Volume 272, Number 36,
Issue of September 5, 1997
pp. 22742-22750
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Isolation of cDNA Encoding Guinea Pig Neutrophil Cationic
Antibacterial Polypeptide of 11 kDa (CAP11) and Evaluation of CAP11
mRNA Expression during Neutrophil Maturation*
(Received for publication, March 3, 1997, and in revised form, May 23, 1997)
Isao
Nagaoka
,
Yuko
Tsutsumi-Ishii
,
Shin
Yomogida
and
Tatsuhisa
Yamashita
From the Department of Biochemistry, Juntendo University, School of
Medicine, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Neutrophils contain various antibacterial
polypeptides and proteins in the granules that contribute to the
killing of microorganisms. Recently, we have purified a cationic
antibacterial polypeptide of 11 kDa (CAP11) from guinea pig neutrophil
granules. CAP11 is a homodimer of
G1LRKKFRKTRKRIQKLGRKIGKTGRKVWKAWREYGQIPYPCRI43
joined with one disulfide bond. In this study, to understand the
regulation of CAP11 expression, we isolated and analyzed cDNA encoding CAP11. Furthermore, we investigated the expression of CAP11
mRNA during neutrophil maturation and localization of CAP11 among
neutrophil granule subsets. Sequence analysis of CAP11 cDNA isolated from guinea pig bone marrow cells using rapid amplification of
cDNA ends technique indicated that CAP11 is synthesized as a
precursor comprising 178 amino acid residues, which is composed of a
signal peptide (N-terminal 29 residues), a propeptide (106 residues),
and a C-terminal mature peptide (43 residues). Interestingly, the
predicted CAP11 precursor displayed the characteristic features of
cathelicidins, a novel protein family of antibacterial polypeptides with a conserved cathelin-like pro-region and a variable C-terminal antibacterial domain. Northern blot and Western blot analyses using
neutrophils, macrophages, eosinophils, mononuclear cells, and bone
marrow cells revealed that only neutrophils and bone marrow cells
expressed CAP11 mRNA and contained CAP11, suggesting that
expression of CAP11 is neutrophil lineage-specific. Furthermore, Northern blot analysis using bone marrow cells separated according to
their maturation stages showed that CAP11 mRNA was predominantly expressed in the cells at later stages of neutrophil maturation. Consistent with this, in situ hybridization using
CAP11-specific cRNA probe demonstrated that CAP11 mRNA was
primarily expressed at metamyelocyte stage. In addition, extracellular
release assay revealed that CAP11 was readily released from neutrophils
accompanied with gelatinase by low concentrations of
N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe without release of specific and
azurophil granule components, and CAP11 was found to be exclusively
present in the fraction containing gelatinase granules, prepared
by Percoll density gradient centrifugation. Together these
observations indicate that CAP11 is a member of cathelicidin family and
its mRNA is preferentially expressed at the later stage of
neutrophil maturation (i.e. metamyelocyte stage).
Furthermore, CAP11 may be stored in the granule subset, possibly the
gelatinase granule.
INTRODUCTION
Neutrophils have been recognized as a key element in host defense
against microbial infections (1, 2). One of the main functions of
neutrophils is the ingestion and subsequent intracellular killing of
microorganisms. Intracellular killing is mediated by oxidative and/or
nonoxidative mechanisms (3, 4). The former depends on oxidants
(H2O2, hypochlorite, chloramines, and hydroxyl radicals) whose production follows the activation and assembly of NADPH
oxidase on the plasma membrane. The nonoxidative mechanism reflects the
actions of potent antibacterial polypeptides residing within the
cytoplasmic granules. A number of antibacterial polypeptides, such as
defensin, azurocidin, bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein,
lysozyme, lactoferrin, cationic antibacterial proteins of 18 kDa
(CAP18)1, indolicidin,
bactenecins, and protegrins, have been isolated from neutrophils of
human and animal species (4-10). In general, they are highly cationic
and act by perturbing the membranes of target microorganisms.
Neutrophils contain three subsets of granules, primary (azurophil)
granules, secondary (specific) granules, and tertiary (gelatinase) granules (11, 12). Among antibacterial polypeptides, defensin, bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein, and azurocidin are known
to be present in azurophil granules, whereas lactoferrin and CAP18 are
found in specific granules, and lysozyme is present in both azurophil
and specific granules (11, 12). Using makers for azurophil granules
(myeloperoxidase, neutrophil elastase, and defensin), specific granules
(lactoferrin) and gelatinase granules (gelatinase), mRNA
expression, and protein synthesis were examined during maturation of
neutrophil precursors in the bone marrow. In this context, in
situ hybridization studies revealed that mRNA transcripts for
myeloperoxidase, neutrophil elastase, and defensin were expressed at
the promyelocyte and myelocyte stages, whereas mRNA for lactoferrin
was expressed at the myelocyte and metamyelocyte stages (13, 14). In
addition, biosynthesis studies using bone marrow cells sorted according
to their stages of maturity showed that myeloperoxidase was mainly
synthesized in the fraction containing myeloblasts and promyelocytes;
lactoferrin was primarily synthesized in the fraction containing
myelocytes and metamyelocytes; and gelatinase was synthesized in the
fraction containing myelocytes, metamyelocytes, and band cells (15). Thus, mRNA expression and synthesis of proteins, which are
characteristic of the different granule subsets, are tightly controlled
at different maturation stages of neutrophil precursors.
Recently, we have purified a cationic antibacterial polypeptide of 11 kDa (CAP11) from guinea pig neutrophil granules (16). CAP11 is a
homodimer of
G1LRKKFRKTRKRIQKLGRKIGKTGRKVWKAWREYGQIPYPCRI43
joined with a disulfide bond and possesses the antimicrobial activities against Gram-negative and positive bacteria. Amino acid
sequence of CAP11 shows partial homology (19-30%) to the putative
active peptides of rabbit and human CAP18 (17-19), suggesting CAP11
might be a homologue of CAP18, the members of cathelin-related antibacterial proteins (cathelicidins) (20). Cathelicidin is a novel
protein family with a conserved pro-region and a variable C-terminal
antibacterial domain, and the pro-sequence is highly identical to the
sequence of cathelin (21), a protein identified in porcine neutrophils.
However, the amino acid sequence of CAP11 precursor has not been
identified, and it is not known whether CAP11 is a member of
cathelicidin family. Furthermore, expression of CAP11 during neutrophil
maturation has not been examined, and the localization of CAP11 among
granule subsets is not clear.
In this study, therefore, to deduce the amino acid sequence of CAP11
precursor, we isolated cDNA encoding CAP11 from bone marrow cells
using RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) technique. In
addition, we evaluated the expression of CAP11 mRNA during neutrophil maturation in the bone marrow by Northern blot and in
situ hybridization. We also examined the localization of CAP11 among granule subsets by extracellular release assay and subcellular fractionation experiment using Percoll density gradient
centrifugation.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cell Preparation
Hartley male guinea pigs weighing
approximately 350 g were used as the source of cells. Blood neutrophils
and mononuclear cells were isolated from heparinized blood by
Ficoll-Conray centrifugation (22). Macrophages were prepared from the
peritoneal cavity 4 days after the intraperitoneal injection of
glycogen (22). Eosinophils were isolated from eosinophil-rich
peritoneal exudates by Ficoll-Conray centrifugation (22). In some
experiments, alveolar macrophages (14), lymphocytes, and monocytes
purified from blood mononuclear cells (22) were also used. Isolated
cells were stained with May/Grünwald/Giemsa, and the purity was
>95%. Bone marrow cells were obtained from femoral bones. Cells were
suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl,
2.7 mM KCl, 8.1 mM
Na2HPO4, 1.5 mM
KH2PO4, pH 7.4).
Isolation of CAP11 cDNA
Total cellular RNA was isolated
from bone marrow cells by the acid guanidinium
thiocyanate/phenol/chloroform extraction method (23).
Poly(A)+ RNA was purified through oligo(dT)-cellulose
chromatography (Collaborative Biomedical Products), and the first
strand cDNA was synthesized with Moloney murine leukemia virus
reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.) using
oligo(dT)18 (U. S. Biochemical Corp.) as a primer. To
obtain the CAP11 cDNA fragment, 5
- and 3
-primers corresponding to
Gly1-Lys8, and
Trp28-Tyr34 of the published amino acid
sequence of CAP11 (16), respectively, were used (Fig. 1): 5
-primer,
5
-gcgaattc-GGCCTGCGGAAGAAGTTCCGGAA-3
; 3
-primer,
5
-gcgaattcGTACTCCCGCCAGGCC-TTCCA-3
, where the lowercase letters
represent EcoRI recognition sequence included to facilitate the subcloning of PCR products. Amplification was performed with 50 pmol of each primer in a final reaction mixture containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 200 µM dNTPs, and 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa) using the following
thermal cycling parameters: 94 °C for 2 min; then 30 cycles at
94 °C for 15 s; 55 °C for 15 s; 72 °C for 30 s;
followed by 72 °C for 5 min. The amplified cDNA fragment
(approximately 120 base pairs was digested with EcoRI and
subcloned into pBluescript SK(
) (Stratagene). DNA sequencing (see
below) revealed that the cDNA fragment encoded the
Gly1-Tyr34 sequence of CAP11. Based on the
nucleotide sequence, 5RT (reverse transcription)-primer, and 5
- and
3
-amplification (amp) primers were synthesized and used for the
RACE protocol (Fig. 1A) (24).
Fig. 1.
Sequencing strategy for cDNA encoding
CAP11, and nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences of the CAP11
precursor. A, bone marrow cell cDNA synthesized with
Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, and
oligo(dT)18 primer was PCR-amplified using 5
-primer and
3
-primer corresponding to Gly1-Lys8 and
Trp28-Tyr34 of mature CAP11, respectively.
Based on the nucleotide sequence of amplified cDNA, 5RT-primer, and
5
- and 3
-amplification (amp) primers were synthesized and used for
the RACE protocol. RACE5
was performed using 5RT-,
5
-amplification, and (dT)18-adapter primers;
AnAAA indicate a tail of dATP. RACE3
was performed using (dT)18adapter, adapter, and
3
-amplification primers. The full-length cDNA was generated using
5
and 3
end primers. B, the nucleotide sequence is
numbered from the 5
end. The deduced amino acid sequence shown under
the nucleotide sequence is numbered from the N-terminal residue of
mature CAP11 peptide, and negative numbers indicate the pre- and
pro-sequence. The consensus sequence for translation initiation (38),
termination codon, and polyadenylation signal are indicated by a
dashed underline, triple stars, and an
underline, respectively. Arrows indicate the
putative cleavage sites for signal peptidase and processing site in
CAP11 precursor.
[View Larger Version of this Image (51K GIF file)]
To amplify the 3
end (RACE3
), poly(A)+ RNA was
reverse-transcribed with oligo(dT)18-adapter primer
containing SalI, BamHI, and HindIII
recognition sites in the adapter sequence. After purification with a
spin column (Quick SpinTM Column G-50, Boehringer Mannheim), the first
strand cDNA was amplified by PCR using the upstream 3
-amplification primer 5
-gcgaattcACAGGAAAAGGATCCAG-3
(corresponding to nt 441-458 shown in Fig. 1B with EcoRI
recognition sequence at 5
end) and the downstream adapter primer. To
amplify the 5
end (RACE5
), poly(A)+ RNA was
reverse-transcribed with 5RT-primer 5
-AGACTTTCCGGCCAGTTTTC-3
(complementary to nt 479-498), and the single-stranded cDNA was tailed with terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase (TOYOBO) using dATP.
Then tailed cDNA was amplified with an upstream
oligo(dT)18-adapter primer and a downstream
5
-amplification primer 5
-gcgaattcCAGTTTTCCCGATTTTCCG-3
(complementary to nt 468-486 with EcoRI recognition
sequence at 5
end) located 12 nucleotides upstream of RT-primer. To
assemble the full-length cDNA, the first strand cDNA
synthesized with oligo(dT)18 primer was amplified using the
5
end primer 5
-gcgaattcGAGTGAGGACCATGGGCA-3
(corresponding to nt
1-18 with EcoRI recognition sequence at 5
end) and the 3
end primer 5
-gcgtcgacCAAGAACACACTAGGTAGTC-3
(corresponding to nt
651-670 with SalI recognition sequence at 5
end). The
amplified cDNA fragments were digested with EcoRI and SalI and subcloned into pBluescript SK(
).
DNA Sequencing
The sequences of cDNAs subcloned into
pBluescript SK(
) were determined by the dideoxy chain termination
method using the ABI PRISMTM Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Core Kit
(with AmpliTaq® DNA Polymerase, FS) and the model 373A DNA Sequencer
(Applied Biosystems). Both strands were sequenced using T3, T7 primers (Promega), and synthetic oligonucleotide primers, which were deduced from the cDNA sequence. Analyses of nucleotide and amino acid sequences were performed with the GeneWorks and PC/GENE software (IntelliGenetics), and homology search was carried out on the SWISS-PROT data base.
Northern Blot Analysis
Total RNA (5 µg) was separated by
electrophoresis on 1% agarose/formaldehyde gel and transferred by
capillary blotting onto nylon membranes (Biodyne® A Membrane; Pall)
(23). RNA was cross-linked with Funa®-UV-Linker (Funakoshi Co. Ltd.),
and the blots were hybridized with cDNA probes labeled with
Multiprime DNA labeling systems (Amersham Corp.) using
[32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol; ICN Biomedicals Inc.) (23).
Probes used for Northern blot analysis were the 0.67-kb CAP11 cDNA
(encompassing nt 1-670; Fig. 1B), the 2.3-kb
-actin
cDNA (pHF
A-1; graciously provided by P. Gunning and L. Kedes,
Stanford University) (25), the 0.76-kb myeloperoxidase cDNA
(PstI-HincII fragment of cDNA clone pMPO62)
(26), the 0.47-kb defensin cDNA isolated from guinea pig bone
marrow cell cDNA library (27), the 0.59-kb lactoferrin cDNA
(encompassing nt 472-1060 of lactoferrin cDNA) (28) obtained by
the PCR amplification of HL60 cell cDNA, and the 0.46-kb gelatinase cDNA (encompassing nt 1567-2024 of gelatinase cDNA) (29)
obtained by the PCR amplification of cDNA from phorbol myristate
acetate-treated U937 cells.
Western Blot Analysis
The cells were treated with 5 mM diisopropyl fluorophosphate (DFP) and disrupted in ice
by sonication (Tomy Ultrasonic Disruptor UD-201, Tominaga Works Ltd.).
The sonicates were centrifuged at 200 × g for 10 min
to sediment nuclei, and the supernatants (106 cell
equivalents) were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on a 7.5-22% linear gradient of polyacrylamide (14). The resolved polypeptides were electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell). The
membrane was blocked in 3% normal goat serum/PBS and probed with
affinity purified rabbit anti-CAP11 antibody (100 ng/ml; see below).
The membrane was further probed with a 1:2000 dilution of horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Organon Teknika Corp.), and
CAP11 was finally detected with ECLTM Western blotting detection
reagents (Amersham Corp.).
Anti-CAP11 serum was raised in rabbits using the synthetic peptide
(corresponding to L2RKKFRKTRKR12 of CAP11) (16)
covalently coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin, and anti-CAP11
antibody was purified by affinity chromatography using the synthetic
peptide-conjugated epoxy-activated Sepharose 6B (Pharmacia Biotech
Inc.), according to the manufacturer's instruction.
Fractionation of Bone Marrow Cells
Bone marrow cells were
mixed with 1% dextran T-500 (Pharmacia), and erythrocytes were
sedimented. The resulting supernatant was centrifuged at 200 × g for 10 min, and the pelleted cells were suspended in PBS
at 107 cells/ml. The cells (15 ml) were applied on top of a
50-ml centrifuge tube containing 9 ml of Percoll (Pharmacia), density
1.080 g/ml, layered below 9 ml of Percoll, density 1.065 g/ml (15). The desired densities of Percoll were obtained by mixing 10 × PBS with precalculated amounts of Percoll and distilled H2O, as
described by the manufacturer. The gradient was centrifuged at
1000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. This resulted in the
fractionation of bone marrow cells into three groups: band 1, a well
defined band on top of the gradient; band 2, all the cells between band
1 and a cell pellet at the bottom, band 3. Band 3 was contaminated with erythrocytes and therefore subjected to a hypotonic lysis.
Cytocentrifuge preparations were made using Cytospin 2 (105
cells/slide, 340 rpm, 10 min; Shandon Instruments) and stained with
May/Grünwald/ Giemsa. Differential counting of stained myeloid cell preparations revealed that band 1 contained 18 ± 6%
myeloblasts, 56 ± 4% promyelocytes, 16 ± 4% myelocytes,
and 10 ± 4% metamyelocytes; band 2 contained 5 ± 3%
promyelocytes, 36 ± 7% myelocytes, 44 ± 8%
metamyelocytes, 10 ± 5% band cells, and 5 ± 3% segmented cells; band 3 contained 4 ± 3% myelocytes, 12 ± 4%
metamyelocytes, 49 ± 5% band cells, and 35 ± 7% segmented
cells (mean ± S.D., n = 3), as previously
reported (15). Total cellular RNA was isolated from the three groups of
cells and subjected to Northern blot analysis (described above). To
measure the relative amounts of mRNA, the detected bands were
quantified using MasterScanTM System (Scanalytics).
In Situ Hybridization
In situ hybridization was
performed essentially based on the methods previously described (14,
30). Bone marrow cells were cytocentrifuged (see above) onto
siliconized RNase-free glass slides, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS,
and treated with 0.25% acetic anhydride, 0.1 M
triethanolamine buffer, pH 8.0. The cytocentrifuge preparations were
hybridized at 45 °C for 14-16 h with 35S-labeled
antisense or sense cRNA probe (107 cpm/ml) and then treated
with RNase. For autoradiography, the slides were coated with Konica
NR-M2 emulsion (Konica Corp.) diluted 1:1 with 0.3 M
ammonium acetate at 42 °C, air-dried, and stored in the dark at
4 °C. After 3-10 days of exposure, the slides were developed in
Konicador Super developer, fixed in Fujifix (Fuji Photo Film Co.,
Ltd.), and stained with May/Grünwald/Giemsa. Silver grain counts
above individual cells or in their close vicinity were microscopically
evaluated, and bone marrow cells hybridized with antisense cRNA probes
were considered as positive if they contained more than four grains per
cell; this was based on the results that the cells hybridized with all
five sense probes (see below) contained less than four grains per cell.
A minimum of 500 cells was evaluated in each preparation using the
morphologic criteria described before (13, 14, 31), and the data were expressed as the percentage of positive cells within each maturation stage. To generate 35S-labeled cRNA probes, the CAP11,
myeloperoxidase, defensin, lactoferrin, and gelatinase cDNAs
(described above) were subcloned into the transcription vector
pBluescript SK (
), and after appropriate linearization, labeled
antisense and sense cRNA probes were synthesized by transcription of
cDNAs with T3 (Stratagene) or T7 (TOYOBO) RNA polymerase using
35S-UTP (1000 Ci/mmol; ICN Biomedicals Inc.).
Immunohistochemical Staining
Cytocentrifuge preparations
(see above) were immunostained as described previously (14). To
inactivate the endogenous peroxidase activity, the slides were treated
with 0.1 M periodic acid and 0.02% sodium borohydride. The
slides were incubated with 100 ng/ml rabbit anti-CAP11 antibody or
rabbit control IgG (Sigma) in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl) containing 1% gelatin and
0.05% Tween 20, and after washing, further incubated with a 1:2000
dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. The
slides were finally developed in 0.05% 3,3
-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride, 0.01% H202 and
counterstained with May/Grünwald/Giemsa.
Extracellular Release
Neutrophils (5 × 107 cells/ml) were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min with or
without various concentrations of N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP; Sigma) in a total volume of 1 ml of PBS containing 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM
MgCl2. After incubation, each tube was placed in ice and
centrifuged at 1850 × g for 5 min. The supernatants
were mixed with 5 mM DFP and used for the assay of CAP11,
lactoferrin, gelatinase,
-glucuronidase, and lactate dehydrogenase.
To measure the total contents, neutrophils sonicates containing 5 mM DFP were used. Extracellular release was calculated as
the content in the supernatant in terms of percentage of the total
content. CAP11 and lactoferrin were detected by Western blot analysis
using rabbit anti-CAP11 antibody and rabbit anti-lactoferrin serum
(1:1000 dilution; Organon Teknika), respectively, as primary
antibodies, as described above. Gelatinase was analyzed by zymography
with SDS-PAGE on 10% polyacrylamide containing 1 mg/ml gelatin under nonreducing conditions (32). To measure the relative amounts, CAP11 (11 kDa) and lactoferrin (80 kDa) bands detected by Western blotting and
gelatinase bands (92, 135, and 220 kDa) (33, 34) detected by zymography
as clear zones of gelatin lysis were scanned with MasterScanTM System.
The densities of CAP11, lactoferrin, and defensin (see below) bands and
the areas of clear zones in gelatin zymograms were quantitated in the
ranges where they were proportional to the amounts of samples used as
follows: CAP11, 105 to 106 cell equivalents;
lactoferrin and defensin, 104 to 105 cell
equivalents; gelatinase, 103 to 104
cell equivalents.
-Glucuronidase and lactate dehydrogenase
activities were measured as described previously (35).
Subcellular Fractionation
Subcellular fractionation of
neutrophils was performed by density centrifugation on Percoll
gradients (36). After treatment with 5 mM DFP, neutrophils
were suspended in disruption buffer (100 mM KCl, 3 mM NaCl, 1 mM ATP, 3.5 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM PIPES, pH 7.2) containing 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride at 5-8 × 107 cells/ml. Cells were disrupted by nitrogen cavitation
(350 p.s.i., 20 min; Parr Instrument Co.), and the cavitate was
collected dropwise into EGTA, pH 7.4, sufficient for a final
concentration of 1.25 mM. Nuclei and unbroken cells were
sedimented by centrifugation at 400 × g for 15 min.
The postnuclear supernatant (S1; 10 ml) was applied on top
of a 3 × 10-ml three-layer Percoll gradient (1.05/1.09/1.12 g/ml)
and centrifuged at 37,000 × g for 30 min. This
resulted in a gradient with four visible bands, from the bottom
designated the
-band (containing azurophil granules), the
1-band (containing specific granules), the
2-band (containing gelatinase granules), and the
-band (containing plasma membrane and secretory vesicles). The four
bands were recovered and used for marker assays after Percoll was
removed by spinning at 180,000 × g for 2 h.
CAP11, lactoferrin, and gelatinase were assayed as described above.
Defensin (3.8 kDa) was analyzed by Western blotting using rabbit
anti-defensin serum (1:1,000 dilution) as a primary antibody (14).
Myeloperoxidase and leucine aminopeptidase activities were
spectrophotometrically measured (35). The densities of Percoll were
adjusted by mixing 10 × disruption buffer with precalculated amounts of Percoll and distilled H2O, and 1 mM
ATP, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1.25 mM EGTA were added before use.
RESULTS
Isolation of cDNA Encoding CAP11
Bone marrow cell
cDNA was PCR-amplified using 5
-primer and 3
-primer corresponding
to Gly1-Lys8 and
Trp28-Tyr34 of mature CAP11 sequence,
respectively (Fig. 1A). DNA
sequencing revealed that the amplified cDNA fragment encoded
Gly1-Tyr34 sequence of CAP11. Based on the
nucleotide sequence, 5RT-primer, and 5
- and 3
-amplification primers
were synthesized and used for the RACE protocol. cDNA fragment
corresponding to nt 1-486 was obtained by RACE 5
, whereas cDNA
fragment corresponding to nt 441-729 with poly(A) tail at 3
end was
obtained by RACE 3
. Finally, sequences of these cDNA fragments
were confirmed by isolation and sequencing of the full-length cDNA
(corresponding to nt 1-670) amplified with 5
and 3
end primers. The
nucleotide sequence (nt 1-729) was deposited with the accession number
D87405. Northern blot analysis using 32P-labeled CAP11
cDNA probe demonstrated a 0.9-kb mRNA in bone marrow cells
(Fig. 3A). Assuming a poly(A) tail of 200-300 nt (37),
CAP11 mRNA is predicted to encode 600-700 nt. Thus, CAP11 cDNA
(nt 1-729) likely represents a nearly complete transcript of CAP11
mRNA.
Fig. 3.
Evaluation of CAP11 expression in various
types of leukocytes and comparison of myeloperoxidase, defensin,
lactoferrin, gelatinase, and CAP11 mRNA expression in bone marrow
cells and mature neutrophils. A, Northern blot analysis of
CAP11 mRNA. Total cellular RNA (5 µg) from various types of
leukocytes was electrophoresed on an agarose/formaldehyde gel and
blotted onto a nylon membrane. The blot was hybridized to
32P-labeled CAP11 or
-actin cDNA probe. The 0.9-kb
CAP11 mRNA and the 2.2-kb
-actin mRNA transcripts are
indicated. B, Western blot analysis of CAP11. Post-nuclear
fractions (106 cell eq) from various types of leukocytes
were subjected to SDS-PAGE, and the 11-kDa bands corresponding to CAP11
were detected by immunoblot analysis. C, Northern blot
analysis of myeloperoxidase (2.8 kb), defensin (0.6 kb), lactoferrin
(2.5 kb), gelatinase (2.8 kb), and CAP11 (0.9 kb) mRNA using bone
marrow cells and mature neutrophils. Total cellular RNA (5 µg) from
bone marrow cells and mature neutrophils was electrophoresed on an
agarose/formaldehyde gel and blotted onto a nylon membrane. The blot
was hybridized to 32P-labeled myeloperoxidase, defensin,
lactoferrin, gelatinase, or CAP11 cDNA probe.
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]
The complete cDNA sequence of 729 nt and its deduced amino acid
sequence are shown in Fig. 1B. An open reading frame of 534 nt was preceded by a short 5
-untranslated region of 11 nt. The sequence flanking the putative translation start site at position 12 showed homology to a Kosak consensus sequence (38). A stop codon was
found at position 546, followed by a 3
-untranslated region of 181 nt.
A typical polyadenylation signal was found at position 707, 23 nt
upstream of the poly(A) tail.
The cDNA encoded a polypeptide of 178 amino acid residues
(prepro-CAP11) with a calculated mass of 20,132 and an overall
calculated pI of 11.02. The start methionine was followed by a 29-amino
acid hydrophobic region (Met
135-Ala
107)
corresponding to a putative signal peptide, as expected for a protein
stored in cytoplasmic granules. The signal peptide was followed by a
portion (Trp
106-Val
1) including 13 positively and 11 negatively charged residues distributed over 106 residues, with a calculated pI of 8.30. The cDNA sequence corresponding to mature CAP11 sequence
(Gly1-Ile43 with a calculated pI of 12.32) was
present at the 3
end of the open reading frame, and its deduced
sequence was identical with the amino acid sequence previously
determined (16). No putative N-glycosylation site was found
in the prepro-CAP11 sequence.
Homology search through the SWISS-PROT data base revealed that the
deduced sequence of prepro-CAP11 was homologous to the known members of
the cathelicidin family of antibacterial polypeptides (Fig.
2) (20). Alignment of these polypeptides
showed that their structural similarities were confined to the
N-terminal regions, whereas the C-terminal regions were very different,
with the exception of short regions of high similarities among CAP11
and CAP18. The pro-region of CAP11 precursor shared 31-52% identities
with the members of cathelicidins. As observed for cathelicidins, four conserved cysteine residues that could form two intramolecular disulfide bridges (20) were clustered in the C-terminal moiety of the
pro-sequence of CAP11 precursor.
Fig. 2.
Alignment of CAP11 precursor with
cathelicidins. The deduced amino acid sequence of CAP11 precursor
is shown on the top. Arrows indicate the putative
cleavage sites for signal peptidase and processing site in CAP11
precursor. Cathelicidin sequences are deduced from CAP18 (human and
rabbit) (19, 39), p15 (52), C12 (41), protegrin-1 (48), PMAP-23 (46),
PMAP-36 (40), RP-39 (44), dodecapeptide (47), Bac7 (42), Bac5 (43), and
indolicidin (45) cDNAs. The amino acid sequence of cathelin was
determined by Edman degradation (21), and the blocked N-terminal residue, pyroglutamic acid, is shown by Z. Identical amino
acid residues are indicated by a dash, and gaps
introduced to optimize the alignment are denoted by a dot.
No attempts were made to align different sequences of the C-terminal
regions of these polypeptides. Four invariant cysteine residues are
boxed. Amino acid residues of human and rabbit CAP18
homologous with CAP11 are underlined in the C-terminal
region.
[View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]
Evaluation of Cells Expressing CAP11
To evaluate the
regulation of CAP11 expression, we examined mRNA expression for
CAP11 in various types of leukocytes. Northern blot analysis revealed
that bone marrow cells and neutrophils expressed the 0.9-kb CAP11
mRNA, but the expression was more abundant in bone marrow cells
than in mature neutrophils (Fig.
3A). No CAP11 mRNA
transcripts were observed in macrophages, eosinophils, and mononuclear
cells. However, when the same RNA samples were analyzed with
-actin
cDNA probe, the 2.2-kb
-actin mRNA transcripts were observed
in these cells. Next, CAP11-containing cells were investigated by
Western blot analysis. The 11-kDa bands corresponding to CAP11 were
detected in bone marrow cells and mature neutrophils but not in other
types of leukocytes (Fig. 3B). Expression of CAP11 was also
evaluated using lymphocytes, monocytes, and alveolar macrophages by
Northern blot and Western blot analyses. However, these cells neither
expressed CAP11 mRNA nor contained CAP11 (data not shown). Thus,
among cells examined, mature neutrophils and bone marrow cells
expressed CAP11 mRNA and contained CAP11, suggesting that the
expression of CAP11 is likely neutrophil lineage-specific.
In addition, expression of myeloperoxidase, defensin, lactoferrin, and
gelatinase mRNA was examined using bone marrow cells and mature
neutrophils and compared with that of CAP11 mRNA. Myeloperoxidase and defensin mRNA transcripts were detected in bone marrow cells but not in mature neutrophils (Fig. 3C). In contrast,
lactoferrin and gelatinase mRNA transcripts were detected in both
bone marrow cells and mature neutrophils, although the mRNA levels
were much lower in mature neutrophils than in bone marrow cells, as
with CAP11 mRNA.
Evaluation of CAP11 mRNA-expressing Cells among Bone Marrow
Cells
The expression of CAP11 gene is assumed to be modulated
during neutrophil maturation in the bone marrow, since the levels of
CAP11 mRNA transcripts are different between mature neutrophils and
bone marrow cells that consist of neutrophil precursor cells at various
maturation stages. Then, CAP11 mRNA expression was evaluated using
bone marrow cells separated according to their maturation stages (15).
Based on the association between cell maturation and specific cell
density, bone marrow cells were sorted into three groups by density
gradient centrifugation as follows: band 1, containing immature cells
(myeloblasts and promyelocytes); band 2, containing cells of
intermediate maturity (myelocytes and metamyelocytes); band 3, containing the most mature cells (band cells and segmented
neutrophils). Expression of myeloperoxidase and defensin mRNA
transcripts was most pronounced in the cells from band 1 but was
remarkably reduced in more mature cells, especially cells from band 3 (Fig. 4, A and B).
In contrast, expression of lactoferrin mRNA was greatly increased
in the cells from band 2 in comparison with cells from band 1. However,
the mRNA level was strikingly decreased in the cells from band 3. Interestingly, gelatinase and CAP11 mRNA transcripts were markedly
increased in the cells from band 2 compared with cells from band 1, and the mRNA levels were considerably maintained in the cells from band
3. Expression of
-actin mRNA was almost the same among cells from three bands. These observations indicate that CAP11 and gelatinase mRNA transcripts are predominantly expressed at the later stages of
neutrophil maturation in the bone marrow and more abundantly expressed
in mature cells than lactoferrin mRNA.
Fig. 4.
Evaluation of the expression of
myeloperoxidase, defensin, lactoferrin, gelatinase, and CAP11 mRNA
in the bone marrow cells separated by Percoll density gradient
centrifugation. A, Northern blot analysis. Total cellular
RNA (5 µg) of bone marrow cells separated into three groups according
to their maturation stages (band 1, containing immature
cells; band 2, containing cells of intermediate maturity;
band 3, containing the most mature cells) was
electrophoresed on an agarose/formaldehyde gel and blotted onto a nylon
membrane. The blot was hybridized to 32P-labeled
myeloperoxidase, defensin, lactoferrin, gelatinase, CAP11, or
-actin
cDNA probe. B, relative amounts of myeloperoxidase (
), defensin (
), lactoferrin (
), gelatinase (
), CAP11
(
), and
-actin (
) mRNA in the cells from bands 1, 2, and
3. mRNA bands detected by Northern blot analysis were quantified
using MasterScanTM System. The content of mRNA in the bands is
expressed as a percentage of the maximum mRNA levels. Values are
the mean ± S.D. of three separate experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]
To further identify mRNA-expressing
cells, we analyzed bone marrow cells with in situ
hybridization using 35S-labeled cRNA probes (Figs. 5 and
6). Positive cells for myeloperoxidase and defensin mRNA transcripts were predominantly present in the promyelocyte (89-99%) and myelocyte (57-93%) stages with much smaller percentages of positive metamyelocytes. In contrast,
lactoferrin mRNA-positive cells were mostly found at the myelocyte
stage (90%), and the percentages of positive cells decreased after the
metamyelocyte stage. In addition, gelatinase mRNA-positive cells
were mainly observed in the myelocyte (71%) and metamyelocyte (90%)
stages, and the proportions of positive cells decreased in band cells and segmented neutrophils. Interestingly, CAP11 mRNA-positive cells
were primarily found in the metamyelocyte stage (96%) with much
smaller percentages of positive myelocytes, band cells, and segmented
neutrophils. No cells of eosinophil, erythroid, or mononuclear cell
lineage showed hybridization with CAP11 cRNA antisense probe.
Fig. 5.
Proportion of bone marrow cells within each
cell stage expressing myeloperoxidase, defensin, lactoferrin,
gelatinase, and CAP11 mRNA. After hybridization with the
appropriate 35S-labeled antisense or sense cRNA probe, the
number of positive cells within each stage was evaluated for
myeloperoxidase (
), defensin (
), lactoferrin (
), gelatinase
(
), and CAP11 (
) mRNA. Positive cells are expressed as a
percentage of total number of cells in each stage. Values are the
mean ± S.D. of three separate experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]
Fig. 6.
Evaluation of CAP11 mRNA expression by
in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical staining of
CAP11 in bone marrow cells. Bone marrow cells were hybridized with
35S-labeled CAP11 cRNA probes (A-F).
A, C, and E, bone marrow cells hybridized with 35S-labeled CAP11 antisense probes.
Myelocytes (MC), metamyelocytes (MM), band cells
(Band), and segmented neutrophil (PMN) show
positive hybridization. B, D, and F,
bone marrow cells hybridized with 35S-labeled CAP 11 sense
probes. All cells are negative. Bone marrow cells were
immunohistochemically evaluated using rabbit anti-CAP11 antibody
(G) or rabbit control IgG (H). Metamyelocytes,
band cells, and segmented neutrophil are positive in G but
negative in H. Magnification × 500.
[View Larger Version of this Image (82K GIF file)]
In addition, bone marrow cells containing CAP11 were
immunohistochemically evaluated using anti-CAP11 antibody. CAP11 was detected predominantly in the cells of neutrophil lineage such as
metamyelocyte, band cells, and segmented neutrophils (Fig. 6) but not
detected in the cells of other cell lineage. Quantification of
CAP11-positive cells at different maturation stages revealed that
positive cells were less than 30% at the myelocyte stage. Interestingly, coincident with the increase of CAP11 mRNA levels, the percentage of CAP11-positive cells markedly increased at the metamyelocyte stage (>95%), and the increased levels remained almost
constant (>99%) in band cells and segmented neutrophils, although the
expression of CAP11 mRNA was reduced in these cells.
Together these observations indicate that CAP11 gene transcription
likely occurs during a very limited stage of neutrophil maturation,
mostly at the metamyelocyte stage, and results in the synthesis and
cytoplasmic accumulation of CAP11, which is present in the subsequent
stages of neutrophil maturation.
Localization of CAP11 among Neutrophil Granule
Subsets
Gelatinase is synthesized and stored in the granules
during later stages of neutrophil maturation (11, 12, 15). Thus, concomitant expression of CAP11 and gelatinase mRNA transcripts in
metamyelocytes suggests that CAP11 and gelatinase might be localized in
the same subset of granules. Gelatinase is localized in both specific
and gelatinase granules, and a low dose of fMLP (10 nM) is
reported to induce the selective release of gelatinase from gelatinase
granules without release of specific and azurophil granule components
(36). Then, the localization of CAP11 among neutrophil granule subsets
was examined by comparing the extracellular release of granular
components. At low concentrations of fMLP (0.5-10 nM),
gelatinase was readily released from neutrophils without release of
lactoferrin (a specific granule marker) above resting level, and the
release further increased at a higher concentration of fMLP (100 nM), accompanied with the release of lactoferrin (Fig.
7). In contrast, extracellular release of
-glucuronidase (an azurophil marker) and lactate dehydrogenase (a
cytosol marker) was less than 10% at any concentration of fMLP.
Interestingly, extracellular release of CAP11 apparently occurred at
low concentrations of fMLP (0.5-10 nM) but was not
augmented by 100 nM fMLP. Furthermore, localization of
CAP11 was assessed using granule subset fractions prepared by Percoll
density gradient centrifugation (Fig. 8)
(36). The
-band contained the majority of azurophil granule markers myeloperoxidase and defensin, whereas the
-band contained plasma membrane identified by leucine aminopeptidase (22). The
1-band contained the majority of specific granule marker
lactoferrin, whereas almost equal amounts of gelatinase (approximately
45% of total cell content) were located in both the
1-band (containing specific granules) and
2-band (containing gelatinase granules), as previously
observed (36). In addition, albumin (a matrix marker for secretory
vesicles) (11, 12) was mostly detected in the
-band by SDS-PAGE
analysis (data not shown), indicating that the
-band contains
secretory vesicles as well as plasma membrane (36). Interestingly,
CAP11 was found to be exclusively localized in the gelatinase
granule-containing
2-band. Together these observations
suggest that CAP11 may be stored in the granule subset, possibly the
gelatinase granule.
Fig. 7.
Extracellular release of CAP11 from
neutrophils. Neutrophils were incubated without or with fMLP
(0.5-100 nM) at 37 °C for 15 min and then centrifuged.
The contents of CAP11 and lactoferrin in the supernatants and
neutrophil sonicates were quantitated by SDS-PAGE/Western blot analysis
using rabbit anti-CAP11 antibody and anti-lactoferrin serum,
respectively. Gelatinase contents were analyzed by zymography with
SDS-PAGE. Release of CAP11 (
), gelatinase (
), and lactoferrin
(
) into the supernatants is expressed as a percentage of total cell
content. Under these conditions, release of lactate dehydrogenase and
-glucuronidase was less than 10%. Values are the mean ± S.D.
of three separate experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]
Fig. 8.
Distribution of biochemical markers among
subcellular fractions separated by three-layer Percoll density gradient
centrifugation. A, neutrophils were disrupted by nitrogen
cavitation followed by centrifugation to pellet nuclei and unbroken
cells. The post-nuclear supernatant (S1) was applied on
three-layer Percoll density gradients and centrifuged. This resulted in
a gradient with four visible bands, the
-band, the
1-band, the
2-band, and the
-band.
These four bands were recovered and assayed for myeloperoxidase (
), defensin (), lactoferrin (
), gelatinase (
), CAP11 (
), and leucine aminopeptidase (). The content of markers in the bands is
expressed as a percentage of the total content recovered in the four
bands. The recovery of each marker is calculated as total content
recovered in the four bands in terms of a percentage of content in
S1 and is as follows: myeloperoxidase, 93 ± 4%;
defensin, 91 ± 9%; lactoferrin, 92 ± 9%; gelatinase,
94 ± 10%; CAP11, 80 ± 13%; leucine aminopeptidase,
92 ± 2%. Values are the mean ± S.D. of three separate
experiments. B, examples of Western blot analyses and
gelatin zymography. The
-,
1-,
2-, and
-bands (corresponding to 105 cell eq for defensin and
lactoferrin and 106 cell eq for CAP11) were subjected to
SDS-PAGE, and 3.8-kDa defensin, 80-kDa lactoferrin, and 11-kDa CAP11
bands were detected by immunoblot analysis. Gelatinase was analyzed by
gelatin zymography using each band (corresponding to 104
cell eq). The 220-kDa bands represent the homodimer of 92-kDa neutrophil gelatinase (34). A faint band of 135 kDa detected in the
1-band likely represents the complex of 92-kDa
gelatinase and 25-kDa neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin
localized in the specific granules (11, 12).
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
To understand the regulation of CAP11 expression, we have isolated
and analyzed cDNA encoding CAP11. Furthermore, we have investigated
the expression of CAP11 mRNA during neutrophil maturation and
localization of CAP11 among neutrophil granule subsets. Sequence analysis of CAP11 cDNA isolated from guinea pig bone marrow cells using RACE technique has revealed that CAP11 is likely synthesized as a
precursor comprising 178 amino acid residues, which is composed of a
signal peptide (N-terminal 29 residues), a propeptide (106 residues),
and a C-terminal mature peptide (43 residues). Interestingly, the
predicted CAP11 precursor is homologous with the members of cathelicidins, a novel family of antibacterial polypeptides, and displays the characteristic features of cathelicidins that consist of a
highly conserved prepro-region of 128-143 residues including a
putative 29-30-residue signal peptide and a cathelin-like propeptide of 99-114 residues containing four invariant cysteine residues and a
variable C-terminal antimicrobial region ranging in length from 12 to
100 residues (20). Based on the structures, the C-terminal peptides of
cathelicidins are classified into
-helical peptides (CAP18, PMAP-36)
(18, 19, 39, 40), proline- and arginine-rich peptides (C12, Bac7, Bac5,
PR-39) (41-44), tryptophan-rich peptides (indolicidin, PMAP-23) (45,
46), and loop-forming peptides with one or two disulfide bonds (cyclic
dodecapeptide, protegrins) (47, 48). CAP11 possesses the amphipathic
-helical structure in the N-terminal cationic region
(Gly1-Lys15), which is assumed to be
implicated in the antibacterial activity (16). Thus, CAP11 could be
regarded as a member of cathelicidins that contain an amphipathic
-helical peptide at the C-terminal region. However, it is worth
noting that CAP11 has a homodimeric structure joined with a disulfide
bond (16), whereas other
-helical peptides (CAP18, PMAP-36) contain
no cysteine residue involved in the covalent dimerization. The
predicted amino acid sequence of prepro-CAP11 suggests that the
pro-CAP11 must be further cleaved to generate mature CAP11, following
signal peptide removal. We have tried to detect the precursors of CAP11
by Western blot analysis using anti-CAP11 antibody. However, we have
been unsuccessful in detecting the high molecular weight bands
corresponding to CAP11 precursors in bone marrow cells and mature
neutrophils (data not shown). This may be due to the transient nature
of the precursor in myeloid cells and/or the fact that the antibody has
been developed against the peptide of mature CAP11 and not the
precursor sequence. The processing of CAP11 precursors could be
elucidated in the future using antibody recognizing the propeptide
sequence of CAP11 and cellular extracts prepared from metabolically
labeled myeloid cells.
Neutrophils contain three subsets of granules, azurophil granules,
specific granules, and gelatinase granules (11, 12). During
differentiation and maturation of neutrophil precursors in the bone
marrow, azurophil granules appear at the promyelocyte stage, whereas
specific granules appear at the myelocyte stage, and gelatinase
granules are formed later than specific granules (11, 12, 31).
Consistent with this, mRNA for myeloperoxidase, neutrophil
elastase, and defensin (azurophil granule constituents) is expressed at
promyelocyte and myelocyte stages, whereas mRNA for lactoferrin (a
specific granule constituent) is expressed at myelocyte and
metamyelocyte stages (13, 14). Furthermore, biosynthesis experiments
have indicated that myeloperoxidase is mainly synthesized in the bone
marrow cell fraction containing myeloblasts and promyelocytes;
lactoferrin is primarily synthesized in the fraction containing
myelocytes and metamyelocytes; gelatinase (specific and gelatinase
granule constituents) is synthesized in the fractions containing
myelocytes, metamyelocytes, and band cells (15). In the present study,
CAP11 has been shown to be specifically expressed in the neutrophil
lineage. Furthermore, Northern blot analyses using bone marrow cells
and mature neutrophils have revealed that mature neutrophils express
CAP11, gelatinase, and lactoferrin mRNA but not myeloperoxidase and
defensin mRNA, although bone marrow cells express all these
mRNA transcripts, suggesting that CAP11 mRNA is expressed at
later stages of neutrophil maturation. In fact, Northern blot analysis
using bone marrow cells separated according to their maturation stages
has shown that CAP11 mRNA as well as gelatinase mRNA is
abundantly expressed in the cells at later stages of neutrophil
maturation. Furthermore, in situ hybridization using
specific antisense cDNA probes has demonstrated that CAP11 mRNA
is primarily expressed in metamyelocytes and to a lesser extent in
myelocytes and band cells, whereas lactoferrin mRNA is mainly
detected in myelocytes with limited expression in metamyelocytes and
band cells. Interestingly, gelatinase mRNA transcripts are mostly
expressed in both myelocytes and metamyelocytes and to a lesser extent
in band cells. Thus, CAP11 mRNA is simultaneously expressed with
gelatinase mRNA at metamyelocyte and band cell stages, although
substantial amounts of gelatinase mRNA are also expressed at
myelocyte stage, as with lactoferrin mRNA. In addition, coincident
with the expression of CAP11 mRNA, the number of CAP11-containing cells has markedly increased at metamyelocyte stage. Together these
observations suggest that CAP11 is actively synthesized at the
metamyelocyte stage, accompanied with its mRNA expression, and
likely stored with gelatinase in the granule subset, possibly the
gelatinase granule, which can be supported by the results of
extracellular release assay and subcellular fractionation experiments. However, it is also possible that CAP11 and gelatinase are present in
the different granule subpopulations within the
2
fraction. This could be definitively resolved by double-labeling
immunogold electron microscopy, which has been employed to distinguish
gelatinase granules from specific granules in human neutrophils
(11).
Several antibacterial polypeptides belonging to cathelicidin family
have been purified from neutrophils (6-10, 20); however, their
subcellular localization and gene expression during neutrophil maturation have not been examined in detail. Recently, CAP18, a member
of cathelicidins, has been identified in the specific granules of human
neutrophils (8). Colocalization of CAP18 and lactoferrin in the same
granule subset (specific granules) apparently suggest that CAP18 gene
transcription occurs primarily at the myelocyte stage of neutrophil
maturation, like lactoferrin gene transcription. Importantly, CAP18
mRNA has been found to be predominantly expressed in myelocytes
with limited mRNA expression in more immature cells (promyelocytes)
and mature cells (metamyelocytes, band cells and segmented neutrophils)
by in situ hybridization using CAP18-specific cRNA probe and
human bone marrow cells.2
Thus, expression of CAP18 and CAP11 genes seems to be differently regulated at the stages of neutrophil maturation in the bone marrow, although CAP18 and CAP11 are both the members of cathelicidin family.
For understanding the in vivo function of CAP11, it is
noteworthy that CAP11 is readily released extracellularly from
neutrophils accompanied with gelatinase. During stimulation of
neutrophils, gelatinase granules are mobilized more extensively than
specific and azurophil granules, and the preferential mobilization of
gelatinase granules leads to the extracellular release of a
collagenolytic enzyme, gelatinase, which may facilitate extravasation
of neutrophils (11, 12). Interestingly, CAP11 has been shown to retain
the antibacterial activities even in the presence of a physiological concentration of NaCl (0.15 M) (16), suggesting that CAP11
can exert the antibacterial activity in the extracellular fluid. Thus, CAP11 is assumed to play an important part in the killing of bacteria in the extracellular milieu during migration of neutrophils into the
infected tissues.
In the present study, we have revealed that the genes for azurophil
granule proteins (myeloperoxidase and defensin), specific granule
proteins (lactoferrin and gelatinase), gelatinase granule protein
(gelatinase), and CAP11 are stage-specifically expressed during
differentiation and maturation of neutrophil precursors in the bone
marrow. Consequently, identification of factors that control the
transcription of genes coding for different granule proteins seems to
be important for the understanding of mechanisms controlling
differentiation and maturation of neutrophil lineage precursor cells.
Based on this concept, the promoters for the myeloperoxidase,
neutrophil elastase, and defensin genes have been investigated, and
transcription factors such as PU.1 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein
are assumed to be involved in the myeloid-specific expression of these
genes (49-51). Isolation and characterization of the promoter for the
CAP11 gene will help us to clarify the transcriptional control that is
acting at the later stage of neutrophil maturation.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported in part by Takeda Science Foundation
and the Science Research Promotion Fund from Japan Private School Promotion Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) D87405.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry,
Juntendo University, School of Medicine, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan. Tel.: 81-3-5802-1033; Fax: 81-3-3814-9300; E-mail: nagaokai{at}med.juntendo.ac.jp.
1
The abbreviations used are: CAP18, cationic
antibacterial proteins of 18 kDa; CAP11, cationic antibacterial
polypeptide of 11 kDa; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; PBS,
phosphate-buffered saline; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT, reverse
transcription; nt, nucleotide(s); kb, kilobase(s); DFP, diisopropyl
fluorophosphate; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; fMLP,
N-formyl Met-Leu-Phe; PMAP, porcine myeloid antibacterial
peptide; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid.
2
I. Nagaoka, M. Nasu, Y. Tsutsumi-Ishii, K. Saionji, and J. Igari, unpublished observations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are grateful to T. Hayakawa for technical
assistance.
REFERENCES
-
Lehrer, R. I., Ganz, T., Selsted, M. E., Babior, B., and Curnutte, J. T.
(1988)
Ann. Intern. Med.
109,
127-142
-
Gallin, J. I.
(1992)
in
Inflammation: Basic Principles and Clinical Correlates (Gallin, J. I., Goldstein, I. M., and Snyderman, R., eds), 2nd Ed., pp. 859-874, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
-
Klebanoff, S. J.
(1992)
in
Inflammation: Basic Principles and Clinical Correlates (Gallin, J. I., Goldstein, I. M., and Snyderman, R., eds), 2nd Ed., pp. 541-588, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
-
Elsbach, P., and Weiss, J.
(1992)
in
Inflammation: Basic Principles and Clinical Correlates (Gallin, J. I., Goldstein, I. M., and Snyderman, R., eds), 2nd Ed., pp. 603-636, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
-
Elsbach, P.
(1990)
Trends Biotechnol.
8,
26-30
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gabay, J. E., and Almeida, R. P.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
5,
97-102
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hirata, M., Shimomura, Y., Yoshida, M., Morgan, J. G., Palings, I., Wilson, D., Yen, M. H., Wright, S. C., and Larrick, J. W.
(1994)
Infect. Immun.
62,
1421-1426
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cowland, J. B., Johnsen, A. H., and Borregaard, N.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
368,
173-176
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Selsted, M. E., Novotny, M. J., Morris, W. L., Tang, Y.-Q., Smith, W., and Cullor, J. S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
4292-4295
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kokryakov, V. N., Harwig, S. S. L., Panyutich, E. A., Shevchenko, A. A., Aleshina, G. M., Shamova, O. V., Korneva, H. A., and Lehrer, R. I.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
327,
231-236
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Borregaard, N., Lollike, K., Kjeldsen, L., Sengeløv, H., Bastholm, L., Nielsen, M. H., and Bainton, D. F.
(1993)
Eur. J. Haematol.
51,
187-198
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Borregaard, N.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Hematol.
3,
11-18
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fouret, P., duBois, R. M., Bernaudin, J.-F., Takahashi, H., Ferrans, V. J., and Crystal, R. G.
(1989)
J. Exp. Med.
169,
833-845
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nagaoka, I., Yomogida, S., Nakamura, S., Someya, A., Iwabuchi, K., and Yamashita, T.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
302,
279-283
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Borregaard, N., Sehested, M., Nielsen, B. S., Sengeløv, H., and Kjeldsen, L.
(1995)
Blood
85,
812-817
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yomogida, S., Nagaoka, I., and Yamashita, T.
(1996)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
328,
219-226
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tossi, A., Scocchi, M., Skerlavaj, B., and Gennaro, R.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
339,
108-112
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Agerberth, B., Gunne, H., Odeberg, J., Kogner, P., Boman, H. G., and Gudmundsson, G. H.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
195-199
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Larrick, J. W., Hirata, M., Balint, R. F., Lee, J., Zhong, J., and Wright, S. C.
(1995)
Infect. Immun.
63,
1291-1297
[Abstract]
-
Zanetti, M., Gennaro, R., and Romeo, D.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
374,
1-5
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ritonja, A., Kopitar, M., Jerala, R., and Turk, V.
(1989)
FEBS Lett.
255,
211-214
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nagaoka, I., and Yamashita, T.
(1984)
Comp. Biochem. Physiol.
79B,
147-151
-
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Frohman, M. A., Dush, M. K., and Martin, G. R.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
8998-9002
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gunning, P., Ponte, P., Okayama, H., Engel, J., Blau, H., and Kedes, L.
(1983)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
3,
787-795
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Johnson, K. R., Nauseef, W. M., Care, A., Wheelock, M. J., Shane, S., Hudson, S., Koeffler, H. P., Selsted, M., Miller, C., and Rovera, G.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
2013-2028
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nagaoka, I., Someya, A., Iwabuchi, K., and Yamashita, T.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
280,
287-291
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Johnston, J. J., Rintels, P., Chung, J., Sather, J., Benz, E. J., Jr., and Berliner, N.
(1992)
Blood
79,
2998-3006
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wilhelm, S. M., Collier, I. E., Marmer, B. L., Eisen, A. Z., Grant, G. A., and Goldberg, G. I.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
17213-17221
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ohwada, A., Takahashi, H., Nagaoka, I., and Kira, S.
(1994)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
11,
214-220
[Abstract]
-
Bainton, D. F.
(1992)
in
Inflammation: Basic Principles and Clinical Correlates (Gallin, J. I., Goldstein, I. M., and Snyderman, R., eds), 2nd Ed., pp. 303-324, Raven Press, Ltd., New York
-
Yasumitsu, H., Miyazaki, K., Umenishi, F., Koshikawa, N., and Umeda, M.
(1992)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
111,
74-80
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hibbs, M. S., Hasty, K. A., Seyer, J. M., Kang, A. H., and Mainardi, C. L.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
2493-2500
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kjeldsen, L., Johnsen, A. H., Sengeløv, H., and Borregaard, N.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10425-10432
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nagaoka, I., and Yamashita, T.
(1985)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
847,
67-76
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kjeldsen, L., Sengeløv, H., Lollike, K., Nielsen, M. H., and Borregaard, N.
(1994)
Blood
83,
1640-1649
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brawerman, G.
(1981)
CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem.
10,
1-38
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kozak, M.
(1984)
Nucleic Acids Res.
12,
857-872
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Larrick, J. W., Morgan, J. G., Palings, I., Hirata, M., and Yen, M. H.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
179,
170-175
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Storici, P., Scocchi, M., Tossi, A., Gennaro, R., and Zanetti, M.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
337,
303-307
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pungercar, J., Strukelj, B., Kopitar, G., Renko, M., Lenarcic, B., Gubensek, F., and Turk, V.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
336,
284-288
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Scocchi, M., Romeo, D., and Zanetti, M.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
352,
197-200
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zanetti, M., Del Sal, G., Storici, P., Schneider, C., and Romeo, D.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
522-526
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Storici, P., and Zanetti, M.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
196,
1058-1065
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Del Sal, G., Storici, P., Schneider, C., Romeo, D., and Zanetti, M.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
187,
467-472
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zanetti, M., Storici, P., Tossi, A., Scocchi, M., and Gennaro, R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
7855-7858
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Storici, P., Del Sal, G., Schneider, C., and Zanetti, M.
(1992)
FEBS Lett.
314,
187-190
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zhao, C., Liu, L., and Lehrer, R. I.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
346,
285-288
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Srikanth, S., and Rado, T. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32626-32633
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ford, A. M., Bennett, C. A., Healy, L. E., Towatari, M., Greaves, M. F., and Enver, T.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
10838-10843
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nagaoka, I., Ishihara, N., and Yamashita, T.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
356,
33-38
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Levy, O., Weiss, J., Zarember, K., Ooi, C. E., and Elsbach, P.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
6058-6063
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.