|
Volume 272, Number 15,
Issue of April 11, 1997
pp. 10080-10086
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
The Human -Type Proteasomal Subunit HsC8 Forms a Double
Ringlike Structure, but Does Not Assemble into Proteasome-like
Particles with the -Type Subunits HsDelta or HsBPROS26*
(Received for publication, December 3, 1996, and in revised form, January 14, 1997)
Will L. H.
Gerards
,
Jacqueline
Enzlin
,
Markus
Häner
,
Ine
L. A. M.
Hendriks
,
Ueli
Aebi
,
Hans
Bloemendal
and
Wilbert
Boelens
§
From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Nijmegen, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands and Maurice E. Müller-Institut für Mikroskopische Strukturbiologie,
Biozentrum der Universität Basel,
CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The eukaryotic proteasome is a barrel-shaped
protease complex made up of four seven-membered rings of which the
outer and inner rings may contain up to seven different - and
-type subunits, respectively. The assembly of the eukaryotic
proteasome is not well understood. We cloned the cDNA for HsC8,
which is one of the seven known human -type subunits, and produced
the protein in Escherichia coli. Recombinant HsC8 protein
forms a complex of about 540 kDa consisting of double ringlike
structures, each ring containing seven subunits. Such a structure has
not earlier been reported for any eukaryotic proteasome subunit, but is
similar to the complex formed by the recombinant -subunit of the
archaebacterium Thermoplasma acidophilum (Zwickl, P.,
Kleinz, J., and Baumeister, W. (1994) Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 765-770). The ability of HsC8 to form -rings suggests that these
complexes may play an important role in the initiation of proteasome
assembly in eukaryotes. To test this, we used two human -type
subunits, HsBPROS26 and HsDelta. Both these -type subunits, either
in the proprotein or in the mature form, exist in monomers up to
tetramers. In contrast to the - and -subunit of T. acidophilum, coexpression of the human -type subunits with
HsC8 does not result in the formation of proteasome-like particles,
which would be in agreement with the notion that proteasome assembly in
eukaryotes is much more complex than in archaebacteria.
INTRODUCTION
The 20 S proteasome is a multicatalytic protease complex which
functions as the catalytic core of the larger 26 S proteasome. This
particle has been found in all eukaryotes analyzed to date and plays a
major role in nonlysosomal proteolysis via the selective degradation of
intracellular proteins, mostly by ubiquitin-dependent, but
also ubiquitin-independent, pathways (1-4). In the archaebacterium Thermoplasma acidophilum a particle is found with a similar
quaternary structure, containing two different subunits named and
(5). The complex consists of a stack of four rings, each containing seven subunits. The outer rings of the archaebacterial proteasome consist of -subunits and the inner rings of -subunits, resulting in an 7 7 7 7
complex (6, 7). In eukaryotes several different proteasomal subunits
are known, which can be divided into two classes, -type and
-type, based on the similarity to either the - or -subunit of
Thermoplasma (8, 9). Seven different members of these -
and -type subunits may constitute, respectively, the heptameric -
and -rings of the eukaryotic proteasomes, each subunit residing
possibly at a defined position (10-13).
The 20 S proteasomes degrade unfolded proteins (14) and oxidized
proteins (15, 16) in vitro. Degradation is achieved by at
least five distinct catalytic activities, which can be detected with
chromogenic peptide substrates (17). Recently, the N-terminal threonine
of the -subunit of T. acidophilum was identified as the
catalytically active amino acid by x-ray crystallographic studies of
inhibitor-proteasome complexes (7) and extensive mutational analysis
(18). The N-terminal threonine results from proteolytic processing of
the N terminus, which is an essential step in the maturation of the
proteasome. In eukaryotic proteasomes not all of the -type subunits
may be proteolytically active (18).
Little is known about the assembly of the eukaryotic proteasome
particle. Several groups have identified 13-16 S particles containing
most of the -type subunits and some -type subunits in their
unprocessed form (19-21). These so-called "preproteasomes" are
converted into 20 S proteasomes, a process which is
translation-dependent and is accompanied by the proteolytic
processing of the -type subunits. Expression of the T. acidophilum -subunit in Escherichia coli revealed
that this subunit forms rings of seven subunits by itself, whereas the
pro- -subunit forms monomers (22). Coexpression of these subunits in
E. coli resulted in the correct processing of the
-subunits and subsequent formation of functional proteasomes (22,
23). Recently, it was shown that the proteolytic processing of these
-subunits is autocatalytic and that their folding and assembly is
chaperoned by the -subunits (24).
To study whether similar processes occur during the formation of
eukaryotic proteasomes, we analyzed the assembly properties of the
recombinant human proteasomal -type subunit HsC8 (25). We found
that, upon expression in E. coli, HsC8 forms by itself large
complexes consisting of pairs of heptameric rings, which closely
resemble the recombinant -rings of T. acidophilum. To test whether simple proteasome-like complexes could be formed, we
coexpressed HsC8 with the -type subunit HsBPROS26 (also called HN3)
(26) or HsDelta (also called Y) (27), but in contrast to T. acidophilum proteasome assembly, no such complexes could be
isolated.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cloning Strategies
Mutation and PCR1 primers were
purchased from Eurogentec. The NcoI and NdeI
sites in the primer sequences are underlined and the mutations
introduced in the proteasomal cDNAs double underlined.
The pJG4-5HsC8 clone was selected via a yeast two-hybrid screening of a
HeLa fusion cDNA library (28) with B-crystallin (29) fused to
LexA as the bait. The coding sequence of the HsC8 cDNA was
amplified from the selected clone with Pwo DNA polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim) using the oligonucleotide
5 -ATCTGCTCAATCGGCACT-3 , introducing an NcoI site containing the ATG-start codon and
the oligonucleotide BcoII, consisting of a sequence located
downstream of the polylinker of the pJG4-5 vector. The PCR product was
digested with NcoI and XhoI and ligated into the
NcoI-XhoI sites of the pET16b expression vector
(pET16bHsC8). For coexpression of HsC8 with -type proteasomal
subunits, the XbaI-BamHI fragment of pET16bHsC8 was subcloned into the XbaI-BamHI sites of pET24d
expression vector (Novagen, pET24dHsC8). Both vectors encode the
complete HsC8 protein with only a Ser to Gly mutation at position
2.
Cloning of the HsBPROS26 cDNA and subcloning into pET3c (pET3cHsB)
has been described elsewhere (26). Recently, also longer human (HsN3)
(30) and rat (RN3) (31) BPROS26 cDNA clones have been isolated with
a putative translation start 93 nucleotides upstream of the initiation
codon of HsBPROS26. To construct the vector for expression of the
mature protein (HsBPROS26mat) in bacteria, an
NdeI site comprising a new ATG start codon 39 base pairs
downstream of the original start position the HsBPROS26 cDNA was
generated by site-directed mutagenesis using the
oligonucleotide-directed in vitro mutagenesis system
(Amersham Corp.) with the oligonucleotide 5 -CAGAGGTCCAATCACCCAGAACCCC-3 as
the mutagenic primer. The NdeI-XhoI(blunt)
fragment was then cloned into the
NdeI-BamHI(blunt) sites of pET3c
(pET3cHsBmat). The HsDelta cDNA was cloned from a
cDNA library of the human cell line MV3 (kindly provided by J. van
Groningen, Nijmegen) using PCR with Taq polymerase. The primers were based on the reported cDNA sequence of human subunit Y
(EMBL data base accession no. D29012[GenBank]) (27). The 5 primer used created
also an NdeI site at the start codon:
5 -AGAATTGCGGCTACCTAACTAGCTGCT-3 . The 3 primer was: 5 -TAGGATCCAGGATTCAGGCGGGTGGTAAGGT-3 . The amplified
product was first ligated into the pCRII vector using a TA cloning kit
(Invitrogen). The NdeI-BamHI fragment was then subcloned into the NdeI-BamHI sites of pET3c
(pET3cHsD). Our HsDelta cDNA clone encodes an HsDelta protein which
has a Gln to Arg mutation at amino acid position 41 of subunit Y,
corresponding to position 7 in the mature protein (27). To produce the
vector for expression of the mature HsDelta protein
(HsDeltamat) part of the HsDelta cDNA in the pCRII
vector was reamplified with Pwo DNA polymerase using the 5
oligonucleotide:
5 -AGAATTACCACTATCATGGCCGTGCAGTTT-3 and the HsDelta 3 oligonucleotide. The generated fragment contains a
5 NdeI site with the new ATG start codon 102 bp downstream the original start site. This fragment was cloned into the
EcoRI-BamHI sites of pTZ18r. The
NdeI-BamHI fragment was subsequently subcloned into the NdeI-BamHI sites of pET3c
(pET3cHsDmat). Mutated cDNAs and cloned PCR fragments
were analyzed by sequencing with the Sequenase version 2.0 sequencing
kit (U. S. Biochemical Corp.). A summary of the expression constructs
and putative products is shown in Table I.
Single Expression and Coexpression of Recombinant Proteasomal
Proteins
Single proteasomal subunits were expressed in the E. coli strain BL21(DE3) (32). Briefly, the pET vectors were
transformed to competent BL21(DE3) bacteria. A single colony of the
transformation plate was grown at 37 °C in 1.5 ml of LB (10 g/liter
casein, enzymatic hydrolysate (Sigma), 5 g/liter yeast extract (Life
Technologies, Inc.), 10 g/liter NaCl) containing 200 mg/liter
ampicillin (Sigma, pET3c and pET16b) or 60 mg/liter kanamycin (Merck,
pET24d) to an A550 of 0.1-0.2. This culture was
stored for maximally 20 h at 4 °C or used directly to inoculate
50 or 500 ml of LB containing the appropriate antibiotics. At an
A550 of 0.5-1.0 expression of proteasomal
proteins was induced by adding
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside (IPTG, Research
Organics) to a final concentration of 1 mM. Bacteria were
harvested 3 h after induction by centrifugation at 5000 × g for 15 min.
For coexpression host bacteria were cotransfected with pET24dHsC8 and a
pET3c construct containing a cDNA encoding a proteasomal -subunit. Bacteria containing both vectors were selected on LB plates containing ampicillin and kanamycin. The expression procedure was as described above except that all growth media contained ampicillin and kanamycin.
Bacterial Fractionation
Bacterial pellets were resuspended in 0.04 volume of the culture
volume in TEN300 (50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 0.5 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl) and frozen at 80 °C.
The bacteria were thawed at 37 °C, lysed with chicken egg white
lysozyme (Sigma) at 0 °C, and centrifuged for 30 min at 90,000 × g at 4 °C. The supernatant (water-soluble fraction)
was used for determination of the molecular mass of the proteasomal
-type subunits.
HsC8 Purification
Recombinant HsC8 was purified from bacterial water-soluble
fraction on a Sepharose Q Fast Flow column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). After loading the HsC8 extract, the column was washed with TEN300, and
proteins were eluted with a linear gradient from 300 to 600 mM NaCl. HsC8 emerged as almost pure protein (>95%) at
about 550 mM NaCl. HsC8-containing fractions were pooled
and concentrated in an Amicon ultrafiltration cell using a filter
(Filtron) with a cutoff of 100 kDa. For electron microscopy (see below)
HsC8 protein was further purified on a Superose 6 HR 10/30 prepacked size exclusion column (Pharmacia-LKB) in 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH
7.5, followed by concentration of the HsC8 peak fractions in a microsep device (Filtron) with a cutoff of 100 kDa.
Analytical Procedures
Analytical ultracentrifugation was performed on an Optima XLA
analytical ultracentrifuge (Beckman Instruments) equipped with an
ultraviolet absorption system (33). The concentration of the
recombinant proteasome particles was adjusted to
A277 = 0.11, and the protein was analyzed at
20 °C in 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA. Sedimentation velocity runs were performed at 52,000 rpm in a 12-mm double-sector Kel-F cell, which was filled with 0.12 ml of sample solution in one sector and the same volume of
buffer measured at 230 nm in the other. Sedimentation coefficients were
corrected to H2O by a standard procedure (34).
Sedimentation equilibrium runs were performed at a rotor speed of 4,400 rpm in an epon-charcoal 12-mm double-sector cell filled with 1.1 ml of
sample solution. The average molecular mass was determined using a
linear regression computer program that adjusts the baseline absorption
so as to obtain the best linear fit of ln A versus r2 (A, absorption; r, radial
distance from the rotor center). A partial specific volume of 0.73 cm3/g was assumed.
The molecular mass of the proteasomal subunits and subunit complexes
present in bacterial water-soluble fraction was estimated by fast
performance liquid chromatography gel filtration in TEN300 on an
LKB-Bromma high performance liquid chromatography system. Three
different size exclusion columns were used to span a molecular mass
range from 5 to 5000 kDa; Superose 6 HR 10/30, Superose 12 HR 10/30,
and Superdex 75 Hiload 16/60 (Pharmacia-LKB) with separation ranges of
50-5000, 5-300, and 5-70 kDa, respectively. Gel filtration columns
were calibrated with marker proteins (Pharmacia-LKB) as indicated in
the figure legends. Column fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (35) and
either stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue or blotted onto
nitrocellulose, whereafter the specific proteasomal subunits were
detected with antibodies. Antibodies used are MCP72 (culture
supernatant, diluted 1:50), directed against HsC8, MCP205 (ascites,
diluted 1:2000) against HsBPROS26, and MCP421 (culture supernatant,
diluted 1:50) against HsDelta (36, 37), all three antibodies kindly
provided by Dr. K. Hendil. Protein bands were visualized according to
van Duijnhoven et al. (38).
The proteolytic activity of the subunits was tested with the synthetic
peptide substrates Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-MCA (chymotrypsin-like), N-Bz-Phe-Val-Arg-MNA (trypsin-like) and N-Cbz-Leu-Leu-Glu- NA (peptidylglutamyl-peptide hydrolase-like). The assays were performed in
a 200-µl reaction volume containing 20 µg of crude bacterial protein, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithioerythritol, 0.5% (v/v)
Me2SO, and 50 µM test peptide at 37 °C.
The reactions were stopped after 1 h by adding 300 µl of 1%
(w/v) SDS and 700 µl of 0.1 M sodium borate, pH 9. Released fluorogenic groups were measured in a Hitachi F-3000
spectrofluorometer at excitation and emission wavelengths,
respectively, for MNA, 333 and 413 nm; for NA, 332 and 408 nm; and
for MCA, 339 and 439 nm.
N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis was performed at the Sequence
Center of Utrecht, Institute of biomembranes, University of
Utrecht.
Electron Microscopy and Digital Image Processing
Conventional Transmission Electron Microscopy
For negative
staining, a 5-µl aliquot of the HsC8 suspension diluted to about 25 µg/ml was adsorbed for 60 s to a glow-discharged carbon-coated
collodium film on a 400 mesh/inch copper grid. The grid was then washed
sequentially on two drops of distilled water, stained for 15 s
with 0.75% uranyl formate, pH 4.25, and finally air-dried after
removal of excess liquid with filter paper followed by suction with a
capillary applied to the edge of the grid. Specimens were examined in a
Hitachi H-8000 TEM (Hitachi Ltd.) operated at 100 kV. Electron
micrographs were recorded on Kodak SO 163 (Eastman Kodak Co.) electron
image film at a nominal magnification of × 52,000. Magnification
calibration was performed according to Wrighly (39) using negatively
stained catalase crystals.
Mass Analysis by Quantitative Scanning Transmission Electron
Microscopy (STEM)
For STEM mass determination of the HsC8
particles, a vacuum Generators (East Grinstead) HB-5 STEM interfaced to
a modular computer system (Tietz Video and Image Processing System
GmbH) was employed (40). For this purpose, a 5-µl drop of the HsC8 suspension diluted to about 25 µg/ml was adsorbed for 60 s to a
thin (i.e. 2.5 nm) hydrophilic carbon film which was
supported by a thick fenestrated carbon film mounted on a gold-coated
200 mesh/inch copper grid. Without negative staining, the grids were then washed sequentially on four drops of quartz bi-distilled water
with a blotting step between each wash. Finally, the specimens were
freeze-dried in the STEM's pretreatment chamber at 80 °C overnight. Low dose (i.e. ranging from 300 e /nm2 to 1000 e /nm2), 512 × 512-pixel elastic annular
darkfield images were recorded at 80 kV and a magnification
corresponding to a sampling distance of 0.92 nm in the specimen plane.
All microscope parameters, including the exact magnification and dose
for each image, were recorded. Evaluation of the digital electron
micrographs was carried out by the IMPSYS software package (40) running
on a VAX 3100 workstation. The mass histograms of the evaluated HsC8
particles were fitted by Gaussian curves.
Correlation Averaging of Negatively Stained Proteasome
Particles
From digitized electron micrographs of negatively
stained proteasome particles 64 × 64-pixel frames of 190 top
views and 110 side views were selected interactively using the SEMPER 6 image processing package (41) installed on a VAX 3100 workstation. For
both top views and side views, the respective particle images were
aligned relative to a single particle reference using cross-correlation techniques. After alignment, an intermediate reference particle image
was computed by summing up those particles yielding the highest
cross-correlation peak. This intermediate reference particle image was
then used for a second round of alignment and averaging. The final
average of the top views included 43 particles having a
cross-correlation coefficient of 0.85 with the intermediate reference
particle. To further enhance the 7-fold symmetry of the averaged top
view, it was also 7-fold symmetrized. Similarly, the final average of
the side views included 25 particles with a cross-correlation
coefficient of 0.85. To further enhance the 2-fold symmetry of the
averaged side view, it was also 2-fold symmetrized.
RESULTS
Recombinant HsC8 Protein Forms Large Complexes
HsC8 was
isolated during the screening of a HeLa cDNA library with the yeast
two-hybrid system in a search for proteins interacting with the small
heat shock protein B-crystallin.2 Since
little is known about the structural properties of the eukaryotic
proteasomal subunits, we decided to study the HsC8 protein in more
detail. We therefore cloned the coding region of the HsC8 cDNA into
a pET16b expression vector (32) to produce the recombinant protein.
Upon induction with IPTG, an E. coli BL21(DE3) strain
transformed with the pET16bHsC8 construct expresses a protein of about
28 kDa (Fig. 1A). The amount of recombinant protein constituted up to 50% of total bacterial protein. The monoclonal antibody MCP72 directed to HsC8 reacts with this protein (Fig. 1B), confirming that the induced protein is HsC8.
Fig. 1.
Expression of HsC8 in E. coli. A, Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained protein
pattern after SDS-PAGE of total lysates of bacteria transformed with
the vector pET16bHsC8, before (left) and 2 h after
(right) induction with IPTG. The asterisk
indicates the position of the recombinant HsC8 protein. Molecular mass
of the markers is indicated in kilodaltons. B, Western blot
of SDS-PAGE separated total bacterial lysate as in A and
purified human proteasomes, probed with the monoclonal antibody MCP72,
directed against HsC8 protein.
[View Larger Version of this Image (51K GIF file)]
To isolate the recombinant HsC8 protein, we extracted freeze-thawed and
lysozyme-treated bacteria expressing the HsC8 protein with buffer
containing 300 mM NaCl. The amount of recombinant protein
which remains water-soluble is over 80%. We purified the HsC8 protein
on a Sepharose Q anion exchange column, resulting in >95% pure HsC8
preparations. Peak fractions were pooled and subjected to size
exclusion chromatography on a Superose 6 column. The fractions were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE. HsC8 is eluted as a large complex in a single
homogeneous peak (Fig. 2) as has also been observed for
the -subunit of T. acidophilum (22). By comparing the
elution volume of HsC8 protein with that of calibration proteins, we
estimated the molecular mass of the HsC8 complexes to be 540 ± 30 kDa. We also analyzed the molecular mass of Sepharose Q-purified HsC8
complexes using analytical ultracentrifugation. The complex sediments
with a sedimentation coefficient s20,w
of 12.5 S, and by sedimentation equilibrium it reveals a molecular mass of 526 kDa, which is in good agreement with the gel filtration data
(see above).
Fig. 2.
The multimeric size of recombinant HsC8.
A Sepharose Q purified HsC8 preparation was separated on a Superose 6 gel permeation column. The graph shows the elution profile. Fractions were analyzed on a Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel. No protein was detected the minor peak at fraction 32. Arrows indicate the position of the peak fraction of marker
proteins; thyroglobulin (670 kDa) and ferritin (440 kDa).
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]
Electron Microscopy
The Thermoplasma proteasomal
-subunit appeared to consist of a double ringlike structure (22). We
wondered whether the HsC8 protein forms a similar complex. Therefore we
analyzed purified HsC8 complexes by electron microscopy. Electron
micrographs of negatively stained HsC8 complexes (Fig.
3A) reveal two different images, namely
donut- or ringlike structures with a diameter of 14.3 ± 0.5 nm
and double-layered rectangular structures, 14.2 ± 0.8 nm × 12.0 ± 0.8 nm in size. They most likely represent, respectively,
the top view and side view of a particle consisting of a pair of
interacting rings. These images are very similar to electron
micrographs of the -subunit of T. acidophilum (22, 42).
Detailed analysis of enlarged top and side views (Fig. 3B),
and correlation averaged top and side projections (Fig. 3, C
and D) revealed that, similar to the -rings of T. acidophilum (Ta), the HsC8-rings consist of seven subunits. As can
be seen in Fig. 3C, each subunit seems to contain two
domains, a large outer domain and a smaller inner domain surrounding a
low mass density center. The center of the HsC8 rings seems to be
"plugged," contrary to Ta- -rings, which have a small central
pore (22). The resolution of structural detail of the correlation
averaged the side view is too low to decide whether the two stacked
rings are out of register (Fig. 3D), like in Ta- -rings
(22), or in a parallel orientation, possibly caused by different
rotational orientations of the complexes.
Fig. 3.
Electron micrographs of negatively stained
recombinant HsC8 complexes. A, overview micrograph of HsC8
complexes negatively stained with 0.75% uranyl formate (pH 4.25).
B, top (top row) and side (bottom row)
views of negatively stained HsC8 complexes selected from electron
micrographs such as shown in A. C, correlation averaged top
view including 43 HsC8 complexes such as displayed in B,
unsymmetrized (left) and after enforcing the 7-fold
rotational symmetry of its rings (middle and
right). D, correlation averaged side view
including 25 HsC8 complexes such as displayed in B, unsymmetrized (left) and after enforcing its double-ring
structure by 2-fold symmetrization (middle and
right). The left and middle panels in
C and D are mass density representations of
protein shown as white with a negative stain dark, whereas in the
right panel in C and D the mass
densities of the symmetrized top and side views have been contoured.
Scale bars, 100 nm (A), 10 nm (C) and
(D).
[View Larger Version of this Image (124K GIF file)]
The complex of two heptameric HsC8 rings contains 14 polypeptides of
28.5 kDa and has a calculated mass of 400 kDa. This is significantly
smaller than the molecular mass determined with either gel filtration
or ultracentrifugation. Therefore, we also performed STEM mass
measurement of unstained freeze-dried HsC8 particles (Fig.
4A) as a third mass determination method. The STEM analysis (Fig. 4B) yielded a molecular mass of 530 ± 90 kDa, thus confirming the mass values determined by gel filtration
(i.e. 540 ± 30 kDa) and analytical ultracentrifugation
(i.e. 526 kDa). The discrepancy between the estimated
molecular mass and the calculated mass is not clear but might be caused
by a relatively large space between the two -rings (Fig.
3D).
Fig. 4.
Mass determination of purified recombinant
HsC8 complexes by quantitative STEM. A, low dose
(i.e. 300 e /nm2 recording dose)
STEM image of unstained/freeze-dried purified recombinant HsC8
complexes. Scale bar, 50 nm. B, 361 mass values determined
from unstained freeze-dried purified HsC8 complexes such as displayed
in A were histogramed, and the resulting histogram was
fitted by a single Gaussian curve.
[View Larger Version of this Image (55K GIF file)]
Expression of Recombinant Proteasomal -Type
Subunits
Coexpression of the - with either the pro- -subunit
(23) or the mature -subunit (22) of T. acidophilum in the
host E. coli resulted in the generation of functional
proteasomes. To investigate whether such simple eukaryotic
proteasome-like particles could be produced we performed coexpression
of HsC8 with two human proteasomal -type subunits. To our best
knowledge it is not known which -type subunit(s) bind to HsC8.
Therefore, we chose arbitrarily the two -type subunits HsBPROS26 and
HsDelta. At first, we expressed and characterized the assembly
properties of the -type subunits alone in their proprotein
(HsBPROS26 and HsDelta) and mature form (HsBPROS26mat and
HsDeltamat) from constructs with, respectively, the natural
start codon or a start codon placed just upstream of the codon for the
N-terminal threonine of the processed forms.
Induction of the -type subunits encoded by the different pET
constructs resulted in the expression of polypeptides in amounts of
10-50% of total bacterial protein (Fig.
5A). Only HsDeltamat expression,
even in different E. coli BL21(DE3) host strains and using
several growth conditions, was undetectable by SDS-PAGE and Western
blotting (data not shown). The expressed proteins were separated by
SDS-PAGE and identified on Western blots with monoclonal antibodies and
compared with the homologous subunit present in human placenta
proteasomes (Fig. 5B). The bacteria expressing HsBPROS26
contain a protein which reacts with the corresponding monoclonal
antibody and is, as expected for the HsBPROS26 proprotein, larger than
the mature proteasomal homologue. HsBPROS26mat has about
the same mobility on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel as its proteasomal homologue. To ascertain that the recombinant HsBPROS26mat
indeed contains the wild-type threonine at the N terminus, the
N-terminal amino acid sequence has been determined. It appeared that
20% of HsBPROS26mat has a free N-terminal threonine, the
rest still having the translation start methionine at the N terminus.
The protein expressed from the pET-vector encoding the HsDelta
proprotein, which reacts with the anti-HsDelta monoclonal antibodies,
has almost the same mobility on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel as the mature proteasomal homologue. Only a faint band at the expected position of
the unprocessed HsDelta form can be detected in some lysates (data not
shown). The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the recombinant protein
is Ala-Val-Arg-Phe-Asp-Gly, which corresponds with the positions 5-10
in the mature protein. This means that the N terminus is
proteolytically cleaved in the bacterium or, alternatively, that the
second AUG codon, which codes for methionine at position 4 in the
mature protein, is used as a translation start site.
Fig. 5.
Expression of -type proteasomal subunits
in E. coli. A, the Coomassie Brilliant
Blue-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel contains total bacterial lysates of
bacteria expressing the indicated proteasomal subunit, 2 h after
induction with IPTG. The control lane contains the lysate of
IPTG-induced bacteria with an empty pET3c vector. The
asterisk indicates the position of the recombinant proteasomal proteins. Molecular mass of the markers is indicated in
kilodaltons. B, Western blots of SDS-PAGE separated total
bacterial lysates as in A and human proteasomes, probed with
the monoclonal antibodies directed against the relevant proteasomal
subunits.
[View Larger Version of this Image (80K GIF file)]
The HsBPROS26 proprotein and our mature-like HsDelta, both of which do
not have a threonine at the N terminus, are thus very likely
proteolytically inactive. Furthermore, HsBPROS26mat having a threonine at the N terminus, but lacking other for proteolytic activity essential amino acid residues located near the active center
(18), may also be inactive. To confirm this, we tested the proteolytic
activity in crude extracts of bacteria expressing -type subunits
using the fluorogenic test peptide substrates Suc-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-MCA,
Bz-Phe-Val-Arg-MNA, and Cbz-Leu-Leu-Glu- NA. Such a test was valid to
detect the proteolytic activity of the archaebacterial -subunit
(22). As a negative control, we used lysates of HsC8-expressing
bacteria. We could not detect a significantly elevated activity in
bacterial extracts containing any of the -type subunits, indicating
that they indeed are proteolytic inactive.
