|
Volume 272, Number 45, Issue of November 7, 1997
pp. 28391-28397
Cell Envelope Signaling in Escherichia coli
LIGAND BINDING TO THE FERRICHROME-IRON RECEPTOR FhuA PROMOTES
INTERACTION WITH THE ENERGY-TRANSDUCING PROTEIN TonB*
(Received for publication, July 16, 1997, and in revised form, September 9, 1997)
Gregory S.
Moeck
§,
James W.
Coulton
¶ and
Kathleen
Postle
From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada and the
Department of Microbiology and Department of Biochemistry and
Biophysics, Washington State University,
Pullman, Washington 99164-4233
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The ferrichrome-iron receptor of
Escherichia coli is FhuA, an outer membrane protein that is
dependent upon the energy-coupling protein TonB to enable active
transport of specific hydroxamate siderophores, infection by certain
phages, and cell killing by the protein antibiotics colicin M and
microcin 25. In vivo cross-linking studies were performed
to establish at the biochemical level the interaction between FhuA and
TonB. In an E. coli strain in which both proteins were
expressed from the chromosome, a high molecular mass complex was
detected when the ferrichrome homologue ferricrocin was added
immediately prior to addition of cross-linker. The complex included
both proteins; it was absent from strains of E. coli that
were devoid of either FhuA or TonB, and it was detected with anti-FhuA
and anti-TonB monoclonal antibodies. These results indicate that,
in vivo, the binding of ferricrocin to FhuA enhances
complex formation between the receptor and TonB. An in
vitro system was established with which to examine the FhuA-TonB
interaction. Incubation of TonB with histidine-tagged FhuA followed by
addition of Ni2+-nitrilotriacetate-agarose led to the
specific recovery of both TonB and FhuA. Addition of ferricrocin or
colicin M to FhuA in this system greatly increased the coupling between
FhuA and TonB. Conversely, a monoclonal antibody that binds near the N
terminus of FhuA reduced the retention of TonB by histidine-tagged
FhuA. These studies demonstrate the significance of ligand binding at the external surface of the cell to mediate signal transduction across
the outer membrane.
INTRODUCTION
High affinity iron uptake in Gram-negative bacteria such as
Escherichia coli is a stepwise process that involves
recognition of a ferric iron chelator (siderophore) by a receptor
within the outer membrane, translocation of the siderophore-Fe(III)
complex into the periplasm, and internalization of the iron by a
cytoplasmic membrane permease in a periplasmic binding
protein-dependent manner (reviewed in Refs. 1-4). Dissection of the
energy requirements for high affinity uptake of iron (5) and of vitamin
B12 (6-9), transport of which shares common elements with
siderophore-Fe(III) transport mechanisms, identified the importance of
the TonB and ExbB/D proteins of the cytoplasmic membrane to couple
proton-motive force with active transport at the outer membrane (Ref.
10; reviewed in Refs. 2 and 11). TonB homologues have been identified in many Gram-negative bacteria, including Salmonella
enterica serovar Typhimurium (12), Yersinia
enterocolitica (13), Haemophilus influenzae (14), and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15). In addition, complexes between
TonB or its homologues and other proteins (ExbB, ExbD, and as yet
unidentified proteins) were detected with anti-E. coli TonB
monoclonal antibodies (mAbs1;
Ref. 16). These findings demonstrate that the
TonB-dependent energy transduction system is shared among
many Gram-negative bacteria and suggest that high affinity
energy-dependent iron uptake in Gram-negative aerobes is
accomplished using TonB and its accessory proteins (16).
Physical association between TonB and a TonB-dependent
outer membrane receptor was first demonstrated biochemically by
in vivo cross-linking experiments in which TonB was coupled
to the E. coli enterobactin (also known as enterochelin)
receptor, FepA (17). This finding substantiated genetic analyses that
suggested interactions between TonB and other outer membrane
transporters, namely the ferrichrome-iron receptor FhuA (18, 19) and
the vitamin B12 receptor BtuB (20-22). However, formation
of the FepA-TonB complex appeared to be independent of the presence of
ferric enterobactin, since the strains used carried mutations in the
enterobactin biosynthetic genes and were negative on chrome azurol S
plates used for detecting siderophore excretion (23). Paradoxically,
TonB did not appear to form cross-links with any of the other outer
membrane receptors. BtuB and FhuA have subsequently been shown to
compete for a limiting amount of TonB function; ferrichrome decreased
the rate of vitamin B12 transport, and, conversely, vitamin
B12 inhibited ferrichrome uptake if BtuB were overexpressed
(24). These results imply that ligand-bound outer membrane receptors
have a means of signaling to TonB that they are occupied. Indeed, outer
membrane receptors have been demonstrated to change conformations
following addition of cognate ligands (25-27). The binding of
ferrichrome-iron to purified FhuA led to a conformational change in the
receptor detectable both as a reduction in reactivity of certain
anti-FhuA mAbs and as a gain in resistance to trypsinolysis at lysine
67 but not at lysine 5 of FhuA (26). We proposed that such a
conformational change in FhuA may act as a signal to TonB in
vivo, indicating that the receptor is loaded with ligand.
To understand the functional relevance of the ligand-induced
conformational change in FhuA and to investigate whether receptors other than FepA can form complexes with TonB, we initiated studies of
FhuA-TonB interactions. We now report that FhuA can be cross-linked to
TonB and that the cross-linking between FhuA and TonB is significantly enhanced by the presence of the ligand ferricrocin. Additionally, we
have established an in vitro system with which to evaluate the coupling between FhuA and TonB and the effect of normally membrane-impermeant macromolecules upon the interaction. Complementary results from in vivo and in vitro experiments
confirm that ligand binding to FhuA enhanced its physical association
with TonB.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Chemicals and Reagents
Goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Ig)
G (heavy plus light chain)-horseradish peroxidase conjugate and goat
anti-mouse IgG1-horseradish peroxidase conjugate antibodies were from
Southern Biotechnology Associates (Birmingham, AL). The enhanced
chemiluminescence Western kit was obtained from Amersham Corp.
Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane was from
Millipore Corp. Ni2+-nitrilotriacetate (NTA)-agarose resin
was from QIAGEN, imidazole from ICN Biomedicals, Inc., and N,
N-dimethyldodecylamine N-oxide (LDAO) detergent from
Fluka. X-Omat AR-5 film was purchased from Eastman Kodak Co.;
Reflection autoradiography film was from NEN Life Science Products.
Bacterial Strains and Media
The E. coli K-12
strains used in this study were GM1 (ara
(lac-pro) thi F (lac-pro); Ref.
28), W3110 (F IN(rrnD-rrnE)1; Ref.
29), MC4100 (F araD (argF-lac)
U169 rspL thi relA flbB deoC1 pstF rbsR; from T. J. Silhavy, Princeton University), SG303 (MC4100 aroB; Ref. 30), KP1032 (W3110 tonB::kan; Ref. 10); KP1060
(GM1 (ompT-fepA-entF); Ref. 17), KP1120 (KP1060
(trp-tonB-opp-ana)467; Ref. 31), RK4691 (P1450
col M+; from R. J. Kadner, University of Virginia),
and AW740 (hisG4 thr-1 fhuA31 tsx-78 ompF
zcb::Tn10 ompC; Ref. 32).
Plasmid pGC01 (30) encodes the wild-type fhuA gene in
pBR322; plasmid pHX405 encodes FhuA.H6 (26), a derivative
of FhuA containing a hexahistidine tag inserted after amino acid 405 of
the deduced mature amino acid sequence of FhuA (33). Plasmid pCG405
encodes FhuA 021-128.H6, a FhuA derivative that contains
a hexahistidine tag inserted after amino acid 405 of the
FhuA 021-128 protein (34).
Construction and Growth of Bacterial Strains
E.
coli strain GSM01 was constructed by P1 transduction of the
tonB::kan mutation from KP1032 into
SG303fhuA, selecting for kanamycin resistance and screening
for colicin B resistance. KP1060fhuA cells were isolated by
selection of spontaneously occurring T5 phage-resistant colonies of
KP1060 and screening for loss of sensitivity to the FhuA-specific
phages UC-1 and 80 and for resistance to colicin M and to the
peptide antibiotic microcin 25. Lack of FhuA expression was confirmed
by immunoblotting of outer membranes from KP1060fhuA with
anti-FhuA mAbs (35). Strain GSM02 was constructed by P1 transduction of
tonB 66-100 (90% linked to
trpB::Tn10) from KP1096 (36) into
KP1060fhuA, selecting for tetracycline resistance and
screening by immunoblot with anti-TonB mAb 4F1 (16) for TonB protein of
reduced molecular mass.
Cultures were grown overnight in LB broth at 37 °C and then
subcultured by 1:100 dilution into M9 glucose minimal medium
supplemented with 0.2% casamino acids, tryptophan at 40 µg/ml,
thiamine at 4 µg/ml, MgSO4 at 1 mM, and
CaCl2 at 0.5 mM. FeCl3 was added to a final concentration of either 2 µM (for tonB
strains) or 20 µM (for aroB and
entF strains). Cultures were grown with aeration at 37 °C
to an A550 of 0.5 (spectrophotometer path
length, 1.5 cm).
Cross-linking in Vivo with Formaldehyde
Ten nmol of the
FhuA-specific hydroxamate siderophore ferricrocin-iron (hereafter
referred to as ferricrocin) was added to 1 ml of cells at 0.5 A550 (ml) equivalents in 100 mM
sodium phosphate, pH 6.8. Following an incubation of 5 min,
formaldehyde was added to a final concentration of 1%. Cross-linking
(17) was allowed to proceed for 25 min. Lysine, cysteine, and tyrosine,
and to a lesser extent tryptophan, histidine, aspartate, and arginine, are targets for cross-linking by formaldehyde (37, 38).
SDS-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (PAGE) and
Immunoblotting
After formaldehyde cross-linking, cells were
pelleted and solubilized in 4 × concentrated SDS-PAGE sample
buffer with heating at 60 °C for 5 min. SDS-solubilized proteins
(0.25 A550 (ml) equivalents/lane) were resolved
(200 mA·h/gel) on 8% polyacrylamide gels and transferred to PVDF
membranes. Conditions for immunoblotting were those described (17).
Anti-FhuA mAbs Fhu8.3 and Fhu5.1 (35) bind to determinants between
residues 1-20 and 21-59, respectively, of the mature FhuA sequence
(33); anti-TonB mAbs 4H4 and 4F1 recognize epitopes corresponding to
P77IPEPPKEAP and R120PASPFENT, respectively
(16), of the TonB sequence (39).
Isolation of Detergent-solubilized TonB
E. coli
K-12 strains GSM02, KP1060fhuA, and KP1120fhuA
were grown to an A600 of 1.0 in supplemented M9
glucose minimal medium. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation,
resuspended in 1/30 volume of 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
and lysed by two passes through a French cell press (Aminco) at 18,000 p.s.i., 4 °C. The cleared cell lysate was centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C to pellet unbroken cells and much
of the outer membrane fraction (40). The supernatant was centrifuged at
185,000 × g for 2 h at 4 °C. The pellet from
ultracentrifugation, enriched for cytoplasmic membrane vesicles
(40), was solubilized with stirring for 45 min at room
temperature in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 2% LDAO, and 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to give a total soluble
protein concentration of approximately 10 mg/ml. Extracts were stored
at 20 °C. Immediately prior to column experiments the samples were
thawed, diluted 10-fold with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 0.1%
LDAO, 100 mM NaCl (TLN) plus 5 mM imidazole,
and filtered over 0.45-µm pore size cellulose acetate filters
(Millipore Corp.).
Construction of a FhuA Column and Its Use to Capture Solubilized
TonB
Hexahistidine-tagged FhuA (FhuA.H6) from the
outer membrane of the E. coli K-12 strain AW740(pHX405) was
purified to apparent homogeneity over Ni2+-NTA-agarose
(26). To construct the FhuA.H6-Ni2+-NTA-agarose
column, a 2-mg aliquot of concentrated FhuA.H6 was diluted
1:10 in TLN and loaded onto a bed of 1 ml of
Ni2+-NTA-agarose in an HR 5/5 column (Pharmacia Biotech
Inc.). A flow rate of 0.5 ml/min was used for all column
chromatography. The column was washed with 10 volumes of TLN plus 5 mM imidazole. A sample of TLN-solubilized proteins from the
ultracentrifugation pellet of E. coli strain GSM02
containing TonB 66-100 was loaded onto the column. The resin was
washed with 10 column volumes of TLN plus 5 mM
imidazole and a linear gradient of imidazole to 500 mM was
applied over 20 column volumes. A major peak was eluted at an imidazole
concentration of approximately 80 mM. Samples (8 µl) of
column fractions (1 ml) were mixed with an equal volume of 4 × concentrated SDS-PAGE sample buffer, boiled for 1 min, and then
resolved on 9% polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were transferred to PVDF
membranes and probed with anti-FhuA and anti-TonB mAbs. The primary
antibodies were detected either with an anti-mouse chain-specific
alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody (187.1; Ref. 41)
followed by visualization using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate
and nitro blue tetrazolium or with a goat anti-mouse IgG horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody followed by visualization by
enhanced chemiluminescence.
In a parallel experiment, a duplicate 2-mg aliquot of concentrated
FhuA.H6 was diluted 1:10 in TLN, mixed with a 20-fold molar excess of ferricrocin, and loaded onto a bed of 1 ml of
Ni2+-NTA-agarose resin. Addition of solubilized proteins
from E. coli strain GSM02 (containing TonB 66-100),
column washing, and elution with imidazole was performed exactly as
described above for the FhuA.H6 sample. To eliminate the
possibility that the presence of TonB 66-100 in the eluate was due
to some affinity of TonB 66-100 for the Ni2+-NTA-agarose
resin, the experiment was repeated without application of
FhuA.H6 to the resin.
In Vitro Analysis of the Effect of Ligands upon the FhuA-TonB
Interaction
To investigate the influence of FhuA-specific ligands
upon the protein-protein interaction, an in vitro experiment
of smaller scale was devised. Aliquots (5 µg) of either
FhuA.H6 or FhuA 021-128.H6 in TLN were
incubated in solution with a 20-fold molar excess of ferricrocin, with
50 µl of undiluted RK4691 cell lysate containing colicin M (Ref. 34;
28-fold dilution of stock gave a clear zone of lysis on the
indicator strain MC4100), with 50 µl of undiluted AY261 cell lysate
containing microcin 25 (Ref. 42; 28-fold dilution of stock
gave a clear zone of lysis), or with 1011 plaque-forming
units of the FhuA-specific phages T5 or 80 for 10 min. All
incubations were at 25 °C. For some experiments, hybridoma supernatants (specific Ig concentration, 5-10 µg/ml) containing anti-FhuA mAbs Fhu8.3 (G2a isotype), Fhu5.1 (G3 isotype), Fhu6.3 (M
isotype), or Fhu8.1 (A isotype) were then added and incubated for
another 10 min. These mAbs bind determinants located between amino
acids 1-20, 21-59, 381-417, and 417-550 of FhuA, respectively (35).
To these mixtures was added an aliquot (100 µl) of TLN-solubilized lysate (total protein concentration ~1 mg/ml) from
KP1060fhuA cells, prepared as described above. In some
experiments, the TLN-solubilized lysate from KP1060fhuA
cells was mixed with 1 µl of a 1 mM stock of either
peptide 1 (corresponding to amino acids 1-18 of FhuA) or peptide 2 (corresponding to amino acids 636-651 of FhuA) for 10 min prior to the
addition of the TonB-containing sample to FhuA.H6. Before
use, the pH of the peptide solutions was adjusted to neutrality with
100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. After a 15-min incubation, 2.5 µl of TLN-equilibrated Ni2+-NTA-agarose resin was added
and mixed for 10 min. The resin was pelleted by centrifugation and
washed twice with TLN containing 5 mM imidazole, and bound
proteins were eluted by addition of 30 µl of TLN containing 50 mM EDTA. Aliquots (5 µl) of the eluate were mixed with
electrophoresis sample buffer, boiled for 1 min, and loaded onto 9%
polyacrylamide gels. Resolved proteins were transferred to PVDF
membranes and probed with anti-FhuA mAb Fhu8.4 and anti-TonB mAb 4H4,
both of which are of the G1 isotype. Primary antibodies were detected
by goat anti-mouse IgG1-horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies
and chemiluminescence. Relative amounts of FhuA.H6, FhuA 021-128.H6, and TonB were assessed by scanning
(Hewlett Packard ScanJet IIcx flatbed scanner; 600 dots per inch
resolution as a black and white photo; default settings of brightness
and contrast) of the developed x-ray film and quantitation (ImageQuant
software, Molecular Dynamics Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) of the bands by
volume integration. To account for slight differences in loading of
FhuA, TonB bands were normalized relative to each FhuA.H6
band after background subtraction. At least three replicates of
experiments with FhuA.H6 were performed.
RESULTS
FhuA Can Be Cross-linked in Vivo to TonB
Previous results
demonstrated the existence of a high molecular mass complex containing
both FepA and TonB (17). We posited that a complex between FhuA and
TonB could be identified by using a similar in vivo
formaldehyde cross-linking protocol. The anti-TonB mAb 4H4 detected
prominent bands with apparent molecular masses of 57-59 kDa and ~175
kDa (Fig. 1A). Anti-TonB
mAb-reactive bands with relative mobilities greater than the band at 69 kDa are not displayed because they have been characterized previously
(10, 16, 17, 36). It should be noted that unequivocal assignments of
molecular masses of bands based on their mobility in SDS-PAGE was not
possible (as noted in Refs. 16 and 17). Since formaldehyde cross-links
are heat-labile, protein samples were not completely denatured by
boiling prior to application to the polyacrylamide gel.
Fig. 1.
Identification of TonB and FhuA proteins by
immunoblot analysis of formaldehyde-cross-linked samples.
Duplicate panels of SDS-soluble proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE,
transferred to PVDF membranes and probed with anti-TonB mAb 4H4
(A) or with anti-FhuA mAb Fhu8.3 (B). Primary
antibodies were detected by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary
antibodies and chemiluminescence. Standard proteins for relative
mobility were 0.1 µg of purified FhuA.H6 (lane
1) and prestained markers with apparent molecular masses as
indicated between panels. Cell extracts, having been subjected to
cross-linking, were collected from the following E. coli
strains: SG303 (lanes 2 and 3),
SG303fhuA (lanes 4 and 5),
SG303fhuA(pGC01) (lanes 6 and 7), and
GSM01(pGC01) (lanes 8 and 9). An equal number of
cells were cross-linked in each sample. C, extended exposure
of lanes 1-5 of the immunoblot shown in B. fc, ferricrocin.
[View Larger Version of this Image (50K GIF file)]
The prominent band of ~175 kDa was present in cells in which FhuA was
expressed at chromosomal levels (E. coli strain SG303) but
absent from SG303fhuA cells. This band was detected when
FhuA was expressed from the multicopy plasmid pGC01 in
SG303fhuA cells but was lost in the isogenic
tonB::kan strain GSM01(pGC01). This band therefore
represented a candidate FhuA-TonB complex.
Ferricrocin Increases the Abundance of the FhuA-TonB
Complex
To establish the specificity of the candidate FhuA-TonB
complex, the effect of adding the FhuA-specific siderophore ferricrocin immediately prior to formaldehyde cross-linking was examined. Ferricrocin induced the appearance of the band migrating to ~175 kDa
in strain SG303 and increased the abundance of the complex in
SG303fhuA(pGC01). Addition of ferricrocin did not
significantly change the SDS-soluble protein profile of either
SG303fhuA or GSM01(pGC01).
To verify that the ~175-kDa complex contained FhuA, an identical
panel of cross-linked proteins was probed by immunoblotting with the
anti-FhuA mAb Fhu8.3 (Fig. 1B). In the SDS-soluble
cross-linked proteins from strain SG303, the most prominent band
corresponded to monomeric wild-type FhuA of 80 kDa. Less intensely
mAb-reactive bands of ~90, 100, and 110 kDa were also identified.
Upon longer exposures of the x-ray film (Fig. 1C), a band
migrating with an apparent molecular mass of ~175 kDa was detected in
the SDS-soluble extract from SG303 cells that had been preincubated
with ferricrocin. As was apparent upon probing with the anti-TonB mAb,
no band migrating to ~175 kDa was present when FhuA was expressed
from the chromosome in the absence of exogenously added ferricrocin.
The formation of this ~175-kDa complex was dependent upon both FhuA
and TonB since in strains SG303fhuA and GSM01(pGC01) the
complex was absent. Furthermore, the complex that was detected by the
anti-FhuA mAb displayed an identical pattern of abundance as influenced
by addition of ferricrocin. These data therefore demonstrated that a
complex between FhuA and TonB was formed in vivo and that
its amount increased by preincubation with ferricrocin.
When FhuA was expressed from the high copy number plasmid pGC01, a
family of FhuA-containing, formaldehyde-cross-linked complexes appeared
above the FhuA monomer in the range of 90-130 kDa (Fig. 1B). These bands had mobilities identical to the less
prominent bands that were seen above the FhuA monomer when FhuA was
expressed from the chromosome in strain SG303 (particularly in longer
exposures; see Fig. 1C) and were independent of the presence
of TonB since their profile was unchanged between
SG303fhuA(pGC01) and GSM01(pGC01). At present, we have not
established the identity of these FhuA-containing complexes. A similar
set of anti-FhuA mAb-reactive bands was disclosed after in
vivo cross-linking with E. coli strain
SG303fhuA(pCG405) (data not shown). In these experiments,
the FhuA-containing complexes migrated slower than the
FhuA 021-128.H6 monomer, which had a relative mobility
of ~72 kDa. This observation indicates that amino acids 21-128 of
FhuA are apparently not required for the formation of these higher
molecular mass complexes.
TonB Binds Specifically to FhuA in Vitro
We developed an
in vitro system with which to examine the interaction
between FhuA and TonB and that would allow for further assessment of
its specificity. Purified FhuA.H6 protein was applied to a
Ni2+-NTA-agarose column. Detergent-solubilized samples
containing TonB were introduced into the column, the resin was washed
and bound proteins were eluted with imidazole. Initial experiments showed that trace amounts of wild-type TonB were retained by the Ni2+-NTA-agarose resin even in the absence of
FhuA.H6. Two modifications were employed to circumvent this
limitation. We postulated that the proline-rich region of TonB might be
responsible for the interaction between TonB and the resin. The TonB
derivative TonB 66-100, which lacks the majority of the proline-rich
region and which confers wild-type TonB phenotype upon cells (36), was
therefore used for in vitro column experiments. Inclusion of
5 mM imidazole in the binding and wash buffers eliminated
nonspecific retention of proteins by the Ni2+-NTA
resin.
Elution of bound FhuA.H6 also led to the recovery of
TonB 66-100 (Fig. 2, middle
blots). In the absence of FhuA.H6 on the resin and
with an equivalent amount of TonB 66-100 applied in a control
experiment, no TonB 66-100 was detected in the eluate (Fig. 2,
top blots). Retention of TonB 66-100 by the
Ni2+-NTA-agarose resin therefore required prior application
of FhuA.H6. Examination of the eluate fractions for FhuA by
total protein staining (data not shown) indicated that the fractions
containing the FhuA peak corresponded to those containing the
TonB 66-100 peak, as determined by immunoblotting with an anti-TonB
mAb. The co-elution of TonB 66-100 with FhuA.H6 implies
that the two proteins interact in this assay since TonB 66-100
displayed no affinity for Ni2+-NTA-agarose in the absence
of bound FhuA.H6.
Fig. 2.
Identification of TonB 66-100 eluted from
a Ni2+-NTA-agarose column containing immobilized
FhuA.H6 by immunoblot analysis of column fractions using
anti-TonB mAb 4H4. Only the relevant area of the immunoblot is
shown since no other anti-TonB mAb-reactive bands were detected in the
range of 14 kDa to ~120 kDa after chemiluminescent development of the
immunoblot. Upper blots, no FhuA.H6 bound to the
resin; middle blots, 2 µg of FhuA.H6 bound to
the resin; bottom blots, 2 µg of FhuA.H6,
which had been preincubated with 20-fold molar excess of ferricrocin
and then bound to the resin. In all cases, an equivalent amount of
TLN-soluble lysate from cells of strain GSM02 was then applied to the
column, the column was washed to remove unbound proteins, and an
imidazole gradient was applied.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
To evaluate whether ferricrocin enhanced complex formation between FhuA
and TonB as it did in vivo, purified FhuA.H6 was
incubated with a 20-fold molar excess of ferricrocin immediately prior
to application onto the resin. When an amount of
TonB 66-100-containing sample that was equivalent to that used
previously (Fig. 2, top and middle blots) was
applied onto the FhuA.H6-ferricrocin column, an increased
amount of TonB 66-100 was eluted (Fig. 2, bottom blots).
Immunoblotting of column fractions with anti-FhuA mAbs (data not shown)
indicated that the same amount of FhuA.H6 was eluted from
the column regardless of the absence or presence of ferricrocin. The
observed increase in TonB 66-100 retained by the
FhuA.H6-ferricrocin complex further demonstrates the
specificity of interaction between the two proteins since ferricrocin
is specific for FhuA.
The in vitro results were extended to examine the effects of
other FhuA-specific ligands, such as colicins and phage, upon the
FhuA-TonB interaction. This necessitated development of a microscale
in vitro experimental protocol due to the relative scarcity
of these ligands, to maintain ligand excess relative to FhuA. Using
this protocol, complexes between FhuA and TonB that were formed in
solution were captured by Ni2+-NTA-agarose resin. Cell
extracts containing wild-type TonB instead of TonB 66-100 were used
to verify that the native TonB protein interacted with
FhuA.H6 in vitro as it did in vivo.
Immunoblotting of resolved Ni2+-NTA-agarose eluates with
anti-FhuA and anti-TonB mAbs identified qualitative differences in TonB
binding to FhuA.H6 (Fig. 3).
Quantitation of the amounts of TonB and FhuA.H6 on the
immunoblot established reproducible and significant alterations in the
amount of TonB retained with different ligand treatments (Fig. 3,
second last row). The addition of ferricrocin to
FhuA.H6 induced a substantial increase in the subsequent
recovery of TonB (Fig. 3, compare lanes 3 and 4).
Relative to the amount of TonB bound to the
FhuA.H6-ferricrocin complex, only the addition of colicin M
led to a similar large amount of TonB, which co-eluted with
FhuA.H6 from the resin (Fig. 3, lane 9). Phage
80 induced a 3-fold increase in the amount of TonB, which bound to
FhuA.H6 and which was subsequently captured by the
Ni2+-NTA-agarose resin (Fig. 3, lane 10).
Addition of phage T5 or microcin 25 (Fig. 3, lanes 11 and
12) in place of ferricrocin led to the recovery of amounts
of TonB that were similar to that obtained after no ligand addition
(Fig. 3, lane 3).
Fig. 3.
FhuA-specific ligands alter the interaction
between FhuA and TonB. Equal amounts of purified
FhuA.H6 protein were incubated with FhuA-specific ligands
(fc, ferricrocin; cM, colicin M;
80, phage 80; T5, phage T5; m25,
microcin 25), with anti-FhuA mAbs, and then with TLN-solubilized cell
extract containing TonB, which in some cases was preincubated with
peptide 1 corresponding to amino acids 1-18 or with peptide 2 corresponding to amino acids 636-651 of the mature FhuA sequence.
Complexes were captured with Ni2+-NTA-agarose, resolved by
SDS-PAGE, and identified by immunoblotting with both anti-FhuA mAb
Fhu8.4 and anti-TonB mAb 4H4. Primary antibodies were detected by
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and
chemiluminescence. Molecular masses are as indicated (in kDa); the
various additions for samples and corresponding controls are indicated
in the grid beneath the blot. quant identifies the results
from quantitation (performed in triplicate as described under
"Experimental Procedures") as the percentage of TonB recovered after each treatment relative to the amount of TonB in lane
4. The results of quantitation of the amount of TonB in each lane (quant%) relative to the amount of TonB in lane
4 as described under "Experimental Procedures" are shown as
means from three replicate experiments; standard deviations (std
dev) are listed in the final row.
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]
Our library of anti-FhuA mAbs (35) has been used previously to probe
FhuA topology, to investigate interactions between receptor and its
ligands, and to identify ligand-induced conformational changes (26). We
investigated whether binding of mAbs to the FhuA.H6-ferricrocin complex could alter the association
between FhuA and TonB. Since the determinants that are recognized by
each mAb have been mapped (35) to regions of the primary sequence of
FhuA, data on antibody-induced alteration of the FhuA-TonB interaction
would provide insight into regions of the receptor that are critical
for the interaction. Incubation of mAb Fhu8.3 with the
FhuA.H6-ferricrocin complex prior to addition of TonB led
to a substantial reduction in the amount of TonB that was subsequently
eluted (Fig. 3, lane 5). Since the determinant of mAb Fhu8.3
is located in a region between amino acids 1 and 20 of mature FhuA,
this result suggests that sequences within this region are important
for physical association between FhuA and TonB. The possibility that
this inhibitory effect was due to nonspecific steric hindrance by the
antibody (~160 kDa) to prevent TonB from interacting with FhuA was
unlikely since the binding of mAbs Fhu5.1 (~160 kDa) and Fhu6.3 (M
heavy chain isotype; ~800 kDa) to their determinants did not
significantly reduce the association of TonB with FhuA (Fig. 3,
lanes 6 and 7). Incubation of the
surface-reactive mAb Fhu8.1 with the FhuA.H6-ferricrocin
complex modestly reduced the subsequent retention of TonB relative to
that without mAb addition.
A synthetic pentapeptide corresponding to the TonB box of the E. coli ferric coprogen receptor FhuE was reported (43) to inhibit
TonB-dependent receptor activity in growing cells. Could a
peptide that includes the TonB box of FhuA inhibit physical association
between FhuA and TonB in vitro? To address this question, a
synthetic peptide (peptide 1) corresponding to amino acids 1-18 of
mature FhuA was incubated with the TLN-solubilized cell extract containing TonB for 10 min prior to the addition of the TonB sample to
the FhuA.H6-ferricrocin complex. Neither peptide 1 nor a
control peptide (peptide 2) corresponding to amino acids 636-651 of
FhuA reduced the amount of TonB bound to the
FhuA.H6-ferricrocin complex (Fig. 3, lanes 13 and 14). Our assay for in vitro interaction also
demonstrated that TonB bound specifically to the hexahistidine-tagged FhuA derivative FhuA 021-128.H6 as well as it did to
FhuA.H6 (data not shown). Furthermore, ferricrocin and
colicin M binding to FhuA 021-128.H6 increased the
amount of TonB, which was subsequently co-eluted with
FhuA 021-128.H6 from the Ni2+-NTA-agarose
resin.
DISCUSSION
Our identification and characterization of a FhuA-TonB complex
indicates that FepA is not the sole high affinity receptor with which
TonB interacts, thus broadening the anecdotal observations (17) and
increasing the likelihood that all TonB-dependent receptors directly contact TonB. The finding that the ferrichrome homologue ferricrocin enhanced the interaction between FhuA and TonB extends our
earlier results of ligand-induced conformational changes in FhuA (26).
Localization of the conformational changes to periplasmically exposed
regions of FhuA led to our hypothesis that FhuA signals TonB via such a
structural alteration, thereby indicating its requirement for energy to
translocate bound ligand across the outer membrane. The
ferricrocin-induced enhancement of FhuA-TonB coupling that was
established by in vivo formaldehyde cross-linking experiments and by in vitro interaction assays supports the
ligand-induced signaling hypothesis. An excess of FhuA over TonB,
achieved by overexpression of FhuA from a multicopy plasmid or by
application of milligram amounts of purified FhuA.H6 to the
Ni2+-NTA-agarose resin, was sufficient to overcome the
apparent ferricrocin-dependence of complex formation. This observation
can be explained if a fraction of the receptors modulates their
conformation independently of the presence of ferricrocin. However, in
the more physiologically relevant expression of chromosomally encoded
FhuA, even prolonged exposure to x-ray film of immunoblots with
anti-FhuA mAbs did not reveal the FhuA-TonB complex in the absence of
ferricrocin. If the complex were present without added ligand, it was
beneath the detection limit of the enhanced chemiluminescence system. Formation of detectable amounts of the FhuA-TonB complex therefore appears to require ferricrocin under physiological circumstances, but
is not absolutely dependent upon the presence of bound ligand when the
receptor is overexpressed.
The prominent band of ~175 kDa migrated slightly faster than the
previously characterized FepA-TonB complex of 195 kDa (17). That this
latter complex was not evident on immunoblots probed with anti-TonB
mAbs was probably due to the aroB mutations in our strains,
leading to a block in enterobactin synthesis. Recent results2 indicate that
enterobactin enhances complex formation between FepA and TonB. Thus,
the early results of Skare et al. (17), taken together with
those presented here, suggest that the FepA-TonB complex was
visualized in ent strains due to synthesis
of enterobactin intermediates, which, although undetectable by the
chrome azurol S plate assay, were nonetheless able to cause the
requisite conformational change in FepA that allowed cross-linking to
TonB.
Particularly intriguing is the set of anti-FhuA mAb-reactive bands with
relative mobilities lower than that of monomeric FhuA, species that
were disclosed by immunoblotting of SDS-soluble cross-linked proteins.
What is the identity of proteins within these complexes? They did not
contain TonB since they were present in a strain in which the
chromosomal tonB gene was disrupted by insertion of a
kanamycin resistance cassette. One or some of the bands with relative
mobilities lower than monomeric FhuA may represent multimeric FhuA
complexes. The enterobactin receptor FepA apparently forms trimers
in vivo since nondenaturing lithium dodecyl sulfate-gel electrophoresis of outer membrane fractions containing FepA revealed an
anti-FepA mAb-reactive band, the relative mobility of which was
approximately 3-fold greater than that of the FepA monomer (44).
Cross-linking in vivo with formaldehyde followed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with an anti-FepA mAb also revealed high molecular mass bands that were proposed to represent FepA dimers and trimers (17). In contrast, FhuA was identified to be monomeric on the basis of
sedimentation equilibrium and velocity measurements (45). Since the
purified FhuA that was used in those biophysical experiments retained
biological activity, it was concluded that the functional state of FhuA
was probably monomeric. However, these findings are also consistent
with an alternate interpretation; FhuA may be organized as a trimer of
independently functional monomers within the outer membrane. Our
preliminary experiments indicate that FhuA trimers exist in samples of
purified protein, whether or not subjected to formaldehyde
cross-linking (data not shown). The multimeric organization of FhuA
in vivo and its significance in receptor and transport
activity thus remain to be demonstrated. The identities of the
molecules that associate with FhuA and that give rise to the higher
molecular mass complexes (90-130 kDa) remain enigmatic, but they may
include other cell envelope proteins that influence FhuA
multimerization or FhuA activity.
That TonB-dependent receptors physically interact with TonB
was originally inferred by recognizing that siderophore receptors, the
vitamin B12 receptor, and group B colicins all share a
short stretch of amino acid homology near their N termini (Refs. 11, 46, and 47; for a recent inventory of 36 TonB-dependent
receptors for which the sequences are known, see Refs. 48). This
consensus amino acid sequence, termed the "TonB box," is thought to
interact with the TonB protein, thereby enabling ligand translocation
across the outer membrane. Which sequences of FhuA and TonB are
required for interaction between the two proteins? The TonB box is a
likely candidate, although sequences outside of this region are also thought to play a role in the interaction between TonB and
TonB-dependent receptors. Only mAb Fhu8.3 greatly reduced
the retention of TonB by the FhuA.H6-ferricrocin complex.
Such inhibition was probably due to specific steric hindrance of the
FhuA-TonB interaction at or near the determinant which is bound by
Fhu8.3. This finding underscores the value of mAbs as highly specific
probes of FhuA in the investigation of protein-protein interactions. To
identify N-terminal sequences of FhuA that are critical for association with TonB, we are currently attempting to delineate precisely the
epitope which is bound by mAb Fhu8.3. Lysine 5 of FhuA plays a role in
the binding of Fhu8.3 since trypsinolysis of purified FhuA.H6 at this residue abolished mAb reactivity (26).
Loss-of-function mutations within the TonB box of FepA, BtuB, and FhuA
have in all cases included the substitution by a turn-promoting residue, either Gly or Pro (11). Recent examination of one such mutation (I14P) involving the TonB box of the enterobactin receptor FepA revealed that such alterations result in the loss of specific in vivo formaldehyde-mediated cross-linking to TonB. The
mutation did not involve a formaldehyde-reactive residue, yet it
altered the conformation of FepA at several distally located
protease-sensitive sites (49). These observations, coupled with the
finding that seemingly invariant residues within the consensus TonB box
sequence could be mutated without significant loss of receptor
functions (11, 18, 21, 50), lead to the suggestion that the TonB box is
not directly involved in interactions with TonB, but affects the
conformation of distal sites through which this interaction occurs (49).
That a synthetic peptide carrying the TonB box of FhuA did not reduce
the physical association between FhuA and TonB in vitro lends support to the role of TonB box conformation as opposed to
primary sequence. Thorough characterization of FhuA peptides which may
inhibit FhuA-TonB coupling is now possible using our in
vitro interaction assay. Such analyses should reveal the sequence specificity of the FhuA-TonB interaction if indeed it is uniquely dependent upon regions of FhuA primary sequence, as inferred from the
results of Tuckman and Osburne (43).
Experiments in vitro allowed us to reproduce a hallmark of
the FhuA-TonB interaction in vivo: that ferricrocin binding
enhanced complex formation. The ability of colicin M and, to a lesser
extent, phage 80 also to promote the physical association between
FhuA and TonB extends our in vitro approach to other
receptor-specific ligands. Furthermore, this observation supports the
conclusion that independently of an energy source, physiologically
relevant conformational changes occur for FhuA to signal its
requirement for TonB energy coupling (26). Our findings therefore
provide novel insights into the early steps of
TonB-dependent transport activity.
The inability of phage T5 and of the protein antibiotic microcin 25 significantly to increase FhuA-TonB coupling may be explained if these
FhuA-specific ligands induce conformational changes in the receptor
that are different from those induced by ferricrocin and colicin M. Indeed, our preliminary results suggest that different subsets of
anti-FhuA mAbs identify conformational changes induced by select
ligands of FhuA (data not shown). Phage T5 binding to FhuA induced a
change in FhuA conformation that resulted in ion conductance across
lipid membranes (51) and both phage DNA transfer into and ferrichrome
efflux from proteoliposomes (52, 53). However, one would not predict
that this same conformational change would increase FhuA-TonB
association since T5 is a TonB-independent ligand. Alternatively, the
large size of the phage particles relative to the other ligands may in
some manner preclude the enhancement of FhuA-TonB interaction as
detected in vitro. The identification and isolation of tail
fiber proteins that constitute the minimal requirement for phage to
participate in receptor recognition (54, 55) will assist in the
analysis of TonB coupling with TonB-dependent receptors.
Future studies need to focus upon the ligand-induced conformational
dynamics of FhuA which govern its physical association with TonB and
upon those regions of FhuA which are required for the interaction with
TonB. Accordingly, our finding that the hexahistidine-tagged FhuA
derivative FhuA 021-128.H6 participated in FhuA-TonB
interactions as well as did FhuA.H6 lays groundwork for our
continuing investigations into the nature of the FhuA-TonB
association.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported in part by a fellowship through
Program 17 of the Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l'Aide à la Recherche (FCAR) and by Operating Grant OGP0007289 from the
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada (to J. W. C.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipient of a research internship in the laboratory of K. P. Recipient of a Santé Fellowship from FCAR/Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec and of the Liberatore Fellowship from
McGill University.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, 3775 University St., Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada. Tel.: 514-398-3929; Fax:
514-398-7052; E-mail: jwcoulton{at}microimm.mcgill.ca.
1
The abbreviations used are: mAb, monoclonal
antibody; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; NTA, nitrilotriacetate;
LDAO, N,N-dimethyldodecylamine N-oxide; PAGE,
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; TLN, Tris-HCl/LDAO/NaCl.
2
K. Postle, unpublished results.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank C. Gujrathi for genetic
constructions and A. Ferguson for samples of purified protein. R. Maranger provided assistance with statistical analyses and support for
the research internship. F. F. Arhin gave a critical reading of
the manuscript. R. A. Larsen provided helpful discussions and
suggested the use of TonB 66-100.
REFERENCES
-
Postle, K.
(1990)
Mol. Microbiol.
4,
2019-2025
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Postle, K.
(1993)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
6,
591-601
-
Braun, V.
(1995)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
16,
295-307
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Earhart, C. F.
(1996)
in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology (Neidhart, F. C., Curtiss, R., III, Ingraham, J. L., Lin, E. C. C., Brooks Low, K., Magasanik, B., Reznikoff, W. S., Riley, M., Schaechter, M., and Umbarger, H. E., eds), 2nd Ed., pp. 1075-1090, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
-
Hancock, R. E. W., and Braun, V.
(1976)
J. Bacteriol.
125,
409-415
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bradbeer, C., and Woodrow, M. L.
(1976)
J. Bacteriol.
128,
99-104
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bassford, P. J., Jr., Bradbeer, C., Kadner, R. J., and Schnaitman, C. A.
(1976)
J. Bacteriol.
128,
242-247
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reynolds, P. R., Mottur, G. P., and Bradbeer, C.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
4313-4319
[Free Full Text]
-
Bradbeer, C.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
3146-3150
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Larsen, R. A., Thomas, M. G., Wood, G. E., and Postle, K.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
13,
627-640
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kadner, R. J.
(1990)
Mol. Microbiol.
4,
2027-2033
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hannavy, K., Barr, G. C., Dorman, C. J., Adamson, J., Mazengera, L. R., Gallagher, M. P., Evans, J. S., Levine, B. A., Trayer, I. P., and Higgins, C. F.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
216,
897-910
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Koebnik, R., Bäumler, A. J., Heesemann, J., Braun, V., and Hantke, K.
(1993)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
237,
152-160
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jarosik, G. P., Sanders, J. D., Cope, L. D., Muller-Eberhard, U., and Hansen, E. J.
(1994)
Infect. Immun.
62,
2470-2477
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Poole, K., Zhao, Q., Neshat, S., Heinrichs, D. E., and Dean, C. R.
(1996)
Microbiology
142,
1449-1458
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Larsen, R. A., Myers, P. S., Skare, J. T., Seachord, C. L., Darveau, R. P., and Postle, K.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
1363-1373
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Skare, J. T., Ahmer, B. M. M., Seachord, C. L., Darveau, R. P., and Postle, K.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
16302-16308
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schöffler, H., and Braun, V.
(1989)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
217,
378-383
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Günter, K., and Braun, V.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
274,
85-88
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Heller, K., Kadner, R. J., and Günter, K.
(1988)
Gene (Amst.)
64,
147-153
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bell, P. E., Nau, C. D., Brown, J. T., Konisky, J., and Kadner, R. J.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
3826-3829
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Anton, M., and Heller, K. J.
(1993)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
239,
371-377
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schwyn, B., and Neilands, J. B.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
160,
47-56
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kadner, R. J., and Heller, K. J.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
4829-4835
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liu, J., Rutz, J. M., Klebba, P. E., and Feix, J. B.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
13274-13283
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Moeck, G. S., Tawa, P., Xiang, H., Turnbull, J., Ismail, A. A., and Coulton, J. W.
(1996)
Mol. Microbiol.
22,
459-471
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jiang, X., Payne, M. A., Cao, Z., Foster, S. B., Feix, J. B., Newton, S. M. C., and Klebba, P. E.
(1997)
Science
276,
1261-1264
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sun, T. P, and Webster, R. E.
(1986)
J. Bacteriol.
165,
107-115
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hill, C. W., and Harnish, B. W.
(1981)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
7069-7072
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Carmel, G., Hellstern, D., Henning, D., and Coulton, J. W.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
1861-1869
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jaskula, J. C., Letain, T. E., Roof, S. K., Skare, J. T., and Postle, K.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
2326-2338
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ingham, C., Buechner, M., and Adler, J.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
3577-3583
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Coulton, J. W., Mason, P., Cameron, D. R., Carmel, G., Jean, R., and Rode, H. N.
(1986)
J. Bacteriol.
165,
181-192
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Carmel, G., and Coulton, J. W.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
4394-4403
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Moeck, G. S., Ratcliffe, M. J. H., and Coulton, J. W.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
6118-6125
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Larsen, R. A., Wood, G. E., and Postle, K.
(1993)
Mol. Microbiol.
10,
943-953
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Means, G. E., and Feeney, R. E.
(1971)
Chemical Modification of Proteins, Holden-Day Publishers, San Francisco
-
Brinkley, M.
(1992)
Bioconjugate Chem.
3,
2-13
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Postle, K., and Good, R. F.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
5235-5239
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nikaido, H.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
235,
225-234
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yelton, D. E., Desaymard, C., and Scharff, M. D.
(1981)
Hybridoma
1,
5-11
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Salomón, R. A., and Farías, R. N.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
7428-7435
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tuckman, M., and Osburne, M. S.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
320-323
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liu, J., Rutz, J. M., Feix, J. B., and Klebba, P. E.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10653-10657
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Boulanger, P., le Maire, M., Bonhivers, M., Dubois, S., Desmadril, M., and Letellier, L.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
14216-14224
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schram, E., Mende, J., Braun, V., and Kemp, R. M.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
3350-3357
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nau, C. D., and Konisky, J.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
1041-1047
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
LeVier, K., and Guerinot, M. L.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
7265-7275
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Larsen, R. A., Foster-Hartnett, D., McIntosh, M., and Postle, K.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
3213-3221
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gudmundsdottir, A., Bell, P. E., Lundrigan, M. D., Bradbeer, C., and Kadner, R. J.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
6526-6533
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bonhivers, M., Ghazi, A., Boulanger, P., and Letellier, L.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1850-1856
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Plançon, L., Chami, M., and Letellier, L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
16868-16872
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Letellier, L., Locher, K. P., Plançon, L., and Rosenbusch, J. P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1448-1451
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
; Correction: (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8836
-
Mondigler, M., Vogele, R. T., and Heller, K. J.
(1995)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
130,
293-300
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mondigler, M., Holz, T., and Heller, K. J.
(1996)
Virology
219,
19-28
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Volume 272, Number 45,
Issue of November 7, 1997
pp. 28391-28397
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Braun
FhuA (TonA), the Career of a Protein
J. Bacteriol.,
June 1, 2009;
191(11):
3431 - 3436.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kim, G. E. Fanucci, and D. S. Cafiso
Substrate-dependent transmembrane signaling in TonB-dependent transporters is not conserved
PNAS,
July 17, 2007;
104(29):
11975 - 11980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Adams, G. Zeder-Lutz, I. Schalk, F. Pattus, and H. Celia
Interaction of TonB with the Outer Membrane Receptor FpvA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
J. Bacteriol.,
August 1, 2006;
188(16):
5752 - 5761.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kodding, F. Killig, P. Polzer, S. P. Howard, K. Diederichs, and W. Welte
Crystal Structure of a 92-Residue C-terminal Fragment of TonB from Escherichia coli Reveals Significant Conformational Changes Compared to Structures of Smaller TonB Fragments
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 28, 2005;
280(4):
3022 - 3028.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. M. Khursigara, G. De Crescenzo, P. D. Pawelek, and J. W. Coulton
Enhanced Binding of TonB to a Ligand-loaded Outer Membrane Receptor: ROLE OF THE OLIGOMERIC STATE OF TonB IN FORMATION OF A FUNCTIONAL FhuA{middle dot}TonB COMPLEX
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 27, 2004;
279(9):
7405 - 7412.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sauter, S. P. Howard, and V. Braun
In Vivo Evidence for TonB Dimerization
J. Bacteriol.,
October 1, 2003;
185(19):
5747 - 5754.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Cadieux, P. G. Phan, D. S. Cafiso, and R. J. Kadner
Differential substrate-induced signaling through the TonB-dependent transporter BtuB
PNAS,
September 16, 2003;
100(19):
10688 - 10693.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Endriss, M. Braun, H. Killmann, and V. Braun
Mutant Analysis of the Escherichia coli FhuA Protein Reveals Sites of FhuA Activity
J. Bacteriol.,
August 15, 2003;
185(16):
4683 - 4692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ogierman and V. Braun
Interactions between the Outer Membrane Ferric Citrate Transporter FecA and TonB: Studies of the FecA TonB Box
J. Bacteriol.,
March 15, 2003;
185(6):
1870 - 1885.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Mey and S. M. Payne
Analysis of Residues Determining Specificity of Vibrio cholerae TonB1 for Its Receptors
J. Bacteriol.,
February 15, 2003;
185(4):
1195 - 1207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Killmann, C. Herrmann, A. Torun, G. Jung, and V. Braun
TonB of Escherichia coli activates FhuA through interaction with the {beta}-barrel
Microbiology,
November 1, 2002;
148(11):
3497 - 3509.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. G. Mikael, P. D. Pawelek, J. Labrie, M. Sirois, J. W. Coulton, and M. Jacques
Molecular cloning and characterization of the ferric hydroxamate uptake (fhu) operon in Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae
Microbiology,
September 1, 2002;
148(9):
2869 - 2882.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Zhao and K. Poole
Mutational Analysis of the TonB1 Energy Coupler of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
J. Bacteriol.,
March 15, 2002;
184(6):
1503 - 1513.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. I. Higgs, T. E. Letain, K. K. Merriam, N. S. Burke, H. Park, C. Kang, and K. Postle
TonB Interacts with Nonreceptor Proteins in the Outer Membrane of Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol.,
March 15, 2002;
184(6):
1640 - 1648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Ferguson, R. Chakraborty, B. S. Smith, L. Esser, D. van der Helm, and J. Deisenhofer
Structural Basis of Gating by the Outer Membrane Transporter FecA
Science,
March 1, 2002;
295(5560):
1715 - 1719.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. Howard, C. Herrmann, C. W. Stratilo, and V. Braun
In Vivo Synthesis of the Periplasmic Domain of TonB Inhibits Transport through the FecA and FhuA Iron Siderophore Transporters of Escherichia coli
J. Bacteriol.,
October 15, 2001;
183(20):
5885 - 5895.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Killmann, M. Braun, C. Herrmann, and V. Braun
FhuA Barrel-Cork Hybrids Are Active Transporters and Receptors
J. Bacteriol.,
June 1, 2001;
183(11):
3476 - 3487.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. S. Moeck and L. Letellier
Characterization of In Vitro Interactions between a Truncated TonB Protein from Escherichia coli and the Outer Membrane Receptors FhuA and FepA
J. Bacteriol.,
May 1, 2001;
183(9):
2755 - 2764.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-Z. Li and K. Poole
Mutational Analysis of the OprM Outer Membrane Component of the MexA-MexB-OprM Multidrug Efflux System of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
J. Bacteriol.,
January 1, 2001;
183(1):
12 - 27.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Cadieux, C. Bradbeer, and R. J. Kadner
Sequence Changes in the Ton Box Region of BtuB Affect Its Transport Activities and Interaction with TonB Protein
J. Bacteriol.,
November 1, 2000;
182(21):
5954 - 5961.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Bracken, M. T. Baer, A. Abdur-Rashid, W. Helms, and I. Stojiljkovic
Use of Heme-Protein Complexes by the Yersinia enterocolitica HemR Receptor: Histidine Residues Are Essential for Receptor Function
J. Bacteriol.,
October 1, 1999;
181(19):
6063 - 6072.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Cadieux and R. J. Kadner
Site-directed disulfide bonding reveals an interaction site between energy-coupling protein TonB and BtuB, the outer membrane cobalamin transporter
PNAS,
September 14, 1999;
96(19):
10673 - 10678.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. M. Possot, M. Gérard-Vincent, and A. P. Pugsley
Membrane Association and Multimerization of Secreton Component PulC
J. Bacteriol.,
July 1, 1999;
181(13):
4004 - 4011.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Bleves, M. Gérard-Vincent, A. Lazdunski, and A. Filloux
Structure-Function Analysis of XcpP, a Component Involved in General Secretory Pathway-Dependent Protein Secretion in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
J. Bacteriol.,
July 1, 1999;
181(13):
4012 - 4019.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. D. Ferguson, E. Hofmann, J. W. Coulton, K. Diederichs, and W. Welte
Siderophore-Mediated Iron Transport: Crystal Structure of FhuA with Bound Lipopolysaccharide
Science,
December 18, 1998;
282(5397):
2215 - 2220.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. I. Higgs, P. S. Myers, and K. Postle
Interactions in the TonB-Dependent Energy Transduction Complex: ExbB and ExbD Form Homomultimers
J. Bacteriol.,
November 15, 1998;
180(22):
6031 - 6038.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Killmann, C. Herrmann, H. Wolff, and V. Braun
Identification of a New Site for Ferrichrome Transport by Comparison of the FhuA Proteins of Escherichia coli, Salmonella paratyphi B, Salmonella typhimurium, and Pantoea agglomerans
J. Bacteriol.,
August 1, 1998;
180(15):
3845 - 3852.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Larsen and K. Postle
Conserved Residues Ser16 and His20 and Their Relative Positioning Are Essential for TonB Activity, Cross-linking of TonB with ExbB, and the Ability of TonB to Respond to Proton Motive Force
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 9, 2001;
276(11):
8111 - 8117.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. C. Scott, Z. Cao, Z. Qi, M. Bauler, J. D. Igo, S. M. C. Newton, and P. E. Klebba
Exchangeability of N Termini in the Ligand-gated Porins of Escherichia coli
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 13, 2001;
276(16):
13025 - 13033.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Chang, A. Mooser, A. Pluckthun, and A. Wlodawer
Crystal Structure of the Dimeric C-terminal Domain of TonB Reveals a Novel Fold
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 13, 2001;
276(29):
27535 - 27540.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|