Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Firtel, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Firtel, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 38, Issue of September 19, 1997 pp. 23690-23695
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Activation of the Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase ERK2 by the Chemoattractant Folic Acid in Dictyostelium*

(Received for publication, April 17, 1997, and in revised form, July 15, 1997)

Mineko Maeda Dagger § and Richard A. Firtel §par

From the Dagger  Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, Machikaneyama-cho 1-16, Toyonaka, Osaka 560, Japan and the § Department of Biology, Center for Molecular Genetics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0634

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

The Dictyostelium MAP kinase ERK2 is activated by extracellular cAMP in aggregation-competent cells and is required for receptor activation of adenylyl cyclase (Maeda, M., Aubry, L., Insall, R., Gaskins, C., Devreotes, P. N., and Firtel, R. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3351-3354; Segall, J., Kuspa, A., Shaulsky, G., Ecke, M., Maeda, M., Gaskins, C., Firtel, R., and Loomis, W. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 405-413). This cAMP-dependent activation of ERK2 is mediated by the serpentine, G protein-coupled cAMP receptors. However, ERK2 activation by cAMP is at least partially heterotrimeric G protein-independent, with a level of activation in cells lacking the sole Gbeta subunit or the G protein-coupled cAMP receptors-coupled Galpha 2 subunit that is ~50% that of wild-type cells (Maeda, M., Aubry, L., Insall, R., Gaskins, C., Devreotes, P. N., and Firtel, R. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3351-3354; Segall, J., Kuspa, A., Shaulsky, G., Ecke, M., Maeda, M., Gaskins, C., Firtel, R., and Loomis, W. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 405-413). Folic acid, a chemoattractant in the vegetative cells that enables amoebae to find bacteria in the wild, also triggers the activation of adenylyl cyclase, which is impaired in the vegetative cells lacking the Galpha protein subunit Galpha 4 (Hadwiger, J., Lee, S., and Firtel, R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10566-10570). In this study, we show that folic acid activates ERK2 in developmentally regulated manner and is required for ERK2 stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity. Maximum levels of folate-stimulated ERK2 activity occur in cells from very early in development, prior to aggregation, and again at the tipped aggregate stages, corresponding to the stages in which folate receptors and the coupled Galpha subunit Galpha 4 are maximally expressed. During the activation by folic acid, ERK2 is phosphorylated on tyrosine residue(s) and contemporaneously shows a mobility shift on SDS-PAGE. Interestingly, this activation is not elicited in the absence of Gbeta subunits, in contrast to the response to cAMP. This response also requires the Galpha 4 subunit known to be required for other folic acid-mediated responses (Hadwiger, J., Lee, S., and Firtel, R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10566-10570). Furthermore, we show that the activation of ERK2 by cAMP is independent of the Galpha 4 subunit, while the activation of ERK2 by folate is independent of Galpha 2. Taken together, these data indicate that there are at least two pathways of ERK2 activation, heterotrimeric G protein-dependent and -independent pathways.


INTRODUCTION

MAP1 kinase cascades are used by eukaryotes to couple extracellular signals to diverse intracellular regulatory pathways. The diversity of these pathways is great and includes growth factor responses in mammalian cells, cell-type differentiation in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans, mating and growth responses in yeast, and stress-mediated responses in yeast and mammalian cells. These cascades are mediated by various classes of G protein- and tyrosine kinase-coupled receptors (5-13). In Dictyostelium, three presumably independent MAP kinase cascades play essential regulatory roles during both growth and multicellular development. The MAP kinase kinase (MEK) DdMEK1 is required for chemotaxis toward cAMP during aggregation; ddmek1 null cells form very small aggregates but continue to differentiate into normally proportioned, but very small, fruiting bodies (14). DdMEK1 is specifically required at the time of cAMP stimulation for the activation of guanylyl cyclase and the production of cGMP, the second messenger for chemotaxis in these cells. Two MAP kinases, ERK1 and ERK2, have been identified and their functions characterized. ERK1 is required for vegetative growth and is thought to play roles during multicellular development (15), while ERK2 is required for the activation of adenylyl cyclase by the chemoattractant cAMP during aggregation, prespore-specific gene expression, and morphogenesis (2, 16). erk2 null cells are aggregation-deficient due to the inability to activate adenylyl cyclase and relay the cAMP signal but show normal activation of guanylyl cyclase, which couples to chemotaxis (17). erk2 null cells expressing a temperature-sensitive ERK2 show abnormal morphogenesis during the multicellular stages, as well as the inability to induce prespore gene expression when shifted to a nonpermissive temperature. ERK2 activity is induce ~40-fold in aggregation-stage cells in response to extracellular cAMP. As expected from their aggregation-stage phenotypes, ERK2 activation is independent of DdMEK1 function. ERK2 is activated by cAMP through the G protein-coupled cAMP receptors cAR1 and cAR3, but the activation occurs to a level ~50% that of wild-type cells in cells in which the gene encoding the only Gbeta subunit or the gene encoding the Galpha subunit known to couple to cAR1 and cAR3 (Galpha 2) is disrupted, indicating that cAMP receptor-mediated ERK2 activation is at least partially G protein-independent (1, 2). This pathway is positively regulated by cAMP-dependent PKA and negatively regulated by Ras pathways (18), although another group has conflicting data on some of these points (Ref. 3; see below). ERK2 is also regulated by components of the adenylyl cyclase pathway such as CRAC (18).

Dictyostelium cells also undergo chemotaxis to other extracellular signals, including folic acid, which is produced by bacteria and is thought to be used by Dictyostelium cells to locate food in the wild (19). The folate response is present in vegetatively growing cells but is maximal in cells that have been starved for 0.5-2 h (19, 20), decreases significantly during aggregation (19, 20), which is the time of maximal cAMP responsiveness (17), and is reacquired at the tipped aggregate stage, when cells are responsive to both folate and the pterin monapterine. In addition to stimulating the activation of guanylyl cyclase and chemotaxis, folate also elicits the activation of adenylyl cyclase in vegetative cells and cells during early development. Folate and monapterine elicit a similar response during the multicellular stages (4, 20, 21). These folate-mediated responses require the Galpha subunit Galpha 4 (4). The folate and monapterine responsiveness at the tipped aggregate stage may be involved in morphogenetic movements and cell-type differentiation and coincides with a stage-specific requirement of Galpha 4 for these processes (4, 21, 22).

In this report, we investigate the possible regulation of ERK2 by folate-mediated pathways. We show that folic acid activates ERK2 in developmentally regulated manner, this activation is paralleled by a mobility shift of ERK2 on SDS-PAGE and phosphorylation on tyrosine residue(s), ERK2 activation requires heterotrimeric G proteins containing the Galpha 4 subunit, and ERK2 is activated by monapterine in cells at the tipped aggregate stage. As has been observed previously for cAMP (2), we show that ERK2 is required for folate stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. We propose that there are two pathways leading to ERK2 activation; folic acid activates ERK2 via a completely G protein-dependent pathway, while cAMP activates ERK2 by pathways that are at least partially G protein-independent.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Strains

Wild-type developing Dictyostelium discoideum KAx-3 and JH10 (a thymidine auxotroph) were used as wild-type strains. Strains carrying disruptions in the genes encoding ERK2 (1, 2, 16), cAMP receptors cAR1 and cAR3 (23), the Gbeta subunit (24), and the Galpha 4 subunit (22, 25) have been described previously. Wild-type and erk2 null cells expressing a His-tagged ERK2 were created by C. Gaskins and L. Aubry (Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA). A genomic ERK2 clone into the BglII and XhoI sites of the Dep-j extrachromosomal vector, a derivative of pATANB42 and carrying an Act15 promoter, was engineered by polymerase chain reaction to add an in-frame His6 tag at the carboxyl terminus of ERK2. After confirming the sequence of the open reading frame, the resulting vector was transformed into erk2 null and wild-type cells and stable transformants were isolated.

Cell Culture

All strains used in this study were cultured in HL5 supplemented with or without G418 at 20 µg/ml or thymidine at 100 µg/ml. Cells were harvested at 2-4 × 106 cells/ml, washed twice with 12 mM sodium/potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.1), and then resuspended in phosphate buffer at 5 × 107 cells/ml. After 30 min of starvation, cells were stimulated with folic acid at 50 µM. At appropriate intervals after the stimulation, 100 µl of cell suspension was withdrawn to 25 µl of 5 × sample buffer for SDS-PAGE and then boiled for 3 min. To see ERK2 activity during development, 0.5 ml of cell suspension was placed onto a Millipore filter (3 cm diameter, 0.45 µm pore size) supported by 1% phosphate-buffered agar and allowed to develop. Every 4 h of incubation, cells were harvested from two filters and resuspended in phosphate buffer at 5 × 107 cells/ml. For the preparation of cell suspension after 12 h of incubation, formed multicellular structures were dissociated by being passed through a needle in MES-EDTA as described previously (26) and washed twice in phosphate buffer. These suspensions were used for stimulation with 50 µM folic acid or 50 µM monapterine.

Purification of His6-tagged ERK2 Protein by Ni2+ Beads

Log-phase, vegetative cells were washed and starved for 30 min before being stimulated as described in the preceding section. At specific intervals after the stimulation, 500 µl of the cell suspension was added to 500 µl of 2 × ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 30 mM p-nitrophenyl phosphate, 20 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 2 mM Na3VO4, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, and 300 mM NaCl). Lysates were clarified by centrifuging for 10 min at 15,000 rpm in a Tomy microcentrifuge at 4 °C. Fifty µl of 50% nickel-agarose beads in phosphate-buffered saline were added to the resulting supernatants. After 1 h of incubation with gentle mixing at 4 °C, Ni2+-agarose beads were collected by centrifuging for 1 min at 10,000 rpm in the Tomy microcentrifuge and washed serially: four times with 200 µl of lysis buffer, once with 20 mM imidazole (pH 7.0) in lysis buffer, and then twice with 50 mM imidazole in lysis buffer with shaking for 5 min, all at 4 °C. Finally, proteins were eluted three times with 100 µl of 250 mM imidazole in lysis buffer. These eluates were boiled for 3 min after the addition of 25 µl of 5 × sample buffer for SDS-PAGE.

In-gel Assay and Immunoblot Analyses

In-gel assays were performed as described previously using myelin basic protein (MBP) as the substrate (1). Cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot as described previously (1, 16).

Folate Binding Sites and Adenylyl Cyclase Activity

Folate binding sites were determined as described previously (4, 27, 28). Cyclic AMP mass assays were performed as published previously (29). Cells were starved for 0.5 h in phosphate buffer, washed, resuspended, and then stimulated with 50 µM folic acid, and accumulated cAMP was measured using the Cayman cAMP enzyme immunoassay (Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI) according to the manufacturer's protocol.


RESULTS

Evidence for ERK2 Activation by Folic Acid

Folic acid elicits the activation of adenylyl cyclase through a G protein-coupled pathway containing the Galpha subunit Galpha 4 with kinetics that are similar to the cAMP/cAR1/Galpha 2-mediated response during aggregation (4, 20, 21). As shown previously, cAMP stimulation of adenylyl cyclase requires ERK2 (2). To determine whether folate also stimulates ERK2 activity, we analyzed ERK2 activity in whole cell lysates and purified ERK2 protein after stimulation with folic acid by an in-gel assay (1) (see "Experimental Procedures"). As shown in Fig. 1A, addition of folate to very early developing cells (cells starved for 0.5 h) stimulates the activity of a kinase that has the mobility of ERK2 (Ref. 1; see below) and is absent from erk2 null cells, strongly suggesting that the activity of endogenous ERK2 is stimulated by the chemoattractant folate. The kinetics and level of activation are similar to those we observed previously for ERK2 activation in response to cAMP in aggregation-stage cells (1).


Fig. 1. ERK2 activation by folic acid. A, folate activation of ERK2 in wild-type (KAx-3) and erk2 null cells. Cells starved for 0.5 h were stimulated with 50 µM folate as described under "Experimental Procedures." Kinase activity was measured using the in-gel assay. Briefly, in the "in-gel" assay, the in vitro ERK2 substrate MBP is embedded in the SDS-PAGE gel (1). After electrophoresis of the samples, the proteins in the gel are denatured and renatured and then in situ kinase activity is assayed with the addition of [gamma -32P]ATP and detected by autoradiography (see "Experimental Procedures"). Closed arrowhead marks the position of the mobility of ERK2. The open arrowhead marks the position of an ~30-kDa kinase (p30) that can phosphorylate MBP and has been described previously (1). B, erk2 null cells constitutively expressing His6-ERK2 were assayed for ERK2 activity using an in-gel assay after stimulation with folic acid. The left-hand panel shows ERK2 activity in whole cell lysates. Lysates were also fractionated using Ni2+ affinity resin into "supernatant," containing materials that did not bind to the resin, and the bound and eluted fraction (labeled Ni-bead fr.). C, comparison of ERK2 activities of Ni2+-bead purified samples from erk2 null cells and erk2 null cells constitutively expressing His6-ERK2. See "Experimental Procedures" and Maeda et al. (1) for details. There is no endogenous ERK2 band in B and C since the strain used for the complementation is the ERK2 knockout strain (erk2 null; Refs. 1 and 16).
[View Larger Version of this Image (51K GIF file)]

To biochemically determine if this activity is ERK2, we expressed His6-tagged ERK2 (His6-ERK2) in erk2 null cells under the control of the Act15 promoter, which is expressed throughout growth and development (30). Expression of His6-ERK2 in erk2 null cells complemented the erk2 null aggregation-deficient phenotype (data not shown), as does the expression of unmodified ERK2 (1, 2), indicating that His6-ERK2 can functionally replace the endogenous ERK2 in vivo. His6-ERK2 was purified at each time point after folate stimulation by affinity chromatography using Ni2+-agarose beads. As shown in Fig. 1B, folate-stimulated His6-ERK2 activity in whole cell extracts with similar kinetics to those of the endogenous ERK2 (Fig. 1A). The in-gel activity of the Ni2+-purified His6-ERK2 samples (panel labeled Ni-bead fr.) shows that the kinase activity is either His6-ERK2 or a kinase that is tightly bound to His6-ERK2 and has a similar mobility in SDS-PAGE gels. When the supernatants of the Ni2+ resin-treated erk2 null cell/His6-ERK2 extracts were assayed by in-gel assay, only a low level of kinase activity remained at the mobility of the His6-ERK2, indicating that the Ni2+ resin effectively purified the expressed His6-ERK2 protein from the extracts. In control experiments using erk2 null or wild-type cells in which cell extracts from cells not expressing His6-ERK2 were treated with Ni2+ affinity resin, no kinase activity is detected at the position of the His6-ERK2 (Fig. 1C; data not shown). Collectively, these results demonstrate that the ~40-kDa protein is ERK2 and its activity is stimulated by folic acid with kinetics similar to what we have observed previously in response to cAMP in aggregation-competent cells.

The whole cell extracts show additional bands of kinase activity, including a major non-ERK2 band at 30 kDa, which we have observed previously in in-gel assays of cAMP-stimulated extracts (1). This band is also present in erk2 null cell extracts and those from other strains, including some in which ERK2 is not present or not activated (see Figs. 1A, 3, and 5; Refs. 1 and 14). Under the cell culture conditions used, the basal activity of the exogenous His6-ERK2 in unstimulated cells was very low. The relative activity of the purified His6-ERK2 protein from unstimulated cells is even lower than that observed in whole cell extracts, suggesting that some of the activity previously found at the same mobility as ERK2 in unstimulated cells may be due to background kinases and not ERK2 (1, 2, 18). Consistent with this, whole cell extracts of erk2 null cells show a low level of background in-gel kinase activity against MBP at the mobility of ERK2 (Fig. 1A).


Fig. 3. Kinetics of ERK2 activation by folic acid in wild-type (KAx-3), gbeta null, and car1/3 double knockout strains. Whole cell lysates were prepared from wild-type cells (KAx-3), gbeta null cells (51), and car1/3 double knockout cells (23) at the intervals indicated after stimulation with 50 µM folic acid and analyzed by in-gel assay containing MBP as a substrate for ERK2. The position of ERK2 (solid arrowhead) and p30 (open arrowhead) are indicated. Each lane contains 5 × 105 cells.
[View Larger Version of this Image (57K GIF file)]


Fig. 5. Developmentally regulated ERK2 activation by folate. A, whole cell lysates were prepared from wild-type KAx-3 cells at various developmental stages before (0 time point) and 50 s after stimulation with 50 µM folic acid and analyzed by in-gel assay containing MBP as a substrate. Data presented in previous figures indicated that folate stimulation of ERK2 activity has a broad peak of maximal activity centered at ~50 s after stimulation. Cells were assayed at 0.5 and 4 h after starvation (preaggregation stages), 8 h (aggregation), 12 h (tipped aggregate stage), 16 h (slug), and 20 h (early culmination) of development. B, similarly, whole cell lysates were prepared from 12 h developed (tipped aggregate stage) JH10 and galpha 4 null cells before (0 time point) and 30 s, 1 min, 2 min, and 4 min after stimulation with 50 µM monapterine and analyzed by the in-gel assay.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]

Mobility Shift of ERK2 and Phosphorylation on Tyrosine Residue(s) by Folic Acid Stimulation

MAP kinases are known to be activated by phosphorylation on conserved tyrosine and threonine residues by an upstream MEK (6) and can often be followed by a mobility shift of the MAP kinase on SDS-PAGE (31). To examine these properties for ERK2, we analyzed whole cell lysates prepared after stimulation with folic acid by Western blot analysis with affinity purified anti-ERK2 antibody (1). Western blot analysis using the ERK2 antiserum demonstrates that His6-ERK2 has a slightly slower mobility than that of the endogenous ERK2, presumably due to the His6 tag (Fig. 2A). To detect a possible ERK2 mobility shift after folate stimulation, we used longer gels for SDS-PAGE than those used for the in-gel assays. As shown in Fig. 2B, ERK2 transiently exhibits a reduced mobility after stimulation that is coincident with the increase in ERK2 activity. The shifted band is detectable in the 30-s and 1-min time points but not in unstimulated cells or cells 4 min after stimulation, when the level of endogenous ERK2 activity has already decreased (see above; Fig. 1A). No band at the position of the unshifted (labeled ERK2) or shifted ERK2 (labeled *ERK2) is observed in erk2 null cells. In addition, we observed a tyrosine-phosphorylated band at the mobility of *ERK2 from wild-type (KAx-3 cells) at the same time points as we observed the mobility-shifted ERK2 in Fig. 2B. No tyrosine-phosphorylated band of this mobility was observed in erk2 null cells; however, erk2 null cells complemented with His6-ERK2 did show a new tyrosine-phosphorylated band at the 30-s and 1-min time points with the expected mobility (slightly slower than the endogenous tyrosine-phosphorylated ERK2 in wild-type cells, consistent with a slower mobility of the His6-tagged protein).


Fig. 2. Mobility shift and phosphorylation of ERK2 on tyrosine during activation by folic acid. A, characterization of endogenous ERK2 and His6-tagged ERK2 by immunoblot analysis with anti-ERK2 antibody. Whole cell lysates were prepared from erk2 null cells, wild-type cells (strain KAx-3), and erk2 null cells expressing His6-tagged ERK2 (Comple.), size-fractionated by SDS-PAGE, blotted, and probed with anti-ERK2 antibody (1, 16). His6-ERK2 shows a slightly slower mobility than endogenous ERK2. A band of mobility similar to the His6-ERK2 is present in all strains. This band is not a form of ERK2 or due the a disruption of ERK2, as it is present in cells in which the ERK2 gene is disrupted within the open reading frame (erk2 null cells) as well as the parental strain (1, 16). B, whole cell lysates prepared from KAx-3 and erk2 null cells at 0 s, 30 s, 1 min, and 4 min after stimulation with folic acid were analyzed by immunoblot with anti-ERK2 antibody. The shifted ERK2 is labeled *ERK2. C, whole cell lysates prepared from KAx-3 cells, erk2 null cells, and erk2 null cells expressing His6-ERK2 (Comple.) were size-fractionated by SDS-PAGE, blotted, and probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. Each lane contains 5 × 105 cells. The shifted ERK2 His6-ERK2 are labeled *ERK2 and *His2ERK2, respectively. The anti-ERK2 antibody has been described previously (1, 16).
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]

The Heterotrimeric G Protein Containing the Galpha 4 Subunit Is Required for Folic Acid-induced ERK2 Activation

Previously, we demonstrated that ERK2 is activated in aggregation-stage cells by cAMP through the cAMP G protein-coupled receptors, cAR1 and cAR3 (1). A level of ERK2 activation that was ~40-60% that observed in wild-type cells was found in strains in which the genes encoding either the cAR-coupled Galpha subunit Galpha 2 or the only Dictyostelium Gbeta subunit were deleted, suggesting that cAMP-stimulated ERK2 activation was at least partially G protein-independent (1). To examine whether heterotrimeric G proteins are required for ERK2 activation by folic acid, we assayed ERK2 activity in whole cell lysates of appropriate strains. As presented in Fig. 1A, wild-type cells (strain KAx-3) showed an increase in ERK2 activity that was detected by 20 s after the stimulation, reaching maximal levels at ~1 min (Fig. 3, upper panel). In contrast to our observations with cAMP-stimulated ERK2 activity in aggregation-competent cells, no folate-stimulated ERK2 activity was detected in gbeta null cells (Fig. 3, middle panel). To determine if this was due to differences in the amount of folic acid binding, this was directly assayed (see "Experimental Procedures"). Wild-type cells starved for 1 h gave 60.8 ± 8.9 [3H]folate binding sites/cell, while gbeta null cells had 52.4 ± 7.4 sites/cell, indicating no significant differences between gbeta null and wild-type cells that would account for the lack of ERK2 activation by folate. In addition, we compared the amount of ERK2 protein in the gbeta null to that in wild-type cells by Western blot analysis. The blots showed no significant differences (data not shown). Moreover, parallel experiments performed simultaneously demonstrated cAMP-stimulated activation of ERK2 in gbeta null cells (1). The results with the gbeta null cells suggest that ERK2 activation by folic acid requires heterotrimeric G proteins.

In Dictyostelium, genes encoding eight distinct Galpha subunits have been cloned, and six have been disrupted by homologous recombination (Galpha 1, Galpha 2, Galpha 4, Galpha 5, Galpha 7, and Galpha 8) (22, 25, 32-35). Folate-stimulated induction of ERK2 was assayed in the single gene disruptants of each of the above Galpha subunit encoding genes. ERK2 activation was normal in all strains except that carrying a deletion in Galpha 4, the only Galpha subunit known to be required for folate-mediated chemotaxis and activation of adenylyl cyclase and guanylyl cyclase (Ref. 4; Fig. 4A). Fig. 4B shows a more detailed analysis of the galpha 4 null strain in comparison to its parental, wild-type-developing, thymidine auxotrophic strain JH10. These data also show the lack of folate-mediated ERK2 activation in galpha 4 null cells. In contrast, cAMP stimulation of ERK2 activity is normal in galpha 4 null cells (Fig. 4B). Although in conflict with previous observations by another group (3), the activation of ERK2 by cAMP in galpha 4 null cells is expected, as cAMP activation of adenylyl cyclase is normal in galpha 4 null cells (4) and ERK2 is required for cAMP activation in wild-type cells (2). Control experiments showed that the galpha 4 null cells did not exhibit folated-mediated chemotaxis, as expected from previous analyses (4). As expected, the activation is independent of cAMP receptors, as exhibited by folate stimulation of ERK2 activity in car1/car3 double knockout cells (Fig. 3, bottom panel), although the activity levels are slightly lower in these cells than in wild-type cells.


Fig. 4. Requirement of the heterotrimeric G protein containing the Galpha 4 subunit in the activation of ERK2 by folic acid. A, analysis of folate-mediated activation of ERK2 in galpha 1 null, galpha 2 null, galpha 4 null, galpha 5 null, galpha 7 null, and galpha 8 null strains. Activity was calculated by measuring the relative density of of the bands at different time points and comparing this to internal wild-type controls assayed and analyzed simultaneously (1). The activity is compared with an internal wild-type standard run on each gel as described previously (1). B, comparison of ERK2 activities in galpha 4 null cells and the wild-type-developing, thymidine auxotroph parental strain (JH10). Whole cell lysates were prepared before (0 time point) and 30 s, 1 min, and 2 min after stimulation with 50 µM folic acid and 30 µM cAMP and analyzed by in-gel assay containing MBP as a substrate for ERK2.
[View Larger Version of this Image (32K GIF file)]

Activation of ERK2 by Monapterine and Developmentally Regulated ERK2 Activation by Folic Acid

The number and ligand specificity of folic acid binding sites, which are thought to correspond to folate receptors as the binding affinities are altered by GTP, change during Dictyostelium development (20, 27, 36-39). Cells show chemotaxis toward folic acid and maximal folate binding sites during vegetative growth and early stages of development (4, 20, 21). The number of sites decreases during aggregation and then increases at the tipped mound stage (4, 20, 21). This pattern also corresponds to the developmental pattern of expression of Galpha 4 (22, 25). Folate binding sites expressed on the cell surface during this later stage also bind the pterin monapterine, suggesting a shift in the type of putative folic acid receptor on the cell surface (20, 21). Fig. 5A shows that the developmental kinetics of folate-stimulated ERK2 activity parallel the known kinetics of folate binding sites, folate responsiveness, and expression of Galpha 4 (4, 20, 22, 25). Folate stimulation of ERK2 is high in 0.5-h starved, 4-h starved, and 12-h starved cells, but low in 8-h aggregation-stage cells, or cells developed for 16 h or longer. Fig. 5B shows that monapterine activates ERK2 in 12-h starved cells. The results indicate that folate stimulates ERK2 activation during the multicellular and preaggregation stages.

