Volume 272, Number 44, Issue of October 31, 1997
pp. 27839-27847
The Main Protein of the Aggregation Factor Responsible for
Species-specific Cell Adhesion in the Marine Sponge Microciona
prolifera Is Highly Polymorphic*
(Received for publication, June 12, 1997)
Xavier
Fernàndez-Busquets
and
Max M.
Burger
From the Friedrich Miescher-Institut, P.O. Box 2543, CH-4002 Basel,
Switzerland and the Marine Biological Laboratory,
Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Species-specific cell recognition in sponges, the
oldest living metazoans, is based on a proteoglycan-like aggregation
factor. We have screened individual sponge cDNA libraries,
identifying multiple related forms for the aggregation factor core
protein (MAFp3). Northern blots show the presence in several human
tissues of transcripts strongly binding a MAFp3-specific probe. The
open reading frame for MAFp3 is not interrupted in the 5
direction, revealing variable protein sequences that contain numerous introns equally spaced. We have studied tissue histocompatibility within a
sponge population, finding 100% correlation between rejection behavior
and the individual-specific restriction fragment length polymorphism
pattern using aggregation factor-related probes. PCR amplifications
with specific primers showed that at least some of the MAFp3 forms are
allelic and distribute in the population used. A pronounced
polymorphism is also observed when analyzing purified aggregation
factor in polyacrylamide gels. Protease digestion of the polymorphic
glycosaminoglycan-containing bands indicates that glycans are also
responsible for the variability. The data presented reveal a high
polymorphism of aggregation factor components, which matches the
elevated sponge alloincompatibility, suggesting an involvement of the
cell adhesion system in sponge allogeneic reactions.
INTRODUCTION
Immune recognition is widespread in invertebrates (1), and
allograft rejection has been described in ascidians (2, 3), earthworms
(4, 5), molluscs (6), coelenterates (7-9), sponges (10), echinoderms
(11-13), and insects (14, 15). Allogeneic reactions have also been
observed in vitro with isolated cells, at least in
urochordates (16), and in sponges (17-19), indicating that
invertebrate allorecognition is a direct cellular response.
Ig domains are found in a vast number of extracellular components,
generally involved in intercellular recognition, including MHC1 and cell adhesion
molecules (20, 21). It is commonly accepted that the Ig superfamily has
been derived by gene duplication and divergence from a primordial
ancestor (22, 23), whose descendants are most likely to be found on the
surface of invertebrate cells involved in cell/cell recognition in
development or in allorecognition phenomena (24). The existence of
Ig-like domains has been discovered in squid (25), insects (26-28),
tunicates (29), and sponges (30). A receptor tyrosine kinase from the
marine sponge Geodia cydonium has been described to contain
a highly polymorphic Ig-like domain (31), although its involvement in
sponge immunity has not been demonstrated. Proteins related to the Ig
superfamily have been found even in slime molds (32) and yeast (33).
However, as reasonably argued by several authors (34, 35), the
differences in physiology between vertebrates and invertebrates demand
extreme prudence before attempting to force invertebrate induced
recognition into mammalian models of immunity (36). The existence of Ig domains in invertebrates does not imply the existence of an Ig domain-based histocompatibility system like the vertebrate MHC. Indeed,
no Ig and MHC sequences have been described in any invertebrate, suggesting that these molecules, and therefore the vertebrate-like immune system, are late evolutive events.
Since invertebrates have well developed histocompatibility systems and
since all evidence at this point in time suggests that they do not have
the same molecular components that define the histocompatibility
systems of vertebrates, then which molecules do invertebrates use? Are
these molecules or their descendants still present in more evolved
animals, or did they disappear when the vertebrate MHC arose? If
present, are they still involved in some aspect of histocompatibility,
or did they evolve to perform other functions in the cell? Whether
vertebrate and invertebrate immunity share a common ancestry or are the
result of convergent evolution remains an open question, and despite
the scattered knowledge about primitive immune systems described above,
there is an absolute lack of protein sequence information concerning the molecules involved in invertebrate histoincompatibility reactions, as has been pointed out in several reviews (23, 24, 37, 38).
Rothenberg (39) proposed that the primordial genes of the
self-recognition system are closely related to the genes responsible for species-specific cell recognition. Sponges represent the lowest metazoan phylum, and although they have a primitive organization, they
are capable of rapid allogeneic recognition (40-42). Curtis and Van de
Vyver, working with the freshwater sponge Ephydatia fluviatilis, first demonstrated that the aggregation factor
promoted aggregation with autogeneic cells but inhibited that of
allogeneic cells (43), acting in fact as a histocompatibility molecule. In xenograft rejection studies with sponges of the Geodia
genus, an indirect involvement of the AF in histoincompatibility
reactions has also been suggested (44). Sponge AFs are extracellular
proteoglycan-like complexes involved in species-specific cell
recognition and adhesion (45-49). Recently, the sequence of the main
protein component of the aggregation factor from the red beard sponge,
Microciona prolifera, was deduced from cDNA (50), and
Southern blot analysis suggested the existence of several related
genes. We have studied this polymorphism in the context of the
evolution of invertebrate histocompatibility systems and their possible
divergence from primitive cell-cell interaction molecules.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Sponges and AF Preparation
Live specimens of the red beard
sponge, M. prolifera, were collected in the Woods Hole area.
AF was isolated as described by Misevic et al. (51).
Dissociative Gradient Fractionation of MAF
In general, the
protocol described by Sajdera and Hascall (52) was followed. To a MAF
solution in H2O, guanidinium hydrochloride and CsCl were
added to final concentrations of 4 M and 50% (w/v), respectively. The resulting volume was centrifuged at 10 °C in Beckman quick seal tubes for 12 h at 48,000 rpm in a VTi 65 vertical rotor (Beckman). Fractions were collected, dialyzed against
H2O before electrophoresis, and finally stored at
20 °C.
SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis
SDS-PAGE was performed
as described by Laemmli (53). Purified AF and dissociative gradient
fractions were analyzed in 5% gels stained with combined Alcian
blue/silver (54) to visualize glycosaminoglycan-containing bands.
Western blots were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane
(Immobilon, Millipore Corp.) with a semidry electroblotter
(JKA-BIOTECH), blocked in 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5%
Tween 20, 1% Triton X-100, 3% bovine serum albumin, and incubated in
the presence of 1 µg/ml block 1 or block 2 monoclonal antibodies in
blocking solution. The ECL Western blotting detection system (Amersham
Corp.) was used to visualize the decorated bands.
Peptide-N-glycosidase F, Proteinase K, Trypsin, and Cyanogen
Bromide Digestions and Amino Acid Sequencing
Enzyme treatments
were done at 37 °C during 5 h in solutions containing 0.1 mg/ml
substrate protein. Digestions with peptide-N-glycosidase F
(Boehringer, recombinant N-Glycosidase F from
Escherichia coli, 20 units/ml final concentration) were
performed in 25 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5, 12.5 mM EDTA, 1% 2-mercaptoethanol. To denature the molecules
prior to deglycosylation, the samples were heated (100 °C, 3 min) in
the presence of 0.1% SDS. Nonidet was then added to a final
concentration of 1% to avoid denaturation of the enzyme by SDS.
Treatments with proteinase K (Boehringer Mannheim, 20 µg/ml) were in
10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS. Trypsin (Promega, sequencing grade, 10 µg/ml) was used in 0.1 M NH4HCO3, pH 7.7. Treatments with
cyanogen bromide (Merck) were according to Hanson and Bentley (55).
Amino acid sequencing was performed as described by
Fernàndez-Busquets et al. (50).
Grafting Experiments
One-cm-long sponge branches (mean
section, 4 mm) were impaled together on a 0.5-mm-thick stainless steel
insect pin, and incubated in running sea water at 20 °C for the
times indicated. The contact surfaces were about 0.3 cm2.
The sponge individuals were kept in running sea water cooled to
14 °C for as long as they looked healthy.
Oligonucleotides and Probes
Digoxigenin-labeled DNA probes
were obtained by PCR and amplified from regions lacking internal
DraI sites. Primers I-S1 (5
-TTTACTGTTCCGATTTACGT-3
, sense)
and I-A (5
-CGGTATTGAGGTGGTTGGTT-3
, antisense) were used with the
cloned cDNA of form MAFp3A1 as template to generate the MAFp3-specific probe I (~1 kb). The primer I-S2
(5
-TACAAAGTGGACAGCGCCTTTTCAG-3
, sense) was used in combination with
I-A in the PCR amplifications shown in Fig. 6. Primers II-S1
(5
-CGTGGCCGAAGAATGGAAAACTTC-3
, sense) and II-A
(5
-ACTTTCGTTACGGGTCACATTGGG-3
, antisense) were designed to generate
probe II (~1.9 kb), using as template a cloned fragment previously
amplified from genomic DNA. Due to the existence of numerous introns
and relatively short exons in region II, cDNA-derived probes were
found to give a poor signal. The extension of sequence E in the 5
direction was amplified from total cDNA with primers II-S2
(5
-GGCTGGACCTTCAGCACCTGACTC-3
, sense) and E-A
(5
-TGATCCTCCAGTATTCAAAGCAAT-3
, antisense). The ~1-kb collagen probe
was amplified from M. prolifera total cDNA and spanned
the region between Gly-41 and Pro-380 of the sequence reported by Aho
et al. (56). Alkali-labile DIG-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim)
was included in the reaction mixture with a DIG-dUTP:dTTP of 1:3. The
resulting probes were analyzed in a 1% agarose gel, and after the
presence of a single labeled band of the expected size was confirmed,
the PCR reaction volume was stored at
20 °C and used at a working
dilution of 1:2000 in hybridization buffer. The MAFp3-specific probe
for Northern blots was prepared as described by
Fernàndez-Busquets et al. (50).
Fig. 6.
PCR amplification of MAFp3A and
MAFp3B/C-specific regions. Primers I-S2 and I-A were used to
perform PCR amplifications of genomic DNA from the individuals of the
population used in this work. The reaction products were analyzed in a
2% agarose gel. The 198-bp band corresponds to sequences MAFp3B/C, and
the 156-bp band corresponds to MAFp3A.
[View Larger Version of this Image (13K GIF file)]
Construction of Sponge cDNA Libraries, Selection of Positive
Clones, and DNA Sequencing
Total RNA from freshly dissociated
sponge cells was prepared according to Chomczynski and Sacchi (57).
Poly(A)+ RNA selection was done according to Sambrook
et al. (58). cDNA libraries were made using the ZAP
ExpressTM cDNA Gigapack II Gold cloning kit from
Stratagene. Plaques (10,000/14-cm plate) were transferred to Hybond-N+
membranes (Amersham Corp.), and screened with probe I. Hybridization,
stringency washes, and detection were performed following the
instructions in the DIG DNA labeling kit from Boehringer Mannheim. From
the positive plaques, pBK-CMV was excised from the ZAP
ExpressTM vector using the in vivo excision
protocol of the ExAssist/XLOLR system (Stratagene). DNA inserts were
sequenced with an A.L.F. automatic sequencer (Pharmacia), using
fluorescein-labeled primers.
PCR Amplifications, Southern and Northern Blot Analyses, and
Intron Placement
Taq DNA polymerase, dNTPs, and PCR
buffer were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim. PCR reaction conditions
were those specified by the manufacturer. The products were analyzed in
0.5 × TBE-agarose gels containing 0.5 µg/ml ethidium bromide
and visualized under UV light. Sponge genomic DNA was isolated as
described by Fernàndez-Busquets et al. (50). When
needed as template for PCR, ~60 pg of genomic DNA or ~20 pg of
poly(A)+ RNA-derived cDNA were used per 1 µl of
reaction. Human genomic DNA from placenta, chorionic membrane, and
umbilical cord of different individuals was purchased from Sigma. For
Southern blots, genomic DNA was digested with DraI or
HaeIII (Boehringer Mannheim), under the conditions specified
by the supplier, for 4 h with constant gentle shaking. The
digested DNA was electrophoresed in 1% agarose gels, transferred to a
positively charged nylon membrane (Boehringer Mannheim) by capillary
transfer, and hybridized with the DIG-labeled DNA probe overnight at
42 °C. Human tissue Northern blots (CLONTECH) were hybridized to the DIG-labeled RNA probes overnight at 68 °C. Stringency washes and detection were performed as described above, with
a final stringency wash of 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 68 °C for both Southern and Northern blots. Intron positions were determined from
PCR-amplified fragments using sponge genomic DNA as template and
primers derived from the cDNA sequences. The PCR products were
analyzed in 1% agarose gels and excised, and the DNA was extracted
(QIAEX II Gel Extraction Kit, QIAGEN), subcloned in pCRTMII
(TA Cloning Kit, Invitrogen), and sequenced as described. The intron
positions were then deduced after comparison with the cDNA sequences.
RESULTS
MAFp3 Has a High Intraspecific Polymorphism
A cDNA
library constructed from a mixture of poly(A)+ RNAs from at
least two different sponge individuals was screened with the
MAFp3-specific probe I. After sequencing some of the positive clones,
it became evident that there existed several MAFp3 forms. To
investigate whether each sponge individual possessed only one or
several forms, poly(A)+ RNA was then separately isolated
from six M. prolifera individuals and used to construct six
oligo(dT)-cDNA libraries, each representing a single individual.
