JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pak, Y.
Right arrow Articles by George, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pak, Y.
Right arrow Articles by George, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 40, Issue of October 3, 1997 pp. 24961-24965
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Agonist-induced Desensitization of the µ Opioid Receptor Is Determined by Threonine 394 Preceded by Acidic Amino Acids in the COOH-terminal Tail*

(Received for publication, May 15, 1997, and in revised form, July 22, 1997)

Youngshil Pak Dagger §, Brian F. O'Dowd Dagger and Susan R. George Dagger par **

From the Departments of Dagger  Pharmacology and par  Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada and the  Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2S1, Canada

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

To identify the structural determinants necessary for µ opioid receptor desensitization, we serially ablated potential phosphorylation sites in the carboxyl tail of the receptor and examined their effects on [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO)-induced desensitization. First, we replaced Thr394 with alanine (T394A) and stably expressed this mutant receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The T394A receptor did not desensitize after 1 h of treatment with DAMGO, indicating that Thr394 is required for agonist-induced early desensitization. To test whether Thr394 was the only residue necessary, we investigated the importance of 7 potential phosphorylation sites between residues 363 and 383, which were all replaced by alanines with the Thr394 maintained. This mutant (AT) showed partial loss of desensitization (30%), which was attributable to the Ala mutation at Thr383, since complete desensitization was achieved by restoring Thr383 (ATT). These results suggest that Thr394 is the primary recognition site for G protein-coupled receptor kinases, but Thr383 is also required for complete agonist-induced desensitization. The specificity of Thr394 as the primary initiation site appears to be dependent on the preceding acidic amino acid stretch, because in a mutant in which glutamic acid residues at 388, 391, and 393 were replaced by glutamines (EQ), agonist-induced desensitization was completely abolished, identical to the T394A mutant.


INTRODUCTION

Desensitization is defined as loss of a biological response to a ligand despite its continuous presence. This phenomenon of desensitization is observed with almost every receptor, and some of the mechanisms involved in desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors have been well characterized using the beta -adrenergic receptor (beta AR)1 and rhodopsin. For these receptors, the primary mechanism of desensitization appears to be receptor phosphorylation mediated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). Since these kinases have the unique feature of phosphorylating receptors only when they are in an active or a ligand-bound conformation, GRK-mediated phosphorylation is considered to be the main mechanism for agonist-induced desensitization. These kinases have been shown to phosphorylate a number of G protein-coupled receptors including the beta AR (1, 2), rhodopsin (3, 4), alpha 2-adrenergic receptor (alpha 2AR) (5, 6), platelet-activating factor receptor (7), thrombin receptor (8), and C5a anaphylatoxin receptor (9).

Endogenous opioids play an important role in a variety of physiological processes through pharmacologically distinct, three major receptor subtypes that are coupled to inhibitory G proteins (10). Although the acute action of opioids can induce a number of beneficial effects, chronic use of opioids produces tolerance and dependence (11, 12), which are among the major factors limiting the clinical use of opioids. The molecular mechanisms underlying these phenomena are poorly understood, and receptor desensitization has been implicated as a possible mechanism.

It has been shown recently that opioid receptor desensitization is directly related to receptor phosphorylation. Protein kinase C (PKC) is involved in the functional uncoupling of the delta opioid receptor (DOR) from G protein in the striatum of guinea pigs (13). However, cellular depletion of PKC failed to alter DOR phosphorylation in HEK 293 cells (14), indicating a role for other kinases as well. In the case of the µ opioid receptor (MOR), it was reported that activation of PKC enhanced desensitization of the receptor, leading to a decrease in the receptor-activated potassium channel current (GIRK1) in Xenopus oocytes (15, 16). However, the PKC inhibitor staurosporine showed differential effects on the PKC-mediated response and the agonist-induced response. Staurosporine blocked PKC-activated MOR phosphorylation and eliminated PKC influence on desensitization, but failed to block desensitization induced by repeated administration of agonist (16). This result suggests participation of other kinases in agonist-mediated desensitization. Indeed, a recent study of agonist-induced phosphorylation of DOR suggests involvement of one or more GRKs in receptor desensitization (14). It has also been shown that overexpression of a functionally impaired mutant form of GRK2 blocks kappa  receptor desensitization in COS-7 cells (17). In contrast to PKC manipulation, agonist-dependent phosphorylation of DOR in HEK 293 cells was altered by overexpression of GRK2, GRK 5, or a functionally impaired mutant form of GRK2 (14). These data suggest that GRKs are more directly involved in receptor desensitization and function together with PKC-mediated mechanisms.

In a previous study, we reported that 1-h pretreatment of MOR with the agonist DAMGO caused agonist-specific desensitization (18). The mechanisms underlying agonist-induced desensitization could include receptor phosphorylation, similar to that described for other G protein-coupled receptors. Recently, a splice variant of the MOR cDNA has been cloned from rat that differs at the 3'-end (19). This variant (MOR1B) shares 100% amino acid sequence identity with MOR1 up to amino acid 386 but differs from residue 387 to the carboxyl tail (rMOR1, 387LENLEAETAPLP398; rMOR1B, 387KIDLF391). Within that region of the carboxyl tail, one potential site for phosphorylation by GRKs is found in MOR that is absent in MOR1B. Interestingly, this shorter variant, rMOR1B, has been shown to be resistant to agonist-induced desensitization, unlike the longer form, rMOR1 (19). The cytoplasmic tail of the MOR contains potential phosphorylation sites for GRKs which may explain the differences between the variants and has led us to map the amino acid residues important in the functional desensitization of MOR.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Generation of Mutants and Stable Cell Lines Expressing Wild Type or Mutant Receptors

The full-length cDNA for the rat MOR was cloned into the mammalian expression vector pRC/CMV (InVitrogen, San Diego, CA). This construct was used as a template for mutagenesis and for subsequent stable transfection of the wild type and mutant receptor cDNAs into Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines. Mutant MORs such as T394A, T/S363-383A (AT), T/S363-379A (ATT), E388-393Q (EQ) (Fig. 1) were constructed by substituting single or multiple amino acid residues with alanine(s). In case of the mutant EQ, glutamic acids between residues 388 and 393 were substituted with glutamine. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using a polymerase chain reaction-based technique as described previously (20). Briefly, oligonucleotide primers corresponding to unique Eco47III and ApaI restriction sites (located at amino acids 304-305 and at vector, respectively) were utilized in combination with two mutagenic primers. Polymerase chain reaction fragments were digested with unique restriction enzymes and subcloned into the corresponding restriction sites of pRC/CMV encoding a MOR. All mutations were verified by dideoxy sequencing. For stable expression, cell line CHO K-1 (no. CCL61; American Type Culture Collection) was grown to 60% confluency in a 100-mm dish and subsequently transfected with wild type or mutant constructs in pRC/CMV vector using a calcium phosphate transfection kit (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Stable transfectants were selected in 1 mg/ml geneticin (Life Technologies, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) and clones with the appropriate expression level were screened by radioligand binding assay. 30-90 clones expressing varying numbers of receptors were screened to select those with comparable expression levels.


Fig. 1. Schematic representation showing the positions of the amino acid substitutions of potential phosphorylation sites in the carboxyl tail of MOR. In wild type MOR (WT), bold letters indicate the potential phosphorylation sites, 8 serines/threonines. The numbers above denote the amino acid position in the receptor protein. In mutant MORs, bold letters indicate the sites of substitution of serine (S)/threonine (T) by alanine (A) or glutamic acid (E) by glutamine (Q), and the line indicates no changes from WT.
[View Larger Version of this Image (11K GIF file)]

Membrane Preparation and Radioligand Binding Assays

Cells were grown until apparent confluency and then washed twice with 12 ml of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, harvested and centrifuged at 100 × g for 10 min. Cells were then lysed in hypotonic buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 2 mM EDTA, containing a protease inhibitor mixture (10 mg/ml leupeptin, 5 mg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor and 5 mg/ml benzamidine)) with a Polytron homogenizer (Brinkman Instruments, Westbury, NY) for two 30-s bursts at the 5.5 setting. The lysate was then centrifuged at 100 × g for 10 min to pellet unbroken cells and nuclei. The supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 30,000 × g for 30 min, and the resulting pellet was resuspended in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA with the protease inhibitor mixture and used immediately for radioligand binding studies. Protein content was determined according to the method of Bradford (21). For saturation experiments, cell membranes (20-30 µg of protein/tube) were incubated with increasing concentrations of [3H]naloxone (specific activity, 58.5 Ci/mmol; DuPont NEN) in a total volume of 1 ml. Specific binding was determined by calculating the difference in binding of the radiolabeled ligand in the absence and presence of the µ-selective antagonist naltrexone (10 µM). Competition experiments were performed using [3H]naloxone at approximately its Kd value and competing cold drug, DAMGO at concentrations ranging from 10-11 to 10-4 M. After 2 h of incubation at room temperature, bound ligand was isolated by rapid filtration through a 48-well cell harvester (Brandel, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) onto GF/C Whatman filters. Filters were washed with 10 ml of ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and placed in glass vials with 5 ml of scintillation fluid (Cytoscint; ICN, Costa, Mesa, CA) and counted for tritium. All experiments were performed in duplicate, and each experiment was repeated at least three times.

Desensitization Conditions and Adenylyl Cyclase Assay

CHO cells expressing wild type or mutant MORs at confluent monolayer were treated with either medium alone or 1 µM DAMGO (final concentration) and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Incubation was terminated by washing plates three times with 12 ml of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline. Membranes were prepared as described above. Adenylyl cyclase assays were conducted essentially as described previously (22). The assay mix contained 20 µl of membrane suspension (15-20 µg of protein), 12 µM ATP, 0.1 mM cAMP, 53 µM GTP, 2.7 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 0.2 unit of pyruvate kinase, 1 unit of myokinase, and 0.13 µCi of [32P]ATP in a final volume of 50 µl. Enzyme activities were determined in triplicate assay tubes containing increasing concentrations (10-11 to 10-3 M) of DAMGO with 10 µM forskolin. Adenylyl cyclase activity was also measured in the presence of buffer alone (basal) or forskolin alone and reactions were incubated at 27 °C for 20 min. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 1 ml of an ice-cold solution containing 0.4 mM ATP, 0.3 mM cAMP and [3H]cAMP (25,000 cpm). [32P]cAMP and [3H]cAMP were isolated by sequential column chromatography using Dowex cation exchange and aluminum oxide columns. The amount of [3H]cAMP was used to quantify individual column recovery. Data were analyzed by nonlinear least-squares regression.


RESULTS

We previously reported that the MOR was desensitized after 1 h treatment with an agonist, DAMGO 1 µM (18). During agonist exposure, basal adenylyl cyclase activity and forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity did not change, suggesting this desensitization was specifically agonist-induced, with no evidence of heterologous desensitization. The underlying mechanism of this agonist-induced form of desensitization is likely due to the involvement of GRKs. Since phosphorylation of receptors plays an important role in receptor desensitization, and the carboxyl tail region of MOR contains a potential phosphorylation site for GRKs (Thr394), Thr394 was substituted by alanine in the longer variant of the receptor to test the involvement of this residue in agonist-induced desensitization of MOR.

Initially, stable CHO cell lines expressing wild type or mutated receptor in which the Thr394 was changed to alanine (T394A) were prepared (Fig. 1). The binding of antagonist [3H]naloxone to the wild type or T394A mutant receptor was saturable and of high affinity. The mu agonist, DAMGO detected two affinity states of the wild type and mutant receptors. With each of the receptors, 70% of the total receptor population was in a high affinity state for agonist with a dissociation constant of 3 nM, and 30% of the receptor population was in a low affinity state with a dissociation constant of 330 nM. To determine the functional coupling of the wild type and mutant receptors (T394A) to adenylyl cyclase, dose-response curves for the inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation with increasing concentrations of DAMGO were tested. The IC50 values for adenylyl cyclase inhibition for both receptors in CHO cells were identical; 8.5 ± 2.6 nM (n = 7) for wild type receptors and 5.6 ± 1.2 nM (n = 4) for mutant (T394A) receptors (Fig. 2, A and B). However, the maximum percentage inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activities was slightly different, but statistically insignificant (p > 0.05), suggesting that mutation of the Thr394 did not affect the G protein-coupling property or the functional coupling of receptors to the effector, adenylyl cyclase. In wild type receptor pretreated with 1 µM DAMGO for 1 h, agonist-dependent inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation was decreased to 60% of the maximum inhibition occurring in untreated cells and IC50 shifted to 200 ± 13 nM (Fig. 2A). Strikingly, in the mutant receptor (T394A), agonist-induced desensitization of receptors was completely abolished, as indicated by the lack of rightward shift of the IC50 and a lack of reduction in the maximum inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation. The IC50 for wild type receptor after 1 µM DAMGO treatment for 1 h was 200 ± 13 nM (n = 7) and IC50 for the T394A mutant was 5.3 ± 0.8 nM (n = 4) (Fig. 2, A and B). Thus, the Thr394 at the carboxyl tail of the receptor is critical for agonist-induced desensitization occurring within 1 h.


Fig. 2. Effects of substitution of serines and threonines in the COOH terminus of the MOR on agonist-induced desensitization. CHO cells expressing wild type and mutant receptors were incubated in the absence (bullet ) and presence (open circle ) of 1 µM DAMGO for 1 h, and subsequently the ability of increasing concentrations of DAMGO (10-11 to 10-3 M), to inhibit the forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation was tested. Data are presented as a percentage of forskolin-stimulated activity, and are shown as follows. A, wild type MOR; B, a mutant MOR in which the last threonine (T394A) was substituted to alanine; C, a mutant MOR in which 2 serines and 5 threonines between residues 363 and 383 (AT) were substituted by alanines but Thr394 was unaltered; D, the effect of seven serine or threonine substitutions on agonist-induced desensitization is presented with the effect on wild type MOR (bullet , wild type MOR without pretreatment of DAMGO; open circle , wild type MOR with DAMGO pretreatment; diamond , AT mutant receptor with DAMGO pretreatment). Data shown are the means ± S.E. of independent experiments (n = 4-8).
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]

However, the role of 7 other potential phosphorylation sites within the carboxyl tail of MOR (2 serines and 5 threonines between residues 363 and 383) remained of interest. To test whether the Thr394 was sufficient to mediate desensitization, a mutant was prepared where all 7 potential phosphorylation sites (T/S363-383A) were replaced by alanines except for the Thr394 which was left intact (AT mutant) (Fig. 1). This mutant (AT) was essentially identical to wild type receptor in expression level, agonist affinity, G protein-coupling properties, and functional coupling to adenylyl cyclase (IC50 = 8.6 ± 4.1 nM, n = 8) (Table I). The ability of this mutant receptor (AT) to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation after 1 h treatment with 1 µM DAMGO (Fig. 2C) was blunted, with maximal inhibition only 70% of that observed with wild type receptor; IC50 for wild type receptor after 1 h of agonist treatment was 200 ± 13 nM and that for AT mutant receptor was 92 ± 28 nM (n = 8) (Fig. 2, C and D). These data indicate there may be other residues in addition to the Thr394 required for full desensitization (Fig. 2D). To identify the other site(s), another mutant receptor was created in which 6 potential phosphorylation sites, 2 serines and 4 threonines, between residues 363 and 379 were substituted by alanines but the last 2 threonines at residues 383 and 394 were left intact (ATT) (Fig. 1). This mutant was also indistinguishable from wild type receptor with respect to expression level, agonist binding affinity and G protein-coupling properties (Table I). The dose-response curve for this mutant receptor (ATT) to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation by DAMGO (25 ± 9 nM, n = 4) was also not different from wild type receptor (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, the maximal inhibition induced by DAMGO by interaction with this mutant receptor (ATT) was identical with that for wild type receptors, 52 and 54%, respectively. One hour of pretreatment with 1 µM DAMGO of cells expressing mutant receptors (ATT) showed an identical degree of desensitization compared with wild type receptors; IC50 for wild type receptor after agonist treatment was 200 ± 13 nM (n = 7) and IC50 for the mutant receptor was 190 ± 12 nM (n = 4). The maximal inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity by the mutant receptor completely overlapped with that by wild type receptors (Fig. 3B). Taken together, results from these three mutants (T394A, AT and ATT) suggest the Thr394 is the primary recognition site by GRKs, but another threonine at residue 383 that is closest located, is also required for complete desensitization of the MOR.

Table I. Binding parameters for the stably transfected wild type or mutant µ opioid receptors

KH and KL, Ki are values of the high (H) and low (L) affinity states; RH and RL, proportion of receptor in high (H) and low (L) affinity states. Kd and Bmax values of naloxone binding were tested with increasing six concentration of [3H]naloxone. Ki and proportion of high and low affinity states were determined by competition assay, by incubation with 2 nM [3H]naloxone and increasing concentration of DAMGO. The binding data from saturation and competition experiments were fitted by nonlinear least-squares regression using the data analysis program LIGAND. Data shown are the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments.

[3H]Naloxone [2H]Naloxone/DAMGO
KH KL RH RL

nM %
Wild type Bmax 3.8  ± 0.9 pmol/mg 2.9  ± 0.7 326  ± 25 69  ± 2 31  ± 2
Kd 0.9  ± 0.2 nM
T394A Bmax 3.5  ± 0.5 pmol/mg 2.7  ± 1.4 329  ± 14 74  ± 2 26  ± 2
Kd 1.0  ± 0.3 nM
T/S363-383A (AT) Bmax 4.3  ± 0.3 pmol/mg 2.2  ± 1.7 370  ± 23 70  ± 1 30  ± 1
Kd 1.0  ± 0.1 nM
T/S363-379A (ATT) Bmax 4.0  ± 0.1 pmol/mg 3.2  ± 0.2 383  ± 97 71  ± 2 29  ± 2
Kd 1.0  ± 0.1 nM
E388-393Q (EQ) Bmax 2.0  ± 0.1 pmol/mg 2.9  ± 1.8 431  ± 215 73  ± 2 27  ± 2
Kd 2.5  ± 0.9 nM


Fig. 3. Effects of Thr394, Thr383, and acidic amino acids on the NH2-terminal side of Thr394 on agonist-induced desensitization of MOR. A, the effect of a mutant MOR in which 2 serines and 4 threonines between residue 363 and 379 (ATT) of MOR were changed to alanines but Thr394 and Thr383 were unaltered. This mutant receptor was incubated in the absence (bullet ) and presence (open circle ) of 1 µM DAMGO and subsequently DAMGO inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity was tested. Data shown are the mean ± S.E. of eight independent experiments. B, the effect of the mutant receptor ATT on agonist-induced desensitization (black-triangle) is presented by overlapping with the effect seen with the wild type receptor, in the absence (bullet ) and presence (open circle ) of 1 µM DAMGO pretreatment. C, the effect of a mutant MOR (EQ) in which three glutamic acids on the NH2-terminal side of Thr394 were changed to glutamines and the effect on agonist-induced desensitization was tested (bullet , EQ mutant MOR without pretreatment by DAMGO; open circle , EQ mutant MOR with DAMGO pretreatment). Data shown are representative of four independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]

Analysis of phosphorylation of a synthetic peptide based on beta 2AR or alpha 2AR sequence showed that negatively charged residues are required for a peptide to serve as a substrate for GRK2 (23). Support for the idea that the Thr394 serves as the primary recognition site for GRKs, compared with the other potential sites in the carboxyl tail, resulted from the stretch of acidic amino acids in front of it, a mutant receptor was created in which glutamic acid residues at 388, 391, and 393 were replaced by glutamines and Thr394 was left intact (EQ). This mutant (EQ) was expressed at low densities and naloxone binding affinity was marginally higher (Table I). However, Ki values for DAMGO at high and low receptor affinity states and their proportions were comparable to those of wild type receptors, indicating no changes in G-protein coupling ability. As shown in Fig. 3C, agonist-induced desensitization was completely abolished in the EQ mutant. Thus, the acidic amino acid residues preceding the Thr394 are absolutely necessary for Thr394 to play the critical role in desensitization, possibly by facilitating phosphorylation of Thr394 by a GRK.


DISCUSSION

Our results demonstrate that the Thr394 and preceding acidic amino acids at the carboxyl tail of the MOR are the key residues required for agonist-induced receptor desensitization. Agonist-induced receptor desensitization has been proposed to be due to phosphorylation of the agonist-bound form of receptors by GRKs (reviewed in Inglese et al. (24) and Lefkowitz (25)). Furthermore, the recognition sites for these kinases have been identified as repeated serines and threonines at the carboxyl tail by phosphopeptide sequencing of high pressure liquid chromatography-purified peptides derived from proteolysis of phosphorylated receptors (1, 26). Since there are usually several repeated serine/threonine residues in the carboxyl tails of G protein-coupled receptors, it is of interest to determine whether all of these residues are required to be phosphorylated to attenuate prolonged agonist-induced stimulation.

Numerous studies have attempted to answer this question by using truncation mutations of the carboxyl tail of various lengths, to interfere with both receptor phosphorylation and agonist-induced desensitization (1-8). These studies demonstrated that phosphorylation of particular residues are necessary for desensitization. These results raise the question of how GRKs distinguish certain serine or threonine residues from others. Analysis of the phosphorylation of several synthetic peptides based on beta 2AR sequence identified two peptides that were phosphorylated by GRK2. Interestingly, the feature common to both substrate peptides was the presence of acidic amino acids, mostly glutamic acids, in close proximity to serine and threonine residues (1, 6, 23, 27-31). However, peptides with glutamic acid residues on the carboxyl-terminal side of the serine or threonine were not substrates for GRK2 (23). A peptide with glutamic acid residues on both sides of the serine residue was also a poor substrate. Furthermore, a peptide that was a good GRK2 substrate became poorly phosphorylated when acidic amino acids at the amino-terminal side of the phosphorylation sites were changed to their neutral counterparts (6, 23). This strongly suggests that amino-terminal acidic amino acids relative to the phosphate acceptor group is a requirement for GRK2 recognition. In contrast to GRK2, rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) recognizes a serine or threonine residue located on the carboxyl-terminal side of basic amino acids (1, 23). This seems to indicate that even though there are several GRKs in this family of kinases, they each have different substrate specificity together with different tissue distributions (24, 25).

Sequential phosphorylation of different residues has been demonstrated in the case of rhodopsin, in which light-dependent phosphorylation occurs first at the serine in position 338, and subsequently at serine 343 and then threonine 336 (4, 32-34). In the case of the human C5a anaphylatoxin receptor, phosphoamino acid analysis of C5a-dependent phosphorylation showed the maximal stoichiometry to be 6 moles of phosphate/mole of receptor. However, mutation of 2 particular serines at positions 332 and 338 completely abolished agonist-dependent phosphorylation, further suggesting multiple phosphorylations occurring in a sequential manner (9). However, in the case of alpha 2AR, there are 4 consecutive serines in the third intracellular loop and substitution of each serine decreased overall phosphorylation by 25% when compared with that of wild type alpha 2AR (6). Since both C5a anaphylatoxin receptor and alpha 2AR are substrates for the same kinase, GRK2, it is unlikely that these two different patterns of phosphorylation are due to different substrate and kinase interactions. It remains to be determined if the nonsequential nature of alpha 2AR phosphorylation reflected the close proximity of each serine residue or its third loop location. However, in our study, substitution of the Thr394 completely abolished agonist-induced desensitization, whereas for achieving the full agonist-induced desensitization, both Thr383 and Thr394 appear necessary in the carboxyl terminus. This would be best explained by a sequential phosphorylation model, in which Thr383 can be phosphorylated only after Thr394 is already phosphorylated. Since it has been reported that GRK2 is the most predominant of the GRK isoforms expressed in CHO cells, as evidenced by Western blotting experiments with antibodies specific for GRK2 and GRK3 (35), we postulate that these two threonine residues are the likely targets for GRK2 action, leading to receptor phosphorylation and desensitization. It remains, however, to be shown that phosphorylation does occur at these threonine residues specifically.

Since there are many repeated serines and threonines in the carboxyl tail of the MOR, it is important to know whether all of these residues actually need to be phosphorylated for receptor desensitization. Furthermore, another unknown factor is whether the sites identified in the cell culture study represent the sites of phosphorylation in endogenous tissues under physiological conditions. Although the stoichiometry of maximum receptor phosphorylation using biochemical experiments has been calculated for many receptors, the actual stoichiometry in vivo in living tissues has not been well studied yet. For instance, cell culture studies have suggested that multiphosphorylation of rhodopsin occurs at as many as 9 residues, but an in vivo study using retinas collected from mice demonstrated that only a single phosphate group was incorporated into the mouse rhodopsin molecule in a light-dependent manner, at serine 338 after light flashes and at serine 334 after continuous illumination (4, 36), both of which were found to be major sites for in vitro phosphorylation. Our data also shows that among the 8 serines or threonines in the carboxyl tail that we have examined, only two threonine residues at 383 and 394 are necessary for agonist-induced desensitization.

Another interesting feature of GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation is that the time course of this event seems to be regulated by the primary recognition residue, usually serine in the carboxyl tail, because the most prominent and rapid desensitization seems to occur in parallel with phosphorylation of the primary recognition site. In the case of the serotonin type 2 receptor (5-HT2R) and the thrombin receptor, each has a similar carboxyl tail structure but a very different time course of functional desensitization, even though they interact with the same effector, phospholipase C. Thrombin receptor desensitization occurs rapidly, but 5-HT2R desensitization is slower. However, a chimeric receptor having the core of the 5-HT2R with the carboxyl-tail of thrombin receptor undergoes rapid desensitization, suggesting that the structure of the carboxyl-tail may determine the time course of desensitization (8). Given that GRKs have a preference for serine residues over threonine (23), and since the thrombin receptor has only serine residues clustered in an acidic environment in the carboxyl tail, it might be interesting to speculate that the slower time course of desensitization of the 5-HT2R might be due to its primary phosphorylation site being threonine. This speculation is very tempting to apply to our data, since the time course of desensitization of the MOR is slower than GRK-mediated desensitization of other receptors, and the primary recognition site for MOR desensitization as we have shown, appears to rely on two threonine residues in the carboxyl tail.

In summary, we have established that both Thr394 and a cluster of glutamic acids at residues 388, 391, and 393 preceding Thr394 in the carboxyl-tail of the MOR are absolute requirements for agonist-induced MOR desensitization. However, Thr383, the closest threonine to Thr394, plays an additional role in this desensitization if Thr394 is left unchanged. Since Thr394 with a stretch of acidic amino acid residues at its amino terminus side serves as an ideal sequence for GRK2 action, we propose the following model. Thr394 is the primary site that is targeted upon agonist binding to the MOR, with recognition of this putative phosphorylation site being dependent on the acidic residues preceding it. This phosphorylation event by itself can lead to submaximal (70%) receptor desensitization. Subsequent sequential phosphorylation of Thr383, after Thr394 phosphorylation, would effect the complete desensitization of the MOR in response to agonist.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported in part by grants from the Medical Research Council of Canada, National Institute for Drug Abuse, Smokeless Tobacco Research Council, and the Gifford-Jones Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   Recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from the Addiction Research Foundation.
**   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Medical Science Bldg., Rm. 4358, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada. Tel.: 416-978-3367; Fax: 416-971-2868; E-mail: s.george{at}utoronto.ca.
1   The abbreviations used are: beta AR, beta -adrenergic receptor; GRK, G protein-coupled receptor kinase; alpha 2AR, alpha 2-adrenergic receptor; PKC, protein kinase C; DOR, delta  opioid receptor; MOR, µ opioid receptor; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; DAMGO, [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol5] enkephalin; 5-HT2R, serotonin type 2 receptor.

REFERENCES

  1. Fredericks, Z. L., Pitcher, J. A., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13796-13803 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Premont, R. T., Koch, W. J., Inglese, J., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6832-6841 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Palczewski, K., and Benovic, J. L. (1991) Trends. Biochem. Sci. 16, 387-391 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Ohguro, H., Van Hooser, J. P., Milam, A. H., and Palczewski, K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14259-14262 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Jewell-Motz, E. A., and Liggett, S. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 18082-18087 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Eason, M. G., Moreira, S. P., and Liggett, S. B. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4681-4688 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Takano, T., Honda, Z., Sakanaka, C., Izumi, T., Kameyama, K., Haga, K., Haga, T., Kurokawa, K., and Shimizu, T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 22453-22458 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Vouret-Craviari, V., Auberger, P., Pouyssegur, J., and Van ObberghenSchilling, E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4813-4821 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Giannini, E., Brouchon, L., and Boulay, F. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19166-19172 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Simon, E. (1991) Med. Res. Rev. 11, 357-374 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Koob, G., Maldonado, R., and Stinus, L. (1992) Trends. Neurosci. 15, 186-191 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Koob, G., and Bloom, F. (1992) Science 242, 715-719
  13. Fukushima, N., Ueda, H., Hayashi, C., Katayama, T., Miyamae, T., and Misu, Y. (1994) Neurosci. Lett. 176, 55-58 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Pei, G., Kieffer, B. L., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Freedman, N. J. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 48, 173-177 [Abstract]
  15. Chen, Y., and Yu, L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7839-7842 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Zhang, L., Yu, Y., Mackin, S., Weight, F. F., Uhl, G. R., and Wang, J. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11449-11454 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Raynor, K., Kong, H., Hines, J., Kong, G., Benovic, J., Yasuda, K., Bell, G. I., and Reisine, T. (1994) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 270, 1381-1386 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Pak, Y., Kouvelas, A., Scheideler, M. A., Rasmussen, J., O'Dowd, B. F., and George, S. R. (1996) Mol. Pharmacol. 50, 1214-1222 [Abstract]
  19. Zimprich, A., Simon, T., and Hollt, V. (1995) FEBS Lett. 359, 142-146 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Liggett, S. B., Ostrowski, J., Chesnut, L. C., Kurose, H., Raymond, J. R., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4740-4746 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Salomon, Y., Londos, C., and Rodbell, M. (1974) Anal. Biochem. 58, 541-548 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Onorato, J. J., Palczewski, K., Regan, J. W., Caron, M. G., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Benovic, J. L. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 5118-5125 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Inglese, J., Freedman, N. J., Koch, W. J., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23735-23738 [Free Full Text]
  25. Lefkowitz, R. J. (1993) Cell 74, 409-412 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Palczewski, K., Arendt, A., McDowell, J. H., and Hargrave, P. A. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 8764-8770 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Richardson, R. M., Kim, C., Benovic, J. L., and Hosey, M. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13650-13656 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Blaxall, H. S., Cerutis, R., Hass, N. A., Iverson, L. J., and Bylund, D. B. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol. 45, 176-181 [Abstract]
  29. Barton, A. C., and Sibley, D. R. (1990) Mol. Pharmacol. 38, 531-541 [Abstract]
  30. Barton, A. C., Black, L. E., and Sibley, D. R. (1991) Mol. Pharmacol. 39, 650-658 [Abstract]
  31. Bates, M. D., Senogles, S. E., Bunzow, J. R., Liggett, S. B., Civelli, O., and Caron, M. G. (1991) Mol. Pharmacol. 39, 55-63 [Abstract]
  32. Ohguro, H., Palczewski, K., Ericsson, L. H., Walsh, K. A., and Johnson, R. S. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 5718-5724 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Palczewski, K., Ohguro, H., Premont, R. T., and Inglese, J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15294-15298 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Pullen, N., and Akhtar, M. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 14536-14542 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Kurose, H., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10093-10099 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Chen, J., Makino, C. L., Peachey, N. S., Baylor, D. A., and Simon, M. I. (1995) Science 267, 374-377 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Fan, G. Varghese, T. Nguyen, R. Tse, B. F. O'Dowd, and S. R. George
A Role for the Distal Carboxyl Tails in Generating the Novel Pharmacology and G Protein Activation Profile of {micro} and {delta} Opioid Receptor Hetero-oligomers
J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38478 - 38488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
T. Koch, A. Widera, K. Bartzsch, S. Schulz, L.-O. Brandenburg, N. Wundrack, A. Beyer, G. Grecksch, and V. Hollt
Receptor Endocytosis Counteracts the Development of Opioid Tolerance
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2005; 67(1): 280 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Qiu, P.-Y. Law, and H. H. Loh
{micro}-Opioid Receptor Desensitization: ROLE OF RECEPTOR PHOSPHORYLATION, INTERNALIZATION, AND RESENSITIZATION
J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2003; 278(38): 36733 - 36739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Li, B. Xiang, W. Su, X. Zhang, Y. Huang, and L. Ma
Agonist-induced Formation of Opioid Receptor-G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase (GRK)-G{beta}{gamma} Complex on Membrane Is Required for GRK2 Function in Vivo
J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 30219 - 30226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Lamey, M. Thompson, G. Varghese, H. Chi, M. Sawzdargo, S. R. George, and B. F. O'Dowd
Distinct Residues in the Carboxyl Tail Mediate Agonist-induced Desensitization and Internalization of the Human Dopamine D1 Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., March 8, 2002; 277(11): 9415 - 9421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
C. Chavkin, J. P. McLaughlin, and J. P. Celver
Regulation of Opioid Receptor Function by Chronic Agonist Exposure: Constitutive Activity and Desensitization
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2001; 60(1): 20 - 25.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Ueda, M. Inoue, and T. Matsumoto
Protein Kinase C-Mediated Inhibition of {micro}-Opioid Receptor Internalization and Its Involvement in the Development of Acute Tolerance to Peripheral {micro}-Agonist Analgesia
J. Neurosci., May 1, 2001; 21(9): 2967 - 2973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J. T. Williams, M. J. Christie, and O. Manzoni
Cellular and Synaptic Adaptations Mediating Opioid Dependence
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2001; 81(1): 299 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
J. Guo, Y. Wu, W. Zhang, J. Zhao, L. A. Devi, G. Pei, and L. Ma
Identification of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 Phosphorylation Sites Responsible for Agonist-Stimulated delta -Opioid Receptor Phosphorylation
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2000; 58(5): 1050 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
P.-Y. Law, L. J. Erickson, R. El-Kouhen, L. Dicker, J. Solberg, W. Wang, E. Miller, A. L. Burd, and H. H. Loh
Receptor Density and Recycling Affect the Rate of Agonist-Induced Desensitization of {micro}-Opioid Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2000; 58(2): 388 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Pak, B. F. O'Dowd, J. B. Wang, and S. R. George
Agonist-induced, G Protein-dependent and -independent Down-regulation of the {micro} Opioid Receptor. THE RECEPTOR IS A DIRECT SUBSTRATE FOR PROTEIN-TYROSINE KINASE
J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 1999; 274(39): 27610 - 27616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. Xie, G. M. Samoriski, J. P. McLaughlin, V. A. Romoser, A. Smrcka, P. M. Hinkle, J. M. Bidlack, R. A. Gross, H. Jiang, and D. Wu
Genetic alteration of phospholipase C beta 3 expression modulates behavioral and cellular responses to {micro} opioids
PNAS, August 31, 1999; 96(18): 10385 - 10390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. M. Appleyard, J. Celver, V. Pineda, A. Kovoor, G. A. Wayman, and C. Chavkin
Agonist-dependent Desensitization of the kappa Opioid Receptor by G Protein Receptor Kinase and beta -Arrestin
J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 1999; 274(34): 23802 - 23807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P.-Y. Law and H. H. Loh
Regulation of Opioid Receptor Activities
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 1999; 289(2): 607 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. El Kouhen, O. M.-E. Kouhen, P.-Y. Law, and H. H. Loh
The Absence of a Direct Correlation between the Loss of [D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly5-ol]Enkephalin Inhibition of Adenylyl Cyclase Activity and Agonist-induced µ-Opioid Receptor Phosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem., April 2, 1999; 274(14): 9207 - 9215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
R. Wolf, T. Koch, S. Schulz, M. Klutzny, H. Schröder, E. Raulf, F. Bühling, and V. Höllt
Replacement of Threonine 394 by Alanine Facilitates Internalization and Resensitization of the Rat µ Opioid Receptor
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 1999; 55(2): 263 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. L. Burd, R. El-Kouhen, L. J. Erickson, H. H. Loh, and P.-Y. Law
Identification of Serine 356 and Serine 363 as the Amino Acids Involved in Etorphine-induced Down-regulation of the µ-Opioid Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., December 18, 1998; 273(51): 34488 - 34495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z.-J. Cheng, Q.-M. Yu, Y.-L. Wu, L. Ma, and G. Pei
Selective Interference of beta -Arrestin 1 with kappa  and delta  but Not µ Opioid Receptor/G Protein Coupling
J. Biol. Chem., September 18, 1998; 273(38): 24328 - 24333.
[Abstract] [Full Text]