|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Received for publication, January 10, 1997, and in revised form, March 26, 1997)
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
Louisiana State University Medical Center,
Shreveport, Louisiana 71130-3932
To test the hypothesis that
tRNATyr recognition differs between bacterial and
human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases, we sequenced several clones identified
as human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase cDNAs by the Human Genome Project.
We found that human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is composed of three
domains: 1) an amino-terminal Rossmann fold domain that is responsible
for formation of the activated E·Tyr-AMP intermediate and
is conserved among bacteria, archeae, and eukaryotes; 2) a tRNA
anticodon recognition domain that has not been conserved between
bacteria and eukaryotes; and 3) a carboxyl-terminal domain that is
unique to the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase and whose primary structure
is 49% identical to the putative human cytokine endothelial
monocyte-activating protein II, 50% identical to the carboxyl-terminal
domain of methionyl-tRNA synthetase from Caenorhabditis elegans, and 43% identical to the carboxyl-terminal domain of Arc1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The first two domains
of the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase are 52, 36, and 16% identical to
tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases from S. cerevisiae,
Methanococcus jannaschii, and Bacillus
stearothermophilus, respectively. Nine of fifteen amino acids
known to be involved in the formation of the tyrosyl-adenylate complex
in B. stearothermophilus are conserved across all of the
organisms, whereas amino acids involved in the recognition of
tRNATyr are not conserved. Kinetic analyses of recombinant
human and B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases
expressed in Escherichia coli indicate that human
tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase aminoacylates human but not B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr, and vice versa,
supporting the original hypothesis. It is proposed that like
endothelial monocyte-activating protein II and the carboxyl-terminal domain of Arc1p, the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase evolved from gene duplication of the carboxyl-terminal domain of methionyl-tRNA synthetase and may direct tRNA to the active
site of the enzyme.
Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the aminoacylation of tRNA by
their cognate amino acid. For most aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (E), tRNA aminoacylation can be separated into two steps:
formation of a stable enzyme-bound aminoacyladenylate intermediate
(E·AA-AMP, Equation 1), followed by transfer of the amino
acid (AA) from the aminoacyl-adenylate intermediate to the 3 Transfer RNA molecules also occur as one of two distinct types, although there does not appear to be a correlation between the two types of tRNA molecules and the two classes of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Tyrosyl-tRNA (tRNATyr) is unique among tRNAs in that in bacteria it is type II (which contains an extended variable loop), whereas in eukaryotes it is type I (16, 17). Furthermore, previous studies indicate that bacterial and eukaryotic tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases do not catalyze the aminoacylation of other tRNATyr substrates suggesting that tRNATyr recognition differs between bacteria and eukaryotes (17-21). If this hypothesis is correct, it should be possible to exploit this species specificity to design novel antibiotics that selectively inhibit bacterial tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases. To test this hypothesis, we have sequenced the cDNA for human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase and expressed the recombinant protein in Escherichia coli cells. During the course of these investigations, it was discovered that the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase consists of three distinct domains, an amino-terminal Rossmann fold domain, an anticodon recognition domain, and an idiosyncratic carboxyl-terminal domain whose amino acid sequence is 49% identical to the putative human cytokine endothelial monocyte-activating protein II (EMAP II),1 50% identical to the carboxyl-terminal domain of methionyl-tRNA synthetase from Caenorhabditis elegans, and 43% identical to the Arc1p protein (also known as G4p1), which has been postulated to direct tRNA to active sites of the methionyl- and glutamyl-tRNA synthetases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (22). This is in contrast to all other known tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase sequences, which possess only the first two domains. The results of these analyses and possible implications of the findings are presented here. Materials cDNA clones 53277 and 124918 (I.M.A.G.E. clone accession numbers) were obtained from the I.M.A.G.E. Consortium (23). All other cDNA clones were obtained from The Institute for Genome Research (TIGR) through the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and are designated by their TIGR clone numbers. Reagents and vectors were purchased from the following sources: pET-30a vector and S-Tag Western blot kit (Novagen), Ni-NTA resin and QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen), Wizard PCR prep system and recombinant enterokinase (Promega), NuSieve low melting point agarose (FMC), Taq polymerase (Amersham), L-[14C]tyrosine (Moravek Biochemicals), and oligonucleotides (Life Technologies, Inc.). Automated DNA sequencing was performed by the DNA sequencing facility at Iowa State University using dye-labeled dideoxy terminators. All other chemicals and reagents were purchased from Fisher. Plasmid Purification and DNA SequencingAll plasmids were
purified on CsCl gradients (24, 25). For clone 186313 and the pHYTS1
expression plasmid, both DNA strands were sequenced using the following
primers2: M13 reverse primer ( Data base searching was performed using the European Bioinformatics Institute implementation of FASTA (26), the Stanford University implementation of BLAST (27), and the Baylor College of Medicine implementation of BEAUTY (28). Multiple alignment of amino acid sequences was performed using the Baylor College of Medicine implementation of ClustalW (29, 30). All data base searches and multiple sequence alignments used the default parameters for each program implementation. Construction of the pHYTS2 Expression PlasmidSubcloning of
the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase cDNA from clone 186313 into the
pET-30a vector for expression of recombinant tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase
protein in E. coli was performed in the following manner.
First, the full-length human tyrosyl-tRNA cDNA from clone 186313 was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction with the HYTS Exp Fwd
and HYTS Exp Rvs primers described above. These primers contain
BglII and HindIII sites near their 5 BL21DE3 pLysS E. coli cells harboring the pHYTS2 plasmid were grown to saturation
at 37 °C in 2 × TY medium containing 50 µg/liter kanamycin
and 0.5 mM
isopropyl- B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase was purified from TG2 cells harboring the pYTS5 plasmid as described previously (31). The concentrations of human and B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases were determined by active site titration using L-[14C]tyrosine to monitor tyrosyl-adenylate formation (32). SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (33) and modified Western blot analysis using the S-Tag Western blot kit (34) were used to assess the purity of the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases and to estimate the molecular weight of the recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. In Vitro Transcription and Purification of Human and B. stearothermophilus tRNATyrB.
stearothermophilus tRNATyr was transcribed in
vitro from pGFX-WT, a derivative of the plasmid pGAG2 (35) in
which a FokI restriction site replaces the BstNI
cleavage site in pGAG2 such that digestion with FokI, and
subsequent in vitro transcription of the digested pGFX-WT
plasmid by T7 RNA polymerase, produces tRNATyr containing
an intact -CCA 3 Three consecutive rounds of polymerase chain reaction mutagenesis (36) were used to replace the B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr cDNA in pGFX-WT with the cDNA sequence for human placental tRNATyr (GenBankTM accession number Hstrny1r), generating the pHYR-WT plasmid. Digestion of pHYR-WT by FokI, followed by in vitro transcription using T7 RNA polymerase, yields the human tRNATyr product. In vitro transcription of the B. stearothermophilus and human tRNATyr substrates from the pGFX-WT and pHYR-WT plasmids was performed as described by Avis et al. (35) with the modification that the plasmids were digested with FokI rather than BstNI. In vitro transcribed tRNATyr products were purified on 12% polyacrylamide gels (37). Purified tRNATyr products were resuspended in diethylpyrocarbonate-treated water containing 10 mM MgCl2, heated to 75 °C, and slowly cooled to room temperature over a period of 30-60 min to allow annealing of the tRNATyr substrates to occur. Comparison of Human Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetases from Different cDNA Libraries To ensure that the tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase cDNA used in subsequent experiments corresponds to the predominant form found in humans, cDNAs from several different libraries were sequenced. Specifically, the following cDNAs were sequenced3: 186313 (TIGR, adult white blood cells), 151265 (TIGR, female infant brain), 160622 (TIGR, adult white blood cells), 109082 (TIGR, adult colon),4 132369 (TIGR, six week old infant),3 53277 (I.M.A.G.E. Consortium, infant brain), and 124918 (I.M.A.G.E. Consortium, fetal liver, spleen). Clones 186313, 151265, and 160622 contain full-length cDNA sequences, clone 109082 is missing the first 181 nucleotides of the coding sequence, clone 132369 is missing the first 792 nucleotides of the coding sequence, clone 53277 is missing the first 426 nucleotides of the coding sequence, and the nucleotide sequence of clone 124918 corresponds to that of the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase cDNA coding sequence through nucleotide 685, and then diverges into an unrelated sequence. In all of the cDNA clones examined (with the exception of the truncated clone 124918), the nucleotide sequence differs from the previously reported cDNA sequence for human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase5 (39) by the insertion of a cytosine at position 1061. This additional nucleotide base alters the reading frame of the cDNA sequence, which extends the open reading frame an additional 525 nucleotides. Within the coding sequence, we observed the following heterogeneity among the cDNA clones. In clone 151265, nucleotides A484 through C489 are absent, resulting in deletion of serine 161 and glycine 162 in the translated protein. Clone 160622 has a guanosine deleted at position 7 in the coding sequence and a thymine inserted at position 479, resulting in an open reading frame from nucleotide 631 to nucleotide 1584. Comparison of the Human Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetase Amino Acid Sequence with Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetase from Other SpeciesIf the hypothesis
that tRNATyr recognition differs between eukaryotic and
bacterial tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases is correct, one would expect these
differences to be reflected in both the nucleotide sequences of
tRNATyr and the amino acid sequences of the tyrosyl-tRNA
synthetases. Comparison of tRNATyr sequences indicates that
in bacteria, tRNATyr is a type II tRNA, whereas in
eukaryotes tRNATyr is a type I tRNA (16, 17), supporting
the above hypothesis. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of
tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases further supports the above hypothesis. Human
tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is 53% identical at the amino acid level to
the S. cerevisiae homologue (excluding the carboxyl-terminal
domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase), 36% identical to the
homologue from the archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii, and
16% identical to the B. stearothermophilus homologue (Fig.
1). Notably, nine of the fifteen amino acids involved in
stabilizing the transition state for the first step of the reaction in
the B. stearothermophilus enzyme (11, 40, 41) are conserved
in the human, M. jannaschii, and S. cerevisiae
enzymes. In contrast, none of the eleven amino acids known to be
involved in tRNATyr recognition (42-47) are conserved
between the human and B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA
synthetases, suggesting that in contrast to the mechanism for formation
of the E·Tyr-AMP intermediate, tRNATyr
recognition differs between eukaryotes, archaea, and bacteria. This is
most apparent in the M. jannaschii amino acid sequence, which surprisingly is missing a substantial portion of the
tRNATyr anticodon recognition domain (amino acids 330-419
in the B. stearothermophilus enzyme).
Fig. 1. Alignment of deduced amino acid sequences for tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. Although only the sequences for tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase from human (H. sapiens), S. cerevisiae, M. jannaschii, and B. stearothermophilus are shown, the alignment shown is based on the ClustalW alignment of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase amino acid sequences from Homo sapiens, S. cerevisiae (cytoplasmic), M. jannaschii, B. stearothermophilus, E. coli, Hemophilus influenzae, and Thiobacillus ferrioxidans. Assignment of secondary structure is based on the structure of the B. stearothermophilus enzyme as determined by x-ray crystallography (10). Conserved amino acids are boxed, shaded regions indicate conserved amino acids that participate in tyrosyl-adenylate formation, and amino acids in boldface type indicate those amino acids in the B. stearothermophilus enzyme that are highly conserved in other bacterial homologues. [View Larger Version of this Image (90K GIF file)] Human Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetase Contains an EMAP II-like Domain FASTA and BLAST searches of the GenBankTM
nucleotide sequence data base identified proteins with significant
homology to the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA
synthetase. In particular, the EMAP II initially isolated from murine
fibrosarcoma cells (48), methionyl-tRNA synthetase from C. elegans (49), and the Arc1p protein from S. cerevisiae
(22) were found to be 49, 50, and 43% identical to the
carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase at the amino
acid sequence level (Fig. 2). In addition, the
carboxyl-terminal domains of methionyl-tRNA synthetases from bacterial
sources show more limited homologies to the carboxyl-terminal domain of
human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. The sequence similarities observed
between Arc1p, EMAP II, and the methionyl-tRNA synthetases have been
previously reported (50). Furthermore, EMAP II has recently been found
to be identical to the p18 protein component of the 24 S aminoacyl-tRNA
synthetase complex found in mammalian
cells.6
Fig. 2. Alignment of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase carboxyl-terminal domain homologues. Although only the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, human EMAP II, S. cerevisiae Arc1p, and C. elegans, E. coli, and H. influenzae methionyl-tRNA synthetase sequences are shown, the actual alignment of these sequences is based on a ClustalW alignment of the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (TyrRS), H. sapiens and Mus musculus endothelial monocyte-activating protein II (EMAP II), S. cerevisiae Arc1p (Arc1p), and the carboxyl-terminal domains of methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MetRS) from C. elegans, S. cerevisiae, Bacillus subtilis, B. stearothermophilus, T. ferrioxidans, E. coli, H. influenzae, and M. genitalium. [View Larger Version of this Image (46K GIF file)]
To quantify the similarity between the amino acid sequences for the carboxyl-terminal domains of the human tyrosyl- and methionyl-tRNA synthetases, we analyzed expressed sequence tags that have been putatively identified as the carboxyl-terminal domains of human methionyl-tRNA synthetase (I.M.A.G.E. clone accession numbers 33689, L1914, and 46655). The nucleotide sequence of the carboxyl-terminal domain of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase was 100% identical to a consensus sequence of these expressed sequence tags, suggesting that the ESTs have been incorrectly assigned due to the similarity of their sequences to the C. elegans methionyl-tRNA synthetase. The recent finding that, in contrast to the C. elegans enzyme, the human methionyl-tRNA synthetase does not have an EMAP II-like domain at its carboxyl terminus is consistent with this hypothesis. Expression of the Recombinant Human Tyrosyl-tRNA Synthetase in E. coliTo further characterize the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase,
the cDNA sequence from clone 186313 was subcloned into the pET-30a vector, and the resulting plasmid was designated pHYTS2. Recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase purified from BL21DE3 pLysS cells harboring pHYTS2 contains both a His-tag and an S-tag on its amino terminus (34, 51). SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the
recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase at various stages of
purification is shown in Fig. 3. Based on its mobility
on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, the recombinant protein has
an apparent molecular mass of approximately 65,500 Da. This is in good
agreement with the predicted molecular mass of 69,773 Da and previously
published molecular mass estimates for other mammalian tyrosyl-tRNA
synthetases (18, 52) and indicates that the carboxyl-terminal domain of the recombinant enzyme is translated in E. coli. Active site
titration confirms that the purified recombinant enzyme is active and
able to form the E·Tyr-AMP intermediate (data not
shown).
Fig. 3. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase expressed in E. coli. Lane A, molecular mass standards (shown in kDa on figure) myosin (200,000 Da), -galactosidase (116,250 Da),
phosphorylase B (97,400 Da), bovine serum albumin (66,200 Da),
ovalbumin (45,000 Da), and carbonic anhydrase (31,000 Da); lane
B, uninduced BL21 DE3 pLysS E. coli cells harboring the
pHYTS2 plasmid; lane C,
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside-induced BL21DE3 pLysS
E. coli cells harboring the pHYTS2 plasmid; lane D, recombinant human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase purified on Ni-NTA resin.
[View Larger Version of this Image (59K GIF file)]
To determine whether there are mechanistic differences in the way human
and bacterial tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases recognize and aminoacylate their
cognate tRNA substrates, tRNATyr substrates corresponding
to tRNATyr from B. stearothermophilus (35, 53)
and human placenta (54) were transcribed in vitro, gel
purified, and annealed. These tRNAs were used as substrates for
aminoacylation by human and B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. As shown in Fig. 4, recombinant
human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase fully aminoacylates the human
tRNATyr but fails to aminoacylate more than 10% of the
B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr during the time
course of the assay. This is in contrast to the recombinant B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, which fully
aminoacylates B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr but
fails to aminoacylate the human tRNATyr above background
levels.
Fig. 4. Aminoacylation kinetics of human and B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr. Dashed lines represent tyrosylation of human tRNATyr by the human ( )
and B. stearothermophilus ( ) tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases. Solid lines represent tyrosylation of B. stearothermophilus tRNATyr by human ( ) and B. stearothermophilus ( ) tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]
If the hypothesis that tRNATyr recognition differs between bacterial and eukaryotic tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases is correct, one would predict that these differences should show up in three different ways. First, the nucleotide sequences of the tRNATyr substrates should differ significantly between bacteria and eukaryotes. In this regard, tRNATyr is unique among tRNAs in that the nucleotide sequence of bacterial tRNATyr is a type II tRNA sequence, whereas eukaryotic tRNATyr substrates are type I tRNAs (16, 17). Differences in tRNATyr recognition should also be reflected in the amino acid sequences of bacterial and eukaryotic tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases. That this is the case is indicated by the observation that amino acids that are involved in tRNATyr recognition by B. stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase are not conserved in the human form of the enzyme. The observation that the KMSKS and HIGH signature sequences are aligned, as well as the conservation of nine amino acids involved in tyrosyl adenylate formation, indicates that the absence of conserved amino acids involved in tRNATyr recognition in the human enzyme has physiological relevance and is not the result of a faulty alignment of the sequences. Finally, the most definitive indication that tRNATyr recognition differs between bacteria and humans comes from the observation that the B. stearothermophilus and human enzymes are unable to aminoacylate each other's tRNATyr substrates. These results are in good agreement with previously published comparisons between bacterial and eukaryotic tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases (17-21). Similar species specificity has also been observed for several other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (55-59) and is consistent with the hypothesis that the recognition of tRNA by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases was still evolving after the divergence of bacteria and eukaryotes (39). The observation that tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase from the archaeon M. jannaschii lacks a substantial portion of the tRNA anticodon recognition domain suggests that the archaea may recognize and bind tRNATyr in a manner distinct from that found in both bacteria and eukaryotes. The absence of an EMAP II-like domain in tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases from S. cerevisiae and bacteria suggests that its appearance on the carboxyl terminus of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is the result of a relatively recent evolutionary event. The presence of a distantly related homologue of this domain in E. coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase suggests this EMAP II-like domain in tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is derived from the carboxyl-terminal domain of methionyl-tRNA synthetase, although it should be noted that the E. coli phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase also contains a distantly related homologue of the EMAP II-like domain in human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (22). In eukaryotes, homologues showing 43-50% sequence identity include the Arc1p protein from S. cerevisiae, EMAP II from human and mouse tissue, and methionyl-tRNA synthetase from C. elegans. The occurrence of this EMAP II-like domain in several different proteins that are either aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases or are associated with aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases in protein complexes suggests that these domains perform a common function in tRNA aminoacylation. The observation that Arc1p binds tRNA nonspecifically (22) is consistent with this hypothesis. In this regard it is interesting that for S. cerevisiae and humans the carboxyl-terminal EMAP II-like domain in methionyl-tRNA synthetase has been lost, and its function appears to have been replaced by Arc1p in S. cerevisiae and EMAP II in humans (EMAP II is identical to the p18 component of the 24 S aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex),6 both of which interact with more than one aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. The selective advantage of allowing multiple aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to have access to the EMAP II-like domain is reflected in the observation that replacement of the carboxyl-terminal domain by a separate protein occurred at least twice during the evolution of eukaryotic methionyl-tRNA synthetases since this domain is absent in the methionyl-tRNA synthetases from both S. cerevisiae and humans but is present in methionyl-tRNA synthetase from C. elegans (49, 60, 61). As discussed above, the homologous domains in human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, Arc1p, EMAP II, and C. elegans methionyl-tRNA synthetase may perform similar functions. The most thoroughly characterized of these proteins is Arc1p from S. cerevisiae. Arc1p was initially isolated using a synthetic lethal genetic screen to identify proteins that interact with components of the tRNA nuclear export machinery (22). Arc1p consists of three domains: an amino-terminal domain that binds the methionyl- and glutamyl-tRNA synthetases, a lysine- and alanine-rich central domain that is 34% identical to histone H1, and a carboxyl-terminal domain that is 54% identical to EMAP II and binds tRNA nonspecifically (22). Steady state kinetic analyses indicate that Arc1p increases the rate of methionyl-tRNA synthetase-catalyzed tRNAMet aminoacylation (22). Based on these observations, Simos et al. (22) postulated that Arc1p participates in directing tRNA to the active sites of the methionyl- and glutamyl-tRNA synthetases. It is likely that the carboxyl-terminal domain in human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase has a function similar to that of Arc1p namely directing tRNA to the active site of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase. This hypothesis is consistent with the observation that in mammalian cells tRNAs are not free to diffuse in the cytoplasm but appear to be "channeled" by the translation machinery (62, 63). While it is likely that both the carboxyl-terminal domain of human
tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase and the EMAP II protein participate in
directing tRNA to the active sites of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, the
ability of the EMAP II protein to induce cell migration, tissue factor
activity, and cell surface expression of P- and E-selectins in
endothelial cells, as well as its ability to induce mRNA synthesis of tumor necrosis factor A third possible function for the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is as a mediator of protein-protein interactions. In E. coli methionyl-tRNA synthetase, the carboxyl-terminal domain is responsible for dimerization of the enzyme (65). Although these carboxyl-terminal domains are distantly related to the carboxyl-terminal domain of human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase, the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase presumably dimerizes through the Rossmann fold domain, as is the case for the B. stearothermophilus enzyme (10, 38). In addition, purification of tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase from porcine and rabbit tissue (18, 52) indicates that in mammalian cells this enzyme is not part of a larger multiprotein complex, suggesting that it does not form strong protein-protein interactions in vivo. Sequence analysis of the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase coding sequence has revealed the existence of a novel carboxyl-terminal domain that is not present in previously sequenced tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases from other organisms. The similarity of this domain to the amino acid sequences of the carboxyl-terminal domains of C. elegans methionyl-tRNA synthetase, the Arc1p protein, and EMAP II suggests that in the human tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase this domain may be involved in directing tRNA to the active site of the enzyme, thereby facilitating the aminoacylation of tRNATyr. The validity of this hypothesis is currently being determined. * This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant GM53693-01 and grants from the Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana, and the Center for Excellence in Cancer Research at Louisiana State University Medical Center-Shreveport.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) U89436[GenBank].
These authors contributed equally to this research.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 318-675-7779; Fax: 318-675-5180; E-mail: efirst{at}lsumc.edu. 1 The abbreviations used are: EMAP II, endothelial monocyte-activating protein II; Ni-NTA, nickel-nitriloacetic acid. 2 The first seven primers are complementary to the antisense strand of the cDNA, and the remaining six primers are complementary to the sense strand; positions of the 3 ends of each
primer relative to the ATG start codon are indicated in parentheses
following the primer; all primers except HYTS Exp Fwd and HYTS Exp Rvs
are 18 to 21 nucleotides in length.
3 Clone numbers refer to either the TIGR or I.M.A.G.E. Consortium accession numbers; clone source and tissues used to construct the cDNA libraries are shown in parentheses following the clone number. 4 The sequences of the initial clones we received bearing these accession numbers did not correspond to their expressed sequence tag sequences. We subsequently obtained the correct clones bearing these accession numbers from ATCC. TIGR and ATCC have since withdrawn these clones from their inventory of publicly available clones. 5 C. L. Quinn, GenBankTM accession number U40714[GenBank]. 6 M. Mirande, personal communication. We thank Alan R. Fersht for the pYTS5 and pGAG2 clones, The Institute for Genome Research and the I.M.A.G.E. Consortium for cDNA clones, Dr. Peter Good for assistance and advice in searching sequence data bases and performing sequence alignments, the DNA Sequencing Facility at Iowa State University for performing the automated DNA sequencing, and the organizers of the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center Nucleic Acid and Protein Sequence Analysis Workshop for Biomedical Researchers for training in sequence analysis.
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||