JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Boothby, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Boothby, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 40, Issue of October 3, 1997 pp. 25083-25090
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

HMG-I(Y) Phosphorylation Status as a Nuclear Target Regulated through Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 and the I4R Motif of the Interleukin-4 Receptor*

(Received for publication, February 3, 1997, and in revised form, June 26, 1997)

Dingzhi Wang Dagger , Jose Zamorano §, Achsah D. Keegan § and Mark Boothby Dagger

From the Dagger  Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2363 and the § Immunology Department, Holland Laboratories, American Red Cross, Bethesda, Maryland 20855

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Interleukin (IL)-4 is a cytokine that regulates both the growth and differentiation of hematopoietic cells. Its ligand binding specificity and important signal transduction mechanisms are conferred by the IL-4 receptor alpha  chain (IL-4Ralpha ). The I4R is a tyrosine-containing motif within IL-4Ralpha that is critical for proliferative responses to IL-4. Although the I4R also contributes to gene regulation, nuclear targets directly regulated by this motif have not been described. It is shown here that the tyrosine at position 497 in the I4R is critical for regulation of the phosphorylation status of a set of nuclear proteins that includes HMG-I(Y), small non-histone chromosomal proteins involved in the control of gene expression in hematopoietic cell lines. Moreover, IL-4 is unable to induce HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation in insulin receptor substrate-1-deficient cells, and the inhibitor wortmannin completely blocks IL-4 regulation of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation status but not activation of an IL-4 Stat protein. Taken together, these data indicate that HMG-I(Y) is a nuclear target whose phosphorylation status is regulated through the I4R motif via insulin receptor substrate proteins, independent of activation of the Stat pathway.


INTRODUCTION

Interleukin (IL)1-4 is a cytokine produced by T cells, mast cells, and basophils (1, 2). Although originally identified on the basis of its stimulation of B lymphocyte proliferation, the pleiotropic effects of IL-4 are now known to include regulation of proliferation, gene expression, and stable differentiation of both lymphocytic and other hematopoietic cells (2, 3). The target genes crucial for IL-4 induction of proliferation are not known, whereas genes activated in B lymphocytes by IL-4 include CD23, class II major histocompatibility antigens, molecules critical to the regulation of T cell activation by B cells, and the immunoglobulin heavy chain epsilon  locus in its germ line arrangement (3-8). Importantly, the genes regulated by IL-4 exert regulatory influences on immune function for which the precise level of gene expression is critical (9, 10). These varied biological functions of IL-4 are regulated through one or more receptor complexes that include a high affinity binding chain, IL-4Ralpha , a member of the hematopoietin receptor gene superfamily (11-13). The IL-4Ralpha chain pairs with an accessory chain, gamma c, while other forms of IL-4 receptor may use a different accessory chain (13-15). Accordingly, the mechanisms by which IL-4Ralpha transduces signals to nuclear proteins represent a fundamental issue in understanding the functions of IL-4.

IL-4Ralpha is widely expressed and contains an extended cytoplasmic tail devoid of intrinsic kinase activity. Non-covalently associated kinases of the Janus kinase family are activated after receptor engagement, leading in turn to phosphorylation of conserved tyrosine residues within the cytoplasmic domain of IL-4Ralpha (12, 16-18). Conserved phosphotyrosine residues at positions 575,2 603, and 631 are recognized by the SH2 domains of the latent cytoplasmic transcription factor Stat6, a member of the Signal Transduction and Activation of Transcription (Stat) family, and docking of Stat6 monomers leads to their phosphorylation, dimerization, and nuclear translocation (19-22). Targeted gene disruption experiments in mice show that an intact Stat6 signaling pathway mediates important IL-4 effects on gene expression, whereas the role of Stat6 in regulating proliferation is quite variable (20, 23-25). However, certain mRNAs may be IL-4-inducible in Stat6-deficient mouse hematopoietic cells (64), thus raising further questions about Stat6-independent signal transduction.

The most membrane-proximal conserved tyrosine, Tyr-1, is at position 497 of the primary sequence of human IL-4Ralpha . In contrast to the distal residues thought most responsible for Stat6 recruitment, phosphorylation of the Tyr-1 residue leads to recruitment of adaptor proteins termed insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2 (originally called 4PS), and this phosphorylation is critical for the ability of IL-4 to stimulate proliferation of the myeloid progenitor cell line 32D (26-28). Based on a shared sequence motif and homology with insulin receptor signal transduction, the region spanning IL-4Ralpha Tyr-1 has been termed the I4R motif (28). Although the I4R motif clearly regulates proliferative responses, its contribution to the regulation of nuclear proteins and gene transcription is less well understood. Emerging data indicate that the I4R motif can contribute to modulation of transcriptional activity through Stat6-independent mechanism(s) (29).3 However, the set of nuclear proteins whose phosphorylation status is regulated through the I4R and the dependence of their regulation on Stat6 remain unclear.

One potential target for Stat6-independent regulation is the non-histone chromosomal protein HMG-I(Y). HMG-I(Y) is a nuclear protein involved in the signal-induced regulation of multiple genes, including virus activation of interferon beta , IL-1 activation of E-selectin, induction of IL-2Ralpha chain and repression of IL-4 transcription in activated T cells, and regulation of the germ line immunoglobulin epsilon (Gepsilon ) promoter (30-36). The phosphorylation status of HMG-I(Y) is regulated in response to IL-4, and the phosphorylated form of HMG-I(Y) exhibits a lower affinity for Gepsilon promoter DNA in vitro, suggesting that phosphorylation decreases the repressor effect of HMG-I(Y) at the Gepsilon promoter in B lymphocytes (37). Since HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation status is regulated through a pathway that appeared independent from Stat6 activation but sensitive to the immunosuppressive agent rapamycin (37, 38), we formulated the hypothesis that this phosphorylation is regulated through the I4R motif rather than the membrane-distal phosphotyrosine residues implicated in Stat6 activation. To investigate this hypothesis, the ability of wild-type and mutant forms of the IL-4 receptor to regulate HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation was measured. Because the I4R motif is linked to IRS-1 recruitment and activation of the lipid kinase PI 3-kinase, we also investigated the requirement for these signal transduction elements in IL-4-inducible HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Culture and Metabolic Labeling

Stable transfectants of the IL-3-dependent myeloid progenitor line 32D, bearing wild-type or mutant human IL-4Ralpha chains with or without transfected rat IRS-1, have been described previously (26, 28). Specific clones used in this study were as follows: wild-type hIL-4R (W.T.; clones 8-2B4 and 8-2B4A6), full-length hIL-4R with Y497F (clones 8-5B6 and 8-5D3), and truncations whose end points are at residue 657 (d657) or 557 (d557) (5-3WY0 and 5-3WY2; 6-3W3 and 6-3W13, respectively). These cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 units ml-1 penicillin, 50 units ml-1 streptomycin, 3 mM L-glutamine, 100 µM 2-mercaptoethanol (RP/10F is complete RPMI 1640 media with 10% fetal bovine serum), and 5% conditioned medium from WEHI-3 cells as a source of IL-3. To prepare conditioned medium, WEHI-3 cells were grown to confluence in Iscove's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 units ml-1 penicillin, 50 units ml-1 streptomycin, and 3 mM L-glutamine. After culture for 4 days in stationary phase, cell debris were removed by centrifugation and sterile filtration. For metabolic labeling experiments, 32D cells (106 cells ml-1) were removed from WEHI-3-conditioned medium and then cultured for 20 h in RP/10F. M12 B lymphoma cells transfected with a truncated huIL-2Rbeta and the Chim-1 chimera of huIL-2Rbeta -huIL4R (residues 457-557) have been described previously (29). Mouse splenocytes were prepared as described (5). Cells were rinsed twice with serum- and phosphate-free RPMI 1640 medium and then resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 50 units ml-1 penicillin, 50 units ml-1 streptomycin, 3 mM L-glutamine, 100 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 10% dialyzed fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.). Cells were cultured for 4 h at 37 °C with 40 µCi ml-1 [32P]orthophosphate (NEN Life Science Products) and then stimulated 4 h with huIL-2 (100 units ml-1; for M12 cells only), huIL-4 (10 ng ml-1), or mIL-4 (10 ng ml-1). For experiments with pharmacologic inhibitors, cells were separately incubated with rapamycin (100 nM), genistein (75 µM), or wortmannin (100 nM), or the solvent (a 1:1 v/v mixture of dimethyl sulfoxide and ethanol) at 1:1000 for 20 h and 2 h prior to stimulation with IL-4.

Reagents

Purified recombinant human IL-4 (huIL-4) was obtained as generous gifts from M. Widmer (Immunex, Seattle, WA) and J. Devries (DNAX, Palo Alto, CA). Purified recombinant mouse IL-4 (mIL-4) was purchased from BioSource International (Camarillo, CA), and IL-4 conditioned medium was prepared from a myeloma cell line transduced with a mIL-4 expression vector as described previously (39). Purified recombinant huIL-2 was obtained from the Biological Response Modifiers Program (Frederick, MD). Rapamycin was a generous gift of S. Sehgal (Wyeth-Ayerst, Princeton, NJ), and was stored at -80 °C in absolute ethanol. Sodium orthovanadate and sodium fluoride were purchased from Sigma, and fresh aqueous solutions were prepared prior to each experiment. Wortmannin and genistein were purchased from Sigma and Life Technologies, Inc., respectively, dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide, and stored at -20 °C. Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad).

Analysis of Nuclear Proteins

After labeling as described above, cells were harvested, rinsed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and lysed with 0.5% Nonidet P-40 in 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (RSB), supplemented with 20 µM leupeptin, 10 µg ml-1 aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1 mM sodium fluoride. Nuclei were pelleted after lysis of the cells, and nuclear extracts were prepared as described previously (37) except for supplementation with protease and phosphatase inhibitors as above. Resolution of basic nuclear proteins by two-dimensional electrophoresis on acid-urea gels followed by SDS-PAGE was performed as described previously (37, 40). For selected experiments, the two-dimensional gels were silver-stained to detect relative protein levels, then exposed to autoradiographic film and phosphorimaging plates, whereas in other experiments aliquots of the nuclear proteins were silver-stained separately. To quantify incorporation of 32P into phosphorylated HMG-I(Y) using a Fuji BAS 1000 phosphorimager, the net density units ("PSLs") incorporated into HMG-I(Y) in each gel were adjusted by subtracting plate background. This incorporation into HMG-I(Y) was normalized by dividing HMG-I(Y)-specific PSLs by the net PSLs in an internal reference spot that was consistently resolved from other labeled proteins. The efficiency of the huIL-4R transfected into a given 32D clone relative to the mouse IL-4R was defined as follows: ({(normalized PSLs in HMG-I(Y)}huIL-4-treated - {normalized PSLs in HMG-I(Y)}basaldiv  ({normalized PSLs in HMG-I(Y)}mouse IL-4-treated - {normalized PSLs in HMG-I(Y)}basal). For gel shift analyses, 32D cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum in the absence of IL-3 for 0 or 2 h and then stimulated with IL-4 for 0.5 h. Electrophoretic mobility shift analyses were performed using a double-stranded oligonucleotide representing the Stat6 binding site spanning nucleotides -122 to -104 of the Gepsilon promoter after preparation of whole cell or nuclear extracts, as described previously (38, 41).

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting

Analyses of phosphotyrosine-containing proteins were performed as described previously (28). After pretreatment with genistein as appropriate, cells deprived of serum for 2 h at 37 °C were cultured in the presence or absence of huIL-4 (5 ng ml-1) for 5 min at 22 °C. The reaction was terminated by dilution in ice-cold PBS containing 100 µM Na3VO4. Cells were lysed in 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, with 50 mM NaF, 10 mM NaPPi, and protease inhibitors (28), followed by immunoprecipitation of proteins in the soluble fraction using a polyclonal rabbit antiserum against rat IRS-1 (generous gift of L. M. Wang and J. Pierce, LCMB, National Institutes of Health). Precipitates were washed in lysis buffer, dissolved in SDS sample buffer, and separated by SDS-PAGE. Resolved proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and probed with the 4G10 monoclonal antiphosphotyrosine antibody or rabbit anti-IRS-1. Bound antibodies were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Corp.).


RESULTS

The I4R Motif Is Essential for IL-4-induced HMG-I(Y) Phosphorylation

At least two spatially distinct motifs have been identified within the cytoplasmic domain of the IL-4 receptor alpha  chain as follows: an I4R region originally linked to control of proliferation but not gene expression or Stat6 phosphorylation (20, 28), and dominant Stat6 docking sites distal to amino acid 557 (19, 22, 42). More recent evidence indicates that lymphocyte proliferation is impaired by Stat6 gene disruption (23-25), whereas HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation status has been correlated with proliferation of cells (43, 44). These observations are consistent with a role for either or both of the IL-4Ralpha motifs in regulation of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation status. To determine which of these IL-4Ralpha motifs, the I4R or Stat6 docking motifs, mediates IL-4 regulation of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation, the ability of wild-type and mutant forms of the human IL-4Ralpha (huIL-4R) to confer regulated HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation was analyzed using transfectants derived from the myeloid progenitor line 32D.

To measure IL-4 regulation of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation, metabolic labeling experiments and two-dimensional acid-urea/SDS-PAGE analyses were performed using a panel of 32D transfectants all of which also expressed rat IRS-1. Because of the known potential for clone-to-clone and inter-experimental variation, we employed a widely used strategy to control for these technical issues. Human and mouse IL-4 exhibit species-specific binding to their respective receptors. Thus, the effect of human IL-4 receptors expressed on a given 32D clone can be compared with the effect of the endogenous mouse IL-4 receptors, and huIL-4R expressed on different clones also can be compared. As shown in Fig. 1A, IL-4 increases the phosphorylation of a set of the basic nuclear proteins which enter acid-urea gels. Of particular note, human IL-4 induced an increase in HMG-I(Y) (arrows) phosphorylation comparable to that observed with mouse IL-4. Since no significant changes in the amount of HMG-I(Y) and other nuclear proteins were observed on silver-stained gels (Fig. 1B), this increase in labeled protein represents an increase in the specific activity of HMG-I(Y).


Fig. 1.

IL-4-inducible phosphorylation of HMG-I(Y) in the 32D cell line requires an intact I4R motif. A, a Y497F substitution in human IL-4Ralpha abolishes huIL-4-inducible HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation. Stably transfected variants of the IL-3-dependent mouse myeloid progenitor cell line 32D were used for metabolic labeling experiments. Each clone expressed rat IRS-1 and either a wild-type IL-4Ralpha (W.T.; clone 8-2B4A6) or a full-length substitution mutant in which tyrosine 497 (conserved Tyr-1) was replaced by phenylalanine (Y497F; clones 8-5B6 and 8-5D3). Cells cultured in 32PO4 were then cultured for 4 h in media alone (none) or media supplemented with purified recombinant huIL-4 or mIL-4 as indicated. After harvest and lysis of the cells, equal masses of radiolabeled nuclear proteins derived from equal cell numbers were electrophoresed on 15% polyacrylamide acid-urea tube gels in the first dimension followed by 15% SDS-PAGE. The acid-urea dimension ran from right to left on the horizontal axis, and SDS-PAGE was from top to bottom. The HMG-I and Y spots are indicated by double arrowheads on the autoradiographs. B, constant HMG-I(Y) levels among experimental samples. Representative results of silver-stained two-dimensional acid-urea/SDS gels used to resolve the nuclear extracts prepared in metabolic labeling experiments. Arrows mark the position of HMG-I(Y). C, quantitation of the results of metabolic labelings shown in A. The ordinate plots PSLs, arbitrary units of beta -particle capture by the phosphorimaging plates. A series of four experiments with two clones bearing each receptor confirmed the inability of the human IL-4, and the ability of mouse IL-4, to induce HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation in Y497F clones. square , basal; , huIL-4; black-square, mIL-4.


[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]

Function of the I4R motif has previously been shown to require a tyrosine at position 497 (Tyr-1) (28). Accordingly, to test if I4R function is required for IL-4 to regulate HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation, parallel labeling experiments were performed using cells transfected with a full-length human IL-4Ralpha bearing the Tyr right-arrow Phe substitution that blocks IRS-1 recruitment and inactivates the I4R motif (28). This Y497F (Y1F) substitution completely eliminated the ability of huIL-4 to induce increases in HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation in each of the two clones tested (8-5B6 and 8-5D3). In sharp contrast, the endogenous wild-type mouse IL-4R in these clones was fully competent to increase HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation (Fig. 1A, right-hand panels; Fig. 1C). This finding indicates that the failure to increase HMG-I(Y) labeling is specific for the mutant human receptor and contradicts the alternative possibility that the huIL-4R Y497F mutant leads to clones in which the basal rate of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation cannot be increased by IL-4 signaling. Quantitation of the results of these experiments showed that the wild-type human receptor was as potent as the mouse receptor, whereas the Y497F (Y1F) mutation dramatically inhibited this function of the IL-4Ralpha chain (Fig. 1C). The phosphorylation status of other basic nuclear proteins resolved in these two-dimensional gels also was sensitive to IL-4 and dependent on I4R function. Although the identity of these other proteins has not been determined,4 we nonetheless can conclude that an intact I4R is essential for regulation of IL-4-inducible increases in HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation.

The above data provide evidence that an intact I4R is essential for regulation of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation by IL-4. However, it was possible that the quantitative level of Stat6 activation might also contribute to regulation of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation (37). Human IL-4 receptors that terminate at amino acid residue 557 (d557), between Tyr-1 and Tyr-2, have a greatly reduced competence to induce Stat6 (Fig. 2A). In contrast, receptors truncated at residue 657 (d657) are fully competent to induce Stat6 (20, 22, 42). We measured the ability of each of these truncated receptors, as well as wild-type huIL-4R or Y497F, to regulate HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation in comparison to the endogenous mouse IL-4R (Fig. 2B). For each individual gel, quantitative measurements of 32P incorporation into HMG-I(Y) were normalized to labeling of a single spot on the gel as an independent internal cellular reference standard. The results show that a receptor minimally competent to induce Stat6 (d557) is highly active in regulating HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation compared with receptors with normal Stat6 induction (W.T. and d657).5 Taken together, these findings indicate that the capacity to regulate HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation is encoded proximal to residue 557 and that the level of Stat6 induction does not influence this process.


Fig. 2. I4R-dependent regulation of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation is quantitatively independent of nuclear Stat6 induction. A, minimal Stat6 induction by a receptor fully competent to signal HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation. The autoradiographic results of a representative gel mobility shift analysis using stable transfectants of the 32D cell line are shown. After growth in IL-3, the indicated clones were incubated in media alone (lanes 1 and 4) or media supplemented with mouse (lanes 2 and 5) or human IL-4 (lanes 3 and 6) for 0.5 h. Following preparation of whole cell extracts, assays of Stat binding activity were performed using a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide probe bearing the n4 Stat binding site from the mouse Gepsilon promoter (38). These data were obtained using clones 8-2B4 (WT, lanes 1-3) and 3-9W5 (d557, lanes 4-6). B, the results of metabolic labeling experiments were quantified as described under "Materials and Methods" after phosphorimaging the electrophoretograms generated by two-dimensional acid-urea/SDS-PAGE. For each individual gel, normalized phosphorylation was calculated as the incorporation of phosphate into HMG-I(Y) divided by the labeling of an internal reference protein. Normalized phosphorylation induced by huIL-4, reflecting the transfected human receptor, was then divided by that induced by mIL-4, reflecting the endogenous wild-type mouse receptor. This latter value was defined as the relative efficiency, which is zero if phosphate on HMG-I(Y) was no greater than basal phosphate incorporation. As an internal control, mouse IL-4 induced significant increases in HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation over basal levels in each clone. Each bar represents the data from at least three independent experiments and two individual clones of 32D cells transfected with IRS-1 and the indicated receptor. The human receptors tested were wild-type (W.T.), full-length Y497F, and truncations whose end points are at residue 657 (d657) or 557 (d557). Schematic diagrams to the left show the approximate positions of Tyr-1 to Tyr-4 (residues 497, 575, 603, and 631, respectively) in the huIL-4Ralpha molecule.
[View Larger Version of this Image (29K GIF file)]

Expression of the IRS-1 Adaptor Protein Is Required for IL-4-inducible HMG-I(Y) Phosphorylation

Although 32D cells express functional gamma c chains and a normal level of mIL-4Ralpha (about 1000 receptors/cell), mIL-4 does not induce proliferation unless expression of the adaptor protein IRS-1 is conferred by transfection (26). Expression of IRS-1 in 32D cells significantly increases their mitogenic response to IL-4 and potentiates tyrosine phosphorylation of downstream targets such as IRS-1 and IRS-2 (4PS) in response to mIL-4 (27). Moreover, the role of IRS-1 and its phosphorylation are dependent on a functional I4R motif (28). These findings prompted us to hypothesize that IRS-1 is a component of the signal transduction pathway linking IL-4 with HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation status. The experiments presented above (Figs. 1 and 2) were performed using clones that express IRS-1. To investigate the requirement for IRS-1 in this pathway, we compared the ability of IL-4 to regulate HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation in 32D cells co-expressing huIL-4Ralpha and IRS-1 to its effect on clones expressing huIL-4Ralpha alone. The results (Fig. 3A) show that regulated phosphorylation occurred only when the IRS-1 protein was present. Because the phosphorylation of other nuclear proteins increased in IL-4-treated IRS-1+ cells, we normalized phosphorylation of HMG-I(Y) to that of the internal reference protein. These normalized results (Fig. 3B) show that IL-4 induced a 3-fold increase in the incorporation of phosphate into HMG-I(Y) only if IRS-1 was also present. Accordingly, we conclude that IRS-1 is a component of the signaling pathway that links the IL-4Ralpha chain with HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation.


Fig. 3. The IRS-1 is essential for IL-4 induction of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation. A, metabolic labeling and quantitation of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation were performed as described under "Materials and Methods," using 32D clones stably transfected with the d557 construct, alone or together with IRS-1, as indicated. Fold induction is defined as radioactivity incorporated into HMG-I(Y) after IL-4 treatment divided by that incorporated in untreated cells. The results (mean ± S.E.) for two independent clones for each construct are shown. Each data point represents the mean from three independent experiments. Open bars represent results after huIL-4 treatment, and filled bars show results for mIL-4R activation through the endogenous receptor. B, pooled results of the above experiments after normalization to an internal reference protein as described under "Materials and Methods" and Fig. 2B. Cells were cultured in media alone (open bars), human IL-4 (hatched bars), or mouse IL-4 (filled bars) as indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]

Wortmannin Inhibits IL-4-induced HMG-I(Y) Phosphorylation

The immunosuppressant rapamycin, which leads to selective inhibition of pp70 S6 kinase, blocks IL-4-induced HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation and reduces Gepsilon transcription activity in the human B cell line JY (37). One molecule important in growth factor regulation of pp70 S6 kinase activity is the lipid kinase PI 3-K, which is involved in platelet-derived growth factor and insulin receptor signaling to pp70 S6 kinase (45). Tyrosine-phosphorylated IRS-1 and IRS-2 (4PS) induced by IL-4 interact with the regulatory subunit (p85) of PI 3-kinase (PI 3-K) and recruit increased PI 3-K activity to the IL-4 receptor (27). In addition, expression of IRS-1 in 32D cells enhanced the stimulation of PI 3-kinase and pp70 S6 kinase by insulin, insulin-like growth factor-1, or IL-4 (46). In light of the relationship of PI 3-K to IL-4 receptor signaling and pp70 S6 kinase activity, we used wortmannin as a selective inhibitor of PI 3-kinase (47, 48) to investigate the possible role of PI 3-K in the regulation of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation. The inhibitor concentration was chosen in accordance with a prior determination of the dose-response relationship for inhibition of PI 3-K activity (47). This wortmannin treatment led to 95% inhibition of inducible phosphorylation of HMG-I(Y) in addition to a decrease in overall phosphorylation of HMG-I(Y) and several other basic nuclear proteins (Fig. 4A). This decrease represented a decrease in specific activity rather than a decrease in protein levels in wortmannin- and IL-4-treated cells (Fig. 4B). Consistent with its biochemical characterization as an irreversible inhibitor of PI 3-K (50), the inhibition of IL-4-inducible phosphorylation was not reversed during an overnight washout (Fig. 4A). In agreement with our previous results with the JY B cell line (37), rapamycin almost completely inhibited IL-4-inducible HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation, whereas in contrast the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein led to only partial inhibition (Fig. 4C). To evaluate whether these results reflected general or nonspecific toxicity of the wortmannin treatment, and to investigate if this pathway impacts Stat6 binding activity, 32D cells were subjected to overnight inhibition with wortmannin, followed by re-treatment and measurement of Stat6 induction by IL-4. As shown in Fig. 5A, wortmannin treatment for 20 h (lane 6) or 2 h (lane 7) did not affect induction of Stat-like proteins by IL-4. Moreover, cell recovery and the frequency of apoptotic cells were not affected by wortmannin during these incubation periods (data not shown). Taken together, these data indicate that a PI 3-kinase inhibitor and a pp70 S6 kinase inhibitor block IL-4 induction of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation while leaving the Jak-Stat signal transduction pathway intact.


Fig. 4.

Wortmannin inhibits IL-4-induced HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation. A, 32D-derived clones expressing huIL-4R (W.T.) and rat IRS-1 were subjected to metabolic labeling and two-dimensional acid-urea/SDS-PAGE as in Fig. 1A. Where indicated, cells were incubated with 100 nM wortmannin for 2 h prior to stimulation with IL-4. Prior to IL-4 stimulation, samples labeled washout were cultured 20 h in media alone after the wortmannin pretreatment. Similar results were obtained for huIL-4R(d557). B, results of silver staining of the samples shown in A. C, wortmannin and rapamycin block HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation. Quantitation of the inhibitory effect of wortmannin was performed as described in Fig. 1. Cells were separately treated with 100 nM rapamycin, 75 µM genistein, or 100 nM wortmannin (as in Ref. 47) for 2 h prior to addition of 32PO4 and IL-4. Quantification of radiolabeled HMG-I(Y) after IL-4 treatment was performed as described in Fig. 1. Relative activity was calculated as 32P incorporated in the presence of IL-4 and an inhibitor divided by incorporation in IL-4 alone (no inhibitor). Similar results were obtained when the data were normalized to an internal reference protein as described under "Materials and Methods" and Fig. 2B. The results represent pooled data from two clones expressing each construct and the mean of three independent experiments. square , huIL4; black-square, mIL4.


[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]


Fig. 5. Independence of the HMG-I(Y) and Jak-Stat pathways. A, Stat6 binding activity is unaffected by wortmannin or rapamycin. 32D cells transfected with IRS-1 and a wild-type huIL-4Ralpha chain were pretreated with nothing (lanes 1 and 2), solvent alone (lane 3), or solvent containing either rapamycin (lane 4), genistein (lane 5), or wortmannin (lanes 6 and 7). Samples were treated with carrier or inhibitor for 2 h (lanes 3-7) prior to addition of IL-4 for 0.5 h (lanes 2-7) and preparation of nuclear extracts. In addition, samples for lanes 3-6 were pretreated overnight as indicated. Mobility shift analyses were performed using equal amounts of protein (5 µg) and a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide probe bearing the n4 Stat binding site from the mouse Gepsilon promoter (38). An arrowhead marks the position of the Stat6-containing NF-IL4·IL-4 NAF complex. B, tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 under conditions inhibiting Stat6 induction. Immunoblot analyses using an antiphosphotyrosine antibody were performed on extracts derived from 32D cells stably transfected with IRS-1. Cells grown in the presence of IL-3 were removed from growth factor and incubated with solvent alone or with 75 µM genistein for 2 h. The cells were then cultured in media (alone or with IL-4) for 5 min in the presence or absence of genistein as appropriate. Cellular proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE before (total lysate) or after (anti-IRS precipitate) immunoprecipitation using immobilized antibodies against IRS-1. The blots are aligned such that the IRS-1 band in total lysates is at the same level as the immunoprecipitated band.
[View Larger Version of this Image (32K GIF file)]

It was surprising that genistein, which is thought to block tyrosine kinase-mediated activation of Stat6 in response to IL-4, had only a partial effect on HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation (37, 49). Data presented above indicate that this regulated phosphorylation is associated with IRS-1 recruitment to the IL-4R, a process that enhances tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 (26-28). To test whether genistein would block the ability of IL-4 to induce IRS-1 phosphorylation, immunoblots were used to determine the level of IL-4-induced IRS-1 tyrosine phosphorylation after inhibition by genistein (Fig. 5B). Although the high expression of IRS-1 in these cells leads to a significant level of basal IRS-1 phosphorylation, IL-4 induced an increase in IRS-1 phosphorylation, and this increase was not significantly inhibited by genistein. These results demonstrate that the pathways leading to IRS-1 and HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation both remain active under conditions that potently block Stat6 induction. Taken together, our findings indicate that the Tyr-1-IRS pathway is of critical importance in signaling the phosphorylation of a nuclear protein involved in transcriptional regulation.


DISCUSSION

IL-4 exerts its disparate actions on hematopoietic cells through a cell surface receptor whose individual domains represent potential checkpoints for regulation of signal transduction. Integration of the signaling pathways initiated at these domains provides the basis for the biologic specificity of IL-4. One signaling pathway initiates at a region termed the I4R motif due to homology of its function in the context of insulin and IL-4 receptor signaling (28). Although it is clear that the I4R motif is crucial for the regulation of proliferative responses to IL-4 and an emerging body of evidence suggests its involvement in gene expression, there has been no evidence that the recruitment of IRS proteins to the I4R regulates proteins involved in gene transcription. The data presented in this study demonstrate that the I4R initiates signals that regulate the phosphorylation status of a set of nuclear proteins that includes HMG-I(Y), a known transcriptional component (30-36). Consistent with the known ability of tyrosine phosphorylation of Tyr-1 in the I4R motif to recruit the adaptor molecule IRS-1 (28), IRS-1 expression is required for IL-4-inducible phosphorylation of HMG-I(Y). Moreover, the recruitment and activation of PI 3-kinase through IRS-1 (26) are inhibited by wortmannin, which also inhibits HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation. Taken together, these data indicate that the phosphorylation of Tyr-1 in the I4R initiates a signal transduction pathway that culminates in increased phosphorylation of HMG-I(Y) and other as yet unidentified nuclear proteins.

This pathway, connecting IL-4Ralpha at the cell surface to nuclear proteins such as HMG-I(Y), is likely to involve the pp70 S6 kinase at an intermediate step. Activation of pp70 S6 kinase is crucial in cell cycle progression (51, 52), participates in the regulation of gene expression (53),6 and may contribute to an anti-apoptotic effect of IL-4 (54). However, very few nuclear proteins other than the transcription factor CREM have been identified downstream from this enzyme (53). IL-4 treatment of 32D cells increases pp70 S6 kinase activity, and the degree of activation is enhanced in IRS-1-expressing cells (46). Moreover, this serine/threonine kinase is regulated by phosphorylation events that include a PI-3 kinase-dependent pathway (45, 47). We have previously shown that the immunosuppressant rapamycin, an inhibitor whose known intracellular target is pp70 S6 kinase, blocks IL-4-inducible phosphorylation of HMG-I(Y) in a cell cycle-independent manner and decreases induction of Gepsilon RNA by IL-4 (37). The present data confirm in 32D cells that rapamycin is an inhibitor of regulated HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation and indicate that the pathway leading to this regulation involves IRS-1 and PI 3-kinase. Preliminary studies further support a biochemical linkage in which HMG-I(Y) lies downstream from pp70 S6 kinase.6 Taken together, the present findings suggest a model in which phosphorylation of Tyr-1 in the I4R motif leads to increased phosphorylation of HMG-I(Y) through recruitment of IRS-1 followed by enhancement of pp70 S6 kinase activity through PI 3-kinase.

These data further substantiate that this signal transduction pathway is not modulated by the activation state of Stat6 (38). A truncated huIL-4Ralpha that contains Tyr-1 but none of the distal tyrosines, d557, is capable of triggering only minimal Stat6 induction (Fig. 2A), yet IL-4 binding to d557 induces quantitatively normal HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation (Figs. 2B and 3B). Moreover, the presence of the IRS-1 adaptor protein is not required for full activation, nuclear translocation, or DNA binding activity of a Stat6-like mobility shift complex (42), whereas regulation of HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation requires the presence of IRS-1. Signaling through the IL-4Ralpha mutant Y1F (clone 8-5D3) is unable to induce HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation yet is competent to induce Stat6 (42). Finally, we have exploited the observation that a chimeric receptor (IL-2Rbeta /I4R region) is competent to signal the partial induction of CD23 (Chim-1 in Ref. 29) but causes no detectable Stat 6 activation in a B lymphoma cell line. This chimera, containing only the I4R region of the IL-4R, was sufficient to confer inducible HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation in response to receptor engagement, whereas the truncated IL-2Rbeta used in the chimera was incapable of signaling such increases.7 This observation suggests that the involvement of the I4R region and the Stat6 independence of IL-4-regulated HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation may be generalized in hematopoietic cells. Taken together, these data provide compelling evidence that the divergence of the signaling pathway for HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation and that for Stat6 occurs at the IL-4 receptor.

One mechanism by which cytokine receptors can integrate different signal transduction pathways to modulate Stat-inducible gene expression is through a mitogen-activated protein kinase-like pathway targeting C-terminal sequences of Stat proteins (55, 56). However, Ras, Raf, and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by IL-4 have been undetectable in many (although not all) cell types and thus are less consistently crucial to IL-4R function relative to most members of the hematopoietin receptor superfamily (57-60). Accordingly, it is unlikely that mitogen-activated protein kinase-like pathways contribute substantially to regulation of IL-4 function through Stat6. However, the region surrounding Tyr-1 enhances downstream gene expression triggered by the Tyr-2, Tyr-3, and Tyr-4 residues (amino acid residues 575, 603, and 631, respectively) of the human IL-4Ralpha intracytoplasmic tail at comparable levels of Stat6 binding activity in transfected M12 B cells.7 These findings linking cytokine-regulated phosphorylation of a nuclear protein involved in the regulation of gene transcription provide a potential Stat6-independent mechanism by which transcriptional activity can be regulated.

A second level of integration might occur through combinatorial interactions. The Gepsilon Stat6 binding motif is insufficient to confer IL-4 inducibility to certain minimal promoters, and this defect may be related mechanistically to a requirement for C/EBP or NF-kappa B/Rel sites (38, 61). Moreover, IL-4-inducible gene expression and proliferation are impaired in normal mouse lymphoid cells with altered NF-kappa B/Rel signal transduction pathways (62).8 Although IL-4 does not appear to regulate C/EBP or NF-kappa B/Rel proteins directly, HMG-I(Y) is able to recruit NF-kappa B/Rel dimers through its ability to interact directly with p50 or c-Rel or to bend DNA (35). HMG-I(Y) can also increase recruitment of transcriptional activators such as c-Rel (35) or interfere with DNA binding of an activator such as NF-AT (63). Since it is well established that HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation decreases its affinity for DNA (37, 44), a decrease in the equilibrium binding of HMG-I(Y) to DNA after IL-4-inducible phosphorylation could contribute to modulation of Stat6 function on the basis of cooperating transcription factors. Although this latter mechanism remains to be proven as a consequence of IL-4-inducible HMG-I(Y) phosphorylation, these findings provide the first Stat-independent linkage of IRS-1, the I4R motif, and tyrosine 497 (Tyr-1) to regulated modification of a transcriptional component.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM42550 (to M. B. and D. Z. W.) and AI 38985 (to A. D. K. and J. Z.) and the Leukemia Society of America through its scholar program (to M. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
   To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 615-343-1699 and 615-343-7392; Fax: 615-343-9443 and 615-343-7392.
1   The abbreviations used are: IL, interleukin; IL-4R, IL-4 receptor; Stat, signal transduction and activation of transcription; IRS, insulin receptor substrate; Gepsilon , germ line Cepsilon (region of immunoglobulin heavy chain locus); PI 3-K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; hu, human; m, mouse; W.T., wild type; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PSL, arbitrary density units.
2   Amino acid residues are numbered according to their positions in the human IL-4Ralpha chain (with +1 as the initiator methionine at the N terminus of the signal peptide).
3   J. Youn, H. Y. Wang, M. Boothby, and A. D. Keegan, unpublished observations.
4   Spots co-migrating with the core histones (H2a, H2b, H3, and H4) demonstrated no significant phosphorylation, whereas histone H1 migrated in a cluster of highly labeled proteins exhibiting an IL-4-inducible increase in phosphorylation and could not be quantified separately.
5   The basis for the apparent increase in potency of the transfected huIL-4Rs relative to the endogenous wild-type mouse receptor on each clone is not clear. However, analysis of the data without normalization to an internal reference standard did not affect the findings.
6   D. Z. Wang and M. Boothby, unpublished observations.
7   J. Youn, H. Y. Wang, D. Z. Wang, M. Boothby, and A. Keegan, manuscript in preparation.
8   A. L. Mora, J. Youn, and M. Boothby, unpublished observations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We gratefully acknowledge the very generous gifts of crucial reagents from M. Widmer, J. deVries, S. Seghal, and J. H. Pierce. We thank H. Wang for helpful discussions and expert technical assistance and J. Youn, J. Donahue, and L. D. Kerr for a critical reading of the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Paul, W. E. (1991) Blood 77, 1589-1570
  2. Jansen, J. H., Fibbe, W. E., Willemze, R., and Kluin-Nelemans, J. C. (1990) Blut 60, 269-274 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Kopf, M., Le Gros, G., Bachmann, M., Lamers, M. C., Bluethmann, H., and Kohler, G. (1993) Nature 362, 245-248 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Richards, M. L., and Katz, D. H. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 3453-3466 [Abstract]
  5. Boothby, M., Gravallese, E., Liou, H.-C., and Glimcher, L. H. (1988) Science 242, 1559-1562 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Stack, R. M., Lenschow, D. J., Gray, G. S., Bluestone, J. A., and Fitch, F. W. (1994) J. Immunol. 152, 5723-5733 [Abstract]
  7. Esser, C., and Radbruch, A. (1990) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 8, 717-735 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Rothman, P., Chen, Y. Y., Lutzker, S., Li, S. C., Stewart, V., Coffman, R., and Alt, F. W. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 1672-1680 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Finkelman, F. D., Holmes, J., Katona, I., Urban, J. F., Jr., Beckmann, M. P., Park, L. S., Schooley, K. A., Coffman, R. L., Mosmann, T. R., and Paul, W. E. (1990) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 8, 303-334 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Matis, L. A., Glimcher, L. H., Paul, W. E., and Schwartz, R. H. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 6019-6023 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Mosley, B., Beckmann, M. P., March, C. J., Idzerda, R. L., Gimpel, S. D., VandenBos, T., Friend, D., Alpert, A., Anderson, D., Jackson, J., Wignall, J. M., Smith, C., Gallis, B., Sims, J. E., Urdal, D., Widmer, M. B., Cosman, D., and Park, L. S. (1989) Cell 59, 335-348 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Ihle, J. N., Witthuhn, B. A., Quelle, F. W., Yamamoto, K., and Silvennoinen, O. (1995) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13, 369-398 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Callard, R. E., Matthews, D. J., and Hibbert, L. (1996) Immunol. Today 17, 108-110 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Russell, S. M., Keegan, A. D., Harada, N., Nakamura, Y., Noguchi, M., Leland, P., Friedmann, M. C., Miyajima, A., Puri, R. K., Paul, W. E., and Leonard, W. J. (1993) Science 262, 1880-1883 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kondo, M., Takeshita, T., Ishii, N., Nakamura, M., Watanabe, S., Arai, K-I., and Sugamura, K. (1993) Science 262, 1874-1877 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Witthuhn, B. A., Silvennoinen, O., Miura, O., Lai, K. S., Cwik, C., Liu, E. T., and Ihle, J. N. (1994) Nature 370, 153-157 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Johnston, J. A., Kawamura, M., Kirken, R. A., Chen, Y., Blake, T. B., Shibuya, K., Ortaldo, J. R., McVicar, D. W., and O'Shea, J. J. (1994) Nature 370, 151-153 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Russell, S. M., Johnston, J. A., Noguchi, M., Kawamura, M., Bacon, C. M., Friedmann, M., Berg, M., McVicar, D. W., Witthuhn, B., Silvennoinen, O., Goldman, A. S., Schmalstieg, F. C., Ihle, J. N., O'Shea, J. J., and Leonard, W. J. (1994) Science 266, 1042-1045 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hou, J., Schindler, U., Henzel, W. J., Ho, T. C., Brasseur, M., and McKnight, S. L. (1994) Science 265, 1701-1706 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Quelle, F. W., Shimoda, K., Thierfelder, W., Fischer, C., Kim, A., Ruben, S. M., Cleveland, J. L., Pierce, J. H., Keegan, A., Nelms, K., Paul, W. E., and Ihle, J. N. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3336-3343 [Abstract]