The libraries were screened with the MAFp3-specific probe I, and a
total of 25 positive clones were selected among those containing the
longest inserts, identifying 10 different sequences whose
cDNA-deduced protein sequences are presented in Fig.
1. In a previous work (50), we described
that MAFp3 is a 35-kDa protein that seems to be translated from a
variety of transcripts ranging from 1.2 to ~9 kb, assuming that the
different RNA species are extended in the 5
-end and that the Northern
blot results do not reflect unspliced introns. Although the longest clone presented in this work has ~2.5 kb, we have specified in Fig.
1A that region II can have up to ~8 kb. The open reading frames of the MAFp3-coding region and its extension in the 5
direction
are continuous, but we decided to represent them separately in Fig.
1A as region I (MAFp3) and region II (5
-ORF) because we
have not found evidence of a functional protein containing the whole
continuous sequence of both regions. In fact, it is most likely that
they are translated as a single polypeptide, which is then processed
into two proteins. Moreover, as we show later, the products of regions
I and II have characteristics that make them different enough to be
considered independently.
Fig. 1.
Different protein sequences derived from ORFs
in the cDNAs of MAFp3. A, schematic drawing of the
mRNA of MAFp3, indicating the relative positions of regions I (coding for MAFp3)
and II, both within a single uninterrupted ORF. The positions of the
sequences corresponding to probes I and II are shown. B-D,
amino acid sequences deduced from incomplete cDNA clones. The
represented sequences are the longest obtained for each form in the
screening of the cDNA libraries. In B, MAFp3 forms B, C,
D, and E are compared with form A with dots indicating
identity and dashes indicating gaps. Variants of A, B, C,
and E are identified as A1, A2, A3, B1, B2, C1, C2, C3, E1, and E2.
Sequence A1 corresponds to the MAFp3 cDNA reported by
Fernàndez-Busquets et al. (50). To simplify the
figure, only those residues that change are indicated in the variants. In panel C, forms B and C are so similar to form A
that they are treated as variants. The arrowhead indicates
the position where region EIII (panel D) is inserted into
form E according to the scheme. Amino acid residues are numbered on the
right, separately for regions I and II. The
arrows indicate intron positions. For region II, the introns
are only indicated on sequence A, although they have also been
determined for sequence D and found to be identically placed.
Stars and squares mark cysteine residues and stop
codons, respectively. The binding positions of the primers used in this
work are indicated above sequence MAFp3A (I-S1, I-S2, I-A,
II-S1, II-S2, and II-A) and below sequence MAFp3E (E-A). The
underlined and double underlined sequences in
panel D are likely to have originated as duplications of the
sequence underlined in panel C. In boldface
type is shown the peptide identified after cyanogen
bromide/trypsin digestion of MAF.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]
According to their length, five different MAFp3 forms have been
identified (MAFp3A, -B, -C, -D, and -E), and variants for some of them
have also been found (Fig. 1B). The only clone containing sequence E was short, starting with Val-59 in region I. For a better
comparison, we decided to extend it, performing PCR on a total cDNA
template using primers E-A (antisense), specific for MAFp3E, and II-S2
(sense), derived from a region conserved in forms A and D. MAFp3A1
corresponds to the sequence described by Fernàndez-Busquets
et al. (50) and goes beyond it in the 5
direction. Assuming
that the amino termini for the mature proteins of all the forms begin
at the same position as that of MAFp3A (position 1 in region I), their
sizes range from 290 to 333 amino acids (31.4-36.8 kDa). While MAFp3A,
-B, and -C lack introns, MAFp3D and -E have a single intron centrally
placed, of ~350 bp in MAFp3D and ~600 bp in MAFp3E, as revealed in
PCR amplifications with sponge genomic DNA as template.
Forms MAFp3A and -B have been isolated from one of the individual
libraries, and three libraries were found to contain forms B and C,
thus indicating that a single sponge individual has several MAFp3
forms. Polymorphic MAFp3-related bands were observed in Southern blots
of sponge genomic DNA isolated from different individuals (Fig.
2A, lanes 1-7),
suggesting the existence in the population of different sets of MAFp3
forms. Data base searches did not find any MAFp3-related DNA or protein
sequences, but Southern blot analysis revealed the presence of
homologous regions in the human genome (Fig. 2A, lane
8), although in this case we did not observe polymorphism in the
bands of seven different individuals analyzed. Northern blots of human
poly(A)+ RNA showed that the MAFp3-specific probe strongly
hybridized with a ~4.5-kb transcript found in different tissues,
after a stringency wash of 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 68 °C (Fig.
2B), suggesting the existence in humans of still unknown
proteins with a considerable degree of homology to MAFp3.
Fig. 2.
MAFp3-related sequences in human Southern and
Northern blots. Panel A, 2 µg of M. prolifera
genomic DNA from seven different individuals (lanes 1-7)
and 8 µg of genomic DNA from human placenta (lane 8) were
digested with HaeIII and analyzed on a Southern blot using
the MAFp3-specific probe I. For the lane with human DNA, exposure time
had to be about four times that needed for a similar band intensity in
the lanes with sponge DNA. Panel B, two commercially
available human tissue Northern blots (left and right
parts) containing about 2 µg of poly(A)+ RNA/lane
were hybridized to the MAFp3 RNA probe (top parts). Without
stripping of the probe, the membranes were hybridized with a
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase RNA probe (GAPDH, bottom parts). In the bottom parts of panel
B, the exposure time of each lane was adjusted to obtain similar
intensities of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase band. Since
the main band revealed by the MAFp3 probe was not significantly removed after the stringency washes for the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase probe, we decided to show it again to provide a more
accurate information about the relative amount of the ~4.5-kb transcript in the different tissues.
[View Larger Version of this Image (44K GIF file)]
The regions II of forms A, B, and C are very similar (Fig.
1C), while MAFp3D and -E are more related to each other than
to any other form. Not all of the clones chosen for sequencing were long enough to provide long stretches of region II; therefore, its
variability might not be well reflected in Fig. 1. The presence of
numerous introns (with sizes between 300 and 650 bp) suggests the
existence of recombination events that can provide a source of
variability. The region EIII (Fig. 1D) has been found only in sequence E and seems to have originated as a duplication. A long
stretch in region II shares 30% identity with the cytoplasmic domain
of the Na+-Ca2+ exchanger protein (50),
although in human Southern and Northern blots we did not detect any
bands hybridizing with the region II-specific probe II. However, we
have found evidence of the existence in M. prolifera of a
protein with the sequence of region II, since cyanogen bromide
treatment followed by trypsin digestion of nondeglycosylated AF
yielded, among other peptides, the peptide XGATSEPFTVR,
whose sequence corresponds to residues 61-71 in the region II of forms A, B, and C. This finding supports the idea that other proteins besides
MAFp3 will participate in the assembly of the Microciona aggregation factor (50) and indicates that at least two of those proteins are processed together from a common mRNA. We have not identified an initiation codon, and, presumably, the ORF will continue
in the 5
direction, suggesting that the protein from region II is a
sizable MAF component that escaped detection until now, probably
because of its tendency to aggregate after being deglycosylated
(50).
The fact that 10 different sequences have been found in the 25 positive
clones isolated from the cDNA libraries indicates that MAFp3 is a
highly variable molecule. The development of variable region molecules
is thought to have been a crucial event in the evolution of primordial
immune systems (59), followed by gene rearrangement to provide more
diversity. Bodmer (60) suggested that histocompatibility polymorphism
may have been an evolutionary byproduct of the need to develop a
cell-cell recognition system when multicellular organisms appeared.
Since sponges are the most primitive extant multicellular animals, the
involvement of a polymorphic protein in sponge cell/cell recognition
prompted us to consider a possible relation of MAFp3 or closely related
molecules with sponge histocompatibility reactions.
Sponges Undergo Allogeneic Reactions in the Wild
We have used
a population of 23 M. prolifera individuals to perform a
total of 243 grafting combinations, including allografts and control
autografts. Each graft was checked after 12 h and classified as
fusion or rejection (Table I). In
rejecting grafts, the bright red tissues of two opposing individuals
were separated by a ~0.5-mm-wide yellowish line (Fig.
3A, center), formed
by the deposition of a collagen layer and the massive migration of gray
cells, which are suspected to be involved in the sponge immune response
(42). The speed of this reaction reproducibly varied depending on the
individual combination, and while in some cases rejection was clearly
visible after 6 h, other pairings did not react before 24 h.
Such a range of responses has also been observed in grafting
experiments with the tropical sponge Callyspongia diffusa
(41) and with the coral Montipora verrucosa (61). Occasionally, in some pairings one of the partners became necrotic, whereas the other was perfectly healthy (Fig. 3B),
indicating the existence in sponges of a good system to fight off
infection after long exposures to allogeneic decaying tissue. Replicate combinations of the same alloparabiosed individuals yielded identical directional rejection reactions in both qualitative (collagen barrier
or necrosis) and quantitative (timing) terms, an observation consistent
with the presence of a hierarchical system based on the genetic
constitutions of different clones.
Table I.
Outcome of grafting combinations within the population used for
this study
Numbers represent sponge individuals, crosses indicate rejection, and
circles indicate fusion. Empty spaces correspond to missing grafts,
result of the death or severe deterioration of one or both individuals
before the excision of tissue to be
grafted.
|
|
|
Fig. 3.
Graft experiments. Panel A,
grafting combination 19/20 and the respective controls 19/19 and 20/20.
Black arrows in the heterologous graft show the lighter zone
indicative of rejection. White arrows indicate the grooves
in the contact regions of nonrejecting homologous grafts. Panel
B, grafting combinations 6/18 and 3/18. The tissue fragments were
separated after 48 h of contact to show that the fragments from
individuals 3 and 6 were not affected by the intimate contact with the
necrotized tissue of 18. Panel C, group of sponge fingers
excised from a single individual to show fusion in the wild. The
fingers were growing from right to left.
Arrows indicate points where fusion can be observed.
Panel D, two different M. prolifera individuals
collected from the field, living close together on a rocky substrate.
Spots in the intricate path of the cleft separating the two bodies are
indicated by arrows. Panels A, B, and
C are about twice-life size, and panel D is about half-life size.
[View Larger Version of this Image (57K GIF file)]
In fusing grafts, the furrow dividing the two pieces was
indistinguishable from the surrounding tissue (Fig. 3A,
sides), and microscopical observation revealed that the
epithelium originally separating the fragments disappeared while new
tissue was rapidly being built up, making it difficult after 24 h
to trace the original border (not shown). After that period, a physical
resistance was clearly felt when trying to pull apart the two fused
pieces. In our experiments, only one out of 220 alloparabionts was
found to be compatible, although both sponges (numbers 14 and 15) were collected the same day and looked morphologically similar, suggesting that they might actually be a single genetical individual. As first
pointed out by Van de Vyver (10), since sponges do also reproduce
asexually, either regenerating viable individuals from fragments or
through the production of gemmules or buds, they can generate clones of
genetically identical but anatomically distinct individuals. The
results presented above confirm an extensive polymorphism of
histocompatibility molecules in sponges already observed by other
authors (18, 41).
Far from being a laboratory artifact, both fusion and rejection
phenomena can also be observed in the field, where the arms of an
individual fuse wherever they touch each other for a long enough time
(Fig. 3C), whereas the bodies of two individuals living close to each other will keep growing separately, leaving a cleft between them (Fig. 3D). In the population used for this
study, the Microciona clumps 8 and 10 included two
individuals each (the smaller ones being labeled individuals 8s and
10s). Clumps 4 and 5 also included more than one individual, but their
bodies were so much entangled that we decided to exclude them from our
experiments. In the M. prolifera population around the Woods
Hole area, such side-by-side cohabitation seems to be common, since
about 20% of the clumps collected contained more than one
individual.
Defined genetic crosses would be the best approach to study sponge
allogeneic reactions, but for M. prolifera the required methods have not been described. Spontaneous rejection occurring between sponges is difficult to study in the field. In our hands, M. prolifera individuals freshly collected from the wild and
immediately transferred to a tank of abundant running sea water cooled
to 14 °C did not survive in optimal conditions for more than 4 weeks, often starting to decay a few days after collection. Therefore, as a preliminary approach to investigate the possible involvement of
MAFp3 or related proteins in sponge graft rejection, we decided to
study the polymorphism of MAFp3-related molecules in the population used for the grafting experiments.
MAF Polymorphism Matches the High Degree of Sponge
Alloincompatibility
Genomic DNA isolated from each individual
used in the grafting experiments was subjected to RFLP analysis (62).
We have found 99.5% correlation between fusion/rejection behavior
within the population used (Table I) and the identical/dissimilar RFLP pattern observed with the MAFp3-specific probe I. Seventeen distinct bands can be distinguished in Fig.
4A, some of them difficult to
discern, like the 1.4- and 0.9-kb double bands better seen in short
exposures. Exactly the same bands and relative intensities were
obtained by using probe I derived by PCR either from total cDNA or
from the cloned sequence MAFp3A. A 435-bp probe corresponding to the
carboxyl-terminal half of MAFp3A comprised between the intron site and
the stop codon also detected all major bands (not shown), despite its
short length on the limit of detection for hybridized DIG-labeled
probes. The multiple-banding pattern implies that each single sponge
individual possesses multiple MAFp3-related sequences, thus confirming
the result obtained in the sequencing of different positive clones from
a single individual cDNA library described above. Of several
restriction enzymes assayed, DraI was the only one that
completely digested the genomic DNA of all of the individuals. Using
HaeIII, we also observed polymorphism, as shown in Fig.
2A, although we do not present HaeIII-digested Southern blots of the population used in this work because several samples could not be completely digested even using higher enzyme concentrations and extended incubation times. Besides the nonrejecting sponge pair 14/15, individuals 8s/13 and 17/23 also exhibited an
identical band pattern. Unfortunately, we lack the grafting combination
17/23 because 17 died soon. Nevertheless, the intensity of the lower
0.9-kb band in individuals 17 and 23 is clearly different, suggesting
even in this case the existence of different MAFp3-related sequences.
When the DraI-digested Southern blot was hybridized to a
probe specific for region II (Fig. 4B), four main
polymorphic bands around 4.3 kb could be identified. Individual 8s had
two DraI fragments binding to probe II while individual 13 had one. Therefore, in the population used for this work, any two
rejecting individuals exhibited a dissimilar RFLP pattern using
AF-related probes.
Fig. 4.
Polymorphism analysis of AF-related
components. 1 µg of DraI-digested genomic DNA of each
sponge individual from the population used was loaded per lane and
analyzed in a Southern blot using either the MAFp3-specific probe I
(panel A) or probe II (panel B). The
arrows point out some of the polymorphic bands. Panel
C, SDS-PAGE analysis of purified AF from the population used.
Glycosaminoglycan-containing bands were revealed with combined Alcian blue/silver stain. The position of subunit S1 is indicated. The
2 × 103-kDa marker refers to hyaluronate.
[View Larger Version of this Image (58K GIF file)]
To study if this polymorphism was also observed in other sponge
proteins we performed an RFLP analysis of the population used for the
rejection experiments with a collagen-specific probe lacking internal
DraI sites, amplified from the cDNA of the only protein besides MAFp3 cloned so far in M. prolifera (56). The result presented in Fig. 5 indicates a
considerable degree of polymorphism also for collagen.
Fig. 5.
RFLP analysis of M. prolifera
genomic DNA using a sponge collagen probe. 1 µg of
DraI-digested genomic DNA of each sponge individual from the
population used was loaded per lane and analyzed in a Southern blot
using a M. prolifera collagen probe.
[View Larger Version of this Image (54K GIF file)]
As mentioned above, the screening of the different libraries revealed
that each single individual possessed several of the MAFp3 sequences
from Fig. 1, but it also suggested that not all of the forms were
present in all of the individuals. Since mere sequencing is unable to
detect the absence of a given form, we decided to perform PCR
amplifications of the genomic DNA from the population used in the
rejection experiments with specific primers common to forms A, B, and
C, flanking the stretch between positions 287-300 in region I of forms
B and C, which is missing from form A. The expected 156- and 198-bp
bands corresponding to forms A and B/C, respectively, were found to
segregate in the population (Fig. 6), and
although most of the individuals had both forms, MAFp3A was not present
in individuals 1, 2, 17, and 23, while MAFp3B and -C were absent from
individual 22. Both amplified fragments were subcloned and sequenced to
confirm that they corresponded to the sequences of forms A and B/C.
Forms D and E were amplified from all the individuals, but we could not
design primers specific enough to distinguish between forms B and C. This result indicates that at least forms MAFp3A, -B, and -C represent
different alleles rather than members of a multigene family.
We described a glycoprotein subunit of ~210 kDa termed S1 that is a
component of MAF (50). When the AFs purified from the 23 specimens were
analyzed in an SDS-polyacrylamide gel, a remarkable polydispersity in
glycosaminoglycan-containing bands could be observed (Fig.
4C), particularly clear in the case of S1 because of its
relatively smaller size, which allows mass variations to be detected as
changes in electrophoretical mobility. S1 is individual-specific, since
its electrophoretic mobility remained unchanged between AFs isolated
either from different parts of the same individual or at different
times, e.g. the day of collection and 4 weeks later.
Occasionally, S1 included two or even three bands, although protein
sequencing yielded for all of them the same amino terminus already
reported by us (50). Again, individuals 14 and 15 were identical in
this assay.
S1 subunits purified from individual sponges were digested with
peptide-N-glycosidase F or proteinase K. The results shown in Fig. 7A indicate the
presence of N-linked glycans and the existence of individual
variability at the glycosaminoglycan level, since the products
resulting from protease digestion still had different mobilities. The
same result was obtained after trypsin digestion (not shown). Other
carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes (chondroitinase ABC, heparinase,
keratanase,
-glucosidase, endoglycosidase F), had no effect on S1
under conditions in which the natural substrates were completely
digested. Monoclonal antibodies block 1 and block 2, which inhibit the
AF-mediated aggregation of sponge cells through their binding to MAF
carbohydrate epitopes (63, 64), strongly recognized most of the
subunits observed after Alcian blue/silver staining (Fig.
7B), suggesting their involvement in the aggregation process. S1 is likely to be the same entity described by Varner as an
extracellular matrix molecule able to inhibit sponge cell adhesion
(65), thus supporting the hypothesis of its role in intercellular
interactions.
Fig. 7.
Analysis of MAF glycans. Panel A,
dissociative density gradient-purified S1 subunits from three different
individuals not belonging to the population used in this work were
digested either with peptide-N-glycosidase F
(PNG) or with proteinase K (PK) and compared in
SDS-PAGE to the undigested samples (U).
Glycosaminoglycan-containing bands were revealed with Alcian
blue/silver staining. Panel B, purified AF (N)
was fractionated in a dissociative density gradient, and the bottom and
middle fractions (F1 and F2, respectively) were
loaded in an SDS-PAGE, transferred to a membrane, and decorated with
block 1 or block 2 monoclonal antibodies. The left part of panel B shows an Alcian blue/silver-stained gel. The 2 × 103-kDa marker refers to hyaluronate, and all of the
others refer to protein.
[View Larger Version of this Image (56K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
Using RFLP analysis and SDS-PAGE, we have revealed three
polymorphic components involved in sponge cell adhesion. MAFp3, the protein from region II, and the S1 subunit exhibit individual variability, and their combination seems to produce unique aggregation factor-related molecular systems for each genetically distinct individual. Since virtually any two genetically distinct sponge individuals will reject each other (Refs. 18 and 41; this work), it is
tempting to describe the existence of a correlation between sponge
graft rejection and AF variability, thus supporting the observations of
Curtis and Van de Vyver (43), which suggested a direct involvement of
sponge AFs in sponge self/non-self recognition. We have also found in
the population used for this work an elevated correlation between
histocompatibility behavior and the RFLP band pattern using a
collagen-specific probe, which might indicate an active involvement of
collagen in allorecognition, given its accumulation in rejection
grafts. However, despite the 100% concordance observed between a
dissimilar RFLP pattern using AF-related probes and
histoincompatibility, we must consider the fact that sponges are
extraordinarily diverse (66). Sequence data suggest that the diversity
of gene families found in higher organisms already existed in sponges
(56). Multiple homologous genes have been found for nonfibrillar
collagen and for src-related kinase genes in the freshwater
sponges Ephydatia mülleri (67) and Spongilla lacustris (68), respectively. Allozyme variation in the tropical sponge Niphates erecta showed 84% correlation with the
observed graft response between different individuals (69), although the enzymes used are not suspected to have any direct relation with
cell/cell interaction systems. Along the same lines, the results of
Curtis et al. (70), reporting dissimilar plasma membrane proteins in graft-accepting pairs of sponges, are in agreement with the
remarkable genetic variability of invertebrates (71, 72) without being
in conflict with the presence of a highly polymorphic
histocompatibility system in sponges. Nevertheless, not all sponge
genes are polymorphic, and single-copy polyubiquitin and fibrillar
collagen genes have already been identified in G. cydonium
(73) and E. mülleri (67), respectively.
The differences between regions I and II within the MAFp3 gene are
evidenced by the higher variability of region I detected in RFLP
analysis. Under certain circumstances, MAFp3 seems to be translated
from a short ~1.2-kb mRNA, which would represent the lower limit
of the transcript size (50). This small transcript might be the result
of alternative splicing, but it also could have originated from a
different gene. When screening the cDNA libraries, we always
selected the longest clones for sequencing, and therefore any
MAFp3-related sequences originated from the small 1.2-kb transcript are
probably not represented in Fig. 1, although they might be responsible
for some of the bands in Southern blots. The variability detected for
region II is restricted to four polymorphic bands around 4.3 kb in the
DraI-digested DNA, which suggests that region II, at least
as represented by probe II, is a single copy sequence with some alleles
apparent. Using the probe specific for region I, the strongest band
corresponds precisely to a 4.3-kb restriction fragment present in all
the individuals, which probably is the same fragment detected with the
region II-specific probe, since probes I and II are separated in the
genomic DNA by about 3 kb according to the PCR amplifications performed
to place the introns. In Southern blots using the MAFp3-specific probe
I, we have detected in each individual between four and six strongly
hybridizing bands both with DraI- and
HaeIII-digested sponge genomic DNA. If we assume that the
weak bands reflect binding to short target sequences resulting from the
presence of internal restriction sites either in the cDNA sequences
or in introns that can appear in the region spanned by the probe, our
result would suggest that each sponge has between four and six MAFp3
copies, indicating the existence in the haploid genome of three loci
coding for MAFp3. The interpretation of the Southern result becomes
more difficult if we consider that some of the weak bands can also represent related sequences sharing low homology with MAFp3.
Minor changes in heparan sulfate structure dramatically affect the
binding of syndecan to collagen (74). Biglycan, a dermatan sulfate
proteoglycan from articular cartilage, also exists as a nonproteoglycan
form especially abundant in adults (75), suggesting different
functional properties of biglycan during development, which would be
linked to the extent of glycosylation. Differences in the carbohydrate
structures of neural cell adhesion molecules modulate their binding
properties during development (76, 77). Carbohydrates are relevant in
lymphocyte recognition (78, 79), and their role is especially important
in natural killer cell functions (80). Of particular interest are the
glycosylation microheterogeneities found on plant self-incompatibility
glycoproteins that might provide structural diversity crucial for
allelic specificity (81, 82). We have shown the existence of different
core proteins and of individual variability at the carbohydrate level
that might account for MAF diversity, thus explaining the differences
observed in monosaccharide and amino acid composition between different MAF preparations (50, 51, 83). Therefore, changes in protein and/or
glycosaminoglycan composition could modulate the AF activity in
intercellular interactions. In our previous work (50), we showed that
the protein subunits of MAF interact through disulfide bonds, whose
structural importance is again revealed by the conservation of
cysteines in all of the sequences obtained so far (Fig. 1) even without
new cysteines appearing in other positions. This suggests that the
precise positioning of disulfide bonds is essential for maintaining the
aggregation factor structure.
Three lines of evidence contribute to distinguish two groups within the
different forms presented in Fig. 1. First, the primary sequences of D
and E are more related to each other than to the other forms. Second,
the gene structures are different in region I, where the intron present
in MAFp3D and -E is missing in forms A, B, and C. Third, while MAFp3A,
-B, and -C seem to be of an allelic nature, forms D and E have been
found in all of the individuals tested so far. Taken together, these
data indicate that the evolutive branching point between the two groups
is previous to the differentiation of forms within each group,
suggesting that the cellular functions of the MAFp3 forms A, B, and C
might be different from those of D and E. Amino acid sequencing has
provided three peptide sequences of MAFp3 (50), although all of them
fit with the relatively unvariable amino-terminal half of forms MAFp3A,
-B, and -C, and two of them even fit with forms D and E, thus not
revealing which of these forms (if not all of them) actually constitute
aggregation factor components. We have sequenced several times the
amino terminus of the deglycosylated MAFp3 protein from several
individuals, never obtaining the sequence of forms D or E, but of
course this absence of proof does not imply proof of absence.
Work with the tunicate Botryllus schlosseri has
experimentally demonstrated that allorecognition in this species is
regulated by a highly polymorphic fusion/histocompatibility (Fu/HC)
locus, comparable in complexity with the vertebrate MHC (84-87). Fuke and Nakamura (3) showed that alloreactivity in the solitary ascidian
Halocynthia roretzi was controlled by two highly polymorphic loci from the histocompatibility gene. Intriguingly, the Fu/HC locus
and the histocompatibility gene seem to control intercolonial compatibility and also fertilization (3, 85, 88). In other words, the
same gene product acting as an immune system molecule might mediate
cell-cell interactions in general, but a biochemical basis for these
phenomena has yet to be discovered. A view of MHC evolution is that the
polymorphism of cell surface MHC-like proteins preceded the ability of
these proteins to present peptides and that a diverse set of receptors
was educated to tolerate self but reject polymorphic ligands (89).
Danska et al. (90) biochemically characterized from
Botryllus a cell surface molecule of unknown function that
resembled T cell receptors, of which several isoforms were detected,
although their individual distribution did not correlate with Fu/HC
allelic diversity. To explain the evolution of the primitive immune
system, Burnet (91) formulated the self-recognition hypothesis,
according to which invertebrate allorecognition would be based on the
positive recognition of common structures originating from common
alleles, rejection resulting from the failure to recognize kin. Indeed,
rejection in Botryllus and Halocynthia occurs
when the interacting individuals do not share alleles (3, 87). This
system, according to Burnet, would detect similarity, not difference,
unlike the vertebrate immune system. However, vertebrate natural killer
cells have been found to destroy self cells if these do not express
self MHC class I molecules (92-94), thus acting as a first line
defense, perhaps evolved from a primitive self-recognition system
similar to that found in present day invertebrates and kept when T
cell-based vertebrate adaptive immunity appeared. Despite the presence
in all MAFp3 sequences of eight conserved cysteines, a correctly placed
tryptophan in position 35, and stretches of alternating hydrophobic and
hydrophilic residues that might structure
-sheets according to
secondary structure predictions (not shown), we have not identified any
Ig domains. Detailed genetic studies such as those performed in
tunicates have not been done with sponges yet, and therefore no loci
have been described that might be involved in regulating the accurate
sponge histoincompatibility system.
All evidence to date, much of it derived from former work done in our
laboratory, indicates that MAF isolated from one individual has equal
activity on the cells of all individuals of the species. In fact, the
molecular components of the AF cause aggregation in a relatively
nonspecific manner by weak molecular association based on repeating
glycosylated subunits. However, the aggregation activity was usually
measured with glutaraldehyde-fixed cells and without care for their
individual or collective origin (51, 83). We have not observed any
significant differences when testing AF on homologous and heterologous
glutaraldehyde-fixed cells, thus confirming the lack of individual
specificity of the MAF-mediated aggregation process. The first hint of
a possible involvement of the AF in sponge allorecognition came from
studies done with E. fluviatilis live cells by Curtis and
Van de Vyver (43), suggesting that allorecognition and species-specific
aggregation might ultimately be based on similar, if not the same,
molecular components. At present, we are establishing the assay
conditions to reproduce with Microciona cells the
experiments done by Curtis and Van de Vyver.
Self/non-self discrimination requires polymorphic recognition
molecules. In this work, we describe a highly polymorphic gene system
that matches the high level of sponge alloincompatibility. So far, we
have found no exception to the fact that any two rejecting M. prolifera individuals exhibit different AF-related components. We
have also demonstrated the allelic nature of several MAFp3 forms. The
existence of AF components that are allelic forms of a polymorphic
system might represent an early form of self-recognition and therefore
suggests an evolutionary relationship between cell adhesion and
histocompatibility systems.
FOOTNOTES
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) X95841(for MAFp3A), AF020901(for MAFp3B), AF020902(for MAFp3C), AF020903(for MAFp3D), and AF020904(for MAFp3E).
Supported by fellowships from the Federation of European
Biochemical Societies and the Human Capital and Mobility Programme of
the European Union Grant ERBCHBICT930332. To whom correspondence should
be addressed. Tel.: 41-61-697-69-54; Fax: 41-61-697-39-76; E-mail:
fernande{at}fmi.ch.
1
The abbreviations used are: MHC, major
histocompatibility complex; AF, aggregation factor; MAF, M. prolifera aggregation factor; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RFLP, restriction
fragment length polymorphism; ORF, open reading frame; DIG,
digoxigenin; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase pair(s); Fu/HC,
fusion/histocompatibility; TBE, Tris-borate-EDTA.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Beatrice Mück and Marianne
Grob for excellent technical assistance, Juliane Alt-Mörbe (Labor
für DNA-Analytik, Freiburg, Germany) for DNA sequencing, Georg
Aeschbacher and Peter Müller for oligonucleotide synthesis,
Renate Matthies for amino acid sequencing, and Linda Golder and Hazel
Richmond for photographic work. We are also indebted to Jim Kaufman,
Francesca Gallego, and Janina Jarchow for critical comments on the
manuscript. We thank Neil Barclay and Philipp Bucher for detailed
analysis of protein sequences.
REFERENCES
-
Ratcliffe, N. A., Rowley, A. F., Fitzgerald, S. W., and Rhodes, C. P.
(1985)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
97,
183-350
-
Oka, H., and Watanabe, H.
(1957)
Proc. Japan Acad.
33,
657-659
-
Fuke, M. T., and Nakamura, I.
(1985)
Biol. Bull.
169,
631-637
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cooper, E. L.
(1969)
J. Exp. Zool.
171,
69-74
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cooper, E. L.
(1969)
Science
166,
1414-1415
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cheng, T. C., and Galloway, P. C.
(1970)
J. Invertebr. Pathol.
15,
177-192
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Theodor, J. L.
(1970)
Nature
227,
690-692
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bigger, C. H.
(1980)
Biol. Bull.
159,
117-134
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lubbock, R.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
6667-6669
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Van de Vyver, G.
(1970)
Ann. Embryol. Morphol.
3,
251-262
-
Hildemann, W. H., and Dix, T. G.
(1972)
Transplantation
15,
624-633
[CrossRef]
-
Coffaro, K. A., and Hinegardner, R. T.
(1977)
Science
197,
1389-1390
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bertheussen, K.
(1979)
Exp. Cell Res.
120,
373-381
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
George, J. F., Howcroft, T. K., and Karp, R. D.
(1987)
Transplantation
43,
514-519
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Howcroft, T. K., and Karp, R. D.
(1987)
Transplantation
44,
129-135
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kelly, K. L., Cooper, E. L., and Raftos, D. A.
(1992)
J. Exp. Zool.
262,
202-208
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
De Sutter, D., and Van de Vyver, G.
(1979)
Dev. Comp. Immunol.
3,
389-397
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Humphreys, T., and Reinherz, E. L.
(1994)
Immunol. Today
15,
316-320
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yin, C., and Humphreys, T.
(1996)
Biol. Bull.
191,
159-167
[Abstract]
-
Edelman, G. M.
(1987)
Immunol. Rev.
100,
11-45
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Williams, A. F., and Barclay, A. N.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
6,
381-405
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hood, L., Kronenberg, M., and Hunkapiller, T.
(1985)
Cell
40,
225-229
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Marchalonis, J. J., and Schluter, S. F.
(1990)
BioScience
40,
758-768
[CrossRef]
-
Cooper, E. L.
(1990)
BioScience
40,
720-722
[CrossRef]
-
Williams, A. F., Tse, A. G.-D., and Gagnon, J.
(1988)
Immunogenetics
27,
265-272
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Seeger, M. A., Haffley, L., and Kaufman, T. C.
(1988)
Cell
55,
589-600
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Harrelson, A. L., and Goodman, C. S.
(1988)
Science
242,
700-708
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sun, S.-C., Lindström, I., Boman, H. G., Faye, I., and Schmidt, O.
(1990)
Science
250,
1729-1732
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schluter, S. F., Schroeder, J., Wang, E., and Marchalonis, J. J.
(1994)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
712,
74-81
[Abstract]
-
Schäcke, H., Rinkevich, B., Gamulin, V., Müller, I. M., and Müller, W. E. G.
(1994)
J. Mol. Recognit.
7,
273-276
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pancer, Z., Kruse, M., Schäcke, H., Scheffer, U., Steffen, R., Kovács, P., and Müller, W. E. G.
(1996)
Cell Adhes. Commun.
4,
327-339
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Matsunaga, T., and Mori, N.
(1987)
Scand. J. Immunol.
25,
485-495
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wojciechowicz, D., Lu, C.-F., Kurjan, J., and Lipke, P. N.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
2554-2563
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Klein, J.
(1989)
Scand. J. Immunol.
29,
499-505
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Smith, L. C., and Davidson, E. H.
(1992)
Immunol. Today
13,
356-362
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Marchalonis, J. J., and Schluter, S. F.
(1994)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
712,
1-12
[CrossRef]
-
Weissman, I. L.
(1988)
Int. Rev. Immunol.
3,
397-416
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Reinisch, C. L., and Litman, G. W.
(1989)
Immunol. Today
10,
278-281
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rothenberg, B. E.
(1978)
Dev. Comp. Immunol.
2,
23-37
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Van de Vyver, G.
(1975)
Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.
10,
123-140
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hildemann, W. H., Johnston, I. S., and Jokiel, P. L.
(1979)
Science
204,
420-422
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Humphreys, T.
(1994)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
712,
342-345
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Curtis, A. S. G., and Van de Vyver, G.
(1971)
J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol.
26,
295-312
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Müller, W. E. G., Bernd, A., Zahn, R. K., Kurelec, B., Dawes, K., Müller, I., and Uhlenbruck, G.
(1981)
Eur. J. Biochem.
116,
573-579
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Humphreys, T.
(1963)
Dev. Biol.
8,
27-47
-
Moscona, A. A.
(1968)
Dev. Biol.
18,
250-277
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Henkart, P., Humphreys, S., and Humphreys, T.
(1973)
Biochemistry
12,
3045-3050
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Müller, W. E. G., and Zahn, R. K.
(1973)
Exp. Cell Res.
80,
95-104
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Müller, W. E. G., Müller, I., Pondeljak, V., Kurelec, B., and Zahn, R. K.
(1978)
Differentiation
10,
45-53
[CrossRef]
-
Fernàndez-Busquets, X., Kammerer, R. A., and Burger, M. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23558-23565
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Misevic, G. N., Finne, J., and Burger, M. M.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
5870-5877
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sajdera, S. W., and Hascall, V. C.
(1969)
J. Biol. Chem.
244,
77-87
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Min, H., and Cowman, M. K.
(1986)
Anal. Biochem.
155,
275-285
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hanson, A. N., and Bentley, J. P.
(1983)
Anal. Biochem.
130,
32-40
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Aho, S., Turakainen, H., Onnela, M.-L., and Boedtker, H.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
7288-7292
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., pp. 7.26-7.29, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Cooper, E. L., Rinkevich, B., Uhlenbruck, G., and Valembois, P.
(1992)
Scand. J. Immunol.
35,
247-266
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bodmer, W. F.
(1972)
Nature
237,
139-145
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
, 183
-
Hildemann, W. H., Jokiel, P. L., Bigger, C. H., and Johnston, I. S.
(1980)
Transplantation
30,
297-301
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wyman, A. R., and White, R.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
6754-6758
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Spillmann, D., Hård, K., Thomas-Oates, J., Vliegenthart, J. F. G., Misevic, G., Burger, M. M., and Finne, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
13378-13387
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Spillmann, D., Thomas-Oates, J. E., van Kuik, J. A., Vliegenthart, J. F. G., Misevic, G., Burger, M. M., and Finne, J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
5089-5097
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Varner, J. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16119-16125
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bergquist, P. R.
(1978)
Sponges, 1st Ed., pp. 202-216, Hutchinson & Co. Ltd., London
-
Exposito, J.-Y., Le Guellec, D., Lu, Q., and Garrone, R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
21923-21928
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ottilie, S., Raulf, F., Barnekow, A., Hannig, G., and Schartl, M.
(1992)
Oncogene
7,
1625-1630
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Neigel, J. E., and Avise, J. C.
(1985)
Evolution
39,
724-732
[CrossRef]
-
Curtis, A. S. G., Kerr, J., and Knowlton, N.
(1982)
Transplantation
33,
127-133
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ayala, F. J.
(1978)
Sci. Am.
239,
56-69
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Solé-Cava, A. M., and Thorpe, J. P.
(1991)
Biol. J. Linn. Soc.
44,
65-80
-
Pfeifer, K., Frank, W., Schröder, H. C., Gamulin, V., Rinkevich, B., Batel, R., Müller, I. M., and Müller, W. E. G.
(1993)
J. Cell Sci.
106,
545-553
[Abstract]
-
Sanderson, R. D., Turnbull, J. E., Gallagher, J. T., and Lander, A. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13100-13106
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Roughley, P. J., White, R. J., Magny, M.-C., Liu, J., Pearce, R. H., and Mort, J. S.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
295,
421-426
-
Edelman, G. M., and Chuong, C.-M.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
7036-7040
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rothbard, J. B., Brackenbury, R., Cunningham, B. A., and Edelman, G. M.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
11064-11069
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pimlott, N. J. G., and Miller, R. G.
(1986)
J. Immunol.
137,
2455-2459
[Abstract]
-
Muchmore, A. V., Shifrin, S., and Decker, J. M.
(1987)
J. Immunol.
138,
2547-2553
[Abstract]
-
McCoy, J. P., Jr., and Chambers, W. H.
(1991)
Glycobiology
1,
321-328
[Free Full Text]
-
Woodward, J. R., Craik, D., Dell, A., Khoo, K.-H., Munro, S. L. A., Clarke, A. E., and Bacic, A.
(1992)
Glycobiology
2,
241-250
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Oxley, D., and Bacic, A.
(1995)
Glycobiology
5,
517-523
[Abstract/Free Full Text]