|
Volume 272, Number 45, Issue of November 7, 1997
pp. 28680-28689
Human N-Myristoyltransferase Amino-terminal Domain
Involved in Targeting the Enzyme to the Ribosomal Subcellular
Fraction*
(Received for publication, July 30, 1997, and in revised form, August 27, 1997)
Constance J.
Glover
,
Kathleen D.
Hartman
and
Ronald L.
Felsted
From the Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutic Section,
Laboratory of Drug Discovery, Research and Development, Developmental
Therapeutic Program, Division of Cancer Treatment, Diagnosis, and
Centers, NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, National
Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland 21702
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
N-Myristoyltransferase (NMT)
catalyzes the cotranslational acylation with myristic acid of the
NH2-terminal glycines of a number of cellular and viral
proteins. Most of the in vitro NMT activity (60-85%) in
isoosmotic cell homogenates of human lymphoblastic leukemia
(i.e. CEM and MOLT-4) and cervical carcinoma
(i.e. HeLa) cells was shown to be associated with the
ribosomal subcellular fractions by differential centrifugation. Also
found in the ribosomal fractions was a 60-kDa protein that was
specifically immunoblotted with an anti-human NMT (hNMT) peptide
antibody. This 60-kDa protein was stable in the presence of
proteolytic enzyme inhibitors but was gradually converted into a
46-kDa species when stored in the absence of protease inhibitors.
Sucrose density gradient centrifugation of the ribosomal fraction
resulted in the hNMT activity sedimenting exactly coincident with the
260 nm absorption profile and exhibiting A260/A280 absorption
ratios >1.8, indicating an association of NMT with putative ribosomal
particle(s)/subunit(s). The subcellular targeting of hNMT was also
examined by immunoblotting subcellular fractions from HeLa cells
transfected with plasmids containing FLAG epitope-tagged hNMT inserts
corresponding either to the originally assigned hNMT gene or to an
alternative open reading frame initiated from an in-frame start site
upstream from the assumed hNMT start site. Anti-FLAG immunoblotting of
cells transfected with a plasmid containing the larger insert revealed
FLAG-NMT primarily in the ribosomal fraction with an apparent molecular
mass similar to the 60-kDa native hNMT. In contrast, immunoblotting
of cells transfected with a plasmid containing the smaller insert
identified a 50-kDa FLAG-NMT predominantly in the cytosolic
fraction. An analysis of mixtures of CEM ribosomes and serial dilutions
of purified recombinant FLAG-NMTs demonstrated that the 60-kDa
FLAG-NMT binds ribosomes with higher affinity than the 50-kDa
FLAG-NMT. These in vivo and in vitro
subcellular targeting and recombinant expression experiments identify a
native hNMT that is 10-12 kDa larger than the enzyme predicted by the
originally assigned hNMT gene and which is apparently translated from
an alternative up-stream start site. The data also indicate that
although the unique NH2-terminal residues encoded by this
larger open reading frame are not required for in vitro
catalytic activity, they do provide signal(s) involved in targeting
hNMT to the ribosomal subcellular fraction where cotranslational
N-myristoylation occurs.
INTRODUCTION
The amino groups of NH2-terminal glycines of a number
of proteins that are essential to normal cell functioning and/or are potential therapeutic targets are found to be N-acylated
with the 14-carbon fatty acid, myristate (e.g. subunits
of heterotrimeric G proteins (1, 2), GTP-binding arf1 (3), human
immunodeficiency virus gag and nef proteins (4, 5), the MARCKS
(myristolated alanine-rich C kinase substrate) protein kinase C
substrate (6), the protein phosphatase calcineurin B (7), the
pp60src protein tyrosine kinase (8), the retinal
calcium-binding recoverin (9), the caveolae-associated endothelial
nitric oxide synthase (10), the catalytic subunit of
cAMP-dependent protein kinase (11), and
mitochondria-associated cytochrome b5 reductase
(12)). N-Myristoylated proteins are therefore found
associated with a variety of organelles with the myristate moiety
required for such diverse functions as specific protein-protein or
protein-lipid interactions, ligand-induced protein conformational
changes, and/or correct subcellular targeting. This protein
modification occurs almost exclusively cotranslationally within
synthesis of the first 100 amino acids and is catalyzed by the enzyme
myristoyl CoA:protein N-myristoyltransferase
(NMT)1 (EC 2.3.1.97)
(13-15). Immunofluorescence microscopy reveals NMT to be distributed
uniformly throughout the cytoplasm of yeast and mammalian cells (16,
17). This finding plus evidence that N-myristoylation occurs
on nascent polypeptides bound to free polyribosomes establish that NMT
is physically localized and functionally active in the cell cytoplasm
(14, 18, 19). However, no evidence has been offered identifying a more
specific subcytosolic localization.
Protein N-myristoylation appears to be a tightly regulated
reaction involving the coordinated participation of several different enzymes/proteins (e.g. N-methionylaminopeptidase, fatty acid
synthetase, long chain acyl-CoA synthetase, acyl-CoA-binding proteins,
etc.), access of NMT to pools of myristoyl-CoA, and the timely
N-myristoylation of nascent polypeptide substrates to avoid
potential interfering reactions (e.g. N-acetylation and
polypeptide folding) (14, 20-22). The ability of NMT to function in
such a process implies the existence of mechanisms designed to ensure
targeting of the enzyme to the appropriate protein synthesis machinery,
possibly involving interactions with other cooperating components that facilitate the recognition and efficient N-myristoylation of
the rapidly growing polypeptide substrates. However, no information is
available regarding mechanisms regulating either the specific association of NMT with the cytoplasmic protein synthesis machinery (i.e. ribosomes, ribosome-associated factors, etc.) or even
its direct participation during protein synthesis. Both are presumably required for NMT to accomplish the cotranslational
N-myristoylation of proteins in mammalian cells.
Previous observations have raised questions as to whether NMT functions
as a monomer or as part of a larger protein synthetic complex (23, 24).
It is also not clear if NMT functions in vivo as a soluble
enzyme (or complex) or whether it acts in close association with
insoluble subcellular structures (17, 22, 24-28). For example, NMT
activity is prepared as a soluble monomer from extracts of human
erythroleukemia cells (29) and bovine spleen (30), but substantial
amounts of the enzyme are found associated with the 100,000 × g sedimented pellets in hypotonic extracts of yeast, rat
(31), and bovine brain,2
human, rat, and rabbit colon (27, 32), and rat liver (27). The ready
extraction of most of the NMT activity from insoluble pellets obtained
from yeast, rat brain, and bovine brain with one or two sequential
washes of low ionic strength buffers prompted the comparison of NMT
with loosely bound peripheral membrane proteins (31), whereas its
in vitro activation by various organic solvents prompted
suggestions that it behaved as an integral membrane protein (25, 27, 33).
Also unresolved is whether NMT subunit sizes ranging from 48 to 67 kDa
(26, 29, 30, 34, 35) are encoded by ORFs analogous to the originally
assigned hNMT gene (36) (i.e. predicting a 48-kDa enzyme)
and/or to ORFs comparable to the alternative in-frame start site(s)
found 183 and 186 nucleotides upstream of the assigned hNMT gene
(i.e. predicting a 55-kDa enzyme). Immunoblotting with
anti-hNMT antibodies has identified a 60-kDa polypeptide as the
predominant NMT subunit in bovine brain and human HeLa cells (17, 24).
Also identified were smaller immuno-cross-reacting forms
(i.e. 46-57 kDa) which apparently resulted from
postextraction proteolysis of the NH2 terminus of the
60-kDa bNMT subunit. A close relationship was also observed between
NH2-terminal proteolysis and the conversion of high
molecular mass forms of native bNMT (i.e. 120 and 400
kDa) into a fully active 50-kDa enzyme. This latter correlation
suggested that the NH2-terminal domain of native bNMT,
although dispensable for catalytic activity, may have in vivo regulatory functions related to subunit multimerization
and/or NMT interaction(s) with other cellular proteins (24). A
catalytically active 46-kDa NMT has also been purified from
Drosophila which apparently results from
NH2-terminal proteolysis of a larger precursor (37).
In the present study we show a specific association of hNMT with the
ribosomal subcellular fractions from human lymphoblastic leukemia
(i.e. CEM and MOLT-4) and human cervical carcinoma
(i.e. HeLa) cells. We also use HeLa cells expressing FLAG
epitope-tagged recombinant hNMTs (i.e. 60 and 50 kDa)
corresponding to the two possible ORFs found in the hNMT gene (36) to
demonstrate that the recombinant 60-kDa polypeptide translated from
the larger ORF is similar in size to native hNMT and is localized to
the ribosomal fraction, whereas the substantially smaller 50-kDa recombinant polypeptide is found primarily in the cytosolic fraction. Also shown is a preferential binding of recombinant 60-kDa FLAG-NMT to isolated CEM ribosomes. Our experiments thus provide in
vivo and in vitro subcellular targeting and recombinant
protein expression data indicating that the native 60-kDa hNMT is
translated from a start site up-stream from the previously assigned
hNMT gene and that the additional NH2-terminal residues
included in the larger polypeptide are involved in the specific
targeting of hNMT to the ribosomal subcellular fraction.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cell Cultures
Cells were obtained from the American Type
Culture Collection (Gaithersburg, MD) and included CEM (ATCC CCL 119)
and MOLT-4 (ATCC CRL 1582) cells that were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum and HeLa (ATCC CCL 2) cells that
were cultured in minimal essential medium with 2 mM
glutamine and 10% fetal bovine serum. All cell lines were grown at
37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
Subcellular Fractionation
Mid-log CEM or MOLT-4 cells
(1-3 × 108) exhibiting a viability >95% by trypan
blue dye exclusion were harvested and washed once with
Tris-HCl-buffered saline, pH 7.4, by centrifugation at 480 × g for 10 min at room temperature. All subsequent
manipulations were carried out at 4 °C. The washed cell pellets were
resuspended in 4 ml of isoosmotic homogenization buffer A
(i.e. 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 0.25 M sucrose and proteolytic enzyme inhibitors (i.e. 1 mM EDTA, 100 µM TLCK, 4 µM leupeptin, 0.3 µM aprotinin, 20 µg/ml
soybean trypsin inhibitor, 110 µM PMSF, 140 µM TPCK, and 1 µM pepstatin A)) or isoionic
homogenization buffer B (i.e. 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, containing 0.15 M KCl and the proteolytic enzyme
inhibitors described above). Cells were disrupted with 25-35 passes of
a tight pestle in a glass Dounce homogenizer until >90% of cells were
broken as determined by trypan blue exclusion. One 530-cm2
plate of HeLa cells ( 90% confluent) was washed twice with
Tris-HCl-buffered saline, pH 7.4, and incubated on ice in 7 ml of
homogenization buffer A (without sucrose) for 20 min. Cells were
scraped from the plates directly into the Dounce homogenizer, and
powdered sucrose was added to a final concentration of 0.25 M. The cells were then subjected to 25 passes in the tight
Dounce homogenizer, resulting in >90% of the cells being disrupted as
monitored by trypan blue dye exclusion. Subcellular fractionation of
CEM, MOLT-4, and HeLa cells was accomplished by sequential differential
centrifugation (38) using an SS-34 rotor in a Sorvall RC5B centrifuge
(NEN Life Science Products) yielding pellets of nondisrupted cells and
cell nuclei (480 × gave for 20 min),
mitochondria (4,000 × gave for 20 min),
and microsomes (20,000 × gave for 30 min)
followed by centrifugation of the microsomal supernatant fraction
at 100,000 × gave for 90 min using
a Ti 50 rotor in a L5-50 Beckman ultracentrifuge and yielding the
ribosomal pellet and supernatant cytosolic fractions. Each pellet was
washed once by resuspension in the original homogenization buffer,
recentrifuged under the respective conditions, and finally resuspended
in the same buffer. Assays for NMT and organelle marker enzymes were
performed on freshly prepared subcellular fractions as described below.
NMT was also visualized by immunoblotting proportional aliquots from each subcellular fraction with an affinity-purified anti-peptide hNMT
pAb (24).
Isokinetic Sucrose Density Gradients
Constant velocity
isokinetic gradients (5 ml) were prepared from 15% and 32% sucrose
solutions in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 25 mM KCl and the proteolytic inhibitors described above (39).
The volumes of sucrose solutions and the centrifugation times were
calculated for eukaryotic ribosomes (density 1.4 g/ml) (40). The
physical setup for gradient formation was as described previously (41,
42). The postmicrosomal supernatant fraction (1 ml) from a CEM cell
homogenate was layered onto the preformed gradient and centrifuged at
50,000 rpm in an SW 50.1 rotor (Beckman) for 1.5 h at 4 °C.
After centrifugation, the tube was punctured at the bottom with an ISCO
Tube Piercer (Lincoln, NE), and fractions were collected at 0.5 ml/min
from the top of the gradient by displacement with a 55% sucrose
solution. Fractions (0.25 ml) from the gradient were assayed for NMT
activity, measured for absorbance at 260 nm and 280 nm, and sucrose
concentrations were determined with a refractometer.
hNMT Expression Plasmids
cDNAs for hNMTs corresponding
to either one or the other of the two possible ORFs in the hNMT gene
(36) were obtained by pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene,
La Jolla, CA) polymerase chain reaction amplification of a reverse
transcribed cDNA library derived from human cerebral brain mRNA
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) using the following
synthetic nucleotide primers: GCGCGCGCAATTCATGATGGAAGGGAACGGGAAACG (i.e. 60-kDa hNMT) or
GCGCGCGCAAGATCTTTATTGTAGCACCAGTCCAACCTT (i.e. 50-kDa
hNMT) with 5 -EcoRI restriction sites as the sense primers
and GCGCGCGCAGATCTTTATTGTAGCACCAGTCCAACCTT with a 5 -BglII restriction sequence as the common antisense primer. The resulting cDNAs were cloned into the pFLAG-2 bacterial expression plasmid (Kodak-IBI, New Haven, CT) to yield constructs expressing
amino-terminal FLAG epitope-tagged hNMTs of 60 and 50 kDa,
respectively (i.e. pFLAG-2-hNMTs). Inserts from the pFLAG-2
constructs were subsequently digested with HindIII and
BglII and cloned into the pFLAG-CMV-2 eukaryotic expression
vector (Kodak-IBI) yielding constructs expressing similar
amino-terminal FLAG epitope-tagged hNMTs (i.e.
pFLAG-CMV-2-hNMTs). Insert sense and antisense strands were sequenced
using dye primers or dye terminators and AmpliTaq FS with an Applied
Biosystems Inc. Autosequencer. The nucleotide sequence of the inserts
predicted the same amino acid sequence as reported previously except
for a glutamine residue instead of a histidine at residue 4 from the
originally published methionine start site (36). This glutamine for
histidine substitution was in agreement with the GenBank entry (accession no. M86707) for myristoyl-CoA:protein
N-myristoyltransferase submitted by the original authors and
was confirmed by sequence analysis of a cDNA clone obtained by
5 -RACE analysis described below.
Transfections
HeLa cells were seeded at 300,000 cells/100-mm tissue culture plate. After 24 h, 80% confluent
monolayers were washed twice with Opti-MEM reduced serum medium (Life
Technologies, Inc.) containing 200 mg/liter CaCl2. Cells
were transfected essentially as suggested by the manufacturer with 16 µg of the pFLAG-CMV-2-hNMT plasmid DNA and 70 µl of LipofectAMINE
reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.) in 12 ml of the Opti-MEM/100-mm
plate. After 6 h at 37 °C, the DNA and liposome-containing
medium was removed, and 12 ml of fresh minimal essential medium
containing 2 mM glutamine and 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin was added. After 24 h, the plates were rinsed twice in Tris-HCl-buffered saline, pH 7.4. 500 µl of
homogenization buffer A (without sucrose) was added, and plates were
left on ice for 20 min. Cells were subsequently scraped from the
plates, powdered sucrose was added to 0.25 M, the cells
subjected to 25 passes through a "tight" Dounce homogenizer, and
the homogenate processed by differential centrifugation as described
above except that the postmicrosomal supernatant fraction was
centrifuged for 30 min at 230,000 × g using a 100.1 rotor in a Beckman TL 100 ultracentrifuge.
