|
Volume 272, Number 43,
Issue of October 24, 1997
pp. 26934-26939
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Mass Spectrometric Determination of the Cleavage Sites in
Escherichia coli Dihydroorotase Induced by a
Cysteine-specific Reagent*
(Received for publication, April 7, 1997, and in revised form, August 7, 1997)
Régis
Daniel
§,
Eliane
Caminade
,
Annie
Martel
,
François
Le Goffic
,
Daniel
Canosa
¶,
Montse
Carrascal
¶ and
Joaquim
Abian
¶
From the Laboratoire de Bioorganique et
Biotechnologies associé au Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique, Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Paris,
11 rue P. & M. Curie, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France and ¶ Consejo
Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Department of Medical
Bioanalysis, Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Escherichia coli dihydroorotase
contains six cysteines/subunit, which are potential ligands of
structural and catalytic zinc metals at protein sites of the enzyme.
Specific thiol reagents modify, in nondenaturing conditions only, two
of these cysteines; these two residues are thought to be ligands of
structural zinc. We report here on the localization of these two
cysteines on the polypeptide chain through their cyanylation by
2-nitro-5-thiocyanobenzoic acid (NTCB) and the analysis by mass
spectrometry of the protein adducts. This is the first study of
E. coli dihydroorotase by mass spectrometry, allowing the
accurate determination of the subunit molecular weight (38,695).
Treatment of dihydroorotase by NTCB induced a cleavage N-terminal to
the cyanylated cysteines. The resulting fragments visualized on
electrophoresis gel have been N-terminal sequenced, and their masses
were determined by electrospray-ionizing mass spectrometry. This
allowed the identification of cysteines 221 and 265 as the two residues
cyanylated by the reagent NTCB. Results from gel filtration of
dihydroorotase cyanylated on the two cysteines indicate that these
residues are involved in subunit interactions leading to the active
dimer. Consistent with literature data, we assume that cysteine 221 and
cysteine 265, along with the neighboring cysteines 263 and 268 arranged in cluster, are potential ligands of structural zinc of E. coli dihydroorotase.
INTRODUCTION
The enzyme L-5,6-dihydroorotase amidohydrolase
(DHOase1; E.C. 3.5.2.3)
catalyzes the key reaction of formation of
L-dihydroorotate, the first cyclic intermediate in the
de novo pathway of pyrimidine biosynthesis (1). Although
DHOase is ubiquitous, distinct properties feature the prokaryotic
enzymes from the eukaryotic ones, indicating an evolution of this class
of enzymes in two different groups (2). Unlike most of the higher
eukaryotic DHOases, the bacterial and yeast enzymes are monofunctional
proteins. The DHOase-encoding gene from Escherichia coli has
been cloned and overexpressed (3).
The E. coli DHOase is a homodimer of 348 amino acids/
subunit as deduced from the cDNA sequence (4, 5). Each subunit binds tightly one zinc atom, which has been suggested to be directly involved in catalysis, because its presence is required for the enzyme
to be functional. In addition to this catalytic zinc, two other zinc
atoms may bind weakly to each subunit. Lost during purification,
they can be reincorporated by dialysis of the one zinc/subunit
dihydroorotase against ZnCl2. They are called structural zincs because they are nonessential for activity but stabilize the enzyme against air oxidation (6).
Substitution of Co(II) for the active site Zn(II) resulted in an active
Co-DHOase. Its electronic absorption spectrum exhibited a broad charge
transfer band that was attributed to a thiolate ligand (7). Among the
six cysteines of each E. coli subunit, two are readily
accessible to sulfhydryl reagents. The properties of the resulting
cysteine-modified enzyme indicated that these two cysteines might be
potential ligands to the structural Zn(II) in external protein
sites.
We report here on the localization of these two reactive cysteines
along the peptide chain of the DHOase subunit by selective chemical
cleavage at the N-peptide bonds of cyanylated cysteine residues and
electrospray-ionizing mass spectrometry analyses of the produced
peptide fragments. 2-Nitro-5-thiocyanobenzoic acid (NTCB) is known to
be an efficient reagent for selective cyanylation of cysteine residues
in protein under mild conditions (8). NTCB is of great value for
protein primary structure investigation compared with other cysteine
reagents, because it has been shown that cyanylated polypeptides
undergo an intramolecular cleavage at the amino peptide bond adjacent
to the SCN-cysteinyl residue upon incubation under slightly alkaline
conditions (Scheme 1) (9).
Scheme 1.
Cyanylation reaction of cysteine residue in
a polypeptide chain and cleavage N-terminal to the cyanylated cysteine
in slightly alkaline conditions. The resulting N terminus is blocked by the iminothiazolidine carboxylyl group (in bold),
which impedes Edman degradation sequence analysis.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
DHOase substrates
N-carbamyl-D,L-aspartate and
L-dihydroorotase, and the cysteine reagents DTNB and NTCB
were purchased from Sigma. Other chemicals and reagents were obtained
from commercial sources at the highest level of purity available. All
buffers were prepared with ultrapure water (Bioblock) and degassed
before use.
Enzyme Assays
E. coli DHOase was purified to
homogeneity as described previously from an overproducing strain (RLM
569) that overexpresses the pyrC gene cloned in plasmid
PKC16 (6). The purified DHOase contained one equivalent of
zinc/subunit. Activity was routinely assayed using the UV determination
of DHO at 230 nm ( 230 = 1170 M 1 cm 1) (10) in the
biosynthetic conversion of CA to DHO as well as in the degradative
pathway of DHO into CA as reported previously (11). Protein
concentrations were determined by the Bio-Rad dye binding method with
bovine serum albumin as the standard (12) and referred to
concentrations of subunits (i.e. active sites).
DTNB and NTCB Treatments of DHOase
The cysteine
derivatization reaction was performed at 30 °C in 0.1 M
Tris phosphate buffer, pH 8, containing 200 µM DTNB or NTCB and was initiated by the addition of DHOase (7.7-12.9
µM). For the determination of total cysteine, DHOase was
incubated with 6 M guanidine HCl. The reaction was
monitored until completion by following the change in absorbance at 412 nm due to the release of the dianion TNB2 , and its extent
was determined from the final absorbance ( 412 = 14,100 M 1 cm 1) (13). After reaction
with NTCB, the S-cyanylated DHOase was cleaved by increasing
the pH of the reaction mixture to 9.5 with 1 N NaOH
followed by incubation at 37 °C for 17 h. Aliquots were removed
during the cleavage reaction for analysis by polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and mass spectrometry.
Analytical Procedures
Gel filtration was performed by fast
protein liquid chromatography on a Superose 12 column (Pharmacia
Biotech, Inc.) eluted with 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, and calibrated with a kit of marker proteins (Pharmacia; 12-700 kDa).
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of SDS (SDS-PAGE)
was performed on 12.5% polyacrylamide gel according to the method of
Laemmli (14) using a vertical slab electrophoresis unit (model
Mini-Protean II, Bio-Rad). Proteins were blotted by electrotransfer (1 h, 100 V) from the gel to an Immobilon P membrane (Whatman) as
described by Towbin et al. (15) using a Mini Trans-Blot cell
(Bio-Rad). After transfer, the membranes were rinsed with ultrapure
water, rapidly saturated with 100% methanol, and stained for 1 min
with a solution of 0.1% Amido Black, 1% acetic acid, and 40%
methanol. The membranes were destained by several washes in ultrapure
water, and after air drying, the blue bands were excised for subsequent N-terminal sequence determination. The blotted proteins were subjected to automated Edman degradation with an Applied Biosystems Procize 492 protein sequencer.
Mass Spectrometric Analyses
The protein samples were made
free of salts and buffers by an high performance liquid chromatography
purification step on an Hypersil C4 column before mass spectrometric
analyses. This high performance liquid chromatography procedure was
also used to isolate the two fragments 29,000 and 25,000 from the rest
of the cleavage mixture. An Applied Biosystems chromatographic
apparatus equipped with a syringe pump and an UV detector was used. UV
detection of the eluted material was done at 214 nm. The column was
equilibrated with a mixture of water:acetonitrile:trifluoroacetic
acid 95:5:0.05 (solvent A) and eluted with the mixture
water:acetonitrile:trifluoroacetic acid 10:90:0.045 (solvent B),
using the following gradient program: 0% B, 2 min; 0-40% B, 4 min;
40-70% B, 10 min; 70-100% B, 1 min; 100% B, 1 min; 100 to 0% B, 1 min (flow rate of 0.3 ml min 1). Purified fractions were
evaporated to dryness in a Speed Vac concentrator and redissolved in
water:methanol 1:1. A Finnigan (San Jose, CA) TSQ-700 triple stage
quadrupole mass spectrometer provided with a Finnigan ESI/APCI ion
source was used for molecular weight determination. The proteins were
ionized by the electrospray method, and the instrument electrical
potentials were set for positive ion detection. Mass spectrometry
conditions were as follows: electrospray needle voltage, 4.5 kV;
sheath gas pressure (nitrogen), 30 psi; electron multiplier voltage,
1200; dinode voltage, 15 kV; ion acquisition range, m/z 400 to m/z 2000. After acquisition, the molecular weight of the
protein was obtained from the electrospray spectrum by using the
deconvolution software provided by Finnigan. The molecular weights
given in the text are the average values resulting from at least three
analyses of each sample. Each spectrum shown is one of those
corresponding to these analyses.
RESULTS
Molecular Weight of the DHOase Subunit
The preparation of the
purified DHOase used for mass spectrometric studies was analyzed by
fast protein liquid chromatography gel filtration and SDS gel
electrophoresis. The DHOase, eluted in one peak from the filtration
column, had an apparent molecular weight of 77,700. The active
fractions SDS-PAGE migrated on a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel as a single
band of apparent molecular weight 38,600. These values were in
agreement with previous work on native and cloned DHOase (6, 16), which
showed the homodimeric structure of the E. coli DHOase.
After SDS-PAGE, the band corresponding to the DHOase subunit was
transferred to a nylon membrane, and its N-terminal sequence was
determined. The first 12 amino acids were those deduced from the
cDNA sequence (5), except that the N-terminal methionine was not
detected as reported for the native DHOase (16). The molecular weight
of the DHOase subunit was thus calculated from the amino acid
composition deduced from the cDNA sequence starting from the
N-terminal threonine (second residue of the cDNA sequence). The
resulting calculated molecular weight of the 347-amino acid DHOase
subunit was 38,696. Mass spectrometric analysis of the purified DHOase
gave a molecular weight of 38,695 ± 1.5 (n = 6)
(Fig. 1), in excellent agreement with the
theoretical value. A very minor component of 38,728 was sometimes
observed, which may correspond to the enzyme with a blocked N terminus, as reported previously by Brown and Collins (7).
Fig. 1.
ESI mass spectrum of native E. coli
dihydroorotase. The protein sample was desalted prior to
analysis by a short high performance liquid chromatography step as
described under "Materials and Methods." A mass value of 38,693.6 was measured for the dihydroorotase subunit represented by the peak in
the deconvoluted spectrum. This value was one of those used for the
determination of the average molecular weight of 38,695 reported in the
text for the native DHOase subunit.
[View Larger Version of this Image (39K GIF file)]
DTNB and NTCB Treatment of DHOase
During incubation of
active DHOase with DTNB, 2 mol of dianion TNB2 / subunit
were released, indicating the oxidative modification of two cysteines
among the six of the enzyme. All six cysteines were modified by DTNB
when the incubation was carried out in 6 M guanidine HCl.
Cyanylated cysteines rather than mixed disulfide are formed upon
incubation with NTCB, but the extent of modification can be determined
in the same way (i.e. through the quantitation of the
released dianion TNB2 ). As in the case of DTNB, two
cysteines of the active DHOase were modified by NTCB (Fig.
2). No cysteine is labeled by NTCB when
the reaction is carried out on DHOase modified previously by DTNB and
vice versa. Consequently, both reagents DTNB and NTCB react
with the same two cysteines of the DHOase subunit. The mass spectrometric analyses of the NTCB-treated DHOase confirmed that two
cysteines were cyanylated (Fig. 3).
Indeed, an average molecular weight of 38,753 ± 5 (n = 6) was obtained for the cyanylated DHOase, in
close agreement with the theoretical value of 38,746 expected for the
enzyme with two covalently attached CN groups.
Fig. 2.
NTCB reaction with native ( ) and guanidine
HCl denatured E. coli dihydroorotase ( ). The number
of cyanylated cysteine residues was determined from the quantitation at
412 nm of the dianion TNB2 released in the medium upon
reaction of NTCB with dihydroorotase as described under "Materials
and Methods."
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
Fig. 3.
ESI mass spectrum of NTCB-treated E. coli dihydroorotase. This NTCB-treated dihydroorotase
contained two CN groups (determined as in Fig. 2), in agreement with
the mass increase of its peak represented in the deconvoluted
spectrum.
[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]
Cleavage of DHOase at S-Cyanylated Cysteine Residues
The
cleavage reaction was performed by adjusting the cyanylation reaction
mixture to pH 9 and then incubating it at 37 °C for 17 h. SDS-PAGE
analysis showed, besides the cyanylated DHOase, two new bands of lower
molecular weight that increased in intensity during the first 10 hours
of reaction (Fig. 4). Incubation at 37 °C for periods longer than 17 h did not increase the
intensity of these bands. After 17 h of incubation, DHOase still
was the major band, indicating a limited cleavage reaction as
reported previously for other proteins (17). The two new bands migrated at apparent molecular weights of 29,000 and 25,000. The N-terminal sequences of these two components as well as of the cyanylated DHOase
were determined after electrotransfer of the protein bands. All of them
had the same N-terminal sequence as the one obtained above for the
native DHOase. This indicated that the two peptides of
Mr 29,000 (peptide A) and
Mr 25,000 (peptide B) stemmed from the DHOase
subunit and that they resulted from the removal of C-terminal fragments
of approximately 8,000 and 13,000, respectively (according to the
mechanism of the cleavage reaction shown on Scheme 1, these two small
fragments should have blocked N termini; this is confirmed by
unsuccessful attempts to sequence the N terminus of the fragment
13,000. Purification and characterization of these two peptides are
currently in process). Given the location of the six cysteines on the
DHOase subunit polypeptide chain, few cleavage sites are possible.
Concerning the peptide A, only a cleavage at one of the three cysteines
arranged in a cluster at positions 263, 265, and 268 (Scheme
2) could result in a peptide of this
mass. Regarding peptide B, only a cleavage at cysteine 221 can give a
fragment of this molecular weight. Consequently, cysteine 221 and one
of the three cysteines 263, 265, or 268 should be the site of
cyanylation by NTCB.
Fig. 4.
Cleavage of E. coli
dihydroorotase subunit analyzed by SDS-12.5% polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. Lane A, molecular weight markers.
Lane B, native E. coli dihydroorotase (30 µg). Lanes C and D, NTCB-treated E. coli
dihydroorotase 0.5 and 17 h, respectively, after the beginning of
the cleavage reaction. After treatments with NTCB, the dihydroorotase
contained two cyanylated cysteines/subunit. Cleavage reaction was
initiated at the end of the incubation with NTCB by increasing pH of
the incubation mixture as described under "Materials and
Methods."
[View Larger Version of this Image (79K GIF file)]
Scheme 2.
Molecular weights of N-terminal fragments
resulting from cleavages N-terminal to cysteines 268, 265, 263, and
221.
[View Larger Version of this Image (11K GIF file)]
Mass Spectrometric Analysis of the Cleavage Reaction
The mass
spectrum of the mixture of the two peptides A and B, separated
previously from the noncleaved DHOase by reversed-phase high
performance liquid chromatography, exhibited as expected two components
(Fig. 5). The first one had a molecular
weight of 29,631 ± 5 (n = 9) and thus should
correspond to peptide A. A molecular weight of 24,684 ± 3 (n = 9) was determined for the second peak, which was
then attributed to peptide B. We assumed above that the latter resulted
from the cleavage of DHOase at cysteine 221, generating a peptide of
calculated Mr 24,684. The molecular weight
obtained by mass spectrometry for peptide B is thus in agreement with
the calculated value. The results from mass spectrometry and N-terminal
sequencing of peptide B indicate cysteine 221 as one of the two
cysteines cyanylated by NTCB.
Fig. 5.
ESI mass spectrum of the mixture of the
peptide fragments 25,000 and 29,000 resulting from the cleavage
reaction of cyanylated DHOase.
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]
We assumed above that a cleavage at one of the three cysteines 263, 265, or 268 generated peptide A, which contains cysteine 221. Because
this cysteine 221 is cyanylated, the mass of one CN group has to be
taken into account in the calculated molecular weight of the peptide A. The N-terminal peptide produced by a cleavage N-terminal to cysteine
265 and cyanylated at cysteine 221 has a calculated molecular weight of
29,605, which is very close to the value of 29,631 obtained by mass
spectrometry. Actually, the difference (+26) between the two values
fits exactly with the mass of one CN group, indicating that an extra
cyanylation of the peptide occurs after the cleavage at cysteine 265. Cysteines 78 and 263 are the remaining potential sites for this
additional cyanylation. A signal at a molecular weight of 29,488 could
be seen in the mass spectrum (Fig. 5) close to the peak corresponding to peptide A. A cleavage of this peptide A at the position N-terminal to cysteine 263 yields a peptide of this range of molecular weight (Scheme 2), suggesting that this residue 263 could be the site of the
additional cyanylation. It is likely that cysteine 263 becomes more
exposed to NTCB after cleavage N-terminal to the neighboring cysteine
265. Taking into account this additional cyanylation, the data from gel
electrophoresis, N-terminal sequencing, and mass spectrometry indicate
that, besides cysteine 221, cysteine 265 is the other primary site of
cyanylation of E. coli DHOase under nondenaturing
conditions.
DISCUSSION
This paper reports the first study of E. coli
dihydroorotase by mass spectrometry. This powerful analytical method
allowed an accurate determination of the molecular weight of the DHOase subunit, compared with the previous estimations by SDS-PAGE and sedimentation equilibrium analyses (16). The DHOase subunit has a
molecular weight of 38,696, i.e. the mass of the 347-amino acid peptide chain beginning from threonine 2 to C-terminal glutamine 348 on the sequence deduced from cDNA. This is in agreement with the N-terminal sequencing, which identifies threonine 2 as the N-terminal residue. Quantitative analyses indicated that the amount of
sequenced N-terminal extremities was as high as expected from the
concentration of the applied sample. Therefore, our DHOase preparation exhibited no blocked N terminus, indicating a
complete removal of the N-(formyl)methionine.
The mass spectrometry study of the modified DHOase confirms also
that two cysteines among the six of the DHOase subunit are easily
accessible to specific thiol reagents under nondenaturing conditions,
suggesting exposed, external positions for these two residues (6). The
features of the cleavage reaction induced by NTCB combined with mass
spectrometric analysis provide an efficient method to locate cysteines
on a polypeptide chain, as reported recently (18). Applying this
strategy to DHOase, we identified these two exposed thiol residues as
cysteines 221 and 265. Cysteine is the most common protein ligand for
structural zinc (19). Given the difference of sensitivity between the
one zinc/subunit and the three zincs/subunit DHOases toward air
oxidation and thiol reagents (6, 7), we assume that the two cysteines
221 and 265 targeted by DTNB and NTCB are ligands of the external
(structural) zinc ion. As observed previously by Brown and Collins (7), cysteine 265 belongs to a cluster of three cysteines (263, 265, and
268), which have the same spacing as three of the four cysteine ligands
of one of the domains of metallothionein (20). Accordingly, cysteines
263 and 268 could be also considered as potential ligands of structural
zinc. These two residues are not accessible to thiol reagents in native
DHOase likely for steric hindrance because at least one of these is
cyanylated upon cleavage reaction.
Structural zinc atoms in proteins are often in outlying regions
of the macromolecules, where they affect the local structure and
conformation (21). Structural zincs are also involved in stabilization
and protection of the protein against oxidation, likely by a very
limited access to their protein binding domains (22). Washabaugh and
Collins (6) showed that the three zincs/subunit DHOase was protected
against air oxidation as compared with the one zinc/subunit and that
air oxidation was reversed by addition of dithioerythritol.
Air-oxidized DHOase has a decreased specific activity and does not
react with DTNB and NTCB. As a consequence, the two cysteines 221 and
265, which are targeted by the thiol reagents, are also the sites of
the oxidative modification. These authors suggested that cysteines of
air-oxidized DHOase were oxidized to either a sulfenic acid or a
disulfide. We did mass spectrometry analysis of air-oxidized DHOase and
obtained a molecular weight of 38,694, almost identical to the
molecular weight of the native DHOase (data not shown). This result
favors the hypothesis of formation of a disulfide bond.
To check the effect of the modification of the two cysteines 221 and
265 on the overall structure of the DHOase subunit, we are performing
studies by gel filtration and circular dichroism that will be published
later. It is worthwhile to note our preliminary results, which show
that DTNB- or NTCB-modified DHOase is eluted on gel filtration columns
under nondenaturing conditions as a dimer and partially as a monomer.
No monomer is observed for the native DHOase, which is eluted as a
single peak of dimer (Fig. 6). Therefore,
modification of the two cysteines disrupts the conformation of the
DHOase subunit in such a way that formation of the dimer is partially
impeded. The partial formation of the monomer parallels the limited
cleavage induced by NTCB. It seems from literature data that the
proteins retain the SCN groups without cleavage, so long as the native
structure is retained (9). The SCN group must be oriented appropriately
for nucleophilic attack, and such an orientation may be constrained by
the native protein structure. Then the hypothesis could be raised that
the monomer fraction is the same fraction cleaved upon incubation at
alkaline pH.
Fig. 6.
Gel filtration on Superose 12 column of
native (A) and cyanylated (B) E. coli
dihydroorotase. Proteins were eluted at 0.4 ml/min in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, and detected at 280 nm.
Arrows indicated molecular masses determined from
calibration with marker proteins. In A, in these
nondenaturing conditions, a molecular mass of 77,600 was determined for
the native dihydroorotase eluted as a dimer. In B, the
cyanylated dihydroorotase exhibited two peaks: one eluted as the native
dimeric protein and the other eluted as the monomer with an halved mass
of 38,000.
[View Larger Version of this Image (9K GIF file)]
Finally, cysteines 221 and 265 are the two thiol residues modified by
DTNB and NTCB, and it is likely that these two cysteines as well as
potentially cysteines 263 and 268 are ligands of the structural zinc
atoms. The latter stabilize DHOase through protection of these thiol
residues against air oxidation and contribution to protein conformation
to yield the active dimer. Concerning the catalytic zinc, previous
studies on Co(II)-substituted E. coli DHOase implicated a
thiol group as a ligand at the active site (7). The two remaining
cysteines not targeted in this study were cysteines 78 and 295. The
former is located on the primary sequence between the most conserved
protein segment, which contains the histidine residues 16 and 18 and
the region containing histidine 139. These three conserved histidines
have been recently shown to be ligands of the catalytic zinc at the
active site of mammalian DHOase by site-directed mutagenesis (23-25).
We are currently investigating the possible role of cysteines 78 and
295 as zinc ligands at the active site of E. coli
DHOase.
FOOTNOTES
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratoire de
Recherches sur les Macromolécules, URA 502 CNRS, Université
Paris 13, avenue J.-B. Clément, 93430 Villetaneuse, France. Tel.:
01 49 40 33 56; Fax: 01 48 23 28 01; E-mail:
regis{at}galilee.univ-paris13.fr.
1
The abbreviations used are: DHOase,
dihydroorotase; NTCB, 2-nitro-5-thiocyanobenzoic acid; DTNB,
5,5 -dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid); TNB2 ,
5-thio-2-nitrobenzoate dianion; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We thank Dr. Squire Booker for
critical reading of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
-
Carrey, E. A.
(1995)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
23,
899-902
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Simmer, J. P., Kelly, R. E., Rinker, A. G., Jr., Zimmermann, B. H., Scully, J. L., Kim, H., and Evans, D. R.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
174-178
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brown, D. C., and Collins, K. D.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
5917-5919
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bäckström, D., Sjöberg, R.-M., and Lundberg, L. G.
(1986)
Eur. J. Biochem.
160,
77-82
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wilson, H. R., Chan, P. T., and Turnbough, C. L., Jr.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
3051-3058
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Washabaugh, M. W., and Collins, K. D.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
5920-5929
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brown, D. C., and Collins, K. D.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
1597-1604
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Degani, Y., and Patchornik, A.
(1974)
Biochemistry
13,
1-11
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stark, G. R.
(1977)
Methods Enzymol.
47,
129-132
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sander, E. G., Wright, L. D., and McCormick, D. B.
(1965)
J. Biol. Chem.
240,
3628-3630
[Free Full Text]
-
Daniel, R., Kokel, B., Caminade, E., Martel, A., and Le Goffic, F.
(1996)
Anal. Biochem.
239,
130-135
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Riddles, P. W., Blakeley, R. L., and Zerner, B.
(1979)
Anal. Biochem.
94,
75-81
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Towbin, H., Staehlin, T., and Gordon, J.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4350-4354
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Washabaugh, M. W., and Collins, K. D.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
3293-3298
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ogilvie, J. W.
(1980)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
622,
277-286
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wu, J., Gage, D. A., and Watson, J. T.
(1996)
Anal. Biochem.
235,
161-174
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Christianson, D. W.
(1991)
Adv. Prot. Chem.
42,
281-355
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Christianson, D. W., and Alexander, R. S.
(1989)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
254,
12506-12512
-
Vallee, B. L., and Auld, D. S.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
5647-5659
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gibbs, P. N. B., and Jordan, P. M.
(1981)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
9,
232-233
-
Williams, N. K., Manthey, M. K., Hambley, T. W., O'Donoghue, S. I., Keegan, M., Chapman, B. E., and Christopherson, R. I.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
11344-11352
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zimmermann, B. H., Kemling, N. M., and Evans, D. R.
(1995)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
370,
699-702
-
Zimmermann, B. H., Kemling, N. M., and Evans, D. R.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
7038-7046
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|