ERK2 Is Required for Folate-mediated Stimulation of Adenylyl Cyclase

ERK2 is required for cAMP-mediated stimulation of adenylyl cyclase (2). To determine whether ERK2 is required for folate activation of adenylyl cyclase, wild-type and erk2 null cells starved for 1 h were stimulated with folic acid and the level of cAMP was quantified at different times after stimulation. As indicated in Fig. 6, wild-type but not erk2 null cells showed a significant increase in cAMP produced in response to folate stimulation.


Fig. 6. ERK2 is required for folate activation of adenylyl cyclase. Stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity by folate was assayed in wild-type (KAx-3) and erk2 null cells developed for 0.5 h by cAMP mass measurement (see "Experimental Procedures"). The experimental results are reproducible, and the curve shown is a representative experiment.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

Extracellular signal-regulated kinases, ERKs or MAP kinases, are mediators for the transmission of extracellular signals to their respective targets. In Dictyostelium, ERK2 plays essential roles in cell aggregation, prespore-specific gene expression, and morphogenesis during multicellular development (2, 16). Previously, it has been demonstrated that ERK2 is required for cAMP stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity and erk2 null cells are aggregation-deficient, as they are unable to relay the cAMP signal (1, 2). Analysis of an ERK2 temperature-sensitive mutation suggests that the requirement of ERK2 for prespore gene expression, and possibly morphogenesis, is distinct from its role in activating adenylyl cyclase (16). In this manuscript, we show that ERK2 is also activated by folic acid in cells at the interface between vegetative growth and starvation and at the time of tip formation, the times during development when folate receptors (binding sites) and Galpha 4 expression are maximal. We demonstrated ERK2 activation using in-gel assays of whole cell extracts made from stimulated and unstimulated cells as previously employed for cAMP-stimulation studies. In addition, for the first time, we directly assayed purified His6-tagged ERK2. These later analyses present additional proof that we are directly measuring ERK2 activity. We show that ERK2 is activated by both folate, which binds to and activates the early (growth/early development) and late (tip stage) receptors, and monapterine, a ligand that binds to and activates late receptors (4, 21). We also show that folate stimulation of ERK2 activity is G protein-dependent and requires the Gbeta and Galpha 4 subunits. Moreover, we demonstrate that ERK2 is required for folate stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity, consistent with ERK2's known role in cAMP stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity during aggregation.

Previous studies have shown that Galpha 4 has multiple functions during the life cycle, and it is required for all previously known folate-mediated responses (4). These responses include folate-mediated chemotaxis, which is thought to be part of a food-seeking response of starved cells that is present during growth, for the first few hours after food is depleted, and before the cells initiate aggregation (19). Galpha 4 also plays essential roles at the tip/finger stages of development (22), being required for proper morphogenesis and cell-type differentiation. The time of Galpha 4 function corresponds with the time of expression of Galpha 4 from its late promoter and the appearance of the late folate receptors (4, 20, 21). It has been proposed that Galpha 4 is required to respond to specific morphogens at this stage of development that function through the late folate receptors and that these pathways are essential for the developmental transitions after tip formation (4). It is not thought that folate per se is the ligand at the tipped mound stage, but it is a convenient agonist for at least some of the pathways studied in the laboratory. Analysis of the ERK2ts mutant indicated that ERK2 also plays an essential role at this stage of development (16). It is thus possible that the late ERK2 functions are mediated by both cAMP and the endogenous folate receptor ligand through cAMP and folate receptors, respectively. The possible role of ERK2 in mediating the activation of adenylyl cyclase by folate in these pathways is not known.

Our analysis has shown that folate activation of ERK2 exhibits kinetics of activation and adaptation similar to those we previously observed for cAMP stimulation of ERK2. However, in contrast to our findings that cAMP can stimulate ERK2 activity through the serpentine cAMP receptors to a level that is ~50% that of wild-type cells in gbeta orgalpha 2 null cells and is thus at least partially G protein-independent, ERK2 activation by folate is fully G protein-dependent. Activation requires both the only known Gbeta subunit and the Galpha 4 subunit, which is required for all other known folate-mediated responses (see above). Thus, our present analysis of the various available mutations suggests that ERK2 can be activated by both G protein-dependent and -independent pathways. Activation by cAMP may proceed through these two pathways, both of which may be required for maximal activation during aggregation, while the folate pathway requires heterotrimeric G proteins. However, it is not known if this pathway is directly mediated by subunits of the heterotrimeric G protein containing Galpha 4 or if this G protein couples to the putative G protein-independent pathway used by the cAMP receptors. As the same gbeta null strain was used for both the folate and cAMP studies on ERK2 activation (1) and some of these studies were performed simultaneously, we conclude that the observed differences in the requirement for G proteins for cAMP and folate responses are not due to strain differences or other uncontrolled experimental effects. Furthermore, we show that single mutations in the genes encoding Galpha 1, Galpha 2, Galpha 5, Galpha 7, and Galpha 8 have no discernible effect on folate stimulation of ERK2 activity, suggesting that they are not required in this pathway. We cannot exclude redundant functions of these Galpha subunits, although all previous data have suggested that the different Galpha subunits have distinct functions (33-35, 40).

We find that cAMP stimulation of ERK2 activity is normal in galpha 4 null cells. This represents a control for the lack of folate stimulation of ERK2 in this strain, as it indicates that galpha 4 null cells are not deficient in a possible, essential component of the signaling pathway that is required for both folate and cAMP stimulation of ERK2. While these results are in conflict with a finding of another group that Galpha 4 is required cAMP-stimulation of ERK2 (3), our observations are consistent with the facts that ERK2 is required for cAMP stimulation of adenylyl cyclase (2) and that cAMP stimulation of adenylyl cyclase is normal in galpha 4 null cells (4).

Folate-mediated chemotaxis in vegetative and very early starved cells is considered a food-seeking mechanism (see above). As with cAMP-mediated chemotaxis during aggregation, this pathway requires receptor/G protein stimulation of guanylyl cyclase activity, and chemotaxis is thought to proceed via the same pathway as during aggregation. However, folate can also stimulate adenylyl cyclase, which we have shown requires ERK2 activation. The physiological significance of folate-mediated ERK2 and adenylyl cyclase activity is probably not for the relay of cAMP but for the activation of cAMP-dependent protien kinase, which is required at multiple stages of the life cycle (41-49). Interestingly, a more primitive Dictyostelium species, D. minutum, exploits a folic acid-related compound as a chemoattractant in the aggregation stage, suggesting chemotaxis toward folic acid and other folate-mediated responses may be very ancient in this group of organisms (50). The requirement of ERK2 and Galpha 4 at the tipped mound stage may be due in part to a potential role of folate-related molecules in controlling both cell movement and cell-type differentiation, as is known to be the case for extracellular cAMP. Further study of the downstream pathways regulated by ERK2 should help elucidate additional components in and the role of these signal transduction cascades.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by United States Public Health Service grants (to R. A. F.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
   Supported in part by Grants 0730852 and 08283107 from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan.
par    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Center for Molecular Genetics, Rm. 220, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0634. Tel.: 619-534-2788; Fax: 619-534-7073; E-mail: rafirtel{at}ucsd.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: MAP, mitogen-activated protein; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; cAR, cAMP receptor; MEK, MAP kinase kinase; MBP, myelin basic protein; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank L. Aubry and C. Gaskins for the construction of the His6-tagged ERK2 and L. Aubry for assistance in some of the initial experiments and helpful discussions.


REFERENCES

  1. Maeda, M., Aubry, L., Insall, R., Gaskins, C., Devreotes, P. N., and Firtel, R. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3351-3354 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Segall, J., Kuspa, A., Shaulsky, G., Ecke, M., Maeda, M., Gaskins, C., Firtel, R., and Loomis, W. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 128, 405-413 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Knetsch, M. L. W., Epskamp, S. J. P., Schenk, P. W., Wang, Y. W., Segall, J. E., and Snaar-Jagalska, B. E. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 3361-3368 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Hadwiger, J., Lee, S., and Firtel, R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10566-10570 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Levin, D., and Errede, B. (1995) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 197-202 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Nishida, E., and Gotoh, Y. (1993) Trends Biol. Sci. 18, 128-131
  7. Herskowitz, I. (1995) Cell 80, 187-197 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Bokemeyer, D., Sorokin, A., and Du, M. (1996) Kidney Int. 49, 1187-1198 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Marshall, C. J. (1995) Cell 80, 179-185 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Kornfeld, K., Guan, K. L., and Horvitz, H. R. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 756-768 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Brunner, D., Oellers, N., Szabad, J., Biggs, W. H. R., Zipursky, S. L., and Hafen, E. (1994) Cell 11, 875-888
  12. Church, D. L., Guan, K. L., and Lambie, E. J. (1995) Development 121, 2525-2535 [Abstract]
  13. Wu, Y., Han, M., and Guan, K. L. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 742-755 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ma, H., Gamper, M., Parent, C., and Firtel, R. A. (1997) EMBO J. 16, in press
  15. Gaskins, C., Maeda, M., and Firtel, R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 996-7012
  16. Gaskins, C., Clark, A., Aubry, L., Segall, J., and Firtel, R. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 118-128 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Chen, M. Y., Insall, R. H., and Devreotes, P. N. (1996) Trends Genet. 12, 52-57 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Aubry, L., Maeda, M., Insall, R., Devreotes, P. N., and Firtel, R. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3883-3886 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Pan, P., Hall, E., and Bonner, J. (1972) Nat. New Biol. 237, 181-182 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. de Wit, R. J. W., Bulgakov, R., de Wit, T. F. R., and Konijn, T. M. (1986) Differentiation 32, 192-199 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Tillinghast, H., and Newell, P. (1987) J. Cell Sci. 87, 45-53 [Abstract]
  22. Hadwiger, J. A., and Firtel, R. A. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 38-49 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Insall, R. H., Soede, R. D. M., Schaap, P., and Devreotes, P. N. (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell 5, 703-711 [Abstract]
  24. Wu, L. J., Valkema, R., van Haastert, P. J. M., and Devreotes, P. N. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 129, 1667-1675 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hadwiger, J. A., Wilkie, T. M., Strathmann, M., and Firtel, R. A. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 8213-8217 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kubohara, Y., Maeda, M., and Okamoto, K. (1993) Exp. Cell Res. 207, 107-114 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. de Wit, R. J. W., and Bulgakov, R. (1985) FEBS Lett. 179, 257-261 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Segall, J. E., Bominaar, A. A., Wallraff, E., and de Wit, R. J. W. (1988) J. Cell Sci. 91, 479-489 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Okaichi, K., Cubitt, A. B., Pitt, G. S., and Firtel, R. A. (1992) Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 735-747 [Abstract]
  30. Knecht, D. A., Cohen, S. M., Loomis, W. F., and Lodish, H. F. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 3973-3983 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lee, R., Cobb, M. H., and Blackshear, P. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1088-1092 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kumagai, A., Hadwiger, J. A., Pupillo, M., and Firtel, R. A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 1220-1228 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Wu, L. J., Gaskins, C., Zhou, K. M., Firtel, R. A., and Devreotes, P. N. (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell 5, 691-702 [Abstract]
  34. Hadwiger, J. A., Natarajan, K., and Firtel, R. A. (1996) Development 122, 1215-1224 [Abstract]
  35. Wu, L., Gaskins, C., Gundersen, R., Hadwiger, J. A., Johnson, R. L., Pitt, G. S., Firtel, R. A., and Devreotes, P. N. (1994) in Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology: GTPases in Biology II (Birnbaumer, B. D., and Birnbaumer, L., eds), Vol. 108, pp. 335-349, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
  36. Wurster, B., Schubiger, K., and Brachet, P. (1979) Cell Diff. 8, 235-242 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. de Wit, R. J. W., Bulgakov, R., Pinas, J. E., and Konijn, T. M. (1985) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 814, 214-226 [CrossRef]
  38. de Wit, R. J. W., and Bulgakov, R. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 886, 76-87 [CrossRef]
  39. de Wit, R. J. W., and Bulgakov, R. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 886, 88-95 [CrossRef]
  40. Dharmawardhane, S., Cubitt, A. B., Clark, A. M., and Firtel, R. A. (1994) Development 120, 3549-3561 [Abstract]
  41. Mann, S. K. O. M., Brown, J. M., Briscoe, C., Parent, C., Pitt, G., Devreotes, P. N., and Firtel, R. A. (1997) Dev. Biol. 183, 208-221 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] .
  42. Mann, S., Richardson, D., Lee, S., Kimmel, A., and Firtel, R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10561-10565 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Mann, S. K. O., and Firtel, R. A. (1993) Development 119, 135-146 [Abstract]
  44. Mann, S. K. O., and Firtel, R. A. (1991) Mech. Dev. 35, 89-101 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. Simon, M. N., Pelegrini, O., Veron, M., and Kay, R. R. (1992) Nature 356, 171-172 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Simon, M. N., Driscoll, D., Mutzel, R., Part, D., Williams, J., and Veron, M. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 2039-2044 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Hopper, N. A., Harwood, A. J., Bouzid, S., Veron, M., and Williams, J. G. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 2459-2466 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Harwood, A. J., Hopper, N. A., Simon, M. N., Driscoll, D. M., Veron, M., and Williams, J. G. (1992) Cell 69, 615-624 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Hopper, N., Anjard, C., Reymond, C., and Williams, J. (1993) Development 119, 147-154 [Abstract]
  50. de Wit, R. J. W., and Konijn, T. M. (1983) Cell Diff. 12, 205-210 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Lilly, P., Wu, L. J., Welker, D. L., and Devreotes, P. N. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 986-995 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
S. Chen and J. E. Segall
EppA, a Putative Substrate of DdERK2, Regulates Cyclic AMP Relay and Chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum.
Eukaryot. Cell, July 1, 2006; 5(7): 1136 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
T. Bukahrova, G. Weijer, L. Bosgraaf, D. Dormann, P. J. van Haastert, and C. J. Weijer
Paxillin is required for cell-substrate adhesion, cell sorting and slug migration during Dictyostelium development
J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2005; 118(18): 4295 - 4310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. Zhang, M. Goswami, and D. Hereld
Constitutively Active G Protein-coupled Receptor Mutants Block Dictyostelium Development
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2005; 16(2): 562 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
D. M. Veltman, J. Roelofs, R. Engel, A. J.W.G. Visser, and P. J.M. Van Haastert
Activation of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase at the Leading Edge during Dictyostelium Chemotaxis
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2005; 16(2): 976 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
S Miotti, M Bagnoli, A Tomassetti, M. Colnaghi, and S Canevari
Interaction of folate receptor with signaling molecules lyn and G(alpha)(i-3) in detergent-resistant complexes from the ovary carcinoma cell line IGROV1
J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2000; 113(2): 349 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
C. Y. Chung and R. A. Firtel
PAKa, a Putative PAK Family Member, Is Required for Cytokinesis and the Regulation of the Cytoskeleton in Dictyostelium discoideum Cells during Chemotaxis
J. Cell Biol., November 1, 1999; 147(3): 559 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
C. WIDMANN, S. GIBSON, M. B. JARPE, and G. L. JOHNSON
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase: Conservation of a Three-Kinase Module From Yeast to Human
Physiol Rev, January 1, 1999; 79(1): 143 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Firtel, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, M.
Right arrow Articles by Firtel, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement