Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yan, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yan, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 44, Issue of October 31, 1997 pp. 27902-27907

Oncogenic c-Ki-ras but Not Oncogenic c-Ha-ras Up-regulates CEA Expression and Disrupts Basolateral Polarity in Colon Epithelial Cells*

(Received for publication, May 22, 1997, and in revised form, July 24, 1997)

Zhongfa Yan Dagger , Xiaobing Deng Dagger , Mingxing Chen Dagger , Ying Xu Dagger , Mamoun Ahram §, Bonnie F. Sloane § and Eileen Friedman Dagger par

From the Dagger  Department of Pathology, State University of New York Health Science Center, Syracuse, New York 13210-2399 and the  Department of Pharmacology and § Cancer Biology Program, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Colon carcinomas commonly contain mutations in Ki-ras4B, but very rarely in Ha-ras, suggesting that different Ras isoforms may have distinct functions in colon epithelial cell biology. In an earlier study we had demonstrated that oncogenic Ki-ras4BVal-12, but not oncogenic Ha-rasVal-12, blocks the apicobasal polarization of colon epithelial cells by preventing normal glycosylation of the integrin beta 1 chain of the collagen receptor. As a result, only the Ki-ras mutated cells exhibited altered cell to substratum attachment, whereas mutation of either Ras isoform activated mitogen-activated protein kinases. We have now asked whether intercellular adhesion proteins implicated in establishing basolateral polarity in colon epithelial cells are modulated by oncogenic Ki-Ras4BVal-12 proteins but not oncogenic Ha-RasVal-12 proteins. The embryonic adhesion protein carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was up-regulated on the mRNA and protein levels in each of three stable Ki-rasVal-12 transfectant lines but in none of three stable Ha-rasVal-12 transfectant lines. The elevated protein levels of CEA in Ki-ras4BVal-12 transfectant cells were decreased by blocking expression of Ki-ras4BVal-12 with antisense oligonucleotides. N-cadherin levels were decreased in only the Ki-ras transfectants, whereas E-cadherin levels were unchanged. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that Ki-ras4BVal-12 transfectant cells did not polarize into cells with discrete apical and basal regions and so could not restrict expression of CEA to the apical region. These unpolarized cells displayed elevated levels of CEA all along their surface membrane where CEA mediated random, multilayered associations of tumor cells. This aggregation was both calcium-independent and blocked by Fab' fragments of anti-CEA monoclonal antibody col-1. Trafficking of the lysosomal cysteine protease cathepsin B may also be altered when cell polarity cannot be established. Ki-ras4BVal-12 transfectant cells expressed 2-fold elevated protein levels of the lysosomal cysteine protease cathepsin B but did not up-regulate cathepsin B mRNA expression. One function of oncogenic c-Ki-Ras proteins in colon cancer progression may be to up-regulate CEA and thus to prevent the lateral adhesion of adjacent colon epithelial cells that normally form a monolayer in vivo.


INTRODUCTION

Studies in tissue culture have shown that cellular polarization may require both E-cadherin-mediated cell-to-cell contact and integrin-mediated cell-substratum interactions (1). E-cadherin is critical to the formation of the basolateral domain, whereas the orientation of the apicobasal axis depends on integrin-mediated associations with the substratum. Orientation of the apical-basal axis in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells is known to depend on integrin-mediated interactions with the growth surface. When grown in suspension, Madin-Darby canine kidney cells aggregate to form cysts with the apical domain facing outward. These cysts reverse their polarity when collagen is added to the culture medium causing apical markers to disappear from the external domain and reappear on the luminal face (2). Collagen interaction with integrins on the basal surface of cells is believed to orient the apical-basal axis, since addition of blocking antibody to beta 1 integrin prevents this polarity reversal (3).

HD6-4 colon carcinoma cells provide a unique model to study the effects of oncogenes on cellular polarization. HD6-4 cells polarize apicobasally by up-regulating their alpha 2beta 1 integrin collagen receptors (4) and basolaterally by up-regulating membrane levels of E-cadherin 35-fold and membrane levels of the desmosomal protein desmoglein I 16-fold (5). HD6-4 cells then differentiate into a specialized epithelial cell, the mucin granule producing colon goblet (5). This cell polarization can occur although HD6-4 cells contain inactivating mutations in the tumor suppressor genes p53 and APC. HD6-4 cells, however, have wild-type ras genes (6). Most colon cancer cells are rounded and unpolarized. As roughly 50% of colon cancers cases exhibit activating mutations in ras genes, mutations in ras may be one mechanism for loss of cell polarization. The vast majority of ras mutations in colon cancers are in Ki-ras, with only a few percent in N-ras and very uncommonly in Ha-ras (7, 8). The selection of Ki-ras mutations in the genesis of colon cancers suggested that mutations in this ras isoform might block colon epithelial cell apicobasal or basolateral polarization.

We have presented evidence in a recent study1 that only mutations in the Ki-ras gene, not the Ha-ras gene, disrupt colon epithelial cell apicobasal polarity through a specific effect on beta 1 integrin maturation. We made stable transfectants of HD6-4 cells using minigene constructs of the huge cellular Ki-ras gene, both wild-type and constructs activated by mutation at valine 12. We compared these transfectants with those made using Ha-ras mutated at valine 12. The mutated Ha-ras and Ki-ras genes were expressed on the protein level and each activated the mitogen-activated protein kinases erk1 and erk2, which were correlated with increased cell proliferation. However, only the mutated Ki-ras gene blocked normal glycosylation of beta 1 integrin, leading to accumulation of an aberrant beta 1 integrin. The aberrant beta 1 integrin was transported to the cell surface where it mediated a looser attachment to collagen I. Antisense oligonucleotides to Ki-ras restored normal glycosyltransferase activity to the Ki-ras transfectants that regained the capacity to make mature beta 1 integrin.1 These studies demonstrated that the blocked glycosylation of beta 1 integrin was the direct result of the functioning of the oncogenic Ki-ras gene not some nonspecific effect of transfection. HD6-4 colon epithelial cells bind to collagen I as a first step in polarization, followed by differentiation to mucin-producing goblet cells (4). Imperfect binding to this substratum could prevent normal apicobasal polarization.

Selection of colon adenoma cells with oncogenic Ki-ras mutations is seen during the growth of benign tumors (10), and this selection is maintained in the transition to malignancy and during further progression of the cancer cells to highly invasive and metastatic states (11, 12). Tumor cells freed from tight cell-to-cell and cell-to-substratum adherence because of the synthesis of aberrant beta 1 integrin could have a selective advantage in both growth and invasion and become the dominant cell type within a tumor. In the current study, we have asked whether the oncogenic Ki-ras4BVal-12 gene can disrupt colon epithelial cell polarity in a second way by targeting intercellular adhesion proteins and whether any such effect is restricted to the Ki-ras gene and is not mediated by oncogenic Ha-rasVal-12.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

[35S]Methionine was obtained from NEN Life Science Products, protein A-Sepharose from Pharmacia Biotech Inc., polyvinylidene difluoride transfer paper Immobulin-P was obtained from Millipore, N-cadherin monoclonal antibody clone GC-4 mouse IgG1 isotype was purchased from Sigma, monoclonal antibody clone 36 to E-cadherin mouse isotype IgG2a from Transduction Labs, pan-ras rat monoclonal antisera Y13-259, which reacts with the p21 translational products of the Ha-, Ki-, and N-ras human oncogenes, and monoclonal antibody CA10 to cathepsin B from Oncogene Science. Col-1 monoclonal antibody to CEA2 (13) was a gift of Dr. Jeffrey Schlom, NCI. Phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides were a gift of Dr. Brett Monia, Isis Pharmaceuticals (Carlsbad, CA). Isis-2503 is a 20-mer targeted to the initiation codon (AUG) of c-Ha-ras mRNA (TCC-GTC-ATC-GCT-CCT-CAG-GG) (14), Isis-6957 is a 20-mer targeted to the 5'-UTR of Ki-ras (CAG-TGC-CTG-CGC-CGC-GCT-CG), Isis-13177 is a 20-mer of random sequence.

Cell Culture

The HD6 human colon carcinoma cell line was subcloned from the HT29 cell line and recloned as the HD6-4 line immediately before transfection. The parental and transfectant lines were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 7% fetal bovine serum or ITS-Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, as described (4).

Antisense Oligonucleotide Treatment

Treatment of Ki-ras and Ha-ras transfectants was essentially as described (15). Cells were seeded per well at 2 × 105 in 6-well plates. 24 h later the cells were washed with pre-warmed serum-free ITS-Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and then incubated in this medium with a fixed ratio of oligonucleotide to Lipofectin (2.4 µl of Lipofectin per 100 µM oligonucleotide) for 4 h. The oligonucleotide-containing medium was then replaced with normal growth medium, and growth continued for 48 h to allow Ras turnover plus reduced Ras mRNA levels to result in reduced Ras protein level.

Immunodetection

50 µg of cell lysate proteins were blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes after separation on 7% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The blots were blocked in PBS containing 4% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% Tween 20 (blocking buffer) for 1 h at room temperature, incubated for 1 h with a 1:500 dilution of col-1 (anti-CEA), 1 µg/ml anti-cathepsin B, 1:2000 dilution of E-cadherin antibody, a 1:100 dilution of N-cadherin antibody, or 5 µg/ml pan-ras antibody, washed once in blocking buffer, then incubated for 1 h with rabbit anti-mouse IgG (H and L chains, Cappel/Cooper Biomedical) at 1:500 in blocking buffer. The blots were then washed once in blocking buffer and either detected by incubation for 30 min at 25 ° with 1 uCi/ml 125I-protein A followed by washing and autoradiography or by using enhanced chemiluminescence.

Ras Immunoprecipitation

The method is essentially the same as that used previously (16). Cells were cultured in 100-mm dishes until subconfluent, and cells were prelabeled overnight with [35S]methionine (625 uCi/ml, 1220 Ci/mmol) and lysed in 0.5 ml of buffer consisting of 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 20 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na2P04, pH 7.4, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 mM benzamidine, 10 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. 50 µg of monoclonal antibody Y13-259 was added and incubation proceeded for 1 h. p21ras·Y13-259 complexes were precipitated by addition of 10 µl of rabbit anti-rat IgG (Cappel) (about 20 µg) per mg of total protein, which had been prebound for 1 h with 60 µl of protein A-Sepharose, and then cleared of unbound antibody by centrifugation, followed by incubation for 10 min with 10 µl of 2% bovine serum albumin. The p21ras·Y13-259 complexes and rabbit anti-rat IgG prebound to protein A and saturated with bovine serum albumin were incubated for an additional hour and washed two times with lysis buffer and three times with TBST (25 mM Tris, pH 8, 125 mM NaCl, 0.025% Tween 20) before analysis.

Northern Analysis for CEA and Cathepsin B mRNA Analysis

20 µg of total RNA from each cell line was electrophoresed in a 0.8% agarose-formaldehyde gel, transferred to nylon membranes by downward capillary transfer, and UV cross-linked. The membranes were hybridized to either a full-length human cathepsin B cDNA or a polymerase chain reaction-generated cDNA corresponding to base pairs 55-638 from the translation start of human CEA. Probes were labeled with 32P by random priming. The blot was hybridized overnight at 42 °C with at least 107 cpm of the labeled probe, washed at room temperature three times for 7 min with 1 × SSC, 1% SDS, then washed for 20 min at 52 °C in 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS, and autoradiographed. The CEA blot was stripped and rehybridized to GAPDH, whereas the cathepsin B blot was rehybridized to human 18 S rRNA cDNA.

Immunocytochemistry

Sections were deparaffinized with xylene and hydrated in graded alcohols, and endogenous peroxidase was quenched with 1% H202. Sections were blocked in a 1:67 dilution of normal horse serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) in PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin (PBS diluent) and then incubated in antibody col-1 at a 1:50 dilution in PBS overnight at 4 °C. After 3 washes in PBS diluent, 1:67 dilution of biotinylated horse anti-mouse IgG in PBS diluent was added for 30 min, followed by ABC reagent and detection using the ABC kit manufacturer's instructions. Slides were counterstained with Harris' hematoxylin.

Culture on Transwells

Cells were cultured on Costar transwells with 2 ml of medium under the layer and 1.5 ml above the layer for 2 weeks postconfluence with media changes 3 times a week, fixed and analyzed for CEA production by immunocytochemistry as above.

Aggregation Assay

Cells were harvested by gentle trypsinization for 3 min with 0.025% trypsin, 0.01% EDTA in 0.15 M NaCl. Cells were washed once with 10 mM EDTA in 1 × PBS, pelleted, and resuspended at 2-3 × 106/ml in 5 mM EDTA, 1 × PBS followed by disaggregation by repeated forceful passages through a transfer pipette. 1-ml aliquots in a 15 × 100-mm test tube were shaken gently for the indicated times at a 45 ° angle in an orbital shaker at room temperature. A sample was taken gently with a pasteur pipette and counted visually using a hemacytometer. For each determination, duplicate aggregation experiments were performed. 5 mM CaCl2 was added to the aggregation experiments performed in the presence of calcium. Anti-CEA monoclonal antibody col-1 and control isotype monoclonal antibody MOPC-21 at 1 mg/ml were digested with papain as described (5). 100 µg/ml Fab' fragments were added to each aggregation assay.


RESULTS

Effects of Ki-ras4BVal-12but not Ha-rasVal-12 on N-cadherin and CEA Expression in Colon Epithelial Cells

Transfections of HD6-4 colon epithelial cells had been performed with a mini-gene construct of the cellular Ki-ras4B gene mutated at codon 12 to valine (Ki-rasG12V), an expression plasmid encoding a mini-gene construct of the wild-type cellular Ki-ras4B gene, and a cellular Ha-rasG12V expression plasmid. We isolated three independent transfectant clones expressing the Ki-ras4BG12V oncogene: 4V, 4V1, and 4V2; three independent transfectant clones expressing the Ha-rasG12V oncogene: H15, H18, and H25; and transfectant clone 4G1, expressing the transfected wild-type Ki-ras4B gene. The transfected oncogenes were expressed as active proteins, which had been identified by Western blotting with pan-rasVal-12 antibody, and these oncogenic proteins bound elevated levels of GTP.1 Whereas the Ki-ras transfectants displayed elevated levels of Ki-Ras proteins and the Ha-ras transfectants displayed elevated levels of Ha-Ras proteins, as expected,1 all the transfectants expressed equal amounts of total Ras proteins as shown by Western blotting of cell lysates with a pan-Ras antibody (Fig. 1A) or by immunoprecipitation from 35S-prelabeled cells (Fig. 1B). Possibly expression of the transfected oncogenic Ras proteins down-regulated levels of endogenous Ras proteins.


Fig. 1. A, Western blot of lysates from oncogenic Ha-ras transfectants (H15, H18, H25), oncogenic Ki-ras transfectants (4V1, 4V2, 4V), wild-type Ki-ras transfectant 4G1, and parental line HD6-4 showing equal expression of Ras proteins in all lines. B, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels showing that equal concentrations of Ras proteins were immunoprecipitated from 35S-prelabeled parental HD6-4, wild-type Ki-ras control cells HD6-4G1, mutated Ki-ras containing HD6-4V cells, and mutated Ha-ras containing H18 cells. + lanes, immunoprecipitations with anti-ras antibody Y13-259; unmarked lanes, control immunoprecipitations with normal rat serum.  marks the position of Ras proteins. Molecular weight markers are 15.7, 18.9, 29.1, 44.5, 67.5, 103, and 202 kDa, indicated by dashes on the left.

[View Larger Version of this Image (50K GIF file)]


In an earlier study, we observed that the culture of HD6-4 cells in low calcium medium prevented both apicobasal and basolateral polarization (5). When HD6-4 cells polarized, levels of E-cadherin increased 35-fold and mediated lateral adherence between adjacent cells to form the HD6-4 monolayer. When cells were prevented from polarization by low calcium, E-cadherin levels were not increased, but levels of CEA increased 3-fold and mediated multicellular aggregation (5). Thus we expected that oncogenic Ki-ras, which blocked apicobasal polarization,1 would also decrease expression of E-cadherin. However, Ki-ras and Ha-ras transfectant cells expressed levels of E-cadherin equal to those expressed by parental or wild-type Ki-ras4B transfectant clone 4G1 (Fig. 2). However, low calcium medium and oncogenic Ki-ras similarly induced CEA expression. Each of the three transfectant clones expressing the Ki-ras4BG12V oncogene: 4V, 4V1, and 4V2, expressed elevated levels of the embryonic adhesion protein CEA compared with each of the three independent transfectant clones expressing the Ha-rasG12V oncogene: H15, H18, and H25, and the parental line (Fig. 3). Instead of decreasing expression of E-cadherin, expression of oncogenic Ki-ras unexpectedly led to decreased levels of the adult adhesion protein N-cadherin in each of the three transfectant lines (Fig. 3).


Fig. 2. Western blot showing similar abundance of E-cadherin in parental HD6-4, Ki-rasVal-12 transfectant 4V2 cells, Ha-rasVal-12 transfectant H18 cells, and wild-type Ki-rasGly-12 transfectant 4G1 cells.

[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]



Fig. 3. Upper panel, Western blots showing increased CEA protein abundance in each of three Ki-rasval12 but not in any of three Ha-rasval12 colon epithelial cell transfectants compared with parental HD6-4 cells. Middle panel, Western blot showing decreased N-cadherin protein abundance in Ki-rasval12 but not Ha-rasval12 colon epithelial cell transfectants. Lower panel, Western blot showing increased cathepsin B protein in Ki-rasval12 but not Ha-rasval12 colon epithelial cell transfectants. Abundance of mature single chain of cathepsin B at 31 kDa is shown.

[View Larger Version of this Image (45K GIF file)]


We then examined CEA expression by Northern analysis. Transcripts representing CEA (3.0 kb) and a CEA family member called NCA at 2.6 kb were detected in each cell line (Fig. 4). Each of the three transfectant clones expressing the Ki-ras4BG12V oncogene: 4V, 4V1, and 4V2, expressed elevated levels of CEA mRNA and decreased levels of NCA mRNA compared with each of the three independent transfectant clones expressing the Ha-rasG12V oncogene: H15, H18, and H25, and the parental line (Fig. 3). Thus, expression of oncogenic Ki-ras elevated CEA expression at the transcriptional level. Oncogenic Ha-Ras proteins in the Ha-transfectant cells were expressed at roughly equivalent protein levels to the oncogenic Ki-Ras proteins in the Ki-transfectant cells as assayed by Western blotting1 (Fig. 1). Thus, the inability of oncogenic Ha-Ras proteins to increase CEA transcription in these colon epithelial cells was not due to low levels of expression of Ha-Ras proteins.


Fig. 4. Upper panel, Northern blot showing increased CEA mRNA levels in each of three Ki-rasVal-12 but not in any of three Ha-rasVal-12 colon epithelial cell transfectants compared with parental HD6-4 cells. All three Ki-rasVal-12 transfectants have down-regulated NCA mRNA levels compared with parental HD6-4 cells. Lower panel, GAPDH mRNA levels for internal control.

[View Larger Version of this Image (41K GIF file)]


Elevated Levels of CEA Shown to Be Caused By Oncogenic Ki-ras Gene By Use of Gene-specific Antisense Oligonucleotides

Blocking transcription of the transfected oncogenic Ki-ras gene in 4V2 cells blocked expression of CEA. A 4-h treatment with oligonucleotides (see "Experimental Procedures") was followed by a 48-h chase to allow turnover of the endogenous Ki-Ras mRNA and protein. In each of three experiments a decrease in CEA protein abundance was seen in 4V2 cells treated with antisense oligonucleotides directed to the Ki-ras gene (A) compared with 4V2 cells treated with random sequence oligonucleotides (R) or untreated cells (C) (Fig. 5). Two concentrations of oligonucleotides were used. 100 nM of the antisense oligonucleotide decreased CEA expression marginally, whereas 200 nM almost completely blocked CEA expression although CEA expression was unaltered by either concentration of the random sequence oligonucleotide. Thus, the increase in CEA expression seen in each of three independently cloned transfectant lines is not due to some extraneous event in the establishment of these lines but is directly due to the functioning of the oncogenic c-Ki-ras gene.


Fig. 5. Phosphorothiolated antisense oligonucleotides directed against the Ki-ras DNA sequence decrease protein levels of CEA in Ki-rasVal-12 transfectant HD6-4V2 cells. nM final concentrations of antisense (A) or random sequence control oligonucleotides (R). C, control untreated.

[View Larger Version of this Image (54K GIF file)]


CEA in Unpolarized Ki-ras Transfectants Is Expressed All Along the Membrane

The HD6-4 parental line and the HD6-4G1 line grow as monolayers when grown in vitro on a transwell that allows feeding through the basal surface as occurs in vivo (Fig. 6, panels 1-3). Cells form lateral attachments and polarize so that their nuclei are found at the basal end of the cell, and CEA expression as identified by immunocytochemistry is restricted to the apical portion (Fig. 6, panels 2 and 3; panel 1 is immunohistochemistry control). In contrast, HD6-4V cells expressing oncogenic Ki-Ras proteins do not polarize and form a monolayer but instead multilayer (Fig. 6, panel 4). Nuclei are not found polarized to the basal region of the cell nearest the transwell membrane but at various locations in the cytoplasm. CEA is abundantly expressed at all cell surfaces and can be clearly seen between the cells where it could mediate adhesion.


Fig. 6. Comparison of polarity and CEA expression of parental cell line HD6-4, wild-type Ki-ras transfectant HD6-4G1, and oncogenic Ki-ras transfectant HD6-4V grown on collagen I-coated transwells. Panels 2, 3 and 4 reacted with anti-CEA antibody col-1 show increased CEA expression coupled with loss of polarity in the HD6-4V line. Panel 1, immunohistochemical negative control. Final magnification × 886.

[View Larger Version of this Image (54K GIF file)]


Expression of Ki-ras4Bval12 Leads to Use of CEA as an Adhesion Molecule

Rounded, unpolarized HD6-4V cells express CEA all along their cell membrane (Fig. 6) and thus can use CEA to aggregate (Fig. 7). Cultures of the parental HD6-4 line, the wild-type Ki-ras control HD6-4G1 line, and the oncogenic Ki-ras HD6-4V line were dissociated to single cells. The capacity of each cell preparation to aggregate was tested by performing the aggregation under permissive conditions in calcium-containing medium, which would allow adherence through cadherins and would not block adherence through CEA (Fig. 7C). In these preparations about 70% of the parental and wild-type Ki-ras transfectants and 50% of the HD6-4V line aggregated. A parallel aggregation experiment was carried out in medium without calcium. Under these conditions only calcium-independent adhesion could occur such as that mediated by CEA, whereas cadherin-mediated adhesion that requires calcium would be blocked. Cells were gently agitated in calcium-free medium in the presence of Fab' fragments of an isotype control antibody, MOPC-21. Neither the parental HD6-4 cells nor the wild-type ras transfectant HD6-4G1 cells were able to aggregate in the absence of calcium (<10%) showing that they did not use their apical cell surface CEA (Fig. 6) to aggregate (Fig. 7A). However, half of the unpolarized HD6-4V cells capable of aggregation in vitro (Fig. 7C) used their cell surface CEA molecules to aggregate (Fig. 7A). CEA was shown to be the adherence molecule as HD6-4V cells were able to form aggregrates in the presence of the isotype control antibody (Fig. 7A) but not in the presence of Fab' fragments of a monoclonal antibody to CEA, col-1 (Fig. 7B).


Fig. 7. Aggregation experiments of single cell suspensions of the HD6-4, HD6-4G1, and HD6-4V lines performed in the presence of EDTA and either control monoclonal antibody Fab' fragments (A) or anti-CEA Fab' fragments (B), or performed in the presence of calcium and control monoclonal antibody Fab' fragments (C). Data is the mean ± S.E. of duplicate experiments with each point the mean of four determinations.

[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]


Expression of Ki-ras4Bval12but Not Ha-rasval12 Leads to Increased Expression of Cathepsin B

When assayed for in vitro invasion through a collagen I coated modified Boyden chamber (17), HD6-4V cells exhibited over double the invasion capability as the HD6-4G1 control transfectant line (28 ± 9 versus 11 ± 3 invasive cells per field, n = 8, mean ± S.E.). We wondered whether the oncogenic Ki-ras gene had increased expression of a protease associated with colon cancer invasion. We investigated expression of the lysosomal protease cathepsin B as transfection of the c-Ha-ras oncogene into MCF-10 human breast epithelial cells increased the protein level and the membrane association of cathepsin B (18). Analysis by Western blotting (Fig. 3) demonstrated an increase in expression of mature single chain cathepsin B protein of 31 kDa in each of the three transfectant clones expressing the Ki-ras4BG12V oncogene: 4V, 4V1, and 4V2, compared with each of the three independent transfectant clones expressing the Ha-rasG12V oncogene: H15, H18, and H25, and the parental line, as well as the wild-type Ki-ras transfectant (data not shown). However, the increase in cathepsin B expression was post-transcriptional as HD6-4V cells exhibited no increase in cathepsin B mRNA expression level compared with control cells (Fig. 8), which is similar to the post-transcriptional regulation observed in Ha-ras transformed MCF-10 human breast epithelial cells (18). Two cathepsin B transcripts were seen in colon epithelial cells, one of 4 kb and one of 2 kb. Duplicate experiments showed no increase in either 4-kb or 2-kb cathepsin B transcripts in HD6-4V cells compared with wild-type Ki-ras transfectant 4G1 cells or parental cells, normalized to 18 S rRNA levels by densitometry analysis. Thus, cathepsin B expression is controlled by post-transcriptional mechanisms in both breast cancer cells transfected with oncogenic Ha-ras (18) and in colon cancer cells transfected with oncogenic Ki-ras (this study). Cathepsin B is present in vesicles in the apical region of normal colon epithelial cells and some benign tumor cells, but with progression to carcinoma, vesicles staining for cathepsin B are redistributed to the basal pole of the cell just inside the basal membrane adjacent to the underlying basement membrane (19). Altered intracellular trafficking of cathepsin B and its membrane association may be caused by ras-induced morphological changes in both Ha-ras-transfected breast cancer cells (18) and in Ki-ras-transfected colon cancer cells (this study).


Fig. 8. Northern analysis for cathepsin B. Blot hybridization of total RNAs from HD6 cell lines to human cathepsin B cDNA (A). The membrane was washed and reprobed for 18 S human ribosomal RNA (B). Molecular weight sizes are indicated on the left side of the blot.

[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]



DISCUSSION

The mammalian ras gene family comprises a highly conserved gene family of 21 kDa GDP/GTP-regulated switches, which relay signals from receptor tyrosine kinases to multiple effectors including the mitogen-activated protein kinases, phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase, and GAP, among others. Three mammalian ras isoforms, Ki-, Ha- and N-ras, share many biochemical, structural, and functional characteristics including localization to the inner surface of the plasma membrane. Transforming ras mutations lock ras molecules in the active GTP-bound state and are found in about 40% of all human cancers. However, Ki-, Ha-, and N-ras must play different roles in transformation in different cell types. A comparison of the three human ras genes, each carrying a G12D mutation, demonstrated that oncogenic Ha-ras was more transforming in rat-2 and NIH3T3 fibroblasts, whereas oncogenic N-ras was more transforming in hematopoietic TF-1 cells (20). The vast majority of ras mutations in colon cancers are in Ki-ras with only a few percent in N-ras and none reported in Ha-ras (8). The selection of Ki-ras mutations in the genesis of colon cancers suggested that mutations in this ras isoform might have different effects on colon epithelial cells than mutations in Ha-ras.

In an earlier study we demonstrated that oncogenic Ki-ras4BVal-12, but not oncogenic Ha-rasVal-12, blocks the apicobasal polarization of colon epithelial cells by preventing normal glycosylation of the beta  chain of the collagen receptor alpha 2beta 1 integrin. We now show that that oncogenic Ki-ras4BVal-12, but not oncogenic Ha-rasval12, up-regulates expression of CEA on the mRNA and protein levels in colon epithelial cells and coincidentally down-regulates expression of the homophilic cell adhesion molecule N-cadherin. Ectopic expression of CEA in melanoma cells was shown to decrease transcription of another homophilic cell adhesion molecule, NCAM (21). Thus, CEA may function to selectively alter expression of other cell adhesion molecules. In an earlier study we found that preventing the expression of E-cadherin by culture in low calcium medium led to the up-regulation of CEA in colon epithelial cells (5). Possibly the cell can express either embryonic adhesion molecules like CEA or the cadherin class of calcium-dependent adhesion molecules. Up-regulation of CEA by either transfection (21) or in this study, expression of oncogenic Ki-ras4BVal-12 may inhibit transcription of one or more cadherins typically expressed by the cell. In the current study, N-cadherin, but not E-cadherin, was down-regulated by expression of CEA. Up-regulation of CEA by oncogenic Ki-ras was paralleled by down-regulation of a closely related homotypic adhesion molecule, NCA. NCA is also up-regulated in various cancer cells but apparently not by oncogenic Ki-ras.

CEA is a cell surface glycoprotein and intercellular adhesion protein that is often increased in abundance and unrestricted in spatial expression in cancer cells (22). CEA was originally described as an oncofetal protein in colon carcinoma cells. During the early weeks of gestation, the human embryonic intestine is multilayered and exhibits CEA expression in adjacent cell membranes when cells develop in multilayered arrays. At later times in gestation and in the adult, the colonocytes form a palisaded monolayer and CEA is localized to the apical luminal membrane (23). In the current studies, HD6-4V cells could not polarize and expressed CEA molecules all over the cell surface. When HD6-4V cells aggregated in multilayered cell arrays, they expressed CEA at points of contact where CEA mediated intercellular adhesion, reproducing the embryonic phenotype.

CEA is known to enhance experimental metastasis (24), probably through its capacity to mediate cell adhesion. CEA injected intravenously into nude mice before injection of tumor cells with low metastatic potential enhanced metastasis by increasing the retention of such tumor cells within the liver and lungs 4 h after intrasplenic injection (25). A strong correlation was found between formation of metastases and early retention of tumor cells after injection. Cell aggregates formed by cell surface CEA molecules may more readily implant in sites of metastasis than single cells. CEA mediated homotypic aggregation of LS-180 colon carcinoma cells (23) and indirectly mediated colon carcinoma attachment to collagen (9) probably because of its adhesive cell to cell properties. The familiar pattern of colon carcinoma cell multilayered growth may result, at least in part, from the adhesive properties of overexpressed and inappropriately localized CEA.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by NCI Grants RO1 CA45783 and RO1 CA67405 (to E. F.) from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
par    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology, State University of New York Health Science Ctr., 750 E. Adams St., Syracuse, NY 13210-2399. Fax: 315-464-8419; E-mail: friedmae{at}vax.cs.hscsyr.edu.
2   The abbreviations used are: CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; kb, kilobase(s).
1   Yan, Z., Chen, M., Perucho, M., and Friedman, E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem, in press.

REFERENCES

  1. Eaton, S., and Simons, K. (1995) Cell 82, 5-8 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Wang, A., Ojakian, G., and Nelson, W. (1990) J. Cell Sci. 95, 153-156 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ojakian, G., and Schwimmer, R. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 561-576 [Abstract]
  4. Hafez, M., Infante, D., Winawer, S., Friedman, E., Yan, Z., Hsu, S., Winawer, S., and Friedman, E. (1990) Cell Growth Differ. 1, 617-626 [Abstract]
  5. Yan, Z., Robinson-Saddler, A., Winawer, S., and Friedman, E. (1993) Cell Growth Differ. 4, 1-8 [Abstract]
  6. Huang, F., Hsu, S., Yan, Z., Winawer, S., and Friedman, E. (1994) Oncogene 9, 3701-3706 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Bos, J., Fearon, E., Hamilton, S., Verlann-de Vries, M., van Boom, J., van der Eb, A., and Vogelstein, B. (1987) Nature 327, 293-297 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Forrester, K., Almoguera, C., Han, K., Grizzle, W. E., and Perucho, M. (1987) Nature 327, 298-303 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Hafez, M., Hsu, S., Yan, Z., Winawer, S., and Friedman, E. (1992) Cell Growth Differ. 3, 753-762 [Abstract]
  10. Shibata, D., Schaeffer, J., Li, Z.-H., Capella, G., and Perucho, M. (1993) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 85, 1058-1063 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Finkelstein, S., Sayegh, R., Bakker, A., and Swalsky, P. (1993) Arch Surg. 128, 526-532 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Suchy, B., Zietz, C., and Rabes, H. (1992) Int. J. Cancer 52, 30-33 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Kuroki, M., Greiner, J. W., Simpson, J. F., Primus, J. F., Guadagni, F., and Schlom, J. (1989) Int. J. Cancer 44, 208-218 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Monia, B., Johnston, J., Ecker, D., Zounes, M., Lima, W., and Freier, S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 19954-19962 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Chen, G., Oh, S., Monia, B., and Stacey, D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28259-28265 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yan, Z., Winawer, S., and Friedman, E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13231-13237 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Hsu, S., Huang, F., Hafez, M., Winawer, S., and Friedman, E. (1994) Cell Growth Differ. 5, 267-275 [Abstract]
  18. Sloane, B., Moin, K., Sameni, M., Tait, L., Rozhin, J., and Ziegler, G. (1994) J. Cell Sci. 107, 373-384 [Abstract]
  19. Campo, E., Munoz, J., Miquel, R., Palacin, A., Cardesa, A., Sloane, B. F., and Emmert-Buck, M. R. (1994) Am. J. Pathol. 145, 301-309 [Abstract]
  20. Maher, J., Baker, D., Manning, M., Dibb, N., and Roberts, I. (1995) Oncogene 11, 1639-1647 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Grimm, T., and Johnson, J. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 3254-3257 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Eidelman, F., Fuks, A., DeMarte, L., Tahery, M., and Stanners, C. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 123, 467-475 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Benchimol, S., Fuks, A., Jothy, S., Beauchemin, N., Shirota, K., and Stanners, C. P. (1989) Cell 57, 327-334 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Tibbetts, L., Doremus, C., Tzanakakis, G., and Vezeridis, M. (1993) Cancer (Phila.) 71, 315-321 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Jessup, J. M., Petrick, A. T., Toth, C. A., Ford, R., Meterissian, S., O'Hara, C. J., Steele, G., Jr., and Thomas, P. (1993) Br. J. Cancer 67, 464-470 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Volume 272, Number 44, Issue of October 31, 1997 pp. 27902-27907
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
J. B. Fleming, G.-L. Shen, S. E. Holloway, M. Davis, and R. A. Brekken
Molecular Consequences of Silencing Mutant K-ras in Pancreatic Cancer Cells: Justification for K-ras-Directed Therapy
Mol. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 3(7): 413 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. Jay, P. Berta, and P. Blache
Expression of the Carcinoembryonic Antigen Gene Is Inhibited by SOX9 in Human Colon Carcinoma Cells
Cancer Res., March 15, 2005; 65(6): 2193 - 2198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. Jantscheff, L. Terracciano, A. Lowy, K. Glatz-Krieger, F. Grunert, B. Micheel, J. Brummer, U. Laffer, U. Metzger, R. Herrmann, et al.
Expression of CEACAM6 in Resectable Colorectal Cancer: A Factor of Independent Prognostic Significance
J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 21(19): 3638 - 3646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Yan, G.-Y. Kim, X. Deng, and E. Friedman
Transforming Growth Factor beta 1 Induces Proliferation in Colon Carcinoma Cells by Ras-dependent, smad-independent Down-regulation of p21cip1
J. Biol. Chem., March 15, 2002; 277(12): 9870 - 9879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
P. J. Ross, M. George, D. Cunningham, F. DiStefano, H. J. N. Andreyev, P. Workman, and P. A. Clarke
Inhibition of Kirsten-ras Expression in Human Colorectal Cancer Using Rationally Selected Kirsten-ras Antisense Oligonucleotides
Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2001; 1(1): 29 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Rebollo and C. Martinez-A
Ras Proteins: Recent Advances and New Functions
Blood, November 1, 1999; 94(9): 2971 - 2980.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Yan, X. Deng, and E. Friedman
Oncogenic Ki-ras Confers a More Aggressive Colon Cancer Phenotype through Modification of Transforming Growth Factor-beta Receptor III
J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 2001; 276(2): 1555 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. B. Walsh and D. Bar-Sagi
Differential Activation of the Rac Pathway by Ha-Ras and K-Ras
J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2001; 276(19): 15609 - 15615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. A. Gupta, J. A. Brockman, P. Sarraf, T. M. Willson, and R. N. DuBois
Target Genes of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor gamma in Colorectal Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2001; 276(32): 29681 - 29687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yan, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yan, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement