JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, H.
Right arrow Articles by Pegg, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, H.
Right arrow Articles by Pegg, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 272, Number 45, Issue of November 7, 1997 pp. 28342-28348

Processing of Mammalian and Plant S-Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase Proenzymes*

(Received for publication, March 11, 1997, and in revised form, August 11, 1997)

Haishan Xiong , Bruce A. Stanley , Babu L. Tekwani and Anthony E. Pegg Dagger

From the Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

S-Adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (AdoMetDC) is a pyruvoyl enzyme, and the pyruvate is formed in an intramolecular reaction that cleaves a proenzyme precursor and converts a serine residue into pyruvate. The wild type potato AdoMetDC proenzyme processed much faster than the human proenzyme and did not require putrescine for an optimal rate of processing despite the presence of three acidic residues (equivalent to Glu11, Glu178, and Glu256) that were demonstrated in previous studies to be required for the putrescine activation of human AdoMetDC proenzyme processing (Stanley, B. A., Shantz, L. M., and Pegg, A. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7901-7907). A fourth residue that is also needed for the putrescine stimulation of human AdoMetDC proenzyme processing was identified in the present studies, and this residue (Asp174) is not present in the potato sequence. The site of potato AdoMetDC proenzyme processing was found to be Ser73 in the conserved sequence, YVLSESS, which is the equivalent of Ser68 in the human sequence. Replacement of the serine precursor with threonine or cysteine by site-directed mutagenesis in either the potato or the human AdoMetDC proenzyme did not prevent processing but caused a significant reduction in the rate. Although the COOH-terminal regions of the known eukaryotic AdoMetDCs are not conserved, only relatively small truncations of 8 residues from the human protein and 25 residues from the potato proenzyme were compatible with processing. The maximally truncated proteins show no similarity in COOH-terminal amino acid sequence but each contained 46 amino acid residues after the last conserved sequence, suggesting that the length of this section of the protein is essential for maintaining the proenzyme conformation needed for autocatalytic processing.


INTRODUCTION

AdoMetDC1 is an essential enzyme for the biosynthesis of polyamines and is one of a small class of decarboxylases that uses a covalently bound pyruvate as a prosthetic group (1, 2). These pyruvoyl-dependent decarboxylases form amines such as histamine, decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine, phosphatidylethanolamine (a component of membrane phospholipids), and beta -alanine (a precursor of coenzyme A), which are all of critical importance in cellular physiology and provide an important target for drug design. The mechanism of formation of the prosthetic group has been studied extensively using histidine decarboxylase from Lactobacillus (1, 3-6), and more preliminary studies with other decarboxylases including AdoMetDC (7-9) suggest that the mechanism is similar (Fig. 1). In all cases, the enzyme is synthesized as a proenzyme that then undergoes an intramolecular cleavage reaction forming the two subunits and generating the pyruvate at the amino terminus of the alpha  subunit from a serine precursor residue. Cleavage takes place via the formation of an intermediate ester resulting from a nucleophilic attack of this serine residue at the amide carbonyl group of the preceding amino acid. This is followed by beta -elimination to form the beta  subunit and the alpha  subunit containing a dehydroalanine at its amino terminus. The dehydroalanine then loses ammonia and is converted to pyruvate via the formation of imine and carbinolamine intermediates (1-3). The initial rearrangement step of this reaction to form a peptide ester linked to the hydroxyl side chain of serine is identical to that involved in protein splicing reactions (10, 11). Further information on such cleavage reactions would be very useful in understanding this reaction in more detail and in producing useful drugs based on prevention of protein maturation.


Fig. 1. Formation of pyruvate from an internal serine residue.

[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]


Studies in which the yeast and the human AdoMetDC (hAdoMetDC) proenzymes were expressed have shown that the site of cleavage was contained in the sequence YVLSESS, with the underlined serine residue forming the pyruvate (8, 9). Apart from the obvious presence of a serine residue, this sequence has little or no resemblance to the cleavage sites in the proenzymes of histidine decarboxylase, phosphatidylserine decarboxylase, and aspartate decarboxylase (1, 2).

Processing and activity of the mammalian and yeast AdoMetDCs is enhanced by the presence of putrescine (12-14). This provides an important physiological mechanism favoring the conversion of putrescine into the higher polyamines, since it links the level of putrescine to the amount of active AdoMetDC that is needed for the conversion of putrescine into spermidine. Site-directed mutagenesis studies of the hAdoMetDC proenzyme have indicated that the interaction of putrescine with at least three acidic acid residues (Glu11, Glu178, and Glu256) is necessary for the acceleration of processing, since conversion of any of these residues to glutamine abolishes the effect (15, 16).

Numerous cDNA sequences for eukaryotic AdoMetDC proenzymes have now been obtained, and at least 23 such sequences can be compared. These include five mammalian (human (17), mouse (18), rat (19), hamster (20), and cow (21)), amphibian (Xenopus laevis) (22), yeast (9), two protozoan parasites (Trypanosoma brucei (GenBankTM U20092) and Leishmania donovani (GenBankTM U20091)), the parasitic worm Onchocerca volvulus, (23), and at least 13 plants including both monocotyledons such as wheat (24), maize (GenBankTM Y07767), and rice (GenBankTM Y07766) and dicotyledons such as potato (25, 26), tomato (GenBankTM Y07768), periwinkle (27), cabbage (GenBankTM X95729), arabidopsis (GenBankTM U63633), morning glory (GenBankTM U64927), and carnation (28). The derived amino acid sequences from these cDNAs show that there are some very highly conserved regions that include the sequence for proenzyme cleavage and the sequence (KTCTG) containing an essential cysteine residue that has been shown to be part of the active site of hAdoMetDC (15).

All of the acidic residues known to be involved in putrescine activation of the processing and activity of the hAdoMetDC (15, 16) are present in the cDNA-derived plant sequences, but there is no obvious similarity to the Mg2+-activated Escherichia coli AdoMetDC (14, 29, 30). However, plant AdoMetDC activities have been reported not to be activated by putrescine (31-34), and the question of the possible activation of the proenzyme processing by putrescine has not been addressed. A comparison of the amino acid sequences of the hAdoMetDC and the potato AdoMetDC (pAdoMetDC) is shown in Fig. 2. We present evidence showing that neither the activity nor the proenzyme processing rate of the pAdoMetDC are stimulated by putrescine or by Mg2+.


Fig. 2. Comparison of human and potato AdoMetDC sequences. The residues that are fully conserved or subject to only highly conservative replacements in all known eukaryote AdoMetDCs are shown in bold. The site of formation of pyruvate is double underlined. The glutamic acid residues and the aspartic acid needed for stimulation of processing of the hAdoMetDC by putrescine are shown underlined or by an asterisk, respectively. The position at which the proteins can be truncated without losing the ability to be processed is indicated with an arrow.

[View Larger Version of this Image (66K GIF file)]


Studies of the processing of AdoMetDC have been hampered by the speed and apparently autocatalytic nature of the reaction. This has rendered it difficult to study the processing reaction, since significant processing occurs during the period of synthesis of the proenzyme needed to accumulate sufficient protein for analysis. In the present studies, we have investigated the effect of replacing the pyruvate-generating serine with two other amino acids, cysteine and threonine, which could also form a peptide ester. Studies were carried out with both the hAdoMetDC and the pAdoMetDC proenzymes. The importance of the COOH-terminal region of the molecule has also been studied, since the largest region of differences in the known AdoMetDC sequences occurs at the carboxyl end of the molecule, where there is no clear similarity after the sequence FXPXXF located at human residues 275-280 (Fig. 2). The potato and all of the other known plant AdoMetDC sequences have a highly charged extension at the carboxyl terminus.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Potato AdoMetDC cDNA contained in a pBluescript KS vector (pTUB13) (25) was generously provided by Dr. M. A. Taylor, Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, Scotland. The T7-coupled Transcription and Translation kit (TNT) and RNasin were purchased from Promega. [35S]Methionine was from NEN Life Science Products, and [14COOH]AdoMet was from Amersham Life Science, Inc. The Chameleon double-stranded site-directed mutagenesis kit were purchased from Stratagene. Unlabeled AdoMet was from Sigma. The restriction enzymes used were from Life Technologies, Inc., Promega, and New England Biolabs Inc. Vent polymerase was from New England Biolabs. DNA sequencing was carried out using Sequenase Version 2.0 (Amersham) and by an ABI 377 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems Inc.) in the macromolecular core facility of Hershey Medical Center. The pQE31 plasmid was obtained from Qiagen Inc. (Chatsworth, CA), and the TalonTM metal affinity resin was purchased from CLONTECH.

Mutagenesis of Residues in Human and Potato AdoMet DC

Mutant cDNAs were constructed using pTUB13 (26) for the potato (which contains the cDNA in a pBluescript KS vector) and pCM9 (which contains the human cDNA in the pGEM3Zf- vector (8)) for the hAdoMetDC.

The COOH-terminal deletion mutants were produced by changing the codons indicated to UGA, which was followed by an XhoI site (for potato) or an XbaI site (for human) using PCR carried out with an antisense mutation primer that produced these changes and a sense primer to the T7 promoter region located upstream of the AdoMetDC coding regions. The PCR products then were cut with AflII and XbaI (for mutations in pCM9) or with BamHI and XhoI (for mutations in pTUB13), and the fragments were ligated into vector pieces derived from the template plasmids that had been cut with the same restriction enzymes. For the double mutations (A326X/K327Stop for human and T335X/R336Stop for potato where X = A, S, K, or E), a similar procedure was used, except that in the antisense primer the codon preceding the UGA was changed to produce the protein containing the desired amino acid.

The Chameleon mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) was utilized for site-directed point mutations according to the manufacturer's instructions. For mutations in the pCM9 plasmid, a selection primer that destroyed a unique NdeI site was used, and for the pTUB13, a selection primer that converted the unique KpnI site to an SrfI site was used.

The complete coding sequence of all of the mutated AdoMetDC cDNA sequences was checked to confirm that the desired mutation was present and that no other mutations had occurred.

Synthesis and Processing of AdoMetDC Proenzyme

The TNT assay system (Promega) with T7 RNA polymerase was used for the coupled transcription and translation from the control and mutant pCM9 and pTUB13 plasmids. Reactions were carried out according to the manufacturer's specifications with some modifications, as indicated below. A typical 12.5-µl reaction assay mix contained 0.2 µg of plasmid DNA, 10 units of RNasin, 1 unit of T7 RNA polymerase, 10 pmol of [35S]methionine (1 Ci/nmol), 20 µM of the other 19 amino acids, and 6.25 µl of rabbit reticulocyte lysate (nuclease-treated). The tubes were incubated at 30 °C for 30 min, and translation was stopped by adding cycloheximide to a final concentration of 200 µM. Aliquots (5 µl) were removed at this time and at various time points after continued incubation at 30 °C in order to measure the processing. The protein products in these aliquots were separated by SDS-PAGE using 12.5% gels. The gels were dried, and the radioactivity of the bands corresponding to proenzyme and mature enzyme were directly measured with a PhosphorImager 425E-120 (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.). In some experiments, 1 mM putrescine was included in the processing reaction mixes. The rates of processing were calculated as described previously (7).

AdoMetDC Activity Assay

For the AdoMetDC activity assays, 47 µM of unlabeled methionine was added to the TNT reactions in place of the [35S]methionine. A 5-µl aliquot of the reaction mix was then assayed for AdoMetDC activity by measuring the ability to convert [14COOH]AdoMet into 14CO2 in a 30-min incubation at 37 °C (35). The assay mix consisted of 1.25 mM dithiothreitol, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, and 9.6 µM [14COOH]AdoMet (52 mCi/mmol). In some experiments, putrescine was added to a final concentration of 1.9 mM as indicated to stimulate AdoMetDC activity. Specific activity was calculated as the cpm of 14CO2 produced per 30 min divided by the band intensity corresponding to the 31- or 32-kDa processed AdoMetDC alpha  subunit from a parallel synthesis with [35S]methionine.

Purification of Potato AdoMetDC

The potato AdoMetDC cDNA was inserted into the pQE31 expression vector. This construction replaced the first three residues of the amino terminus of the pAdoMetDC sequence (MEM) with the sequence MRGS(H)6TDP and allows the protein to be purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography. Insertion was carried out by using PCR with pTUB13 as a template and the primers 5'-TCATAATGGATCCGGATTGCCAGTTTCTGCC-3' and 5'-AATTAACCCTCACTAAAGGG-3' to generate a 1.4-kilobase fragment that was cut with BamHI and KpnI and inserted into pQE31 cut with the same enzymes, giving plasmid pHIS-PSAM. XL-1 Blue cells were transformed with pHIS-PSAM and grown to a density corresponding to A600 of 0.6. Expression of AdoMetDC was then induced by the addition of isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside to a final concentration of 0.3 mM, and after 3 h the cells were harvested and washed once with buffer X (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) at 4 °C. The cell pellet was then resuspended in buffer X and homogenized with a French press. The suspension was centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 30 min, and the supernatant was applied to a 1-ml column of TalonTM resin pre-equilibrated with buffer X. The column was washed with buffer X containing 10 mM imidazole, and the protein was eluted with buffer X containing 200 mM imidazole. The eluted protein was immediately passed through a Sepahadex G-25 column pre-equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to remove the imidazole, and the protein was stored at -80 °C. The S73C mutant pAdoMetDC protein was prepared in the same way using the pTUB13 containing the S73C mutation for the PCR template.

Sequencing of Potato AdoMetDC

The pyruvate prosthetic group was converted to alanine by reductive amination by incubation at 37 °C in 2 M ammonium acetate, pH 6.5, and 100 mM NaCNBH3 (8, 9, 36), and the protein subunits were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The protein bands were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore), and the 32-kDa band was subjected to amino acid sequencing using an Applied Biosystems 477A protein sequencer.


RESULTS

The Processing of AdoMetDC

Previous studies have shown that the 38-kDa hAdoMetDC proenzyme is processed in reticulocyte lysates and that putrescine stimulates this reaction. The data for hAdoMetDC shown in Fig. 3a are in agreement with this. After a synthesis period of 30 min in a typical TNT reaction in the presence of putrescine, 35% of hAdoMetDC was in the processed 31-kDa form. After 60 min of further incubation plus putrescine, virtually all of the proenzyme was processed. When synthesis and further reaction were carried out in the absence of putrescine, the mature enzyme constituted only about 15% of the total enzyme after a 30-min synthesis and only about 70% at the end of an additional 120-min incubation. In contrast, the pAdoMetDC proenzyme was processed so rapidly in the reticulocyte lysate system that only the processed band of 32 kDa could be detected at the end of the synthesis period (Fig. 3a). The expected proenzyme band of 40 kDa from the pAdoMetDC could only be detected using a shorter synthesis time and, even then, only a very weak band corresponding to the proenzyme was seen; this disappeared after 2 min of processing. The presence of putrescine did not appear to stimulate this reaction (data not shown), but since the processing is so fast, no definitive conclusion could be drawn.


Fig. 3. The processing of human and potato AdoMetDC. The proenzyme proteins were synthesized as described under "Experimental Procedures" for 15 min (panel b) or 30 min (panel a). After the addition of cycloheximide to 200 nM, incubation was continued, and 5-µl aliquots were removed at the time shown and separated on 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Panel a shows the processing curves of hAdoMetDC and pAdoMetDC in the absence of putrescine and the hAdoMetDC in the presence of 1.0 mM putrescine. Panel b shows the gel of the processing of pAdoMetDC after a 15-min synthesis period with samples removed at 2-min intervals. Results are shown for the wild type (WT) pAdoMetDC and for the truncated mutant Y339Stop.

[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]


The Cleavage Site of AdoMetDC

The cleavage site of the hAdoMetDC is known to be between residues Glu67 and Ser68, with Ser68 forming the pyruvate prosthetic group at the NH2 terminus of the alpha  subunit. This serine residue was converted to alanine, threonine, or cysteine by site-directed mutagenesis. As previously reported (8), the S68A mutant proenzyme gave no detectable 31-kDa subunit, but both the S68C and S68T mutants did process, although much more slowly than the wild type (Fig. 4a). The half-time for processing of the proenzyme of the S68T mutant was about 5 h, whereas that of the S68C mutant was >12 h.


Fig. 4. The processing of mutants at the cleavage site of human and pAdoMetDC. Processing was measured as described in Fig. 3. Panel a shows the time course of processing in the presence of 1.0 mM putrescine after a 30-min synthesis reaction for the hAdoMetDC and its mutants in which the Ser68 residue was changed to threonine, cysteine, or alanine as shown. Panel b shows results for the pAdoMetDC in which residues Ser73 and Ser74 were changed to cysteine or Ser73 was changed to threonine as shown. Samples were taken at the end of the 30-min synthesis reaction. Panel c shows the effect of putrescine on the processing of S73C and S73T pAdoMetDC mutants. Processing was measured after a 30-min synthesis period in the presence or absence of putrescine (Put.) as shown. Aliquots of the synthesis reaction for the S73C mutant were also precipitated with 2 M (NH4)2SO4 (A.S.), at 4 °C, redissolved and desalted, and then incubated in the presence or absence of reticulocyte lysate as indicated. W.T., wild type.

[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]


From sequence comparisons (Fig. 2), the equivalent residue to the human Ser68 in the potato sequence appears to be Ser73. Mutating this residue to threonine or cysteine led to a much slower cleavage of the pAdoMetDC, whereas mutating the adjacent serine residue to cysteine (S74C) had no effect on the cleavage (Fig. 4b and 4c). As with the hAdoMetDC mutants, the pAdoMetDC containing cysteine at position 73 was cleaved more slowly than the mutant containing threonine.

These results provide suggestive but indirect evidence that Ser73 is the source of the pyruvate in pAdoMetDC. To confirm that this is the case, the pAdoMetDC protein was expressed in E. coli and purified to homogeneity. The purified protein was treated by reductive amination using ammonium ions and NaCNBH3 to convert the amino-terminal pyruvate into alanine and allow sequencing by Edman degradation. The reduced protein was separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the 32-kDa subunit was sequenced using a gas phase sequencer. The sequence obtained was Ala-Ser-Leu-Phe-Val-Tyr-Ser-Tyr-Lys, which agrees completely with the sequence predicted from the proenzyme cDNA (Fig. 2) of residues 73-81 with the Ser73 replaced by Ala. Interestingly, the same sequence (but in lower yield) was obtained even when the purified pAdoMetDC was not treated to convert the pyruvate. The most likely explanation for this finding is that a portion of the recombinant pAdoMetDC has been inactivated by transamination during expression in E. coli. Although the explanation for this phenomenon is not known, a similar observation has been made when either the yeast or the E. coli AdoMetDC were overproduced to high levels in E. coli (9).

Replacement of the serine precursor of the pyruvate prosthetic group with threonine generates an alpha -ketobutyrate (1, 4). Although such mutants of histidine decarboxylase or phosphatidylserine decarboxylase have been shown to be active (4, 37), neither the human S68T nor the potato S73T AdoMetDCs had any detectable activity (Table I). Replacement of the serine precursor with cysteine has no effect on the prosthetic group formed on cleavage, which is still pyruvate but produces a thiocarboxylate group at the carboxyl terminus of the beta  chain in the mutant (1, 4). Within the limits of experimental error, the plant S73C mutant appeared to be fully active (Table I). The human S68C AdoMetDC was also active, but the specific activity was considerably less than that of wild type (Table I). The correct processing/cleavage of the pAdoMetDC S73C mutant was confirmed by expressing the protein in E. coli and sequencing the large subunit after reductive amination as described above.

Table I. Effect of mutation of the serine residue that serves as the precursor of pyruvate on activity of human and pAdoMetDC

Results are given as the specific activity expressed as a percentage of the respective wild type enzyme. The specific activity was calculated as activity/unit of processed enzyme. The amount of processed enzyme was determined by the density of the band corresponding to the alpha  subunit from a synthesis reaction with [35S]methionine run in parallel. Assays of enzymatic activity were carried out using a 30-min incubation at 37 °C with [14COOH]AdoMet in the presence of 1.0 mM putrescine for hAdoMetDC and without putrescine for pAdoMetDC. The limit of detection of the AdoMetDC activity measurement was determined by assuming that twice the background cpm released in the assay was the minimum amount that unequivocally indicated activity. This limit is lower for the human AdoMetDC because this is more active than the pAdoMetDC. The limit of detection for the processing reaction was 0.3%/h.

AdoMetDC used Specific activity Processing

% control % proenzyme cleaved in 1 h
Wild type human 100 >95
S68T <0.2 12
S68C 7 4
S68A <0.2 <0.3
Wild type potato 100 >95
S73T <1 10
S73C 90 4
S74C 98 >95

Putrescine Effect on the Processing and Activity of AdoMetDC

Putrescine had absolutely no stimulatory effect on the slower rate of processing of the potato S73C or S73T mutants (Fig. 4c). This is not due to the presence of sufficient putrescine in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate used in the TNT reactions to stimulate the processing of pAdoMetDC. The concentration of putrescine was investigated by high performance liquid chromatography and found to be <1 nM. Furthermore, treatment of the samples with M (NH4)2SO4 at 4 °C to precipitate the AdoMetDC proenzyme protein and remove putrescine did not slow the rate of processing and re-addition of untreated lysate did not stimulate it (Fig. 4c). The addition of Mg2+ also did not influence the processing of the pAdoMetDC proenzyme (results not shown). Activity assays with the wild type and S74C mutant pAdoMetDC also indicated that the activity of pAdoMetDC was not affected by putrescine or by Mg2+ at concentrations of up to 8 mM (data not shown).

Three acidic residues have been found to be essential for the stimulation of the processing of mammalian AdoMetDC proenzyme by putrescine, suggesting that interactions between the cationic putrescine and the protein change its configuration to favor processing (7, 15, 16). A simple model for this interaction would involve two putrescine molecules, each forming a bridge between two acidic sites, and would suggest that a fourth site also exists. Previous studies have eliminated all of the other conserved glutamic acid residues (15, 16), but comparisons of the amino acid sequences of the putrescine-activated AdoMetDCs revealed two conserved aspartic acid residues that were possible candidates for a fourth site. These two residues, Asp174 and Asp266, were therefore mutated separately in the hAdoMetDC to Asn, and the effect of putrescine on the processing and activity was studied. As shown in Fig. 5, the processing of the D174N mutant proenzyme was not stimulated by putrescine, whereas the processing of the D266N proenzyme was the same as wild type AdoMetDC. Therefore, Asp174 appears to be the fourth site of interaction of putrescine with the human AdoMetDC. An acidic residue at this site is absent from the pAdoMetDC (Fig. 2) and from all other plant AdoMetDC sequences.


Fig. 5. Effect of mutation of some aspartic acid residues in hAdoMetDC on the stimulation of proenzyme processing by putrescine. The experiment was carried out as in Fig. 3 with no putrescine (open symbols) or 1.0 mM putrescine (closed symbols) present during the synthesis and processing reactions as indicated.

[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]


The enzymatic activity of the processed D174N mutant hAdoMetDC was not stimulated by putrescine (Table II). Although the activity was slightly reduced compared with that of the wild type or the D266N mutant, most of this reduction was due to the lack of putrescine stimulation.

Table II. Effect of mutation of aspartic acids residues and of the carboxyl terminus on activity of hAdoMetDC and pAdoMetDC

Assays were carried out as described in Table I except that in some of the assays for the hAdoMetDC, the incubation for synthesis, processing, and activity measurement were carried out in the absence of putrescine. Results are shown either as the mean ± S.D. or as the mean of at least three estimations.

AdoMetDC used Putrescine Specific activity

mM % wild type
hAdoMetDC 1.9 100
hAdoMetDC 0 5.2 ± 1.2
D174N hAdoMetDC 1.9 5.4 ± 1.5
D174N hAdoMetDC 0 5.3 ± 0.7
D266N hAdoMetDC 1.9 82 ± 3
D266N hAdoMetDC 0 4.9 ± 0.3
Q329Stop hAdoMetDC 1.9 102
K327Stop hAdoMetDC 1.9 83
A326E/K327Stop hAdoMetDC 1.9 42
A326K/K327Stop hAdoMetDC 1.9 65
A326G/327Stop hAdoMetDC 1.9 53
A326Stop hAdoMetDC 1.9 7
pAdoMetDC 0 100
T337Stop pAdoMetDC 0 78
R336Stop pAdoMetDC 0 40
T335A/R336Stop pAdoMetDC 0 51
T335S/R336Stop pAdoMetDC 0 39
T335E/R336Stop pAdoMetDC 0 43
T335K/R336Stop pAdoMetDC 0 46
T335Stop pAdoMetDC 0 0

Effect of Carboxyl Truncation of AdoMetDC Proenzyme on Processing

The hAdoMetDC and the pAdoMetDC differ most significantly at the COOH terminus, where there is little similarity after human residue Phe280 (equivalent to potato residue Phe289), and the potato protein contains a very acidic 17-amino acid extension that is not present in the human. These differences raised the possibilities that (a) part of the carboxyl domain may not be necessary for activity or processing and (b) that the COOH-terminal region of the pAdoMetDC is responsible for the very rapid processing of this proenzyme. To determine the minimum size of the AdoMetDC proenzyme compatible with processing, a series of deletion mutations were made in both enzymes (Fig. 6).


Fig. 6. Effects of carboxyl truncation of hAdoMetDC and pAdoMetDC proenzyme on processing. Truncations were made by converting codons corresponding to the residue indicated to stop codons as described under "Experimental Procedures." Processing was then measured using a 30-min synthesis period and a 1-h processing period at 30 °C for the hAdoMetDC and a 30-min synthesis period for the pAdoMetDC. Panel a shows the gels of the wild type (W.T.) and truncation mutants of hAdoMetDC assayed in the presence or absence of 1.0 mM putrescine. The numbers below the lanes are the total number of residues in the corresponding AdoMetDC mutants. Panel b shows the percentage of the processed hAdoMetDC proenzymes in the presence (complete bar) or absence (shaded bar) of putrescine. Panel c shows the percentage of processed pAdoMetDC found after a 30-min period at 30 °C. The mutants are indicated by the amino acid residue whose codon was changed to a stop codon with the number of total residues in the AdoMetDC proenzyme in parentheses.

[View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]


Removal of eight residues from the COOH-terminal of hAdoMetDC proenzyme had no effect on processing in the presence of putrescine and only a slight effect on processing in the absence of putrescine. Removal of one more residue (mutant A326Stop) greatly reduced the rate of processing, and any additional truncations (mutants F325Stop, S324Stop, V321Stop, and C310Stop) reduced processing to undetectable levels (>98% reduction) (Fig. 6, a and b). These results indicate that the minimal size for normal processing of the hAdoMetDC is 326 amino acids, with the protein extending for 46 residues beyond the Phe280 residue. Similarly, truncations of the pAdoMetDC proenzyme that still included Thr335 (which is 46 residues beyond Phe289) still processed at wild type rates, but truncations to 334 or fewer residues produced essentially complete inhibition of processing (Fig. 6c).

Although their removal prevented proenzyme processing, the nature of the COOH-terminal residues in the smallest processable truncated proenzymes (K327Stop, human; R336Stop, potato) seemed to make little difference to the processing rate. Thus, both potato COOH-terminal mutants T335A/R336Stop, T335S/R336Stop, T335K/R336Stop, and T335E/R336Stop (Fig. 6c) and, in the presence of putrescine, human COOH-terminal mutants A326G/K327Stop, A326K/K327Stop, and A326E/K327Stop (results not shown) still processed at the same rate as their respective wild type proenzymes. However, when assayed in the absence of putrescine, the human K327Stop mutant processed somewhat slower than longer proenzymes, and whereas the double mutation of A326G/K327Stop did not slow down the processing rate further, A326K/K327Stop and A326E/K327Stop mutants did process still more slowly than K327Stop.

To determine whether the pAdoMetDC proenzyme processes so much faster than the human because of the highly charged COOH-terminal sequence, the final six residues of the human sequence (QQQQQS) were replaced by a sequence similar to the potato (EEEEKE or QEQEEE). However, these alterations had no effect on the processing rate in the absence or presence of putrescine (results not shown).

Effect of Carboxyl Truncation of AdoMetDC Proenzyme on Activity

Deletions up to K327Stop had only slight effects on the specific activity of processed hAdoMetDC assayed in the presence of putrescine (Table II). Further truncation of the hAdoMetDC by removing Ala326 produced a major reduction in activity to 7% that of wild type. Replacement of this alanine residue by a variety of other amino acids produced only a small decline in activity (Table II). Substitution of glutamic acid had the greatest effect on reducing the activity of the K327Stop mutant from 83 to 42% that of wild type. The potato R336Stop mutant AdoMetDC had about half the activity of wild type (Table II). The decrease was independent of the residue present at the carboxyl terminus. A more detailed study of the R336Stop AdoMetDC indicated the apparent Km for AdoMet was increased from 0.05 to 0.11 mM, which accounts for part of this difference (results not shown).


DISCUSSION

Our results confirm that the residue forming the pyruvate moiety after cleavage of the pAdoMetDC proenzyme is Ser73. This is as expected since it is the equivalent residue to Ser68, which is known to form the pyruvate in the hAdoMetDC proenzyme (8), and the sequence surrounding these residues, YVLSESS, is totally conserved in all of the known eukaryotic AdoMetDC sequences. The equivalent residue has also been identified as the source of pyruvate in AdoMetDCs from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (9) and Catharanthus roseus (27). Cleavage of the proenzyme of either the human or the plant AdoMetDC to form the alpha  and beta  subunits was not prevented when either threonine or cysteine was substituted for this serine, but the rate of processing was greatly reduced. This finding is similar to that found for two other pyruvoyl enzymes, histidine decarboxylase (4) and phosphatidylserine decarboxylase (37), and suggests that all of these proenzymes undergo a similar type of reaction in generating the two subunits and the pyruvoyl prosthetic group needed for activity.

However, there are several differences between the responses of the AdoMetDC proenzyme mutants and those of these other proenzymes. First, the processing was more rapid when threonine was substituted rather than cysteine, whereas with histidine decarboxylase (4), the reverse was the case, and with phosphatidylserine decarboxylase (37), the rates were equal. Second, the serine-to-threonine change reduced AdoMetDC activity by >99%, whereas both histidine decarboxylase and phosphatidylserine decarboxylase mutants did retain some enzymatic activity with this substitution (1). This indicates that alpha -ketobutyrate cannot substitute for pyruvate in the AdoMetDC reaction. One possible reason for this might be that the larger prosthetic group is not compatible with substrate binding.

Third, although the replacement of the critical serine with cysteine in the hAdoMetDC greatly decreased the activity, which is similar to the result with the equivalent histidine decarboxylase and phosphatidylserine decarboxylase mutants (4, 37), this substitution caused little or no reduction of the activity of the pAdoMetDC. There are two possible reasons for the loss of activity with the hAdoMetDC. One is that the mutant proenzyme containing cysteine actually undergoes an abortive cleavage reaction that fails to generate pyruvate (1, 3). Such a reaction is known to occur with a mutant histidine decarboxylase (4) and is facilitated by the greater nucleophilicity of the thiol group of cysteine compared with the hydroxyl group of serine. A similar reaction occurs when protein splicing intermediates are produced with cysteine in place of serine at the upstream splice junction (11). These reactions may be stimulated by exogenous reagents such as thiol reactants or hydroxylamine, but the rate of cleavage of the mutant hAdoMetDC was not increased by the addition of excess dithiothreitol (results not shown). It is therefore more likely that any incorrect cleavage is spontaneous and is mediated by residues in the hAdoMetDC sequence. This interpretation would be consistent with the fact that the pAdoMetDC formed from the S73C mutant was fully active, indicating that incorrect cleavage does not occur with this protein. An alternative but less likely explanation is that the presence of the thiocarboxylate group at the carboxyl terminus of the beta  subunit reduces the activity in the hAdoMetDC.

The most striking difference in the processing of the hAdoMetDC and pAdoMetDC proenzymes is that the formation of the mature pAdoMetDC occurs much more rapidly and is not affected by putrescine. Since the potato proenzyme processes so rapidly, any effect of putrescine would be of minimal physiological significance and might be missed in our in vitro experiments. However, our results with the S73C and S73T mutants show unequivocally that putrescine does not accelerate the reaction.

Previous site-directed mutagenesis studies of the hAdoMetDC indicated that the acceleration of processing mediated by putrescine requires an interaction with three Glu residues located at positions 11, 178, and 256 (15, 16). The identification of Asp174 as an additional residue essential for acceleration of processing by putrescine provides support for the suggestion that the binding of two putrescine molecules is necessary for the change in conformation that favors the processing reaction (7, 38). Since all four acidic residues must be present for putrescine activation of the human enzyme, the absence in the potato enzyme of an acidic residue equivalent to human Asp174 may explain the lack of putrescine activation in the potato enzyme, despite the presence of acidic residues equivalent to Glu11, Glu178, and Glu256. It is noteworthy that all of the known putrescine-activated mammalian, parasite, and yeast AdoMetDC sequences contain an acidic residue in a position equivalent to human Asp174, whereas none of the known plant AdoMetDC sequences do and none of the plant enzymes appear to be activated by putrescine. The mechanism of activation of the hAdoMetDC is postulated to involve a conformational change in response to the binding of putrescine to these acidic residues (16, 39). It therefore appears that other residues present in the pAdoMetDC proenzyme ensure the formation of a fully active configuration without the need for the binding of putrescine.

Although the totally conserved residue nearest to the carboxyl terminus of the hAdoMetDC proenzyme is Phe280, only a very limited truncation of eight of the COOH-terminal residues was compatible with processing. A somewhat greater deletion of 25 residues from the longer potato protein was possible. The COOH-terminal regions of the resulting active maximally truncated proteins are the same length, with 46 residues after this last conserved Phe (Fig. 2). Since our results show that the nature of the terminal residue in the minimal length proenzymes is not critical, it appears that it is the length of the protein that is essential for processing. It is likely that this section of the protein forms an essential part of the structure, placing the key residues in position to facilitate the processing.


FOOTNOTES

*   This research was supported by Grant CA 18138 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, P. O. Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033-0850. Tel.: 717-531-8152; Fax: 717-531-5157; E-mail: apegg{at}cmp.hmc.psu.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: AdoMetDC, AdoMet decarboxylase; AdoMet, S-adenosylmethionine; hAdoMetDC, human AdoMetDC; pAdoMetDC, potato AdoMetDC; TnT, Transcription and Translation kit; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

REFERENCES

  1. van Poelje, P. D., and Snell, E. E. (1990) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 59, 29-59 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Hackert, M. L., and Pegg, A. E. (1997) in Comprehensive Biological Catalysis (Sinnott, M. L., ed), Academic Press, Ltd., London , in press
  3. Recsei, P., and Snell, E. (1984) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 53, 357-387 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Vanderslice, P., Copeland, W. C., and Robertus, J. D. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 10583-10586 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gallagher, T., Rozwarski, D. A., Ernst, S. R., and Hackert, M. L. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 230, 516-528 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Gallagher, T., Snell, E. E., and Hackert, M. L. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 12737-12743 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Stanley, B. A. (1995) in Polyamines: Regulation and Molecular Interaction (Casero, R. A., ed), pp. 27-75, R. G. Landes Co., Austin, TX
  8. Stanley, B. A., Pegg, A. E., and Holm, I. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 21073-21079 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kashiwagi, K., Taneja, S. K., Liu, T. Y., Tabor, C. W., and Tabor, H. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 22321-22328 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Shao, D., Xiao, L., Ha, H. C., and Casero, R. A. (1996) J. Cell. Physiol. 166, 43-48 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Shao, Y., Xu, M. Q., and Paulus, H. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 3810-3815 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Pegg, A. E. (1986) Biochem. J. 234, 249-262 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Kameji, T., and Pegg, A. E. (1987) Biochem. J. 243, 285-288 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Tabor, C. W., and Tabor, H. (1984) Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 56, 251-282 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Stanley, B. A., and Pegg, A. E. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 18502-18506 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Stanley, B. A., Shantz, L. M., and Pegg, A. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7901-7907 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Pajunen, A., Crozat, A., Jänne, O. A., Ihalainen, R., Laitinen, P. H., Stanley, B., Madhubala, R., and Pegg, A. E. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 17040-17049 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Persson, K., Holm, I., and Heby, O. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 5642-5648 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Pulkka, A., Ihalainen, R., Suorsa, A., Riviere, M., Szpirer, J., and Pajunen, A. (1993) Genomics 16, 342-349 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Tekwani, B. L., Stanley, B. A., and Pegg, A. E. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1130, 221-223 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Mach, M., White, M. W., Neubauer, M., Degen, J. L., and Morris, D. R. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 11697-11703 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Shinga, J., Kashiwagi, K., Tashiro, K., Igarashi, K., and Shiokawa, K. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1308, 31-40 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Da'dara, A. A., Henkle-Dührsen, K., and Walter, R. D. (1996) Biochem. J. 320, 519-530
  24. Dresselhaus, T., Barcelo, P., Hagel, C., Lorz, H., and Humbeck, K. (1996) Plant Mol. Biol. 30, 1021-1033 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Taylor, M. A., Mad Arif, S. A., Kumar, A., Davies, H. V., Scobie, L. A., Pearce, S. R., and Flavell, A. J. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 20, 641-651 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Mad Arif, S. A., Taylor, M. A., George, L. A., Butler, A. R., Burch, L. R., Davies, H. V., Stark, M. J. R., and Kumar, A. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 26, 327-338 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Schröder, G., and Schröder, J. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 228, 74-78 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Lee, M. M., Lee, S. H., and Park, K. Y. (1997) Plant Mol. Physiol. 34, 371-382
  29. Tabor, C. W., and Tabor, H. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 16037-16040 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Tabor, C. W., and Tabor, H. (1985) Microbiol. Rev. 49, 81-99 [Free Full Text]
  31. Coppoc, G. L., Kallio, P., and Williams-Ashman, H. G. (1971) Int. J. Biochem. 2, 673-681 [CrossRef]
  32. Pegg, A. E. (1984) Cell Biochem. Funct. 2, 11-15 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Yamanoha, B., and Cohen, S. S. (1985) Plant Physiol. (Rockv.) 78, 784-790 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Yang, Y. G., and Cho, Y. D. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 181, 784-780
  35. Shirahata, A., and Pegg, A. E. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 9583-9588 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Huynh, Q. K., Vaaler, G. L., Recsei, P. A., and Snell, E. E. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 2826-2832 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Li, Q. X., and Dowhan, W. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 4111-4115 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Dezeure, F., Gerhart, F., and Seiler, N. (1989) Int. J. Biochem. 21, 889-899 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Stanley, B. A., and Shantz, L. M. (1994) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 22, 863-869 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Volume 272, Number 45, Issue of November 7, 1997 pp. 28342-28348
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
W.-W. Hu, H. Gong, and E. C. Pua
The Pivotal Roles of the Plant S-Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase 5' Untranslated Leader Sequence in Regulation of Gene Expression at the Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Levels
Plant Physiology, May 1, 2005; 138(1): 276 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. V. Toms, C. Kinsland, D. E. McCloskey, A. E. Pegg, and S. E. Ealick
Evolutionary Links as Revealed by the Structure of Thermotoga maritima S-Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase
J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33837 - 33846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Hanfrey, M. Franceschetti, M. J. Mayer, C. Illingworth, and A. J. Michael
Abrogation of Upstream Open Reading Frame-mediated Translational Control of a Plant S-Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase Results in Polyamine Disruption and Growth Perturbations
J. Biol. Chem., November 8, 2002; 277(46): 44131 - 44139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
S. Biondi, S. Scaramagli, F. Capitani, M. Maddalena Altamura, and P. Torrigiani
Methyl jasmonate upregulates biosynthetic gene expression, oxidation and conjugation of polyamines, and inhibits shoot formation in tobacco thin layers
J. Exp. Bot., February 1, 2001; 52(355): 231 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. G. Kocsis and A. D. Hanson
Biochemical Evidence for Two Novel Enzymes in the Biosynthesis of 3-Dimethylsulfoniopropionate in Spartina alterniflora
Plant Physiology, July 1, 2000; 123(3): 1153 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Xiong and A. E. Pegg
Mechanistic Studies of the Processing of Human S-Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase Proenzyme. ISOLATION OF AN ESTER INTERMEDIATE
J. Biol. Chem., December 3, 1999; 274(49): 35059 - 35066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
U. C. Kabisch, A. Grantzdorffer, A. Schierhorn, K. P. Rucknagel, J. R. Andreesen, and A. Pich
Identification of D-Proline Reductase from Clostridium sticklandii as a Selenoenzyme and Indications for a Catalytically Active Pyruvoyl Group Derived from a Cysteine Residue by Cleavage of a Proprotein
J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 1999; 274(13): 8445 - 8454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xiong, H.
Right arrow Articles by Pegg, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed