. D. (1991) Blood 77, 1033-1043 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Nice, E., Dempsey, P., Layton, J., Morstyn, G., Cui, D. F., Simpson, R., Fabri, L., and Burgess, A. (1990) Growth Factors 3, 159-169 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Seelig, G., Prosise, W., Scheffler, J., Nagabhushan, T., and Trotta, P. (1990) J. Cell. Biochem. 14C, 246
  50. Brown, C. B., Pihl, C. E., and Kaushansky, K. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 225, 873-880 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Greenfield, R. S., Braslawsky, G. R., Kadow, K. F., Spitalny, G. L., Chace, D., Bull, C. O., and Bursuker, I. (1993) J. Immunol. 150, 5241-5251 [Abstract]
  52. Clark-Lewis, I., Lopez, A. F., To, L. B., Vadas, M. A., Schrader, J. W., Hood, L. E., and Kent, S. B. H. (1988) J. Immunol. 141, 881-889 [Abstract]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Monfardini, C.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, W. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Monfardini, C.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, W. V.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement