Volume 272, Number 44, Issue of October 31, 1997
pp. 27877-27885
Direct Interaction of the KRAB/Cys2-His2
Zinc Finger Protein ZNF74 with a Hyperphosphorylated Form of
the RNA Polymerase II Largest Subunit*
(Received for publication, July 1, 1997)
Benoît
Grondin
§,
Francine
Côté
¶,
Martine
Bazinet
,
Michel
Vincent
and
Muriel
Aubry
**
From the
Institut de Recherches Cliniques de
Montréal et Département de Médecine, Université
de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H2W 1R7, Canada and
Recherche en Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé, Pavillon
Marchand, Université Laval, Ste-Foy,
Québec G1K 7P4, Canada
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
We previously identified ZNF74 as a
developmentally expressed gene commonly deleted in DiGeorge syndrome.
ZNF74 encodes an RNA-binding protein tightly associated
with the nuclear matrix and belongs to a large subfamily of
Cys2-His2 zinc finger proteins containing a
KRAB (Kruppel-associated box) repressor motif. We now report on the
multifunctionality of the zinc finger domain of ZNF74. This nucleic
acid binding domain is shown here to function as a nuclear matrix
targeting sequence and to be involved in protein-protein interaction.
By far-Western analysis and coimmunoprecipitation studies, we
demonstrate that ZNF74 interacts, via its zinc finger domain, with the
hyperphosphorylated largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (pol IIo) but
not with the hypophosphorylated form. The importance of the
phosphorylation in this interaction is supported by the observation
that phosphatase treatment inhibits ZNF74 binding. Double
immunofluorescence experiments indicate that ZNF74 colocalizes with the
pol IIo and the SC35 splicing factor in irregularly shaped subnuclear
domains. Thus, ZNF74 sublocalization in nuclear domains enriched in
pre-mRNA maturating factors, its RNA binding activity, and its
direct phosphodependent interaction with the pol IIo, a form of the RNA
polymerase functionally associated with pre- mRNA processing,
suggest a role for this member of the KRAB multifinger protein family
in RNA processing.
INTRODUCTION
Zinc finger proteins of the TFIIIA/Kruppel type belong to the
largest known family of transcription factors (1, 2). These proteins
are characterized by Cys2-His2 zinc finger
motifs often repeated in tandem that fold around zinc ions and function as nucleic acid binding domains (3-6). About one-third of mammalian Cys2-His2 zinc finger proteins contain a
conserved domain of approximately 75 amino acids called KRAB
(Kruppel-associated box) (7). The KRAB domain, located at the N
terminus of Cys2-His2 multifinger proteins, can
confer strong distance-independent transcriptional repression of both
activated and basal RNA polymerase II promoter activity (8-14). Since
they encode a repression motif and a potential DNA binding domain,
members from the large KRAB/Cys2-His2 protein family are presently thought to function as transcriptional regulators of gene expression.
We previously cloned ZNF74, a gene that encodes a
KRAB/Cys2-His2 protein (15). ZNF74
lies a few kilobases proximal to a polymorphic CA repeat (D22S264) (16)
that was shown to be a distal marker for 22q11.2 deletions associated
with increased susceptibility to schizophrenia (17). ZNF74
is also one of the few genes found hemizygously deleted in the majority
of patients with the DiGeorge syndrome, a microdeletion disorder
associated with a wide variety of congenital malformations including
cardiac defects, thymic hypoplasia, and hypocalcemia (18-20). To date, however, both the role of embryologically expressed ZNF74 in
the DiGeorge syndrome (19) and its biochemical and cellular functions remain unclear.
Although the presence of a KRAB motif and of 12 Cys2-His2 zinc finger motifs suggest that ZNF74
may function as a transcription factor, we recently demonstrated that
its zinc finger domain harbors an RNA binding activity in
vitro (15). This result suggests that, in addition to its
potential function in transcriptional regulation, ZNF74 may also be
involved in RNA metabolism. We also previously reported that ZNF74 is
tightly associated with the nuclear matrix, since detergent, DNase,
RNase, and high salt treatments could not release it from this nuclear
scaffold structure (15). In this study, we report that the ZNF74 zinc
finger domain acts as a nuclear matrix targeting sequence. Furthermore,
to further define ZNF74 function, we searched for proteins from the
nuclear matrix that directly interact with ZNF74. We now show that
ZNF74 interacts, via its multifinger domain, with a hyperphosphorylated form of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (pol IIo) and colocalizes with this protein in irregularly shaped subnuclear domains.
Because the hyperphosphorylated form of this RNA pol II1 subunit has been shown to
colocalize (21, 22) and associate (23-25) with splicing factors and to
be involved in pre-mRNA processing (26, 27), our results indicate
that ZNF74 might play a role in the regulation of gene expression not
only by transcriptional but also by post-transcriptional
mechanisms.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Plasmid Constructs Used
pCGN, a cytomegalovirus
enhancer-driven eukaryotic expression vector (28) that encodes an
N-terminal hemagglutinin (HA) epitope was used to generate HA fusion
constructs. pMAL-c vector (New England Biolabs) was used to generate
maltose-binding protein (MBP) fusion constructs for expression in
Escherichia coli. The following constructs were previously
described in Grondin et al. (15): HA-ZNF74-(1-572),
HA-ZNF74
Krab-(68-572), HA-N
Krab-Zn-(68-509), HA-Zn-C-(175-572), HA-Zn-(175-509), MBP-ZNF74-(1-572),
MBP-ZNF74-(106-572), MBP-Zn-(175-509), and MBP-
-gal-
(also
called MBP herein). GAL4 DNA binding domain (GAL4-(1-147)) fusion
proteins were obtained by introducing either the zinc finger domain (aa
175-509) or the N-terminal domain (aa 1-174) of ZNF74 in a Rous
sarcoma virus enhancer-driven eukaryotic expression vector pRSVGAL4
(kindly provided by Dr. Robert Rehfuss). The zinc finger domain (aa
175-509) or the N-terminal domain (aa 1-174) of ZNF74 were
PCR-amplified with oligonucleotide primers containing XbaI
cloning sites. In each case, the 3
-primer included an in frame stop
codon. The PCR-amplified products were subcloned in frame at the 3
-end
of the GAL4 DNA binding domain in a unique XbaI site of the
pRSVGAL4 vector.
Antibodies Used
The mAb CC3 (IgG2a) was
previously obtained by immunizing Balb/C mice with chick embryo
proteins (29) and shown to recognize a phosphoepitope located on the
carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of the hyperphosphorylated RNA
polymerase II largest subunit (pol IIo) (23, 30). The mAb Pol3/3
recognizes a conserved region located outside of the CTD of the largest
subunit of the RNA polymerase II (RNA pol II LS) and was kindly
provided by E. K. F. Bautz (31). The mouse hybridoma cell
line CRL 2031, secreting the mAb SC35 (IgG1), was purchased
from the American Type Culture Collection. The mAb SC35 recognizes a
phosphorylated form of SC35 (32), a non-snRNP splicing protein, and
possibly another structural protein that colocalizes to the same
nuclear domains (33). The mAb 12CA5 (34) or the rabbit polyclonal
antibody Y-11 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) was used to detect the HA
epitope tag. The GAL4 (DBD) mouse monoclonal IgG antibody (RK5C1)
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used to detect the DNA binding domain
(aa 1-147) of GAL4 protein. A rabbit anti-MBP polyclonal antiserum
(New England Biolabs) was used to detect the maltose-binding protein.
The mAb 131C1 (kindly provided by Dr. Yves Raymond) was used to detect lamin A and C.
Cellular Fractionation and Nuclear Matrix Isolation
Monkey
fibroblast-like COS-7 cells, mouse skin fibroblast L cells, mouse
embryonal carcinoma P19 cells, human embryonal kidney HEK 293 cells, or
293T cells (35) were used to prepare the various cellular fractions.
For experiments requiring transfection, cells were plated at a cell
density of 4-8 × 105/100-mm plate, transfected 24 h
later with various plasmid constructs (25 µg of DNA) (36), and
harvested 30-36 h after transfection (3-6 × 106
cells obtained from a 100-mm plate). For cellular fractionation and
nuclear matrix isolation, transfected or untransfected cells (3-6 × 106 cells) were first submitted to a hypotonic lysis in
40 µl of RSB buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM PMSF), and nuclei were recovered following essentially
the method of Cockerill and Garrard (37) as described previously (15). Washed nuclei were subjected to subnuclear fractionation and nuclear matrix isolation using the method of He et al. (38) as
previously detailed (15). In brief, the nuclei derived from a 100-mm
plate were freed of the chromatin by a 50-min digestion at 30 °C
with RNase-free DNase I (about 20 units/106 cell nuclei)
(Life Technologies, Inc.) in 40 µl of digestion buffer (10 mM Pipes, pH 6.8, 50 mM NaCl, 300 mM sucrose, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1.2 mM PMSF,
2 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 µg/ml pepstatin A),
and then extracted by the addition of 1 M ammonium sulfate
to a final concentration of 0.25 M. The 750 × g supernatant containing digested chromatin corresponds to
the soluble DNase I-treated nuclear fraction also called soluble
nuclear fraction herein. The pellet was then submitted to an additional
extraction with 50 µl of digestion buffer containing 2 M
NaCl. The subsequent 750 × g pellet corresponding to
insoluble nuclear matrix and associated ribonucleoproteins was
subjected to RNase A (Quiagen) and RNase T (Boehringer Mannheim) (5 µg and 2 units, respectively) in 50 µl of digestion buffer. The
resulting 750 × g pellet corresponds to the
RNase-treated insoluble nuclear matrix fraction. To prepare the various
nuclear fractions used in far-Western analysis, 2 mM
orthovanadate was also included in the RSB buffer, and both 2 mM orthovanadate and 50 mM NaF were added to
the digestion buffer. Furthermore, in some cases as indicated in the
figure legends, a faster cell fractionation scheme was used to limit
protein dephosphorylation by endogenous phosphatases; the
centrifugation steps were reduced to 15 s at 15,000 × g, the chromatin was digested for only 25 min with twice the
amount of DNase I, and the RNase A and T digestion step was
omitted.
Preparation of Total Cell Extracts, Soluble DNase I-treated
Fraction, and Nuclear Matrix Extracts for
Immunoprecipitations
Before immunoprecipitations, the soluble
DNase I-treated fractions (equivalent to 20-40 × 106
cells/350 µl of digestion buffer) obtained as described under "Cellular Fractionation and Nuclear Matrix Isolation" were diluted with 2 volumes of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM orthovanadate, 50 mM
NaF, 1 mM PMSF, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin).
To prepare nuclear matrix extracts for immunoprecipitations, the DNase/RNase-digested nuclear matrix pellets (from about 10-20 × 106 cells) obtained as described under "Cellular
Fractionation and Nuclear Matrix Isolation" were extracted with 500 µl of SDS solubilizing buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.8% SDS, 2 mM orthovanadate, 50 mM NaF) for 4 min at 95 °C (39). The extracts were
cooled at 4 °C for 4 min before adding 500 µl of Triton buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 4% Triton X-100,
2 mM orthovanadate, 50 mM NaF) and then
centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 2 min at 4 °C. To
prepare total cell extracts (5-10 × 106 cells/ml)
for immunoprecipitations, cells were either extracted in SDS
solubilizing buffer and diluted in Triton buffer as described above or
extracted in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM orthovanadate, 50 mM
NaF, 1 mM PMSF, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin).
The extracts were passed through a 26G1/2 needle to reduce viscosity
before centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 15 min at
4 °C. Total cell, nuclear matrix, and diluted soluble DNase I-treated extracts were precleared with protein A-Sepharose (Sigma) for
1 h at 4 °C. Precleared extracts were then recovered after removal of the beads by centrifugation (1 ml/20 µl stacked protein A
beads). Immunoprecipitations were then carried out for 2 h at 4 °C (or 16 h for coimmunoprecipitation experiments) using 1 ml of precleared extracts, 10-50 µl of the appropriate antibody, and 30 µl of protein A-Sepharose. For the coimmunoprecipitation experiments,
10 mM EDTA and 10 mM EGTA were added during the
preclearing and the immunoprecipitation steps to stabilize the pol IIo
(40). The protein A-Sepharose beads were then washed 3 times either with 1 ml of lysis buffer for immunoprecipitations or with a buffer containing 25 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl,
0.2% SDS, and 1% Triton for coimmunoprecipitations. Washed
immunoprecipitates were resuspended in Laemmli buffer, and the
recovered proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. In some cases, the
supernatants of immunoprecipitation were first concentrated using
Microcon 100 filter devices (Amicon) before dilution in Laemmli
buffer.
Bacterial Expression and Purification of MBP Fusion
Proteins
E. coli DH5
strain transformed with
pMal-c-ZNF74 fusion constructs were grown to an
A600 of 0.3-0.5 (500 ml) and induced with 0.3 mM isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside for
3 h. Crude soluble extracts containing the soluble MBP fusion
proteins were prepared from bacterial cells resuspended in column
buffer (200 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM
-mercaptoethanol) (50 ml). MBP fusion proteins from
these extracts were immobilized on amylose resin (0.5 ml) (New England
Biolabs). The resin was washed with 20 volumes of column buffer and
with 40 volumes of elution buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl). Then, the immobilized MBP fusion proteins were
eluted with 1.5 ml of elution buffer containing 10 mM
maltose. Depending on the preparation and on the fusion proteins,
100-1000 µg of eluted affinity-purified proteins were recovered as
estimated by a Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad) and as confirmed by
Coomassie gel staining. The purified proteins were aliquoted and stored
at
80 °C.
Protein Biotinylation
Proteins were biotinylated according
to Cicchetti and Baltimore (41). In brief, the MBP-ZNF74-(106-572)
fusion protein eluted from the amylose resin was dialyzed against a
borate buffer (100 mM, pH 8.0). The protein was incubated
for 4 h at room temperature with biotinamidocaproate
N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (Sigma) at a concentration of 50 µg of the biotin derivative for 1 mg of MBP-ZNF74-(106-572) fusion
protein. The reaction was stopped by adding 1 M
NH4Cl at a ratio of 4 µl for 50 µg of biotin derivative for 10 min at room temperature. The biotinylated protein was then dialyzed against a 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, buffer containing
100 mM NaCl. Glycerol (final concentration 15%) was added
to the dialyzed biotinylated protein before its storage at
20 °C.
Thawed biotinylated proteins (1.5 µg/µl) were never kept longer
than 2 weeks at 4 °C before use.
Far-Western Blotting
Nuclear protein fractions or proteins
immunoprecipitated from cell or nuclear extracts were resolved by
SDS-PAGE on a 6% separating gel and electrophoretically transferred to
0.2-µm nitrocellulose membrane at 22 V for 12-16 h using a Mini
Trans-Blot® electrophoretic transfer cell (Bio-Rad). After
transfer, the blots were rinsed in TBST buffer (10 mM Tris,
pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) and used immediately
or kept at 4 °C in the same buffer for a few days. The blots were
incubated for 4-16 h in blocking buffer (50 mM Tris, pH
7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2% bovine serum albumin). For
far-Western analysis, the blots (9-cm2 strips) were probed
for 12-16 h with affinity-purified MBP fusion proteins (0.5 µg/ml)
or with biotinylated MBP-ZNF74-(106-572) fusion proteins (30 ng/ml) in
overlay buffer (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 100 mM
NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 0.25% gelatin) (2 ml). For competition experiments, the blots
were incubated in the presence of the biotinylated MBP fusion protein
and a 100-fold excess of unbiotinylated MBP fusion protein. All the
above steps were performed at 4 °C. The blots were then washed in
washing buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM
NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.2% gelatin) three times for 5 min at room
temperature and then incubated for 1 h in TBST buffer containing
1% bovine serum albumin. Bound MBP fusion proteins were revealed by
sequential incubation with a rabbit primary anti-MBP polyclonal
antiserum (New England Biolabs), a secondary goat anti-rabbit
horseradish peroxidase (Sigma), and a chemiluminescence reagent as
described by the manufacturer (Renaissance® kit, NEN Life
Science Products). Bound biotinylated MBP-ZNF74 fusion proteins were
also revealed by chemiluminescence after an incubation step with
avidin-horseradish peroxidase (Sigma).
Alkaline Phosphatase Treatment of CC3-immunoprecipitated
Proteins
This protocol was modified from Bregman et
al. (22). Proteins were immunoprecipitated as above with mAb CC3
coupled to protein A-Sepharose. For alkaline phosphatase treatment, the
beads were washed with phosphatase buffer (10 mM Tris
acetate, pH 7.5, 10 mM magnesium acetate, 50 mM
potassium acetate) and treated with or without 5 units of calf
intestinal phosphatase (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) in 25 µl (excluding
bed volume) of phosphatase buffer for 10-60 min at 37 °C. The beads
were resuspended in Laemmli buffer for analysis of the eluted proteins
by SDS-PAGE.
Immunofluorescence
Subconfluent monkey COS-7 cells plated
in 1 × 2-cm four-well Lab-TekTM (Nunc) were transfected with
appropriate plasmid constructs (2 µg) (36). About 40 h after
transfection, the cells were either fixed and processed directly for
immunofluorescence when indicated or first extracted in situ
as described by Bisotto et al. (42) using the method of He
et al. (38). Briefly, for in situ sequential extraction, the cells were first washed in isotonic phosphate saline
buffer (PBS buffer) and then extracted in cytoskeleton buffer (10 mM Pipes, pH 6.8, 100 mM NaCl, 300 mM sucrose, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mM PMSF),
digested with DNase I (Life Technologies), and washed with 0.25 M ammonium sulfate for chromatin removal. When indicated,
the transfected cells were also subjected to a high salt extraction
with 2 M NaCl and an RNase A and T digestion. For
immunofluorescence microscopy, untreated or in situ
extracted cells were treated sequentially at room temperature with 4%
formaldehyde/PBS for 1 h, with 0.2% Tween-20, 4%
formaldehyde/PBS for 1 h, with 50 mM
NH4Cl/PBS for 30 min and with 0.2% cold fish gelatin
(Sigma)/PBS for 30 min (15). Primary and secondary antibody incubations
were then performed essentially as described (15). For single
immunolabeling, the mouse mAb 12CA5 (hybridoma supernatant diluted
1:500) was used as a primary antibody to detect HA epitope-tagged ZNF74
proteins, and a mouse anti-Gal 4 antibody (1:50) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) was used to detect GAL4 proteins. A rabbit anti-mouse
IgG conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (Sigma) was used as a
secondary antibody. For double immunolabeling of HA-ZNF74-(1-572) and
pol IIo/CC3 antigen, a rabbit polyclonal anti-HA antibody (diluted
1:200) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and the mouse mAb CC3 antibody
(ascitic fluid diluted 1:500) were sequentially added. For
immunolabeling of both HA-ZNF74-(1-572) and SC35 antigen, the rabbit
polyclonal anti-HA antibody and the mouse mAb SC35 (ascitic fluid
diluted 1:200) were used as primary antibodies. A goat anti-rabbit IgG
conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (Sigma) and a goat anti-mouse
IgG conjugated to Rhodamine (Pierce) were then used as secondary
antibodies. The specificity of each of the secondary antibodies was
tested either by omitting one of the primary antibodies or by
incubating the primary antibody individually with each of the secondary
antibodies. No cross-reaction was observed between the two sets of
antibodies. DNA was stained by a 5-min treatment with 2.5 µg/ml
Hoechst 33258 fluorochrome (Sigma). Preparations were examined under a
Leika photomicroscope equipped for epifluorescence and photographed
using NEOPAN 1600 (Fuji) or EPL 400 (Kodak) films.
RESULTS
The Zinc Finger Region of ZNF74 Is Sufficient for Association with
the Nuclear Matrix
We previously reported that the protein
encoded by ZNF74-2 cDNA (EMBL accession number X92715),
called ZNF74 here, is an RNA-binding protein tightly associated with
the nuclear matrix (15, 19). To delimit the region required for ZNF74
association with the nuclear matrix, we assessed the subnuclear
localization of various HA-tagged deletion mutants in transfected
cells. Following subcellular fractionation of transfected L cells, all
truncated ZNF74 proteins that included at least the zinc finger domain
were found associated with the insoluble nuclear matrix fraction as assessed by immunoblot (Fig.
1A). As previously observed
for the full-length protein (15), the attachment of all of these
truncated ZNF74 proteins to the nuclear matrix was very tight, since
none were detectable in the soluble nuclear fractions recovered after sequential DNase, high salt, and RNase treatments (not shown). Immunofluorescence studies using monolayers of transfected COS-7 cells
confirmed that the multifinger region (aa 175-509) alone was targeted
to the nuclear matrix, where it remained tightly bound following
in situ sequential DNase/RNase extractions (Fig. 2A).
Fig. 1.
Identification of ZNF74 zinc finger region as
a nuclear matrix targeting domain. A, L cells were
transfected with HA-tagged ZNF74-(1-572), ZNF74
Krab-(68-572),
N
Krab-Zn-(68-509), Zn-C-(175-572), Zn-(175-509).
DNase/RNase-treated nuclear matrix fractions were prepared from
transfected cells as under "Experimental Procedures." For each
fraction, proteins from an equal number of cells (3 × 106 cells) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot
analysis using the anti-HA mAb 12CA5. Expressed proteins containing at
least the zinc finger region were found exclusively associated with the
insoluble fraction of the nucleus, the nuclear matrix. No signal was
seen in the soluble fraction of the nucleus (not shown). Proteins with
an apparent molecular mass close to the expected size were observed:
ZNF74 (67 kDa), ZNF74
Krab (59 kDa), N
Krab-Zn (52 kDa), Zn-C (47 kDa), and zinc finger (Zn) (40 kDa). A schematic representation of ZNF74 protein with its KRAB and zinc finger (Zn) domains is shown. N, N-terminal domain;
C, C-terminal domain. Amino acids delimiting these domains
are numbered. B, 293T cells were transfected with GAL4 DNA
binding domain-zinc finger domain (aa 175-509) and GAL4 DNA binding
domain-N-terminal domain (aa 1-174). The soluble DNase I-treated
nuclear fraction (fraction 1), the subsequent soluble
fraction obtained after a 2 M NaCl extraction
(fraction 2), and the nuclear matrix (fraction 3)
were obtained as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
fractions from an equal number of cells (3 × 106)
were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis using an anti-GAL4
DNA binding domain monoclonal antibody. The GAL4 DNA-binding protein
fused to the zinc finger region of ZNF74 is targeted to the insoluble
nuclear matrix fraction, whereas the GAL4 DNA binding domain fused to
the N-terminal domain of ZNF74 is found in the soluble DNase I-treated
nuclear fraction. Proteins with an apparent molecular mass close to the
expected size were observed: GAL4 DNA binding domain-zinc finger domain
(Zn) (56 kDa), GAL4 DNA binding domain-N-terminal domain (34 kDa). The calibrated molecular mass of prestained marker proteins
(Bio-Rad) is indicated in kDa.
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]
Fig. 2.
Targeting of ZNF74 zinc finger region and a
fused heterologous nucleoplasmic protein to the nuclear matrix as
detected by immunolocalization. COS-7 cells were transfected in
A with HA-tagged Zn-(175-509) and in B with the
GAL4 DNA binding domain or the GAL4 DNA binding domain-Zn-(175-509)
fusion construct. Cells were untreated or submitted to in
situ sequential extractions with 0.5% Triton X-100, DNase I, low
and high salts, and RNases before fixation. Immunolabeling was
performed using as primary antibodies either the anti-HA mAb 12CA5
(A) or the anti-GAL4 mouse monoclonal antibody
(B) and a fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated antibody as
secondary antibody. When indicated, the corresponding DNA Hoescht
staining is shown. The zinc finger domain of ZNF74 alone (A,
bottom left panel) or fused to the nucleoplasmic GAL4 DNA
binding domain (B, right panel) remains tightly
bound to the nuclear matrix after DNase/RNase treatment of the cells.
While a diffuse GAL4 DNA binding domain signal is seen in untreated cells (B, left panel), no more signal is detected
after DNase/RNase treatment (not shown).
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]
The zinc finger domain was also found to be sufficient to target a
heterologous nucleoplasmic protein, the GAL4 DNA binding domain
(GAL4-(1-147)) to the nuclear matrix. Indeed, the zinc finger domain
(aa 175-509) fused to the GAL4-(1-147) was targeted to the nuclear
matrix fraction, while the N-terminal domain (aa 1-174) of ZNF74 fused
to GAL4-(1-147) was detected in the soluble fraction of the nucleus
(Fig. 1B) as assessed by immunoblots. Similarly, a punctate
signal indicating tight attachment to the matrix was clearly detected
after in situ extractions of transfected cells expressing
the zinc finger domain (aa 175-509) fused to GAL4 (aa 1-147) (Fig.
2B). In contrast, the GAL4-(1-147) protein, normally
detected in the soluble nucleoplasm of untreated cells (Fig.
2B), was completely extractable from the nucleus, since no
signal remained after in situ sequential DNase/RNase
extractions (not shown). The ZNF74 zinc finger domain (previously shown
to be sufficient for nuclear translocation) (15) was also found sufficient to target
-galactosidase, a normally cytoplasmic protein, to the nuclear matrix (not shown).
ZNF74 Interacts via Its Zinc Finger Region with a 250-kDa Nuclear
Protein
Since DNase and RNase treatments did not affect the
association of ZNF74 with the nuclear matrix, we suspected that this
attachment was independent of ZNF74 nucleic acid binding properties and
instead involved protein-protein interactions. To identify potential
nuclear proteins associated with ZNF74, we performed far-Western blot analysis. Proteins from an insoluble nuclear matrix fraction and a
soluble DNase I-treated nuclear fraction were separated by gel electrophoresis and transferred to membranes. As protein probes, we
used various ZNF74 fusion proteins constructed with the MBP at their N
terminus and produced in E. coli as described previously (15). We found that MBP-ZNF74 fusion proteins bound to a few high
molecular weight nuclear proteins (Fig.
3) in various cell types such as monkey
COS-7 cells (Fig. 3A), mouse P19 cells (Fig. 3,
B-D), and human HEK 293 (not shown). A strong signal was
obtained with a protein of approximately 250 kDa that partitioned
between the insoluble nuclear matrix fraction and the soluble fraction of the nucleus. As seen in Fig. 3C, the zinc finger region
alone was sufficient for interaction with this nuclear protein. This association appeared to be specific to the ZNF74 zinc finger domain, since no binding was observed with the MBP control protein alone (Fig. 3D).
Fig. 3.
Predominant interaction of ZNF74 and its zinc
finger domain with a 250-kDa nuclear protein. Monkey COS-7
(A) or mouse P19 (B-D) cells were used to
prepare soluble (Sol) and insoluble nuclear fractions
(Ins). The soluble nuclear fractions were recovered after
digestion of the chromatin with DNase I and extraction with 0.25 M ammonium sulfate. The corresponding insoluble nuclear
fractions (Ins) were further extracted with 2 M
NaCl and subjected to RNase digestions except in A, where a
faster protocol without RNase digestions was used to limit
dephosphorylation by phosphatases (see "Experimental Procedures").
Both soluble and insoluble nuclear fractions were subjected to SDS-PAGE
and far-Western analysis. The probe used for far-Western was
MBP-ZNF74-(1-572), MBP-ZNF74
1-106-(106-572), MBP-Zn-(175-509),
or MBP as indicated. The calibrated molecular mass of prestained marker
proteins (Bio-Rad) is indicated in kDa. A predominant 250-kDa nuclear
protein was detected by each ZNF74 fusion protein that contained at
least the zinc finger region.
[View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]
The 250-kDa Protein Recognized by ZNF74 Is a Hyperphosphorylated
Form of the Largest Subunit of the RNA Polymerase II
Using the
monoclonal antibody CC3 (mAb CC3), Vincent and colleagues (42)
identified a phosphoprotein of approximately 250 kDa partitioning
between the nuclear matrix and the soluble nuclear fraction. Since the
CC3 antigen was very recently found to associate with splicing
complexes and to correspond to pol IIo, a hyperphosphorylated form of
the RNA pol II LS (23, 30, 43), this antigen was envisaged as the
putative 250-kDa protein interacting with ZNF74.
A comparative analysis of a far-Western blot probed with ZNF74 (Fig.
4A, left panel) and
Western blots probed with mAb CC3 revealed that a major nuclear protein
interacting with ZNF74 and its zinc finger domain comigrated precisely
with the 250-kDa pol IIo/CC3 antigen (Fig. 4A, middle
panel). In contrast, the hypophosphorylated form of the RNA pol II
LS (pol IIa) was identified as a faster migrating protein (220 kDa) as
revealed using the mAb Pol3/3 (31) that recognizes both the 220-kDa pol
IIa and 250-kDa pol IIo forms of the polymerase (Fig. 4A,
right panel).
Fig. 4.
Identification of the RNA pol IIo as the
250-kDa nuclear protein interacting with ZNF74. A, COS-7
cell soluble nuclear fraction (Sol) was recovered after
digestion of the chromatin with DNase I and extraction with 0.25 M ammonium sulfate. The corresponding COS-7 cell insoluble
nuclear fraction (Ins) was further extracted with 2 M NaCl (the faster protocol without RNase digestions was
used to limit dephosphorylation by phosphatases; see "Experimental
Procedures"). Soluble and insoluble nuclear fractions were subjected
to SDS-PAGE. For far-Western analysis, MBP-Zn-(175-509) was used as a
probe. For Western blot analysis, either mAb CC3, recognizing the
250-kDa Pol IIo, or mAb Pol 3/3, recognizing the 250-kDa Pol IIo and
the 220-kDa Pol IIa, were used. The 250-kDa nuclear protein interacting
with ZNF74 is comigrating with Pol IIo. B, COS-7 cell
soluble nuclear fraction (Soluble) and insoluble nuclear
fraction (Insoluble) obtained as in A were immunoprecipitated with CC3 or a control monoclonal antibody (mAb 12CA5) as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
supernatants (S) and the pellets (P) of
immunoprecipitations were subjected to SDS-PAGE and analyzed by
far-Western blot using MBP-Zn-(175-509) as a probe. The 250-kDa
nuclear protein interacting with ZNF74 is immunoprecipitated by the CC3
antibody and is thus confirmed to be the Pol IIo. C, pol IIo
was immunoprecipitated from a Triton X-100/deoxycholate COS-7 cell
extract with mAb CC3. The pellet of immunoprecipitation was subjected
to SDS-PAGE. To demonstrate the specificity of ZNF74-Pol IIo
interaction, far-Western competition experiments were performed using
the biotinylated-MBP-ZNF74-(106-572) alone as well as in the presence
of an excess of MBP or of an excess of nonbiotinylated
MBP-ZNF74-(106-572). The truncated MBP-ZNF74-(106-572) protein rather
than the full-length fusion protein MBP-ZNF74-(1-572) was used as a
competitor, since it was previously found to be less susceptible to
degradation in solution (15). The interaction of the biotinylated ZNF74
with the pol IIo was detected using avidin conjugated to horseradish
peroxidase as described under "Experimental Procedures."
[View Larger Version of this Image (31K GIF file)]
To confirm that the 250-kDa protein recognized on far-Western blots by
ZNF74 was pol IIo, we investigated the potential interaction of ZNF74
with mAb CC3-immunoprecipitated proteins. As illustrated in Fig.
4B, the ZNF74 zinc finger region bound to the 250-kDa pol
IIo immunoprecipitated from nuclear matrix and soluble DNase I-treated
nuclear extracts by mAb CC3. After immunoprecipitation, such extracts
were completely depleted in the 250-kDa protein interacting with ZNF74
zinc finger domain, since no signal remained in the supernatants (Fig.
4B). In contrast, the 250-kDa protein remained in the
supernatants when a monoclonal antibody directed against an epitope
unrelated to pol IIo was used as a control (Fig. 4B). These
results showed that a single nuclear protein migrating at an apparent
molecular weight of 250,000 is interacting with ZNF74 via its zinc
finger domain and confirmed that this protein is pol IIo.
The specificity of ZNF74 interaction with the immunoprecipitated pol
IIo was furthermore confirmed in competition experiments. As seen in
Fig. 4C (right lane), the binding of a
biotinylated MBP-ZNF74 fusion protein to immunoprecipitated 250-kDa pol
IIo/CC3 antigen was completely abolished in the presence of an excess of unbiotinylated MBP-ZNF74 as revealed using avidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase. Such binding, however, remained unaffected in
the presence of an excess of MBP control protein (Fig. 4C, middle lane).
Phosphodependence of ZNF74-pol IIo Interaction
RNA pol II LS
is subjected to cycles of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of its CTD,
a region composed of multiple tandem repeats of a conserved
heptapeptide (Tyr-Ser-Pro-Thr-Ser-Pro-Ser) (44, 45). As previously
discussed, two resulting main forms, the 250-kDa hyperphosphorylated
pol IIo and the 220-kDa hypophosphorylated pol IIa, can be resolved by
gel electrophoresis (reviewed in Refs. 44 and 45). Since ZNF74
associates only with hyperphosphorylated pol IIo, we determined whether
this interaction was in fact phosphodependent. As demonstrated by
far-Western blot, no ZNF74-pol IIo interaction signal could be observed
following phosphatase treatment of the CC3-immunoprecipitated pol IIo
(Fig. 5, left panel). In this
phosphatase time course experiment, the disappearance of the ZNF74-pol
IIo interaction signal was clearly coincident with the appearance of
partially dephosphorylated forms of the CC3-immunoprecipitated polymerase (Fig. 5, right panel). Upon phosphatase
treatment, the progressive dephosphorylation of the polymerase was
indeed evidenced by its increased electrophoretic mobility as revealed on Western blot using the mAb Pol3/3 that recognizes RNA polymerase II
LS independently of its phosphorylation state. This result indicated
that the interaction of ZNF74 with pol IIo is dependent on the
phosphorylation state of the polymerase. Consistent with this,
ZNF74-pol IIo interaction was also considerably reduced when the
cellular fractions used for detecting such interaction were prepared in
the absence of phosphatase inhibitors (not shown).
Fig. 5.
Phosphodependence of the ZNF74-pol IIo
interaction. Proteins immunoprecipitated with mAb CC3 from a
Triton X-100/deoxycholate COS-7 cell extract were treated in the
presence or absence of 5 units of calf intestinal phosphatase
(CIP) for the indicated time and were then subjected to
SDS-PAGE. Far-Western analysis using MBP-Zn-(175-509) as a probe and
Western blot analysis using mAb Pol 3/3 that recognizes the RNA pol II
LS independently of its phosphorylation state, were performed. Pol IIo
that has been subjected to calf intestinal phosphatase
dephosphorylation is no longer recognized by the ZNF74 zinc finger
domain on far-Western blots.
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]
Identification of ZNF74-pol IIo Protein Complexes in Cell
Extracts
To determine whether ZNF74-pol IIo interaction also
occurred in the context of a complex cell extract, we then tested for the presence of ZNF74-pol IIo protein complexes by performing coimmunoprecipitation of both proteins from soluble cell extracts. Since ZNF74 is very tightly associated with the nuclear matrix and not
detected in the soluble nucleoplasm, SDS cell extracts renatured by
dilution in Triton X-100 were used as the only mean found to recover
soluble ZNF74 protein complexes. Extracts prepared from human 293T
cells expressing HA epitope-tagged ZNF74 were immunoprecipitated with
either the anti-HA mAb 12CA5 or anti-pol IIo mAb CC3. The
immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE and examined by
immunoblot for the presence of ZNF74 and Pol IIo. These studies showed
that either the antibody directed against ZNF74 (Fig.
6A) or that specific for the
pol IIo (Fig. 6B) was able to coimmunoprecipitate both
proteins, indicating that ZNF74-pol IIo protein complexes formed in
total cell extracts. The specificity of the coimmunoprecipitation
obtained with either mAb 12CA5 or mAb CC3 was demonstrated by the fact
that ZNF74 and pol IIo were undetectable when nontransfected cell
extracts (Fig. 6A) or a control IgG directed against the
nuclear lamins (mAb 131C3) (Fig. 6B) was used.
Fig. 6.
Identification of ZNF74-Pol IIo/CC3 antigen
complexes by coimmunoprecipitation from cell extracts. Human 293T
cells transfected with HA-ZNF74-(1-572) or nontransfected control
cells were used to prepare cell extracts. To recover proteins tightly associated with the nuclear matrix, cells were solubilized by boiling
in SDS, and the resulting extracts were renatured by dilution in Triton
X-100. ZNF74-pol IIo complexes were immunoprecipitated using the mouse
anti-HA mAb 12CA5 (A) and the anti-pol IIo mAb CC3 or a
control antibody (anti-lamin mAb 131C3) (B).
Immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to
membranes. The top part of the membrane was probed with either the mAb
CC3 or the mAb Pol 3/3 to detect pol IIo. The bottom part of the
membrane was probed with a rabbit polyclonal anti-HA antibody to detect ZNF74 (a rabbit rather than the mouse anti-HA mAb 12CA5 was used to
avoid secondary antibody detection of the mouse immunoglobulin heavy
chain migrating just below ZNF74). The calibrated molecular mass of
prestained marker proteins (Bio-Rad) is indicated in kDa.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
Coimmunolocalization of ZNF74 and pol IIo in Cells
To test
whether ZNF74-pol IIo interaction may occur in vivo, we then
tested whether both proteins were found in the same cell nuclear
compartments. For this purpose, we performed double immunofluorescence labeling in COS-7 cells transfected with HA-tagged ZNF74. Most COS-7
cells overexpressing ZNF74 showed a clear colocalization of ZNF74 and
pol IIo in discrete subnuclear domains that exhibited irregular shapes
and often apparent interconnections. As illustrated, the fluorescein
signal identifying ZNF74 in the nucleus of a COS-7 cell (Fig.
7A) was coincident with the
rhodamine signal specific for the pol IIo/CC3 antigen (Fig.
7B) as seen in a merged image (Fig. 7C). Previous
studies have shown that the pol IIo (22)/CC3 antigen (42) colocalizes
in irregularly shaped nuclear speckles with the non-snRNP splicing
protein SC35, a member of the SR protein family (32, 46). We thus also
addressed the colocalization of ZNF74 with the splicing protein SC35
and found that the signals for these two proteins were overlapping
(Fig. 7, D-F). As previously demonstrated by Vincent and
co-workers (42), no change in the distribution of pol IIo/CC3 antigen
and SC35 occurs after in situ extraction of cells with
nonionic detergent, DNase I, and RNases to remove soluble components of
the nucleus. Similarly, ZNF74 colocalization with pol IIo/CC3 antigen
and SC35 splicing protein persisted following this treatment (not
shown), indicating a tight association of these three proteins with the
nuclear scaffold.
Fig. 7.
Colocalization of ZNF74 with pol IIo/CC3 and
SC35 antigens. COS-7 cells expressing HA epitope-tagged
ZNF74-(1-572) were double-labeled with a rabbit anti-HA antibody
(a, d) and the mAb CC3 (b) or the mAb
SC35 (e) mouse antibodies. In superimposed images
(c and f), the colocalization of
fluorescein-labeled and rhodamine-labeled structures appears
yellow. Both Pol IIo/CC3 antigen (c) and SC35
antigen (f) colocalize with ZNF74 in irregularly shaped
subdomains of the nucleus (yellow regions). Bar,
5 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (93K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
We previously reported that ZNF74, a KRAB domain-containing
protein with 12 tandemly repeated Cys2-His2
zinc finger motifs, is an RNA-binding protein tightly associated with
the nuclear matrix (15). In the present study, we show that the
multifinger domain of ZNF74 can function as a nuclear matrix targeting
sequence and that it interacts in a phosphodependent manner with the
pol IIo, a form of the RNA pol II LS functionally associated with pre-mRNA elongation and processing. Furthermore, we provide
evidence that ZNF74 colocalizes in vivo with pol IIo in
irregularly shaped nuclear domains enriched in splicing factors.
The results presented here indicate that the ZNF74 multifinger domain
is sufficient for the tight association of ZNF74
KRAB/Cys2-His2 protein with the nuclear matrix
and that this domain serves as a nuclear matrix targeting signal as
demonstrated by its ability to target heterologous cytoplasmic or
nucleoplasmic proteins to the nuclear scaffold. This exclusive
interaction of ZNF74 with the nuclear matrix and its absence from the
nucleoplasm contrast with the observation that several transcription
factors, including the Cys2-His2 trifinger
protein Sp1, partition between these two nuclear compartments (47).
Therefore, our results provide the first evidence that a zinc finger
domain can function as a nuclear matrix targeting sequence.
From our previous (15) and present results, the multifinger domain of
ZNF74 appears to be plurifunctional, being responsible for ZNF74
nuclear translocation, nuclear matrix attachment, RNA binding
properties, DNA binding
properties,2 and direct
interaction with the pol IIo, a form of the RNA pol II LS
hyperphosphorylated on its CTD. While both nucleic acids and the
hyperphosphorylated pol IIo CTD are long negatively charged polymers,
the ZNF74 zinc finger domain does not promiscuously interact with
polyphosphate polymers, because it binds selectively to only some of
the polyribosides previously tested (15) and because it binds solely to
the hyperphosphorylated pol IIo but not to partially
dephosphorylated forms of the polymerase generated by limited
phosphatase treatment.
The nucleic acids and pol IIo binding properties of ZNF74 zinc finger
domain suggest that ZNF74 KRAB Cys2-His2
protein may be involved in multiple steps of the RNA synthesis and
maturation. ZNF74 interaction with the hyperphosphorylated RNA pol
II LS is of particular interest in this context. The RNA pol II LS is
part of a multisubunit complex responsible for the synthesis and
processing of pre-mRNAs in all eukaryotic cells and exists as
previously mentioned in two main forms, the hyperphosphorylated pol IIo
and the hypophosphorylated pol IIa. The fact that ZNF74 interacts specifically with pol IIo in a phosphodependent manner may provide insights concerning the functional significance of this interaction. Indeed, several studies indicate that pol IIo has specific functions that differ from pol IIa. The pol IIa is more efficiently recruited in vitro to preinitiation complexes, whereas pol IIo is
observed during initiation of transcription (promotor clearance) and
transcription elongation (45, 48-50).
While the role of pol IIo in transcription remains unclear (Refs. 51
and 52 and references therein), several groups recently provided
independent evidence that the RNA pol II LS, most probably via its
phosphorylated CTD, may participate in RNA processing (53). These
include experiments showing that the pol IIo, but not the pol IIa, is
associated with splicing complexes isolated in vitro (23,
24, 43) and is coimmunoprecipitated with snRNPs and proteins of the
non-snRNP SR family (24, 25). Furthermore, in contrast to pol IIa that
interacts with proteins associated with the preinitiation transcription
complex (such as TATA-binding protein, TFIIE, and TFIIF) (Refs. 25 and
26 and references therein), the only proteins shown to date to directly
interact with pol IIo, namely members of the SR family (54, 55) and CstF/CPSF cleavage-polyadenylation factors (27), are from two protein
classes involved in RNA processing. Taking advantage of the fact that
all known phosphorylation sites of the RNA pol II LS have been located
to its heptapeptide (YSPTSPS) repeats within the CTD (44, 45), several
very recent studies have further documented the importance of the pol
IIo phosphorylation state in RNA processing. Indeed, these studies
showed (i) the inhibition of in vitro splicing in the
presence of anti-pol IIo antibodies recognizing specifically the
phosphorylated CTD (43) or in the presence of CTD heptapeptides
(peptides with mutated phosphorylation sites are not inhibitory) (54),
(ii) the dispersal of snRNPs and SR splicing factors from discrete
subnuclear domains with a speckled pattern as well as the in
vivo inhibition of splicing in transfected cells overexpressing an
in vivo phosphorylated RNA pol II LS CTD domain (26), and
(iii) the requirement of the CTD for efficient in
vivo splicing, 3
-end cleavage, and polyadenylation of mRNA
precursors (26, 27).
Given that all proteins shown to interact with pol IIo are contributing
to RNA processing and considering the emerging role of pol IIo in this
process, it is tempting to speculate that ZNF74, due to its
phosphodependent interaction with pol IIo, represents a new class of
proteins involved in the regulation of RNA maturation. Supporting this
proposal, ZNF74 was also found to colocalize with Pol IIo in
irregularly shaped subdomains of the nucleus enriched in the splicing
SC35 protein and previously reported to be also enriched in other
proteins of the SR family as well as in factors involved in the
cleavage and ligation steps essential to generate mature mRNA (21,
22, 24, 42). While there is some controversy concerning the functional
involvement of such nuclear subdomains exhibiting a speckled pattern in
splicing, since some studies suggested that they may represent sites of
storage for splicing factors rather than the sites of active splicing
(56, 57), recent results indicate that pre-mRNA processing can take
place within such domains (33, 46, 58-62). By examining the nuclear localization of transiently and stably expressed nascent RNA
transcripts containing or lacking introns as well as the localization
of splicing factors, Huang and Spector (58) furthermore demonstrated
the intron-dependent recruitment of pre-mRNA splicing
factors to sites of transcription seen as nuclear subdomains ranging
from small dots to larger clusters. Huang and Spector (58) also
provided a reconciling view by proposing that, depending on the
relative rate of splicing and transcription of a studied template and
on its copy number at one locus, the splicing factors may or may not be
in sufficient abundance at the transcription sites to be detected by
the light microscope, whereas they are easily detectable in storage
sites where they are present in high amounts.
Because ZNF74 is an RNA-binding protein (15) that (i) colocalizes with
the pol IIo and the SC35 splicing factor in subnuclear domains, (ii)
remains tightly associated with splicing factors in the nuclear matrix,
(iii) coimmunoprecipitates with pol IIo complexes, and (iv) interacts
directly with pol IIo in vitro as a few proteins involved in
mRNA processing, we suggest that this KRAB/Cys2-His2 protein, the expression of which
is restricted to fetal tissues (19), plays a role in the developmental
regulation of pre-mRNA maturation. The multifunctional properties
of the ZNF74 zinc finger domain raise the intriguing possibility that ZNF74 KRAB Cys2-His2 protein may be involved in
transcriptional regulation via its DNA binding activity and in RNA
processing as a result of its interaction with RNA and pol IIo. A dual
transcriptional and post-transcriptional role has been previously
proposed for the Wilm's tumor protein, a
Cys2-His2 tetrafinger protein that also behaves
as a DNA- and an RNA-binding protein, whereas it associates with
speckled subdomains of the nucleus in an RNA-dependent fashion (63, 64). Considering that ZNF74 interacts with pol IIo like
few other described pre-mRNA maturating factors, different modes of
action where ZNF74 may facilitate or compete against (65) the
recruitment of splicing or maturating factors to pre-mRNA may be
envisaged. It will be interesting to determine whether the
multifunctional properties of the ZNF74 multifinger domain, and in
particular its ability to interact with the pol IIo within specialized
nuclear subdomains, may be a general trait of the large
KRAB/Cys2-His2 family.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by grants from the Heart and Stroke
Foundation of Canada and the Medical Research Council of Canada (to
M. A.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by a studentship from the Fonds de la Recherche en
Santé du Québec and by a one-year studentship from
Bio-Méga (Montréal).
¶
Supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Fonds de la
Recherche en Santé du Québec.
**
Supported by a scholarship from the Fonds de la Recherche en
Santé du Québec. To whom correspondence should be
addressed: Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, 110 avenue des Pins Ouest, Montréal, Québec H2W 1R7, Canada.
Tel.: 514-987-5546 or 514-987-5536; Fax: 514-987-5732; E-mail:
aubrym{at}ircm.umontreal.ca.
1
The abbreviations used are: pol, polymerase; HA,
hemagglutinin; MBP, maltose-binding protein; aa, amino acids; mAb,
monoclonal antibody; CTD, carboxyl-terminal domain; snRNP, small
nuclear ribonucleoprotein; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; Pipes, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; LS, largest subunit; SR protein family, family of proteins rich in serines and
arginines.
2
F. Côté, unpublished results.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Dr. Christian F. Deschepper for
kindly providing access to a fluorescence microscope. We also thank
Drs. Timothy L. Reudelhuber and David L. Lohnes for critical reading of
the manuscript.
REFERENCES
-
Pieler, T., and Bellefroid, E.
(1994)
Mol. Biol. Rep.
20,
1-8
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Klug, A., and Schwabe, J. W.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
597-604
[Abstract]
-
Pavletich, N. P., and Pabo, C. O.
(1991)
Science
252,
809-817
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Theunissen, O., Rudt, F., Guddat, U., Mentzel, H., and Pieler, T.
(1992)
Cell
71,
679-690
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Darby, M. K., and Joho, K. E.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
3155-3164
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Suzuki, M., Gerstein, M., and Yagi, N.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
3397-3405
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bellefroid, E. J., Poncelet, D. A., Lecocq, P. J., Revelant, O., and Martial, J. A.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
3608-3612
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Margolin, J. F., Friedman, J. R., Meyer, W. K., Vissing, H., Thiesen, H. J., and Rauscher, F. J., III
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
4509-4513
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Witzgall, R., O'Leary, E., Leaf, A., Onaldi, D., and Bonventre, J. V.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
4514-4518
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vissing, H., Meyer, W. K., Aagaard, L., Tommerup, N., and Thiesen, H. J.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
369,
153-157
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pengue, G., and Lania, L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
1015-1020
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kim, S.-S., Chen, Y.-M., O'Leary, E., Witzgall, R., Vidal, M., and Bonventre, J. V.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
15299-15304
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Friedman, J. R., Fredericks, W. J., Jensen, D. E., Speicher, D. W., Huang, X. P., Neilson, E. G., and Rauscher, F. J., III
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2067-2978
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Moosmann, P., Georgiev, O., Le Douarin, B., Bourquin, J. P., and Schaffner, W.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
4859-4867
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Grondin, B., Bazinet, M., and Aubry, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15458-15467
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Marineau, C., Aubry, M., Julien, J. P., and Rouleau, G. A.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
1430
[Free Full Text]
-
Karayiorgou, M., Morris, M. A., Morrow, B., Shprintzen, R. J., Goldberg, R., Borrow, J., Gos, A., Nestadt, G., Wolyniec, P. S., Lasseter, V. K., Eisen, H., Childs, B., Kazazian, H. H., Kucherlapati, R., Antonarakis, S. E., Pulver, A. E., and Housman, D. E.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
7612-7616
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Aubry, M., Marineau, C., Zhang, F. R., Zahed, L., Figlewicz, D., Delattre, O., Thomas, G., de Jong, P. J., Julien, J. P., and Rouleau, G. A.
(1992)
Genomics
13,
641-648
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Aubry, M., Demczuk, S., Desmaze, C., Aikem, M., Aurias, A., Julien, J. P., and Rouleau, G. A.
(1993)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
2,
1583-1587
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Glover, T. W.
(1995)
Nat. Genet.
10,
257-258
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bregman, D. B., Du, L., Ribisi, S., and Warren, S. L.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
387-396
[Abstract]
-
Bregman, D. B., Du, L., Van der Zee, S., and Warren, S. L.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
287-298
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vincent, M., Lauriault, P., Dubois, M.-F., Lavoie, S., Bensaude, O., and Chabot, B.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
4649-4652
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mortillaro, M. J., Blencowe, B. J., Wei, X., Nakayasu, H., Du, L., Warren, S. L., Sharp, P. A., and Berezney, R.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8253-8257
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kim, E., Du, L., Bregman, D. B., and Warren, S. L.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
19-28
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Du, L., and Warren, S. L.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
5-18
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McCracken, S., Fong, N., Yankulov, K., Ballantyne, S., Pan, G., Greenblatt, J., Patterson, S. D., Wickens, M., and Bentley, D. L.
(1997)
Nature
385,
357-361
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tanaka, M., and Herr, W.
(1990)
Cell
60,
375-386
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Thibodeau, A., and Vincent, M.
(1991)
Exp. Cell Res.
195,
145-153
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dubois, M. F., Vincent, M., Vigneron, M., Adamczewski, J., Egly, J.-M., and Bensaude, O.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
694-700
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kramer, A., Haars, R., Kabish, R., Will, H., and Bautz, E. K.
(1980)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
180,
193-199
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fu, X. D., and Maniatis, T.
(1990)
Nature
343,
437-441
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Xing, Y., Johnson, C. V., Moen, P. T., Jr., McNeil, J. A., and Lawrence, J. B.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
1635-1647
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Niman, H. L., Houghten, R. A., Walker, L. E., Reisfeld, R. A., Wilson, I. A., Hogle, J. M., and Lerner, R. A.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
4949-4953
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pear, W. S., Nolan, G. P., Scott, M. L., and Baltimore, D.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8392-8396
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Colbere-Garapin, F., and Garapin, A. C.
(1983)
Dev. Biol. Stand.
55,
267-271
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cockerill, P. N., and Garrard, W. T.
(1986)
Cell
44,
273-282
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
He, D. C., Nickerson, J. A., and Penman, S.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
569-580
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brancolini, C., and Schneider, C.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
6936-6940
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kim, W.-Y., and Dahmus, M. E.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
14219-14225
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cicchetti, P., and Baltimore, D.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
256,
140-148
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bisotto, S., Lauriault, P., Duval, M., and Vincent, M.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
1873-1882
[Abstract]
-
Chabot, B., Bisotto, S., and Vincent, M.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
3206-3213
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Corden, J. L.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
3,
213-218
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Dahmus, M. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19009-19012
[Free Full Text]
-
Spector, D. L.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
9,
265-315
[CrossRef]
-
Van Wijnen, A. J., Bidwell, J. P., Fey, E. G., Penman, S., Lian, J. B., Stein, J. L., and Stein, G. S.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
8397-8402
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lu, H., Flores, O., Weinmann, R., and Reinberg, D.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
10004-10008
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chesnut, J. D., Stephens, J. H., and Dahmus, M. E.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10500-10506
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weeks, J. R., Hardin, S. E., Shen, J., Lee, J. M., and Greenleaf, A. L.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2329-2344
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Serizawa, H., Conaway, J. W., and Conaway, R. C.
(1993)
Nature
363,
371-374
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Makela, T. P., Parvin, J. D., Kim, J., Huber, L. J., Sharp, P. A., and Weinberg, R. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5174-5178
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Steinmetz, E. J.
(1997)
Cell
89,
491-494
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yuryev, A., Patturajan, M., Litingtung, Y., Johshi, R. V., Gentile, C., Gebara, M., and Corden, J. L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
6975-6980
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bourquin, J.-P., Stagljar, I., Meier, P., Moosmann, P., Silke, J., Baechi, T., Georgiev, O., and Schaffner, W.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
2055-2061
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zhang, G., Taneja, K. L., Singer, R. H., and Green, M. R.
(1994)
Nature
372,
809-812
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zeng, C., Kim, E., Warren, S. L., and Berget, S. M.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1401-1412
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Huang, S., and Spector, D. L.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
719-732
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jimenez-Garcia, L. F., and Spector, D. L.
(1993)
Cell
73,
47-59
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Huang, S., and Spector, D.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
2288-2302
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Carter, K. C., Taneja, K. L., and Lawrence, J. B.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1191-1202
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wang, J., Cao, L. G., Wang, Y. L., and Pederson, T.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
7391-7395
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Caricasole, A., Duarte, A., Larsson, S. H., Hastie, N. D., Little, M., Holmes, G., Todorov, I., and Ward, A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
7562-7566
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Larsson, S. H., Charlieu, J.-P., Miyagawa, K., Engelkamp, D., Rassoulzadegan, M., Van Heyningen, V., and Hastie, N. D.
(1995)
Cell
81,
391-401
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Caceres, J. F., Stamm, S., Helfman, D. M., and Krainer, A. R.
(1994)
Science
265,
1706-1709
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Volume 272, Number 44,
Issue of October 31, 1997
pp. 27877-27885
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us