![]()
|
|
||||||||
(Received for publication, December 3, 1996, and in revised form, February 25, 1997)
From the Adenine repression of the purine nucleotide
biosynthetic genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves
down-regulation of the activator protein BAS1 or BAS2 by an unknown
mechanism. To determine the minimal cis-acting requirements for adenine
regulation, hybrid promoter constructs were made between
ADE5,7 promoter fragments and a CYC1-lacZ
reporter. A 139-nucleotide fragment containing two BAS1 binding sites
was sufficient to confer adenine regulation on the
CYC1-lacZ reporter. Analysis of deletion and substitution mutations led to the conclusion that the proximal BAS1 binding site is
both necessary and sufficient for regulation, whereas the distal site
augments the function of the proximal site. By performing saturation
mutagenesis, we found two essential regions that flank the proximal
site. An ABF1 consensus sequence is within one of these regions, and
mutations that impaired in vitro ABF1 binding impaired
promoter activity in vivo. A second region is AT-rich and
appears to bind BAS2. No substitution mutations led to high level
constitutive promoter activity as would be expected from removal of an
upstream repression sequence. Our results indicate that ABF1, BAS1, and
BAS2 are required for ADE5,7 promoter function and that
adenine repression most likely involves activator modification or a
negative regulator that does not itself bind DNA.
The de novo synthesis of purine nucleotides requires 10 enzymatic steps to form the first purine nucleotide, inosine
monophosphate. IMP is converted to either AMP or GMP in two steps. The
products of at least 13 genes are required for this synthesis, since
mutations in any one of these lead to an adenine requirement (1). Most of these genes encode the biosynthetic enzymes that participate in
specific steps of the pathway (ADE1, ADE2, ADE4, ADE5,7, ADE6, ADE8, ADE12, ADE13), others encode enzymes required to produce additional substrates necessary to complete the pathway (ADE3, ASP5), and the function of one gene product is unknown
(ADE9). Strains with mutations in two additional genes,
BAS1 and BAS2, have a partial adenine requirement
(2). In these latter mutants, expression of the biosynthetic enzymes is
low, indicating a positive regulatory role for these gene products (3,
4).
Expression of the adenine biosynthetic genes is repressed when cells
are grown in the presence of adenine (3-6). This adenine-mediated repression occurs at the transcriptional level (7). ADE gene transcription is unregulated in bas1 or bas2
mutant strains (3). The expression of BAS1 and
BAS2 is not regulated by adenine levels (8, 9), however,
indicating that adenine repression occurs by down-regulating the
activator functions of the BAS1 or BAS2 proteins.
BAS1 and BAS2 were identified as transcriptional activator proteins
required for the basal expression of the HIS4 gene (2). BAS1
binds to DNA using an amino-terminal myb motif (8). This tryptophan-rich motif is repeated three times in the BAS1 protein (8,
10). BAS1 binds to two sites in the HIS4 promoter (8) and to
two sites in each of the promoters for the ADE2 and
ADE5,7 genes (3). The consensus sequence derived from these
six BAS1 binding sites is TGACTC. Interestingly, this hexanucleotide
sequence forms the core of the binding site for GCN4 protein as well,
although flanking nucleotides differently affect the binding affinity
of these two proteins (10, 11). Whereas GCN4 has a preference for the
sequence RRTGACTCATTT (R represents A or G; Ref. 11), none
of the known BAS1 sites or any predicted sites in other ADE gene promoters have either an A nucleotide at the 3 BAS2 binds to DNA via an amino-terminal homeodomain that is closely
related to the engrailed protein of Drosophila (8). The BAS2
binding site at HIS4 has been mapped to an A + T-rich repeat, TTAA (8). The results of electrophoretic mobility shift assays
suggested that BAS2 binds to the ADE2 and ADE5,7
promoters; however, no specific binding sites were identified (3). In addition to participating with BAS1 in transcriptional activation of
HIS4 and the ADE genes, BAS2 (also known as PHO2
and GRF10) stimulates transcription of PHO5 (12) and
HO (13). High level transcription of HO requires
BAS2 in conjunction with SWI5 (13, 14). Binding of BAS2 and SW15 to the
HO promoter is cooperative in vitro (13, 15).
BAS2 also interacts with PHO4 to induce PHO5 transcription
under phosphate starvation conditions (16). Binding of PHO4 is
BAS2-dependent and restricted to derepressing conditions as
shown by in vivo footprinting experiments (17). There is
evidence that BAS2 and PHO4 physically interact at the promoter and
that this interaction is regulated by phosphate (18).
Because expression of the genes that are activated by BAS1 and BAS2 is
lower when cells are grown in adenine excess, adenine antagonizes the
activation function of one or both of these proteins. Excess adenine
could inhibit their ability to interact with one another, to bind to
DNA, or to interact with components of the transcriptional machinery.
Down-regulation of BAS protein function could also occur by covalent
modification or through binding of a negative regulator, analogous to
binding of the repressor GAL80 to the activator GAL4 (12).
Alternatively, a DNA binding repressor might interact with negative
control sites in the promoter, as described for the MIG1-TUP1-SSN6
complex that mediates the carbon catabolite repression of
GAL genes (12).
To define more clearly the cis- and trans-acting regulatory elements
required for adenine regulation, we performed an extensive analysis of
the ADE5,7 promoter. First, we identified the minimal sequences from ADE5,7 sufficient to confer adenine-regulated
activation (UASADE5,71 function) to
a heterologous CYC1-lacZ reporter lacking its native UASCYC. We then subjected the minimal UASADE5,7 to
extensive mutagenesis by making successive 3-nucleotide substitutions across this element to identify precisely the critical nucleotides contained therein. Our results indicate that of the two BAS1 binding sites at UASADE5,7, the gene-proximal copy is the more critical, being both necessary and sufficient for adenine-regulated promoter activity. Two additional regions were essential for
UASADE5,7 function. One region, located 5 Saccharomyces cerevisiae
strains AY854 ( E. coli cells were grown in LB medium supplemented with 100 µg/ml ampicillin. S. cerevisiae cells were grown in
synthetic dextrose (SD) medium (20) supplemented with 0.5 mM arginine and 0.3 mM histidine. Adenine was
added to 0.15 mM in the cultures grown under repressing
conditions.
Table I lists
the oligonucleotides that were used as polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
and sequencing primers for cloning and as probes for DNA binding assays
as described below. Deletion of an XhoI fragment that
contained the UASCYC1 from plasmid pLG699Z (21) generated
pLG699Z Table I.
Oligonucleotides
Volume 272, Number 20,
Issue of May 16, 1997
pp. 13343-13354
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
§,
Department of Biology, Georgetown
University, Washington, D. C. 20057 and the ¶ Laboratory of
Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, NICHD, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
base following the
conserved hexanucleotide core or any other sequence conservation.
to the critical BAS1
site, is a binding site for ABF1. The other, located 3
to the critical BAS1 site, is an extended A + T-rich element that appears to be a Bas2
binding site. We found that none of the nucleotide substitutions in the
UASADE5,7 led to constitutively derepressed expression, the
phenotype expected from the loss of a repressor binding site. Thus, our
results suggest that the repression of UASADE5,7 function in
adenine-replete cells involves a modification of one of the three
transcriptional activator proteins, BAS1, BAS2, or ABF1, rather than
binding of a repressor.
Strains and Media
GCN4 BAS1 BAS2 ura3-52), AY856 (a
GCN4 bas1-2 BAS2 ura3-52), AY858 (
GCN4 BAS1
bas2-2 ura3-52), AY860 (
GCN4 bas1-2 bas2-2
ura3-52), AY957 (a gcn4 BAS1 BAS2 ura3-52), and
AY862 (a gcn4 bas1-2 bas2-2 ura3-52) were provided
by Kim Arndt (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories). ElectroMax
Escherichia coli strain DH10B (Life Technologies, Inc.) was
used for transformation (19).
XhoI. Plasmid pCM81, a derivative of
pLG699Z
XhoI, contains an oligonucleotide that replaces
the unique XhoI site with adjacent BglII and
XhoI sites (22). Fragments of the ADE5,7 promoter
were generated by the PCR using plasmid pYEADE5,7(5.2R) (23) and the
primers listed in Table I, as described in the relevant figure and
table legends. PCR reactions were performed using Taq
polymerase (Perkin-Elmer) under the following conditions: 30 cycles of
denaturing at 95 °C for 2 min, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min, and
chain extension at 72 °C for 30 s. PCR fragments were digested
with either XhoI or XhoI and BglII,
separated from primers by electrophoresis, purified, and inserted into
pLG699Z
XhoI or pCM81. The ligated products were
transformed into competent E. coli by electroporation (19).
Bacterial transformants were screened for insertions by colony
hybridization (24), by restriction analysis (24), or by whole cell PCR
(25). The nucleotide sequence of the vector-insert junctions was
verified in all constructs by sequence analysis using primer RO-26,
which corresponds to positions
160 to
142 (relative to the ATG
codon) of the CYC1 gene. Plasmids were transformed into
yeast cells using lithium acetate (26) and plated on medium lacking
uracil.
end.
Comments indicate what the oligonucleotide was used for. Underlined positions indicate restriction enzyme sites used for cloning, as
indicated in the text. seq., sequencing primer; mut., mutant.
Sequences of the oligonucleotides are listed from their 5
end.
Comments indicate what the oligonucleotide was used for. Underlined positions indicate restriction enzyme sites used for cloning, as
indicated in the text. seq., sequencing primer; mut., mutant.
Name
Comments
Sequence
RO-26
CYC1
seq.
5
-GCCATATGATCATGTGTCG-3
RO-27
End
2715
-CGTCCTCGAGGTGGCAGTAAGCAGC-3
RO-28
End
1335
-CGTCCTCGAGGTTCAAGCCCATCGC-3
RO-29
End
2335
-CGTCCTCGAGCATTTTTTTTTTCAGTTGAC-3
RO-30
End
1605
-CGTCCTCGAGGCTGTTATTACCAGGACACG-3
RO-35
Distal
site
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCATTTTTTTTTTCAGTTGAATTCGCC-3
RO-36
Proximal
site
5
-CGTCCTCGAGGCTGTTATTACCAGGACACGAATTCAG-3
RO-39
End
2115
-CGTCCTCGAGGCCCCGTCGGTAGTG-3
RO-40
End
1835
-CGTCCTCGAGGTGGGCACTTGTCAC-3
RO-41
End
1455
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATTCATTATTGC-3
RO-43
End
1955
-CGTCCTCGAGCAAGTGCCGACTGACTC-3
RO-53
End
2115
-CGTCAGATCTGCCCCGTCGGTAGTGAC-3
RO-54
Cluster
1
5
-CGTCAGATCTNNNCCGTCGGTAGTGAC-3
RO-55
Cluster
2
5
-CGTCAGATCTGCCNNNTCGGTAGTGAC-3
RO-56
Cluster
3
5
-CGTCAGATCTGCCCCGNNNGTAGTGAC-3
RO-57
Cluster
4
5
-CGTCAGATCTGCCCCGTCGNNNGTGACAAG-3
RO-58
Cluster
5
5
-CGTCAGATCTGCCCCGTCGGTANNNACAAGTGCC-3
RO-59
Cluster
6
5
-CGTCAGATCTGCCCCGTCGGTAGTGNNNAGTGCCGA-3
RO-60
Cluster
7
5
-CGTCAGATCTGCCCCGTCGGTAGTGACANNNGCCGACTG-3
RO-61
Cluster
8
5
-CGTCAGATCTGCCCCGTCGGTAGTGACAAGTNNNGACTGACT-3
RO-62
Cluster
9
5
-CGTCAGATCTGCCCCGTCGGTAGTGACAAGTGCCNNNTGACTCGT-3
RO-63
Cluster
10
5
-CGTCAGATCTGCCCCGTCGGTAGTGACAAGTGCCGACNNNCTCGTGTC-3
RO-64
Cluster
11
5
-CGTCAGATCTGCCCCGTCGGTAGTGACAAGTGCCGACTGANNNGTGTCCTG-3
RO-65
Cluster
12
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATTCATTATTGCTGTTATTACCAGGANNNGAGTCAGT-3
RO-66
Cluster
13
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATTCATTATTGCTGTTATTACCANNNCACGAGTCAG-3
RO-67
Cluster
14
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATTCATTATTGCTGTTATTANNNGGACACGA-3
RO-68
Cluster
15
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATTCATTATTGCTGTTANNNCCAGGACA-3
RO-69
Cluster
16
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATTCATTATTGCTGNNNTTACCAGG-3
RO-70
Cluster
17
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATTCATTATTGNNNTTATTACCAGG-3
RO-71
Cluster
18
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATTCATTANNNCTGTTATTACCAGG-3
RO-72
Cluster
19
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATTCANNNTTGCTGTTATTACC-3
RO-73
Cluster
20
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATNNNTTATTGCTG-3
RO-74
Cluster
21
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCANNNTCATTATTGCTG-3
RO-75
Cluster
22
5
-CGTCCTCGAGNNNNTATTCATTATTGCTG-3
RO-97
Linker
5
-GATCGTCCATATGCTCG-3
RO-98
Linker
5
-GATCCGGAGCATATGGAC-3
RO-103
BAS2
5
-GATCGAGATGATGGAAT-3
RO-104
BAS2
5
-AATTCTTCCATCATCTC-3
RO-107
BAS1
5
-CATTTTATCGCATATGTCGAATATAAGTACC-3
RO-108
BAS1
5
-CACGAGATCTCCGACGTCGGTGTGTTTGAATCGTGTAGC-3
RO-118
ARS1
5
-CCTATTTCTTAGCATTTTTGACGAAATTTGCT-3
RO-119
ARS1
5
-AGCAAATTTCGTCAAAAATGCTAAGAAATAGG-3
RO-120
ARS1
mut.
5
-CCTATTTCTTAGCATTTTTGGTGAAATTTGCT-3
RO-121
ARS1
mut.
5
-AGCAAATTTCACCAAAAATGCTAAGAAATAGG-3
RO-136
Vector
5
-GGCTCGAAGATCTGCC-3
FZP20
III and
IV
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATTCATTATTGCTGGGAGATCCAGGAC-3
FZP21
III and
IV
5
-CGTCCTCGAGCGCATATTCACGGGTCCTGGGAGATCCAGGAC-3
Plasmid pR116 carries an ADE5-lacZ fusion and was
constructed by first introducing a 3.0-kb BamHI fragment
carrying the E. coli lacZ gene (27) into the
BamHI site located in the ADE5,7 gene of plasmid
pYEADE5,7(5.2R) (23) to produce plasmid pR111. The ~8-kb
SalI to BspEI fragment containing the
ADE5-lacZ fusion from pR111 was subcloned into the
SalI and XmaI sites of a modified form of pRS316,
lacking the
-fragment of lacZ, to produce pR116.
Plasmid pR173 contains a fusion of the bacterial glutathione
S-transferase (GST) gene with the full-length coding
sequence of BAS1 and was constructed in three steps. First,
an oligonucleotide duplex formed between RO-97 and RO-98 was inserted
at the BamHI site of pGEX-5X-3 (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) to
yield pR171. The 5
end of the gene was generated by PCR using
oligonucleotides RO-107 to RO-108 and pCB286 (2). The PCR fragment was
cleaved with NdeI and BglII and ligated into the
NdeI and BamHI sites of pR171 to yield pR172. The
remainder of the BAS1 gene was cloned as a 3.5-kb
BamHI fragment from pCB286, ligated into the same site in
pR172 to yield pR173.
Plasmid pR175, encoding the GST-BAS2 fusion, was constructed in two steps. First, an oligonucleotide duplex formed between RO-103 and RO-104 was inserted at the BamHI and EcoRI sites of pGEX-5X-3 to yield pR174. Plasmid pCB841 (2), which carries BAS2, was partially digested with EcoRI to generate a 2.5-kb fragment that was ligated into the EcoRI site of pR174 to yield pR175. Plasmid M2025 carrying the (His)6-BAS2 fusion was a gift of D. Stillman (15).
-Galactosidase Assays
Transformants to be assayed for
-galactosidase activities were inoculated in 5 ml of SD medium
supplemented with 0.5 mM arginine, 0.3 mM
histidine and 0.15 mM adenine and cultured for ~42 h.
Each saturated culture was diluted 1:50 in 25 ml of fresh medium, with and without adenine supplementation, and grown for 5 h with
shaking at 30 °C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation and frozen
at
20 °C overnight.
-Galactosidase assays were performed using whole-cell extracts (22).
To generate labeled ADE5,7 DNA
fragments, oligonucleotides RO-41 and RO-136 were end-labeled with
polynucleotide kinase and [
-32P]ATP and were separated
from unincorporated label by passage over a G25 spin column. PCR
reactions were performed as described above using the labeled
oligonucleotides as primers and plasmids containing the appropriate
ADE5,7 sequences as templates to amplify the region between
211 and
145 (relative to the ADE5,7 start codon). The
templates were pR224, carrying the wild-type ADE5,7 fragment, or selected plasmids carrying mutated ADE5,7
promoter fragments, constructs numbered 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 14, 19, 20, 27, 29, 34, 35, 39, and 43 as listed in Table IV. After PCR, a portion of each sample was separated by electrophoresis, and concentrations of
the PCR products were estimated by ethidium bromide staining in
comparison with known concentrations of duplex oligonucleotides of
approximately the same length.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oligonucleotides RO-118 and RO-119, encoding ARS1, and
RO-120 and RO-121, encoding a mutant ARS1, were prepared by
end labeling with polynucleotide kinase and [
-32P]ATP
(24), removing the unincorporated ATP on G25 spin columns, and
annealing equimolar amounts of each by heating to 65 °C and cooling
slowly to room temperature.
DNA fragments used as competitors were prepared as described above for the radiolabeled PCR probes, omitting the end labeling and purification steps. To generate the fragment carrying mutations in both regions III and IV, RO-136 and FZP20 were used as primers in a PCR reaction. The product of this PCR reaction was then used as template in another round of PCR using RO-136 and FZP21 as primers. The PCR fragment was inserted into pCM81 and subjected to sequence analysis to verify the correct sequence.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays of DNA Binding by ABF1Yeast strain AY862 was grown to midlog phase and harvested
by centrifugation. Cells were broken using glass beads in buffer A (25 mM Hepes, pH 7.7, 50 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, and
0.5 mM EDTA). Cell lysates were clarified by centrifugation
at 20,000 × g. Labeled DNA probes for electrophoretic
mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were either a 32-base duplex
oligonucleotide containing the ABF1 binding site from ARS1
or radiolabeled PCR fragments containing ADE5,7 sequences,
prepared as described above. DNA binding assays were performed in 20 µl with 10 µg of protein in a whole cell lysate and 10 fmol of DNA
in a buffer containing 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.7, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 µg of
poly(dI·dC), and 1 µg of sonicated calf thymus DNA. Binding
reactions were incubated at room temperature for 30 min and separated
by gel electrophoresis using 6% polyacylamide gels in 22.3 mM Tris borate, pH 8.3, 0.5 mM EDTA. The gel
was pre-electrophoresed for 15 min prior to loading samples. Supershift experiments were performed by adding either preimmune serum or immune
serum raised against partially purified ABF1 to the binding reactions.
The antisera, kindly provided by Bruce Stillman (28), were diluted in
buffer A as indicated in the legend to Fig. 3. Competitions with
unlabeled DNA fragments were performed using wild-type or mutant
ARS1-containing oligonucleotides, or with PCR-derived
fragments of the ADE5,7 promoter prepared as described above.
211 to
145 from the ADE5,7
promoter. For lanes 1 and 5, no yeast extract was
added; for all others, 10 µg of extract from strain AY862 was added.
