JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rao, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lakshman, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rao, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lakshman, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 39, Issue of September 26, 1997 pp. 24455-24460
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Purification and Partial Characterization of a Cellular Carotenoid-binding Protein from Ferret Liver*

(Received for publication, January 24, 1997, and in revised form, May 28, 1997)

Manjunath N. Rao , Pradeep Ghosh and M. R. Lakshman Dagger

From the Department of Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, D. C. 20037 and the Lipid Research Laboratory, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, D. C. 20422

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

A cellular carotenoid-binding protein was purified to homogeneity from beta -carotene-fed ferret liver utilizing the following steps: ammonium sulfate precipitation, ion exchange, gel filtration, and affinity chromatography. The final purification was 607-fold. [14C]beta -Carotene co-purified with the binding protein throughout the purification procedures. SDS-PAGE of the purified protein showed a single band with an apparent molecular mass of 67 kDa. Scatchard analysis of the specific binding of the purified protein to beta -carotene showed two classes of binding sites, a high affinity site with an apparent Kd of 56 × 10-9 M and a low affinity site with a Kd of 32 × 10-6 M. The Bmax for beta -carotene binding to the high affinity site was 1 mol/mol, while that for the low affinity site was 145 mol/mol. The absorption spectrum of the complex showed a 32-nm bathochromic shift in lambda max with minor peaks at 460 and 516 nm. Except for alpha -carotene and cryptoxanthin, none of the model carotenoids or retinol competed with beta -carotene binding to the protein. Thus, a specific carotenoid-binding protein of 67 kDa has been characterized in mammalian liver with a high degree of specificity for binding only carotenoids with at least one unsubstituted beta -ionone ring.


INTRODUCTION

The protective effects of beta -carotene and, possibly, other carotenoids against certain chronic diseases such as cancer (1), coronary heart disease (2), and erythropoietic protoporphyria (3) are well documented, although a controversy has been raised recently (4). In addition, carotenoids serve as biological precursors of vitamin A (5-7). However, the mechanism of tissue uptake, storage, and transport of intact beta -carotene in a mammalian system is not fully understood. The transportation of absorbed beta -carotene by low density lipoproteins in the plasma compartment has been reported (8, 9).

We have previously reported the isolation of a partially purified carotenoid-protein complex from rat liver (10). Therefore, the existence of a specific cellular carotenoid-binding protein (CCBP)1 in mammalian system is a distinct possibility in analogy with the well characterized cellular retinoid-binding proteins (11, 12). The inability in characterizing such a protein complex from mammalian tissues so far may be due to difficulties in formulating a proper aqueous medium for the extraction of such a carotenoid-protein complex.

In this paper we present, for the first time, the purification to homogeneity and partial characterization of a CCBP from the livers of beta -carotene-fed male ferrets. The domestic ferret (Mustela putoris furo) was chosen for this study because it has many anatomical and physiological features that are similar to humans (13). Furthermore, just like humans, ferrets are also known to absorb intact beta -carotene from their diet and have the capacity to store absorbed beta -carotene in tissues (14-16). Therefore, characterization of a CCBP in the ferret would have relevance to humans.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Animals and Diet

Male ferrets (M. putoris furo) (body weight ~600 g) were procured from Marshall Farms, North Rose, NY. After 1 week of quarantine, they were maintained on a high protein ferret diet (Purina, St. Louis, MO) for 1 week. This diet had 40% protein, 13% fat, and 22% carbohydrate. This diet was fortified with 2 g of beta -carotene in the form of beadlets (Hoffman-La Roche, Nutley, NJ; beta -carotene, 10% w/w, product code 65661) and 10 g of taurocholate/kg, and the animals were fed ad libitum for a period of 4 weeks. The animals were euthanized by aortic exsanguination under pentobarbital anesthesia (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), and the livers were saved for CCBP isolation.

Chemicals

All chemicals, solvents, and reagents were of analytical or ultrapure grade.

Carotenoid Protein Complex Isolation

The procedure was performed essentially according to that described by us previously for rat liver (10). Briefly, each liver was homogenized using a Polytron homogenizer (Brinkman Instruments, Westbury, NY.) with 10 volumes of the homogenizing buffer (50 mM MES, 1 mM EDTA, 20% glycerol, 0.2% n-octyl-beta -D-glucopyranoside, 5 mM CHAPS, 0.5% Triton X-100, 50 µg/ml butylated hydroxytoluene, and 1 µg/ml each of the following protease inhibitors: phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, aprotinin, and leupeptin. Unless otherwise specified, all procedures were carried out under F40 Gold fluorescent light at 4 °C. Following ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g, the supernatant fraction was subjected to 0-50% ammonium sulfate (AS) fractionation. The AS fraction was redissolved in elution buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH 7.2, containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and 1 µg/ml each of the following: phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, aprotinin, and leupeptin). After dialysis against the elution buffer, this fraction was incubated with [14C]beta -carotene (2 × 106 dpm) for 1 h at 25 °C.

DEAE-Sephacel Column Chromatography

The dialyzed [14C]beta -carotene-labeled AS fraction from the previous step was further fractionated on a DEAE-Sephacel column (1.5 cm × 25-cm bed; Sigma), equilibrated with elution buffer. The column was initially washed with two bed-volumes of the elution buffer containing 10 mM NaCl, and then with two bed-volumes of the same buffer containing 100 mM NaCl. Finally, the carotenoid-protein complex was eluted from the column as a yellow band with the elution buffer containing 350 mM NaCl at a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min. The eluted fractions were monitored for their absorption at 280 and 465 nm in a Shimadzu UV-visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-160). Fractions 9-19 corresponding to the peak of 14C radioactivity were pooled, concentrated by the use of a Speed-Vac Concentrator (Forma Scientific, Inc., Marrieta, OH), and stored at 4 °C for further studies.

Sephadex G-75 Column Chromatography

The concentrated fraction containing CCBP from the previous step was subjected to gel filtration chromatography on a Sephadex G-75 column (1 cm × 25 cm) equilibrated with the elution buffer. The eluted fractions were monitored for their absorption at 280 and 465 nm. Fractions 20-25 corresponding to the major peak of 14C radioactivity were collected, concentrated by the use of a Speed-Vac concentrator, and stored at 4 °C for further studies.

Release of the Apoprotein Component from the Complex

The yellow concentrated CCBP fraction obtained from the Sephadex-G75 column chromatography step was treated with an equal volume of cold acetone (-20 °C), shaken gently, and left aside at -20 °C for 20-30 min, followed by centrifuging at 1300 × g for 20 min. The organic supernatant fraction was removed, while the apoprotein pellet was dissolved in the original volume of TAB buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer, pH 7.2). The apoprotein was reprecipitated with an equal volume of cold acetone as before, and the pellet again was redissolved in the original volume of TAB buffer. Its protein content was estimated (17).

Affinity Chromatography

Since CCBP showed high affinity for beta -carotene, we decided to explore whether it was possible to make an affinity column with immobilized beta -carotene as the affinity ligand. However, beta -carotene is a long chain hydrocarbon with no functional groups, which makes its immobilization difficult, if not impossible. Therefore, we took a novel approach of using the Pharmalink immobilization kit (Pierce), which is based on the principles of the Mannich reaction to immobilize the ligand. The Mannich reaction consists of the condensation of formaldehyde or any other aldehyde with ammonia, primary or secondary amines, and a ligand molecule having possibly an active hydrogen. The Pharmalink gel included in the kit is immobilized diaminodipropylamine, which can be used as a source of the primary amine. The 5,6-ethylenic bond on the beta -ionone ring, especially with the activator methyl group at C-5 position, can sufficiently activate the hydrogen atom at C-4 or C-4' to participate in this reaction, as shown in Fig. 1. However, the ligand binding to the matrix can also occur at other positions since beta -carotene has a number of conjugated double bonds with adjacent methyl groups to activate a hydrogen atom for participation in this reaction.


Fig. 1. Chemistry of beta -carotene affinity gel. beta -Carotene in the presence of formaldehyde reacts with the immobilized diaminodipropylamine through an active hydrogen at C-4 of the beta -ionone ring, thus getting immobilized onto the agarose matrix. See "Experimental Procedures" for further explanation.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]

Preparation of Pharmalink-immobilized beta -Carotene

All operations were carried out in the dark or, where necessary, under F40 gold fluorescent light to minimize the oxidation of beta -carotene. The procedure described below was essentially according to manufacturer's specifications using their kit, which contained all the coupling reagents. Briefly, the storage solution in the Pharmalink column (2-ml prepacked column) was drained completely, and the gel was equilibrated with the coupling buffer (2 ml of buffer plus 2 ml of dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO)). The coupling buffer was also drained as before. Purified beta -carotene (10 mg) dissolved in 2 ml of Me2SO containing butylated hydroxytoluene (50 µg/ml) was then mixed with the Pharmalink gel, followed by the addition of Pharmalink coupling reagent in the reaction bottle initially at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by incubation at 4 °C for 24 h with gentle mixing end over end. The column matrix was washed thoroughly with 30 ml of the TAB buffer containing 50% ethanol until no more unbound beta -carotene was eluted from the column (evidenced by absorption spectrum). It was found that 90% of the added beta -carotene was bound to the matrix. The ligand binding to the affinity matrix increased to 100% when only 0.2 mg of beta -carotene was used for binding. The washed column with immobilized beta -carotene was ready for affinity chromatography after equilibration with five volumes of TAB buffer. Fig. 1 shows the proposed structure of immobilized beta -carotene using the Pharmalink gel, although other sites of attachment of the chromophore may be possible as indicated previously.

Affinity Chromatographic Purification of CCBP

CCBP apoprotein fraction, isolated by cold acetone treatment of the complex fraction from Sephadex-G75 column chromatography step (~3 mg of protein), was subjected to affinity chromatography on the Pharmalink-immobilized beta -carotene column prepared above. After applying the protein, the column was initially washed with 20 ml of the TAB buffer to remove the unbound protein (evidenced by the decrease in absorbance at 280 nm). The bound protein was then eluted from the affinity column with 20 ml of the TAB buffer containing 250 mM NaCl and collected as 1-ml fractions. Aliquots of fractions showing protein peaks were tested for their homogeneity by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on a 10% polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad). Fractions showing a single homogeneous band were pooled, concentrated in a Speed-Vac concentrator, dialyzed against TAB buffer, and stored at 4 °C. This purified protein was tested for its binding affinity to various carotenoid ligands as described below.

Binding Assay

The standard binding assay (unless specified otherwise) was as follows; 30 µg of purified CCBP or a nonspecific protein like bovine serum albumin (BSA) or the 43-kDa protein from ferret liver in 950 µl of TAB buffer was incubated with 8 nmol of beta -carotene in 50 µl of acetone at 37 °C for 60 min. This was followed by thorough extraction of each reaction mixture with 8 ml of light petroleum five times to remove the unbound carotenoid. The absorption spectrum of each resulting aqueous reaction mixture was determined. In addition to beta -carotene, the binding of the following ligands to CCBP was tested under standard binding conditions: alpha -carotene, cryptoxanthin, zeaxanthin, lycopene, astaxanthin, and retinol.

Competitive Binding Assay of CCBP with Alternate Ligands

The competitive binding assay was similar to the standard binding assay described above except for the following details. (i) [14C]beta -Carotene (specific activity 168,000 dpm/nmol) was used instead of unlabeled beta -carotene. (ii) The incubation with labeled beta -carotene was carried out both in the absence and presence of 20-fold excess of the following unlabeled ligands: beta -carotene, alpha -carotene, cryptoxanthin, astaxanthin, lycopene, and retinol. At the end of the incubation period, 100 µl of the reaction mixture was loaded on a Sephadex G-25 column matrix (Biospin disposable column with an Eppendorf collection tube: 0.65 × 3 cm, packed dimensions, Bio-Rad) pre-equilibrated with TAB buffer. The column was centrifuged at 1100 × g for 5 min, and the 14C radioactivity in the eluted fraction was determined using a Beckman LS-6500 liquid scintillation spectrometer, which showed a 14C counting efficiency of 95%. This procedure resulted in the quantitative recovery of CCBP-bound [14C]beta -carotene in the Eppendorf collection tube, whereas the unbound [14C]beta -carotene was completely trapped on the column. Control experiments with (i) labeled beta -carotene only and (ii) labeled beta -carotene incubated with a nonspecific protein, BSA, showed negligible recovery of the label in the eluate.

Binding Assay for Scatchard Analysis

The method was identical to the competitive binding assay described above, except that the CCBP (62 nM) was incubated with increasing concentrations of [14C]beta -carotene (62.5-3200 nM) both in the presence and absence of 20-fold excess of unlabeled beta -carotene and the amount of [14C]beta -carotene bound was determined after the spin column procedure. The specific binding (total minus nonspecific) was subjected to Scatchard analysis using the LIGAND computer program.

Gel Electrophoresis

All fractions were tested by 10% SDS-PAGE or 6% native PAGE essentially as described by Laemmli and Favre (18), and stained with Silver Stain Plus (Bio-Rad) or Coomassie Blue stain.

Labeling of Apo-CCBP with 125I

Purified apo-CCBP (50 µg) was labeled with 125I using Bolton and Hunter's reagent essentially as described (19). After extensive dialysis the specific activity of the 125I-apo-CCBP was 2 × 105 cpm/µg, of which 95% was trichloroacetic acid-precipitable (15% w/v).


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A 67-kDa protein has been purified to homogeneity from ferret liver, which showed a high degree of specificity to beta -carotene. The purification steps involved ion exchange, gel filtration, and affinity chromatography, which are described below.

DEAE-Sephacel Chromatography

The elution profile of labeled beta -carotene complex during ion exchange chromatography of the crude AS fraction of the 100,000 × g fraction of ferret liver homogenate in a detergent-containing buffer is shown in Fig. 2. The yellow fraction that was eluted with the elution buffer containing 0.35 M NaCl showed the characteristic beta -carotene absorption spectrum (data not shown). It was also found that 78% of the 14C radioactivity applied to the column was associated with this protein complex. SDS-PAGE on 10% gel of this fraction is shown in Fig. 3. It revealed the existence of four major bands and several minor bands when stained with Coomassie Blue. The peak fraction from DEAE-Sephacel column had an absorbance of 0.156 at 280 nm and 0.284 at 465 nm (A465/A280 ratio 1.82).


Fig. 2. [14C]beta -Carotene-bound CCBP elution profile from the DEAE-Sephacel column. The ammonium sulfate precipitate of the crude liver homogenate was incubated with [14C]beta -carotene and was chromatographed on a DEAE-Sephacel column pre-equilibrated with the elution buffer as described under "Experimental Procedures." Later the column was washed with elution buffer containing 350 mM NaCl, and each fraction was analyzed for the radioactive counts and absorption at 280 and 465 nm. The profile of the radioactivity eluted from the column is shown here.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]


Fig. 3. SDS-PAGE of the protein pool eluted from the DEAE-Sephacel column. An aliquot of the DEAE-Sephacel column purified complex was delipidated and subjected to SDS-PAGE on a 10% gel according to the procedures described under "Experimental Procedures." Following the run, the gel was stained using Coomassie Blue to visualize the protein bands.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]

Gel Filtration on Sephadex G-75 Column

The peak labeled beta -carotene complex fraction isolated from the DEAE-Sephacel chromatography step was subjected to Sephadex-G75 gel filtration chromatography. Several early fractions were eluted exhibiting minor radioactive peaks, but none of them had beta -carotene spectrum (data not shown). However, fractions 20-25 showed a major radioactive peak along with a characteristic beta -carotene spectrum. Fractions 20-25 accounted for 74% of the 14C radioactivity applied to the column. The peak fractions 21 and 22 had 14C/protein ratios of 6 × 105 and 6.1 × 105 dpm/280 nm absorbance unit, respectively. The peak fraction had an absorbance of 0.24 at 280 nm and 0.46 at 465 nm (A465/A280 ratio 1.92). SDS-PAGE of this fraction showed a major band of 67 kDa and several minor bands of <= 50 kDa (data not shown). It was clear that the beta -carotene-binding protein was still not homogeneous. A 43-kDa protein band was extracted with TAB buffer and saved for binding assay as a nonspecific ferret liver protein. To purify further, the apoprotein fraction was isolated from the pooled fractions 20-25 by removing the chromophore with cold acetone as described under "Experimental Procedures."

Elution Profile of Labeled beta -Carotene Alone on DEAE-Sephadex and Sephadex G-75 Chromatography Columns

To rule out that it was not labeled beta -carotene alone that was being eluted during the chromatography steps described above, the elution profile of radioactive beta -carotene from both DEAE-Sephacel and Sephadex G-75 columns without any protein extracts was tested as follows. [14C]beta -Carotene (1 µCi and 100 nmol) was prepared as a liposome with phosphatidylcholine (1000 nmol) according to cholate dialysis method (20) and chromatographed on each of the above columns. In contrast to the elution profile of the CCBP, all of the labeled beta -carotene was eluted from these columns in the void volume of elution buffer (data not shown).

Affinity Chromatography

The apoprotein fraction, isolated from the complex after Sephadex-G75 chromatography, when subjected to affinity chromatography on the Pharmalink-immobilized beta -carotene column, yielded a fraction that was eluted with TAB buffer (no detergent) containing 250 mM NaCl. SDS-PAGE of an aliquot of this fraction on 10% gel showed a single homogeneous band with a molecular mass of 67 kDa (Fig. 4). Significantly, no detergent-containing buffer was used to elute the apoprotein from the affinity column. Thus the apoprotein is totally water-soluble. This affinity-purified protein fraction was used for all subsequent analyses. The elution profile of BSA, a nonspecific protein, was tested to demonstrate the specificity of this affinity column. It was found that BSA was completely eluted in the void volume when chromatographed on the affinity column under identical conditions. This experiment proves beyond doubt the specificity of the affinity column to a specific carotenoid-binding protein.


Fig. 4. SDS-PAGE of CCBP purified from ferret liver. 20 µg of CCBP taken after affinity column purification, in 20 µl of TAB buffer, was loaded on to a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and electrophoresed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Later, the gel was stained using the Silver Stain Plus kit from Bio-Rad to visualize the protein band. CCBP protein moved parallel to the 67-kDa marker.
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]

Summary of Purification

Table I shows the summary of purification of CCBP. It must be pointed out that because the crude liver homogenate failed to show any high affinity binding with labeled beta -carotene the true -fold purification of the homogeneous CCBP should be much higher than that reported. Thus, taking the crude AS fraction to have a relative binding of 1 arbitrary unit, CCBP was purified 15-fold at DEAE-Sephacel chromatography step, 30-fold at Sephadex G75 chromatography step, and, finally, 607-fold after the affinity chromatography step. The final yield of the purified protein was approximately 500 µg from 5 g of liver.

Table I. Summary of purification of CCBP

Binding assay was carried out with the indicated amounts of each fraction using 8 nmol of [14C]beta -carotene (168,000 dpm/nmol) in the absence (total binding) and presence of 20-fold excess nonradioactive beta -carotene (nonspecific binding) under standard conditions, and the amount specifically bound (total minus nonspecific binding) is expressed in picomoles of beta -carotene. The -fold purification was calculated based on the specific binding of each fraction. Each value is the average of three independent determinations.

Fraction Protein  beta -Carotene bound Specific binding Purification

µg pmol pmol/µg protein -fold
AS-Fraction 3500 77.8 0.022 1
DEAE-Sephacel 500 166.8 0.33 15
Sephadex-G75 245 162.3 0.66 30
Affinity 50 667 13.35 607

Ligand Binding

The purified protein showed a high affinity binding with beta -carotene with its characteristic absorption spectrum (Fig. 5) consisting of a shoulder peak at 460 nm and two prominent peaks at 482 and 516 nm, apart from a protein peak at 280 nm. There was a 32-nm bathochromic shift of its lambda max compared with that of beta -carotene in light petroleum. The bound chromophore could be extracted from the CCBP complex with light petroleum only after it was treated with an equal volume of acetone. In contrast, the nonspecific proteins BSA and ferret liver 43-kDa protein showed low affinity binding to beta -carotene as evidenced by the lack of the characteristic beta -carotene absorption spectrum in the standard binding assay. This was because the weakly bound beta -carotene was completely extracted with light petroleum even without denaturation with acetone.


Fig. 5. Absorption spectrum of the beta -carotene bound to CCBP. Purified CCBP was incubated with 8 nmol of beta -carotene under standard conditions and subjected to gel filtration on Sephadex-G25 spin column as described under "Experimental Procedures." The absorption spectrum of the beta -carotene-bound complex was monitored in a Shimadzu UV-visible spectrophotometer between 250 and 800 nm. Note the protein absorption peak at 280 nm and a shift in the lambda max of the complex to 482 nm with the appearance of a third peak at 516 nm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]

Scatchard Analysis of Specific Binding Data

Fig. 6 shows the Scatchard plot of the specific binding of beta -carotene to CCBP as a function of increasing concentration of beta -carotene. The nonspecific binding ranged from 7 to 13% of the total binding at the ligand concentrations tested. The analysis of the specific binding data by LIGAND program showed two classes of binding sites, with an apparent Kd of 56 × 10-9 M for the high affinity site and an apparent Kd of 32 × 10-6 M for the low affinity site. The Bmax for beta -carotene binding to the high affinity site was 1.16 mol/mol. It can be seen in Table I that when the binding assay was carried out on a large scale, 13.35 pmol of beta -carotene were specifically bound/µg of purified CCBP. This amounts to 0.89 mol of beta -carotene bound/mol of CCBP, a value comparable to that obtained from the Scatchard analysis. Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that CCBP binds beta -carotene mole per mole at the high affinity site. In contrast, the calculated Bmax of 145 mol/mol by LIGAND program for the low affinity site may not have physiological relevance because of its very high Kd of 32 µM.


Fig. 6. Scatchard analysis of specific binding of beta -carotene CCBP. Duplicate samples of CCBP (62 nM) were incubated with the indicated increasing concentration of [14C]beta -carotene (62.5-3200 nM) in TAB buffer at 37 °C for 90 min, both in the presence and absence of 20-fold excess of unlabeled beta -carotene. At the end of 90 min, each reaction mixture was subjected to spun column purification of holo-CCBP using Sephadex G-25 equilibrated in TAB buffer. The filtrate containing the bound [14C]beta -carotene was analyzed for radioactivity in a Beckman LS-6500 Scintillation Spectrometer. The analysis of the specific binding data by LIGAND program showed two classes of binding sites, with an apparent Kd of 56 × 10-9 M for the high affinity site and an apparent Kd of 32 × 10-6 M for the low affinity site. The nonspecific binding ranged from 7 to 13% of the total binding at the ligand concentrations tested.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]

Native PAGE of the Purified CCBP Complex

The purified 125I-apo-CCBP was complexed with beta -carotene under standard conditions, and both the holo- and apo-CCBP were subjected to native PAGE on a 6% polyacrylamide gel followed by autoradiography. Fig. 7 shows that both holo-CCBP (lane 1) and apo-CCBP (lane 2) moved as homogeneous bands, although apo-CCBP moved faster than the holo-CCBP. Since the mobility of proteins in native PAGE is by their net charge, native PAGE is not a reliable method to assess the molecular size of any protein (21). Significantly, 125I-apo-CCBP moved as a single sharp band with a molecular size of 67 kDa on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel (data not shown) and thus confirmed our finding of the mobility of unlabeled apo-CCBP (Fig. 4).


Fig. 7. Autoradiogram of native PAGE profile of purified apo-CCBP and holo-CCBP. Purified 125I-apo-CCBP (10 µg; specific activity 2 × 105 cpm/µg) in 100 µl of TAB buffer was incubated with 2.7 nmol of beta -carotene for 1 h at 37 °C and subjected to gel filtration on Sephadex-G25 spin column. 125I-Holo-CCBP was isolated in the eluate. Both holo- and apo-CCBP were mixed with glycerol/bromocresol purple loading dye and electrophoresed on a 6% native polyacrylamide gel as described under "Experimental Procedures." Later, the gel was dried and exposed to autoradiographic film for 3 h. A single slow moving radioactive band can be clearly seen in lane 1 for holo-CCBP, while a faster moving band can be seen in lane 2 for apo-CCBP. However, no molecular size can be assigned to these bands based on their mobility on native PAGE. Bio-Rad Kaleidoscope prestained molecular size markers, consisting of myosin (217 kDa), beta -galactosidase (130 kDa), BSA (72 kDa), carbonic anhydrase (42 kDa), soybean trypsin inhibitor (31 kDa), and lyzozyme (18 kDa), were run on lane 3. The 217-, 130-, and 72-kDa markers can be seen as diffused bands.
[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]

Competition by Alternate Ligands

Among the alternate ligands tested, only alpha -carotene and cryptoxanthin showed any binding as evidenced by their corresponding absorption spectra (data not shown). In contrast, beta -ionone ring substituted carotenoids such as zeaxanthin or astaxanthin, a carotenoid without an intact beta -ionone ring like lycopene, and a shortened molecule with one intact beta -ionone ring like retinol showed no binding, as evidenced by the lack of their characteristic absorption spectra.

Competitive binding of [14C]beta -carotene by 20-fold excess of each alternative ligand was determined, and the results are shown in Table II. Each value is the average of triplicate experiments. It is obvious that, while alpha -carotene and cryptoxanthin inhibited labeled beta -carotene binding by 94% and 84%, respectively, none of the other ligands tested showed any competition. Thus, CCBP showed a high degree of specificity toward carotenoids with at least one unsubstituted beta -ionone ring but not toward other carotenoids, or retinol.

Table II. Competition by various ligands for CCBP binding to [14C]beta -carotene

[14C]beta -Carotene binding to purified CCBP was determined in the absence and presence of 20-fold excess of the indicated ligands as described under "Experimental Procedures," and the results are expressed as % inhibition (or % activation marked by + sign) taking the inhibition by 20-fold excess of beta -carotene to be 100%.

Ligand Inhibition

%
 beta -Carotene 100
 alpha -Carotene 94
Cryptoxanthin 84
Astaxanthin 5
Lycopene +13
Retinol 0

It is significant to point out that in contrast to a molecular size of 67 kDa for the mammalian CCBP found in this study, carotenoproteins from various lower organisms vary widely between 18 and 350 kDa in their sizes. Thus, alpha -crustacyanin, an astaxanthin-binding protein from carapace of the lobster, is a 350-kDa protein (22), whereas a lutein-binding protein isolated from the mid-gut of silkworm Bombyx mori is a 36-kDa protein (23). The plant and the bacterial carotenoproteins are 18- and 35-kDa proteins, respectively (24, 25). On the other hand, mammalian retinoid-binding proteins are in the 15-kDa range (11, 12).

CCBP from the mammalian source in the present study exhibits three peaks at 460, 482, and 516 nm (Fig. 5) with a 32-nm bathochromic shift in its lambda max compared with the absorption spectrum of beta -carotene in light petroleum. Interestingly, carotenoid-binding proteins from Mangifera indica (26) and from cyanobacterium (25) also had a similar absorption spectra with lambda max at 498 and 476 nm, respectively. However, crustacyanin, the carotenoprotein from lobster carapace, showed a 160-nm bathochromic shift in its lambda max compared with the absorption spectrum of the parent carotenoid, astaxanthin (27).

Possible Roles of CCBP in Biological Systems

The physiological role/s of CCBP remains to be defined. In view of the possible protective roles of carotenoids against cancer, heart disease, and erythropoietic porphyria, a potential role for a specific binding protein may become central in the mechanism of action of carotenoids. Thus, CCBP may play a major role in the storage, transport, and targeting of beta -carotene in mammalian systems. It may also act as the natural substrate for many of the metabolic reactions of beta -carotene. By virtue of forming a stable high affinity complex, it may protect the carotenoid from degradation. As a result, carotenoids bound to CCBP may be better antioxidants compared with free carotenoids and thus protect the system from oxidative damage.

In conclusion, a specific CCBP has been purified to homogeneity with a molecular mass of 67 kDa from a mammalian liver. It exhibits high affinity binding to beta -carotene in the molar ratio of 1:1, with an apparent dissociation constant of 56 × 10-9 M. The complex exhibits the characteristic carotenoid absorption with the lambda max at 482 nm. Alternate ligands, with one intact beta -ionone ring like alpha -carotene and cryptoxanthin, compete with beta -carotene binding by 94% and 84%, respectively. However, CCBP does not bind astaxanthin, zeaxanthin, lycopene, or retinol.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health NCI Grant CA39999. A part of this work was presented at a mini-symposium on carotenoids held during FASEB Annual Meeting, April 14-17, 1996, Washington, D. C.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Chief, Lipid Research Laboratory, VA Medical Center, Washington, D.C. 20422.
1   The abbreviations used are: CCBP, cellular carotenoid-binding protein; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; BSA, bovine serum albumin; AS, ammonium sulfate; MES, 2-(N-morpholino)-ethane sulfonic acid; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We gratefully acknowledge the generous gift of beta -carotene beadlets and [14C]beta -carotene from Hemmige N. Bhagavan, Hoffmann-La Roche, Nutley, NJ.


REFERENCES

  1. Ziegler, R. G., Subar, A. F., Craft, N. E., Ursin, G., Peterson, B. H., and Graubard, B. I. (1992) Cancer Res. 52, 2060S-2066S
  2. Steinberg, D., and Workshop Participants (1992) Circulation 85, 2338-2344
  3. Mathews-Roth, M. M. (1993) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 691, 127-138 [Abstract]
  4. Alpha-Tocopherol, beta -Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group (1994) N. Engl. J. Med. 330, 1029-1035 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Goodman, D. S., and Huang, H. S. (1965) Science 149, 879-880 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Olson, J. A., and Hayaishi, O. (1965) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 54, 1364-1370 [Free Full Text]
  7. Lakshman, M. R., Mychkovsky, I., and Attlesey, M. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 9124-9128 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Krinsky, N. I., Cornwell, D. G., and Oncley, J. L. (1958) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 73, 233-246 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Traber, M. G., Diamond, S. R., Lane, J. C., Brody, R. I., and Kayden, H. J. (1994) Lipids 29, 665-669 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Okoh, C., Mychkovsky, I., and Lakshman, M. R. (1993) J. Nutr. Biochem. 4, 569-575
  11. Ong, D. E., Crow, J. A., and Chytil, F. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 13385-13389 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Chytil, F., and Ong, D. E. (1984) in The Retinoids (Sporn, M. B., Roberts, A. B., and Goodman, D. S., eds), pp. 90-119, Academic Press, New York
  13. Fox, J. G. (ed) (1988) Biology and Diseases of the Ferret, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia
  14. Ribaya-Mercado, J. D., Holmgren, S. C., Fox, J. G., and Russel, R. M. (1989) J. Nutr. 119, 665-668
  15. Ribaya-Mercado, J. D., Fox, J. G., Rosenblad, W. D., Blanco, M. C., and Russel, R. M. (1992) J. Nutr. 122, 1898-1903
  16. White, W. S., Peck, K. M., Ulman, E. A., and Erdman, J. W., Jr. (1993) J. Nutr. 123, 1129-1139
  17. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Laemmli, U. K., and Favre, M. (1973) J. Mol. Biol. 80, 575-599 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Bolton, A. E., and Hunter, W. M. (1973) Biochem. J. 133, 529-539 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Chen, C.-H., and Albers, J. J. (1982) J. Lipid Res. 23, 680-691 [Abstract]
  21. Nielsen, T. B., and Reynolds, J. A. (1978) Methods Enzymol. 48, 3-10 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Keen, J. N., Caceres, I., Eliopoulos, E. E., Zagalsky, P. F., and Findlay, J. B. C. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 202, 31-40 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Jouni, Z. E., and Wells, M. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14722-14726 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Zhou, J. R., Gugger, E. T., and Erdman, J. W., Jr. (1994) J. Agric. Food. Chem. 42, 2386-2390
  25. Bullerjahn, G. S., and Sherman, L. A. (1986) J. Bacteriol. 167, 396-399 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Subbarayan, C., and Cama, H. R. (1966) Indian J. Biochem. 3, 225-227 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Zagalsky, P. F., Eliopoulos, E. E., and Findlay, J. B. C. (1991) Biochem. J. 274, 79-83

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Bhosale, A. J. Larson, J. M. Frederick, K. Southwick, C. D. Thulin, and P. S. Bernstein
Identification and Characterization of a Pi Isoform of Glutathione S-Transferase (GSTP1) as a Zeaxanthin-binding Protein in the Macula of the Human Eye
J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 49447 - 49454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
V. Diwadkar-Navsariwala, J. A. Novotny, D. M. Gustin, J. A. Sosman, K. A. Rodvold, J. A. Crowell, M. Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis, and P. E. Bowen
A physiological pharmacokinetic model describing the disposition of lycopene in healthy men
J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2003; 44(10): 1927 - 1939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Tabunoki, H. Sugiyama, Y. Tanaka, H. Fujii, Y. Banno, Z. E. Jouni, M. Kobayashi, R. Sato, H. Maekawa, and K. Tsuchida
Isolation, Characterization, and cDNA Sequence of a Carotenoid Binding Protein from the Silk Gland of Bombyx mori Larvae
J. Biol. Chem., August 23, 2002; 277(35): 32133 - 32140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. D. Haegele, C. Gillette, C. O’Neill, P. Wolfe, J. Heimendinger, S. Sedlacek, and H. J. Thompson
Plasma Xanthophyll Carotenoids Correlate Inversely with Indices of Oxidative DNA Damage and Lipid Peroxidation
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2000; 9(4): 421 - 425.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rao, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lakshman, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rao, M. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lakshman, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.