![]()
|
|
||||||||
Volume 272, Number 44, Issue of October 31, 1997 pp. 27513-27516
(Received for publication, July 14, 1997, and in revised form, September 8, 1997)
andFrom Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Carlsbad, California 92008
RNase H1 from Escherichia coli
cleaves single strand RNA extending 3
from an RNA-DNA duplex.
Substrates consisting of a 25-mer RNA annealed to complementary DNA
ranging in length from 9-17 nucleotides were designed to create
overhanging single strand RNA regions extending 5
and 3
from the
RNA-DNA duplex. Digestion of single strand RNA was observed exclusively
within the 3
overhang region and not the 5
overhang region. RNase H
digestion of the 3
overhang region resulted in digestion products with
5
-phosphate and 3
-hydroxyl termini. The number of single strand RNA
residues cleaved by RNase H is influenced by the sequence of the single strand RNA immediately adjacent to the RNA-DNA duplex and appears to be
a function of the stacking properties of the RNA residues adjacent to
the RNA-DNA duplex. RNase H digestion of the 3
overhang region was not
observed for a substrate that contained a 2
-methoxy antisense strand.
The introduction of 3 deoxynucleotides at the 5
terminus of the
2
-methoxy antisense oligonucleotide resulted in cleavage. These
results offer additional insights into the binding directionality of
RNase H with respect to the heteroduplex substrate.
RNase H hydrolyzes RNA in an RNA-DNA duplex (1). RNase H activity
appears to be ubiquitous in eukaryotes and bacteria (2, 3). This family
of enzymes functions as endonucleases exhibiting limited sequence
specificity and requiring divalent cations to produce 5
-phosphate and
3
-hydroxyl termini (4).
RNase H1 from Escherichia coli is perhaps the best
characterized isotype of this family of enzymes. The substrate
requirements for RNase H1 have been studied extensively. The
dissociation constants for various duplexes and E. coli
RNase H1 indicate that this enzyme is a double strand RNA-binding
protein that cleaves RNA only in an RNA-DNA duplex (5). Furthermore,
the cleavage specificity of the enzyme appears to be due to the
catalytic process and not the binding interaction between RNase H and
the substrate duplex. For example, although RNase H exhibited a binding
affinity for substrates containing 2
-methoxy modifications
approximately equal to the unmodified RNA-DNA heteroduplex, RNase H
activity was ablated by these modifications. Kinetic analyses of
substrates containing RNA duplexed with chimeric oligonucleotides
composed of a mixture of deoxy- and 2
-modified nucleotides
demonstrated that the rate of cleavage was a function of the length of
the deoxy portion of the chimeric oligonucleotide, i.e. the
cleavage rate decreased with a diminishing number of contiguous
deoxynucleotides, and complete loss in activity was observed for
chimeric oligonucleotides containing less than 4 contiguous
deoxynucleotides (6, 7). In all cases E. coli RNase H1
cleavage of the RNA was observed to occur exclusively within regions
base-paired to DNA.
In this communication we report that E. coli RNase H1
can cleave single strand RNA extending 3
from an RNA-DNA duplex. The fact that the products are 5
-phosphate and 3
-hydroxyl suggests that
the enzyme cleaves single and double strand regions via the same
mechanism. Furthermore, these data suggest that E. coli
RNase H1 cleaves RNA in RNA-DNA duplexes through a DNase-like
mechanism. A series of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides ranging in
length from 9 to 17 were designed to target a 25-mer RNA producing a heteroduplex with overhanging single strand RNA regions of varying length and sequence composition at both the 3
or 5
termini (Fig. 1). The single strand RNA regions 3
to
the heteroduplex ranged in length from 5 to 16 residues and were
positioned on the 25-mer RNA such that the sequence composition of the
single strand RNA immediately 3
of the heteroduplex consisted of
either mixed purine and pyrimidine nucleotides, a string of three
purines, or two pyrimidines. Heteroduplexes were preformed and then
digested with RNase H, and the digestion products were analyzed by
denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In addition, the
secondary structures of the heteroduplex substrates were mapped using
single strand-specific ribonucleases, as described previously (8).
