JBC PeproTech; Our Business is Cytokines!

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, Peter. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Newman, Peter. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 40, Issue of October 3, 1997 pp. 24868-24875
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Characterization of Phosphotyrosine Binding Motifs in the Cytoplasmic Domain of Platelet/Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 (PECAM-1) That Are Required for the Cellular Association and Activation of the Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase, SHP-2*

(Received for publication, June 25, 1997)

Denise E. Jackson Dagger , Kevin R. Kupcho Dagger and Peter. J. Newman Dagger §

From the Dagger  Blood Research Institute, The Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233 and the § Departments of Cellular Biology and Pharmacology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53266

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Recent studies have shown that the Src homology-2 (SH2) domain-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-2, associates with the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 as it becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated during platelet aggregation: a process that can be mimicked in part by small synthetic phosphopeptides corresponding to the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 encompassing tyrosine residues Tyr-663 or Tyr-686. To further examine the molecular requirements for PECAM-1/SHP-2 interactions, we generated human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cell lines that stably expressed mutant forms of PECAM-1 harboring tyrosine to phenylalanine (Tyr right-arrow Phe) mutations in the cytoplasmic domain. Y663F and Y686F forms of PECAM-1 were tyrosine-phosphorylated to a somewhat lesser extent than wild-type PECAM-1, and a doubly substituted Y663,686F form of PECAM-1 failed to become tyrosine-phosphorylated, suggesting that the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain tyrosine residues 596, 636 and 701 do not serve as substrates for cellular kinases. Interestingly, SHP-2 binding was lost when either Tyr-663 or Tyr-686 were changed to phenylalanine, indicating that both residues are required for SHP-2/PECAM-1 association. Although PECAM-1 phosphopeptides NSDVQpY663TEVQV and DTETVpY686SEVRK stimulated the catalytic activity of the phosphatase to a similar extent, surface plasmon resonance studies revealed that the Tyr-663-containing peptide had approximately 10-fold higher affinity for SHP-2 than did the Tyr-686 peptide. Finally, peptido-precipitation analysis showed that the NH2-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 reacted preferentially with the Tyr-663 PECAM-1 phosphopeptide, while the Tyr-686 phosphopeptide associated only with the COOH-terminal SH2 domain of the phosphatase. Together, these data provide a molecular model for PECAM-1/SHP-2 interactions that may shed light on the downstream events that follow PECAM-1-mediated interactions of vascular cells.


INTRODUCTION

Phosphorylation of proteins on tyrosine residues provides a key cellular control mechanism for intracellular signaling processes that regulate cell growth, proliferation, adhesion, differentiation, and metabolism (1, 2). The level of tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins is controlled by the co-ordinated actions of protein-tyrosine kinases and protein-tyrosine phosphatases. Signal transmission by tyrosine phosphorylation is mediated by the binding of sequence-specific Src homology-2 (SH2)1 domains present on cytosolic signaling molecules to phosphotyrosine (Tyr(P)) sites on activated receptors (3-7). These highly conserved protein modules play an important role in mediating protein-protein interactions and can regulate many facets of the signaling process (8, 9). The association of SH2-containing proteins with Tyr(P) sites on activated receptors can elicit biochemical changes within the cell, including regulating catalytic activity (10), directing subcellular localization (11), and enhancing tyrosine phosphorylation (12) to potentiate downstream signaling events.

Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1/CD31) is a 130-kDa member of the Ig gene superfamily expressed on the surface of leukocytes and platelets and is also enriched at the junctions of endothelial cells (13, 14). PECAM-1 is a multifunctional receptor consisting of six extracellular Ig homology domains, a transmembrane and cytoplasmic domain (for reviews, see Refs. 15 and 16). Its amino-terminal Ig homology domains 1 and 2 mediate homophilic cell-cell adhesion (17, 18) during the process of leukocyte transendothelial migration (19-21). Evidence is also emerging that PECAM-1 may be involved in cell migration (22), endothelial cell tube formation (23), and angiogenesis (24).

Human PECAM-1 contains five potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites in its cytoplasmic domain (25), which, once phosphorylated, could serve as docking sites for recruitment and physical assembly of cytosolic signaling complexes to potentiate downstream signaling events and evoke changes in biological responses. PECAM-1 has been shown recently to become tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to mechanical stimulation (26), cross-linking with domain-specific monoclonal antibodies (27-32), aggregation of high affinity IgE receptor (33), pervanadate treatment (34), and integrin alpha IIbbeta 3-mediated platelet aggregation (35). Previous studies have demonstrated that tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 binds the protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 during the process of integrin alpha IIbbeta 3-mediated platelet aggregation in an SH2-dependent manner (35). This association can also be mimicked using synthetic phosphopeptides corresponding to the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 encompassing residues Tyr-663 or Tyr-686 (35). While these phosphopeptide binding studies implicate two discrete regions encompassing residues Tyr-663 and Tyr-686 in the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain as targets for SHP-2 association, the binding site(s) on PECAM-1 required for the in vivo cellular association of SHP-2 remain to be determined.

The ubiquitously expressed non-transmembrane protein-tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-2 (also known as SHPTP-2, Syp, PTP1D, PTP2C, and SH-PTP3) contains two tandem amino- and carboxyl-terminal SH2 domains, followed by a catalytic phosphatase domain (36-39). SHP-2 binds phosphotyrosine residues of activated growth factor and cytokine receptors, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor, c-Kit, interleukin-6, and insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1), in an SH2-dependent manner (40-44). The catalytic activity of SHP-2 is enhanced by its tyrosine phosphorylation (39), and also by occupancy of its amino-terminal SH2 domains. Phosphorylation of its COOH-terminal tyrosine at position 542 of SHP-2 by receptor tyrosine kinases creates a docking site for Grb2, linking Grb2-Sos with SHP-2 to activate the Ras-Raf-mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway (45, 46). In contrast to receptor tyrosine kinases such as beta  subunit of platelet derived growth factor, PECAM-1 lacks a catalytic kinase subunit in its cytoplasmic domain, making it incapable of mediating phosphorylation of associated SHP-2. Whether occupancy of the SH2 domains of SHP-2 with phosphotyrosine binding sites on PECAM-1 can stimulate its catalytic activity is not known.

