JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sano, T.
Right arrow Articles by Inagami, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sano, T.
Right arrow Articles by Inagami, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 38, Issue of September 19, 1997 pp. 23631-23636
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

A Domain for G Protein Coupling in Carboxyl-terminal Tail of Rat Angiotensin II Receptor Type 1A*

(Received for publication, April 23, 1997, and in revised form, June 25, 1997)

Tomoaki Sano , Kenji Ohyama , Yoshiaki Yamano Dagger , Yoshiko Nakagomi , Shinpei Nakazawa , Mitsuhiro Kikyo Dagger , Heigoro Shirai §, Jonathan S. Blank , John H. Exton and Tadashi Inagami §par

From the Department of Pediatrics, Yamanashi Medical University, Yamanashi 409-38, the Dagger  Department of Metabolic Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Tottori University, Tottori 680, Japan, the  Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University and the § Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

To delineate domains essential for Gq protein coupling in the C-terminal region (C-tail) of rat angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor type 1A (AT1A), we modified the putative cytosolic regions of the receptor by truncation or alanine substitution and determined resultant changes in the guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgamma S) effect on Ang II binding and inositol trisphosphate production by the agonist. Independently, we studied the effect of synthetic C-tail peptides (P-5) and its alanine substitution analogs on [35S]GTPgamma S binding to Gq. Effects of GTPgamma S on Ang II binding (shift to a low affinity form) and inositol trisphosphate production in the deletional mutant receptor 1-317 AT1A was similar to wild type AT1A, whereas in shorter C-terminal deletion mutants 1-309, 1-311, 1-312, 1-313 AT1A, and substitutional mutants Y312A, F313A, and L314A these activities were markedly reduced. The binding of [35S]GTPgamma S to Gq was promoted by the synthetic C-terminal peptide P-5 but not when mutated at Tyr312, Phe313, or Leu314. Results indicate that Tyr312, Phe313, and Leu314 in cytosolic carboxyl-terminal region of rat AT1A are essential for coupling and activation of Gq.


INTRODUCTION

Angiotensin II (Ang II)1 receptor type 1A (AT1A) is a seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor (1, 2). Ang II activates Gq, Gi, and Go proteins through the AT1A receptor (3-5). The GTP·Gqalpha complex stimulates phospholipase C (PLC) resulting in inositol trisphosphate (InsP3) generation (6, 7).

Not a single consensus structure has yet been identified within the G protein-coupled superfamily that uniquely defines the G protein binding function. Mutagenesis studies on adrenergic receptors and rhodopsin indicate that the C-terminal domains of the third intracellular loop (ICL3) and the N-terminal region of the cytosolic tail are essential for coupling to G proteins (8-10). By contrast, the regions of the thyrotropin receptor essential for intracellular signal transduction appear to be the first intracellular loop (ICL1) and the C-terminal regions of the second intracellular loop (ICL2) and the third intracellular loop (ICL3) (11). Four isoforms of prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP3, which differ only at their C-terminal tails and are produced by alternative splicing, couple to different G proteins. Thus the C-terminal tail of EP3 determines G protein specificity (12).

Studies by Wang et al. (13) using chimeras of human AT1 and AT2 suggested that the N-terminal portion of ICL3 was important for Gq coupling. We reported observations suggesting that the acidic-arginine-aromatic (DRY) triplet of ICL2, the C-terminal portion of ICL2, the C-terminal region of ICL3, and the cytosolic C-terminal tail region were involved in G protein coupling. Our data from transient transfection of the AT1A receptor in COS7 cells showed that the last 50 amino acid residues (beyond Phe309) were also important for Gq coupling (14). Thomas et al. (15) reported that truncation of the last 45 amino acid residues of the rat AT1A beyond Leu314 was not important for efficient coupling to the G protein. Thus, we focused on the amino acid sequence between Lys310 and Leu314, constructed five deletional mutants and four substitutional mutants of rat AT1A, and examined their InsP3 production and ligand binding. We also synthesized nine peptides based on the amino acid sequence of the cytosolic region and examined their Gq activation with the aim of defining a region in the C-tail essential for the coupling to Gq in rat AT1A.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mutagenesis

The entire coding region of rat kidney AT1A was cloned into EcoRI site of a plasmid pUC19 (16). A KpnI-EcoRI fragment was subcloned into polylinker sites of the plasmid vector pBluescript II KS+, and single-stranded DNA was prepared using helper phage R 408 (Stratagene). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed by the procedure of Kunkel (17). Sites of truncation and substitution are shown in Fig. 1. The mutated DNA sequences were confirmed by Sanger's dideoxynucleotide sequencing method (18). The mutated AT1A cDNA was excised with enzymes BamHI and XhoI and introduced into the expression vector pCDNA1.


Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the rat AT1A receptor. The illustration shows amino acid sequence in the N-terminal portion of the C-terminal tail represented by closed circles in the upper panel (Gly306 to Ile320). The sites of truncation for the deletion mutants, Mut 310-del, Mut 312-del, Mut 313-del, Mut 314-del, and Mut 318-del are indicated by arrows. The sites of substitution of Lys310 and Lys311 to Gln (K310,311Q) are indicated by an underline. The sites of substitution of Tyr312 to Ala, Phe313 to Ala, and Leu314 to Ala are indicated by amino acid sequences of P-5. The synthetic peptide sequences are indicated by solid lines and named as P-1 to P-5. Mut P-5: Tyr312, Phe313, and Leu314 were simultaneously replaced by Ala; Mut P-5Y: Tyr312 was replaced by Ala; Mut P-5F: Phe313 was replaced by Ala; and Mut P-5L: Leu314 was replaced by Ala. These are shown below.
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]

Stable Expression of Wild Type AT1A and Its Mutants in CHO-K1 Cells

Forty µg of plasmid constructs containing the wild type or mutated rat AT1A cDNA were co-transfected with 1 µg of pSV-G1-Neo (Green Cross Corp.) into 5 × 106 of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells in 500 µl of phosphate buffer using a gene pulser (Bio-Rad). Native CHO-K1 cells do not express Ang II receptor.

Transfected CHO-K1 cells were cultured for 2 days in 10-cm dishes in Ham's F12 medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) containing 10% fetal calf serum. Then the culture medium was changed to selection medium containing 400 µg/ml Geneticin (G418, Life Technologies, Inc.). When individual colonies emerged 10-14 days after the transfection, 60 sufficiently separated colonies were isolated and inoculated into 200 µl of selection medium in 96-well plates. Each of these colonies was scaled up independently to 24-well plates, and the binding assay was performed using 125I-Ang II (NEN Life Science Products). The binding assay was repeated three times for each clone. Two colonies were selected after the binding assay, and 300 single cells isolated from the colonies were cultured in the selection medium in 96-well plates. Two or three weeks later, each of these clones was scaled up independently to 24-well plates, and binding assay was performed again. The clone expressing the highest specific binding of 125I-Ang II was selected.

Binding Assay

AT1A-expressing CHO-K1 cells were grown in Ham's F12 medium with 10% fetal calf serum in 24-well plates. They were washed with Hank's balanced salt solution and incubated for 90 min at 37 °C in 250 µl of Ham's F12 medium with 2% fetal calf serum. Varying concentrations of [125I-Sar1,Ile8]Ang II (NEN Life Science Products) from 0.3 to 10 nM were incubated in this medium for determination of the specific binding. After the incubation, cells were immediately placed on ice, washed three times with ice-cold Hanks' balanced salt solution, and then solubilized with 250 µl of 0.5 N NaOH. Radioactivity was measured by a gamma counter. Specific [Sar1,Ile8]Ang II binding was determined as the difference between the total binding of [125I-Sar1,Ile8]Ang II in the absence and presence of 1 µM [Sar1,Ile8]Ang II. Nonspecific binding was below 15% of the total binding. The dissociation constant (Kd) for [Sar1,Ile8]Ang II binding was determined by Scatchard analysis.

Inositol Trisphosphate (InsP3) Determination

CHO-K1 cells transfected with mutated AT1A cDNA were grown in 35-mm dishes. Confluent cells were washed with 1.0 ml of 20 mM HEPES buffer, preincubated in 0.5 ml of 20 mM HEPES buffer containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 20 min at 37 °C, then in 0.5 ml of HEPES buffer with 0.1% BSA and 10 mM LiCl for 10 min. Then the cells were incubated in the same HEPES buffer with or without 1 µM Ang II for 10 s at 37 °C. InsP3 was extracted with a 1.5-ml mixture of chloroform/methanol, 12 N HCl (1:2:0.05, v/v). A 0.4-ml mixture of chloroform and distilled water (1:1, v/v) was added to the extract and centrifuged. The supernatant was washed with 0.8 ml of chloroform and centrifuged. The supernatant was dried in a Speedvac. The dried extract was redissolved with 150 µl of distilled water, sonicated for 30 min, and centrifuged. InsP3 in 100 µl of the supernatant was measured by competitive receptor binding using an InsP3 assay kit (NEN Life Science Products).

