Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tian, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, C.-A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tian, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, C.-A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 38, Issue of September 19, 1997 pp. 23722-23728
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

The Involvement of Serine 175 and Alanine 185 of Cytochrome b of Rhodobacter sphaeroides Cytochrome bc1 Complex in Interaction with Iron-Sulfur Protein*

(Received for publication, May 27, 1997)

Hua Tian , Linda Yu , Michael W. Mather and Chang-An Yu Dagger

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

An approach involving cysteine replacement of potentially noncritical amino acid residues, followed by chemical modification studies, was used to investigate structure-function of the "cd helix" of cytochrome b from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Three amino acid residues, Ser-155, Ser-175, and Ala-185, which span this region of cytochrome b, were selected for this study. The S155C substitution yields cells unable to support photosynthetic growth, indicating that Ser-155 is a critical amino acid residue. Further mutational studies of Ser-155 indicate that the size of the amino acid side chain at this position is critical for photosynthetic growth of R. sphaeroides. On the other hand, the S175C and A185C substitutions yield cells with photosynthetic growth rates and enzyme kinetics of the bc1 complexes very similar to those of the unmutated complex, indicating that Ser-175 and Ala-185 are noncritical residues. Thus, engineered cysteines at these two positions of cytochrome b are suitable for membrane topology and domain/subunit interaction studies. Cys-175 does not react with a sulfhydryl-modifying reagent, N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), either in sealed, inside-out chromatophores or in detergent-disrupted chromatophores, indicating that position 175 of cytochrome b is inaccessible from both sides of the membrane and is probably buried within the protein complex. Cys-185 reacts with NEM only after detergent disruption of the sealed, inside-out chromatophores, indicating that this position of cytochrome b is accessible on the outer (periplasmic) surface of the membrane. These results place the cd helix of cytochrome b on the periplasmic side of the chromatophore membrane. When purified A185C-substituted bc1 complex was treated with NEM, about 87% of the activity was abolished due to NEM modification of Cys-185. The signature of the Rieske iron-sulfur center is broadened upon NEM modification of A185C, with the gx signal shifting from g = 1.80 to g = 1.75, suggesting that Ala-185 of cytochrome b interacts with the iron-sulfur protein. When purified S175C-substituted bc1 complex is treated with NEM, no change in the activity is observed, since Cys-175 is inaccessible to NEM. However, when the iron-sulfur protein is removed from the S175C-substituted bc1 complex, Cys-175 becomes accessible to NEM, indicating that Ser-175 of cytochrome b is shielded by the iron-sulfur protein in the bc1 complex.


INTRODUCTION

The cytochrome bc1 complex from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides has been purified and characterized in several laboratories (1-6). This complex catalyzes electron transfer from ubiquinol to cytochrome c2 in the photosynthetic cyclic electron transfer system and concomitantly translocates protons across the membrane to generate a membrane potential and pH gradient for ATP synthesis. The purified complex contains four protein subunits and five redox-active centers. Subunit I houses cytochromes b (b565 and b562), subunit II houses cytochrome c1, and subunit III houses the iron-sulfur cluster. Subunits I and IV have been identified as the Q1-binding proteins in the complex by photoaffinity labeling using an azido-Q derivative (7).

The R. sphaeroides cytochrome bc1 complex is functionally analogous to the mitochondrial ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase, and the three largest subunits are homologous to their mammalian counterparts. Biophysical, biochemical, and genetic (8, 9) studies of this bacterial complex have contributed greatly to our present knowledge of its electron and proton transfer mechanisms. It is generally believed that electron and proton transfer in this complex follows the Q-cycle mechanism (10-12), which hypothesizes two Q-binding sites, a ubiquinol oxidation site (Qo) and a ubiquinone reduction site (Qi site). The two Q-binding sites are thought to be on opposite sides of the membrane, with quinol oxidation occurring on the periplasmic side and quinone reduction occurring on the cytoplasmic side.

The cytochrome b polypeptide is major structural element of both Q-binding sites. Two Q-binding regions were identified in the cytochrome b subunit of bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex (13) by isolating and sequencing azido-Q-linked peptides from azido-Q-labeled cytochrome b. These two regions correspond to amino acid residues 158-171 and 369-379 of the R. sphaeroides cytochrome b sequence (14). According to the 8-helix structural model of cytochrome b (15, 16), the first Q-labeled peptide is located in the cd helix, an amphipathic helix in the amino-terminal portion of the connecting loop between transmembrane helices C and D. The second labeled peptide is in the transmembrane helix G. Mutational studies of the cd helix region of cytochrome b have been extensive; substitutions for Gly-158, Ile-162, and Thr-163 have been reported to confer resistance to Qo center inhibitors (17, 18). These results are consistent with participation of the first labeled peptide in the formation of the Qo site. The participation of the second labeled peptide in a Q-binding site has not been well established, since no mutation studies have been reported.

To further understand the Qo site in the cytochrome bc1 complex, we have replaced a number of relatively conserved amino acid residues in the cd helix region of the R. sphaeroides cytochrome b. Herein, we report generation and characterization of R. sphaeroides mutants carrying the S155C, S175C, or A185C amino acid substitution in cytochrome b, the topology of the cd helix region of cytochrome b in the chromatophore membrane, and involvement of S175 and A185 of cytochrome b in the interaction with the iron-sulfur protein of the cytochrome bc1 complex. The involvement of Cys-167 of cytochrome c1 in interaction with the iron-sulfur protein in the bc1 complex was also observed.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Dodecylmaltoside (DM) was purchased from Anatrace. 3H-Labeled N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) was from Du Pont. Dithiothreitol (DTT) was from Sigma. All other chemicals were of the highest purity commercially available. pSELNB3503, which was used as the template for mutagenesis, and pRKDNB3505 and pRKDNB35KmBP, which were used for the transfer and expression of wild type and engineered fbc genes, were constructed in our laboratory (19). Restriction endonucleases and DNA-modifying enzymes were purchased from Promega, Life Technologies, Inc., New England Biolabs, U.S. Biochemical Corp, Perkin-Elmer, and Pharmacia Biotech Inc. Escherichia coli S17-1 (20) and R. sphaeroides BC17 (14) were generously provided by Dr. R. B. Gennis of the University of Illinois.

Growth of Bacteria

E. coli was grown at 37 °C on LB medium. Extra-rich media, e.g. TYP, were used in procedures for the rescue of single-stranded DNA or the purification of low copy number plasmids (21). R. sphaeroides cells were grown at 30 °C on an enriched Sistrom's medium (22) essentially as described (19). Antibiotics were added at the following concentrations: ampicillin, 100-125 mg/liter; tetracycline, 10-15 mg/liter for E. coli and 0.75-1.0 mg/liter for R. sphaeroides; kanamycin sulfate, 30-50 mg/liter for E. coli and 20-25 mg/liter for R. sphaeroides; trimethoprim, 85-100 mg/liter for E. coli and 25-30 mg/liter for R. sphaeroides.

Construction of Mutation(s) and Expression of Mutated Complexes in R. sphaeroides

Mutants were constructed by site-directed mutagenesis using the Altered Sites system from Promega Corp. (23), and oligonucleotides were synthesized at the OSU Recombinant DNA/Protein Core Facility. The oligonucleotides used were GTGGGGCCAGATGGCCTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT, CGTGGGGCCAGATGTACTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT, GTGGGCCAGATGACCTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT, CCGTGGGGCCAGAATGCGGTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT, CCGTGGGGCCAGATGGACTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT, GTGGGGCCAGATGGGCTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT, GTGGGGCCAGATGCTCTTCTGGGGGCGCCACCGT, and GGGGCCAGATGTGCTTCTGGGGCGCCAC for Ser-155 to Ala, Tyr, Thr, Arg, Asp, Gly, Leu, and Cys, respectively, and GGCATCGGCCATTGCATCCAGACCTGGCTGCT for the Ser-175 to Cys, and GCTGCTCGGCGGCCCGTGCGTGGACAATGCCA for Ala-185 to Cys mutations. The previously constructed plasmid pSELNB3503 (19), in which a PinAI site was introduced by a silent mutation at position 579 in the fbcB gene, a BstEII site outside of the fbcFBC operon coding region was eliminated, and a XbaI site was introduced between the fbcB and fbcC genes, was used as template DNA for mutagenesis.

Following mutagenesis, a 200-base pair BstEII-PinAI fragment from pSELNB3503 containing the altered codon was ligated into the BstEII-PinAI sites of pRKDNB35KmBP (19). The use of pRKDNB35KmBP to receive the mutated BstEII-PinAI fragments eliminates the possibility of retaining or recloning the wild type fragment when attempting to subclone the mutated fragments into the expression vector. Loss of kanamycin resistance was then used to screen for recombinant plasmids. pRKDNB3503 derivatives were conjugated into R. sphaeroides BC17 from E. coli S17-1 using a plate-mating procedure (19).

Other Recombinant DNA Techniques

General molecular genetic manipulations were performed essentially as described by Sambrook et al. (24). Nucleotide sequencing was performed with an Applied Biosystems model 373 automatic DNA sequencer. Sequencing of mutated DNA templates was conducted by amplification of a DNA segment including the entire BstEII to PinAI sequence using the polymerase chain reaction followed by conversion to the single-stranded form by treatment with T7 gene 6 exonuclease as described (25). The presence of engineered mutations and the absence of other changes in the template region was reconfirmed once for each mutant clone, following transfer to and expression in R. sphaeroides BC17, by purifying the expression plasmid from an aliquot of a photosynthetic culture and determining the nucleotide sequence as described (26).

Enzyme Preparations and Activity Assay

The sealed, inside-out chromatophores used for topology studies were prepared essentially according to the method described by Hunter et al. (27). Chromatophores used for isolation of the cytochrome bc1 complex were prepared from frozen cell pastes of photosynthetically grown R. sphaeroides BC17 complement and mutant strains as described previously (28). The cytochrome bc1 complexes were purified from chromatophores by the method of Mather et al. (19). Ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase activity was measured at 23 °C in a 1-ml assay mixture containing 100 mM sodium/potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 0.3 mM EDTA, 50 µM cytochrome c, and 25 µM 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-geranyl-1,4-benzoquinol (Q2H2). 30 µM potassium cyanide was added to assays of chromatophores to inhibit oxidase activity. For determination of apparent Km for Q2H2, various concentrations of Q2H2 were used. Cytochrome bc1 complex activity was determined by measuring the reduction of cytochrome c (the increase in absorbance at 550 nm) in a Shimadzu UV2101PC spectrophotometer, at 23 °C. Nonenzymatic oxidation of Q2H2 was determined under the same conditions in the absence of enzyme. A millimolar extinction coefficient of 18.5 was used to calculate the reduced cytochrome c concentration.

Preparation of the Rieske Iron-Sulfur Protein-depleted bc1 Subcomplex

30 µl of purified bc1 complex (300 µM cytochrome b) in 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, was mixed with 100 µl of a solution containing 80 mM Na2CO3, 8 mM DTT and 0.6 M urea, pH 10.5. After incubation for 5 min at 0 °C, the sample was loaded onto a linear pH sucrose density gradient. The gradient was prepared from 5 ml each of 8% sucrose solution containing 80 mM Na2CO3, 4 mM DTT, 0.6 M urea, and 0.01% DM, pH 10.5 and 16% sucrose solution containing 120 mM Tris-Cl, 0.2 mM DTT, and 0.01% DM, pH 6.5. After centrifugation for 9 h at 44,000 rpm (230,000 × g) in a Beckman SW 50.1 rotor, the red fractions containing Rieske iron-sulfur protein-depleted bc1 subcomplex were found in the lower third of the gradient. The Rieske iron-sulfur protein was mainly in the upper part of the gradient. The Rieske iron-sulfur protein-depleted bc1 subcomplex was collected, and the buffer was exchanged (to remove DTT) by repeated (3 times) dilution and concentration in a Centricon-30 device with a solution containing 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.2, and 0.01% DM.

Reaction of NEM with the bc1 Complexes

3 nmol of the cytochrome bc1 complexes from complement, S175C, or A185C were incubated with [3H]NEM at a 2:1 molar ratio to cytochrome b heme at 23 °C for 15 min. The radioactivity of NEM was 12,000 cpm/nmol. The NEM-treated samples were spotted onto a 3 M paper and developed with a mixture of chloroform and methanol (2:1, v/v) to remove unreacted NEM. To determine NEM distribution among bc1 subunits, the denatured bc1 complexes, which remained at the origin of the paper chromatogram, were eluted from the paper with 0.1 M Tris-Cl, pH 7.0, containing 1% SDS and 1% beta -mercaptoethanol and subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The gels were cut into about 0.3-cm slices, and radioactivity was determined in a Packard Tri-Carb 1900CA liquid scintillation counter. To determine the amount of NEM incorporated into bc1 complexes, the paper at the origin was cut into small pieces and subjected to liquid scintillation counting.

Isolation of [3H]NEM-labeled Peptides from Cytochrome c1

The [3H]NEM-labeled cytochrome c1 band was excised from the SDS-PAGE gel, and the protein was eluted using an electroeluter from Bio-Rad. The electrophoretically eluted protein was concentrated with a Centricon-10 and precipitated with 50% cold acetone (-20 °C). The precipitate was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-Cl buffer, pH 7.4, and digested with endoprotease Arg-C at 37 °C for 12 h. 100-µl aliquots of the Arg-C-digested cytochrome c1 protein were then separated by HPLC on a Synchro-pak RP-8 column (0.46 × 25 cm) using a gradient formed from 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid containing 90% acetonitrile, with a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min. Samples were collected in 0.8-ml fractions. The absorbance at 214 nm and the radioactivity of each fraction were measured. Peaks with high specific radioactivity were collected, dried, and subjected to peptide sequence analysis.

Other Biochemical Methods

Protein was determined by the Lowry method (29) with the inclusion of 1% SDS in samples and standards. For accurate measurement of the protein content of chromatophores, interfering pigments were removed by acetone/methanol extraction as described (30). Cytochrome b (31) and cytochrome c1 (32) were determined according to published methods.

SDS-PAGE was performed according to Laemmli (33) using a Bio-Rad Mini-Protean dual slab vertical cell.

Low temperature EPR spectra were obtained with Bruker ER200D spectrometer equipped with an Air Products flow cryostat. Instrument setting details are provided in the legends of the relevant figures.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Characterization of R. sphaeroides Mutants Expressing the S155C, S175C, and A185C Alterations in Cytochrome b

Previous studies of the cytochrome bc1 complex from beef heart mitochondria have identified Q-binding peptides within cytochrome b, one of which corresponds to residues 158-171 of cytochrome b of R. sphaeroides. This peptide is located in an extra-membrane amphipathic cd helix in the eight-transmembrane helix model of cytochrome b. Certain mutations at Gly-158, Ile-162, and Thr-163 of cytochrome b confer resistance to Qo center inhibitors, indicating that the cd helix may be involved in the Qo site (17, 18). If this cd helix is indeed a part of the Qo site, it would have to be located on the periplasmic side of the chromatophore membrane according to the Q-cycle mechanism. An approach involving cysteine substitution at noncritical amino acid residues, followed by chemical modification of engineered cysteines, was adopted for a study of the topology of the cd helix.

Three amino acid residues, Ser-155, Ser-175, and Ala-185, which are located before, within, and after the putative cd helix of cytochrome b, were chosen to be mutated to cysteines. Table I summarizes the photosynthetic growth behavior of cells expressing the wild type cytochrome b (complement cells) and the S155C, S175C, and A185C cytochrome b replacement mutations, as well as the ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase activities of chromatophores and purified bc1 complexes derived from these recombinant strains. Replacing Ser-175 or Ala-185 with cysteine yields cells capable of photosynthetic growth at a rate similar to that of the complement cells. Since the electron transfer activities and the apparent Km for Q2H2 of S175C- and A185C-substituted bc1 complexes are essentially the same as those of the complex from the complement strain, both in chromatophore membranes and in the purified state, Ser-175 and Ala-185 of cytochrome b are apparently noncritical residues, and the engineered cysteines at these two positions can be used to study topology of the cd helix and its interaction with other subunits. On the other hand, the substitution of Ser-155 of cytochrome b with cysteine yields cells unable to grow photosynthetically in either rich or minimal medium, indicating that Ser-155 is a critical residue and that the engineered cysteine at this position is not suitable for topology and interaction studies.

Table I. Characterization of the S155C, S175C, and A185C cytochrome b mutations


Mutations Photosynthetic growth Enzymatic activitya
Chromatophores Purified bc1

µmol cytochrome c reduced/min/nmol cytochrome b
Complement (no mutation) ++b 1.9 2.2
S155C  -c NAd NA
S175C ++ 1.7 2.0
A185C ++ 1.8 2.3

a The Km values of S175C and A185C are almost the same as that of the bc1 from the complement strain, Km ~0.9 µM Q2H2.
b ++, the photosynthetic growth phenotype is essentially the same as the "wild type."
c -, no photosynthetic growth within 7 days.
d NA, not available.

The Effect of Size of the Amino Acid Side Chain at Position 155 of Cytochrome b on Photosynthetic Growth of R. sphaeroides

Since substitution of Ser-155 of cytochrome b with cysteine results in cells unable to support photosynthetic growth, the structural importance of Ser-155 was further examined by substituting glycine, alanine, threonine, tyrosine, leucine, aspartic acid, and arginine at this position. The cytochrome b S155G or S155A substitution results in cells having a photosynthetic growth rate comparable with that of the complement cells. The S155T substitution yields cells with a retarded photosynthetic growth rate (about <FR><NU>1</NU><DE>10</DE></FR> that of the complement strain). Substitutions of Ser-155 with tyrosine, leucine, aspartic acid, and arginine yield cells unable to support photosynthetic growth. These results indicate that the size of the amino acid side chain at position 155 of cytochrome b is critical for photosynthetic growth of R. sphaeroides. A similar size-activity relationship was previously observed for Gly-158 of cytochrome b in Rhodobacter capsulatus (17).

To investigate whether the size limitation at position 155 of cytochrome b correlates with Q-binding, the enzymatic activity and apparent Km for Q2H2 of the cytochrome bc1 complexes in chromatophores of the photosynthesis-competent strains expressing the S155G, S155A, and S155T cytochrome b variants were measured and compared with those in chromatophores from complement cells. Although the ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase activity differed significantly (S155G (100%), S155A (40%), S155T (10%)) the apparent Km values for Q2H2 in all three mutated complexes were virtually the same as that of the complement bc1 complex (~0.9 µM), indicating that the structural requirement for a small amino acid residue at position 155 of cytochrome b may not be simply to accommodate a Q molecule at this position. This speculation is consistent with the crystallographic structural data from the bovine heart cytochrome bc1 complex, which show that the corresponding amino acid residue does not contribute to the so-called Qo cavity (34).

Since serine and alanine residues occupy virtually the same volume in proteins, the 2.5-fold reduction in activity observed when alanine replaces serine at position 155 of cytochrome b suggests that the hydroxyl moiety of this serine plays some role in maintaining the optimal protein structure and/or reactivity, perhaps by participating in an important hydrogen bond. In the case of the replacement of Ser-155 by glycine, which displayed full retention of activity, the hydroxyl group could be supplied by a cavity-filling water molecule, a situation thought to occur in several well studied proteins upon substitution of glycine for a serine (35-37).

Topology of the cd Helix of Cytochrome b

The topology of the cd helix of cytochrome b was studied by comparing the reaction of NEM with the cysteines of wild type and mutated bc1 complexes contained within the membranes of sealed (inside-out) versus detergent-disrupted chromatophores. The intactness of sealed chromatophores preparations was confirmed by measuring the increase of the bc1 complex activity upon the addition of detergent; this increase averaged 6-fold after treatment with 0.2% potassium deoxycholate. Three parallel experiments were performed on each sealed chromatophore preparation (see Fig. 1) (1). The sealed chromatophores were treated with 1 mM NEM followed with 2 mM DTT to remove any unreacted NEM. The chromatophores were then treated with 0.2% deoxycholate to break the membrane. This reaction sequence will label -SH groups accessible on the outside of the chromatophore membrane (cytoplasmic surface) but not those exposed on the inside of the vesicles or buried within the membrane or protein interior (2). The sealed chromatophores were disrupted with 0.2% deoxycholate and then treated with 1 mM NEM. The excess NEM was removed by the addition of 2 mM DTT. This reaction sequence should label all of the externally accessible cysteines from either side of the chromatophore membrane (cytoplasmic and periplasmic surfaces) (3). The sealed chromatophores were broken with 0.2% deoxycholate and then treated with 2 mM DTT prior to reaction with 1 mM NEM. This control reaction sequence provides unlabeled membranes that have gone through the experimental procedure, but with sulfhydryl modification blocked by the addition of DTT before NEM.


Fig. 1. Reaction scheme for treatment of sealed and detergent-disrupted (opened) chromatophores with NEM for topological mapping. Sealed (inside-out) chromatophores were prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures." Three parallel experiments, as diagrammed in the figure, were performed on sealed chromatophore preparations obtained from complement, S175C, and A185C cells (see discussion under "Results and Discussion"). The specific activities (S.A.) observed with a representative preparation of chromatophores from cytochrome b A185C-expressing cells are provided as an illustrative example of the results obtained. A185C specific activity was 0.3 µmol of cytochrome c reduced/min/nmol of cytochrome b. KDDC, potassium deoxycholate.
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]

When sealed chromatophores prepared from complement, S175C, and A185C-expressing cells were treated with NEM, no change in cytochrome bc1 complex activity was observed. When deoxycholate-disrupted chromatophores were treated with NEM, about 85% of the cytochrome bc1 complex activity in the cytochrome b A185C substitution was abolished, while no change in activity was observed with complement or the cytochrome b S175C substitution. Since no change in the cytochrome bc1 activity was observed after NEM treatment of either sealed or broken chromatophores from complement cells, the endogenous cysteine residues contained in the cytochrome bc1 complex are probably inaccessible to NEM treatment (see below). This result greatly simplifies our assessment of the location of the engineered cysteines in the chromatophore membrane. Ala-185 of cytochrome b is located on the inside surface of the chromatophore membrane (periplasmic side) because NEM did not react with the cysteine residue engineered at cytochrome b position Ala-185 in the sealed inside-out chromatophore preparation, but it did react with this engineered cysteine in disrupted chromatophores. Since Ala-185 is contained in the cd loop connecting the C and D transmembrane helices of cytochrome b, the cd loop must also be on the periplasmic side of the chromatophore membrane. The placement of the cd loop on the periplasmic side of the chromatophore membrane is consistent with the current cytochrome bc1 crystal structure from bovine heart, which describes the cytochrome b protein as a membrane-spanning polypeptide having eight transmembrane helices (named A-H) and several transversal helices on both sides of the membrane, including a cd helix comprising the amino-terminal portion of the cd loop located on the periplasmic side (34). The observation of no activity loss in both sealed and disrupted chromatophore preparations from the cytochrome b S175C mutant cells upon NEM treatment indicates that the Ser-175 position of the cd helix is inaccessible to the aqueous phase, either facing the interior of cytochrome b or covered by another subunit of the complex.

Effect of NEM on Purified Cytochrome bc1 Complexes from S175C and A185C Mutant Cells

The cytochrome bc1 complex contains nine cysteine residues: one in cytochrome b, four in cytochrome c1, and four in the iron-sulfur protein. It has been established that two cysteines in the iron-sulfur protein are ligands to the [2Fe-2S] cluster (38), and two cysteines in cytochrome c1 are covalently bonded to heme c (39). Thus, there are five free cysteines that are potential candidates for NEM modification. When the cytochrome bc1 complex from complement strain was treated with NEM, no change in enzymatic activity was observed (Table II), indicating that cysteine residues contained in the cytochrome bc1 complex are either inaccessible to NEM or the reaction product is functionally active. Radioactive NEM was used to distinguish these two possibilities. Since no radioactivity was found in any of the four subunits of the complement bc1 complex treated with [3H]NEM (see Fig. 2), the lack of inhibition by NEM treatment must be due to the inaccessibility of the free cysteines rather than to formation of active cysteine-NEM products.

Table II. The effect of NEM on the cytochrome bc1 complexes from complement, S175C, and A185C cells

NEM (100 mM freshly prepared stock solution in H2O) was added to the bc1 complexes (10 nmol of cytochrome b/ml) at a 2-fold molar excess to cytochrome b heme. The treated samples were flushed briefly with nitrogen, sealed, and incubated at room temperature for 15 min before the cytochrome bc1 complex activities were measured.

bc1 complex preparations Activity (at 23 °C)
No treatment NEM treatment

µmol cytochrome c reduced/min/nmol cytochrome b
Complement 2.2 2.1
S175C 2.0 1.92
A185C 2.3 0.3


Fig. 2. Radioactivity distribution among subunits of the cytochrome bc1 complexes from complement, S175C, and A185C treated with [3H]-NEM. Purified bc1 complexes from complement, S175C, and A185C were incubated with [3H]NEM as described under "Experimental Procedures." ISP, iron-sulfur protein.
[View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]

When the cytochrome bc1 complex containing the cytochrome b S175C replacement was treated with NEM, no loss of activity was observed (see Table II), suggesting that Ser-175 of cytochrome b is shielded by other subunits or other parts of cytochrome b in the bc1 complex. The inaccessibility of the engineered cysteine of cytochrome b to NEM treatment is further confirmed by the absence of radioactive labeling of the cytochrome b subunit of the cytochrome b S175C cytochrome bc1 complex treated with [3H]NEM (see Fig. 2). These results are consistent with the three-dimensional structure analysis of the bovine heart bc1 complex, which shows that the amino acid residue corresponding to Ser-175 is not exposed on the surface of the molecule (34).

When the cytochrome b A185C-cytochrome bc1 complex was treated with various concentrations of NEM, about 87% of the bc1 activity was lost (Table II) when 2.0 mol of NEM/mol of cytochrome b heme was used, consistent with the results observed in chromatophores (see above). The loss of activity correlates with the incorporation of NEM into the cytochrome b subunit; when [3H]NEM-treated cytochrome b A185C-cytochrome bc1 complex, which had lost 87% of its activity, was subjected to SDS-PAGE, all of the radioactivity was located in the b subunit (Fig. 2). About 1 mol of NEM was incorporated into one mol of cytochrome b protein.

EPR Characteristics of Cytochrome b, Cytochrome c1, and Iron-Sulfur Cluster in NEM-treated, A185C Cytochrome bc1 Complex

EPR spectra properties of cytochrome b, cytochrome c1, and the Rieske iron-sulfur cluster in the cytochrome b A185C-cytochrome bc1 with and without NEM treatment, were examined in an attempt to identify which active centers of the complex are perturbed by the modification at position 185 and thus may interact with this region of cytochrome b.

Fig. 3 shows the EPR characteristics of cytochromes b in the cytochrome bc1 complexes of complement and cytochrome b A185C with and without NEM treatment. The cytochrome b A185C-cytochrome bc1 complex exhibits two EPR signals at g = 3.5 and g = 3.76, corresponding to b565 and b562, respectively. These two b signals are identical to those observed in cytochrome b of the complement bc1 complex, indicating that the cytochrome b A185C substitution probably has little effect on the cytochrome b heme environments. When the cytochrome b A185C-cytochrome bc1 complex was treated with NEM to inactivate the complex, the EPR characteristics of cytochrome b (Fig. 3) and cytochrome c1 (data not shown) in the treated complex were the same as those in the untreated complex, suggesting that Ala-185 is not involved in interaction with the hemes of the cytochrome b molecule or with cytochrome c1.


Fig. 3. The EPR spectra of b cytochromes in purified bc1 complexes of complement and cytochrome b A185C with and without NEM treatment. Cytochrome bc1 complexes were partially reduced by the addition of 1 mM sodium ascorbate. The samples were incubated at 0 °C for 20 min before freezing in liquid nitrogen. EPR spectra were recorded at 7 K with the following instrument settings: microwave frequency, 9.27 GHz; microwave power, 20 milliwatts; modulation amplitude, 20 G; time constant, 0.1 s; scan rate, 5 G/s.
[View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]

Fig. 4 compares EPR characteristics of the Rieske iron-sulfur clusters in the cytochrome bc1 complexes of complement and A185C, with and without NEM treatment. When complement and A185C-substituted bc1 complexes were reduced by a small excess of ascorbate, the EPR signals of the Rieske iron-sulfur cluster in these two cytochrome bc1 complexes were essentially the same, with resonances at gz = 2.02, gy = 1.89, and gx = 1.80. However, when the A185C bc1 was treated with NEM, the gx = 1.80 signal broadened and shifted to 1.75, while no change in the iron-sulfur spectrum was observed in NEM-treated complement bc1 complex. Upon complete reduction of the NEM-treated complement and A185C mutant bc1 complexes with dithionite, the spectrum of the bc1 complement complex is broadened, with gx shifting to 1.75, as previously reported for the wild type bc1 complex under fully reduced conditions (4, 5), whereas the dithionite-reduced spectrum of the NEM-treated A185C complex remains unchanged with gx = 1.75. The NEM-treated A185C complex thus has a spectrum closely resembling the "reduced state" spectrum of the complement, regardless of the redox state of the ubiquinone pool.


Fig. 4. The EPR spectra of the Rieske [2Fe-2S] cluster in the cytochrome bc1 complexes of complement and cytochrome b A185C with and without NEM treatment. Partially purified cytochrome bc1 complexes obtained after the first ion-exchange column chromatography step during the purification process were treated with NEM. Excess modifying reagent was removed from the mixture by applying the treated sample to a second ion-exchange column and extensively washing with washing buffer. No free NEM was present in the purified bc1 complex eluted from the second column. The ascorbate-reduced cytochrome bc1 complexes were prepared as described in Fig. 3. The EPR spectra were recorded at 10 K. Instrument settings were the same as in Fig. 3.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]

The iron-sulfur subunit is thought to bind in the general vicinity of b565 on the positive side of the membrane to form part of the quinol-oxidizing center, because the iron-sulfur cluster is a primary electron acceptor from the quinol. The particular line shape observed for the [2Fe-2S] cluster is thought to be mediated by the oxidation state of the ubiquinone present in the Qo site (4, 5, 40-42). When oxidized quinone is present, the gx signal is sharper than that observed when quinol is present. The gx of the bc1 from R. sphaeroides is found at g = 1.80 when ubiquinone is present, but shifts to 1.75 and becomes much broader when ubiquinol is present. NEM modification of the engineered cysteine at position 185 of cytochrome b resulted in broadened [2Fe-2S] EPR signals with gx = 1.75, independent of the redox potential. There was no detectable difference between the EPR spectrum of the NEM-treated A185C complex and the full reduction spectrum of the NEM-treated and -untreated complement bc1 complex. The effect of NEM treatment on the iron-sulfur cluster spectrum suggests that the Ala-185 residue of cytochrome b interacts with the [2Fe-2S] cluster or is located in the close vicinity of the cluster. This idea is consistent with the current x-ray crystal structure of this part of the complex (34).

The effect of NEM treatment on the iron-sulfur cluster of the A185C bc1 complex is also reminiscent of the change observed for the substitution of Leu for Phe-144 (F144L) in the cytochrome b from R. capsulatus (41). The F144L bc1 complex in R. capsulatus chromatophores was reported to have a very low turnover rate with a broadened, redox state-insensitive, gx value at 1.765. It was suggested that these properties of the F144L complex resulted from a reduced affinity for quinone and quinol exhibited by the Qo center of the mutated complex. In a subsequent study of the effect of extraction of ubiquinone from chromatophore membranes on the iron-sulfur cluster, Ding et al. (42) found that the gx signal of the "depleted state" at approximately g = 1.765 was broadened considerably beyond that seen in the presence of either ubiquinone or ubiquinol. Since the changes in the gx signal of iron-sulfur clusters resulting from the NEM modification of Cys-185 of R. sphaeroides cytochrome b in the complex do not exhibit the extremely broad line shape reported for the quinone-depleted state, they are probably not due to a complete absence for quinone and quinol binding to the Qo center.

[3H]NEM Modification of Rieske Iron-Sulfur Protein-depleted bc1 Complex

Since we have shown that the Ala-185 residue of cytochrome b is near the iron-sulfur protein, the inaccessibility of the engineered cysteine at position 175 could be the result of close interaction between the iron-sulfur protein and the cd helix of cytochrome b. In that case, removal of iron-sulfur protein from the bc1 complex might expose Ser-175 and thus make it accessible to NEM. The bc1 complex was dissociated into Rieske iron-sulfur protein and the iron-sulfur protein-depleted bc1 subcomplex by incubation with Na2CO3 (pH 10.5) under reducing conditions (43). The addition of urea (0.6 M) to the solution helps the dissociation process. Since NEM is not stable at alkaline pH, modification of dissociated subcomplex cannot be carried out without neutralization. To prevent the reassociation of the iron-sulfur protein to the complex upon neutralization, the dissociated iron-sulfur protein was removed by pH sucrose density gradient centrifugation. This density gradient serves two purposes: to separate the iron-sulfur protein from the bc1 subcomplex and to restore neutral pH to avoid further destruction of subcomplex. Under the centrifugation conditions used, the subcomplex and iron-sulfur protein fractions are well separated. A typical distribution of the two components obtained after centrifugation is shown in Fig. 5. The fractions at the top of the gradient contained iron-sulfur protein, whereas the fractions at the bottom contained the larger, faster sedimenting bc1 subcomplex. The bc1 subcomplex was modified with [3H]NEM after removal of DTT by repeated dilution and concentration using Centricon-30. The incorporation of NEM into wild type bc1 subcomplex was 1.1 NEM/bc1, while 2.2 molecules of NEM were incorporated into subcomplex with the S175C replacement. Fig. 6 shows the 3H radioactivity distribution among subunits of complement and S175C-substituted cytochrome bc1 subcomplexes. When [3H]NEM-treated complement cytochrome bc1 subcomplex was subjected to SDS-PAGE, radioactivity was found in cytochrome c1 subunit (see Fig. 6A), indicating that one of the cysteines in cytochrome c1 is shielded by the iron-sulfur protein in the intact bc1 complex and became accessible to NEM after its removal. When the cytochrome bc1 subcomplex containing cytochrome b with the S175C mutation was treated with [3H]NEM, both cytochrome b and cytochrome c1 subunits became labeled (see Fig. 6B), indicating that Ser-175 of cytochrome b is also shielded by the iron-sulfur protein in the intact bc1 complex.


Fig. 5. Gel pattern of pH sucrose gradient fractions of alkaline-treated cytochrome bc1 complex. Aliquots of selected fractions of the gradient were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, molecular weight standards; lanes 2-5, top four fractions from the gradient rich in iron-sulfur protein (ISP); lanes 6-8, red fractions from the middle of the gradient mainly consisting of cytochrome b, cytochrome c1, and subunit IV (the pH of these middle fractions is neutral); lane 9, the bottom-most fraction, which contains no significant protein bands.
[View Larger Version of this Image (64K GIF file)]


Fig. 6. [3H]NEM distribution among subunits of the iron-sulfur protein (ISP)-depleted bc1 subcomplexes. The iron-sulfur protein-depleted subcomplexes of complement (A) and S175C (B) cytochrome bc1 were treated with [3H]NEM as described under "Experimental Procedures," and the samples were subjected to denaturing SDS-PAGE, along with control samples labeled with cold NEM. The gels containing radioisotope labeled samples were divided into 3-mm slices, and the radioactivity was counted. The positions of the subunits were determined by staining the control gels.
[View Larger Version of this Image (46K GIF file)]

Isolation of a [3H]NEM-labeled Peptide from Cytochrome c1

The fact that one of the cysteines from cytochrome c1 became labeled in bc1 subcomplex indicates that this cysteine may be located in the interface between cytochrome c1 and the iron-sulfur protein. To identify which one of the cysteines reacts with NEM, [3H]NEM-labeled cytochrome c1 was eluted from SDS-PAGE gels and digested with arginine-specific protease (Arg-C). Fig. 7 shows the radioactivity distribution among the Arg-C-digested peptides of cytochrome c1 separated by HPLC. The majority of the radioactivity was found in fractions 14, 22, and 47. Since very few amino acids were detected in fractions 14 and 22, it is likely that they contained decomposed [3H]NEM. Some radioactivity was also found in fractions 60-70, due to the incomplete digestion of cytochrome c1.


Fig. 7. 3H radioactivity distribution in an HPLC chromatogram of Arg-C-digested, [3H]NEM-labeled cytochrome c1 protein. The [3H]NEM-labeled cytochrome c1 (1 mg/ml, 2 × 104 cpm/mg) was digested with Arg-C, and 100-µl aliquots of digested solution were subjected to HPLC separation as described under "Experimental Procedures." 100-µl aliquots of the separated HPLC fractions were withdrawn for radioactivity determination.
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]

The partial N-terminal amino acid sequence of the labeled peptide in fraction 47 was determined to be AGFHGPMGT. From the primary sequence of cytochrome c1, this can be seen to be the initial portion of the expected Arg-C proteolytic fragment encompassing residues 130-180. The only cysteine in this peptide is Cys-167, which is thought to be located in the soluble domain of cytochrome c1. Our results suggest that the region containing Cys-167 forms part of the interface of cytochrome c1 with the Rieske iron-sulfur protein. Elucidation of the exact docking surfaces of these two subunits, as well as of cytochrome b and the iron-sulfur protein, requires refinement of the crystal structure and/or other detailed protein characterizations.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant GM 30721 and the Oklahoma State University Agricultural Experiment Station.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed.
1   The abbreviations used are: Q, ubiquinone; Q2H2, 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-geranyl-1,4-benzoquinol; DTT, dithiothreitol; DM, dodecylmaltoside; NEM, N-ethylmaleimide; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; high pressure liquid chromatography.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Roger Koeppe for critical review of this manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Gabellini, N., Bowyer, J. R., Hurt, E., Melandri, B. A., and Hauska, G. (1982) Eur. J. Biochem. 126, 105-111 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Ljungdahl, P. O., Pennoyer, J. D., Robertson, D. E., and Trumpower, B. L. (1987) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 891, 227-241 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Yu, L., Mei, Q-C., and Yu, C. A. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 5752-5760 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. McCurley, J. P., Miki, T., Yu, L., and Yu, C. A. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1020, 176-186 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Andrews, K. M., Crofts, A. R., and Gennis, R. B. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 2645-2651 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Purvis, D. J., Theiler, R., and Niederman, R. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1208-1215 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Yu, L., and Yu, C. A. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 3658-3663 [CrossRef]
  8. Trumpower, B. L., and Gennis, R. B. (1994) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 675-716 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Brasseur, G., Saribas, A. S., and Daldal, F. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1275, 61-69 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Mitchell, P. (1976) J. Theor. Biol. 62, 327-367 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Trumpower, B. L. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 11409-11412 [Free Full Text]
  12. Brandt, U., and Trumpower, B. (1994) Criti. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 29, 165-197
  13. He, D-Y., Yu, L., and Yu, C. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2292-2298 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Yun, C. H., Beci, R., Crofts, A. R., Kaplan, S., and Gennis, R. B. (1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 194, 399-411 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Crofts, A., Robinson, H., Andrew, K., Van Doren, S., and Berry, E. (1987) in Cytochrome Systems: Molecular Biology and Bioenergetics (Papa, S., Chance, B., and Ernster, L., eds), pp. 617-631, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
  16. di Rago, J. P., Coppee, J. Y., and Colson, A. M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 14543-14548 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Atta-Asafo-Adjei, E., and Daldal, F. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 492-496 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ding, H., Daldal, F., and Dutton, P. L. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 15997-16003 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Mather, M. W., Yu, L., and Yu, C. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 28668-28675 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Simon, R., Priefer, U., and Puhler, A. (1983) Bio/Technology 1, 784-791 [CrossRef]
  21. Khosravi, M., Ryan, W., Websger, D. A., and Stark, B. C. (1990) Plasmid 23, 138-143 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Sistrom, W. R. (1960) J. Gen. Microbiol. 22, 778-785 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Promega Corp. (1996) Altered SitesTM in Vitro Mutagenesis Systems, Technical Manual, Promega Corp., Madison, WI
  24. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  25. Du, Z., Hood, L., and Wilson, R. K. (1993) Methods Enzymol. 218, 104-121 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Suwanto, A., and Kaplan, S. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 1124-1134 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Hunter, D. N., Pennoyer, J. D., Sturgis, J. N., Farrelly, D., and Niederman, R. A. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 3459-3467 [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, L., and Yu, C. A. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 4934-4939 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275 [Free Full Text]
  30. Cohen-Bazzire, G., Sistrom, W. R., and Stanier, R. Y. (1957) J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 49, 25-68
  31. Berden, J. A., and Slater, E. C. (1970) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 216, 237-249 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Yu, L., Dong, J-H., and Yu, C. A. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 852, 203-211 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Xia, D., Kim, H., Deisenhofer, J., Yu, C. A., Xia, J-Z., Kachurin, A. M., Zhang, L., and Yu, L. (1997) Science 277, 60-66 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Lewendon, A., Murray, I. A., Shaw, W. V., Gibbs, M. R., and Leslie, A. G. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 2075-2080 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Paddock, M. L., Feher, G., and Okamura, M. Y. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 15742-15750 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Cannon, W. R., Briggs, J. M., Shen, J., McCammon, J. A., and Quiocho, F. A. (1995) Protein Sci. 4, 387-393 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Davidson, E., Ohnishi, T., Atta-Asafo-Adjei, E., and Daldal, F. (1992) Biochemistry 29, 3342-3351
  39. Gray, K. A., Davidson, E., and Daldal, F. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 11864-11873 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Meinhardt, S. W., Yang, X., Trumpower, B. L., and Ohnishi, T. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 8702-8706 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Roberson, D. E., Daldal, F., and Dutton, P. L. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 11249-11260 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Ding, H., Robertson, D. E., Daldal, F., and Dutton, P. L. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 3144-3152 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Szczepaniak, A., Huang, D., Keenan, T. W., and Cramer, W. A. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 2757-2764 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Esser, X. Gong, S. Yang, L. Yu, C.-A. Yu, and D. Xia
Surface-modulated motion switch: Capture and release of iron-sulfur protein in the cytochrome bc1 complex
PNAS, August 29, 2006; 103(35): 13045 - 13050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Liu, C.-A. Yu, and L. Yu
The Role of Extra Fragment at the C-terminal of Cytochrome b (Residues 421-445) in the Cytochrome bc1 Complex from Rhodobacter sphaeroides
J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 2004; 279(45): 47363 - 47371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Tian, L. Yu, M. W. Mather, and C.-A. Yu
Flexibility of the Neck Region of the Rieske Iron-Sulfur Protein Is Functionally Important in the Cytochrome bc1 Complex
J. Biol. Chem., October 23, 1998; 273(43): 27953 - 27959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Xiao, L. Yu, and C.-A. Yu
Confirmation of the Involvement of Protein Domain Movement during the Catalytic Cycle of the Cytochrome bc1 Complex by the Formation of an Intersubunit Disulfide Bond between Cytochrome b and the Iron-Sulfur Protein
J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2000; 275(49): 38597 - 38604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-C. Tso, S. K. Shenoy, B. N. Quinn, and L. Yu
Subunit IV of Cytochrome bc1 Complex from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. LOCALIZATION OF REGIONS ESSENTIAL FOR INTERACTION WITH THE THREE-SUBUNIT CORE COMPLEX
J. Biol. Chem., May 12, 2000; 275(20): 15287 - 15294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tian, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, C.-A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tian, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yu, C.-A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement