![]()
|
|
||||||||
(Received for publication, April 23, 1997, and in revised form, June 25, 1997)
,
,
From the Department of Pediatrics, To delineate domains essential for
Gq protein coupling in the C-terminal region (C-tail)
of rat angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor type 1A (AT1A), we
modified the putative cytosolic regions of the receptor by truncation
or alanine substitution and determined resultant changes in the
guanosine 5 Angiotensin II (Ang II)1
receptor type 1A (AT1A) is a seven-transmembrane, G
protein-coupled receptor (1, 2). Ang II activates Gq,
Gi, and Go proteins through the
AT1A receptor (3-5). The GTP·Gq Not a single consensus structure has yet been identified within the G
protein-coupled superfamily that uniquely defines the G protein binding
function. Mutagenesis studies on adrenergic receptors and rhodopsin
indicate that the C-terminal domains of the third intracellular loop
(ICL3) and the N-terminal region of the cytosolic tail are essential
for coupling to G proteins (8-10). By contrast, the regions of the
thyrotropin receptor essential for intracellular signal transduction
appear to be the first intracellular loop (ICL1) and the C-terminal
regions of the second intracellular loop (ICL2) and the third
intracellular loop (ICL3) (11). Four isoforms of prostaglandin E
receptor subtype EP3, which differ only at their C-terminal tails and
are produced by alternative splicing, couple to different G proteins.
Thus the C-terminal tail of EP3 determines G protein specificity
(12).
Studies by Wang et al. (13) using chimeras of human
AT1 and AT2 suggested that the N-terminal
portion of ICL3 was important for Gq coupling. We reported
observations suggesting that the acidic-arginine-aromatic (DRY) triplet
of ICL2, the C-terminal portion of ICL2, the C-terminal region of ICL3,
and the cytosolic C-terminal tail region were involved in G protein
coupling. Our data from transient transfection of the AT1A
receptor in COS7 cells showed that the last 50 amino acid residues
(beyond Phe309) were also important for Gq
coupling (14). Thomas et al. (15) reported that truncation
of the last 45 amino acid residues of the rat AT1A beyond
Leu314 was not important for efficient coupling to the G
protein. Thus, we focused on the amino acid sequence between
Lys310 and Leu314, constructed five deletional
mutants and four substitutional mutants of rat AT1A, and
examined their InsP3 production and ligand binding. We also
synthesized nine peptides based on the amino acid sequence of the
cytosolic region and examined their Gq activation with the
aim of defining a region in the C-tail essential for the coupling to
Gq in rat AT1A.
The entire coding region of rat kidney
AT1A was cloned into EcoRI site of a plasmid
pUC19 (16). A KpnI-EcoRI fragment was subcloned
into polylinker sites of the plasmid vector pBluescript II KS+, and
single-stranded DNA was prepared using helper phage R 408 (Stratagene).
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed by the procedure of Kunkel
(17). Sites of truncation and substitution are shown in Fig.
1. The mutated DNA sequences were
confirmed by Sanger's dideoxynucleotide sequencing method (18). The
mutated AT1A cDNA was excised with enzymes
BamHI and XhoI and introduced into the expression
vector pCDNA1.
Forty µg of plasmid constructs containing the
wild type or mutated rat AT1A cDNA were co-transfected
with 1 µg of pSV-G1-Neo (Green Cross Corp.) into 5 × 106 of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells in 500 µl of
phosphate buffer using a gene pulser (Bio-Rad). Native CHO-K1 cells do
not express Ang II receptor.
Transfected CHO-K1 cells were cultured for 2 days in 10-cm dishes in
Ham's F12 medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) containing 10% fetal calf
serum. Then the culture medium was changed to selection medium
containing 400 µg/ml Geneticin (G418, Life Technologies, Inc.). When
individual colonies emerged 10-14 days after the transfection, 60 sufficiently separated colonies were isolated and inoculated into 200 µl of selection medium in 96-well plates. Each of these colonies was
scaled up independently to 24-well plates, and the binding assay was
performed using 125I-Ang II (NEN Life Science Products).
The binding assay was repeated three times for each clone. Two colonies
were selected after the binding assay, and 300 single cells isolated
from the colonies were cultured in the selection medium in 96-well
plates. Two or three weeks later, each of these clones was scaled up
independently to 24-well plates, and binding assay was performed again.
The clone expressing the highest specific binding of
125I-Ang II was selected.
AT1A-expressing CHO-K1 cells were
grown in Ham's F12 medium with 10% fetal calf serum in 24-well
plates. They were washed with Hank's balanced salt solution and
incubated for 90 min at 37 °C in 250 µl of Ham's F12 medium with
2% fetal calf serum. Varying concentrations of
[125I-Sar1,Ile8]Ang II (NEN Life
Science Products) from 0.3 to 10 nM were incubated in this
medium for determination of the specific binding. After the incubation,
cells were immediately placed on ice, washed three times with ice-cold
Hanks' balanced salt solution, and then solubilized with 250 µl of
0.5 N NaOH. Radioactivity was measured by a gamma counter.
Specific [Sar1,Ile8]Ang II binding was
determined as the difference between the total binding of
[125I-Sar1,Ile8]Ang II in the
absence and presence of 1 µM
[Sar1,Ile8]Ang II. Nonspecific binding was
below 15% of the total binding. The dissociation constant
(Kd) for [Sar1,Ile8]Ang II
binding was determined by Scatchard analysis.
CHO-K1 cells transfected with mutated
AT1A cDNA were grown in 35-mm dishes. Confluent cells
were washed with 1.0 ml of 20 mM HEPES buffer, preincubated
in 0.5 ml of 20 mM HEPES buffer containing 0.1% bovine
serum albumin (BSA) for 20 min at 37 °C, then in 0.5 ml of HEPES
buffer with 0.1% BSA and 10 mM LiCl for 10 min. Then the
cells were incubated in the same HEPES buffer with or without 1 µM Ang II for 10 s at 37 °C. InsP3
was extracted with a 1.5-ml mixture of chloroform/methanol, 12 N HCl (1:2:0.05, v/v). A 0.4-ml mixture of chloroform and
distilled water (1:1, v/v) was added to the extract and centrifuged.
The supernatant was washed with 0.8 ml of chloroform and centrifuged.
The supernatant was dried in a Speedvac. The dried extract was
redissolved with 150 µl of distilled water, sonicated for 30 min, and
centrifuged. InsP3 in 100 µl of the supernatant was
measured by competitive receptor binding using an InsP3
assay kit (NEN Life Science Products).
Transfected CHO-K1
cells were grown in 10-cm dishes, washed with Hanks' balanced salt
solution, scraped, and collected by centrifugation at 1500 × g for 5 min. The plasma membrane fraction was prepared by a
published method (19). Membranes obtained were suspended at a protein
concentration of 250 µg/ml in 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4)
containing 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% BSA, and 100 µg/ml
phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride and used as the membrane
preparation.
Dose response was determined as follows. Suspended membranes were
incubated with 0.1 nM 125I-Ang II at 25 °C
for 60 min in the presence of varying concentrations of GTP The
amino acid sequences of the peptides used in this study are shown in
Fig. 1. They were synthesized by the solid-phase method and purified to
95-99% homogeneity by high performance liquid chromatography using a
Nucleosil 5 C18 column eluted with a linear concentration gradient
(0-60%) of CH3CN containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid.
The lyophilized synthetic peptide was dissolved in water.
Heterotrimeric forms of Gq proteins from bovine liver were
purified to homogeneity as published (20).
[35S]GTP The results of experiments with the
synthetic peptide study was examined by unpaired Student's
t test. p values less than 0.05 were considered
significant.
As shown in Table
I the dissociation constants
(Kd) and Bmax values of the
wild type AT1A and its mutants determined by Scatchard
analysis were similar, indicating that the mutants possessed similar
ligand binding affinity and sites of comparable magnitude. In this
study [125I-Sar1,Ile8]Ang II was
used as ligand. Scatchard plots indicated single high affinity sites.
When 125I-Ang II was used as ligand results indicated
similar single high affinity sites. The possible presence of low
affinity sites was practically undetectable.
Table I.
Binding affinity of [Sar1-Ile8]Ang II binding for rat
AT1A wild type receptor and mutant receptors
Department of Metabolic
Biochemistry,
-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTP
S) effect on Ang
II binding and inositol trisphosphate production by the agonist.
Independently, we studied the effect of synthetic C-tail peptides (P-5)
and its alanine substitution analogs on [35S]GTP
S
binding to Gq. Effects of GTP
S on Ang II binding (shift to a low affinity form) and inositol trisphosphate production in the
deletional mutant receptor 1-317 AT1A was similar to wild type AT1A, whereas in shorter C-terminal deletion mutants
1-309, 1-311, 1-312, 1-313 AT1A, and substitutional
mutants Y312A, F313A, and L314A these activities were markedly reduced.
The binding of [35S]GTP
S to Gq was
promoted by the synthetic C-terminal peptide P-5 but not when mutated
at Tyr312, Phe313, or Leu314.
Results indicate that Tyr312, Phe313, and
Leu314 in cytosolic carboxyl-terminal region of rat
AT1A are essential for coupling and activation of
Gq.
complex
stimulates phospholipase C (PLC) resulting in inositol trisphosphate
(InsP3) generation (6, 7).
Mutagenesis
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the rat
AT1A receptor. The illustration shows amino acid
sequence in the N-terminal portion of the C-terminal tail represented
by closed circles in the upper panel
(Gly306 to Ile320). The sites of truncation for
the deletion mutants, Mut 310-del, Mut 312-del, Mut 313-del, Mut
314-del, and Mut 318-del are indicated by arrows. The sites
of substitution of Lys310 and Lys311 to Gln
(K310,311Q) are indicated by an underline. The sites of substitution of Tyr312 to Ala, Phe313 to Ala,
and Leu314 to Ala are indicated by amino acid sequences of
P-5. The synthetic peptide sequences are indicated by solid
lines and named as P-1 to P-5. Mut P-5: Tyr312,
Phe313, and Leu314 were simultaneously replaced
by Ala; Mut P-5Y: Tyr312 was replaced by Ala; Mut P-5F:
Phe313 was replaced by Ala; and Mut P-5L:
Leu314 was replaced by Ala. These are shown below.
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]
S on Ang II Binding
S. For
studying the time course of ligand binding, membranes were incubated
with 0.1 nM 125I-Ang II for 60 min at 37 °C
to attain binding equilibrium and unlabeled Ang II (1 µM)
or GTP
S (10 µM) or both of them were added to the
mixture and incubated for another 60 min. The membrane-bound radioligand was separated from the free radioligand by filtration over
glass filters (GF/B) using a cell harvester (Millipore). Radioactivity
was measured in a gamma counter.
S Binding Assay
S binding to
10 nM purified heterotrimeric Gq promoted by
synthetic peptides was measured in 25 mM HEPES-NaOH buffer (pH 7.4) containing 120 µM MgCl2, 100 µM EDTA, and 100 nM
[35S]GTP
S in the absence of phospholipids as described
by Okamoto et al. (9). Briefly, Gq was incubated
at 37 °C for 10 min in the absence (control) or presence of a
synthetic peptide (100 µM). The incubation was terminated
by addition of 10 volumes of ice-cold stopping buffer containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 25 mM MgCl2,
100 mM NaCl, and 20 µM GTP. After a 50-µl
aliquot of the reaction mixture was rapidly filtered through a
nitrocellulose filter (pore size, 0.45 µm) and washed three times
with the stopping buffer, the filter was counted in a liquid
scintillation counter. The maximal binding of
[35S]GTP
S to Gq was measured in the
presence of 1 µM GTP
S and 25 mM
Mg2+ at room temperature by the method of Northup et
al. (21) as a positive control.
Binding Affinity of Mutant Receptors
Kd
Bmax
nM
fmol/mg
protein
Wild type
1.6
± 0.1
18.8 ± 1.4
Mut 310-del
2.4 ± 0.2
16.0
± 1.1
Mut 312-del
2.4 ± 0.2
17.8 ± 1.6
Mut
313-del
2.0 ± 0.3
15.2 ± 1.8
Mut 314-del
1.8
± 0.2
15.6 ± 1.6
Mut 318-del
2.5 ± 0.3
17.8
± 1.8
Mut Y312A
2.4 ± 0.4
16.6 ± 1.8
Mut
F313A
2.6 ± 0.4
15.5 ± 1.9
Mut L314A
2.8
± 0.3
14.8 ± 1.2
Mut K310,311Q
2.7 ± 0.3
18.3
± 1.4
As shown in Fig.
2, the binding of 125I-Ang II
to wild type AT1A, Mut 318-del, and Mut K310,311Q receptors
were dose-dependently decreased by GTP
S, whereas the
effect of GTP
S (shift from a high affinity state to a low affinity
form) was practically abolished in Mut 310-del, Mut 312-del, Mut
313-del, Mut 314-del, Mut Y312A, Mut F313A, and Mut L314A
receptors.
S on
125I-Ang II binding to membrane preparations expressing
wild type AT1A and its mutants. Each point represents
the mean ± S.D. obtained from three separate experiments at
25 °C.
Time-related changes in dissociation of 125I-Ang II from
the wild type and mutated receptors are shown in Fig.
3. The binding of 125I-Ang II
to the receptors in membrane preparations reached a plateau in 60 min.
In wild type AT1A and all of its mutants, the
receptor-bound 125I-Ang II was displaced by 1 µM unlabeled Ang II to similar extents (the range of
half-life time of dissociation was 19.5 to 21.4 min). GTP
S (10 µM) markedly shortened the half-life time of the spontaneous dissociation in the wild type AT1A, and Mut
318-del, and Mut-K310,311Q receptors (3.5 to 4.6 min), whereas the
binding of 125I-Ang II remained unchanged for 60 min in Mut
310-del, Mut 312-del, Mut 313-del, and Mut 314-del. Moreover, although
the half-life times in the wild type AT1A and Mut 318-del
were shortened in the presence of both Ang II and GTP
S (0.9 to 1.2 min), those in other deletion mutants were similar to the half-life
time in the presence of Ang II alone (17.0 to 20.1 min).
S in the wild type
AT1A (a) and its mutants (b, Mut
310-del; c, Mut 312-del, d, Mut 313-del;
e, Mut 314-del; and f, Mut 318-del). Membrane preparations were preincubated in the presence of 0.1 nM 125I-Ang II for 60 min, and then Ang II (1 µM) (open circles), GTP
S (10 µM) (open triangles), or both of them
(solid triangles) were added. Controls (closed
circles) did not contain GTP
S or cold Ang II. Each value
represents the mean ± S.D. obtained from three separate
experiments at 37 °C
InsP3 Formation
Binding of Ang II to
AT1A activates a PLC via Gq resulting in
stimulation of InsP3 formation. Thus, increased
InsP3 formation by Ang II can be considered to indicate
effective coupling to Gq of the mutants. In unmutated
AT1A, InsP3 production was significantly increased from 2.52 ± 0.05 pmol/dish of unstimulated control to 16.55 ± 1.88 pmol/dish at 10 s after Ang II stimulation.
Similar results were obtained in Mut 318-del and Mut K310,311Q. By
contrast, in Mut 310-del, Mut 312-del, Mut 313-del, Mut 314-del, Mut
Y312A, Mut F313A, and Mut L314A responses of InsP3 to Ang
II stimulation were abolished (Fig.
4).
Effects of Synthetic Peptides on G Protein Activation
Gq was incubated for 10 min in the
presence of [35S]GTP
S with peptides representing
domains in the cytoplasmic segments of native AT1A (P-1 to
P-5) or mutated peptides of P-5. As shown in Fig.
5, Peptides P-3 and P-5 activated
Gq as well as positive control. The
Gq-activating function was attenuated to 25% relative to
intact P-5 in Mut P-5 (Tyr312, Phe313, and
Leu314 were replaced by alanine). The uptake of
[35S]GTP
S was significantly lower in Mut Y, Mut F
(p < 0.01) and Mut L (p < 0.05) than
in P-5.
S binding to of Gq protein.
Purified Gq (10 nM) was incubated with 100 nM [35S]GTP
S at room temperature in the
absence (control) or presence of a synthetic peptide 100 µM for 10 min. A 50-µl aliquot of reaction mixture was
subjected to the analysis of [35S]GTP
S binding. The
basal binding (control) was obtained as [35S]GTP
S
bound to Gq in the absence of a synthetic peptide. The 100% (maximum) binding is set as [35S]GTP
S binding in
the presence of 2.5 mM Mg2+. Each
bar represents the mean ± S.D. of three independent
experiments. ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 versus corresponding values in wild type P-5.
The cytoplasmic C-terminal (C-tail) region was shown to play an essential role in agonist-induced receptor internalization (15). However, its role in the G protein-coupled phospholipase activation has been controversial. Now in three independent approaches using five deletion mutants, four alanine substitution mutants, and synthetic peptides with native and mutated amino acid sequences corresponding to an N-terminal region of C-tail, we were able to identify the tripeptide region Tyr312-Phe313-Leu314 (Fig. 5) as a domain essential for Gq activation.
Different experimental approaches produce results leading to different
and sometimes contradicting conclusions. Wang et al. (13)
using chimeric human AT1 with a grafted AT2
C-tail that shows Gq activation concluded that the major
determinant of Gq coupling specificity is in the ICL-3, and
the C-tail has little role in the activation of PLC. However, we had
shown that deletion beyond Phe309 (Mut 310-del) abolished
the Gq-coupled inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate formation (14).
Since both of these modifications could introduce additional factors
such as conformational changes or the effect of ICL3 not directly
related to the action of deleted or replaced residues, multiple
approaches had to be taken. Loss of Gq coupling in Mut
310-del and complete recovery of the Gq activation in Mut 318-del narrowed the Gq coupling domain to residues
310-317 (Figs. 1 and 4) (14). The observation of a robust activity
with Mut 315-del by Thomas et al. (15) further narrowed it
to a region between residues 310 and 314. Almost complete loss of the
activity with Mut 312-del, 313-del, 314-del, and single residue alanine mutation Y312A, F313A, and L314A and the preservation of a full PLC
activity with the double mutant K310Q,K311Q indicated that Tyr312-Phe313-Leu314 is the
essential domain required for PLC activation. Its essential role in
Gq coupling was also determined by loss of the well known GTP
S-induced shift to a low affinity state for agonist binding in
these mutants (Figs. 2 and 3). Further evidence for the essential role
of the tripeptide sequence for the G protein coupling was obtained by a
third and completely independent approach in which peptides with the
amino acid sequences of the native and alanine-substituted C-tail
(residues 307-320) were allowed to interact with purified heterotrimeric Gq, and binding to
[35S]GTP
S was examined. Again, alanine substitution of
Tyr312-Phe313-Leu314 singly or
three together significantly reduced GTP
S binding. It is interesting
to note that, whereas the triple mutant Mut P-5 lost almost the entire
binding ability, other mutants, particularly Mut L (L314A), retained
recognizable binding, although the conformation of the C-tail domain of
AT1A and the shorter synthetic segment may have a different
conformation. These results suggest synergism of the three residues and
some difference in the role of Tyr312 and
Leu314 in Gq
activation and GTP
S
binding.
The G protein coupling sites seem to vary from receptor to
receptor, and no definitive rules or consensus sequences seem to exist.
For example the N-formyl peptide receptor uses ICL2 (22), and G protein specificity of PGE2 receptor isoforms (EP3)
is determined by the C-tail region. More than a single domain could
participate in the interaction. The possibility of cooperation of ICL3
and amphipathic
-helical structure of the N-terminal region of the C-tail has been proposed by Probst et al. (23). The
-adrenergic receptor uses the C-terminal region of ICL3 and the
N-terminal region of C-tail for Gs activation (10).
The present finding that the synthetic 16-mer peptide P-3 with the amino acid sequence of the N-terminal region of ICL3 and the C-tail peptide (P-5) activated purified Gq just as well as the C-tail peptide (P-5) (Fig. 5) supports the observation of Hunyady et al. (24) that the deletion of a sequence (215-226) in this domain abolished Gq activation. It also supports the observation of Wang et al. (13) that in chimeras of AT1 and AT2, ICL3 plays dominant roles in Gq coupling. Shirai et al. (25) showed the same ICL3 domain activates Gi1, Gi2, and Go by using the synthetic peptide P-3. These results indicate that AT1A may use and require the tripeptide sequence of C-tail in collaboration with ICL3 in Gq activation. Interesting information revealed by the activation of G proteins by these peptides are that the same peptides (P-3 and P-5) are capable of activating Gi, Go, and Gq. Mechanisms by which a receptor selects the type of G proteins are yet to be clarified. On the other hand, peptides with unrelated sequences like P-1, P-2, and P-4 which did not show the activation may be considered as controls and indicate that activation by P-3 and P-5 is specific to their sequences.
Bmax values of mutated receptors expressed in each cell line were at levels comparable to that of the wild type. Hence, the decrease in InsP3 formation in Mut 310-del, Mut 312-del, Mut 313-del, Mut 314-del, Mut Y312A, Mut F313A, and Mut L314A should be due to the receptor mutation rather than a decrease in expression of each mutant receptor. Our previous study using substitutional mutations of basic polar amino acid residues in ICL2 and ICL3 indicated that ICL2 and the C-terminal domain of ICL3 would be important for Gq coupling (14). These mutations targeted at domains with dense electrical charges probably caused nonspecific conformational changes and led to erroneous results that could be misinterpreted.
Tyr292 in transmembrane domain 7 was reported to be essential for G protein coupling (26). The conserved sequence NPLFY at the bottom of transmembrane domain 7 was shown to contribute to both agonist binding and signal transduction (24). Thus, the junctional area of AT1 between transmembrane domain 7 and C-tail seems to play an important role in receptor signaling. This area of AT1 also contains the sequence KKFKK that was shown to be an unusual Gi activator domain of insulin growth factor II receptor (9). However, in AT1 mutation to Lys-Lys-Phe-Gln310-Gln311 did not have any effect on Gq coupling. This observation helped our work in narrowing the Gq activating domain to Tyr312-Phe313-Leu314.
In summary, the present study presents evidence that a Gq coupling site in the type 1A angiotensin receptor AT1A should reside between residues 312 and 318 in the C-terminal tail, and the specific sequence Tyr312-Phe313-Leu314 is essential for coupling and activation of the Gq protein.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville,
Tennessee 37232. Tel.: 615-322-4347; Fax: 615-322-3201.
S,
guanosine 5
-3-O-(thio)triphosphate; G protein, guanyl
nucleotide-binding protein; CHO-K1, Chinese hamster ovary cells.
We are grateful to Japanese Cancer Research Resources Bank (JCRB)-Cell for the gift of CHO-K1 cell.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. V. McCulloch, V. Morrow, S. Milasta, I. Comerford, G. Milligan, G. J. Graham, N. W. Isaacs, and R. J. B. Nibbs Multiple Roles for the C-terminal Tail of the Chemokine Scavenger D6 J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2008; 283(12): 7972 - 7982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Jackson, D. G. Gillespie, C. Zhu, J. Ren, L. C. Zacharia, and Z. Mi {alpha}2-Adrenoceptors Enhance Angiotensin II-Induced Renal Vasoconstriction: Role for NADPH Oxidase and RhoA Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 719 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Anavi-Goffer, D. Fleischer, D. P. Hurst, D. L. Lynch, J. Barnett-Norris, S. Shi, D. L. Lewis, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. C. Howlett, P. H. Reggio, et al. Helix 8 Leu in the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Contributes to Selective Signal Transduction Mechanisms J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2007; 282(34): 25100 - 25113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Oliveira, C. M. Costa-Neto, C. R. Nakaie, S. Schreier, S. I. Shimuta, and A. C. M. Paiva The Angiotensin II AT1 Receptor Structure-Activity Correlations in the Light of Rhodopsin Structure Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 565 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kuniyeda, T. Okuno, K. Terawaki, M. Miyano, T. Yokomizo, and T. Shimizu Identification of the Intracellular Region of the Leukotriene B4 Receptor Type 1 That Is Specifically Involved in Gi Activation J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2007; 282(6): 3998 - 4006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Verzijl, L. Pardo, M. van Dijk, Y. K. Gruijthuijsen, A. Jongejan, H. Timmerman, J. Nicholas, M. Schwarz, P. M. Murphy, R. Leurs, et al. Helix 8 of the Viral Chemokine Receptor ORF74 Directs Chemokine Binding J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2006; 281(46): 35327 - 35335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Thompson, A. Napier, and K. S. Wekesa Attenuation of the Production of Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate in the Mouse Vomeronasal Organ by Antibodies Against the {alpha}q/11 Subfamily of G-Proteins Chem Senses, September 1, 2006; 31(7): 613 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. D. Santos, L. A. Gardner, S. W. White, and S. W. Bahouth Characterization of the Residues in Helix 8 of the Human beta1-Adrenergic Receptor That Are Involved in Coupling the Receptor to G Proteins J. Biol. Chem., May 5, 2006; 281(18): 12896 - 12907. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Turner and J. R. Raymond Interaction of Calmodulin with the Serotonin 5-Hydroxytryptamine2A Receptor: A PUTATIVE REGULATOR OF G PROTEIN COUPLING AND RECEPTOR PHOSPHORYLATION BY PROTEIN KINASE C J. Biol. Chem., September 2, 2005; 280(35): 30741 - 30750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Jackson, L. Gao, and C. Zhu Mechanism of the Vascular Angiotensin II/{alpha}2-Adrenoceptor Interaction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2005; 314(3): 1109 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mifune, H. Ohtsu, H. Suzuki, H. Nakashima, E. Brailoiu, N. J. Dun, G. D. Frank, T. Inagami, S. Higashiyama, W. G. Thomas, et al. G Protein Coupling and Second Messenger Generation Are Indispensable for Metalloprotease-dependent, Heparin-binding Epidermal Growth Factor Shedding through Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor J. Biol. Chem., July 15, 2005; 280(28): 26592 - 26599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Schleif and C. Wolberger Arm-domain interactions can provide high binding cooperativity Protein Sci., October 22, 2004; 13(10): 2829 - 2831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Duvernay, F. Zhou, and G. Wu A Conserved Motif for the Transport of G Protein-coupled Receptors from the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Cell Surface J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30741 - 30750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-F. Guo, V. Tardif, K. Ghelima, J. S. D. Chan, J. R. Ingelfinger, X. Chen, and I. Chenier A Novel Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor-associated Protein Induces Cellular Hypertrophy in Rat Vascular Smooth Muscle and Renal Proximal Tubular Cells J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 2004; 279(20): 21109 - 21120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Liu, G. Sandford, G. Fei, and J. Nicholas G{alpha} Protein Selectivity Determinant Specified by a Viral Chemokine Receptor-Conserved Region in the C Tail of the Human Herpesvirus 8 G Protein-Coupled Receptor J. Virol., March 1, 2004; 78(5): 2460 - 2471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Gaborik, G. Jagadeesh, M. Zhang, A. Spat, K. J. Catt, and L. Hunyady The Role of a Conserved Region of the Second Intracellular Loop in AT1 Angiotensin Receptor Activation and Signaling Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2220 - 2228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gao, C. Zhu, and E. K. Jackson alpha 2-Adrenoceptors Potentiate Angiotensin II- and Vasopressin-Induced Renal Vasoconstriction in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2003; 305(2): 581 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Vazquez, C. Sun, J. Du, L. Fuentes, C. Sumners, and M. K. Raizada Transduction of a Functional Domain of the AT1 Receptor in Neurons by HIV-Tat PTD Hypertension, March 1, 2003; 41(3): 751 - 756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Leclerc, M. Auger-Messier, P. M. Lanctot, E. Escher, R. Leduc, and G. Guillemette A Polyaromatic Caveolin-Binding-Like Motif in the Cytoplasmic Tail of the Type 1 Receptor for Angiotensin II Plays an Important Role in Receptor Trafficking and Signaling Endocrinology, December 1, 2002; 143(12): 4702 - 4710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Kang and L. M. F. Leeb-Lundberg Negative and Positive Regulatory Epitopes in the C-Terminal Domains of the Human B1 and B2 Bradykinin Receptor Subtypes Determine Receptor Coupling Efficacy to G9/11-Mediated Phospholipase Cbeta Activity Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2002; 62(2): 281 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Thekkumkara and S. L. Linas Role of internalization in AT1A receptor function in proximal tubule epithelium Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2002; 282(4): F623 - F629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Seachrist, S. A. Laporte, L. B. Dale, A. V. Babwah, M. G. Caron, P. H. Anborgh, and S. S. G. Ferguson Rab5 Association with the Angiotensin II Type 1A Receptor Promotes Rab5 GTP Binding and Vesicular Fusion J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2002; 277(1): 679 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Jackson, W. A. Herzer, C. K. Kost Jr, and S. J. Vyas Enhanced Interaction Between Renovascular {alpha}2-Adrenoceptors and Angiotensin II Receptors in Genetic Hypertension Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 353 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. de Gasparo, K. J. Catt, T. Inagami, J. W. Wright, and Th. Unger International Union of Pharmacology. XXIII. The Angiotensin II Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2000; 52(3): 415 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||