Molecular Mass of the Recombinant -Type Subunits
The
molecular masses of HsBPROS26, HsBPROS26mat, and HsDelta
present in the water-soluble fraction of crude bacterial lysates were
determined using size exclusion chromatography. About 50% of the
HsBPROS26 subunit and only a small fraction (less than 10%) of the
HsBPROS26mat and mature-like HsDelta proteins are soluble
in buffer containing 300 mM NaCl. The pro- -subunit and mature form of T. acidophilum behave also differently (22). Fig. 6 displays Western blots of fractions obtained with
the molecular mass determination on a size-calibrated Superose 12 column. The soluble -type subunits have much smaller molecular
masses than the HsC8 subunit. Both the -type HsBPROS26 and
HsBPROS26mat emerged at the monomer position of about 30 kDa. In contrast the HsDelta subunit is eluted at the tetramer position
(Fig. 6). Thus, both -type subunits do not form ring structures upon
recombinant expression in the absence of other proteasomal
subunits.
Fig. 6.
The size of the soluble recombinant -type
proteasomal subunits present in bacterial lysates. The
water-soluble fraction of bacteria expressing HsC8 or a -type
proteasomal subunit was separated on a Superose 12 gel permeation
column. Fractions were analyzed on Western blots and probed with the
relevant monoclonal antibodies. Arrows indicate the position
of the peak fraction of marker proteins, thyroglobulin (670 kDa) and
chymotrypsinogen A (25 kDa).
[View Larger Version of this Image (32K GIF file)]
Coexpression of HsC8 with -Type Subunits
To test whether
the human -type subunits, like in T. acidophilum, can
assemble into proteasome-like particles with the HsC8 complex, we
coexpressed HsC8 with HsBPROS26, HsBPROS26mat or the mature-like HsDelta. The presence of both HsC8 and a -subunit in
IPTG-induced bacteria was confirmed on Western blots (data not shown).
It appeared that HsDeltamat also could not detectably be
expressed in combination with HsC8. Coexpression of the -type subunits with HsC8 does not result in a change in solubility of the
recombinant subunits (data not shown). The water-soluble fraction of
bacteria coexpressing HsC8 with one of the -type subunits was
separated on a Superose 6 column and the fractions were analyzed by
Western blotting (Fig. 7). Elution profiles of HsC8
obtained with single expression of HsC8 and coexpression with the
-type subunits were similar (data not shown). Upon coexpression with HsC8 a significant amount of HsBPROS26 is present in the
HsC8-containing higher molecular mass fractions. There is, however,
still HsBPROS26 present in the monomer region, although HsC8 is present
in at least 5-fold excess (data not shown). The molecular mass of the HsC8-HsBPROS26 complex is not increased up to the size of proteasomes (which are eluted in fraction 4, data not shown), indicating that HsBPROS26 cannot form a ring structure on the HsC8 complex. The -type subunit is also not processed into the mature form and no
proteasomal activity is present in the HsC8-HsBPROS26 fraction. Furthermore, we did not observe a change in the elution profile of
HsBPROS26mat and mature-like HsDelta on a Superose 6 column when coexpressed with HsC8, compared with single expression. Thus coexpression of the ring-forming -type subunit HsC8 with two different -type subunits does not result in the formation of proteasome-like complexes, suggesting that for their formation other
- and -type subunits are needed.
Fig. 7.
The multimeric size of the proteasomal
-type subunits coexpressed with HsC8 in bacterial lysates. The
water-soluble fraction of bacteria coexpressing HsC8 with a -type
proteasomal subunit was separated on a Superose 6 gel permeation
column. Fractions were analyzed on Western blots probed with the
relevant monoclonal antibodies. Similar elution profiles of HsC8 were
obtained from Superose 6 runs of the three preparations used, therefore
only the Western blot of the HsC8/HsBPROS26 separation probed with anti
HsC8 antibodies is shown. Arrows indicate the positions of marker proteins as in Fig. 6.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
In this report we present the first detailed investigation of the
assembly properties of isolated eukaryotic proteasome subunits. We show
that the recombinant eukaryotic proteasomal -type subunit HsC8 forms
ringlike structures. Accordingly, the HsC8 subunits assemble into
double-ring type structures with two rings, consisting of seven
subunits each, stacking on top of each other. Rings containing seven
subunits were also found in proteasomes of eukaryotes (43, 44) and
T. acidophilum (7). Recombinant Ta- -subunits also form
complexes consisting of two heptameric rings. Correlation averaged top
views of both complexes appear very similar (compare Fig. 3C
with Fig. 4 in Zwickl et al. (22)). A remarkable difference between the human and archaebacterial complexes is that the
Ta- -complex reveals a small, stain-filled hole in the center, which
is apparently far less pronounced or absent in HsC8 rings.
Unfortunately, the resolution in the side views of HsC8 double rings is
not sufficient to distinguish if the two rings are staggered, like the
Ta- -rings, or in register relative to each other.
The observation that the eukaryotic HsC8 forms rings in the absence of
other -type proteasomal subunits was surprising, since in eukaryotic
proteasomes the -rings may consist of seven different subunits (8,
36). Indications for this are that in purified proteasomes from human
placenta (36, 37) and yeast (45) all seven -type subunits are found,
and that in yeast all -type subunits except Y13 are essential for
life (see Heinemeyer et al. (8) and references therein).
Furthermore, immuno-EM localization studies of the -type subunits
HsPROS30/HC2 and XAPC7 (10) and the -type subunit HsBPROS26/HN3 (11)
in human placenta proteasomes indicate that these subunits were present
in two copies per proteasomal particle. The property of HsC8 to form
rings may, however, indicate that this subunit can actually occupy
several positions in -rings of proteasome(-like) particles, which
would result in proteasome subpopulations differing in the content of
-type subunits. Such compositional variation could explain why the
monoclonal antibody p31k (46), which is directed to HsC8
(47),3 stained mainly areas in rat liver
cells that are close to the bile canaliculi, whereas a much more
general staining was obtained with a polyclonal antiserum directed to
proteasomes (48, 49). Also in C2.7 myoblasts (50), LCLC103 lung
carcinoma cells and the adherent fraction of NCI-H524 lung carcinoma
cells,4 and cells in some stages of early
embryonic development of the newt Pleurodeles waltl (51),
the p31k antibody gave different staining patterns compared with the
monoclonal antibodies directed to other -type subunits. On the basis
of the present results it is not clear whether putative proteasomal
complexes with a high HsC8 content are assembly intermediates or
functional proteasome complexes.
Proper folding, assembly, and processing of the -subunits of
T. acidophilum is chaperoned by the -rings (22, 24). The formation of an -subunit ring is therefore the first event in assembly. Coexpression of the Ta- and Ta- -subunits in E. coli produces functional proteasomes. Since HsC8 forms similar
rings, these complexes may be important for proteasome assembly in
eukaryotes. However, coexpression of the ring-forming HsC8 and the
-type subunits HsBPROS26, HsBPROS26mat, or HsDelta did
not yield proteasome-like complexes, although a fraction of HsBPROS26
does bind to HsC8. Moreover, coexpression of -type subunits with
HsC8 did not change their solubility either (data not shown) indicating
that HsC8 does not chaperone the proper folding of these proteins. The
three human -type subunits tested thus apparently cannot bind
properly to HsC8 rings. This means that the HsC8 rings and Ta- -rings
behave differently since the Ta- -rings can assemble into
proteasome-like particles with both processed and unprocessed
Ta- -subunits (24). A possible explanation is that eukaryotic
-subunits do interact with two different -type subunits in the
proteasome, which define a binding pocket for a certain -type
subunit. This is possible since the - and -rings are about 25°
out of register, which is approximately half a subunit (6, 7, 52).
Thus, the HsC8 ring may be an important complex for proteasome
assembly, but before -type subunits can bind properly to the
-ring, the latter needs to consist of different -type subunits.
In this respect it is of interest whether the ability of HsC8 to form rings by itself is a general feature of human -type subunits. If so
the variability in the subunit composition of proteasomes may be more
extended than is believed presently. Alternatively, if only HsC8 can
form rings, these rings may be a start point for proteasome assembly.
As can also be concluded from the recent work on processing and
assembly of -type subunits in yeast (13), our data confirm that
proteasome assembly in eukaryotes is much more complex than in
archaebacteria.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by the Netherlands Technology
Foundation (STW).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry,
University of Nijmegen, P. O. Box 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, The
Netherlands. Tel.: 31-24-3616753/3614254; Fax: 31-24-3540525.
1
The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase
chain reaction; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; STEM,
scanning transmission electron microscopy; Ta, Thermoplasma
acidophilum; Suc, succinyl; Bz, benzoyl; Cbz, carbobenzoxy; NA,
-naphthylamide; MNA, 4-methoxy- -naphthylamide, AMC,
7-amido-4-methylcoumarin; IPTG,
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside.
2
W. Boelens, W. Gerards, Y. Croes, and W. W. de
Jong, manuscript in preparation.
3
W. L. H. Gerards, unpublished
observations.
4
B. M. Machiels, personal communication.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Dr. K. Hendil for providing the
monoclonal antibodies MCP72, MCP205, and MCP421. We also thank Dr. W. de Jong for critically reading the manuscript, and H. Smits and Dr. L. Benedetti for advice and technical assistance with the initial electron microscope studies.
REFERENCES
-
Hilt, W., and Wolf, D. H.
(1996)
Trends. Biochem. Sci.
21,
96-102
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hochstrasser, M.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
7,
215-223
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Peters, J. M.
(1994)
Trends. Biochem. Sci.
19,
377-382
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Coux, O., Tanaka, K., and Goldberg, A. L.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65,
801-847
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dahlmann, B., Kopp, F., Kuehn, L., Niedel, B., Pfeifer, G., Hegerl, R., and Baumeister, W.
(1989)
FEBS Lett.
251,
125-131
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pühler, Weinkauf, S., Bachmann, L., Müller, S., Engel, A., Hegerl, R., and Baumeister, W.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
1607-1616
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Löwe, J., Stock, D., Jap, B., Zwickl, P., Baumeister, W., and Huber, R.
(1995)
Science
268,
533-539
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Heinemeyer, W., Tröndle, N., Albrecht, G., and Wolf, D. H.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
12229-12237
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Coux, O., Nothwang, H. G., Silva Pereira, I., Recillas Targa, F., Bey, F., and Scherrer, K.
(1994)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
245,
769-780
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kopp, F., Dahlmann, B., and Hendil, K. B.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
229,
14-19
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kopp, F., Kristensen, P., Hendil, K. B., Johnsen, A., Sobek, A., and Dahlmann, B.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
248,
264-272
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schauer, T. M., Nesper, M., Kehl, M., Lottspeich, F., Muller Taubenberger, A., Gerisch, G., and Baumeister, W.
(1993)
J. Struct. Biol.
111,
135-147
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chen, P., and Hochstrasser, M.
(1996)
Cell
86,
961-972
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wenzel, T., and Baumeister, W.
(1995)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
2,
199-204
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rivett, A. J.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
291,
1-10
-
Pacifici, R. E., Kono, Y., and Davies, K. J. A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
15405-15411
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Orlowski, M., Cardozo, C., and Michaud, C.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
1563-1572
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Seemüller, E., Lupas, A., Stock, D., Löwe, J., Huber, R., and Baumeister, W.
(1995)
Science
268,
579-582
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Frentzel, S., Pesold-Hurt, B., Seelig, A., and Kloetzel, P.-M.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
236,
975-981
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Patel, S. D., Monaco, J. J., and McDevitt, H. O.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
296-300
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yang, Y., Früh, K., Ahn, K., and Peterson, P. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27687-27694
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zwickl, P., Kleinz, J., and Baumeister, W.
(1994)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
1,
765-770
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zwickl, P., Lottspeich, F., and Baumeister, W.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
312,
157-160
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Seemüller, E., Lupas, A., and Baumeister, W.
(1996)
Nature
382,
468-470
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tanaka, K., Kanayama, H., Tamura, T., Lee, D. H., Kumatori, A., Fujiwara, T., Ichihara, A., Tokunaga, F., Aruga, R., and Iwanaga, S.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
171,
676-683
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gerards, W. L. H., Hop, F. W., Hendriks, I. L., and Bloemendal, H.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
346,
151-155
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Akiyama, K. Y., Yokota, K., Kagawa, S., Shimbara, N., Tamura, T., Akioka, H., Nothwang, H. G., Noda, C., Tanaka, K., and Ichihara, A.
(1994)
Science
265,
1231-1234
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gyuris, J., Golemis, E., Chertkov, H., and Brent, R.
(1993)
Cell
75,
791-803
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Iwaki, A., Iwaki, T., Goldman, J. E., and Liem, R. K. H.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
22197-22203
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nothwang, H. G., Tamura, T., Tanaka, K., and Ichihara, A.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1219,
361-368
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Thomson, S., and Rivett, A. J.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
315,
733-738
-
Studier, F. W., Rosenberg, A. H., Dunn, J. J., and Dubendorff, J. W.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
185,
60-89
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Terzi, E., Holzemann, G., and Seelig, J.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
1345-1350
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Eason, R.
(1986)
in
Centrifugation, a Practical Approach (Rickwood, E., ed), 2nd Ed., pp. 251-286, IRL Press, Washington, D. C.
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hendil, K. B., Kristensen, P., and Uerkvitz, W.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
305,
245-252
-
Kristensen, P., Johnsen, A. H., Uerkvitz, W., Tanaka, K., and Hendil, K. B.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
205,
1785-1789
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
van Duijnhoven, J. L. P., Verschuren, M. C. M., Timmer, E. D. J., Vissers, P. M., Groeneveld, A., Ayoubi, T. A. Y., van den Ouweland, A. M. W., and van de Ven, W. J. M.
(1991)
J. Immunol. Methods
142,
187-198
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wrigley, N. G.
(1968)
J. Ultrastruct. Res.
24,
454-464
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Müller, S. A., Goldie, K. A., Bürki, R., Häring, R., and Engel, A.
(1992)
Ultramicroscopy
46,
317-334
[CrossRef]
-
Saxton, O., Pitt, Y. J., and Horner, M.
(1968)
Ultramicroscopy
4,
343-354
-
Grziwa, A., Maack, S., Pühler, Wiegand, G., Baumeister, W., and Jaenicke, R.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
223,
1061-1067
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yoshimura, T., Kameyama, K., Takagi, T., Ikai, A., Tokunaga, F., Koide, T., Tanahashi, N., Tamura, T., Cejka, Z., Baumeister, W., Tanaka, K., and Ichihara, A.
(1993)
J. Struct. Biol.
111,
200-211
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Morimoto, Y., Mizushima, T., Yagi, A., Tanahashi, N., Tanaka, K., Ichihara, A., and Tsukihara, T.
(1995)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
117,
471-474
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Heinemeyer, W., Kleinschmidt, J. A., Saidowsky, J., Escher, C., and Wolf, D. H.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
555-562
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Grossi de Sa, M. F., Martins de Sa, C., Harper, F., Coux, O., Akhayat, O., Pal, J. K., Florentin, Y., and Scherrer, K.
(1988)
J. Cell Sci.
89,
151-165
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kania, M. A., DeMartino, G. N., Baumeister, W., and Goldberg, A. L.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
236,
510-516
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Briane, D., Olink-Coux, M., Vassy, J., Oudar, O., Huesca, M., Scherrer, K., and Foucrier, J.
(1992)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
57,
30-39
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Scherrer, K., and Bey, F.
(1994)
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.
49,
1-64
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Olink-Coux, M., Arcangeletti, C., Pinardi, F., Minisini, R., Huesca, M., Chezzi, C., and Scherrer, K.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
353-366
[Abstract]
-
Pal, J. K., Gounon, P., Grossi de Sa, M. F., and Scherrer, K.
(1988)
J. Cell Sci.
90,
555-567
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Baumeister, W., Dahlmann, B., Hegerl, R., Kopp, F., Kuehn, L., and Pfeifer, G.
(1988)
FEBS Lett.
241,
239-245
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Chondrogianni, C. Tzavelas, A. J. Pemberton, I. P. Nezis, A. J. Rivett, and E. S. Gonos
Overexpression of Proteasome {beta}5 Assembled Subunit Increases the Amount of Proteasome and Confers Ameliorated Response to Oxidative Stress and Higher Survival Rates
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 25, 2005;
280(12):
11840 - 11850.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Kaczowka and J. A. Maupin-Furlow
Subunit Topology of Two 20S Proteasomes from Haloferax volcanii
J. Bacteriol.,
January 1, 2003;
185(1):
165 - 174.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. L. Wilson, M. S. Ou, H. C. Aldrich, and J. Maupin-Furlow
Biochemical and Physical Properties of the Methanococcus jannaschii 20S Proteasome and PAN, a Homolog of the ATPase (Rpt) Subunits of the Eucaryal 26S Proteasome
J. Bacteriol.,
March 15, 2000;
182(6):
1680 - 1692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. L. Wilson, H. C. Aldrich, and J. Maupin-Furlow
Halophilic 20S Proteasomes of the Archaeon Haloferax volcanii: Purification, Characterization, and Gene Sequence Analysis
J. Bacteriol.,
September 15, 1999;
181(18):
5814 - 5824.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. C. Boelens, Y. Croes, M. de Ruwe, L. de Reu, and W. W. de Jong
Negative Charges in the C-terminal Domain Stabilize the alpha B-Crystallin Complex
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 23, 1998;
273(43):
28085 - 28090.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|