JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Chishti, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanada, T.
Right arrow Articles by Chishti, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 43, Issue of October 24, 1997 pp. 26899-26904
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Human Homologue of the Drosophila Discs Large Tumor Suppressor Binds to p56lck Tyrosine Kinase and Shaker Type Kv1.3 Potassium Channel in T Lymphocytes*

(Received for publication, March 2, 1997, and in revised form, June 25, 1997)

Toshihiko Hanada Dagger , Lunhui Lin Dagger , K. George Chandy §, S. Steven Oh Dagger and Athar H. Chishti Dagger

From the Dagger  Laboratory of Tumor Cell Biology, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02135 and the § Departments of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, California 92697

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Human homologue of the Drosophila discs large tumor suppressor protein (hDlg) belongs to a newly discovered family of proteins termed MAGUKs that appear to have structural as well as signaling functions. Consistent with the multi-domain organization of MAGUKs, hDlg consists of three copies of the PDZ (<A><AC>P</AC><AC>&cjs1142;</AC></A>SD-95/<A><AC>D</AC><AC>&cjs1142;</AC></A>iscs large/<A><AC>z</AC><AC>&cjs1142;</AC></A>O-1) domain, an SH3 motif, and a guanylate kinase-like domain. In addition, the hDlg contains an amino-terminal proline-rich domain that is absent in other MAGUKs. To explore the role of hDlg in cell signaling pathways, we used human T lymphocytes as a model system to investigate interaction of hDlg with known tyrosine kinases. In human T lymphocyte cell lines, binding properties of hDlg were studied by immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, and immune complex kinase assays. Our results show that protein tyrosine kinase activity is associated with the immunoprecipitates of hDlg. Immunoblotting experiments revealed that the immunoprecipitates of hDlg contain p56lck, a member of the Src family of tyrosine kinases. The specificity of the interaction is demonstrated by the lack of p59fyn tyrosine kinase and phosphotidylinositol 3-kinase in the hDlg immunoprecipitates. Direct interaction between hDlg and p56lck is demonstrated using glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins of hDlg and recombinant p56lck expressed in the baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells. The p56lck binding site was localized within the amino-terminal segment of hDlg containing proline-rich domain. In addition, we show in vivo association of hDlg with Kv1.3 channel, which was expressed in T lymphocytes as an epitope-tagged protein using a vaccinia virus expression system. Taken together, these results provide the first evidence of a direct interaction between hDlg and p56lck tyrosine kinase and suggest a novel function of hDlg in coupling tyrosine kinase and voltage-gated potassium channel in T lymphocytes.


INTRODUCTION

hDlg is the closest human homologue of the Drosophila discs large tumor suppressor protein (1, 2). It belongs to a rapidly expanding family of proteins termed MAGUKs (membrane-associated guanylate kinases). MAGUKs are characterized by the presence of distinct protein modules including the PDZ domain, SH3 domain, and guanylate kinase-like domain (3, 4). hDlg is a peripheral membrane protein associated with the membrane cytoskeleton presumably via its protein 4.1-binding domain (5, 6). The PDZ domains of hDlg have been shown to interact with the carboxyl termini of several proteins including Shaker-type K+ channels and adenomatous polyposis coli tumor suppressor protein (7, 8). Unlike other MAGUKs, hDlg contains a proline-rich amino-terminal domain with two potential SH3 domain binding sites (1, 9). The presence of these consensus binding sites suggests that hDlg participates in signaling pathways by forming protein complexes via the SH3 domains of other proteins.

The Shaker-related channel Kv1.3 plays a critical role in modulating the membrane potential of T lymphocytes (10, 11). Many structurally dissimilar peptide and nonpeptide blockers of the Kv1.3 channel inhibit mitogen-induced [3H]thymidine incorporation and interleukin-2 production by T cells in vitro (12-17) and immune responses in vivo (18). These antagonists are thought to chronically depolarize the T cell membrane, reduce calcium entry via calcium-activated release calcium channels in the plasma membrane, and consequently inhibit the calcium signaling pathway essential for lymphocyte activation (10, 11). Due to its restricted tissue distribution (19) and distinct mechanism of action, Kv1.3 is widely recognized as a therapeutic target for novel immunosuppressive drugs that may prove useful for transplantation therapy as well as for the treatment of autoimmune disorders (16, 18).

The stimulation of Fas receptor leads to rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of Kv1.3 channel and dramatic inhibition of potassium channel current in Jurkat T cells (20). The Fas-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Kv1.3 channel is not observed in Jurkat cells lacking p56lck (JCaM1), suggesting that Kv1.3 channel is phosphorylated by p56lck tyrosine kinase in vivo (20). It is noteworthy here that the Src tyrosine kinase phosphorylates human Kv1.5 channel and suppresses its channel current in the transfected human embryonic kidney cells (21). A proline-rich motif within the cytoplasmic domain of Kv1.5 channel has been identified as the binding site for the SH3 domain of Src tyrosine kinase (21). In contrast, the cytoplasmic domain of Kv1.3 channel does not appear to conform to known SH3 binding consensus motifs, which may facilitate its binding to p56lck tyrosine kinase. Therefore, the mechanism by which p56lck is recruited to Kv1.3 channel in T lymphocytes remains unknown.

In this study, we report that hDlg binds independently to p56lck tyrosine kinase and Kv1.3 channel in human T lymphocytes. Our results suggest a mechanism by which hDlg could recruit p56lck to the cytoplasmic domain of Kv1.3 channel in human T lymphocytes.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cell Lines and Antibodies

Human T cell leukemia cell line Jurkat J77 was maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 1.0 mM sodium pyruvate, 4.0 mM L-glutamine, and necessary antibiotics. Polyclonal antibodies against hDlg were generated by injecting a unique amino-terminal peptide (DRSKPSEPIQPVN) of hDlg in rabbits. Serum was affinity-purified by chromatography on a column of immobilized immunizing peptide. Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (Rw2-8C8) and a control monoclonal antibody (Een69-11c5) were kindly provided by Dr. Ellis Reinherz of the Dana Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA). Baculovirus-expressed human p56lck was a gift from Dr. M. Eck of the Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School (Boston, MA). The properties of the baculovirus-produced p56lck have been published previously (22). Anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibodies (4G10), anti-p85 subunit of phosphotidylinositol 3-kinase, and anti-p56lck rabbit polyclonal antibodies were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). Monoclonal antibodies anti-p56lck (3A5) and anti-p59fyn (Fyn15) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.

Generation of Glutathione S-Transferase Fusion Proteins

GST1 fusion proteins of hDlg were generated using standard procedures (GST Gene Fusion System, Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). GST-hDlg protein corresponds to the full-length hDlg including insertions I-1 and I-3 (1). GST-NT protein of hDlg contains amino acids 1-229 (valine), whereas the GST-hDlgDelta NT fusion protein starts from amino acid 201 (leucine) and ends at amino acid 926 (leucine). GST fusion proteins were produced in bacteria and affinity-purified on a column of glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia).

Immunoprecipitation, Immunoblotting, and Lipid Kinase Assay

Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1.0 mM EDTA, 1.0 mM NaF, 1.0 mM Na3VO4, 2.0 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml each of aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin) for 30 min at 4 °C, and the lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant of the lysates were precleared with 50 µl of protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Pharmacia) for 2 h at 4 °C and then used for immunoprecipitation or pull-down assay with GST fusion proteins. For immunoprecipitation, lysate was incubated with an appropriate antibody for 4 h in 4 °C and then with protein A-Sepharose for 1 h. For pull-down assay with GST fusion proteins, the lysate was incubated with GST fusion protein attached to glutathione-Sepharose beads for 4 h in 4 °C. The precipitated beads were washed six times with the lysis buffer and once with PBS and solubilized in SDS sample buffer. The proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, and immunoblotted with the appropriate antibodies. Blots were developed by ECL (Amersham Corp.). For lipid kinase assay, immunoprecipitated beads were washed six times with the lysis buffer, four times with PI 3-kinase buffer (25 mM MOPS, pH 7.0, 5.0 mM MgCl2, 1.0 mM EGTA). Lipid kinase assay was performed using phosphatidylinositol (Avanti Polar Lipids) and [gamma -32P]ATP as described before (23). Lipids were extracted with CHCl3 and analyzed by TLC on a Silica Gel 60 plate using the following solvent mixture CHCl3:MeOH:H2O:NH4OH (60:47:11.3:2).

Expression of Kv1.3 Channel in T Lymphocytes Using Vaccinia Virus/T7 Hybrid Expression System

J77 and JCaM1 T cells were cultured in RPMI medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 4 mM glutamine at 37 °C (5% CO2). For each vaccinia virus infection experiment 2-4 × 107 cells were used. The medium was removed by centrifugation, and the cell pellets were washed once with PBS-D (26.8 mM KCl, 14.7 mM KH2PO4, 1.37 M NaCl, 1.37 M Na2HPO4). The supernatant was removed and reserved. To the cell pellets suspended in 30 ml of PBS-MB (PBS-D with 1 mM MgCl2), vaccinia virus/T7 and vaccinia virus/Kv1.3 (29), both at 5 multiplicity of infection, were added, and the cell mixture was rocked at room temperature for 45 min. The infected cells were added back to the reserved medium and incubated at 37 °C/5% CO2 for 17 h. The cells were harvested and concentrated by centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellets were washed once with 45 ml of PBS-D and then placed on ice. To each pellet was added 2-4 ml of cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2.0 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml aprotinin), and the mixture was suspended using a Wheaton Teflon-glass homogenizer for 20 strokes. The lysis solutions were rocked at 4 °C for 30 min and then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatants (cell lysates) were collected and used for immunoprecipitation assays.

CD3 Cross-linking of T Lymphocytes

J77 cells were incubated in methionine-free RPMI 1640 medium for 60 min and then radiolabeled with TRAN35S-label (ICN, Inc.) 120 µCi/5 × 107 cells for 90 min. Radiolabeled cells were washed four times with cold PBS and used for CD3 cross-linking and immunoprecipitation studies. Radiolabeled cells (2.5 × 107) were incubated at 37 °C for 1.0 min in 5.0 ml of RPMI 1640 medium containing 5.0 µg of either activating mAb (Rw2-8C8) or control mAb (Een69-11C5), followed by their treatment with 5.0 µg of rabbit anti-mouse antibody for 4.0 min. In a separate experiment, the T cell activation was monitored by quantifying interleukin-2 secretion using an interleukin-2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Endogen, Inc.). Activated cells were washed once with cold PBS containing 0.4 mM Na3VO4 and 1.0 mM NaF. Lysates were incubated with 5.0 µg of anti-hDlg antibody and 20 µl of protein A-Sepharose beads for 2 h at 4 °C. The protein A beads were extensively washed and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and fluorography.

In Vitro Immune Complex Kinase Assay

Unlabeled J77 cells (5 × 107) were lysed in the lysis buffer, and solubilized proteins were immunoprecipitated with either anti-hDlg/anti-p56lck rabbit antiserum bound to protein A-Sepharose beads or GST-hDlg fusion protein (full-length) coupled with glutathione-Sepharose beads. Beads containing precipitated complexes were washed six times with the lysis buffer and twice with the kinase buffer without ATP (40 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 3.0 mM MnCl2) and then incubated in 100 µl of the kinase buffer supplemented with 0.5 mM of unlabeled neutralized ATP. After 30 min at 25 °C, beads were washed once with the lysis buffer and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10). Blots were developed using an ECL kit (Amersham Corp.).

In Vitro Binding of Recombinant p56lck and GST-hDlg Fusion Protein

2.0 µg of purified baculovirus-expressed p56lck (residues 53-509 of human p56lck) (22) was incubated with either GST or GST-hDlg fusion proteins bound to 10 µl of glutathione Sepharose beads in 250 µl of lysis buffer at 4 °C for 3 h. The beads were washed six times with lysis buffer and once with PBS and then resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted with anti-p56lck mAb (3A5).

Surface Plasmon Resonance Measurements

A BIAcore biosensor instrument (Pharmacia Biosensor) was used to detect binding interactions between purified p56lck and NH2-terminal segment of hDlg. Purified p56lck was immobilized on the surface of a CM5 sensor chip by amine coupling (24). Approximately 530 resonance units of immobilized p56lck, which corresponds to ~0.5 ng protein/mm2 surface was obtained. Purified hDlg(N) protein, which was cleaved from GST-NT fusion protein using a thrombin-specific cleavage site, was injected in HBS (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 3.4 mM EDTA, 0.05% surfactant P20) continuous flow buffer. After each protein binding experiment, the p56lck-immobilized surface was regenerated with two short pulses of 0.03% SDS. The background nonspecific binding of hDlg(N) and the contribution of bulk solution in SPR signal were determined by injecting a hDlg(N) solution in HBS onto a blank CM5 sensor chip surface activated with NHS/EDC and blocked with 1.0 M hydroxylamine hydrochloride.


RESULTS

Protein Tyrosine Kinase Activity Is Associated with the Immunoprecipitates of hDlg

A functional role of MAGUKs has been suggested in signaling pathways. However, no evidence exists to support this hypothesis in a mammalian system. The presence of two potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites in hDlg (located between the protein 4.1-binding domain and guanylate kinase-like domain) suggests that hDlg may be tyrosine phosphorylated (25). We used a phosphotyrosine-immunoblotting assay to test the tyrosine phosphorylation of hDlg in J77 cells. Immunoprecipitation of p56lck served as a positive control. As expected, p56lck immunoprecipitated from nonactivated J77 cells was tyrosine phosphorylated (Fig. 1A, lane 1). Incubation of p56lck immune complexes with ATP further enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of p56lck (Fig. 1A, lane 2). In contrast, hDlg protein immunoprecipitated from nonactivated J77 cells was not tyrosine phosphorylated (Fig. 2A, lane 3). Similarly, the hDlg protein immunoprecipitated from CD3-activated J77 cells was also not tyrosine phosphorylated (data not shown). However, incubation of beads containing hDlg immune complexes with ATP resulted in the tyrosine phosphorylation of a 120-kDa protein (Fig. 1A, lane 4, asterisk). The hDlg immunoprecipitates also contained a tyrosine phosphorylated protein of ~55-60 kDa that migrated just above the IgG band (Fig. 1A, lane 4). In addition, CD3-mediated activation of J77 cells did not modulate tyrosine phosphorylation of hDlg-associated proteins as detected by in vitro kinase assay (data not shown).


Fig. 1. Immune complex in vitro kinase assay and anti-phosphotyrosine Western blot analysis. Nonactivated J77 cells (5 × 107 cells/lane) were lysed in lysis buffer. A, immunoprecipitations were performed either with anti-p56lck (lanes 1 and 2) or anti-hDlg (lanes 3 and 4). Immune complexes were incubated with 0.5 mM ATP (lanes 2 and 4) and transferred to nitrocellulose, and blots were analyzed using anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibodies (4G10). The position of tyrosine phosphorylated hDlg is marked with an asterisk (lane 4). B, lysates from nonactivated J77 cells were incubated with glutathione beads containing GST-hDlg fusion protein. After extensive washing of beads with the lysis buffer, beads were incubated with ATP and analyzed using anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibodies (4G10). The position of tyrosine phosphorylated hDlg is shown with an asterisk in lane 2. Note that the tyrosine phosphorylated bands are detectable only after incubation of beads with ATP.

[View Larger Version of this Image (56K GIF file)]



Fig. 2. Coimmunoprecipitation of p56lck with hDlg. A, lysis buffer lysate from J77 cells (2 × 108 cells/lane) was incubated with either protein A beads alone (lane 1) or protein A beads containing anti-hDlg (lane 2). After extensive washing of the beads, bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting using an anti-p56lck monoclonal antibodies (3A5). The locations of IgG band and p56lck are indicated by an arrowhead and an arrow, respectively (lane 2). B, J77 lysate was immunoprecipitated using normal rabbit serum (NRS) (lane 2) and anti-hDlg Ab (lane 3). Western blotting with anti-p59fyn mAb (fyn15) did not detect any p59fyn in hDlg immunoprecipitates. Lane 1 shows the presence of p59fyn in J77 lysate. C, J77 lysate (5 × 107 cells/sample) was immunoprecipitated with a control antibody (11c5) (lanes 1 and 2), anti-hDlg (lanes 3 and 4), and anti-PI 3-kinase (lanes 5 and 6). Lipid kinase activity was assayed in the presence and the absence of 0.5% Nonidet P-40 (NP40), which is known to inhibit the activity of PI 3-kinase. As shown in lane 3, no detectable amount of phosphatidylinositol phosphate was produced by hDlg immunoprecipitates.

[View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]


To determine whether the tyrosine phosphorylated 120-kDa protein was hDlg, bacterially expressed GST-hDlg fusion protein coupled to glutathione-Sepharose beads was incubated with J77 cell lysate. The GST-hDlg beads were then sedimented, incubated with ATP, and immunoblotted using anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. Again, two tyrosine phosphorylated proteins of 110 and ~55-60 kDa were detected, indicating that bacterially expressed hDlg can be tyrosine phosphorylated by protein kinases that are present in J77 cells (Fig. 1B, lane 2). Based on these results and the fact that the GST-hDlg fusion protein exhibits no autophosphorylation activity (data not shown), we speculated that protein tyrosine kinase(s) may be associated with beads containing hDlg immune complexes. In summary, these results suggest that the hDlg may form a constitutive complex with tyrosine kinase(s) that is independent of CD3 activation of J77 cells.

p56lck Tyrosine Kinase Co-precipitates with hDlg

Because the coprecipitated ~55-60-kDa protein was similar in size to that of auto-phosphorylated Src family protein tyrosine kinases, we suspected that hDlg physically associates with well characterized T cell tyrosine kinases such as p56lck and p59fyn. To identify the tyrosine kinase(s) associated with the hDlg immunoprecipitates, immunoblotting was performed using mAbs against p56lck and p59fyn, which are present in J77 cells. Cell lysates were prepared in lysis buffer and incubated with either protein A-Sepharose beads alone (Fig. 2A, lane 1) or protein A-Sepharose beads bearing hDlg antibodies (Fig. 2A, lane 2). As shown in Fig. 2A (lane 2, arrow), p56lck specifically bound to the beads containing hDlg immunoprecipitates. In contrast, no measurable amount of p59fyn tyrosine kinase was detected using an anti-p59fyn mAb (Fig. 2B, lane 3). These results show that p56lck, but not p59fyn, is associated with hDlg immunoprecipitates in J77 cells. To further demonstrate specificity of the p56lck-hDlg interaction, we examined hDlg immunoprecipitates for the presence of PI 3-kinase, a well characterized SH3 domain-containing protein. As shown in Fig. 2C (lanes 3 and 4), no PI 3-kinase activity was detected in the hDlg immunoprecipitates from J77 cells. Immunoprecipitation of PI 3-kinase via its p85 subunit served as a positive control to demonstrate the retention of enzyme activity under the immunoprecipitation conditions used here (Fig. 2C, lanes 5 and 6). Moreover, no tyrosine kinase activity was detected when hDlg was immunoprecipitated from HeLa cells, further demonstrating the specificity of p56lck-hDlg interaction in T lymphocytes.

Direct Binding of p56lck with the NH2-terminal Segment of hDlg

Using GST fusion proteins of hDlg, a sedimentation assay was performed to determine the binding site of p56lck within hDlg. The GST-NT fusion protein contained amino acids 1-229 of hDlg including its proline-rich insertion I-1. The GST-hDlgDelta NT fusion protein contained the remaining amino acids (201-926) of hDlg (Fig. 3). The GST-hDlg (full-length) and GST-hDlgDelta NT fusion proteins were immobilized on glutathione beads and incubated with the lysate of nonactivated J77 cells. Proteins that bound to the fusion proteins were detected by immunoblotting using an anti-p56lck mAb. As shown in Fig. 4A, p56lck bound specifically to GST-hDlg but not to GST-hDlgDelta NT fusion protein. Similar sedimentation assays using hDlg fusion proteins failed to coprecipitate p59fyn further, supporting the specificity of the interactions (data not shown). To confirm direct association of p56lck with the NH2-terminal segment of hDlg, GST-NT fusion protein, in addition to GST-hDlg and GST-hDlgDelta NT, was incubated with purified p56lck expressed in Sf9 cells (22). Again, p56lck specifically associated with GST-hDlg and GST-NT but not with the GST-hDlgDelta NT fusion protein (Fig. 4B). Further evidence supporting direct association between p56lck and hDlg was obtained from surface plasmon resonance measurements. The NH2-terminal segment of hDlg without GST (Fig. 3) specifically interacted with p56lck immobilized onto a CM5 sensor chip surface (data not shown). Although concentration dependence was apparent in the binding isotherm, precise quantification of the binding was unsuccessful due to the weak nature of the binding interaction and the sensitivity limitations of the BIAcore biosensor instrument. We estimate the Kd value in the mM range for in vitro binding between p56lck and recombinant NH2-terminal domain of hDlg. In summary, these results show that purified p56lck directly binds to the proline-rich NH2-terminal domain of hDlg.


Fig. 3. Schematic location of GST fusion proteins of hDlg. GST-hDlg contains full-length hDlg. GST-NT contains amino acids 1-229, which includes insertion I-1 (proline-rich domain) of hDlg. GST-hDlgDelta NT includes amino acids 201-926. See "Experimental Procedures" for more details.

[View Larger Version of this Image (11K GIF file)]



Fig. 4. A, GST-hDlg pulls down p56lck from J77 cell lysate. J77 cell lysate (2 × 108 cells/sample) was incubated with GST (lane 1), GST-hDlgDelta NT (lane 2), and GST-hDlg (lane 3) coupled to glutathione-Sepharose beads. Beads were sedimented, washed, and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-p56lck mAb (3A5). Note that only the full-length hDlg fusion protein precipitated p56lck from J77 cell lysate. B, direct binding of hDlg fusion proteins with recombinant p56lck. GST-hDlg fusion proteins were incubated with baculovirus-expressed human p56lck. See details under "Experimental Procedures." After extensive washing of the beads, bound p56lck was detected by Western blot analysis. Note that p56lck binds only to the full-length (GST-hDlg) and amino-terminal (GST-NT) fusion proteins of hDlg.

[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]


hDlg Forms a Stable Complex with the Kv1.3 channel in T Lymphocytes

Shaker-related Kv1 family proteins directly interact with hDlg, PDS-95, and Chapsyn-110 through a PDZ domain binding motif, (T/S)XV (7, 26). These observations, made in neuronal cells, imply that MAGUKs functioned as channel-clustering proteins in vivo (27, 28). Because the Kv1.3 channel is expressed principally in lymphocytes (19) and because the carboxyl terminus of Kv1.3 contains a PDZ domain binding motif (TDV), we tested whether hDlg associated with the Kv1.3 channel in T lymphocytes. Using a vaccinia virus/T7 hybrid expression system (29), the Kv1.3 channel was expressed in human J77 and JCaM1 (p56lck-deficient) T cells as an epitope-tagged fusion protein. The use of this expression system was necessitated because of the lack of antibodies that can distinguish Kv1.3 in cells. Immunoblot analysis revealed that the T7-tagged Kv1.3 protein migrated as a 64-kDa band (Fig. 5A), which is consistent with its predicted size (29). Interestingly, the expression of epitope-tagged Kv1.3 protein was significantly lower in J77 cells as compared with the p56lck deficient-JCaM1 cells (Fig. 5, compare lanes 1 and 2), although the reasons for this differential expression remain an enigma. Immunoprecipitation of hDlg with a specific polyclonal antibody from both J77 and JCaM1 cells also coprecipitated the Kv1.3 fusion protein (Fig. 5A, lanes 5 and 6). In parallel experiments, the Kv1.3 protein was immunoprecipitated from JCaM1 cells with an anti-T7 monoclonal antibody, and subsequent immunoblotting with the anti-hDlg antibody revealed the presence of hDlg in the precipitate. Together, these results show that hDlg directly associates with the Kv1.3 protein in human T lymphocytes, and the binding is independent of the presence of p56lck.


Fig. 5. Association of Kv1.3 channel with hDlg in T lymphocytes. A, T7 epitope-tagged Kv1.3 channel was expressed in J77 and JCaM1 cell lines (1 × 108 cells were used for immunoprecipitation). Lanes 1 and 2 show an equal amount of whole cell lysate. Note that the expression of Kv1.3 channel is significantly higher in the JCaM1 cells as compared with J77 cells. JCaM1 cells lack all forms of p56lck. Lanes 3 and 4 show immunoprecipitation with normal rabbit serum (NRS), whereas lanes 5 and 6 show immunoprecipitation with anti-hDlg. Note that Kv1.3 channel coprecipitated with hDlg from JCaM1 as well as J77 cells. The presence of Kv 1.3 was detected by immunoblotting using anti-T7 mAb. B, alternatively, control JCaM1 cells (lane 1) and T7-Kv1.3 expressing JCaM1 cells (lane 2) were lysed and immunoprecipitated with anti-T7 mAb. The presence of coprecipitated hDlg was detected by immunoblotting using anti-hDlg Ab.

[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

Activation of T lymphocytes and their elimination via apoptosis are key events required for the maintenance of immune homeostasis. These events are initiated by the transmission of extracellular signals to the cell interior via distinct transmembrane proteins (30, 31). A common theme in T cell activation and apoptosis is the immediate and rapid phosphorylation of multiple substrates by Src family tyrosine kinases p56lck and p59fyn (32-35). p56lck is predominantly expressed in T lymphocytes associating with the cytoplasmic domains of CD4/CD8 co-receptors and plays a critical role in T cell activation and thymocyte development (32, 36). In addition to the T cell receptor signaling, p56lck also mediates signaling through CD28, CD44, and interleukin-2 receptor (37-39). The data reported in this paper establish direct binding of p56lck with the human homologue (hDlg) of the Drosophila discs large tumor suppressor protein.

The interaction between p56lck and hDlg appears to be constitutive and independent of CD3/T cell receptor-mediated T cell activation. CD3 cross-linking of J77 cells does not appear to affect hDlg interactions with other T cell proteins as assessed by metabolic radiolabeling and immunoprecipitation techniques (data not shown). In vivo, hDlg is not tyrosine phosphorylated when immunoprecipitated from either unstimulated or activated J77 cells (Fig. 1). In contrast, incubation of hDlg immunoprecipitates with ATP induces tyrosine phosphorylation of hDlg (Fig. 1). Although we have not yet identified signaling pathways that can stimulate tyrosine phosphorylation of hDlg in vivo, the presence of two potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites located near the protein 4.1-binding domain of hDlg (25) may have important physiological consequences. Phosphorylation of these tyrosines and the effect of this phosphorylation on hDlg-protein 4.1 binding, as well as its effect on the nuclear localization of hDlg, are currently under investigation.

The discovery of a ~56-kDa tyrosine phosphorylated protein in hDlg immunoprecipitates and in the GST-hDlg precipitated from J77 lysates prompted us to investigate whether hDlg is associated with p56lck, a Src-like tyrosine kinase. The recombinant p56lck used in this study was engineered to encode the SH3, SH2, and protein kinase domains (amino acids 53-509) (22), and the p56lck binding site was localized to the NH2-terminal segment of hDlg (Figs. 3 and 4). Because the proline-rich domain present in the NH2-terminal segment of hDlg contains two potential SH3 binding motifs (1, 9), it appears likely that the hDlg-p56lck interaction is mediated by the direct binding of SH3 domain of p56lck with the proline-rich sequences of hDlg. This proposal is further supported by the fact that the in vitro interaction between p56lck and hDlg(N) is relatively weak consistent with the lower affinity of known SH3 domain-mediated interactions (40).

Our results provide evidence of the direct association of a tyrosine kinase with a member of the MAGUK family and may have important physiological consequences. hDlg may play a role in tyrosine phosphorylation of Kv1.3 channel in T cells (41). Although Kv1.3 channels are known to be phosphorylated by p56lck, the issue of how p56lck is recruited to these ion channels is not resolved (20). The cytoplasmic domain of Kv1.3 channel lacks consensus proline-rich sequences that might bind the SH3 domain of p56lck (19), in the way that Kv1.5 directly binds to the SH3 domain of Src tyrosine kinase (21). However, Kv1.3 channel contains the PDZ domain binding consensus sequence in its COOH terminus cytoplasmic tail and was shown to bind PDZ domain of hDlg as well as its close relative, PSD-95, in neuronal cells (7, 26). Our results provide the first evidence of the in vivo interaction between a MAGUK and Shaker type potassium channel in non-neuronal cells. Because of the lack of a specific antibody against Kv1.3 channel, we used T7 epitope-tagged Kv1.3 channel expressed in T lymphocytes. Immunoprecipitation of hDlg coprecipitated Kv1.3 channel, whereas immunoprecipitation of T7-tagged Kv1.3 channel coprecipitated hDlg (Fig. 5). It is relevant to note here that native Kv1.3 channel expressed in T lymphocytes migrates as a 65-kDa protein (42), and the immunoprecipitation of hDg from metabolically radiolabeled J77 cells coprecipitates a 65-kDa protein that is likely to be Kv1.3 channel (data not shown). These results suggest that hDlg associates with native as well as epitope-tagged Kv1.3 channel expressed in T lymphocytes. In summary, our results are consistent with the possibilities for hDlg to form independent complexes with p56lck and Kv1.3, although it is intriguing to consider the possibility that hDlg functions as an adaptor protein to bring p56lck in proximity to Kv1.3 channel and allow the tyrosine phosphorylation to take place. We were, however, unable to verify the latter possibility because the expression of epitope-tagged Kv1.3 channel was very poor in J77 cells, and the endogenous Kv1.3 levels in these cells were below the level of detection by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting assays.

The hDlg transcript and protein isoforms are ubiquitously distributed (1), whereas p56lck expression is restricted largely to T cells (32). Although we could not detect binding of hDlg with p59fyn, it is possible that hDlg associates with other Src family tyrosine kinases in nonhematopoietic cells. Because the proline-rich sequences encoded in the alternatively spliced insertion I-1 in hDlg appear likely to mediate its specific interaction with the SH3 domain of p56lck, the expression of tissue-specific isoforms of hDlg will likely determine its binding function in a particular tissue. Moreover, the specificity of the hDlg-p56lck interaction in a given cell type is supported by the fact that hDlg does not bind to other SH3 domain-containing proteins such as p59fyn and PI 3-kinase in T lymphocytes. Our observation that the complete deficiency of p56lck in JCaM1 cells does not affect binding of hDlg with Kv1.3 channel is also consistent with the proposed function of hDlg as an adaptor protein coupling Kv1.3 channel to p56lck in T lymphocytes. The restricted expression of Kv1.3 channel in lymphocytes and brain (19) lends credence to our hypothesis that hDlg may link novel tyrosine kinases to potassium channel in lymphocytes as well as in neuronal cells.

The hDlg-mediated recruitment of tyrosine kinases to specific sites may couple these critical enzymes to cytoskeletal protein 4.1 and serine/threonine kinases because hDlg immunoprecipitates from J77 cells also contain serine/threonine kinase activity.2 Consistent with this hypothesis is our previous observation that protein 4.1 binds to hDlg via an alternatively spliced insertion I-3 and that both insertions I-1 and I-3 are found together in an hDlg isoform (1). Whether the hDlg-p56lck paradigm truly contributes to these related binding issues remains to be investigated.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA66263 (to A. H. C.), GM-OD54872-01 (Shannon Award), and AI24783 (to K. G. C.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
   Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. To whom correspondence should be addressed: St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Bldg. ACH4, 736 Cambridge St., Boston, MA 02135. Tel.: 617-789-3118.
1   The abbreviations used are: GST, glutathione S-transferase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; mAb, monoclonal antibody; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid; PI, phosphotidylinositol; PDZ, PSD-95/Discs large/zO-1.
2   T. Hanada and A. H. Chishti, unpublished data.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. M. Eck and W. Xu of the Children's Hospital (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) for the generous gift of human p56lck produced in a baculovirus expression system. We are also indebted to Jennifer Wu of our laboratory for valuable editorial assistance and to Dona Marie-Mironchuk for assistance with the artwork.


REFERENCES

  1. Lue, A. R., Marfatia, S. M., Branton, D., and Chishti, A. H. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 91, 9818-9822 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Woods, D. F., and Bryant, P. J. (1991) Cell 66, 451-464 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Cho, K.-O., Hunt, C. A., and Kennedy, M. B. (1992) Neuron 9, 929-942 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Woods, D. F., and Bryant, P. J. (1993) Mech. Dev. 44, 85-89 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Marfatia, S. M., Morais Cabral, J. H., Lin, L., Hough, C., Bryant, P. J., Stolz, L., and Chishti, A. H. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 753-766 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lue, R. A., Brandin, E., Chan, E. P., and Branton, D. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 1125-1137 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kim, E., Niethammer, M., Rothschild, A., Jan, Y. N., and Sheng, M. (1995) Nature 378, 85-88 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Matsumine, A., Ogai, A., Senda, T., Okumura, N., Satoh, K., Baeg, G.-H., Kawahara, T., Kobayashi, S., Okada, M., Toyoshima, K., and Akiyama, T. (1996) Science 272, 1020-1023 [Abstract]
  9. Ren, R., Mayer, B. J., Cicchetti, P., and Baltimore, D. (1993) Science 259, 1157-1161 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Chandy, K. G., Gutman, G. A., and Grissmer, S. (1993) Semin. Neurosci. 5, 125-134 [CrossRef]
  11. Lewis, R. S., and Cahalan, M. D. (1995) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13, 623-654 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Chandy, K. G., DeCoursey, T. E., Cahalan, M. D., McLaughlin, C., and Gupta, S. (1984) J. Exp. Med. 160, 369-385 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Price, M., Lee, S. C., and Deutsh, C. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 10171-10175 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Leonard, R. J., Garcia, M. L., Slaughter, R. S., and Reuben, J. P. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 89, 10094-10098 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lin, C. S., Boltz, R. C., Blake, J. T., Nguyen, M., Talento, A., Fischer, P., Springer, M. S., Sigal, N. H., Slaughter, R. S., Garcia, M. L., Kaczorowski, G., and Koo, G. C. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 177, 637-645 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Nguyen, Q. A., Kath, J., Hanson, D. C., Biggers, M. S., Canniff, P. C., Donovan, C. B., Mather, R. J., Bruns, M. J., Rauer, H., Aiyar, J., Lepple-Weienhues, A., Gutman, G. A., Grissmer, S., Cahalan, M. D., and Chandy, K. G. (1996) Mol. Pharmacol. 50, 1672-1679 [Abstract]
  17. Rader, R. K., Kahn, L. E., Anderson, G. D., Martin, C. L., Chinn, K. S., and Gregory, S. A. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 1425-1430 [Abstract]
  18. Koo, G. C., Blake, J. T., Talento, A., Nguyen, M., Lin, S., Sirotina, A., Shah, K., Mulvany, K., Hora, J. D., Cunningham, P., Wunderler, D., Mcmanus, O. B., Slaughter, R., Bugianesi, R., Felix, J., Garcia, M., Wiiliamson, J., Kaczorowski, G., Sigal, N. H., Springer, M. S., and Feeney, W. (1997) J. Immunol. 158, 5120-5128 [Abstract]
  19. Chandy, K. G., and Gutman, G. A. (1995) in Handbook of Receptors and Channels: Ligand and Voltage-gated Ion Channels (North, A., ed), pp. 1-71, CRC Press, Boca Ranton, FL
  20. Szabo, I., Gulbins, E., Apfel, H., Zhang, X., Barth, P., Busch, A. E., Schlottmann, K., Pongs, O., and Lang, F. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20465-20469 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Holmes, T. C., Fadool, D. A., Ren, R., and Levitan, I. B. (1996) Science 274, 2089-2091 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Weissenhorn, W., Eck, M. J., Harrison, S. C., and Wiley, D. C. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 238, 440-445 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Varticovski, L., Drucker, B., Morrison, D., Cantley, L., and Roberts, T. (1989) Nature 342, 699-702 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Johnsson, B., Lofas, S., and Lindquist, G. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 198, 268-277 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Kim, A. C., Metzenberg, A. B., Sahr, K. E., Marfatia, S. M., and Chishti, A. H. (1996) Genomics 31, 223-229 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Kim, E., Cho, K.-O., Rothschild, A., and Sheng, M. (1996) Neuron 17, 103-113 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Kim, E., Naisbitt, S., Hsueh, Y.-P., Rao, A., Rothschild, A., Craig, A. M., and Sheng, M. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 136, 669-678 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Gomperts, S. N. (1996) Cell 84, 659-662 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Spencer, R. H., Sokolov, Y., Li, H., Takenaka, B., Milici, A. J., Aiyar, J., Nguyen, A., Park, H., Jap, B. K., Hall, J. E., Gutman, G. A., and Chandy, K. G. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2389-2395 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Weiss, A., and Littman, D. R. (1994) Cell 76, 263-274 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Nagata, S. (1997) Cell 88, 355-365 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Straus, D. B., and Weiss, A. (1992) Cell 70, 585-593 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Eischen, C. M., Dick, C. J., and Leibson, P. J. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 1947-1954 [Abstract]
  34. Appleby, M. W., Gross, J. A., Cooke, M. P., Levine, S. D., Qian, X., and Perlmutter, R. M. (1992) Cell 70, 751-763 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Atkinson, E. A., Ostergaard, H., Kane, K., Pinkoski, M. J., Caputo, A., Olszowy, M. W., and Bleackley, R. C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5968-5971 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Molina, T. J., Kishihara, K., Siderovski, D. P., van Ewijk, W., Narendran, A., Timms, E., Wakeham, A., Paige, C. J., Hartmann, K.-U., Veillette, A., Davidson, D., and Mak, T. W. (1992) Nature 357, 161-164 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Gibson, S., August, A., Branch, D., Dupont, B., and Mills, G. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 7079-7083 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Taher, T. E. I., Smit, L., Griffioen, A. W., Schilder-Tol, E. J. M., Borst, J., and Pals, S. T. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2863-2867 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Hatakeyama, M., Kono, T., Kobayashi, N., Kawahara, A., Levin, S. D., Permutter, R. M., and Taniguchi, T. (1991) Science 252, 1523-1528 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Yu, H., Chen, J. K., Feng, S., Dalgarno, D. C., Brauer, A. W., and Schreiber, S. L. (1994) Cell 76, 933-945 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Grissmer, S., Dethlefs, B., Wasmuth, J. J., Goldin, A. L., Gutman, G. A., Cahalan, M. D., and Chandy, K. G. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 87, 9411-9415 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Cai, Y.-C., and Douglass, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23720-23727 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Arpin-Andre and J.-M. Mesnard
The PDZ Domain-binding Motif of the Human T Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax Protein Induces Mislocalization of the Tumor Suppressor hScrib in T cells
J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2007; 282(45): 33132 - 33141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
L. M. Stephenson, B. Sammut, D. B. Graham, J. Chan-Wang, K. L. Brim, A. S. Huett, A. V. Miletic, T. Kloeppel, A. Landry, R. Xavier, et al.
DLGH1 Is a Negative Regulator of T-Lymphocyte Proliferation
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2007; 27(21): 7574 - 7581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P. Szigligeti, L. Neumeier, E. Duke, C. Chougnet, K. Takimoto, S. M. Lee, A. H. Filipovich, and L. Conforti
Signalling during hypoxia in human T lymphocytes - critical role of the src protein tyrosine kinase p56Lck in the O2 sensitivity of Kv1.3 channels
J. Physiol., June 1, 2006; 573(2): 357 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
S. Feske, M. Prakriya, A. Rao, and R. S. Lewis
A severe defect in CRAC Ca2+ channel activation and altered K+ channel gating in T cells from immunodeficient patients
J. Exp. Med., September 6, 2005; 202(5): 651 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
J. L. Round, T. Tomassian, M. Zhang, V. Patel, S. P. Schoenberger, and M. C. Miceli
Dlgh1 coordinates actin polymerization, synaptic T cell receptor and lipid raft aggregation, and effector function in T cells
J. Exp. Med., February 7, 2005; 201(3): 419 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
L. A. Pardo
Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels in Cell Proliferation
Physiology, October 1, 2004; 19(5): 285 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
V. Blot, L. Delamarre, F. Perugi, D. Pham, S. Benichou, R. Benarous, T. Hanada, A. H. Chishti, M.-C. Dokhelar, and C. Pique
Human Dlg protein binds to the envelope glycoproteins of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 and regulates envelope mediated cell-cell fusion in T lymphocytes
J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2004; 117(17): 3983 - 3993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. J. Ralston, S. L. Hird, X. Zhang, J. L. Scott, B. Jin, R. F. Thorne, M. C. Berndt, A. W. Boyd, and G. F. Burns
The LFA-1-associated Molecule PTA-1 (CD226) on T Cells Forms a Dynamic Molecular Complex with Protein 4.1G and Human Discs Large
J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33816 - 33828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
R. Xavier, S. Rabizadeh, K. Ishiguro, N. Andre, J. B. Ortiz, H. Wachtel, D. G. Morris, M. Lopez-Ilasaca, A. C. Shaw, W. Swat, et al.
Discs large (Dlg1) complexes in lymphocyte activation
J. Cell Biol., July 19, 2004; 166(2): 173 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. M. Bautista and R. S. Lewis
Modulation of plasma membrane calcium-ATPase activity by local calcium microdomains near CRAC channels in human T cells
J. Physiol., May 1, 2004; 556(3): 805 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Leonoudakis, L. R. Conti, C. M. Radeke, L. M. M. McGuire, and C. A. Vandenberg
A Multiprotein Trafficking Complex Composed of SAP97, CASK, Veli, and Mint1 Is Associated with Inward Rectifier Kir2 Potassium Channels
J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 19051 - 19063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Laprise, A. Viel, and N. Rivard
Human Homolog of Disc-large Is Required for Adherens Junction Assembly and Differentiation of Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., March 12, 2004; 279(11): 10157 - 10166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Panyi, G. Vamosi, Z. Bacso, M. Bagdany, A. Bodnar, Z. Varga, R. Gaspar, L. Matyus, and S. Damjanovich
Kv1.3 potassium channels are localized in the immunological synapse formed between cytotoxic and target cells
PNAS, February 3, 2004; 101(5): 1285 - 1290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Mantovani and L. Banks
Regulation of the Discs Large Tumor Suppressor by a Phosphorylation-dependent Interaction with the {beta}-TrCP Ubiquitin Ligase Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2003; 278(43): 42477 - 42486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Hanada, A. Takeuchi, G. Sondarva, and A. H. Chishti
Protein 4.1-mediated Membrane Targeting of Human Discs Large in Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., September 5, 2003; 278(36): 34445 - 34450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
B. Zhu, L. Luo, G. R. W. Moore, D. W. Paty, and M. S. Cynader
Dendritic and Synaptic Pathology in Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2003; 162(5): 1639 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

<

Home page