Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yiu, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yiu, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, N. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 43, Issue of October 24, 1997 pp. 26926-26933
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Novel Testis-specific Protein-DNA Interactions Activate Transcription of the Mouse Protamine 2 Gene during Spermatogenesis*

(Received for publication, July 7, 1997, and in revised form, August 12, 1997)

Gary K. Yiu and Norman B. Hecht Dagger

From the Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

The mouse protamines are expressed exclusively in postmeiotic male germ cells and are crucial for the compaction of chromatin during the late stages of spermatogenesis. The temporal expression of the two mouse protamines is transcriptionally regulated in the testis. Recent studies have demonstrated that ubiquitous and testis-specific proteins bind to the promoter of the mouse protamine 2 (mP2) gene. We have performed in vitro transcription and mobility shift assays to characterize the functional significance of the protein-DNA interactions within 180 base pairs upstream of the mP2 transcription start site. Deletion and mutational analyses reveal two positive regulatory sequences for mP2 transcription at positions -59/-47 and -83/-72 of the mP2 promoter. The proximal element at -59/-47 binds to a novel testis-specific protein we name protamine-activating factor 1 (PAF-1). PAF-1 reaches high levels in round spermatids at the time of mP2 transcription. Deletion of the -59/-47 sequence results in about a 3-fold reduction of mP2 transcription in vitro. Although the PAF-1 binding site (PAF-responsive element, PAF-RE), contains the sequence GTCA present in the cAMP-responsive element and is very similar to the estrogen-responsive element, mobility shift assays revealed that neither the cAMP-responsive element modulator nor the estrogen receptor is the protein(s) binding to PAF-RE. Competition mobility shift assays reveal that the second positive regulatory element at -83/-72 binds a Y-box-binding protein. Using in vitro transcription assays, a 5-fold decrease in mP2 transcription is seen when both the PAF-RE and this Y-box are deleted. These data suggest that the testis-specific PAF-1 and a Y-box-binding protein are needed to activate mP2 transcription in postmeiotic male germ cells.


INTRODUCTION

Spermatogenesis is a unique process of cellular differentiation in which diploid testicular stem cells differentiate into haploid spermatozoa (1, 2). During meiosis and spermiogenesis, male germ cells undergo major morphological and biochemical changes. These changes are regulated by the stage-specific transcriptional and translational activation of a large number of genes under temporal and cell-specific regulation (3). In addition to numerous testis-specific genes, many testis-specific variants of somatic genes are also expressed during spermatogenesis (2, 4, 5).

Protamines are small, arginine-rich proteins expressed only during the postmeiotic stages of spermatogenesis (2, 6). In the mouse, there are two protamines, mP1 and mP2, which differ in size and amino acid sequence and are transcribed from genetically linked single copy genes (6, 7). The nuclear compaction of the sperm nucleus during spermiogenesis involves the sequential replacement of histones by transition proteins and then by protamines. These chromatin changes contribute to the cessation of transcription in the maturing spermatids. Since transcription of the two mouse protamine genes is temporally coordinated (8), it is likely that similar sequences in the 5'-flanking regions of the protamine genes participate in their regulation (9).

The promoters of the mP1 and mP2 genes have been used to direct transcription in transgenic mice. A 113-bp region of the mP1 promoter from -150 to -37 successfully directs spermatid-specific transcription (10, 11). A number of ubiquitous and testis-specific proteins bind within this region (12), including a testis-specific nuclear protein (Tet-1), which binds to an 11-mer sequence at -64. Tet-1 has been proposed to activate the transcription of mP1 (13). Likewise, an 859-bp region of the mP2 gene immediately upstream of the transcription start site confers specific expression in round spermatids (14). Analyses of the mP2 promoter by in vitro transcription assays have identified a potential positive regulatory region from -170 to -82 (15). Mobility shift assays of the mP2 promoter region from -140 to -23 have detected the binding of ubiquitous and testis-specific proteins (16).

Recent studies analyzing protein-DNA interactions within the proximal mP2 promoter by DNase I footprinting and mobility shift assays have identified five protein-binding sites (17). Site 1 (-64/-48) contains the single core motif AGGTCA recognized by orphan nuclear receptors that are believed to be important for gonadal and brain development (18). Site 1 also contains a half-site of the cAMP-responsive element (CRE) that binds CRE-binding protein (CREB) or CRE modulator (CREM) (19) and a sequence similar to the estrogen receptor-responsive element (ERE) (20). Site 2 has a putative Y-box at -83/-72, which binds a family of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins, one of them capable of activating germ cell-specific transcription (21). A testicular Y-box protein has also been shown to bind to a putative Y-box at -489/-478 of the mP2 promoter (22).

To characterize and determine the functional significance of the DNA-protein interactions at sites 1 and 2 of the mP2 promoter, in vitro transcription and mobility shift assays were performed. We find that both site 1 and site 2 are important to obtain maximal mP2 transcription in vitro and suggest that a novel orphan nuclear receptor and a Y-box-binding protein are essential to activate mP2 transcription during the late stages of spermatogenesis.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Construction of G-free Cassette Plasmids

The promoter-less pEcoRV(C2AT) plasmid, containing a G-free cassette, was derived from the plasmid p(C2AT)19 (23). DNA fragments representing various lengths of the mP2 promoter (Fig. 2A) were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Each of the 5'-primers used in PCR has an EcoRI site at its 5'-end. Their sequences are 5'-CAG AAT TCA AAG CAA GAT GAG TAA C-3' (for Pr168); 5'-CCG AAT TCG CCC TCA CAG AGG GGA C-3' (for Pr115); and 5'-CAG AAT TCT TTA CCT TTA TAT ATG AGC C-3' (for Pr45). The 3'-primer (5'-TCC ACG TGG TGA TGA TGG TCT GG-3') has an EcoRV site at its 5'-end. The PCR fragments were subcloned into the EcoRI and EcoRV sites upstream of the G-free cassette in pEcoRV(C2AT). The G-free cassettes together with their upstream mP2 promoter fragments were excised by digestion with EcoRI and SmaI and subcloned into the EcoRI and EcoRV sites of pBluescript SK(+) plasmids to generate plasmids Pr168, Pr115, and Pr45. The Pr67 plasmid was prepared by amplifying Pr115 with a pBluescript primer encompassing the unique EcoRI site (5'-AAT TCC TGC AGC CCG GGG GA-3') and an mP2 internal primer (5'-GGG CCG ACA GGT CAC AGT GG-3') starting at -67 of the mP2 promoter. The open ends of the PCR fragments were then phosphorylated and ligated.


Fig. 2. Schematic representation of mP2 promoter constructs. A, deletion constructs of the mP2 promoter were prepared by subcloning a G-free cassette downstream to various lengths of the mP2 5'-flanking sequences ranging from 45 to 168 bp upstream from the transcription start site indicated by the right arrow. The open boxes represent TATA sequences, whereas the hatched boxes and striped boxes denote the putative Y-boxes and PAF-RE sites, respectively. B, mP2 promoter regions from -370 to +11 containing promoter changes are linked upstream of G-free cassettes. When the putative Y-box and PAF-RE sequences are altered, the boxes are outlined in broken lines.

[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]


To construct Pr370, an mP2 promoter fragment from -870 to +11 was amplified by PCR using the 5'-primer (5'-GGA ATT CTG GCC TGG CAT GTG C-3') and the 3'-primer (5'-TCC CCC GGG GGT GGT GAT GAT GGT-3'). Subcloning of this DNA fragment into the EcoRI and EcoRV sites upstream of the G-free cassette in pEcoRV(C2AT) generated Pr870. The mP2 promoter from -370 to +11 and the G-free cassette were then excised from Pr870 and subcloned into the HindIII and XbaI sites of pBluescript KS(+). To remove the Y-boxes and the protamine-activating factor 1 (PAF-1)-responsive element (PAF-RE) in Pr370, two specific PCR primers were synthesized for each construct. Each pair of the primers has matched restriction enzyme sites at their 5'-ends. The primer sets used for the mutations were 5'-CGG GAT CCA AAG TTA CTC ATC TTG C-3' and 5'-CGG GAT CCG TTC CAG TCC TGC AAA CC-3' (for Pr370Delta Y1); 5'-GGA ATT CGG ATC CCA CCC TGC CC-3' and 5'-GGA ATT CAT GGG GTG GGC CGA CAG G-3' (for Pr370Delta Y2); and 5'-GAA GGC CTC ACG GTT TAC CTT TAT ATA TG-3' and 5'-GAA GGC CTT GCG TCG GCC CAC CCC-3' (for Pr370Delta RE). Using these primer sets, the Pr370 construct was amplified by PCR, and the open ends of the PCR fragments obtained were digested with the appropriate restriction enzymes and ligated. Double mutant constructs were similarly prepared by PCR using a Pr370 plasmid carrying the first mutation as DNA template. The sequences of all of the mP2 promoter constructs used for in vitro transcription assays were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Purification of Germ Cells

Populations of germ cells were fractionated by sedimentation through a linear gradient of 2-4% bovine serum albumin at unit gravity in a Staput chamber as described previously (24).

Preparation of Nuclear Extracts

Mouse liver and testis nuclear extracts used for in vitro transcription and mobility shift assays were prepared as described previously (25, 26). Nuclear protein extracts from purified germ cells were prepared as follows. Mouse spermatogenic cells were isolated (24) and washed twice in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline. The cells were then resuspended in buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) containing 0.05% Nonidet P-40 and homogenized briefly on ice with a Kontes pellet pestle. Protease inhibitors (1 mM benzamidine, 1% aprotinin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin, and 1.1 µg/ml leupeptin) were added to buffer A to minimize protein degradation. After incubation on ice for 15 min, the homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm in a microcentrifuge at 4 °C for 10 min. The pellet was washed twice in buffer A and resuspended in buffer C (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.42 M NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 6.25% glycerol) containing protease inhibitors. After incubation on ice for 40 min, the nuclear suspension was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm in a microcentrifuge at 4 °C for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and diluted with an equal volume of buffer D (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 20% glycerol). The protein concentrations determined by Bio-Rad protein assays ranged from 1 to 5 mg/ml.

In Vitro Transcription Analyses of the mP2 Promoter Constructs

In vitro transcription was performed as described previously (23, 27). Testis nuclear extracts (60 µg) were incubated with 0.8-1.0 µg of DNA templates in 20 µl of reaction mixtures containing 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 26 mM KCl, 6 mM MgCl2, 0.6 mM CTP, 0.6 mM ATP, 36 µM UTP, 1 mM 3'-O-methyl-GTP (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.), 10 µCi of [alpha -32P]UTP (Amersham Corp.), 1 µl of RNasin RNase inhibitor (Promega), and 3% glycerol. The reactions were incubated at 30 °C for 45 min and were terminated by the addition of 0.3 ml of stop buffer (0.25 M NaCl, 1% SDS, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA) containing 20 µg of Escherichia coli tRNA and 50 µg of proteinase K. After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, the RNA samples were extracted once with phenol/chloroform and precipitated with ethanol. The samples were then washed once in 70% ethanol, vacuum dried, and dissolved in 6 µl of 98% formamide loading buffer. After heating at 90 °C for 5 min, the RNA samples were electrophoresed on 4% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and visualized by autoradiography. The transcription levels of the various mP2 promoter constructs were quantitated with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).

Mobility Shift Assays

Double-stranded oligonucleotides were radiolabeled with Klenow polymerase, purified in 15% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels, and recovered by overnight elution in 0.5 M ammonium acetate, 0.1% SDS, and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0. The radiolabeled oligonucleotides were then extracted once with phenol/chloroform, precipitated with ethanol, and dissolved in Tris-EDTA, pH 7.5. Labeled DNA probes (2-4 × 104 cpm) were incubated with 5-10 µg of protein extracts on ice for 20 min in a binding buffer containing 12 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 60 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.3 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1-3 µg of poly(dI-dC)·poly(dI-dC), and 12% glycerol. After incubation, the samples were resolved on 4% native polyacrylamide gels in 0.5 × TBE (45 mM Tris borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.5), and the protein-DNA complexes were detected by autoradiography. For competition mobility shift assays, protein extracts were preincubated with unlabeled specific or nonspecific oligonucleotides for 15 min before the addition of labeled DNA probes.

Isolation and Analysis of DNA-Protein Complexes

Mobility shift assays were performed as described above using radiolabeled DNA probes and liver or testis nuclear extracts. After the DNA-protein complexes were visualized in the wet gel by autoradiography, gel slices containing the complexes were excised from the polyacrylamide gels and the proteins were eluted at 37 °C for 4 h in a buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 20 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1% Triton X-100. The eluted proteins were precipitated with ice-cold 50% acetone, washed once with ice-cold 80% acetone, and resuspended in SDS-loading buffer. After being heated at 95 °C for 5 min, the proteins were resolved on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes using the Bio-Rad Semi-Dry Trans-Blot SD system (Bio-Rad). The membranes were blocked at room temperature for 1 h with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 0.5 M NaCl. After several washes with TBST (TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20), the membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature in TBST, 1% bovine serum albumin with polyclonal antibodies to the Xenopus germ cell-specific Y-box-binding protein at a dilution of 1:20,000 (28). The filters were then washed with TBST and incubated for another hour at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated protein A (Amersham) in TBST, 1% bovine serum albumin at a 1:8,000 dilution. After four final washes with TBST at room temperature, the Y-box proteins binding to the antibodies were detected by the ECL system (Amersham).


