Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ashley, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ashley, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 38, Issue of September 19, 1997 pp. 23880-23886
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Rat Brain p64H1, Expression of a New Member of the p64 Chloride Channel Protein Family in Endoplasmic Reticulum*

(Received for publication, February 18, 1997, and in revised form, May 12, 1997)

Rory R. Duncan , Paul K. Westwood , Alan Boyd and Richard H. Ashley Dagger

From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Many plasma membrane Cl- channels have been cloned, including the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and several members of the voltage-gated ClC family. In contrast, very little is known about the molecular identity of intracellular Cl- channels. We used a polymerase chain reaction-based approach to identify candidate genes in mammalian brain and cloned the cDNA corresponding to rat brain p64H1. This encoded a microsomal membrane protein of predicted Mr 28,635 homologous to the putative intracellular bovine kidney Cl- channel p64. In situ mRNA hybridization histochemistry showed marked expression in hippocampus and cerebellum, and in vitro expression revealed a large cytoplasmic domain, one membrane-spanning segment, and a small nonglycosylated N-terminal luminal domain. The predicted protein contained consensus phosphorylation sites for protein kinase C and protein kinase A, and protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation increased the Mr of p64H1 to ~43,000, characteristic of the native protein in Western blots. Recombinant p64H1 was immunolocalized to the endoplasmic reticulum of human embryonic kidney 293 and HT-4 cells, and incorporation of human embryonic kidney 293 endoplasmic reticulum vesicles into planar lipid bilayers gave rise to intermediate conductance, outwardly rectifying anion channels. Although p64H1 is the first intracellular Cl- channel component or regulator to be identified in brain, Northern blotting revealed transcripts in many other rat tissues. This suggests that p64H1 may contribute widely to intracellular Cl- transport.


INTRODUCTION

Ion channel reconstitution followed by single-channel recording and analysis has shown that intracellular organelles contain numerous ion channels. These include channels in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1 and sarcoplasmic reticulum (1-8) and ion channels in mitochondria (9-11), secretory vesicles (12, 13), and synaptic vesicles (14). Although a concerted effort to understand the molecular basis of intracellular ion transport has revealed the molecular identities of several intracellular cation channels, intracellular Cl- channels are much less well characterized. Nevertheless, it has been speculated that anion channels may help to regulate organelle volume or conduct counterions to balance intracellular Ca2+ uptake and release. Such channels could therefore have important roles in many cellular processes.

Experimental work by Landry et al. (15) establishes a role for the protein p64 in intracellular Cl- transport. Briefly, Landry et al. (15) identify specific ligands for a bovine kidney microsomal Cl- transporter and purified candidate proteins, including the 64-kDa protein p64, using drug affinity chromatography (16). Reconstitution of partially purified p64 into planar lipid bilayers revealed anion channel activity (16), and incorporation into proteoliposomes conferred a 36Cl permeability that was abolished by anti-p64 antibodies (17). p64 cDNA was cloned (17) and expressed in Xenopus oocytes, where the recombinant protein was localized to intracellular membranes. Taken as a whole, this work strongly suggested that p64 was a component of an intracellular Cl- channel, and it provided the impetus for the present study.

Genes homologous to bovine p64 are expressed in rat tissues, including brain (18). In addition, p64-expressed sequence tags have been identified in several tissues during the Human Genome Mapping Project. In an attempt to identify p64-related intracellular Cl- channel proteins in mammalian brain, we used a PCR-based approach to clone and functionally express a rat brain homologue of p64, p64H1. This is the first putative intracellular Cl- channel component to be identified in brain, and we suggest that p64- and p64H1-related genes encode a family of proteins associated with intracellular Cl- transport.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

RT-PCR and cDNA Library Screening

RT-PCR was carried out on whole rat brain total RNA (19) using two fully degenerate oligonucleotide primers (18) based on the amino acid sequence of bovine kidney p64 (Ref. 17; GenBankTM accession number L16547). We used the random primer method to label a 346-bp EcoRI fragment of BS2, a partial cDNA clone generated by this procedure, with [alpha -32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol, Amersham). This probe was used to screen an oligo(dT)-primed rat olfactory bulb lambda ZAP II cDNA library (Stratagene) at moderate stringency (6 × SSPE, 5 × Denhardt's solution, 1% SDS, 100 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA, 65 °C). We isolated 13 clones after washing the filters at moderate stringency (final wash: 2 × SSPE, 65 °C, 30 min), and phagemid DNA was rescued according to the manufacturer's instructions. DNA sequencing was carried out using the Sequenase II system (Amersham).

Circle (or Concatemer) Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends-PCR (20)

Poly(A)+ RNA was purified from rat brain total RNA using Poly(A)+ Quick columns (Stratagene). 10 pmol of an antisense oligonucleotide (5'-CGGTGGTGACACTGAACACGACTCC-3', based on sequence analysis of the longest cDNA clone) were used to direct first-strand cDNA synthesis from 1 µg of poly(A)+ RNA by 10 units of Superscript II RNase H- reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies Inc.). The RNA template was destroyed by alkaline hydrolysis, and the cDNA was circularized by incubation with 10 units of T4 RNA ligase (NEB). This was used as a template in a PCR with the following oligonucleotides: forward primer, 5'-TGCAGTTTCCTATGCTCTCACCATC-3'; reverse primer, 5'-TCACAGAGGCTCTTCATGATCCTTT-3'. The PCR product (cRI) was ligated to the T/A cloning vector pGEM-T (Promega) and sequenced (Sequenase II, Amersham). cRI extended an additional 120 bp farther upstream from the original RT-PCR clone, and this was used to screen a second rat whole brain cDNA library (lambda gt10 5' STRETCH, CLONTECH) under conditions identical to those previously described. The 1.9-kb insert from the newly isolated clone (p64H1) was PCR-amplified using lambda gt10 insert-flanking primers (forward primer, 5'-AGCAAGTTCAGCCTGGTTAAGT-3'; reverse primer, 5'-TTATGAGTATTTCTTCCAGGG-3'); and a polymerase mixture of Taq and Pwo (Extend, Boehringer Mannheim). The final product was ligated to pTAg (R&D Systems).

Northern Hybridization

3 µg of tissue-specific poly(A)+ RNAs purified from total tissue RNAs were electrophoresed in a 1% (w/v) agarose-formaldehyde gel, transferred to Hybond-N (Amersham), and cross-linked in a Stratalinker UV oven (Stratagene). We also used a commercial rat multiple tissue Northern blot (CLONTECH). A 346-bp EcoRI restriction fragment of BS2 labeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP, as described earlier, was hybridized to the membranes and washed under conditions of high (final wash: 0.2 × SSPE, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 65 °C for 10 min) or moderate (final wash: 2 × SSPE, 65 °C for 30 min) stringency and exposed to radiographic film for 24 h.

In Situ mRNA Hybridization

Freshly dissected brains from adult Harlan Sprague Dawley rats were slowly frozen on dry ice and mounted on the cutting block of a cryostat using Tissue Tek (Miles Laboratories). 15-20-µm sections were cut at -14 °C and thaw-mounted on poly-L-lysine-coated slides, fixed by immersion for 5 min in ice-cold 4% (w/v) phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde, rinsed in 1 × PBS, and dehydrated in 70% (v/v), 80% (v/v), and 95% (v/v) ethanol. Following fixation, the sections were rehydrated in 1 × PBS and immersed for 10 min at room temperature in a solution containing 0.25% (v/v) acetic anhydride in 0.1 M triethanolamine hydrochloride (pH 8.0), 0.9% (w/v) NaCl (21). After dehydration through graded alcohols, the sections were dipped in chloroform for 5 min then dehydrated again. A probe was synthesized by end-labeling 5 ng of a 45-mer antisense oligonucleotide (5'-CCTTTTCAGGTCAACGGTGGTGACACTGAACACGACTCCTTTGAG-3') with alpha -35S-dATP (1200 Ci/mmol, 12.5 mCi/µl, Amersham) using terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Labeling was confirmed by electrophoresing an aliquot in a 6% (w/v) polyacrylamide gel in the presence of 6.6 M urea. This probe was diluted 100-fold in a hybridization buffer containing 50% (v/v) formamide, 4 × SSC, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 × Denhardt's solution, 0.25% (w/v) SDS, 10% (w/v) dextran sulfate, 5 µg/ml yeast tRNA, 200 µg/ml yeast total RNA, and 200 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA and hybridized to the sections for 16 h at 42 °C in a chamber humidified with 50% (v/v) formamide, 2 × SSC. The sections were washed twice for 20 min in 2 × SSC at 22 °C then twice for 20 min in 2 × SSC at 55 °C. They were then rinsed in 0.3 × SSC, 70% (v/v) ethanol at 22 °C and dehydrated in 95% (v/v) ethanol before being exposed to radiographic film for 10 days. A complementary sense 45-mer probe was used as a negative control.

In Vitro Translation

A 1.5-kb cDNA insert in pTAg (R&D Systems) encoding the complete open reading frame of p64H1 was used to direct protein translation in a coupled in vitro transcription/translation system (TnT, Promega). The insert contained 165 bp of 5'-UTR and ~500 bp of 3'-UTR. The reaction was initiated from the T7 promotor of pTAg in the presence or absence of canine pancreatic microsomes (Promega), labeling the protein with [alpha -35S]methionine (0.8 mCi/ml; specific activity, 1,016 Ci/mmol, Amersham), which was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The translation product (5 µl or the equivalent after treatment) was analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. To treat the translation product at high pH, the microsomes were incubated on ice in 10 volumes of 100 mM Na2CO3 (pH 11.5) for 30 min, pelleted by centrifugation (100,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C), and rinsed with 10 volumes of ice-cold PBS (22) before electrophoresis. For proteolysis, 10 µl of the translation product were incubated with proteinase K (10 mg/ml, Sigma) at 0 °C in the presence or absence of 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100. The digestion products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 6% (w/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gels using Tris-Tricine SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (23).

Mammalian Cell Culture and in Vivo Expression

HEK-293 and HT-4 (24) cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 2 mM sodium pyruvate, and 50 units/ml penicillin and streptomycin (Life Technologies). Cells were exposed to humidified air supplemented with 5% (v/v) CO2 and routinely passaged between 60-70% confluency using 0.05% (w/v) trypsin, 0.53 M EDTA. All transfections were performed using the same cell line between passage numbers 15-25 (HEK-293) or 4-6 (HT-4). The p64H1 insert used for in vitro translation was subcloned into the mammalian expression vector pCI (Promega) downstream of the vector's cytomegalovirus IE promotor sequence. Its orientation was verified by sequencing and by demonstrating the continued ability of the construct to direct protein synthesis from the T7 promotor in a coupled transcription/translation system. Cells were transiently transfected in 100-mm culture dishes at 50% confluency using either 1 ml of calcium phosphate DNA precipitate containing 20 µg of plasmid DNA prepared using standard methods or Tfx-20 (Promega). p64H1 expression was confirmed by immunoblotting after 48-72 h (see below). Negative control transfections were performed in an identical manner using vector alone as a source of DNA. To analyze expressed products in planar lipid bilayers, cells were harvested from transfected or control plates by scraping into cold buffer containing 5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.32 M sucrose, 0.1 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonyl fluoride, and 10 µg/ml trypsin inhibitor and homogenized on ice using 25 strokes of a Teflon glass homogenizer. The homogenates were fractionated by differential centrifugation to yield microsomal membranes, which were either used immediately or snap-frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -70 °C for up to 6 weeks.

Western Blotting

We previously reported the generation of a polyclonal antiserum (Ab990) to a fusion protein containing a fragment of p64H1 (18), and this was used to detect p64H1 after in vitro translation. Briefly, proteins were transferred onto Hybond-C (Amersham), and excess binding sites were blocked with 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin in a solution containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 140 mM NaCl, and 0.1% (v/v) TTBS). Membranes were exposed to polyclonal antibody (1:2000 dilution in TBS) for 60 min, washed with TTBS, and exposed to horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1:4000 dilution in TBS, Pierce). Membranes were washed extensively with TTBS, and bound antibody complexes were revealed by enhanced chemiluminescence detection.

Indirect Immunofluorescence

Transfected HEK-293 and HT-4 cells were grown to subconfluency on sterile glass coverslips. 48 h after transfection, the cells were washed extensively in ice-cold PBS containing Ca2+ and Mg2+, fixed for 20 min in ice-cold buffered paraformaldehyde, and washed again in PBS. p64H1 was detected using a 1:50 dilution of antiserum (18) in PBS, 0.2% (v/v) fish skin gelatin (Sigma). After extensive washing, the primary antibody was detected using rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG second antibody (1:100 dilution in PBS, 0.2% (v/v) fish skin gelatin). Nuclear DNA was stained using Hoechst 33258 dye, and ER membranes were visualized using the short chain cationic dicarbocyanine DiO-C5-(3), similar to 3',3'-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (25, 26). The cells were mounted and examined at magnifications of up to × 400 under oil immersion. Images were obtained with a Hamamatsu C5810 chilled color CCD camera using standard Nikon filter cubes. Negative controls, using pre-immune serum from the same animal, showed no p64H1-specific staining.

Planar Bilayer Reconstitution

Planar lipid bilayers (27) comprising equimolar palmitoyloleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine and palmitoyloleoyl phosphatidylserine (each 15 mg/ml, Avanti) suspended in n-decane, were cast at room temperature across a polystyrene partition separating two solutions containing 50 mM choline chloride, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4). Microsomal membrane vesicles were added to the cis chamber (final concentration, ~1 µg of protein/ml), which was voltage-clamped relative to the trans chamber using a Biologic RK-300 patch-clamp amplifier. Membrane vesicles were induced to fuse at 0 mV by adding 2 mM Ca2+ and 450 mM choline chloride to the cis chamber with constant stirring (2). The contents of the cis and trans chambers were changed by perfusion after channel incorporation (see "Results"), and transmembrane currents were low-pass-filtered (up to 1.0 kHz, -3 decibel point, 8-pole Bessel) and digitally recorded at various holding potentials (sampling at 10 kHz). Previous work has suggested that noninverted rather than inverted brain ER vesicles fuse with bilayers (2) so that a net flux of Cl- flowing cis to trans through incorporated channels represents a negative outward current flowing from cytoplasm to lumen. The signs of the voltage-clamp potential (measured as cis minus trans or cytoplasmic minus luminal potential) and the membrane currents conform to the standard electrophysiological convention. Current/voltage relationships were plotted after current amplitude histogram analysis (pClamp 6, Axon Instruments) to measure single-channel slope conductances and reversal potentials. The relative permeabilities (P) of monovalent anions versus monovalent cations were calculated from reversal potentials measured in asymmetric ionic conditions (e.g. 2, 11) or by directly fitting data to the GHK current equation (28). Junction potentials were insignificant (11).


RESULTS

Isolation of p64H1 cDNA

p64 was identified as a Cl- channel component in bovine kidney (15-17). In this study, we used RT-PCR and cDNA library screening to clone cDNAs encoding p64-related Cl- channels from rat brain. Sequence analysis revealed that none of the original 13 clones isolated by this approach (see "Experimental Procedures") contained full-length cDNA inserts. Many of the cDNAs contained long 3'-UTR sequences, and computer analysis predicted extensive RNA secondary structure (Genetics Computer Group 8, University of Wisconsin). This probably reduced the abundance of full-length p64H1 cDNAs when the original library was constructed. To overcome these problems, we used circle (or concatemer) rapid amplification of cDNA ends-PCR (20) to extend the partial-length cDNAs obtained by conventional library screening toward the 5'-end of the p64H1 transcript. This technique, briefly described under "Experimental Procedures," produced the probe cRI and, eventually, p64H1. Sequence analysis of two independent PCR clones of p64H1 revealed 100% identity to BS2 and cRI, and the presence of a methionine codon in a consensus region favorable for translation, viz. GGCCATGG (29, 30). This single potential-initiating methionine codon was followed by a 753-bp open reading frame encoding a protein with a predicted Mr of 28,635. The nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of p64H1 and p64H1 are shown in Fig. 1A. The clone also contained 165 bp of 5'-UTR (as shown). The same cDNA was obtained when another cDNA library was screened with the 5'-UTR sequence. There were two in-frame termination codons within the 5'-UTR, and the other reading frames contained multiple termination codons (not shown). Partial p64H1 cDNA clones obtained by screening an oligo(dT)-primed cDNA library contained unusually long 3'-UTR sequences of ~3.9 kb.



Fig. 1. cDNA and protein sequences. A, nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of p64H1. Consensus PKC and PKA phosphorylation sites are shown by closed and open circles, respectively, and a predicted transmembrane domain is boxed. The arrows indicate the PCR primers (sense and antisense) used to clone BS2. B, predicted amino acid sequences and optimal alignment of p64H1 and p64. Vertical lines (|), colons, and periods indicate identical residues and conserved and nonconserved substitutions, respectively. C, Kyte-Doolittle hydrophobicity prediction for p64H1 and p64 (hydrophobic regions are above the center line). Note that p64H1 is only about half the length of p64. An arrow indicates the hydrophobic region corresponding to the predicted transmembrane domain of p64H1.
[View Larger Versions of these Images (41 + 39K GIF file)]

Predicted Protein Sequence and Secondary Structure

Fig. 1B shows an optimized alignment of the predicted 253 amino acid residues of p64H1 with bovine p64. p64H1 showed 71% identity to the C-terminal portion of p64 (which has an additional 226 N-terminal residues) and appeared to have a single potential membrane-spanning region, which was predicted to adopt an alpha-helical conformation (31). The hydropathy profile of p64H1 closely resembled the C-terminal half of p64 (Fig. 1C). There were no consensus N-glycosylation sites, but p64H1 had multiple consensus sites for phosphorylation by a variety of kinases. These included a single protein kinase A (PKA) site and four protein kinase C (PKC) sites (indicated in Fig. 1A). The putative transmembrane domain was preceded by a relatively short N-terminal domain, but this had no similarity to published cleaved signal peptide sequences, and sequence analysis did not predict a protease cleavage site. Finally, data base searching revealed no similarity to any other protein apart from bovine p64 and other p64-related proteins.

Distribution of p64H1 mRNA in Brain and Other Tissues

Northern blot analysis at moderate stringency using a 346-bp probe derived from p64H1 cDNA revealed three transcripts of approximately 1.9 kb, 4.8 kb, and 6.5 kb in samples from whole rat brain (Fig. 2A). At higher stringency, the p64H1 transcript hybridized exclusively to the 4.8-kb species (Fig. 2B). The 1.9-kb and 6.5-kb transcripts may represent related members of a gene family or result from alternative mRNA splicing. The 4.8-kb transcript was detected in RNA from several rat tissues, indicating that p64H1 is widely expressed (Fig. 2B). Based on these results, we further localized p64H1 expression in rat brain by in situ mRNA hybridization. Marked expression was observed in the cerebellum, hippocampus, and dentate gyrus, and moderate expression was observed in the cerebral cortex (Fig. 2C). No signal was detected in parallel experiments using a sense probe or in samples treated with RNase (not shown).


Fig. 2. Distribution of p64H1 mRNA. A, Northern blot of rat whole-brain mRNA at moderate stringency, revealing three transcripts of ~6.5, 4.8, and 1.9 kb. B, probe of total RNA from several rat tissues (CLONTECH) at higher stringency, showing only the ~4.8-kb species. C, in situ mRNA hybridization using an antisense 45-mer oligonucleotide showing strong hybridization in cerebellum (Cb), hippocampus (Hi), and dentate gyrus (Dg) and moderate signals in cerebral cortex.
[View Larger Version of this Image (93K GIF file)]

In Vitro Expression, Membrane Topology, and Phosphorylation

We expressed p64H1 in vitro to confirm the location of the initiating methionine and to delineate the protein membrane topology. The Mr of p64H1 was unaltered in the presence of canine pancreatic microsomal membranes (Fig. 3A), consistent with the lack of predicted consensus glycosylation sites. Microsomes containing recombinant p64H1 were incubated at high pH to lyse the membrane vesicles and dissociate peripheral membrane proteins. This treatment failed to dissociate the translation product (Fig. 3A, lane 4), consistent with an integral membrane protein (32, 33). Intact microsomes containing recombinant p64H1 were also exposed to proteinase K to determine how much of the protein was accessible to an extravesicular protease. As shown in Fig. 3B, this reduced the apparent Mr of the in vitro translation product by ~27,000, whereas solubilization of the microsomal membranes with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (not shown) allowed complete digestion. The bands containing unincorporated label are an artifact of the Tris-Tricine gels used to resolve the low Mr (~6,000) peptide. Finally, we demonstrated that PKC phosphorylated p64H1 in vitro. This increased the apparent Mr of the protein by up to ~10,000 (Fig. 3C), with a ladder of phosphorylated proteins consistent with multiple phosphorylation states (four PKC sites could theoretically give rise to 42 - 1 = 15 different phosphoproteins).


Fig. 3. In vitro translation of p64H1. A, autoradiogram of [alpha -35S]methionine-labeled translation products. Lane 1, no microsomes; lane 2, with microsomes; lane 3, microsomes pelleted by centrifugation at 100,000 × g; lane 4, microsomes treated at high pH. The label indicates the apparent Mr of the protein band. B, treatment of an aliquot from the same experiment with proteinase K. Lane 1, no treatment; lane 2, proteinase K. The arrows show the position of the Mr markers carbonic anhydrase (29) and aprotinin (6.5). The large, diffuse bands are artefacts (see text). C, Western blot showing that phosphorylation of the translation product by PKC increases the apparent Mr. The arrows show the position of the Mr markers ovalbumin (45) and carbonic anhydrase (29). The apparent Mr of p64H1 increases to a maximum of ~43,000. D, schematic illustration showing the predicted membrane topology of p64H1. The Mr labels refer to the predicted Mr values of the cytoplasmic domain (22.7 kDa) and the remainder of the protein, which includes the ER luminal and membrane domains (6.2 kDa).
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]

Localization of Expressed p64H1 to the ER

To determine the cellular location of p64H1, we transiently transfected HEK-293 cells and the mouse neuronal cell line HT-4 with an expression vector containing p64H1. We detected p64H1 with an apparent Mr of ~33,000 after 48 h using an anti-p64H1 polyclonal antiserum (Ab990). The protein was localized to the P3 membrane fraction, which is known to be enriched in ER but also contains other membranes including Golgi and plasma membranes. p64H1 was not detected in the P1 or P2 fractions corresponding to unbroken cells and nuclear membranes (P1) or mitochondria (P2), and it was absent in mock-transfected cells. Its intracellular localization was confirmed by indirect immunofluorescence. As before, p64H1 could be detected 48 h post-transfection, and it appeared to be localized to the ER, with characteristic staining of the outer nuclear membrane and staining of membrane-bound organelles extending toward, but not including, the plasma membrane. It was absent in dummy-transfected cells. In the triple-stained cells in Fig. 4, where the ER of p64H1-transfected HT-4 cells was visualized using DiO-C5-(3) (25, 26), p64H1 is clearly localized to ER membranes.


Fig. 4. Immunolocalization of recombinant protein. A, nuclear DNA of HT-4 cells stained with Hoechst 33258 dye. B, ER of the same cells stained with fluorescent DiO-C5-(3) (green); the arrow indicates typical perinuclear ER staining. C, rhodamine-conjugated fluorescence (red) corresponding to recombinant p64H1. Note the characteristic perinuclear ER distribution. D, superimposition of panels B and C demonstrating colocalization of recombinant p64H1 and ER membranes (yellow). Scale: bar, 2 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (121K GIF file)]

Single-channel Recording

P3 microsomal membrane vesicles from p64H1-transfected and mock-transfected HEK-293 cells were incorporated into voltage-clamped planar lipid bilayers in the presence of choline chloride to select for Cl- channels (1, 2, 11). The presence of p64H1 in the transfected samples and its absence in controls was confirmed by Western blotting. Anion channels similar to those illustrated in Fig. 5A were obtained from each of seven independent transfections but not from five mock-transfected control preparations. Like p64 (16), the channels were unaffected by indanyloxyacetic acid 94 (up to 50 µM cis and trans), and they were not blocked by 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino)benzoic acid or DIDS (up to 50 µM). The channels showed no obvious voltage-dependence or rectification until perfusion was carried out to give more physiological ionic conditions, viz. 10 mM choline chloride cis (presumed "cytoplasmic," see "Experimental Procedures") and 100 mM choline chloride trans (extracytoplasmic, both solutions buffered to a pH of 7.4 with 10 mM Tris-HCl). Under these conditions, the channels showed mild outward rectification (Fig. 5B). The single-channel reversal potential shifted to less negative values in each of four experiments where cis [choline chloride] was increased to 50 mM, but the channels were only poorly selective for anions versus cations. In fusion conditions (450:50 mM choline chloride), PCl-/Pcholine was 3.1 ± 0.7, mean ± S.D., n = 16 experiments from seven independent transfections (not corrected for ionic activities). In symmetric 50 mM choline chloride experiments, the channels had a slope conductance of 43 ± 12 picosiemens, n = 3).


Fig. 5. Ion channel reconstitution. A, single-channel recording at a holding potential of -60 mV (cis-trans) after incorporation of p64H1-transfected HEK-293 microsomal membrane vesicles into a voltage-clamped planar bilayer in the presence of 450 versus 50 mM choline chloride (cis versus trans). The closed levels are shown (dotted lines), and downward deflections represent net Cl- flux cis to trans low-pass-filtered at 50 Hz. B, current/voltage relationship from seven experiments with 10 versus 100 mM choline chloride (cis versus trans). The bars represent ± S.D. (n = 4-7), and the continuous line is a best fit to the GHK current equation (PCl/PCholine = 1.9). The arrow shows the mean reversal potential (4.6 ± 3.3 mV, mean ± S.D., n = 4) obtained after increasing cis choline chloride from 10 to 50 mM (this reversal potential corresponds to a calculated mean PCl/PCholine of 1.8).
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

The newly isolated rat brain cDNA, p64H1, encodes a homologue of the putative bovine kidney Cl- channel p64. Like p64H1, the cDNA encoding bovine p64 includes an unusually long (~5 kb) 3'-UTR (17). Computer predictions of the novel protein membrane topology and in vitro translation experiments showing the pattern of protease protection in the presence of microsomal membranes indicate that p64H1 has a large (Mr ~25,000) C-terminal cytoplasmic domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a small intraluminal (Mr ~5,000) domain (Fig. 3D). This topology would of course be conserved regardless of an ER, secretory vesicle, or plasma membrane location for p64H1, but Western blotting of the native protein in subcellular fractions from rat brain (18), together with immunoblotting and indirect immunofluorescence studies on transiently transfected HEK-293 and HT-4 cells, indicate that native and recombinant p64H1 are intracellular membrane proteins localized to the ER. The similarities between p64 and p64H1 raise the possibility of a family of homologous genes, possibly with alternative mRNA splicing (see low stringency Northern blots, Fig. 2A). Although p64 was predicted to have up to four transmembrane domains (17), including two within the C-terminal sequence noted to be highly homologous to p64H1, our in vitro translation experiments suggest that this topology is unlikely and p64 may in fact have only one or two transmembrane domains.

With the exception of phospholemman (34), which is also a relatively small protein, no other putative Cl- channel has a similar topology to p64H1. Apart from polypeptide toxins and ion channels encoded by viruses (35, 36), the smallest proteins currently thought to contribute to ion channel pores are phospholemman and minK (37, 38). These have Mr values of ~8,000 and ~14,000, respectively. The apparent Mr of the muscle plasma membrane protein phospholemman increases markedly (by ~7,000) on phosphorylation by PKC and PKA, whereas the apparent Mr of p64H1 increases by ~10,000 on PKC-mediated phosphorylation to ~43,000, even though the consensus PKC site located between the predicted transmembrane domain and the N terminus (Fig. 1A) may be nonfunctional. This corresponds to the Mr of the native rat brain protein (18), suggesting that p64H1 is phosphorylated in vivo. Western blotting suggested that in our experiments, the recombinant protein (Mr ~33 kDa) was not phosphorylated. It may be significant that both PKC and p64H1 are enriched in hippocampus and cerebellum. Phospholemman homo-oligomers formed anion channels following bilayer reconstitution (34), and minK mRNA induced Cl- currents and K+ currents in oocytes via interactions involving the N-terminal and C-terminal domains of the expressed protein (39). minK has recently been shown to contribute to the cardiac inward rectifier Iks, where it associates with the novel K+ channel subunit KvQT1 (40, 41). Interestingly, PKC enhanced minK-associated Cl- currents and diminished K+ currents in oocytes by phosphorylating different sites on the protein (35).

Despite the detailed experimental evidence suggesting that p64 is an ion channel component (15-17), we suggest that it is possible that p64H1 may act as a channel regulator or activate endogenous brain ER anion channels. p64H1 may associate with other proteins (18), consistent with this possibility. The difficulty of assigning specific roles to novel proteins has been well illustrated by ICln. This widely distributed membrane current has been associated with the expression of a soluble cytoplasmic protein, pICln, which appears to couple the activation of plasma membrane Cl- channels and cell swelling in, for example, Xenopus oocytes (42). Mutagenesis studies strongly suggested that pICln actually contributes to an ion channel pore (43), although the precise molecular mechanism by which this occurs remains to be elucidated. Meanwhile, it has been shown that expression of either pICln or the unrelated protein ClC-6 can enhance an endogenous Xenopus oocyte current indistinguishable from ICln (44). This suggests that in reality ICln is an unidentified channel that can be activated by a variety of different proteins. Many proteins, including membrane proteins, are known to act as channel regulators. For example, the integral membrane protein TipE has been shown to enhance the expression of a Drosophila Na+ channel (33). It is clear that detailed information concerning the biophysical and pharmacological properties of identified intracellular Cl- channels would be valuable, but there are very few single-channel data for ER anion channels including p64 (16). Most recordings are from non-neural tissues (3, 5, 7), and many of these channels may be protein translocation pores rather than conventional ion channels. Anion channels reconstituted from rat brain microsomes (2, 45) and cardiac mitoplast membranes (11) are poorly selective for anions versus cations, like p64H1-related channels, but they appear to display different conductances and have different single-channel gating and substate behavior.

In conclusion, we have described p64H1 as the first brain ER anion channel component to be identified at the molecular level. We have also demonstrated the existence of a new gene family containing p64, p64H1, and possibly other members (as suggested by Northern blotting). p64H1 may contribute directly to an ion channel, as suggested for p64 (16, 17), or its role may be more indirect. For example, it could belong to a new class of membrane proteins coupling ion channels, transporters, and membrane receptors in a cascade of interacting proteins (46). The availability of p64H1 cDNA will enable this and other models to be tested to elucidate the precise role of the protein in neurones and other cells.


FOOTNOTES

*   This research was supported by the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Hugh Robson Bldg., University of Edinburgh, George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, UK. Tel.: 44-131-650-3873; Fax: 44-131-650-3711; E-mail: Richard.Ashley{at}ed.ac.uk.
1   The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR; SSPE, saline/sodium phosphate/EDTA; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; SSC, saline/sodium citrate buffer; UTR, untranslated region; HEK, human embryonic kidney; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; PKC, protein kinase C; PKA, protein kinase A; DiO-C5-(3), 3',3'-dipentyloxacarbocyanine iodide; DIDS, 4,4'-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase(s); TTBS, Tween 20/Tris-buffered saline.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank David Sheppard for helpful discussions, Richard Ribchester for help with image capture and printing, and Ronald McKay for the HT-4 cells.


REFERENCES

  1. Smith, J. S., Coronado, R., and Meissner, G. (1985) Nature 316, 446-449 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Ashley, R. H. (1989) J. Membr. Biol. 111, 179-189 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Schmid, A., Gogelein, H., Kemmer, T. P., and Schulz, I. (1988) J. Membr. Biol. 104, 275-282 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Schmid, A., Dehlinger-Kremer, M., Schulz, I., and Gogelein, H. (1990) Nature 346, 374-376 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Simon, S. M., and Blobel, G. (1991) Cell 65, 371-380 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Martin, C., and Ashley, R. H. (1993) Cell Calcium 14, 427-438 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Morier, N., and Sauve, R. (1994) Biophys. J. 67, 590-602 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Sukhareva, M., Morrissette, J., and Coronado, R. (1994) Biophys. J. 67, 751-765 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Schein, S. J., Colombini, M., and Finkelstein, A. (1976) J. Membr. Biol. 30, 99-120 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Sorgato, M. C., Keller, B. U., and Stuhmer, W. (1987) Nature 330, 498-500 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hayman, K. A., Spurway, T. S., and Ashley, R. H. (1993) J. Membr. Biol. 136, 181-190 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Arispe, N., Pollard, H., and Rojas, E. (1992) J. Membr. Biol. 130, 191-202 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Ashley, R. H., Brown, D. M., Apps, D. K., and Phillips, J. H. (1994) Eur. Biophys. J. 23, 263-275 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Rahamimoff, R., DeRiemer, S. A., Sakmann, B., Stadler, H., and Yakir, N. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 5310-5314 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Landry, D. W., Reitman, M., Cragoe, E. R., and Al-Awqati, Q. (1987) J. Gen. Physiol. 90, 779-798 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Landry, D. W., Akabas, M. H., Redhead, C., Edelman, A., Cragoe, E. J., and Al-Awqati, Q. (1989) Science 244, 1469-1472 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Landry, D., Sullivan, S., Nicolaides, M., Redhead, C., Edelman, A., Field, M., Al-Awqati, Q., and Edwards, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14948-14955 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Howell, S., Duncan, R. R., and Ashley, R. H. (1996) FEBS Lett. 390, 207-210 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Chomszinski, P., and Sattchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Muruyama, I. N., Rakow, T. L., and Muruyama, H. I. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 3796-3797 [Free Full Text]
  21. Young, W. S., Mezey, E., and Siegel, R. E. (1986) Neurosci. Lett. 70, 198-203 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Gilmore, R., and Blobel, G. (1985) Cell 42, 497-505 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Schagger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 166, 368-379 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Frederiksen, K., Jat, P. S., Valtz, N., Levy, D., and McKay, R. (1988) Neuron 1, 439-448 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Terasaki, M., Song, J., Wong, J. R., Weiss, M. J., and Chen, L. B. (1984) Cell 38, 101-108 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Terasaki, M., and Reese, T. S. (1992) J. Cell Sci. 101, 315-322 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Miller, C. (ed) (1984) Ion Channel Reconstitution, Plenum Publishing Corp., New York
  28. Hodgkin, A. L., and Katz, B. (1949) J. Physiol. 108, 27-77
  29. Kozak, M. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 857-872 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kozak, M. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 8125-8148 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Rost, B., Fariselli, P., and Casadio, R. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 1704-1718 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Fujiki, Y., Hubbard, A. L., Fowler, S., and Lazarow, P. B. (1982) J. Cell. Biol. 93, 97-102 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Feng, G., Deak, P., Chopra, M., and Hall, L. M. (1995) Cell 82, 1001-1011 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Moorman, J. R., Ackerman, S. J., Kowdley, G. C., Griffin, M. P., Mounsey, J. P., Chen, Z. H., Cala, S. E., Obrian, J. J., Szabo, G., and Jones, L. R. (1995) Nature 377, 737-740 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Duff, K. C., and Ashley, R. H. (1992) Virology 190, 485-489 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Pinto, L. H., Holsinger, C. J., and Lamb, R. A. (1992) Cell 69, 517-528 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Palmer, C. J., Scott, B. T., and Jones, L. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 11126-11130 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Takumi, T., Ohkubo, H., and Nakanishi, S. (1988) Science 242, 1042-1045 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Attali, B., Guillemare, E., Lesage, F., Honore, E., Romey, G., Lazdunski, M., and Barhanin, J. (1993) Nature 365, 850-852 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Barhanin, J., Lesage, F., Guillemare, E., Fink, M., Lazdunski, M., and Romey, G. (1996) Nature 384, 78-80 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Sanguinetti, M. C., Curran, M. E., Zou, A., Shen, J., Spector, P. S., Atkinson, D. L., and Keating, M. T. (1996) Nature 384, 80-83 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Krapivinsky, G. B., Ackerman, M. J., Gordon, E. A., Krapivinsky, L. D., and Clapham, D. E. (1994) Cell 76, 439-448 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Paulmichl, M., Li, Y., Wickman, K., Ackerman, M., Peralta, E., and Clapham, D. (1992) Nature 356, 238-241 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Buyse, G., Voets, T., Tytgat, J., De Greef, C., Droogmans, G., Nilius, B., and Eggermont, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3615-3621 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Clark, A. G., Murray, D., and Ashley, R. H. (1997) Biophys. J. 73, 168-178 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Al-Awqati, Q. (1995) Science 269, 805-806 [Free Full Text]
  47. Valenzuela, S. M., Martin, D. K., Por, S. B., Robbins, J. M., Warton, K., Bootcov, M. R., Schofield, P. R., Campbell, T. J., and Breit, S. N. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12575-12582 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. S. Suh, J. M. Crutchley, A. Koochek, A. Ryscavage, K. Bhat, T. Tanaka, A. Oshima, P. Fitzgerald, and S. H. Yuspa
Reciprocal Modifications of CLIC4 in Tumor Epithelium and Stroma Mark Malignant Progression of Multiple Human Cancers
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 13(1): 121 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. C. Edwards, C. Cohen, W. Xu, and P. H. Schlesinger
c-Src Control of Chloride Channel Support for Osteoclast HCl Transport and Bone Resorption
J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 28011 - 28022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Bohman, T. Matsumoto, K. Suh, A. Dimberg, L. Jakobsson, S. Yuspa, and L. Claesson-Welsh
Proteomic Analysis of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-induced Endothelial Cell Differentiation Reveals a Role for Chloride Intracellular Channel 4 (CLIC4) in Tubular Morphogenesis
J. Biol. Chem., December 23, 2005; 280(51): 42397 - 42404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. S. Suh, M. Mutoh, M. Gerdes, J. M. Crutchley, T. Mutoh, L. E. Edwards, R. A. Dumont, P. Sodha, C. Cheng, A. Glick,, et al.
Antisense Suppression of the Chloride Intracellular Channel Family Induces Apoptosis, Enhances Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha}-Induced Apoptosis, and Inhibits Tumor Growth
Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 65(2): 562 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Berryman, J. Bruno, J. Price, and J. C. Edwards
CLIC-5A Functions as a Chloride Channel in Vitro and Associates with the Cortical Actin Cytoskeleton in Vitro and in Vivo
J. Biol. Chem., August 13, 2004; 279(33): 34794 - 34801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. S. Suh, M. Mutoh, K. Nagashima, E. Fernandez-Salas, L. E. Edwards, D. D. Hayes, J. M. Crutchley, K. G. Marin, R. A. Dumont, J. M. Levy, et al.
The Organellular Chloride Channel Protein CLIC4/mtCLIC Translocates to the Nucleus in Response to Cellular Stress and Accelerates Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2004; 279(6): 4632 - 4641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. L. Berry, H. E. Bulow, D. H. Hall, and O. Hobert
A C. elegans CLIC-like Protein Required for Intracellular Tube Formation and Maintenance
Science, December 19, 2003; 302(5653): 2134 - 2137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
F. Thevenod
Ion channels in secretory granules of the pancreas and their role in exocytosis and release of secretory proteins
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): C651 - C672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. P. Dixon, B. G. Davis, and R. Edwards
Functional Divergence in the Glutathione Transferase Superfamily in Plants. IDENTIFICATION OF TWO CLASSES WITH PUTATIVE FUNCTIONS IN REDOX HOMEOSTASIS IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA
J. Biol. Chem., August 16, 2002; 277(34): 30859 - 30869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
L. Ronnov-Jessen, R. Villadsen, J. C. Edwards, and O. W. Petersen
Differential Expression of a Chloride Intracellular Channel Gene, CLIC4, in Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1-Mediated Conversion of Fibroblasts to Myofibroblasts
Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2002; 161(2): 471 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Warton, R. Tonini, W. D. Fairlie, J. M. Matthews, S. M. Valenzuela, M. R. Qiu, W. M. Wu, S. Pankhurst, A. R. Bauskin, S. J. Harrop, et al.
Recombinant CLIC1 (NCC27) Assembles in Lipid Bilayers via a pH-dependent Two-state Process to Form Chloride Ion Channels with Identical Characteristics to Those Observed in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells Expressing CLIC1
J. Biol. Chem., July 12, 2002; 277(29): 26003 - 26011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
E. Fernandez-Salas, K. S. Suh, V. V. Speransky, W. L. Bowers, J. M. Levy, T. Adams, K. R. Pathak, L. E. Edwards, D. D. Hayes, C. Cheng, et al.
mtCLIC/CLIC4, an Organellular Chloride Channel Protein, Is Increased by DNA Damage and Participates in the Apoptotic Response to p53
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2002; 22(11): 3610 - 3620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
T. J. Jentsch, V. Stein, F. Weinreich, and A. A. Zdebik
Molecular Structure and Physiological Function of Chloride Channels
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2002; 82(2): 503 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. M Valenzuela, M. Mazzanti, R. Tonini, M. R. Qiu, K. Warton, E. A Musgrove, T. J Campbell, and S. N Breit
The nuclear chloride ion channel NCC27 is involved in regulation of the cell cycle
J. Physiol., December 15, 2000; 529(3): 541 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. Berryman and A. Bretscher
Identification of a Novel Member of the Chloride Intracellular Channel Gene Family (CLIC5) That Associates with the Actin Cytoskeleton of Placental Microvilli
Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2000; 11(5): 1509 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Nishizawa, T. Nagao, T. Iwatsubo, J. G. Forte, and T. Urushidani
Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Novel Chloride Intracellular Channel-related Protein, Parchorin, Expressed in Water-secreting Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 6, 2000; 275(15): 11164 - 11173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Fernandez-Salas, M. Sagar, C. Cheng, S. H. Yuspa, and W. C. Weinberg
p53 and Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha Regulate the Expression of a Mitochondrial Chloride Channel Protein
J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 1999; 274(51): 36488 - 36497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J.-Z. Chuang, T. A. Milner, M. Zhu, and C.-H. Sung
A 29 kDa Intracellular Chloride Channel p64H1 Is Associated with Large Dense-Core Vesicles in Rat Hippocampal Neurons
J. Neurosci., April 15, 1999; 19(8): 2919 - 2928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
J. C. Edwards
A novel p64-related Cl- channel: subcellular distribution and nephron segment-specific expression
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 1999; 276(3): F398 - F408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Qian, D. Okuhara, M. K. Abe, and M. R. Rosner
Molecular Cloning and Characterization of a Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase-associated Intracellular Chloride Channel
J. Biol. Chem., January 15, 1999; 274(3): 1621 - 1627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. M. Tulk, P. H. Schlesinger, S. A. Kapadia, and J. C. Edwards
CLIC-1 Functions as a Chloride Channel When Expressed and Purified from Bacteria
J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2000; 275(35): 26986 - 26993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. C. Edwards and S. Kapadia
Regulation of the Bovine Kidney Microsomal Chloride Channel p64 by p59fyn, a Src Family Tyrosine Kinase
J. Biol. Chem., October 6, 2000; 275(41): 31826 - 31832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. J. Harrop, M. Z. DeMaere, W. D. Fairlie, T. Reztsova, S. M. Valenzuela, M. Mazzanti, R. Tonini, M. R. Qiu, L. Jankova, K. Warton, et al.
Crystal Structure of a Soluble Form of the Intracellular Chloride Ion Channel CLIC1 (NCC27) at 1.4-A Resolution
J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2001; 276(48): 44993 - 45000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
B. M. Tulk, S. Kapadia, and J. C. Edwards
CLIC1 inserts from the aqueous phase into phospholipid membranes, where it functions as an anion channel
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2002; 282(5): C1103 - C1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ashley, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ashley, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement