|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Received for publication, May 27, 1997)
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma
State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078
An approach involving cysteine
replacement of potentially noncritical amino acid residues, followed by
chemical modification studies, was used to investigate
structure-function of the "cd helix" of cytochrome b
from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Three amino acid residues,
Ser-155, Ser-175, and Ala-185, which span this region of cytochrome
b, were selected for this study. The S155C substitution
yields cells unable to support photosynthetic growth, indicating that
Ser-155 is a critical amino acid residue. Further mutational studies of
Ser-155 indicate that the size of the amino acid side chain at this
position is critical for photosynthetic growth of R. sphaeroides. On the other hand, the S175C and A185C substitutions
yield cells with photosynthetic growth rates and enzyme kinetics of the
bc1 complexes very similar to those of the
unmutated complex, indicating that Ser-175 and Ala-185 are noncritical
residues. Thus, engineered cysteines at these two positions of
cytochrome b are suitable for membrane topology and domain/subunit interaction studies. Cys-175 does not react with a
sulfhydryl-modifying reagent, N-ethylmaleimide (NEM),
either in sealed, inside-out chromatophores or in detergent-disrupted chromatophores, indicating that position 175 of cytochrome
b is inaccessible from both sides of the membrane and is
probably buried within the protein complex. Cys-185 reacts with NEM
only after detergent disruption of the sealed, inside-out
chromatophores, indicating that this position of cytochrome
b is accessible on the outer (periplasmic) surface of the
membrane. These results place the cd helix of cytochrome b
on the periplasmic side of the chromatophore membrane. When purified
A185C-substituted bc1 complex was treated with
NEM, about 87% of the activity was abolished due to NEM modification
of Cys-185. The signature of the Rieske iron-sulfur center is broadened
upon NEM modification of A185C, with the gx
signal shifting from g = 1.80 to g = 1.75, suggesting that Ala-185 of cytochrome b interacts
with the iron-sulfur protein. When purified S175C-substituted
bc1 complex is treated with NEM, no change in
the activity is observed, since Cys-175 is inaccessible to NEM.
However, when the iron-sulfur protein is removed from the
S175C-substituted bc1 complex, Cys-175 becomes
accessible to NEM, indicating that Ser-175 of cytochrome b
is shielded by the iron-sulfur protein in the
bc1 complex.
The cytochrome bc1 complex from the
photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides has been
purified and characterized in several laboratories (1-6). This complex
catalyzes electron transfer from ubiquinol to cytochrome
c2 in the photosynthetic cyclic electron transfer system and concomitantly translocates protons across the
membrane to generate a membrane potential and pH gradient for ATP
synthesis. The purified complex contains four protein subunits and five
redox-active centers. Subunit I houses cytochromes b
(b565 and b562), subunit
II houses cytochrome c1, and subunit III houses
the iron-sulfur cluster. Subunits I and IV have been identified as the
Q1-binding proteins in the
complex by photoaffinity labeling using an azido-Q derivative (7).
The R. sphaeroides cytochrome bc1
complex is functionally analogous to the mitochondrial
ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase, and the three largest
subunits are homologous to their mammalian counterparts. Biophysical,
biochemical, and genetic (8, 9) studies of this bacterial complex have
contributed greatly to our present knowledge of its electron and proton
transfer mechanisms. It is generally believed that electron and proton
transfer in this complex follows the Q-cycle mechanism (10-12), which
hypothesizes two Q-binding sites, a ubiquinol oxidation site
(Qo) and a ubiquinone reduction site (Qi site).
The two Q-binding sites are thought to be on opposite sides of the
membrane, with quinol oxidation occurring on the periplasmic side and
quinone reduction occurring on the cytoplasmic side.
The cytochrome b polypeptide is major structural element of
both Q-binding sites. Two Q-binding regions were identified in the
cytochrome b subunit of bovine heart mitochondrial
cytochrome bc1 complex (13) by isolating and
sequencing azido-Q-linked peptides from azido-Q-labeled cytochrome
b. These two regions correspond to amino acid residues
158-171 and 369-379 of the R. sphaeroides cytochrome
b sequence (14). According to the 8-helix structural model
of cytochrome b (15, 16), the first Q-labeled peptide is
located in the cd helix, an amphipathic helix in the amino-terminal
portion of the connecting loop between transmembrane helices C and D. The second labeled peptide is in the transmembrane helix G. Mutational
studies of the cd helix region of cytochrome b have been
extensive; substitutions for Gly-158, Ile-162, and Thr-163 have been
reported to confer resistance to Qo center inhibitors (17,
18). These results are consistent with participation of the first
labeled peptide in the formation of the Qo site. The
participation of the second labeled peptide in a Q-binding site has not
been well established, since no mutation studies have been
reported.
To further understand the Qo site in the cytochrome
bc1 complex, we have replaced a number of
relatively conserved amino acid residues in the cd helix region of the
R. sphaeroides cytochrome b. Herein, we report
generation and characterization of R. sphaeroides mutants
carrying the S155C, S175C, or A185C amino acid substitution in
cytochrome b, the topology of the cd helix region of
cytochrome b in the chromatophore membrane, and involvement
of S175 and A185 of cytochrome b in the interaction with the
iron-sulfur protein of the cytochrome bc1
complex. The involvement of Cys-167 of cytochrome c1 in interaction with the iron-sulfur protein
in the bc1 complex was also observed.
Dodecylmaltoside (DM) was purchased from
Anatrace. 3H-Labeled N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) was
from Du Pont. Dithiothreitol (DTT) was from Sigma. All other chemicals
were of the highest purity commercially available. pSELNB3503, which
was used as the template for mutagenesis, and pRKDNB3505 and
pRKDNB35KmBP, which were used for the transfer and expression of wild
type and engineered fbc genes, were constructed in our
laboratory (19). Restriction endonucleases and DNA-modifying enzymes
were purchased from Promega, Life Technologies, Inc., New England
Biolabs, U.S. Biochemical Corp, Perkin-Elmer, and Pharmacia Biotech
Inc. Escherichia coli S17-1 (20) and R. sphaeroides BC17 (14) were generously provided by Dr. R. B. Gennis of the University of Illinois.
E. coli was grown at 37 °C
on LB medium. Extra-rich media, e.g. TYP, were used in
procedures for the rescue of single-stranded DNA or the purification of
low copy number plasmids (21). R. sphaeroides cells were
grown at 30 °C on an enriched Sistrom's medium (22) essentially as
described (19). Antibiotics were added at the following concentrations:
ampicillin, 100-125 mg/liter; tetracycline, 10-15 mg/liter for
E. coli and 0.75-1.0 mg/liter for R. sphaeroides; kanamycin sulfate, 30-50 mg/liter for E. coli and 20-25 mg/liter for R. sphaeroides;
trimethoprim, 85-100 mg/liter for E. coli and 25-30
mg/liter for R. sphaeroides.
Mutants were constructed by site-directed
mutagenesis using the Altered Sites system from Promega Corp. (23), and
oligonucleotides were synthesized at the OSU Recombinant
DNA/Protein Core Facility. The oligonucleotides used were
GTGGGGCCAGATGGCCTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT, CGTGGGGCCAGATGTACTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT,
GTGGGCCAGATGACCTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT, CCGTGGGGCCAGAATGCGGTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT,
CCGTGGGGCCAGATGGACTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT, GTGGGGCCAGATGGGCTTCTGGGGCGCCACCGT,
GTGGGGCCAGATGCTCTTCTGGGGGCGCCACCGT, and
GGGGCCAGATGTGCTTCTGGGGCGCCAC for Ser-155 to Ala, Tyr, Thr, Arg, Asp, Gly, Leu, and Cys, respectively, and
GGCATCGGCCATTGCATCCAGACCTGGCTGCT for the Ser-175 to Cys,
and GCTGCTCGGCGGCCCGTGCGTGGACAATGCCA for Ala-185 to
Cys mutations. The previously constructed plasmid pSELNB3503 (19), in
which a PinAI site was introduced by a silent mutation at
position 579 in the fbcB gene, a BstEII site
outside of the fbcFBC operon coding region was eliminated,
and a XbaI site was introduced between the fbcB
and fbcC genes, was used as template DNA for
mutagenesis.
Following mutagenesis, a 200-base pair
BstEII-PinAI fragment from pSELNB3503 containing
the altered codon was ligated into the
BstEII-PinAI sites of pRKDNB35KmBP (19). The use
of pRKDNB35KmBP to receive the mutated
BstEII-PinAI fragments eliminates the possibility of retaining or recloning the wild type fragment when attempting to
subclone the mutated fragments into the expression vector. Loss of
kanamycin resistance was then used to screen for recombinant plasmids.
pRKDNB3503 derivatives were conjugated into R. sphaeroides BC17 from E. coli S17-1 using a plate-mating procedure
(19).
General molecular genetic
manipulations were performed essentially as described by Sambrook
et al. (24). Nucleotide sequencing was performed with an
Applied Biosystems model 373 automatic DNA sequencer. Sequencing of
mutated DNA templates was conducted by amplification of a DNA segment
including the entire BstEII to PinAI sequence
using the polymerase chain reaction followed by conversion to the
single-stranded form by treatment with T7 gene 6 exonuclease as
described (25). The presence of engineered mutations and the absence of
other changes in the template region was reconfirmed once for each
mutant clone, following transfer to and expression in R. sphaeroides BC17, by purifying the expression plasmid from an
aliquot of a photosynthetic culture and determining the nucleotide
sequence as described (26).
The sealed,
inside-out chromatophores used for topology studies were prepared
essentially according to the method described by Hunter et
al. (27). Chromatophores used for isolation of the cytochrome
bc1 complex were prepared from frozen cell
pastes of photosynthetically grown R. sphaeroides BC17
complement and mutant strains as described previously (28). The
cytochrome bc1 complexes were purified from
chromatophores by the method of Mather et al. (19).
Ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase activity was measured at
23 °C in a 1-ml assay mixture containing 100 mM sodium/potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 0.3 mM EDTA, 50 µM cytochrome c, and 25 µM
2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-geranyl-1,4-benzoquinol (Q2H2). 30 µM potassium cyanide
was added to assays of chromatophores to inhibit oxidase activity. For
determination of apparent Km for
Q2H2, various concentrations of
Q2H2 were used. Cytochrome bc1 complex activity was determined by measuring
the reduction of cytochrome c (the increase in absorbance at
550 nm) in a Shimadzu UV2101PC spectrophotometer, at 23 °C.
Nonenzymatic oxidation of Q2H2 was determined
under the same conditions in the absence of enzyme. A millimolar
extinction coefficient of 18.5 was used to calculate the reduced
cytochrome c concentration.
30 µl of purified
bc1 complex (300 µM cytochrome
b) in 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, was mixed with 100 µl of a solution containing 80 mM
Na2CO3, 8 mM DTT and 0.6 M urea, pH 10.5. After incubation for 5 min at 0 °C, the
sample was loaded onto a linear pH sucrose density gradient. The
gradient was prepared from 5 ml each of 8% sucrose solution containing
80 mM Na2CO3, 4 mM DTT,
0.6 M urea, and 0.01% DM, pH 10.5 and 16% sucrose
solution containing 120 mM Tris-Cl, 0.2 mM DTT,
and 0.01% DM, pH 6.5. After centrifugation for 9 h at 44,000 rpm
(230,000 × g) in a Beckman SW 50.1 rotor, the red
fractions containing Rieske iron-sulfur protein-depleted bc1 subcomplex were found in the lower third of
the gradient. The Rieske iron-sulfur protein was mainly in the upper
part of the gradient. The Rieske iron-sulfur protein-depleted
bc1 subcomplex was collected, and the buffer was
exchanged (to remove DTT) by repeated (3 times) dilution and
concentration in a Centricon-30 device with a solution containing 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.2, and 0.01% DM.
3 nmol
of the cytochrome bc1 complexes from complement,
S175C, or A185C were incubated with [3H]NEM at a 2:1
molar ratio to cytochrome b heme at 23 °C for 15 min. The
radioactivity of NEM was 12,000 cpm/nmol. The NEM-treated samples were
spotted onto a 3 M paper and developed with a mixture of
chloroform and methanol (2:1, v/v) to remove unreacted NEM. To
determine NEM distribution among bc1 subunits,
the denatured bc1 complexes, which remained at
the origin of the paper chromatogram, were eluted from the paper with
0.1 M Tris-Cl, pH 7.0, containing 1% SDS and 1%
The [3H]NEM-labeled
cytochrome c1 band was excised from the SDS-PAGE
gel, and the protein was eluted using an electroeluter from Bio-Rad.
The electrophoretically eluted protein was concentrated with a
Centricon-10 and precipitated with 50% cold acetone ( Protein was determined by the
Lowry method (29) with the inclusion of 1% SDS in samples and
standards. For accurate measurement of the protein content of
chromatophores, interfering pigments were removed by acetone/methanol
extraction as described (30). Cytochrome b (31) and
cytochrome c1 (32) were determined according to
published methods.
SDS-PAGE was performed according to Laemmli (33) using a Bio-Rad
Mini-Protean dual slab vertical cell.
Low temperature EPR spectra were obtained with Bruker ER200D
spectrometer equipped with an Air Products flow cryostat. Instrument setting details are provided in the legends of the relevant
figures.
Previous studies of
the cytochrome bc1 complex from beef heart
mitochondria have identified Q-binding peptides within cytochrome b, one of which corresponds to residues 158-171 of
cytochrome b of R. sphaeroides. This peptide is
located in an extra-membrane amphipathic cd helix in the
eight-transmembrane helix model of cytochrome b. Certain
mutations at Gly-158, Ile-162, and Thr-163 of cytochrome b
confer resistance to Qo center inhibitors, indicating that
the cd helix may be involved in the Qo site (17, 18). If
this cd helix is indeed a part of the Qo site, it would
have to be located on the periplasmic side of the chromatophore
membrane according to the Q-cycle mechanism. An approach involving
cysteine substitution at noncritical amino acid residues, followed by
chemical modification of engineered cysteines, was adopted for a study of the topology of the cd helix.
Three amino acid residues, Ser-155, Ser-175, and Ala-185, which are
located before, within, and after the putative cd helix of cytochrome
b, were chosen to be mutated to cysteines. Table I summarizes the photosynthetic growth
behavior of cells expressing the wild type cytochrome b
(complement cells) and the S155C, S175C, and A185C cytochrome
b replacement mutations, as well as the ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase activities of chromatophores and purified
bc1 complexes derived from these recombinant
strains. Replacing Ser-175 or Ala-185 with cysteine yields cells
capable of photosynthetic growth at a rate similar to that of the
complement cells. Since the electron transfer activities and the
apparent Km for Q2H2 of
S175C- and A185C-substituted bc1 complexes are
essentially the same as those of the complex from the complement
strain, both in chromatophore membranes and in the purified state,
Ser-175 and Ala-185 of cytochrome b are apparently
noncritical residues, and the engineered cysteines at these two
positions can be used to study topology of the cd helix and its
interaction with other subunits. On the other hand, the substitution of
Ser-155 of cytochrome b with cysteine yields cells unable to
grow photosynthetically in either rich or minimal medium, indicating
that Ser-155 is a critical residue and that the engineered cysteine at
this position is not suitable for topology and interaction studies.
Table I.
Characterization of the S155C, S175C, and A185C cytochrome b
mutations
Since
substitution of Ser-155 of cytochrome b with cysteine
results in cells unable to support photosynthetic growth, the structural importance of Ser-155 was further examined by substituting glycine, alanine, threonine, tyrosine, leucine, aspartic acid, and
arginine at this position. The cytochrome b S155G or S155A substitution results in cells having a photosynthetic growth rate comparable with that of the complement cells. The S155T substitution yields cells with a retarded photosynthetic growth rate (about To investigate whether the size limitation at position 155 of cytochrome b correlates with Q-binding, the enzymatic activity and apparent Km for Q2H2 of the cytochrome bc1 complexes in chromatophores of the photosynthesis-competent strains expressing the S155G, S155A, and S155T cytochrome b variants were measured and compared with those in chromatophores from complement cells. Although the ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase activity differed significantly (S155G (100%), S155A (40%), S155T (10%)) the apparent Km values for Q2H2 in all three mutated complexes were virtually the same as that of the complement bc1 complex (~0.9 µM), indicating that the structural requirement for a small amino acid residue at position 155 of cytochrome b may not be simply to accommodate a Q molecule at this position. This speculation is consistent with the crystallographic structural data from the bovine heart cytochrome bc1 complex, which show that the corresponding amino acid residue does not contribute to the so-called Qo cavity (34). Since serine and alanine residues occupy virtually the same volume in proteins, the 2.5-fold reduction in activity observed when alanine replaces serine at position 155 of cytochrome b suggests that the hydroxyl moiety of this serine plays some role in maintaining the optimal protein structure and/or reactivity, perhaps by participating in an important hydrogen bond. In the case of the replacement of Ser-155 by glycine, which displayed full retention of activity, the hydroxyl group could be supplied by a cavity-filling water molecule, a situation thought to occur in several well studied proteins upon substitution of glycine for a serine (35-37). Topology of the cd Helix of Cytochrome bThe topology of the
cd helix of cytochrome b was studied by comparing the
reaction of NEM with the cysteines of wild type and mutated
bc1 complexes contained within the membranes of
sealed (inside-out) versus detergent-disrupted
chromatophores. The intactness of sealed chromatophores preparations
was confirmed by measuring the increase of the
bc1 complex activity upon the addition of detergent; this increase averaged 6-fold after treatment with 0.2%
potassium deoxycholate. Three parallel experiments were performed on
each sealed chromatophore preparation (see Fig.
1) (1). The sealed chromatophores were
treated with 1 mM NEM followed with 2 mM DTT to
remove any unreacted NEM. The chromatophores were then treated with
0.2% deoxycholate to break the membrane. This reaction sequence will
label -SH groups accessible on the outside of the chromatophore
membrane (cytoplasmic surface) but not those exposed on the inside of
the vesicles or buried within the membrane or protein interior (2). The
sealed chromatophores were disrupted with 0.2% deoxycholate and then
treated with 1 mM NEM. The excess NEM was removed by the
addition of 2 mM DTT. This reaction sequence should label
all of the externally accessible cysteines from either side of the
chromatophore membrane (cytoplasmic and periplasmic surfaces) (3). The
sealed chromatophores were broken with 0.2% deoxycholate and then
treated with 2 mM DTT prior to reaction with 1 mM NEM. This control reaction sequence provides unlabeled
membranes that have gone through the experimental procedure, but with
sulfhydryl modification blocked by the addition of DTT before NEM.
Fig. 1. Reaction scheme for treatment of sealed and detergent-disrupted (opened) chromatophores with NEM for topological mapping. Sealed (inside-out) chromatophores were prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures." Three parallel experiments, as diagrammed in the figure, were performed on sealed chromatophore preparations obtained from complement, S175C, and A185C cells (see discussion under "Results and Discussion"). The specific activities (S.A.) observed with a representative preparation of chromatophores from cytochrome b A185C-expressing cells are provided as an illustrative example of the results obtained. A185C specific activity was 0.3 µmol of cytochrome c reduced/min/nmol of cytochrome b. KDDC, potassium deoxycholate. [View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]
When sealed chromatophores prepared from complement, S175C, and A185C-expressing cells were treated with NEM, no change in cytochrome bc1 complex activity was observed. When deoxycholate-disrupted chromatophores were treated with NEM, about 85% of the cytochrome bc1 complex activity in the cytochrome b A185C substitution was abolished, while no change in activity was observed with complement or the cytochrome b S175C substitution. Since no change in the cytochrome bc1 activity was observed after NEM treatment of either sealed or broken chromatophores from complement cells, the endogenous cysteine residues contained in the cytochrome bc1 complex are probably inaccessible to NEM treatment (see below). This result greatly simplifies our assessment of the location of the engineered cysteines in the chromatophore membrane. Ala-185 of cytochrome b is located on the inside surface of the chromatophore membrane (periplasmic side) because NEM did not react with the cysteine residue engineered at cytochrome b position Ala-185 in the sealed inside-out chromatophore preparation, but it did react with this engineered cysteine in disrupted chromatophores. Since Ala-185 is contained in the cd loop connecting the C and D transmembrane helices of cytochrome b, the cd loop must also be on the periplasmic side of the chromatophore membrane. The placement of the cd loop on the periplasmic side of the chromatophore membrane is consistent with the current cytochrome bc1 crystal structure from bovine heart, which describes the cytochrome b protein as a membrane-spanning polypeptide having eight transmembrane helices (named A-H) and several transversal helices on both sides of the membrane, including a cd helix comprising the amino-terminal portion of the cd loop located on the periplasmic side (34). The observation of no activity loss in both sealed and disrupted chromatophore preparations from the cytochrome b S175C mutant cells upon NEM treatment indicates that the Ser-175 position of the cd helix is inaccessible to the aqueous phase, either facing the interior of cytochrome b or covered by another subunit of the complex. Effect of NEM on Purified Cytochrome bc1 Complexes from S175C and A185C Mutant CellsThe cytochrome bc1 complex contains nine cysteine residues: one in cytochrome b, four in cytochrome c1, and four in the iron-sulfur protein. It has been established that two cysteines in the iron-sulfur protein are ligands to the [2Fe-2S] cluster (38), and two cysteines in cytochrome c1 are covalently bonded to heme c (39). Thus, there are five free cysteines that are potential candidates for NEM modification. When the cytochrome bc1 complex from complement strain was treated with NEM, no change in enzymatic activity was observed (Table II), indicating that cysteine residues contained in the cytochrome bc1 complex are either inaccessible to NEM or the reaction product is functionally active. Radioactive NEM was used to distinguish these two possibilities. Since no radioactivity was found in any of the four subunits of the complement bc1 complex treated with [3H]NEM (see Fig. 2), the lack of inhibition by NEM treatment must be due to the inaccessibility of the free cysteines rather than to formation of active cysteine-NEM products.
Fig. 2. Radioactivity distribution among subunits of the cytochrome bc1 complexes from complement, S175C, and A185C treated with [3H]-NEM. Purified bc1 complexes from complement, S175C, and A185C were incubated with [3H]NEM as described under "Experimental Procedures." ISP, iron-sulfur protein. [View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]
When the cytochrome bc1 complex containing the cytochrome b S175C replacement was treated with NEM, no loss of activity was observed (see Table II), suggesting that Ser-175 of cytochrome b is shielded by other subunits or other parts of cytochrome b in the bc1 complex. The inaccessibility of the engineered cysteine of cytochrome b to NEM treatment is further confirmed by the absence of radioactive labeling of the cytochrome b subunit of the cytochrome b S175C cytochrome bc1 complex treated with [3H]NEM (see Fig. 2). These results are consistent with the three-dimensional structure analysis of the bovine heart bc1 complex, which shows that the amino acid residue corresponding to Ser-175 is not exposed on the surface of the molecule (34). When the cytochrome b A185C-cytochrome bc1 complex was treated with various concentrations of NEM, about 87% of the bc1 activity was lost (Table II) when 2.0 mol of NEM/mol of cytochrome b heme was used, consistent with the results observed in chromatophores (see above). The loss of activity correlates with the incorporation of NEM into the cytochrome b subunit; when [3H]NEM-treated cytochrome b A185C-cytochrome bc1 complex, which had lost 87% of its activity, was subjected to SDS-PAGE, all of the radioactivity was located in the b subunit (Fig. 2). About 1 mol of NEM was incorporated into one mol of cytochrome b protein. EPR Characteristics of Cytochrome b, Cytochrome c1, and Iron-Sulfur Cluster in NEM-treated, A185C Cytochrome bc1 ComplexEPR spectra properties of cytochrome b, cytochrome c1, and the Rieske iron-sulfur cluster in the cytochrome b A185C-cytochrome bc1 with and without NEM treatment, were examined in an attempt to identify which active centers of the complex are perturbed by the modification at position 185 and thus may interact with this region of cytochrome b. Fig. 3 shows the EPR characteristics of
cytochromes b in the cytochrome bc1
complexes of complement and cytochrome b A185C with and
without NEM treatment. The cytochrome b A185C-cytochrome bc1 complex exhibits two EPR signals at
g = 3.5 and g = 3.76, corresponding to
b565 and b562,
respectively. These two b signals are identical to those
observed in cytochrome b of the complement bc1 complex, indicating that the cytochrome
b A185C substitution probably has little effect on the
cytochrome b heme environments. When the cytochrome
b A185C-cytochrome bc1 complex was
treated with NEM to inactivate the complex, the EPR characteristics of cytochrome b (Fig. 3) and cytochrome
c1 (data not shown) in the treated complex were
the same as those in the untreated complex, suggesting that Ala-185 is
not involved in interaction with the hemes of the cytochrome
b molecule or with cytochrome c1.
Fig. 3. The EPR spectra of b cytochromes in purified bc1 complexes of complement and cytochrome b A185C with and without NEM treatment. Cytochrome bc1 complexes were partially reduced by the addition of 1 mM sodium ascorbate. The samples were incubated at 0 °C for 20 min before freezing in liquid nitrogen. EPR spectra were recorded at 7 K with the following instrument settings: microwave frequency, 9.27 GHz; microwave power, 20 milliwatts; modulation amplitude, 20 G; time constant, 0.1 s; scan rate, 5 G/s. [View Larger Version of this Image (18K GIF file)]
Fig. 4 compares EPR characteristics of
the Rieske iron-sulfur clusters in the cytochrome
bc1 complexes of complement and A185C, with and
without NEM treatment. When complement and A185C-substituted bc1 complexes were reduced by a small excess of
ascorbate, the EPR signals of the Rieske iron-sulfur cluster in these
two cytochrome bc1 complexes were essentially
the same, with resonances at gz = 2.02, gy = 1.89, and gx = 1.80. However, when the A185C bc1 was treated with
NEM, the gx = 1.80 signal broadened and shifted to 1.75, while no change in the iron-sulfur spectrum was observed in
NEM-treated complement bc1 complex. Upon
complete reduction of the NEM-treated complement and A185C mutant
bc1 complexes with dithionite, the spectrum of
the bc1 complement complex is broadened, with
gx shifting to 1.75, as previously reported for
the wild type bc1 complex under fully reduced
conditions (4, 5), whereas the dithionite-reduced spectrum of the
NEM-treated A185C complex remains unchanged with
gx = 1.75. The NEM-treated A185C complex thus
has a spectrum closely resembling the "reduced state" spectrum of
the complement, regardless of the redox state of the ubiquinone
pool.
Fig. 4. The EPR spectra of the Rieske [2Fe-2S] cluster in the cytochrome bc1 complexes of complement and cytochrome b A185C with and without NEM treatment. Partially purified cytochrome bc1 complexes obtained after the first ion-exchange column chromatography step during the purification process were treated with NEM. Excess modifying reagent was removed from the mixture by applying the treated sample to a second ion-exchange column and extensively washing with washing buffer. No free NEM was present in the purified bc1 complex eluted from the second column. The ascorbate-reduced cytochrome bc1 complexes were prepared as described in Fig. 3. The EPR spectra were recorded at 10 K. Instrument settings were the same as in Fig. 3. [View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]
The iron-sulfur subunit is thought to bind in the general vicinity of b565 on the positive side of the membrane to form part of the quinol-oxidizing center, because the iron-sulfur cluster is a primary electron acceptor from the quinol. The particular line shape observed for the [2Fe-2S] cluster is thought to be mediated by the oxidation state of the ubiquinone present in the Qo site (4, 5, 40-42). When oxidized quinone is present, the gx signal is sharper than that observed when quinol is present. The gx of the bc1 from R. sphaeroides is found at g = 1.80 when ubiquinone is present, but shifts to 1.75 and becomes much broader when ubiquinol is present. NEM modification of the engineered cysteine at position 185 of cytochrome b resulted in broadened [2Fe-2S] EPR signals with gx = 1.75, independent of the redox potential. There was no detectable difference between the EPR spectrum of the NEM-treated A185C complex and the full reduction spectrum of the NEM-treated and -untreated complement bc1 complex. The effect of NEM treatment on the iron-sulfur cluster spectrum suggests that the Ala-185 residue of cytochrome b interacts with the [2Fe-2S] cluster or is located in the close vicinity of the cluster. This idea is consistent with the current x-ray crystal structure of this part of the complex (34). The effect of NEM treatment on the iron-sulfur cluster of the A185C bc1 complex is also reminiscent of the change observed for the substitution of Leu for Phe-144 (F144L) in the cytochrome b from R. capsulatus (41). The F144L bc1 complex in R. capsulatus chromatophores was reported to have a very low turnover rate with a broadened, redox state-insensitive, gx value at 1.765. It was suggested that these properties of the F144L complex resulted from a reduced affinity for quinone and quinol exhibited by the Qo center of the mutated complex. In a subsequent study of the effect of extraction of ubiquinone from chromatophore membranes on the iron-sulfur cluster, Ding et al. (42) found that the gx signal of the "depleted state" at approximately g = 1.765 was broadened considerably beyond that seen in the presence of either ubiquinone or ubiquinol. Since the changes in the gx signal of iron-sulfur clusters resulting from the NEM modification of Cys-185 of R. sphaeroides cytochrome b in the complex do not exhibit the extremely broad line shape reported for the quinone-depleted state, they are probably not due to a complete absence for quinone and quinol binding to the Qo center. [3H]NEM Modification of Rieske Iron-Sulfur Protein-depleted bc1 ComplexSince we have shown that
the Ala-185 residue of cytochrome b is near the iron-sulfur
protein, the inaccessibility of the engineered cysteine at position 175 could be the result of close interaction between the iron-sulfur
protein and the cd helix of cytochrome b. In that case,
removal of iron-sulfur protein from the bc1
complex might expose Ser-175 and thus make it accessible to NEM. The
bc1 complex was dissociated into Rieske
iron-sulfur protein and the iron-sulfur protein-depleted
bc1 subcomplex by incubation with Na2CO3 (pH 10.5) under reducing conditions
(43). The addition of urea (0.6 M) to the solution helps
the dissociation process. Since NEM is not stable at alkaline pH,
modification of dissociated subcomplex cannot be carried out without
neutralization. To prevent the reassociation of the iron-sulfur protein
to the complex upon neutralization, the dissociated iron-sulfur protein
was removed by pH sucrose density gradient centrifugation. This density
gradient serves two purposes: to separate the iron-sulfur protein from the bc1 subcomplex and to restore neutral pH to
avoid further destruction of subcomplex. Under the centrifugation
conditions used, the subcomplex and iron-sulfur protein fractions are
well separated. A typical distribution of the two components obtained after centrifugation is shown in Fig. 5.
The fractions at the top of the gradient contained iron-sulfur protein,
whereas the fractions at the bottom contained the larger, faster
sedimenting bc1 subcomplex. The
bc1 subcomplex was modified with
[3H]NEM after removal of DTT by repeated dilution and
concentration using Centricon-30. The incorporation of NEM into wild
type bc1 subcomplex was 1.1 NEM/bc1, while 2.2 molecules of NEM were
incorporated into subcomplex with the S175C replacement. Fig.
6 shows the 3H radioactivity
distribution among subunits of complement and S175C-substituted
cytochrome bc1 subcomplexes. When
[3H]NEM-treated complement cytochrome
bc1 subcomplex was subjected to SDS-PAGE,
radioactivity was found in cytochrome c1 subunit (see Fig. 6A), indicating that one of the cysteines in
cytochrome c1 is shielded by the iron-sulfur
protein in the intact bc1 complex and became
accessible to NEM after its removal. When the cytochrome bc1 subcomplex containing cytochrome
b with the S175C mutation was treated with
[3H]NEM, both cytochrome b and cytochrome
c1 subunits became labeled (see Fig.
6B), indicating that Ser-175 of cytochrome b is
also shielded by the iron-sulfur protein in the intact
bc1 complex.
Fig. 5. Gel pattern of pH sucrose gradient fractions of alkaline-treated cytochrome bc1 complex. Aliquots of selected fractions of the gradient were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Lane 1, molecular weight standards; lanes 2-5, top four fractions from the gradient rich in iron-sulfur protein (ISP); lanes 6-8, red fractions from the middle of the gradient mainly consisting of cytochrome b, cytochrome c1, and subunit IV (the pH of these middle fractions is neutral); lane 9, the bottom-most fraction, which contains no significant protein bands. [View Larger Version of this Image (64K GIF file)] Fig. 6. [3H]NEM distribution among subunits of the iron-sulfur protein (ISP)-depleted bc1 subcomplexes. The iron-sulfur protein-depleted subcomplexes of complement (A) and S175C (B) cytochrome bc1 were treated with [3H]NEM as described under "Experimental Procedures," and the samples were subjected to denaturing SDS-PAGE, along with control samples labeled with cold NEM. The gels containing radioisotope labeled samples were divided into 3-mm slices, and the radioactivity was counted. The positions of the subunits were determined by staining the control gels. [View Larger Version of this Image (46K GIF file)] Isolation of a [3H]NEM-labeled Peptide from Cytochrome c1 The fact that one of the cysteines from
cytochrome c1 became labeled in
bc1 subcomplex indicates that this cysteine may
be located in the interface between cytochrome
c1 and the iron-sulfur protein. To identify
which one of the cysteines reacts with NEM, [3H]NEM-labeled cytochrome c1 was
eluted from SDS-PAGE gels and digested with arginine-specific protease
(Arg-C). Fig. 7 shows the radioactivity
distribution among the Arg-C-digested peptides of cytochrome
c1 separated by HPLC. The majority of the
radioactivity was found in fractions 14, 22, and 47. Since very few
amino acids were detected in fractions 14 and 22, it is likely that
they contained decomposed [3H]NEM. Some radioactivity was
also found in fractions 60-70, due to the incomplete digestion of
cytochrome c1.
Fig. 7. 3H radioactivity distribution in an HPLC chromatogram of Arg-C-digested, [3H]NEM-labeled cytochrome c1 protein. The [3H]NEM-labeled cytochrome c1 (1 mg/ml, 2 × 104 cpm/mg) was digested with Arg-C, and 100-µl aliquots of digested solution were subjected to HPLC separation as described under "Experimental Procedures." 100-µl aliquots of the separated HPLC fractions were withdrawn for radioactivity determination. [View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]
The partial N-terminal amino acid sequence of the labeled peptide in fraction 47 was determined to be AGFHGPMGT. From the primary sequence of cytochrome c1, this can be seen to be the initial portion of the expected Arg-C proteolytic fragment encompassing residues 130-180. The only cysteine in this peptide is Cys-167, which is thought to be located in the soluble domain of cytochrome c1. Our results suggest that the region containing Cys-167 forms part of the interface of cytochrome c1 with the Rieske iron-sulfur protein. Elucidation of the exact docking surfaces of these two subunits, as well as of cytochrome b and the iron-sulfur protein, requires refinement of the crystal structure and/or other detailed protein characterizations. * This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant GM 30721 and the Oklahoma State University Agricultural Experiment Station.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed.
1 The abbreviations used are: Q, ubiquinone; Q2H2, 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-geranyl-1,4-benzoquinol; DTT, dithiothreitol; DM, dodecylmaltoside; NEM, N-ethylmaleimide; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; high pressure liquid chromatography. We thank Dr. Roger Koeppe for critical review of this manuscript.
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||