RESULTS

Deletion Analysis of the Mouse Protamine 2 Promoter

DNase I footprinting analyses of the mP2 promoter from -370 to +4 revealed five protein-binding sites (17). Nuclear proteins prepared from mouse liver and testis bind to sites 1, 2, and 4; whereas nuclear proteins from liver but not testis bind to site 3, and testis but not liver nuclear proteins bind to site 5. We denote the three protein-binding sites closest to the start of transcription (sites 1-3) as BS1 to BS3 (Fig. 1). BS1 contains the sequence AGGTCA recognized by orphan nuclear receptors (18), and the sequence GTCA inside this motif is also a half-site of the CRE, the binding site of CREB or CREM (19). BS1 also has an element at -59 to -47 with 11 of 13 nucleotides present in the consensus sequence of the ERE (20). By sequence homology, there are two putative Y-boxes present at -148 and -83 (BS2) in the mP2 proximal promoter. Both of them have 9 out of 12 nucleotides identical to the Y-box consensus sequence of Xenopus germ cell promoters (21).


Fig. 1. The proximal promoter of the mouse protamine 2 gene. The nucleotide sequence of the upstream region of the mouse protamine 2 gene from nucleotides -210 to +5 is shown. The transcription start site is indicated by a right arrow and is assigned +1. The putative TATA sequence is boxed, and the protein-binding sites detected previously by DNase I footprinting analyses (17) are underlined and denoted as BS1, BS2, and BS3. The two putative Y-boxes examined in this study are overlined and are designated Y-box 1 (at -148) and Y-box 2 (at -83), respectively.

[View Larger Version of this Image (21K GIF file)]


To define in the proximal promoter of mP2 the importance of specific protein-DNA interactions on transcription, a series of 5'-deletion constructs containing various lengths of the mP2 promoter were subcloned upstream of a 400-bp G-free cassette (Fig. 2A). Using these constructs with crude testis nuclear extracts, in vitro transcription assays generate transcripts of 411 nucleotides (Fig. 3A). A 331-nucleotide transcript from a construct containing 45 bp of the mP2 promoter subcloned upstream of a 320-bp G-free cassette was used as a control for each of the deletion constructs (Fig. 3A). Transcription of each altered promoter was expressed as a percentage of the activity of the Pr168 construct (Fig. 3B). Removal of the distal Y-box at -148 in the Pr115 construct did not significantly decrease transcription. However, when both of the Y-boxes were deleted in Pr67, transcription was decreased to about 65% of the control. Removal of the two Y-boxes and the PAF-RE sequence from the mP2 promoter dramatically reduced transcription to about 18% of the control Pr168. The greatly reduced transcription of Pr45 relative to Pr168 indicates that the proteins binding at BS1 and BS2 are crucial for the activation of mP2 transcription.


Fig. 3. Transcriptional activity of truncation constructs of the mP2 promoter. A, in vitro transcription assays were performed with the mP2 deletion constructs using testis nuclear extracts. The RNA produced from the transcription of a control construct containing a shorter G-free cassette subcloned downstream to the mP2 promoter from -45 to +11 was used as a control to normalize the amounts of transcription in each of the reactions. B, densitometric analysis of the transcription signals detected. The data are expressed as relative transcription as compared with the amount of RNA synthesized with the Pr168 construct. Values shown are the means ± S.E. (bars) of five independent experiments.

[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]


Analysis of the Sequence Elements in the mP2 Promoter

To better define the importance of the protein-binding sites BS1 and BS2 in activating mP2 transcription, a series of mP2 promoter fragments were generated in which the sequence elements at -59/-47 containing the PAF-RE or the Y-boxes at -148/-137 and -83/-72 were replaced by unrelated sequences (see Fig. 2B). No change in transcription was seen when the upstream Y-box at -148 (Pr370Delta Y1) was removed, whereas deletion of the downstream Y-box at -83 (Pr370Delta Y2) resulted in about a 40% reduction in transcription (Fig. 4). When both of the Y-box sequences were replaced with unrelated sequences (Pr370Delta Y), the relative transcription was reduced to about 50% of the control transcription. These data are consistent with our findings with the deletion constructs demonstrating that the proximal Y-box at -83 is more important than the more distal Y-box at -148 for mP2 transcription (Fig. 3). Moreover, when the PAF-RE sequence was deleted (Pr370Delta RE), transcription was decreased to about 38%, indicating the importance of this sequence element for mP2 transcription. Transcription was further reduced to 23% of the control Pr370 construct when the two Y-boxes and the PAF-RE sequence element were removed (Pr370Delta Y-RE). These results, in agreement with the 5'-deletion experiment (Fig. 3), confirm that the proximal putative Y-box at -83 and the PAF-RE at -59 are needed for maximal mP2 transcription.


Fig. 4. Transcriptional activity of mutated constructs of the mP2 promoter. The DNA fragments containing the wild type or altered mP2 promoters were subcloned upstream of a 360-bp G-free cassette and were analyzed by in vitro transcription assays. A, representative in vitro transcriptions of the mP2 mutant promoter constructs using testis nuclear extracts. The amounts of the 371-nucleotide transcript obtained from the transcription of the respective promoter constructs were normalized to the amounts of the 331-nucleotide control transcript. Relative transcription of each construct was expressed as a percentage of the transcription activity of the wild type mP2 promoter construct Pr370. B, densitometric analysis of the in vitro transcription assays. The data are presented as transcription activities relative to the signal obtained from the wild type promoter construct Pr370. Values shown are the means ± S.E. (bars) of three independent experiments.

[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]


Liver and Testis Nuclear Proteins Bind to BS1

To characterize the protein factors that bind to BS1, mobility shift assays were performed with liver and testis nuclear extracts using a radiolabeled BS1 oligonucleotide as DNA probe. One DNA-protein complex (complex I) was detected with liver and testis nuclear extracts (Fig. 5, lane 2), and two additional DNA-protein complexes (complexes II and III) were seen with testis nuclear extracts (Fig. 5, lane 6). To determine the specificity of protein binding to the BS1 DNA probe, a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled specific or nonspecific DNA oligonucleotides was added to the binding reactions before the addition of the radiolabeled probe. Unlabeled BS1 oligonucleotides greatly diminished both the DNA-protein complex I seen with liver extracts (Fig. 5, lane 3) and the DNA-protein complexes I, II, and III seen with testis nuclear extracts (Fig. 5, lane 7). No reduction in liver or testicular protein binding was detected with a nonspecific competitor oligonucleotide containing binding site BS2 (Fig. 5, lanes 4 and 8) or binding site BS3 (Fig. 5, lanes 5 and 9). Since neither BS2 nor BS3 has homology to BS1, these data confirm the specificity of protein binding to BS1.


Fig. 5. The PAF-RE sequence in the proximal promoter of mP2 binds ubiquitous and testis-specific nuclear proteins. Radiolabeled BS1 probe was incubated with no protein (lane 1), with 5-10 µg of nuclear proteins from mouse liver (lanes 2-5), or with 5-10 µg of nuclear proteins from mouse testis (lanes 6-9). The protein-DNA complexes formed were resolved on 4% native polyacrylamide gels and detected by autoradiography. To confirm binding specificity, 100-fold molar excesses of unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides as indicated at the tops of the lanes were used as competitors in binding reactions. -, no added competitor. The sequences of the sense strands of BS1, BS2, and BS3 oligonucleotides are depicted in Fig. 1. The arrow at the left indicates the ubiquitous DNA-protein complex (complex I), whereas the arrows at the right denote testis-specific protein-DNA interactions (complexes II and III).

[View Larger Version of this Image (67K GIF file)]


The Testicular Nuclear Proteins Binding to BS1 Are Developmentally Regulated

To further characterize the nuclear proteins that interact with BS1, mobility shift assays were performed using a radiolabeled BS1 DNA probe and nuclear extracts prepared from the testes of mice at different ages. Complex I was detected in the testis nuclear extracts of 12-day-old or 17-day-old mice (Fig. 6, lanes 1 and 2), and complexes II and III were first seen with nuclear extracts prepared from the testes of 22-day-old and adult mice (Fig. 6, lanes 3 and 4). These data indicate that the complexes II and III become detectable at the same time that postmeiotic germ cells begin to differentiate. Since mP2 is expressed only postmeiotically, the mobility shift assays and in vitro transcription data suggest that specific nuclear proteins present in postmeiotic germ cells bind to the BS1 site at -64/-48 of the mP2 promoter and activate its transcription.


Fig. 6. The testis-specific proteins binding to the BS1 in the mP2 proximal promoter are germ cell-specific and developmentally regulated. Nuclear protein extracts prepared from the testes of mice at different ages (lanes 1-4), enriched spermatogenic cells (lanes 5-7), or liver (lane 8) were incubated with 32P-labeled BS1 DNA, and the DNA-protein complexes were analyzed on native 4% polyacrylamide gels. Complex I is ubiquitous, whereas complexes II and III are testis-specific. PS, pachytene spermatocytes; RS, round spermatids; ES, elongated spermatids.

[View Larger Version of this Image (42K GIF file)]


To confirm which testicular cells express the proteins that form complexes II and III with the BS1 DNA probe, mobility shift assays were performed with nuclear extracts prepared from enriched germ cell populations (Fig. 6). Complex III was the major DNA-protein complex seen in the extracts from meiotic pachytene spermatocytes, although small amounts of complexes I and II were detected (Fig. 6, lane 5). The amounts of complexes II and III greatly increased in round spermatids (Fig. 6, lane 6), and elongated spermatids contain large amounts of complex III and a smaller amount of complex II (Fig. 6, lane 7). When equal amounts of proteins were assayed, we see that liver contains higher amounts of complex I than the differentiating germ cells (compare lane 8 to lanes 5-7 in Fig. 6). Mobility shift assays with nuclear extracts prepared from other somatic tissues and cells including kidney, spleen, Sertoli cells, and NIH 3T3 cells only detect complex I (data not shown). These data suggest that complex I is ubiquitous, whereas complexes II and III are germ cell-specific. Moreover, the amounts of complexes II and III increase greatly in round spermatids, the cell type in which protamine 2 is transcribed.

The Testicular Nuclear Proteins Binding to BS1 Are neither the Estrogen Receptor nor the CREM Protein

Since BS1 contains a putative ERE and a half-site of CRE, we performed mobility shift assays to determine whether the estrogen receptor or CREM binds to the BS1 site. Radiolabeled BS1 probe and whole cell extracts prepared from Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with human estrogen receptor were used in mobility shift assays. Although a prominent DNA-protein complex was detected with the CHO extract (Fig. 7A, lane 1), its mobility differed significantly from DNA-protein complexes I, II, or III (Fig. 7A, lanes 2 and 3). When supershift experiments were performed using an antibody raised against the first 21 amino acids of the estrogen receptor, no change in electrophoretic mobilities or band intensities were observed for the DNA-protein complexes, suggesting that estrogen receptor is not the source of the protein in the DNA-protein complexes (data not shown).


Fig. 7. The proteins binding to BS1 are not the estrogen receptor or CREM. Mobility shift assays were performed using BS1, a DNA probe (-64/-48) that contains a putative estrogen-responsive element at -59/-47 and a half-site of the c-AMP-responsive element at -57/-54. Radiolabeled DNA probes were incubated with protein extracts for 20 min on ice, and the reactions were electrophoresed on 4% native polyacrylamide gel. In each panel, the ubiquitous DNA-protein complex (complex I) is indicated by an arrow at the left, whereas the testis-specific protein-DNA interactions (complexes II and III) are denoted by the arrows at the right. A, lane 1, 5 µg of whole cell extract of CHO cells stably transfected with human estrogen receptor; lane 2, 5 µg of mouse liver nuclear extract; lane 3, 5 µg of mouse testis nuclear extract. The arrowhead indicates the position of the major DNA-protein complex detected with the CHO whole cell extract. B, lane 1, DNA probe alone; lane 2, 100 ng of purified CREM-1 protein; lane 3, 5 µg of mouse liver nuclear extract; lane 4, 5 µg of mouse testis nuclear extract. Arrowheads denote the DNA-protein complexes detected with the BS1 probe and CREM-1.

[View Larger Version of this Image (67K GIF file)]


The transcriptional activator CREMtau is highly expressed in postmeiotic cells (29, 30). It is a member of a group of transcriptional regulators called CREMs that mediate cAMP-dependent transcription. Recent studies of CREM-deficient mice have shown that CREM is essential for mP2 transcription (31, 32). Since BS1 contains a half-site of CRE, we performed mobility shift experiments with purified CREM-1 proteins using BS1 as probe. CREM-1 and CREMtau are two different CREM isoforms produced from the CREM gene by alternative splicing and are expected to have similar electrophoretic mobilities in native polyacrylamide gels (33). Two major DNA-protein complexes formed between BS1 and CREM-1 (Fig. 7B, lane 2). However, these DNA-protein complexes have different mobilities from those detected with liver (Fig. 7B, lane 3) or testis (Fig. 7B, lane 4) nuclear extracts. Thus, although purified CREM-1 binds to BS1, the DNA-protein complexes I, II, and III appear to be formed by other proteins.

Characterization of the Nuclear Proteins Binding to BS2 of the mP2 Promoter

The BS2 protein-binding site identified by DNase I footprinting (17) contains a putative Y-box sequence at -83 (Fig. 1). In gel shift assays using a radiolabeled BS2 oligonucleotide and nuclear extracts prepared from mouse liver, three major DNA-protein complexes are detected (Fig. 8, lane 2). The three DNA-protein complexes are diminished by the addition of a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled BS2 oligonucleotides (Fig. 8, lane 4) but not by adding equivalent amounts of the nonspecific BS1 oligonucleotide as competitor (Fig. 8, lane 3). The addition of unlabeled BS3 oligonucleotide (Fig. 1) specifically abolishes the formation of the slowest migrating complex but not of the other two complexes (Fig. 8, lane 5). When mouse testis nuclear extracts are analyzed by mobility shift assays using the radiolabeled BS2 DNA probe, two major protein-DNA complexes are seen (Fig. 8, lane 6). The slower migrating DNA-protein complex detected with testis has a mobility similar to that of the middle complex seen with liver nuclear extracts. Both of the complexes can be successfully competed by unlabeled BS2 (Fig. 8, lane 8) but not with equivalent amounts of the BS1 or BS3 oligonucleotides (Fig. 8, lanes 7 and 9).


Fig. 8. Mobility shift analysis of the Y-box at -83 in the mP2 promoter with mouse liver or testis nuclear extracts. Radiolabeled BS2 DNA containing the Y-box at -83 was incubated with 5 µg of nuclear proteins prepared from mouse liver (lanes 2-5) or testis (lanes 6-9) in the absence (-) or presence of 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled competitor DNAs. The competitors (BS1, BS2, and BS3) are indicated at the tops of the lanes, and their sequences are depicted in Fig. 1. The DNA-protein complexes are indicated by the arrows at the left of the gel.

[View Larger Version of this Image (78K GIF file)]


Since the BS2 protein-binding site contains a putative Y-box element, we performed competition mobility shift assays to determine whether the Y-box sequence is essential for the binding of nuclear proteins to BS2. Although the three DNA-protein complexes detected with liver nuclear extracts were successfully competed by the unlabeled BS2 oligonucleotide (Fig. 9, compare lanes 1 and 2), only the complex with intermediate mobility was diminished by the addition of the specific Y-box competitor (Fig. 9, lane 3). No competition was seen with the Y-box mutant oligonucleotide (Fig. 9, lane 4) (26). These data indicate that the Y-box is essential for protein binding in this complex. The addition of the CTF/NF-I consensus sequence that contains a CAAT box diminished the slowest migrating complex detected with liver nuclear extracts (Fig. 9, lane 5).


Fig. 9. Competition mobility shift assays of the Y-box at -83 in the mP2 promoter. DNA-protein binding reactions were performed on ice with 32P-labeled BS2 and 5 µg of liver or testis nuclear extracts in the absence (-) (lanes 1 and 6) or presence of double-stranded oligonucleotides as competitors (lanes 2-5 and 7-10). The BS2 sequence is depicted in Fig. 1, while the sequences of the sense strands of the other competition oligonucleotides are as follows. Lanes 3 and 8, Y-box, 5'-GAT CTC ACA GCC AAT CAG CAG CGA-3'; lanes 4 and 9, Y "mutant", 5'-GAT CTC CGC TAC CGA ATC CAG CGA-3'; lanes 5 and 10, CTF/NF-I, 5'-ATT TTG GCT TGA AGC CAA TAT G-3'. The Y-box sequence found in the mouse cytochrome cT promoter (lanes 3 and 8) and the substituted random sequence in the Y mutant oligonucleotide (lanes 4 and 9) are underlined. The Y-box, but not the Y mutant oligonucleotide, has been shown to bind specifically to Y-box-binding proteins (17). All competitors were added at a 100-fold molar excess before the addition of the radiolabeled DNA. The arrows at the left of the gel indicate the three specific DNA-protein complexes detected with the BS2 DNA probe.

[View Larger Version of this Image (86K GIF file)]


Two DNA-protein complexes are seen when testis nuclear extracts were used in mobility shift assays with the BS2 probe (Fig. 9, lane 6). Both were successfully competed by unlabeled BS2 oligonucleotide (Fig. 9, lane 7). As seen with liver nuclear extracts, the slower migrating complex was diminished by the addition of the Y-box oligonucleotide (Fig. 9, lane 8), but not by the addition of the Y-box mutant competitor (Fig. 9, lane 9) or by the CTF/NF-I consensus sequence (Fig. 9, lane 10). These data suggest that the binding of Y-box proteins to the BS2 probe generates the slower migrating complex detected with testis nuclear extracts.

The Testicular Y-box Protein Binding to BS2 Is the Mouse Homologue of the Xenopus Germ Cell-specific Y-box Binding Protein p54/p56

Y-box proteins have been reported to specifically interact with the Y-box sequences in various germ cell-specific promoters and serve as transcriptional activators (21). The Xenopus protein p54/p56 is a germ cell-specific Y-box-binding protein that has been shown to activate the transcription of Xenopus heat shock protein (hsp70) (34). Two mouse homologues of p54/p56 are present in the cytoplasmic extracts of mouse testis. These 48/52-kDa mouse proteins (p48/p52) are detected in pachytene spermatocytes with a maximal level of expression in round spermatids (35). To identify the mouse testicular nuclear protein that forms the slower migrating DNA-protein complex with the Y-box sequence in BS2, the protein in the complex was analyzed by Western blot assays using polyclonal anti-p54/p56 antibodies. As previously reported for testicular cytoplasmic extracts (35), two proteins of about 54 and 56 kDa are seen with control purified Xenopus proteins (Fig. 10, lane 1). One protein of about 52 kDa was detected in testis nuclear extracts (Fig. 10, lane 3) but not in liver nuclear extracts (Fig. 10, lane 2). When the protein in the testicular DNA-protein complex was recovered and analyzed by Western blotting, a protein of about 52 kDa was seen (Fig. 10, lane 4).


Fig. 10. Western blot analysis of the protein in the slower migrating DNA-protein complex formed by testis nuclear extracts and the BS2 oligonucleotide. Gel mobility shift assays were performed using mouse testis or liver nuclear extract and radiolabeled BS2 probe. The gel slices containing the slower migrating DNA-protein complexes were excised, and the proteins were eluted and resolved on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. After being transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, the proteins were analyzed by Western blotting using polyclonal anti-p54/p56 antibodies. Lane 1, purified Xenopus p54/p56; lane 2, liver nuclear extract; lane 3, testis nuclear extract; lane 4, protein eluted from testis protein-DNA complex. Molecular sizes are indicated at the left of the blot.

[View Larger Version of this Image (94K GIF file)]


Developmental Changes in Electrophoretic Mobility of the Y-box Proteins Binding to the Y-box within BS2

Previous studies have shown that the mouse homologues of the Xenopus germ cell-specific protein p54/p56 are maximally expressed in round spermatids (35). To investigate the pattern of expression of the Y-box protein binding to the BS2 site of the mP2 promoter, mobility shift assays were performed with radiolabeled BS2 oligonucleotides and nuclear extracts prepared from prepuberal and adult mouse testes. Two DNA-protein complexes (U and L) were detected with the testis extracts obtained from adult mice (Fig. 11A, lane 4) and from prepuberal mice at 12, 17, or 22 days of age (Fig. 11A, lanes 1-3). Interestingly, the slower migrating complex detected with 12-day testis nuclear extract appears to migrate faster than that observed with testis nuclear extracts from 22-day-old and adult mice (Fig. 11A, compare lane 1 with lanes 3 and 4). DNA-protein complexes of both mobilities are seen with BS2 and nuclear extracts from the testes of 17-day old mice (Fig. 11A, lane 2).


Fig. 11. Prepuberal and adult testicular nuclear proteins bind to the Y-box at -83 of the mP2 promoter. A, mobility shift assay using BS2 DNA and nuclear extracts prepared from the testes of mice at different ages (lanes 1-4). The arrows at the left of the gel indicate the major protein-DNA complexes detected with BS2 and adult testis nuclear extracts. The slower migrating and faster migrating DNA-protein complexes formed by the BS2 probe and Y-box-binding proteins are denoted by the arrowheads labeled U and L, respectively. B, competition mobility shift analyses were performed with 32P-labeled BS2 oligonucleotides and testis nuclear extracts from 12-day-old (lanes 1-3) or adult mice (lanes 4-6) to demonstrate the specificity of binding to the Y-box at -83 of the mP2 promoter. The Y-box and Y mutant competition oligonucleotides are the same as those described in Fig. 9. U and L indicate the slower migrating and faster migrating DNA-protein complexes, respectively.

[View Larger Version of this Image (35K GIF file)]


To determine whether the faster migrating variant of the slower migrating complex detected in gel shift assays with testis nuclear extracts from 12-day-old mice requires a Y-box for binding, competition mobility shift assays were performed using radiolabeled BS2 probes. As shown in Fig. 11B, the slower migrating complex formed with nuclear proteins from the testes of 12-day old mice migrates faster than that from adult testes (Fig. 11B, lanes 1 and 4). Both of the complexes are abolished by the addition of the Y-box oligonucleotide (Fig. 11B, lanes 2 and 5), but equivalent amounts of the Y-box mutant show no competition (Fig. 11B, lanes 3 and 6).


DISCUSSION

In this study we have sought to define the importance of protein-DNA interactions in the proximal promoter (-168 to -45) of the mP2 gene by performing in vitro transcription analyses and mobility shift assays. Previous in vitro transcription studies of the mP2 promoter using nuclear extracts prepared from mouse testis have demonstrated that a positive regulatory sequence element is present between -170 and -82 (15), a region that binds a nuclear protein found in adult testis (16). DNase I footprinting analyses of the promoter region from -370 to +65 revealed five protein-binding sites (17). Mouse liver and testis nuclear proteins bind to site 1 (-64/-48), site 2 (-87/-67), and site 4 (-239/-210); whereas liver but not testis proteins bind to site 3 (-202/-175), and testis but not liver nuclear proteins bind to site 5 (-328/-311).

We have focused on sites 1 and 2 because these two sites show considerable homology to the consensus sequences of known DNA-binding proteins. The sequence AGGTCA in BS1 is present in the responsive element recognized by orphan nuclear receptors (18). Moreover, site 1 (BS1) contains the 3'-half of the palindromic consensus sequence of the CRE. CRE is recognized by the postmeiotic transcription activator CREMtau (19, 29). Sequence analysis also revealed that BS1 contains an element at -59/-47 similar to the consensus sequence of ERE (20). Based on homology, BS2 also has a sequence element at -83 in which 9 of 12 nucleotides are identical to the consensus Y-box sequence (21). Y-box-binding proteins have been shown to bind to Xenopus and mouse germ cell-specific promoters and serve as transcriptional regulators (22, 26, 34).

To define the importance of these sequence elements on mP2 transcription, 5' deletion constructs were generated, and their transcriptional activities were tested (Fig. 3). From in vitro transcription using mouse testis nuclear extracts, we conclude that BS1 and BS2 are essential for transcription, since their removal or alteration leads to significant reduction in mP2 transcription.

Mobility shift assays using BS1 as DNA probe detected one ubiquitous and two testis-specific DNA-protein complexes. The predominant testis-specific complex (complex III) was first detected in the testes of 22-day-old mice. Its abundance greatly increases from pachytene spermatocytes to round spermatids and appears to be present only in postmeiotic germ cells. We have named the protein forming this complex PAF-1 and named the sequence to which it binds PAF-RE. The AGGTCA motif in BS1 is similar to the binding sites of a group of transcription factors known as orphan receptors (18). These orphan receptors recognize a responsive element containing the sequence AGGTCA either as direct repeats separated by several nucleotides (36) or as a single motif (37). Mammalian orphan receptors have been found to play an important role in gonadal and brain development (18, 38, 39).

Germ cell nuclear factor GCNF/RTR, a germ cell-specific orphan nuclear receptor expressed during the development of oocytes and spermatocytes (38), is a possible candidate of PAF-1 due to their similar expression patterns. Expression of mouse RTR starts at day 17 after birth and reaches a high level at day 22 when spermatids appear (40). It binds as a homodimer to a response element containing the direct repeat of the sequence TCAAGGTCA, a half-site of steroidogenic factor-1 (41), and as a monomer to the single core motif TCAAGGTCA (40). GCNF/RTR is predominantly expressed in round spermatids with little or no expression in somatic cell types such as Sertoli cells (38, 42), and it can bind to a sequence at -228/-213 of the mP2 promoter containing the core motif (40). However, although the expression pattern of PAF-1 coincides with that of GCNF/RTR, their binding sites differ because BS1 has GAC instead of TCA upstream of the AGGTCA motif. Mobility shift assays showed that the T and C nucleotides at the 5'-end of the binding site are essential for GCNF binding (38). These crucial differences in the sequences recognized by PAF-1 and GCNF suggest that they are not the same protein.

Tr2-11 is another murine orphan receptor that has an expression profile similar to that of PAF-1 (43). High levels of testis-specific expression of Tr2-11 begin at postnatal day 18 and reach a maximum at day 22, the time at which postmeiotic germ cells become abundant. Tr2-11 is not detectable in other cell types including Sertoli cells (43), and it binds to a sequence containing AGGTCA. Considering the similarity in binding sites and germ cell-specific expression patterns, our data indicate that PAF-1 may be a novel member of this family of orphan nuclear receptors found in testes.

Despite the importance of CREM in regulating the transcription of testis-specific genes (31, 32), our mobility shift and supershift assays using a BS1 probe and purified CREM-1 protein suggest that the testis-specific protein(s) that binds to the BS1 site in the mP2 promoter is not a CRE-binding protein. The possibility of BS1 binding to other CREB/CREM isoforms is also unlikely, since the DNA-protein complexes formed between BS1 and liver or testis nuclear extracts could not be competed by the CRE consensus sequence (data not shown). Other studies have also reported testis-specific factors differing from CREM that interact with the CRE-like element in the proximal mP1 promoter and activate mP1 transcription (12, 13). One testis-specific protein, Tet-1, has been proposed to differ from the family of CRE-binding factors based on differences in their protein binding sites (13). Since mP2 is not expressed in CREM mutant mice (31, 32), our data suggest that CREM may affect mP2 transcription by binding to other CRE elements elsewhere in the mP2 gene or by controlling the expression of additional upstream transcription factor(s).

The protein-binding site BS1 also contains an element at -59/-47 that shares 11 of 13 nucleotides in the 13-bp ERE palindromic consensus sequence (5'-GGT CAC AGT GAC C-3'). Estrogen receptor is a ligand-activated transcription factor that belongs to the steroid receptor superfamily (44). Gene targeting experiments in male mice have demonstrated that the disruption of the estrogen receptor gene leads to a disorganized seminiferous epithelium and a decrease in the number of spermatogenic cells (45). The importance of 17-beta -estradiol and estrogen receptor in spermatogenesis is also suggested by the expression of aromatase in developing spermatids (46). However, we believe that the estrogen receptor is not PAF-1, since different DNA-protein complexes are formed between BS1 and protein extracts prepared from liver, testis, and CHO cells stably transfected with human estrogen receptor. Moreover, when liver, testis, and CHO cells are incubated with an oligonucleotide probe containing the ERE from the Xenopus vitellogenin A2 gene, we find DNA-protein complexes with different electrophoretic mobilities (data not shown). The DNA-protein complexes formed by the vitellogenin ERE and CHO whole cell extract, but not liver or testis nuclear extracts, can be supershifted by the addition of the anti-estrogen receptor antibody H222 (data not shown).

Eukaryotic Y-box-binding proteins represent a family of DNA-binding proteins that activate transcription of germ cell-specific genes by binding to the Y-box sequence (CTGATTGG(C/T)(C/T)AA) (21, 34). They also bind to RNA in a sequence-independent fashion (28, 47). The mouse homologue of the Xenopus protein p48/p52 is only detected in germ cells with maximal expression in round spermatids (35) and has been shown to bind to a Y-box located at -489/-478 in the mP2 promoter (22). The BS2 site of the mP2 promoter contains a putative Y-box at -83. Mobility shift assays have detected proteins that specifically bind to this Y-box sequence. Western blot analysis of the testis DNA-protein complexes with polyclonal anti-p54/p56 antibodies has confirmed the binding of p48/p52 to BS2 (Fig. 10). It has been proposed that Y-box proteins bind to promoter elements and modify gene activity through the interaction with other tissue-specific trans-acting factors (48). The protein binding and the in vitro transcription data presented here provide the first direct evidence for this hypothesis, and we propose that p48/p52 facilitates the activation of mP2 transcription in the testis.

Interestingly, in mobility shift assays, the DNA-protein complexes formed between BS2 and the Y-box protein in the testes of 12-day-old mice migrate faster than those from the testes of 22-day-old and adult mice. The changes in mobility may be due to modification of the Y-box-binding proteins during development. Alternatively, since Y-box-binding proteins are capable of multimerization (49), they may form different multimers as the mouse approaches adulthood. Although low levels of p48/p52 in nuclei cannot be detected by immunocytochemistry using anti-p54/p56 antibody, p48/p52 is first detected in the cytoplasm of early pachytene spermatocytes, its amount increases as the male germ cells develop, and it reaches a maximum in step 1-8 round spermatids (50). It appears that p48/p52 is modified when it is first detected in pachytene spermatocytes. As maximal p48/p52 production occurs with high levels of transcription during spermatogenesis, this modification may be crucial for its function as a transcriptional activator.

In summary, we have identified two sequence elements in the mP2 proximal promoter that are important for activating its transcription during spermatogenesis. The PAF-RE at -59/-47 binds to a postmeiotically expressed germ cell-specific protein PAF-1 and induces a 3-fold increase in mP2 transcription. A second protein, p48/p52, binds to a Y-box sequence and further increases mP2 transcription. Together, these two DNA-protein interactions enhance mP2 transcription more than 5-fold. We conclude that PAF-1 and p48/p52 act together to enhance transcription of the mP2 gene during the late stages of spermatogenesis.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HD 11878.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed: Center for Research on Reproduction and Women's Health, 752b Clinical Research Bldg./6142, 415 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104. Tel.: 215-898-0144; Fax: 215-573-5408; E-mail: nhecht{at}obgyn.upenn.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: CRE, cAMP-responsive element; CREB, CRE-binding protein; CREM, CRE modulator; ERE, estrogen receptor-responsive element; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; DTT, dithiothreitol; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; bp, base pair(s); CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; PAF-1, protamine-activating factor 1; PAF-RE, PAF-1-responsive element.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Geoffery Green for providing the CHO cell extracts and the H222 estrogen receptor antibody, Dr. R. G. Roeder for the pEcoRV(C2AT) G-free cassette plasmid, and Akira Aizawa for many useful suggestions.


REFERENCES

  1. Bellvé, A. R. (1979) in Reviews of Reproductive Biology (Finn, C. A., ed), pp. 159-261, Oxford University Press, New York
  2. Hecht, N. B. (1986) in Experimental Approaches to Mammalian Embryonic Development (Rossant, J., and Pedersen, R. A., eds), pp. 151-193, Cambridge University Press, New York
  3. Eddy, E. M., Welch, J. E., and O'Brien, D. A. (1993) in Molecular Biology of the Male Reproductive System (deKretser, D., ed), pp. 181-232, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego
  4. Goldberg, E. (1977) in Isozymes: Current Topics in Biological Research (Rattazzi, M. C., Scandalios, J. S., and Litt, G. S., eds), pp. 79-124, Alan R. Liss, New York
  5. Hecht, N. B. (1995) Dev. Genet. 16, 95-103 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Hecht, N. B. (1989) in Histones and Other Basic Nuclear Proteins (Hnilica, L., Stein, G., and Stein, J., eds), pp. 347-373, CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL
  7. Balhorn, R. (1989) in Molecular Biology of Chromosome Function (Adolph, K., ed), pp. 366-395, Springer-Verlag, New York
  8. Kleene, K. C., Distel, R. J., and Hecht, N. B. (1983) Dev. Biol. 98, 455-464 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Johnson, P. A., Peschon, J. J., Yelick, P. C., Palmiter, R. D., and Hecht, N. B. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 950, 45-53 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Peschon, J. J., Behringer, R. R., Brinster, R. I., and Palmiter, R. D. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 5316-5319 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Zambrowicz, B. P., Harendza, C. J., Zimmermann, J. W., Brinster, R. L., and Palmiter, R. D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 5071-5075 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Zambrowicz, B. P., and Palmiter, R. D. (1994) Biol. Reprod. 50, 65-72 [Abstract]
  13. Tamura, T., Makino, Y., Mikoshiba, K., and Muramatsu, M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4327-4332 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Stewart, T. A., Hecht, N. B., Hollingshead, P. G., Johnson, P. A., Leong, J. A. C., and Pitts, S. L. (1988) Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 1748-1755 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Bunick, D., Johnson, P. A., Johnson, T. R., and Hecht, N. B. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 891-895 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Johnson, P. A., Bunick, D., and Hecht, N. B. (1991) Biol. Reprod. 44, 127-134 [Abstract]
  17. Ha, H., van Wijnen, A. J., and Hecht, N. B. (1997) J. Cell Biochem. 64, 94-105 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Enmark, E., and Gustafsson, J. (1996) Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 1293-1307 [Free Full Text]
  19. Delmas, V., van der Hoorn, F., Mellstrom, B., Jegou, B., and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 1502-1514 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Klein-Hitpass, L., Ryffel, G. U., Heitlinger, E., and Cato, A. C. B. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 647-663 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Wolffe, A. P., Tafuri, S., Ranjan, M., and Familari, M. (1992) New Biol. 4, 290-298 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Nikolajczyk, B. S., Murray, M. T., and Hecht, N. B. (1995) Biol. Reprod. 52, 524-530 [Abstract]
  23. Sawadogo, M., and Roeder, R. G. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 4394-4398 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hake, L. E., Alcivar, A. A., and Hecht, N. B. (1990) Development 110, 249-257 [Abstract]
  25. Gorski, K., Carneiro, M., and Schibler, U. (1986) Cell 47, 767-776 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Yiu, G. K., Murray, M. T., and Hecht, N. B. (1997) Biol. Reprod. 56, 1439-1449 [Abstract]
  27. Dignam, J. D., Lebowitz, R. M., and Roeder, R. G. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 1475-1489 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Murray, M. T., Schiller, D. L., and Franke, W. W. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 11-15 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Foulkes, N. S., Mellstrom, B., Benusiglio, E., and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1992) Nature 355, 80-84 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Foulkes, N. S., Schlotter, F., Pévet, P., and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1993) Nature 362, 264-267 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Nantel, F., Monaco, L., Foulkes, N. S., Masquilier, D., LeMeur, M., Henriksén, K., Dierich, A., Parvinen, M., and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1996) Nature 380, 159-162 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Blendy, J. A., Kaestner, K. H., Weinbauer, G. F., Nieschlag, E., and Schutz, G. (1996) Nature 380, 162-165 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Zhou, Y., Sun, Z., Means, A. R., Sassone-Corsi, P., and Bernstein, K. E. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 12262-12266 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Tafuri, S. R., and Wolffe, A. P. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 9028-9032 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Kwon, Y. K., Murray, M. T., and Hecht, N. B. (1993) Dev. Biol. 158, 90-100 [CrossRef]
  36. Umesono, K., Murakami, K. K., Thompson, C. C., and Evans, R. M. (1991) Cell 65, 1255-1266 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Wilson, T. E., Fahrner, T. J., and Milbrandt, J. (1993) Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 5794-5804 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Chen, F., Cooney, A. J., Wang, Y., Law, S. W., and O'Malley, B. W. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 1434-1444 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ingraham, H. A., Lala, D. S., Ikeda, Y., Luo, X., Shen, W. H., Nachtigal, M. W., Abbud, R., Nilson, J. H., and Parker, K. L. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 2302-2312 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Yan, Z. H., Medvedev, A., Hirose, T., Gotoh, H., and Jetten, A. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10565-10572 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Borgmeyer, U. (1997) Eur. J. Biochem. 244, 120-127 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Hirose, T., O'Brien, D. A., and Jetten, A. M. (1995) Gene (Amst.) 152, 247-251 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Lee, C. H., Chang, L., and Wei, L. (1996) Mol. Reprod. Dev. 44, 305-314 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Evans, R. M. (1988) Science 240, 889-895 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Eddy, E. M., Washburn, T. F., Bunch, D. O., Goulding, E. H., Galden, B. C., Lubahn, D. B., and Korach, K. S. (1996) Endocrinology 137, 4796-4805 [Abstract]
  46. Hess, R. A., Bunick, D., and Bahr, J. M. (1995) Environ. Health Perspect. 103, 59-62
  47. Tafuri, S. R., Familari, M., and Wolffe, A. P. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12213-12220 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Sommerville, J., and Ladomery, M. (1996) Chromosoma 104, 469-478 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Tafuri, S. R., and Wolffe, A. P. (1992) New Biol. 4, 349-359 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Oko, R., Korley, R., Murray, M. T., Hecht, N. B., and Hermo, L. (1996) Mol. Reprod. Dev. 44, 1-13 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
J. Martin-Coello, H. Dopazo, L. Arbiza, J. Ausio, E. R.S. Roldan, and M. Gomendio
Sexual selection drives weak positive selection in protamine genes and high promoter divergence, enhancing sperm competitiveness
Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2009; 276(1666): 2427 - 2436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. T. Carrell, B. R. Emery, and S. Hammoud
Altered protamine expression and diminished spermatogenesis: what is the link?
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 313 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Yang, C. R. Morales, S. Medvedev, R. M. Schultz, and N. B. Hecht
In the Absence of the Mouse DNA/RNA-Binding Protein MSY2, Messenger RNA Instability Leads to Spermatogenic Arrest
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2007; 76(1): 48 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. Somboonthum, H. Ohta, S. Yamada, M. Onishi, A. Ike, Y. Nishimune, and M. Nozaki
cAMP-responsive element in TATA-less core promoter is essential for haploid-specific gene expression in mouse testis
Nucleic Acids Res., June 10, 2005; 33(10): 3401 - 3411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Yang, S. Medvedev, J. Yu, L. C. Tang, J. E. Agno, M. M. Matzuk, R. M. Schultz, and N. B. Hecht
Absence of the DNA-/RNA-binding protein MSY2 results in male and female infertility
PNAS, April 19, 2005; 102(16): 5755 - 5760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Yang, S. Medvedev, P. P. Reddi, R. M. Schultz, and N. B. Hecht
The DNA/RNA-binding protein MSY2 marks specific transcripts for cytoplasmic storage in mouse male germ cells
PNAS, February 1, 2005; 102(5): 1513 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. Wang, J. T. San Agustin, G. B. Witman, and D. L. Kilpatrick
Novel Role for a Sterol Response Element Binding Protein in Directing Spermatogenic Cell-Specific Gene Expression
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2004; 24(24): 10681 - 10688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Yu, N. B. Hecht, and R. M. Schultz
RNA-Binding Properties and Translation Repression In Vitro by Germ Cell-Specific MSY2 Protein
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2002; 67(4): 1093 - 1098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
U. Barkai, A. Prigent-Tessier, C. Tessier, G. B. Gibori, and G. Gibori
Involvement of SOCS-1, the Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling, in the Prevention of Prolactin-Responsive Gene Expression in Decidual Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2000; 14(4): 554 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
W. Gu, S. Tekur, R. Reinbold, J. J. Eppig, Y.-C. Choi, J. Z. Zheng, M. T. Murray, and N. B. Hecht
Mammalian Male and Female Germ Cells Express a Germ Cell-Specific Y-Box Protein, MSY2
Biol Reprod, November 1, 1998; 59(5): 1266 - 1274.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yiu, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yiu, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, N. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement