Volume 272, Number 11,
Issue of March 14, 1997
pp. 7473-7481
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
The Hemopexin-like Domain (C Domain) of Human Gelatinase A
(Matrix Metalloproteinase-2) Requires Ca2+ for Fibronectin
and Heparin Binding
BINDING PROPERTIES OF RECOMBINANT GELATINASE A C DOMAIN TO
EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX AND BASEMENT MEMBRANE COMPONENTS*
(Received for publication, July 17, 1996, and in revised form, December 20, 1996)
U. Margaretha
Wallon
and
Christopher M.
Overall
§
From the Faculty of Dentistry and Department of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British
Columbia, 2199 Wesbrook Mall,
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The binding properties of the COOH-terminal
hemopexin-like domain (C domain) of human gelatinase A (matrix
metalloproteinase-2, 72-kDa gelatinase) were investigated to determine
whether the C domain has binding affinity for extracellular matrix and
basement membrane components. Recombinant C domain (rC domain)
(Gly417-Cys631) was expressed in
Escherichia coli, and the purified protein, identified
using two antipeptide antibodies, was determined by electrospray mass
spectrometry to have a mass of 25,925 Da, within 0.1 Da of that
predicted. As assessed by microwell substrate binding assays and by
column affinity chromatography, the matrix proteins laminin, denatured
type I collagen, elastin, SPARC (secreted protein that is acidic and
rich in cysteine), tenascin, and MatrigelTM were not bound
by the rC domain. Unlike the hemopexin-like domains of collagenase and
stromelysin, the rC domain also did not bind native type I collagen.
Nor were native or denatured types II, IV, V, and X collagen, or the
NC1 domain of type VII collagen bound. However, binding to heparin and
fibronectin (Kd, 1.1 × 10
6
M) could be disrupted by 0.58-0.76 and 0.3 M
NaCl, respectively. Using nonoverlapping chymotrypsin-generated
fragments of fibronectin, binding sites for the rC domain were found on
both the 40-kDa heparin binding and the 120-kDa cell binding
fibronectin domains (Kd values, ~4-6 × 10
7 M). The Ca2+ ion, but not the
potential structural Zn2+ ion, were found to be essential
for maintaining the binding properties of the protein. The apo-form of
the rC domain did not bind heparin, and both ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid and the specific Ca2+ ion chelator
1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)
ethane-N,N,N
,N
-tetraacetic acid, but not the
Zn2+ ion chelator 1,10-phenanthroline, eluted the holo form
of the rC domain from both heparin-Sepharose and fibronectin. Inductive coupled plasma mass spectrometry also did not detect a Zn2+
ion in the rC domain. In contrast, reduction with 65 mM
dithiothreitol did not interfere with heparin binding, further
emphasizing the crucial structural role played by the Ca2+
ion. Together, these data demonstrate for the first time that the
hemopexin-like domain of gelatinase A has a binding site for fibronectin and heparin, and that Ca2+ ions are important
in maintaining the structure and function of the domain.
INTRODUCTION
The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)1
constitute a family of proteolytic enzymes that together can degrade
all components of the extracellular matrix and basement membranes, with
each MMP having a distinct substrate preference (1, 2). MMP activity plays a major role during physiological and pathological processes, including embryogenesis, metastasis (3, 4), and inflammatory diseases
(5, 6). Most soluble MMPs are secreted as proenzymes and share
homologous primary and tertiary structures organized into distinct
structural domains, with some differences in domain composition and
number (6). These functionally and structurally defined domains include
the NH2-terminal zymogen domain containing the conserved
PRCGXPD motif involved in enzyme latency (7) and a Zn2+ and
Ca2+ ion binding catalytic domain. As with other
proteinases, the specificity of peptide bond cleavage is determined by
the S and S
subsite defining amino acid residues (8). Equally
important are discrete substrate binding domains, or smaller functional modules, located outside of the active site, which form specialized exosites (9) to target proteolytic activity in tissues and are
essential for cleavage of some substrates. Immediately adjacent to the
catalytic site in gelatinase A (MMP-2, 72-kDa gelatinase) and
gelatinase B (MMP-9, 92-kDa gelatinase) is a fibronectin type II-like
module triple repeat (10, 11), which forms a collagen binding domain
(CBD) with strong affinity for elastin and denatured types I (12, 13),
IV, and V collagens, and native types I, V, and X collagens (9,
13),2 proteins degraded by the gelatinases.
Following the catalytic domain is a variably long linker, which in
collagenase-1 (MMP-1) may be important for triple helicase activity
(14). The linker connects to the COOH-terminal domain (C domain),
comprising four hemopexin-like modules possessed by all MMPs except
matrilysin (15). Three-dimensional structure analysis of the C domain
of gelatinase A (16, 17) and collagenase-1 (18) has revealed a
four-bladed
-propeller structure with a central Ca2+
ion, a potential Zn2+ ion binding site, and either a
Ca2+-Cl
(17) or a
Na+-Cl
(16) ion pair in the central
channel.
Even though the primary and tertiary structures of the MMP C domains
share extensive homology, they possess a range of different properties
that are MMP-specific. The C domain of gelatinase B binds the natural
tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) (11, 19, 20)
whereas the C domain of gelatinase A is involved in binding to TIMP-2
(21) and to cell membranes (9, 22) on concanavalin A (ConA)
activated normal cells (23) and tumor cells (24, 25). In addition,
latent gelatinase A, in complex with TIMP-2, is activated on
interaction with active membrane type MMPs (MT-MMPs) (26). Deletion
mutants have demonstrated the requirement of the C domain of gelatinase
A for cell binding and activation of the latent enzyme on cell surfaces
(27), whereas the C domain of the collagenases mediates substrate
specificity for native, triple helical type I collagen. In the absence
of the C domain, the catalytic domain alone of collagenase-1 (28, 29)
and neutrophil collagenase (30, 31) cleaves synthetic peptides and
casein, but not native collagen. Indeed, the C domain alone of
collagenase-1 binds native type I collagen (32-34), as can the C
domain of stromelysin-1 (33, 34), even though collagen is not cleaved
by stromelysin-1. In contrast, neither the activity nor the substrate
specificity of the stromelysins is dramatically modified by the removal
of the C domain (35-38). Likewise, the gelatinases degrade gelatin
and native type IV collagen in a manner that appears independent of the
presence of the C domain (39).
The gelatinases also efficiently degrade fibronectin, native types V,
VII, and X collagen, and elastin (40-42). However, the importance of
the C domain for these activities is unknown. Indeed, other than for
elastin, native types I and V collagen, and gelatins that are bound by
the CBD (12, 13, 42), exosites conferring specificity for these
substrates have yet to be identified. The gelatinases may depend on the
C domain for binding fibronectin or native type VII and X collagens as
a requisite for efficient catalysis and triple helicase activity, but
this has not been directly tested. In the present study we investigated
the potential binding properties of a recombinant C domain of human
gelatinase A for a number of extracellular matrix and basement membrane
components. We found that the C domain exhibits strong binding
properties for fibronectin and heparin and that the binding is
dependent on the structural Ca2+ but not Zn2+
ion in the C domain.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials and Reagents
Human types IV and V collagen
(non-pepsin-treated) were from Becton Dickinson and Life Sciences; type
X collagen and elastin were from Sigma; fibronectin
fragments (40 and 120 kDa) and laminin were from Life Sciences;
MatrigelTM was obtained from Beckton Dickinson; tenascin
was from Chemicon and Life Sciences; Affi-Gel heparin, Affi-Gel 10, and
10-DG columns were from Bio-Rad; chelating Sepharose 6B,
gelatin-Sepharose 4B, heparin-Sepharose CL-6B, and CM-Sepharose Fast
Flow were from Pharmacia Biotech Inc.; G-10 Sephadex, 1,2-bis(2-amino
phenoxy)-ethane-N,N,N
,N
-tetraacetic acid
(BAPTA), and keyhole limpet hemocyanin were from Sigma; and Freund's
complete and incomplete adjuvants were from Calbiochem. Human
gelatinase A cDNA was a kind gift from Dr. K. Tryggvason (Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden) (43) secreted protein that is
acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) was kindly provided by Dr. J. Sodek
(University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada); the NC1 domain of
type VII collagen was generously provided by Dr. P. Rousselle (Centre
National de la Recherche Scientifique, Lyon, France); and type II
collagen was a gift from Dr. J. Mort (Shriners Hospital, Montreal,
Quebec, Canada).
Acid-soluble native type I collagen was prepared from rat tail tendons
by extraction with 0.5 M acetic acid and purified by differential precipitation with 1.7 M NaCl (44).
Fibronectin was affinity purified from bovine serum by binding to
gelatin-Sepharose 4B and elution with a 0-10% Me2SO
gradient (45). The Me2SO was then removed from the
fibronectin using a 10-DG column. Purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE
analysis under reducing and nonreducing conditions.
Polyclonal Antipeptide Antibodies
Rabbit polyclonal
His6 and
72ex12 antipeptide antibodies were raised
against a peptide present in the polyHis fusion tag and from part of a
surface exposed
-strand of hemopexin module III of the gelatinase A
C domain, respectively. Synthetic peptides were purified by high
performance liquid chromatography before coupling to keyhole limpet
hemocyanin (46). After emulsifying in Freund's complete adjuvant 1 mg
of each peptide was injected subcutaneously into two rabbits each.
Three to four biweekly boosts of peptide in incomplete Freund's
adjuvant were administered intramuscularly. Whole serum was
affinity-purified against peptide coupled to Affi-Gel 10 and
quantitated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Recombinant Gelatinase A Hemopexin-like C Domain Expression
Construct
The 5
- and 3
-boundaries of the cDNA encoding the
C domain and linker of gelatinase A
(Gly417-Cys631) were defined by the 5
-boundary
of exon 9 and the natural stop codon in exon 13, respectively. The
cDNA was polymerase chain reaction-amplified from the full-length
cDNA of human gelatinase A using the primers
5
-GCTAGCTAGCGGGGCCTCTCCTGACATT-3
and
5
-CTTAAGCTTCAGCAGCCTAGCCAGTC-3
, which added an NheI site
and a BamHI site in the 5
- and 3
-extensions, respectively.
The purified 688-base pair product was digested with NheI
and BamHI and ligated into the expression vector pGYMX (13),
which expresses recombinant protein with a short
NH2-terminal fusion tag comprising an initiation
methionine, a His6 tag, and a factor Xa
cleavage site (13). Sequencing (47) of the plasmid, pGYMX9-13,
confirmed the fidelity and reading frame of the cDNA.
Recombinant Protein Expression in Escherichia coli
E.
coli strains were screened for recombinant protein expression
after growth in 1% (w/v) tryptone (Becton Dickinson), 0.8% (w/v)
yeast extract (Becton Dickinson), 0.5% (w/v) NaCl, and 100 µg/ml
ampicillin, pH 7.4. Log phase seed cultures were used to inoculate
either 35- or 60-liter Chemap fermentor cultures, which were then grown
under controlled constant temperature and aeration conditions for
24 h. Collected cells were washed and then lysed, inclusion bodies
were dissolved in guanidinium-HCl, and recombinant protein was refolded
prior to purification using procedures slightly modified (48) from
those previously demonstrated (13) to produce correctly folded,
disulfide cross-linked monomeric recombinant protein. In brief,
disulfide bond exchange was performed in 0.1 M sodium
borate, pH 10, under highly aerated conditions for 2 h, and the
guanidinium was then slowly removed by step dialysis to refold the
protein.
Purification of the Recombinant C Domain
Refolded protein
was loaded on a Zn2+-charged chelating Sepharose 6B Column
(Vt, 20 ml). After extensive washes with chromatography buffer (100 mM sodium dibasic phosphate
buffer, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 8.0), nonspecifically bound
bacterial proteins were eluted with a step pH gradient (pH 8.0-6.0) in
1.0 M NaCl. Recombinant protein was then eluted with a
0-400 mM imidazole gradient developed over 100 ml, and the
pooled fractions buffer was exchanged to 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.4, by gel filtration prior to snap freezing in liquid
N2.
SDS-PAGE and Enzymography
Heat-denatured protein samples
were separated under reducing (65 mM DTT) or nonreducing
conditions by SDS-PAGE according to the method of Laemmli (49) using
15% polyacrylamide gels. Protein bands were stained with Coomassie
Brilliant Blue R-250. Samples analyzed by enzymography were
electrophoresed nonreduced on 10% polyacrylamide gels copolymerized
with 1 mg/ml gelatin according to the method of Overall and Limeback
(50).
Immunoblot Analysis
To confirm the identity of the purified
protein, reduced and nonreduced recombinant protein was blotted onto a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore), reacted with
affinity-purified
His6 or
72ex12 antibodies, and then
detected with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody and
enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham Corp.) on Kodak SB-5 film
(Eastman Kodak Co.).
Mass Spectrometry
The mass of the rC domain was measured by
electrospray mass spectrometry using a PESCIEX API 300 spectrometer
after sample injection on a C18 high performance liquid chromatography
column at 50 µl/min. The Zn2+ ion content of the rC
domain was measured three times by inductive coupled plasma mass
spectrometry using 8.6-10 mg protein per analysis on a Sola
(Finnigan-MAT) spectrometer.
Microwell Substrate Binding Assay
Binding of the rC domain
to extracellular matrix proteins and substrates of gelatinase A was
determined using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent type assay (13).
Proteins tested were soluble fibronectin, laminin, SPARC, tenascin,
native and denatured types I, II, IV, V, and X collagens, the NC1
domain of type VII collagen, and reconstituted basement membrane
MatrigelTM. Denatured collagens were prepared by heat
denaturation at 56 °C for 30 min. Ovalbumin was used as a negative
control. To map C domain binding sites on fibronectin, nonoverlapping
40- and 120-kDa chymotrypsin fragments of fibronectin were used.
Proteins (0.5 µg) in 15 mM
Na2CO3, 35 mM NaHCO3,
and 0.02% (w/v) NaN3, pH 9.6, were coated on 96-well
microtiter plates for 18 h at 4 °C. Consistent and equal
coating of test substrates in this assay has been previously confirmed
(13). Wells were then blocked with 2.5% (w/v) ovalbumin, and serially
diluted rC domain was added (1024 to 4 pmol/100 µl (10.24 µM to 40 nM) in 20 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.4, for 1 h. Extensive washes with phosphate-buffered saline,
0.02% Tween 20 (v/v) followed, and the bound rC domain was then
quantitated using either the
His6 or the
72ex12
antibodies followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody and p-nitrophenyl
phosphate disodium as substrate. Assays were performed at least in
duplicate per plate, and data were only compared for experiments on the
same plate. All experiments were repeated six times, except for type II
and X collagens, the type VII collagen NC1 domain, SPARC, and tenascin,
which were performed in quadruplicate. Specificity was confirmed by
comparing the binding of the rC domain with another recombinant domain
from gelatinase A, the fibronectin type II-like triple repeat
previously designated the collagen binding domain (13). The rCBD
contains the same fusion tag and was expressed in the same E. coli strain used for rC domain expression.
Affinity Chromatography
Binding properties of the rC domain
were also determined by affinity chromatography. Minicolumns containing
either gelatin-Sepharose 4B, elastin/Sephadex G-10, heparin-Sepharose
CL-6B, fibronectin coupled to gelatin-Sepharose 4B, or fibronectin
coupled to Affi-Gel 10 (Vt, 100, 200, 100, 70, and
50 µl, respectively) were used in 50 mM Tris-HCl with or
without 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4, chromatography buffer as
appropriate (51). To ensure saturation of binding sites on the affinity
matrix, a standardized quantity (50 µg, 2 nmol) of the rC domain was
loaded onto the columns, which would result in excess protein being
recovered in the unbound and wash fractions. To confirm binding to
affinity matrices, any rC domain recovered in the unbound material was
reapplied to another column of the affinity matrix, and binding was
compared. Binding of the rC domain was typically assessed by step
elution with NaCl to 1.0 M followed by a step gradient of
Me2SO (1-10%) in chromatography buffer. Chromatography
fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE using 15% gels. Affinity
chromatography experiments were performed at least six times for each
matrix. FPLC was also performed using both heparin-Sepharose and
Affi-Gel heparin 1.0-ml columns. After sample loading, a 0-1.0
M NaCl gradient was developed over 10 ml at 1.0 ml/min.
Chelation Experiments
To assess the role of the structural
divalent cations on the binding of the rC domain to heparin and
fibronectin, chelators (EDTA, 1,10-phenanthroline, EGTA, and BAPTA)
were used to attempt elution from these affinity matrices. To confirm
the elution by chelators, columns were then eluted with 1.0 M NaCl to recover any remaining bound rC domain. The apo rC
domain was prepared before Affi-Gel heparin chromatography by chelation
of structural Ca2+ ions for 1 h by 50 or 100 mM EDTA followed by desalting on a Sephadex G-10 spun
column.
RESULTS
Characterization of the rC Domain of Human Gelatinase A
To
investigate the properties of the hemopexin-like C domain of human
gelatinase A, recombinant protein encoded by exons 9-13 of gelatinase
A (Gly417-Cys631) was expressed in E. coli. The purified rC domain electrophoresed as a single band on
15% SDS-PAGE gels with an apparent molecular mass of ~26.5 kDa under
reducing conditions (Fig. 1A). The absence of
intermolecular disulfide linked multimeric forms of the recombinant protein was evident following electrophoresis under nonreducing conditions (Fig. 1A). The downshift in apparent molecular
mass (
0.8 kDa) for nonreduced samples indicated the presence of an intact disulfide bond between Cys440 and Cys631
(20) within the protein. The precise mass of the rC domain was measured
to be 25,925.0 Da by electrospray mass spectrometry, within 0.1 Da of
the predicted mass of a NH2-terminal methionine-processed form of the recombinant protein (25, 924.9 Da), confirming the fidelity
of correct expression. Immunoreactivity with two affinity purified
antipeptide antibodies,
72ex12 (Fig. 1B) and
His6 (data not shown), further verified the identity of
the purified protein. Importantly, essentially no disulfide
cross-linked multimeric forms were observed on the immunoblots even
when the ECL reaction was allowed to proceed well beyond the linear
range.
Fig. 1.
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting analysis of
purified rC domain. Samples of the rC domain (2.5 µg/lane) were
separated on 15% SDS-PAGE gels under reducing (+DTT) and
nonreducing (
DTT) conditions in duplicate and then stained
with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (A) or transferred to a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane by Western blotting (B).
Immunoreactive protein was detected with affinity-purified
72ex12
peptide antibody as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Mr, reduced molecular mass marker proteins used here
and elsewhere: rabbit muscle phosphorylase b (97.4 kDa),
bovine serum albumin (66 kDa), chicken egg ovalbumin (45 kDa), bovine
carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa), horse heart myoglobin (18.4 kDa), chicken
egg white lysozyme (14.2 kDa), and bovine insulin (6.2 kDa).
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]
Characterization of rC Domain Binding to Fibronectin, Laminin,
SPARC, and Tenascin
Binding of the rC domain to basement membrane
components was quantitated by the microwell substrate binding assay.
Although the rC domain did not bind MatrigelTM and laminin
(Fig. 2A) or SPARC and tenascin (not shown),
saturable binding to fibronectin in either NaCl-free 50 mM
Tris buffer or phosphate-buffered saline was found, with an apparent
Kd of 1.1 × 10
6 M. A
recombinant collagen binding domain (13) from gelatinase A with the
identical fusion tag did not bind fibronectin (Fig. 2B),
further confirming the specificity of the rC domain interaction. Using
nonoverlapping chymotrypsin-generated fragments of fibronectin, binding
sites for the rC domain were found on both the 40-kDa heparin binding
and the 120-kDa cell binding fibronectin fragments with a similar but
slightly stronger (apparent Kd values, 4 × 10
7 and 6 × 10
7 M,
respectively) affinity than for intact fibronectin (Fig.
3).
Fig. 2.
Interaction of gelatinase A rC domain and
rCBD with fibronectin, laminin, and reconstituted basement
membrane. Fibronectin, laminin, and MatrigelTM were
coated on the bases of microtiter plate wells as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Two-fold dilutions of the rC domain
(10.24 to 0.04 µM and 0 M) were added to the
wells in a total volume of 100 µl. To show the specificity of the rC
domain interaction with fibronectin, the relative binding affinity of rCBD to fibronectin was also determined (B). The amounts of
bound rC domain (A and B) and rCBD (B)
were quantitated by reaction with affinity-purified
His6-antipeptide antibody (which recognizes the same
fusion tag on both the rC domain and rCBD) and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody. Data are plotted as the mean
values of two experiments from the same plate. At saturation, rC domain
binding to fibronectin compared with laminin and Matrigel (A) or fibronectin binding by rC domain compared with rCBD
(B) was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001) as analyzed by the two-tailed Student's t test
(n = 12).
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
Fig. 3.
Interaction of rC domain with fibronectin
domains. Serially diluted rC domain was added to microwell plates
coated with 0.5 µg each of the 40- and 120-kDa fibronectin domains
and intact soluble fibronectin as indicated. The bound rC domain was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay reaction with
affinity-purified
His6-antipeptide antibody.
Curve-fitting and data points from the means of duplicate measurements
from one enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plate performed in
triplicate are presented.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]
To further investigate the binding of the rC domain to fibronectin, the
recombinant protein was applied to minicolumns of fibronectin coupled
to gelatin-Sepharose columns in chromatography buffer containing 0.15 M NaCl. After adding the rC domain to saturation, as
determined by the eventual detection of the recombinant protein in the
unbound fraction (Fig. 4A, U), the
bound rC domain was step eluted with 0.3-0.5 M NaCl in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. No further rC domain was recovered
with 1.0 M NaCl or when Me2SO was used to elute
the gelatin-bound fibronectin (not shown). That the rC domain did not
bind to the gelatin-Sepharose was confirmed in control experiments
(Fig. 4B). Identical elution profiles were obtained when the
rC domain was loaded in chromatography buffer with NaCl omitted (data
not shown). To ensure that the small amount of unbound rC domain did
not represent a misfolded form of the protein, this material was
reapplied to another fibronectin affinity column. Fibronectin binding
was again demonstrated (data not shown), confirming that the unbound rC
domain was the result of overloading after saturation of fibronectin
binding sites.
Fig. 4.
SDS-PAGE analysis of fibronectin affinity
chromatography of rC domain. Purified bovine fibronectin was
coupled to gelatin-Sepharose 4B and packed into 70-µl affinity
chromatography minicolumns. To ensure saturation of binding to the
fibronectin, the rC domain (B, before chromatography) was
overloaded onto these columns (A) or gelatin-Sepharose
control columns (B) until detected in the flow-through
fraction (U, unbound). After extensive sequential washes
with chromatography buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.4), NaCl at 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 M
concentrations in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, was then
applied to the column with an intervening wash (W) in
chromatography buffer as indicated. In B, columns were
eluted first with 1.0 M NaCl (N) and then
Me2SO (DMSO) at the concentrations shown.
Aliquots from each fraction were electrophoresed on 15% SDS-PAGE gels,
and Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 was used for staining.
Mr, molecular mass marker proteins in Da as
indicated; front, dye front.
[View Larger Version of this Image (33K GIF file)]
rC Domain Interaction with Type I, II, IV, V, VII, and X Collagens
and Elastin
Although the C domains of collagenase-1 and
stromelysin-1 bind native type I collagen, there was no binding of the
gelatinase A rC domain to either native or denatured type I collagen in
the microwell substrate binding assay compared with the negative
control ovalbumin (Fig. 5A). The rC domain
also did not bind gelatin-Sepharose (Fig. 4B), being
quantitatively recovered in the unbound and wash fractions with no
protein recovered in any elutes. In contrast, the rCBD from gelatinase
A, used as a positive control for collagen interaction, showed
avid binding to both forms of type I collagen (Fig. 5A).
Fig. 5.
Interaction of rC domain with native and
denatured collagens. Microwell plate wells were coated with 0.5 µg of either native or heat-denatured type I collagen (A)
or type IV or V collagens (B) with ovalbumin coated as a
negative control. In A, after blocking and rinses, serial
dilutions of rCBD (filled symbols) and the rC domain
(open symbols) were added starting at 10.24 µM
in a final volume of 100 µl. In B, binding of the rC
domain to native (open symbols) and denatured (filled
symbols) type IV and V collagens was assessed. Bound recombinant
proteins were quantitated with affinity-purified
His6-antipeptide antibody as described under "Experimental Procedures." Data points are the averages of two experiments on the same plate. At saturation, rCBD binding to type I
collagens compared with binding by the rC domain was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001) as analyzed by the
two-tailed Student's t test (n = 6).
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]
To determine whether the gelatinase A C domain contributes to the
binding specificity for other substrates of the enzyme, the rC domain
was tested for interaction with types IV and V collagen and elastin. As
for type I collagen, the rC domain did not bind these collagens in
either their native or denatured forms (Fig. 5B). Native and
denatured types II and X collagen and the NC1 domain of type VII
collagen were also not bound by the rC domain (not shown). In
confirmation of these data using the
His6 antibody, identical results were also obtained with the
72ex12 antibody (not
shown). rC domain binding to elastin was assessed using 6 mg of
insoluble elastin mixed with 100 µl of Sephadex G-10. All the loaded
rC domain protein was recovered in the unbound and first wash
fractions, and none was eluted with NaCl or Me2SO (data not
shown). This indicated that the rC domain does not contribute to the
elastin binding properties of the enzyme that are localized to the
fibronectin type II-like CBD of gelatinase A (13) and shown to be
essential for elastinolysis by gelatinase B (42).
The rC Domain Binds to Heparin
Heparin-Sepharose minicolumns
and FPLC columns were used to investigate the binding properties of the
C domain of gelatinase A to the heparan sulfate component of basement
membranes and cell surface proteoglycans. The bound rC domain was step
eluted off heparin-Sepharose minicolumns with 0.5 M NaCl
(Fig. 6A) and at 0.58 M NaCl on a
NaCl gradient developed on a 1.0-ml heparin-Sepharose FPLC column (data
not shown). Taking into consideration the calculated lag time for
protein elution off the 1.0-ml column, the results of the minicolumn
and FPLC were in accordance. Binding to Affi-Gel heparin was
consistently stronger, requiring 0.76 M NaCl for peak elution (Fig. 7A). Heparin specificity was
confirmed by the absence of binding to the negatively charged
CM-Sepharose and that the unbound overloaded protein from the
minicolumns could bind heparin-Sepharose on subsequent chromatography
(data not shown).
Fig. 6.
Binding of rC domain to heparin.
Minicolumns of heparin-Sepharose CL-6B (n = 4) were
overloaded with 50 µg of the rC domain (A, lane
B) and then washed (W) with chromatography buffer followed by elution of bound protein using a step gradient of NaCl as
indicated. Aliquots from fractions 1 and 2 of each elute were analyzed
by 15% SDS-PAGE. U, unbound protein; Mr, molecular mass marker proteins in Da as indicated; front,
dye front. B, cell culture medium (500 µl) from
ConA-treated ROS 17/2.8 cells (64) containing activated gelatinase A
(lane A) was loaded onto heparin-Sepharose minicolumns
(n = 4). After washes (W) with chromatography buffer, bound gelatinase A was eluted from the columns
with a step gradient of 0.1-1.0 M NaCl, as before. Samples were separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels copolymerized with 1 mg/ml gelatin. After zymography, gelatinase activity was detected as
cleared bands after staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250.
Std, latent gelatinase A standard;
C-Gs,
mini-gelatinase lacking the C domain produced by autolytic processing
of the gelatinase A on ConA stimulation of cultures. In C,
the rC domain was applied to a column of heparin-bound active
gelatinase A (n = 4) in an attempt to compete for
binding sites. After extensive washes (W, 3 and
4), bound proteins were eluted by a step gradient of NaCl as
shown.
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]
Fig. 7.
FPLC elution profiles of reduced and apo-rC
domain chromatographed on Affi-Gel heparin. The rC domain
(A) was loaded at 0.5 ml/min on a 1.0-ml Affi-Gel heparin
FPLC column equilibrated in chromatography buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) and eluted at 1.0 ml/min with a 1.0 M
NaCl gradient. Protein elution was monitored by in line absorbance
measurements at 280 nm with 1.0-ml fractions (hatch marks)
collected after a 0.24-ml delay. Elution profiles of 100 µg of the rC
domain (A), the rC domain treated with 130 mM
DTT for 1 h prior to chromatography (B), and the rC
domain treated with 100 mM EDTA (C) are
presented. The rC domain chromatographed in the presence of 0.15 M NaCl also bound Affi-Gel heparin and was eluted in an
identical manner (not shown) as for the protein chromatographed in the
absence of NaCl.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
To compare the heparin binding properties of the rC domain with
gelatinase A, active enzyme was obtained from confluent cell cultures
treated for 18 h with 20 µg/ml ConA (23) and then
chromatographed over heparin-Sepharose minicolumns. Similar to the rC
domain and confirming our previous studies (23, 51), the activated
gelatinase A was also eluted off the column by 0.5 M NaCl
(Fig. 6B). Previously we have shown that the gelatinase A
CBD has a low affinity heparin binding site (13), and our recent
mutagenesis studies3 have identified
Lys357 as an essential residue in this site. Therefore, to
compare the relative importance of this and other possible heparin
binding sites on gelatinase A, active enzyme was loaded onto
heparin-Sepharose, and competition was attempted with >20-fold molar
excess rC domain added before elution was continued. Since only a small
amount of the bound enzyme could be competed off the column by the rC domain, with the bulk of the enzyme being recovered in the 0.5 M NaCl elute (Fig. 6C), this indicated that
other heparin binding sites on gelatinase A remained associated with
the heparin. Since the previously described "mini-gelatinase,"
representing a ConA-induced processed form of gelatinase A lacking the
C domain (23, 52) (Fig. 6, B and C,
C-Gs), was predominantly but not quantitatively recovered
in the unbound and wash fractions, this reveals the importance of the C
domain heparin binding site relative to the other heparin binding sites
on human gelatinase A.
Structural Requirements for Heparin Binding
The structural
importance of the Cys440-Cys631 disulfide bond
for heparin binding was examined after treatment of the rC domain with
65 or 130 mM DTT for 60 min prior to heparin-Sepharose
chromatography. All minicolumn solutions also included freshly prepared
65 mM DTT to ensure that reducing conditions were
maintained throughout chromatography. As shown in Fig.
8A, there was no change in the heparin-Sepharose elution profile of the reduced rC domain compared with unreduced samples (see Fig. 6A). When more precisely
analyzed by Affi-Gel heparin FPLC, the reduced rC domain (130 mM DTT; Fig. 7B) was found to possess
essentially identical elution properties as the unreduced protein (Fig.
7A) at 22 °C.
Fig. 8.
Binding to heparin by rC domain is
independent of disulfide bond integrity but divalent
cation-dependent. The rC domain was reduced with 65 mM DTT for 1 h prior to chromatography (B, +DTT) over heparin-Sepharose CL-6B minicolumns (A). The
column was overloaded until the rC domain appeared in the unbound
fraction (U) followed by three 100-µl washes
(W) with chromatography buffer containing 65 mM
DTT. Elution was as described in Fig. 6A with 0.5 M NaCl and 1.0 M NaCl as indicated, but with 65 mM DTT added to all solutions. The rC domain in column
fractions migrated with an apparent molecular mass of 26.5 kDa compared
with 25.7 kDa of nonreduced rC domain (B,
DTT)
electrophoresed as a standard, confirming that the disulfide bond
remained reduced during all chromatography steps. In B,
excess rC domain (lane B; 50 µg) was loaded onto
heparin-Sepharose CL-6B minicolumns until the rC domain could be
detected in the unbound (U) material. After washes
(W), EDTA was applied to the columns with an intervening
wash (W) in the absence of EDTA. To elute any remaining
bound protein, 0.5 M NaCl in chromatography buffer was then
added. Eluted protein was separated by 15% SDS-PAGE and then
visualized by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 staining.
Mr, molecular mass marker proteins in Da as
indicated; front, dye front.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
The recently published three-dimensional structures of the collagenase
(18) and gelatinase A C domains (16, 17) show a divalent ion, modeled
as a Ca2+ ion, in the central channel of the four-bladed
-propeller structure, together with either a
Na+-Cl
(16) or
Ca2+-Cl
(17) ion pair. In addition, a
potential Zn2+ ion was also modeled in hemopexin module IV
(16). In support of an important structural and/or functional role for
the Ca2+ ions and a possible Zn2+ ion for
binding of the rC domain to matrix components, the apo-rC domain was
found to have lost binding potential for Affi-Gel heparin (Fig.
7C) and heparin-Sepharose (not shown) on FPLC. The loss of
binding properties on removal of the structural Ca2+ was
also confirmed by the elution of the heparin-Sepharose-bound holo-rC
domain by 50 mM EDTA on minicolumns (Fig. 8B).
Elution was quantitative, with no further protein recovered by 100 mM EDTA or in the subsequent 0.5 M NaCl
elution. Lower concentrations of EDTA (5, 10, and 20 mM)
did not elute the bound rC domain (data not shown), suggesting a tight
coordination of the divalent cations with the protein. Moreover, the rC
domain treated with 15 mM EDTA prior to FPLC over Affi-Gel
heparin retained heparin binding and elution properties identical to
that of the holo protein (data not shown).
Identification of the Structural Divalent Cations
Since EDTA
is a chelator of several divalent cations, including Ca2+
and Zn2+, more specific chelators were used to identify the
important structural ions in the rC domain. The well characterized
Zn2+ ion chelator 1,10-phenanthroline had no apparent
effect on the binding of the rC domain to heparin, with all bound
protein being recovered with the final 0.5 M NaCl elution
(Fig. 9A). Thus, either no Zn2+
ions are normally ligated to the C domain, or if present, then chelation by 1,10 phenanthroline does not alter the binding properties of the protein. Moreover, inductive coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis of the rC domain failed to detect a biologically significant Zn2+ ion content in the protein (8.5 × 10
6 mol of Zn2+/mol of rC domain).
Fig. 9.
Heparin binding by rC domain shows a
Ca2+ but not a Zn2+ ion requirement. To
investigate the role of a potential structural Zn2+ ion in
the rC domain, the recombinant domain was bound to heparin-Sepharose, and after extensive washes (W) to ensure no carryover of
overloaded unbound (U) protein, 1,10-phenanthroline
(prepared from a stock solution of 1,10 phenanthroline dissolved in
70% (v/v) ethanol) was applied to the columns with an intervening wash
(A, W). Finally, 0.5 M NaCl in chromatography
buffer was applied to step elute any remaining bound rC domain (see
Fig. 6A). B and C show the results
using EGTA and BAPTA, respectively, for elution from heparin-Sepharose. Aliquots from each fraction, together with a sample of the rC domain
before chromatography (B), were separated on 15% SDS-PAGE gels. Mr, molecular mass marker proteins in Da as
indicated; front, dye front.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
Surprisingly, 100 mM EGTA was ineffective in eluting the rC
domain from heparin-Sepharose (Fig. 9B). This was confirmed
by Affi-Gel heparin FPLC analysis in which elution was achieved only at
180-200 mM EGTA (not shown). Since EGTA is a
Ca2+ and Mg2+ ion chelator, this result was
paradoxical. However, several Ca2+ binding proteins are
known to directly bind EGTA (53) due to the high electronegativity of
the chemical. Therefore, to confirm the identity of the central
Ca2+ ion, a newer and one of the most highly specific
chelators of Ca2+ ions, BAPTA, was used. Low concentrations
of BAPTA were ineffective in eluting rC domain (1 and 5 mM), but at 20 mM BAPTA (Fig. 9C) the bound rC domain was quantitatively eluted from the
heparin-Sepharose. No further protein was recovered with 0.5 M NaCl (cf. 1,10-phenanthroline and EGTA; Fig.
9, A and B), confirming the importance and
strength of association of the Ca2+ ion.
The rC Domain also Binds Fibronectin in a Ca2+
Ion-dependent Manner
To determine whether the
structural Ca2+ ion has a similar influence on the binding
properties of the C domain for fibronectin, minicolumns of fibronectin
coupled to gelatin-Sepharose were loaded with the rC domain. Both 50 mM EDTA (Fig. 10A) and 20 mM BAPTA (Fig. 10B) quantitatively dissociated
the rC domain from the fibronectin, with no further rC domain being
recovered with 1.0 M NaCl. Overall, these experiments
exclude the possibility of a structurally important Zn2+
ion in the rC domain, chemically identify the essential divalent cation
in the rC domain as a Ca2+ ion, indicate the strength of
the Ca2+ ion coordination with the protein, and reveal its
important role in defining the binding properties of the rC domain to
heparin and fibronectin.
Fig. 10.
Ca2+-dependent
binding of rC domain to fibronectin. To determine whether the
binding of the rC domain to fibronectin also requires structural
Ca2+ ions, 50 µg of the rC domain (B) was
loaded onto mini-affinity columns of fibronectin coupled to
gelatin-Sepharose 4B. The rC domain was overloaded until the protein
appeared in the flow-through fraction (U) to ensure
saturation of rC domain bound to fibronectin. After extensive washes
(W), either 50 mM EDTA (A) or 20 mM BAPTA (B) was applied to the column. 1.0 M NaCl in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer was then used
to recover any residual bound protein. Aliquots were analyzed by 15%
SDS-PAGE. Mr, molecular mass marker proteins in Da
as indicated; front, dye front.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
Reported here are the fibronectin and heparin binding properties
of the COOH-terminal hemopexin-like domain of human gelatinase A, the
first such report for any of the MMPs. Fibronectin is a complex
mutidomain matrix glycoprotein with multiple binding sites for
extracellular matrix components and cell membrane proteins. Indeed, the
rC domain binds two nonoverlapping chymotrypsin-generated fragments of
fibronectin with similar Kd values
(10
7 M range). The display of binding sites
on fibronectin is conformation-dependent, with some cryptic
sites being exposed on denaturation, surface binding, or cleavage (54),
possibly explaining the slight difference in binding strength of the rC
domain to the intact protein (apparent Kd, 1.1 × 10
6 M) compared with the 40- and 120-kDa
fibronectin fragments. Fibronectin and its alternately spliced variants
also occur as matrix-bound and soluble forms in serum. Accordingly, the
exact binding stoichiometry and dynamics of the gelatinase A C domain
association with fibronectin in tissues is likely a complex
interaction. Thus, although these experiments directly revealed the
presence of multiple potential gelatinase A binding sites on the
fibronectin chains, these sites may not always be available for
concurrent occupancy due to structural differences between the intact
tertiary fold of the protein and the cleavage fragments or to steric
clashes, which may prevent multiple binding.
Fibronectin cleavage by gelatinase A results in prominent degradation
fragments (40) that include the amino- and carboxyl-terminal fibrin
binding domains and the larger central cell binding domain (54). Other
fibronectin-degrading MMPs include the stromelysins, matrilysin, and
metalloelastase (2), but as with gelatinase A, their
fibronectin-degradative activities have received little study. With the
exception of matrilysin, a fibronectin binding site might also be
located on the C domain of these MMPs. Fibronectin binding may be a
requisite for efficient catalysis, but previous C domain deletion
mutant studies of gelatinase A (27, 55) or other MMPs (39, 55) did not
investigate fibronectin binding or degradation. Fibronectin binding
might also represent another means by which gelatinase A can bind cell
surfaces. This may produce a reservoir of latent gelatinase A in
proximity to the cell surface for eventual interaction with TIMP-2 and
its receptor (56), poised for cis activation by
MT-MMP-expressing cells (26, 57).
Gelatinase A also degrades native type IV basement membrane collagen
and is considered pivotal for basement membrane remodeling during
embryogenesis4 and in tumor cell invasion
and metastasis (58). However, the rC domain did not bind basement
membrane components either individually (type IV collagen, tenascin,
laminin, and SPARC) or in combination as reconstituted basement
membrane (MatrigelTM) or to the NC1 domain of anchoring
fibril type VII collagen. This is consistent with the findings of
others that C domain deletion mutants of gelatinase A did not bind (55)
but still degraded (27) native type IV collagen and laminin. The rC
domain also did not bind native type I, V, or X collagens, which are
degraded by gelatinase A, or other collagens such as type II, which are not. Thus, the C domain of gelatinase A differs from those of the
collagenases and stromelysins, which bind native type I collagen (32,
35-37, 55) and which, for the collagenases, are absolutely essential
for collagenolytic activity (28-31). This indicates that the molecular
mechanism involved in the triple helicase activity of gelatinase A for
native type I, IV, V, and X collagens is fundamentally different from
that of the collagenases. Indeed, a C domain deletion mutant of
gelatinase A showed only slight alteration in type IV collagen
cleavages (27). Alternatively, the collagen binding properties of the
CBD of gelatinase A may compensate for the absence of collagen
tethering by the C domain to potentiate triple helicase activity.
Nonetheless, this does not explain the mechanism of type IV
collagenolytic activity, since the isolated CBD does not bind native
type IV collagen (13).
The heparin binding properties of gelatinase A have previously been
described (51, 59) and shown to be important for enzyme activation
(59). A gelatinase A heparin binding site has been previously located
within the CBD (13).3 The heparin binding site located in
the C domain is specific, since the rC domain did not bind and was only
slightly retarded by interaction with the negatively charged
CM-Sepharose. Although no match to the canonical heparin binding
consensus sequences (XBBXBX and
XBBBXXBX; B, basic amino acids;
X, undefined) (60) is found in the C domain, a site that
matches the XBBXBX site in reverse
(SKNKKT) and a sequence with high similarity (VKKKMD
G) are
located in the lysine- and arginine-rich hemopexin-like module III.
However, competition experiments using an antipeptide antibody raised
against this sequence (
72ex12) had no effect on the binding of the
rC domain to heparin (data not shown). These and other positively
charged clusters within hemopexin-like modules III and IV are now being
studied by site directed mutagenesis to identify the binding sites for
heparin and the negatively charged COOH-terminal peptide of
TIMP-2.5 Thus, heparan sulfate binding to
the C domain may alter TIMP-2 interaction, which could in turn modulate
cell surface activation of gelatinase A.
The Ca2+ ion dependence of the C domain interaction with
fibronectin and heparan sulfate proteoglycans points to a new potential therapeutic target for gelatinase A. Confirmation of the importance and
identity of the structural Ca2+ ions was shown in the apo
form of the rC domain by disruption of the structural properties
important for ligand binding. Chelation with EDTA and BAPTA, a new
derivative of EGTA that is a highly specific Ca2+ chelator
(61) but which has greatly improved rate constants and pH insensitivity
over EGTA (61, 62), also eluted the bound holo-rC domain from heparin.
The unexpected results obtained with EGTA may be due to direct
association of EGTA with the protein (53) or the neutral pH used. At pH
7, EGTA occurs as a dianion, which results in a reduced ability to bind
Ca2+ ions by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude compared with pH
8.6 (61). Together, these effects minimize the effective chelating
capacity of the free EGTA for the heptacoordinated Ca2+
ion. Therefore, the chelation results obtained with BAPTA were important in clearly establishing the identity and importance of the
Ca2+ ions in the rC domain. The chelation experiments
further revealed the tight coordination of the Ca2+ ions in
the protein, supporting the conclusion that the Ca2+ ions
play an essential stabilizing role in the domain, possibly acting like
a hub to centrally pin the four
-blades together. Last, since
inductive coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis did not measure any
Zn2+ ions in the rC domain and 1,10-phenanthroline did not
alter the binding properties of the rC domain, these data failed to
confirm the presence of a structural Zn2+ ion in the C
domain of gelatinase A. Together, these data indicate that the
Zn2+ ion modeled in a potential binding site on module IV
of the C domain was likely an artifact of crystallization in 150 mM Zn2+ acetate (16).
The central Ca2+ ion was also more effective than the
disulfide bond in maintaining the structural integrity of the rC domain at 22 °C. Of note, these chromatography experiments were performed entirely under reduced conditions and not with reduced and alkylated protein. The introduction of blocking groups or a charged moiety during
alkylation after reduction and protein denaturation by 6 M
guanadinium or by heat can alter the structural properties of the
protein distinct from those due to disulfide bond reduction alone.
Indeed, reduced and alkylated rCBD from gelatinase A does not bind
gelatin (13, 63), whereas rCBD protein chromatographed and analyzed
under continuous reducing but nondenaturing conditions retains gelatin
interaction equal to nonreduced rCBD (13). Thus, these experiments
indicate that the integrity of the four-bladed
-propeller structure
of the rC domain was not markedly perturbed at 22 °C by reduction of
the disulfide bond but was altered sufficiently by chelation and loss
of the structural Ca2+ ions to disrupt the heparin and
fibronectin binding sites.
The widespread and near constitutive expression of gelatinase A
indicates that the most important level of regulation of gelatinase A
activity may be cellular activation and inhibition by TIMPs rather than
by regulated transcription (1, 23, 65). In this regard, we have
previously proposed that latent gelatinase A may bind native type I
collagen through the CBD (13) and so may remain localized in tissues,
poised for proteolysis of gelatin on collagenase cleavage of the native
collagen and trans activation by other MT-MMP-expressing
cells. A similar reservoir of enzyme may also be important for
elastinolysis, since binding to elastin also occurs through the CBD of
gelatinases (13, 42).2 The binding of rC domain to
fibronectin and potentially to heparan sulfate proteoglycans reveals
additional extracellular or pericellular matrix components that may
serve as anchors to sequester gelatinase A in tissues and to the cell
surface. This may render the enzyme readily accessible to MT-MMPs for
activation and to substrates, such as fibronectin and proteoglycan core
proteins, on activation for cleavage. Together with the potential for
the CBD to bind pericellular collagen,3 this also provides
a novel additional mechanism for cell surface interaction that may
complement those involving
v
3-integrin, MT-MMPs, and TIMP-2 receptors.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported in part by Grant 006388 from the
National Cancer Institute of Canada and initially by a grant from the
Medical Research Council of Canada.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Washington,
Seattle, WA.
§
Recipient of a Medical Research Council of Canada Clinician
Scientist Award. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 604-822-2958; Fax: 604-822-8279; E-mail: overall{at}unixg.ubc.ca.
1
The abbreviations used are: MMP, matrix
metalloproteinase; gelatinase A, also termed 72-kDa gelatinase, 72-kDa
type IV collagenase, MMP-2; gelatinase B, also termed 92-kDa
gelatinase, 92-kDa type IV collagenase, MMP-9; C domain, gelatinase A
COOH-terminal domain; BAPTA,
1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N
,N
-tetraacetic
acid; ConA, concanavalin A; DTT, dithiothreitol; ECL, enhanced
chemiluminesence; FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography; PAGE,
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; rCBD, recombinant collagen binding
domain of gelatinase A, consisting of fibronectin type II-like modules 1-3; rC domain, recombinant COOH-terminal hemopexin-like domain; SPARC, secreted protein that is acidic and rich in cysteine; TIMP, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases; MT, membrane type.
2
R. S. Abbey, B. Steffensen, and C. M. Overall,
manuscript in preparation.
3
B. Steffensen and C. M. Overall, manuscript in
preparation.
4
A. Iamaroon, U. M. Wallon, C. M. Overall, and
V. M. Diewert, resubmitted for publication.
5
C. M. Overall, A. King, M. Wallon, T. Lau, A. Ong, and D. Sam, unpublished data.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Stephen Withers for access to
the electrospray mass spectrometer, Dr. Herman Ziltner for helpful
discussions designing the antipeptide antibodies, and Dr. B. Steffensen
for providing the rCBD protein.
REFERENCES
-
Overall, C. M.
(1991)
Trends Glycosci. Glycotechnol.
3,
384-399
-
Matrisian, L. M.
(1992)
Bioessays
14,
455-463
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nicholson, G. L.
(1989)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
1,
1009-1019
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stetler-Stevenson, W. G., Aznavoorian, S., and Liotta, L. A.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
9,
541-573
[CrossRef]
-
Docherty, A. J., and Murphy, G.
(1990)
Ann. Rheum. Dis.
49,
469-479
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Woessner, J. F.
(1991)
FASEB J.
5,
2145-2154
[Abstract]
-
Springman, E. B., Angleton, E. L., Birkedal-Hansen, H., and Van Wart, H. E.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
364-368
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schechter, I., and Berger, A.
(1967)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
27,
157-162
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Overall, C. M., Wallon, U. M., Steffensen. B., and Abbey, R. (1997) in
Tissue Inhibitors of MMPs in Health and Disease (Edwards,
D., Hawkes, S., and Kokha, R. ed), in press
-
Collier, I. E., Krasnov, P. A., Strongin, A. Y., Birkedal-Hansen, H., and Goldberg, G. I.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
6776-6781
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wilhelm, S. M., Collier, I. E., Marmer, B. L., Eisen, A. Z., Grant, G. A., and Goldberg, G. I.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
17213-17221
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Banyai, L., and Patthy, L.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
282,
23-25
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Steffensen, B., Wallon, U. M., and Overall, C. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11555-11566
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
de Souza, S. J., Pereira, H. M., Jacchieri, S., and Brentani, R. R.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
927-930
[Abstract]
-
Muller, D., Quantin, B., Gesnel, M-L., Millon-Collard, R., Abecassis, J., and Breathnach, R.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
253,
187-192
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Libson, A. M., Gittis, A. G., Collier, I. E., Marmer, B. L, Goldberg, G. I., and Lattman, E. E.
(1995)
Nature Struct. Biol.
2,
938-942
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gohlke, U., Gomis-Rüth, F-Z., Crabbe, T., Murphy, G., Docherty, A. J. P., and Bode, W.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
378,
126-130
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Li, J., Brick, P., O'Hare, M. C., Skarzynski, T., Lloyd, L. F., Curry, V. A., Clark, I. M., Bigg, H. F., Hazelman, B. L., Cawston, T. E., and Blow, D. M.
(1995)
Structure
3,
541-549
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ward, R. V., Hembry, R. M., Reynolds, J. J., and Murphy, G.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
278,
179-187
-
Goldberg, G. I., Marmer, B. L., Grant, G. A., Eisen, A. Z., Wilhelm, S., and He, C.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
8207-8211
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fridman, R., Fuerst, T. R., Bird, R. E., Hoyhtya, M., Oelkuct, M., Kraus, S., Komarek, D., Liotta, L., Berman, M. L., and Stetler-Stevensen, W. G.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
15398-15405
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ward, R. V., Atkinson, S. J., Reynolds, J. J., and Murphy, G.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
304,
263-269
-
Overall, C. M., and Sodek, J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
21141-21151
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Azzam, H. S., and Thompson, E. W.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
4540-4544
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Emonard, H. P., Remacle, A. G., Noel, A. C., Grimaud, J.-A., Stetler-Stevensen, W. G., and Fiodart, J.-M.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
5845-5848
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sato, H., Takino, T., Okada, Y., Cao, J., Shinagawa, A., Yamamoto, E., and Seiki, M.
(1994)
Nature
370,
61-65
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Murphy, G., Willenbrock, F., Ward, R. V., Cockett, M. I., Eaton, D., and Docherty, A. J. P.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
283,
637-641
-
Clarke, I. M., and Cawston, T. E.
(1989)
Biochem. J.
263,
210-206
-
Windsor, L. J., Birkedal-Hansen, H., Birkedal-Hansen, B., and Engler, J. A.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
30,
641-647
-
Hasty, K. A., Jeffrey, J. J., Hibbs, M. S., and Welgus, H. G.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
10048-10052
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schnierer, S., Kleine, T., Gote, T., Hilleman, A., Knäuper, V., and Tschesche, H.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
191,
319-326
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bigg, H. F., Clark, I. M., and Cawston, T. E.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1208,
157-165
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Allan, J. A., Hembry, R. M., Angal, S., Reynolds, J. J., and Murphy, G.
(1991)
J. Cell Sci.
99,
789-795
[Abstract]
-
Murphy, G., Allan, J. A., Willenbrock, F., Cockett, M. I., O'Connell, J. P., and Docherty, A. J. P.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
9612-9618
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Okada, Y., Nagase, H., and Harris, E. D., Jr.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
14245-14255
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Koklitis, P. A., Murphy, G., Sutton, C., and Angal, S.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
276,
217-221
-
Marcey, A. I., Eiberger, L. L., Harrison, R., Chan, H. K., Hutchinson, N. I., Hagmann, W. K., Cameron, P. M., Boulton, D. A., and Hermes, J. D.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
6476-6483
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sanchez-Lopez, R., Alexander, C. M., Behrendtsen, O., Breathnach, R., and Werb, Z.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
7238-7247
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murphy, G., Cockett, M. I., Ward, R. V., and Docherty, A. J.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
277,
277-279
-
Collier, I. E., Wilhelm, S. M., Eisen, A. Z., Marmer, B. L., Grant, G. A., Geltzer, J. L., He, C., Kronberger, A., Bauer, E. A., and Goldberg, G. I.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6579-6587
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Seltzer, J. L., Eisen, A. Z., Bauer, E. A., Morris, N. P., Glanville, R. W., and Burgeson, R. E.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
3822-3826
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shipley, J. M., Doyle, G. A. R., Fliszar, C. J., Ye, Q-Z., Johnson, L. L., Shapiro, S. D., Welgus, H. G., and Senior, R. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
4356-4341
-
Huhtala, P., Chow, L. T., and Tryggvason, K.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
11077-11082
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Piez, K. A.
(1967)
in
Treatise on Collagen (Ramachandran, G. N., ed), pp. 207-252, Academic Press, London
-
Dedhar, S., Saulnier, R., Nagle, R., and Overall, C. M.
(1993)
Clin. & Exp. Metastasis
11,
391-400
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ziltner, H. J., Clark-Lewis, I., Hood, L. E., Kent, S. B. H., and Schrader, J. W.
(1987)
J. Immunol.
138,
1099-1104
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sanger, F., Coulson, A. R., Friedman, T., Air, G. M., Barrell, B. G., Brown, N. L., Fiddes, J. C., Hutchinson, C. A., III, Slocombe, P. M., and Smith, M.
(1978)
J. Mol. Biol.
125,
225-246
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Luck, D. N., Gout, P. W., Sutherland, E. R., Fox, K., Huyer, M., and Smith, M.
(1992)
Protein. Eng.
5,
559-567
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Overall, C. M., and Limeback, H.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
256,
965-972
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Overall, C. M., Wrana, J. L., and Sodek, J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
1860-1869
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Howard, E. W., and Banda, M. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
17972-17977
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Manalan, A. S., and Klee, C. B.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
2047-2050
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fukai, F., Ohtaki, M., Fujii, N., Yamija, H., Ishii, T., Nishizawa, Y., Miyazaki, K., and Katayama, T.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
11453-11459
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Allen, J. A., Docherty, A. J. P., Barker, P. J., Huskisson, N. S., Reynolds, J. J., and Murphy, G.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
309,
299-306
-
Emmert-Buck, M. R., Emonard, H. P., Corcoran, M. L., Krutzsch, H. C., Fiodart, J.-M., and Stetler-Stevenson, W. G.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
364,
28-32
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yu, M., Sato, H., Seiki,