For lanes 3 and 7, a 100-fold molar excess of the
unlabeled ARS1 oligonucleotide was used as competitor; for
lanes 4 and 8, the same amount of a mutant
unlabeled ARS1 oligonucleotide was used as competitor. The
mutation in the ARS1 fragment is a two-nucleotide
substitution, replacing AGCATTTTTGACG with
AGCATTTTTGGTG (underlines indicate the changes from the ABF1 consensus), shown previously to abolish ABF1
binding (33). B, formation of a supershifted complex with ABF1 antibodies. ABF1-DNA complexes were formed using the labeled ADE5,7 probe as described in A, and no serum was
added to the reaction (lane 2), 1 µl of a 1:10 dilution of
preimmune serum was added (lane 3), or 1 µl of a 1:100
dilution or of a 1:10 dilution of a polyclonal serum prepared against
partially purified ABF1 (28) was added (lanes 4 and
5, respectively), prior to electrophoresis. C,
binding of ABF1 to wild-type and mutant fragments from
ADE5,7. Labeled oligonucleotides identical to the
ADE5,7 probe describe above (lanes 1 and
9) or containing point mutations in the clusters indicated
along the top were employed in EMSAs as described above for
A. The mutations in clusters 2, 3, 5, and 6 alter conserved positions in the predicted ABF1 binding site and correspond to the
mutations introduced in constructs shown as numbers 5, 7, 13, 14, and
19 in Table IV. The mutations in cluster 4 (corresponding to constructs
10 and 11 in Table IV) alter only nonconserved positions in the ABF1
site. Cluster 7 lies outside the ABF1 binding site, and the mutations
analyzed at these positions had no effect on UASADE5,7 function
(construct 20 in Table IV). The mutations analyzed in clusters 10-13,
15, and 16 led to reduced UASADE5,7 function but altered
clusters outside of the ABF1 binding site constructs 27, 29, 34, 35, 39, and 43 in Table IV).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays of DNA Binding by BAS1
Bacterial strains containing the GST-BAS1 fusion construct
or the pGEX empty vector were inoculated at a 1:100 dilution from saturated cultures into 50 ml of LB containing ampicillin. Cultures were grown for 2.5 h, and IPTG was added to 0.5 mM for
induction of the GST proteins. Cells were harvested by centrifugation
after an additional 2.5 h of growth, frozen in a dry ice/ethanol
bath, and stored at
80 °C. Pellets were thawed on ice and
resuspended in buffer A containing 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol
and a mixture of protease inhibitors: 1 µg/ml aprotinin, 0.5 µg/ml
leupeptin, 1 µg/ml antipain, 1 µg/ml chymostatin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride. Cell extracts were
prepared by sonication with four 15-s pulses in an ice water bath and
by three cycles of freezing in a dry ice/ethanol bath and thawing in
water. Cellular debris was removed by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 15 min. Extracts were loaded onto a glutathione
S-Sepharose column with a 2-ml bed volume equilibrated in
buffer A. GST control and GST-BAS1 fusion proteins were eluted from the
column with 10 mM reduced glutathione in buffer A. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed in 10 µl using
0.25 µg of purified protein and 10 fmol of wild-type or mutant DNA
fragments in a buffer containing 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.7, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.5 µg of poly(dI·dC), and 10% glycerol (8).
Unlabeled DNA fragments were added as competitors in a 200-fold molar
excess. Samples were fractionated by electrophoresis on 6%
polyacrylamide gels, as described above for ABF1 binding.
GST-BAS2 was prepared and used in EMSAs as described above
for GST-BAS1. The (His)6-BAS2 protein was prepared for use
in EMSA experiments as described (13, 15) with the following
modification. Crude cell lysates (1.5 mg) from bacteria transformed
with GST-BAS2 plasmid pM2025 (13) or the empty vector were prepared and
added to 200 µl of Ni2+ charged His-Bind resin (Novagen).
The fraction that eluted with 300 mM imidazole was dialyzed
against buffer: 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.5 mM
EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 10%
glycerol, and the protease inhibitors described above. Bovine serum
albumin as a carrier protein was added to a final concentration of 0.75 mg/ml before storage at
80 °C. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed using 1.6 µl of these purified protein
fractions.
We began our study of adenine regulation by analyzing expression of an ADE5,7-lacZ fusion in various strains grown in the presence and absence of exogenous adenine. We assayed wild-type and mutant strains lacking BAS1, BAS2, or GCN4. We found that ADE5,7 promoter activity under derepressing conditions (without Ade medium) and repressing conditions (with Ade medium) was lost in strains containing the mutant alleles bas1-2 or bas2-2 but was not significantly affected in a strain containing the mutant gcn4 allele (Table II). These results indicated that BAS1 and BAS2 are both essential for transcriptional activation of ADE5,7 under derepressing conditions, and they are consistent with the idea that the adenine repression involves down-regulation of BAS1 or BAS2 (3). In addition, they show that GCN4 is dispensable for ADE5,7 promoter activity and its regulation by adenine under these growth conditions (7).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The results in Table II suggest that the ability of BAS1
and BAS2 to activate ADE5,7 transcription is completely
inhibited in adenine-replete cells. It was not known, however, whether
ADE5,7 promoter activity is dependent on any additional
positive regulators that might be subject to adenine repression or
whether repression involves a DNA binding repressor. To address these
issues, we set out to identify the cis-acting sequences required for
adenine-regulated promoter activity by determining the smallest DNA
fragment from ADE5,7 sufficient to confer
adenine-repressible UAS function on a CYC1-lacZ reporter
(21). Various fragments of the ADE5,7 promoter were
generated by PCR and inserted ~185 nucleotides upstream of the
CYC1 transcription initiation sites where the UASCYC normally resides (Fig. 1). These constructs were
introduced into four different yeast strains carrying wild-type or
mutated alleles of GCN4, BAS1, and BAS2, and
-galactosidase expression was assayed after growing transformants in
minimal medium containing or lacking adenine. As expected, expression
of
-galactosidase in transformants of each strain bearing the
parental CYC1-lacZ construct lacking UASCYC1 was
very low (~10 units) and essentially unaffected by adenine
supplementation or mutations in any of the regulatory genes (Table
III, line 19). The ADE5,7 promoter fragments
exhibited a wide range of expression from the CYC1 promoter
in the wild-type strain, and in many cases promoter activity was
repressed by adenine in the medium. As seen with the authentic
ADE5,7 promoter (Table II), expression depended upon the
wild-type alleles of BAS1 and BAS2 but not upon
GCN4 (Table III). In addition to these adenine-regulated constructs, promoter fragments with 3
end points at positions
183
(Table III, lines 3 and 7) or at
160 (Table III, lines 2 and 10)
exhibited significant activity that was independent of GCN4, BAS1, and BAS2 and was largely unaffected by adenine in
the medium.
217 and
212, and the proximal site is located between
184
and
179. A, constructs used in the deletion analysis. PCR
fragments with 5
end points at positions
271,
233,
211, or
195
and 3
end points at
183,
160,
145, or
133 were generated using
oligonucleotides listed in Table I and are indicated by the
lines shown below the schematic. These fragments were inserted in place of UASCYC1 in plasmid pLG669Z
XhoI, and the resulting constructs were introduced
into yeast strain AY854 (wild type).
-Galactosidase activities in whole cell extracts were determined after growing the transformants under derepressing (
Ade) or repressing conditions
(+Ade) and are listed in Table III. These results have been
corrected for UAS activity that is not attributed to the three
transcriptional activators GCN4, BAS1, or BAS2 by subtracting the
activity found in strain AY862 (gcn4 bas1 bas2) and are
shown to the right of each construct. In cases where the
corrected value was a negative number, it is enclosed by
parentheses. NA, not applicable. B, constructs used to analyze mutations in the BAS1 binding site. A point
mutation from TGACTC to TGAATTC in the core
sequence is represented by an X.
| ||||||||||||