|
Volume 272, Number 42,
Issue of October 17, 1997
pp. 26727-26733
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Sequence of cDNAs Encoding Components of Vascular Actin
Single-stranded DNA-binding Factor 2 Establish Identity to Pur
and Pur *
(Received for publication, July 7, 1997, and in revised form, August 12, 1997)
Robert J.
Kelm Jr.
§,
Paula K.
Elder
,
Arthur R.
Strauch
¶ and
Michael J.
Getz
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo
Clinic/Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905 and ¶ The
Biochemistry Program and Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and
Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine,
Columbus, Ohio 43210-1239
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Transcriptional repression of the mouse vascular
smooth muscle -actin gene in fibroblasts and myoblasts is mediated,
in part, by the interaction of two single-stranded DNA binding
activities with opposite strands of an essential transcription enhancer
factor-1 recognition element (Sun, S., Stoflet, E. S., Cogan,
J. G., Strauch, A. R., and Getz, M. J. (1995) Mol.
Cell. Biol. 15, 2429-2436). One of these activities, previously
designated vascular actin single-stranded DNA-binding factor 2 includes
two distinct polypeptides (p44 and p46) which specifically interact
with the purine-rich strand of both the enhancer and a related element
in a protein coding exon of the gene (Kelm, R. J., Jr., Sun, S.,
Strauch, A. R., and Getz, M. J. (1996) J. Biol.
Chem. 271, 24278-24285). Expression screening of a mouse lung
cDNA library with a vascular actin single-stranded DNA-binding
factor 2 recognition element has now resulted in the isolation of two
distinct cDNA clones that encode p46 and p44. One of these proteins
is identical to Pur , a retinoblastoma-binding protein previously
implicated in both transcriptional activation and DNA replication. The
other is a related family member, presumably Pur . Comparative band
shift and Southwestern blot analyses conducted with cellular p46, p44,
and cloned Pur proteins synthesized in vitro and in
vivo, establish identity of p46 with Pur and p44 with Pur .
This study implicates Pur and/or Pur in the control of vascular
smooth muscle -actin gene transcription.
INTRODUCTION
Transcriptional activation or repression of RNA polymerase
II-dependent genes is often mediated by sequence-specific
DNA-binding proteins (i.e. transcription factors) that
respond to extracellular signals by interacting with critical
cis-acting regulatory elements. Activator or repressor
proteins generally bind to double-stranded DNA recognition sites distal
to the TATA box and influence promoter activity by interacting, either
directly or through an adaptor protein, with factor(s) comprising the
RNA polymerase II basal transcription complex (1, 2). Although most
transcription factors demonstrate preferential binding to
double-stranded DNA, a number of recent studies have associated
sequence-specific, single-stranded DNA
(ssDNA)1-binding factors with
both transcriptional activating (3-6) and repressing elements (7-12).
In particular, some ssDNA-binding proteins, such as the far upstream
element-binding protein and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K,
have been shown to utilize cis elements, prone to forming
non-B-DNA structures, as docking sites to effect gene expression
(13-15).
In support of a role for ssDNA-binding proteins as transcription
factors, our study of the vascular smooth muscle (VSM) -actin gene
has revealed the integral involvement of several ssDNA-binding proteins
in the control of promoter activity (16-18). Activation and repression
of the mouse VSM -actin promoter in both fibroblasts and
undifferentiated myoblasts is mediated, in part, by positive and
negative trans-acting factors that bind to a 30-base pair polypurine-polypyrimidine tract containing an inverted, muscle-specific M-CAT consensus motif (AGGAATG) (16, 17). While activation likely
requires the M-CAT-binding protein, transcription enhancer factor-1
(TEF-1) (17), repression appears to result from the interaction of two,
tissue-restricted, ssDNA binding activities which putatively function
by stabilizing local alterations in DNA secondary structure that
preclude TEF-1 binding to double-stranded DNA (16). We have recently
reported that one of these ssDNA binding activities, designated
vascular actin single-stranded DNA-binding factor 2 (VACssBF2), also
interacts with a conserved 30-base coding sequence element (CE) which
borders the 3 end of intron 2 in the mouse VSM -actin gene (18).
Interestingly, this CE sequence was found to repress promoter activity
when positioned 5 and adjacent to either a TEF-1 or activator
protein-1 enhancer element (18), further confirming the ability of
VACssBF2 to function as a transcriptional repressor.
Our initial efforts to biochemically characterize VACssBF2 prompted us
to search the literature for known ssDNA-binding proteins that
exhibited a similar preference for purine-rich sequences and possessed
a molecular weight comparable to the p46 and p44 components of
VACssBF2. Our search revealed a protein known as Pur (19). This
ssDNA-binding protein was originally identified as a HeLa cell nuclear
protein that interacted with a region of stably-bent DNA in the
5 -region of the human c-myc gene, designated the PUR (for
purine-rich) element (20). This sequence element is present in several
eukaryotic zones of initiation of DNA replication as well as in the
flanking regions of a number of different genes (20). Although the
exact role of Pur in mammalian DNA replication is still unknown,
recent studies have implicated Pur in the transcriptional activation
of several different genes (5, 21-23). Moreover, the identification
and partial cloning of a cDNA encoding the C-terminal region of a
homologous protein, termed Pur (19), suggested that a family of Pur
proteins may exist in higher eukaryotes. In this study, we have
utilized both biochemical and molecular cloning techniques to reveal
the identity of the p46 and p44 components of VACssBF2 as mouse Pur
and Pur , respectively.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Oligonucleotide Probes
Oligonucleotide CE-PrM4,
a multimer of the VACssBF2 exon-binding site (18)
(GGGAGTAATGGTTGGAATGGGCCAAAAAGA)4 was synthesized on a
Applied Biosystems model 394 DNA/RNA synthesizer and gel filtered over
a NAP-25 column (Pharmacia) in distilled water. The full-length
120-base oligonucleotide was purified from smaller synthesis products
by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. CE-PrM4, end-labeled
with [ -32P]ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase was used
as the primary probe in expression library screening and Southwestern
blotting. A 30-base mutant form of the VACssBF2 exon-binding site,
designated CE-PrMmu2 (18) or CE-Fmu2, was used as a nonspecific
competitor. Oligonucleotides corresponding to the forward and reverse
strands of the human c-myc PUR element (20), PUR-F,
GGAGGTGGTGGAGGGAGAGAAAAG, and PUR-R, CTTTTCTCTCCCTCCACCACCTCC, were
synthesized as described above. Biotinylated oligonucleotides
corresponding to the PUR element and the VSM -actin promoter element
(16, 18) were also prepared by chemical synthesis using a biotin
phosphoramidite containing a mixed polarity triethylene glycol spacer
(BioTEG, Glen Research, Sterling, VA).
Preparation AKR-2B Fibroblast Nuclear Extract
Nuclear
extract was prepared according to the method of Sealey and Chalkley
(24) with some minor modifications. AKR-2B fibroblasts were harvested
from monolayer cultures by scraping in the presence of ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline and then collected by centrifugation. Following two additional washes with phosphate-buffered saline, the
cell pellet was suspended in 10 volumes of 10 mM HEPES pH 8, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 M sucrose, 1.0 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM spermidine, 0.15 mM
spermine, 0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100, 7 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 µg/ml leupeptin,
0.5 µg/ml pepstatin, 0.5 µg/ml aprotinin. After a 20-min incubation
on ice with frequent (every 5 min) vortexing, nuclei were collected by centrifugation. The nuclear pellet was suspended by vigorous vortexing in 6 volumes of extraction buffer (10 mM HEPES pH 8, 350 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM
spermidine, 0.15 mM spermine, 25% (v/v) glycerol, and
protease inhibitors). After centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 min, the supernatant was saved and the pellet was
extracted a second time with 6 volumes of extraction buffer containing
530 mM NaCl. Following centrifugation, the 350 and 530 mM NaCl supernatants were pooled, assayed for total
protein, then aliquoted, and stored at 80 °C.
Fractionation of AKR-2B Nuclear Proteins
AKR-2B nuclear
protein (~10 mg) was diluted to 0.1 M NaCl and applied to
3 ml of heparin-agarose resin (Sigma) equilibrated in 25 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 M NaCl.
Fractions were collected and monitored for protein by absorbance
measurement at 280 nm. After washing to a baseline
A280 reading with equilibration buffer,
heparin-binding proteins were eluted by increasing the concentration of
NaCl to 0.6 and 1.0 M in a stepwise fashion. Selected
fractions were assayed for VACssBF2 DNA binding activity by
electrophoretic mobility shift assay and Southwestern blotting as
described previously (16, 18). All Southwestern blots reported in this
study were probed with 106 cpm/ml
32P-CE-PrM4 supplemented with 10 µg/ml
poly(dI-dC) and a 50-100-fold molar excess of nonspecific competitor
oligonucleotide, CE-PrMmu2.
Capture of VACssBF2 from AKR-2B Nuclear Extract Using
Oligonucleotide-coupled Paramagnetic Particles
DNA affinity
particles were prepared by gently mixing a synthetic 3 -biotinylated
oligonucleotide (250 pmol) of known VACssBF2-binding specificity (PE-F
and PUR-F) or a negative control (PE-R) with a 1-ml suspension of
streptavidin-paramagnetic particles (Promega) in 25 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (TNE)
for 30 min at room temperature. Under these conditions, all
oligonucleotides tested exhibited a coupling efficiency of 100% as
assessed by absorbance measurement at 260 nm. Parallel reaction
mixtures containing AKR-2B nuclear protein (150 µg) and 12.5 pmol
equivalents (50 µl) of ssDNA-coupled particles in 0.5 ml of 1 × electrophoretic mobility shift assay buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 50 µM spermidine, 15 µM spermine, 2.5% (v/v) glycerol) containing 0.01%
(v/v) Tween 20 were incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The
particles were then captured with a magnet and washed sequentially
three times with 0.5 ml of 2 × electrophoretic mobility shift
assay buffer containing 0.01% (v/v) Tween 20 and 10 µg/ml
poly(dI-dC). Bound protein was eluted from the ssDNA-coupled particles
by adding 40 µl of 30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol,
1% (w/v) SDS and incubating at 65 °C for 3 min. Eluates were
supplemented with 5% (v/v) -mercaptoethanol, heated for 5 min at
90 °C, then assayed for VACssBF2 components by Southwestern
blotting.
Screening of a Mouse Lung Expression Library for cDNAs
Encoding VACssBF2 p46 and p44 and Sequencing of Binding-site
Clones
A mouse lung cDNA expression library (Stratagene)
was plated in Escherichia coli host strain, XL1-Blue, on 10 150-mm plates at a density of 25,000 plaque forming units per plate.
After a 4-h incubation at 42 °C, the plates were overlaid with
nitrocellulose filters saturated with 10 mM
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside. Following an
additional 16-h incubation at 37 °C, filters were lifted from the
plates, placed in a blocking buffer of 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (TNE) containing
5% Carnation nonfat dry milk, and gently agitated for 1 h at room
temperature. After a 15-min equilibration in binding buffer (1% nonfat
dry milk-TNE), filters were then incubated for 3 h with 1-2 × 106 cpm/ml 32P-CE-PrM4 in the
presence of a 160-fold molar excess of CE-PrMmu2 diluted in binding
buffer containing 10 µg/ml poly(dI-dC). Filters were washed three
times with TNE containing 0.05% Tween 20 and one time with TNE alone.
Filters were then air dried and autoradiographed for 1-2 h at
80 °C. Potential positive plaques were selected, titered, replated
on 100-mm dishes, and rescreened as above. Two clones, designated 9-5 and 10-1, were positive in the secondary screen. After a final tertiary
screen to ensure clonal homogeneity, single plaques were selected and
cDNA inserts were excised as pBluescript phagemids by co-infection
with helper phage. The upper and lower strands of clones 9-5 and 10-1 were sequenced by semiautomated dideoxy termination using an Applied
Biosystems Model 377A DNA sequencer and the appropriate T3, T7, and
internal primers.
In Vitro Synthesis of Mouse Pur and Pur
Proteins
encoded by clones 9-5 (Pur ) and 10-1 (Pur ) were synthesized
in vitro using a T3-dependent,
transcription/translation-coupled wheat germ extract system (TnT,
Promega). Cesium chloride-purified pBluescript plasmid (empty vector or
vector containing cDNA insert), 1 µg, was combined with 25 µl
of wheat germ extract, 20 µM amino acid mixture, 40 units
of ribonuclease inhibitor, and 10 units of T3 RNA polymerase in a final
volume of 50 µl. After a 1-h incubation at 30 °C, an 8-µl
aliquot from each TnT reaction was removed, combined with an equal
volume of 2 × SDS sample preparation buffer with 5% (v/v)
-mercaptoethanol and heated at 90 °C for 5 min. TnT products were
analyzed for VACssBF2 DNA binding activity by Southwestern
blotting.
Construction and Transfection of Mouse Pur (9-5) and Pur
(10-1) Expression Vectors
The cDNAs encoding mouse Pur
(clone 9-5) and mouse Pur (clone 10-1) were cut from pBluescript by
EcoRI and KpnI. Agarose gel purified cDNAs
were then subcloned into a mammalian expression vector, pCI (Promega).
Ligated plasmids were transformed into E. coli
HB101 cells using standard CaCl2 techniques. All expression vectors used in transfection experiments were purified by double cesium
chloride gradient centrifugation and sequenced by semi-automated dideoxy DNA sequencing to confirm the orientation and fidelity of the
cDNA insert. Transient transfections of mouse embryo-derived AKR-2B
fibroblasts were performed using 10 µg of total plasmid DNA per
106 cells as described previously (18). After a 16-18-h
recovery period, the transfected cells were rendered quiescent by
incubating 48 h in serum-free MCDB402 medium (JRH Biosciences,
Lenexa, KS). Cells were restimulated for 6 h with fresh MCDB402
medium supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT).
Cells were then washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline and
extracted by adding 1 ml of hypotonic lysis buffer (10 mM
MOPS, pH 6.5, 10 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100) supplemented with 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 0.5 µg/ml each
leupeptin, pepstatin, and aprotinin. Following centrifugation at
14,000 × g, cell extracts were assayed for total
protein by BCA dye-binding assay (Pierce) using bovine serum albumin as
a standard. Equivalent amounts of cellular protein were evaluated for
p46 (Pur ) and p44 (Pur ) ssDNA binding activity by Southwestern
blotting and band shift assay.
RESULTS
VACssBF2 Is Composed of Three, Electrophoretically Distinct,
ssDNA-binding Proteins
To facilitate the molecular
characterization of VACssBF2, we performed experiments aimed at
defining the polypeptide composition of VACssBF2. Nuclear proteins from
AKR-2B fibroblasts were applied to heparin-agarose resin, eluted
stepwise with NaCl, and the fractions monitored for VACssBF2 by band
shift assay. As shown in Fig. 1 (top panel), VACssBF2-ssDNA binding activity was
released from heparin-agarose by 0.6 M NaCl and
resolved as three distinct bands. Southwestern blotting of pooled,
VACssBF2-enriched fractions (0.6 M NaCl eluate)
revealed three, electrophoretically distinct, ssDNA-binding proteins
with relative apparent molecular weights of ~115,000, 46,000, and
44,000 (Fig. 1, lower panel). These data, coupled with
previous UV cross-linking experiments (18), suggested that the
Mr ~ 115,000 protein is the major component of
the more slowly migrating band shift complex, while the
Mr ~ 46,000 and 44,000 proteins comprise the
more rapidly migrating band-shift doublet (Fig. 1, top
panel). It should be noted that these molecular weights are
slightly different from those previously reported (121,000, 51,000, and
48,000) (18). This was due to a change in the equation used to fit the
relative electrophoretic mobilities of the marker proteins (linear
versus nonlinear regression, r = 0.95 versus r = 0.99). Multiple Southwestern analyses
conducted with variously sized marker proteins yielded consistent
molecular weight estimates for the components of VACssBF2 (115,00 ± 5,000, 46,400 ± 1,000, 44,100 ± 1,000, n = 3). Based on these data, we have designated the individual VACssBF2
components as p115, p46, and p44.
Fig. 1.
VACssBF2 resolves as three distinct
ssDNA-binding polypeptides of Mr ~ 115,000, 46,000, and 44,000. Upper panel, heparin-agarose fractions
(5 µl) of AKR-2B nuclear protein were assayed for VACssBF2 by band
shift assay using a 32P-ssDNA probe corresponding to the
purine-rich sense strand of the CE (CE-PrMss). Arrows
indicate band-shifted complexes characteristic of VACssBF2 (16, 18).
Lower panel, fractions enriched in VACssBF2 (numbers 33-38,
0.6 M NaCl) were pooled and ~4 µg of protein was analyzed by Southwestern blotting. Arrows (from
top to bottom) show p115 (single
arrow), and p46/p44 (double arrows) protein-ssDNA complexes. Abbreviations used are: SM, starting material;
FT, flow through; FP, free probe.
[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]
VACssBF2 p46 and p44 Interact with the Human c-myc PUR
Element
To determine whether VACssBF2 p46 and p44 are related to
the Pur family in terms of ssDNA-binding specificity, we tested the ability of the human c-myc PUR element sense strand (PUR-F)
to function as a competitor in band shift assays using an AKR-2B fibroblast nuclear extract and 32P-probe corresponding to
the VACssBF2 coding element recognition site (CE-PrMss or CE-F). As
shown in Fig. 2, PUR-F (lanes
5-8) was as effective, if not better, at inhibiting the formation
of the faster migrating p46/p44 ssDNA-binding complexes (Fig. 2, double arrows) than the VSM -actin coding element and
promoter element sense strand oligonucleotides, CE-F (lanes
1-4) and PE-F (lanes 13-16). The absence of
competition by the reverse strand of the PUR element (PUR-R,
lanes 9-12) and by the CE mutant (CE-Fmu2, lanes
17-20) indicate that the competitive properties of PUR-F were
specific. Consistent with previous results, the ssDNA binding activity
of the slower migrating, p115 complex (Fig. 2, single arrow)
showed no apparent sequence specificity. When used as a band shift
probe, 32P-PUR-F exhibited a band shift pattern that was
virtually identical to that displayed by 32P-CE-F and
32P-PE-F (data not shown). Moreover,
streptavidin-paramagnetic particles coupled with either biotin-PUR-F or
biotin-PE-F were equally efficient at "capturing" p46 and p44 from
AKR-2B nuclear extracts (Fig. 3,
lanes 1 and 2). Importantly, biotin-PE-R bound
particles failed to capture p46 and p44 (Fig. 3, lane 3).
Since equivalent amounts of fibroblast protein and
oligonucleotide-coupled particles were used in each instance, these
results were not attributable to a loading artifact but represent
actual differences in ssDNA-binding affinity. The absence of p115 in
this experiment is indicative of its weak ssDNA-binding affinity and
specificity (16, 18). The stringency of the binding and washing
conditions and/or competition by p46/p44 probably contributed to the
failure of p115 to bind the DNA-affinity particles. Collectively, these
results indicated that p46 and p44 bind to purine-rich ssDNA with
substantially greater affinity and specificity than p115. Furthermore,
the data suggested that VACssBF2 p44 and p46 might be related to the
Pur family of ssDNA-binding proteins.
Fig. 2.
VACssBF2 p46 and p44 interact with the
purine-rich sense strand of the human c-myc PUR
element. AKR-2B nuclear protein (3 µg) was incubated with
32P-oligonucleotide corresponding to the sense strand of
the VSM -actin coding element (CE-PrMss, ~40 fmol, 20,000 cpm) in
the presence of the indicated molar excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide corresponding to either the coding element sense strand (CE-F, lanes 1-4), coding element mutant sense strand (CE-Fmu2,
lanes 17-20), promoter element sense strand (PE-F,
lanes 13-16), PUR element sense strand (PUR-F, lanes
5-8), or PUR element antisense strand (PUR-R, lanes
9-12). Protein-ssDNA complexes were resolved by band shift assay.
The 24-base PUR element oligonucleotides correspond to base pairs
1648 to 1625 upstream of the P1 transcription start site of the
human c-myc gene. Arrows (from top to
bottom) show p115 (single arrow), and p46/p44
(double arrows) protein-ssDNA complexes. FP, free
probe.
[View Larger Version of this Image (61K GIF file)]
Fig. 3.
VACssBF2 p46 and p44 are "captured" from
AKR-2B nuclear extract using ssDNA affinity beads coupled with the
sense strand of the human c-myc PUR element. Parallel
reaction mixtures containing equivalent amounts of AKR-2B nuclear
protein (150 µg) and ssDNA-coupled magnetic particles (12.5 pmol of
ssDNA) corresponding to the PUR element sense strand (PUR-F, lane
1), the VSM -actin promoter element sense strand (PE-F,
lane 2), or the promoter element antisense strand (PE-R,
lane 3) were incubated under conditions which mimicked a
band shift assay. After magnetically capturing and washing the
particles with buffer containing excess poly(dI-dC), bound protein was
eluted with 1% SDS and analyzed by Southwestern blotting. Lane
4 is an additional negative control in which oligonucleotide-free particles were used. Each lane represents the amount of VACssBF2 captured from 75 µg of starting AKR-2B nuclear protein.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]
Isolation and Sequence Analysis of VACssBF2 cDNA
Clones
Owing to the enrichment of VACssBF2 in the lung (17), a
mouse lung cDNA expression library was selected as a source for isolating cDNA clones encoding p44 and p46 using a ssDNA-binding site screening strategy. Initially, 250,000 plaques were screened with
a 32P-end labeled oligonucleotide multimer of the VACssBF2
exon recognition element (CE-PrM4) in the presence of
excess, unlabeled mutant oligonucleotide (CE-Fmu2) deficient in p46/p44
binding (Fig. 2 and Ref. 18). Two clones, designated 9-5 and 10-1, which were positive in the second round of screening, were each
replated at 100 plaque forming units per plate and lifted onto
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside-saturated filters.
Each filter was cut in half and each half was screened with
32P-CE-PrM4 in the presence of a 160-fold molar
excess of either unlabeled wild-type (CE-F) or unlabeled mutant
(CE-Fmu2) oligonucleotide. For both clones, CE-F effectively competed
for probe binding while CE-Fmu2 did not (data not shown). These results
confirmed that each clone encoded a protein whose ssDNA binding
properties were consistent with that of VACssBF2 p44 or p46.
The amino acid sequence deduced from the corresponding nucleotide
sequence of each clone is represented in Fig.
4. The open reading frame of clone 9-5 encodes a protein of 321 amino acids (Mr = 34,884), while clone 10-1 encodes a protein of 324 amino acids
(Mr = 33,901). In both clones, the AUG codon
encoding the putative start methionine is in a favorable context for
translational initiation based upon Kozak consensus criteria (25).
Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences suggested that clones 9-5 and 10-1 encode structurally related proteins (71% identity) (Fig. 5). A search of the GenBank data base
revealed that the nucleotide sequence encoding the open reading frame
of clone 9-5 is identical to the cDNA sequence previously reported
for mouse Pur (26). Moreover, the COOH-terminal sequence (amino
acids 213-324) encoded by 10-1 is virtually identical to the amino
acid sequence encoded by a partial cDNA clone of human Pur (19)
(Fig. 5). Based upon these results, it seems likely that clone 10-1 encodes full-length mouse Pur .
Fig. 4.
Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences
of VACssBF2 recognition element-binding proteins. Expression
screening of a mouse lung cDNA library using a tetramer of the
VACssBF2 exon recognition element as a probe resulted in the isolation of two clones, designated 9-5 and 10-1. The upper and
lower stands of each clone were sequenced independently. The
amino acid sequences deduced from the corresponding upper strand
nucleotide sequence are represented using single letter code. Clone 9-5 encodes a 321-amino acid protein that is identical to mouse Pur
(26). Clone 10-1 encodes a related 324-amino acid protein, presumably Pur . Stop codons are indicated by a "*" symbol.
[View Larger Version of this Image (69K GIF file)]
Fig. 5.
Alignment of mouse Pur (clone 9-5) and
full-length mouse Pur (clone 10-1). A, amino acid
sequences were aligned using the Gap algorithm (Genetics Computer
Group). The 71% overall sequence identity between mouse Pur and
mouse Pur is due to conservation of several sequence modules
previously identified within the context of human Pur (19). These
include three basic class I repeats (single underline), two
acidic class II repeats (double underline), and a predicted
-helical region later designated the "psycho motif"
(dotted line) (26). B, the COOH-terminal region
of mouse Pur is virtually identical to the amino acid sequence
encoded by a partial clone of human Pur previously reported
(19).
[View Larger Version of this Image (57K GIF file)]
Comparison of the two cloned mouse Pur proteins reveal some remarkable
similarities as well as some equally striking differences (Fig. 5).
Mouse Pur exhibits the same modular structure as originally described for the human Pur protein (19). The basic, 23-amino acid
class I repeats (Fig. 5, single line) and acidic, 26-amino acid class II repeats (Fig. 5, double lines) are highly
conserved between Pur and Pur . Because these repeat modules have
been implicated in the ssDNA binding of human Pur (27), it is
noteworthy that the second class II repeat is interrupted by a
glycine-rich stretch in Pur . The "psycho" motif (Fig. 5,
dotted line), which was identified on the basis of homology
to the retinoblastoma protein-binding region of SV-40 large T-antigen,
other viral transforming proteins, and certain cellular proteins
involved in replication and transcription (26), is also conserved in
mouse Pur , albeit with some differences. This region has been shown
to be important in modulating protein-protein interaction between
retinoblastoma protein and human Pur (27). Interestingly, Pur
lacks a potential casein kinase II phosphorylation site present in the
C-terminal region of the psycho motif of Pur as well as a potential
N-linked glycosylation site between the first class I and
first class II repeats (amino acid 95 in Pur , amino acid 81 in
Pur ). However, the most striking difference between Pur and
Pur lies in the NH2- and COOH-terminal ends of the
proteins. Although the overall glycine-rich composition of their
NH2-terminal regions are relatively similar, the
glycine-rich stretch of Pur (19 of 26 residues) begins at amino acid
11 and is interrupted by a 6-amino acid sequence (23FQPAPR28) while Pur exhibits an almost
uninterrupted stretch of glycine residues (17 of 18 residues) starting
at amino acid 31. Moreover, the COOH-terminal glutamine-rich stretch of
Pur (296QQQQQQQ302) is absent in Pur .
Identification of p46 as Pur and p44 as Pur
Several
previous studies have noted that Pur exhibits an electrophoretic
mobility in SDS-polyacrylamide gels consistent with a protein of 42 (28) or 45-47 kDa (27). In at least one study, the anomalous
electrophoretic mobility of Pur was attributed to post-translational
processing (27) although another report ruled out
N-glycosylation and phosphorylation as contributing to its
unusual migration in SDS gels (28). To confirm the identity of cellular
p46 and p44 as Pur and Pur , respectively, the electrophoretic mobility of both in vitro and in vivo translation
products of clones 9-5/Pur and 10-1/Pur were compared with
cellular p46 and p44. As shown in Fig.
6C, the in vitro
transcription/translation products of clones 9-5 and 10-1 migrated
similarly to cellular p46 and p44, respectively, when analyzed by
Southwestern blotting. Moreover, transient transfection of
cytomegalovirus enhancer driven-expression vectors harboring clones 9-5 (Pur ) and 10-1 (Pur ) into AKR-2B fibroblasts resulted in the
enhanced expression of p46 in cells transfected with pCI 9-5 (Fig.
6A, lanes 2-4), while p44 was elevated in fibroblasts
transfected with pCI 10-1 (Fig. 6A, lanes 6-8).
Cotransfection of both pCI 9-5 and pCI 10-1 resulted in the
enhanced expression of the p46/p44 bands relative to endogenous p46 and
p44 (Fig. 6B, compare lanes 2 and 5).
Corroborative results were obtained when selected transfectants were
analyzed by band shift assay. As shown in Fig.
7 (lanes 5-8), cotransfection
of pCI 9-5 and pCI 10-1 resulted in the enhanced expression of the p46/p44 gel shift doublet. Importantly, only the faster migrating band of the doublet was augmented in cells transfected with pCI 10-1
alone (Fig. 7, lanes 1-4). These data establish the
identity of slower migrating band as the Pur /p46-ssDNA complex and
the faster migrating species as the Pur /p44-ssDNA complex.
Interestingly, the overall expression of transfected Pur /p44 was
consistently greater than that of Pur /p46 (Fig. 6, A
and B, and Fig. 7). This was probably due to some inherent
difference in mRNA or protein stability, since both expression
constructs utilized the same parent vector. In any case, these
transfection results support the conclusion that p46 is Pur and p44
is Pur .
Fig. 6.
In vitro and in vivo
synthesis of clones 9-5 and 10-1 identify Pur as p46 and Pur as
p44. A, AKR-2B fibroblasts were transfected with 0, 1, 2, or
4 µg of either pCI 9-5 (Pur ) (lanes 1-4) or pCI
10-1 (Pur ) (lanes 5-8) expression vectors. Empty pCI
vector was used to maintain a constant amount of DNA transfected. B, fibroblasts were transfected with 2 µg of either empty
pCI vector (lane 2), pCI 9-5 (lane 3), pCI
10-1 (lane 4), or cotransfected with 1 µg each of pCI
9-5 and pCI 10-1 (lane 5). A and
B, transfectants were rendered quiescent and then
serum-stimulated for 5 h. In each case, 3 µg of lysed cell
protein was analyzed for p46 and p44 ssDNA binding activity via
Southwestern blotting. C, Pur and Pur were synthesized
in vitro using pBluescript clones 9-5 and 10-1 as DNA
templates in a coupled transcription/translation system. Products of
translation reactions containing either no DNA (lane 2),
empty pBluescript vector (lane 3), clone 9-5 (lane 4), or clone 10-1 (lane 5) were analyzed by
Southwestern blotting. Lane 1 is a positive control of
cellular p46/p44 (3 µg of AKR-2B nuclear extract).
[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]
Fig. 7.
The slower and faster migrating bands of the
VACssBF2 band shift doublet correspond to Pur and Pur ,
respectively. 32P-Oligonucleotide corresponding to the
sense strand of the VSM -actin promoter element (PE-PrMss, ~20
fmol, 30,000 cpm) was incubated with 4 µg of lysed cell protein from
AKR-2B fibroblasts transfected with varying amounts of pCI 10-1
alone (lanes 1-4) or pCI 10-1 plus pCI 9-5
(lanes 5-8) as described in the legend to Fig. 6.
Protein-ssDNA complexes were resolved by band shift assay.
Arrows (from top to bottom) show
Pur and Pur protein-ssDNA complexes. FP, free
probe.
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
The varied expression of VSM -actin in phenotypically altered
smooth muscle cells and stromal fibroblasts associated with such
pathological processes as arteriosclerosis (29-31), vascular and
cutaneous wounding (32, 33), and tumor cell invasion (34, 35) suggests
that these cell types have evolved transcriptional mechanisms to both
activate and repress VSM -actin gene expression in response to
external stimuli. Indeed, a number of studies conducted with chicken,
mouse, and human VSM -actin promoters have indicated that cell
context is critically important in determining the operative regulatory
elements and DNA-binding proteins that mediate transcriptional activation and repression (36-39). Our previous analyses of the mouse
VSM -actin promoter pointed to a novel molecular model in which
sequence-specific VACssBFs repress promoter activity in cells of both
myogenic and fibroblastic lineage by interacting with opposing strands
of an essential TEF-1 enhancer element (16-18). One of these factors,
VACssBF1, has been cloned and is identical to the mouse Y-box
protein MSY1 (40). Interestingly, the human homolog, YB-1, has also
been reported to function as a transcriptional repressor within the
context of the major histocompatibility class II DRA (41) and
grp78 (42) promoters. In the mouse VSM -actin promoter,
MSY1 interacts with the pyrimidine-rich, antisense strand of the TEF-1
enhancer. The other factor, VACssBF2, binds to the purine-rich sense
strand of the TEF-1 enhancer and a related element in a protein-coding
exon of the gene (18). While initial data suggested that VACssBFs
function in a cooperative manner to disrupt TEF-1 enhancer function
(16), recent experiments conducted with chimeric promoters have
indicated that VACssBF2 can repress enhancer activity in the absence of
detectable VACssBF1/MSY1-binding to the opposing strand (18).
Owing to the relative paucity of reports documenting a role for
ssDNA-binding proteins in transcriptional repression, we sought to
characterize VACssBF2 using biochemical and molecular cloning techniques. Southwestern blotting of heparin-agarose fractions enriched
in VACssBF2 revealed three prominent bands of Mr
~115,000, 46,000, and 44,000 (Fig. 1). However, only the p46 and p44
species demonstrated high affinity, purine-rich ssDNA-binding
specificity (Figs. 2 and 3). Expression screening of a mouse lung
cDNA library with a multimer of VACssBF2 exon recognition element
yielded two cDNA clones (9-5 and 10-1) that encode related
ssDNA-binding proteins (Figs. 4 and 5). Clone 9-5 encodes Pur , a
purine-rich ssDNA-binding protein previously shown to interact with
(GGN)n repeats in sequence elements functionally linked to both
DNA replication and transcription (5, 19, 20, 23, 26, 28, 43). Based
upon homology to a partial cDNA clone of human Pur previously reported (19), clone 10-1 encodes mouse Pur . These results were not
surprising given the prior finding that cellular p46 and p44 could also
bind to an authentic Pur ssDNA-recognition element in
vitro (Figs. 2 and 3). However, clones 9-5 and 10-1 encode
full-length proteins with predicted molecular masses of 34.9 and 33.9 kDa, respectively. While these values differ substantially from the
apparent molecular weights of p46 and p44, both in vitro and
in vivo synthesized Pur and Pur co-migrate with
cellular p46 and p44 in SDS-polyacrylamide gels (Fig. 6). Thus, the
apparent discrepancies in molecular weight are a result of anomalous
electrophoretic migration.
Because the cloning and detection strategies employed in these studies
were based on affinity for a VACssBF2 ssDNA recognition element, it
might be argued that cellular p46 and p44 are not identical to the Pur
proteins but simply exhibit similar ssDNA-binding properties. We
believe this is highly unlikely for the following reasons. First, with
the exception of p115, no other bands are detectable in band shift,
Southwestern blot, or biotinylated ssDNA capture experiments using
fibroblast nuclear extracts and either VACssBF2 or human
c-myc Pur ssDNA oligonucleotide probes (Figs. 1, 2, 3, and
data not shown). Second, and most importantly, Pur and Pur
exactly co-migrate with cellular p46 and p44 when overexpressed in
fibroblasts and subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 6). Thus, any non-Pur proteins which exhibit Pur-like ssDNA binding activity would have to exactly co-migrate with authentic Pur
and Pur . Based on these considerations, we conclude that the p46 and
p44 components of the VACssBF2 complex correspond to Pur and Pur ,
respectively.
With the molecular cloning of the p46 and p44 components of VACssBF2,
we have now identified 4 of the 5 proteins previously shown to interact
with single- or double-stranded forms of an essential VSM -actin
TEF-1 enhancer element (16, 17). These include a TEF-1 related protein
(17), MSY1 (or VACssBF1), and now Pur and Pur (or VACssBF2
p46 and p44). Only the relatively weak and nonspecific ssDNA-binding
p115 component of VACssBF2 remains to be cloned and identified.
Curiously, both cellular Pur and YB-1 (the human homolog of MSY-1)
have also been implicated in the activation of early (Pur ) and late
(YB-1) gene transcription of human JC polyomavirus in glial cells of
the central nervous system (22). In this context, Pur and YB-1 were
found to function cooperatively in that each protein was capable of
modulating the binding of the other to its respective viral promoter
ssDNA-binding site (23). Since certain astroglial cells are known to
also express VSM -actin (44, 45), the functional association of Y-box and Pur proteins may be common to VSM -actin expressing cell
types.
It is interesting that human Pur and YB-1 function as activators of
JC polyomavirus gene transcription in glial cells while mouse Pur
and/or Pur , and MSY1 apparently function as repressors of VSM
-actin gene transcription in myoblasts and fibroblasts. While it is
not uncommon for a transcription factor, such as Pur or YB-1, to act
as either an activator or as a repressor depending upon the influence
of other cell and/or promoter-specific gene regulatory proteins, the
structural differences between mouse Pur and Pur are nevertheless
provocative (Fig. 5). Because glutamine-rich sequences have been
associated with transcriptional activation domains (1), the absence of
a Q7 sequence and other differences in the COOH-terminal
region of Pur may be of functional significance in terms of
repression. Perhaps Pur antagonizes activation by Pur via
competitive ssDNA binding. Elucidation of the individual functional
roles of MSY1, Pur , and Pur , in repression of the VSM -actin
gene promoter in myoblasts and fibroblasts will obviously require
further investigation. Several questions to be addressed include 1) do
these proteins possess the ability to modulate TEF-1 enhancer topology,
2) do they interact with the enhancer in a mutually-dependent or independent manner, 3) what are the
consequences of such interactions in terms of enhancer function, 4) are
these proteins differentially expressed or post-translationally
modified in a cell- or tissue-specific manner, and 5) does Pur , like
Pur (27), interact with the retinoblastoma protein? Answers to such questions should lead to an improved understanding of the mechanisms that regulate VSM -actin gene expression during smooth muscle myogenesis, cutaneous wound healing, vascular injury, fibrocontractive disease, and stromal responses to neoplasia.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported in part by a grant from the National
Institutes of Health (R01 HL54281) and the Mayo Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequences reported in this paper have been
submitted to GenBankTM/EBI with accession numbers AF017630 (mouse Pur ) and AF017631 (mouse Pur ).
§
Supported by a fellowship from the Minnesota Affiliate of the
American Heart Association (MN-97-F-20).
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic/Foundation, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905. Tel.: 507-284-2875; Fax:
507-284-3383; E-mail: getz.michael{at}mayo.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: ssDNA,
single-stranded DNA; VSM, vascular smooth muscle; VACssBF, vascular
-actin single-strand binding factor; TEF-1, transcriptional enhancer
factor-1; CE, coding element; PE, promoter element; MOPS,
4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We thank Mary Johnson for assistance in
preparing the manuscript.
REFERENCES
-
Tjian, R., and Maniatis, T.
(1994)
Cell
77,
5-8
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Johnson, A. D.
(1995)
Cell
81,
655-658
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Duncan, R., Bazar, L., Michelotti, G., Tomonaga, T., Krutzsch, H., Avigan, M., and Levens, D.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
465-480
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Duncan, R., Collins, I., Tomonaga, T., Zhang, T., and Levens, D.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
2274-2282
[Abstract]
-
Haas, S., Thatikunta, P., Steplewski, A., Johnson, E. M., Khalili, K., and Amini, S.
(1995)
J. Cell. Biol.
130,
1171-1179
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tomonaga, T., and Levens, D.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5830-5835
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pan, W. T., Liu, Q., and Bancroft, C.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
7022-7028
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wilkison, W. O., Min, H. Y., Claffey, K. P., Satterberg, B. L., and Spiegelman, B. M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
477-482
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Altiok, S., and Groner, B.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
7303-7310
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tanuma, Y., Nakabayashi, H., Esumi, M., and Endo, H.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
517-523
[Abstract]
-
Grossman, M. E., and Tindall, D. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10968-10975
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Haas, S., Steplewski, A., Siracusa, L. D., Amini, S., and Khalili, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
12503-12510
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bazar, L., Meighen, D., Harris, V., Duncan, R., Levens, D., and Avigan, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8241-8248
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Michelotti, G. A., Michelotti, E. F., Pullner, A., Duncan, R. C., Eick, D., and Levens, D.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
2656-2669
[Abstract]
-
Davis-Smyth, T., Duncan, R. C., Zheng, T., Michelotti, G., and Levens, D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31679-31687
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sun, S., Stoflet, E. S., Cogan, J. G., Strauch, A. R., and Getz, M. J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2429-2436
[Abstract]
-
Cogan, J. G., Sun, S., Stoflet, E. S., Schmidt, L. J., Getz, M. J., and Strauch, A. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11310-11321
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kelm, R. J., Jr., Sun, S., Strauch, A. R., and Getz, M. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24278-24285
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bergemann, A. D., Ma, Z., and Johnson, E. M.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
5673-5682
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bergemann, A. D., and Johnson, E. M.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
1257-1265
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Herault, Y., Chatelain, G., Brun, G., and Michel, D.
(1993)
Cell. & Mol. Biol. Res.
39,
717-725
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chen, N. N., and Khalili, K.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
5843-5848
[Abstract]
-
Chen, N. N., Chang, C., Gallia, G. L., Kerr, D. A., Johnson, E. M., Krachmarov, C. P., Barr, S. M., Frisque, R. J., Bollag, B., and Khalili, K.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
1087-1091
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sealey, L., and Chalkley, R.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
787-798
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kozak, M.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
887-903
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ma, Z., Bergemann, A. D., and Johnson, E. M.
(1994)
Gene (Amst.)
149,
311-314
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Johnson, E. M., Chen, P.-L., Krachmarov, C. P., Barr, S. M., Kanovsky, M., Ma, Z.-W., and Lee, W.-H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24352-24360
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jurk, M., Weissinger, F., Lottspeich, F., Schwarz, U., and Winnacker, E.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
2799-2806
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gabbiani, G., Kocher, O., Bloom, W. S., Vandekerckhove, J., and Weber, K.
(1984)
J. Clin. Invest.
73,
148-152
-
Babaev, V. R., Bobryshev, Y. V., Stenina, O. V., Tararak, E. M., and Gabbiani, G.
(1990)
Am. J. Pathol.
136,
1031-1042
[Abstract]
-
Betz, E., Fallier-Becker, P., Wolburg-Buchholz, K., and Fotev, Z.
(1991)
J. Cell. Physiol.
147,
385-395
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kocher, O., Gabbiani, F., Gabbiani, G., Reidy, M. A., Cokay, M. S., Peters, H., and Hüttner, I.
(1991)
Lab. Invest.
65,
459-470
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Skalli, O., and Gabbiani, G.
(1988)
in
The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair (Clark, R. A. F., and Henson, P. M., eds), Plenum Press, New York
-
Schurch, W., Seemayer, T., and Gabbiani, G.
(1992)
in
Histology for Pathologists (Sternberg, S., ed), pp. 109-144, Raven Press, New York
-
Ronnov-Jessen, L., Petersen, O. W., and Bissell, M. J.
(1996)
Physiol. Rev.
76,
69-125
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Min, B., Foster, D. N., and Strauch, A. R.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
16667-16675
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Foster, D. N., Min, B., Foster, L. K., Stoflet, E. S., Sun, S., Getz, M. J., and Strauch, A. R.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
11995-12003
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stoflet, E. S., Schmidt, L. J., Elder, P. K., Korf, G. M., Foster, D. N., Strauch, A. R., and Getz, M. J.
(1992)
Mol. Biol. Cell
3,
1073-1083
[Abstract]
-
Shimizu, R. T., Blank, R. S., Jervis, R., Lawrenz-Smith, S. C., and Owens, G. K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7631-7643
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cogan, J. G., Getz, M. J., and Strauch, A. R.
(1994)
Mol. Biol. Cell
5,
950
(abstr.)
-
MacDonald, G. H., Itoh-Lindstrom, Y., and Ting, J. P.-Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
3527-3533
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Li, W. W., Hsiung, Y., Wong, V., Galvin, K., Zhou, Y., Shi, Y., and Lee, A. S.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
61-68
[Abstract]
-
Du, Q., Tomkinson, A. E., and Gardner, P. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14990-14995
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lecain, E., Alliot, F., Laine, M. C., Calas, B., and Pessac, B.
(1991)
J. Neurosci. Res.
28,
601-606
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Abd-El-Basset, E. M., and Fedoroff, S.
(1991)
Neurosci. Lett.
125,
117-120
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yoshida
MCAT Elements and the TEF-1 Family of Transcription Factors in Muscle Development and Disease
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
January 1, 2008;
28(1):
8 - 17.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Knapp, J. E. Ramsey, S.-X. Wang, A. R. Strauch, and R. J. Kelm Jr.
Structure-Function Analysis of Mouse Pur II: CONFORMATION ALTERING MUTATIONS DISRUPT SINGLE-STRANDED DNA AND PROTEIN INTERACTIONS CRUCIAL TO SMOOTH MUSCLE {alpha}-ACTIN GENE REPRESSION
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 7, 2007;
282(49):
35899 - 35909.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Ji, G. L. Tsika, H. Rindt, K. L. Schreiber, J. J. McCarthy, R. J. Kelm Jr., and R. Tsika
Pur{alpha} and Pur{beta} Collaborate with Sp3 To Negatively Regulate {beta}-Myosin Heavy Chain Gene Expression during Skeletal Muscle Inactivity
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
February 15, 2007;
27(4):
1531 - 1543.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Knapp, J. E. Ramsey, S.-X. Wang, K. E. Godburn, A. R. Strauch, and R. J. Kelm Jr.
Nucleoprotein Interactions Governing Cell Type-dependent Repression of the Mouse Smooth Muscle {alpha}-Actin Promoter by Single-stranded DNA-binding Proteins Pur{alpha} and Purbeta
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 24, 2006;
281(12):
7907 - 7918.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-X. Wang, P. K. Elder, Y. Zheng, A. R. Strauch, and R. J. Kelm Jr.
Cell Cycle-mediated Regulation of Smooth Muscle {alpha}-Actin Gene Transcription in Fibroblasts and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Involves Multiple Adenovirus E1A-interacting Cofactors
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 18, 2005;
280(7):
6204 - 6214.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yoshida and G. K. Owens
Molecular Determinants of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Diversity
Circ. Res.,
February 18, 2005;
96(3):
280 - 291.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Gupta, V. Sueblinvong, J. Raman, V. Jeevanandam, and M. P. Gupta
Single-stranded DNA-binding Proteins PUR{alpha} and PUR{beta} Bind to a Purine-rich Negative Regulatory Element of the {alpha}-Myosin Heavy Chain Gene and Control Transcriptional and Translational Regulation of the Gene Expression: IMPLICATIONS IN THE REPRESSION OF {alpha}-MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN DURING HEART FAILURE
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 7, 2003;
278(45):
44935 - 44948.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Kelm Jr., S.-X. Wang, J. A. Polikandriotis, and A. R. Strauch
Structure/Function Analysis of Mouse Pur{beta}, a Single-stranded DNA-binding Repressor of Vascular Smooth Muscle {alpha}-Actin Gene Transcription
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 3, 2003;
278(40):
38749 - 38757.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Khalili, L. Del Valle, V. Muralidharan, W. J. Gault, N. Darbinian, J. Otte, E. Meier, E. M. Johnson, D. C. Daniel, Y. Kinoshita, et al.
Pur{alpha} Is Essential for Postnatal Brain Development and Developmentally Coupled Cellular Proliferation As Revealed by Genetic Inactivation in the Mouse
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
October 1, 2003;
23(19):
6857 - 6875.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Kumar and G. K. Owens
Combinatorial Control of Smooth Muscle-Specific Gene Expression
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
May 1, 2003;
23(5):
737 - 747.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. Cogan, S. V. Subramanian, J. A. Polikandriotis, R. J. Kelm Jr., and A. R. Strauch
Vascular Smooth Muscle alpha -Actin Gene Transcription during Myofibroblast Differentiation Requires Sp1/3 Protein Binding Proximal to the MCAT Enhancer
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 20, 2002;
277(39):
36433 - 36442.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Liu and E. M. Johnson
Distinct proteins encoded by alternative transcripts of the PURG gene, located contrapodal to WRN on chromosome 8, determined by differential termination/polyadenylation
Nucleic Acids Res.,
June 1, 2002;
30(11):
2417 - 2426.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Shelley, J. M. Teodoridis, H. Park, O. C. Farokhzad, E. P. Bottinger, and M. A. Arnaout
During Differentiation of the Monocytic Cell Line U937, Pur{alpha} Mediates Induction of the CD11c{beta}2 Integrin Gene Promoter
J. Immunol.,
April 15, 2002;
168(8):
3887 - 3893.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. Carlini, M. J. Getz, A. R. Strauch, and R. J. Kelm Jr.
Cryptic MCAT Enhancer Regulation in Fibroblasts and Smooth Muscle Cells. SUPPRESSION OF TEF-1 MEDIATED ACTIVATION BY THE SINGLE-STRANDED DNA-BINDING PROTEINS, Puralpha , Purbeta , and MSY1
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 1, 2002;
277(10):
8682 - 8692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. L. Gallia, E. M. Johnson, and K. Khalili
SURVEY AND SUMMARY: Pur{alpha}: a multifunctional single-stranded DNA- and RNA-binding protein
Nucleic Acids Res.,
September 1, 2000;
28(17):
3197 - 3205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Kelm Jr., P. K. Elder, and M. J. Getz
The Single-stranded DNA-binding Proteins, Puralpha , Purbeta , and MSY1 Specifically Interact with an Exon 3-derived Mouse Vascular Smooth Muscle alpha -Actin Messenger RNA Sequence
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 31, 1999;
274(53):
38268 - 38275.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. L. Gallia, N. Darbinian, A. Tretiakova, S. A. Ansari, J. Rappaport, J. Brady, M. J. Wortman, E. M. Johnson, and K. Khalili
Association of HIV-1 Tat with the cellular protein, Puralpha , is mediated by RNA
PNAS,
September 28, 1999;
96(20):
11572 - 11577.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Kelm Jr., J. G. Cogan, P. K. Elder, A. R. Strauch, and M. J. Getz
Molecular Interactions between Single-stranded DNA-binding Proteins Associated with an Essential MCAT Element in the Mouse Smooth Muscle alpha -Actin Promoter
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 14, 1999;
274(20):
14238 - 14245.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. L. Gallia, M. Safak, and K. Khalili
Interaction of the Single-stranded DNA-binding Protein Puralpha with the Human Polyomavirus JC Virus Early Protein T-antigen
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 4, 1998;
273(49):
32662 - 32669.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Hoggatt, A. M. Kriegel, A. F. Smith, and B. P. Herring
Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor-3 Homologue 1 (HFH-1) Represses Transcription of Smooth Muscle-specific Genes
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 29, 2000;
275(40):
31162 - 31170.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. A. Becker, R. J. Kelm Jr., J. A. Vrana, M. J. Getz, and L. J. Maher III
Altered Sensitivity to Single-strand-specific Reagents Associated with the Genomic Vascular Smooth Muscle alpha -Actin Promoter during Myofibroblast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 12, 2000;
275(20):
15384 - 15391.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|