end-labeled RNA for 15 h at 37 °C in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 20 mM
KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM
dithiothreitol, and 1 unit of Inhibit-ACE and then digested with
1.4 × 10
8 mg of E. coli RNase H for 30 min at 37 °C. Base hydrolysis ladder (lane 9) was
prepared by incubation of 5
end-labeled RNA at 90 °C for 5 min in
10 µL containing 100 mM sodium carbonate, pH 9.0. Enzymatic footprinting of DNA oligonucleotide (substrate 6)
with RNases T1 and CL3 (lanes 7 and 8) was
performed in 10 µL containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 3 µg of
tRNA, and 30,000 cpm of 5
end-labeled RNA and incubated for 5 min at 37 °C. Position of DNA oligonucleotide bound to the RNA is indicated by the boxed sequence. B, sites of RNase H digestion
(1-6 and 10-13) and RNase T1 and CL3
(7 and 8) on the heteroduplex substrates. For
each substrate the RNA sequences (5
3
) are shown above the DNA
sequence. Boxed sequences indicate the position of the 2
-methoxy-modified residues. Substrate numbers correspond to the
lane numbers in A.
[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]
Digestion outside of the heteroduplex site was observed for all of the
oligodeoxynucleotide-RNA duplexes tested (substrates 1-6,
Fig. 1). These cleavages were observed exclusively in the region 3
of
the heteroduplex. Under no circumstances was cleavage observed in the
single strand RNA region 5
to the heteroduplex and consistent with
earlier reports. The 5
-most cleavage site observed on the RNA was 5 nucleotides downstream of the 3
end of the oligodeoxynucleotide (7).
The greatest number of single strand RNA cleavage sites was observed
for the substrate containing the string of three purines within the
single strand region immediately adjacent to the heteroduplex
(substrate 6, Fig. 1). RNase H digestion of this substrate
resulted in four cleavage sites within the single strand region of the
RNA. The substrates containing mixed pyrimidine and purine sequences or
two pyrimidines in the overhanging RNA resulted in fewer cleavage
sites, with a maximum of two cleavage sites observed for these
substrates (substrates 1-5, Fig. 1). Enzymatic structure
mapping of the heteroduplexes with single strand-specific ribonucleases
showed that the RNA regions flanking the heteroduplex were indeed
single-stranded (Fig. 1), and thus alternative intramolecular or
intermolecular structures were not formed.
The length of the single strand RNA sequence downstream of the heteroduplex (e.g. ranging from 5 to 16 residues for the substrates tested) appeared to have no effect on the number of cleavage sites within the single strand RNA region. For example, the substrate containing the longest single strand region, i.e. 16 nucleotides, exhibited only two cleavage sites outside of the heteroduplex (substrate 2, Fig. 1), whereas four single strand RNA residues of the substrate containing a 6-nucleotide single strand region were digested by RNase H (substrate 6, Fig. 1). These data suggest that the ability of E. coli RNase H1 to cleave single strand RNA regions is a function of the structure of these regions resulting from the sequence composition and not the length of the single strand RNA.
Analysis of the RNase H digestion products suggests that the
overhanging single strand regions are cleaved by the same mechanism as
the heteroduplex region (Fig. 2).
Specifically, the cleavage products for both the heteroduplex and
single strand overhanging regions were found to consist of a
5
-phosphate and 3
-hydroxyl termini. These data are consistent with
previous studies showing that E. coli RNase H1 cleaves RNA
in an RNA-DNA duplex leaving a 5
-phosphorylated product (1). In
addition these data suggest that the RNase H cleavage of the
overhanging regions differs from many single strand-specific
endoribonucleases which produce a 3
-phosphorylated product (9). These
RNases follow a two-step mechanism involving the use of the 2
-hydroxyl
to perform a nucleophilic in-line attack on the phosphorus resulting in
the formation of a 2
,3
-cyclic phosphate intermediate. This trigonal
bipyrimidal intermediate is then hydrolyzed to form the
3
-phosphorylated product (10). Although the catalytic pathway for
RNase H remains unknown, the enzyme likely uses a catalytic mechanism
similar to that observed for other nucleases which have been shown to produce a 5
-phosphorylated product (e.g. DNases, RNase P,
and group I and II ribozymes) (11). These nucleases supply the
nucleophile required to react directly on the phosphorus center, thus
eliminating the requirement of the 2
-hydroxyl. RNase H has adopted
this DNase-like mechanism presumably because in stacked and/or duplexed
RNA the position of the 2
-hydroxyl is such that an in-line attack of the phosphorus is not possible via the 2
-hydroxyl (12).
end-labeled using [32P]cytidine bisphosphate
(pCp) and RNA ligase as described previously (9).
Hybridization reactions were prepared as described in Fig. 1.
A, reactions were divided into equal aliquots with one aliquot subjected to dephosphorylation with alkaline phosphatase (from
calf intestine) prior to digestion with RNase H. The digestion reactions were further divided into equal aliquots, again with one
aliquot subjected to dephosphorylation. Asterisk indicates the position of the 32P label. B, untreated
hybridization reaction digested with RNase H are shown in lanes
3 and 6. Hybridization reactions treated with alkaline
phosphatase prior to digestion with RNase H exhibited slower migration
on the polyacrylamide gel due to the loss of the 3
-phosphate
(lanes 2 and 5). RNase H digestion reactions treated with alkaline phosphatase exhibited a further reduction in
migration due to the loss of the 5
-phosphate on the cleavage product
(lanes 1 and 4).
[View Larger Version of this Image (19K GIF file)]
Previous studies have shown that substrates containing RNA
hybridized to 2
-methoxy oligonucleotides do not support RNase H
activity (6, 13). To determine whether heteroduplex substrates containing 2
-methoxy antisense oligonucleotides would support RNase H
digestion of single strand RNA overhangs, we designed a 2
-methoxy
antisense analog (substrate 15, Fig. 1) of the antisense sequence that yielded the greatest number of cleavage sites outside of
the heteroduplex region (substrate 6, Fig. 1). Consistent
with previous studies, the heteroduplex substrate containing the
2
-methoxy antisense oligonucleotide did not support RNase H activity
within the heteroduplex region. In addition, no cleavage of the single strand RNA region was observed with this substrate.
Clearly, digestion of the 3
-overhanging RNA by RNase H requires that
the antisense sequence consist of deoxynucleotides. To determine
if oligonucleotides consisting of both deoxynucleotides and
2
-methoxynucleotides would support RNase H cleavage of the 3
overhang
region, we designed chimeric oligonucleotides with the deoxynucleotide
portion on the 5
end of the antisense sequence adjacent to the 3
overhang region and varied the size of the deoxynucleotide portion of
the chimeric oligonucleotide from 1 to 5 residues (substrates
10-14, Fig. 1). Again, the antisense sequence selected for this
study corresponded to the oligodeoxynucleotide which yielded the
greatest number of cleavages within the 3
overhang (substrate
6, Fig. 1). E. coli RNase H1 digestion of substrates 10-14 shows that three of the five substrates containing the chimeric oligonucleotides were cleaved by the enzyme. Furthermore, in all cases
in which cleavage was observed with these substrates, the RNase H
cleavage occurred exclusively within the single strand RNA region.
Interestingly, the substrates containing chimeric oligonucleotides
exhibited fewer cleavage sites within the single strand RNA region as
compared with the analogous unmodified substrate (substrate
6, Fig. 1). These data also suggest that placement of a minimum of
3 deoxynucleotides at the 5
end of the antisense oligonucleotide was
required to support RNase H cleavage. Kinetic analysis of the substrate
containing the chimeric oligonucleotide with the 5-deoxynucleotide
portion at the 5
end showed that this substrate was digested by
E. coli RNase H1 at approximately the same rate as the
unmodified RNA-DNA substrate (data not shown). Previous studies with
chimeric oligonucleotides containing a string of 5 deoxynucleotides
within other regions of the oligonucleotide showed that these
substrates were digested 3- to 5-fold more slowly than the unmodified
RNA-DNA substrate (5). Taken together these results suggest that
placement of the deoxynucleotide portion at the 5
end of the chimeric
oligonucleotide and adjacent to the 3
RNA overhang serves to
effectively increase the size of the substrate portion of the chimeric
oligonucleotide.
The cleavage patterns for the various substrates tested show that the
5
-most cleavage site on the RNA is 5 nucleotides from the 3
end of
the oligodeoxynucleotide and that the 3
-most cleavage site extends 4 residues past the heteroduplex into the single strand 3
overhang
region. These data are consistent with the observed structure and
function of RNase H1. Structural studies suggest that the enzyme
exhibits a selective "binding directionality" with respect to the
RNA of the heteroduplex substrate such that the binding region on the
enzyme is positioned several residues 5
to the catalytic region (14,
15) (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the binding
interaction is sensitive to the structure of the substrate with the
enzyme exhibiting a 40-fold greater affinity for RNA-DNA heteroduplexes
than single strand RNA (9). Therefore, presented with an RNA-DNA
substrate containing overhanging single strand RNA regions, the enzyme
would preferentially bind to the heteroduplex region of the substrate.
Binding of E. coli RNase H to the 3
-most end of the
oligodeoxynucleotide duplexed with RNA would result in cleavage several
nucleotides downstream on the RNA (e.g. yielding the
observed cleavage 5-7 nucleotides from the 3
end). Binding of RNase H
to the 5
-most end of the oligodeoxynucleotide duplexed with the RNA
would result in cleavage within the downstream 3
overhang region of
the RNA (e.g. yielding the observed cleavage 1-4
nucleotides from the 5
end). Said another way, RNase H-induced cleavages less than 5 nucleotides from the 3
end of the
oligodeoxynucleotide or more than 4 residues within the 3
-overhanging
RNA are not observed presumably because this would position the binding
region of the enzyme within the overhanging single strand RNA, a region for which the enzyme exhibits significantly lower affinity (Fig. 3).
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
The greater number of cleavage sites observed for the substrate
containing the string of purines may be due to the fact that single
strand purines exhibit a greater propensity to continue stacking on the
base pairs of a duplex (16, 17). Because the footprint of the enzyme
appears to comprise a single helical turn on the duplex substrate and
this binding/catalytic interaction is sensitive to the helical
structure of the substrate, the extended helical structure created by
the continued stacking of single strand RNA residues on the
heteroduplex would serve to effectively increase the size of the
substrate beyond the heteroduplex. Single strand sequences consisting
of pyrimidines and mixed purines/pyrimidines also continue stacking but
are in general limited to 1 or 2 residues immediately adjacent to the
duplex (16, 17). This lower propensity for stacking may explain why
these substrates exhibited fewer cleavages within the 3
overhang.
Given that cleavage of the 3
-overhanging RNA region by RNase H occurs
with the enzyme bound to the heteroduplex region and that the
2
-hydroxyl does not appear to function as the nucleophile during
catalysis, we designed RNA-DNA duplexes with 3
- and 5
-overhanging DNA
regions to determine whether, provided with the heteroduplex binding
site, RNase H would cleave single strand DNA adjacent to the RNA-DNA
duplex. These substrates were patterned after substrates 4 and 6 (Fig.
1B), with the exception that 32P-end-labeled DNA
was substituted for the RNA strand and RNA was substituted for the DNA
strand. In both cases, no digestion of the DNA was observed for either
the heteroduplex or single strand regions (data not shown). These data
suggest that although the enzyme is capable of binding to the
heteroduplex region, cleavage of the single strand overhanging region
requires the presence of the 2
-hydroxyl. The role of the 2
-hydroxyl
with respect to RNase H catalysis is unclear particularly in light of
the fact that group I and II ribozymes, which also produce
5
-phosphorylated products, have been shown to cleave DNA (18, 19).
These data support the proposed catalytic mechanism involving a single
Mg2+ ion (14, 20, 21). This mechanism uses the 2
-hydroxyl
to position the single water-bound Mg2+ ion and the amino
acid residue (Asp-70) to activate the water nucleophile. Alternatively,
the lack of cleavage observed within the overhanging single strand DNA
region may be due to the difference in base-stacking properties between
single strand RNA and DNA adjacent to the heteroduplex region. E. coli RNase H1 activity has been shown to be sensitive to the
helical structure of the substrate, preferring A-form-like duplexes
over B-form duplexes (5). Therefore, stacking of the single strand DNA
on the heteroduplex region in a manner other than an A-form-like
structure would likely result in the observed abrogation of RNase H
activity.
In addition to the helical structure of the substrate, RNase H activity
within the 3
overhang appears to be sensitive to chemical
modifications within the antisense oligonucleotide. For example, RNase
H activity was abrogated by 2
-methoxy substitution within the
antisense oligodeoxynucleotide sequence. Activity was restored with the
introduction of a minimum of 3 deoxynucleotides at the 5
end of the
2
-methoxy-substituted antisense oligonucleotide (substrates
10-12, Fig. 1). Previous studies have shown that the rate at
which the RNA in a chimeric heteroduplex is digested by E. coli RNase H is a function of the length of the deoxynucleotide portion of the chimeric oligonucleotide (6, 7). Therefore, with longer
RNAs, improved RNase H activity may be realized by placing the
deoxynucleotide portion at the 5
end of the chimeric antisense
oligonucleotide and thereby effectively increasing the size of the
substrate. Finally, these data suggest that for RNase H cleavage of
single strand RNA to occur, at the minimum two criteria must be met.
First, in order for the enzyme to bind to the substrate in a way that
supports cleavage of the single strand RNA overhang, the duplex region
must be positioned 5
to the cleavage site. Second the 5
end of the
antisense sequence must consist of a minimum of 3 deoxynucleotides.
These data support previous observations that RNase H is both
directional and processive (7, 14, 15, 22). Clearly the selective
binding directionality exhibited by RNase H plays a crucial role in the
biological processes involving the enzyme. For example, E. coli RNase H1 is believed to participate in DNA replication by
removing the upstream RNA primers of Okazaki fragments (23). The
binding specificity and polarity exhibited by the enzyme,
i.e. binding region positioned several residues 5
to the
catalytic region, is consistent with the orientation of the RNA primers
which are positioned 5
with respect to the Okazaki fragments. Similar
cleavage specificity with respect to the position of the RNA primers
has been observed for calf thymus RNase H1 (24). Furthermore, RNase H
activity is also often implicated in antisense
oligodeoxynucleotide-mediated degradation of RNA. In a previous study
examining E. coli RNase H1 activity on antisense oligonucleotide-induced RNA pseudo-half-knot structures we have shown
that cleavage of the structured RNA is profoundly affected by the
binding directionality of the enzyme (25). Taken together, these
studies suggest that the binding polarity exhibited by RNase H has
important implications both biologically and pharmacologically.
The demonstration that E. coli RNase H1 cleaves single strand RNA adjacent to heteroduplex regions via the same mechanism as it cleaves RNA within the heteroduplex, coupled with the demonstration that the enzyme is a double strand RNA-binding protein (5), suggests that the enzyme may have derived from genes coding for an RNA-binding protein and a DNase-like nuclease. The nuclease domain enables cleavage of stacked RNA whereas the double strand RNA binding domain serves either to provide greater substrate specificity or to modulate enzyme activity in a manner similar to that suggested for the double strand RNA binding domain of S. cerevisiae RNase H1 (26).
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Isis Pharmaceuticals,
2292 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008. Tel.: 760-603-2387; Fax:
760-931-0265; E-mail: wlima{at}isisph.com.
We thank Henri Sasmor and Pierre Villet for oligonucleotide synthesis and Drs. Thomas W. Bruice, David Ecker, Susan Freier, Frank Bennett, and Nick Dean for helpful discussions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. D. Vilfan, W. Kamping, M. van den Hout, A. Candelli, S. Hage, and N. H. Dekker An RNA toolbox for single-molecule force spectroscopy studies Nucleic Acids Res., October 8, 2007; 35(19): 6625 - 6639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sobczak and W. J. Krzyzosiak CAG Repeats Containing CAA Interruptions Form Branched Hairpin Structures in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 Transcripts J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2005; 280(5): 3898 - 3910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sobczak and W. J. Krzyzosiak Imperfect CAG Repeats Form Diverse Structures in SCA1 Transcripts J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 41563 - 41572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gabler, S. Krebs, D. Seichter, and M. Forster Fast and accurate determination of sites along the FUT2 in vitro transcript that are accessible to antisense oligonucleotides by application of secondary structure predictions and RNase H in combination with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2003; 31(15): e79 - e79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Yazbeck, K.-L. Min, and M. J. Damha Molecular requirements for degradation of a modified sense RNA strand by Escherichia coli ribonuclease H1 Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2002; 30(14): 3015 - 3025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kurreck, E. Wyszko, C. Gillen, and V. A. Erdmann Design of antisense oligonucleotides stabilized by locked nucleic acids Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2002; 30(9): 1911 - 1918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pileur, J.-J. Toulme, and C. Cazenave Eukaryotic ribonucleases HI and HII generate characteristic hydrolytic patterns on DNA-RNA hybrids: further evidence that mitochondrial RNase H is an RNase HII Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2000; 28(18): 3674 - 3683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Wrzesinski, M. Legiewicz, and J. Ciesiolka Mapping of accessible sites for oligonucleotide hybridization on hepatitis delta virus ribozymes Nucleic Acids Res., April 15, 2000; 28(8): 1785 - 1793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wu, W. F. Lima, and S. T. Crooke Properties of Cloned and Expressed Human RNase H1 J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 1999; 274(40): 28270 - 28278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Boiziau, E. Dausse, L. Yurchenko, and J.-J. Toulme DNA Aptamers Selected Against the HIV-1 trans-Activation-responsive RNA Element Form RNA-DNA Kissing Complexes J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 1999; 274(18): 12730 - 12737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. McKay, L. J. Miraglia, L. L. Cummins, S. R. Owens, H. Sasmor, and N. M. Dean Characterization of a Potent and Specific Class of Antisense Oligonucleotide Inhibitor of Human Protein Kinase C-alpha Expression J. Biol. Chem., January 15, 1999; 274(3): 1715 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |