![]()
|
|
||||||||
Volume 272, Number 46, Issue of November 14, 1997 pp. 28819-28822
(Received for publication, August 4, 1997, and in revised form, September 3, 1997)
,
,From the Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS-UPR 411, 660, route des Lucioles, Sophia Antipolis, 06560 Valbonne, France
Proton-gated cation channels are acid sensors that are present in both sensory neurons and in neurons of the central nervous system. One of these acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC) has been recently cloned. This paper shows that ASIC and the mammalian degenerin MDEG, which are colocalized in the same brain regions, can directly associate with each other. Immunoprecipitation of MDEG causes coprecipitation of ASIC. Moreover, coexpression of ASIC and MDEG subunits in Xenopus oocytes generates an amiloride-sensitive H+-gated Na+ channel with novel properties (different kinetics, ionic selectivity, and pH sensitivity). In addition, coexpression of MDEG with mutants of the ASIC subunit can create constitutively active channels that become completely nonselective for Na+ versus K+ and H+-gated channels that have a drastically altered pH sensitivity compared with MDEG. These data clearly show that ASIC and MDEG can form heteromultimeric assemblies with novel properties. Heteromultimeric assembly is probably used for creating a diversity of H+-gated cation channels acting as neuronal acid sensors in different pH ranges.
H+-gated cation channels are ligand-gated ion channels activated by the simplest possible ligand, the proton. In nociceptive neurons those channels are thought to be responsible for the sensation of pain that accompanies tissue acidosis (1-3), particularly during inflammation and ischemic conditions. H+-gated cation channels are also present in neurons of the central nervous system (2), where their physiological role remains to be established. We have recently cloned a proton-gated cation channel (ASIC, acid sensing ion channel 1) (4). The closest structural homologue of ASIC is MDEG (5, 6). MDEG is a mammalian degenerin. Upon the same mutations that in Caenorhabditis elegans degenerins induce degeneration of specific neurons (7, 8), MDEG can also acquire constitutive Na+ channel activity that becomes toxic for the cells in which it is expressed (5). In addition, native MDEG also behaves as a H+-gated Na+ channel.
The variety of H+-gated cation channels with different ion selectivities, pH dependencies, and kinetics described in sensory neurons (1, 9, 10), as well as in neurons of the central nervous system (2), suggests that ASIC and MDEG are probably only the first two members of this novel ion channel family and that other genes for new H+-activated Na+ channels remain to be discovered. However, the existence of different genes is probably only one of the ways used to create a diversity of H+-gated cation channels. Many other types of ion channels are known to form heteromultimers of structurally related subunits, resulting in the assembly of channels with novel properties (11). Furthermore, other structural homologues of the ASIC and MDEG channels, such as the epithelial amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel (12-18) and the degenerins of the nematode C. elegans, which are believed to be mechanosensitive channels (19-21), require heteromultimeric subunit assembly for their function. All these considerations taken together suggest that new channels might be formed by heteromultimers of ASIC and MDEG subunits. This paper provides both electrophysiological and biochemical evidence that ASIC, together with MDEG, form heteromultimeric channels with properties distinct from those of the parental subunits.
Experiments were performed on adult
Wistar rats by using standard procedures (4). Brains were fixed in
ice-cold 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde, 0.1 M sodium phosphate
buffer solution (PBS,1 pH
7.4) for 8 h and then immersed overnight at 4 °C in a 20% sucrose/PBS solution. Frozen sections (10 µm) were cut on a cryostat (Leica) at
25 °C, collected on 3-aminopropylethoxysilane-coated slides and stored at
20 °C until use. Four antisense
oligonucleotides, complementary to the rat cDNA sequences of ASIC
and MDEG, were used to detect ASIC and MDEG transcripts,
respectively. The sequences of the oligonucleotides were: ASIC,
5
-GGTGTAGAAGAGGATACTCGCCGACAGAGACTTC-3
or
5
-AACAGACACCACTCTTTCCTCAGAACTGGTATCTCAGGA-3
and MDEG,
5
-ATGAGCACCTGTGACACAATGCCAAACCAC3
or
5
-GTCTACATGTTTCGTGGACGTACGTACGAGTCTGAAGAATGTCGC-3
.
Probes were 3
-end-labeled with [
-33P]dATP (3000 Ci/mmol, ICN Radiochemicals) by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase.
Sections were treated consecutively with 0.1 M glycine in
PBS for 10 min, PBS for 3 min, 5 µg/ml proteinase K diluted in 0.1 M Tris, 50 mM EDTA (pH 8.0) for 15 min at
37 °C, 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS (pH 7.2) for 5 min. Slides were then
rinsed 10 min in PBS, acetylated for 10 min in 0.25% acetic anhydride
in 0.1 M triethanolamine, and dehydrated. Hybridization was
carried out overnight at 37 °C in hybridization buffer (50%
deionized formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 500 µg/ml denatured salmon
sperm DNA, 1% Denhardt, 5% Sarcosyl, 250 mg/ml yeast tRNA, 20 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM NaPO4 in
2 × SSC, and the radiolabeled probe (0.2 ng/ml, 8 × 108 dpm/µg)). After hybridization, slides were washed in
1 × SSC at room temperature for 30 min before dehydration,
drying, and exposure to Hyperfilm-
max (Amersham Corp.) for 6 days.
Slides were then dipped in Ilford K5 nuclear emulsion (diluted 1:1 with water) and exposed 4 weeks. Sections were then stained with cresyl violet and coverslipped. The specificity of labeling was verified by
cold displacement of the radioactive probe with a 500-fold excess of
unlabeled oligonucleotide and by the use of two specific oligonucleotide probes for each subunit complementary to nonconserved regions in either the coding or the noncoding sequences of the cDNAs.
Primers were designed to add the FlagM2 epitope (Asp-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys) (Eastman Kodak Co.) to the NH2 terminus of MDEG and the T7tag epitope (Met-Ala-Ser-Met-Thr-Gly-Gly-Gln-Gln-Met-Gly) (Novagen) to the NH2 terminus of ASIC. The tagged ASIC and MDEG coding sequences were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and subcloned in the pVL 1393 vector (PharMingen). SF9 cells were transformed with either pVL-ASIC-T7tag or pVL-MDEG-Flag vector, and recombinant baculovirus was isolated according to the "baculoGold" protocol (PharMingen).
Expression of ASIC T7tag or MDEG-Flag Fusion Proteins and Immunoprecipitation7 × 106 SF9 cells were infected with 108 recombinant baculovirus particles (ASIC-T7tag, MDEG-Flag, or both). Four days later, cells were harvested, washed in PBS, sonicated at 4 °C in solubilization buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0, 1% desoxycholate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1 mM iodoacetamide) and subsequently centrifuged for 30 min at 80,000 × g. An aliquot of the supernatant containing 50 µg of protein was incubated overnight with 10 µl of M2 anti-Flag mouse monoclonal antibody immobilized on Sepharose (Eastman Kodak Co.). After a 30 s 8000 × g spin, the supernatant was saved and the pellet was washed six times in 500 µl of solubilization buffer and twice with PBS. Both supernatant and pellet were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (9% acrylamide) and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond C extra Amersham). The blots were saturated 30 min with TBST (10 mM Tris-Cl pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 0, 1% Tween 20) containing 4% BSA, then incubated overnight at 4 °C with either M2 anti-Flag antibody (anti MDEG-Flag) or anti-T7tag monoclonal antibody (anti-ASIC-T7tag) in TBST containing 2% BSA. After 5 washes with TBST, the blots were incubated with goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunotech) 1:10,000 in TBST containing 2% BSA for 1 h at room temperature, washed with TBST and revealed using a substrate for enhanced chemiluminescence detection (ECL, Pierce).
ElectrophysiologyOocytes were injected with 0.1 or 0.25 ng
of cRNA and microelectrode voltage-clamp and patch-clamp recordings
were performed two days after injection. For outside-out patch the
pipettes contained: 140 mM KCl, 2 mM
MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM Hepes (pH
7.4) (with KOH). The bath medium contained: 140 mM NaCl (or
140 mM LiCl or 140 mM
N-methyl-D-glucamine chloride), 2 mM
MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.4) (adjusted with HCl, NaOH, LiOH, or
tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide). Rapid pH changes from the initial pH
of 7.4 were produced by rapid perfusion with bath solution adjusted to the pH values indicated in Figs. 2, 3, 4. Data were sampled at 2 kHz and
filtered at 500 Hz for analysis (Biopatch software).
). Points represent mean values from 5 to 11 outside-out patches. The pH dependencies of ASIC and MDEG are given for comparison. The
dashed line represents the theoretical pH dependence of a
mixture of equivalent amounts of ASIC and MDEG in the absence of any
interaction between them. C and D, effect of
amiloride on the proton-gated current induced by a pH drop from pH 7.4 to pH 4. D, points represent mean values from
five experiments. E, histogram of the mean inactivation time
constants of the inward current induced by pH drops from 7.4 to 4 at 0 mV. F, semi-logarithmic plot of H+-gated
currents deactivation illustrating the single exponential decay.
Currents were normalized to the value at t = 0.
[View Larger Version of this Image (27K GIF file)]
75
mV). C, outside-out multichannel currents recorded after a
pH pulse from pH 7.4 to pH 5. Current levels are indicated by
horizontal dashed lines. D, I-V
relationship with Na+ as conducting ion. E,
properties of ASIC, MDEG, and ASIC + MDEG channels. Permeability ratios
and single channel conductances for Na+ were determined
from outside-out patches. pS, picosiemens.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
70 mV. B and
C, mean I-V relationships of the whole
oocyte currents measured by voltage ramps from
150 mV to +100 mV at
pH 7.4. D, current responses induced by a drop of pH from
7.4 to 5 recorded from whole oocytes. E, pH dependence of
the H+-activated ASIC(G431V)/MDEG and ASIC(G431F)/MDEG
currents. Points represent mean values from 15 oocytes. The
added curve indicates the pH dependence of MDEG for
comparison.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
The in situ experiments performed on whole brain
sections shows a widely overlapping expression of ASIC and MDEG
mRNAs (Fig. 1A). The
highest expression levels were detected in the olfactory bulb, neo and
allocortical regions, dentate granule cells, as well as in pyramidal
cells of CA1-CA3 subfields of the hippocampal formation, habenula,
basolateral amygdaloid nuclei, and in the Purkinje and granule cells of
the cerebellum. A diffuse expression was observed over most other
regions of the basal ganglia, including thalamic nuclei, substantia
nigra, striatum and globus pallidus, hypothalamus, midbrain, pons, and
medulla. ASIC and MDEG transcripts were expressed at low levels in
choroid plexus. Coexpression of both transcripts in the same type of
neurons was observed in all regions of gray matter, which are strongly
labeled. Fig. 1A, panels c-d, show an example of the high
degree of colocalization of ASIC and MDEG in the Purkinje and granule
cells of the cerebellar cortex. These results are consistent with
observations made by others (22). This colocalization led us to analyze
whether MDEG and ASIC could interact to form a proton-activated channel
and whether this new channel had different properties from those of the
parental subunits expressed alone.
[View Larger Version of this Image (95K GIF file)]
The direct demonstration of an association of ASIC and MDEG was obtained from co-immunoprecipitation experiments. ASIC and MDEG were tagged with short epitopes ("T7tagTM" and "FlagTM") introduced at their NH2 terminus. The tagged proteins ASIC-tag and MDEG-Flag were expressed either alone or coexpressed in SF9 cells using a baculovirus system. Electrophysiological analysis of the infected cells was carried out to show that the introduction of the epitope does not alter the channel properties (data not shown). The detergent solubilized membranes of SF9 cells expressing either ASIC-tag or MDEG-Flag or both subunits were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Flag(MDEG) antibody, and both the immunoprecipitated fractions and the supernatants were analyzed by Western blot. Analysis of the blots with the anti-Flag(MDEG) antibody (Fig. 1B, top panel) revealed that at least 50% of MDEG-Flag was immunoprecipitated (lane 2) and that the anti-Flag(MDEG) antibody did not cross-react with ASIC-tag (lane 1). We then incubated the same blots with an anti-tag(ASIC) antibody (Fig. 1B, bottom panel) to analyze whether immunoprecipitation of MDEG-Flag caused coprecipitation of ASIC-tag. The anti-tag(ASIC) antibody did not cross-react with MDEG-Flag, since a signal was only obtained with samples that contained ASIC-tag. When both ASIC-tag and MDEG-Flag were co-expressed in the same cells, immunoprecipitation with the anti-Flag(MDEG) antibody caused co-precipitation of ASIC-tag (lane 3), indicating that ASIC-tag associates with MDEG-Flag to form a heteromultimeric channel. The heteromultimeric association occurs in vivo and not after solubilization of the cells. No co-immunoprecipitation of ASIC-tag by the anti-Flag(MDEG) antibody was found when we used a mixture of membranes from cells expressing either ASIC-tag or MDEG-Flag (lane 4, bottom panel).
Both ASIC (4) and MDEG (5) expressed in Xenopus laevis
oocytes form amiloride-sensitive H+-gated cation channels
that are activated transiently when the extracellular pH drops
(4).2 The ASIC and the MDEG
channels have different inactivation kinetics, ion selectivities, and
pH dependencies (Figs. 2, B,
E, and F, and 3E). Coexpression of both ASIC
and MDEG yields an amiloride-sensitive H+-gated current
(Fig. 2A) with single exponential inactivation kinetics that
are intermediate between those of the ASIC and the MDEG current (Fig.
2, E and F) instead of the biphasic kinetics that
would be expected for two independent homomultimeric channels. The pH
dependence of the H+-activated current obtained after
coexpression of ASIC and MDEG (Fig. 2B) is less steep than
with either subunit alone and the pH at which half-maximal activation
occurs (pH0.5 = 4.8) is situated between that obtained with
ASIC (pH0.5 = 6.2) or MDEG (pH0.5
4.1)
alone. Besides, the pH dependence curve of the ASIC/MDEG channel is
monophasic, while a biphasic curve is expected for independent
equimolar expression of the two subunits (Fig. 2B, dashed
line). The channel formed after coexpression of ASIC and MDEG is
less selective for Na+ versus K+
than either the ASIC or the MDEG channel (Fig.
3, A, B, and E), suggesting that most of the channel activity recorded in oocytes expressing both ASIC and MDEG is due to a heteromultimeric channel. Amiloride blocks the ASIC/MDEG channel as it blocks ASIC and MDEG activity (Fig. 2, C and D). The
K0.5 value for this inhibition is 20 µM. The single channel conductance of the ASIC/MDEG
channel is 10 picosiemens (Fig. 3, C and
D).
Substitution of an alanine just before the second putative
transmembrane domain of the degenerin MEC-4 of the nematode C. elegans by bulky amino acids, such as phenylalanine or valine, causes degeneration of mechanosensitive neurons (23). This phenotype was proposed to be due to a gain-of-function of a putative
stretch-activated channel composed of three subunits, MEC-4, MEC-6, and
MEC-10 (19). Mutation of the corresponding amino acid
(Gly430) in MDEG also causes constitutive activity and cell
death (5). We initially reported that identical mutations
(Gly431
Val or
Phe) introduced into ASIC do not
cause constitutive channel activity (4). However a more exhaustive
study of the amiloride-insensitive basal currents of ASIC
Gly431 mutants revealed a low constitutive channel activity
for G431V or a larger activity for the G431F mutant (Fig.
4, A and B). These constitutive channels were not inhibited by 1 mM amiloride
(not shown) and have a reversal potential (Erev)
of +30 mV for G431V and +15 mV for the G431F mutant (Fig.
4B). Responses to external H+ were also markedly
altered by mutations. Increases in H+ concentrations did
not induce any channel activation of the G431V mutant and they
decreased the amplitude of the constitutive current of the G431F mutant
(Fig. 4D). ASIC(G431V) and ASIC(G431F) were found to greatly
alter the properties of MDEG (Fig. 4, C, D, and E). Coexpression of the ASIC mutant G431V with MDEG in
X. laevis oocytes induced an amiloride-insensitive
nonselective current (Fig. 4, A and C) with an
intensity which is much higher than the sum of MDEG or ASIC(G431V)
currents (Fig. 4A), indicating that a novel heteromultimeric
channel has been formed by association of both subunits. Extracellular
acidification from pH 7.4 to below pH 7 further activated the
ASIC(G431V)/MDEG (pH0.5 = 6.2) or ASIC(G431F)MDEG (pH0.5 = 5.8) channels (Fig. 4, D and
E). Since the mutant subunits ASIC(G431V) and ASIC(G431F)
cannot form proton-activated channels by themselves, and since the
activation of MDEG requires an extracellular acidification to pH values
lower than 5 (Fig. 4E), the proton activated current recorded at pH
values above pH 5.5 in oocytes co-expressing ASIC(G431V) or ASIC(G431F)
together with MDEG can only be explained by the formation of a
heteromultimeric channel.
Like many other ligand-gated cation channels, such as the ionotropic glutamate and purinergic receptors (11), ASIC as well as MDEG subunits can form both homomultimeric and heteromultimeric channels. The formation of heteromultimeric channels with novel properties augments the repertory of H+-gated channels and introduces new possibilities of regulation. For example, ASIC displays a consensus site for protein kinase A phosphorylation in position 474 and two consensus sites for protein kinase C phosphorylation in positions 40 and 497. Association with MDEG introduces a new consensus site for protein kinase C in position 39.
Interestingly H+-gated cation currents with kinetics and pH dependencies similar to those of the heteromultimeric ASIC/MDEG channel were recorded in brain neurons (24). Rapid acidic pH transients accompany synaptic activity and were proposed to be involved in neuromodulation (25, 26). It is thus tempting to speculate that H+-gated cation channels present in neurons, such as ASIC and MDEG, but also the heteromultimeric ASIC/MDEG channels, have a mediatory role between extracellular acidic transients and changes in neuronal excitability.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
We are very grateful to Dr. Eric Lingueglia for helpful discussions and to Catherine Le Calvez, Catherine Widman, Gisèle Jarretou, Martine Jodar, and Nathalie Leroudier for their skillful technical assistance, Dahvya Doume for secretarial assistance, and Frank Aguila for help with the artwork
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-H. Cho and C. C. Askwith Presynaptic Release Probability Is Increased in Hippocampal Neurons From ASIC1 Knockout Mice J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 426 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Paukert, X. Chen, G. Polleichtner, H. Schindelin, and S. Grunder Candidate Amino Acids Involved in H+ Gating of Acid-sensing Ion Channel 1a J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2008; 283(1): 572 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Meltzer, N. Kapoor, Y. J. Qadri, S. J. Anderson, C. M. Fuller, and D. J. Benos Heteromeric Assembly of Acid-sensitive Ion Channel and Epithelial Sodium Channel Subunits J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25548 - 25559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chai, M. Li, J. Lan, Z.-G. Xiong, J. A. Saugstad, and R. P. Simon A Kinase-anchoring Protein 150 and Calcineurin Are Involved in Regulation of Acid-sensing Ion Channels ASIC1a and ASIC2a J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2007; 282(31): 22668 - 22677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Cho and C. C. Askwith Potentiation of acid-sensing ion channels by sulfhydryl compounds Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): C2161 - C2174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Chen and S. Grunder Permeating protons contribute to tachyphylaxis of the acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) 1a J. Physiol., March 15, 2007; 579(3): 657 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Goblirsch, P. P. Zwolak, and D. R. Clohisy Biology of bone cancer pain. Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 12(20): 6231s - 6235s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Jiang, K. K. Rau, R. D. Johnson, and B. Y. Cooper Proton Sensitivity Ca2+ Permeability and Molecular Basis of Acid-Sensing Ion Channels Expressed in Glabrous and Hairy Skin Afferents J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2006; 95(4): 2466 - 2478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-G. Peng, S. Ahmad, S. Chen, P. Chen, M. P. Price, and X. Lin Acid-Sensing Ion Channel 2 Contributes a Major Component to Acid-Evoked Excitatory Responses in Spiral Ganglion Neurons and Plays a Role in Noise Susceptibility of Mice J. Neurosci., November 10, 2004; 24(45): 10167 - 10175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-J. Wu, B. Duan, Y.-D. Mei, J. Gao, J.-G. Chen, M. Zhuo, L. Xu, M. Wu, and T.-L. Xu Characterization of Acid-sensing Ion Channels in Dorsal Horn Neurons of Rat Spinal Cord J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 2004; 279(42): 43716 - 43724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Syntichaki and N. Tavernarakis Genetic Models of Mechanotransduction: The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans Physiol Rev, October 1, 2004; 84(4): 1097 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. C. Askwith, J. A. Wemmie, M. P. Price, T. Rokhlina, and M. J. Welsh Acid-sensing Ion Channel 2 (ASIC2) Modulates ASIC1 H+-activated Currents in Hippocampal Neurons J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 18296 - 18305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Paukert, S. Sidi, C. Russell, M. Siba, S. W. Wilson, T. Nicolson, and S. Grunder A Family of Acid-sensing Ion Channels from the Zebrafish: WIDESPREAD EXPRESSION IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM SUGGESTS A CONSERVED ROLE IN NEURONAL COMMUNICATION J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 18783 - 18791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Yermolaieva, A. S. Leonard, M. K. Schnizler, F. M. Abboud, and M. J. Welsh Extracellular acidosis increases neuronal cell calcium by activating acid-sensing ion channel 1a PNAS, April 27, 2004; 101(17): 6752 - 6757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Wemmie, M. W. Coryell, C. C. Askwith, E. Lamani, A. S. Leonard, C. D. Sigmund, and M. J. Welsh Overexpression of acid-sensing ion channel 1a in transgenic mice increases acquired fear-related behavior PNAS, March 9, 2004; 101(10): 3621 - 3626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mamet, M. Lazdunski, and N. Voilley How Nerve Growth Factor Drives Physiological and Inflammatory Expressions of Acid-sensing Ion Channel 3 in Sensory Neurons J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 48907 - 48913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Coric, P. Zhang, N. Todorovic, and C. M. Canessa The Extracellular Domain Determines the Kinetics of Desensitization in Acid-sensitive Ion Channel 1 J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 45240 - 45247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Berdiev, J. Xia, L. A. McLean, J. M. Markert, G. Y. Gillespie, T. B. Mapstone, A. P. Naren, B. Jovov, J. K. Bubien, H.-L. Ji, et al. Acid-sensing Ion Channels in Malignant Gliomas J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2003; 278(17): 15023 - 15034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Leonard, O. Yermolaieva, A. Hruska-Hageman, C. C. Askwith, M. P. Price, J. A. Wemmie, and M. J. Welsh cAMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation of the acid-sensing ion channel-1 regulates its binding to the protein interacting with C-kinase-1 PNAS, February 18, 2003; 100(4): 2029 - 2034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Reid, G. S. Hawkings, F. Galvez, and G. G. Goss Localization and characterization of phenamil-sensitive Na+ influx in isolated rainbow trout gill epithelial cells J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2003; 206(3): 551 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Baron, E. Deval, M. Salinas, E. Lingueglia, N. Voilley, and M. Lazdunski Protein Kinase C Stimulates the Acid-sensing Ion Channel ASIC2a via the PDZ Domain-containing Protein PICK1 J. Biol. Chem., December 20, 2002; 277(52): 50463 - 50468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Lin, T. Ogura, and S. C. Kinnamon Acid-Activated Cation Currents in Rat Vallate Taste Receptor Cells J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 133 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kellenberger and L. Schild Epithelial Sodium Channel/Degenerin Family of Ion Channels: A Variety of Functions for a Shared Structure Physiol Rev, July 1, 2002; 82(3): 735 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-C. Chen, A. Zimmer, W.-H. Sun, J. Hall, M. J. Brownstein, and A. Zimmer A role for ASIC3 in the modulation of high-intensity pain stimuli PNAS, June 25, 2002; 99(13): 8992 - 8997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xie, M. P. Price, A. L. Berger, and M. J. Welsh DRASIC Contributes to pH-Gated Currents in Large Dorsal Root Ganglion Sensory Neurons by Forming Heteromultimeric Channels J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2835 - 2843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Anzai, E. Deval, L. Schaefer, V. Friend, M. Lazdunski, and E. Lingueglia The Multivalent PDZ Domain-containing Protein CIPP Is a Partner of Acid-sensing Ion Channel 3 in Sensory Neurons J. Biol. Chem., May 3, 2002; 277(19): 16655 - 16661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-P. Chu, J. Miesch, M. Johnson, L. Root, X.-M. Zhu, D. Chen, R. P. Simon, and Z.-G. Xiong Proton-Gated Channels in PC12 Cells J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2555 - 2561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-L. Ji, B. Jovov, J. Fu, L. R. Bishop, H. C. Mebane, C. M. Fuller, B. A. Stanton, and D. J. Benos Up-regulation of Acid-gated Na+ Channels (ASICs) by Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Co-expression in Xenopus Oocytes J. Biol. Chem., March 1, 2002; 277(10): 8395 - 8405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Benson, J. Xie, J. A. Wemmie, M. P. Price, J. M. Henss, M. J. Welsh, and P. M. Snyder Heteromultimers of DEG/ENaC subunits form H+-gated channels in mouse sensory neurons PNAS, February 19, 2002; 99(4): 2338 - 2343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Berdiev, T. B. Mapstone, J. M. Markert, G. Y. Gillespie, J. Lockhart, C. M. Fuller, and D. J. Benos pH Alterations "Reset" Ca2+ Sensitivity of Brain Na+ Channel 2, a Degenerin/Epithelial Na+ Ion Channel, in Planar Lipid Bilayers J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2001; 276(42): 38755 - 38761. |