While SHP-2 is a well defined adaptor protein linking cytokine and receptor tyrosine kinases to the Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway, it has been recognized recently that protein-tyrosine phosphatases such as SHP-2 can transduce either a positive or negative regulatory role in cellular signaling, depending on the cell type, their compartmentalization, and the substrates with which they associate (47). SHP-2 is constitutively tyrosine-phosphorylated in v-Src-transformed cell lines, implicating that SHP-2 can serve as a substrate of the Src family kinases (39). Indeed, a physical association between SHP-2 and pp60c-src results in SHP-2-mediated dephosphorylation of pp60c-src Tyr-527 in vitro (48). Whether PECAM-1/SHP-2 interactions can promote cellular signaling events by dephosphorylating Src family kinases is not yet known. A more recent study has suggested that tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 can directly associate with pp60c-src via its SH2 domains interacting via an immune tyrosine-based activation motif in the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 (49).

The purpose of the study was to determine the tyrosine phosphorylation sites within the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 that mediate the cellular association of SHP-2. In addition, we characterized the orientation, affinity, and catalytic activation mediated by the association of the SH2 domains of SHP-2 with PECAM-1 phosphotyrosyl peptides. Mutational analyses of tyrosine residues replaced by phenylalanine at phosphorylation sites 663 and 686 of PECAM-1 demonstrated that the cellular association of SHP-2 requires both Tyr-663- and Tyr-686-containing binding sites. The N-SH2 domain of SHP-2 preferentially bound to Tyr-663, while the C-SH2 domain favored Tyr-686 of PECAM-1. These two phosphotyrosine binding motifs, Tyr-663 and Tyr-686, of PECAM-1 stimulated catalytic activation of SHP-2.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, Triton X-100, bovine serum albumin, leupeptin, dimethyl sulfoxide, isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactoside, ampicillin, and reduced glutathione were purchased from Sigma. Protein G-Sepharose and glutathione-Sepharose 4B were from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. (Uppsala, Sweden). Immobilon-P membrane was obtained from Millipore Corp. (Bedford, MA). Sodium dodecyl sulfate, glycine, prestained broad SDS-PAGE markers, Tween 20, and TEMED were from Bio-Rad. The enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection kit was obtained from Amersham Life Sciences, Inc. [gamma -32P]ATP was obtained from NEN Life Science Products. SmaI restriction enzyme was purchased from New England Biolabs. Sodium orthovanadate was obtained from LC Laboratories (Woburn, MA).

Antibodies

The murine anti-PECAM-1 monoclonal antibody, PECAM-1.3 (specific for Ig homology domain 1) and the polyclonal anti-PECAM-1 antibody, SEW16, have been described previously (17, 50). The horseradish peroxidase-conjugated monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, PY-20, was obtained from Zymed Laboratories Inc. (South San Francisco, CA). A polyclonal antibody directed to the NH2- and COOH-terminal SH2 domains of SHP-2 was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Normal Mouse IgG1 was obtained from Sigma. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse F(ab')2 antibody was purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA).

Site-directed Mutagenesis of PECAM-1 cDNA

A full-length cDNA encoding wild-type human PECAM-1 was cloned into plasmid vector pGEM-7zf(+) (50). The Quik-change site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) along with two single-nucleotide mismatched primers containing the desired mutation was used to construct PECAM-1 cDNAs encoding mutant Tyr right-arrow Phe forms of PECAM-1. An oligonucleotide mismatched primer pair (5'-TCAGACGTGCAGTTCACG-GAAGTTCAA-3') and (3'-AGTCTGCACGTCAAGTGCCTTCAA-GTT-5') from base 2197 to 2223 of PECAM-1 was used to construct the Y663F mutant form of PECAM-1. For generation of the Y686F mutant form of PECAM-1, an oligonucleotide mismatched primer pair (5'-ACAGAGACAGTGTTCAGTGAAGTCCGG-3') and (3'-TGTCTCTGTCACAAGTCACTTCAG-GCC-5') from base 2266 to 2292 of PECAM-1 was used. The double Y663,686F mutant form of PECAM-1 was generated by sequential site-directed mutagenesis of using both mismatched primer sets. The mutated forms of the PECAM-1 cDNA were exchanged into a wild-type plasmid vector pcDNA3.0 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). cDNAs were subjected to nucleotide sequence analysis to confirm the presence of the desired mutation(s) and to exclude polymerase chain reaction-induced errors.

Development of Stable PECAM-1-expressing HEK-293 Cell Lines

Human embryonal kidney (HEK-293) cells obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC CRL 1573) were cultured in minimal essential medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) containing Earle's salts, Glutamax, and 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 HEK-293 cells were grown to 80-90% confluence in 100-mm dishes, incubated with 10 µg of plasmid pcDNA3.0 (Invitrogen) containing wild-type, Y663F, Y686F, or Y663,686F PECAM-1 in a LipofectAMINE mixture for 4-6 h in serum-free medium (Opti-MEM, Life Technologies Inc.). Cells were cultured for an additional 48 h in serum-containing minimal essential medium before adding G418 (0.7 mg/ml, Geneticin, Life Technologies Inc.). G418-resistant clones were analyzed by flow cytometry for cell surface expression of PECAM-1, and positive cells were subsequently isolated by two rounds of cell sorting.

Stimulation of HEK-293 Cell Lines

Adherent HEK-293 cell lines expressing either wild-type or Tyr right-arrow Phe mutant forms of PECAM-1 were lifted using 0.1% trypsin and 10 mM EDTA, washed in sterile PBS, and resuspended at 6 × 106 cells/ml in serum-free medium. Cells were equilibrated at 37 °C for 15 min and then stimulated with a mixture of 2.5 mM H2O2 and 100 µM sodium orthovanadate (pervanadate) at 37 °C for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of ice-cold PBS. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 2,000 rpm for 5 min at room temperature, then washed twice in ice-cold PBS before lysis with 1 ml of Triton lysis buffer (2% Triton X-100, 10 mM EGTA, 15 mM HEPES, 145 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, pH 7.4) for 1 h at 4 °C.

Immunoprecipitation Analysis

Following cell lysis, the 15,000 × g Triton-soluble fraction was precleared with 50 µl of a 50% slurry of Protein G-Sepharose for 30 min at 4 °C and then centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 5 min. Precleared cell lysates were incubated with either 10 µg/ml normal mouse IgG1 or 10 µg/ml PECAM-1.3 IgG overnight at 4 °C. Immune complexes were captured with 50 µl of a 50% slurry of Protein G-Sepharose for 1 h at 4 °C, and then washed five times with immunoprecipitation wash buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl, and 2% Triton X-100). Bound proteins were eluted from the beads by boiling for 10 min in 30 µl of SDS reducing buffer, loaded onto a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, then transferred to Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA), and analyzed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated PY-20 or polyclonal antibodies directed to SHP-2 or PECAM-1.

Preparation and Expression of GST Fusion Proteins Containing the SH2 Domains of SHP-2

~300-base pair segments encoding amino acid residues 1-105 (the NH2-terminal SH2 domain) or 112-213 (the COOH-terminal SH2 domain) of SHP-2 were generated by polymerase chain reaction amplification of SHP-2 cDNA cloned into pGEX-2T (kindly provided by Dr. Benjamin Neel, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA). Following amplification, the cDNA fragments were gel-purified and ligated into SmaI-digested pGEX-4T-2 (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). The resulting bacterial expression constructs, termed pGEX-4T-2-N-SH2 and pGEX-4T-2-C-SH2, respectively, were used to transform Escherichia coli BL 21 D3 cells (Novagen Inc., Madison, WI). Full-length SHP-2 and individual NH2- and COOH-terminal SH2 domain GST fusion proteins were produced by inducing log-phase 1-liter cultures with 0.2 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactoside, and isolated using glutathione-Sepharose beads as described previously (51).

Peptido-precipitation Analysis

Biotinylated PECAM-1 phosphopeptides were prepared as described previously (35). These PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain peptides ± Tyr(PO4) (10 µg/ml) were incubated with 2 µg of recombinant GST alone, a GST fusion protein encompassing the amino- and carboxyl-terminal SH2 domains of SHP-2, termed GST-N-SH2-C-SH2-SHP-2, or GST-N-SH2-SHP-2, or GST-C-SH2-SHP-2 in 1 ml of Triton lysis buffer, overnight at 4 °C with constant mixing. Fifty µl of Ultralink Plus neutravidin-agarose beads (Pierce) were then added to the peptide-protein mixture and incubated for an additional 1 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed five times in immunoprecipitation buffer and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 5 min. Bound proteins were eluted by boiling in SDS reducing buffer and resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE.

Surface Plasmon Resonance Measurements

BIAcore sensor chip SA (BIAcore AB, Uppsala, Sweden), consisting of pre-immobilized streptavidin on a carboxymethylated dextran matrix, was conditioned with 1 M NaCl in 50 mM NaOH according to manufacturer's instructions. All experiments were carried out in HBS buffer (0.01 M Hepes, pH 7.4, containing 0.15 M NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, and 0.005% v/v Tween-20) with a flow rate of 5 µl/min and a constant temperature of 25 °C. For each series of experiments, 30 µl of biotinylated PECAM-1 phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated peptides (100 µg/ml) were injected onto the chip. Specificity of the tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 peptides was demonstrated by the binding of an monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody to only the tyrosine-phosphorylated forms, Tyr(P)-663 and Tyr(P)-686, and not the non-phosphorylated forms of each PECAM-1 peptide. Typical binding sensorgrams of PY-20 antibody binding demonstrated a 5500-6500 change in resonance units. The sensor surface was regenerated with 0.1 M HCl following each protein or antibody interaction. For determination of affinity constants for the interaction of recombinant amino- and carboxyl-terminal SH2 domains of SHP-2 (rN-SH2-C-SH2-SHP-2) (lacking the GST portion) with the PECAM phosphopeptides, Tyr(P)-663 and Tyr(P)-686, 30 µl of recombinant fusion protein (100 µg/ml) was injected onto the sensor chip. Equilibrium binding isotherms were evaluated in the BIAcore evaluation program. Data were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism Version 2.0 and Microsoft Excel Version 5.0 to generate Scatchard plots using least squares linear regression analysis.

Phosphatase Activity Assay

[32P]RCM-lysozyme was prepared by incubating pp60c-src tyrosine kinase (Oncogene Research Products, Cambridge, MA) (200 nM) and RCM-lysozyme (200 µg/ml) (Life Technologies, Inc.) with 500 µM [gamma -32P]ATP (500 µCi/ml) in 50 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.5, containing 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.015% Brij 35, 0.15 mM ATP, and 30 mM MgCl2 overnight at 30 °C. The product was then precipitated with trichloroacetic acid and dialyzed to remove free gamma -32P to yield [32P]pY-RCM-lysozyme having a specific activity of approximately 2000 cpm/pmol. Phosphorylated [32P]pY-RCM lysozyme (2 µM) was incubated with 2 µg/ml recombinant purified SHP-2 with the indicated concentrations of each respective PECAM-1 peptide ± Tyr(PO4) at 30 °C for 5 min in 25 µl of reaction buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 5 mM EDTA, and 10 mM dithiothreitol). Following centrifugation at 4,000 rpm for 5 min, [32P]phosphate release in the supernatant solutions was measured using a charcoal binding assay (52). Preliminary experiments established that reaction rates were linear under these conditions.


RESULTS

Two phosphotyrosine binding motifs in the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain are required for the cellular association of SHP-2. Previous studies have demonstrated that tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides encompassing residues 658-668 and 681-691 of PECAM-1 bind the protein-tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-2, and that SHP-2 binds tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 in aggregating human platelets (35). To determine the binding site(s) on PECAM-1 required for the cellular association of SHP-2, we prepared PECAM-1 cDNA constructs containing Tyr right-arrow Phe mutations at positions 663 and 686 and stably expressed them in HEK-293 cells. In preliminary experiments (not shown), we confirmed that the HEK-293 cells do not express endogenous PECAM-1, but synthesize abundant amounts of SHP-2. As shown in Fig. 1, the introduction of either a single or double Tyr right-arrow Phe mutation at positions 663 and 686 did not affect cellular trafficking or expression of PECAM-1 on the cell surface.


Fig. 1. Flow cytometry profiles of the various stable HEK-293 human cell lines expressing wild type PECAM-1, Y663F, Y686F, and Y663,686F mutants. The open histograms show the binding of isotype-matched normal mouse IgG1 to the various cell lines, while the filled histograms demonstrate the binding of the anti-PECAM-1 monoclonal antibody, PECAM-1.3. Note that mutation of cytoplasmic domain tyrosine residues does not significantly affect the cell surface expression of PECAM-1.
[View Larger Version of this Image (32K GIF file)]

We next examined the cellular association of SHP-2 with the various Tyr right-arrow Phe PECAM-1 mutants. PECAM-1-expressing HEK-293 cell lines were treated with pervanadate, a protein-tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor, that has been shown previously to elicit proximal signal transduction events, including tyrosine phosphorylation. As shown in Fig. 2, in unstimulated HEK-293 cell lines, a small degree of constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation of PECAM-1 was observed in the PY-20 immunoblot (Fig. 2, left middle panel) of PECAM-1.3 immunoprecipitates from wild-type, Y663F, and Y686F mutants. In contrast, in pervanadate-treated cell lines, prominent tyrosine-phosphorylation of PECAM-1 was observed in the PY-20 immunoblot (Fig. 2, right middle panel) of PECAM-1.3 immunoprecipitates from wild-type, and to a slightly lesser extent, Y663 and Y686F mutants. Examination of the double Y663,686F mutant revealed complete loss of tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 in the PY-20 immunoblot (Fig. 2, right middle panel), despite the presence of abundant amounts of PECAM-1 in the PECAM-1.3 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 2, right upper panel). Interestingly, there was evidence of three potential, unidentified PECAM-1-associated phosphoproteins with molecular masses of 90-95, 60-70, and 40-50 kDa in the PY-20 immunoblot of PECAM-1.3 immunoprecipitates from pervanadate-treated HEK-293 cells expressing wild-type PECAM-1.


Fig. 2. Two phosphotyrosine binding motifs in the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 are required for the cellular association of the protein-tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-2. Stable HEK-293 cell lines expressing wild type PECAM-1 and the various Tyr right-arrow Phe mutants, as described in Fig. 1, were incubated with or without pervanadate for 10 min at 37 °C. Following detergent solubilization, supernatants immunoprecipitated with either normal mouse IgG1 or PECAM-1.3 IgG. Bound proteins were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with either anti-PECAM-1 polyclonal antibody, SEW 16 (top panel), HRP-conjugated anti-phosphotyrosine antibody PY-20 (middle panel), or anti-SHP-2 polyclonal antibody (lower panel). Molecular weight standards are indicated on the left. Note that while singly substituted Tyr right-arrow Phe forms of PECAM-1 still became significantly tyrosine-phosphorylated, they did not support the association of SHP-2 with the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1.
[View Larger Version of this Image (63K GIF file)]

Once we had confirmed the presence of tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 in the various HEK-293 cells, we next stripped the immunoblot and reprobed with a specific polyclonal antibody directed to SHP-2. As shown in the lower panel of Fig. 2, in pervanadate-treated HEK-293 cells expressing wild type PECAM-1, the presence of SHP-2 could be easily detected in the PECAM-1.3 immunoprecipitate. In contrast, SHP-2 failed to co-precipitate with either the Y663F, Y686F, or Y663,686F mutant forms of PECAM-1. These data suggest that both phosphotyrosine binding motifs in the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 are required for mediating the cellular association of SHP-2.

The NH2-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 binds directly to tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-(658-668) peptide, while the COOH-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 binds directly to tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-(681-691) peptide. Previous studies have shown that SHP-2 associates with tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1, in an SH2-dependent manner. The orientation of the SH2 domains of SHP-2 interacting with tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1, however, is unknown. To address this issue, we prepared recombinant GST fusion proteins expressing individual NH2- and COOH-terminal SH2 domains of SHP-2 and incubated them with biotinylated peptides corresponding to PECAM-(658-668) and -(681-691). As shown in Fig. 3, nonphosphorylated peptides failed to associate with GST alone or with the GST-N-SH2-C-SH2, GST-N-SH2 and GST-C-SH2 fusion proteins. In contrast, the PECAM-1 phosphopeptide encompassing Tyr-663 bound avidly to GST fusion proteins containing both SH2 domains or the single NH2-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2, while the PECAM-1 phosphopeptide encompassing Tyr-686 bound avidly to the GST fusion proteins containing both SH2 domains or the single COOH-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2. These data demonstrate that the NH2-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 binds via the phosphotyrosine binding motif of PECAM-1 encompassing Tyr-663, while the COOH-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 binds via the phosphotyrosine binding motif encompassing Tyr-686.


Fig. 3. In vitro binding of PECAM-1 phosphopeptides with the individual NH2- and COOH-terminal SH2 domains of SHP-2. 10 µg of the indicated biotinylated PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain peptide (lower boxes) was incubated with 2 µg/ml of recombinant GST alone (rGST), with a GST fusion protein containing both amino-terminal SH2 domains of SHP-2 (N-SH2-C-SH2-SHP-2), or with a GST fusion protein containing either the NH2-terminal or COOH-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 (N-SH2-SHP-2 or C-SH2-SHP-2). The peptide/fusion protein complexes were precipitated by neutravidin-agarose beads, resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted using an anti-SHP-2 polyclonal antibody. Note that the phosphorylated PECAM-(658-668) Tyr(P)-663 peptide interacted with only the NH2-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2, while the phosphorylated PECAM-(681-691) Tyr(P)-686 peptide interacted with only the COOH-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2. Stds, molecular mass standards; Y(P), phosphotyrosine.
[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]

Surface Plasmon Resonance Studies of Recombinant N-SH2-C-SH2-SHP-2 Association with PECAM-1 Phosphopeptides

