JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arteaga, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Guyer, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arteaga, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Guyer, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 37, Issue of September 12, 1997 pp. 23247-23254
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Unliganded Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Dimerization Induced by Direct Interaction of Quinazolines with the ATP Binding Site*

(Received for publication, October 3, 1996, and in revised form, May 23, 1997)

Carlos L. Arteaga Dagger §, Timothy T. Ramsey , Laura K. Shawver par and Cheryl A. Guyer **

From the Dagger  Departments of Medicine and Cell Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt Cancer Center and the Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-5536, the  Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-5536, par  SUGEN, Inc., Redwood City, California 94063, and the ** Department of Molecular Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Receptor dimerization is critical for signaling by the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase. This occurs after binding of the receptor's extracellular domain by ligand or bivalent antibodies. The role of other receptor domains in dimerization is less clear, and there are no examples of dimers induced by direct perturbation of the EGFR kinase domain. Submicromolar concentrations of AG-1478 and AG-1517, quinazolines specific for inhibition of the EGFR kinase, induced reversible receptor dimerization in vitro and in intact A431 cells. Consistent with the inhibitory effect of quinazolines on receptor kinase activity, the dimers formed lacked a detectable Tyr(P) signal. Quinazoline-induced EGFR dimerization was abrogated in vitro by ATP and the ATP analog adenyl-5'-yl imidodiphosphate. Receptors with a single-point mutation in the ATP binding site as well as wild-type EGFR with a covalent modification of the ATP site failed to dimerize in response to AG-1478 and AG-1517. These data suggest that EGFR dimerization can be induced by the interaction of quinazolines at the ATP site in the absence of receptor ligand binding. In SKBR-3 cells, the quinazolines induced the formation of inactive EGFR/ErbB-2 heterodimers, potentially sequestering ErbB-2 from interacting with other coreceptors of the ErbB family. Structural studies of the quinazoline interaction with the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain should allow for an analysis of receptor-specific chemical features required for binding to the ATP site and disruption of signaling, a strategy that can be perhaps applied to other tumor cell receptor systems.


INTRODUCTION

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)1 is a 170-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein with an extracellular (EC) ligand-binding domain, a single transmembrane (TM) region, and an intracellular (IC) tyrosine kinase and regulatory domain (Ref. 1 and references therein). Ligand binding to the EC domain results in receptor dimerization and stimulation of the intrinsic tyrosine kinase, leading to receptor autophosphorylation and the phosphorylation of numerous cellular substrates (2-4). The EGFR interaction with a variety of signal transduction proteins ultimately transmits growth and differentiation signals (2-4). One of the earliest events leading to receptor activation is ligand-induced conformational changes in the EC domain followed by receptor dimerization (5-7). The EGFR domains mediating protein-protein interactions critical for dimerization are still under investigation. Studies using chemical cross-linkers to trap dimer formation demonstrate that soluble EGFR EC domains undergo ligand-mediated dimerization (8-10), suggesting that the IC domain may not be essential for EGFR oligomerization. However, expressed EGFR IC domains are capable of undergoing autophosphorylation as well as associating with full-length receptors and phosphorylating kinase-negative receptors (11, 12), suggesting a more than passive role of the IC domain in dimerization.

The requirement for the EGFR tyrosine kinase activity in cellular signaling is based upon observations that receptors in which Lys-721 within the ATP binding site has been mutated and, hence, lack detectable kinase activity, do not display the full range of biochemical responses (13-15). This apparent requirement for kinase activity has focused attention on the development of drugs capable of blocking kinase activity specifically. Quinazoline inhibitors of the EGFR kinase are competitive with ATP; in the 1-10 nM range, they block EGFR phosphorylation and Src kinase activity in vivo but do not inhibit the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, p210Bcr-Abl, insulin receptor, CSF-1 receptor, and bFGF receptor tyrosine kinases (16-19). In studying the ability of the EGFR kinase quinazoline inhibitors AG-1478 and AG-1517 to block TGFalpha -induced signaling, their effect on receptor dimerization was measured. These studies demonstrated that quinazoline inhibitors per se induce inactive EGFR homodimers in EGFR-overexpressing cells or EGFR/ErbB-2 heterodimers in cells overexpressing ErbB-2 and containing lower levels of EGFR. The ability of the quinazolines to inhibit kinase function by sequestering receptors into inactive dimers appears related to their interaction with the receptor ATP binding site. These data suggest a novel biochemical mechanism of (inactive) receptor dimerization in which the initial monomer interactions are mediated via the EGFR IC domain and point to the variety of mechanisms by which the activities of ErbB receptor kinases can be inhibited by such compounds.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cell Lines and Reagents

The A431 human squamous carcinoma and SKBR-3 human breast cancer cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockland, MD). A431 cells were maintained in IMEM (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FCS (JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, KS), while the SKBR-3 line was passaged in McCoy 5A medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 15% FCS. Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing either wild-type EGFR or one of two kinase-negative receptors; D813A, in which Asp-813, the catalytic base in phosphoryl transfer, is mutated to Ala, and K721R, in which Lys-721 within the ATP binding site is mutated to Arg, have been described previously (20, 21). These cell lines were maintained in minimum essential medium alpha  medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% dialyzed FCS (Sigma). Genistein, ATP, and AMP-PNP were purchased from Sigma. AG-1478 and AG-1517 are quinazolines that display an IC50 for inhibition of EGFR kinase activity in vitro of 3 nM and 0.9 nM, respectively (16, 18, 19). AG-1296 is a quinoxaline inhibitor of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor kinase (16). SU-4231 is a tyrphostin inhibitor of the HER2/ErbB-2 kinase which exhibits an IC50 of 50 nM in vitro.2 Recombinant heregulin-beta was kindly provided by Dr. Mark Sliwkowski (Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA).