  21. Darnell, J. E., Jr., Kerr, I. M., and Stark, G. R. (1994) Science 264, 1415-1421 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ryan, J. J., McReynolds, L. J., Keegan, A. D., Wang, L.-H., Garfein, E., Rothman, P, Nelms, K., and Paul, W. E. (1996) Immunity 4, 123-132 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Takeda, K., Tanaka, T., Shi, W., Matsumoto, M., Minami, M., Kashiwamura, S.-I., Nakanishi, K., Yoshida, N., Kishimoto, T., and Kira, S. (1996) Nature 380, 627-630 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Shimoda, K., van Deursen, J., Sangster, M. Y., Sarawar, S. R., Carson, R. T., Tripp, R. A., Chu, C., Quelle, F. W., Nosaka, T., Vignali, D. A. A., Doherty, P. C., Grosveld, G., Paul, W. E., and Ihle, J. N. (1996) Nature 380, 630-633 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Kaplan, M. H., Schindler, U., Smiley, S. T., and Gruesby, M. J. (1996) Immunity 4, 313-319 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Wang, L., Myers, M. G., Jr., Sun, X., Aaronson, S. A., White, M., and Pierce, J. H. (1993) Science 261, 1591-1594 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Wang, L., Keegan, A. D., Paul, W. E., Heidaran, M. A., Gutkind, J. S., and Pierce, J. H. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 4899-4908 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Keegan, A. D., Nelms, K., White, M., Wang, L.-M., Pierce, J., and Paul, W. E. (1994) Cell 76, 811-820 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Wang, H. Y., Paul, W. E., and Keegan, A. D. (1995) Immunity 4, 113-121
  30. Thanos, D., and Maniatis, T. (1992) Cell 71, 777-789 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Whitley, M. Z., Thanos, D., Read, M. A., Maniatis, T., and Collins, T. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6464-6475 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Lewis, H., Kaszuba, W., DeLamarter, J. F., and Whelan, J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5701-5709 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. John, S., Reeves, R. B., Lin, J.-X., Child, R., Leiden, J. M., Thompson, C. B., and Leonard, W. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1786-1796 [Abstract]
  34. Chuvpilo, S., Schomberg, C., Gerwig, R., Heinfling, A., Reeves, R., Grummt, F., and Serfling, E. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 5694-5704 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Himes, S. R., Coles, L. S., Reeves, R., and Shannon, M. F. (1996) Immunity 5, 479-489 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Kim, J., Reeves, R., Rothman, P., and Boothby, M. (1995) Eur. J. Immunol. 25, 798-808 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Wang, D.-Z., Ray, P., and Boothby, M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22924-22932 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Wang, D.-Z., Cherrington, A. L., Famakin-Mosuro, B. M., and Boothby, M. (1996) Int. Immunol. 8, 977-989 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Karasuyama, H., and Melchers, F. (1988) Eur. J. Immunol. 18, 97-104 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Kardalinou, E., Zhelev, N., Hazzalin, C. A., and Mahadevan, L. C. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 1066-1074 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Schindler, C., Shuai, K., Prezioso, V. R., and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1992) Science 257, 809-813 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Pernis, A., Witthuhn, B., Keegan, A. D., Nelms, K., Garfein, E., Ihle, J. N., Paul, W. E., Pierce, J. H., and Rothman, P. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 7971-7975 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Giancotti, V., Pani, B., Andrea, P. D., Berlingieri, M. T., Di Fiore, P. P., Fusco, A., Vecchio, G., Philp, R., Crane-Robinson, C., Nicolas, R. H., Wright, C. A., and Goodwin, G. H. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 1981-1987 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Reeves, R., Langan, T. A., and Nissen, M. S. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1671-1675 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Chung, J., Grammer, T. C., Lemon, K. P., Kazlauskas, A., and Blenis, J. (1994) Nature 370, 71-75 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Myers, M. G., Jr., Grammer, T. C., Wang, L.-M., Sun, X. J., Pierce, J. H., Blenis, J., and White, M. F. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28783-28789 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Dahl, J., Freund, R., Blenis, J., and Benjamin, T. L. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2728-2735 [Abstract]
  48. Ikizawa, K., Kajiwara, K., Basaki, Y., Koshio, T., and Yanagihara, Y. (1996) Cell. Immunol. 170, 134-140 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Mustelin, T., Coggeshall, K. M., Isakov, N., and Altman, A. (1990) Science 247, 1584-1587 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Wymann, M. P., Bulgarelli-Leva, G., Zvelebil, M. J., Pirola, L., Vanhaesebroeck, B., Waterfield, M. D., and Panayotou, G. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1722-1733 [Abstract]
  51. Calvo, V., Crews, C. M., Vik, T. A., and Bierer, B. E. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7571-7575 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Chung, J., Kuo, C. J., Crabtree, G. R., and Blenis, J. (1992) Cell 69, 1227-1236 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  53. de Groot, R. P., Ballou, L. M., and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1994) Cell 79, 81-91 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Zamorano, J., Wang, H. Y., Wang, L.-M., Pierce, J. H., and Keegan, A. D. (1996) J. Immunol. 157, 4926-4934 [Abstract]
  55. Wen, Z., Zhong, Z., and Darnell, J. E. (1995) Cell 82, 241-250 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Zhang, X., Blenis, J., Li, H.-C., Schindler, C., and Chen-Kiang, S. (1995) Science 267, 1990-1994 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Satoh, T., Nakafuku, M., Miyajima, A., and Kaziro, Y. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 3314-3318 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Welham, M. J., Duronio, V., Sanghera, J. S., Pelech, S. L., and Schrader, J. W. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 1683-1693 [Abstract]
  59. Welham, M. J., Duronio, V., and Schrader, J. W. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5865-5873 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Muszynski, K. W., Ruscetti, F. W., Heidecker, G., Rapp, U., Troppmair, J., Gooya, J. M., and Keller, J. R. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 181, 2189-2199 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Delphin, S., and Stavnezer, J. (1995) J. Exp. Med. 181, 181-192 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Snapper, C. M., Zelazowski, P., Rosas, F. R., Kehry, M. R., Tian, M., Baltimore, D., and Sha, W. C. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 183-191 [Abstract]
  63. Klein-Hessling, S., Schneider, G., Heinfling, A., Chuvpilo, S., and Serfling, E. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 15311-15316 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Kaplan, M. H., and Grusby, M. J. (1997) J. Allerg. Clin. Immunol. 99, S484 (abstr.)

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. M. Stephenson, D.-S. Park, A. L. Mora, S. Goenka, and M. Boothby
Sequence Motifs in IL-4R{alpha} Mediating Cell-Cycle Progression of Primary Lymphocytes
J. Immunol., October 15, 2005; 175(8): 5178 - 5185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. E. Kelly-Welch, H. Y. Wang, L.-M. Wang, J. H. Pierce, G. Jay, F. Finkelman, and A. D. Keegan
Transgenic Expression of Insulin Receptor Substrate 2 in Murine B Cells Alters the Cell Density-Dependence of IgE Production In Vitro and Enhances IgE Production In Vivo
J. Immunol., March 1, 2004; 172(5): 2803 - 2810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. M. McCarthy, D. McDevit, A. Andreucci, R. Reeves, and B. S. Nikolajczyk
HMGA1 Co-activates Transcription in B Cells through Indirect Association with DNA
J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2003; 278(43): 42106 - 42114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Rabah, S. Grant, C. Ma, and D. H. Conrad
Bryostatin-1 Specifically Inhibits In Vitro IgE Synthesis
J. Immunol., November 1, 2001; 167(9): 4910 - 4918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]