To determine the kinetics of the binding of the SH2 domains of SHP-2 with the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1, two 11-amino acid biotinylated tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 peptides encompassing residues 663 and 686 were immobilized onto a streptavidin-dextran-coated BIAcore sensor chip. Preliminary experiments demonstrated that a specific anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody bound to the tyrosine-phosphorylated, but not the nonphosphorylated versions of each PECAM-1 peptide, establishing the specificity of the interaction (data not shown). To determine the dissociation rate constants of the SH2 domains of SHP-2, varying amounts of the recombinant N-SH2-C-SH2-SHP-2 fusion protein lacking the GST portion were injected over the immobilized PECAM-1 phosphopeptides and the interaction followed continuously by surface plasmon resonance. The overlay surface plasmon resonance plots of the raw data for the recombinant N-SH2-C-SH2-SHP-2 fusion protein interactions with tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 peptides encompassing Tyr-663 (A) and Tyr-686 (C) are shown in Fig. 4. In addition, these results were analyzed by Scatchard plots of equilibrium responses of rN-SH2-C-SH2-SHP-2 binding to PECAM-1 phosphopeptides encompassing Tyr-663 (B) and Tyr-686 (D) of Fig. 4. As shown, rN-SH2-C-SH2-SHP-2 binds to PECAM phosphopeptide, NSDVQpY663TEVQV with approximately 10-fold higher affinity (KD of 3.47 ± 0.5 nM) than does the PECAM phosphopeptide, DTETVpY686SEVRK (KD of 32.47 ± 15 nM). A summary of the KD rate constants is shown in Table I. These results are consistent with the predicted consensus sequence for SHP-2 binding, as the phosphotyrosine binding motif encompassing Tyr-663 completely conforms to the consensus sequence, suggesting it constitutes a high affinity binding site. The PECAM phosphotyrosine binding motif encompassing Tyr-686 only loosely conforms to the consensus sequence consistent with its lower affinity binding.


Fig. 4. Determination of the binding affinity of the SH2 domains of SHP-2 for tyrosine-phosphorylated regions of the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain. A recombinant protein consisting of the two tandem SH2 domains of SHP-2 was incubated at concentrations ranging from 0.8 to 2.5 µM with immobilized biotinylated PECAM-1-(658-668) Tyr(P)-663 (A) or PECAM-1-(681-691) Tyr(P)-686 (C). The resulting surface plasmon resonance sensorgrams are shown. Scatchard plots derived from these data are shown in B and D. Note that the peptide containing Tyr-663 exhibits approximately 10-fold higher affinity for the SH2 domains of SHP-2 than does the Tyr-686-containing peptide. RU, resonance units; Req, response at equilibrium in resonance units.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]

Table I. Equilibrium affinity constants for the binding of recombinant N-SH2-C-SH2-SHP-2 with PECAM-1 phosphopeptides


Binding protein Immobilized phosphopeptide Sequence KD

nM
rN-SH2-C-SH2-SHP-2 PECAM-(658-668) Tyr(P)-663 NSDVQpYTEVQV 3.47
4.50
4.20
4 ± 0.5 (mean ± S.D.)
rN-SH2-C-SH2-SHP-2 PECAM-(681-691) Tyr(P)-686 DTETVpYSEVRK 32.47
59.52
32.89
59.20
46 ± 15 (mean ± S.D)

Activation of SHP-2 Catalytic Activity Mediated by PECAM-1

Since the studies described above suggest that PECAM-1-derived Tyr(P)-663 and Tyr(P)-686 phosphopeptides interact with the N-and COOH-terminal SH2 domains of SHP-2, we next examined the ability of these PECAM-1 phosphopeptides to activate the catalytic activity of SHP-2. Synthetic tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides corresponding to the five potential phosphorylation sites in the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 were used to determine the effect of SH2 domain occupancy on SHP-2 catalytic activity. As shown in Fig. 5A, two out of the five tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM derived peptides encompassing Tyr-663 and Tyr-686 produced at least a 5-fold increase in the activation of SHP-2 catalytic activity, as determined by the dephosphorylation of the artificial substrate, [32P]pY-RCM lysozyme. Activation of SHP-2 by these two PECAM phosphopeptides was dose-dependent, as shown in Fig. 5B. Under these conditions, PECAM-1 Tyr(P)-663 and PECAM-1 Tyr(P)-686 demonstrated monophasic activation of SHP-2 (ED50 of 50 µM). Interestingly, PECAM-1 Tyr(P)-663 induced a higher maximal fold activation (10-fold) at 300 µM peptide concentration compared with PECAM-1 Tyr(P)-686 (5-fold). Inhibition of the maximal effect was seen at higher peptide concentrations (>500 µM). The nonphosphorylated versions of PECAM-(658-668) and -(681-691) peptides showed no significant activation of SHP-2 within the concentration range tested.


Fig. 5. SHP-2 catalytic activity is stimulated by PECAM-1 Tyr-663 and Tyr-686 phosphopeptides. A, activation of SHP-2 catalytic activity by PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides was determined by incubating 2 µg/ml recombinant SHP-2 in the presence or absence of the indicated PECAM-1 Tyr(P) peptides at 150 µM final concentration and then measuring the release of 32P counts in 5 min from the artificial substrate, [32P]pY-RCM-lysozyme. Note that PECAM-1 Tyr-663 and Tyr-686 phosphopeptides stimulate the catalytic activity of SHP-2, while the other three PECAM-1 tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides were without effect. Values shown are the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments. B, dose-dependent profile of activation of SHP-2 by PECAM-1 Tyr-663 and Tyr-686 phosphopeptides. SHP-2 catalytic activity was assayed using [32P]pY-RCM-lysozyme in the presence of increasing concentrations of phosphorylated PECAM-1-(658-668) Tyr(P)-663 (open circles), unphosphorylated PECAM-1-(658-668) (closed circles), phosphorylated PECAM-1-(681-691) Tyr(P)-686 (open triangles), or unphosphorylated PECAM-1-(681-691) (closed triangles). Values shown are the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

We have demonstrated previously that tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides encompassing residues 658-668 and 681-691 of the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1 bind SHP-2 and that SHP-2 binds tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 during platelet aggregation (35). While these in vitro studies suggested that tyrosine phosphorylation of amino acid residues 663 and 686 within the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain is required for the association of SHP-2 with PECAM-1, we needed to examine mutant forms of PECAM-1 by replacing these tyrosine residues with phenylalanine to define the precise binding site(s) on PECAM-1 for SHP-2 in vivo. Our results indicate that phosphorylation of both Tyr-663 and Tyr-686 is required for the cellular association of SHP-2 with PECAM-1 (Fig. 2). Interestingly, mutation of both tyrosine phosphorylation sites, 663 and 686, resulted in a dramatic loss of tyrosine phosphorylation of PECAM-1 (Fig. 2). There are several possible explanations for this observation. First, these two amino acid residues are primary sites for tyrosine phosphorylation of PECAM-1, while the other three tyrosine residues do not contribute. Second, mutation of these sites may result in the loss of direct or indirect association of SH2-containing signaling molecules such as protein-tyrosine kinases, which may be responsible for phosphorylating the other three tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic domain of PECAM-1.

The defined crystal structure of the tandem SH2 domains of SHP-2 has suggested that the orientation and spacing between the phosphotyrosine residues of an activated receptor is critical for the binding of one or both SH2 domains and stimulation of enzymatic activation (53). Tyrosines 663 and 686 in the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain are spaced 23 amino acids apart, which is similar to known colinear docking sites characteristic of tyrosine-based activation motifs (TAM), described for ZAP-70 and a brain immunoglobulin-like molecule (54, 55). The phosphotyrosine binding motif encompassing Tyr-663 in the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain most closely correlates with Tyr-1009 in the carboxyl-terminal region of the beta -subunit of PDGF. Previous studies have shown that the Tyr-1009-containing motif alone is able to associate with the N-and C-SH2 domains of SHP-2 with equivalent affinity (43, 56). These observations prompted us to examine the orientational relationship between the SH2 domains of SHP-2 with the two phosphotyrosine binding motifs in the PECAM-1 cytoplasmic domain. To address this question, we generated individual recombinant NH2- and COOH-terminal SH2 domains of SHP-2 in E. coli and examined their ability to associate with nonphosphorylated and tyrosine-phosphorylated forms of 658-668 and 681-691 PECAM-1 peptides. Our results showed that the N-SH2 and C-SH2 domains of SHP-2 have distinct differences of selectivity in recognition of phosphotyrosine sequences in PECAM-1. Tyr(P)-663 is the binding site for the N-SH2 of SHP-2 on PECAM-1, while Tyr(P)-686 is the binding site for the C-SH2 of SHP-2 on PECAM-1 in vitro (Fig. 3). However, the association mediated by the NH2-terminal SH2 domain of SHP-2 with Tyr(P)-663 of PECAM-1 appears to be more efficient. This finding has also been previously observed with a number of other SHP-2 associated receptors such as the beta -subunit of PDGF and epidermal growth factor (42, 57).

Direct determination by surface plasmon resonance of the affinity of the tandem N-SH2-C-SH2 domains of SHP-2 for PECAM-1 Tyr(P) peptides 663 and 686 revealed that PECAM-1 pY-663 (pY663TEV) binds with a KD of 4 nM, consistent with a high affinity ligand for the tandem SH2 domains of SHP-2, while a 10-fold loss in affinity (KD of 46 nM) was observed with PECAM-1 pY-686 (pY686SEV) (Fig. 4). These results are in agreement with the predicted consensus sequence required for SHP-2 binding, a Val residue at -2 position, a phosphotyrosine residue, a beta -branched residue at +1 (Thr/Val/Ile), and a hydrophobic residue at +3 position (Val/Leu/Ile), where Tyr-663 binding motif fulfills all requirements, while Tyr-686 binding motif only partially conforms (6, 58, 59).

A recent crystallographic study showed that the tandem SH2 domains of SHP-2 in complex with two phosphotyrosyl peptides corresponding to the Tyr-1009 binding site in PDGF revealed a fixed orientation of the domains in widely spaced and antiparallel orientations (53). Mutational analyses of tyrosine residues at positions 1009 and 1021 of the PDGF receptor have demonstrated that the cellular association of SHP-2 with ligand-stimulated PDGF requires only Tyr-1009, but not Tyr-1021 to creat a binding site (60). In contrast, when IRS-1 is stimulated by insulin, two tyrosine phosphorylation sites, 1172 and 1222, are necessary to create docking sites for the selective recruitment in vitro of the tandem N- and C-SH2 domains of SHP-2 (52). Furthermore, the simultaneous occupancy of both SH2 domains of SHP-2 by the two tyrosine phosphorylation sites, 1172 and 1222 of IRS-1, resulted in potent stimulation of SHP-2 catalytic activity (61).

Since both SH2 domains of SHP-2 appear to bind two distinct phosphotyrosine binding motifs in PECAM-1, we speculated that occupancy of one or both SH2 domains would contribute to the catalytic activation of SHP-2. To study the relationship between SH2 domain recognition and allosteric activation, we analyzed five different Tyr(P) peptides comprising potential in vitro phosphorylation sites within the cytoplasmic domain of human PECAM-1 for their ability to stimulate the catalytic activity of full-length SHP-2. Our data showed that SHP-2 was activated by only two of the five tyrosine-containing monophosphopeptides, those encompassing either Tyr-663 or Tyr-686 of PECAM-1 (Fig. 5). Monophosphopeptide occupancy of either SH2 domain of SHP-2 is thought to stimulate catalytic activation by stabilizing an "open" active configuration of the catalytic domain (61). More potent stimulation of catalytic activity of SHP-2 is observed at lower concentrations of biphosphorylated peptides constituting a TAM motif due to the high affinity interaction with both SH2 domains of SHP-2. This finding has been observed for IRS-1 and brain immunoglobulin-like molecule (BIT) (10, 55, 61). PECAM-1 contains a TAM-like binding motif encompassing sequences pY663TEV and pY686SEV, which is similar in consensus sequence to IRS-1 pY1172IDL and pY 1222ASI and the two TAM motifs described for BIT, N-TAM pY436ADL and pY460ASI, or C-TAM pY477ADL and pY501ASV. We predict that a PECAM-1 biphosphorylated peptide encompassing the two tyrosine phosphorylation sites, 663 and 686, would also potently enhance the catalytic activation of SHP-2. Due to its length, this has been difficult to test in vitro.

Unlike growth factor receptors such as the beta -subunit of PDGF and epidermal growth factor, the association of SHP-2 with tyrosine-phosphorylated PECAM-1 in either 1) pervanadate-treated HEK-293 cells expressing wild-type PECAM-1 or 2) aggregated platelets does not appear to result in tyrosine phosphorylation of SHP-2 itself (data not shown). Therefore, it is unlikely in these settings that SHP-2 serves as an adapter molecule to bind Grb2 and link SHP-2 with the Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. The fact that the binding of SHP-2 with activated PECAM-1 leads to stimulation of its catalytic activity suggests that SHP-2 could exert either positive or negative signaling responses via catalytic dephosphorylation of nearby signaling substrates, such as Src family kinases.

It is well established that PECAM-1 serves as a key participant in adhesion cascades that occur during cellular processes such as leukocyte transendothelial migration, cell migration, cell-cell contact, and junctional localization. PECAM-1 is predominantly distributed on the surface of transmigrating lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils that come into contact with adjacent PECAM-1 molecules highly enriched in the endothelial cell intercellular junctions. In the process of transmigration, homophilic PECAM-1 cell-cell adhesion appears to be sufficient without the need for a chemotactic gradient to induce a signaling process to allow migration of cells into peripheral tissues (19, 20, 62). Engagement of PECAM-1 molecules or integrin-mediated cell adhesion that occurs during leukocyte-endothelial cell interactions could initiate outside-in signal transduction that induces tyrosine phosphorylation of PECAM-1 leading to formation of docking sites that can recruit SH2-containing signaling molecules, such as SHP-2. Activation of downstream signaling events may then initiate inside-out signal transduction leading to modulation of either integrin or PECAM-1 function. Further work will be required to define PECAM-1-mediated cell signaling pathways and the associated cytosolic signaling molecules operational in various cell types. The observation that SHP-2 is associated with PECAM-1 implicates this phosphatase in cellular events that follow interaction of blood and vascular cells.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by Program Project Grant HL-44612 (to P. J. N.) from the National Institutes of Health, American Heart Association (Wisconsin Affiliate) Postdoctoral Fellowship Award 96F-Post-34 (to D. E. J.), and Established Investigatorship 92001390 of the American Heart Association (P. J. N.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Blood Research Inst., The Blood Center of Southeastern Wisconsin, 638 N. 18th St., Milwaukee, WI 53233-2194. Tel.: 414-937-6237; Fax: (414) 937-6284 E-mail: pjn{at}smtpgate.bcsew.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: SH2, Src homology 2; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; RCM, reduced carboxyamidomethylated and maleylated; PECAM-1, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1; IRS-1, insulin receptor substrate-1; BIT, brain immunoglobulin-like molecule; pY or Tyr(P), phosphotyrosine; TAM, tyrosine-based activation motif; N-SH2, NH2-terminal SH2 domain; C-SH2, COOH-terminal SH2 domain; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. Benjamin Neel for the gift of plasmid SHP-2 in pGEX-2T, to M. Trudy Holyst for preparing the PECAM-1 phosphopeptides, and to Lorie Miller for assistance with cell sorting and use of the BIAcore.


REFERENCES

  1. Cantley, L. C., Auger, K. R., Carpenter, C., Duckworth, B., Graziani, A., Kapeller, R., and Soltoff, S. (1991) Cell 64, 281-302 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Fischer, E. H., Charbonneau, H., and Tonks, N. K. (1991) Science 253, 401-406 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sadowski, I., Stone, J. C., and Pawson, T. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 4396-4408 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mayer, B. J., Hamaguchi, M., and Hanafusa, H. (1988) Nature 332, 272-275 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Tyers, M., Rachubinski, R. A., Stewart, M. I., Varrichio, A. M., Shorr, R. G. L., Haslam, R. J., and Harley, C. B. (1988) Nature 333, 470-473 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., Chaudhuri, M., Gish, G., Pawson, T., Haser, W. G., King, F., Roberts, T., Ratnofsky, S., Lechleider, R. J., Neel, B. G., Birge, R. B., Fajardo, J. E., Chou, M. M., Hanafusa, H., Schaffhausen, B., and Cantley, L. C. (1993) Cell 72, 767-778 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Pawson, T. (1995) Nature 373, 573-580 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Koch, C. A., Anderson, D., Moran, M. F., Ellis, C., and Pawson, T. (1991) Science 252, 668-674 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Pawson, T., and Gish, G. D. (1992) Cell 71, 359-362 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Sugimoto, S., Wandless, T. J., Shoelson, S. E., Neel, B. G., and Walsh, C. T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13614-13622 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Sabe, H., Hata, A., Okada, M., Nakagawa, H., and Hanafusa, H. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 3984-3988 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Rotin, D., Honegger, A. M., Margolis, B. L., Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 9678-9683 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Newman, P. J., Berndt, M. C., Gorski, J., White, G. C., White, S., Lyman, S., Paddock, C., and Muller, W. A. (1990) Science 247, 1219-1222 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Albelda, S. M., Oliver, P. D., Romer, L. H., and Buck, C. A. (1990) J. Cell. Biol. 110, 1227-1237 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Newman, P. J. (1994) in Platelet-dependent Vascular Occlusion (Fitzgerald, G. A., Jennings, L. K., and Patrono, C., eds), pp. 165-174, New York Academy of Sciences, New York
  16. Newman, P. J. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 99, 3-8 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Sun, Q.-H., DeLisser, H. M., Zukowski, M. M., Paddock, C., Albelda, S. M., and Newman, P. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11090-11098 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Sun, J., Williams, J., Yan, H.-C., Amin, K. M., Albelda, S. M., and DeLisser, H. M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 18561-18570 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Muller, W. A., Weigl, S. A., Deng, X., and Phillips, D. M. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 178, 449-460 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Zocchi, M. R., Ferrero, E., Leone, B. E., Rovere, P., Bianchi, E., Toninelli, E., and Pardi, R. (1996) Eur. J. Immunol. 26, 759-767 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Liao, F., Ali, J., Greene, T., and Muller, W. A. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 185, 1349-1357 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Schimmenti, L. A., Yan, H., Madri, J. A., and Albelda, S. M. (1992) J. Cell. Physiol. 153, 417-428 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Matsumura, T., Wolff, K., and Petzelbauer, P. (1997) J. Immunol. 158, 3408-3416 [Abstract]
  24. Sheibani, N., Newman, P. J., and Frazier, W. A. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell. 8, 1329-1341 [Abstract]
  25. Kirschbaum, N. E., Gumina, R. J., and Newman, P. J. (1994) Blood 84, 4028-4037 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Osawa, M., Masuda, M., Harada, N., Lopes, R. B., and Fujiwara, K. (1997) Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 72, 229-237 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Tanaka, Y., Albelda, S. M., Horgan, K. J., Van Seventer, G. A., Shimizu, Y., Newman, W., Hallam, J., Newman, P. J., Buck, C. A., and Shaw, S. (1992) J. Exp. Med. 176, 245-253 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Leavesley, D. I., Oliver, J. M., Swart, B. W., Berndt, M. C., Haylock, D. N., and Simmons, P. J. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 4673-4683 [Abstract]
  29. Piali, L., Albelda, S. M., Baldwin, H. S., Hammel, P., Gisler, R. H., and Imhof, B. A. (1993) Eur. J. Immunol. 23, 2464-2471 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Berman, M. E., and Muller, W. A. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 299-307 [Abstract]
  31. Berman, M. E., Xie, Y., and Muller, W. A. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 1515-1524 [Abstract]
  32. Varon, D., Shenkman, B., Dardik, R., Tamarin, I., Savion, N., Jackson, D. E., and Newman, P. J. (1996) Tissue Antigens 48, 469a
  33. Sagawa, K., Swaim, W., Zhang, J., Unsworth, E., and Siraganian, R. P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13412-13418 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Modderman, P. W., von dem Borne, A. E. G. K., and Sonnenberg, A. (1994) Biochem J. 299, 613-621
  35. Jackson, D. E., Ward, C. M., Wang, R., and Newman, P. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6986-6993 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Freeman, R. M., Plutzky, J., and Neel, B. G. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 11239-11243 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Ahmad, S., Banville, D., Zhao, Z., Fischer, E. H., and Shen, S.-H. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 2197-2201 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Feng, G.-S., Hui, C.-C., and Pawson, T. (1993) Science 259, 1607-1610 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Vogel, W., Lammers, R., Huang, J., and Ullrich, A. (1993) Science 259, 1611-1614 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Kuhne, M. R., Pawson, T., Leinhard, G. E., and Feng, G.-S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11479-11481 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Lechleider, R. J., Freeman, R. M., Jr., and Neel, B. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13434-13438 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Lechleider, R. J., Sugimoto, S., Bennett, A. M., Kashishian, A. S., Cooper, J. A., Shoelson, S. E., Walsh, C. T., and Neel, B. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21478-21481 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Tauchi, T., Feng, G.-S., Marshall, M. S., Shen, R., Mantel, C., Pawson, T., and Broxmeyer, H. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25206-25211 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Stahl, N., Farruggella, T. J., Boulton, T. G., Zhong, Z., Darnell, J. E., and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1995) Science 267, 1349-1353 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Bennett, A. M., Tang, T. L., Sugimoto, S., Walsh, C. T., and Neel, B. G. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 7335-7339 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Li, W., Nishimura, R., Kashishian, A., Batzer, A. G., Kim, W. J. H., Cooper, J. A., and Schlessinger, J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 509-517 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Stone, R. L., and Dixon, J. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 31323-31326 [Free Full Text]
  48. Peng, Z.-Y., and Cartwright, C. A. (1995) Oncogene 11, 1955-1962 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Lu, T. T., Barreuther, M., Davis, S., and Madri, J. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14442-14446 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Goldberger, A., Middleton, K. A., Oliver, J. A., Paddock, C., Yan, H-C., DeLisser, H. M., Albelda, S. M., and Newman, P. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17183-17191 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Dechert, U., Adam, M., Harder, K. W., Clark-Lewis, I., and Jirik, F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5602-5611 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Sugimoto, S., Lechleider, R. J., Shoelson, S. E., Neel, B. G., and Walsh, C. T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 22771-22776 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Eck, M. J., Pluskey, S., Trub, T., Harrison, S. C., and Shoelson, S. E. (1996) Nature 379, 277-280 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Hatada, M. H., Lu, X., Laird, E. R., Green, J., Morgenstern, J. P., Lou, M., Marr, C. S., Phillips, T. B., Ram, M. K., Theriault, K., Zoller, M. J., and Karas, J. L. (1995) Nature 377, 32-38 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Ohnishi, H., Kubota, M., Ohtake, A., Sato, K., and Sano, S.-I. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25569-25574 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Kazlauskas, A., Feng, G. S., Pawson, T., and Valius, M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6939-6942 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Tenev, T., Keilhack, H., Tomic, S., Stoyanov, B., Stein-Gerlach, M., Lammers, R., Krivtsov, A. V., Ullrich, A., and Bohmer, F.-D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5966-5973 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Huyer, G., Li, Z. M., Adam, M., Huckle, W. R., and Ramachandran, C. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 1040-1049 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  59. Case, R. D., Piccione, E., Wolf, G., Bennett, A. M., Lechleider, R. J., Neel, B. G., and Shoelson, S. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10467-10474 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Valius, M., Bazenet, C., and Kazlauskas, A. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 133-143 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Pluskey, S., Wandless, T. J., Walsh, C. T., and Shoelson, S. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2897-2900 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Muller, W. A., and Weigl, S. A. (1992) J. Exp. Med. 176, 819-828 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
C. Bergom, C. Paddock, C. Gao, T. Holyst, D. K. Newman, and P. J. Newman
An alternatively spliced isoform of PECAM-1 is expressed at high levels in human and murine tissues, and suggests a novel role for the C-terminus of PECAM-1 in cytoprotective signaling
J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2008; 121(8): 1235 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. Garnacho, V. Shuvaev, A. Thomas, L. McKenna, J. Sun, M. Koval, S. Albelda, V. Muzykantov, and S. Muro
RhoA activation and actin reorganization involved in endothelial CAM-mediated endocytosis of anti-PECAM carriers: critical role for tyrosine 686 in the cytoplasmic tail of PECAM-1
Blood, March 15, 2008; 111(6): 3024 - 3033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Nakata, N. Fujita, Y. Kitagawa, R. Okamoto, H. Ogita, and Y. Takai
Regulation of Platelet-derived Growth Factor Receptor Activation by Afadin through SHP-2: IMPLICATIONS FOR CELLULAR MORPHOLOGY
J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37815 - 37825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. Boylan, M. C. Berndt, M. L. Kahn, and P. J. Newman
Activation-independent, antibody-mediated removal of GPVI from circulating human platelets: development of a novel NOD/SCID mouse model to evaluate the in vivo effectiveness of anti-human platelet agents
Blood, August 1, 2006; 108(3): 908 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page