|
Volume 272, Number 36,
Issue of September 5, 1997
pp. 22564-22569
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Cell-specific Expression and Regulation of a Glucokinase Gene
Locus Transgene*
(Received for publication, May 15, 1997, and in revised form, July 3, 1997)
Kevin D.
Niswender
§,
Catherine
Postic
¶,
Thomas L.
Jetton
,
Brian D.
Bennett
,
David W.
Piston
,
Shimon
Efrat
and
Mark A.
Magnuson
**
From the Department of Molecular Physiology and
Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville,
Tennessee 37232 and the Department of Molecular Pharmacology,
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Transgenic mice containing one or more extra
copies of the entire glucokinase (GK) gene locus were generated and
characterized. The GK transgene, an 83-kilobase pair mouse genomic DNA
fragment containing both promoter regions, was expressed and regulated in a cell-specific manner, and rescued GK null lethality when crossed
into mice bearing a targeted mutation of the endogenous GK gene. Livers
from the transgenic mice had elevated GK mRNA, protein, and
activity levels, compared with controls, and the transgene was
regulated in liver by dietary manipulations. The amount of GK
immunoreactivity in hepatocyte nuclei, where GK binds to the GK
regulatory protein, was also increased. Pancreatic islets displayed
increased GK immunoreactivity and NAD(P)H responses to glucose, but
only when isolated and cultured in 20 mM glucose, as
a result of the hypoglycemic phenotype of these mice (Niswender, K. D., Shiota, M., Postic, C., Cherrington, A. D., and
Magnuson, M. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22604-22609). Together, these results indicate that the region of the
gene from 55 to +28 kilobase pairs (relative to the liver GK
transcription start site) contains all the regulatory sequences
necessary for expression of both GK isoforms, thereby placing an upper
limit on the size of the GK gene locus.
INTRODUCTION
Glucokinase (GK)1 plays
an essential role in maintaining euglycemia, both in humans and rodents
(2-7). GK gene expression is cell type-specific and involves two
alternate promoters that are differentially regulated (8-10).
Expression of the islet GK isoform, which is determined by the upstream
promoter, is a key determinant of the insulin secretory response to
glucose (11, 12). The upstream promoter is also expressed in several
other rare neural/neuroendocrine cell types in the brain and gut,
including pituitary corticotropes, although the functional significance of GK in these locations remains to be determined (13). The downstream GK promoter determines expression of the hepatic GK isoform,
which is thought to be a rate-determining step for hepatic glucose
utilization (11, 14, 15).
Studies of the cis-regulatory elements involved in
cell-specific expression of islet GK have shown that a 294-bp DNA
fragment containing the upstream promoter is sufficient for reporter
gene expression in a variety of neural/neuroendocrine cell types,
including pancreatic cells (13). Elements in the proximal promoter
region have been identified that contribute to transcription in both insulinoma cells (16, 17) and AtT-20 cells, a pituitary corticotrope cell line (18). Distal elements may also be involved, although none
have been reported (17). GK gene transcription in the islet appears to
be largely constitutive, although glucose acts at a post-transcriptional level to regulate islet GK activity. Increased glucose leads to a 3-4-fold elevation in GK activity, islet glucose usage, and insulin secretion, without a parallel increase in islet GK
mRNA (19-21).
The regulation of the downstream GK promoter, which is expressed only
in hepatocytes, is both more complex and less well understood than that
of the upstream promoter. Insulin increases hepatic GK gene
transcription, whereas glucagon, acting via cAMP, decreases transcription (8, 22-24). Thyroid hormone and biotin also increase GK
gene transcription in liver (25, 26). The cis-regulatory elements that determine hepatocyte-specific expression and regulation of the hepatic GK isoform are largely undefined as a DNA fragment able
to confer both hepatocyte-specific and hormone-regulated expression to
a reporter gene has not yet been identified. While Iynedjian et
al. (27) have recently reported that a 1-kb fragment of the rat
downstream promoter is transciptionally active in primary hepatocytes,
it is not regulated by insulin. Furthermore, in transgenic mice a
7.5-kb fragment of the rat downstream promoter DNA does not confer
position-independent expression on a reporter gene (28).
We have previously reported the cloning and partial sequencing of an
83-kb DNA fragment of the mouse GK gene locus (28). These studies
revealed that the two promoters in the mouse GK gene are separated by
35 kb, and that the gene contains at least eight liver-specific DNase
I-hypersensitive sites that span over 20 kb of DNA (28). Given the
complexity of the GK gene locus, both in terms of the widely separated
promoter regions, and the multiple, widely dispersed hypersensitive
sites, we sought to place an upper limit on its size by inserting the
83-kb fragment of cloned genomic DNA into the genome of mice. The
studies presented here indicate that this DNA fragment, which spans
from 55 to +28 kilobase pairs relative to the liver transcription
start site, is expressed and regulated both in the liver and in the
islet, strongly suggesting that it contains the entire mouse GK gene locus. In addition to placing an upper limit on the size of the GK gene
locus, these studies have generated a novel animal model for
determining the metabolic ramifications of increased GK gene copy
number, as are described separately (1).
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Transgene Preparation
The insert from P1-305, which
contains all GK coding sequences and both promoter regions (28), was
isolated using a Qiagen Maxi plasmid purification kit (Qiagen,
Chatsworth, CA). Restriction of P1-305 DNA with NruI left
392 bp of vector sequence on the 5 end and 202 bp of vector sequence
on the 3 end of the insert, thereby enabling the transgene to be
distinguished from the endogenous mouse GK gene locus. The 83-kb
genomic DNA fragment was isolated as a single fragment by pulsed-field
gel electrophoresis and agarase digestion (Gelase, Epicentre, Madison,
WI) of a slice of gel. The DNA solution was dialyzed against TE,
concentrated with a microconcentrator tube (Amicon, Beverly, MA), and
quantitated by Hoechst dye fluorescence.
DNA Pronuclear Injection, Identification of Transgenic Animals,
Transgene Integrity, and Copy Number
Mouse zygotes produced by
mating two (C57BL/6J × DBA/2J) F1 hybrid mice were
microinjected with the P1-305 DNA fragment (~3 ng/µl) then
transferred into pseudopregnant ICR females (29). Transgenic mice were
identified by PCR and Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA prepared
from tail biopsies (29). PCR analysis was performed using primers that
detected either a 355-bp fragment from the 5 end vector sequence
(5 -AGACGTAGCCCAGCGCGTCGGC and 5 -GCGGCCGCAAATTTATTAGAGC) or a 170-bp
fragment from the 3 end vector sequence (5 -CGACGGCCAATTAGGCCTAC and
5 -GGCTTGAGTCGCTCCTCCTG). Southern blot analysis was performed using
standard procedures (30) with the 5 end-specific PCR fragment used to
routinely identify transgenic animals. For copy number analysis, probe
1, which lies near the 5 end of the transgene, was a 2.3-kb
SacI fragment from plasmid mGK28.H2.S1. Probe 2, which is
located near the middle of the transgene, was a 1.3-kb
SacI-BamHI fragment from plasmid mGK40.SB. Probe
3 was a 500-bp BamHI-EcoRI fragment from
pmGK18.BS, which contains sequences near the 3 end of the transgene.
Mice bearing the targeted mutation of the endogenous GK gene (7) were
identified using a 268-bp PCR fragment amplified from pmGK28.H2 using
the primer pair 5 -AGCTTTGGCAAATAGACAT and 5 -TGATGTAACTCATAAGGT. The
DNA was cut with BglII and analyzed by Southern blot
analysis. A 2.5-kb band was specific for the inactivated GK allele, and
a 9-kb band indicated a wild type GK allele, as described previously by
Bali et al. (7). An ~1-kb DNA fragment (generated by PCR
using the primers 5 -CGCTCTAGAACTAGTGGATCC and
5 -GAACAAGCTAGACACAGGTAG) containing sequences from a neomycin resistance gene was used as an internal probe for the targeted GK
locus. Quantitation of band intensity was performed by
phosphorimager analysis (GS-250 Molecular Imager, o-Rad).
All mice were housed in specific pathogen-free barrier facilities,
maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle, and fed a standard rodent
chow (Purina Mills, Inc., St. Louis, MO). Females from both transgenic
lines were used for most analyses. The gene rescue experiment was
conducted using animals from line 37 only. Non-transgenic offspring of
similar genetic backgrounds from within the same mouse colony served as
controls. Animals were killed at 0600, which corresponds to a fed state
(31), except for those in Fig. 5, which were killed in the afternoon.
Fig. 5.
GK transgene rescue of the lethal GK null
phenotype. The GK transgene from line 37 was crossed onto the
targeted GK null background. A, Southern blot analysis
results are shown for mouse 1318, which was homozygous null at the
endogenous GK allele (lane 1) and homozygous for the
transgene (lane 3). A littermate, mouse 1319, was
heterozygous for both the knock-out allele (lane 2) and the
GK transgene (lane 4). Probes that detected the knock-out allele (BglII digests; lanes 1 and 2)
as well as the neomycin resistance gene (BglII digests;
lanes 5 and 6) showed twice the band intensity
for mouse 1318 compared with mouse 1319, suggesting homozygosity for
the mutant GK allele. The transgene probe was used on
BamHI-digested DNA (lanes 3 and 4).
B, genotypes of the test cross of 1318 with a wild type
mouse showing transmission of one targeted GK allele to all offspring
(n = 7, p < 0.01). This result
provides genetic proof that animal 1318 was homozygous null at the
endogenous GK gene. C, GK immunostaining of tissues from
animal #1318 (rescued) and a wild type mouse. The patterns of GK
immunoreactivity in fasted liver (both low and high magnification) and
islets were indistinguishable. The scale bars equal 50 µM. D, Northern blot of total RNA from various
tissues of a control mouse (lanes 1-5), a line 37 transgenic mouse (lanes 6-10), and the transgene-rescued
mouse (lanes 11-15). Lanes 1, 6, and
11 contain liver RNA; lanes 2, 7, and
12 contain white adipose tissue RNA; lanes 3,
8, and 13 contain heart RNA; lanes 4,
9, and 14 contain skeletal muscle RNA;
lanes 5, 10, and 15 contain kidney RNA.
[View Larger Version of this Image (59K GIF file)]
Northern Blot Analysis
Total RNA was prepared by acid
guanidinium thiocyanate extraction (32). RNA gels, blots, and
hybridizations were performed as described previously (28). A 789-bp
rat GK cDNA fragment from pGK.Z1 (24) was used as the probe. The
loading control probe was an ~700-bp
HindIII-EcoRI cyclophilin DNA fragment (33). Densitometric analysis of autoradiograms was performed using NIH Image
software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) after digital
scanning. GK values were corrected for loading differences with the
cyclophilin value.
Western Blot Analysis
Western blot analyses were performed
as described (34). To visualize GK antibody binding, the washed
membranes were incubated in a 1:10,000 dilution of donkey anti-sheep
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch) for
1 h at room temperature. A solution consisting of 1.25 mM Luminol, 0.2 mM para-coumaric acid, and 0.009% H2O2 in 100 mM
Tris (pH 8.5) was used to initiate the chemiluminescence reaction. The
membranes were then drip-dried, wrapped in polyvinyl chloride film, and
exposed to autoradiography film.
GK Activity Measurements
GK activities in crude liver
extracts (as prepared for Western blotting) were estimated by
determining the difference in glucose phosphorylation in the presence
of 100 mM and 0.5 mM glucose. The final assay
mixture contained 50 mM triethanolamine hydrochloride, 20 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 10 mM ATP, 1 mM NADP, either 0.5 or 100 mM glucose, 4 µg/ml glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase
(Boehringer Mannheim), and 100 µl of liver extract. Glucose
phosphorylating activity was taken as the increase in NADPH
fluorescence measured at 340 nM after 4 min at
32 °C.
Immunocytochemical Analysis
Tissues were processed for
immunocytochemical analysis as described previously (34). Briefly, GK
immunoreactivity was detected using an anti-GST-GK fusion protein
antibody (34) with a CY3-conjugated donkey anti-sheep IgG secondary
antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA). Samples were imaged
using a Zeiss LSM410 confocal scanning laser microscope with the 543 nm
line of a helium/neon laser, and digital images were quantitated using
NIH Image software. When expression levels were to be compared, tissues
were processed in parallel, sections cut to the same thickness, and
immunostaining reactions were conducted in parallel with the same
reagents. The sensitivity and base line of the photomultiplier tube in
the confocal microscope was adjusted such that the full range of pixel
intensities were collected without saturation. Hepatocyte nuclear GK
quantification was performed by counting the number of
immunofluorescent positive (nuclear signal above cytoplasmic signal)
nuclei per high powered field (mm2).
Cultured Islet Studies
Islets were isolated from
heterozygous transgenic animals from line 37 and control mice by
pancreatic distension and collagenase digestion of the splenic portion
of the pancreas (35, 36). Islets were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium
(Life Technologies, Inc.) with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 IU/ml
penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 20 mM glucose for
40 h. Whole islet immunostaining was performed using
affinity-purified anti-GK IgG (34) at a 1:10 dilution. Two-photon
excitation microscopy analysis of NAD(P)H autofluorescence in intact
islets was performed as described (37).
Statistical Analysis
Results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical significance was determined
by Student's t test. Differences are reported as
statistically significant at an value of 0.05.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Generation of GK Gene Locus Transgenic Mice, Transgene Integrity,
and Copy Number
Pronuclear DNA microinjection experiments were
performed to generate transgenic mice containing additional copies of
the entire GK gene, including both promoter regions and all exons (28). Three founders were generated, two of which passed the transgene through the germline (animals 37 and 41). The founder that did not pass
the transgene was presumed to be mosaic. Transgene inheritance patterns
indicated that the exogenous GK gene sequences had integrated into the
X chromosome in founder 37 and into an autosome in founder 41. Because
of the large size of the transgene, both PCR and Southern blot
experiments were performed to exclude fragmentation or rearrangement of
the DNA upon integration into the genome. These analyses suggest that
transgene integration occurred without any major rearrangements or
deletions in both lines of mice (Fig. 1,
A-C). Quantitation of Southern blot band intensities (Fig.
1C) indicated that line 37 had ~1 transgene copy per
haploid genome, whereas line 41 had ~4 copies.
Fig. 1.
Detection and characterization of the GK gene
locus transgene. A, diagram of the GK gene fragment used.
The insert was excised from the P1 vector using NruI. This
left short vector DNA sequences on the 5 and 3 ends that enabled
detection of the transgene. B, PCR detection of the 5 and
3 ends of the transgene in two of three founders. C,
Southern blot analysis using probes isolated from three different parts
of the gene (locations are shown in A). The same three
probes were used to determine the transgene integrity and calculate
copy number. This analysis was performed using mice that were both
homozygous (hom.) and heterozygous (het.) for the
transgene, as well as non-transgenic controls
(cont.).
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]
Expression and Regulation of the Transgene in Liver
To
determine whether the downstream GK promoter in the transgene is
expressed in liver, GK mRNA, GK activity, and GK immunoreactivity were assayed in transgenic and control mice. In fed animals from line
37, GK mRNA levels were elevated 1.8-fold in heterozygotes and
2.6-fold in homozygotes, compared with the controls (Fig. 2A, left). Similar
expression expression levels were evident in line 41; GK mRNA was
1.8- and 2.4-fold greater in the heterozygous and homozygous transgenic
mice, respectively (Fig. 2D). Increased hepatic GK activity
(Fig. 2, B and E) and increased GK protein (Fig.
2, C and F) were also observed in both lines of
mice.
Fig. 2.
Expression and regulation of the GK gene
locus transgene in liver. A, hepatic GK mRNA analysis
for line 37 (n = 6-7/group; #, p < 0.01 compared with the fed group; *, p < 0.05 compared with control). Mice were fed ad libitum overnight or were
starved for 34 h. Relative band intensities were normalized to the
values of overnight fed control animals. B, hepatic GK
activities for overnight fed, line 37 animals (n = 9-14/group; *, p < 0.01 compared with control).
C, immunoreactive hepatic GK for line 37 (n = 4-5/group; *, p < 0.05 compared with control). The
same fed liver extracts used to estimate activity were also assayed by
Western blot, and GK band intensity was quantitated by densitometry.
Values were normalized to controls. D, hepatic GK mRNA
analysis for line 41 (n = 10-12/group; *,
p < 0.05 compared with control). E, hepatic GK activities for line 41 (n = 8-14/group; *,
p < 0.05 compared with control). F,
immunoreactive hepatic GK for line 41 (n = 4-5/group; *, p < 0.05 compared with control). For RNA blot
analysis, variation in RNA loading was corrected with a rat cyclophilin
control probe. RNA and immunoblot results were normalized to control
mouse values. Except for the fasted animals in A, all were
fed ad libitum overnight.
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]
To assess the regulation of the transgene in liver, GK mRNA levels
were determined in mice fasted for 34 h or fed diets that varied
in carbohydrate content. In the 34-h fasted mice GK mRNA expression
was decreased in both the transgenic and control mice to very low
levels (Fig. 2A). In addition, hepatic GK mRNA was decreased by ~70% in mice fed a low carbohydrate diet, compared with
those fed a high carbohydrate diet (data not shown). These results
indicate that the GK transgene is expressed in liver, that there is an
association between gene copy number and gene expression within a given
line, and that the expression of the transgene in liver is affected by
dietary manipulations known to alter expression of the endogenous GK
gene (8, 24, 38-40). Identification of GK mRNA and GK
immunoreactivity in the liver of a transgene-rescued GK null mouse (as
shown below) also provides evidence that the downstream GK promoter in
the transgene is transcriptionally active in hepatocytes.
The transmission pattern of the GK transgene in line 37 revealed that
it had integrated into the X chromosome, as noted above. In this line,
hepatic GK mRNA was elevated 1.8-fold in heterozygotes (3 gene
copies) and 2.6-fold in homozygotes (4 gene copies) compared with
controls (2 gene copies). Since the increase in hepatic GK mRNA was
nearly proportional to the number of GK genes, the GK transgene appears
to escape X chromosome inactivation. Other X-linked transgenes have
also been shown to escape inactivation (41-43). While both lines of
mice showed increased GK gene expression in liver, thus suggesting
position-independent expression of the downstream promoter in the
transgene, the design of these studies, which did not use a reporter
gene strategy, makes it difficult to conclude whether expression is
also copy number-dependent. The combination of
position-independent, and copy number-dependent transgene
expression are accepted criteria by which the presence of a locus
control region within a gene locus is defined (44-47).
Altered Subcellular GK Localization in Hepatocytes
Recent
studies have revealed that GK translocates from the cytoplasm to
nucleus in certain metabolic states (48, 49). Thus, to examine the
subcellular location of GK in the livers of transgenic mice, we
performed immunocytochemical studies. In livers from fed control mice,
GK immunoreactivity displayed a peri-central zonation pattern typical
of GK and other glycolytic enzymes (50) with only a few faintly
immunopositive nuclei being observed (Fig.
3A). In contrast, the livers
of fed transgenic mice showed both more pronounced nuclear GK
immunostaining (Fig. 3B) and cytosolic GK immunoreactivity
that was more intense than the controls (Fig. 3, compare A
and B). Approximately 5-fold more nuclei stained positively
for GK in both homozygous and heterozygous transgenic livers (Fig.
3C). In addition, the peri-central zone of both nuclear and
cytoplasmic GK immunoreactivity was expanded in transgenic livers (data
not shown). While the functional significance of GK localization in the
nucleus of the hepatocyte remains to be determined, the enhanced
nuclear localization of GK in transgenic hepatocytes appears to reflect
nuclear sequestration of excess GK by binding to GKRP, since the latter
has been found to be a nuclear protein (48, 51). Given that alterations
in GK gene expression profoundly affect the plasma glucose
concentration (1), increased binding of GK to GKRP in these mice may be
a mechanism that protects the animals from the physiologic effects of
excess hepatic GK catalytic activity.
Fig. 3.
Immunocytochemical analysis of GK subcellular
localization in hepatocytes. A, control liver from overnight
fed mouse. A representative 1-mm2 field is shown with a
central vein near the center of the image. Faint GK immunoreactivity
can be seen in a few nuclei as well as diffuse cytoplasmic GK
immunoreactivity. Scale bar = 50 µM. B, corresponding field from a transgenic liver.
C, quantitation of nuclear GK immunoreactivity
(n = 2 mice/group, ~10 fields/animal; *,
p < 10 8 compared with control). GKRP
immunostaining patterns and numbers of positive nuclei were not
different between transgenic and control mice (data not shown).
[View Larger Version of this Image (65K GIF file)]
GK Transgene Expression in Islets
To assess expression of the
upstream GK promoter in the transgene, we used quantitative methods to
examine GK immunoreactivity in pancreatic islets. Given that small
fragments of the upstream GK promoter have previously been shown to be
expressed in both the islet and other rare neuroendocrine cell types
(13, 52), we expected that a transgene with ~15 kb of additional
5 -flanking sequence for the upstream promoter would cause increased
islet GK gene expression. Surprisingly, in freshly isolated pancreata, the amount of immunoreactive GK in islets from both lines of transgenic mice was less than the controls: 66% and 74%, respectively, for line
37 and 41 (Fig. 4, A and
B). Representative islets from a line 37 mouse, compared
with a control mouse, are shown in Fig. 4 (C and
D). However, since glucose is known to regulate islet GK
content (20, 53), and since these mice have a hypoglycemic phenotype,
as is described in detail elsewhere (1), decreased islet GK content may
reflect differences in the plasma glucose concentrations in transgenic
mice. To test this possibility, GK immunoreactivity was assessed after
culturing islets under equivalent glucose conditions. After culturing
control and transgenic islets from line 37 in 20 mM
glucose, 1.5-fold more immunoreactive GK was present in the transgenic
islets (Table I), a difference that
parallels the addition of the single extra GK gene in these mice (3 versus 2 gene copies). To further validate this result, differences in glucose metabolism were quantitatively assessed using
two photon excitation microscopy to measure changes in NAD(P)H autofluorescence (37). The 1.5-fold increase in GK immunoreactivity observed after culturing the transgenic islets in 20 mM
glucose was matched by a 1.4-fold increase in glucose-stimulated
NAD(P)H autofluorescence. Finally, detection of GK immunoreactivity in cells of the transgene-rescued mouse also provides clear evidence that the GK gene locus transgene is expressed in the islet (see below).
Fig. 4.
Quantitative immunofluorescence analysis of
islet GK content. Immunoreactive GK content in pancreata from
transgenic and control mice was determined as described under
"Experimental Procedures." A, quantitation of islet GK
immunoreactivity from line 37 mice (*, p < 10 5 compared with control). B, quantitation of
islet GK immunoreactivity from line 41 mice (*, p < 10 5 compared with control). For both A and
B, 2 mice/group and 8-15 islets/animal were analyzed.
C, representative confocal micrograph of an islet from a
line 37 mouse. D, representative confocal micrograph of a
control islet.
[View Larger Version of this Image (63K GIF file)]
Table I.
Quantitation of GK immunoreactivity and NAD(P)H autofluorescence in
isolated islets after culture in 20 mM glucose
Transgenic and control islets were isolated as described and cultured
for 40 h in equimolar glucose conditions. The NAD(P)H response to
30 mM glucose was first determined as described, and then
islets were fixed and quantitatively immunostained for GK expression
level determination. The number of animals in each group is indicated
in parentheses (*, p < 10 6,
**, p < 0.05).
|
|
Control |
Transgenic |
Ratio |
|
| GK immunofluorescence
intensity |
101 ± 3 (6) |
153
± 4 (6)* |
1.5 ± 0.04 |
| NAD(P)H autofluorescence response to
30 mM glucose |
1.76 ± 0.08 (2) |
2.47
± 0.005 (2)** |
1.41 ± 0.06 |
|
These results indicate that transgenic islets, when exposed to the same
glucose concentrations as controls, express a proportionally greater
amount of GK. Moreover, like the liver, the amount of GK
immunoreactivity also appears to be GK gene copy
number-dependent. While an extensive analysis of transgene
expression in other neuroendocrine cell types known to express the
islet GK isoform was not performed (13), GK mRNA levels were
elevated to a similar extent (~1.6-fold) in a sample of pooled
transgenic pituitaries, suggesting that the GK transgene is probably
expressed in all locations where the endogenous upstream GK promoter is
transcriptionally active.
Rescue of GK Null Lethality
The effects of complete
inactivation of the endogenous GK gene by gene targeting have been
reported by two different groups (6, 7). While the time of death varies
greatly in the two different studies, the availability of these mice
provided an opportunity to directly test the expression of the GK
transgene in the absence of endogenous GK gene expression. GK
transgenic mice were were first crossed with the heterozygous null GK
mice generated and characterized by Bali et al. (7) to
generate animals that were heterozygous for both the GK transgene and
targeted endogenous GK alleles. The double heterozygous mice were then intercrossed, and 56 offspring were generated and characterized. Because the genomic Southern blot analysis was complicated by the
presence of up to four GK genes in some mice (Fig.
5A), variable band
intensities, and a random insertion of the targeting vector in the
genome of the GK null mice (see extra band for the neomycin resistance
gene probe in Fig. 5A), all candidate rescued mice were
test-mated to a wild type mouse to verify transmission of one null GK
allele to all offspring.
From these matings, a single female mouse was identified that passed
one null GK allele to all offspring (n = 7, p < 0.01), as shown in Fig. 5B. This animal
was killed for tissue analysis at ~12 weeks of age and was euglycemic
at that time (104 mg/dl). GK immunostaining in both liver and
pancreatic tissue sections in the rescued mouse were indistinguishable
from a control mouse (Fig. 5C). RNA blot analysis also
indicated that there was a similar amount of hepatic GK mRNA
expressed compared with the control (Fig. 5D). There was no
evidence of transgene misexpression in a survey of several other
tissues that do not express endogenous GK (Fig. 5D). More
importantly, the transgene-rescued mouse lived well past the time when
the GK null mice died (6, 7) and survived metabolic stresses such as
weaning and pregnancy. While the results of this experiment need to be
interpreted with caution, it suggests that the GK gene locus transgene
is able to fully compensate for the lack of endogenous GK gene
expression in the GK null mice, thus providing additional evidence that
the 83-kb DNA fragment tested in these mice defines the mouse GK gene
locus.
Conclusion
The analyses performed here indicate that an 83-kb
DNA fragment spanning from about 55 to +28 kilobase pairs relative to the liver transcription start site defines a functional mouse GK gene
locus. By all criteria applied, expression of the GK gene locus
transgene fully recapitulates the patterns of expression and regulation
that characterize the endogenous GK gene. Given this, these mice can be
used to explore the physiological effects of increased GK gene copy on
blood glucose homeostasis, as we describe in a related study (1).
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported in part by Grants DK 42612 and DK
42502 from the National Institutes of Health (to M. A. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Vanderbilt Medical Scientist Trainee under National Institutes of
Health Grant 5T3Z C-M07347. Submitted to fulfill part of the
requirements for a Ph.D.
¶
Supported by a fellowship from the Juvenile Diabetes
Foundation.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: 702 Light Hall,
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-0615. Tel.: 615-322-7006; Fax: 615-322-7236; E-mail:
mark.magnuson{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: GK, glucokinase; kb,
kilobase pair(s); bp, base pair(s); PCR, polymerase chain
reaction.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Pronuclear DNA microinjections were performed
by the Transgenic/ES Cell Shared Resource, tissue processing and
sectioning was performed by the Tissue Acquisition and Pathology Shared
Resource, and confocal micrographs were acquired through use of the
Cell Imaging Shared Resource. These resources are supported by Grants CA68485 and DK20593 from the National Institutes of Health. We thank
Kathy Shelton and Jill Lindner for their invaluable assistance.
REFERENCES
-
Niswender, K. D., Shiota, M., Postic, C., Cherrington, A. D., and Magnuson, M. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
22604-22609
-
Froguel, P., Zouali, H., Vionnet, N., Velho, G., Vaxillaire, M., Sun, F., Lesage, S., Stoffel, M., Takeda, J., Passa, P., Permutt, M. A., Beckmann, J. S., Bell, G. I., and Cohen, D.
(1993)
N. Engl. J. Med.
328,
697-702
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Froguel, P., Vaxillaire, M., Sun, F., Velho, G., Zouali, H., Butel, M. O., Lesage, S., Vionnet, N., Clëment, K., Fougerousse, F., Tanizawa, Y., Weissenbach, J., Beckmann, J. S., Lathrop, G. M., Passa, P., Permutt, M. A., and Cohen, D.
(1992)
Nature
356,
162-64
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Vionnet, N., Stoffel, M., Takeda, J., Yasuda, K., Bell, G. I., Zouali, H., Sesage, S., Lesage, S., Velho, G., Iris, F., Passa, P., Froguel, P., and Cohen, D.
(1992)
Nature
356,
721-22
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Terauchi, Y., Sakura, H., Yasuda, K., Iwamoto, K., Takahashi, N., Ito, K., Kasai, H., Suzuki, H., Ueda, O., Kamada, N., Jishage, K., Komeda, K., Noda, M., Kanazawa, Y., Taniguchi, S., Miwa, I., Akanuma, Y., Kodama, T., Yazaki, Y., and Kadowaki, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30253-30256
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Grupe, A., Hultgren, B., Ryan, A., Ma, Y. H., Bauer, M., and Stewart, T. A.
(1995)
Cell
83,
69-78
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bali, D., Svetlanov, A., Lee, H.-W., Fusco-DeMane, D., Leiser, M., Li, B., Barzilai, N., Surana, M., Hou, H., Fleischer, N., DePinho, R., Rossetti, L., and Efrat, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
21464-21467
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Iynedjian, P. B., Pilot, P. R., Nouspikel, T., Milburn, J. L., Quaade, C., Hughes, S., Ucla, C., and Newgard, C. B.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
7838-42
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Magnuson, M.
(1990)
Diabetes
39,
523-527
[Abstract]
-
Magnuson, M. A., and Shelton, K. D.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
15936-15942
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Matschinsky, F. M.
(1990)
Diabetes
39,
647-652
[Abstract]
-
Matschinsky, F., Liang, Y., Kesavan, P., Wang, L., Froguel, P., Velho, G., Cohen, D., Permutt, M. A., Tanizawa, Y., Jetton, T. L., Niswender, K., and Magnuson, M. A.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
92,
2092-2098
-
Jetton, T., Liang, Y., Pettepher, C. C., Zimmerman, E. C., Cox, F. G., Horvath, K., Matschinsky, F. M., and Magnuson, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3641-3654
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Granner, D., and Pilkis, S.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
10173-10176
[Free Full Text]
-
Pilkis, S. J., and Granner, D. K.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
54,
885-909
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Shelton, K. D., Franklin, A. J., Khoor, A., Beechem, J., and Magnuson, M. A.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
4578-4589
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Leibiger, I. B., Walther, R., Pett, U., and Leibiger, B.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
337,
161-166
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Moates, J., Shelton, K., and Magnuson, M.
(1996)
Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
723-731
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chen, C., Hosokawa, H., Bumbalo, L. M., and Leahy, J. L.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
94,
1616-1620
-
Liang, Y., Najafi, H., and Matschinsky, F. M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
16863-16866
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liang, Y., Najafi, H., Smith, R. M., Zimmerman, E. C., Magnuson, M. A., Tal, M., and Matschinsky, F. M.
(1992)
Diabetes
41,
792-806
[Abstract]
-
Iynedjian, P. B., Jotterand, D., Nouspikel, T., Asfari, M., and Pilot, P. R.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
21824-21829
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Iynedjian, P. B., Gjinovci, A., and Renold, A. E.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
740-744
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Magnuson, M. A., Andreone, T. L., Printz, R. L., Koch, S., and Granner, D. K.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
4838-4842
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chauban, J., and Dakshinamurti, K.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
10035-10038
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Narkewicz, M. R., Iynedjian, P. B., Ferre, P., and Girard, J.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
271,
585-589
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Iynedjian, P. B., Marie, S., Wang, H., Gjinovci, A., and Nazaryan, K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29113-29120
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Postic, C., Niswender, K. D., Decaux, J.-F., Parsa, R., Shelton, K. D., Gouhot, B., Pettepher, C. C., Granner, D. K., Girard, J., and Magnuson, M. A.
(1995)
Genomics
29,
740-750
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hogan, B., Beddington, R., Constantini, F., and Lacy, E.
(1994)
Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, pp. 217-251, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY
-
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Nagai, K., Nishio, T., Nakagawa, H., Nakamura, S., and Fukuda, Y.
(1978)
Brain Res.
142,
384-389
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Danielson, P. E., Forss-Petter, S., Brow, M. A., Calavetta, L., Douglass, J., Milner, R. J., and Sutcliffe, J. G.
(1988)
DNA
7,
261-267
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jetton, T. L., and Magnuson, M. A.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
2619-2623
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sharp, D. W., Kemp, C. B., Knight, M. J., Ballinger, W. F., and Lacy, P. E.
(1973)
Transplantation
16,
686-689
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stefan, Y., Meda, P., Neufeld, M., and Orci, L.
(1987)
J. Clin. Invest.
80,
175-183
-
Bennett, B. D., Jetton, T. L., Ying, G., Magnuson, M. A., and Piston, D. W.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3647-3651
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weinhouse, S.
(1976)
Curr. Top. Cell. Regul.
11,
1-50
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kraus-Friedmann, N.
(1984)
Physiol. Rev.
64,
170-259
[Free Full Text]
-
Exton, J.
(1972)
Metabolism
21,
945-990
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Disteche, C. M.
(1995)
Trends Genet.
11,
17-22
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wu, H., Fassler, R., Schnieke, A., Barker, D., Lee, K.-H., Chapman, V., Francke, U., and Jaenisch, R.
(1992)
Development
116,
687-695
[Abstract]
-
Krumlauf, R., Chapman, V. M., Hammer, R. E., Brinster, R., and Tilghman, S. H.
(1986)
Nature
319,
224-226
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Li, Q., and Stamatoyannopoulos, J. A.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6087-6096
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gross, D. S., and Garrard, W. T.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
57,
159-197
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Grosveld, F., Blom Van Assendelft, G., Greaves, D. R., and Kollias, G.
(1987)
Cell
51,
975-985
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ganss, R., Montoliu, L., Monaghan, A. P., and Schutz, G.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3083-3093
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Miwa, I., Mitsuyama, S., Toyoda, Y., Nonogaki, T., Aoki, S., and Okuda, J.
(1990)
Biochem. Int.
22,
759-767
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Toyoda, Y., Miwa, I., Kamiya, M., Ogiso, S., Nonogaki, T., Aoki, S., and Okuda, J.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
204,
252-256
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Moorman, A. F., de Boer, P. A., Charles, R., and Lamers, W. H.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
287,
47-52
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Toyoda, Y., Miwa, I., Satake, S., Anai, M., and Oka, Y.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
215,
467-473
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jetton, T. L., Postic, C., Niswender, K. D., Moates, M. J., and Magnuson, M. A.
(1994)
in
Diabetes (Baba, S., and Kaneko, T., eds), pp. 193-197, Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam
-
Liang, Y., Jetton, T. L., Zimmerman, E. C., Najafi, H., Berner, D. K., Matschinsky, F. M., and Magnuson, M. A.
(1994)
Diabetes
43,
1138-1145
[Abstract]
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Yang, R. K. Wong, M. Park, J. Wu, J. R. Cook, D. A. York, S. Deng, J. Markmann, A. Naji, B. A. Wolf, et al.
Leucine Regulation of Glucokinase and ATP Synthase Sensitizes Glucose-Induced Insulin Secretion in Pancreatic {beta}-Cells
Diabetes,
January 1, 2006;
55(1):
193 - 201.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Efanov, D. G. Barrett, M. B. Brenner, S. L. Briggs, A. Delaunois, J. D. Durbin, U. Giese, H. Guo, M. Radloff, G. S. Gil, et al.
A Novel Glucokinase Activator Modulates Pancreatic Islet and Hepatocyte Function
Endocrinology,
September 1, 2005;
146(9):
3696 - 3701.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Song, X. Zhang, C. Zhao, N. T. Ang, and Z. A. Ma
Inhibition of Ca2+-Independent Phospholipase A2 Results in Insufficient Insulin Secretion and Impaired Glucose Tolerance
Mol. Endocrinol.,
February 1, 2005;
19(2):
504 - 515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Toye, L. Moir, A. Hugill, L. Bentley, J. Quarterman, V. Mijat, T. Hough, M. Goldsworthy, A. Haynes, A. J. Hunter, et al.
A New Mouse Model of Type 2 Diabetes, Produced by N-Ethyl-Nitrosourea Mutagenesis, Is the Result of a Missense Mutation in the Glucokinase Gene
Diabetes,
June 1, 2004;
53(6):
1577 - 1583.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Magnuson, P. She, and M. Shiota
Gene-altered Mice and Metabolic Flux Control
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 2003;
278(35):
32485 - 32488.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Shiota, C. Postic, Y. Fujimoto, T. L. Jetton, K. Dixon, D. Pan, J. Grimsby, J. F. Grippo, M. A. Magnuson, and A. D. Cherrington
Glucokinase Gene Locus Transgenic Mice Are Resistant to the Development of Obesity-Induced Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes,
March 1, 2001;
50(3):
622 - 629.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. She, M. Shiota, K. D. Shelton, R. Chalkley, C. Postic, and M. A. Magnuson
Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxykinase Is Necessary for the Integration of Hepatic Energy Metabolism
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
September 1, 2000;
20(17):
6508 - 6517.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Foretz, C. Guichard, P. Ferre, and F. Foufelle
Sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c is a major mediator of insulin action on the hepatic expression of glucokinase and lipogenesis-related genes
PNAS,
October 26, 1999;
96(22):
12737 - 12742.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Postic, M. Shiota, K. D. Niswender, T. L. Jetton, Y. Chen, J. M. Moates, K. D. Shelton, J. Lindner, A. D. Cherrington, and M. A. Magnuson
Dual Roles for Glucokinase in Glucose Homeostasis as Determined by Liver and Pancreatic beta Cell-specific Gene Knock-outs Using Cre Recombinase
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 1, 1999;
274(1):
305 - 315.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. D. Niswender, M. Shiota, C. Postic, A. D. Cherrington, and M. A. Magnuson
Effects of Increased Glucokinase Gene Copy Number on Glucose Homeostasis and Hepatic Glucose Metabolism
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 5, 1997;
272(36):
22570 - 22575.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|