Expression and Affinity Purification of Recombinant
hNMTs
Escherichia coli (strain BL-21/DE3) (Novagen,
Madison, WI) transformed according to the manufacturer's
recommendations with pFLAG-2-hNMT plasmids containing inserts
corresponding to one or the other of the two hNMT gene ORFs were
cultured in LB broth supplemented with 0.4% glucose and 100 µg/ml
ampicillin at 30 °C with shaking until the
A600 reached about 0.4, treated with 500 µM isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside,
and the shaking continued for 3 h. Recombinant proteins were
extracted from bacteria by a procedure similar to that recommended by
the plasmid manufacturer. Except where noted, all of the following
operations were carried out at 4 °C. Bacteria from 100 ml of medium
were sedimented by centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 10 min at 10 °C and broken in lysis buffer (i.e. 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 5 mM EDTA, 0.02% sodium azide, 0.25 mg/ml lysozyme) at 12,000 p.s.i. using a
French press at room temperature. Immediately after extraction the
lysis mixture was supplemented with 0.1 volume of a 10 × concentrated extraction solution (i.e. 2.0 M
NaCl, 0.1 M CaCl2, 0.1 M
MgCl2, 50 µg/ml ovomucoid protease inhibitor, 167 µg/ml
soybean trypsin inhibitor, 300 µg/ml TLCK, 17 µg/ml each of
leupeptin and aprotinin, 210 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 420 µg/ml TPCK, and 6 µg/ml pepstatin A) and centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 1 h in an SS-34 rotor. Recombinant proteins
were purified by applying the clarified supernatant solution to a
Q-Sepharose anion exchange column (2.5 × 16 cm) (Pharmacia
Biotech Inc.) equilibrated in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 0.2 M NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 17 µg/ml each of leupeptin and aprotinin, 167 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 300 µg/ml TLCK, and 50 µg/ml sodium azide followed by washing the
column with the same buffer. The flow-through from the Q-Sepharose column was concentrated by ultrafiltration using a YM-10 membrane (Amicon, Beverly, MA), applied to a 5-ml anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel
column (Kodak-IBI) equilibrated in Tris-HCl-buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 1.7 µg/ml leupeptin and aprotinin, and allowed to mix
end-over-end for 25 min at room temperature. The settled gel was then
washed with equilibration buffer at room temperature until
A280 reached background, and the recombinant
FLAG-NMT was eluted with equilibration buffer containing 120 µg/ml
FLAG peptide. The FLAG-NMT was reequilibrated in 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 5 mM EDTA and 50 µg/ml
sodium azide by repetitive (3 ×) concentration to <1 ml and
redilution with 10 ml of reequilibration buffer by ultrafiltration
using a YM-10 membrane (Amicon) and finally concentrated with a
Centricon 10 (Amicon). Affinity-purified FLAG-hNMTs exhibited single
bands on SDS-PAGE by protein staining and by anti-hNMT or anti-FLAG
immunoblotting and had similar specific activities (i.e.
1,500-1,800 nmol/min/mg of protein) when assayed for NMT activity.2 The final concentrated enzyme was stored in
aliquots at 80 °C.
Immunoblotting
Immunoblotting with an affinity-purified
rabbit anti-peptide pAb to residues 27-38 (i.e.
KTMEEASKRSYQ) of hNMT was described previously (24). Immunoblotting
with anti-FLAG M2 mAb (Kodak-IBI) was similar except for incubation
with the primary antibody for 30 min at room temperature.
Immunoreactive bands were visualized using goat anti-rabbit or goat
anti-mouse secondary antibodies conjugated to alkaline phosphatase, and
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium was used as
substrate (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). Immunospecificity was assessed
in duplicate lanes by preincubating the primary antibody with 20 µM peptide antigen for 12 h at 4 °C before
blotting (24).
In Vitro Binding of FLAG-NMTs to CEM Ribosomes
The
postmicrosomal supernatant fraction obtained by differential
centrifugation of homogenates of 2.7 × 108 CEM cells
was separated into 580-µl aliquots (i.e. equivalent to
45 × 106 cells). To each aliquot was added 20 µl of
2-fold serial dilutions of either the 60- or 50-kDa
affinity-purified FLAG-NMTs to yield the following final recombinant
protein concentrations: 0.667, 0.333, 0.167, 0.0833, 0.0417, and 0.0208 µg/ml. The mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 10 min and
then centrifuged at 230,000 × g for 30 min with a
100.1 rotor in a TL 100 ultracentrifuge at 4 °C. Ribosomal pellets
were finally suspended in SDS-sample buffer, heated for 5 min at
95 °C, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with an anti-FLAG
M2 mAb.
Assays
NMT activity was assayed essentially as described
(31, 43) except for the presence of 0.1% bovine serum albumin. Assays for succinate dehydrogenase for mitochondria and NADPH cytochrome c reductase for microsomes were performed as described (44). Assays for lactate dehydrogenase for the cytosolic fraction and 5 -nucleotidase for plasma membranes were performed using diagnostic kits obtained from Sigma. The enrichment of ribonucleoprotein in the
ribosomal fraction was assessed by
A260/A280 and
A235/A280 absorption
ratios (45, 46).
Analytical Procedures
SDS-PAGE (47) was performed on 10%
polyacrylamide gels (Integrated Separation Systems, Inc., Hyde Park, MA
or Novex, Inc., San Diego, CA), and proteins were visualized by
Pro-Blue staining (Integrated Separation Systems). Prestained molecular
weight markers were from Bio-Rad. Partially purified bNMT was prepared
through the Sephacryl S-100 step as described previously (24). Protein concentrations were determined by the BCA method (Pierce) with standard
curves constructed with bovine serum albumin. Synthetic peptides were
purchased from Peptide Technologies (Washington, D. C.), and synthetic
oligonucleotides were obtained from the Midland Certified Reagent Co.
(Midland, TX). Peptide radioiodination was performed as described
previously (31). 5 -RACE analysis (48) was performed using the Marathon
cDNA amplification kit (CLONTECH) using a
cDNA library derived from human brain mRNA (CLONTECH) and internal primers (i.e.
GGGGTAGAACCAGTGCTCCACCTCCTCCTGGC (nucleotides 860-891) as the
antisense and GAGCTGTTCTCAGTGGGTCAGGG (nucleotides 49-72) as the
sense) to the hNMT gene (36). 3 -A overhangs were added to the
full-length 5 -RACE cDNA by brief treatment with Taq DNA
polymerase (PE Applied Biosystems), the cDNAs were TA cloned into
pCRII (In Vitrogen, San Diego, CA), and the inserts were sequenced by
Lofstrand Laboratories Limited (Gaithersburg, MD). Sigmoidal regression
curve fitting to a three-parameter Chapman model was carried out using
SigmaPlot version 4.0 (SSPS, Inc., Chicago).
RESULTS
Subcellular Localization of hNMT
Despite extensive evidence
supporting a direct participation of NMT in the cotranslational
N-myristoylation of nascent polypeptides (14, 18, 19), no
experiments have been published demonstrating a specific association of
NMT with ribosomes, nor has a mechanism(s) accounting for the enzyme's
specific participation with the protein synthesis machinery of the cell
been described. We have now examined the intracellular localization of
NMT in human lymphoblastic leukemia (i.e. CEM and MOLT-4)
and cervical carcinoma (i.e. HeLa) cells. CEM cell extracts
were prepared in homogenization buffer A containing 0.25 M
sucrose and separated into nuclear (480 × g/10 min),
mitochondrial (4,000 × g/20 min), microsomal
(20,000 × g/30 min), ribosomal ( 100,000 × g/90 min), and cytosolic supernatant ( 100,000 × g) fractions by differential centrifugation. Each
subcellular fraction was assayed immediately for subcellular organelle
marker enzyme activities (i.e. succinate dehydrogenase
(mitochondria), NADPH cytochrome c reductase (microsomes),
5 -nucleotidase (plasma membrane), and lactate dehydrogenase (cytosol))
and NMT activity (Table I and Fig.
1). Most (i.e. 60-85%) of
the original NMT activity was found in the subcellular fraction
exhibiting the highest
A260/A280 and
A235/A280 absorbance
ratios (i.e. 1.8 and 1.2, respectively), indicative of
highly enriched ribonucleoprotein structures (45, 46). Also found in
the ribosomal fraction were relatively low levels of the mitochondrial,
microsomal, plasma membrane, and cytosolic marker enzyme activities
confirming the absence of gross contamination by other major
subcellular fractions. These results demonstrate a colocalization of
the majority of cellular NMT activity with the subcellular fraction
most enriched in ribosomes. A preferential cofractionation of NMT
activity with the ribosomal fraction was also found when similar
experiments were carried out using MOLT-4 and HeLa cells (Fig. 1). When
CEM cells were extracted and fractionated in homogenization buffer B
containing 150 mM KCl instead of sucrose, the NMT activity
in the ribosomal fraction was reduced from 78% to 52%, whereas the
activity released into the cytosol increased from 16% to 23% (data
not shown). When CEM ribosomal pellets (isolated in homogenization
buffer A) were resuspended in buffer A containing either 150 or 300 mM KCl and recentrifuged at 100,000 × g,
27% or >75%, respectively, of the NMT activity was recovered in
the supernatant fraction with the balance of the activity remaining with the ribosomal pellet, indicating that relatively weak ionic interactions are involved in the association of hNMT with the ribosomes.
Table I.
Subcellular distribution of hNMT and organelle marker enzyme activities
in human CEM cells
|
| Fractions |
NMT |
Succinate dehydrogenase |
Lactate
dehydrogenase |
NADPH cytochrome c
reductase |
5 -Nucleotidase |
Ratios
|
| 260/280 |
235/280 |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
%
|
| Mitochondrial (4,000 × g/20
min) |
2.5 |
56 |
0.4 |
30 |
21 |
1.58 |
1 |
| Microsomal
(20,000 × g/30
min) |
2.8 |
12 |
0.2 |
16 |
4 |
1.34 |
0.65 |
| Ribosomal
(100,000 × g/90
min) |
78 |
1.0 |
4.6 |
8.3 |
NDa |
1.8 |
1.2
|
| Cytosolic |
16 |
8.4 |
95 |
45 |
35 |
|
|
a
ND, not detected.
|
|
Fig. 1.
Subcellular distribution of hNMT activity in
human lymphoblastic leukemia and cervical carcinoma cells. Human
CEM, MOLT-4, or HeLa cells were lysed in homogenization buffer A
containing 0.25 M sucrose and separated into nuclear
(480 × g for 20 min), mitochondrial (4,000 × g for 20 min), microsomal (20,000 × g for 30 min), ribosomal ( 100,000 × g for 90 min), and
cytosolic ( 100,000 × g supernatant) subcellular
fractions by differential centrifugation. The distribution of hNMT
activity among subcellular fractions was determined in vitro
by assaying for N-myristoylation of a synthetic
N-glycylpeptide acceptor and presented as a percentage of
total NMT activity.
[View Larger Version of this Image (23K GIF file)]
To exclude the possibility that NMT activity in the ribosomal fraction
resulted from the association of the enzyme with some unidentified
cosedimenting cellular fragment/organelle and/or macromolecular
complex, the CEM ribosomal fraction was examined further by sucrose
gradient centrifugation. In this analysis, the postmicrosomal
supernatant fraction from CEM cells was subjected to centrifugation on
a 12-25% isokinetic sucrose gradient, and the fractions collected
from the gradient were assayed for NMT activity and analyzed for 260 and 280 nm absorbance (Fig. 2). As shown,
most of the NMT activity was found to cosediment exactly with two
prominent 260 nm absorption peaks consistent with an apparent
association of NMT with ribosomal particle(s)/subunit(s). The
identification of these absorption peaks as highly enriched ribosomal
particle(s)/subunit(s) is supported by finding
A260/A280 and
A235/A280 absorbance
ratios of >1.8 and 1.2, respectively (data not shown) (45,
46). These experiments provide the first demonstration of an
association of hNMT with cellular ribosomes. Furthermore, these data,
plus our subsequent identification of possible structural signals
involved in targeting of hNMT to ribosomes (see below), provide new
insights into the mechanism(s) regulating cotranslational
N-myristoylation in mammalian cells.
Fig. 2.
Cosedimentation of hNMT activity with CEM
ribosomal particle(s)/subunit(s) during isokinetic sucrose density
centrifugation. The postmicrosomal supernatant fraction
(20,000 × g/30 min) from CEM cells homogenized in
buffer A as described in Fig. 1 was applied to the top of a preformed
15-25% sucrose gradient and centrifuged at 50,000 rpm in a swinging
bucket rotor for 90 min. Fractions (0.25 ml) displaced from the top of
the gradient were collected and assayed for NMT activity, measured for
absorption at 260 and 280 nm, and the percentage of sucrose was
determined with a refractometer.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
Identification of a 60-kDa hNMT in the Ribosomal Fractions from
CEM, MOLT-4, and HeLa Cells
The subcellular distribution of hNMT
in CEM cells was also assessed by immunoblotting with an
affinity-purified pAb raised against a hNMT peptide (24). This analysis
permitted the visualization of a number of lightly stained bands of
various sizes in several of the subcellular fractions as well as one
prominently stained band of 60 kDa which was seen only in the
ribosomal fraction (Fig. 3, lanes
1-5). Preincubation of the primary antibody with 20 µM peptide antigen before blotting completely prevented
immunostaining of the 60 kDa band without diminishing the other
minor bands, thereby establishing the identity of the 60 kDa band as
the hNMT polypeptide (Fig. 3, lanes 7-11). Identical
results were obtained by a similar analysis of hNMT in subcellular
fractions from MOLT-4 and HeLa cells (data not shown). Immunoblotting
of the ribosomal fractions from CEM, MOLT-4, and HeLa cells revealed
hNMTs with nearly identical relative electrophoretic mobilities on
SDS-PAGE, indicative of similar sized enzymes in all three human cell
lines (Fig. 4, lanes 3-5). A
similar sized band was also immunostained in partially purified
preparations of bNMT (24) (Fig. 4, lane 2), thereby
establishing a close size identity of NMTs in human cells and bovine
brain.
Fig. 3.
Immunoblotting of hNMT in subcellular
fractions from CEM cells. Proportional aliquots of subcellular
fractions from CEM cells prepared as described in Fig. 1 were analyzed
by SDS-PAGE (10% ISS gel) and immunoblotted with an affinity-purified
pAb raised against a peptide from hNMT (24). Immunoblotting of
subcellular fractions from CEM cells with antibody preincubated for
12 h at 4 °C in the absence (lanes 1-6) or presence
(lanes 7-12) of 20 µM peptide antigen is
shown. Prestained molecular mass (MW) markers: 105, 82, 49, and 33 kDa.
[View Larger Version of this Image (52K GIF file)]
Fig. 4.
Comparison of immunostained NMTs from human
cell ribosomal fractions, bovine brain, and bacteria expressing
recombinant hNMT. Representative NMT preparations from several
different sources were analyzed by SDS-PAGE on the same gel (10%
Novex) and immunoblotted with an affinity-purified anti-hNMT pAb.
Lane 1, molecular mass markers (see Fig. 3); lane
2, bNMT; lane 3, ribosomal fraction from CEM cells;
lane 4, ribosomal fraction from MOLT-4 cells; lane
5, ribosomal fraction from HeLa cells; lane 6, extract
from bacteria expressing a polypeptide corresponding to the larger of
the two hNMT gene ORFs (36); and lane 7, molecular mass
markers.
[View Larger Version of this Image (53K GIF file)]
We reported previously that partially purified preparations of bNMT
contain variable amounts of low molecular mass immuno-cross-reactive polypeptides (e.g. 46-57 kDa) which appeared to arise
primarily as a result of postextraction proteolysis of the
NH2 terminus of the 60-kDa bNMT (24). This proteolysis
was shown to have no affect on the bNMT in vitro catalytic
activity (24). To determine the susceptibility of hNMT to a similar
NH2-terminal proteolysis, CEM ribosomal fractions were
prepared in the presence or absence of proteolytic enzyme inhibitors,
and the stability of the hNMT polypeptide was followed during storage
at 4 °C by immunoblotting. In the absence of proteolytic enzyme
inhibitors, most of the 60-kDa hNMT was converted into a band of
46 kDa by 6 weeks (Fig. 5, lanes
2 and 3), whereas in the presence of inhibitors the
native 60-kDa hNMT was unchanged even after 3 months (Fig. 5,
lanes 4 and 5). These experiments reveal a
sensitivity of hNMT to proteolysis which is directly analogous to the
proteolytic cleavage of catalytically dispensable
NH2-terminal residues from yNMT (49-51), bNMT (24), and
Drosophila NMT (37). These findings are therefore consistent with the suggestion that the NH2-terminal domain of NMT may
be important for regulating N-myristoylation in
vivo (24, 50, 52) and that NH2-terminal proteolysis
may constitute a physiological process to uncouple the enzyme from such
regulatory constraints (24, 37).
Fig. 5.
Proteolysis of hNMT. Ribosomal fractions
isolated from CEM cells (see Fig. 1) and stored at 4 °C in the
absence (6 weeks) or presence (12 weeks) of proteolytic enzyme
inhibitors were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with an
affinity-purified anti-hNMT pAb. Lane 1, molecular mass
markers (see Fig. 3); lane 2, 3 µl (1 µg) of ribosomal
protein in the absence of inhibitors; lane 3, 10 µl (3.35 µg) of ribosomal protein in the absence of inhibitors; lane
4, 3 µl (2.2 µg) ribosomal protein in the presence of
inhibitors; and lane 5, 10 µl (7.3 µg) of ribosomal
protein in the presence of inhibitors.
[View Larger Version of this Image (28K GIF file)]
Identification of the ORF Most Likely Accounting for the 60-kDa
hNMT
Our finding of a 60-kDa polypeptide for the native hNMT
was surprising considering that the ORF thought to account for hNMT predicts a substantially smaller (i.e. 48 kDa) enzyme
(36). Although additional in-frame methionines were reported 183 and 186 nucleotides upstream (i.e. predicting a 55-kDa
polypeptide) from the originally chosen start site, the smaller ORF was
chosen as the most likely hNMT gene based upon homology with the yNMT gene and the observation that a recombinant 48-kDa hNMT
corresponding to the chosen ORF was catalytically active. However,
considering our finding of a substantially larger 60-kDa native
enzyme in human cell lines (see Fig. 4), the existence of nonhomologous (both in length and sequence) NH2-terminal domains of
yeast, fungi, and human NMTs (36, 37, 52-54) and the fact that the
183 codon also conforms closely to predictions of a prospective start
site (55-57), we speculated that the native hNMT could actually be
translated from the larger ORF defined by one of the two adjacent
upstream start site(s) (i.e. at codon 186 or 183).
However, considering that this larger ORF predicts a polypeptide of
only 55 kDa, compared with our finding of a 60-kDa native enzyme
on SDS-PAGE and the absence of in-frame stop codons in the known
sequence even further upstream, it was also possible that translation
of hNMT could have actually initiated from start sites upstream from
the published sequence. To identify possible in-frame start site(s)
and/or stop codons upstream of the known 5 -sequence, we performed
5 -RACE polymerase chain reaction analysis on a human brain cDNA
library using internal primers based on the known hNMT gene (36).
Polymerase chain reaction generated one major cDNA consistent with
the existence of a single mRNA for hNMT in human brain (data not
shown). Subsequent sequencing identified two new in-frame stop codons
255 and 270 nucleotides up-stream from the originally assigned
start site with no additional in-frame ATGs (Table
II). The presence of these in-frame stop
codons plus the absence of additional conventional start sites upstream
of the known sequence establish that one of only two of the previously
identified ORFs must account for the native 60-kDa hNMT.
We and others (24, 35) have speculated that bNMT may be translated from
an ORF analogous to the larger of two possible ORFs in the hNMT gene
(36). This suggestion was based upon a close amino acid sequence
homology between hNMT and bNMT (35) and the finding that although
bacterially expressed hNMTs corresponding to the originally proposed
ORF (36) exhibit apparent molecular masses close to the predicted size
(i.e. 48 kDa) (58, 59), native bovine and human NMTs were
found to migrate as 60-kDa polypeptides on SDS-PAGE (24, 35). We
have further examined the question of which ORF accounts for native
hNMT by preparing bacterial plasmids containing inserts encoding
amino-terminal FLAG epitope-tagged hNMTs corresponding to each of the
two possible ORFs of the hNMT gene. As shown in Fig. 4 (lane
6), blotting the extracts from bacteria expressing a recombinant
hNMT corresponding to the larger of the two ORFs with an anti-hNMT pAb
immunostained a prominent polypeptide that migrates in a way similar to
the native 60-kDa hNMT. In contrast, a recombinant hNMT
corresponding to the smaller of the two ORFs migrates with an apparent
molecular mass of 50 kDa (as shown below). To exclude the
possibility that the product of the smaller ORF might migrate
anomalously as a larger (i.e. 60 kDa) band when expressed
in mammalian cells because of post-translational modification(s),
eukaryotic plasmids expressing the same two FLAG epitope-tagged hNMTs
were transfected into HeLa cells, and the respective translation
products were identified in subcellular fractions by anti-FLAG
immunoblotting (see Fig. 6). This
experiment revealed 60 or 50 kDa bands (i.e.
corresponding to the larger and smaller hNMT ORFs) in HeLa cells which
were identical in size with the respective recombinant polypeptides expressed in bacteria. These results therefore excluded the possibility that the native 60-kDa hNMT results from the anomalous migration of
the smaller gene product. Furthermore, our finding that the recombinant
hNMT encoded by the larger ORF migrates in a way similar to the
60-kDa native enzyme supports the proposal that the hNMT gene is
actually initiated from one of the adjacent start codon(s) upstream
from the originally assigned start site, defining an ORF consisting of
1431/1434 nucleotides and encoding a 477/478-residue polypeptide with
an apparent molecular mass of 60 kDa.
Fig. 6.
Identification of recombinant FLAG-NMTs in
the subcellular fractions from transfected HeLa cells.
Proportional aliquots of subcellular fractions from HeLa cells (see
Fig. 1) transfected for 24 h with plasmids expressing FLAG
epitope-tagged hNMTs corresponding to either the longer (lanes
1-5) or the shorter (lanes 6-10) of two ORFs
associated with the hNMT gene (36) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (10%
Novex gel) and immunoblotted with an anti-FLAG mAb. Mitochondrial
fraction (lanes 1 and 7), microsomal fraction
(lanes 3 and 8), ribosomal fraction (lanes
4 and 9), cytosolic fraction (lanes 5 and
10), and molecular mass markers (lanes 2 and
6) (see Fig. 3) are shown.
[View Larger Version of this Image (40K GIF file)]
Identification of a Prospective Ribosomal Binding Signal in the
Amino-terminal Domain of hNMT
Our previous finding that
NH2-terminal proteolysis converted the native 60-kDa
bNMT subunit into 46-48-kDa forms with no loss of in vitro
catalytic activity (24) was consistent with earlier suggestions that
the NH2 terminus of NMT may have noncatalytic regulatory
function(s) (50, 52). We have now used plasmids expressing in human
cells recombinant FLAG-NMTs corresponding to the two possible ORFs of
the hNMT gene (see Table II) to test the hypothesis that targeting of
hNMT to the ribosomal subcellular fraction is determined primarily by
sequences encoded within the NH2 terminus of the 60-kDa
enzyme. Expression vectors encoding the two FLAG epitope-tagged hNMTs
were transfected into human HeLa cells, and after 24 h the
postnuclear cell extracts were separated into mitochondrial,
microsomal, ribosomal, and cytosolic fractions by differential
centrifugation as described above and analyzed for expression of
FLAG-NMTs by immunoblotting with an anti-FLAG mAb. Analysis of cells
transfected with the vector containing an insert corresponding to the
larger ORF revealed a prominent 60-kDa FLAG-NMT almost exclusively
in the ribosomal fraction (Fig. 6, lane 4), whereas cells
transfected with the vector containing the insert corresponding to the
smaller ORF expressed a 50-kDa FLAG-NMT predominantly in the cytosol
(Fig. 6, lane 10). These results indicate that sequences
within the NH2-terminal 10-12-kDa domain of the 60-kDa
FLAG-NMT are necessary for optimal targeting of hNMT to the ribosomal
subcellular fraction. Nevertheless, as the level of FLAG-NMT protein
expression increased during longer post-transfection cell incubations,
higher amounts of 50-kDa FLAG-NMT in the ribosomal fraction and
60-kDa FLAG-NMT in the cytosolic fraction were observed (data not
shown). Low affinity or nonspecific interaction between the 50-kDa
FLAG-NMT and the ribosomal fraction may explain the increased
presence of the enzyme in the ribosomal fraction during protein
overexpression (60). On the other hand, the apparent "spillover" of
the 60-kDa FLAG-NMT into the cytosolic fraction when expressed at
higher levels may reflect a limited number of specific binding sites
for the enzyme in the ribosomal fraction.
Apparent differences in the affinities of 60- and 50-kDa hNMTs
for the ribosomal fraction were also examined in vitro.
Serial dilutions of affinity-purified and catalytically
active2 60- or 50-kDa FLAG-NMTs were incubated with
CEM ribosomes, and the FLAG-NMT bound to ribosomal pellets was
determined by anti-FLAG immunoblotting after centrifugation (Fig.
7A). Densitometry analysis
indicated clear differences in the affinities of the two FLAG-NMTs for
the ribosomal pellet (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, the 60-kDa
FLAG-NMT binding curve appears to approach a saturable plateau,
suggesting a limited number of enzyme binding sites on the ribosomes.
Assuming that 50-kDa FLAG-NMT binding to the ribosomal pellet is
mostly nonspecific, then subtraction of this nonspecific binding from
the 60-kDa FLAG-NMT binding curve yields a difference plot for the
larger enzyme, suggesting saturable binding with an affinity around
1-2 nM (Fig. 7B, inset). However,
regression analysis of the difference binding curve indicated optimum
convergence to sigmoidal functions suggestive of a more complex binding
process. On the whole, these results are consistent with our above
transfection experiments (see Fig. 6) and confirm a preferential
association of the 60-kDa FLAG-NMT for the ribosomal fraction
compared with the 50-kDa FLAG-NMT.
Fig. 7.
Comparison of relative binding affinities of
recombinant 60- and 50-kDa FLAG-NMTs for CEM ribosomes.
Panel A, mixtures containing the indicated concentrations
(µg/ml) of affinity-purified recombinant 60-kDa (lanes
2-7) or 50-kDa (lanes 10-15) FLAG-NMTs and equal
sized aliquots of the postmicrosomal fraction (20,000 × g for 30 min) from CEM cells (see Fig. 1) were incubated for 10 min at room temperature and centrifuged at 230,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The resulting ribosomal pellets
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with an anti-FLAG mAb.
Lanes 1, 8, 9, and 16,
molecular mass markers (see Fig. 3). Panel B, the immunostained 60-kDa ( ) and 50-kDa ( ) recombinant FLAG-NMTs were quantified by densitometry imaging, and the resulting integrated areas were plotted as a function of the molar concentration of the
respective recombinant FLAG-NMT in the incubation mixtures described in
panel A. Inset, the 50-kDa FLAG-NMT ribosomal
binding curve was subtracted from the 60-kDa FLAG-NMT binding curve
to yield a difference plot ascribed to specific ribosomal binding ( ). Data from the difference plot were fit to a three-parameter Chapman model by nonlinear regression analysis (dotted
line).
[View Larger Version of this Image (30K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
N-Myristoylation is a cotranslational event (14, 19)
presumably occurring on cytosolic free ribosomes rather than
membrane-associated ribosomes since nascent polypeptides containing the
N-myristoylation motif do not contain the signal or
topogenic bearing sequences required for targeting the protein
synthesis complex to the endoplasmic reticulum (16, 61, 62). Although
previous studies generally support this supposition by confirming the
presence of NMT in the cytoplasm, such analyses have failed to
establish a direct association of the enzyme with ribosomes as
hypothesized (19, 63). We have now used differential centrifugation of
isoosmotically disrupted cell extracts to establish an apparent
specific association of hNMT with the ribosomal subcellular fractions
from human lymphoblastic leukemia (e.g. CEM and MOLT-4) and
cervical carcinoma (e.g. HeLa) cells. This conclusion is
based first upon our finding that the bulk of the in vitro
NMT activity and the 60-kDa hNMT polypeptide are associated with the
subcellular fraction containing both the highest
A260/A280 and
A235/A280 ratios
(e.g. >1.8 and 1.2, respectively) as well as
relatively reduced levels of other subcellular organelle marker enzymes
(see Figs. 1 and 3 and Table I). These observations indicate a
preferential concentration of the majority of the hNMT with the
subcellular fraction enriched in ribosomes. Second, a direct physical
association of hNMT with putative ribosomal subunit(s)/particle(s) is
inferred from the exact cosedimentation of the NMT activity with the
260 nm absorption profile during isokinetic sucrose gradient centrifugation (see Fig. 2). Finally, the specificity of subcellular targeting is indicated by a demonstration that optimum binding of hNMT
to ribosomes appears to require NH2-terminal amino acid residues encoded from start site(s) (i.e. codon 183 or
186) upstream from and in-frame with the start site originally
proposed for the hNMT gene (36) (see Figs. 6 and 7 and Table II). At least one of these upstream codons (i.e. codon starting at
183) would be a favorable start site because of its 5 -position and its context (i.e. it contains both an A at position 3 and
a G at position +4) and thus is close to the optimal consensus sequence for initiation by eukaryotic ribosomes (55-57). The presumption that
this additional 5 -sequence is in fact translated in vivo is
supported by our finding an apparent molecular mass for the native hNMT
corresponding closely to a 60-kDa recombinant polypeptide expressed
from the upstream start site rather than to a 50-kDa recombinant
polypeptide expressed from the originally proposed gene (see Figs. 4,
6, and 7). Furthermore, our finding of identical relative
electrophoretic mobilities for the recombinant 50-kDa polypeptide
expressed in both bacteria and HeLa cells excludes the possibility that
the native 60-kDa hNMT results from anomalous migration during
SDS-PAGE of the smaller ORF product due to intrinsic polypeptide
properties and/or as a result of post-translational modification(s). On
the other hand, the expression in bacteria and HeLa cells of a
60-kDa recombinant polypeptide that is slightly larger than that
predicted from the upstream ORF (i.e. 55 kDa) most likely
results from the highly charged nature of the added NH2
terminus (64, 65). Our experiments thus provide in vivo and
in vitro subcellular targeting and recombinant expression data identifying a native hNMT gene product that is 10-12 kDa larger
than is generally assumed for the enzyme and thereby indicates that the
native hNMT is translated from a start site upstream from the one
previously assigned. Furthermore, the additional NH2-terminal residues encoded by this larger ORF apparently
provide most, if not all, of the high affinity ribosome-targeting
signal enabling hNMT to function cotranslationally during protein
synthesis. It is also possible, however, that residues located within
the COOH-terminal 50-kDa domain of the 60-kDa enzyme also
contribute lower affinity signals to promote optimum binding of the
native hNMT to ribosomes in vivo.
The marked differences in both length and sequence among the
NH2-terminal domains of yeast, fungi, and human NMTs (66)
plus the finding that the NH2-terminal domains of yNMT
(51), hNMT2 (50), bNMT (24), and Drosophila NMT
(37) are not required for in vitro catalytic activity are
consistent with the proposal that these NH2-terminal
sequences could provide species-specific regulatory signal(s) that
nevertheless are necessary for N-myristoylation in
vivo (24, 50, 52). Our finding of an apparent ribosomal targeting
signal within the NH2-terminal 10-12-kDa domain of hNMT indicates that such an in vivo regulatory signal does in
fact exist. Furthermore, the sensitivity of hNMT ribosomal binding to
150-300 mM salt suggests that interactions between the
NH2-terminal residues of hNMT and cognate acceptor site(s)
in the ribosomal fraction involve relatively weak electrostatic
interactions, a characteristic consistent with both the highly charged
nature of the hNMT NH2 terminus and reminiscent of a
similar salt sensitivity exhibited by other cotranslationally active
enzymes (e.g. N-methionylaminopeptidase and
N-acetyltransferase) (67). Of particular interest is the presence in the NH2 terminus of the 60-kDa hNMT of a
polylysine block encompassing amino acid residues 37-50
(i.e. KKKKKKQKKKKEKG) with a 64% identity to the most NH2-terminal of two basic
stretches found in human and rat N-methionylaminopeptidases
involving residues 34-47 (i.e.
AKKKRRKKKKS/GKG) (68, 69). Three
such basic stretches are also found in the NH2 terminus of
the eIF-2 subunit of the eukaryotic initiator factor
(i.e. a protein that mediates binding of the initiator
Met-tRNA to the 40 S ribosomal subunit and mRNA before the start
of translation (70)) with the most NH2-terminal basic
stretch involving residues 12-25 of human eIF-2 (i.e.
MSKKKKKKKKPFML) (71) and residues 14-25 of
yeast eIF-2 (i.e.
ALKKKKKTKKVIPD) (72) exhibiting a
50% identity with the hNMT basic stretch. In all cases the groups of
NH2-terminal basic amino acids are interspersed with
stretches rich in acidic residues which together are speculated to
account for the protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions
facilitating the participation of these factors in protein synthesis
(69, 71-73). Similar basic patches formed by distant lysine residues
which become closely apposed on the hydrophilic face of an amphipathic
-helix have been shown to be critical to formation of a
"double-stranded RNA binding motif" (74-77) and conserved
COOH-terminal lysines in the connecting loops and/or within -helices
of methionyl- and tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases are critical for binding the
nucleotide CCAA-end sequence of tRNA (78). Thus, considerable
precedence exists for the involvement of basic amino acid motifs in the
interaction of nucleic acids, including tRNA and mRNA, with
proteins involved in protein synthesis. It is thus possible that the
formation of similar basic patches within the nonhomologous
NH2-terminal domains of other NMTs by secondary folding and
juxtapositioning of distant basic residues could provide analogous
ribosomal targeting signals for NMT in these more primitive eukaryotic
organisms.
Regardless of the nature of the subcellular targeting signal or the
precise acceptor(s) responsible for localization of hNMT to the
ribosomal fraction, we envision a cotranslational model that involves
the positioning of NMT within the protein synthetic complex so as to be
in close proximity to its prospective nascent polypeptide substrate and
thereby ensuring a timely response when transiently prompted by an
appropriate N-myristoylation consensus signal. We speculate
that the efficiency of this process would be enhanced substantially by
interactions of NMT with specific proteins (e.g. fatty acid
acyl-CoA synthetase, acyl-CoA-binding proteins, etc.) which could
provide ready access to a pool of the relatively rare cosubstrate,
myristoyl-CoA, while protecting NMT from competitive interference by a
presumably much larger pool of palmitoyl-CoA. Stable interactions
between hNMT and other cooperative proteins as hypothesized in this
model could explain the existence of high molecular weight forms of
bNMT in bovine brain (23, 24) and hNMT in cultured cell2
extracts. Furthermore, an apparent requirement for the
NH2-terminal domain of NMT for formation of high molecular
mass bNMTs (24) and for the ribosomal targeting of hNMT suggests the
involvement of this noncatalytic NH2 terminus in subunit
multimerization and/or interaction(s) with other cellular proteins
(e.g. those involved in protein synthesis).
In conclusion, our data provide the first direct evidence for the
existence of a specific regulatory function associated with the
NH2 termini of mammalian NMTs. We propose that this
NH2-terminal signal plays an important role in the
targeting of hNMT to the site of protein synthesis on free ribosomes,
thereby facilitating the participation of the enzyme in the
cotranslational N-myristoylation of proteins in mammalian
cells.
FOOTNOTES
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF020500.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Health and
Human Services, NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center,
National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 1052, Rm. 121, Frederick, MD
21702. Tel.: 301-846-1828; Fax: 301-846-6860; E-mail:
cglover{at}mail.ncifcrf.gov.
1
The abbreviations used are: NMT,
N-myristoyltransferase; ORF, open reading frame; hNMT, human
NMT; bNMT, bovine brain NMT; TLCK,
L-1-chloro-3-tosylamido-7-amino-2-heptanone; TPCK,
L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone; pAb,
polyclonal antibody; CMV, cytomegalovirus; 5 -RACE, rapid amplification
of 5 -cDNA ends; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; mAb,
monoclonal antibody; yNMT, yeast NMT.
2
C. J. Glover and R. L. Felsted, unpublished
observations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Drs. Paul Randazzo, Richard Cysyk,
and Edward Sausville for help, encouragement, and support.
REFERENCES
-
Wedegaertner, P. B., Wilson, P. T., and Bourne, H. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
503-506
[Free Full Text]
-
Neer, E. J., and Smith, T. F.
(1996)
Cell
84,
175-178
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Randazzo, P. A., Terui, T., Sturch, S., Fales, H. M., Ferrige, A. G., and Kahn, R. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14809-14815
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yu, G., Shen, F. S., Sturch, S., Aquino, A., Glazer, R. I., and Felsted, R. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4792-4796
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yu, G., and Felsted, R. L.
(1992)
J. Virol.
187,
46-55
-
Vergères, G., Manenti, S., Weber, T., and Stürzinger, C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
19879-19887
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Watanabe, Y., Perrino, B. A., and Soderling, T. R.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
562-566
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rigacci, S., Degl'Innocenti, D., Bucciantini, M., Cirri, P., Berti, A., and Ramponi, G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1278-1281
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ames, J. B., Porumb, T., Tanaka, T., Ikura, M., and Stryer, L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4526-4533
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
García-Cardeña, G., Oh, P., Liu, J., Schnitzer, J. E., and Sessa, W. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
6448-6453
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yonemoto, W., McGlone, M. L., and Taylor, S. S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
2348-2352
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Borgese, N., Aggujaro, D., Carrera, P., Pietrini, G., and Bassetti, M.
(1996)
J. Cell. Biol.
135,
1501-1513
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Towler, D. A., Adams, S. P., Eubanks, S. R., Towery, D. S., Jackson-Machelski, E., Glaser, L., and Gordon, J. I.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
2708-2712
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Deichaite, I., Casson, L. P., Ling, H. P., and Resh, M. D.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
4295-4301
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gordon, J. I., Duronio, R. J., Rudnick, D. A., Adams, S. P., and Gokel, G. W.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
8647-8650
[Free Full Text]
-
Knoll, L. J., Levy, M. A., Stahl, P. D., and Gordon, J. I.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
5366-5373
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McIlhinney, R. A., and McGlone, K.
(1996)
Exp. Cell Res.
223,
348-356
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schultz, A. M., Henderson, L. E., Oroszlan, S., Garber, E. A., and Hanafusa, H.
(1985)
Science
227,
427-429
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wilcox, C., Hu, J., and Olson, E. N.
(1987)
Science
238,
1275-1278
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rudnick, D. A., McWherter, C. A., Gokel, G. W., and Gordon, J. I.
(1993)
Adv. Enzymol.
67,
375-430
-
Johnson, D. R., Bhatnagar, R. S., Knoll, L. J., and Gordon, J. I.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63,
869-914
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Felsted, R. L., Glover, C. J., and Hartman, K.
(1995)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
87,
1571-1573
[Free Full Text]
-
King, M. J., and Sharma, R. K.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
113,
77-81
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Glover, C. J., and Felsted, R. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23226-23233
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Boutin, J. A., Clarenc, J.-P., Ferry, G., Ernould, A.-P., Remond, G., Vincent, M., and Atassi, G.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
201,
257-263
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Boutin, J. A., Ferry, G., Ernould, A., Maes, P., Remond, G., and Vincent, M.
(1993)
Eur. J. Biochem.
214,
853-867
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Raju, R. V. S., Magnuson, B. A., and Sharma, R. K.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
149/150,
191-202
-
Magnuson, B. A., Raju, V. S. R., and Sharma, R. K.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1300,
119-124
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kishore, N. S., Wood, D. C., Mehta, P. P., Wade, A. C., Lu, T., Gokel, G. W., and Gordon, J. I.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
4889-4902
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Raju, R. V. S., Kalra, J., and Sharma, R. K.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12080-12083
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Glover, C. J., Goddard, C., and Felsted, R. L.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
250,
485-491
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Magnuson, B. A., Raju, R. V., Moyana, T. N., and Sharma, R. K.
(1995)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
87,
1630-1635
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
King, M. J., and Sharma, R. K.
(1991)
FASEB J.
5,
1157
(abstr.)
-
Rocque, W. J., McWherter, C. A., Wood, D. C., and Gordon, J. I.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
9964-9971
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McIlhinney, R. A. J., McGlone, K., and Willis, A. C.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
290,
405-410
-
Duronio, R. J., Reed, S. I., and Gordon, J. I.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
4129-4133
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ntwasa, M., Egerton, M., and Gay, N. J.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
149-156
[Abstract]
-
Zwerner, R. K., Wise, K. S., and Acton, R. T.
(1979)
Methods Enzymol.
58,
221-229
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Steensgaard, J.
(1970)
Eur. J. Biochem.
16,
66-70
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
van der Zeijst, B. A. M., and Bloemers, H. P. J.
(1975)
in
Handbook of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Fasman, G. D., ed), 3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 426-517, The Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, OH
-
Noll, H.
(1967)
Nature
215,
360-363
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bharucha, A. D., and Ven Murthy, M. R.
(1992)
Methods Enzymol.
216,
168-179
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Glover, C. J., Tellez, M. R., Guziac, F. S., Jr., and Felsted, R. L.
(1991)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
41,
1067-1074
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Graham, J. M.
(1993)
in
Biomembrane Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology (Graham, J. M., and Higgins, J. A., eds), Vol. 19, pp. 1-18, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
-
Spedding, G.
(ed)
(1990)
Ribosomes and Protein Synthesis: A Practical Approach, pp. 1-27, Oxford University Press, Oxford
-
Palmiter, R. D.
(1974)
Biochemistry
13,
3606-3615
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Frohmann, M. A., Dush, M. K., and Martin, G. R.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
8998-9002
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rudnick, D. A., McWherter, C. A., Adams, S. P., Ropson, I. J., Duronio, R. J., and Gordon, J. I.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
13370-13378
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rudnick, D. A., Johnson, R. L., and Gordon, J. I.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
23852-23861
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Duronio, R. J., Jackson-Machelski, E., Heuckeroth, R. O., Olins, P. O., Devine, C. S., Yonemoto, W., Slice, L. W., Taylor, S. S., and Gordon, J. I.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
1506-1510
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lodge, J. K., Johnson, R. L., Weinberg, R. A., and Gordon, J. I.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2996-3009
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Duronio, R. J., Towler, D. A., Heuckeroth, R. O., and Gordon, J. I.
(1989)
Science
243,
796-800
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wiegand, R. C., Carr, C., Minnerly, J. C., Pauley, A. M., Carron, C. P., Langner, C. A., Duronio, R. J., and Gordon, J. I.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
8591-8698
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kozak, M.
(1986)
Cell
44,
283-292
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kozak, M.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
8,
197-225
[CrossRef]
-
Kozak, M.
(1996)
Mamm. Genome
7,
563-574
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
McIlhinney, R. A. J., Patel, P. B., and McGlone, K.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
222,
137-146
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Raju, R. V. S., Datla, R. S. S., and Sharma, R. K.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
155,
69-76
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Duan, D. R., Humphrey, J. S., Chen, D. Y. T., Weng, Y., Sukegawa, J., Lee, S., Gnarra, J. R., Linehan, W. M., and Klausner, R. D.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
6459-6463
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Towler, D. A., Eubanks, S. R., Towery, D. S., Adams, S. P., and Glaser, L.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
1030-1036
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murphy, E. C., III, Zheng, T., and Nicchitta, C. V.
(1997)
J. Cell. Biol.
136,
1213-1226
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Olson, E. N., and Spizz, G.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
2458-2466
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fuller, R. S., Brake, A., and Thorner, J.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
1434-1438
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Benton, B. M., Zang, J.-H., and Thorner, J.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
623-639
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Knoll, L. J., Johnson, D. R., Bryant, M. L., and Gordon, J. I.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
250,
405-435
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Arfin, S. M., and Bradshaw, R. A.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
7979-7984
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Arfin, S. M., Kendall, R. L., Hall, L., Weaver, L. H., Stewart, A. E., Matthews, B. W., and Bradshaw, R. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
7714-7718
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wu, S., Gupta, S., Chatterjee, N., Hileman, R. E., Kinzy, T. G., Denslow, N. D., Merrick, W. C., Chakrabarti, D., Osterman, J. C., and Gupta, N. K.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10796-10801
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wu, S., Rehentulla, A., Gupta, N. K., and Kaufman, R. J.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
8275-8280
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pathak, V. K., Nielsen, P. J., Trachsel, H., and Hershey, J. W. B.
(1988)
Cell
54,
633-639
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Donahue, T. F., Cigan, A. M., Pabich, E. K., and Valavicius, B. C.
(1988)
Cell
54,
621-632
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Clark, R. J., and Felsenfeld, G.
(1971)
Nature New Biol.
229,
101-106
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mattaj, I. W.
(1993)
Cell
73,
837-840
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Burd, C. G., and Dreyfuss, G.
(1994)
Science
265,
615-621
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Green, S. R., Manche, L., and Mathews, M. B.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
358-364
[Abstract]
-
Romano, P. R., Green, S. R., Barber, G. N., Mathews, M. B., and Hinnebusch, A. G.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
365-378
[Abstract]
-
Hountondji, C., Dessen, P., and Blanquet, S.
(1986)
Biochimie (Paris)
68,
1071-1078
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Volume 272, Number 45,
Issue of November 7, 1997
pp. 28680-28689
©1997 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H. Dowen, J. L. Engel, F. Shao, J. R. Ecker, and J. E. Dixon
A Family of Bacterial Cysteine Protease Type III Effectors Utilizes Acylation-dependent and -independent Strategies to Localize to Plasma Membranes
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 5, 2009;
284(23):
15867 - 15879.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Pierre, J. A. Traverso, B. Boisson, S. Domenichini, D. Bouchez, C. Giglione, and T. Meinnel
N-Myristoylation Regulates the SnRK1 Pathway in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL,
September 1, 2007;
19(9):
2804 - 2821.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wu, Y. Tao, M. Zhang, M. H. Howard, S. Gutteridge, and J. Ding
Crystal Structures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae N-Myristoyltransferase with Bound Myristoyl-CoA and Inhibitors Reveal the Functional Roles of the N-terminal Region
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 27, 2007;
282(30):
22185 - 22194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Ducker, J. J. Upson, K. J. French, and C. D. Smith
Two N-Myristoyltransferase Isozymes Play Unique Roles in Protein Myristoylation, Proliferation, and Apoptosis
Mol. Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2005;
3(8):
463 - 476.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. P. Price, M. R. Menon, C. Panethymitaki, D. Goulding, P. G. McKean, and D. F. Smith
Myristoyl-CoA:Protein N-Myristoyltransferase, an Essential Enzyme and Potential Drug Target in Kinetoplastid Parasites
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 21, 2003;
278(9):
7206 - 7214.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q.-R. Liu, P.-W. Zhang, Q. Zhen, D. Walther, X.-B. Wang, and G. R. Uhl
KEPI, a PKC-dependent Protein Phosphatase 1 Inhibitor Regulated by Morphine
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 5, 2002;
277(15):
13312 - 13320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Farazi, G. Waksman, and J. I. Gordon
The Biology and Enzymology of Protein N-Myristoylation
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 19, 2001;
276(43):
39501 - 39504.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Qi, R. V. S. Rajala, W. Anderson, C. Jiang, K. Rozwadowski, G. Selvaraj, R. Sharma, and R. Datla
Molecular Cloning, Genomic Organization, and Biochemical Characterization of Myristoyl-CoA:Protein N-Myristoyltransferase from Arabidopsis thaliana
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 24, 2000;
275(13):
9673 - 9683.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. van't Hof and M. D. Resh
Dual Fatty Acylation of p59Fyn Is Required for Association with the T Cell Receptor zeta Chain through Phosphotyrosine-Src Homology Domain-2 Interactions
J. Cell Biol.,
April 19, 1999;
145(2):
377 - 389.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Lodge, E. Jackson-Machelski, M. Higgins, C. A. McWherter, J. A. Sikorski, B. Devadas, and J. I. Gordon
Genetic and Biochemical Studies Establish That the Fungicidal Effect of a Fully Depeptidized Inhibitor of Cryptococcus neoformans Myristoyl-CoA:Protein N-Myristoyltransferase (Nmt) Is Nmt-dependent
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 15, 1998;
273(20):
12482 - 12491.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. K. Giang and B. F. Cravatt
A Second Mammalian N-Myristoyltransferase
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 20, 1998;
273(12):
6595 - 6598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Utsumi, M. Sato, K. Nakano, D. Takemura, H. Iwata, and R. Ishisaka
Amino Acid Residue Penultimate to the Amino-terminal Gly Residue Strongly Affects Two Cotranslational Protein Modifications, N-Myristoylation and N-Acetylation
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 23, 2001;
276(13):
10505 - 10513.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|