![]()
|
|
||||||||
Volume 272, Number 45, Issue of November 7, 1997 pp. 28175-28178
(Received for publication, July 31, 1997, and in revised form, September 14, 1997)
§,
**
§§ and
¶¶
From the
Department of Biological Sciences,
Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan 48309-4401, the
¶ Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine,
Stanford, California 94305, the
Program in Molecular and
Cell Biology, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma 73104, the ** Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73190, and the 
Howard Hughes Medical
Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
Shortly after initiating promoter-specific transcription in vitro, mammalian RNA polymerase II becomes highly susceptible to arrest in a promoter-proximal region 9-13 base pairs downstream of the transcriptional start site (Dvir, A., Conaway, R. C., and Conaway, J. W. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 23352-23356). Arrest by polymerase in this region is suppressed by TFIIH in an ATP-dependent reaction (Dvir, A., Conaway, R. C., and Conaway, J. W. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 9006-9010). In this report, we present evidence that, in addition to TFIIH and an ATP cofactor, efficient transcription by RNA polymerase II through this promoter-proximal region requires formation of an "escape-competent" transcriptional intermediate. Formation of this intermediate requires template DNA 40-50 base pairs downstream of the transcriptional start site. This requirement for downstream DNA is transient, since template DNA downstream of +40 is dispensable for assembly of the preinitiation complex, for initiation and synthesis of the first 10-12 phosphodiester bonds of nascent transcripts and for further extension of transcripts longer than ~14 nucleotides. Thus, promoter escape requires that the RNA polymerase II transcription complex undergoes a critical structural transition, likely driven by interaction of one or more components of the transcriptional machinery with template DNA 40-50 base pairs downstream of the transcriptional start site.
Initiation of eukaryotic messenger RNA synthesis is a complex process catalyzed by multisubunit RNA polymerase II and governed by the concerted action of a diverse collection of transcription factors. Biochemical studies have resolved transcription by RNA polymerase II into multiple stages that include (i) assembly and ATP-dependent activation of the preinitiation complex, which evidence suggests involves unwinding of promoter DNA surrounding the transcriptional start site by the TFIIH DNA helicase, (ii) transcription initiation, and finally (iii) escape of polymerase from the promoter and formation of the stable elongation complex (1-3).
Although substantial information is currently available on the mechanisms underlying assembly and ATP-dependent activation of the preinitiation complex and transcription initiation, relatively little is known about how RNA polymerase II escapes the promoter to form the stable elongation complex. In a recent study carried out with a reconstituted basal transcription system composed of recombinant TBP, TFIIB, TFIIE, and TFIIF and highly purified RNA polymerase II and TFIIH from rat liver, we observed that, shortly after initiating transcription, RNA polymerase II becomes highly susceptible to arrest in a promoter-proximal region 9-13 base pairs downstream of the transcriptional start site (4). Furthermore, we found that arrest by RNA polymerase II in this region is suppressed by TFIIH in an ATP-dependent reaction that may be catalyzed by the TFIIH DNA helicase (5), since basal transcription in the reconstituted system is insensitive to the TFIIH kinase inhibitor H-8 (6, 7).
In this report, we present evidence that, in addition to TFIIH and an ATP cofactor, efficient promoter escape by RNA polymerase II requires formation of an "escape-competent" transcriptional intermediate. Formation of this intermediate exhibits a transient requirement for template DNA 40-50 base pairs downstream of the transcriptional start site. Here we present these findings, which shed new light on the mechanisms underlying promoter escape and formation of the stable RNA polymerase II elongation complex.
Unlabeled ultrapure ribonucleoside
5
-triphosphates, dATP, and
3
-O-MeGTP1 were
purchased from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. [
-32P]CTP (>400
Ci/mmol) was obtained from Amersham Corp. Dinucleotides CpU and CpA and
polyvinyl alcohol (type II) were from Sigma. Bovine serum albumin
(Pentex fraction V) was purchased from ICN Immunobiologicals. Recombinant ribonuclease inhibitor (RNasin 1) was obtained from Promega.
RNA polymerase II (8) and TFIIH (rat
(9), TSK SP 5-PW
fraction (10)) were purified as described from rat liver nuclear extracts. Recombinant yeast TBP (AcA 44 fraction (11, 12)) and TFIIB
(rat
(13)) were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified as described. Recombinant TFIIE was prepared as described (14), except that the 56-kDa subunit was expressed in E. coli strain BL21(DE3)-pLysS. Recombinant TFIIF was prepared as
described (15) from E. coli strain JM109(DE3) co-infected
with M13mpET-RAP30 and M13mpET-RAP74.
Preinitiation complexes were assembled at the AdML promoter at 28 °C by a 45-min preincubation of 105-µl reaction mixtures containing 20 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.9), 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 60 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 2% (w/v) polyvinyl alcohol, 7% (v/v) glycerol, 18 units of RNasin, ~30 ng of the EcoRI to NdeI fragment from pDN-AdML (16), ~150 ng of recombinant yeast TBP, ~30 ng of recombinant TFIIB, ~60 ng of recombinant TFIIF, ~60 ng of recombinant TFIIE, ~450 ng of TFIIH, and ~0.03 unit of RNA polymerase II. Transcription was initiated by addition of nucleotides as indicated in the figure legends. For analysis of short transcripts, 15 µl of each reaction mixture were added to 6 µl of 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K in 100 mM EDTA. Following incubation at room temperature for 15 min, 25 µl of 10 M urea containing 0.025% bromphenol blue and 0.025% xylene cyanol FF were added to each sample. The samples were vortexed for 10 s, heated at 70 °C for 5 min, and subjected to 25% acrylamide, 3% bisacrylamide, 7 M urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as described (17). For analysis of runoff transcripts, 35 µl of each reaction mixture were added to 35 µl of 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K and 0.6 mg/ml yeast tRNA in 200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 300 mM NaCl, 25 mM EDTA, and 2% (w/v) SDS. Following incubation at room temperature for 15 min, transcripts were extracted once with phenol/chloroform and ethanol-precipitated. Samples were resuspended in 10 M urea containing 0.025% bromphenol blue and 0.025% xylene cyanol FF and subjected to 6% acrylamide, 0.8% bisacrylamide, 7 M urea gel electrophoresis. Gels were imaged by autoradiography or on a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager.
In experiments investigating the mechanism of formation of the RNA
polymerase II elongation complex in a basal transcription system
composed of recombinant TBP, TFIIB, TFIIE, and TFIIF and purified
polymerase and TFIIH from rat liver, we discovered that promoter escape
by RNA polymerase II has a transient requirement for template DNA
40-50 base pairs downstream of the transcriptional start site. To
investigate the role of downstream template DNA in promoter escape, we
took advantage of the plasmid pDN-AdML (16), which contains AdML core
promoter sequences from
50 to +10 inserted between the
KpnI and XbaI sites in the polylinker of pUC-18.
The EcoRI to NdeI fragment of pDN-AdML was used
as DNA template in transcription reactions. The NdeI site is
located ~250 base pairs downstream of the AdML transcriptional start
site. As illustrated in Fig. 1, pDN-AdML
can also be cleaved by the restriction enzymes PstI,
SphI, HindIII, and HaeIII, which cut the template strand at sites 22, 29, 39, and 48 nucleotides downstream of the AdML transcriptional start site. By digesting the
EcoRI to NdeI fragment of pDN-AdML with these
restriction enzymes before transcription initiation or after synthesis
of short transcripts, we could assess the requirements for downstream
template DNA during initiation, promoter escape, and subsequent
elongation by RNA polymerase II.
[View Larger Version of this Image (9K GIF file)]
To determine how much downstream template DNA is required for
transcription initiation, we used the dinucleotide-primed abortive initiation assay. As shown previously, RNA polymerase II will utilize
dinucleotides to prime synthesis of promoter-specific transcripts (16,
18-20). Transcription initiation from the AdML promoter can be primed
by a variety of dinucleotides within a small region centered around the
transcriptional start site (20); for example, in the presence of
[
-32P]CTP and the dinucleotide CpU, which
supports initiation at a position 3 base pairs upstream of the AdML
transcriptional start site, RNA polymerase II will initiate and
synthesize the radioactively labeled trinucleotide CpU*pC
(see Fig. 1).
To determine how much downstream template DNA is required for very
early elongation and promoter escape, we carried out
transcription in the presence of CpU, ATP, UTP,
[
-32P]CTP, and the chain-terminating
nucleotide analog 3
-O-MeGTP. Under these conditions, RNA
polymerase II can initiate and synthesize transcripts that have a
maximum length of 18 nucleotides (terminated at the first G residue,
marked with an asterisk in Fig. 1).
In the experiment of Fig. 2,
preinitiation complexes were assembled at the AdML promoter by
preincubation of the EcoRI to NdeI fragment of
pDN-AdML with RNA polymerase II and initiation factors. Following
treatment of preinitiation complexes with either HaeIII,
HindIII, SphI, or PstI, reaction
mixtures were divided into three equal portions and assayed for
synthesis of CpU-primed trinucleotide transcripts, for synthesis of
CpU-primed 3
-O-MeG-terminated 18-nucleotide-long
transcripts, and, to control for efficient restriction enzyme digestion
of the template, for synthesis of CpU-primed full-length runoff
transcripts. As shown in lanes 15 and 19,
transcription of the undigested KpnI to NdeI
fragment of pDN-AdML resulted in synthesis of the full-length
~250-nucleotide-long runoff transcript. Synthesis of the
NdeI-terminated ~250-nucleotide runoff transcript was
almost completely abolished by treatment of preinitiation complexes
with HaeIII, HindIII, SphI, or
PstI (lanes 16-18, 20, and 21), arguing that the
DNA templates were digested to near completion by each restriction
enzyme.
-32P]CTP, and 5 µM dATP to assay
synthesis of the dinucleotide-primed trinucleotide CpUpC (because A
would be the next nucleotide incorporated after synthesis of CpUpC,
dATP was used instead of ATP to satisfy the energy requirement for
transcription initiation); 200 µM CpU, 0.5 [
-32P]CTP, 5 µM ATP, 5 µM
UTP, and 100 µM 3
-O-MeGTP to assay synthesis of 3
-O-MeG-terminated transcripts; or 200 µM
CpU, 100 µM ATP, 100 µM UTP, 100 µM GTP, 10 µM CTP, and 0.5 µM
[
-32P]CTP to assay synthesis of runoff transcripts.
After 30 min at 28 °C, transcription reactions were terminated and
products were analyzed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Pol II, RNA polymerase II;
3
-OMeG, 3
-O-MeGTP; *C,
[
-32P]CTP; U, UTP; A, ATP;
G, GTP; dA, dATP; nt, nucleotides;
NTPs, ribonucleoside triphosphates; Res. Enz.,
restriction enzyme.
[View Larger Version of this Image (44K GIF file)]
Synthesis of CpU-primed trinucleotide transcripts was unaffected by digestion of preinitiation complexes with HaeIII (compare lanes 1 and 3) and only modestly reduced by digestion with either HindIII (compare lanes 1 and 5) or SphI (compare lanes 1 and 7 and lanes 9 and 10). In contrast, synthesis of trinucleotide transcripts was almost completely inhibited by digestion of preinitiation complexes with PstI (compare lanes 9 and 11). Thus, transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II does not require template DNA downstream of +29, but is strongly dependent on the presence of template DNA between +23 and +28, even though the preinitiation complex does not protect DNA in this region from digestion by restriction enzymes.
Like synthesis of CpU-primed trinucleotide transcripts, synthesis of
CpU-primed 3
-O-MeG-terminated 18-nucleotide-long
transcripts was unaffected by digestion of preinitiation complexes with
HaeIII prior to initiation (compare lanes 2 and
4). In contrast, little or no 3
-O-MeG-terminated
18-nucleotide transcripts were synthesized when preinitiation complexes
were digested with HindIII (lane 6) or
SphI (lanes 8 and 13). Under these
conditions, CpU-primed transcripts reached a maximum length of only
~10-12 nucleotides. Thus, promoter escape by very early RNA
polymerase II elongation complexes is strongly dependent on the
presence of template DNA located between 40 and 47 base pairs
downstream of the AdML transcriptional start site (or between 30 and 40 base pairs downstream of the polymerase catalytic site), even though
this region of the DNA template is not essential for assembly of the
preinitiation complex formation and transcription initiation.
Although digestion of preinitiation complexes with HindIII
prior to transcription initiation is sufficient to inhibit synthesis of
transcripts longer than ~10-12 nucleotides, digestion of
preinitiation complexes with HindIII after synthesis of
~14-nucleotide-long transcripts does not prevent their further
extension. In the experiment of Fig. 3,
preinitiation complexes were assembled at the AdML promoter by
preincubation of the EcoRI to NdeI fragment of
pDN-AdML with RNA polymerase II and initiation factors. Transcription
was carried out in the presence of the initiating dinucleotide CpA, [
-32P]CTP, UTP, and dATP to satisfy the energy
requirement for transcription initiation. Under these conditions, RNA
polymerase II can initiate and synthesize transcripts that have a
maximum length of 14 nucleotides (terminated at the U residue
immediately preceding the first A residue that must be incorporated
into the transcript, marked with a circle in Fig. 1).
Following treatment of preinitiation complexes with either
HaeIII or HindIII, RNA polymerase II
transcription intermediates were assayed for their abilities to extend
the CpA-primed 14-nucleotide-long transcripts to
3
-O-MeG-terminated 16-nucleotide transcripts or to
full-length runoff transcripts. As shown in lanes 1-6,
digestion of preinitiation complexes with either
HaeIII or HindIII had no effect on the
efficiency with which CpA-primed 14-nucleotide-long transcripts were
chased into 3
-O-MeG-terminated 16-nucleotide transcripts.
In addition, full-length runoff transcripts of the expected length were
synthesized when nascent transcripts were chased into longer products
in the presence of all four ribonucleoside triphosphates (lanes
7-9). Similar results were obtained when transcription was
initiated with the dinucleotide CpU (data not shown).
-32P]CTP,
5 µM UTP, and 5 µM dATP. After 20 min at
28 °C, DNA templates were digested with 15 units of the indicated
restriction enzymes. Reaction mixtures were then divided into three
equal portions, which were either terminated by addition of 15 µl of
0.5 mg/ml proteinase K in 100 mM EDTA or chased with either
100 µM ATP and 100 µM 3
-O-MeGTP
or 100 µM ATP, 100 µM UTP, 100 µM GTP, and 200 µM CTP. After 20 min at
28 °C, chased transcription reactions were terminated and products
were analyzed as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Pol II, RNA polymerase II; CTP*,
[
-32P]CTP; 3
O-MeG, 3
-O-MeGTP;
nt, nucleotides; NTPs, ribonucleoside triphosphates; Res. Enz., restriction enzyme.
[View Larger Version of this Image (44K GIF file)]
As summarized in Fig. 4, in the process
of investigating the mechanism of formation of the stable RNA
polymerase II elongation complex, we have discovered that promoter
escape by RNA polymerase II has a transient requirement for template
DNA between 40 and 50 base pairs downstream of the transcriptional
start site. We observe that, in the absence of downstream DNA in this
region, very early RNA polymerase II elongation complexes are unable to synthesize transcripts longer than ~10-12 nucleotides. In contrast, elongating RNA polymerase II does not normally require an extended region of downstream template DNA for transcription; indeed, RNA polymerase II is able to transcribe to the extreme 3
-end of most DNA
templates during synthesis of longer runoff transcripts (21-23). Moreover, we observe that template DNA downstream of +40 is not required for assembly of the preinitiation complex, for initiation and
synthesis of the first 10-12 phosphodiester bonds of nascent transcripts, or for further extension of transcripts longer than ~14
nucleotides. Taken together, our findings argue that promoter escape
requires that the RNA polymerase II initiation complex undergoes a
critical structural transition that is likely driven by interaction of
one or more components of the transcriptional machinery with template
DNA 40-50 base pairs downstream of the transcriptional start site and
that results in formation of an escape-competent transcriptional
intermediate.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]
Finally, it is not yet clear which components of the RNA polymerase II transcriptional machinery require downstream DNA for promoter escape. In light of our recent findings (i) that RNA polymerase II is highly susceptible to arrest in a very similar promoter-proximal region (~9-13 base pairs downstream of the transcriptional start site) during promoter-specific transcription reconstituted with TBP, TFIIB, TFIIE, TFIIF, and TFIIH (4) and (ii) that arrest by polymerase at this site is suppressed by TFIIE and TFIIH in a step that requires an ATP cofactor (5), it is tempting to speculate TFIIE, TFIIH, ATP, and downstream DNA are all involved in formation of the same escape-competent transcriptional intermediate. In this regard, it is noteworthy that results of previous footprinting (10, 24-26) and electron crystallographic studies (27) suggest that TFIIH and/or TFIIE may be positioned at the leading edge of the preinitiation complex, consistent with the possibility that they could facilitate promoter escape through interactions with downstream DNA.
-O-MeGTP, 3
-O-methylguanosine 5
-triphosphate;
AdML, adenovirus 2 major late.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Grunberg, M. S. Bartlett, S. Naji, and M. Thomm Transcription Factor E Is a Part of Transcription Elongation Complexes J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2007; 282(49): 35482 - 35490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Weaver, J. F. Kugel, and J. A. Goodrich The Sequence at Specific Positions in the Early Transcribed Region Sets the Rate of Transcript Synthesis by RNA Polymerase II in Vitro J. Biol. Chem., December 2, 2005; 280(48): 39860 - 39869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Weber, J. Liu, I. Collins, and D. Levens TFIIH Operates through an Expanded Proximal Promoter To Fine-Tune c-myc Expression Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 147 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pal and D. S. Luse The initiation-elongation transition: Lateral mobility of RNA in RNA polymerase II complexes is greatly reduced at +8/+9 and absent by +23 PNAS, May 13, 2003; 100(10): 5700 - 5705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wang, L. Spangler, and A. Dvir Promoter Escape by RNA Polymerase II. DOWNSTREAM PROMOTER DNA IS REQUIRED DURING MULTIPLE STEPS OF EARLY TRANSCRIPTION J. Biol. Chem., March 14, 2003; 278(12): 10250 - 10256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Spangler, X. Wang, J. W. Conaway, R. C. Conaway, and A. Dvir TFIIH action in transcription initiation and promoter escape requires distinct regions of downstream promoter DNA PNAS, April 25, 2001; (2001) 101004498. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Steinke, S. J. Kopytek, and D. O. Peterson Discrete promoter elements affect specific properties of RNA polymerase II transcription complexes Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2000; 28(14): 2726 - 2735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kim, R. H. Ebright, and D. Reinberg Mechanism of ATP-Dependent Promoter Melting by Transcription Factor IIH Science, May 26, 2000; 288(5470): 1418 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tang, Y. Liu, L. Madabusi, and D. S. Gilmour Promoter-Proximal Pausing on the hsp70 Promoter in Drosophila melanogaster Depends on the Upstream Regulator Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2000; 20(7): 2569 - 2580. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bradsher, F. Coin, and J.-M. Egly Distinct Roles for the Helicases of TFIIH in Transcript Initiation and Promoter Escape J. Biol. Chem., January 28, 2000; 275(4): 2532 - 2538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yan and J. D. Gralla The Use of ATP and Initiating Nucleotides during Postrecruitment Steps at the Activated Adenovirus E4 Promoter J. Biol. Chem., December 3, 1999; 274(49): 34819 - 34824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ramanathan, S. M. Reza, T. M. Young, M. B. Mathews, and T. Pe'ery Human and Rodent Transcription Elongation Factor P-TEFb: Interactions with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Tat and Carboxy-Terminal Domain Substrate J. Virol., July 1, 1999; 73(7): 5448 - 5458. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Coulombe and Z. F. Burton DNA Bending and Wrapping around RNA Polymerase: a ""Revolutionary"" Model Describing Transcriptional Mechanisms Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 1999; 63(2): 457 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Kumar, S. Akoulitchev, and D. Reinberg Promoter-proximal stalling results from the inability to recruit transcription factor IIH to the transcription complex and is a regulated event PNAS, August 18, 1998; 95(17): 9767 - 9772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Kugel and J. A. Goodrich A Kinetic Model for the Early Steps of RNA Synthesis by Human RNA Polymerase II J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2000; 275(51): 40483 - 40491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Spangler, X. Wang, J. W. Conaway, R. C. Conaway, and A. Dvir TFIIH action in transcription initiation and promoter escape requires distinct regions of downstream promoter DNA PNAS, May 8, 2001; 98(10): 5544 - 5549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |