|
Volume 272, Number 13,
Issue of March 28, 1997
pp. 8764-8773
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Molecular Cloning and Expression of a Bovine
(1,3)-Fucosyltransferase Gene Homologous to a Putative Ancestor
Gene of the Human FUT3-FUT5-FUT6 Cluster*
(Received for publication, June 20, 1996, and in revised form, December 3, 1996)
Ahmad
Oulmouden
,
Anne
Wierinckx
,
Jean-Michel
Petit
,
Marieta
Costache
§,
Monica M.
Palcic
¶,
Rosella
Mollicone
§,
Rafael
Oriol
§ and
Raymond
Julien
**
From the Institut de Biotechnologie, Faculté
des Sciences, Université de Limoges, 87060 Limoges,
§ INSERM U178, Université de Paris-Sud XI,
94807 Villejuif Cedex, France, and the ¶ Department of
Chemistry, University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2G2, Canada
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Only one bovine gene, corresponding to the human
cluster of genes FUT3-FUT5-FUT6, was found by Southern blot
analysis. The cognate bovine (1,3)-fucosyltransferase shares 67.3, 69.0, and 69.3% amino acid sequence identities with human FUC-T3,
FUC-T5, and FUC-T6 enzymes, respectively. As revealed by protein
sequence alignment, potential sites for asparagine-linked glycosylation and conserved cysteines, the bovine enzyme is an intermediate between
FUC-T3, FUC-T5, and FUC-T6 human enzymes. Transfected into COS-7 cells,
the bovine gene induced the synthesis of an (1,3)-fucosyltransferase
enzyme with type 2 substrate acceptor pattern specificity and induced
expression of fucosylated type 2 epitopes (Lex and
sialyl-Lex), but not of type 1 structures (Lea
or sialyl-Lea), suggesting that it has an acceptor
specificity similar to the human plasma FUC-T6. However, no enzyme
activity was detected in bovine plasma. Gene transcripts are detected
on tissues such as bovine liver, kidney, lung, and brain. The type 2 sialyl-Lex epitope was found in renal macula densa and
biliary ducts, and Lex and Ley epitopes were
detected on the brush border of epithelial cells of small and large
intestine, suggesting a tissue distribution closer to human FUC-T3, but
fucosylated type 1 structures (Lea, Leb, or
sialyl-Lea) were not detected at all in any bovine tissue.
Analysis of genetic distances on a combined phylogenetic tree of
fucosyltransferase genes suggests that the bovine gene is the
orthologous homologue of the ancestor of human genes constituting the
present FUT3-FUT5-FUT6 cluster.
INTRODUCTION
Cell surface fucosylated oligosaccharides have received a
substantial amount of attention because they play a role in
inflammation-mediated cell adhesion and are frequently modified in
malignant cells (1-5). The biosynthesis of these glycoconjugates
requires the ordered action of several glycosyltransferases, of which
fucosylation is the last step (6).
Five human (1,3)-fucosyltransferase genes have been cloned as
follows: FUT3 encodes the Lewis
(1,3/1,4)-fucosyltransferase or FUC-T3 enzyme (7-10),
FUT4 encodes the myeloid (1,3)-fucosyltransferase or
FUC-T4 enzyme (11, 12), FUT5 encodes an unspecified type of
(1,3)-fucosyltransferase called FUC-T5 (13), FUT6 encodes the plasma (1,3)-fucosyltransferase or FUC-T6 (14, 15), and FUT7 encodes the leukocyte (1,3)-fucosyltransferase or
FUC-T7 (16, 17). Three out of these five genes (FUT3,
FUT5, and FUT6) constitute a cluster within 1 centimorgan on human chromosome 19p13.3 (18, 19) and share more than
90% sequence identity (14, 20). The individual members of the human
(1,2)-fucosyltransferase family, H1 (21,
22) and Se (23, 24) and the human (1,3)-fucosyltransferase family
(FUC-T3, FUC-T4, FUC-T5, FUC-T6, and FUC-T7), are discriminated by
differences in substrate specificities, cation requirement, sensitivity
to inhibitors, and tissue distribution (25-28). Besides humans and to
a lesser extent mice (29), little is known about the molecular
mechanisms that determine the tissue-specific (30) and the
developmentally regulated expression patterns of fucosyltransferases (31-34).
Previous histochemical data having revealed the absence of
(1,4)-fucosylated structures and the prevalence of Gal-type 2 epitope, on bovine red cells and tissues (35), we chose to isolate and
characterize the bovine genes homologous to the human
FUT3-FUT5-FUT6 cluster to identify the
enzymes and glycoconjugate epitopes present in this species. Only one
gene, named futb, homologous to the three genes of the human
cluster was detected on genomic DNA. We also observed the corresponding
mRNA transcript on different bovine tissues such as liver, kidney,
brain, and lung. The predicted sequence of the cognate enzyme has a
transmembrane type II topology and presents a high degree of identity
with the three human enzymes. Nevertheless, the bovine enzyme has a
type 2 acceptor substrate specificity, like human FUC-T6, as
demonstrated by (i) type 2 acceptor specificity of the activity
detected in homogenates of COS-7 cells transfected with
futb, (ii) immunofluorescence detection of type 2 (1,3)-fucosylated epitopes (Lex and
sialyl-Lex) on COS-7 cells transfected with
futb, and (iii) the presence of fucosylated type 2 epitopes
(Lex, Ley, and sialyl-Lex) on
normal bovine tissues.
The position of the bovine gene on the mammalian phylogenetic tree of
fucosyltransferase genes suggests that this gene may be the orthologous
homologue of an ancestor gene, from which has derived the present human
FUT3-FUT5-FUT6 cluster of genes.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Nomenclature
The gene described represents the first bovine
fucosyltransferase gene. It will be designated futb and the
cognate (1,3)-fucosyltransferase enzyme Futb.
PCR Amplification of the Bovine fut Probe
PCR was performed
as described previously (36) in a mixture containing 50 mM
KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9 at 25 °C), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 150 µM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and
dTTP, 50 ng of DNA, 100 pmol of PCR primers (Table I), and 1.25 units
of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) in a total volume of 25 µl. After heating at 95 °C for 4 min, 35 cycles were performed
(denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min,
and extension at 72 °C for 2 min). The PCR product was analyzed on
1.4% agarose gel electrophoresis. The 459-bp band was eluted from the
gel, subcloned into the SmaI site of pBluescript II
KS (Stratagene), and sequenced.
Bovine Genomic Library Screening
Approximately 2 × 105 bacterial colonies representing more than four bovine
genomes (37), with recombinant cosmids bearing bovine DNA fragments of
35-kilobase pair average size (bovine genomic library prepared from
semen DNA, Stratagene), were screened. Filters were prehybridized at
42 °C for 1 h in 50% deionized formamide, 2 × Pipes
buffer (10 × Pipes buffer is 4 M NaCl, 0.1 M Pipes, pH 6.5), 0.5% SDS, and denaturated sonicated
salmon sperm DNA (100 µg/ml). Then they were hybridized at 42 °C
for 16 h in prehybridization solution containing the bovine
futb -32P-labeled probe of 459 bp, generated
by PCR with primers derived from regions highly conserved in human
FUT3, FUT5, and FUT6 genes (see above,
Table I and Fig. 1). After hybridization, filters were rinsed three
times for 15 min each at 65 °C with 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS and
subjected to autoradiography.
Fig. 1.
Nucleotide sequence of the bovine
(1,3)-fucosyltransferase gene (futb) and comparison to
human FUT6, FUT5, and FUT3 sequences. The
adenine residues of the putative initiation codons are assigned as
residue 1. Dashed lines below the futb sequence
denote DNA identity with futb. Gaps in the nucleotide
sequence alignments are indicated by dots and are not taken
into account for nucleotide numbering. The catalytic domain
FUT3 (303 bp) and futb (301 bp) probes are
indicated by open triangles and solid arrowheads
on FUT3 and futb sequences. The stem domain
futb probe (459 bp) was obtained by PCR, with the
thick underlined sense primer and the antisense primer,
whose complementary sequence is stippled underlined (see
Table I and "Experimental Procedures").
[View Larger Version of this Image (66K GIF file)]
The cosmidic DNA, resulting from a positive colony isolated after a
tertiary screening, was digested by BamHI, EcoRI,
PstI, HindIII, and XhoI restriction
enzymes, fractionated through 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis, and
subjected to Southern blot and hybridization. A single 5.8-kilobase
pair BamHI restriction fragment encompassing a potential
futb structural gene was found. This insert was cloned into
the plasmid pFL44 (38) and was designated pFL44-futb (Fig.
2A).
Fig. 2.
Subcloning of the coding region of
futb into the mammalian expression plamid
pcDNAI/Amp. The 5.8-kilobase pair BamHI restriction
fragment encompassing the potential futb structural gene was
cloned into the plasmid pFL44 and was designated pFL44-futb (A). The 1213-bp AvrII-SacI fragment
containing the full open reading frame of futb was cloned
into the pFL44 between SacI and XbaI sites. Then
it was isolated by EcoRI-HindIII digestion and subcloned into the mammalian expression plasmid pcDNAI/Amp between EcoRI and HindIII sites (B). A
representative plasmid, designated pcDNAI/Amp-futb,
containing a single insertion in the correct orientation, was selected
for transfection experiments in COS-7 cells.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
DNA Sequence Analysis
Both strands of the 5.8-kilobase pair
BamHI insert were sequenced by the dideoxy chain termination
method using T7 DNA polymerase (Sequenase, Amersham Corp.).
Southern Blot Analysis of Bovine Genomic DNA
Bovine as well
as human genomic DNA (as a control) were digested with restriction
endonucleases, fractionated through 0.8% agarose gels, and subjected
to Southern transfer. Southern blots were probed with an
-32P-labeled FUT3 probe of 303 bp, generated
by PCR (14), and a futb probe of 301 bp obtained by
BglI digestion of the 1213-bp AvrII-SacI fragment of pFL44-futb.
Both probes are located on the 3 ends of the coding regions of
FUT3 and futb and cover part of their putative
catalytic domains (Fig. 1).
High stringent hybridizations were performed for at least 12 h at
65 °C in a buffer without formamide, containing 0.26 M
Na2HPO4, 7% (w/v) SDS, 5% (w/v) dextran
sulfate, 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin, and 0.2 mg/ml salmon sperm
DNA. Blots were rinsed three times for 20 min each at 65 °C, in
0.2 × SSC and then were subjected to autoradiography.
One set of low stringent hybridizations was performed for 12 h at
65 °C in the above described buffer. Three washings were made for 20 min at 42 °C in 2 × SSC before autoradiography.
Another set of low stringent hybridizations was performed for 12 h
at 42 °C in the same buffer, but they were washed only once in
0.2 × SSC.
Reverse Transcriptase-PCR Detection of futb
Transcripts
All cDNAs were synthesized using 1 µg of
poly(A)+ RNAs (CLONTECH) and the Marathon cDNA
Amplification Kit (CLONTECH). First strand synthesis was made with the
Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and a modified
docking oligo(dT) primer that contains two degenerate nucleotide
positions at the 3 end: 5 -TTCTAGAATTCAGCGGCCGC(T)30N 1N-3
(N 1 = G, A, or C; N = G, A, C, or T). These
nucleotides position the primer at the start of the poly(A) tail and
thus eliminate the 3 heterogeneity inherent to conventional oligo(dT)
priming (39, 40). Second strand synthesis was performed (41) with a
mixture of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, RNase H, and
E. coli DNA ligase (CLONTECH). One percent of each cDNA
preparation was then amplified by a first PCR in the presence of the U1
and L1 primers (Table I). Aliquots of each reaction were then amplified
by a second PCR in the presence of U2 and L2 primers
(Table I). The 25-µl PCR reaction mixture contained
2.5 nmol each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP; 10 pmol of primers; 25 nmol of MgCl2, and 1.25 units of Taq DNA
polymerase (Promega). The conditions for the first PCR reaction were as
follows: one cycle of denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, annealing at
60 °C for 15 s and extension at 72 °C for 5 min, followed by
35 cycles; denaturation at 94 °C for 10 s, annealing at
60 °C for 15 s and extension at 72 °C for 40 s,
supplemented by 1 s at each cycle, plus a last extension at
72 °C for 7 min. The second PCR reaction was started by denaturation
at 94 °C for 2 min, annealing at 68 °C for 15 s, and
extension at 72 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles; denaturation at
94 °C for 10 s, annealing at 68 °C for 15 s, and extension at 72 °C for 40 s, supplemented with 1 s at each
cycle and a last extension at 72 °C for 7 min. Final products were
analyzed in 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, and PCR fragments were
sequenced after gel extraction (PCR pure-bind Kit, CLONTECH).
Transfection and Expression of the Bovine Fucosyltransferase
Gene
The 1213-bp AvrII-SacI fragment from
the pFL44-futb plasmid containing futb, was
cloned between SacI and XbaI sites, into the
pFL44 plasmid (Fig. 2A). After amplification
in bacteria, the 1247-bp insert was isolated by
EcoRI-HindIII digestion and cloned between
EcoRI-HindIII sites into the mammalian expression plasmid pcDNAI/Amp (Invitrogen) (Fig. 2B). A plasmid
containing a well oriented insert was selected and designated
pcDNAI/Amp-futb. COS-7 cells were transiently
transfected using DEAE-dextran (42) and expression incubation time of
48 h.
Fucosyltransferase Enzyme Assay
Transfected cells were
homogenized at 4 °C in 1% Triton X-100. Each assay contained in a
total volume of 60 µl: 50 µg of the protein cell homogenate or 25 µl of plasma, 25 mM cacodylate buffer, pH 6.5, 4 mM ATP, 20 mM MnCl2, 10 mM L-fucose, 3.5 µM
GDP-[14C]fucose (Amersham Corp., 300 mCi/mmol), and 5 µl of 1 mg/ml solution of the different synthetic
8-methoxycarbonyloctyl trisaccharide acceptors. The mixture was
incubated for 2 h at 37 °C, and the reaction was stopped by
addition of 3 ml of water, centrifuged, and the supernatant applied to
a conditioned Sep-Pak C18 reverse chromatography cartridge
(Waters, Milford), attached to a 10-ml syringe. The unreacted
GDP-[14C]fucose and its hydrolysis products were washed
out with 25 ml of H2O, and the radiolabeled reaction
products were eluted with two 5-ml portions of methanol collected
directly into scintillation vials and counted with 1 volume of Instagel
(Packard, IL) in a liquid scintillation beta counter (43).
Synthetic Oligosaccharide Acceptors
Trisaccharide acceptor
substrates with the 8-methoxycarbonyloctyl aglycone, R = (CH2)8COOCH3, were obtained from
Chembiomed (Alberta Research Council, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada).
The Gal-type 2, Gal 1-3Gal 1-4GlcNAc -R was synthesized by
incubating 10 mg of Gal 1-4GlcNAc -R with 35 milliunits of
(1,3)-galactosyltransferase (44) and 4 mg of UDP-Gal in 30 mM sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 6.5, containing 0.1%
Triton X-100 and 20 mM MnCl2 at 37 °C for
48 h. After 3, 6, 24, and 28 h of incubation, an additional 4.3 mg of UDP-Gal donor was added to the reaction mixture. The product
was isolated on three tandem Sep-Pak C18 cartridges, washed with 150 ml of water, and then eluted with 45 ml of methanol, which was
evaporated to dryness and the residue chromatographed on an IATROBEAD
column (21 × 180 mm) and washed with 60 ml of 4:1
dichloromethane/methanol to remove Triton X-100. The product was eluted
with 65:35:2 dichloromethane/methanol/H2O and evaporated to
dryness (final yield: 12 mg of trisaccharide). The NMR spectrum of this
product showed signals for the new anomeric H-1 proton of the Gal
residue at 5.146 ppm (J = 4.0 Hz) (45).
Cell Membrane Fluorescence Staining
Transfected cells were
trypsinized and distributed in 96-well conic-bottom microtiter plates
(3 × 105 cells/well). Oligosaccharide epitopes were
stained by 30 min incubation with first monoclonal antibodies (50 µl
per well), washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.5, and
incubated for 30 min with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled sheep
anti-mouse Ig's second antibodies (Pasteur Diagnostics, Marnes la
Coquette, France). Each reaction was stopped by sucking off the
reagent, after 10 min centrifugation of the plates at 2000 rpm, and
then cells were resuspended and washed (3 ×) in phosphate-buffered saline. Stained and washed cells were resuspended in 10 µl of phosphate-buffered saline/paraformaldehyde 4%. Then 5 µl of Mowiol 4:80 (Hoechst, Frankfurt, Germany) were added, and they were mounted under coverslides for observation, on a Leitz SM-Lux epifluorescence microscope. Positive and negative cells were counted with a 25 × oil-immersion NPL-fluotar objective.
Tissue Immunofluorescence Staining
Routine
formalin-fixed/paraffin-embedded sections were deparaffinated and
stained by indirect (monoclonal antibodies) or direct (lectin)
immunofluorescence. They were incubated for 30 min in a wet chamber
with the first monoclonal antibody, washed, and stained for 30 min with
fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled sheep anti-mouse Ig's second
antibody (Pasteur Diagnostics, Marnes la Coquette, France). Direct
staining was performed for 30 min with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-labeled Ulex europaeus lectin 1 (UEAI) and
fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled Griffonia simplicifolia isolectin I-B4 (GSI-B4) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Stained
slides were washed again and mounted under coverslides with 1 drop of
Mowiol 4:80 (34) and observed under the epifluorescence microscope.
Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies
Anti-Lex were
obtained from Sigma (CD15), Valbiotech (SSEA1), and Chembiomed (82H5);
anti-Lea (069, 070, 071), anti-A (013), and anti-B (026)
were obtained from the Second International Workshop on Monoclonal
Antibodies Against Human Red Blood Cells (46);
anti-sialyl-Lex was from Valbiotech (KM93) and P. I. Terasaki (UCLA) (TT19A6); anti-Ley (75.12) was from P. Avner (Pasteur Institute, Paris, France); anti-Lea (7LE),
anti-Leb (2.25LE), and anti-sialyl-Lea (19.9)
were from J. Bara (INSERM U55, St. Antoine Hospital, Paris, France).
Molecular Phylogeny
Twelve selected complete coding
sequences available from the GenBank/EMBL data base
(Table II), were aligned with the Clustalw 1.5 program,
and the genetic distances in the matrix were analyzed with the Phylip
phylogeny package, using the Fitch-Margoliash (47) least square method
with evolutionary clock.2 The phylogenetic
tree was drawn from the Phylip dendrogram with the NJ plot program in a
Power Macintosh 6100/66 computer.
Table II.
Accession numbers on the GenBank/EMBL data base of the DNA sequences
containing the coding sequences (cds) of the published functional
fucosyltransferase genes of different species, used to build the
phylogenetic tree of Fig. 6
| Accession
number |
Species |
Locus |
DNA cds |
Protein amino acids |
Ref.
|
|
|
|
|
bp
|
| M355[GenBank]31 |
Human |
FUT1 |
1098 |
365 |
64
|
| U178[GenBank]94 |
Human |
FUT2 |
999 |
332 |
24
|
| X535[GenBank]78 |
Human |
FUT3 |
1086 |
361 |
7
|
| M585[GenBank]96 |
Human |
FUT4 |
1218 |
405 |
11
|
| M814[GenBank]85 |
Human |
FUT5 |
1125 |
374 |
13
|
| L016[GenBank]98 |
Human |
FUT6 |
1080 |
359 |
14
|
| X780[GenBank]31 |
Human |
FUT7 |
1029 |
342 |
16
|
| X802[GenBank]26 |
Rabbit |
rfut1 |
1122 |
373 |
65
|
| X802[GenBank]25 |
Rabbit |
rfut2 |
1065 |
354 |
65
|
| U334[GenBank]57 |
Mouse |
mfut4 |
1302 |
433 |
29
|
| U459[GenBank]80 |
Mouse |
mfut7 |
1170 |
389 |
66
|
| X878[GenBank]10 |
Bovine |
futb |
1098 |
365 |
This
article |
|
RESULTS
Molecular Cloning of a Bovine Fucosyltransferase Gene
Using
the bovine futb probe (459 bp), obtained as described under
"Experimental Procedures" and corresponding to the stem domain of
FUT3, FUT5, and FUT6 human genes, the
hybridization screening of a bovine genomic library for an
(1,3)-fucosyltransferase gene yielded one positive cosmid.
BamHI digestion released a 5.8-kilobase pair fragment (Fig.
2A) that also cross-hybridizes with the futb
probe. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the genomic fragment identified
a single long open reading frame including a sequence fully homologous to the bovine probe (Fig. 1). This open reading frame was located within a sequence context largely consistent with Kozak's consensus rules for mammalian translation initiation. Like its human counterpart, the bovine gene apparently maintains a single coding exon.
Hydropathy analysis (48) of the 365-amino acid protein sequence,
predicted by the open reading frame, identified a single 19-amino acid
hydrophobic segment at the NH2 terminus, corresponding to
amino acids 15-34 flanked by histidine and arginine, implying that the
polypeptide has the type II transmembrane topology typical of mammalian
glycosyltransferases (49). Sequence comparisons made between the
predicted bovine protein and human FUC-T3, FUC-T5, and FUC-T6 enzymes
revealed that they share 67.3, 69, and 69.3% amino acid sequence
identity, respectively (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
Comparison of protein sequences of bovine
(1,3)-fucosyltransferase enzyme (Futb) and human FUC-T6, FUC-T5, and
FUC-T3 enzymes. Amino acid sequence identities are indicated with dashed lines and gaps with dots. The double
underlined amino acids in the bovine (1,3)-fucosyltransferase
enzyme correspond to the putative transmembrane domain. Solid
circles represent common cysteine residues. Solid
triangles represent potential asparagine-linked glycosylation
sites. The underlined sequence in the hyper-variable domain,
between amino acids 115 and 155, corresponds to the sequence of
subdomains 4 and 5 (51).
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]
Seven cysteine residues are common to human FUC-T3, FUC-T5, and FUC-T6
(16); the bovine enzyme has these same 7 cysteines (Fig. 3), including
the bovine Cys-147, which determines N-ethylmaleimide sensitivity (50). As expected, 90% of the Futb activity determined on
type 2 acceptors was inhibited by pretreatment with 8 mM
N-ethylmaleimide for 1 h at 37 °C. Consequently,
Futb behaves as FUC-T3, FUC-T5, and FUC-T6 and is different from the
human myeloid (FUC-T4) and leukocyte (FUC-T7) enzymes, which are
resistant to N-ethylmaleimide (26).
Two potential consensus sites for asparagine-linked glycosylation
(bovine amino acids 158 and 189) are common to the bovine Futb and the
human FUC-T3, FUC-T5, and FUC-T6 enzymes. Another bovine glycosylation
site (Asn-100) is close to a similar glycosylation site in human FUC-T5
(Asn-105) and FUC-T6 (Asn-91). Finally, a fourth glycosylation site is
only present in human FUC-T5 (Asn-46) and FUC-T6 (Asn-60) (14), and it
is absent from human FUC-T3 and bovine enzymes (Fig. 3).
Protein sequence alignment of bovine Futb and human FUC-T3, FUC-T5,
FUC-T6 across the subdomains 4 and 5 (51) also revealed an intermediate
primary structure of the bovine enzyme. Indeed, between bovine
positions 115 and 155 there are 14 amino acids common to the four
enzymes (37%), and only 10 are specific for the bovine sequence
(24%). One amino acid is identical only to FUC-T3 (Futb position 122),
four are identical to FUC-T3 and FUC-T5 (Futb positions 127, 131, 146, 153), five are identical to FUC-T5 and FUC-T6 (Futb positions 140, 141, 143, 145, 155), and five are common only with the human FUC-T6 (Futb
positions 115, 116, 117, 124, 151) (Fig. 3).
After position 46, the FUC-T5 enzyme has a unique insertion of 11 amino
acids, which is not present in any of the other two human enzymes (14)
nor in the bovine enzyme. In this area the bovine peptide segment,
between positions 36 and 69, shows the strongest divergency from human
enzymes. Indeed, only 2 amino acids (6%) are common to the four
sequences (Fig. 3).
Southern Blot Analyses of Bovine Genomic DNA
FUT3
and futb catalytic domain probes were used to sample both
bovine and human genomes for cross-hybridizing DNA sequences. Regardless of the restriction enzyme used, both probes identify the
same three bands corresponding to human FUT3,
FUT5, and FUT6 genes in human genomic DNA (14).
Alternatively, but also regardless of the restriction enzyme used, the
same two probes recognize only one band corresponding to the bovine
gene identified above in bovine genomic DNA (Fig.
4A). As a control, the low stringency hybridization of
bovine DNA with futb probe revealed a similar pattern (Fig.
4, B and C). At these low stringencies two other bands were detected resulting from unspecific hybridization due to the
high amount of repeated satellite DNA. The 1.4-kilobase pair band (Fig.
4, B and C) corresponded to an already described bovine satellite (52), and the other around 1.8-kilobase pair (Fig.
4B) is not well characterized. Altogether, these results suggest that in the bovine genome, there is a single gene,
futb, related to the human enzyme family of
(1,3)-fucosyltransferases.
Fig. 4.
Southern blots of human and bovine genomic
DNA. A, human (H) and bovine (B)
genomic DNA were digested with the restriction enzymes
EcoRV/EcoRI (lanes 1 and 3)
and BamHI/EcoRI (lanes 2 and 4) and electrophoresed on agarose gels. Results are derived
from a master gel and blot, containing reiterated sets of the two
digests (10 µg of digested DNA/lane). Each strip, containing two
digests, was separately hybridized at high stringency (see
"Experimental Procedures") with a futb probe constituted
of 301 bp (I) and a human FUT3 probe of 303 bp
(II). B, low stringency hybridization of bovine
DNA was obtained using the same futb (I) and
human FUT3 (II) probes. Conditions were as
follows: hybridization at 65 °C followed by three washings at
42 °C with 2 × SSC. Lane 1 contains EcoRV/EcoRI digests and lane 2 contains BamHI/EcoRI digests. futb denotes the bovine gene fragments. The main bovine satellite (52) is
indicated by an arrow at 1.4 kilobase pairs. C,
low stringency hybridization. The same experiment was performed as
described in B, but hybridization temperature was 42 °C
and only one washing at 42 °C with 0.2 × SSC was done.
[View Larger Version of this Image (53K GIF file)]
Identification of mRNA Transcripts of
futb
cDNAs obtained by reverse transcriptase-PCR
on mRNA transcripts from bovine liver, kidney, lung, and brain were
probed by nested PCR using specific primer pairs corresponding to the
futb stem domain (Table I and Fig. 1). In all cases, the
clear-cut amplified band of 333 bp (Fig. 5) was eluted
and sequenced. A complete identity between sequences of the amplified
DNAs and futb was found, certifying that the bovine gene is
effectively transcribed in the probed bovine tissues.
Fig. 5.
futb transcripts in some bovine
tissues. cDNAs were prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Nested PCR reactions were performed with
primers U1 and L1 for the first PCR and U2 and L2 for the second PCR
(Table I). The amplification product (333 bp) was observed in all the
tissues tested as follows: lane 2 (brain), lane 3 (liver), lane 4 (lung), and lane 5 (kidney); lane 6 was a control without DNA.
[View Larger Version of this Image (81K GIF file)]
Expression of Bovine futb and Human FUT3, FUT5, and FUT6 Genes in
COS-7 Cells
To confirm that the bovine sequence encodes a
functional (1,3)-fucosyltransferase, the 1247-bp
EcoRI-HindIII fragment encompassing the bovine
open reading frame was cloned into the mammalian expression vector
pcDNAI/Amp (Fig. 2B), and the resulting plasmid
(pcDNAI/Amp-futb) was introduced into COS-7 cells. The
cells were analyzed to assess in vitro substrate acceptor
pattern of enzyme activity (Table III) and the
appearance of fucosylated type 1 and type 2 epitopes on transfected
cells (Table IV), comparatively to COS-7 cells transfected with the human FUT3, FUT5, and
FUT6 genes.
Table III.
(1.3/1.4)-Fucosyltransferase activities of extracts of COS7 cells
transfected with pcDNAI/Amp vector alone or containing either
human FUT3, FUT5, or FUT6, or bovine futb constructs
Enzyme activity is expressed as cpm of [14C]fucose
incorporated onto synthetic oligosaccharide acceptors, after 2 h
incubation at 37 °C.
| Acceptor Oligosaccharides |
Transfected
constructions
|
| pcDNAI/Amp |
Human FUT3 |
Human
FUT5 |
Human FUT6 |
Bovine futb |
|
| Type-1
|
Fuc 1-2Gal 1-3GlcNAc -Ra |
0 |
50,000 |
11,960 |
0 |
0
|
|
| Type-2
|
Fuc 1-2Gal 1-4GlcNAc -R |
0 |
2,690 |
19,100 |
24,900 |
3,000
|
Gal 1-3Gal 1-4GlcNAc -R |
0 |
1,350 |
3,920 |
19,100 |
2,390
|
NcuAc 2-3Gal 1-4GlcNAc -R |
0 |
650 |
4,450 |
22,900 |
1,880 |
|
|
a
R, (CH2)8COOCH3.
|
|
Table IV.
Percentage of fluorescent positive cells detected with monoclonal
antibodies
Anti-type 1 (Lea and sialyl-Lea), anti-type 2 (Lex and sialyl-Lex), and anti-human blood group B, on
COS-7 cells are transfected with the pcDNA1/Amp vector alone or
containing either human FUT3, FUT5, or FUT6
or the bovine futb constructs.
Monoclonal antibodies
|
Transfected
constructions
|
| Chain |
Epitope |
Name |
pcDNAI/Amp |
Human
FUT3 |
Human FUT5 |
Human FUT6 |
Bovine futb
|
|
| Type 1 |
|
Lea |
7LE |
0 |
15 |
4 |
0 |
0
|
|
Lea |
069 |
0 |
32 |
4 |
0 |
0
|
|
Lea |
070 |
0 |
40 |
6 |
0 |
1
|
|
Lea |
071 |
0 |
40 |
4 |
0 |
1
|
|
Sialyl-Lea |
19.9 |
0 |
53 |
22 |
0 |
0
|
|
| Type 2 |
|
Lex |
82H5 |
0 |
29 |
36 |
35 |
22
|
|
Lex |
SSEA1 |
0 |
42 |
54 |
40 |
28
|
|
Lex |
CD15 |
0 |
18 |
22 |
25 |
14
|
|
Sialyl-Lex |
TT19A6 |
0 |
12 |
30 |
25 |
20
|
|
Sialyl-Lex |
KM93 |
0 |
31 |
28 |
23 |
18
|
|
| Human blood group B
|
|
B |
026 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Both analyses demonstrate that pcDNAI/Amp-futb can
determine transient expression of type 2 (Lex and
sialyl-Lex) but not type 1 (Lea or
sialyl-Lea) epitopes. These results are similar to those
obtained with the human FUT6 construct (Tables III and IV).
However, in quantitative terms the bovine enzyme is about 10-fold less
efficient than the human FUC-T6 for the three type 2 acceptors tested.
The amount of fucose incorporated by the bovine enzyme on H-type 2 is
7-fold lower than that of FUC-T5 and similar to that obtained with the FUC-T3 human enzyme. The amounts of fucose incorporated onto
Gal-type 2 and sialyl-type 2, by the bovine enzyme, are intermediate
between those observed with human FUC-T3 and FUC-T5 enzymes (Table
III).
Molecular Phylogeny of Fucosyltransferase Genes
We have added
to the human paralogous fucosyltransferase tree (20) the sequences of
orthologous animal fucosyltransferase genes to make a combined
phylogenetic tree. This new tree suggests that separation of mouse,
rabbit, and bovine species from the main evolutionary pathway, during
the great mammalian radiation, about 80 millions years ago
(Fig. 6), occurred after the duplication events which
originated the ancestral H and Se (1,2)-fucosyltransferase genes and
the divergency of the ancestors of the myeloid, leukocyte, and Lewis
(1,3)-fucosyltransferase loci but before the duplication events that
originated the present FUT3, FUT5, and
FUT6 human genes. Consequently, the bovine
fucosyltransferase gene, described in this paper, may be the
orthologous homologue of an ancestor gene, which originated the present
human FUT3-FUT5-FUT6 cluster.
Fig. 6.
Phylogenetic tree of cloned human and animal
fucosyltransferase genes. Loci names of paralogous human
fucosyltransferase genes (plain text) and the corresponding
orthologous animal genes (shaded) are indicated on the
right. The points of divergency between human and mammalian
fucosyltransferase genes, represented by gray circles, are
located at a similar genetic distance (assumed to correspond to about
80 million years).
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]
Tissue Enzyme Distribution
Human FUC-T6 activity is mainly
found in plasma, whereas human FUC-T3 is absent from plasma. Using the
same conditions established for detection of human
(1,3)-fucosyltransferase activity, no enzyme activity was detected
in two different samples of bovine plasma. Alternatively,
(1,3)-fucosyltransferase activity has been reported in mesenteric
lymph nodes, suggesting the presence of another calf enzyme
functionally homologous to the human FUC-T4 (53).
Immunofluorescent Detection of Oligosaccharide Epitopes on Normal
Bovine Tissues
Bovine tissues present an immunofluorescent
pattern of carbohydrate epitopes similar to other lower mammals and new
world monkey tissues but quite different from human and old world
monkey tissues (35). Vascular endothelium, leukocytes, and red cells are strongly positive with the anti- Gal isolectin GSI-B4 and are
completely negative with ABH and either of type 1 or type 2 Lewis-related reagents.
Bovine pancreas present strong staining with GSI-B4 of vascular
endothelium, canaliculi, and ducts and weak staining of acinar cells
and ducts, as illustrated on Fig. 7A. For
comparison strong staining of acinar cells and ducts with anti-A and no
staining at all of vascular endothelium are illustrated in Fig.
7B. None of the reagents tested stained the endocrine cells
of the islets of Langerhans (white star, Fig.
7A).
Fig. 7.
Immunofluorescent staining of normal bovine
tissues. Strong staining, with the isolectin I-B4 of G. simplicifolia, on vascular endothelium, red cells, and leukocytes
of pancreas (A, the white star identifies an
islet of Langerhans), kidney (C), and liver (E);
anti-A staining on pancreas of an A+ cow (B);
anti-sialyl-Lex staining, with antibody KM93, on epithelial
cells of the macula densa of kidney (D, arrows are located
around the glomerulus on the left of the macula densa); anti-H-type 2, U. europaeus lectin I, staining of goblet cells of colonic
mucosa of an A cow (F, arrows point to the
surface epithelium). Anti-Lex staining, with 82H5 antibody,
of the brush border of surface epithelial cells of small intestine from
an A+ cow (G); anti-Ley staining,
with antibody 75.12, of brush border of surface epithelium of colon
from an A cow (H). Magnification × 250 A-D and G and H, and × 100 E and F.
[View Larger Version of this Image (139K GIF file)]
Kidney cortex shows strong staining, with GSI-B4, of vascular
endothelium of glomeruli, intertubular capillaries, and larger vessels
and weak staining of the epithelial cells of proximal convoluted
tubules (Fig. 7C). The only stain observed in kidney, with
other Lewis-related reagents, was seen with
anti-sialyl-Lex, and it was specifically located on cells
of the macula densa of the juxtaglomerular apparatus (Fig.
7D), but the glomeruli and the rest of the renal parenchyma
were negative.
Liver vascular endothelium and hepatocytes were strongly stained with
GSI-B4, whereas biliary ducts were weakly stained with GSI-B4 (Fig.
7E). No other staining was detected with other Lewis-related reagents, with the exception of a weak staining of biliary ducts with
anti-sialyl-Lex (Table V).
All vascular endothelium and bronchial epithelium of lung were strongly
stained with GSI-B4 (Table V).
Type 2-fucosylated (Lex and Ley) epitopes were
detected only on the brush border of epithelial cells of small (Fig.
7G) and large intestine (Fig. 7H), whereas
fucosylated type 1 (Lea, Leb,
sialyl-Lea) was not detected at all in any of the cow
intestinal sections studied (Table V). Presence of Lex
epitope has also been reported on bovine pituitary hormones (54).
Human blood group A and/or H epitopes were not present on bovine red
cells nor on vascular endothelium but were found in exocrine epithelial
cells of pancreas (Fig. 7B), renal distal convoluted tubules, biliary ducts, lung, small intestine, and colon (Fig. 7F and Table V).
DISCUSSION
The bovine futb gene is similar in its structure to
FUT3, FUT5, and FUT6 human genes, and
the corresponding cognate enzymes are nearly identical in their
COOH-terminal regions (catalytic domain).
Some amino acids in the subdomains 4 and 5 play an important role in
determining the efficiency with which human FUC-T3, FUC-T5, or FUC-T6
use type 1 and type 2 acceptor substrates (51, 55). The bovine enzyme
presents, in this region (positions 115-155), a greater homology to
the human FUC-T6 enzyme, in good agreement with the exclusive type 2 acceptor substrate specificity of both enzymes. Since the main acceptor
chain present in bovine tissue is the Gal 1-3Gal 1-4GlcNAc
epitope, which is absent from human tissues, but is in vitro
an acceptor for human (56), mouse (29), and a bovine lymph node (53)
(1,3)-fucosyltransferases, a special effort was made to add this
acceptor to the present study. This trisaccharide with the same
hydrophobic aglycone tail as the other three acceptors was synthesized,
but it was not a better acceptor for the bovine enzyme as compared with
the other acceptors tested (Table III). Therefore, the quantitative
difference in fucose incorporation between bovine and human gene
products cannot be ascribed to a specific preference of this bovine
enzyme for the Gal-type 2 acceptor substrate.
Large amounts of Gal epitopes are present in all bovine tissues,
suggesting that the low amounts of Lex detected on bovine
tissues may be secondary to bovine Lex epitopes being built
on this Gal-type 2 acceptor. The resulting Gal tetrasaccharide
epitope Gal 1-3Gal 1-4(Fuc 1-3)GlcNAc is not well recognized
by anti-Lex reagents, because the terminal Gal masks the
Lex epitope (57). Furthermore, the Gal-type 2 epitope is
a good acceptor for the bovine lymph node (1,3)-fucosyltransferase
(53). However, preliminary histochemical results suggest that the
coffee bean -galactosidase digestion removes the Gal epitope from
tissue sections but does not increase the staining of
anti-Lex on calf tissue.3 The
question now is to know if the (1,3)-fucosyltransferase is
effectively expressed in the bovine tissues that we have probed. To
overcome this difficulty, we looked for futb transcripts in mRNA extracts from some bovine tissues. Reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis (Fig. 5) showed that futb is transcribed in liver,
kidney, brain, and lung.
To control that the lower expression of enzyme activity of
futb cannot be ascribed to an incorrectly folded mRNA
transcript lacking its 5 -untranslated region, we also transfected
COS-7 cells with a pcDNAI/Amp construct containing the
futb coding sequence plus the 5 -untranslated region of a
bovine kidney transcript. A high increase of enzyme activity (about
10-fold) was observed with this DNA construct suggesting that the
expression of futb is under a tight control of
5 -untranslated regions.4
Fucosylated glycoconjugate epitopes are synthesized in two compartments
in man. Mesodermal cells produce mainly type 2 ABH and Lewis structures
(Lex, Ley, sialyl-Ley) under
control of FUT1 (H), FUT4, FUT6, and
FUT7 genes, whereas exocrine cells produce mainly type 1 ABH
and Lewis structures (Lea, Leb,
sialyl-Lea) under control of FUT2 (Se) and
FUT3 (Le) genes (58). The Lex epitope is mainly
found on neutrophiles, brain (26), and epithelial cells of kidney
proximal convoluted tubules (34, 59). Sialyl-Lex is also
found on renal proximal convoluted tubules and on monocytes and on
hepatocytes (60). Lea and Leb are found on
biliary and pancreatic ducts (61), on bronchial epithelium, and on
surface digestive epithelium, whereas Lex and
Ley are mainly found on deep glands of digestive mucosae
(62). This distribution of glycoconjugate epitopes on human tissues is
different from the immunofluorescent pattern found in bovine tissues
(Table V and Fig. 7). It suggests that different glycoconjugate epitopes have been selected by different species, in different tissues,
and it illustrates that type 2 Lex-related structures are
poorly represented in bovine tissues.
Despite using the same GDP-fucose donor substrate, having the same type
II transmembrane topology, a similar location of the catalytic domain
in the COOH terminus, a similar size (Table II), and a common
three-dimensional folding (63), less than 20% of sequence identity was
found between the two main families of -2- and
-3-fucosyltransferase enzymes (63). The present phylogenetic analysis is compatible with a low degree of homology, since the largest
genetic distance detected in the Phylip matrix corresponds to these two
main families of -2- and -3-fucosyltransferases. Consequently,
the root of the tree is located between these two families of
fucosyltransferases (Fig. 6) (20).
The position of futb on the phylogenetic tree suggests that
the duplication event, at the origin of this gene, occurred before the
duplication events that originated FUT3, FUT5,
and FUT6 human genes. Therefore, it is not surprising that,
by Southern blot, whatever the stringency conditions, only one
hybridization signal is obtained on bovine genomic DNA (Fig. 4,
A-C), regardless of restriction enzymes and human or bovine
origin of the probes used. Alternatively, the presence of three
hybridization bands on human genomic DNA with the bovine probe confirms
that the three human genes have a high degree of sequence homology and
cross-hybridize with the bovine probe.
In addition, the futb gene that we propose to be the
orthologous homologue of the ancestor of the human fucosyltransferase cluster of genes FUT3-FUT5-FUT6 is
located on the bovine chromosome 7 (36), which is, by comparative
mapping, homologous of the human chromosome 19, bearing the
FUT3-FUT5-FUT6 cluster.
In good agreement with the present phylogenetic evolutionary model, we
have recently cloned three different chimpanzee genes, each with about
98% sequence identity with the corresponding human FUT3,
FUT5, and FUT6 genes, suggesting that the
divergency of chimpanzee and human species occurred after the
duplication events which originated the present
FUT3-FUT5-FUT6 cluster of
genes.5
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported in part by Grant 9514111 "Action
Concertée Coordonnée des Sciences du Vivant" (ACCSV14)
from "Ministère de l'Education Nationale de l'Enseignement
Supérieur et de la Recherche" (MENESR, France), a Mitzutani
grant for Glycoscience (Japan), and the Immunology Concerted Action
3026PL950004 of the Biotechnology Program from the European Union.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) X87810[GenBank].
Full time investigator of the Center National de la Recherche
Scientifique (CNRS), France.
**
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed:
Institut de Biotechnologie, Faculté des Sciences,
Université de Limoges, 123 Ave. Albert Thomas, 87060 Limoges,
France. Tel.: 33 5 55 45 76 76; Fax: 33 5 55 45 76 53; E-mail:
rjulien{at}unilim.fr.
1
The abbreviations used are: H enzyme (EC
2.4.1.69), FUT1-encoded (1,2)-fucosyltransferase; Se or
secretor enzyme, FUT2-encoded (1,2)-fucosyltransferase;
FUC-T3 (EC 2.4.1.65) Le or Lewis enzyme, FUT3-encoded
(1,3/1,4)-fucosyltransferase; FUC-T4 or myeloid enzyme,
FUT4-encoded (1,3)-fucosyltransferase; FUC-T5, FUT5-encoded (1,3)-fucosyltransferase; FUC-T6 (EC
2.4.1.152) or plasma enzyme, FUT6-encoded
(1,3)-fucosyltransferase; FUC-T7 or leukocyte enzyme,
FUT7-encoded (1,3)-fucosyltransferase; FUT1 to
FUT7 are the Genome Data Base (GDB) registered names of the cloned human fucosyltransferase genes; Futb is the bovine
futb encoded (1,3)-fucosyltransferase; type 1 substrate,
neo-lactosamine; type 2 substrate, lactosamine; H-type 1, Fuc 1-2Gal 1-3GlcNAc -R; H-type 2, Fuc 1-2Gal 1-4GlcNAc -R; sialyl-type 2, NeuAc 2-3Gal 1-4GlcNAc -R; Gal-type 2, Gal 1-3Gal 1-4GlcNAc -R; R,
-(CH2)8COOCH3; Lea,
Gal 1-3(Fuc 1-4)GlcNAc; Leb,
Fuc 1-2Gal 1-3(Fuc 1-4)GlcNAc; sialyl-Lea,
NeuAc 2-3Gal 1-3(Fuc 1-4)GlcNAc; Lex,
Gal 1-4(Fuc 1-3)GlcNAc; Ley,
Fuc 1-2Gal 1-4(Fuc 1-3)GlcNAc; sialyl-Lex,
NeuAc 2-3Gal 1-4(Fuc 1-3)GlcNAc; bp, base pair(s); PCR,
polymerase chain reaction; Pipes, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic
acid.
2
All programs are available at CIS INFOBIOGEN, 7 rue Guy Mocquet, BP8, 94801 Villejuif Cedex, France; E-mail:
bioinfo{at}infobiogen.fr; WEB: http://www.infobiogen.fr.
3
A. Oulmouden, A. Wierinckx, J.-M. Petit, M. Costache, M. M. Palcic, R. Mollicone, R. Oriol, and R. Julien,
unpublished results.
4
A. Wierinckx, Ph.D. thesis, in
preparation.
5
M. Costache, Ph.D. thesis in preparation.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are grateful to Dr. P. F. Gallet for expert
technical assistance and helpful discussions.
REFERENCES
-
Hakomori, S. I.
(1989)
Adv. Cancer Res.
52,
257-331
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lasky, L. A.
(1992)
Science
258,
964-969
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yago, K., Zenita, K., Ginya, H., Sawada, M., Ohmorik, K., Okuma, M., Kannagi, R., and Lowe, J.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
5559-5565
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sun, J., Thurin, J., Cooper, H. S., Wang, P., Mackiewicz, M., Steplewiski, Z., and Blaszczyk-Thurin, M.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5724-5728
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Maly, P., Thall, A. D., Petryniak, B., Rogers, G. E., Smith, P. L., Marks, R. M., Kelly, R. J., Gersten, K. M., Cheng, G. Y., Saunders, T. L., Camper, S. A., Camphausen, R. T., Sullivan, F. X., Isogai, Y., Hindsgaul, O., Vonandrian, U. H., and Lowe, J. B.
(1996)
Cell
86,
643-653
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Watkins, W. M.
(1995)
in
Glycoproteins (Montreuil, J., Schachter, H., and Vligenhart, J. F. G., eds), pp. 313-390, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam
-
Kukowska-Latallo, J. F., Larsen, R. D., Nair, R. P., and Lowe, J. B.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
1288-1303
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mollicone, R., Reguigne, I., Kelly, R. J., Fletcher, A., Watt, J., Chatfield, S., Aziz, A., Cameron, H. S., Weston, B. W., Lowe, J. B., and Oriol, R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20987-20994
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Koda, Y., Kimura, H., and Mekada, E.
(1993)
Blood
82,
2915-2919
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nishihara, S., Narimatsu, H., Iwasaki, H., Yazawa, S., Akamatsu, S., Ando, T., Seno, T., and Narimatsu, I.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29271-29278
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Goelz, S. E., Hession, C., Goff, D., Griffiths, B., Tizard, R., Newman, B., Chi-Rosso, G., and Lobb, R.
(1990)
Cell
63,
1349-1356
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lowe, J. B., Kukowska-Latallo, J. F., Nair, R. P., Larsen, R. D., Marks, R. M., Macher, B. A., Kelly, R. J., and Ernst, L. K.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
17467-17477
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weston, B. W., Nair, R. P., Larsen, R. D., and Lowe, J. B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
4152-4160
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weston, B. W., Smith, P. L., Kelly, R. J., and Lowe, J. B.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
24575-24584
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mollicone, R., Reguigne, I., Fletcher, A., Aziz, A., Rustam, M., Weston, B. W., Kelly, R. J., Lowe, J. B., and Oriol, R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12662-12671
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sasaki, K., Kurata, K., Funayama, K., Nagata, M., Watanabe, E., Ohta, S., Hanai, N., and Nishi, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
14730-14737
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Natsuka, S., Gersten, K. M., Zenita, K., Kannagi, R., and Lowe, J. B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
16789-16794
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reguigne-Arnould, I., Couillin, P., Mollicone, R., Faure, S., Fletcher, A., Kelly, R. J., Lowe, J. B., and Oriol, R.
(1995)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
71,
158-162
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
McCurley, R. S., Recinos, A., Olsen, A. S., Gingrich, J. C., Szczepaniak, D., Cameron, H. S., Krauss, R., and Weston, B. W.
(1995)
Genomics
26,
142-146
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mollicone, R., Cailleau, A., and Oriol, R.
(1995)
Transfus. Clin. Biol.
2,
235-242
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sarnesto, A., Köhlin, T., Thurin, J., and Blaszczyk-Thurin, M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
15067-15075
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kelly, R. J., Ernst, L. K., Larsen, R. D., Bryant, J. G., Robinson, J. S., and Lowe, J. B.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
5843-5847
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sarnesto, A., Köhlin, T., Hindsgaul, O., Thurin, J., and Blaszczyk-Thurin, M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
2737-2744
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kelly, R. J., Rouquier, S., Giorgi, D., Lennon, G. G., and Lowe, J. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4640-4649
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sarnesto, A., Köhlin, T., Hindsgaul, O., Vogele, K., Blaszczyk-Thurin, M., and Thurin, J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
2745-2752
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mollicone, R., Gibaud, A., François, A., Ratcliffe, M., and Oriol, R.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
191,
169-176
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Macher, B., Holmes, E. H., Swiedler, S. J., Stults, C. L., and Srnka, C. A.
(1991)
Glycobiology
1,
577-584
[Free Full Text]
-
de Vries, T., Srnka, C. A., Palcic, M. M., Swiedler, S. J., van den Eijnden, D. H., and Macher, B. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8712-8722
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gersten, K. M., Natsuka, S., Trinchera, M., Petryniak, B., Kelly, R. J., Hiraiwa, N., Jenkins, N. A., Gilbert, D. J., Copeland, N. G., and Lowe, J. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25047-25056
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cameron, H. S., Szczepaniak, D., and Weston, B. W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20112-20122
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Miyake, M., Zenita, K., Tanaka, O., Okada, Y., and Kannagi, R.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
7150-7158
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tuo, X. H., Itai, S., Nishikata, J., Mori, T., Tanaka, O., and Kannagi, R.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
5744-5751
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mollicone, R., Candelier, J. J., Mennesson, B., Couillin, P., Venot, A. P., and Oriol, R.
(1992)
Carbohydr. Res.
228,
265-276
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Candelier, J. J., Mollicone, R., Mennesson, B., Bergemer, A. M., Henry, S., Coullin, P., and Oriol, R.
(1993)
Lab. Invest.
69,
449-459
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Oriol, R., Candelier, J. J., Taniguchi, S., Peters, L., and Cooper, D. K. C.
(1996)
Transplant. Proc.
28,
794
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
(abstr.)
-
Oulmouden, A., Vaiman, D., Oustry, A., Cribiu, E. P., and Julien, R.
(1995)
Mamm. Genome
6,
760-761
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Clarke, L., and Carbon, J.
(1976)
Cell
9,
91-99
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bonneaud, N., Ozier-Kalogeropoulos, O., Li, G. Y., Labouesse, M., Minvielle-Sebastia, L., and Lacroute, F.
(1991)
Yeast
7,
609-615
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chenchik, A., Moqadam, F., and Siebert, P. (1995) CLONTECHniques
X, 5-8
-
Borson, N. D., Sato, W. L., and Drewes, M. R.
(1992)
in
PCR 1. Methods and Applications (McPherson, B. D., Hames, B. D., and Taylor, G. R., eds), Vol. 1, pp. 144-148, IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford
-
Gubler, U., and Hoffman, B. J.
(1983)
Gene (Amst.)
25,
263-269
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Davis, L. G., Dibner, M. D., and Battey, J. F.
(1986)
Basic Methods in Molecular Biology, pp. 290-292, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York
-
Palcic, M. M., Heerze, L. D., Pierce, M., and Hindsgaul, O.
(1988)
Glycoconj. J.
5,
49-63
-
Blanken, W. M., and van den Eijnden, D. H.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
12927-12934
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Joziasse, D. H., Shaper, N. L., Salyer, L. S., van den Eijnden, D., van den Spoel, A. C., and Shaper, J. H.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
191,
75-83
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chester, M. A., Johnson, U., Lundblad, A., Löw, B., Messeter, L., and Samuelsson, B.
(1990)
Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Monoclonal Antibodies Against Human Red Blood Cells and Related Antigens, pp. 207-213, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden
-
Fitch, W. M., and Margoliash, E.
(1970)
Evol. Biol.
4,
67-109
-
Kyte, J., and Doolittle, R. F.
(1982)
J. Mol. Biol.
157,
105-132
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lowe, J. B.
(1991)
Semin. Cell Biol.
2,
289-307
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Holmes, E. H., Xu, Z., Sherwood, A. L., and Macher, B. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8145-8151
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Legault, D. J., Kelly, R. J., Natsuka, Y., and Lowe, J. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20987-20996
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gaillard, C., Doly, J., Cortadas, J., and Bernardi, G.
(1981)
Nucleic Acids Res.
9,
6069-6082
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chandrasekaran, E. V., Jain, R. K., Larsen, R. D., Wlasichuk, K., DiCioccio, R. D., and Matta, K. L.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
8925-8933
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Siciliano, R. A., Morris, H. R., McDowell, R. A., Azadi, P., Rogers, M. E., Bennett, H. P. J., and Dell, A.
(1993)
Glycobiology
3,
225-239
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Xu, Z., Vo, L., and Macher, B. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8818-8823
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Joziasse, D. H., Schiphorst, W. E., Koeleman, C. A., and van den Eijnden, D. H.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
194,
358-367
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cho, S. K., Yeh, J., Cho, M., and Cummings, R. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3238-3246
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Oriol, R., Mollicone, R., Couillin, P., Dalix, A. M., and Candelier, J. J. (1992) Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. 100, Suppl. 27, 28-38
-
Caillard, T., Le Pendu, J., Ventura, M., Mada, M., Rault, G., Mannoni, P., and Oriol, R.
(1988)
Exp. Clin. Immunogenet.
5,
15-23
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ito, N., and Hirota, T.
(1992)
Prog. Histochem. Cytochem.
25,
1-85
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ito, N., Tabata, S., Kawahara, S., Hirano, Y., Nakajima, K., Uchida, K., and Hirota, T.
(1993)
Histochem. J.
25,
242-249
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mollicone, R., Bara, J., Le Pendu, J., and Oriol, R.
(1985)
Lab. Invest.
53,
219-227
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Breton, C., Oriol, R., and Imberty, A.
(1996)
Glycobiology
6,
vii-xii
-
Larsen, R. D., Ernst, L. K., Nair, R. P., and Lowe, J. B.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
6674-6678
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hitoshi, S., Kusunoki, S., Kanazawa, I., and Tsuji, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8844-8850
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Smith, P. L., Gersten, K. M., Petryniak, B., Kelly, R. J., Rogers, C., Natsuka, Y., Alford, J. A., III, Scheidegger, E. P., Natsuka, S., and Lowe, J. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8250-8259
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Norden, K. Nystrom, and S. Olofsson
Activation of host antiviral RNA-sensing factors necessary for herpes simplex virus type 1-activated transcription of host cell fucosyltransferase genes FUT3, FUT5, and FUT6 and subsequent expression of sLex in virus-infected cells
Glycobiology,
July 1, 2009;
19(7):
776 - 788.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Ma, L. H. Lau, M. M. Palcic, B. Hazes, and D. E. Taylor
A Single Aromatic Amino Acid at the Carboxyl Terminus of Helicobacter pylori {alpha}1,3/4 Fucosyltransferase Determines Substrate Specificity
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 4, 2005;
280(44):
36848 - 36856.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Rabbani, V. Miksa, B. Wipf, and B. Ernst
Molecular cloning and functional expression of a novel Helicobacter pylori {alpha}-1,4 fucosyltransferase
Glycobiology,
November 1, 2005;
15(11):
1076 - 1083.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Patnaik, B. Potvin, and P. Stanley
LEC12 and LEC29 Gain-of-Function Chinese Hamster Ovary Mutants Reveal Mechanisms for Regulating VIM-2 Antigen Synthesis and E-selectin Binding
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 26, 2004;
279(48):
49716 - 49726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Dupuy, A. Germot, R. Julien, and A. Maftah
Structure/function study of Lewis {alpha}3- and {alpha}3/4-fucosyltransferases: the {alpha}1,4 fucosylation requires an aromatic residue in the acceptor-binding domain
Glycobiology,
April 1, 2004;
14(4):
347 - 356.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Ma, G. Wang, M. M. Palcic, B. Hazes, and D. E. Taylor
C-terminal Amino Acids of Helicobacter pylori{alpha}1,3/4 Fucosyltransferases Determine Type I and Type II Transfer
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 6, 2003;
278(24):
21893 - 21900.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Sherwood, D. A. Upchurch, M. R. Stroud, W. C. Davis, and E. H. Holmes
A highly conserved His-His motif present in {alpha}1->3/4fucosyltransferases is required for optimal activity and functions in acceptor binding
Glycobiology,
October 1, 2002;
12(10):
599 - 606.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Joly, R. Leonard, A. Maftah, and C. Riou-Khamlichi
{alpha}4-Fucosyltransferase is regulated during flower development: increases in activity are targeted to pollen maturation and pollen tube elongation
J. Exp. Bot.,
June 1, 2002;
53(373):
1429 - 1436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Dupuy, A. Germot, M. Marenda, R. Oriol, A. Blancher, R. Julien, and A. Maftah
{alpha}1,4-Fucosyltransferase Activity: A Significant Function in the Primate Lineage has Appeared Twice Independently
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
June 1, 2002;
19(6):
815 - 824.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Sarria, T. A. Wagner, M. A. O'Neill, A. Faik, C. G. Wilkerson, K. Keegstra, and N. V. Raikhel
Characterization of a Family of Arabidopsis Genes Related to Xyloglucan Fucosyltransferase1
Plant Physiology,
December 1, 2001;
127(4):
1595 - 1606.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Saunier, J.-P. Barreaud, A. Eggen, R. Oriol, H. Leveziel, R. Julien, and J.-M. Petit
Organization of the Bovine {alpha}2-Fucosyltransferase Gene Cluster Suggests that the Sec1 Gene Might Have Been Shaped Through a Nonautonomous L1-Retrotransposition Event Within the Same Locus
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
November 1, 2001;
18(11):
2083 - 2091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E.V. Chandrasekaran, R. Chawda, J. M. Rhodes, J. Xia, C. Piskorz, and K. L. Matta
Human lung adenocarcinoma {{alpha}}1,3/4-L-fucosyltransferase displays two molecular forms, high substrate affinity for clustered sialyl LacNAc type 1 units as well as mucin core 2 sialyl LacNAc type 2 unit and novel {{alpha}}1,2-L-fucosylating activity
Glycobiology,
May 1, 2001;
11(5):
353 - 363.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Javaud, F. Dupuy, A. Maftah, J.-C. Michalski, R. Oriol, J.-M. Petit, and R. Julien
Ancestral Exonic Organization of FUT8, the Gene Encoding the {alpha}6-Fucosyltransferase, Reveals Successive Peptide Domains Which Suggest a Particular Three-Dimensional Core Structure for the {alpha}6-Fucosyltransferase Family
Mol. Biol. Evol.,
November 1, 2000;
17(11):
1661 - 1672.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Barreaud, K. Saunier, J. Souchaire, D. Delourme, A. Oulmouden, R. Oriol, H. Leveziel, R. Julien, and J.-M. Petit
Three bovine {alpha}2-fucosyltransferase genes encode enzymes that preferentially transfer fucose on Gal{beta}1-3GalNAc acceptor substrates
Glycobiology,
June 1, 2000;
10(6):
611 - 621.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Dupuy, J.-M. Petit, R. Mollicone, R. Oriol, R. Julien, and A. Maftah
A Single Amino Acid in the Hypervariable Stem Domain of Vertebrate alpha 1,3/1,4-Fucosyltransferases Determines the Type 1/Type 2 Transfer. CHARACTERIZATION OF ACCEPTOR SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY OF THE LEWIS ENZYME BY SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 30, 1999;
274(18):
12257 - 12262.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Zhang, B. Potvin, A. Zaiman, W. Chen, R. Kumar, L. Phillips, and P. Stanley
The Gain-of-Function Chinese Hamster Ovary Mutant LEC11B Expresses One of Two Chinese Hamster FUT6 Genes Due to the Loss of a Negative Regulatory Factor
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 9, 1999;
274(15):
10439 - 10450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Schwientek, M. Nomoto, S. B. Levery, G. Merkx, A. G. van Kessel, E. P. Bennett, M. A. Hollingsworth, and H. Clausen
Control of O-Glycan Branch Formation. MOLECULAR CLONING OF HUMAN cDNA ENCODING A NOVEL beta 1,6-N-ACETYLGLUCOSAMINYLTRANSFERASE FORMING CORE 2 AND CORE 4
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 19, 1999;
274(8):
4504 - 4512.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kudo, Y. Ikehara, A. Togayachi, M. Kaneko, T. Hiraga, K. Sasaki, and H. Narimatsu
Expression Cloning and Characterization of a Novel Murine alpha 1,3-Fucosyltransferase, mFuc-TIX, That Synthesizes the Lewis x (CD15) Epitope in Brain and Kidney
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 9, 1998;
273(41):
26729 - 26738.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Nguyen, E. H. Holmes, J. M. Whitaker, S. Ho, S. Shetterly, and B. A. Macher
Human alpha 1,3/4-Fucosyltransferases. I. IDENTIFICATION OF AMINO ACIDS INVOLVED IN ACCEPTOR SUBSTRATE BINDING BY SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 25, 1998;
273(39):
25244 - 25249.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Vo, S. Lee, M. C. Marcinko, E. H. Holmes, and B. A. Macher
Human alpha 1,3/4-Fucosyltransferases. II. A SINGLE AMINO ACID AT THE COOH TERMINUS OF FucT III AND V ALTERS THEIR KINETIC PROPERTIES
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 25, 1998;
273(39):
25250 - 25255.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Sherwood, A. T. Nguyen, J. M. Whitaker, B. A. Macher, M. R. Stroud, and E. H. Holmes
Human alpha 1,3/4-Fucosyltransferases. III. A LYS/ARG RESIDUE LOCATED WITHIN THE alpha 1,3-FucT MOTIF IS REQUIRED FOR ACTIVITY BUT NOT SUBSTRATE BINDING
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 25, 1998;
273(39):
25256 - 25260.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Costache, P.-A. Apoil, A. Cailleau, A. Elmgren, G. Larson, S. Henry, A. Blancher, D. Iordachescu, R. Oriol, and R. Mollicone
Evolution of Fucosyltransferase Genes in Vertebrates
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 21, 1997;
272(47):
29721 - 29728.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Elmgren, R. Mollicone, M. Costache, C. Borjeson, R. Oriol, J. Harrington, and G. Larson
Significance of Individual Point Mutations, T202C and C314T, in the Human Lewis (FUT3) Gene for Expression of Lewis Antigens by the Human alpha (1,3/1,4)-Fucosyltransferase, Fuc-TIII
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 1997;
272(35):
21994 - 21998.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Martin, M. R. Edbrooke, T. C. Hodgman, D. H. van den Eijnden, and M. I. Bird
Lewis X Biosynthesis in Helicobacter pylori. MOLECULAR CLONING OF AN alpha (1,3)-FUCOSYLTRANSFERASE GENE
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 22, 1997;
272(34):
21349 - 21356.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. H. Holmes, T.-Y. Yen, S. Thomas, R. Joshi, A. Nguyen, T. Long, F. Gallet, A. Maftah, R. Julien, and B. A. Macher
Human alpha 1,3/4 Fucosyltransferases. CHARACTERIZATION OF HIGHLY CONSERVED CYSTEINE RESIDUES AND N-LINKED GLYCOSYLATION SITES
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 4, 2000;
275(32):
24237 - 24245.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|