|
Volume 272, Number 29,
Issue of July 18, 1997
pp. 18140-18146
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Membrane Potential-generating Malate (MleP) and Citrate (CitP)
Transporters of Lactic Acid Bacteria Are Homologous Proteins
SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY OF THE 2-HYDROXYCARBOXYLATE TRANSPORTER
FAMILY*
(Received for publication, March 25, 1997, and in revised form, May 22, 1997)
Michael
Bandell
,
Virginie
Ansanay
§,
Najma
Rachidi
§,
Sylvie
Dequin
§ and
Juke S.
Lolkema
¶
From the Department of Microbiology, Groningen
Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences Institute, University of
Groningen, 9751NN Haren, The Netherlands and the
§ Laboratoire de Microbiologie et Technologie des
Fermentations, Institut des Produits de la Vigne, INRA, 2 Place Viala,
F-34060 Montpellier Cedex 1, France
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Membrane potential generation via malate/lactate
exchange catalyzed by the malate carrier (MleP) of Lactococcus
lactis, together with the generation of a pH gradient via
decarboxylation of malate to lactate in the cytoplasm, is a typical
example of a secondary proton motive force-generating system. The
mleP gene was cloned, sequenced, and expressed in a
malolactic fermentation-deficient L. lactis strain.
Functional analysis revealed the same properties as observed in
membrane vesicles of a malolactic fermentation-positive strain. MleP
belongs to a family of secondary transporters in which the citrate
carriers from Leuconostoc mesenteroides (CitP) and
Klebsiella pneumoniae (CitS) are found also. CitP, but not CitS, is also involved in membrane potential generation via
electrogenic citrate/lactate exchange. MleP, CitP, and CitS were
analyzed for their substrate specificity. The 2-hydroxycarboxylate
motif R1R2COHCOOH, common to the physiological
substrates, was found to be essential for transport although some
2-oxocarboxylates could be transported to a lesser extent. Clear
differences in substrate specificity among the transporters were
observed because of different tolerances toward the R substituents at
the C2 atom. Both MleP and CitP transport a broad range of
2-hydroxycarboxylates with R substituents ranging in size from two
hydrogen atoms (glycolate) to acetyl and methyl groups (citromalate)
for MleP and two acetyl groups (citrate) for CitP. CitS was much less
tolerant and transported only citrate and at a low rate citromalate.
The substrate specificities are discussed in the context of the
physiological function of the transporters.
INTRODUCTION
The electrochemical gradient of protons across the cytoplasmic
membrane is a major store of free energy in the bacterial cell. Usually, the proton motive force (pmf)1 is
generated by translocation of protons against the gradient across the
cell membrane which results in the two components of the pmf, a
membrane potential and a pH gradient. Proton pumping is catalyzed by
primary transport systems at the expense of some source of chemical
energy or light. In certain anaerobes a different mechanism of pmf
generation has evolved which involves the action of secondary
transporters rather than primary ion pumps and, therefore, is termed
secondary pmf generation (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2). An example
of such a system is the malolactic fermentation pathway found in
several lactic acid bacteria (3-5). In Lactococcus lactis
the uptake of divalent malate is coupled to the exit of its
decarboxylation product, monovalent lactate (precursor/product exchange), which leads to the formation of a membrane potential of
physiological polarity. Furthermore, the intracellular decarboxylation of malate catalyzed by malolactic enzyme consumes a cytosolic proton
which results in a pH gradient over the cell membrane. The combined
activities of electrogenic exchange and proton-consuming decarboxylation result in a pmf that is sufficiently high to drive ATP
synthesis via the F0F1-ATPase (3). Similar
pathways have been described for a number of other substrates (6-8).
Recently, a more complex system termed citrolactic fermentation was
found in Leuconostoc mesenteroides, another lactic acid
bacterium. Similar to the malolactic fermentation pathway a secondary
transporter catalyzes the uptake of divalent citrate in exchange for
monovalent lactate, but the pathway in the cytosol converting citrate
into lactate requires three different enzymes and is coupled to glucose metabolism (9, 10).
The membrane potential-generating secondary transporters involved in
malolactic fermentation and citrolactic fermentation, MleP and CitP,
respectively, differ from "usual" secondary transporters in two
aspects: (i) they translocate net negative charge across the membrane,
and (ii) they catalyze efficient heterologous exchange of two
structurally related substrates (the precursor and the product).
Functionally, MleP and CitP are quite similar because lactate is a
substrate of both, and, moreover, it was shown that malate is a
substrate of CitP as well (9). The structural gene coding for CitP was
cloned from different organisms (11, 12) and shown to be homologous to
the Na+-dependent citrate carrier CitS of
Klebsiella pneumoniae (13). CitS is a usual secondary
transporter driven by the pmf and sodium ion motive force (14-16).
Recently, CitS was shown to represent a new structural class of
secondary transporters with a nine-helix bundle motif (17).
Here, we report the cloning and sequencing of the mleP gene
coding for the malate transporter of L. lactis which is
involved in malolactic fermentation. In line with the functional
similarities of MleP and CitP the gene was found to be homologous to
the citP and citS genes. The three proteins are
part of a family of secondary transporters in which both metabolic
energy-dissipating (CitS) and -generating (CitP and MleP) members are
found. Essential for MleP and CitP is the ability to transport two
differently charged but structurally related molecules, which suggests
a wide substrate specificity. It is shown that a broad range of
2-hydroxycarboxylates can be transported by members of the family. In
line with its physiological function, the substrate specificity of CitS
is much more restricted than observed for the two precursor/product
exchangers.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions
L. lactis strains IL1403 and IL1441 are wild type
malate-fermenting strains; strains MG1363 and LL108 do not ferment
malate. Strain IL1441 is a streptomycin-resistant derivative of IL1403 (18). Strain LL108, kindly provided by K. Leenhouts, is a
chloramphenicol-resistant derivative of MG1363 with multiple copies of
the repA gene inserted in its chromosome which results in an
increase in plasmid copy number (19). L. lactis NCDO176 is a
wild type citrate-fermenting strain obtained from the Dutch Institute
of Dairy Research (Ede, The Netherlands). The L. lactis
strains were grown in closed serum bottles without shaking in M17 broth
(Difco) supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) glucose and at 30 °C.
Concentrations of 5 µg/ml erythromycin and 5 µg/ml chloramphenicol
were used when indicated. L. mesenteroides ssp.
mesenteroides 19D was grown at 30 °C in MRS medium
without acetate and Tween and with 0.5% ammonium citrate (20).
Escherichia coli strains DH5 , BL21(DE3), and MC1061 were
grown aerobically at 37 °C in Luria broth supplemented with 100 µg/ml carbenicillin or 10 µg/ml chloramphenicol when indicated.
Recombinant DNA Techniques
Standard DNA manipulation techniques were carried out
essentially as described by Sambrook et al. (21). L. lactis genomic DNA was isolated as described by Simon et
al. (22). L. lactis and L. mesenteroides
plasmid DNA was isolated as described by Leenhouts et al.
(23). L. lactis was transformed by electroporation as
described by Holo and Nes (24). For sequencing, plasmids were
transformed to and propagated in E. coli DH5 . Nucleotide sequences were determined on a Vistra 725 or Applied Biosystems 373A
automated sequencer.
Cloning and Sequencing of the mleP Gene
Plasmid p153A has been described before (25) and was shown to
contain mleS encoding malolactic enzyme and the 5 part of a
second open reading frame ORF2, presumably mleP encoding the malate transporter. A 3-kb fragment obtained by BamHI
digestion of chromosomal DNA isolated from L. lactis IL1441
overlapped with the insert in p153A. The fragment was cloned into the
unique BamHI restriction site of plasmid pUC18 (26) yielding
p191A. Unidirectional sets of nested deletions of p191A were
constructed using exonuclease III (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). Truncated
fragments were sequenced using vector-specific primers after which
internal primers were designed to sequence the remaining regions of
each strand. The insert contained the first 1,068 base pairs of ORF2.
To clone the missing 3 end of ORF2, an
EcoRI/BamHI fragment of p191A containing the
final 900 base pairs of the ORF2 fragment was used to probe a
HindIII digest of chromosomal DNA. The sequence of a 2.5-kb fragment that hybridized with the probe was determined using inversed polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Genomic DNA of L. lactis
IL1441 digested with HindIII was ligated with T4 DNA ligase
under conditions that favored the formation of monomeric circles. The
circular fragments were used as a template for a PCR using
oligonucleotides based on the sequence of the
EcoRI/BamHI fragment of p191A. The primer
sequences were 5 -TGGCAGGTATTGGTCTTG-3 and 5 -CCATACCACCTGACATCAT-3 . A 2-kb fragment presenting a head to tail structure was amplified and
cloned into pGEM-T (Invitrogen) to give vector pPNJ. The missing 0.4-kb
fragment of ORF2 on pPNJ was sequenced on both strands. ORF2 was
amplified from genomic DNA using a forward primer based on the sequence
of p153A (5 -ATCTCGAGATGAAAAAACTTAAAGAA-3 ) and a reverse primer based
on the sequence of pPNJ (5 -GATAGGCGATATAGTCCC-3 ) and ligated into
pGEM-T, yielding pPME. The sequence of ORF2 reconstructed from all of
the fragments was confirmed by sequencing one strand of the pPME
insert.
Construction of Expression Vectors
An expression vector was constructed containing a promoter
region that is located in front of the citP gene on the
7.9-kb plasmid of L. lactis NCDO176 (27). The 1,572-base
pair region was amplified from the plasmid by PCR. The forward primer,
5 -GCTTAGAATTCCTTGCTATCAGTATGTC-3 , introduced
an EcoRI restriction site in the fragment. The reverse primer,
5 -GGTGGATCCACATGTTTCTATCTCCATTTATATC-3 ,
overlapped with the citP start codon and introduced a unique
AflIII site (ACATGT) around the start codon and a
BamHI site at the end. Bases introducing mutations are
underlined, and the start codon is indicated in bold. The PCR product
was digested with EcoRI and BamHI and ligated
into plasmid pGK13 (28) digested with the same enzymes. The resulting
plasmid pMB contains the L. lactis citP promoter region
followed by a ribosomal binding site and an AflIII
restriction site around the start codon. Downstream of the
AflIII restriction site a number of unique restriction sites
are present for cloning purposes.
The gene coding for the malate transporter mleP was
amplified by PCR from chromosomal DNA isolated from L. lactis IL1403. The forward primer,
5 -TCTTAATCCATGGGAAAAAAACTTAAAGAAACGAAAATATCGG-3 , generated an NcoI site around the start codon, and the
reverse primer,
5 -TGCTCTAGATTACGCGTATACAAAGAATCGGATAAGAATTCCACC-3 , generated an XbaI site downstream of the stop codon.
Start and stop codons are indicated in bold. Similarly, the gene coding for the citrate transporter citP was amplified from an
endogenous plasmid preparation of L. mesenteroides while
creating unique NcoI and XbaI restriction sites
around the start codon and downstream of the stop codon, respectively.
The forward primer was
5 -GATAGAACCATGGTGAATCACCCGCATTC-3 and the reverse primer
5 -CTTTAAATATCTAGATTACTTCATG-3 . The amplified
fragments were digested with NcoI and XbaI and
ligated into the AflIII and NheI sites of pMB
which have compatible overhangs. The resulting vectors
pMBmleP and pMBcitP code for mleP and
citP under control of the citP promoter. In case
of MleP, the cloning procedure resulted in a Gly insertion after
position 1, and the COOH-terminal Tyr residue was replaced by
Val-Tyr-Ala. In CitP Met2 was replaced by Val. The sequence of the
inserts was confirmed by automated sequencing.
Preparation of Membrane Vesicles and Hybrid Membranes
Cells of L. lactis MG1363 or LL108 expressing either
MleP or CitP were harvested at the end of the exponential growth phase at an A660 of 0.8, washed with 50 mM
potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, resuspended in the same buffer at an
A660 of 500, and subsequently rapidly frozen in
liquid nitrogen until use. Rightside-out membrane vesicles were
prepared by the osmotic shock lysis procedure essentially as described
by Otto et al. (29). The membranes were fused to liposomes
or to proteoliposomes containing beef heart cytochrome c
oxidase (COVs) essentially as described by Driessen et al.
(30). Liposomes consisted of a mixture of purified E. coli
lipids and egg yolk phosphatidylcholine at a ratio of 3:1. E. coli lipids were purified by successive washing of an E. coli extract (Avanti Polar Lipids) with acetone and diethyl ether,
after which the concentration was determined as described by Driessen
et al. (31). Cytochrome c oxidase isolated from
beef heart mitochondria was reconstituted into liposomes by detergent
dialysis. Liposomes or COVs were fused with the membrane vesicles of
L. lactis at a ratio of 10 mg of lipid and 1 mg of protein
by a single freeze/thaw step (30). The buffer contained 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6. In case of fusion with
liposomes 5 mM L-malate or citrate was included
in the buffer to load the vesicles. The resulting hybrid membranes were
made unilamellar by subsequent extrusion through 400- and 200-nm pore
size polycarbonate filters (32). Hybrid membranes were concentrated by
ultracentrifugation at 250,000 × g for 20 min at
10 °C.
Rightside-out membrane vesicles of E. coli strain BL21(DE3)
expressing CitS from pSK LcitS (17) were prepared by the
osmotic lysis procedure essentially as described by Kaback (33) with the following modification. Spheroplasts were lysed in 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7, containing 5 mM
potassium citrate to load the vesicles with citrate. All subsequent
steps were done in the presence of 5 mM potassium citrate.
Before use the membrane vesicles were washed once in 15 volumes of
potassium phosphate, pH 6, containing 5 mM citrate and
appropriate concentrations NaCl and KCl and concentrated by
centrifugation for 20 min in a Eppendorf tabletop centrifuge operated
at full speed. Protein concentrations were determined as described by
Lowry et al. (34).
Transport Assays
Pmf-driven Uptake in Hybrid Membranes
The experiments were
performed in 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.0, under a
flow of water saturated air and continuous stirring at 30 °C.
Membrane vesicles fused with COVs were incubated for 1 min in the
presence of 200 µM TMPD, 20 µM cytochrome
c (horse heart, Sigma), and 10 mM potassium
ascorbate. The assay volume was 100 µl and the membrane protein
concentration 0.6-0.8 mg/ml. Valinomycin and nigericin were used at
concentrations of 1 µM and 0.5 µM,
respectively. L-[1,4(2,3)14C]malate or
[1,5-14C]citrate was added at a concentration of 13.1 or
4.4 µM, respectively. Uptake was stopped at different
time intervals by adding 2 ml of ice-cold 0.1 M LiCl to a
sample and rapid filtration over 0.45-µm pore size cellulose nitrate
filters (Schleicher & Schuell). Filters were rinsed once with 2 ml of
ice-cold 0.1 M LiCl and transferred to scintillation vials,
and the internalized radioactivity was determined.
Exchange in Membrane Vesicles
Membrane vesicles of L. lactis LL108 fused to liposomes and E. coli
rightside-out membrane vesicles preloaded with 5 mM
L-malate or citrate were concentrated by centrifugation.
Strain LL108 was used for this assay because of the higher expression
of MleP and CitP in this strain. Concentrated hybrid membranes were
incubated in 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6, with 50 µM nigericin with 72.5 µM
[1,5-14C]citrate or 186.7 µM
L[1,4(2,3)14C]malate for 30 min at room temperature. When
indicated, 100 µM valinomycin or 100 mM KSCN
was present in the assay mixture. Similarly, the concentrated E. coli membranes were incubated in 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6, in the presence of 100 µM valinomycin
and 50 µM nigericin with 217.5 µM
[1,5-14C]citrate and the appropriate concentrations of
NaCl and KCl for 2 h. Aliquots of 2 µl were diluted 100-fold
into buffer of 20 C containing various substrates at a concentration of
5 mM. The buffer contained 100 mM KCl in the
case the membranes where preloaded with KSCN. Final membrane protein
concentrations in the assays were 0.1-0.15 mg/ml and 0.23 mg/ml for
L. lactis hybrid membranes and E. coli membranes,
respectively. Samples were stopped and processed as described above.
The data were fitted to an exponential decay. Within one set of
experiments, the zero time point was determined from the curve
representing efflux which is slow enough to allow a linear back
extrapolation. The infinite time point was estimated from curves
representing rapid exchange, usually homologous exchange.
Chemicals
[1,5-14C]Citrate (115 mCi/mmol) and
L-[1,4(2, 3)14C]malate (51 mCi/mmol) were
obtained from Amersham International (Buckinghamshire, U. K.).
Oligonucleotides were obtained from Eurosequence (Groningen, The
Netherlands) and from Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium). All other compounds were obtained from commercial sources.
RESULTS
Cloning and Sequencing of mleP
In a previous paper the
cloning and sequencing were reported for the gene mleS
encoding malolactic enzyme, the decarboxylase in the malolactic
fermentation pathway of L. lactis (25). One of the clones
contained the 5 end of a second ORF starting 15 base pairs downstream
of the stop codon of mleS. It was suggested that this ORF
would be mleP coding for the malate transporter, the second
protein of the pathway. The complete second reading frame, 1,278 base
pairs in length, was cloned as described under "Experimental
Procedures," and the nucleotide sequence was determined. A putative
Shine-Dalgarno sequence AAGG is found 16 nucleotides upstream of the
start codon (ATG). The stop codon (TAA) is followed closely by an
inverted repeat that has features typical of a putative rho-independent
transcription termination signal (35). This organization suggests that
the two genes are organized in an operon. To verify this, total RNA was
isolated from L. lactis IL1441 grown in medium on glucose
with and without additional malate. Malolactic enzyme coded by
mleS is an inducible enzyme (18). The results demonstrated
that in malate-grown cells a single transcript of approximately 3 kb
hybridized with a probe specific for mleP and with plasmid
p191A containing mleS and a 5 fragment of mleP. No band was detected when malate was omitted from the growth medium (not shown). The mleP sequence is available under accession
number X75982.
Analysis of the deduced MleP amino acid sequence reveals a hydrophobic
protein of 425 amino acid residues with a predicted mass of 46.7 kDa.
Screening of the available data bases showed that the protein revealed
homology to the citrate transporters of lactic acid bacteria (CitPs)
and to the Na+-dependent citrate carriers of
K. pneumoniae (CitS), Salmonella pullorum (CitC),
and Salmonella dublin (CitC). Like the lactococcal CitPs,
the Na+-dependent transporters form a group of
proteins with almost identical primary sequences (>95%). The
alignment of MleP with representative sequences from these two groups
is shown in Fig. 1. MleP is most similar to CitP with
48% identical residues and shares 30% sequence identity with CitS.
Overall, the alignment shows 86 (19%) conserved residues with an
additional 85 similar residues. A glycine-rich region around residue
175 in MleP and approximately the COOH-terminal 60 residues are the
most conserved regions in the family. Fig. 2 shows the
hydropathy profiles of the individual members (thin lines)
and the average profile of the family (bold). The profiles are remarkably similar, indicative of the same global structure.
Fig. 1.
Alignment of the primary sequences of MleP,
CitP, and CitS. Identical residues are printed in gray
boxes. Residues conserved in all three transporters are indicated
by an asterisk. Putative transmembrane segments (17) are
indicated by bars.
[View Larger Version of this Image (67K GIF file)]
Fig. 2.
Hydropathy profile of MleP, CitP, and
CitS. The individual profiles (thin) and average
profile (bold) were calculated with a window of 21 residues
and the normalized hydrophobicity scale of Kyte (42). Putative
transmembrane segments are indicated by bars (17).
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
Functional Expression of MleP
To determine whether the cloned
gene identified as mleP is the malate transport protein
involved in malolactic fermentation, the gene was expressed in L. lactis MG1363 and LL108, strains not able to ferment malate.
Cytoplasmic membranes with a rightside-out orientation prepared from
L. lactis MG1363 harboring pMBmleP (see "Experimental Procedures") were fused to proteoliposomes
reconstituted with purified beef heart cytochrome c oxidase
(COVs) as a pmf-generating system. In these hybrid membranes a pmf
(inside negative and alkaline relative to the outside) is generated in
the presence of the electron donor system potassium ascorbate, TMPD,
and cytochrome c. In the presence of a pmf the hybrid
membranes took up a low but significant amount of
[14C]malate (Fig. 3A, ).
Control experiments with hybrid membranes prepared from membrane
vesicles of strain MG1363 without pMBmleP showed no uptake
under identical conditions (not shown). Therefore, the product of the
mleP gene is a malate transporter. The pmf generated by
cytochrome c oxidation is composed of a membrane potential
( ) and a pH gradient ( pH). The role of each component of the
pmf in driving [14C]malate uptake was investigated by
manipulating pH and  with the ionophores nigericin, a
K+/H+ antiporter, and valinomycin, a
K+ pore. In the presence of nigericin, when the pmf
consists solely of a membrane potential, no uptake was observed,
indicating that the membrane potential is not a driving force for
malate transport ( ). On the other hand, in the presence of
valinomycin, when the pmf is composed solely of a pH gradient, a strong
stimulation of malate uptake was observed, indicating that the membrane
potential counteracts malate transport ( ) and that net negative
charge is translocated across the membrane during turnover.
Fig. 3.
Malate uptake in the presence of a pmf
(panel A) and exchange (panels B and
C) catalyzed by MleP. Panel A, malate (13.1 µM) uptake by membrane vesicles of
MG1363/pMBmleP fused with COVs was assayed in the presence
of the electron donor system cytochrome c/TMPD/potassium
ascorbate. , no ionophores; , valinomycin; and , nigericin.
Panels B and C, membrane vesicles of L. lactis LL108 expressing MleP, fused with liposomes were preloaded
with 5 mM L[14C]malate with (panel
C) and without (panel B) 100 mM KSCN and subsequently diluted 100-fold into buffer containing 5 mM
lactate ( ), malate ( ), or no additions ( ). Valinomycin
(panel B) and nigericin (panels B and
C) were present at 1 and 0.5 µM,
respectively.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]
A second important feature of the malate carrier involved in malolactic
fermentation is the physiological mode of transport, i.e.
heterologous malate/lactate exchange (3). Rightside-out membrane
vesicles of L. lactis LL108 harboring pMBmleP
were fused with liposomes and preloaded with 5 mM
L-[14C]malate. 100-fold dilution of the
membranes in buffer did not result in significant release of label
within the first 40 s, indicating that efflux of malate down a
concentration gradient is a slow process (Fig. 3B, ). In
contrast, dilution of the preloaded membranes in buffer containing an
equimolar concentration of unlabeled malate resulted in rapid release
of internal labeled malate, indicative of rapid homologous exchange
( ). Most importantly, the same rapid release of label was observed
upon dilution into buffer containing an equimolar concentration of
lactate ( ). To prevent the formation of pH or  which would
counteract efflux, the ionophores valinomycin and nigericin were
included in these experiments. Preloading of the membranes with the
membrane permeable ion SCN results in the generation of a
diffusion potential, negative outside, upon dilution when valinomycin
is omitted from the assay mixture. The diffusion potential
significantly inhibited malate/lactate exchange whereas malate/malate
exchange was not affected (Fig. 3C) showing that
heterologous exchange is electrogenic. The results are consistent with
those found for malate transport in membrane vesicles of the wild type
malate-fermenting L. lactis IL1403 (3) showing that the
mleP gene product is the malate transporter involved in
malolactic fermentation.
Substrate Specificity of MleP, CitP, and CitS
The
heterologous exchange assay demonstrated in Fig. 3B provides
a sensitive and unambiguous assay for the substrate specificity of a
transporter in general and was used to determine the substrate specificity of MleP and the two other representatives of the family, CitP of L. mesenteroides and CitS of K. pneumoniae. To use the assay it is essential that efflux is much
slower than exchange. This condition is a property of precursor/product
exchangers (2) and has also been demonstrated for CitP (9). In case of
CitS, conditions of rapid exchange/slow efflux were sought by varying the concentration of the symported Na+ ion (Fig.
4). With no additional Na+ added, efflux and
exchange in rightside-out membrane vesicles of E. coli
BL21(DE3) harboring plasmid pSK lcitS (17) were observed at comparable rates. Since no effort was made to work "sodium free"
the observed activities are most likely caused by sodium ion
contaminations in the buffer (15). Addition of 1 mM
Na+ increased both the rate of efflux and exchange.
However, at 75 mM added Na+ the rate of
exchange increased further, but the rate of efflux decreased. This
behavior is typical for a solute/co-ion symporter (36). The latter
condition was used for the substrate specificity assay.
Fig. 4.
Effect of the sodium ion concentration on
homologous exchange and efflux catalyzed by CitS. RSO membrane
vesicles of E. coli BL21(DE3) expressing CitS were preloaded
with 5 mM [14C]citrate and with no further
additions (panel A), with 1 mM NaCl (panel
B), and with 75 mM NaCl (panel C). The
Cl concentration was kept constant by adding compensating
amounts of KCl. The membranes were diluted 100-fold into buffer
containing the same NaCl and KCl concentrations, in the presence ( )
or the absence ( ) of 5 mM citrate. Valinomycin and
nigericin were present at 1 and 0.5 µM,
respectively.
[View Larger Version of this Image (12K GIF file)]
From previous studies it was known that MleP transports both malate and
lactate, CitP transports citrate, lactate, and malate (9), whereas for
CitS no substrate other than citrate has been reported. These
substrates all share the 2-hydroxycarboxylate motive,
R1R2COHCOO . The effect of the
R1 and R2 groups, the hydroxyl group, and the
carboxylate group on the ability of the three transporters to
translocate the substrates was investigated subsequently.
The R Substituents
Nine different 2-hydroxycarboxylates with
R substituents which differ both in size and polarity were included in
the assay. The results are summarized in Table I. The
main conclusion is that CitS is very specific, transporting only
citrate and to a low extent citromalate, whereas MleP and CitP
transport a wide variety of these substrates. MleP has a preference for
the smaller substrates, whereas CitP seems to prefer the larger
molecules. In contrast to CitP, MleP does not transport citrate and
only poorly citromalate, whereas CitP even transports isocitrate, which has the largest substituent, at a low but significant rate. At the
other end of the spectrum, glycolate is a good substrate of MleP and a
poor substrate of CitP. No clear discrimination is evident between
substituents with a polar and a hydrophobic character.
The Hydroxyl Group
A set of compounds was selected in which
the hydroxyl group of one of the transported substrates listed in Table
I was replaced by another substituent. In line with the high
specificity of CitS reported above, none of these compounds was
transported by CitS (Table II). Substrates in which the
hydroxyl group is replaced by a hydrogen atom are not transported.
Similarly, the hydroxyl cannot be replaced by an amino group.
Replacement of the hydroxyl group by a keto group resulted in
significant transport in the case of oxaloacetate, especially by MleP.
This transporter could also transport glyoxylate, the 2-oxo analog of
glycolate, at a significant rate, whereas the rate catalyzed by CitP
was very low but significant. The latter was also observed for
pyruvate, the 2-oxocarboxylate analog of lactate, for both MleP and
CitP. The position of the hydroxyl group relative to the caboxylate group was investigated by comparing 2-hydroxybutyrate and
3-hydroxybutyrate. A low but significant transport activity with the
latter substrate was observed with CitP but not with MleP. In
conclusion, MleP and CitP have the highest activity with
2-hydroxycarboxylates, but significant activity is observed with
some 2-oxocarboxylates and in case of CitP even a
3-hydroxycarboxylate.
Table II.
Effect of OH substituents on the ability of MleP, CitP, and CitS to
transport a substrate
Details are in the legend to Table I.
|
| Substrate |
OH
substituent |
Relative rate of exchange
|
| MleP |
CitP |
CitS |
|
|
|
%
|
| Citrate |
OH |
0.5
± 0.3 |
100 ± 8 |
100 ± 6 |
| Tricarballate |
H |
1.0
± 0.2 |
2.2 ± 0.7 |
1.0 ± 0.1
|
| Malate |
OH |
100 ± 8 |
142 ± 6 |
1.6
± 0.8 |
| Succinate |
H |
0.4 ± 0.1 |
0.5 ± 0.3 |
1.0
± 0.5 |
| Oxaloacetate |
O |
27 ± 4 |
14 ± 1 |
1.5
± 0.8 |
| Aspartate |
NH3+ |
0.7 ± 0.3 |
1.3
± 0.3 |
0.8 ± 0.5 |
| Lactate |
OH |
91
± 14 |
36 ± 1 |
1.7 ± 0.5 |
| Propionate |
H |
0.5
± 0.1 |
0.7 ± 0.3 |
1.3 ± 0.4 |
| Pyruvate |
O |
1.2
± 0.3 |
4.2 ± 0.7 |
1.9 ± 0.8
|
| Alanine |
NH3+ |
0.6 ± 0.2 |
0.6
± 0.2 |
0.7 ± 0.4 |
| Glycolate |
OH |
26
± 8 |
3.3 ± 0.5 |
1.7 ± 0.8 |
| Acetate |
H |
0.5
± 0.3 |
0.3 ± 0.2 |
1.0 ± 0.5 |
| Glyoxylate |
O |
13
± 2 |
2.2 ± 0.2 |
0.9 ± 0.5
|
| Glycine |
NH3+ |
0.7 ± 0.3 |
1.1
± 0.3 |
0.9 ± 0.5 |
| 2-Hydroxybutyrate |
OH on
C2 |
15 ± 3 |
54 ± 1 |
1.3 ± 0.4
|
| 3-Hydroxybutyrate |
OH on C3 |
1.1 ± 0.5 |
3.9
± 0.2 |
1.5 ± 0.6 |
| None |
|
0.5
± 0.3 |
1.0 ± 0.5 |
1.0 ± 0.6 |
|
The Carboxylate Group
Three different analogs of lactate with
different substituents replacing the carboxylate group were tested in
the exchange assay (Table III). A common feature of the
analogs 1,2-propanediol, methyllactate, and glyceraldehyde is that the
charge of the carboxylate is removed. In addition to the aldehyde group
replacing the carboxylate, glyceraldehyde has a hydroxyl group at the
C3 position. This might have an additional effect on the suitability as
a substrate, but, on the other hand, tartrate, an analog of malate, has
the same feature and is transported both by MleP and CitP (Table I).
None of the analogs was transported by any of the transporters,
emphasizing the relevance of the carboxylate group in the motif.
DISCUSSION
Secondary pmf-generating pathways were discovered only in the last
decade. Oxalate decarboxylation in Oxalobacter formigenes and malolactic fermentation in L. lactis were the first
systems described in detail (3, 6). Both pathways consist of only two
enzymes, a secondary transporter and a cytoplasmic decarboxylase. The
secondary transporters that take up the substrate in exchange for the
decarboxylation product (precursor/product exchange) and, thereby,
generate the membrane potential play a central role in the pathways.
Recently, the structural gene coding for the oxalate/formate exchanger
OxlT of O. formigenes was cloned and sequenced (37). Here,
we report the cloning and sequencing of MleP, the malate/lactate exchanger of L. lactis. The cloned gene was expressed in the
malolactic fermentation-negative L. lactis strains MG1363
and LL108. Functional characterization in membrane vesicles derived
from these cells showed that the gene product conferred the same
transport characteristics as was observed before in membrane vesicles
of the malate-fermenting wild type strain IL1403 (3). The cloned
transporter catalyzed efficient heterologous malate/lactate exchange,
and unidirectional uptake into the membranes was counteracted by the
membrane potential.
The mleP gene of L. lactis is not homologous to
the oxlT gene of O. formigenes, indicating that
genes coding for membrane potential-generating secondary transporters
do not form a separate gene family. MleP was found to be homologous to
the membrane potential-generating citrate transporter CitP of lactic
acid bacteria and the Na+-dependent citrate
transporters CitS (13) and CitC (38) of K. pneumoniae and
Salmonella species. The homology to CitS and CitC which are
metabolic energy-dissipating transporters suggests that MleP and CitP,
and membrane potential-generating secondary transporters in general,
are conventional secondary transporters. The membrane topology of CitS
was recently reported to be quite different from the transmembrane
12-helix motif usually observed for secondary transporters (17). CitS
traverses the membrane 9 times (the bars in Fig. 1) with a
cytoplasmic amino terminus and a periplasmic carboxyl terminus. The
sequence homology and the highly conserved hydropathy profile of the
members in the family strongly suggest that MleP and CitP fold in a
similar fashion in the membrane. In this structural model the two most
conserved regions in the alignment shown in Fig. 1 are located in the
periplasmic loop between helices V and VI and the cytoplasmic loop
preceding the COOH-terminal helix IX. The alignment shows 6 conserved
positively charged amino acid residues of which only Arg-407 (MleP
numbering) is predicted to be located in the membrane, in putative
helix IX. Since MleP, CitP, and CitS transport negatively charged
substrates this Arg residue could play a role in substrate binding
and/or transport.
Previous studies had shown that MleP, CitP, and CitS transport one or
more of the structurally related substrates citrate, malate, and
lactate (3, 9, 14), and it was noted that these substrates all contain
the motif R1R2COHCOO (9). In the
present study the importance of the hydroxyl and carboxylate groups of
the substrates was investigated. None of a limited number of lactate
analogs in which the carboxylate group was methylated or replaced by an
hydroxyl or aldehyde group could be translocated by any of the
transporters. This suggests that the carboxylate and possibly the
negative charge of this group are essential. A larger number of analogs
showed that replacement of the hydroxyl group by a hydrogen atom or an
amino group completely abolished transport activity (Table II).
However, replacement by a keto group resulted to some extent in
activity with MleP and CitP, especially with oxaloacetate. Moving the
hydroxyl to the C3 position resulted in a low transport activity by
CitP. Possibly, hydrogen bonding between a residue on the transporter and the hydroxyl or keto group on the substrates is essential for
translocation. The transport activity of CitP with oxaloacetate is
remarkable since oxaloacetate is the first metabolic intermediate in
the citrate degradation pathway in lactic acid bacteria (39). Since the
2-hydroxycarboxylates are the physiological and preferred substrates of
these carriers we have termed the family the 2-hydroxycarboxylate transporter family.
A typical feature of membrane potential-generating secondary
transporters like MleP and CitP is the ability to translocate two
structurally related substrates, i.e. malate/lactate and
citrate/lactate, respectively. The transporters specifically
recognize the common 2-hydroxycarboxylate motif. At the same time, MleP
and CitP need to be quite tolerant toward the R1 and
R2 groups since the cytoplasmic conversion of the substrate
into the product not only results in a smaller molecule but also
removes the charge on one of the R groups. Charge removal is crucial
and results in the generation of the membrane potential. A similar
tolerance toward the R groups is not a physiological requirement for
the Na+-dependent citrate transporter CitS that
functions as a Na+/H+ symporter (14-16).
Consistent with this observation, the results in Table I show that CitS
has a very narrow substrate specificity (mainly citrate), whereas MleP
and CitP transport a wide range of 2-hydroxycarboxylates with
different R substituents. Remarkably, the R groups of the transported
substrates range in size from the smallest possible, i.e.
hydrogen atoms in glycolate, to the R groups of the physiological
substrates, i.e. malate for MleP and citrate for CitP.
Larger R groups as in citromalate for MleP and isocitrate for CitP
result in very poor translocation. Apparently, the translocation site
is optimized for the physiological substrates, and smaller R groups are
compensated for by the conformation of the protein or a varying amount
of cotransported water (40, 41). In the case of CitS smaller R groups
reduce transport drastically, possibly because the R groups are
essential for Na+ binding.
The members of the 2-hydroxycarboxylate transporter family are a potent
experimental system to study the relation between the primary sequence
and substrate specificity. Currently, we are dissecting the binding and
translocation events kinetically, analyzing the stereo selectivity of
the transporters, and identifying residues in the primary sequences
which are located in the binding pockets of MleP, CitP, and CitS. Such
studies will eventually give a detailed model of the binding sites and
explain how the details in similar structures result in important
functional differences.
FOOTNOTES
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Microbiology, Biological Centre, Kerklaan 30, 9751NN Haren, The
Netherlands. Tel.: 3150-363-2155; Fax: 3150-363-2154; E-mail:
j.s.lolkema{at}biol.rug.nl.
1
The abbreviations used are: pmf, proton motive
force; ORF, open reading frame; kb, kilobase(s); PCR, polymerase chain
reaction; TMPD,
N,N,N ,N -tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine;
COV, cytochrome c oxidase-containing vesicle.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank K. Leenhouts for kindly providing
L. lactis strain LL108, B. Poolman for initiating the
collaboration between S. D. and J. L., and W. N. Konings for
carefully reading the manuscript and for many helpful suggestions.
REFERENCES
-
Konings, W. N., Lolkema, J. S., and Poolman, B.
(1995)
Arch. Microbiol.
164,
235-242
[CrossRef]
-
Lolkema, J. S., Poolman, B., and Konings, W. N.
(1996)
in
Handbook of Biological Physics (Konings, W. N., Kaback, H. R., and Lolkema, J. S., eds), Vol. 2, pp. 229-260, Elsevier, Amsterdam
-
Poolman, B., Molenaar, D., Smid, E. J., Ubbink, T., Abee, T., Renault, P. P., and Konings, W. N.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
6030-6037
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Salema, M., Poolman, B., Lolkema, J. S., Loureiro Dias, M. C., and Konings, W. N.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
225,
289-295
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Olsen, E. B., Russel, J. B., and Henick-Kling, T.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
6199-6206
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Anantharam, V., Allison, M. J., and Maloney, P. C.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
7244-7250
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Molenaar, D., Bosscher, J. S., Ten Brink, B., Driessen, A. J. M., and Konings, W. N.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
2864-2870
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Abe, K., Hayashi, H., and Maloney, P. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3079-3084
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Marty-Teysset, C., Lolkema, J. S., Schmitt, P., Divies, C., and Konings, W. N.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25370-25376
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Marty-Teysset, C., Posthuma, C., Lolkema, J. S., Schmitt, P., Divies, C., and Konings, W. N.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
2178-2185
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
David, S., van der Rest, M. E., Driessen, A. J. M., Simons, G., and de Vos, W. M.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
5789-5794
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vaughan, E. E., David, S., Harrington, A., Daly, C., Fitzgerald, G. F., and de Vos, W. M.
(1996)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61,
3172-3176
[Abstract]
-
van der Rest, M. E., Siewe, R. M., Abee, T., Schwarz, E., Oesterhelt, D., and Konings, W. N.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
8971-8976
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
van der Rest, M. E., Molenaar, D., and Konings, W. N.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
4893-4898
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lolkema, J. S., Enequist, H., and van der Rest, M. E.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
220,
469-475
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pos, K. M., and Dimroth, P.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
1018-1026
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
van Geest, M., and Lolkema, J. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
25582-25589
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Renault, P. P., and Heslot, H.
(1987)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
53,
320-324
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Leenhouts, K., Buist, G., Bolhuis, A., ten Berge, A., Kiel, J., Mirau, I., Dabrowska, M., Venema, G., and Kok, J.
(1996)
Mol. & Gen. Genet.
253,
217-224
-
De Man, J. C., Rogosa, M., and Sharp, M. E.
(1960)
J. Appl. Bacteriol.
23,
130-135
-
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring harbor, NY
-
Simon, D., Rouault, A., and Chopin, M. C.
(1985)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
26,
239-241
-
Leenhouts, K. J., Kok, J., and Venema, G.
(1990)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
56,
2726-2735
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Holo, H., and Nes, I. F.
(1989)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
55,
3119-3123
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ansanay, V., Dequin, S., Blondin, B., and Barre, P.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
332,
74-80
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yanish-Perron, C., Vieira, J., and Messing, J.
(1985)
Gene (Amst.)
33,
103-119
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lopez de Felipe, F., Magni, C., de Mendoza, D., and Lopez, P.
(1995)
Mol. & Gen. Genet.
246,
590-599
-
Kok, J., Vossen, J. M. B. M., and Venema, G.
(1984)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
48,
726-731
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Otto, R., Lageveen, R. G., Veldkamp, H., and Konings, W. N.
(1982)
J. Bacteriol.
149,
733-738
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Driessen, A. J. M., de Vrij, W., and Konings, W. N.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
7555-7559
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Driessen, A. J. M., Brundage, L., Hendrick, J. P., Schiebel, E., and Wickner, W.
(1991)
Methods Cell Biol.
34,
147-165
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mayer, D. L., Hope, M. J., and Cullis, P. R.
(1986)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
858,
161-168
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kaback, H. R.
(1971)
Methods Enzymol.
22,
99-120
-
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275
[Free Full Text]
-
De Vos, W. M.
(1987)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
46,
281-295
[CrossRef]
-
Viitanen, P. V., Garcia, M. L., Foster, D., Kaczorowski, G. J., and Kaback, H. R.
(1983)
Biochemistry
22,
2531-2536
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Abe, K., Ruan, Z.-S., and Maloney, P. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
6789-6793
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ishiguro, N., Izawa, H., Shinagawa, M., Shimamoto, T., and Tsuchiya, T.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
9559-9564
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Marty-Teysset, C., Lolkema, J. S., Schmitt, P., Divies, C., and Konings, W. N.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
6209-6215
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Loo, D. D. F., Zeuthen, T., Chandy, G., and Wright, E. M.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13367-13370
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zeuthen, T.
(1995)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
160,
99-161
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Eisenberg, D.
(1984)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
53,
595-623
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-W. Youn, E. Jolkver, R. Kramer, K. Marin, and V. F. Wendisch
Identification and Characterization of the Dicarboxylate Uptake System DccT in Corynebacterium glutamicum
J. Bacteriol.,
October 1, 2008;
190(19):
6458 - 6466.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Lensbouer, A. Patel, J. P. Sirianni, and R. P. Doyle
Functional Characterization and Metal Ion Specificity of the Metal-Citrate Complex Transporter from Streptomyces coelicolor
J. Bacteriol.,
August 15, 2008;
190(16):
5616 - 5623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Guinane, P. D. Cotter, E. M. Lawton, C. Hill, and R. P. Ross
Insertional Mutagenesis To Generate Lantibiotic Resistance in Lactococcus lactis
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
July 15, 2007;
73(14):
4677 - 4680.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. A. M. Wolken, P. M. Lucas, A. Lonvaud-Funel, and J. S. Lolkema
The Mechanism of the Tyrosine Transporter TyrP Supports a Proton Motive Tyrosine Decarboxylation Pathway in Lactobacillus brevis
J. Bacteriol.,
March 15, 2006;
188(6):
2198 - 2206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Sobczak and J. S. Lolkema
The 2-Hydroxycarboxylate Transporter Family: Physiology, Structure, and Mechanism
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
December 1, 2005;
69(4):
665 - 695.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Sobczak and J. S. Lolkema
Alternating Access and a Pore-Loop Structure in the Na+-Citrate Transporter CitS of Klebsiella pneumoniae
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 23, 2004;
279(30):
31113 - 31120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Warner and J. S. Lolkema
Growth of Bacillus subtilis on citrate and isocitrate is supported by the Mg2+-citrate transporter CitM
Microbiology,
November 1, 2002;
148(11):
3405 - 3412.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. P. Krom, R. Aardema, and J. S. Lolkema
Bacillus subtilis YxkJ Is a Secondary Transporter of the 2-Hydroxycarboxylate Transporter Family That Transports L-Malate and Citrate
J. Bacteriol.,
October 15, 2001;
183(20):
5862 - 5869.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. F. Núñez, M. Teresa Pellicer, J. Badía, J. Aguilar, and L. Baldomà
The gene yghK linked to the glc operon of Escherichia coli encodes a permease for glycolate that is structurally and functionally similar to L-lactate permease
Microbiology,
April 1, 2001;
147(4):
1069 - 1077.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. P. Krom, J. B. Warner, W. N. Konings, and J. S. Lolkema
Complementary Metal Ion Specificity of the Metal-Citrate Transporters CitM and CitH of Bacillus subtilis
J. Bacteriol.,
November 15, 2000;
182(22):
6374 - 6381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Pos, P. Dimroth, and M. Bott
The Escherichia coli Citrate Carrier CitT: a Member of a Novel Eubacterial Transporter Family Related to the 2-Oxoglutarate/Malate Translocator from Spinach Chloroplasts
J. Bacteriol.,
August 15, 1998;
180(16):
4160 - 4165.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bandell, M. E. Lhotte, C. Marty-Teysset, A. Veyrat, H. Prévost, V. Dartois, C. Diviès, W. N. Konings, and J. S. Lolkema
Mechanism of the Citrate Transporters in Carbohydrate and Citrate Cometabolism in Lactococcus and Leuconostoc Species
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
May 1, 1998;
64(5):
1594 - 1600.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Wei, A. A. Guffanti, M. Ito, and T. A. Krulwich
Bacillus subtilis YqkI Is a Novel Malic/Na+-Lactate Antiporter That Enhances Growth on Malate at Low Protonmotive Force
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 22, 2000;
275(39):
30287 - 30292.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bandell and J. S. Lolkema
Arg-425 of the Citrate Transporter CitP Is Responsible for High Affinity Binding of Di- and Tricarboxylates
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 8, 2000;
275(50):
39130 - 39136.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|