EGFR and Tyr(P) Precipitation and Immunoblot Procedures

Subconfluent A431 cells in IMEM, 10% FCS were treated with TGF-alpha at 37 °C, washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) on ice, and solubilized in TGP buffer (1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). After removing Triton-insoluble material by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, lysates were precipitated at 4 °C using the 986 polyclonal EGFR antiserum (Ref. 22; a generous gift from Dr. Graham Carpenter, Vanderbilt University) or the 528 monoclonal IgG2a raised against the EC domain of the EGFR (Ref. 23; kindly provided by Dr. John Mendelsohn, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) followed by protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Sigma). After four washes with TGP buffer, the EGFR immune complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. Immunoblot analyses of EGFR or Tyr(P) employed an anti-EGFR monoclonal IgG raised against a cytoplasmic receptor sequence (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA) or an anti-Tyr(P) IgG2 (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc, Lake Placid, NY), respectively. Bound antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-mouse Ig followed by ECL (Amersham Corp.).

ErbB-2 Precipitation and Immunoblot Procedures

For the former, cell lysates were incubated with the Tab 250 IgG1 raised against the EC domain of ErbB-2 (Ref. 24; Berlex Biosciences, Richmond, CA). For immunoblotting, a rabbit polyclonal antiserum raised against amino acid residues 1222-1236 at the carboxyl terminus of ErbB-2 (NeoMarkers, Freemont, CA) was utilized.

Chemical Cross-linking of EGFR in Intact Cells and Soluble EGFR

Chemical cross-linking in intact cells was performed as described by Sorkin and Carpenter (25). After treatment with ligand or kinase inhibitors, cell monolayers were washed twice with ice-cold PBS on ice and solubilized for 20 min at 4 °C with TGP buffer containing freshly prepared 1 mM bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate (BS3, Pierce) (26). To terminate the cross-linking reaction, a final concentration of 250 mM glycine was added for an additional 5 min prior to centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove Triton-insoluble material. This procedure would cross-link both cell surface and internalized EGFR dimers (25). Therefore, to detect EGFR dimers present at the surface, cells were incubated for 20 min at 4 °C with 1 mM BS3 dissolved in PBS. Glycine (250 mM) was added for 5 min at 4 °C followed by washes with PBS on ice and subsequent lysis with TGP buffer. Protein concentration in cross-linked lysates was measured by the BCA method (Pierce). Equivalent amounts of protein were then resolved by 5-7% gradient SDS-PAGE followed by EGFR immunoblot analysis.

For experiments with soluble EGFR, A431 cells were solubilized with TGP buffer containing 5 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM MnCl2 for 20 min at 4 °C. After removing detergent-insoluble material by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, equivalent aliquots of lysate (approximately 100 µg in 100 µl) were treated at room temperature with TGF-alpha for 5 min or with AG-1296, AG-1478, or AG-1517 for 30 min. Freshly prepared 10-20 mM BS3 was then added to a final concentration of 1 mM, and samples were rocked for 20 min at 4 °C. Cross-linking reactions were terminated by the addition of 2.5 M glycine to a final concentration of 250 mM for an additional 5 min. Samples were then subjected to 5-7% gradient SDS-PAGE and EGFR immunoblot analysis.

Modification of A431 Membrane Vesicles by FSBA

A431 cell membrane vesicles were prepared by published procedures (27). To covalently modify the EGFR ATP binding site, vesicles were incubated with 50 µM FSBA in N,N-dimethylformamide for 60 min at room temperature as described previously (28). The vesicles were subsequently solubilized in TGP buffer and subjected to quinazoline-mediated dimerization as described above.

In Vitro Kinase Assay of the EGFR IC Domain

Aliquots of the recombinant TKD61 (provided by John Koland, University of Iowa), which corresponds to the entire cytoplasmic portion of the EGFR (residues 645-1186) in 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 10 mM MnCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100 were incubated for 5 min at room temperature in the presence or absence of 10-50 µM ATP (Sigma) as described previously (29). Phosphorylation reactions were quenched by the addition of SDS-PAGE sample buffer and boiling for 5 min. Equal volumes from each sample were then resolved by 5-10% gradient SDS-PAGE and subjected to EGFR and Tyr(P) immunoblot procedures.

Anchorage-independent Growth Assay

For testing the growth effects of quinazolines, a 1-ml top layer containing a single-cell suspension of 3 × 104 cells, 0.8% agarose (Sea-Plaque, FMC BioProducts, Rockland, ME), IMEM, 10% FCS, and 10 mM Hepes, with or without different concentrations of inhibitors, was added to a 1-ml bottom layer of 0.8% agarose, 10% FCS in triplicate 35-mm dishes. In some cases, heregulin-beta was added the following day in a 100-µl volume to the top layer. Dishes were incubated in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C, and colonies measuring >50 µm were counted after 7 days using an Omnicon Stem model II image analyzer (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY).


RESULTS

Blockade of EGFR Phosphorylation---We initially studied the inhibitory potency of AG-1478 on basal and ligand-induced EGFR phosphorylation in intact A431 cells. A 30-min preincubation with >= 100 nM AG-1478 inhibited the basal and TGF-alpha -stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of the receptor without a detectable change in immunoprecipitable EGFR (Fig. 1). Similar results were obtained with AG-1517 (not shown). These compounds reversibly inhibit the growth of cultured EGFR-overexpressing human tumor cells in the submicromolar range without altering EGF binding (Refs. 16 and 19 and data below).


Fig. 1. Effect of AG-1478 on basal and TGF-alpha -induced EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation in A431 cells. Subconfluent A431 cells in IMEM, 10% FCS were preincubated for 30 min with the indicated concentrations of AG-1478 followed by incubation with TGF-alpha (100 ng/ml) for 5 min at 37 °C. After two washes with ice-cold PBS on ice, the monolayers were solubilized with TGP buffer and precipitated with 986 polyclonal EGFR antiserum. Immune complexes were resolved by 7% SDS-PAGE and subjected to Tyr(P) (P-Tyr) and EGFR immunoblot analyses as indicated under "Experimental Procedures."
[View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]

Quinazoline-mediated Dimerization of Wild-type and Mutant EGFR in Intact Cells

The effect of various inhibitors on EGFR dimerization in vivo was assessed by chemical cross-linking. TGF-alpha , AG-1478, and AG-1517 induced EGFR homodimers in A431 cells, whereas AG-1296, a quinoxaline inhibitor of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor, SU-4231, a quinazoline inhibitor of the HER2/ErbB-2 kinase, or genistein, a nonspecific competitive ATP inhibitor (30), had no effect on dimer formation (Fig. 2A). These cross-linking conditions would be expected to trap both internalized and cell surface EGFR dimers, since BS3 was added to cells simultaneously with detergent (25). Antiphosphotyrosine immunoblot analysis indicated that TGF-alpha induced the formation of active dimers as evidenced by the high levels of phosphorylation in the dimer band, whereas receptors treated with AG-1478 or AG-1517 exhibited no Tyr(P) signal (Fig. 2B), confirming that AG-1478 and AG-1517 specifically inhibit kinase activity. Genistein at 100 µg/ml blocked phosphorylation of the EGFR. EGFR dimerization by AG-1478 was dose-dependent and detectable at concentrations as low as 100 nM, occurred as early as 5 min after quinazoline treatment, and was reversible upon removal of the kinase inhibitor (not shown). To distinguish internalized from cell surface EGFR dimers and confirm that the quinazolines were inducing receptor dimerization in intact cells, we performed experiments in which BS3 was added in the absence of detergent to A431 cells pretreated with TGF-alpha , AG-1478, or AG-1517. Although at a lower level than when the cross-linking was performed in TGP buffer, EGFR dimers were induced by TGF-alpha and both kinase inhibitors in intact A431 cells (Fig. 2C). The increased amount of dimers detected after solubilization in BS3-containing TGP buffer could be due to availability of the EGFR cytoplasmic domain to the cross-linking agent in detergent-permeabilized/solubilized cell lysates.


Fig. 2. Quinazoline-induced dimerization of EGFR in intact A431 cells. Subconfluent A431 cells in IMEM, 10% FCS were treated for 5 min with 100 ng/ml TGF-alpha or for 30 min with the indicated quinazolines (10 µM) or genistein (10-100 µg/ml) at 37 °C. After two washes with PBS on ice, monolayers were subjected to chemical cross-linking with 1 mM BS3 in TGP buffer as described under "Experimental Procedures." Equivalent amounts of protein were resolved by 5-7% gradient SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting to detect EGFR (A) or Tyr(P) (P-Tyr; B). C, comparison of quinazoline-induced dimerization of surface EGFR (intact cells) versus surface plus internalized EGFR (Triton-solubilized) in A431 cells. Cells were treated at 37 °C with 100 ng/ml TGF-alpha for 5 min or with 10 µM of the indicated quinazolines for 30 min. After washes, receptor cross-linking was performed with 1 mM BS3 dissolved in TGP buffer (Triton-solubilized cells) or with 1 mM BS3 in PBS (intact cells) followed by lysis in TGP buffer. As in panel A, cross-linked cell lysates were tested in an EGFR immunoblot procedure. Each lane contains 50 µg of protein. ctl, control.
[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]

We next studied the biochemical mechanisms of quinazoline-induced dimerization using Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing either wild-type EGFR or one of two kinase-negative receptors: D813A, in which Asp-813, the catalytic base in phosphoryl transfer, is mutated to Ala (20), or K721R, in which Lys-721 within the ATP binding site is mutated to Arg (21). Like TGF-alpha , which induced dimers of wild type and each EGFR mutant in intact cells, the treatment of cells expressing wild-type receptor or D813A with AG-1478 and AG-1517 also resulted in receptor dimerization. However, no detectable dimers were observed upon treatment of cells expressing K721R (Fig. 3). These results suggest that the direct interaction of quinazolines with residues within the ATP binding site, including Lys-721, is critical for the observed dimerization. Alternatively, the binding of the quinazolines at another site within the kinase domain allosterically induces a conformational change of the ATP binding site that precludes kinase activation but facilitates dimerization.


Fig. 3. Ligand- and quinazoline-induced dimerization of wild-type and kinase-negative mutant EGF receptors in intact cells. Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing wild-type EGFR, D813A (a kinase-negative receptor in which the catalytic base is mutated to Ala), or K721R (a kinase-negative receptor with a Lys right-arrow Arg substitution in the ATP binding site) were treated at 37 °C for 5 min with 100 ng/ml TGF-alpha or for 30 min with AG-1296, AG-1478, or AG-1517 (each at 10 µM). After chemical cross-linking with 1 mM BS3, samples were subjected to electrophoresis as in Fig. 2 followed by EGFR immunoblotting. ctl, control.
[View Larger Version of this Image (58K GIF file)]

Effect of AMP-PNP and Modification of the ATP Site on Quinazoline-mediated EGFR Dimerization

To test whether a quinazoline-ATP site interaction was necessary for dimer formation, we examined the competitive effect of the slowly hydrolyzable ATP analog, AMP-PNP, on EGFR dimerization induced by AG-1478. Initial experiments showed that like TGF-alpha , AG-1478 and AG-1517 can dimerize Triton-solubilized EGFR at room temperature or at 37 °C, indicating that results in vitro paralleled those obtained with intact cells (data not shown). To facilitate binding of AMP-PNP to the ATP site, the divalent cations Mg2+ and Mn2+ were added to soluble EGFR preparations prior to quinazoline treatment. As shown in Fig. 4A, preincubation of soluble EGFR with 1 mM AMP-PNP drastically reduced EGFR dimerization induced by 0.1-10 µM AG-1478. Similar results were obtained using 200 µM ATP (data not shown). Further mechanistic evidence linking quinazoline binding to the ATP site and EGFR dimerization was obtained using A431 membrane vesicles modified with the ATP analog FSBA, which covalently reacts with Lys-721 within the ATP binding site of the EGFR, thus inhibiting kinase activity (28, 31, 32). Minimal dimerization of FSBA-modified EGFR occurred in the presence of 1-10 µM AG-1478, whereas AG-1478-mediated dimerization of unmodified EGFR was prominent at concentrations >= 0.1 µM (Fig. 4B). Under the conditions utilized, FSBA treatment results in the modification of approximately 80% of the EGFR present as assessed by inhibition of receptor kinase activity (28). Therefore, the residual dimeric signal probably corresponds to AG-1478-mediated dimerization of the remaining unmodified EGFR.


Fig. 4. Effect of AMP-PNP or FSBA on AG-1478-mediated EGFR dimerization. A, a 100-mm tissue culture dish of A431 cells was solubilized in TGP buffer containing 5 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM MnCl2 for 20 min at 4 °C. After removing Triton-insoluble material by centrifugation at 14,000 × g, equal aliquots of lysate were incubated in the presence or absence of 1 mM AMP-PNP for 30 min on ice, followed by treatment with 0.001-10 µM AG-1478 at room temperature for 30 min. B, membrane vesicles from A-431 cells were incubated in the absence (N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) controls) or presence of 50 µM FSBA as described under "Experimental Procedures" and then solubilized in TGP buffer. Equal aliquots were next treated with 0.001-10 µM AG-1478 for 30 min at room temperature. As in Fig. 4A, in each lane soluble receptors were cross-linked with 1 mM BS3 and resolved by 5-7% gradient SDS-PAGE followed by EGFR immunoblot analysis.
[View Larger Version of this Image (33K GIF file)]

A number of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the tyrphostin class display competition with both ATP and the protein substrate (16); however, the ability of the quinazolines to compete with an EGFR protein substrate is unknown. To investigate whether a peptide substrate would impair quinazoline-induced EGFR dimer formation, we used a previously characterized high affinity tyrosine-containing substrate (Glu-Glu-Leu-Glu-Asp-Asp-Tyr-Glu-Asp-Asp-Nle-Glu-Glu; tyrsub), which exhibits a Km (app) of 32 µM for phosphorylation by the EGFR (33). Preincubation with 200 µM peptide substrate did not alter EGFR dimerization, nor did it enhance the inhibition of AG-1478-mediated dimerization by AMP-PNP (Fig. 5), suggesting that EGFR dimerization does not result from quinazoline interaction with the peptide substrate binding site but rather results predominantly from their effect on altering the conformation of the ATP binding site, either directly or allosterically.


Fig. 5. Effect of AMP-PNP and peptide substrate on quinazoline-mediated EGFR dimerization. Equal aliquots of Triton-solubilized EGFR, prepared as in Fig. 4A, were preincubated for 30 min at 4 °C with 1 mM AMP-PNP, 200 µM peptide substrate (p.s.), or both, followed by a 30-min treatment with 1-10 µM AG-1478 at room temperature. Following BS3-mediated cross-linking, samples were analyzed for EGFR monomers and cross-linked dimers as described in the legend to Fig. 4.
[View Larger Version of this Image (67K GIF file)]

Studies with EGFR IC Domain

We examined whether quinazoline-mediated EGFR dimerization required the EC and TM receptor domains by utilizing recombinant TKD61 protein, which corresponds to the entire cytoplasmic portion of the EGFR (29). As shown in Fig. 6, soluble holoreceptors from A431 cells but not TKD61 form dimers in the presence of AG-1478, suggesting that the EC and/or TM domains are required for stabilization of homodimer formation by the quinazoline. The functional integrity of the ATP site was tested by an in vitro kinase reaction in the presence of divalent cations (12, 29). In the presence of 10 mM MnCl2 and 10-50 µM ATP, TKD61 underwent phosphorylation on tyrosine and exhibited slower migration on SDS-PAGE as determined by immunoblot analysis (data not shown).


Fig. 6. Effect of AG-1478 on dimerization of the EGFR IC domain. Soluble TKD61 (100 nM), corresponding to residues 645-1186 of the human EGFR, or solubilized A-431 EGFR was incubated in TGP buffer containing 5 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM MnCl2 with or without 10 µM AG-1478 for 30 min at room temperature. Following cross-linking with 1 mM BS3, samples were subjected to 5-10% gradient SDS-PAGE and EGFR immunoblotting.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]

Quinazoline-mediated EGFR/ErbB-2 Heterodimerization and Growth Effects

The effect of quinazolines on dimerization of the homologous receptor ErbB-2 (HER2/neu) was examined in SKBR-3 human breast cancer cells. These cells exhibit gene amplification for ErbB-2 (34), approximately 105 EGF binding sites/cell (35, 36), and constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation and association of both ErbB-2 and ErbB-3 (37). TGF-alpha treatment had little effect on the appearance of ErbB-2 on the region corresponding to dimeric receptors. The Tyr(P) signal in the dimer band resulting from TGF-alpha stimulation probably corresponds to cross-linked EGFR and/or EGFR/ErbB-2 heterodimers. However, AG-1517 effectively induced ErbB-2 dimers in SKBR-3 cells; these as well as the ErbB-2 monomers were not detected by Tyr(P) immunoblotting (Fig. 7, left and middle panels). These results suggest that in the presence of AG-1517, the elevated basal activity of the ErbB-2 kinase is inhibited, leading to a reduction in Tyr(P) content perhaps due to the action of cellular phosphatases. To investigate the composition of the dimers induced by TGF-alpha versus AG-1517, cross-linked lysates were precipitated using either anti-EGFR or anti-ErbB-2 monoclonal antibodies that recognize each respective receptor's EC domain. ErbB-2 immunoblot analysis revealed that the dimers induced by AG-1517 are a combination of EGFR/ErbB-2 heterodimers and ErbB-2 homodimers (Fig. 7, right panel). Similar results were obtained with 10 µM AG-1478. Of note, the Tyr(P) dimeric band enhanced by TGF-alpha treatment (Fig. 7, middle panel) was not precipitated at a detectable level by anti-EGFR antibodies (Fig. 7, right panel) suggesting that, given the relative amounts of each receptor present in SKBR-3 cells (ErbB-2[tmt]EGFR), TGF-alpha may not be as effective as EGF in inducing EGFR/ErbB-2 heterodimerization (38, 39) and/or that quinazolines are more effective in mediating stable association, albeit inactive, of the co-receptor tyrosine kinases.


Fig. 7. Quinazoline-induced ErbB-2 dimerization. Subconfluent SKBR-3 cell monolayers in McCoy 5A, 15% FCS were treated at 37 °C for 5 min with 100 ng/ml TGF-alpha or for 30 min with 10 µM AG-1478. After two washes with PBS on ice, monolayers were subjected to chemical cross-linking with 1 mM BS3 as described under "Experimental Procedures," resolved by 4-7% gradient SDS-PAGE, and subjected to immunoblot procedures to detect ErbB-2 (left) or Tyr(P) (P-Tyr) (middle). Each lane contains 50 µg of protein. From 500 µg of cross-linked cell lysates, each EGFR or ErbB-2 was precipitated with the 528 anti-EGFR or the Tab 250 anti-ErbB-2 monoclonal antibody, respectively. Immune complexes were resolved by 4-7% gradient SDS-PAGE and subjected to ErbB-2 immunoblot analysis (right). ctl, control; ip, immunoprecipitation.
[View Larger Version of this Image (53K GIF file)]

We next examined the effect of incubation with quinazolines on anchorage-independent growth of A431 and SKBR-3 cells. These cell lines exhibit an EGFR- and ErbB-2-dependent phenotype in culture, respectively, as supported by studies with specific antibodies that block each respective receptor's EC domain and markedly inhibit tumor cell proliferation (40, 41). Both lines were growth-inhibited by AG-1517 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 8A). The IC50 for growth in A431 cells was <0.1 µM, consistent with the concentration of quinazoline required for inhibition of basal EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 1) and induction of inactive receptor homodimerization in vivo (Fig. 4) as well as with the published (nanomolar) concentrations required for inhibition of the EGFR kinase in vitro (16, 18). On the other hand, the IC50 for growth in the ErbB-2-overexpressing SKBR-3 cells was >1 µM (Fig. 8). This concentration corresponded to those required to block ErbB-2 phosphorylation and inducing inactive ErbB-2 dimerization in vivo (Fig. 7); however, it was markedly lower than the published quinazoline IC50 (>100 µM) for the ErbB-2 kinase in vitro (16). Finally, we tested the effect of AG-1517 on heregulin action in SKBR-3 cells. This ligand can induce ErbB-2 phosphorylation and cell proliferation via binding to ErbB-3 (42). As shown in Fig. 8B, AG-1517 blocked heregulin-beta -stimulated colony growth. Examination of tyrosine phosphorylation of ErbB-2 in response to exogenous heregulin-beta treatment of SKBR-3 cells was also inhibited by AG-1517.3 These results suggest that the quinazolines can alter growth factor responses by the formation of inactive ErbB-2 homodimers and/or heterodimers with other ErbB family members.


Fig. 8. Effect of AG-1478 on anchorage-independent growth of EGFR- and ErbB-2-overexpressing tumor cells. A, 3 × 104 A431 or SKBR-3 cells were plated in 0.8% agarose, 10% FCS, 10 mM Hepes in the absence or presence of AG-1517 (0.01-10 µM). After 7 days, colonies measuring >50 µm were counted as described under "Experimental Procedures." Each data point represents the mean number of colonies ± S.E. of triplicate determinations. Inset, numerical data shown as percentage of control A431 or control SKBR-3 colonies for comparing the IC50 of AG-1517 for both cell lines. B, effect of recombinant heregulin-beta on AG-1517-treated SKBR-3 cells. A similar number of SKBR-3 cells was plated in soft agarose as indicated above in the absence or presence of 10 µM AG-1517. The following day, a 100-µl volume containing recombinant heregulin-beta for a final assay concentration ranging from 0.1-10 nM was added to the top layer of agarose. Each data point represents the mean number of colonies ± S.E. of three dishes. As in the data shown in Fig. 8A, 10 µM AG-1517 totally suppressed SKBR-3 colony formation.
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

Previous studies have demonstrated that ligand- or bivalent antibody-mediated perturbation of the EGFR EC domain either in intact cells or in vitro results in receptor dimerization. Our studies suggest that the interaction of quinazoline inhibitors with the receptor's kinase domain can also lead to receptor dimerization. This quinazoline-mediated EGFR dimerization is related to the inhibitors' effects on the ATP binding site as indicated by 1) the absence of dimers in AG-1478-treated Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing a kinase-negative receptor mutated at the ATP site (K721R) versus another kinase-negative receptor mutated at the catalytic base (D813A); 2) the inhibition of quinazoline-induced EGFR dimer formation by AMP-PNP and ATP; 3) the inhibition by FSBA of AG-1478-induced dimerization of EGFR from A431 membrane vesicles. In addition, the lack of inhibition of homodimer formation by a high affinity peptide substrate for the EGFR suggests that quinazoline effects on the ATP site rather than on the substrate binding site mediate EGFR oligomerization. Taken together with previously published experiments in which quinazolines show competitive kinetics with respect to ATP (16, 18), these results provide support for a direct interaction of quinazolines within the ATP binding site rather than at an allosteric site.

Aside from inhibiting kinase activation by directly competing with ATP, quinazoline binding to the ATP pocket in the EGFR appears to perturb the three-dimensional structure of the receptor and hence stabilize interactions involved in receptor dimerization. The ability to induce dimerization was somewhat surprising, given that under physiological conditions of high ATP concentrations in intact cells or in the presence of 1 mM AMP-PNP (Figs. 4A and 5) or 200 µM ATP in vitro, little or no dimerization is observed. These results suggest that the affinity of the receptor for ATP is insufficient for ATP binding to stably induce and/or transduce the desired conformational changes required for dimerization, whereas the higher affinity interactions of quinazoline inhibitors with the ATP site are of adequate stability to induce a conformational change leading to dimerization. Our results further indicate that the presence of the EC and/or TM domains is required for the ability of quinazolines to cause EGFR dimerization by an induced fit mechanism, since the treatment of the TKD61 cytoplasmic EGFR domain with AG-1478 did not result in its dimerization. These results support previous studies suggesting that multiple receptor domains play a role in EGFR dimerization.

In terms of involvement of the EC domain in dimerization, the v-ErbB oncoprotein, a naturally occurring altered form of the EGFR that lacks the majority of the EC domain, did not display oligomerization as assayed by nondenaturing gel electrophoresis (43). In addition, EGF can induce the dimerization of a soluble EGFR EC domain (8). Sorokin et al. (44) reported that insertion of an extra cysteine in the EC juxtamembrane region of the EGFR led to the formation, albeit ligand-induced, of a covalently linked dimeric receptor that exhibited constitutive activity upon ligand removal. In the case of the TM domain, an activating single-point mutation in the TM domain of the homologous receptor HER2/neu results in constitutive dimerization and kinase autophosphorylation (45). An equivalent Glu-627 right-arrow Val mutation in the EGFR TM domain expressed in NIH 3T3 cells resulted in constitutive receptor phosphorylation, hypersensitivity to exogenous ligand, and physical association with cellular substrates, although constitutive homodimers were not detected (46). These studies suggest that the TM domain plays more than a passive role in receptor dimerization.

The specific region(s) of the EC and TM domains required for quinazoline-mediated EGFR dimerization will require additional studies with site-directed mutants. In the context of other studies, however, our results suggest a possible role for the IC and/or kinase domains in EGFR dimerization. Supporting the possible involvement of these domains, a 110-kDa EC domain peptide generated by proteolytic cleavage of A431 cell-purified EGFR, dimerized less efficiently than full-length receptors as measured by sedimentation profiles in sucrose gradients (47). In a more recent study, Chantry (11) reported that a truncated EGFR lacking the EC domain was capable of associating with and phosphorylating kinase-negative full-length receptors when both receptors were coexpressed in human 293 fibroblasts. These truncated EGFR constructs associated with full-length EGFR, HER-2, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor in vivo, suggesting that the conserved regions in the kinase domain of these molecules (48) may be involved in receptor/receptor interactions. Finally, v-ErbB mutants exhibiting truncation of the majority of the ligand-binding EC domain heterodimerize covalently with native c-ErbB1 in chicken embryo fibroblasts in the absence of ligand (49). Recently, an EGFR mutant highly homologous to v-ErbB was isolated from human glioblastoma cells (50). Sucrose gradient centrifugation analysis of this receptor suggested the ligand-independent presence of a dimeric autophosphorylated truncated receptor population (51).

An obvious question is whether the quinazolines would also dimerize other receptors of the ErbB family (ErbB-2, ErbB-3, and ErbB-4), which exhibit 53-80% homology with the EGFR in their kinase domain (52). Since A431 cells contain low levels of these other tyrosine kinases, we examined this question in SKBR-3 cells, which exhibit approximately 105 EGF binding sites/cell, gene amplification at the ErbB-2 locus, and high levels of ErbB-3. Although it binds ATP, ErbB-3 is devoid of tyrosine kinase activity (53), preferably associating with ErbB-2 for signaling (54, 55). AG-1517 induced unphosphorylated EGFR/ErbB-2 heterodimers as well as ErbB-2 homodimers in SKBR-3 cells. This resulted in inhibition of basal and heregulin-stimulated anchorage-independent growth (Fig. 8). The formation of inactive EGFR/ErbB-2 heterodimers as well as ErbB-2 homodimers mediated by AG-1517 potentially decreases the population of ErbB-2 available for constitutive and ligand-induced association with the kinase-weak ErbB-3 coreceptor, leading to the observed growth inhibition.

Taken together, these data imply that in addition to their affinity to and competition for the ATP site, these compounds can inhibit tyrosine kinase activity by causing receptor homo- and heterodimerization in an inactive state, thus sequestering EGFR and/or related ErbB receptors from signaling interactions and acting very much like dominant-negative receptor mutants. Therefore, one could infer that for the antitumor effect of quinazolines, not only high intracellular concentrations of ATP need to be considered but also the functional coexpression and content of ErbB family members within different cell backgrounds, which, in turn, might dictate the net impact of drug action. The latter is underscored by the large difference between the in vitro and in vivo IC50 for quinazolines against the ErbB-2 kinase (>100 µM versus <10 µM (Fig. 8), the latter in SKBR-3 cells). Although these compounds exhibit relatively higher specificity for EGFR at low concentrations, the heterodimerization between EGFR and ErbB-2 would be attractive in tumor cells co-overexpressing both receptors, a condition associated with cell transformation and a more malignant phenotype in human carcinomas (56-58). In addition, ErbB-2 inactivation per se has been shown to impair EGFR-mediated transformation (59, 60). In cells such as A431 that contain very high levels of EGFR, the preferred and perhaps only detectable mechanism of antitumor action would be the formation of inactive EGFR homodimers.

It should be pointed out that the proportion of receptors trapped by cross-linker during cell solubilization may indeed underestimate the total EGFR pool dimerized at the moment of BS3 addition. Cell solubilization could result in dissociation of EGF from EGFR (25), suggesting a similar possibility for receptors bound by quinazolines. In addition, the efficiency of receptor cross-linking is limited due to the rapid hydrolysis of BS3 in aqueous solution. Since A431 cells secrete autocrine TGF-alpha (61) and exhibit a very high EGFR density, one could assume that in these cells, receptors are in a dynamic monomer-dimer equilibrium. All these considerations raise the possibility that, in cells with EGFR overexpression, most of the EGFRs could potentially be shifted into an inactive dimer state by quinazoline inhibitors as long as stable concentrations of these are maintained inside the cell. In tumor cells that are dependent on endogenous EGFR signaling for viability and/or the maintenance of their transformed phenotype, this scenario would have important clinico-biological implications.

In summary, the data presented indicate that the interaction of quinazolines with the ATP binding site can induce homodimerization of the EGFR as well as eliminate effective signal transduction. Binding to the ATP site of the EGFR by submicromolar concentrations of quinazolines results in marked growth inhibition of tumor cells with EGFR overexpression and/or gene amplification. At higher concentrations, this interaction with the EGFR can also induce detectable inactive heterodimers of EGFR with ErbB-2, thus preventing functional interactions with other preferred ErbB receptors. Structural three-dimensional studies of the quinazoline interactions with the receptor's ATP site will shed light on the molecular basis for this novel mechanism of dimerization and should allow for further development of more specific and effective inhibitors of the EGFR kinase and related ErbB receptors.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by Merit Review and Clinical Investigator grants from the Department of Veteran Affairs (to C. L. A.), National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant R01 CA62212 (to C. L. A.), the Ingram Gene Therapy Fund, and NIH Grant R55 CA65943 (to C. A. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed. Division of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 1161 22nd Ave. South, 1956 TVC, Nashville, TN 37232-5536. Tel.: 615-936-1919; Fax: 615-343-7602; E-mail: carlos.arteaga{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EC, extracellular; TM, transmembrane; IC, intracellular; TGF, transforming growth factor; FCS, fetal calf serum; AMP-PNP, adenyl-5'-yl imidodiphosphate; BS3, bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; FSBA, 5'-p-fluorosulfonylbenzoyl adenosine; IMEM, improved minimal essential medium; IC50, quinazoline concentration that inhibits kinase activity 50%; Tyr(P), phosphotyrosine.
2   C. L. Arteaga and L. K. Shawver, unpublished results.
3   T. T. Ramsey, L. K. Shawver, C. A. Guyer, and C. L. Arteaga, manuscript in preparation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge the technical support of Deirdre Sanchez and thank the following individuals: Dr. John Koland (Univ of Iowa) for supplying the TKD61 receptor, Dr. Alexander Levitzki (Hebrew University of Jerusalem) and Dr. Cho Tang (SUGEN, Inc.) for providing the kinase inhibitors and Dr. James V. Staros (Vanderbilt University) for critical reading of the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Carpenter, G., and Cohen, S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 7709-7712 [Free Full Text]
  2. Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1990) Cell 61, 203-212 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Carpenter, G. (1993) Forum 3, 616-634
  4. Pawson, T., and Schlessinger, J. (1994) Curr. Biol. 3, 434-442
  5. Cochet, C., Kashles, O., Chambaz, E. M., Borrello, I., King, C. R., and Schlessinger, J. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 3290-3295 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Heldin, C.-H. (1995) Cell 80, 213-223 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Greenfield, C., Hiles, I., Waterfield, M. D., Federwisch, M., Wollmer, A., Blundell, T. L., and McDonald, N. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 4115-4123 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Hurwitz, D. R., Emanuel, S. L., Nathan, M. H., Sarver, N., Ullrich, A., Felder, S., Lax, I., and Schlessinger, J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22035-22043 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lax, I., Mitra, A. K., Ravera, C., Hurwitz, D. R., Rubinstein, M., Ullrich, A., Stroud, R. M., and Schlessinger, J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 13828-13833 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Carpenter, C. D., Ingraham, H. A., Cochet, C., Walton, G. M., Lazar, C. S., Sowadski, J. M., Rosenfeld, M. G., and Gill, G. N. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 5750-5755 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Chantry, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 3068-3073 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Mohammadi, M., Honegger, A., Sorokin, A., Ullrich, A., Schlessinger, J., and Hurwitz, D. R. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 8742-8748 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Chen, S. W., Lazar, S. C., Poenie, M., Tsien, R. Y., Gill, G., and Rosenfeld, G. M. (1987) Nature 328, 820-823 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Honegger, A. M., Dull, T. J., Felder, S., Van Obberghen, E., Bellot, F., Szapary, D., Schmidt, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1987) Cell 51, 199-209 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Moolenaar, W. H., Bierman, A. J., Tilly, B. C., Verlaan, I., Devize, L. H. K., Honegger, A. M., Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 707-710 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Levitzki, A., and Gazit, A. (1995) Science 267, 1782-1788 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Osherov, N., and Levitzki, A. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 225, 1047-1053 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Ward, W. H. J., Cook, P. N., Slater, A. M., Davies, D. H., Holdgate, G. A., and Green, L. R. (1994) Biochem. Pharmacol. 48, 659-666 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Fry, D. W., Kraker, A. J., McMichael, A., Ambroso, L. A., Nelson, J. M., Leopold, W. R., Connors, R. W., and Bridges, A. J. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 265, 1093-1095
  20. Coker, K. J., Staros, J. V., and Guyer, C. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 6967-6971 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Selva, E., Raden, D. L., and Davis, R. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 2250-2254 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Stoscheck, C. M., and Carpenter, G. (1983) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 227, 457-467 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Fan, Z., Lu, Y., Wu, X., and Mendelsohn, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27595-27602 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Langton, B. C., Crenshaw, M. C., Chao, L. A., Stuart, S. G., and Akita, R. W. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 2593-2598 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sorkin, A., and Carpenter, G. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 23453-23460 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Staros, J. V. (1982) Biochemistry 21, 3950-3957 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Cohen, S., Ushiro, H., Stoscheck, C., and Chinkers, M. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 1523-1531 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Buhrow, S. A., Cohen, S., and Staros, J. V. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 4019-4022 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Cheng, K., and Koland, J. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 311-318 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Akiyama, T., Ishida, J., Nakagawa, S., Ogawara, H., Watanabe, S., Itoh, N., Shibuya, M., and Fukami, Y. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 5592-5595 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Buhrow, S. A., Cohen, S., Garbers, D. L., and Staros, J. V. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 7824-7827 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Russo, M. W., Lukas, T. J., Cohen, S., and Staros, J. V. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 5205-5208 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Guyer, C. A., Woltjer, R. L., Coker, K. J., and Staros, J. V. (1994) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 312, 573-578 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Kraus, M. H., Popescu, N. C., Amsbaugh, S. C., and King, C. R. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 605-610 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Imai, Y., Leung, C. K. H., Friesen, H. G., and Shiu, R. P. C. (1982) Cancer Res. 42, 4394-4398 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Arteaga, C. L., Hurd, S. D., Dugger, T. C., Winnier, A. R., and Robertson, B. J. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 4703-4709 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Alimandi, M., Romano, A., Curia, M. C., Muraro, R., Fedi, P., Aaronson, S. A., Di Fiore, P. P., and Kraus, M. H. (1995) Oncogene 10, 1813-1820 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Stern, D. F., and Kamps, M. P. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 995-1001 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. King, C. R., Borrello, I., Bellot, F., Comoglio, P., and Schlessinger, J. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 1647-1651 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Fan, Z., Masui, H., Altas, I., and Mendelsohn, J. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 4322-4328 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Kumar, R., Shepard, H. M., and Mendelsohn, J. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 979-986 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Peles, E., and Yarden, Y. (1993) BioEssays 15, 815-824 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Yarden, Y., and Schlessinger, J. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 1443-1451 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Sorokin, A., Lemmon, M. A., Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 9752-9759 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Bargmann, C. I., Hung, M. C., and Weinberg, R. A. (1986) Cell 45, 649-657 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Miloso, M., Mazzotti, M., Vass, W. C., and Beguinot, L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19557-19562 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Basu, M., Sen-Majumdar, A., Basu, A., Murthy, U., and Das, M. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 12879-12882 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Hanks, S., Quinn, A., and Hunter, T. (1988) Science 241, 42-52 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Adelsman, M. A., Huntley, B. K., and Maihle, N. J. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 2533-2544 [Abstract]
  50. Wong, A. J., Ruppert, J. M., Bigner, S. H., Grzeschik, C. H., Humphrey, P. A., Bigner, B. S., and Vogelstein, B. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 2965-2969 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Kwatra, M. M., Bigner, D. D., and Cohn, J. A. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1134, 178-181 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Pinkas-Kramarski, R., Alroy, I., and Yarden, Y. (1997) J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neopl. 2, 97-107 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. Guy, P. M., Platko, J. V., Cantley, L. C., Cerione, R. A., and Carraway, K. L. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 8132-8136 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Wallasch, C., Weiss, F. U., Niederfellner, G., Jallal, B., Issing, W., and Ullrich, A. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4267-4275 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Tzahar, E., Waterman, H., Chen, X., Levkowitz, G., Karunagaran, D., Lavi, S., Ratzkin, B. J., and Yarden, Y. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5276-5287 [Abstract]
  56. Kokai, Y., Myers, J. N., Wada, T., Brown, V. I., LeVea, C. M., Davis, J. G., Dobashi, K., and Greene, M. I. (1989) Cell 58, 287-292 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Zhang, K., Sun, J., Liu, N., Wen, D., Chang, D., Thomason, A., and Yoshinaga, S. K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3884-3890 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Harris, A. L., Nicholson, S., Sainsbury, J. R. C., Farndon, J., and Wright, C. (1989) J. Steroid Biochem. 34, 123-131 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Graus-Porta, D., Beerli, R. R., and Hynes, N. E. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1182-1191 [Abstract]
  60. Qian, X., Dougall, W. C., Hellman, M. E., and Greene, M. I. (1994) Oncogene 9, 1507-1514 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Van de Vijver, M. J., Kumar, R., and Mendelsohn, J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7503-7508 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
V. L. Keedy, C. L. Arteaga, and D. H. Johnson
Does Gefitinib Shorten Lung Cancer Survival? Chaos Redux
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2008; 26(15): 2428 - 2430.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Okabe, I. Okamoto, K. Tamura, M. Terashima, T. Yoshida, T. Satoh, M. Takada, M. Fukuoka, and K. Nakagawa
Differential Constitutive Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells Bearing EGFR Gene Mutation and Amplification
Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 67(5): 2046 - 2053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. K. Gan, F. Walker, A. W. Burgess, A. Rigopoulos, A. M. Scott, and T. G. Johns
The Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor AG1478 Increases the Formation of Inactive Untethered EGFR Dimers: IMPLICATIONS FOR COMBINATION THERAPY WITH MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY 806
J. Biol. Chem., February 2, 2007; 282(5): 2840 - 2850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Fichera, N. Little, S. Jagadeeswaran, U. Dougherty, A. Sehdev, R. Mustafi, S. Cerda, W. Yuan, S. Khare, M. Tretiakova, et al.
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Is Required for Microadenoma Formation in the Mouse Azoxymethane Model of Colonic Carcinogenesis
Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 67(2): 827 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. W. Wong, F. Y. Lee, C. Yu, F. R. Luo, S. Oppenheimer, H. Zhang, R. A. Smykla, H. Mastalerz, B. E. Fink, J. T. Hunt, et al.
Preclinical Antitumor Activity of BMS-599626, a pan-HER Kinase Inhibitor That Inhibits HER1/HER2 Homodimer and Heterodimer Signaling.
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 12(20): 6186 - 6193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Erjala, M. Sundvall, T. T. Junttila, N. Zhang, M. Savisalo, P. Mali, J. Kulmala, J. Pulkkinen, R. Grenman, and K. Elenius
Signaling via ErbB2 and ErbB3 Associates with Resistance and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Amplification with Sensitivity to EGFR Inhibitor Gefitinib in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells.
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 12(13): 4103 - 4111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.