Effect of GTPgamma S on Ang II Binding

Transfected CHO-K1 cells were grown in 10-cm dishes, washed with Hanks' balanced salt solution, scraped, and collected by centrifugation at 1500 × g for 5 min. The plasma membrane fraction was prepared by a published method (19). Membranes obtained were suspended at a protein concentration of 250 µg/ml in 50 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.4) containing 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% BSA, and 100 µg/ml phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride and used as the membrane preparation.

Dose response was determined as follows. Suspended membranes were incubated with 0.1 nM 125I-Ang II at 25 °C for 60 min in the presence of varying concentrations of GTPgamma S. For studying the time course of ligand binding, membranes were incubated with 0.1 nM 125I-Ang II for 60 min at 37 °C to attain binding equilibrium and unlabeled Ang II (1 µM) or GTPgamma S (10 µM) or both of them were added to the mixture and incubated for another 60 min. The membrane-bound radioligand was separated from the free radioligand by filtration over glass filters (GF/B) using a cell harvester (Millipore). Radioactivity was measured in a gamma counter.

Synthetic Peptides and Heterotrimeric Gq

The amino acid sequences of the peptides used in this study are shown in Fig. 1. They were synthesized by the solid-phase method and purified to 95-99% homogeneity by high performance liquid chromatography using a Nucleosil 5 C18 column eluted with a linear concentration gradient (0-60%) of CH3CN containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The lyophilized synthetic peptide was dissolved in water. Heterotrimeric forms of Gq proteins from bovine liver were purified to homogeneity as published (20).

GTPgamma S Binding Assay

[35S]GTPgamma S binding to 10 nM purified heterotrimeric Gq promoted by synthetic peptides was measured in 25 mM HEPES-NaOH buffer (pH 7.4) containing 120 µM MgCl2, 100 µM EDTA, and 100 nM [35S]GTPgamma S in the absence of phospholipids as described by Okamoto et al. (9). Briefly, Gq was incubated at 37 °C for 10 min in the absence (control) or presence of a synthetic peptide (100 µM). The incubation was terminated by addition of 10 volumes of ice-cold stopping buffer containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 25 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, and 20 µM GTP. After a 50-µl aliquot of the reaction mixture was rapidly filtered through a nitrocellulose filter (pore size, 0.45 µm) and washed three times with the stopping buffer, the filter was counted in a liquid scintillation counter. The maximal binding of [35S]GTPgamma S to Gq was measured in the presence of 1 µM GTPgamma S and 25 mM Mg2+ at room temperature by the method of Northup et al. (21) as a positive control.

Statistical Analysis

The results of experiments with the synthetic peptide study was examined by unpaired Student's t test. p values less than 0.05 were considered significant.


RESULTS

Binding Affinity of Mutant Receptors

As shown in Table I the dissociation constants (Kd) and Bmax values of the wild type AT1A and its mutants determined by Scatchard analysis were similar, indicating that the mutants possessed similar ligand binding affinity and sites of comparable magnitude. In this study [125I-Sar1,Ile8]Ang II was used as ligand. Scatchard plots indicated single high affinity sites. When 125I-Ang II was used as ligand results indicated similar single high affinity sites. The possible presence of low affinity sites was practically undetectable.

Table I. Binding affinity of [Sar1-Ile8]Ang II binding for rat AT1A wild type receptor and mutant receptors

Data represent results of three identical series of binding isotherms followed by Scatchard analysis. Results are presented as means ± S.D.

Kd Bmax

nM fmol/mg protein
Wild type 1.6  ± 0.1 18.8  ± 1.4
Mut 310-del 2.4  ± 0.2 16.0  ± 1.1
Mut 312-del 2.4  ± 0.2 17.8  ± 1.6
Mut 313-del 2.0  ± 0.3 15.2  ± 1.8
Mut 314-del 1.8  ± 0.2 15.6  ± 1.6
Mut 318-del 2.5  ± 0.3 17.8  ± 1.8
Mut Y312A 2.4  ± 0.4 16.6  ± 1.8
Mut F313A 2.6  ± 0.4 15.5  ± 1.9
Mut L314A 2.8  ± 0.3 14.8  ± 1.2
Mut K310,311Q 2.7  ± 0.3 18.3  ± 1.4

Effects of a Stable GTP Analog

As shown in Fig. 2, the binding of 125I-Ang II to wild type AT1A, Mut 318-del, and Mut K310,311Q receptors were dose-dependently decreased by GTPgamma S, whereas the effect of GTPgamma S (shift from a high affinity state to a low affinity form) was practically abolished in Mut 310-del, Mut 312-del, Mut 313-del, Mut 314-del, Mut Y312A, Mut F313A, and Mut L314A receptors.


Fig. 2. Effects of the stable GTP analog GTPgamma S on 125I-Ang II binding to membrane preparations expressing wild type AT1A and its mutants. Each point represents the mean ± S.D. obtained from three separate experiments at 25 °C.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]

Time-related changes in dissociation of 125I-Ang II from the wild type and mutated receptors are shown in Fig. 3. The binding of 125I-Ang II to the receptors in membrane preparations reached a plateau in 60 min. In wild type AT1A and all of its mutants, the receptor-bound 125I-Ang II was displaced by 1 µM unlabeled Ang II to similar extents (the range of half-life time of dissociation was 19.5 to 21.4 min). GTPgamma S (10 µM) markedly shortened the half-life time of the spontaneous dissociation in the wild type AT1A, and Mut 318-del, and Mut-K310,311Q receptors (3.5 to 4.6 min), whereas the binding of 125I-Ang II remained unchanged for 60 min in Mut 310-del, Mut 312-del, Mut 313-del, and Mut 314-del. Moreover, although the half-life times in the wild type AT1A and Mut 318-del were shortened in the presence of both Ang II and GTPgamma S (0.9 to 1.2 min), those in other deletion mutants were similar to the half-life time in the presence of Ang II alone (17.0 to 20.1 min).


Fig. 3. Time course study on the dissociation of 125I-Ang II binding in the presence of excessive concentration of Ang II and/or GTPgamma S in the wild type AT1A (a) and its mutants (b, Mut 310-del; c, Mut 312-del, d, Mut 313-del; e, Mut 314-del; and f, Mut 318-del). Membrane preparations were preincubated in the presence of 0.1 nM 125I-Ang II for 60 min, and then Ang II (1 µM) (open circles), GTPgamma S (10 µM) (open triangles), or both of them (solid triangles) were added. Controls (closed circles) did not contain GTPgamma S or cold Ang II. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. obtained from three separate experiments at 37 °C
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]

InsP3 Formation

Binding of Ang II to AT1A activates a PLC via Gq resulting in stimulation of InsP3 formation. Thus, increased InsP3 formation by Ang II can be considered to indicate effective coupling to Gq of the mutants. In unmutated AT1A, InsP3 production was significantly increased from 2.52 ± 0.05 pmol/dish of unstimulated control to 16.55 ± 1.88 pmol/dish at 10 s after Ang II stimulation. Similar results were obtained in Mut 318-del and Mut K310,311Q. By contrast, in Mut 310-del, Mut 312-del, Mut 313-del, Mut 314-del, Mut Y312A, Mut F313A, and Mut L314A responses of InsP3 to Ang II stimulation were abolished (Fig. 4).


Fig. 4. Increment of inositol trisphosphate (InsP3) produced upon stimulation of transfected CHO-K1 cells by 1 µM Ang II. Each point represents the mean ± S.D. obtained from three separate experiments in triplicate.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]

Effects of Synthetic Peptides on G Protein Activation

Gq was incubated for 10 min in the presence of [35S]GTPgamma S with peptides representing domains in the cytoplasmic segments of native AT1A (P-1 to P-5) or mutated peptides of P-5. As shown in Fig. 5, Peptides P-3 and P-5 activated Gq as well as positive control. The Gq-activating function was attenuated to 25% relative to intact P-5 in Mut P-5 (Tyr312, Phe313, and Leu314 were replaced by alanine). The uptake of [35S]GTPgamma S was significantly lower in Mut Y, Mut F (p < 0.01) and Mut L (p < 0.05) than in P-5.


Fig. 5. Effect of synthetic peptides on [35S]GTPgamma S binding to of Gq protein. Purified Gq (10 nM) was incubated with 100 nM [35S]GTPgamma S at room temperature in the absence (control) or presence of a synthetic peptide 100 µM for 10 min. A 50-µl aliquot of reaction mixture was subjected to the analysis of [35S]GTPgamma S binding. The basal binding (control) was obtained as [35S]GTPgamma S bound to Gq in the absence of a synthetic peptide. The 100% (maximum) binding is set as [35S]GTPgamma S binding in the presence of 2.5 mM Mg2+. Each bar represents the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 versus corresponding values in wild type P-5.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

The cytoplasmic C-terminal (C-tail) region was shown to play an essential role in agonist-induced receptor internalization (15). However, its role in the G protein-coupled phospholipase activation has been controversial. Now in three independent approaches using five deletion mutants, four alanine substitution mutants, and synthetic peptides with native and mutated amino acid sequences corresponding to an N-terminal region of C-tail, we were able to identify the tripeptide region Tyr312-Phe313-Leu314 (Fig. 5) as a domain essential for Gq activation.

Different experimental approaches produce results leading to different and sometimes contradicting conclusions. Wang et al. (13) using chimeric human AT1 with a grafted AT2 C-tail that shows Gq activation concluded that the major determinant of Gq coupling specificity is in the ICL-3, and the C-tail has little role in the activation of PLC. However, we had shown that deletion beyond Phe309 (Mut 310-del) abolished the Gq-coupled inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate formation (14). Since both of these modifications could introduce additional factors such as conformational changes or the effect of ICL3 not directly related to the action of deleted or replaced residues, multiple approaches had to be taken. Loss of Gq coupling in Mut 310-del and complete recovery of the Gq activation in Mut 318-del narrowed the Gq coupling domain to residues 310-317 (Figs. 1 and 4) (14). The observation of a robust activity with Mut 315-del by Thomas et al. (15) further narrowed it to a region between residues 310 and 314. Almost complete loss of the activity with Mut 312-del, 313-del, 314-del, and single residue alanine mutation Y312A, F313A, and L314A and the preservation of a full PLC activity with the double mutant K310Q,K311Q indicated that Tyr312-Phe313-Leu314 is the essential domain required for PLC activation. Its essential role in Gq coupling was also determined by loss of the well known GTPgamma S-induced shift to a low affinity state for agonist binding in these mutants (Figs. 2 and 3). Further evidence for the essential role of the tripeptide sequence for the G protein coupling was obtained by a third and completely independent approach in which peptides with the amino acid sequences of the native and alanine-substituted C-tail (residues 307-320) were allowed to interact with purified heterotrimeric Gq, and binding to [35S]GTPgamma S was examined. Again, alanine substitution of Tyr312-Phe313-Leu314 singly or three together significantly reduced GTPgamma S binding. It is interesting to note that, whereas the triple mutant Mut P-5 lost almost the entire binding ability, other mutants, particularly Mut L (L314A), retained recognizable binding, although the conformation of the C-tail domain of AT1A and the shorter synthetic segment may have a different conformation. These results suggest synergism of the three residues and some difference in the role of Tyr312 and Leu314 in Gqalpha activation and GTPgamma S binding.

The G protein coupling sites seem to vary from receptor to receptor, and no definitive rules or consensus sequences seem to exist. For example the N-formyl peptide receptor uses ICL2 (22), and G protein specificity of PGE2 receptor isoforms (EP3) is determined by the C-tail region. More than a single domain could participate in the interaction. The possibility of cooperation of ICL3 and amphipathic alpha -helical structure of the N-terminal region of the C-tail has been proposed by Probst et al. (23). The beta -adrenergic receptor uses the C-terminal region of ICL3 and the N-terminal region of C-tail for Gs activation (10).

The present finding that the synthetic 16-mer peptide P-3 with the amino acid sequence of the N-terminal region of ICL3 and the C-tail peptide (P-5) activated purified Gq just as well as the C-tail peptide (P-5) (Fig. 5) supports the observation of Hunyady et al. (24) that the deletion of a sequence (215-226) in this domain abolished Gq activation. It also supports the observation of Wang et al. (13) that in chimeras of AT1 and AT2, ICL3 plays dominant roles in Gq coupling. Shirai et al. (25) showed the same ICL3 domain activates Gi1, Gi2, and Go by using the synthetic peptide P-3. These results indicate that AT1A may use and require the tripeptide sequence of C-tail in collaboration with ICL3 in Gq activation. Interesting information revealed by the activation of G proteins by these peptides are that the same peptides (P-3 and P-5) are capable of activating Gi, Go, and Gq. Mechanisms by which a receptor selects the type of G proteins are yet to be clarified. On the other hand, peptides with unrelated sequences like P-1, P-2, and P-4 which did not show the activation may be considered as controls and indicate that activation by P-3 and P-5 is specific to their sequences.

Bmax values of mutated receptors expressed in each cell line were at levels comparable to that of the wild type. Hence, the decrease in InsP3 formation in Mut 310-del, Mut 312-del, Mut 313-del, Mut 314-del, Mut Y312A, Mut F313A, and Mut L314A should be due to the receptor mutation rather than a decrease in expression of each mutant receptor. Our previous study using substitutional mutations of basic polar amino acid residues in ICL2 and ICL3 indicated that ICL2 and the C-terminal domain of ICL3 would be important for Gq coupling (14). These mutations targeted at domains with dense electrical charges probably caused nonspecific conformational changes and led to erroneous results that could be misinterpreted.

Tyr292 in transmembrane domain 7 was reported to be essential for G protein coupling (26). The conserved sequence NPLFY at the bottom of transmembrane domain 7 was shown to contribute to both agonist binding and signal transduction (24). Thus, the junctional area of AT1 between transmembrane domain 7 and C-tail seems to play an important role in receptor signaling. This area of AT1 also contains the sequence KKFKK that was shown to be an unusual Gi activator domain of insulin growth factor II receptor (9). However, in AT1 mutation to Lys-Lys-Phe-Gln310-Gln311 did not have any effect on Gq coupling. This observation helped our work in narrowing the Gq activating domain to Tyr312-Phe313-Leu314.

In summary, the present study presents evidence that a Gq coupling site in the type 1A angiotensin receptor AT1A should reside between residues 312 and 318 in the C-terminal tail, and the specific sequence Tyr312-Phe313-Leu314 is essential for coupling and activation of the Gq protein.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by Scientific Grant B-06454298 from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture and the Uehara Memorial Foundation, Japan, and by USPHS Research Grants HL-14192, HL-35323, and HL58205 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
par    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232. Tel.: 615-322-4347; Fax: 615-322-3201.
1   The abbreviations used are: Ang II, angiotensin II; AT1A, angiotensin type 1A receptor; AT2, angiotensin type 2 receptor; ICL2, second intracellular loop; ICL3, third intracellular loop; PLC, phospholipase C; InsP3, inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate; Mut, mutant; del, deletion; GTPgamma S, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate; G protein, guanyl nucleotide-binding protein; CHO-K1, Chinese hamster ovary cells.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We are grateful to Japanese Cancer Research Resources Bank (JCRB)-Cell for the gift of CHO-K1 cell.


REFERENCES

  1. Sasaki, K., Yamano, Y., Bardhan, S., Iwai, N., Murray, J. J., Hasegawa, M., Matsuda, Y., and Inagami, T. (1991) Nature 351, 230-232 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Murphy, T. J., Alexander, R. W., Griendling, K. K., Runge, M. S., and Bernstein, K. E. (1991) Nature 351, 233-236 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Inagami, T., Iwai, N., Sasaki, K., Yamano, Y., Bardhan, S., Chaki, S., Guo, D. F., and Furuta, H. (1992) J. Hypertens. 10, 713-716 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Crawford, K. W., Frey, E. A., and Cote, T. E. (1992) Mol. Pharmacol. 41, 154-162 [Abstract]
  5. Mitchell, J., Murphy, E. A., and Northup, J. K. (1991) Endocrine Society Abstract 199,
  6. Griendling, K. K., Rittenhouse, S. E., Brock, T. A., Ekstein, L. S., Gimbrone, M. A., Jr., and Alexander, R. W. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 5901-5906 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hescheler, J., Rosenthal, W., Hinsch, K. D., Wulfern, M., Trautwein, W., and Schultz, G. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 619-624 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Franke, R. R., Konig, B., Sakmar, T. P., Khorana, H. G., and Hofmann, K. P. (1990) Science 250, 123-125 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Okamoto, T., Murayama, Y., Hayashi, Y., Inagaki, M., Ogata, E., and Nishimoto, I. (1991) Cell 67, 723-730 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. O'Dowd, B. F., Hnatowich, M., Regan, J. W., Leader, W. M., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 15985-15992 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Chazenbalk, G. D., Nagayama, Y., Russo, D., Wadsworth, H. L., and Rapoport, B. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20970-20975 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Namba, T., Sugimoto, Y., Negishi, M., Irie, A., Ushikubi, F., Kakizuka, A., Ito, S., Ichikawa, A., and Narumiya, S. (1993) Nature 365, 166-170 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Wang, C., Jayadev, S., and Escobedo, J. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16677-16682 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ohyama, K., Yamano, Y., Chaki, S., Kondo, T., and Inagami, T. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 189, 677-683 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Thomas, W. G., Thekkumkara, T. J., Motel, T. J., and Baker, K. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 207-213 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Iwai, N., Yamano, Y., Chaki, S., Konishi, F., Bardhan, S., Tibbett, C., Sasaki, K., Hasegawa, M., Matsuda, Y., and Inagami, T. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 177, 299-304 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Kunkel, T. A. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 488-492 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Chaki, S., and Inagami, T. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 182, 388-394 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Taylor, S. J., Smith, J. A., and Exton, J. H. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 17150-17156 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Northup, J. K., Smigel, M. D., and Gilman, A. G. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 11416-11423 [Free Full Text]
  22. Schreiber, R. E., Prossnitz, E. R., Ye, R. D., Cochrane, C. G., and Bokoch, G. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 326-331 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Probst, W. C., Snyder, L. A., Schuster, D. I., Brosius, J., and Sealfon, S. C. (1992) DNA Cell Biol. 11, 1-20 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Hunyady, L., Bor, M., Baukal, A. J., Balla, T., and Catt, K. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16602-16609 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Shirai, H., Takahashi, K., Katada, T., and Inagami, T. (1995) Hypertension 25, 726-730 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Marie, J., Maigret, B., Joseph, M.-P., Larguier, R., Nouet, S., Lombard, C., and Bonnafous, J.-C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 20815-20818 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Strosberg, A. D. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 196, 1-10 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. V. McCulloch, V. Morrow, S. Milasta, I. Comerford, G. Milligan, G. J. Graham, N. W. Isaacs, and R. J. B. Nibbs
Multiple Roles for the C-terminal Tail of the Chemokine Scavenger D6
J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2008; 283(12): 7972 - 7982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. K. Jackson, D. G. Gillespie, C. Zhu, J. Ren, L. C. Zacharia, and Z. Mi
{alpha}2-Adrenoceptors Enhance Angiotensin II-Induced Renal Vasoconstriction: Role for NADPH Oxidase and RhoA
Hypertension, March 1, 2008; 51(3): 719 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Anavi-Goffer, D. Fleischer, D. P. Hurst, D. L. Lynch, J. Barnett-Norris, S. Shi, D. L. Lewis, S. Mukhopadhyay, A. C. Howlett, P. H. Reggio, et al.
Helix 8 Leu in the CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Contributes to Selective Signal Transduction Mechanisms
J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2007; 282(34): 25100 - 25113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
L. Oliveira, C. M. Costa-Neto, C. R. Nakaie, S. Schreier, S. I. Shimuta, and A. C. M. Paiva
The Angiotensin II AT1 Receptor Structure-Activity Correlations in the Light of Rhodopsin Structure
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 565 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Kuniyeda, T. Okuno, K. Terawaki, M. Miyano, T. Yokomizo, and T. Shimizu
Identification of the Intracellular Region of the Leukotriene B4 Receptor Type 1 That Is Specifically Involved in Gi Activation
J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2007; 282(6): 3998 - 4006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Verzijl, L. Pardo, M. van Dijk, Y. K. Gruijthuijsen, A. Jongejan, H. Timmerman, J. Nicholas, M. Schwarz, P. M. Murphy, R. Leurs, et al.
Helix 8 of the Viral Chemokine Receptor ORF74 Directs Chemokine Binding
J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2006; 281(46): 35327 - 35335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
R. N. Thompson, A. Napier, and K. S. Wekesa
Attenuation of the Production of Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate in the Mouse Vomeronasal Organ by Antibodies Against the {alpha}q/11 Subfamily of G-Proteins
Chem Senses, September 1, 2006; 31(7): 613 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. M. D. Santos, L. A. Gardner, S. W. White, and S. W. Bahouth
Characterization of the Residues in Helix 8 of the Human beta1-Adrenergic Receptor That Are Involved in Coupling the Receptor to G Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., May 5, 2006; 281(18): 12896 - 12907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. H. Turner and J. R. Raymond
Interaction of Calmodulin with the Serotonin 5-Hydroxytryptamine2A Receptor: A PUTATIVE REGULATOR OF G PROTEIN COUPLING AND RECEPTOR PHOSPHORYLATION BY PROTEIN KINASE C
J. Biol. Chem., September 2, 2005; 280(35): 30741 - 30750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. K. Jackson, L. Gao, and C. Zhu
Mechanism of the Vascular Angiotensin II/{alpha}2-Adrenoceptor Interaction
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2005; 314(3): 1109 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Mifune, H. Ohtsu, H. Suzuki, H. Nakashima, E. Brailoiu, N. J. Dun, G. D. Frank, T. Inagami, S. Higashiyama, W. G. Thomas, et al.
G Protein Coupling and Second Messenger Generation Are Indispensable for Metalloprotease-dependent, Heparin-binding Epidermal Growth Factor Shedding through Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., July 15, 2005; 280(28): 26592 - 26599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
R. Schleif and C. Wolberger
Arm-domain interactions can provide high binding cooperativity
Protein Sci., October 22, 2004; 13(10): 2829 - 2831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. T. Duvernay, F. Zhou, and G. Wu
A Conserved Motif for the Transport of G Protein-coupled Receptors from the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Cell Surface
J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30741 - 30750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D.-F. Guo, V. Tardif, K. Ghelima, J. S. D. Chan, J. R. Ingelfinger, X. Chen, and I. Chenier
A Novel Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor-associated Protein Induces Cellular Hypertrophy in Rat Vascular Smooth Muscle and Renal Proximal Tubular Cells
J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 2004; 279(20): 21109 - 21120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. Liu, G. Sandford, G. Fei, and J. Nicholas
G{alpha} Protein Selectivity Determinant Specified by a Viral Chemokine Receptor-Conserved Region in the C Tail of the Human Herpesvirus 8 G Protein-Coupled Receptor
J. Virol., March 1, 2004; 78(5): 2460 - 2471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
Z. Gaborik, G. Jagadeesh, M. Zhang, A. Spat, K. J. Catt, and L. Hunyady
The Role of a Conserved Region of the Second Intracellular Loop in AT1 Angiotensin Receptor Activation and Signaling
Endocrinology, June 1, 2003; 144(6): 2220 - 2228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. Gao, C. Zhu, and E. K. Jackson
alpha 2-Adrenoceptors Potentiate Angiotensin II- and Vasopressin-Induced Renal Vasoconstriction in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2003; 305(2): 581 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. Vazquez, C. Sun, J. Du, L. Fuentes, C. Sumners, and M. K. Raizada
Transduction of a Functional Domain of the AT1 Receptor in Neurons by HIV-Tat PTD
Hypertension, March 1, 2003; 41(3): 751 - 756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. C. Leclerc, M. Auger-Messier, P. M. Lanctot, E. Escher, R. Leduc, and G. Guillemette
A Polyaromatic Caveolin-Binding-Like Motif in the Cytoplasmic Tail of the Type 1 Receptor for Angiotensin II Plays an Important Role in Receptor Trafficking and Signaling
Endocrinology, December 1, 2002; 143(12): 4702 - 4710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
D. S. Kang and L. M. F. Leeb-Lundberg
Negative and Positive Regulatory Epitopes in the C-Terminal Domains of the Human B1 and B2 Bradykinin Receptor Subtypes Determine Receptor Coupling Efficacy to G9/11-Mediated Phospholipase Cbeta Activity
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2002; 62(2): 281 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
T. Thekkumkara and S. L. Linas
Role of internalization in AT1A receptor function in proximal tubule epithelium
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2002; 282(4): F623 - F629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. L. Seachrist, S. A. Laporte, L. B. Dale, A. V. Babwah, M. G. Caron, P. H. Anborgh, and S. S. G. Ferguson
Rab5 Association with the Angiotensin II Type 1A Receptor Promotes Rab5 GTP Binding and Vesicular Fusion
J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2002; 277(1): 679 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. K. Jackson, W. A. Herzer, C. K. Kost Jr, and S. J. Vyas
Enhanced Interaction Between Renovascular {alpha}2-Adrenoceptors and Angiotensin II Receptors in Genetic Hypertension
Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 353 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
M. de Gasparo, K. J. Catt, T. Inagami, J. W. Wright, and Th. Unger
International Union of Pharmacology. XXIII. The Angiotensin II Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2000; 52(3): 415 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]